190016_PERMIT FILE_20171231

20 — r 1f
(Type of Visit: iQ Co Lance Inspection O Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
!!Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: County:
Farm Name: �%%7 1 �-�' C� Lr'�1 ���� / Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Longitude:
Wean to Finish
I Layer
I
I Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder
Non -La er
I
Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish
Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean
Design C•ur'rent
Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder
Dt, P.ouItt: Ca aci P.o
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
La ers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other
Turkey Poults
Other
Other
Region:
Discharges and Stream ImQacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes 2rNo NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes rNo[D
NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ YesNA CD NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ YesNA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facility Number: 1 Date of inspection: —Y tl
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes No A ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?: C—
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): �tothe
5. Are there any immediate thregrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No " NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? Yes _ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes 2TNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
_Waste Application
10_Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
VNoD
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ YesNA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved
Area
12. Crap Type(s): 2 5'C4-f /!1 p ,✓L�
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
VNo NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
NA
eN5o
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
NA
VNo
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:.
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transf s ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rainfall InspectioSludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes�Vo"
❑NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

[Facility Number: 7-7 Date of Inspection: Z
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑Yes No NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes [] No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
Gomrn6ts (mfer,to question '.#) Explain any YES answers and/or any additionat recommendations or any other comments,.., _
Use dearvings of facility tobetter�'i ilairi situations (use additional pages as necessary). i
46
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Date: 6-2— f�
21412011

Zr/
Reason for Visit: J2rRoutine 0
on
0 Follow-up C) Referral 0 E
0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: Liu County:
Farm Name:_ r / �d C �, Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Title:
Integrator:
Phone:
Certified Operator: 'I L:F L Certification Number:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Region:
lillllllllllllllllllill!l OldDesign Current
Swine EICapacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
Design Current
Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
- er
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
airyCow Q a
Wean to Feeder
IlNon-Layer
Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Design Current
Dr. P,oult . Ca aci P,o
Layers
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Da*
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Other
Other
Turke s
Turke Pouets
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes ONo 0 NA ❑ NE
[—]Yes
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
[:]Yes rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What 1s the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons). 1.11
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes eN ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ YesVNN❑NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412011 Continued

(Facility Number: jDate of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes VNo
NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes
waste management or closure plan?
Structure 6
�5No NA ❑ NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental rent, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes o NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes N ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ }-Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop T e s �GQ
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes Zr N ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes N ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ NA
VN
❑ NE
❑ Yes❑
NA
❑ NE
❑Other:
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facili Number: q - Zr
jDate of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes jNo
No NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below,
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the ReviewerlInspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
D Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any,YES.answers and/or any additional recommendations or any, other eomments �'k-
Use drawings of facility to better.explain situations (use additional pages as necessary)..,_. A �;` , _ ,�,�, �a,
ReviewerlInspector Name:
Phone: 791- 7 2- to
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Date: (y Z
214120.11

6 (II I IY1
1
(Type of Visit: Q Compute Inspection Q Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: ORoRoutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Timed Departure Time: County:
Farm Name: %� !� P L �Q �� �� t �—� Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Title:
Integrator:
Phone:
Certified Operator: #? ct t'2 e e I J le- 4 Certification Number:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Region:
Design Current
Design
Current
Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop.
Wet Poultry
Capacity
Pop.
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish I
ILayer
I
Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder I
INon-Layer
I
Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish
Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean
Design
Current
Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder
D . POula
Ca aci
P,o
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
Layers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Turke s
Other
dTurkeyPouets
Other
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
ZrNo ❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
NA
gNo
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ YesVoF
A
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
[3YesA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ YesA
❑ NE
of theState other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3
21412011 Condnued

Vacility Number: t 1 - Date of I nspection:C0r
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
❑ Yes
Structure 4 Structure 5
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
N NA
No ❑ NA
Structure 6
❑ Yes EfNo ❑ NA
❑ Yes No ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental th at, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Da any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑Yes No NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): Af n 5'i e_re ec , ��' �'� f q j ,2 1,
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑Yes
No NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
o ❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
Vo ❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
No NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage &Permit readily available?
Yes
❑ No NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need im ment? If yes, check the appropriate box below,
es
❑ No ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections []Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections
ludgc Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
wl�o NA
❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
o ❑ NA
❑ NE
Page 2 of 3
21412011 Continued

]Facility Number: - Date of Ins ection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ��Yeso No ❑ NA NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes [] No A ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface the drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No [] NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations;or= any other comments.,
Use drawings of facility to better explain` situations (use additional=pages as necessary). A,
�Ay ',�►_;�' f S a le- ri'1 4 Curr2 7
�t 4+71s-k /,Oj
2- m j 4
NO 4nia,,( t"k&,
t f ash S 1 jq-.,R. Cj t9
Reviewer/Inspector Name: r-1
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
t,'-y 2fy
Phone: 91 - 7 2 d
Date: 61 t -8 / (9
21412011

Type of Visit: 0 Compliance Inspection U Operation Review U Structure Evaluation U Technical Assistance I
Reason for Visit: fZrRoutine O Complaint O Follow-up p Referral Q Emergency Q Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: 9//a /j Arrival Time: ¢bi `, ce Departure Time: G County: C''hcn
Farm Name: Alke LX24 Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Title:
Latitude:
Phone:
Phone:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Region: 4-, /
NEM&Uesi Current
Design
Current
Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop.
Wet Poaltry "
Capacity
Pop.
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
La er
DairyCow
lac
Wean to Feeder
on -Layer
Dai Calf
Feeder to Finish,
DairyHeifer
Farrow to Wean
Design
Current
D Cow
Farrow to Feeder
I)r. P,oultr,
Ca .acit
P.o
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
La ers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -La ers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
113cef Brood Cow
Turke s
iff
Other
Turkey Poults
Other
Other
di
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made'?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes O<o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ,,a]No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes YTNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
[]Yes � No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 1 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facility Number: - le 7 1 Date of Inspection: r 1v /i
Wast6 Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes 2 "No ❑ NA ❑ NE
I a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ;D-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes ETNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes 0No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes JC2-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need [] Yes E2rlqo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes <o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload 0 Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or l0 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate ManurelStudge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes ;Ef No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes ;2T-No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes XNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
VNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
ZfNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections
❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
,KNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
23. if selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
2 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes J'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2,. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check [] Yes Prl�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
,[a No
❑ NA
❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
Zo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
fo
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
r
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
PIN�o
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
;aSNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
permit'? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
,rNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32, Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes i -- 0 NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes O No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or.any other;comments� '
Use drawings of facility to. better explain: situations (use additional pages as necessary) g' s
/, CI'c'G/car L..>otP G?.rllysp �w d `h ���df
Reviewer/inspector Name:
Phone:'
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Date: 7 " le,>-- //
21412011

jr
i ype or visit fd"Gompliance Inspection V Operation Review U Structure Evaluation U Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit Q'Routine Q Complaint Q Follow up Q Referral Q Emergency Q Other El Denied Access
Date of Visit:ii�,, /- Arrival Time: C% [G Departure 'rime: Z; G County: Region: /«S5
Farm Name: Mee Owner Email:
Owner Name: Prone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: _
Back-up Operator: _
Location of Farm:
Title:
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: = O = 1 = Longitude: = e ❑ i = {1
Design C►urrent
Design Current
Design
C**urrent
Swine Capacity Population
Wet Paaltry Capacity Population
Cattle
Capacity
Population
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ Layer
❑ DairyCow
f
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑Non -La Non -Layer
Dry Poultry
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Layers
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Gilts
❑ Non -La ers
El Beef Feeder
❑ Boars
❑ Pullets
❑ Beef Brood Cow
❑ Turkeys
Other
IF] Other
❑Turke Poults
❑ Other
Number of Structures:
Discharges
❑Dai Calf
❑ Feeder to Finish
El Dairy Heifer
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ D Cow
&Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: El Structure ❑Application Field El Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made'?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes Fe'>\io ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 21�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
Page
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
;?I -No
❑ Yes
;�J'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
1 0f3 11/28/04 Continued

Facility Number: Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes Q'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: Z
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes
;ZrNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes
ZNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,
notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes
,❑ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes
PNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes
J] No
❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes
,/No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, ,Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 Ibs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
;3"No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
�Er`&o
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination ?
❑ Yes
O No
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments {refyr ¢y`ptoqu�st]iponp#)ptExplka�n`a �ygYES aynswc�rsand,or atpy�r�ecoyrmtmle"ndations or:any other cotnmenfs:
1 Y i l .. • 3®+F t '5''i i •i) 4 i... @'R'F+�:�•�Y': _'. drawings of facilityf to better explarn,sttuattgns: (use add►tional�ages as necessary):
Use
,...'t.
Reviewer/Inspector Name :�s� %'jPhone: %�9 75� ylaG
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: z I L
page 2 of 3 12128104 Continued

Facility Number: Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ,0No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes ET'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists El Design ❑Maps ❑ Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below, ❑ Yes PrNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes 0 to ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
24,
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit`?
❑ Yes
2 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
FLINo
❑ NA
❑ NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
�3No
❑ NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
PIN
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
O—No
❑ NA
❑ NE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
FerNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
;alNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
O-No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
PIN
❑ NA
❑ NE
Additional4Comme'tits and/or' Drawin s
✓ Lrt/l�� �� � C��Gr�rP d
Page 3 of 3 12128104

i
f
R:
Fael I,ty�NUmbe'r
_
-f'
_. � __ I
UiviWafer QuOltty
),DivisionWSoil, and,Water Conserya
):Other Agency
Type of Visit Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit PIRoutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: J3'o9 Arrival Time: Z.Of/ Departure'Hme: � County: �1/
Farm Name: 7d f Ahp r l Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing; Address:
Phone:
Physical Address: Facility Contact: /in 'k �'Title: Phone No:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
es
"Swine �' Caps
J❑ Wean to Finish
n ❑ Wean to Feeder
k° ❑ Feeder to Finish
i' ❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
" ❑ Boars
Pthcr, R ��' ,� ' •:
❑ Others
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Region:zi'7a
Latitude: [=o =6 Longitude: =o=, =
Current I' �; Design Current,fi,
? POE Wet Poultry Capacity ,Po ulagson 5 Catt c�{� fat
❑ Layer ❑ Dair Cow
❑ Non -Laver ❑ Dairy Calf
x * 1
• [] Dairy Heifer
ODry Cow
Dry- Poultry
❑ La ers
❑ Non -La ers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turke s
❑ Turkey POU Its
❑ Other
Dischart=es & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure []Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made'?
t, on -Darr
❑ Beef'Stocker
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood C
��
a
;: �Nz.umberofiE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (Ifyes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters ol'the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system'? (if yes, notify DWQ)
2. is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters orthe State
other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3
❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
12'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
P No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
RrNo
❑ Yes
ON
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
I'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: �� — B� Date of Inspection
r
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes ;2rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure l Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed'? ❑ Yes Lallo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes ZrNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement'? ❑ Yes 2rNO ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 2No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes 2No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes .TNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. []Yes [21No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14, Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
WNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
E!fNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?[] Yes
P No
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application'?
❑ Yes
;'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
P No
❑ NA
❑ NE
RifA}G' . .']1 LV
Ijq
iAT
-3
Comments1(refer to question.,#) Eicplatn any IJS answers and/or anyxecom;me dat oas or anotcomment
Xsgdrawings of=facility to better�ezplAih',situations (use 'additiona! pages astnecessary) ,
1 `.l�t16; 11%lkl ",�i ? or - #s 1�11 sue} _= a.lia F _ _- � r^ yt�. ' ax �� _
Reviewer/inspector Name-- l,- CJ Phone: 7/y 7 00
Reviewer/inspector Signature: Date: i/�13'Oq
Page 2 of 3 12128104 Continued

z
Facility Number: % --Q Date of Inspection�� -O
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes FzMo ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? if yes, check ❑ Yes i❑'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box.
❑ WUP El Checklists El Design [I Maps El Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1 " Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ,-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes 12No ❑ NA ❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
�allo
❑ NA
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
O No
❑ NA
❑ NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
21No
❑ NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
O—No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
,21'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
Z_No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
0"No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
/❑No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (iel discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
ZrNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
33.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
WNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page 3 of 3 12128104

�7 r 2 1 73 ti?
Type of Visit Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit A! Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: Region:
A fJ
Farm Name: «� L c/l Q �. Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: _
Back-up Operator: _
Title:
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: = e = i = Longitude: ❑ n = 6 ❑ fi
Will
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Cpcity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer airy Cow
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Non -Layer ❑Dairy Calf
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Dairy Heifer
Dry Poultry ❑ Dry Cow
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
ElNon-Dairy
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Laers
❑ Beef Stocker
❑Non -La ers❑
Beef Feeder
PE]Gilts
Boars
Pullets❑
❑ Beef Brood Cow -
Turkeys
Other
r[Turkey Poults
ME] Other
❑ Other Number of Structures:
Discharees & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
ONo ❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
No NA
ElNE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
ElYes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ yes
N ❑ A
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NA
❑ NE
other than from a discharge'?
Page 1 of 3
12128104 Continued

i
Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): l
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
through a waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes No NA El NE
❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
❑ Yes o NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threa otify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement`? ❑ Yes No ❑.NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ yes LdN0 NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
4. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes o NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes P4o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
[-]PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) 01=k1k , 'j ,,� e, r $! �► S �}��
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes o NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?[] Yes NA ❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ElTNo
NA El NA
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? El Yes NA ❑ NE
.e tr&s..s. t. .. c. _. ,ve_x _...._i ew�2e.:Cts.�'F'�a'w^a.x�.'d'LxvY...iig .:�:-Zn .4 L'�-�. h.ai '�3X a'1:8-4'§C's a4ie',YAefiffiffiPI@y'9'Y1�ID' -_ Y.fiiiC6Q'i'4',v�=Y 5Nti16irJW'.,B&'�_lY�a��Q'BaffiY�ffi1'�q�
Reviewer/Inspector Name -- - — --� — --- - - -- Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: 7o—Date:
Page 2 of 3 12128104 Continued

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑Maps ❑Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes .❑'No (J NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ StockingI ❑Crop Yield ❑ ! 20 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1" Rain Inspections ❑ her Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes o NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes�V�No'NA ❑NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ YesA ❑ NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? ❑ YesA ❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ YesA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes �NoO
A ❑ NE
El Yes NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Additional Comments and/orrDiawings'
Page 3 of 3 12128104

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 190016 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWC190016 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection _ _ Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Chatham Region: Raleiah
Date of Visit: QZ(07/2007 Entry Time:11:30 AM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: James Mike Lindley Farm Owner Email:
Owner: James M Lindley Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 614 Mike Lindley Rd Snow Camp NC 27349
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude: 35°4 '42" Longitude: 79°22'46"
County Road 1336, 1116 mi. south of the intersection of county roads 1336 and 1337. Johnny Lindley Road.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: James M Lindley
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name
On -site representative Mike Lindley
Operator Certification Number: 20967
Title
Phone:
24 hour contact name Mike Lindley Phone:
Primary Inspector: Joseph Gyamfi Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Phone
Page: 1

Permit: AWC190016 Owner- Facility: James M Lindley Facility Number: 190016
Inspection Date: 02/07/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
" WUP dated 12/18/97
* Waste analysis:
12/11/06 = 5.2
417l06= 7.4
• Reviewed waste application records -
- please go back and charge the waste applied in September 2006 to Small Grain(wheat) instead of Corn on SLUR-1 and SLUR-2
- Also be sure that waste application dates are within 60 days of waste analysis dates (before or after)
• Lagoon levels have been recorded weekly
# 21. No rainfall records were available - Need to keep daily rainfall records
#21. Stocking and mortality records need to be kept. Producer has STOCK-1 form to use.
#24. Missing waste application equipment calibration - Producer says calibration will be done during next waste application. He could
not find his previous calibration and did not remember when it was done
" Crop yield records available
Page: 2

Permit: AWC190016 Owner - Facility: James M Lindley Facility Number: 190016
Inspection Date: 02/07/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Cattle
O Cattle -Milk Cow 170 156
Total Design Capacity: 170
Total SSLW: 238,000
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Data Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
Laste Pond MAIN 36.00 44.00
Page: 3

Permit: AWC190016 Owner -Facility: James M Lindley Facility Number: 190016
Inspection Date: 02/07/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No NA
NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
■ ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
■ ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■ ❑
❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■ ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■ ❑
❑
1 Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts"to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■ ❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
❑
■ ❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -sits that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■ ❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■ ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■ ❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■ ❑
❑
improvement?
Waste.Application
Yes
No NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■ ❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWC190016 Owner - Facility: James M Lindley
Inspection Date: 02/07/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 190016
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Corn (Silage)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain (Wheat,
Barley, Oats)
Crop Type 3
Fescue (Pasture)
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Sail Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14, Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■. ❑ ❑
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 5

Permit. AWC190016 Owner - Facility: James M Lindley
Facility Number: 190016
Inspection Date: 02/07/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
.............................................................................................................
Yes
No
NA
NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
■
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
■
Inspections after> 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
■
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)? ❑
❑
■
Cl
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
■
❑
❑
❑
25, Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
❑
■
Cl
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑
■
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■
❑
❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours andlor document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 6

Permit: AWC190016 Owner - Facility: James M Lindley
Inspection Date: 02/07/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Other Issues
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Facility Number: 190016
Reason for Visit: Routine
Page: 7

Type of Visit 10 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit IrRoutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: L.�L_L.L" r� Arrival Time: • A Departure Time: County:
Region: ' `P,d
Farm Name: 'lolrn er Nl P- L) ncl )�W +,:�kYyv� OwnerEmail: 7
Owner Name: Phone: �� Phone: l 4J ZOO
Mailing Address: �p �,,, 1 e _ G
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone No:
Onsite Representative olwe1- M t E n e' Integrator:
Certified Operator: m Qf 6A ''� Operator Certification Number: `2,0
Back-up Operator:
Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: n o n & n 1{ Longitude: n ° n & n
Discharges & Stream Impacts
i. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation'?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
1PNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
FINo
❑ NA
❑ NE
12128104
Continued

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection 1' P
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes �io ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ff❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? [--]Yes 'M No El NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes EPo El NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan? 11
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes [�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit'? ❑ Yes PNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crooj�Vindp i] Evidence of Wir�l�rifl ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop types) b W, [ I 10 3 94,) , 'f
52iC-2
3. Soil type(s) Z3'Z 3C!, C� 13�
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes {� No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?[] Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes 'tl No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
�� ;AAA b� I, e � y
re-vo
6
Reviewer/inspector Name ~� Phone: 119
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
Required Records &Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ElNA [INE
the appropirate box. ElWUp ❑ Checklists ElDesign [I Maps El Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. 1P Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
Rainfall Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes �4 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
F1 Yes ❑ No PINA ❑ NE
F] Yes El No El NA ❑ NE
I❑` Yes ❑ No gNA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
_MNo
❑ NA
El NE
❑ Yes
�No
ElNA
[INE
ElYes
9No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes allo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
5No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
`P No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
/
N
d�
r^�
m off r�
ek ,-ems G\j0.A
12128104

❑ Division of Water Quality
E Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 190016 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWC190016 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Operations Review Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Chatham Region: Raleigh
Date of Visit: 10/10/2006 Entry Time:10000 AM Exit Time: 11:00 AM Incident #:
Farm Name: James Mike Lindley Farm Owner Email:
Owner: James M Lindlffv Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 614 Mike Lindley Rd Snow Camp NC 27349
Physical Address:
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°49'42" Longitude: 79°22'46"
County Road 1336, 1116 mi. south of the intersection of county roads 1336 and 1337. Johnny Lindley Road.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: James M Lindley Operator Certification Number: 20967
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
Primary Inspector: Carl Henry Outz Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
all records up to date. Mr. Lindley has fixed feedlots by pouring concrete berm to direct runoff from the stock trail to the holding pond
Page: 1

Permit: AWC190016 Owner - Facility: James M Lindley Facility Number : 190016
Inspection Data: 10/10/2006 Inspection Type: Operations Review Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Ctosed Date Start Data Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
kaste Pond MAIN 36.00 96.00
Page: 2

Permit: AWC190016 Owner -Facility: James M Lindley Facility Number:
190016
Inspection Date: 10/10/2006 Inspection Type: Operations Review Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No
NA
NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
■
❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑
❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■
❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWC190016 Owner - Facility: James M Lindley
Facility Number : 190016
Inspection Date: 10/10/2006 Inspection Type: Operations Review
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No
NA
NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Small Grain
(Wheat,
Barley,
Oats)
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Georgeville
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■
❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■
❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■
❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■
❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■
❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWC190016 Owner • Facility: James Mt Lindley Facility Number : 190016
Inspection Date: 10/10/2006 Inspection Type: Operations Review Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Other? ❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
■
❑
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■
Cl
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■
❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to property dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AWC190016 Owner - Facility: James M Lindley
Inspection Date: 10/10/2006 Inspection Type: Operations Review
Facility Number. 190016
Reason for Visit: Routine
Other issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
32. Did Reviewertinspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative?
Q
■
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
■
❑
❑
Page: 6

Yahoo! [e-mail]
http://us.f320.mail.yahoo.com/ym/ShowLetter?box=Inbox&Msgtd=2...
_J%kIOQ?+MAIL
S„bfecl: ASCE LY0ch000 NOLMe,'Undtnunddp North Cerollne'e Weennd,leveam Reeul"mry P.—.dnq F ...' . February 15, 2007
Oep[ Mon, 12 Feb 70e7 e7;e7:e7 -0600
From: 'N"u , Roderick" r nndSvick®NNTB.com
ASCE LUNCHEON NOTICE
DATE: Thursday, February 15, 2007
LOCATION: NC State University Club
4200 Nillaborough Street
Raleigh, NC
PROGRAM: "Understanding North Carolina's Wetlands/Stroam Regulatory Permitting Process"
SPEAKER: Budd Tittow, PWS, PWB - BSC Rice
TIME: 12:00 PM • 1:70 PM
rA41I
$ 20,00 per MEMBER
$ 25,00 per NON-MEMBER
$ 6.00 per STUDENT or LIFE MEMBER
(Pay by cash or check at meeting)
Print - Close Window
�u d
This program will provide on overview of the complexities of North Carolina's wetland7streamlbuffer zone regulatory process ,The presentation explains the following key topics:
Wetland delineations
o Field Data Sheets: hydrology, hydric soils, & hydrophytic vegetation
o Jurisdictional Determinations (JD's)
Stream Assessment Forms
o Perennial, intermittent & ephemeral
o Buffer "calls"
Impact avoidance
o Design thresholds
Mitigation options
o Restoration
o Enhancement
o Creation
o Preservation
a EEP In -lieu -fee program
Section 404/401 Applications
o Designing for Nationwide/General Permits
o Avoiding Individual Permits
Isolated Wetland Permits
Buffer Protection Plans and Permits
Stormwater Management Plans & Permits
Erosion & Sedimentation Control Plans & Permits
NPDES Permits & SWPPP's
Professional Weiland Sciontist, Wildlife Ecologist and Aquatic Biologist, Budd Titlow has 33 years of experience in regulatory compliance and permitting. During his career, he has
worked on more then 1,000 projects, ranging from regional mal Is, "big box' retail plazas, international airports and interstate highways to wind 'farms", wild and
scenic rivers and statelnational parks.
Please make your reservations by 12.00 PM, Tuesday February 13s' by emailing',
Natasha Rodevick([e-mail])
Please note that if you make a reservation and cannot attend, you must cancel before the lunch meeting or send a MPlOWMent to avoid being charged. We will be sending out invoices after the meeting for anyone who
does not attend.
of 1 2/14/2007 8:57 AM

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 19001Q Facility Status: Active _ Permit: AWC190QIQ _ ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Chatham Region: Raleigh
Date of Visit: 02/07/2007 Entry Time: 11:30 AM Exit Time:
Farm Name: James Mike Lindley Farm
Owner: Jgmg§ M Lindley_
Incident #:
Owner Email:
Phone:[phone]_ _
Mailing Address: 614 Mike Lindley Rd ,SnowCaMp NC 27349
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35'4942" Longitude: 79°22'46"
County Road 1336, 1116 mi. south of the intersection of county roads 1336 and 1337. Johnny Lindley Road.
Question Areas:
R Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
jj Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: James M Lindley Operator Certification Number: 20967
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
On -site representative Mike Lindley Phone:
24 hour contact name Mike Lindley Phone:
Primary Inspector: Joseph Gyamfr Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

Permit: AWC190016 Owner- Facility: James M Lindley Facility Number: 190016
inspection Date: 02/07/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
* WUP dated 12/18/97
` Waste analysis:
12/11/06 = 5.2
4/7/06= 7.4
` Reviewed waste application records -
- please go back and charge the waste applied in September 2006 to Small Grain(wheat) instead of Corn on SLUR-1 and SLUR-2
- Also be sure that waste application dates are within 60 days of waste analysis dates (before or after)
" Lagoon levels have been recorded weekly
# 21. No rainfall records were available - Need to keep daily rainfall records
#21. Stocking and mortality records need to be kept. Producer has STOCK-1 form to use.
#24. Missing waste application equipment calibration - Producer says calibration will be done during next waste application. He could
not find his previous calibration and did not remember when it was done
Crop yield records available
Page: 2

Permit: AWC190016 Owner - Facility: James M Lindley
Inspection Date: 02/07I2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 190016
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Cattle
Cattle -Milk Cow 170 156
Total Design Capacity: 170
Total SSLW: 238,000
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
aste Pond MAIN 36.00 44.00
Page: 3

Permit: AWC190016 Owner - Facility: James M Lindley
Facility Number : 190016
inspection Date: 02/07/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a Cl ■ ❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes No NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc,)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■ ❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■ ❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No NA
NE
14. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■ ❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu. Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWC190016 Owner - Facility: James M Lindley
Facility Number: 190016
Inspection Date: 02/07l2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Tota I P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Corn (Silage)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain (Wheat,
Barley, Oats)
Crop Type 3
Fescue (Pasture)
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the'Certified Animal Waste Management
❑
■
❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
110
❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■
❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■
❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
■
0-0
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 5

Permit: AWC190016 owner - Facility: James M Lindley Facility Number : 190016
Inspection Date: 02/07/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Other? ❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application? ❑
120 Minute inspections? ❑
Weather code? ❑
Weekly Freeboard? ❑
Transfers? ❑
Rainfall?
■
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
■
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
❑
■
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
■
❑
❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
❑
■
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
Cl
■
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑
■
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■
❑
❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those
❑
■
❑
❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air
❑
■
❑
❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 6

Permit: AWC190015 Owner -Facility: James M Lindley
Inspection Date: 02/07/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Other Issues
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewerllnspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Facility Number: 190016
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 7

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P. E., Director
Division of Water Quality
October 1, 2004
James Mike Lindley
James Mike Lindley Farm
614 Mike Lindley Road
Snow Camp NC 27349
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWC190016
James Mike Lindley Farm
Cattle Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Chatham County
Dear James Mike Lindley:
On June 11, 2004, the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (Division) issued a revised State General
Permit for swine facilities. The General Permit was issued in accordance with the directive of Senate Bill
733 (Session Law 2003-28).
In accordance with your application received on February 11, 2003 and in accordance with the directive
of Senate Bill 733, we are hereby forwarding to you this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to James
Mike Lindley, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste collection, treatment, storage and
land application system in accordance with General Permit AWG200000. The issuance of this COC
supercedes and terminates your previous COC Number AWC 190016 which expires October 1, 2004,
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
of animal waste from the James Mike Lindley Farm, located in Chatham County, with an animal capacity
of no greater than an annual average of 170 Dairy cattle and the application to land as specified in the
facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2009. Pursuant to this COC,
you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting
and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this
facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number
of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and
this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please carefully read this COC and the enclosed State General Permit. Since this is a revised State
General Permit, it contains new requirements in addition to most of the conditions contained in the
previous State General Permit. Enclosed for your convenience is a package containing the new and
revised forms used for record keeping and reporting. Please pay careful attention to the record keeping
and monitoring conditions in this permit.
If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
Aquifer Protection Section —Animal Feeding Operations Unit
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1638 One
NorthCarolina
Phone: [phone] / FAX: [phone] / Internet: h2o.enr.state.nc.us �lxtlfrl�001�
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycledl10% Post Consumer Paper

The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.
Per 15A NCAC 2H .0225(c) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards a 100 foot separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a
spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil pcnalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Raleigh Regional Office. The Regional Office Water
Quality Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this COC
or the General Permit, please contact J.R. Joshi at [phone].
Sincerely,
vd6 /L
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Enclosures (General Permit AWG200000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Raleigh Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Chatham County Health Department
Chatham County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File AWC190016
APS Central Files

Type of Visit QKCo ance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: aL Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: Region:
Farm Name: ;(�} �y..Qs 1� Q _L 1 �r Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative: '/�' �' '�GJ,� Certified Operator: ` �`�
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Title:
Phone:
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: 0 o Q g= Longitude: = o=` = q
JU Wean to Finish
I 1[—j Layer I
I LJI)airy Cow
❑ Wean to Feeder
11 j[] Non -Layer I
I ❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
Gilts ❑
Dry Poultry ❑ D Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ La ers
El Stocker
Non -La ers
❑ Pullets ❑ Beef Feeder
_.. ❑ Beef Brood Cow
❑ Boars
Poults
Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made'?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d, Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3
❑ Yes [No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes o] NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
NA ❑ NE
NA ❑ NE
NA ❑ NE
12128104 Continued

J ,
Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes "NoNA El NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard`? El o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in): �--
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental thr , notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes N NA El
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? El Yes No NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require El Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ZNoNA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
I t . Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) '" I `v%A ��tR c ✓! S �r
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination ? ❑ Yes
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes
VN ❑NA ONE
A NE
A ❑ NE
N ❑ NA ❑ NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain. any YES answers and/or any recommendahorisoraany other�comments
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. use additional a esi.as necessa
g tY p ( p g r Y)�.
T
Reviewerllnspector Name �- --�- --^ - - --- ----- - --- - ---- - � � Phone:
Reviewer/inspector Signature: Date:
Page 2 of 3 12128104 Continued

Facility Number: d— Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes "NoE01
NA El
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check El Yes NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP El Checklists [3 Design El Maps El Other
21.
Does record keeping need improvement? if yes, check the appropriate box below,
❑ Yes o ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V
Rain Inspections Weather
Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
El Yes No NA
❑ NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes o NA
❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes ❑ NA
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fait to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes o NA
❑ NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes o NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification`?
❑ Yes o ❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
[] Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31, Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
Page 3 of 3 12128104

0
Division of Water LI
Quality
Facility Number 101!Diggi=04 Soil and Water ConseOther Agency
Type of Visit I-^oLmpliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit outine O Complaint Q Follow up O Referral Q Emergency O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: %Z Zb ArrivalTime. Departure Time: County: c'tl h" Region: e4t�)-
Farm Name: '___ __ - __ Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
$ Q- is 3.�-
Phone: 3 , Z 6► 3 f 1F�'
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number: q6 % _ _ __
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: 0 0= Longitude: = 0 0 A
Design
Swine ' C•apacity
❑ Wean to Finish
C►urrent
Population
❑
Destgri. Current
S �Ma
Wet Poultry" C,apaci Po
Design Current
a acity Population
Laver
iry Cow
p
v
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑
Non -La et +
❑ Dair Calf
❑ Feeder to Finish
ElFarrow to Wean
>-
Dry Poultr,
Layers
-La Non -Layers
,. ❑Dairy Heifer
D Cow
❑ Nan-Dai
El Beef Stocker
❑Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cow
Number of Structures:
Xw'
Ely Farrow to Feeder
El Farrow to Finish
❑
❑ Gilts
❑Non
Pullets
❑ Boars
El
Turkeys
-
Other
❑
❑
Turkey Poults
❑ Other
JEI
Other
"I
..
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation`?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge`?
❑ Yes PNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
PNA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
PfNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ YesZZ
No
[DNA
❑ NE
12128104 Continued
K

Facility Number: — (ti Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure
5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
�No
❑ NA
El NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
❑ Yes
0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or
environmentZNo
eat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement`?
El Ye
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes /qNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks) /
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ yes 4 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No [INA ElNE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
El Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload El Frozen Ground El Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 Ibs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drifl ❑ Application Outside of Area
ZI . Zo r jo
12. Croptype(s) C--"bPA S. �SG �Sc-Qq--
13. Soil type(s)
jt,c , co,
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement'?
❑ Yes
1�z No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination%❑ Yes
�ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
P No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
[:jNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Z a
Reviewer/InsT7,
tr- �ilPhone: ale! 79J
Reviewer/Inspector Name
P Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: I 'Z Z�
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: r q — Date of Inspection i z Za a
Reuuired Records & Documents
19.
Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes )No
❑ NA
❑ NE
rZ
CAW
20.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the P }eadily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
[Z No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design El Maps El Other
21.
Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box belowf
I /y{o3
El Yes
,�,/
IQ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Wast�Application ElWee�y F!!r-eeboa�d",/3uu Waste Analysis ❑ Soii!(,Anal%.ysis ❑Waste
Transfers
El Annual
Certification
El Rainfall El Stoking ElCrop/Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1"
Rain Inspections ❑
Weather Code
22,
Did the facility fail to install and ma nta' in a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
JZ/No
❑ NA
❑ NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
A No
❑ NA
❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
�f] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
[�o
El NA
❑ NE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
El Yes
/� No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
1XNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
ErNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
�No
❑ NA
El NE
33.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ YeSXNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Add�ttonal Coriiments ai�d/o`r Drawin s i r°7 �'".
3) d Stu) S tj TO rMYR��14- v,Ji7FP f �,2i;'JA G' ;
E C a j S i L.A-G 'E_ F+o
�2.rat c� cA+Arl'aQL. A-P-4vJO L-A-Cob-1 �`��T IA' Pa;
M�.1'r S W T't �o I EA r; A _ LAJ IN- -T5—
cx,.j TP-c.'r C14 4 T S .,,E4b T ze-- A-5S'5'-turd Cst-
rZ.i l� C= l
— P+ Cr.r F r3 rA ` G t°V`�"
1 i!£.:l`
'T � Ro �I C��'� S�pck.- -rP� i � A• N9
Co � .' rL'-l� Ci G•r '� t V r'c ha Li 1` �'(. L�j+�y
!i. 'VE: ';'a ,967 rn,. •�(>✓.� - ) �o 12128104

Type of Visit ,0 Compliance inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility NumberEn=Date of visit: L Time: A
O Not Operational Q Below Threshold
�rmitted Certified [3 Conditionally
QCertified [3 Registered Date Last Operaate or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: ......�. A , . �`.....�'.+4R.---- ���!4el!------. County: ..4 j..
OwnerName : .............. ...'C (/) �/a .......... ....... Phone No:......................................................................................
MailingAddress:....tSl "�..... f :'............................................................................................................................................... ..........................
Facility Contact:................................................................ .. Title: Phone No:
OnsiteRepresentative: ............................................................................. .............................. Integrator:......................................................................................
Certifed Operator:............................................-----....».----.................................................... Operator Certification Number:..................................----....
Location of Farm:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry 2(cattle ❑ Horse Latitude • ' 49 Longitude • 4 4�
Swine
Desrgn,�f, Current r Deslp ' Curre
Canacitv Poyulation`:. r'°. etde ,°Caaactty: iPonulal
❑ Wean to Feeder
0.
❑ Layer
❑ Feeder to Finish
Ei
❑ Non -Layer
Farrow to Wean
❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Feeder
El Farrow to Finish
E E
�'� . Tolt�1 �BSII
E
❑Gilts
❑ Boars
''.He
Discharges & Stream lmnacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min'?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: }
❑ Yes yNo
❑ Yes JVNo
ElYes 11EI No
❑ Yes PrF;o
❑ Yes ANo
❑ Yes ;2fNo
❑ Yes rio
Structure b
.................................................................. .................................... ................................... ................................... ...................................
>,n u
Freeboard (inches):
12112103 Continued

Facility Number: ! -.� Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
21. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available? ❑ Yes 9410
22. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(iel WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes No
23. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes /❑ No
❑ Waste pl' ation ❑ Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ 5oil Sampling
2.
24. Is facility p t i compliance with any applicable setback trite � nn�4tec't at the time of design? ❑ Yes 0No
(/ rr /p
25. Did the f di �f it to, ave a actively certified operator in charge7A ❑ Yes PNo
26. Fail to noti y t'c ionai AVQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes VN0
27. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes No
28. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes �No
29. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes �No
NPDES Permitted Facilities
30. Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35) ❑ Yes PNo
31. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No
32. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
33. Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey? ❑ Yes ❑ No
34. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No
35. Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Stocking Form ❑ Crop Yield Form [:]Rainfall [:]Inspection After 1" Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form
12112103

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection i ]Z
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ yes P N
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or ❑ Yes <0
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4.6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes io
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes � No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level ❑ Yes 0<0
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes �To
11. Is there evidence of over application? if yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No
[:]Excessive Ponding [:]PAN [:]Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc
12. Crop type ('DLj , SM C.. P2 ksrjAr
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes L2,No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
PMO
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
[]Yes
No
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
❑ Yes
" o
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
'.P
No
18, Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
❑ Yes
;3
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
❑ Yes
IVo
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional
❑ Yes
;21<0
Air Quality representative immediately.
irk lilt yli
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
Date:
11/11/ul Lonnnued

Type of Visit Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit Q Routine O Complaint O Follow up 0 Emergency Notification 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 1 Date of visit: L S Time: 1 •d
rO Not O erational 0 Below Threshold
Pillermitted 9 Certified [3 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last IT
or Above Threshold:
CL �
Farm Name: ��"e5 ; & County: �
Owner Name: Phone No:
Mailing Address: �'`! '� 604 S X73yl
Facility Contact: Title: Phone No:
Onsite Representative: Jf Integrator:
Certified Operator: AlxO UOperator Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
AL
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry dcattle ❑ Horse Latitude �° °° Longitude
Design Current
Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
Poultry
Capacity Population Cattip Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Layer
I I ET5airy1
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Non -Layer
I I ii JE1 Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Total SSLW
Number of lagoons ❑Subsurface Drains Pi
rig Ponds I Solid Traps 0', ❑ No Liquid Waste Ma
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1, Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
K If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ;2<pillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: ?L _
Freeboard (inches): 0
05103101
] Spray Field Area
❑ Yes ❑'No
❑ Yes ONO
❑ Yes 2(No
❑ Yes
2fNo
❑ Yes
dNo
❑ Yes
FfNo
❑ Yes P'<o
Structure 6
Continued

I Facility Number: I — 1l Date of [wilivetioin
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. is there any evidence of wind drift during land application" (i,e, residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure. and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (ix, broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blad c(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32, Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
Additional
05103101
❑ Yes 2TNo
El Yes -ETNo
0 Yes ZN10
❑ Yes 'Fe <0
❑ Yes ZN�o
El Yes Z No
0 Yes P'No

Facility Number: 4,
Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental tbreat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenancelimprovement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Pending ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type C' IA) �. 6,14 (a &,_ 6 iiu mm
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17, Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of thCertified Animal Va4e Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) i// //
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, wa a analysis & si sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23, Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
;W0
❑ Yes
eNo
P-1-le's
❑ No
❑ Yes
to
❑ Yes
<0
❑ Yes
sT
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes ANo
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes �No
❑ Yes .1 "01
C Yes
ZNoo
❑ Yes
,D4
�s
❑ No
❑ Yes
�Nio
❑ Yes
NN0
❑ Yes
Ind o
Te Yes
o
❑ Yes
, o
❑ Yes
P ""
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
�You
Comments' refei torn n�Stion�#` ;I�.X"Iain'aaa� 7. 1'rA Y[$�w�.�3�r�W 0r am r€e��:ittn�tTt��llOns�;�rfFEa���th@r,€e�m�inents.'{ &3tE#E�{i {y �1�1� E fl 3 y �
ry
}, .-wNl�} l" 6F$ rF
�lSE drawings of facllity3to better expiaaw�1situations (use additional pages.is hecessar}) f' q
} Field Conv ❑ Final Notes
1yp
'i{y:,1v,lE1i { y F %91S'b..a} Y {EE 1 id 6 t j"{❑
w s . E ::, i C elY 1 , J. A.,E a ,2 „� .3 . "1; k { 6
rri,
U I rtc�µ. Air=- ��1 iW�S .
J4•)U.A1 If a "TD 4rfL
111) IVI0� 5A4y4 �n -;/o ` 3l�, ArA•w -f ;U #"T 13" I % �lZ� �1 5 ,/ f G� lJ
(.d s 1- i; T � fz -78 -- e_P,o--_w �,.,, rte.� , ►f t' ,."04 �,- 7 A t,
(. ,v W "A4 Ge. *moo . �Pr Gam/1 vt - G4U�w 114 ." jWd4_1 k 04f'4 C,,f
Hy
s
E. , .';eviewrinspecter Name
,eRwrlInspector
Re, Signature: Date: 3
05103101 Continued
�J

s
Type of Visit CFCorppliance Inspection 0 Operation Review () Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit _}/Routine 0 Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number i Date of visit: 2 2 e Time: 70
rO / Not O erational Below Threshold
['Permitted Certified 0 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated%r tve Threshold:
/Farm Name: � '"' P6 t ff County: C `
Owner Name: Sows !� Phone No:
Mailing Address: 111 ( C- 73 C15
Facility Contact: Title: Phone No:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Location of Farm:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry xattie ❑ Horse Latitude 0 ° " Longitude 0 4 11
Design Current
Design Current Design Current;
Swine
Capacity Po ulation Poultry
Capacitv. Poptulation Ca e- CHPUCitV Po fulatibn
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Layer
DairyO
ElFeeder to Finish
I
❑ Non -Lay
FLE]Non-Dai
El Farrow to Wean
-- -el
-
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
TOtal,SSLW
Number of Lagoons' ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑ La oon Area I❑ Spray Field Area
a -s
'Holdang`:Ponds I Wid Traps .' ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System `
�'W- w..
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes �No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes 0] No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes xbNo
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ONo
Waste Collection 8& Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes Z No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches):
05103101 Continued

Facility Number: J� — Date of Inspection
942r IssI es
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc,)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes ONo 11Y
❑ Yes VNo P/4-
❑ Yes El No
❑ Yes F.�fNo
❑ Yes 6Xo
❑ Yes Z NNoo
El Yes <1`
05103101

Facility Number: — f b Date of inspection 2 2
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ❑�No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? El Yes [�1Vo
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes P No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes P No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ;iNo
Waste Aunlication
10.
Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
;2'No
11.
is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
(I Yes
DNo
12.
Crop type co."j r .�M %,rrJ [ Lam¢ N'
13.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
❑ No
14.
a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
P - -
16.
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
[:]Yes
P O
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
[; io
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Ani 1 W g/g/to priagement Plan readily available?
[ 9
El Yes
No
e/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) / (r t v�V
C/ �I tLylat
O
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sa pie reports)
co Yes
[__1 N
i
20. is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
El Yes
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑Yes��No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
4f No
23, Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
E]'No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
Po
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
6<0
0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
s ...
MomctientsArefer to question #) Explain any YES, answers@andlor any" recommendations or any other coinT
drawings, "situations.
Use of facility tobetter explain (use additional pages as necessary ) ❑Field Copy El Final
.#. " Notes
'lily �Lp Y -�D �� It d �/Lt.Lrc , l-t ` e
// I
Reviewer/Inspector Name c,is�-`-7] •- di7
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: i) 7
05103101 ' Continued

. , w
Division of Water
Q.Drviision of,Soffand
O Other Agency ,,
�.. ,
n
Type of Visit
Complignce Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Beason for Visit Q Aoutine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number I I I
Date of Visit.:
© Permitted © Certified ❑ Conditionally Certified [3 Registered
e
Farm Name: a.'laos......�' :!.........IL.;.j .................'.."`"^'�
/(o a Time: d+- 1 Printers on: 10/26/2000
0 Not Operational Q Below Threshold
Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
County ......f.Ld ..........................
OwnerName: ................................................... ............................................................... Phone No:.......................................................................................
FacilityContact: ............................. "hitle................................................. Phone No:...................................................
,'Mailing Address: ..................................................................................................................... ..................................................................................... ..........................
Onsite Representative; ......................................................................................... Integrator:....................
Certified Operator:..... ..................................................— Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location of Farm:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 0 4 « Longitude 0 ' «
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer I I airy J p I I Z 6
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present 1111 Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps 10 No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharees & Stream ImpacLS
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑�No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other l
a. If discharge is ohserved, was the conveyance man-made'? ❑ Yes o
h. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ElYes No
c. if discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in galhnin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon tiystem? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes o
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ElYes No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes 9/No
StrUCtUrc l Structure 2 Structure , Structure 4 Structure S Structure h
Identifier: qn*0i .............. .— ................................ ....... - ....... .................. .................................... ..................................................................................................
Freehoard (inches): i tt
5/00 Continued on back

r
Facility Number: f — Date of Inspection G Printed on: 10/26/2000
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures obs rved? (iel trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes )dNo
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? Yes (If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes OJNo
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings'? ❑ Yes INO
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? El Yes o
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ZNo
12, Crop type %o (2.n.1 / SM 4-4 G fA,) C, W
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)•?
❑ Yes )D No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes,,;6No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes �No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes )EfNo
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement'?
❑ Yes N
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes No
Required Records & Documents
17, Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available? ❑ Yes filNo
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal W to a agement an adily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) / _ �rc�f l ❑YesNo
V pp ?0 � 11d��5 �c�
19, Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, wart alysis & soirsz;m`pl reports) 'Yes ❑ No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? /❑ Yes
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes N 1`u
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes No
24, Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes �No
�'Vo a>GiQris:ojr ciencies wire po(ed• i3>jrritig �his'visit'. • Y:oir Will•ree0ive t)4 fu>fth ;
' , rorres�oridence: A66f this 'visit:.... • . • . • .... • . .... • . • .
." y y y t
Comments (refer to uestyan #): Ezplain im YES answers and/or an recommendations or an other comments ,l s E t+
dra wingsof facilrty to better explain situations. {use adt honaI pages as necessary}
Use
Reviewer/Inspector Name coon
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: (,&"—( LOH 14/)-- Date: i�_ //hA) 5100

Facility Number: Date of Inspection ra a ( Printed on: 10/26/2000
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes �No
li -id level of In oon or stora a and with no a itation?
q g g p g
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31, Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes `Y "0"
❑ Yes Vo
❑ Yes 9<0
❑ Yes �o
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes �XNo
Additional, Comments andfor' ra ngs:, - ," ;'' , {.
AL
1
5/00

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Naturat Rescyurces
Raleigh Regional Office
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
CERTTFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. James Mike Lindley
614 Mike Lindley Rd.
Snow Camp, North Carolina 27349
AL
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA C1113P4RTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT ANa NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
May 17, 2001
Subject: Notice Of Deficiency
Lindley Farm
COC AWC190016
Chatham County
Dear Mr. Lindley:
On May 16, 2001, Mr. JD Hester from the Raleigh Regional Office conducted a compliance inspection of
the subject animal operation. This inspection is a part of the Division's effort to determine compliance with
the State's Animal Waste Management Regulation.
An inspection of your facility revealed that wastewater from your facility was not actively discharging to
waters of the State, nor were any manmade pipes, ditches or other prohibited conveyances observed.
However as a result of the inspection the following deficiency was observed:
As a permitted animal facility, you are required to have a copy of your weekly freeboard records, readily
available for inspection to determine compliance with conditions in your general permit
Please respond to this Notice within 30 days of receipt. You should include in your response the actions
that you will take to address this deficiency.
The Raleigh regional office appreciates your cooperation in this matter. If you have any further questions
regarding this inspection, please call Mr. JD Hester at [phone].
/S'cerely,
Kenneth Schuster, P.E.
Regional Supervisor
cc: Chatham County Health Department
Chatham County Soil and Water Conservation District
Ms. Margaret O'Keefe/ DSWC-RRO
RRO Files
1628 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity AHinmative Action Employer 50% recycledllD% post -consumer paper

of Water Quality
ft'
L f
.Division
ODivision of Soil and Water Conservattom
.:; C Other Agency }
. a 3,i
Type of Visit 0 Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date (if Visit-, q tO Tune: Ea
� Printed on: 7/21/2000
Facility NumberNot O eratl Q Below Threshold
© Permitted,Certified ❑ Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
! 444 A T4+A rv%
Farm Name: .................... �!Jgr1..� &.A.....� .......... .................... .......... County:.............................
Owner Name:....... ;PS .... % -,:), ,,,`f a..9... ~S - Phone No.
Facility Contact: ...............................................................................Title:...................... ....... Phone No:
MailingAddress: ........................................................................................
.►i� t...; r1 4 L�
Onsite Representative:......../........................................
.�..+...................................... Integrator:......................................................................................
V
Certified Operator:,........ ... Operator Certification Number: .....................
Location of Farm:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry A-C"attle ❑ Horse Latitude Longitude F7T7•
Swine
Design Current
Canacitv Ponulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ FarroW to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer airy I
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present 110 Lag--,-n Area 10 Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ONo
Discharge originated -w ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. I[discharge is observed, was the convevancc man-rnade? ❑Yes eNo
b. If discharge is observed. did it reach Water (if the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ) []Yes I�o
cf. Idischarge is obsdrvcd. what is the estimated flow in gal/min'?
)`in
d. Does discharge hypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes 2�No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ZNo
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes FzNo
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ffNo
Structure I Struc:tUre 2 Structure Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ............ ................... ........... ................... ........ ................... ..................... ...,........................... .:....... .... ................................
Freehnard (inches):
5100 Continued on back

Facility Number: i1 — A Date of Inspection Printed on: 7/21/2000
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ic/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑Yes
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes�o
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ O
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings' ❑ Yes �To
Waste Application �
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenancelimprovement'? ❑ YeszNo
11. Is there evidence of over application'? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes �o
12. Crop type C , , 94.f, C:., S r G P A; . j f:rc S C U e,
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need it wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records _& Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Getieral Permit readily available?
19. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Managet ent an readily available?
(ic/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, ctc.)
'eli,l/-, 0 ��13r
on�
19. Does record keeping need improvement'? (ic/ irrig , freeboard, waste analysis & soil sat le reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design'?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ic/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative'?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency'?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
�No.viofafi6ris'oe. deiiciencles .'ere noted• during thisMsit.' • Y64 Will viogiye ;tW further
corie ondence: about. this visit. '
❑ Yes �No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes [-]No
❑ Yes XrNo
❑ Yes A: No
❑ Yes �No
❑ Yes JD -No
❑ Yes �No
❑ Yes �o
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes
❑Yes eNo
[]Yes Ja "o
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
MAEN>r"q,iJ A ^,F-?- q RAF_AaAa-aP V-> G
Cx, P �� .'3' cr► i [Y�I Q..T t: Ttti �' >✓c.a�CL.ps
1 7) M n T-�' `�•►` r�.� �f£�•}-�,_ `
r) , p;,s �, C ATCA 43 9s f w
7
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: (J u iJ, 4J --T Date: 9 /,9/3 5/00

Facility Number: i Date of inspection Printed on: 7/21/2000
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or hielow ❑ Yes No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27, Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes EfNo
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes EfNo
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes/] No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover'? g�les �Co
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanentltemporary cover? ❑ Yes o
'Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
A6
'3 � l d•i �ilV CS Ly i � �i,W W VLl"'�� r
7
5100

7zll ql*
' { 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation Operation ReviewE ' ';
i�ti 'i E a _riF a [ s - I, r!tih r I I,.. j'ra� '� t o,g r " r - r I t { P
Division of Soil and Water�Conservation -'Compliance Inspection i ,� ;�r, �(';
v lill��s .°'pl'€Ez:'�r ! �1VlStOn�Of Water QUahty Compliance Inspection t a , 'j'{ftH, S
Other Agency. - Operation�RevieW
JRoutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of DWQ inspection 0 Followu: op f DSWC review 0 Other
Facility Number Date of Inspection 7 z 4
Time of Inspection J 24 hr. (hh:mm)
E3 Permitted U Certified © Conditionally Certified [3 Registered113 Not O erational Date Last Operated: P ..........................
Farm Name: 11.4'kQ. 4,iJ�y................. FV Al County:.....CJ1,• 49"
...................................
Owner Name:......... .......... t.. ! Phone No•
�63
....... :k�........................................ -. ., ..,,.,..................................
Facility Contact: .............. !64 y............ ..Title 0I Phone No: ...............................
Mailing Address �..� + �f � �� C.c.wi�/.............................. .2 �..1.. b .........5 ............. ..J............. �1...... 7N.,.......................
Onsite Representative: ... e.;lee.MIN.-. 1-.;,g .� Integrator:
................... ...........................
Certified Operator: ............M.Ike..............L r �e.�1................ Operator Certification Number 'Z4 ah-� .
Location of Farm:
U Latitude ' 6 Longitude ` �_�9 «
a
'I
Design Current
Swine •CaDaCitV Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts,
❑ Boars
�i.,> �Nurnber of,
Lagoons,,
u
HoldingIPonds / Solid Traps
Design
''Curren t '
Design Cu'rr'ent
Poultry` , y Ca acit .
Po ulation, , Cat e" ,
Capacity Population'!.,,
❑ Layer
Dairy
1
:,
❑ Non -Layer
ElNon-Dairy
❑ Other
i
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
I'
r ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area
I0 Spray Field Area
'.
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
;
Discharaes & Stream impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'?
h. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (ll'yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: If
Freeboard (inches): . .......................................................... ....................................................................................................... ......
...... ..
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes P<0
seepage, etc.)
3123/99 Continued on back
❑ Yes 2'No
❑ Yes E?fqo
❑ Yes 21<0
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes 52'1to
❑ Yes Lo
❑ Yes 2<0
Structure 6

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or ��//'
closure plan'? ❑ Yes B"No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
T Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ER'<o
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes 2'�40
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes DKo
Waste ADDHCOtiOn
10.
Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
[_D-I�o
11.
Is there evidence of over application? []Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
❑ Yes
F--q* Vo
12.
Croptype C'p_Y`n1 5& ct•rv, 41 -re Scu Q_'
13.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
OyKo
14.
a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
U No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
QINo
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
2/No
t5.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
&/No
16.
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
19<0
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(iel WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
.. Rio yi. a�itj . . . iie;iieiel�cies mere noted d>Gx ing fbis:visit; • Y'oi} Witi•r, eeeiye iio fuf tier ;
,corres oricl�e' 'e: ab' f this visit... .:: • • • • • • • • •
9 glii._.,,,idY' 39ve.".,..1:'36._ ...i l,.ft�--.ri. •� .'. °: ., .l. .. �'_.e: ".< ,.'�, ,._:': t.'E .. �).E �.N f ai�,� �r:.:...Y.i•
rings of tacilityiU)
r
Need fa 14. a An ap nr rilu f lie
tre c JtsM /j,ecS fev used
Reviewer/Inspector Name 1""'
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
EMM
❑ Yes ❑ No 10`4
❑ Yes
[R'1�i0
❑ Yes
R(No "he
❑ Yes
[/io
❑ Yes
Q~No
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
r f.'eM 5; 2e. ..ar
Date:
IF9
3/23/99

Facility Number:. — Date of Inspection 7 Z
Odor Issues
26, Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30, Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover'?
❑ Yes [y No /J14
❑ Yes 5xO
❑ Yes dNo
❑ Yes [/No
❑ Yes [ZINo
❑ Yes jdNo
❑ Yes WNo 1 /A
3/23/99

` Division of Soil and Water Conservation - Operation Review
[j Division of Soil and Water Conservation - Compliance Inspection
Q Division of Water Quality - Compliance Inspection
13 Other Agency - Operation Review
on
1-facilily Number Y W < N-� I>im of In.,q)eC iol
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Q Permitted Q Certified 0 Conditionally Certified © Registered JE3 Not OperaDate Last Operated:
Harm Narne: C 6�! .. ..:$/1�.........Y`[.!�.Ia..�.t*..y..... f�. ............ C'uunty: C.. .7 � .. -� .....................................
Owner Name: ................................ Phone No:
Facility Contact: ................... l'itle:................................................................ Phone No: ...............
MailingAddress:..................................................•...........................•..•..•.. ..................................................•.................................................... ..........•...............
Onsite Intearator:......................................................................................
............. .........
Certified Operator:................................................... .!................... ....................................... Operator Certification Number:
Location of
.�
..........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Latitude Longitude �• �` ���
Design Current. Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Populatio
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer airy
❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder JE1 Other
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts
❑ Roars Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains ['resent ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / SoIid 'Traps 10 No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges S Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation (If ycs, notify DWQ)'?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance incsn-mc€dc?
h, if ilkchargc is observed. did it reach: ❑ Surface Waters ❑ Waters of the State
e. 11' discharge is observed. what is the estim.,ac;d 116w in a]/min?
d. Docs discharge hypass a lagoon system?
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than From a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ,lam! No
[:]Yes No
❑ Yes ,VNo
❑ Yes] No
❑ Yes No
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes o r
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structt€rc 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Slruclure 6 / .I
Identifier: �j �% A
Ereehon.d (inches)= .....•I•D.........................................................I........
x
] /6/99 Continued o

Facility Number: - Date of Inspection ITT
5..Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes 0
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addresscd and/or manag*ed through a waste management or
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement'? ❑ Yes No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancelimprovemcm? ❑ Yes No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required top of dike, maximum and minimum
liquid level elevation inarkings? ❑ Yes JkINo
Waste r1l)pEication
10. Are there any huffers that need maintenance/iIII pro vemcnl? ❑ Yes [ No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Pondin, ❑ Nitro -en El Yes �No
12. Crop type U 5 G'
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those dcsi-Inatcd in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)'? ❑ Yes WNo
14.
Does the facility lack wettable acreag*e for land application'? (footprint)
[I Yes ,�No
15.
Does the receivinv crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
91N0
16.
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
INo
/
Required Records t\ Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑Yes
VNo
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design. maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
ON
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? Oe/ irrigation, freehoard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
2:�IQo
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the lime of design?
❑ YesZKNo
21.
Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
❑ Yes
�10
/
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
[�N0
/j
23.
Did Rcvicwer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
No
24
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
ONo
1Vo.vialations or defciencie5 .�s:ere Hated dv.ring.t ii.s.visi .'. V-ati v'M1.rerceive na Mrtiiei- .:. ;
eorrespixidence: boot;this;visit,,,;,,;,,;;;;;,;;;;;;;,;;;;;;;;; ;;;
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments..
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
P� N TZ) IQop7 p
mar PV,p � r, s rNL6 4-145— l EP3i2 . 05 7- /E1 _TT
VA) ,-tom
T l� � � f� wr � �. IC � � P Q t cd►�v�s �� r�-X �7 `��� � � a- �„�� ti
i/
Reviewer/Inspector Name /'! A t4-r D 4-c f Z_�AqlJ y L
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: 116 Q, Date:

Revised January 22, 1999
JUSTIFICATION & nOCUMI=NTATION FnR MA.Nine.T04v ►non nMr=DRnFnTnT1r11A
Facility Number A`411F r Operation is'flagged for a wettable
Farm Name: NF! "�`�.� R iy Li A) p L. cz: i ��IR ,,� acre determination due to failure of
On -Site Representative: Part 11 eligibility item(s) F1 F2 F3 F4
Inspector/Reviewer's Name:
Date of site visit: _V
4/ Operation not required to secure WA
determination at this time based on
exemption E1 E2 E3 E4
Date of most recent WUP: i Annual farm PAN deficit: c pounds
Irrigation System(s) - circle #: 1. hard -hose traveler; 2. center -pivot system; 3. linear -move system;
4. stationary sprinkler system wlpermanent pipe; 5. stationary sprinkler system wlportable pipe;
6. stationary gun system wlpermanent pipe; 7. stationary gun system wlportable pipe
4)jE� w�&0 n/
PART I. WA Determination Exemptions (Eligibility failure, Part 11, overrides Part I exemption.)
E1 Adequate irrigation design, including map depicting wettable acres, is complete
and signed by an I or PE.
E2 Adequate D, and D2/D3 irrigation operating parameter sheets, including map
depicting wettable acres, is complete and signed by an I or PE.
E3 Adequate D, irrigation operating parameter sheet, including map depicting
wettable acres, is complete and signed by a WUP.
E4 75% rule exemption as verified in Part III. (NOTE: 75 % exemption cannot be
applied to farms that fail the eligibility checklist in Part 11. Complete eligibility
checklist, Part II - F1 F2 F3, before completing computational table in Part I11).
PART II. 75% Rule Eligibility Checklist and Documentation of WA Determination
Requirements. WA Determination required because operation fails one of the eligibility
requirements listed below:
F1 Lack of acreage which resulted in over application of wastewater (PAN) on spray
field(s) according to farm's last two years of irrigation records.
F2 Unclear, illegible, or lack of information/map.
F3 Obvious field limitations (numerous ditches; failure to deduct required
buffer/setback acreage; or 25% of total acreage identified in CAWMP includes
small, irregularly shaped fields - fields less than 5 acres for travelers or less thr
2 acres for stationary sprinklers).
F4 WA determination required because CAWMP credits fieid(s)'s acreagelir'
of 75% of the respective field's total acreage as noted in table in Part/'

s
3 tvision of Sail and Water Conservation [] Other Agency
Division of Water Quality
143 Routine O Complaint O Follow-up of DWQ inspection O Follow-up of .DSWC review O Other
Facility Number
Date of Inspection
��--�
Time of Inspection qi0 3 24 hr. (hh:mm)
0 Registered 0 Certified 0 Applied for Permit 0 Permitted 10 Not Opera Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: ...... J.�Pn!�+�!?.�i�51........................... �►.)OJ.I�. County:.................................................................................
Owner Name Phone No: �1.� 6�1... ZG3R
........................
r
Facility Contact: .i"1�kL�.......�.;,�.1 . 1. �l ............................... (Title .......p............................1........................... Phone No:...................................................
Mailing Address:....... 4. � y.......
............0 +�1� .................M. iP LJ N� I tSl�..........(. on�.M,P. �.......G..... ...
�1..................... ......
Onsite Representative:.. Nkg. .... LL . dg)y. .... Integrator:...................................................................
Certified Operator;........],!lkit.............................. L..1. y .......... Operator Certification Number-_209A..?...............
Lnrsftinn of Farrn:
/ A
:......................................................................i.................................................................................................
....... .. .. ......... .. � ..... .. ... t
Latitude ©' ®' " Longitude ® • Z z— 1 44
General
No
1.
Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
&I
2.
Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
r�No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
[To
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
Q04
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
CK0
3.
Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
9<0
4.
Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes
Ltd No
M/N
S.
Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
❑ Yes
o
maintenance/improvement?
6.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
L) No
7.
Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
❑ Yes
O No
7/2S/97

Facility Number: q9
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes N(No
Structures_(Lagoons.Holdine Ponds. Flush -Pits. etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes LKNo
3-
6- ) Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6,
Identifier:
...................................................................................................................................................................................................................
rr/
Freeb�d (ft):......... ..?................ ................ I ....
............... ................................... ..................................... .................................... ....................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes 54
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes 04
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes Ei?/No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
13.
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
Do
ZNo
any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes
Waste Application
2N0
14.
Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15.
Crop type ............... C a F..#........................ ..........A.34A ............................ ... iM .....................................................................................
16.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes
No
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
9No
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
3No
19,
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
14
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
I/No
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
PrNo
22. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ Yes PNo
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ❑ Yes WNo
24, Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes 8 N
25. Wgre any additional problems noted 'which cause noncompliance of the Permit? ❑ Yes 63 No
EffNo violatio'nsor deficiencies:werenotedduring this; visit'- Nou.will receive-n&furth`er-.
cvrr006fidekci dhoti this:visit:-:::: :.: ::. ; . ` ' : :
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/tnspector Signature: Date:

jQ-1f4utine'g0,Complaint_�O,Follow=up of DW .inspection - O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other j
Facility Number E" , a ' — Date of Inspection .
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh ;mm)
f4 4
D Registered ,Ceitefiedw:.D'Applied for Permiitl D.Permitted IGNotOperational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name:,....:;,. , .a T! "11:... L-.t h ... County:....... f!.1�t�'ClE?'�..............................
tft
Owner Name:........:�......lr ^`14# ......................................... Phone No:.......:1.1.2.........3a. �.............
tFacility Contact:...i,L.t3Ja-! j................ Title:................... .. Phone No:................ .......................
MailingAddress: ................ ... ........... ....................................................................................................................................................... ..........................
Oncite Representative: .......1—�[ ,
.-.. .......................................... Integrator:.........................................................
Certified Operator;..........Nt� 1-,�i.t.� �] .. Operator Certification Number;.---------
..... ....... �...----'----'--...---'---".................. .......................
Location of Farm.
0
Latitude • 1 '6 Longitude • i {{
Mz'sDeSlgn�
`�
Currents Desr n Current
;� g LS1gII v a k rCIIt�
Swrrie „� ,Capacity
Populatrori Poultry Capacity' P,opulatianCa le a Caprxty ;I'opuiatrvIIi'
❑ Layer Dairy
# ` ❑Nan Layer ❑Non Dairy
E;ean to Feeder
to Finish
2
❑ Farrow t0 Wean.
❑ Farrow to Feeder
a. ': vs; r,, x�g ?'
❑Other , .a ,
;t.
El Farrow to Finish
El Gilts
j t:.Tata1D#�stgti"Capacity w
Boars
Nuruber�ofLagoonsl�HoldrngnPonds ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area 10
,
wXi
Spray Field Area
M'° ❑ Na Liquid Waste Management System
A
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenancelimprovement? ❑ Yes No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaVmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes Q] No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes 00
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes xNo
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes VNo
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes l3No
9,nCM17 7

Facility�N;;mb_r: jq —
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures ons ldin -Ponds, Fig sh fits, VIS.),
9. Isstorage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes eNo
Structure l Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:.............................................................................................................................................
...................................
Freeboard(ft): ..............................................................................................................................................................................................................
10.
Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes
ONO
11.
is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
No t�
12.
Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13.
Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes
[;KNo
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
VNo
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15.
Crop type Cll.'N...........I.r;; : �,`.F....v..�.................................................. .................................... :......................... .....................................................
16.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes
[INO
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
16 No
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
0 No
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
O No-.
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
s„❑ Yes
0 No
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
Q(No
22.
Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes
FN 0
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
5�.,3�<o
24.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
�o
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
ElL'IYes
�L�J
'No
No.Vlolatiori5'Or deficiencies. Were noted, during' this.Vi h.- Yoil:mill receive'no•further' : -
correspondehO dtiout-this:visit: .:..:.: .
4d
an ,U LUW /Q
7/25/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/[nspector Signature: /I II Ir,.l �}!% r , V-,,) ff /�r , . '✓ 0. - — : { ).." P i 4)4: /h r1.5 -1 IQ Q

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
JamSeptember 25, 1997 es B. Hunt, Jr., Governor DIVISION WATER QUALITY Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Mr. Jonathan Lindley
614 Mike Lindley Road
Snow Camp, North Carolina 27349
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Facility 4 19-16
Jonathan Lindley Farm
Chatham County
Dear Mr. Lindley:
On July 28, 1997, Terri Hollingsworth from the Raleigh Regional Office conducted a compliance inspection of
the subject animal facility. This inspection is part of the Division's efforts to determine compliance with the
State's animal waste nondischarge rules.
The inspection deternuned that the cattle operation was not discharging wastewater into waters of the State and
that the waste holding pond had the required amount of freeboard. As a result of the inspection, the facility was
found to be in compliance with the State's animal nondischarge regulations,
l would lilac to renlind you of the requirement to have an approved Animal Waste Management Plan by December
31, 1997. This plan must be certified by a designated technical specialist or a professional engineer. I understand
you are currently working with the local Soil and Water Consen-ation District to establish appropriate buffers,
stock trails, fencing, and revegetation. I encourage you to continue in your efforts to ensure necessary
modifications to your facitlity are implemented and certified prior to the statutory deadline. For a listing of
certified technical specialists or assistance with your waste management plan contact your local Soil and Water
Consmalion District office.
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in this matter. If you have any questions regarding
this inspection please call Terri Hollingsworth at [phone].
Sincerely,
Jul Garrett
Water Quality Section Supervisor
cc: Chatham County Health Department
Mike Sturdivant, Chatham Soil and Water Conservation District
Margaret O'Keefe, DSWC-RRO
DWQ Compliance Group
RRO Files
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101 • Raleigh, NC 27609
Voice (919)5714700 " FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity AMrmadve Action Employer
50% recycled / 10% poq{onmumer paper

wrp _r i€
a C*
❑DSWC Animal Feedlot Operation'Review ��
1 _� ®'bWQAnimal Feedlot Operation SIt��„Inspechonfi�
.Routine O Cum laint O Follow-up of DWQ ins ection O Follow-uR of DSWC review O Other
Facility Number l Date of Inspection "L
Time of Inspection VS'.VSM 24 hr. (hh:mtn)
Total Time (in fraction of hours
Farm Status. (916stered ❑ Applied for Permit (ex:.1.25 for I hr 15 min)) Spent on Review
❑ Certified ❑ Permitted or Inspection includes travel andprocessing)
❑ Not Operational Date Last Operated: ............................................................................................... . ...... . ....... . ....... . . ...... .................
Farm Name:.�1. Y� �. rlrtaln....Ll ld!...... .. �ar.r�'1................... County: -!r�. a ........................................
LandOwner Name:..- 9.1r..a. 1 ........4 ...& .. Phone No k.o ........................... .......................
Facility Conctact:... �.� ....,.. :��qPhone No.3� Mailing Address:..;; .`. ...... +. ... ......... '! ..` .:.....Sh,S1 .. !h! ?......i4�....... .A111% ..........................
Onsite Representative:
ll.�� V4 L\ ......
Certified Operator: .....± _' ...
Location of Farm:' {- �32,e
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number: ............................. ....... . ...
eaf �Ck, 1i3& C41A
Latitude Longitude �• ��
Type of Operation and Design Caaacity
Wean to Feeder I r *'U Layer '. lld'Dair
Feeder to Finish «❑ Non -Layer: ❑ Non -Dairy
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water`? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes M-No
e. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaVinin? Q Al
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes a o
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes �o
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes B-<0
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes 09Ko
4/30/97 maintenance/improvement? Continued on back

' Facility Number:
6, Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes M o
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures f l,aagoons and/or Holding Ponds)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Freeboard (ft): Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
❑ Yes t] vo
❑ Yes 920 o
❑ Yes R'1vo
Structure 5 Structure 6
............................ ............................ ............................ ............................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes ®"No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes 2-go
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? SW4 t�..
Waite Application(�
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering
iwaters
�of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop typeL:`'n�....V�!�Pz4,t�.a....•5..:�.........................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
h co
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19, Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21, Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
Fpr Cgrfified Facilities Only
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
24. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes 62-1Q0
[Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes 21�o
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes 0<o
❑ Yes M-NO,
❑ Yes G-No
❑ Yes [D-Ko
❑ Yes ®-N—o
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Reviewer/Inspector Name a ''1 1�, �.. � ` �` ` u."
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: CPS! y�4s.vG,ld�i Date: `i -2_g 4
�r�i uru rr..��rrw ■nr iri __
cc: Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Facility Assessment Unit 4/30/97

r
DSu'C Animal Feedlot Operation Review
❑ DWQ Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
Routine O Com lnint O Follniv-uu of DwvQ inspection O Follow•-un of 1),SWC review O tither
Facility Number 9
Farm Status: ® Registered ❑ Applied for Permit
❑ Certified ❑ Permitted
Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection �24 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Time (in fraction of hours
(es:1.25 for 1 hr 15 min)) Spent on Review [i
or Inspection (includes travel and arocessin2)
m❑ Not Operational IDate Last Operated: ...... ....... . ......................... . ............................... ............................................... ........................
Farm. ame:..... .l.!.J.! it � .° � -�1=}� �it�i. ........._ . ...... Count}:.....hPt #ter .m......_ ...... .........................
—.. ++ ! fr
Owner :Name: rn. 1 ?l..sr. �iu � ._ ka id1. ....... Phone Na: �z�'3 ..;�k3% c 5`f - 1_ .........................
Facwtv Conctact: � .. � C��,nl ._ Title:.-J2_LjsU.vc.l........................ Phone r1o:�C?�! ? ` �?.. +?_.-�I51---..
J }
Mailing address: �� ?�?4.. Y��r~.. r jn�cv.1 n/� ��i c,. �.. � s� —
.Fan. �1 �..._......L....���_..�����.� ..-�'..�Y..�L�'1.�� rt �:..3i 1.1. _t.,�r1.�C ..... ..._.....
Onsite Representative: i..�. ..i�. ....... Inreb„ratar:..... ».... »„
Certified Operator: r I! t �'.:`�� O eratar Certification Number: p _....................... ....._.`.._......_................_...---................ p
Location of Farm:
Latitude • 6 " Longitude • �. 6.
Ntttnber o€L`agootzstlHoldtng Ponds Q ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoan Area ❑Spray Field Area
R1. ;-: .
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in _aL min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify D% Q)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation'?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
S. Does any part of the waste management systcm (other than lagoons/holdine ponds) require
4!30i')7 maintenance/improvement'.'
M Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
159 No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
W No
❑ Yes
9No
❑ Yes
KNo
Continued
on back

....... . ....—^.... ...........`. t
a .cilicv not in compiiance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of .iesign?
❑ Yes
Z No
P.
Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
❑ Yes
9 No
` S.
Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? _ _ ._..
❑ Yes
JE No
Structures f 1_a;;oons and;or TIoldin2 Ponds)
9.
Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
V) No
Freeboard (ft): Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Strucn:.re 4 Strtcture S
Structure 6
.__..... _............... ...... ......... _........ .. ._ .__....... .......... __....-._.............
................
_........ _
10.
Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes
J�g No
11.
Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
[:]Yes
® No
12.
Do any of the structures need maintenance!lmprovement?
❑ Yes
[9 No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13.
Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level. markers?
® Yes
❑ No
Waste Application
14.
Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
[J No
(If in excess of IN-114P, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15.
Crop type .�S}}.�I�l...l lkl.... �m. �. .......
.._...
16.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AW-.%1P)1
❑ Yes
® No
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
N No
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
No
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
No
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Cl Yes
® No
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
m No
For
Certified Facilities Only
22.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
ONO
23.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
24.
Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Comments (refer to question #): ' Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments. —
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as- necessary):
lemporAr"{ m02� �� 4o 6e ;,�� IIed, I�'ACSP mts; oc%s 90t� b.5 as� -lV
��
rr�1 t I r r c A rr ctrc�a StK�;.J Aid 1 ✓c��zxl c E zi,cs, c�nl ,
��Z�n 0& Qck� C� Rid prod l t C1I 1 u-tia
q�
� ort /marker.
Jr� fl 4-lc rj�
Reviewer/Inspector wer/lnspector \amekr` " I Ifni;
Revielver/InspectorSignature:J LL44 Date: 4i J62
11-7
:c: Divivion of Water Ouulity. Water Ounlity Section, Facility ; .. essnr nt Utz it al NO7

it
0 DSWC Animal Feedlot Operation Review
❑ DWQ Animal Feedlot Operation Site InspeAMlr—
M
I-aRoutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of DNVQ inspection 0 Follow-up of I SNVC revibi_10 (W1 1 -1 IJ�11 I iJ I 1
t Facility Number
Dare of Inspection
H REG10l�fAE OFf ICE
Time of Inspection
Total Time (in fraction ot'hours
Farm Status: ® Rea stered ❑ Applied for Permit (ex:l.'-5 for 1 hr 15 min)) Spent on Review
❑ Certified ❑ Permitted or Inspection (includes travel and rocessin2)
❑ Not Operational Date Last Operated: .... --.........................................................
- .r
Farm Name: �� a-5_!,�i.��Cs ...... Counn:.... ... ........ ....... _............ .............
Owner Name: L�l.i� li -- _ 1 � ... L.4dtoq.................. ... Phone tio:L�3 �ra���._,�`!�. �'}��................ ............
Facility Conctact: •..� . .�ucn �nl;�� . -_ .. Title: _.lac.au.w. ....................... Phone No:rc��.�lv�j�1
Mailinu Address: .... _...... ..... Y(�/K�f : ': J/l<:`1,��1� f �.7.1..X C '( i-.rC17G1' 1.� �� �..1.J./f.S�S.� � l'C.... ........... _......
Onsite Representadve:.%s�n�l N.. ¢: c.fr(�r'���.� . f:L... �!!! ��` ........ Integrator: ............................
Certified Operator:_ M �'.I.-: `........ Operator Certification Number:
�............................... ..
Location of Farm:
w
Latitude [�•[�� �� Longitude �• �• �•
Type of Operation a;M.
Design `Currents`' Design Design
K= : Current
Swine pPoultry Ca acity. Po Matron. 'Cattle `
Ca acitv;Po 'ulation..:.
Current
Ca acity 'I?o `illation
[] Wean to Feeder
Laver
❑ Dairy
ElFeeder to Finish
JE1
❑Non -Laver
❑ Non -Dairy
Farrow to Wean
^
Farrow to Feedery
Total DeStgn:.Capaeity
= ,
rr
Farrow to Finish' "
❑Other flI^� Total SSL T Wf
w
1
plumber v€ agaoas J Hoo WAng,Ponds . ❑.Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area
10 Spray Field Area
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?,[
Yes ❑ No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes 12 No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes. notify DWQ
❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is obsm,cd, what is the estimated flow in galfiiiin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes. notify D%VQ)
❑ Yes ❑ No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes f9 No
4, Were there anv adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes gNo
S. Dora any pan of the waste management system (other than lagoons/ho[ding ponds) require
❑ Yes KNo
msiotcnance/improvcrncnt.'
4/30i97
Cwrrinmed otr back

[ i)tr:....1...l..... ......SY......
.acility not in compliance with anv applicable setback criteria in effect at the time oFdcsi,n?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible chargre?
❑ Yes 19 No
❑ Yes jK No-
S. Aire there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures f I,atTnonc and/or lloldin�y Ponds)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Freeboard (ft): Structure I Stricture 2 Structure 3
--. ..- ............... ........ ------.-.......
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
- - ❑ Yes JE No
❑ Yes JR No
Structure 4 St7LCtLire Structure 6
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was ansivered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate pubiie health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of W-,,v1P, or runoff entt�e{{ring waters of the �State, notify DWQ)
15, Crop type S�.II i>i ..`..�jalr4l.l.... ......... ................. ..... -........ - .........
_..-� .._..
Q
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AW-MP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
r Certified Facilities OnIv
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
24. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes J91 No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes 0 No
2 Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes (f No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes EN No
❑ Yes X No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments (refer to question #): 'Explain. any YES answers and/or any recommendations -or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages ­as nt:cessary):..:
V TE ry) Po r•-A rLi rraOZ tA40 6E j,44A d, P nvao cs 9�'"� 6E r � tics ►/! 4
5�Cx�G +rA r C'r- r .1; c e-) I carCn Se6di� pad ✓e64L& ex a-
LO e a,LQ .-k_, r-e_� � L'- Q � ��rd 61f p t-o
v�) 4-7 o r\t .rr,ark i
Reviewer/InspectorName
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date:
c: DivLvinn of Iifulcr Duulitr. {Muter (Juulity Section. Fncilirn :.. —W lit Unit
4/30/97

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
DE H NR
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
October 20, 1995
Mr. Jonathan Lindley
1800 Johnny Lindley Road
Snow Camp, NC 27349
Subject: Compliance Inspection
_Johnny Lindley Dairy Farm
Facility No. 19-16
Chatham County
Dear Mr. Lindley:
On October 10, 1995, Mr. Ted Cashion from this office conducted a
compliance inspection of the subject facility. This inspection is a part of the
Division's efforts to determine potential problems associated with waste disposal
systems.
Mr. Cashion's site visit determined that wastewater from this facility was
not discharging to the surface waters of the State. No manmade pipes, ditches,
or other prohibited conveyances (for the purpose of willfully discharging
wastewater) were observed. The facility appeared well operated and maintained.
Effective wastewater treatment and facility stewardship are a
responsibility of all animal facility operators. The Division of Environmental
Management is required to enforce water quality regulations in order to protect
the natural resources of the State.
This office also reminds you that an approved animal waste management plan
must be incorporated by December 1997. This plan must be certified by a
designated technical specialist or a professional engineer. For a listing of
certified technical specialists or assistance with your waste management plan you
should contact your local Soil and Water Conservation District.
The Raleigh Regional Office appreciates your cooperation in this matter.
If you have any questions regarding your inspection please call Mr. Cashion at
919-571-4700.
Sincerely,
Judy Garrett
Regional Water Quality Supervisor
cc: Chatham County Health Department
'Chatham County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facilities Assessment Unit
h:\animal\iindleyj.ine
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101, FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 NO C An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-571-4700 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

JUL-J �-195� 15 26 FP.Ur I GE�I 6JATER QUAL I T`�' SECTION T J
PRO, P.02/02
Site Requires Immediate A lien ,�nr
Facility No. 4/DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANl•MAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: 4C f 0 ,1995
Time:
Farm Na.rnc/Osvncr- ,1ah-Tli ,yj - " 1 "_
Mailing Address: fg0a J 4hn
County:
7ntegratar _ Phone: d' 39 6 9-
On Site Representative: Jo4„h�r _��'�t�y— - — Phone:._
Physical Addres�ation:
Type of Operation: Swine Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: Number of Animals an Site:
DENT Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude: Longitude: Elevation: Feet
Circle Yes or No
Dcc,s the An.imai Waste Lagoon have sufficient &aeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storro event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) Yes or No Acrual Freeboard: Ft. 4 inches
Was any seepage observed ftm the lagoou(s)? Yes OiFWas any erosion observed? Yes off�)
Is adequate land available for spray'? v or No is the cover crop adequate? es r No
Crop(s) being utilized:
Does the facility meet SCS rzu=um setback criteria'? 200 Feet from Dwellings? es No
100 Feet from. Wells? �or No
�t animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line So-eam? Yes o Do
a usnal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a liSGS kfap Blue Line? Yes `r&
T animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
:;irri;a_r matt -made device-0 Yes or No If yes, Please Explain.
rk�cs trio Facility watntam adequate Waste a=ageracnt rCcordS (VOIUMtS Of Manure, land applicd_
spray irrigated on spccific i cage with cover crop)'? Yes or No
Additional Comments: on� ye CPS, �� e
Signature
cc: Facility ASsessmemt Unit
Use Attachments if Needed.
TOTAL P.02

O�OF W A rFgQG Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr„ Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION
February 14, 2007
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
CM4 7006 0810 0002 6049 0131
Mr. James M. Lindley
James Mike Lindley Farm
614 Mike Lindley Rd
Snow Camp, NC 27349
RE: Notice of Violation (NOV-2007-PC-0106)
James Mike Lindley Farm
Facility No. 19-16
Chatham County
Dear Mr. Lindley:
On February 7, 2007 our office conducted an annual compliance inspection of your facility 51-38 in
Johnston County to verify that (1) the facility is complying with the requirements of State Rules 15A
NCAC 2T.1300 and its Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP); (2) the farm's waste
management structures are being operated properly under the direction of a Certified Operator; (3) the
required records are being kept; and that (4) there are no signs of seepage, erosion, and/or runoff.
Attached is a copy of the inspection report for your review. The following violations were noted:
In accordance with Condition 11.24 of your General Permit, all waste application equipment must
be tested and calibrated once n. the first two years after issuance of the Certificate of Coverage
(COC) and then at least once every two years thereafter. The results must be documented on
forms provided by, or approved by, the Division.
o No calibration results were available for review, and producer could not ascertain if and
when it was performed
• In accordance with Condition 111.3 of your General Permit, precipitation events at facilities issued
with a COC to operate under the General Permit shall be monitored and recorded. The
precipitation type and amount shall be recorded daily for all precipitation events and maintained
on site for Department review.
e Daily rainfall records have not been kept
In accordance with Condition 111.8 of your General Permit, the Permittee must maintain monthly
stocking records for the facility (except for pastured animals not contributing waste to the animal
Aquifer Protection Section - Raleigh Regional Office One
NorthCaroli
1628 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 Phone [phone] Customer Service 1-877-623-6748 ;Vaturalt
3800 Barrett Dr. Raleigh, NC 27609 FAX [phone] Internet: http://www.ncwaterquality.org
An Equal Opportunit /Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper

Cont. Page Two
February 14, 2007
James M Lindley Farm
Facility # 19-16
waste management system), and make them available to the Department of Environment and
Natural Resources.
o Stocking records were not available for review
Required Action:
• Please complete the irrigation equipment calibration during your next waste application event,
and submit copy of the results to the address at the bottom of the first page
• Beginning the day of inspection, please record and maintain daily rainfall and monthly
stocking records as stipulated in the above -stated conditions in your permit.
• The Permittee shall provide to this office within thirty (30) days from receipt of this violation
notice, a ,written explanation and a plan that will ensure that the problem does not recur. Your
explanation will be reviewed, and be advised that if this violation continues, the Division will
send recommendation to the Director of the Division of Water Quality for the appropriate
enforcement action to be taken.
It is very important as the owner and/or the Operator in Charge that the aforementioned
violation(s) and any other problems that may arise be resolved, as soon as possible.
Thank you for your assistance and cooperation during the inspection. If you have any questions,
please contact me at 919-7914232 or Joseph Gyamfi at 919-791-4234.
Sincerely,
S. J mmerman, L.G.
Cc: Mr. Henry Outz, Chatham County DSWC Office
Mr. John Hunt, DSWC-RRO
APS Central Animal Files
RRO File (19-16)

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 120016__ _,_ Facility Status: Active Permit: AWC190016 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Comgliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Chatham Region: Raleigh
Date of Visit: 02/0712007 Entry Time: 11:30 AM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: James Mike Lindley F
Owner; James M Lindlev
Owner Email:
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 614 M& Lindley Rd Snow Camp NC 27349
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Location of Farm:
Integrator:
Latitude "
Longitude: 79°22'46"
County Road 1336, 111E mi. south of the intersection of county roads 1336 and 1337. Johnny Lindley Road
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: James M Lindley Operator Certification Number: 20967
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
On -site representative Mike Lindley Phone:
24 hour contact name Mike Lindley Phone:
Primary Inspector: Joseph Gyamfi Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

Permit: AWC190016 Owner- Facility: James M Lindley
Facility Number: 190016
Inspection pate: 02/07/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection. Summary:
• WUP dated 12/18/97
• Waste analysis:
12/11/06 = 5.2
417106= 7.4
' Reviewed waste application records -
- please go back and charge the waste applied in September 2006 to Small Grain(wheat) instead of Corn on SLUR-1 and SLUR-2
- Also be sure that waste application dates are within 60 days of waste analysis dates (before or after)
• Lagoon levels have been recorded weekly
# 21. No rainfall records were available -!Need to keep daily rainfall records
#21. Stocking and mortality records need to be kept. Producer has STOCK-1 form to use.
#24. Missing waste application equipment calibration - Producer says calibration will be done during next waste application. He could
not find his previous calibration and did not remember when it was done
" Crop yield records available
Page: 2

Permit: AWC190016 Owner- Facility: James M Lindley
Facility Number: 190016
Inspection Date: 02/07/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Cattle
Cattle -Milk Cow 170 156
Total Design Capacity: 170
Total SSLW: 238,000
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
kaste Pond MAIN 36.00 54.D0
Page: 3

Permit: AWC190016 Owner - Facility: James M Lindley Facility Number: 190016
Inspection Date: 02/07/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No
NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
■
❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑
❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■
❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
Cl
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
M
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWC190016 Owner - Facility: James M Lindley
Inspection Date: 02/07/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 190016
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Corn (Silage)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain (Wheat,
Barley, Oats)
Crop Type 3
Fescue (Pasture)
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15, Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
17, Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WU P?
❑
Page: 5

Permit: AWC190016 Owner- Facility: James M Lindley Facility Number: 190016
Inspection Date: 02/07/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Other? ❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application? ❑
120 Minute inspections? ❑
Weather code? ❑
Weekly Freeboard? ❑
Transfers? ❑
Rainfall?
■
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
■
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑
❑
23, If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
❑
■
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
■
❑
❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
❑
■
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑
■
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■
❑
❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air Cl ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 6

Permit: AWC190016 Owner - Facility: James M Lindley
Inspection Date: 02/07/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Other issues
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWO of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Facility Number: 190016
Reason for Visit: Routine
Page: 7

p�pF W ATF,9oG Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
co
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
0 Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION
February 19, 2007
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
CM# 7006 0810 0002 6049 0148
Mr. Julius Neil Lindley
Lindale Farm
1156 Moon -Lindley Rd.
Snow Camp, NC 27349
RE: Notice of Violation (NOV-2007-PC-0115)
Lindale Farm
Facility No. 19-23
Chatham County
Dear Mr. Lindley:
On February 16, 2007 our office conducted a compliance inspection of the subject animal operation
in Chatham County to verify that (1) the facility is complying with requirements of the State Rules 15A
NCAC 2T.1300 and its Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP); (2) the farm's waste
management structures are being operated properly under the direction of a Certified Operator; (3) the
required records are being kept; and that (4) there are no signs of seepage, erosion, and/or runoff.
Attached is a copy of the inspection report for your review. The following violations were noted:
• In accordance with Condition 11.24 of your General Permit, all waste application equipment must
be tested and calibrated once in the first two years after issuance of the COC and then at least
once every two years thereafter. The results must be documented on forms provided by, or
approved by, the Division.
Your waste application equipment has not been calibrated since 1998
• In accordance with Condition 111.3 of your General Permit, precipitation events at facilities issued
with a COC to operate under the General Permit shall be monitored and recorded. The
precipitation type and amount shall be recorded daily for all precipitation events and maintained
on site for Department review.
o Daily rainfall records have not been kept
• In accordance with Condition III.5 of your General Permit, an analysis of the animal waste shall
be conducted according to recommended laboratory sampling procedures as close to the time of
application as practical and at least within sixty (60) days (before or after) of the date of
application.
Aquifer Protection Section - Raleigh Regional Office
None hCaroli
1628 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 Phone [phone] Customer Service 1-877-623-6748 ;atunl
3800 Barrett Dr. Raleigh, NC 27609 FAX [phone] Internet: http,l/www.ncwaterquality.org
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper

Cont. Page Two
February 19, 2007
Lindale Farm
Facility # 19-23
o It was determined that no waste analysis was conducted for waste applications on October
10, 2006 and December 11, 2006.
• In accordance with Condition UA of your General Permit, land application rates shall be in
accordance with the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP), of which the Waste
Utilization Plan (WUP) is part. In no case shall land application rates exceed the nutrient
agronomic rate of the receiving crop and/or shall result in excessive ponding or runoff during any
application event.
o It was determined during the inspection that all fields on tract 1623 were combined into
two fields, and one PAN value (not stated in the WUP) used for each field. This means
that the recommended PAN values for the different fields on tract 1623 (which could be
based on soil type and slope even for same crop type) were not adhered to. Our
recommendation is that the f elds can only be combined if the PAN resulting in the lowest
application amount (inches) is used.
Required Action:
+ Please complete the land application equipment calibration during your next waste application
event, and submit copy of the results to the address at the bottom of the first page.
• Beginning the day of inspection, please record and maintain daily rainfall amounts, and conduct
waste analysis as close to the time of waste application as possible. Please begin to keep monthly
stocking records as well.
• The Permittee shall provide to this office within thirty (30) days from receipt of this violation notice,
a written explanation and a plan that will ensure that the problem does not recur. Your explanation
will be reviewed, and be advised that if these violations continue, the Division will send
recommendation to the Director of the Division of Water Quality for the appropriate enforcement
action to be taken.
Thank you for your assistance and cooperation during the inspection. If you have any questions,
please contact me at 919-791-4232 or Joseph Gyamfi at 919-791-4234.
Sincerely,
S. J Z mmennan, L.G.
Cc: Mr. Carl Henry Outz, Chatham County NRCS/DSWC
Mr. John Hunt, DSWC-RRO
APS Central Animal Files
RRO File (1944)

o�0,� W A rF90G
7
DUG
4 `C
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION
February 19, 2007
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
CM# 7006 0810 0002 6049 0148
Mr. Julius Neil Lindley
Lindale Farm
1156 Moon -Lindley Rd.
Snow Camp, NC 27349
RE: Notice of Violation (NOV-2007-PC-0115)
Lindale Farm
Facility No. 19-23
Chatham County
Dear Mr. Lindley:
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
On February 16, 2007 our office conducted a compliance inspection of the subject animal operation
in Chatham County to verify that (1) the facility is complying with requirements of the State Rules 15A
NCAC 2T.1300 and its Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP); (2) the farm's waste
management structures are being operated properly under the direction of a Certified Operator; (3) the
required records are being kept; and that (4) there are no signs of seepage, erosion, and/or runoff.
Attached is a copy of the inspection report for your review. The following violations were noted:
• In accordance with Condition I1.24 of your General Permit, all waste application equipment must
be tested and calibrated once in the first two years after issuance of the COC and then at least
once every two years thereafter. The results must be documented on forms provided by, or
approved by, the Division.
Your waste application equipment has not been calibrated since 1998
• In accordance with Condition 111.3 of your General Permit, precipitation events at facilities issued
with a COC to operate under the General Permit shall be monitored and recorded. The
precipitation type and amount shall be recorded daily for all precipitation events and maintained
on site for Department review.
o Daily rainfall records have not been kept
• In accordance with Condition III.5 of your General Permit, an analysis of the animal waste shall
be conducted according to recommended laboratory sampling procedures as close to the time of
application as practical and at least within sixty (60) days (before or after) of the date of
application.
Aquifer Protection Section - Raleigh Regional Office
one NCaroh
1628 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 Phone [phone] Customer Service 1-877-623-6748 ff// Vtuml�
3800 Barrett Dr. Raleigh, NC 27609 FAX [phone] Internet: http:llwww.ncwaterquality.org
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper

Cont. Page Two
February 19, 2007
Lindale Farm
Facility # 19-23
o It was determined that no waste analysis was conducted for waste applications on October
10, 2006 and December 11, 2006.
• In accordance with Condition HA of your General Permit, land application rates shall be in
accordance with the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP), of which the Waste
Utilization Plan (WUP) is part. In no case shall land application rates exceed the nutrient
agronomic rate of the receiving crop and/or shall result in excessive ponding or runoff during any
application event.
o It was determined during the inspection that all fields on tract 1623 were combined into
two fields, and one PAN value (not stated in the WUP) used for each field. This means
that the recommended PAN values for the different fields on tract 1623 (which could be
based on soil type and slope even for same crop type) were not adhered to. Our
recommendation is that the fields can only be combined if the PAN resulting in the lowest
application amount (inches) is used.
Required Action:
• Please complete the land application equipment calibration during your next waste application
event, and submit copy of the results to the address at the bottom of the first page.
• Beginning the day of inspection, please record and maintain daily rainfall amounts, and conduct
waste analysis as close to the time of waste application as possible. Please begin to keep monthly
stocking records as well.
• The Permittee shall provide to this office within thirty (30) days from receipt of this violation notice,
a written explanation and a plan that will ensure that the problem does not recur. Your explanation
will be reviewed, and be advised that if these violations continue, the Division will send
recommendation to the Director of the Division of Water Quality for the appropriate enforcement
action to be taken.
Thank you for your assistance and cooperation during the inspection. If you have any questions,
please contact me at 919-791-4232 or Joseph Gyamfi at 919-791-4234.
Sincerely,
zmenrian,
S. J ZL.G.
Cc: Mr. Carl Henry Outz, Chatham County NRCS/DSWC
Mr. John Hunt, DSWC-RRO
APS Central Animal Files
RRO File (19-44)

O�OF wAT�gpG Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
0 Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION
February 19, 2007
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
CM# 7006 0810 0002 6049 0148
Mr. Julius Neil Lindley
Lindale Farm
1156 Moon -Lindley Rd.
Snow Camp, NC 27349
RE: Notice of Violation (NOV-2007-PC-0115)
Lindale Farm
Facility No. 19-23
Chatham County
Dear Mr. Lindley:
On February 16, 2007 our office conducted a compliance inspection of the subject animal operation
in Chatham County to verify that (1) the facility is complying with requirements of the State Rules 15A
NCAC 2T.1300 and its Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP); (2) the farm's waste
management structures are being operated properly under the direction of a Certified Operator; (3) the
required records are being kept; and that (4) there are no signs of seepage, erosion, and/or runoff.
Attached is a copy of the inspection report for your review. The following violations were noted:
In accordance with Condition 11.24 of your General Permit, all waste application equipment must
be tested and calibrated once in the first two years after issuance of the COC and then at least
once every two years thereafter. The results must be documented on forms provided by, or
approved by, the Division.
Your waste application equipment has not been calibrated since 1998
• In accordance with Condition 111.3 of your General Permit, precipitation events at facilities issued
with a COC to operate under the General Permit shall be monitored and recorded. The
precipitation type and amount shall be recorded daily for all precipitation events and maintained
on site for Department review.
o Daily rainfall records have not been kept
• In accordance with Condition III.5 of your General Permit, an analysis of the animal waste shall
be conducted according to recommended laboratory sampling procedures as close to the time of
application as practical and at least within sixty (60) days (before or after) of the date of
application.
Aquifer Protection Section - Raleigh Regional Office
Noe Caroli
1628 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 Phone [phone] Customer Service 1-877-623-6748 �turait
3800 Barrett Dr. Raleigh, NC 27609 FAX [phone] Internet: htlpJlwww,ncwalerqualily,org
An Equal Opportunity]Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycledl10% Post Consumer Paper

Cont. Page Two
February 19, 2007
Lindale Farm
Facility # 19-23
o It was determined that no waste analysis was conducted for waste applications on October
10, 2006 and December 11, 2006.
In accordance with Condition 11.4 of your General Permit, land application rates shall be in
accordance with the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP), of which the Waste
Utilization Plan (WUP) is part. In no case shall land application rates exceed the nutrient
agronomic rate of the receiving crop and/or shall result in excessive ponding or runoff during any
application event.
o It was determined during the inspection that all fields on tract 1623 were combined into
two fields, and one PAN value (not stated in the WUP) used for each field. This means
that the recommended PAN values for the different fields on tract 1623 (which could be
based on soil type and slope even for same crop type) were not adhered to. Our
recommendation is that the fields can only be combined if the PAN resulting in the lowest
application amount (inches) is used.
Required Action:
• Please complete the land application equipment calibration during your next waste application
event, and submit copy of the results to the address at the bottom of the first page.
• Beginning the day of inspection, please record and maintain daily rainfall amounts, and conduct
waste analysis as close to the time of waste application as possible. Please begin to keep monthly
stocking records as well.
• The Permittee shall provide to this office within thirty (30) days from receipt of this violation notice,
a written explanation and a plan that will ensure that the problem does not recur. Your explanation
will be reviewed, and be advised that if these violations continue, the Division will send
recommendation to the Director of the Division of Water Quality for the appropriate enforcement
action to be taken.
Thank you for your assistance and cooperation during the inspection. If you have any questions,
please contact me at 919-791-4232 or Joseph Gyamfi at 919-791-4234.
Sincerely,
mmerman, L.G.
Cc: Mr, Carl Henry Outz, Chatham County MRCS/DSWC
Mr. John Hunt, DSWC-RRO
APS Central Animal Files
RRO File (19-44)

I .,
0 Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 190027 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWC190027 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Chatham Region: Raleigh
Date of Visit: 02/16/2007 Entry Time:12:1Q.QM _ Exit Time:
Farm Name: Cloer Farms
Owner: Warren L Cloer
Incident #:
Owner Email:
Mailing Address: 2864 Tom Stevens Rd Snow Camp NC 273499467
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:35'49'52" Longitude:79°23'29"
Location: located on county road 1343 approx. 800 feet south of the intersection of county road 1342 and 1343.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Warren L Cloer Operator Certification Number: 20931
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name
On -site representative Lee Cloer
Title
Phone:
24 hour contact name Lee Cloer Phone:
Primary Inspector, Joseph Gyamfi Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Phone
Inspection Summary:
WUP dated 8113/05
No waste application since 2005
Waste levels and rainfall records are kept. Need to initial rain events greater than or equal to 1"
Spreader calibrated in August 2005, Needs to be calibrated again this year
Soil test for 2006 dated 6/10/06. Will take another one for this year.
Producer needs to apply waste sooner or later, since waste level in holding pond is 2" below the start pump mark.
- Remember to take waste sample for next application
Need to keep monthly stocking records.
Producer given FRBD form.
Page: 1

Permit: AWC190027 Owner - Facility: Warren L Cloer Facility Number : 190027
Inspection Date: 02/16/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Cattle
Cattle - Milk Cow 100 50
Total Design Capacity: 100
Total SSLW: 140,000
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
torage 1 37.00 39.0
Page: 2

Permit: AWC190027 Owner - Facility: Warren L Cloer Facility Number : 190027
Inspection Date: 02/16/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Cl ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑.
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (LeJ large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
MOO
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
Q
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

J
Permit: AWC190027 Owner - Facility: Warren L Cloer
Facility Number : 190027
Inspection Date: 021i6/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste_Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Fescue (Hay, Pasture)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain (Wheat,
Barley, Oats)
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Georgeville
Soil Type 2
Cid
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
17. Does the facility tack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
18, Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

• 6 r
Permit: AWC190027 Owner - Facility: Warren L Cloer
Facility Number : 190027
Inspection Date: 02/16/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
..,.,._...........................................................................
Yes
No
NA
NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
■
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
■
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22, Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES
only)? ❑
Cl
■
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
❑
■
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑
■
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ IN ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AWC190027 Owner • Facility: Warren L Cloer Facility Number: 190027
Inspection Date: 02/16/2007 Inspection Type. Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative? ❑ M Q ❑
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 6

W A 7'F9
Michael F. Easley. Governor
O�
Q
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
0
7
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
j
Alan W. Klimek, P. E., Director
Division of Water Quality
October 1, 2004
James Mike Lindley
James Mike Lindley Farm
614 Mike Lindley Road
Snow Camp NC 27349
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWC190016
James Mike Lindley Farm
Cattle Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Chatham County
Dear James Mike Lindley:
On June 11, 2004, the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (Division) issued a revised State General
Permit for swine facilities. The General Permit was issued in accordance with the directive of Senate Bill
733 (Session Law 2003-28).
In accordance with your application received on February 11, 2003 and in accordance with the directive
of Senate Bill 733, we are hereby -forwarding to you this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to James
Mike Lindley, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste collection, treatment, storage and
• land application system in accordance with General Permit AWG200000. The issuance of this COC
supercedes and terminates your previous COC Number AWC190016 which expires October 1, 2004.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
of animal waste from the James Mike Lindley Farm, located in Chatham County, with an animal capacity
of no greater than an annual average of 170 Dairy cattle and the application to land as specified in the
facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2009. Pursuant to this COC,
you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting
and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this
facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number
of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and
this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please carefully read this COC and the enclosed State General Permit. Since this is a revised State
General Permit, it contains new requirements in addition to most of the conditions contained in the
previous State General Permit. Enclosed for your convenience is a package containing the new and
revised forms used for record keeping and reporting. Please pay careful attention to the record keening
and monitoring conditions in this permit.
If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
Aquifer Protection Section - Animal Feeding Operations Unit
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1638 One
NorthCarohna
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Internet: h2o.enr.stale.nc.us An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer- 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper Aqturally

The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable �.
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current MRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.
Per 15A NCAC 2H .0225(c) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per MRCS standards a 100 foot separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a
spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed.below for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Raleigh Regional Office. The Regional Office Water
Quality Staff may be reached at (919) 5714700. If you need additional information concerning this COC .
or the General Permit, please contact J.R. Joshi at [phone].
Sincerely,
U � .
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Enclosures (General Permit AWG200000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Raleigh Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Chatham County Health Department
Chatham County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File AWC 190016
APS Central Files
0

*I
Producer: C, e e l j�_ I F-U
Location: - r l ol.-; (L W-349
R MOMI • Lei in R s
Type Operation :
Number of Animals:_ 00
(Design capacity)
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a
specified rate to prevent pollution of surface water and/or
groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be
used to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the
crops in the fields where the waste is to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient.
Waste should be analyzed to determine nutrient content before each
application cycle. Annual soil tests are strongly encouraged so
that all plant nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of
the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste
utilization plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of the
waste and to ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe
• manner:
1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be
grown and the nutrient content of the waste. Do not
apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
0
2. Soil types are important as they have different
infiltration rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange
capacities, and available water holding capacities.
3. Normally waste shall not be applied to land eroding at
greater than 5 tons per acre per year. With special
precautions, waste may be applied to land eroding at up
to 10 tons per acre per year.
4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is
raining, or when the surface is frozen. Either of these
conditions may result in runoff to surface waters which
is not allowed under North Carolina Division of
Environmental Management (NCDEM) .4200 regulations.
S. wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift
and downwind odor problems.
1

. 6. To maximize the value of nutrients for crop production
and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste
should be applied to a growing crop or applied to bare
ground not more than 30 days prior to planting.
Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients
and reduce odor problems.
0
i
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on
typical nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage
requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from your
waste management facility. Attached you will find information on
proper sampling techniques, preparation, and transfer of waste
samples to the lab for analysis.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements
for compliance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217 adopted by the Environmental
Management Commission.
FA

•
Amount of Waste Produced Per Year(gallons, ft3, tons, etc.)
1�1animals X.11 amt.) waste/animal/year =
il$'gO +v-J_ (amt.) waste/year
Amount of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) Produced Per Year
JJ0 animals X- J(g _lbs. PAN/animal/year = O .lbs. PAN/year.
(PAN from N. C. Tech. Guide Std. 633)
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan
time and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely
manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on
the nitrogen (N) requirements of the crop to be grown and assuming
surface application:
Table 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
Tract Field Soil Crop Lbs. N Acres Lbs. N Month of
# No. Type Per Ac.* Utilized Application
MOM
Total � J Sy.'.3l 1_�1038 j
* This N is from animal waste only. Xf nutrients from other
sources such as commercial fertilizer are applied, they must be
accounted for. N must be based on realistic yield expectation.
i
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied
while meeting the N requirements. Beginning in 2996 the Coastal
Zone Management Act will require farmers in some eastern counties
of North Carolina to have a nutrient Management plan that addresses
all nutrients. This plan only addresses Nitrogen.
3

tOi
-T, T.
s.:�txis.m•:r:�:y�io$w; •: :cor:.wv
<r a»�+.o:.<L }�u-aby
.a:t'iir .•.: o�". ro...:ri:• sra S3�`,C���
r $ 9..i'ro. _5.`:.r; a a v:�4,?G.::tc..
-.,.:. .:-.. - - �.�.,�:.,�,:.,:: �:.;,,rr i•: �.:.x.:I•o3 t a.:cha}:oa. v ::.r:,: ,a z•o'
"S; 0 ,. .'.�p �S .<'rYi :Ai;:f;}?:}.`,5 `: i^!t.'�Y.SN'•#.0
>r::ocrr„ko:+:•:2: ft .>r • #r' :m}}, tao',;4y?:: E. .,rt.•.cv.n:rs]',]S•?o3•.`•`i•Y�'S'Yc:,�...r
�lC:i:r'''::{ii:rG•.; ., rir''iwv 'T?c oo'� #c.. s.t:,3>:o.a.wc�w'�'aa):,: �:: ..:.:ad:;S}.},::;w.,r.
.. ->�. :. ': .::- .. ..'.:::: ......... ........h fR:I .:...,.t•.r..o-.Y. xvx..: «„a?,,....,.rlc,...,,we.ac,:.w,v,,:.,,Ras,...,,:..w.,r
Table 2: ACRES
(Agreement with adjacent landowner must be attached)
(Required only if operator does not own
adequate land [see Required Specification 21)
Traci. Field Soil
# Type
Crop Lbs. N Acres Lbs. N Month of
Per Ac.* Utilized Application
rs �o.a1 59
a7
o
c
IrNlp
►a-1
t
o
a
. S"
1 a,a
i a
154
a
7
7
1 o%tl
1'7
= 9
J O
7
Vb
To+A
A
�,.
°F.
'`Y. ��#q.'��sk.:,d
? ":•.'c:SAP, ]a'i'
i°t ,/'G.. S'. r
fd-4 ''..1 .
-i. d
��,, �.F,'.
y�.F:
��•b.:�
'
.IJ .J
fy`+Ypl..
v.)t. -'4 ':+V 2L.
,.'d. :i-%-t`SA�+'
�:•. 1. +d�j
.'a}'x� Y �.{..+f�k7.:
�„r`aFa... '.".
!C � �
n,�
�sl -.">T`,�
�y a� }y
:t'�C rf'}Y+���G
'�y.�. y�ry�•y�y
'(:� �.��-� •-..�T1i.' i a^ 'F�f��t i
,•r
boa.
!-:vEr"n ;��r r`L'
i "'',�aS�,
'
't J i
,� >!
k'?s ��....
5" i�,
hv"(a:� I 1s
�:',: }
t T
'•'lI.,'.
1, )`i!•. ,'�..
i F'
S.: "iy�� VL
,} i.i a.lk
�:r �.;:. �.
.
.IA-. - .'
.^:7� . �..yy.k,
� t a ..f �`. �.�e
:�: =•'
�ri ,. ; 1Jr �.R
�1' .J...,�'3; zmr �1 �`,i
L tLi �.p _����, t..-
�^
,. �.
.4 ,: ' I
� �-Nv7yy,t��
f � � � . ':''i:t
- £
t� '�+.-. �i+, ,,
:, ..�,
'" iL,,• -'[ � '"�'
H:� 4 �<.�::
� '' rR -.
�'� j, .,w, .� a�:"tr�
�3f �c �•j�3 rGA�; '
.S`.t.�f r• .
�. �.�+�}y.
'
ti•..�1"
-,: .t
-
sf ,f.Y r'�•
�:'r;.re -r•': .i8+':��t>-
`fir ;sl,r a- ;
Total I 113Lz51 _1 30,0x-S__T' t.
See footnote for Table 1.

IL
'Al
.2 0ar P.
IN X.
.34,
?5t

AND
i
0
(Needed only if additional land has to be 2eaaed, etc.)
I, hereby give A'�e 4,
permission Zo apply animal waste from his Waste Utilization System
on :J 0 — acres of my land for the duration of time shown below.
I understand that this waste contains nitrogen, phosphorous,
potassium, and other trace elements and when properly applied
should not harm my land or crops. I also understand that the use
of waste will reduce my need for commercial fertilizer.
Adjacent Landow
Waste Producer:
Technical Repre
SWCD Representative: Date:
Term of Agreement: t , IRI to
fxlnimv of Tan roars on Coat 9 ed Itama) -
(See Required Specification No. 2.)
2 OLO
12 ,

0
0
Table 2: ACRES WITH AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowner must be attached)
!Required only if operator does not own
adequate land [see Required Specification 21)
Tract Field Soil Crop Lbs. N Acres Lbs.' N Month of
# Type Per Ac.* Utilized Application
See footnote for Table 1.
Totals from above Tables
Acres Lbs. N
Utilized
Table 1 11 O
Table 2
Total
Amount of N Produced la 420
Surplus or eficit j7 3
NOTE: The Waste Utilization Plan must contain provisions '.for
periodic land application of sludge at agronomic rates. The sludge
will be nutrient rich and will require precautionary measures to
prevent over application of nutrients or other elements.
4

•
Your facility is designed for ' days of temporary storage and
the temporary storage must be removed on the average of once every
__MONTHS. In no instance should the volume of waste being
stored in your structure exceed Elevation
•
i
Call the local Natural Resources Conservation Service (formerly Soil
Conservation Service) or Soil and Water Conservation District office
after you receive the waste analysis report for assistance in
determining the amount per acre to apply and the proper application
rate prior to applying the waste.
NARRATIVE OF OPERATION
(Use additional sheets as needed to describe the operation of the
Dsystem within the context of the livestock operation)
End 9 fl4d 19 _ ,mot
I t P !
� - s i ►J -�► �7a � �e
rr► Ag E- m 6 V4 A r4 J LDS C- E rk�:- A i Sk, C, Ci i E tdS �L e4 G-A
5

Nitrogen Application Rate Calculated Using Soil Type and
. Realistic Yield Table For Chatham County
SOIL TYPE 205B2
r11ww"Rua
APPL. DATE
ON to
KIMU
Era 'Me �I�W.301110111
1
�.l� .
. ►
:� :._
i
• ►
• •' . • a w' I-
• ►
:._.
1 :..
: a� • _:. _
• ►
-•U•
1 :
•

•
•
rill
S-nall
wai-t
for
grazing
i � .
;.�.
SOIL TYPE 50D
APPL. DATE
1r
:._ f
:1 i L
i I!.i
Ir
_
- • f
1 •• • L
si
1i
=11 1110010
mtlzntoml!
-f=
Ir
fv .1_-
•• i
-f
19
sorelum w.f
1-
:.I
Ir
SoJbeans
i � ,
io -�
IrSmall
grain hay
I 10 lbs N/ac
Aug -April
Ir
i.rass for
i
' i
Srtall grain. for grazing
82 lbs Vac
IrRveurass
fori
�
Ir
Matua forgrazing
i
•
SOIL TYPE 130B
APPL. DATE
1:
. f-! INUMM Welor.itnZ
VMS
:
Barlev for-!N-art
i 1!
I/
1 :
.
WON
0911
' i
tl.
• e'f.it.
i M !
•Sorghum
silage
April -July
1:
f i-+
. 11f f .
f
11 i e
-11
i i.•
tl:
i-.t�. .- -
i
-11
., ..
t1:Fescue-
,
i_k!
,

0
C� J

1�
•
0
AMYL. VALL
DA7 L
19

n
NOTE. THESE ARE THE RECOMMENDED REALISTIC YIELD NITROGEN
APPLICATION RATES FOR THE SOIL TYPES LISTED ON THE PRECEEDING
PAGES. WHEN A CROP IS PLANTED THAT VARIES FROM THE WASTE
MANAGEMENT PLAN, THE NITROGEN APPLICATION RATES FROM ABOVE
MUST BE USED IN ORDER TO COMPLY WITH .0200 REGULATIONS. IF
HAYLAND IS USED FOR GRAZING, THE HAYLAND APPLICATION RATE
MUST BE REDUCED BY 25 PERCENT. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE
CALL OUR OFFICE, THE PHONE NUMBER IS 545-8353, OR 542-2244 EXT 3.
20

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
. REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift, manmade conveyances, direct application, or
direct discharge during operation or land application. Any discharge of waste which reaches surface water is
prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer either owns or has a notarized agreement for use of
adequate Iand on which to properly apply the waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to properly dispose of
waste, he/she shall provide a copy of a notarized agreement with a landowner who is within a reasonable proximity,
allowing him/her the use of the land for waste application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the facility to secure
an update of the Waste Utilization Plan when there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of animals,
method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the Nitrogen needs for realistic crop yields based on soil type,
available moisture, historical data, climate conditions, and level of management, unless there are regulations that
restrict the rate of application for other nutrients. Actual yields may be used in lieu of realistic yield tables at the
discretion of the planner.
4. Animal waste shall be applied on land eroding less than 5 tons per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land that is
eroding at more than 5 tons but less than 10 tons per acre per year providing grass filter strips are installed where
runoff leaves the field. (See FOTG Standard 393-Filter Strips)
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after waste application. Waste should not be applied when there
is danger of drift from the irrigation field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, it will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled
cropland. When applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application
does not occur during a season prone to flooding. (See "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance.)
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to
surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift from the site during application. No ponding should occur
in order to control odor and flies.
S. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or when the surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste should be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that the crop is not covered with waste to
depth that would prohibit growth. The potential for salt damage from animal waste should also be considered.
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted crops on soils with a high potential for leaching.
Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to
take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of a crop or forages breaking
dormancy..
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with the following: The outer perimeter of the
land area onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from
any residential property boundary and from any perennial stream or river other than an irrigation ditch or canal.
MRCS, NC
JUKE, 1996

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
(continued)
Animal waste other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995, shall not be applied closer than
25 feet to surface water. This distance may be reduced for waters that are not perennial provided adequate vegetative
filter strips are present (See Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet from wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than those owned by landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public right-of-ways.
15. Animals waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways or wetlands by a discharge or by over -
spraying. Animal waste may be applied to prior converted cropland provided it has been approved as a land
applications site by a "technical specialise". Animal waste applied on grassed waterways shall be at agronomic rates
and in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the
animal waste management system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms,
pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and
other woody species, etc. are limited to areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and
accessible. Lagoonn berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence of erosion, leakage, or discharge.
. 18. If animal production at the facility is terminated, the owner is responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure
plan" which will eliminate the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns,
leaks, and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be kept on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other crops for direct human consumption.
However, if animal waste is used on crops for direct human consumption it should only be applied preplant with no
further applications of animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible permanent markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom elevations of the temporary storage
(pumping volume) of all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid level between the
markers. A marker will be required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste storage ponds.
22. Soil tests shall be made every two years and a liquid waste analysis be taken at least twice each year consistent with
waste utilization plan. Poultry litter shall be tested prior to application. Soil and waste analysis records shall be kept
for five years_
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets NC regulations.
MRCS, NC
JUNE, 1996

r
•
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
Name of Farm:
Owner/Manager Agreement
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications
and the operation and maintenance procedures established in the
approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I
(we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the
waste treatment and storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the
North Carolina Division of Environmental Management (NCDEM) before
the new animals are stocked. I (we) also understand that there
must be no discharge of animal waste from this system to surface
wasters of the state from a storm event less severe than the 25-
year, 24-hour storm. The approved plan will be filed on -site at
the farm office and at the office of the local Soil and Water
Conservation District and will be available for review by NCDEM
upon request.
• Name of Facility Owner:
C
(Please print)
Signature:
Name of Manager(I
r,1
Signature:
Name of Technical
Date: 1ci.! jb )q—r
er)
Date: _ 1,� I is I q-7
Specialist:(please print)
Affiliation:
Address (Agency)
Signature: COurDate:
11

Agricuitural Ext,- lion SerJice Iof 3
Management
• Biologic l Gr c: , gr cul oral Engineering North Carolina State University
LIVESTOCK WASTE SAMPLING, ANALYSIS AND CALCULATION
OF LAND APPLICATION RATES
,lames C. Barker*
I. SAMPLE COLLECTION
A. Semi -Solid Lot Manure
i. Scraped directly from lot into spreader
a. From loaded spreader, collect about 2 lbs of manure from
different locations using nonmetallic collectors.
ii. From storage
a. Collect about 2 lbs of manure from under the surface crust
avoiding bedding materials and using nonmetallic collectors.
B. Liquid Manure Slurry
• i. Under -slotted -floor pit
a. Extend a 1/2" nonmetallic conduit open on both ends into
manure to pit floor.
b. Seal upper end of conduit (e.g., by placing a thumb over end
of conduit) trapping manure that has entered lower end, remove
and empty slurry into plastic bucket or nonmetallic container.
c. Take subsamples from 5 or more locations or at least 1 quart.
d. Mix and add about 3/4 pint to nonmetallic sample container.
ii. Exterior storage basin or tank
a. Make sure manure has been well mixed with a liquid manure
chopper -agitator pump or propeller agitator.
b. Take subsamples from about 5 pit locations, from agitator pump
or from manure spreader and place in a plastic bucket.
* Professor and Extension Specialist, Biological and Agricultural Engineering
. Department, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC.

1-iL4cct;iiJll�AIL 1J
2 of 3
2-
c. Mix and add 3/4 pint to a nonmetallic sample container.
C. Lagoon Liquid
i. Collect about 3/4 pint of recycled lagoon liquid from inflow pipe
to flush tanks in a nonmetallic sample container.
ii. From lagoon
a. Place a small bottle (1/2 pint or less) on end of 10-15, pole.
b. Extend bottle 10-15' away from bank edge.
c. Brush away floating scum or debris.
d. Submerge bottle within l' of liquid surface.
e. Empty into a plastic bucket, repeat about 5 times around
lagoon, mix, and add 3/4 pint to nonmetallic sample container.
D. Broiler or Turkey Litter
i. House litter
a. Visually inspect litter for areas of varying quality, e.g.,
areas around feeders and waterers, and estimate percent of
floor surface in each area.
• b. Take about 5 litter subsamples at locations proportionate to
item a. E.g., if 20% of litter of similar visual quality is
around feeders and waterers, take Y subsample there and the
other 4 subsamples from remainder of floor surface.
c. At each location, collect litter from a 6" by 6" area down to
earth floor and place in a plastic bucket.
d. After 5 subsamples have been added toa the bucket, affix, and add
about 2-3 lbs litter to a'nonmetallic sample container such as
a 1-gallon freezer bag and seal.
ii. From stockpile
a. Take subsamples from about 5 locations at least 18" into pile.
b. Mix, add 2-3 lbs to nonmetallic sample container and seal.

- 3 -
II. SAHPLE PREPAkaTION AND TRANSFER '
3 of 3
n
LJ
0
0
A. Place sample into an expandable container that can be sealed. Rinse
residues from container with clean water but do not use disinfectants,
soaps, or treat in any other way.
B. Pack sample in ice, refrigerate, freeze, or transfer to lab quickly.
C. Hand -delivery is most reliable way of sample transfer.
D. If mailed, protect sample container with packing material such as
newspaper, box or package with wrapping paper, and tape.
E. Commercial sample containers and mailers are also available. Contacts:
i. A&L Eastern Agricultural Lab, Inc. iii. Polyfoam Packers Corp.
7621 Whitepine Road 2320 S. Foster Avenue
Richmond, VA 23237 Wheeling, IL 60090
Ph: [phone] Ph: [phone]
ii. Fisher Scientific Co.
3315 'Tinton Road
Raleigh, NC 27604
Ph: [phone]
iv. NASCO
901 Janesville Avenue
Fort Atkinson, WI 53538
Ph: [phone]
F. Private analytical labs are available, but sample analyses are costly.
G. The NCDA_provides this service for North Carolina residents.
i. Address: North Carolina Department of Agriculture
Agronomic Division
Plant/Waste/Solution Advisory Section
Blue Ridge Road Center
P.O. Box 27647
Raleigh, NC 27611
Ph: [phone]
Attn: Dr. Ray Campbell
ii. Forward $4 along with the sample.
iii. Include the following identification information with sample:
a. Livestock species (dairy, swine, turkey, etc.)
b. Livestock usage (swine -nursery, finishing; turkey -breeders,
brooderhouse, grower, number flocks grown on litter; etc.)
c. Waste type (dairy -lot scraped manure, liquid slurry; swine -pit
slurry, lagoon liquid, sludge; broiler -house litter, stockpile
iv. Routine analyses performed on all samples: N, P, K, Ca. Mg, Na.
S, Fe, Mn, Zn, Cu, B
v. Additional analyses performed upon request: DM, No, Cd, Ni, Pb

,
CALIBRATION
Applicators can apply manure, litter and wastewater at varying rates and patterns. depending on
forward travel and/or PTO speed, gear box sertinas, gate openings, operating pressures, spread
widths and overlaps. Calibration detines the combination of settings and travel speed needed to
apply manure, litter or wastewater at a desired rate and to ensure uniform aonlication.
Spreader Caoaciry
Liquid spreader capacities are normally rated by the manufacturer in gallons. Multiply gallons by
0.0042 to get tons. Solid and semi -solid spreaders are rated by the manufacturer either in bushels
or cubic feet (multiply bushels by 1.24 to get cubic feet). Nfost spreaders have rwo rating
capacities: 1) struck or level full, and 2) heaped. Since manures and Iitters have different
densities, an on -farm test should be done. Fill a five -gallon bucket level full with material to be
spread. Do not pack the material in the bucket but ensure that it settles similar to a loaded
spreader. Weigh the bucket full and then empty. Multiply the weight of the contents by 1.5 to get
pounds per cubic feet. Nfultiply this value times the cubic feet capacity of the spreader and divide
by 2000 to get the tons of material in a spreader load.
manure weight, Ibs x 1.5 x spreader capacity, ft ; 2000 = spreader load, tons
Spreader Calibration
Calibration Method 1: This method is most useful for liquid spreaders but can be used for all
types. Spread at least one frill load of manure preferably in a square or rectangular field pattern
for ease of measuring with normal overlaps. Nfeasure the length and width of coverage
recognizing that the outer fringe areas of the coverage wiII receive touch lighter applications than
the overlapped areas. Nfultiply the length by the width and divide by 43560 to determine the
coverage area in acres. Divide the tons of manure in the spreader by the acres covered to
determine the application rate in tons per acre.
spreader manure, tons ; (coverage length, ft x width, ft - 43560) = application rate, tons/acre
Repeat the procedure at different speeds and/or spreader settings until the desired application rate
is achieved.
DPL%[P - Dcc_;Roer o- E996. ?»et - i `

it 1.
E.Tamale:
• What forvard speed would be needed to apply 6.0 tons litter per acre from a sc_ reader with a
6-ton capacity, a 5-minute spreading time. and a 25-xet spreading width?
Forward speed. mph capacity, tons x -'95
time (ruin) x width x rate. tons 'per acre
= 6 tons x 495
5 min x 25 ft x 6 ton per acre
4 miles per hcur
Calibration Method 2: This method is often used for solid and semi -solid spreaders. A tang or
Plastic sheet of about 100 square feet (9'x12', 10'x10', etc.) should be measured for exact surface
area (length x width), weighed using a set of spring -tension or platform scales, then spread and
pinned on the field surface. The spreader should be operated at its normal settings, sped and
overlap. With a rear discharge spreader, three passes should be made: the first directly over the
center of the shee't, the other two on opposite sides of the center at the normal spreader overlap
spacing. The sheet with the collected manure should again be weighed. Subtract the empty sheet
weight from the total weight to get the weight of the collected manure. Multiply the pounds of
collected manure by 21.8 and divide by the collection area of the sheet in square feet to get the
. application rate in tons per acre.
collected manure, lbs x 21.8 / collection area, ft2 = application rate, tons/acre
•
Repeat the procedure using different settings or speeds to obtain the desired application rate.
S r_ p eader Pattern Unifotznity
To determine the uniformity of spread and the amount of overlap needed, place a line of small
pans or trays equally spaced (2-4 feet apart) across the spreader path. The pans should be a
minimum of 12" by 12" or 15" diameter, no more than 24" by 24", and 2"-4" deep. Make one
spreading pass directly over the center pan. Weigh the contents caught in each pan or pour the
contents into equally sized glass cylinders or clear plastic tubes and compare the amount in each.
The effective spread width can be found by locating the point on either side of the path center
where the manure contents caught in the containers is half of what it is in the center. The distance
between these points is the effective spread width. The outer fringes of the coverage area beyond
these points should be overlapped on the next path to ensure a uniform rate over the area. "1411
,
"W", "steeple", or "lopside" patterns are not satisfactory and one or more of the spreader
adjustments should be made.
DP! MP - Decc^ic. i, 1496. - i3

EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN
PHONE
NT MBERS
MVQ
511- H foo
EtiTER GENTCY �i_��1AGE:
NT YSTE11 NI r — 91
S W CD
919 5�1a�8a o
N-RCS
T'nis plan will be implemented in the event that wastes from your operation are leaking,
overflowing, or running off site. You should not wait until wastes reacts surface waters or
leave your property to consider that you have a problem. You should make every effort to
ensure that this does not happen. This plan should be posted in an accessible location for
all employees at the facility. The following are some action items you should take.
I. Stop the release of wastes. Depending on the situation. this may or may not be
possible. Suggested responses to some possible problems are listed be]ow.
A. Lagoon overflow -possible solutions are:
a. Add soil to berm to increase elevation of dam.
b. Pump wastes to fields at an acceptable rate.
c. Stop all flows to the lagoon immediately.
• d. Call a pumping contractor.
e. lviake sure no surface water is entering lagoon.
B: Runoff from waste application field -actions include:
a. Immediately stop waste application.
b. Create a temporary diversion to contain waste.
c. Incorporate waste to reduce runoff.
d. Evaluate and eliminate the reason(s) that caused the runoff.
e. Evaluate the application rates for the fields where runoff occurred.
C, Leakage from the waste pipes and sprinklers -action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
c. Close vafves to eliminate further discharge.
d. Repair all leaks prior to restartin_ pumps.
D: Leakage from flush systems. houses, solid separators -action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
. c. 11a1;e sure no il�non ocz:.lrs.
U. S[op -111 tl��u ;a ilie house_ tIu_�h s\'sterls. _e,iLI separa(ors.
De__.: _. 1 S. ."C6

e. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
• E: Leakage from base or sidewall of lagoon. Often this is seepage as opposed to
flowing leaks- possible action:
a. Dig a small sump or ditch away from the embankment to catch all seepage.
put in a submersible pump, and pump back to lagoon.
b. if holes are caused by burrowing animals. trap or remove animals and fiil
holes and compact with a clay type soil.
c. Have a professional evaluate the condition of the side walls and lagoon
bottom as soon as possible.
2_ Assess the extent of the spill and note any obvious damages.
a. Did the waste reach anv surface waters?
b. Approximately how much was released and for what duration?
c. Anv damage noted, such as employer injury, fish }:ills, or property damage?
d. Did the spill leave the property?
e. Does the spill have the potential to reach surface waters?
f.. Could a future rain event cause the spill to reach surface waters'?
g. Are potable water wells in danger (either on or off of the property)?
h. How much reached surface waters"
3: Contact appropriate agencies.
ia. During normal business hours, call your DWQ (Division of Water Quality)
regional office; Phone - - After hours, emergency number: 919-733-3942.
Your phone call should include: your name, facility, telephone number, the details
of the incident from item 2 above, the exact location of the facility, the location or
direction of movement of the spill, weather and wind conditions. The corrective
measures that have been under taken, and the seriousness of the situation.
b. If spill leaves property or enters surface waters, call local EMS Phone number -
c. Instruct EMS to contact local Health Department.
d. Contact CES, phone number - - , locaI SWCD office phone number
and local NRCS office for advice/technical assistance phone number - -
4: If none of the above works call 911 or the Sheriffs Department and explain your
problem to them and ask that person to contact the proper agencies for you.
5: Contact the contractor of your choice to begin repair of problem to minimize off -site
damage.
a.
b.
0
Contractors Name:_
Contractors :address:
Contractors Phone:

6: Contact the technical specialist who certified the lagoon MRCS, Consulting
. Engineer, etc.) _
a. Name: ; 1=
b. Phone: y0
7: Implement procedures as advised by DWQ and technical assistance agencies to
rectify° the damage. repair the system. and reassess the waste management plan to
ke:p problems with release of wastes from happening again-
0
n
LJ

Dairy Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
Source Cause BMPs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
Farmstead • Dairy production Gf Vegetative or wooded buffers
0 Recommended best management practices
W Good judgment and common sense
Paved lots or barn • Wet manure -covered Scrape or flush daily
alley surfaces surfaces
E. Promote drying with proper ventilation
9( Routine checks and maintenance on waterers,
hydrants, pipes, stock tanks
Bedded areas • Urine 0 Promote drying with proper ventilation
* Partial microbial M/ Replace wet or manure -covered bedding
decomposition
Manure dry stacks * Partial microbial 0 Provide liquid drainage for stored manure
decomposition f �(
Storage tank or basin �• Partial microbial 0 Bottom or mid -level loading
surface decomposition - 0 Tank covers
* Mixing while filling 0 Basin surface mats of solids
• Agitation when emptying E/ Minimize lot runoff and liquid additions
I( Agitate only prior to manure removal
C7 Proven biological additives or oxidants
Settling basin • Partial microbial
surfaces decomposition
0 Liquid drainage from settled solids
0 Remove solids regularly
• Mixing while filling
* Agitation when emptying
Manure, slurry, or * Agitation when spreading 0 Soil injection of slurry/sludges
sludge spreader * Volatile gas emissions 62rWash residual manure from spreader after use
outlets 13 Proven biological additives or oxidants

Dairy Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
Source Cause BMPs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
Uncovered manure, • Volatile gas emissions while C] Soil injection of slurry/sludges
slurry, or sludge on drying 0` Soil incorporation within 48 hours
field surfaces S" Spread in thin uniform layers for rapid drying
Flush tanks + Agitation of recycled lagoon
liquid while tanks are filling
O Proven biological additives or oxidants
C] Flush tank covers
C] Extend fill lines to near bottom of tanks with W14
anti -siphon vents
Outside drain + Agitation during wastewater Cl Box covers .
collection or conveyance's
iunction boxes
Lift stations • Agitation during sump tank CO Sump tank covers , /�
filling and drawdown f`� R
End of drainpipes at • Agitation during wastewater 0 Extend discharge point of pipes underneath
lagoon conveyance lagoon liquid level
Lagoon surfaces • Volatile gas emission Proper lagoon liquid capacity
• Biological mixing M� Correct lagoon startup procedures
• Agitation MK� inimum surface area -to -volume ratio
[� Minimum agitation when pumping
C] Mechanical aeration
C] Proven biological additives
0 49

Dairy Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
Source Cause BMPs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
Irrigation sprinkler • High pressure agitation CI Irrigate on dry days with little or no wind
nozzles • Wind drift 0 Minimum recommended operating procedure
0 Pump intake near lagoon liquid surface
0 Pump from second -stage lagoon
0 Flush residual manure from pipes at end of
slurry/sludge pumpings
Dead animals • Carcass decomposition Q' Proper disposition of carcasses
Standing water • Improper drainage Grade and landscape such that water drains away
around facilities • Microbial decomposition of from facilities
organic matter
Mud tracked onto • Poorly maintained access 0 Farm access road maintenance
public roads from roads
faun access
Additional Information:
Cattle Manure Management; .0200 RuleBMP Packet
Dairy Educational Unit Manure Management System —Lake Wheeler Road Field Laboratory; EBAE 209-95
igoon Design and Management for Livestock Manure Treatment and Storage; EBAE 103-83
Management of Dairy Wastewater; EBAE 106-83
Calibration of Manure and Wastewater Application Equipment; EBAE Fact Sheet
Nuisance Concerns in Animal Manure Management: Odors and Flies; PRO 107, 1995 Conference Proceedings
Available From:
NCSU, County Extension Center
NCSU—BAE
NCSU—BAE
NCSU—BAE
NCSU—BAE
Florida Cooperative Extension
0

Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
Source Cause BMPs to Control Insects Site Specific Practices
Flush gutters •
solids 0
uid
Flush system is designed and operated
sufficiently to remove accumulated solids from
gutters as designed
Remove bridging of accumulated solids at
WA
Lagoons and pits • Crusted solids Cf Maintain lagoons, settling basins and pits where
pest breeding is apparent to minimize the crusting
of solids to a depth of no more than d to 8 inches
over more than 30 percent of surface
Excessive vegetative • Decaying vegetation Ef Maintain vegetative control along banks of
growth lagoons and other impoundments to prevent
accumulation of decaying vegetative matter along
water's edge on impoundment's perimeter.
/ Dry Systems
T7Peders • Feed spillage Ef Design, operate, and maintain feed systems
(e.g., bunkers and troughs) to minimize the
accumulation of decaying wastage
Clean up spillage on a routine basis (e.g., 7- to 10-
day interval during summer; 15- to 30-day interval
during winter)
a i i

Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
Source Cause BMPs to Control Insects Site Specific Practices
Feed storage • Accumulations of feed P" Reduce moisture accumulation within and around
residues immediate perimeter of feed storage areas by
ensuring drainage is away from site and/or
providing adequate containment (e.g., covered bin
for brewer's grain and similar high moisture grain
phroducts)
nspect for and remove or break up accumulated
lids in filter strips around feed storage as needed
,Animal holding • Accumulations of animal Li' Eliminate low areas that trap moisture along fences
areas wastes and feed wastage and other locations where waste accumulates and
/Irlsturbance by animals is minimal
Mr Maintain fence rows and filter strips around animal
holding areas to minimize accumulations of wastes
(i.e., inspect for and remove or break up
accumulated solids as needed)
Dry manure • Accumulations of animal 0 Remove spillage on a routine basis (e.g.,
handling systems wastes 7- to 10-day interval during summer; 15- to 30-day
interval during winter) where manure is loaded for
land application or disposal
0 Provide for adequate drainage around manure
stockpiles
C3 Inspect for and remove or break up accumulated
wastes in filter strips around stockpiles and manure
handling areas as needed
For more information contact:
Cooperative Extension Service, Department of Entomology, Box 7613, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7613.

•
0
`IortaIity Nlanagement Nlethods
fcheck which method(s) are being implemented)
Burial three feet beneath the surface of the around within 24 hours after
knowledge of the death. The burial must b at least 300 feet from anv flowing
stream or public body of water. y�
Rendering at a rendering plant licensed un
der G.S. 106-I63.7 OpuJj
❑ Complete incineration
❑ In the case of dead poultry only, placing in a disposal pit of a size and design
approved by the Department of Agriculture
l:1 Any method which in the professional opinion of the State Veterinarian would
make possible the salvage of part of a dead animaI's value without endangering
human or animal health. (Written approval of the State Veterinarian must be
attached)
C't__..bt

Form SLUR-1 Slurry and Sludge Application Field Record
For Recording Slurry Application Events on Different Fields
Farm Owner Facility Number -
Spreader Operator
Date Field Size Application # of Loads Volume of Loads 2
Tract # Field # r Crop Type i
{mmld dty) (acres) Method Per Field (gallons)
' SI = soil incorporat isked); BR = broadcast (surface applied)
*2 Can be found in operator's manual for the spreader. Contact a local dealer if you do not have your owners manual.

Form SLUR-2
Tract #
Field Size (acres) = (A)
Farm Owner
Owner's Address
Owner's Phone #
Field #
Slurry and Sludge Application Field Record
One Form for Each Field Per Crop Cycle
Facility Number I-
Spreader Operator
Spreader Operator's
Address
Operator's Phone #
From Animal Waste Management Plan
Recommended PAN
Crap Type Loading (lb/acre) = (B)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
m
(8)
Dale
(mmlddlyr)
# of Loads Per Field
Volume of Loads i
Total Volume
(gallons)
(2) x (3)
Volume Per Acre
(gaVac)
(4) + (A}
Waste Analysis Z
PAN (kb11000 gal)
PAN Applied
(lblac)
((5) x (6)] + 1,000
Nitrogen Balance 3
(lblac)
(B) - (7)
Crop Cycle Totals
Owner's Signature Operator's Signature
Certified Operator (Print) Operator Certification #
Can be found in tors manual for the spreader. Contact a local dealer if you do not have your ownernual.
Y z See your animal a management plan for sampling frequency. At a minimum, waste analysis is requirlWthin 60 days of rand application events.
' Enter the value received by subtracting column (7) from (B). Continue subtracting column (7) from column (8) following each application event.
0

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
December 11, 2003
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. James Mike Lindley
614 Mike Lindley Rd.
Snow Camp, North Carolina 27349
Subject: Notice Of Violation
Lindley Farm
COC AWC 190016
Chatham County
Dear Mr. Lindley:
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Colleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
On December 5, 2003, Mr. JD Hester from the Raleigh Regional Office conducted a compliance
inspection of the subject animal operation. This inspection is a part of the Division's effort to determine
compliance with the State's Animal Waste Management Regulation.
An inspection of your facility revealed that wastewater from your facility was not actively discharging to
waters of the State, nor were any manmade pipes, ditches or other prohibited conveyances observed. As a
result of the inspection the following was observed:
1) No waste samples were taken for the 3/17/03- 3/21/03 waste applications. A condition of your
Certified Waste Management Plan requires waste samples must be taken within (60) days of application
of waste to the fields. Wastes are typically applied throughout the year for this type of waste system and
thus a minimum of three samples will be required annually. Keep in mind that waste must be applied to
actively growing crops.
Please respond to this Notice within 30 days of receipt. You should include in your response the actions
that you will take to address this deficiency.
The Raleigh regional office appreciates your cooperation in this matter. If you have any further questions
regarding this inspection, please call Mr. JD Hester at (919) 5714700.
Sincerely,
Kenneth Schuster, P.E.
Regional Supervisor
cc: Chatham County Health Department
Chatham County Soil and Water Conservation District
Ms. Betsy Gerwig/ DSWC-RRO
Raleigh Regional Office 1628 Mail Service Center DE-NR phone [phone] Customer Service
Water Quality Section Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 ne facsimile [phone] 1-877-623-6748
Nturldy
Karolina

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
- James B. Hunt, Jr., Governar
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
JAMES M. LINDLEY
JAMES MIKE LINDLEY FARM
614 MIKE LINDLEY ROAD
SNOW CAMP, NC 27349
Dear James M. Lindley:
A74
• •
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT ANo NATURAL RESOURCES
January 7, 2000
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWC190016
James Mike Lindley Farm
Cattle Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Chatham County
In accordance with your application received on June 6, 1999, we are forwarding this Certificate
of Coverage (COC) issued to James Mike Lindley, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste
collection, treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with General Permit
AWG200000. This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to,
the management of animal waste from the James Mike Lindley Farm Farm, located in Chatham County,
with an animal capacity of no greater than 170 Dairy cows and the application to land as specified in the
Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until April 30, 2003. Pursuant to this COC,
you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations
as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP , and this COC, with no discharge of wastes to
surface waters. An adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and
operational information must be established for this farm. Any increase in waste production greater than
the certified design capacity or increase in number of stocked animals above the number authorized by
this COC will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and shall be completed prior to
actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the
General Permit or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance
with NCGS 143-215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive
relief.
Upon notification by the Division of this COC's expiration, you shall apply for its renewal. This
request shall be made within 30 days of notification by the Division.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Certificate of Coverage AWC190016
James Mike Lindley Farm
Page 2
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be
submitted to the DWQ prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the
right to apply for an individual non -discharge permit by contacting the engineer listed below for
information on this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and
binding.
The subject farm is located in the Raleigh Regional Office. The Regional Office Water Quality
Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this COC or the
General Permit, please contact Susan Cauley at [phone] ext. 546.
Sincerely,
Kerr T. Stevens
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
ChathamCounty Health Department
Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Chatham County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File
NDPU Files
rn�Gf�

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
James Mike Lindley
James Mike Lindley Farm
614 Mike Lindley Road
Snow Camp NC 27349
Dear James Mike Lindley:
A
0 •
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RF-50URCEs
December 30, 1999 _1 —
L.F.-_-I-c�(:1a l;�ui„ty"'-'_It`• ,E1
Subject: Fertilizer ApplicatiantiRecordkeeping---
Animal Waste i1 ariagement System
Facility Number 1-9=1,6.-
.Ghatham:County
This letter is being sent to clarify the recordkeeping requirement for Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN)
application on fields that are part of your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan.
In order to show that the agronomic loading rates for the crops being grown are not being exceeded, you
must keep records of all sources of nitrogen that are being added to these sites. This would include nitrogen
from all types of animal waste as well as municipal and industrial sludges/residuals, and commercial fertilizers.
Beginning January 1, 2000, all nitrogen sources applied to Iand receiving animal waste are required to
be kept on the appropriate recordkeeping forms (i.e. IRRI, 1RR2, .DRYI, DRY2, DRY3, SLURI, SLUR2,
SLD1, and SLD2) and maintained in the facility records for review. The Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
compliance inspectors and Division of Soil and Water operation reviewers will review all recordkeeping during
routine inspections. Facilities not documenting all sources of nitrogen application will be subject to an
appropriate enforcement action.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statute, Local County Ordinance, or permitting
requirement.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Ms. Sonya Avant of the
DWQ staff at [phone] ext. 57 L
Z
"�' X 4
Kerr T. Stevens, Director '��7
Division of Water Quality
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Chatham County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
James Mike Lindley
James Mike Lindley Farm
614 MIKE LINDLEY ROAD
SNOW CAMP NC 27349
Dear James Mike Lindley:
IT V
1 � •
NCDENR
NORThi CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
t�
e
Subject: Application No.GAw -L 5�
AdditionaI.Information Request
Dames Mike•L-indley-Farm
Animal Waste Operation Y
'Chatham.Countyi
The Non -Discharge Permitting Unit has completed a preliminary engineering review of the subject application. Additional
information is required before we can continue our review. Please address the following by :
Please lease agreement between W. B. Johnson and the Jonathan Lindley Farm does not indicate a term of
agreement. Please provide a new lease agreement that includes a term of agreement, and signature of both
the landowner and the lessee.
Please note that all WUP revisions must be signed and dated by both the owner and the technical specialist. Please
reference the subject permit application number when providing the requested information. All information should be signed,
sealed, and submitted in duplicate to my attention at the address below. The information requested by this letter must be
submitted on or before or the Division will return your application as incomplete in accordance with 15A N.C.A.C. 2H .0200
and your facility will be considered to be operating without a permit.
PIease be advised that operation of the subject animal waste management system without a valid permit is a violation of North
Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and will subject you to the enforcement authority of the Environmental Management
Commission.
If you have any questions regarding this request, please call me at [phone], extension 546.
5incer ly,�
Susan Cauley
Environmental Engineer
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
cc: Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality
Permit File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Y
U
Producer:
Location:04 M E L-Nd
Telephone:
Type Operation : _� a_-KJ E —
Number of Animals: 170
(Design Capacity)
The waste `rom your animal facility must be land applied at a
specified rate to prevent pollution of surface water and/or
groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be
used to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the
crops in the fields where the waste is to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient.
waste should be analyzed to determine nutrient content before each
application cycle. Annual soil tests are strongly encouraged so
that all plant nutrients can be balanced for realistic yields of
the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste
utilization plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of the
waste and to ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe
manner:
1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be
grown and the nutrient content of the waste. Do not
apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
2. Soil types are important as they have different
infiltration rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange
capacities, and available water holding capacities.
3. Normally waste shall not be applied to land eroding at
greater than 5 tons per acre per year. With special
precautions, waste may be applied to land eroding at up
to 10 tons per acre per year.
4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is
-raining, or when the surface is frozen. Either of these
conditions may result in runoff to surface waters which
is not allowed under North Carolina Division of
Environmental Management (NCDEM) .0200 regulations.
No
5. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift
and downwind odor problems.
i
K�i:BVED 1 DENR ! DVVQ CC)
1 Aqil fFC rnq�(;#di7!i sec On A
2�Q9 r� 1

QN PLAN
6. To maximize the value of nutrients for crop production
and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste
should be applied to a growing crop or applied to bare
ground not more than 30 days prior to planting.
injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients
and reduce odor problems.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on
typical nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage
requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from your
waste management facility. Attached you will find information on
proper sampling techniques, preparation, and transfer of waste
samples to the lab for analysis.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements
for compliance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217 adopted by the Environmental
Management Commission.
•
r]
0
2

.WASTE UTILIZATION=PLAN �,•
•
Amount of Waste Produced Per Year(gallons, ft3, tons, etc.)
I'10 animals Xiiin4amt.) waste/animal/year =
d b7D +0-4 _(amt.) waste/year
Amount of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) Produced Per Year
1-10 animals X�.(o lbs . PAN/animal/year = fa_9c7C)A5. lbs . PAN/year.
(PAN from N. C. Tech. Guide Std. 633)
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan
time and have acpropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely
manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on
the nitrogen (N) requirements of the crop to be grown and assuming
surface apolication:
• Table 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
Tract Field Soil Crop Lbs. N Acres Labs. N Month of
# No. Type Per Ac.* Utilized Application
MWLM Pe
Total �f l _54.'3-1 I aR_ _T S
* This N is from animal waste only. If nutrients from other
sources such as commercial fertilizer are applied, they must be
accounted for. N must be based on realistic yield expectation.
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied
while meeting the N requirements. Beginning in 1996 the Coastal
Zone Management Act will require farmers in some eastern counties
of North Carolina to have a nutrient management plan that addresses
all nutrients. This plan only addresses Nitrogen.
.3

WAS -f.E
F: ......
Table 2: ACRES
(Agreement with adjacent landowner mast be attached)
(Required 'only if operator does not own
adequate land [see Required Specification 2))
Tract Fie-16 Sail Crop Lbs. N * Acres Lbs. N Month of
# '=y-je Per Ac. Utilized Application
i�-�� 11;J1!■ IL7-
L
0
Total
See footnote for Table 1.

Nitrogen Application Rate Calculated Using Soil Tvpe and
• Realistic Yield Table For Chatham. County
•
C]
SOIL TYPE 205B
APPL. DATE
2.Q5B
Oat. grain4
lbs N/ac
Aug -April
205B
Wheat ain
1 21 s lac
2 5B
Barley grain
88 lbs N/ac
-Auk-April
Auk-ril
205B
Rye grain132
lbs N/ac
Aug -April
B
rn f r drain
119 lbs N/ac
Feb -Jul
2 5B
Com for silage
228 lbs N/ac
Feb -Jul
2 SB
or hum f
Qr grain
144 lbs N ac
Aril- ul
l2y
2 5B
SQrhum-sila-e
228 lb5 NZac
April -July
2 5B
Soybeans
140 lbs N/ c
April -Sept
2 5B
Sorghum -Sudangfass for hay
180 lbs N/ c
April-Augus
2Q5B
Sudangrass for hay
180 lbs N/• c
April -August
2 5B
Fescue for hay
180 lbs N/ac
u u t-july
205B
r and a a
180 lbs N/a
Au u- ul
B
-for
Small grain for hay
120 lbs N/ac
Aug -April
2 5B
Ryegrass for hay
180lbsN/ac
Feb -May
205.
Sudangrass for grazing
135 Ihs N/aApril-August
2 5B
Fescue for grazing
135 lbs N/ac
August- ul
205B
Orchard-,rass for gazing
1 lb N/ c
August -July
2 B
Small grain for grazing,
90 1 s N/ac
ug-April
2 5B
Ryegrass f r raz'
1 lbs N a
F- a
2 5B
Ma ua grass f r ha
1 lbs N c
A gu t-July
"B
Matua for yrazin2
135 lbs N/ac
All t- ul
SOIL TYPE 205B2
APPL. DATE
205B2
Oat grain
88 lbs N/ac
Aug -April
205B2
W t rain
112 i / c
Au - ril
205B2
Barley.grain75
lbs N/ac
Au.g-April
2Q5B2
e grain
112 N/a
-..Aug--April
205 B2
Com ain
10 1 lbs N ac
Feb -July
5B2
Com silage194
lbs N/ c
Feb -Jul
205B2
s
11 N/ac
A ri= e t
205B2
Sorghum grain
122 lbs N/ c
April -July
205B2
or hum iflage
194 lbs N/ac
April -July
205B2
--Sorghum- Sudangjas5.fr
I 5LLbs N
AadLA-ugust
205B2
Sudangrass fQr hay
153 lbs N ac
April -August
B2
escue hay
153 1bs N/ac
August- uly
205B2
Orchardgiass hay15
lac
August -July
grain
102 lbs N/ac
Aug-Apffl
B2
Rvegrass f r hay
1" 1 s N/ac
Fe - a
B2
Sudangrass for ain
1APHL-August
82
Fescue for grazing
It 5 lbs N/ac
A u - uI
B2
for gazing
115 lbs N/ac
August- ul
B2
-.QrchaEd-,rass
m l rain for grazing
87 lbs N/ac
Aug -April
2-UR2
Ryggrasa f r grazing
11 5 lbs N/ac
Feb
5B2
Matua for hay
153 lbs N/ac
--May
August -July
205B2
Matua forgrazing
115 lbs N/ac
August -July

SOIL TYPE 205C
APPL. DATE
t grain
96 1bs
N/ac
Aug -April
Wheat
121 I
s N/
rip-y-
grain
81 lbs
N/ac
ain
121 1
s N
u -
2
5
o
ain
109 1
s N c
Feb-July.
om silage
210 I
s N/ac
Fe - I
205C
Sorghum'n
1,32, lb5
Mac
A 1- ul
205C
orghum
silage
2
N/ac
April -July
2
5C
Soy -beans
12
N/ac
April -Sept
205C
Sorghum-
Sudangrass hay166
lbs
N/ cApril-
u
Sudan
grass hay
166 lb N/ac
April -August
Fescug
hay
166 lbs
N/ac
August-Jul
205C
Orchardumassa
1 61
sN c
August -July
Small
grain hay
I 10 lbs
N/ac
Aug -April
205C
Rye
for bay
166 1
/ c
Feb -May
Sudangrass
for grazing124
lbs
NIac
I - Au gust
205C
Fescue
for grazing
124 lbs
N/ac
t- ul
OrcharduCss
for grazing
124 i
s N/ c
u - u
205C
Small-ain
for grazing82
lbs
N/ac
2
e
rgrazing-124
lbs
N/ac
Feb -May
205C
Matua
for hay
166 1
s N/ac
- ul
atua
for grazine
124 1bs
N/ac
Au - ul
SOIL TYPE 205C2
APPL. DATE
205C2
Oat grain
84
N/a
Aug-April
2
_-W—hea-tgrairi106
lbs
N/ac
Aug-Apri
5
2
arl ai
72 lbs
N/ac
Aug-April
Rye grain
106 lb N/ac
Aug —April
205C2
Com grain
95 lbs
N/ac
Feb -July
205C2
Com silage
182 lbs
N/ac
Feb-July
2
jum.. grain120
lbs
N/ac
April -July
205C2
-,Sprg
Sorghum silage1
2 lbs
N/ac
April -July
205C2
n
2 lbs
Nlac
April -Sept
205C2
S rghum-S udan grass hay
144 lbs
N/ac
April -August
205C2
Suclangrass hay
144 lbs
N/
ril- u ust
205C2
Fescue hay
144Lbs
N/ac
August -July
205C2
Orchardgiass hay
144 1
s N/ac
August—August-J 1
205C2
Small grain hay
96 Ibs N/acAua-ADril
2
Ryegrass for hay
144 1
s N/acFeb-May2
Suclangrass for grazing10
N/ac
April-Augus
Fescue r i
1-August-July
205C2
orchardgrass fQr icazing
10
N/ac
u u- 1
205C2
Small o f grazing
72 1
/a
ril
205C2
for grazing
108 lbs
N/a
Feb -May
205C2
Matua for hay
144 lbs
N/ac
August -July
205C2
Matua for in
108 lbs
N/a
u u- 1
0
•
SOIL TYPE 206C2 APPL. DATE
1206C2 Oats for grain84 lbs N/ac Au -April
1206C2 Wheat for giain 106 IN N/ c - 1 •

•
.7
0
206 2
Barley for ain
72 lbs N/ac
Aug-Al2ril
206C2
Rye for grain
106 lbs / c
Au -A 'l
206C2
Com for grain
95 l s N/ac
Feb -July
206C2
Com for silage
182 lbs N/ac
Feb -July
206C2
Sorghum for grain
120 lbs N/ac
April-July
2
Sorghum for sila e
182 lbs N/ac
Aril- ul
206C2
Sovbeans
1121bs N/ac
Aprjl-Sept
2Q6C2
Sorghum -Sudan grilss hay
144 lbs N/ac
Al2ril-August
206C2
Sudangrass hay144
N/April-August
206C2
Fescue hay
144 l s N/ac
Au u t- ul
206C2
Qrchardass hay
144 I /ac
Au ust- ul
206C2
Small rain hay
96 l s WagAu
-A
206C2
Ryegjass for hay
144 lbs N/ac
Feb -May
Sudangra5s for grazing
108 lbs N/ac
Aril- u ust
206C2
Fescue for grazing
1 I s N/ac
Au ust- u]
206C2
Orchardgrass for grazing
10 1 a
August -July
206C2
all in for grazing,
72 lbs N/ac
Aug -April
206C2
e a or grazing
108 lbs n/ac
Feb -May
206C2
Matua for hay
144 lb N/ac
August-july
206C2
Matua for uazinQ
108 lbs N/ac
August- ul
SOIL TYPE 212B
APPL. DATE
212B
Oat grain
104 lbs N/ac
Aug -April
212B
Wheat grain
21 N/
-A r'1
21
ain
88 lbs N/ac
Aug -April
212
R ain
132 lbs N/ac
Aug -April
212B
Com grain
119 lbs N/ac
Feb -July
212E
Com silage
228 lbs N c
-July,
212B
Sorghum grain
138 lbs N/• c
...Feb
April -July
212E
Sorghum silage
228 lbs N/ac
April -July
212B
Sovbeans
140 lbs N/ac
April-Sel2l
212B
Sorghum Sudangrass hay
175 lbs N/ac
April -August
2
i an graa5 ha
175 l lac
-April -August
2
cue hay
175 lbs N/ac
August-Jul
212B
Orchard s ha
1 s N/ac
August-Jul
212B
Small ain hay
120 lbs N/ac
Aug -April
212B
Ryegrass for ha
1 N/ac
Feb -Ma
212B
Sudan-,risso n
1 1 lbs N/ac
April -August
212B
Fescue for grazing131
lb N/ac
u u- ul
2 2B
Orchardgiass for giazing
131 lbs N/ac
Augut-july
212B
Small giain for grazing
90 lbs N/ac
Aug -April
212B
Ryegrass for gTazing
131 lbs N c
Feli-May
21
ua for hay
175 lbs N/ac
August -July
B
Matua for szrazing
131 lbs N/ c
u u - ul
SOIL TYPE 212C and 212D
APPL. DATE
212C
Oat grain
96 lbs N/ac
Aug -April
212C
Wheat grain
121 lbs N/ac
Au -Ap I
212C
Barley in
81 lbs N/ac
Aug -April
212C
Ryg..grain
121 lbs N/ac
Aug-Apri
212C
2
Feb -July
212
m uain
127 tbs N/ac
Aril- ul

sorghum silage
210 lbs NI
-July
212C
Soybeans
129 lb N/ac
-April
Aril-Sept
212C
S,QrghjjmSudangrass hay
161 lbs N ac
ril-Au ust
21-2C
Sudang[asshay
1 1 s N/
ril-August
212C
161 lbs N/ac
August-Jul
212C
161 lbs N/ac
Aujust-july
212C
..QmhaTdgrasshay
Small grain hay
110 lbsN/ c
Au2-ADnl
212C
Ryegrass for hay
161 lbs N/ac
F- a
212C-,.
S�dangrass for grazing
121 lbs N ac
April -August
212C
Fescue for grazing
121 lbs Ni/ac
August -July
212
rchard a s for gazing
121 lbs N
-
u u tJuly
2 2
mall ai r ra in
lac
u -
212
Ryegrass for grazing121
lbs N/ac
Fe& -May
212
a f r a
161 lbs N/a-Auguat-luly
212C
Mntllq r uazin2
121 l /Allmlvt-lltjv
SOIL TYPE 212D2
APPL. DATE
212D2
Oat grain
83 lbs N/ac
Aug -April
212D2
Wheat grain
106 lbs N/
-Aug-Apdl
212D2
Barley in
7-Q lbs Wac-A
l
212D2
Ryg grain
106 lbs N/ac
Aug -April
212D2
ain
95 lbs N/ac
Feb -July
212D2
Com silage
1 2 N/ac
- ul
212D2
SQrghum grain
110 lbs N/ac-ApriLluly
212 2
Sorghum silage
182 1 s N/ cA6ril-July
212D2
Soybeans
112 lbs N/ac
April -Sept
212D2
..-S-Qrghum Sudangrasshay
140 lbs N/ac
April -August
212D2
Sudanglass-hay14
N/ac
April -August
212D2
Fescue ha
lac
August -July
212D2
Orchardgrass hay
14 N/ac
-
A u tWy
212D2
Small gLaina
Wag
u -A l
212D2
Ryegrass for hay
14Q lb5 N/ac
-Ma
212D2
Sudanassfor grazing
1121 N/ac
April -August
212D2
Fescue for -grazing
112 lbs N/ac
Au us - ul
212D2
hard for grazing
112 lbs N/ac
Au u t- ul
212D2
Small grain for grazing771
/ac
Aug -April
212D2
agrazing
112 lbs N/acFeb-May
212 2
o f r hay
140 IN N/ac
Augol-July
212D2
Matua for P-Tazin2
112 lbs N/ac
Au ust- ul
SOIL TYPE 520C
APPL. DATE
520C
Oatgrain
/ c
Aug-Al2ril
520C
W eat grain
99 IbS N/ac
Aug -April
520C
Barley grain66
lbs N/ac
Auj-April
52grain
99 1 / cAug-Apffl
520C
Com grain-___
92 N/acFeb-Julv
520C
CQm silage
177 lbs N/acFeb-Juli
520C
SQrghum_g[ain
92Uril-July
5
m ilage
177 lbs NIac
April-luly
5
92 lbs N/ac
ADnl-Sept
Qrghum Sudangrasshay
129 lbs N
' l-August
520C
Sudangrassa
12 /ac
Pril-August
Ap

r�L
.7
Fescue hay
129 l lac
520C
Orchardgrasshay
129 l s lac
_.Augu5t-jUIy--
August -July
520C
Small gjain hay
110 lbs N/ac
Aug -April
Ryegrass fQrhay129
lbs N/ac
Feb -Ma
520C
Sudangrassr grazing
97 l / c
April —August
520C
Fescue for grazing97
1 lac
AugusL-july
520C
Qrchardgrassf r irazing
97 1 lac
August -July
Small grain for grqzing
82 lac
Aug -April
Ryegrass for grazing
97 lbs.NLac
e -Ma
2
Matua f r
12 1 ac
August -July
2
Matua f r uaziing
97 lbs N/ac
AiicFij-,t-JLIIV
SOIL TYPE 35B
APPL.DATE
S B
Oat grain
117 I lac
Aug -April
SB
Wheat grain
144 lac
Aug -April
B
BAdley grain
9 / c
-A ril
SB
Rye gLrain
144 lbs N/ac
Aug -April
113 1 s N/ac
Feb -July
35B
—c6m-grain
CQm silage
216 lbs N/ac
Feb -July
5B
hum grain
113 I s N/ac
ril- ul
355-
Sorg -hum ailage
216 lb5lLac
At)ri]-July
B
Soybeans
14 N/ac
A�ril-Sevt
3 B
Sorghum Sudangrass hay
150 1 s lac
April -August
5
u Ligrass hay1501
lac
AVril-August
358
Fescue hay
150 1 s N/ac
August- uI
B
OrchardgLass hay
150 lbs N/ac
3
all gjain bay
120 lbs N/ac
-August-July
Auj-April
358----
Ry-cgma for hay150
lbs N/ac
Feb -Ma
35B
S-udangrass for grazing
113 I s N/ac
Al2ril-August
SB
Fescue for grazing
113 lbs N/ac
August -July
0-r—ehar-dgrass for gazing
11 /ac
August -July
35B
S-m—all gjjjj.n for gjazingl
/ c
u -A ril
ass for grazing
11 lac
Feb -May
B
Matua for h
15 N/aAugust-July
SB
Matua r r 'n
11 N/ c
Au ust- it
SOIL TYPE 57C
APPL.DATE
57C
Oat gjain
108 lbs Nlac
Aug -April
57C
Wh6at. grain
132 l I c
-A ri
57C
Barleyrain
96 1 / c
Aug-Al2ril
57
e grain
1321 lac
Auer -April
orn a
92 lbs N/ac
F - ul
57
orn Alage
177 lbs N/ac
Feb -July,
57C
SQr&hurngrain
92 lb5 N/ac:
April -July
57C
Sgrghum silage
177 l s lac
April -July
57C--.-
SDyb&ana
129 l lac
April-Sep
57C
Sgrgh,um Sudangrass hay
175 lbs N ac-AlAdl-August
Sudangrass hay
17 N/ac
ADW-Auiust
57
F-ugue hay
175 l ac
u t- 1
7C
Qr-chaidgiass hay
175 1 ac
August -July
57C
Small-grain11
/ac
Au -A ril
Ryegca5s for hay
175 lbs N/ac
Feb -May
57C,.
Sudangrassfor grazimz
131 i s /ac
Aril- ul

Fescue for grazing
13 I N/ac
57C
Orchardgrassfor grazing
131 lbs N/ac
-August-July­
August-JUly
57C
Small grain f azin
2 / c
-April
7
for grazing
t3lJbs N/ac
7
--..Ryggfass
Matua for hay
--Feb-May
175 1 s N/ac
August -July
.57C
Matim for in
1 1 lac—+AUust-
SOIL TYPE 50D
APPL. DATE
Oat grain4
c
Auv-Aoril
Wheat grain
99 I c
Aug -April
Barley
ac
Au -A ri
50D
Rye grain
ac
Aug -April
50D
com graill
104 ac
Feb -July
D
ila e
199 I ac
Feb -July
50D
or h r'
104 lbs N/ac
April-July.-
50D
Sor hum ila e
1 lac
April -July
50D
Soybeans---11
lacApril-Swl
r hum ud n ass hay
1 / c
April -August
D
184 lbs N/ac
April —August
D
—5u(fangiasshay
Fescue hay
184 lbs N/acu
ust- ul
ar hay
1841bs N/ac
August -July----......
50D
Small grain hay
110 lbs N/ac
Aug -April
ass for hay
18 lacTeb-May
50D
Sudan ass for grazing
138 lbs N/ac
April -August
Fescue for grazing
138 1 lac
u t-July'---
50D
Orchardgrass for a i
138 lbs N/ac
August -July
50D
mall gLain for gi7azing
8 2 lb s N/acAuk-April
50D
Ryegrass for grazing
138 lbs N/ac
Feb -Ma
50D
Matua for hay
1 4 lbs lac
August -July
50D
Matua for grazing
138 lbs N/ac
Au ust-Jul
SOIL TYPE 130B
APPL. DATE
13QB
Oat grain
911 acAug-Apfil
B
Wheat for grain
108l / c
-A
130B
arle for grain
72 lbs N/ac-A
B
Rye f r a'
108 1 ac
Aug -April
orn for grain
113 lbs N/ac
Feb -July
B
Com for silage
2 ac
Feb -July
B
r hum for grain
113 1 /a
130B
Sorghum silage
216 lbs N/ac
April -July
130B
Soybeans
120 lbs N/ac
April -Sept
1303
Sorghum Sudanglass bay
200 lbs N/ac
April -August
130B
Sudangjassa
2 0l ac
April -Au ust
Fescue for hay
200 1 lac
August-Jul
130B
hay
20
u t-
1
_Qmhardgrassr
grain f r hay
12N/ac
Aug -April
--Small
130B
e a
20 ac
Feb -May
130B
Sudangrass for grazing
150 lbs N/ac
April -August
130B
F scue for grazing
15 a
130B
Orcharduass for uazin2
15 ac
Au u- 1
0
•

•
•
CJ
130B
Small trrain or azin
90 lbs N/ac
a -A
130B
Rvegrass for grazing
150 lsNl
-Ma
1 B
Nfatua for hay
200 lb N/ac
August -July
13 B
Matua for araz'n
ISO lbs N/ac
Uaust-July
SOIL TYPE 130C
APPL. DATE
130C
Qats for gicain
85 lbs N/a
Aug -April
13 OC
Wheat for grain
99 lbs N/ac
Aijg-Apdl..
130C
Barl r ourain
66 lbs N/ac
-A 1
130C
JfQ
Rye for grain
99 1bs N/ac
Aug -April
130C
Urn fQr grain
104 lbs N/ac
Feb -July
1
orn fQr.silage
1 /a
Feb -July
130C
Sorghum..for grain
104 lbs N/ac
April -July
130C
Sorghumsilage
199 lbs N/ac
April -July
130C
Sorghum,Sudan grass for hay
184 lbs lac
April -August
130
Soybeans
I 10 lbs N/aq
April -Sept
130C
lbs N/ac--April-August
130C
.Sudangrassforhay184
Fescue -for hay
1 U lbs N/ac
August-1
130C
Qrchardgrass for hay
184 ls N/ac
August-Jul
130C
Small grain for hay
1 IQ I s N/a
-A ril
1
e f r hay
184 lbs NI
Feb -May
130C
S 6ngrass for ra zin
138 lbs N/ac
April -August
130C
Fpscue for grazing
138 lbs N/ac-August-July
130C
Orchardgrass for grazing
138 1 a N/ac
August -July
130C
Small grain for grincr
82 lbs N/ac
Aug -April
130C
Ryegrass for grazing
138 I 5 N/ac
Fe - 1a
130C
Matua-fQr.hay184
lbs N/ c
Au u Quly
130C
Matua for ara-zini4
138 lbs N/ c
u ust- ul
SOIL TYPE 130D
APPL. DATE
130D
at for grain
s N/ac
Aug -April
130D
Wheat for grain
99 lbs N/ac
Au -A r•I
130D
Barley for am
66 lbs N/ac
Aug -April
130D
Rye for grain
99 1 lac
u - ril
130D
Corn fWgrain
104 lbs N/ac
- ul
130D
Com for silage
199 lbs / c
13 OD
Sorghum for
98 lbs N/ac
—Le-b�-Iuly
it -Jul
130D
-grain
Sorg —hum for silage
199 lbs N/ac
Aril- ul
130D
SQr hum- Sudangrass for hay
184 N/ac
A�ril-Auust
130Q
Soybeans
I 10 lbs N/ac
ril- e t
130D
Sudang[ass for
184 lbs N/ac
April -August
130D
Fescue r hay
184 lbs N/ac
u ust- ul
130D
Orchardgrass for hay
1 4 lbs N/ac
August -July
130D
Smal.t..grain for hay
I 10 lb N/
-A
RyeRyegau for hay
184 lbs N/ac
-Ma
1
udangrass for grazing
N/ac
ril-
1
escue razin
1 / c
u u t-
13 D
rchard ass ain for
1 Ibs N/ac
Au ust- ul
Small grain grazing for
2 /
Au2-Anril
13 DD
Ryegrass for grazing
138 lbs N/ac
-Ma
130D
Matua for hay
184 lbs N/acugust-july
130D __
_Matua for Lyrazin _ _______
138 .lb N/ac
Au u t-Ju.lv_..

SOIL TYPE 51B APPL. DATE 0
51B
Qqts for grain
85 lbs N/ac
Au -A
51B
Wheat f r grain
132 1 s N/a
-A ril
51 B
Barley for grain
88 lbs. N/ac
-A i
518
Rye for grain
132 i s N/a
l
51B
Com for ain
106 I s N/aQ
Feb-Jul
1B
rn for silage
204 lbs N/ac
Feb -July
1B
r h r rai
106 lbs N/acApril-July
51BSorghum
silage
2 41 s N/a
1- ul
51B
SoLbeans140
I s N/ac
'1- e
51B ---Sorghum-Sudangiass
for hav
175 lbs / c
April -August
51B
Siviangrass. for hay
j-7-5—Ib5N/ac
Aril -Au u t
51B
Fescue for ha
N/ac
August -July
51B
hay
175 lbs N/ac
Aujust-july
5I B
-Qrchardgrassr
Small gigain for hay
12 N/ac
Aug -April
51B
R e f r hay
175 lbs N/a
-Ma
51B
Sp6ngrass for grazin.g
1 lac
April -August
51B
F scu azing
131 lbs. N/ac
August -July
1 B
grazing
131 l a
us -luly
51B
-Qrchardgrassfor
Small gLain for grazing
90 lbs N/ac
Aug -April
5I
R egrass for grazing
131 lbs N/ac
Feb -May
51B
Matl4a fQLgrazing
N/ac
August -July
51B
Matu r 2raziniz
131 lb N/ac
A t- ul
SOIL TYPE 30B
APPL. DATE
30B
Oats for gain
117 lbs N/ac
.—Aug—April
30B
Wheat for grain
144 lbs N/ac-A,ug-Aprd
OB
for grain
96 1 s N/ac
Aug-Apri
30B
—13-arley
Rye forgin
144 1 N/
-A
OB
rn f ain
119 lbs N/ac
Feb -July
OB
C rn for silage
22 N/ac
Feb -July
30B
Sorghum for grain
15 1 lac
A - ul
OB
silage
22 N/ac
April-july-
30Bbeans
.&rghum
14 lac
April -Sept
B
Sofghum Suclangrass for hay
2 /ac
Aoril-August
30B
Suclangrass for hgy
22 lac
April -Au u t
OB
Fescue for ha
22" 1 s N/ c
t- ul
B
(JTcbardgrass for hay
225 lbs N/ac
u st- ul
30B
Small gjain for hay
120N/ac
Aug -April
30B
R e ra for hay
2 N/ac
Feb -May
OB
an s for grazing
1 N/ac
April -August
B
--Lescue for grazing1
s N/ac
August-Jul
char for grazing
1 l c
- ul
30B
Small giainr grazing
90 1 lac
Aug -April
30B
Ryegiiss for grazing169
1 Nlac
Feb -May
OB
iatua for hay
22Ub-sN/ac
August-July
B
atu r jzrazin2
169 lbs N/ac
Au-gust-Jul
IL TYPE 37B
0

0
C� J
•
7B
Wheat f r 'rain
144 lb lac
ug- riI
7B
Barley for ain
96 lb ac
Au -A ril
7B
Rye for gn6n
144 1 lac
Aug-Al2fil
7B
Com for ai
113 1 /a
F b- uI
7B
Com for silage
216 lbs N ac
Feb -July
7B
Sorghum f r rain
113 1bs N/ac
APfil-lulY
7B
Sorghum silage
216 l lac
fil-July
7B
140 1 /ac
AT)HI-Sept
7B
-Sutgans
SQrghum-Suda ngrass for hay
150 l lac
April -August
7B
Sudangrass for hay
1.50 1 lac
Aril- u u t
7B
Fescue for hay
150 1 lac
Augu-July
B
Orchardglass for hay
150 lbs /ac
Au2ust-July
7B
Small gjain for hay
120 1 / c
-A ri
7B
Rycgjas5 for hay
150 1 /aF6-May
B
Sudanarass for grazing
11 3 lbs N/ac
April -August
323
FQ_soo f grazing
113 l lac
August -July
7
rchar r ss r a ing,
113 lbs NlacAugust-July
B
Small grain for gfazing90
lbs N/ac
Aug -April
7B
Ryggrass for grazing
113 lbs N/a
Feb -May
7B
Matua for hay
150 lb lac
Aug
7B I
Matua for arazin2113
lb lac
SOIL TYPE 20B
APPL. DATE
2013
Oats -for Grain
l 41bs N/ac,
Aug -April
2 B
Wheat for Qrain
1 2 1bs N/ac
Aug-Al2ril
20B
Barley for drain
88 lbs N/ac
Aug -April
B
Rye for grain
132 lb N/ac
Au -A ril
2 B
orn for rain
119 lbs lac
F - ul
2 B
Com for silage
228 lbs ac
Feb-July2
B
SQrghum for grain
150 lbs lac
April-july
2013
or m silage
228 lb / cApril-
1
20
Soy can
140 IN lac
April -Sept
2 B
Sorghum SudangrassJor hay
ISO lbs ac-April-Auguat
2 B
Sudangiass for hay
J 1 lac
April -August
2 B
Fescue for hay
ac
Au us - ul
2 B
for hay
180 lbs lac
August- uly
2 B
-Orchardgrass
Small Gminfor hay
120 lb lac
Aug -April
2 B
Ryegrass for hay
180 lb ac
Feb -May
2 B
Sudatigrass for grazing
13 5 lb3 N/ac.
Aril-Augu t
Fescue for grazing
J IN lac
AL12USt-IUIY
.20
rc and ass for gjazing
135 lbs lac
August-Jul
20B
S mall ain f rai n R
90 lbs Nlac
Aug -April
2 B
a r grazing
1351 s N/acFeb-May
B
Matua for hay
180 lbs NlacAugust-
ul
2 B
Matua for zrazina
135 lbs lac
A u t- ul
SOIL TYPE 20B2
APPL. DATE
2
B2
Oats for Grain
88 lbs N ac
Aug
-April
B2
Wheat for Grain
-12 lbs /ac
A
-A ri1
202.-Barley
for ain
75I c
2
B2
RyLfgr grain
112 lbs lac
_Aug-Apnl
Au
-A nl
2
B2
Com far in
101 lbs N ac
Fe
-Jul

2 B2
om for silage
194 lbs N/ac
Feb -Jul
20B2
S r hum for grain
127 lbs N/ac
Aril- ul
20B2
Sorghum silage
1 4 1 lac
April -July
2082
So eans
119 1 lac
April -Sept
20B2
or hu u an a for h
153 lb N/ac
April -August
B2
Sudangi:ass for hay
153 1 lac
Aril- u u t
20B2
FeScue f r
153 lb lac
u - 1
20B2
Orchardgrass for hay
153 lbs N/ac
August-Jul
20B2-
Sall Grain for hay
102 lbs N/ac
Auj-April
2 B2
Ryegfass for hay
153 lbs N/ac
Feb -May
20B2
Sudangjass for gicazing
11 " lac
April -August
20B2
Fe u f r grazing
11 " lb lac
August -July
20B2
Orchardgjass for grazing
115 1 lac
August-Jul
20B2
Small grain for grazing77
lbs N ac
Aug -April
20B2
Ryegrass for grazing
115 lbs N/ac
Feb-May--
20B2
Matua for hay
153 1 lac
August -July
B2
Matua for ain
1 " lb N/a
u - ul
SOIL TYPE 20C
APPL. DATE
20C
Oatsr grain
96 lbs N a
Au.g-Ai2ffl
Wheat f r gicain
121 lbs lac
ril
20C
Ba fQr.grain
81 lbs N/ac
Aug -April
20
Rye for grain
121 lbs N/ac
Aug -April
20C
Com for ai
1 lbs lacFeE-July
20C
CQm for 5ilage
2 10 lbs lac
Feb -July
Sorghum for grain
1 /ac
April -July
20C
Sorghumsilage
2 10 lb lac
April -July
20
129 lbs N/ac
ril-Sept
2QC
SorghumSudangrass for hay
1 lac
April -August
20C
Sudangrassfor hay
166 lb N/ac
April -August
20C
F f r hay
166 lb lac
Auglj5t-July
20C
Orchardgiassr hay
166 lbs lac
- ul
20C
Small..Crain for hay
110 1 lac
Au.g-April
20C
Ryegras5for hay
166 lbs NI c
Feb -May
Sudangrasa for grazing1241b
I c
April -August
20C
Feacuj for grazing
124 /ac
August-Jul
20C
Orchardgrass for grazing
124 lbs lac
August-Jul
20C
Small. glain for grazin.g
82 lb lac
ug- it
20C
Rye-grass for grazing
1241 N/acFeb-May
20
Mat a for hay
166 1bs N/gp
August -July
M f ina
124 lb lac
u u t- ul
SOIL TYPE 23B2
APPL. DATE
23B2
Oats for grain
lbs N/ac
u - ril
2 B2
Wheat a'
112 lbs N/ac
ril
23B2
Barley for grain
75 lac
Aug-Apfil
23B2
Rye for grain
112 lbs N/ac
u -A ril
23B2
Com for grain10
1 lbs N/ac
Feb -July
23B2
Com fQuilage
194 lbs Nlac
Eeb-July
2382
Sorghum for grain
122 / c
Aril- ul
23B2
Sorghum silage
194 1 lac
April -July
23.B2
SoAbeans
119 lb N/ac
Ai)ril-Se6t
0
rl
L
10

0
n
U
•
23B2Sorghum-
u an ass for hay
153 lbs N/ac
Aril -A
23B2
Sudangrass for hay
153 lbs N/ac
Aphl—August
23132
Fescue for hay
153lbs N/ c
August-Jul
23B2
Orchardgjass for hay
153 lbs N/ac
Au u t-
23B2
Small Grain for hay
102 lbs MacAug-April
2 B2
Rvegrrass for hay
153 lbs N/ac
F- a
23B2
S 6ngrass for grazing
l l Ibs lac
April -August
23B2
Fescue for grazing
115 IN N/ac
Ajjgjj$L_j5jy
23B2
r h f rgrazing.....115
1 s N/a
Au ust- u!
23B2
Small grain f r razin
77 lb N/ac
Aug-Apfil
2 B2
Ryegrass for grazing
115 lbs N/ac
Feb -Ma
23 B2
Matua for
15 1 N/ac
August -July
2382
Ma ua f r a ing
115 1 s Nlac
Au ust- ul
SOIL TYPE 232B
APPL. DATE
232B
Oats for grain
1 lbs N/ac
Aug -April
232B
Wh at CQrr in
12 lbs N/ac
Aug -April
232E
Barley for grain
80 lbs N/ac..Aug-April
232B
Rye for grain
120 lbs N/ac
Aug -April
232B
Com foCgrain
11 3 lb N/ac
Feb -July
232B
orn for Silage
21.6 1b 5 N—/ac
Feb -July
232B
um for grain
113 lbs N/ac
Aril- ul
232B
r h m silage
216 lbs N/ac
April -July
232B
Sorghum Sudiangrass for hay
175 1bs N/ac
Aril -August
232B
soybeans
120 lbs N/ac
April -Sept
232B
Sudangrass. for hay
175 lbs N/ac
April— t
232B
Fescue for
175 1 / c
a- ul
OrgbaEdgrass.for hay
175 lbs N/ac
August- ul
-232-B
232B
Small grain f r hay
120 lbs. N/ac
Aug -April
232B
Rye.grass for hay
175 lbs Nlac
Feb -Ma
232B
Sudangl:assfor gfazing
131 lbs N/ac
April -August
232B
Fescue for grazing
1 3 1 /
u- ul
232B
r hard ass for grazing
131 lbs lac
Aug-ust-july
232B
Small gaain for grazing
90 lbs N/ac
Aug -April
232B
Ryegrass for grazing
131 l s N/ac
Feb -Ma
232B
Matua for hay
175 lbs N/ac
August -July
232B
Matua for grazina
131 lbs N/ac I
Au ust- ul
SOIL TYPE 232C
APPL. DATE
232C
Oatsin
85 lbs N/ac
Au -A riI
232C
Wheat for grain
110 lbs N/ac
Aug -April
232C
Barley for gjain
74 Ib N/
Aug -April
232
R e for
110 lbs N/ac
Aug -April
232C
Com for grain
104 lbs /
Feb -July
232C
o ila e
199 lbs N/ac
Feb -July
232C
Sorghum For rain
104 lbs N/ac
Aril -Jul
232C
Sorghum silage
199 1 ac
April -July
232C_
110 lbs Nlac
April -Sept
232C
Sorghum Sudangass for hay
161 lbs N/ac
Aril -A s
232C
for hay
161 lbs N/ c
Aril- g1jst
-..Sudangxass
232C
Fescue for hay
161 lbs N ac
Auust-July
232C
Orchardglassr hay
161 1 s N/ac
August -July
232C
I Small grain -for ha
11 0 1 N/ac
Au -A ril

232C,
Ryegrass for hay
161 lbs N/acFeb-May
32jC-
Sudangrassgrazing
21 lbs N/ac
April -August
232C
Fescue for grazing121
lbs N/ac
August-July
2C
irazing
121 lbs Nlac
Au u t- u]
232Small
-Qrchar-dgrassfor
in for grazing
82 lbs N/ac
u -A ril
232C
Ryegrass for grazing
121 lbs lac
Feb -Ma
232C
Matua for haj
161 lbs N/ac
u ust- ul
232C
Matua f
21 lbs N/ac
AL - u1
SOIL TYPE 232D
APPL. DATE
232D
0 ats for grain
85 lbs Nlac
Aug -April
32D
Wheat for grain
110 lbs N/ac
Aug -A ri
32D
Barely for krain
7 I N/ac
Au -A riI
232D
R e for grain
110 lbs Wag
Aug -April
32D
Com fouraill
104 lbs N/ac
Feb -July
232D
Com for silage
199lbs lac
Eeb-July
2D
or u rain
104 lbs /ac
April -July
32D
Spribum fbriiLame-
i 99 lbs lac
A - ul
32D
S 3Lbeans
ii 0 lbs N/ac
A ri - e t
2D
ud ngl:ass hay
161 lbs N/acAl2ril-August
232
--Sorghum
grass r hay
161 lbs N/ac
April -August
232D
-Sudan
FQscue for hay
161 lbs lac
u t- ul
232D
QTchardgrassa
lbs N/ac
Au u -
32D
Small grain for hay
110lbs N/ac
Aug -April
232D
Rycgrass for hay
161 lbs N/ac
Feb-
232D
Sudangrass for grazing
12 L lbs N/acAr)ril-Augusl
232
for grazing
121lbs N/ac
u ust- ul
232D
-Fcsgue
grazing
121 1 N/ac
August -July
232D
-0-rcha[dgrassfor
S all grain for grazing
82 l N/ac
Aug-Apn
232D
Ryegras$.,fQr grgzing
121 lbs lac
Feb-Mqy
Mglua for hay
161 Ibs N/ c
August -July
232D
Matua for uuin2 i
121 lbs N/ c
Au u t- ul
SOIL TYPE 232B2
APPL. DATE
232 2
Qats for grain
78 lb
N/ac
Aug -April
232B2
Wheat f6r
grain
102 lb
N/ac
u -A
2 2B2
Barley f
a'
8 lbs
N/ac
Aug -April
2 2 2
R e f r
102
N/ac
Aug -April
232B2
rn for goi.n104
lbs
N/ac
Feb -July
232132
C rn for '
la �
199 lb
NI c
Feb -Jul
232B2
Sorghum for grain
96 lbs
N/ c
April -July
232B2
r hum
ila e
1991
N/ac
A '1- ul
232B2
Spybgans2lb
N/ac
Al2ril-Sept
232B2
r h -
udanor s for hay
14 lbs N/ac
A l- u ust
232B2
Sucfangrass
for hay
142.1
N/ac
Apfil-August
232B2
escue. for
-hay
149 lbs
N/ac
August-july
232B2
for ha
14 lb
NI
Au us - l
232B2
--Olcbardgrass
Small Grain
for ha
2 lb
N/a
u -April
232B2
for hay
149lb
Nlac
Fe -Ma
232B2
-Rycgjjjss
grass
a
121b
N/acApril-August
232B2
-Sudan
Fescue for
grazing
112 lb
N/ac
u ust-
2 2 2
Orchardgra5s
for grazing
112 lbs
N/ac
Au - u1
232B2
S all uain
for mazln277
lb
N/ c
IW-MIXII
•
12

C7
0
•
2 2B2
R e rass fQr grilZigg112
lbs / c
Fe -Ma
2 2
Matua for ha
149 lbs N/ c
A u t- u]
232B2
Matua for era in
112 lbs N/ac
Au u t- ul
SOIL TYPE_ 232C2
APPL. DATE
2 2 2
Oats for gfain
73 lbs N/a
Aug -April
2 2 2
Wheat for "rain
96 lbs N/ac
Aug -April
2 2 2
Barley for gjain
641b N/ac
Aug -April
212 2
Rye for ¢rain
lb N/ac
Aug -April
2
rn for grain
90 lb Nlac
Feb -July
232 2
rn for silage
173 lbs lac
F- ul
232 2
Sorghum for grain
90 lb$ Nlgg
April-July
2
--Sorihum for idage
J 7 3 1 lac
A il-july
232C2
r hum- u an grass for hav
140 lbs N/ac
A ri- u u t
2 2 Z
Soybeans
96 lbs N/ac
April -Sept
2 2 2
Sudangrass for hay
140 lbs N/ac
April -August
232C2
Fescue for hay
140 1
August -July
2 2CZ
-Qrchardgrass for hay
140 lbs N/ac
August -July
2 2 2-Small
grain for hay
96 lbs N/ac
Aug -April
232C2
R f r hay---.-...140
lbs lac
Fgb-May
2
an ass for in
5 1 /ac
A r'1-A
232 2
—Fescue for grazinglbs
N/ac
Au t- u1
232C2
hard grass.f r grazing
105 IN N/ac
Augtig-jilly
232 2
_QrQ
Small grain for.grazin.g
72 lbs Mac
Au -pril
2 2 2
Ryegass for grazing
105 lbs N/ac
Fe -May
2 2 2
Matua for grazing
140 1bs N/ac
August -July
232C2
Matua for in
lb N/ac
Au t- 1
SOIL TYPE 232D2
APPL. DATE
232D2
Oats for grain
73 lbs NI
Au -
2 2 2
Wheat for gjain
lb Nla
Aug -April
232D2
for gjain
64 lbs Mac
Aug -April
232D2
-BgEigy
Rye for grain
96 lbs Nlac
A -
232D2
90 lbs NI c
F b- ul
2
-Co-mbr-grain
Com for silage
173 lb N/ac
Feb-July
2D2
Sorghum f r r in
90 lbs Nlac
Aril-
2 2D2
r hum for silage
173 lb N/ac
April -July
2 2 2
r hum- udan rass for hay
14 1 N/ac
April -August
232D2
Sovbeans
96 lbs N/ac.
April -Sept
2 2 2
Sudangrass for hay
140 lbs N/ac
A - ugust
232D2
Fescue for hay
140 lbs N/ac
August -July
232D2
Orchardgrass for hay
140 lbs N/ac
Auggst-July
232D2
-Small uain
6 lbs N/ac
Aug
232D2
for bay
140 lbs N/ac
--April
Fe -May
232D2
udan a for grazing
10" lbs N/a
Al2ril-August
2 2 2
Fgsgttfor grazi-ng
105 lbs lac
August -July
2 2 2
Orchardgrass r grazing105
Ib I c
August -July
232D2
Small grain for grazing2
l s N/ac
Aug -April
232D2
Ryegjass for grazing
105 lbs Nlac
Feb-May
MaWa for hay--
140 lbs N/ac
t- ul
232D2
Matua for__ ra in
105 lbsNc
Au_u - 1
13

SOIL TYPE 131B
APPL. DATE
131B
Oatsr graiDL
91 lbs N/ac
Aug- April
11B
Wheat for gain
108 l s N/ac
Auiz-April
131 B
B Hey for grazing
72 lbs N/ c
Aug -April
131B
Rye for ain
I OS lbs lac
Aug -April
131B
Com for in
113 lbs lac
Feb -July
131 B
CQm for silage
216 lbs N/ac
Feb -July
131B
Sorghum for
13 lbs N/ac
April -July
131
-grain
hum for silage
216 lbs N/ac
April-july
131 B
Sorghum Sudangiass for hay
200 lbs / c
April -Au ust
13 1 B
So- eans
120 lbs N/ac
Aril- e
131 B
Sudangrass for hay
200 lb N/ac
April -August
131B
FQscue for hay
200 lbs N/ac
A
Qrghudgrass for hay
200 lbs N/ac
Au ust- ul
131 B
Small grain for hay
120lbs N/ac
Aug -April
131
ass for hay
200 lbs N/ac
Feb-May
B
Sudangfass for grazing
150 lbs N/ac
A ri -AugUst
131B
Fe cue for grazing
150lb /ac
August -July
1318
h r ass for grazing
150 lbs N/ac
AuauaLluly
1 1 B
Small grain f in
lbs N/ac
Auiz-Aoril
131
R e ass for grazing
150lbs lac
Fe -Ma
1 a
M tua for ha
200 lbs N/ac
AugusLaly
131B
Mat a f r grazing
150 lbs N/ac
Au ust-July
SOIL TYPE 131C
APPL. DATE
131C
Oats for ain
85 lbs N/ac
Aug -April
131C
W eat for grain
i s N/ag
Au.g-April
1 1C
for grain
66 lbs N/ac
Aug -April
131C
.13arley
Rye for giain
99 lbs N/ac
Aug-April
1
rn for grain
104 lbs N/ac
Feb-July
iae
199 lbs N/ac
Fe - l
1
f r rain
104 lbs N/ac
April -July
131CL
Sorghum silage
199 lbs N/ac
April -July
1l
hum- udan ra s for hav
184 lb N/ c
A - uQust
131C
Soytgans
l /ac
April -Sept
131C
Sudan a s for hay
184lbs Nlac
Al2ril-August
131C
Fescue for hay
184 lbs N/ac
August -July
Orchar—dgrassf r hay
184 lbs N/ac
August -July
131
a 1 grain for hay
I 10 lbs N/ac
Aug -April
131C
s for hay
184 lbs N/ac
Feb-May
1
n ass for grazing
138 lbs N/ac
April -August
]
E!-,-Kue for grazing
138 lbs N/ac
Aueust-July
131C
Orchardgrassgrazing.
lbs N/ac
August-July
1 C
Smal.1-grain for grazing
ELILs N/ac
Aug -April
131C
Ry&glass for grazing
138 lbs N/ac
Feb -May
131C
Matua for hay
184 lbs N/ac
August -July
1
for a'
lbs lac
August -July
SOIL TYPE 522A
APPL. DATE
522A
Oats for grain
78 lbs N/ac
Aug -April
72A
Wheat for graini
s N/
A- '1
522A
for grain
72 lbs Nlac
Aug -April
-.522
Rve for in
9.6 1 N/ac
Au -
C
0
Is
14

•
•
•
522A
orn for grain
113 Ibs N/ac
Feb -July
522A
orn fQr ailage192
Ibs N/ac
Feb -July
522A
Sorghum far rain
J 13 Ibs N/ac
ril- ul
522A
Sorghum for silage
192 Ibs Nlac
Aril- ul
22A
Sorghum- S a an graujor hay
150 Ibs N/ac
Apri I -August
522A
So beans
140 lbs N/ac
A il- e t
22A
SudangraU for hay
150 lbs N/ac
April—
22A
Fescue for hay
150 lbs N/ac
i- f
522A
Orchardgfass for hay
150 lbs Nlac
Au ust- ul
522A
Small gEain for hay
120 lbs N/ac
l
522A
Rvegrass for bay
150 lbs N/ac
Feb -May
22A
Su6ngraa&fQr grazin.g
113 lbs N/ac
i- u ust
522A
Fescue for grazing
113 lbs N/ac
u u t- ul
22A
Orchardgjass for gi[azing
113 lbs N/ac
- 1
22
all gLain for grazing
90 Ibs NI c
Aug -April
522A
R e rass for grazing
•113 lbs N/ac
e -lVla
522A
Matua for hay
150 Ibs N/ac
Augus -July
522A
Matua for i4razinit
113 lbs N/ac
A u - ul
SOIL TYPE 41 B
APPL. DATE
41—Oats
for grain
78 lbs N/ac
Aug -April
4l
Wheat f r rain
96 lb N/ac
l
41
Barley for grain
72 lbs N/ac
Aug-April
41B
e for grain
96 lb N/ac
Aug-Apd.1
41 B
Com for grain
113 1 s N/ac
Feb -Jul
41B
CQm for silage
192 lbs lac
Feb -July
41 B
Sorghum for grain
113 lbs N/ac
April -July
41B
Sor.,ughum for silage
2 1 s N/ac
April -July
4113
Sorghum-Sudangra5S-fQr hay
150 lbs N/ac
April -August
41 B
Soybeans
140 Ibs N/ac
April -Sept
41B
Sudangra$5f r hay
150 Ibs N/ac
ril-Au ust
41 B
Fescue for hay
150 Ibs N/ac
August-Jul
41 B
Orchardgrass for hay
150 lbs N/ac
August -July
41 B
Small in for hay
120 lbs Nlac
u- l
41 B
R e f r hay
15 l N/ac
Feb -May
41 B
S14dangrass for grazing
113 lbs N/ac
April -August
Fescue for grazing
113 l N/ c
Au ust- ul
413
Orchardgrass for grazing
113 lbs N/ac
August -July
4I
all grain for grazing0
lb N/ac
u -AP61
41B
Ryegrass for grazing
113 lbs N/ac
Fe - a
41
Matua for hay
1501 s N/ac
st- ul
41 B
Matua for uazin2
113 lbs N/ c
Au ust- u]
SOIL TYPE 49B
APPL._DATE
4
B
Oats for grain
91 lb N/ac
Aug -April
4
B
Vaeat fQr ain
108 lbs N/ac
Aug -April
493
Barley for gain
72 lbs N/ac
Aug -April
493
Rye fgr.grain
108 lbs N/ac
Aug -April
498
Comfor gfain
113 lbs N/ac
4
B
Com for silage
216 lbs N/ac
Feb -July
4—Sorghum
for rain
113 lbs N/ac
April -July
4
B
Sorghum for silage
216 lbs N/ac
April-Jul
4
bean
120 l s N/ac
Aril-
t
15

•
49
r hurn- dari ra s foLhay
2QO lbs N/ c
Aril -Au u t
49B
Sudangrass for hay
200 ibsN/ac
April -August
493
F ue f r ha
200 bs N a
August -July
49
r hard ass for hay
200 lbs N/gc
August -Jul
49B
Small grain for hay
12 lbs N/ac
Au-9--AAu-9--A il
493
Rvegrass for hay
200 lbs N/ac
Feb -May
4-9B
an as F r azina
150 lbs N/aQ
April-Augjjst
49B
Fescue f r razi
150 lbs N/ac
ugust- ul
49
and j a s for grazin g
150..Ibs N/ac
u ust- ul
4
all grai.n for gra iria
90 lbs N/ac
o- riI
4913
R rass f r grazing
1 " lbs lac
- Ta
49B
Matua for ha
0 lbs N ac
u ust-Tul
49B
Matua- for arazin2
150lbs N/ac
Au ust- ul
SOIL TYPE 49B2
APPL. DATE
49B2
Qats for rain
7 lbs N/a
Aug -April
49132
Wh at for rain
2 lbs N/ac
Aug -April
49B2
BIrley for grain
61 1 s N/ac
Attg--Apdl
49B2
R (or grzin
92 lbs N a
'
49B2
Com for grain
!bs N/ac
Feb -July
49B2
Com for ila c
184 lbs N
Fe - ul
49B2
r m for grain
96 lbs N/ac
April -July
49B2-Sorghum
for ila e
184 lbs N/ c
April -July
49B2
can
2 lbs / c
April -Sept
49B2
hum- udan ass far ha
17 lbs NI
April-Augot
49B2
Sudangrass for &y
1701bs N ac
Aril -Au
49B2
Fe cue for ha
1 0 lb N/ac
gust- ul
49B2
r and a for hay
170 lbs. N/ac
Au us - ul
49B2
all ain forbay
102 lbs N • c
Aug -April
49B2
Ryegrass for hay
170Jbs /a
F- a
49B2
angrass for grazing
127 lbs N/ c
April -August
49B2
FQscue f r grazing
127 lbs N/ac
u u t- ul
49B2
OrchardgrCss f r a i
127 lbs
August -July
49B2
all ain for grazing
76 IN N/ac
Aug -April
49B2
R grass f r grazing
127 lb / c
Feb -May
49B2
Matua for ha
7-0—lbs N/ac
August —July
49B2
Mat —for in
127 lbs Zac
Maust-july
SOIL TYPE 522B
APPL. DATE
522B
Qatsfor glain
78 lbs N/ac
Aug- rii
522B
Wheat for grain
96 lbs N/ac
A - ril
.522B
Barley for grigin
72 lb N/ac
Aug -April
522B
Rye for a67in
96 lbs N/ac
Aug-April-
522B
m for ain
113 lbs N/ac
Feb-Jufy
522B
rn f r ila e
1 2 lbs N/
Fe -Jul
522E
um f r rain
113 lbs N ac
April -July
522B
Sorghum for sliage
192 lbs / cApril-
ul
522B
Sorghum Sudandrass for hay
150 lb lac
ril-Au u t
522B
Soybeans
140 Ibs Mac
ARdll--Sgpj
22
anafor h
1"lbs N
I- u ust r
522B
Fescue forh
150 s N a
August- 1
522B
Orchardgrassfor hay
1 Ibs Nlac
AugUSt-july.
522B
Small erain for hay
120 1 lac
Au - 1
16

" 2B
Rveuass for hav
150 Ibs N/ c
Feb-May5
2B
Sudangiass ing
1.13 Ib s N/
22B
Fescue r grazing1
N/ c
-ADrit-Auug
- ul
522B
r and a r grazing
113lbs N/ c
August-Jul
5228
all gain for uazinglbs
Mac
A -A ri
5 2B
foc grazing113
lbs c
Feb -May
522B
-Rvegrass
Matua for hay
150 lbs N/ac
22B
Matua for ouazing
-��gust-july
113 Ibs /
st- 1
SOIL TYPE 525B
APPL.DATE
525B
Oats for Uginlb
lac
Aue-ADrit
25B
Wh at for grainIbs
N/aAug--April
525B
arI for -grain
72 IN N/a
-A ri
525B
e -far graioN/
-Aug-April
525B
Co —for umain
113 Ibs Mac
Feb -July
25B
m f r silage
1 2 s N/ac
Feb-hily
52513
Sorghum for
113 Ibs N/ c
-Jul
25B
-grain
Qum Silage
192 lbs N/ c-April-July-
525B
Sorg-h—um--,S-u-dan.gLrass for havi
s lac
ril- u t
525
ans
-140 Ibs Nlac
April -Sept
B
S-uda=ass for hay15Q
Ibs c
'1-A u
SB
Tescue for bay
1 1 s / c
August -July
525B
1bs N/ac
August -July
525B
.-Qrgh—ardgrassa
Small grain for bgy
.-1.20 Ibs-Aug--Apri
525B
R e asf rha
1 5a i s NZac
Feb -May
525B
SudawaaLfugwing
11 3 Ibs /aAPHI-August
525B
Fcscue or grazingi
t s N/ac
August-J61Y
525B
r hard ras f r grazing13
i s N/ag
August-july
525B
S all gain—forgrazing--
s N ac
-Aug-Ap l
525B
Rvegr—ass fQr grazing
-113 Ibs NLac
F- a
L25 B
Matua Lor hay
150Ibs NZac
ugust-July
525B
Matuaf r P-raziniz
113 Ibs N ac 712ust-july
SOIL TYPE 526B
APPL. DATE
526j3
QjItsIbs
NI
526B
WheaLLor grain
96ibs NI c
-Aug--April-
1
26B
B rIgy For io
72 Ibs N/ac
u -A ril
26B
for grain
96 Ibs N/ac
-Au - ril
526B
-Ry&
CQm for ggrain113
lbs N/ c
Fe - ul
26B
CQM for 5itage
192 Ib NIaQ
F&JUly-
526Br
u in
3 N/ac
April-July-
526Bu
for silage
2 /acAmil-July
526
an s for hay
150 Ibs N aApril-August
2
s
1sNa
-et
526B
Sudangrass for hay
I 501bs N/ac
ADn'l-August
26
cuefQr
/
-
526B
OrphardgrasS for hay
I 5 bs Y/ac
Au.gust-Juty
526B
Small,grainr hay
A 2N/ac
Aug -April
26B
RvepLa5s f r hay
150 Ibs 1
-May
26B
Su angrassain
s N14C
Apiit--Augyst
B
ascj&Jorgrazing-13
Ib N/acAugust-july
2 B
Orchardgrass for grazing1
3 lb Mae
-Aug-u-st-July
526B
Smallai for grazinglac
•
•
CJ
17

•
•
11
52 B
R e ass for ra in
113 lbs N
Feb -Ma
526BL
Matua for hAi
150 lbs N/ac
Augu t- 1
26B
MatoMatua for z_inu
113 lbs N/aac
_-ust-Jul
A I'_
SOIL TYPE 522C
APPL. DATE
�222f
Qats for grain
72 lbs lac
Aug -April
522C.
Wheat for grain
88 lbs N/ac
Aug -April
522C
Barleyr grain
66 lbs N/ac
Aug -A ril
522
Rye for grain
88 lbs Nia
..Aug -April
522
for Lrrain
104 1b N/a
Fe - ul
522C
C rn for silage
177 lbs N/ac
Feb -July
522C
Sorghumfor grain
104lbs / c
April-july
522C
S rihurri sila e
177 lbs ac
April -July
522C
So rghum-S udan grass for hay
138 lb ac
April -August
522C
Soybeans100
lbs N/gc
A ril-
"22
u angrass for hay
13S lbs lac
April -August
22
or hay
138 l c
Au ust- u]
522C
—Fgacue
for hay
13 lb N/ac
August -July
_522C.
Small gmain f r ha
11 lbs N/ac
Aug -April
22
ass f r ha
138 lbs
Feb -May
522C
Sudangrassfor grazing
103 !bs N/ac
A r'1-Au t
S 2
scu or r zin
1 lb
Augu t-
522
rch d ass or az in
1 lbs c
Au u t- 1
5 22C
Small grain for grazing
82 lbs N ac
Aug -April
522
R ass for ra in
103 I N/ac
F -May
522
atua for hay
138 lbs N/ac
Au u t- ul
522C
Matua for arazini4
103 lbs lac
Au st-Jvlv
TYPE 525C
APPL. DATE
525C
Oatsfor gmin
72 lbs /ac
Au - ril
25
at f6r.grain
88 lbs N/ac
Aug -April
525C
Barley for gfain
66 IN NI c
A u g -A riI
.525C
Rye for —grain
88 lb N/a
Au -A ril
525C
C m foCgrain
1041b N/ac
Febjuly
525
for silage
177 lbs N/ac
Feb -July
525C
SQro,,hijm for grain
104 lb5 N ac
April -July
525
ghum ilage
177 lbs N/ c
A ri - ul
Sorghurn-Sudan-grassLor hay
138 lbs N/ac
April -August
...525C.
525C
SQybeans129
l I c
Aril- t
525C
Sudanglass for hay
138 1 c
Aril -Au us
525C
Fescue for hay
138 1bs N/ac
August- ul
525C
Orchardograss for hay
138 lbs N/ac
Au ust- 1
525C
S.mall.grin for hay
110 lbs N/ac
Aug -April
52 -C_
RyCgrass for hay
138 lbs N/ac
Feb -May
525
dangrass for grazing
103 lbs N/ac
April -August
525C
F cu or grazing
10 lbs /a
August -July
525C
Orchard-ums-sor grazing
103 lbs / c
Augu - ul
525C
Small gjain for grazing
82 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
525
as for aazing
103 lbaNLauc
Feb- a
525C
Matuafor hay
1 lbs N/ac
August-july
525C
M tua f r zrazing
103 1 ac
Au u t- ul

SOIL TYPE 688-C
APPL. DATE
68B-C
Oatsr grain
68 lbs N c
Aug- 'I
68B-C
lyheatfor glain
84 l s N/ac
Au - ' 1
8 -
Barlev for arain
72 lbs N/a
Aug -April
68 -
R e for grain
84 lbs Nlac
Aug -April
B-
Com for glain
88 1N N/ac
Feb -July
68B-C
Com for iflage
168 1 s Wac
F b- ul
68B-C
So ah m f r r i
lbs Mac
Aril- ul
68B-C
Sorghum silage-
168 l s ac
Aril- ul
.68B-C
Sorghum-Sudangrassf r ha
1 0 lb N c
Apr-il-August
8B-
ns
80.1bs N/ac
April-SepL
68B-
dan a s for hay
150 l s ac
A ril-Augu t
68H--C
Fesgue for hay501
s ac
u us -July
68B-C
Or hardgrass for hay
150.Lbsc
August -July
6 B-C
Small grain for hay
1201
Aug -April
6$ -
for bay
150lac
Fe -M
68 -
-R—yggr-ass
a a s for grazing
113 1 s N ac
April—AuApril-Au ust
68B-C
Fescue for grazing
113 lb N/ c
August -July
6 B-C
-QLQLardgrassfor grazing
1 1bs N/ac
August -July
B-
all gain for grazing
l la
l
$B-C
Ry!-.glass.for grazing
113 lbs Macftb-May-
68B-C
Matugfor a
5 N/
u t- u
B-
Ma ua fo rar azin 2
113 i s N/ac
AuQust-July
SOIL TYPE .68D
APPL. DATE
D
Oats f r ain
63 Is N/ac
Aug-Al2ril
68D
Wheat for grain
77 lb lac
Aug -April
6 D
B rle f r grain
66lbs lac
-
AApril
8D
R n
771 N a
A -A 1
8D
rn f r uain
81 lbs N ac
F -July
6D
Com for silage
15 is NZ c
Fe-u
D
SQ ghum min
81 N Nla
April-July-
68D
SQrhgi4m siia e
155 Lbs NZacApri.1-
ul
r hum- u an
138 1 / c
April -August
D
Soybrnans
741b-s N/ac
April-Sept
udan a s for hay
13 i s lac
April -August
D
F cue ha
13 8 1 lac
A us - ul
68 D
chard a s ha
13 lbs I c
Au u-July
1 ain bay
11 nl s N-/ac
Aug -April
8D
Ryegrass hay
138
Feb —May
8D
Sudan=ss for gazing
1041bs N/ag
Aril- u u
68D
Fescue for glazing
104 lb / c
August -July
68D
Orchardur-assfr
104 lbs NAugust-july
D
ll ain f r grazing
82 1 /a
u- i
68
a ass f r i
1 4 N
Feb-.May.-D
u f r ha
8
August-July
Ma ua for g6zing
1 41 / c
Aueust-July
•
•
•
19

NOTE: THESE ARE THE RECOMMENDED REALISTIC YIELD NITROGEN
. APPLICATION RATES FOR THE SOIL TYPES LISTED ON THE PRECEEDING
PAGES. WHEN A CROP IS PLANTED THAT VARIES FROM THE WASTE
MANAGEMENT PLAN, THE NITROGEN APPLICATION RATES FROM ABOVE
MUST BE USED IN ORDER TO COMPLY WITH .0200 REGULATIONS. IF
HAYLAND IS USED FOR GRAZING, THE HAYLAND APPLICATION RATE
MUST BE REDUCED BY 25 PERCENT. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE
CALL OUR OFFICE, THE PHONE NUMBER IS 545-8353, OR 542-2244 EXT 3.
•
•
20

4po,

,.ls c�yT'yn"� �e �. 4 -1 ;•
! ".z l r �. i}d _. J •Iwo-♦ `Js' - rrr" �'�" 5 y 1' •1 ...,;r.r�--��� JayMy.
• ` • Q; !+��:;,.y. •.J s ,; c ' ra. a yr ,+..11 1�� '•' a .:� � ,air i -'• � si .z,�, Y, �,
a.�; ,r f�w'� tiL t v •r !, z{ �. ,kt �r�, � �r � a - t yv'w'
' �Yr ��^-�:r•� r' # Sv1 K y, �. ,.�� A t r 515; i i� I � v.-M 1►� �, � - 3 Y i
' 1 I P � sa �V g tl t s,�.y! •�„ � �. ,� 1 r 1� •.. .,
i '�'i
�i—1
s ... 1 r'•\ 'r , ` , 1'�`_ �~ � f s r-�f�� r �tir 1 t��
r �.1- sll..y f' 1 `'1 � 7 H k��. .4 = i as�r � S � i 1��I 1 �Y •� � a �7f ' 1 , i 5.� t
'.,,,� �. '� •ri "I,,� .. �i 1 ' ''�. �*'a'I�ar.Mb� ��� �in;,1 � Ir, � ' �� Ylf�� - i5 ',A,ti- '���I 4. r F�'.y� ' '�s I _ a � x f / i
1,.•� k i - x 1.� 14 r DD F € k. r1' �_/�i. _`f+k .........."r','rrA 4 f€ i°•E a" A 0 •Txa 4 I-
,f�
,h •1 9 ,! r �1;», i -- _ f + r t+idIr riY;c s's'h t V'1 °'�
�i �`i� i 4 'h� � �JF�cYt'�""'�!, liar r i j ,,4� � r +1f„. 1 �i i� •^� t N.... � �'kt�rr t lu y i v _,Y s }',G`, r 1
r'>R�
�` '� ` 5 _�, !� � i � + -3 / I s d < z s t.+ xft'r.i t 8 a� >1 r r ? 4 N � ° • '•v i � .�
if , IE; a -t n = i7 8tfti�! ► s S _-;.t�kL - .+ 7 ,} f 1t• -<�� s a ,� er_' r ,i
� Tt- r ,fir};z rfr Fr'' "s'•,,sC_���1r .r, a � .`,S-r -'g :tx 1 t,1 t.tr '+ ��d '° "' �` � * �
r f r��1 '"i'ix s s fyrYr r, a �5 i M �Ld •r} •�. r+ } ' �`tt t ,`� �:; t s._ '1 ..F
:,M'1 �' � ."Y r i4 a .5 J - C ?' "'i a J-,,.'i" ";' •� � 'v�y�,. , >< �.. 'r. tl s t' i r - � a �`� y � s
_ r�., �. ,� "fI';y.,� 1� '• w 1,
NAN
i r r A x `' �et�'r•� f� ro s. �tr �I��.� s'1" �z f fir.. ��� � s 4 }'� � r y. cs' � r "!r t� �� r r, f
r tj €• �•±� i -,�- ��..•• YM f J.. 1�.-,.�AT' I �Y..S �,. �, �� ` L" �+ � O'r' - 1 � Fi,y- off �r�_�'1 ,.��'�1 ��
I 1 � e if• rt� '�1 r ��r Y7,tY'tlri - rr+i L"� � T~ f. ��, t 1Ll i� '+ 1 a �Y .� � ry�y.F` f. rri. �F .1r4 ,` k� � - '' I
(�yzr i r - !�' _ �.2x� k7 i+ �' i k �� r •--x `� �'r •' � - ; +r �Y�• . �r Y �` '•�'�t �4'i '�f f -
n gY
I �zY'` � F. ii _l r •s a .f �a rQi , �r S ° b°1Y!' � � * +}, �. } l.• -.
s �3 tip, .wv f s . Yr r /t .wPr ; y� •"�;�� r f ;e+ s a /'�
i
it r ffi •r' 1 �' !� �z..%' y T� ' e +z.�s
itys Ir, V 'y, i .r '9.- f f i - '.. F' v x is, e _'�• , s v'
a �1 A1`r. t 'f; ' fi 1.�!' ' :. .a �,� _ e ��� i mx 7 1 +� • t_
°' '1
` i 9k '�i s• 1. a s A L a�- } ti : n( l,..w �r2 J- f
� 3, 6r r r� � • } r t .r r
Alit
r r ��. ri a •t,_r - •,�_ �!. :'i
,1'"
r
i. Fw` 7 r ' r �; uk r "• 1.+ t Cz `d ,� r '>w G•r r * t'r - n i, - % [}�-
7-li w I- i 4G 41 F F' i." 1 1 i _z.,. P'1 •,n F-s _ i?.'¢,�n:il�
i• s a' r � ` � r i - ',. �� �►1 ,.,,.st d 1 . � A, r f ca ti ir. ~~ S lti ., !" �' .
s^ r I .� �� ,y: L 1 Y@• li+^rr r;,. 'lilj 1}' ".iy3 f �� jL C�-l�,i� �j �_
c1 s • Yn , t, 7 F 'i ce t -'T Y 3" x 'tl' o? ,j k t �t r � x � • �
`xtr _ a ' _ r fir_ {.,r pax # Iral fi, '. d ;-Y'•'�t s r , .CJlr
.:4 �11k ,- .fir �,�r �'.Sr"; P .r+,,_fi' � t-y6 > '�., ,u c " a ' "a -, 7a r� r d d: i I. 'fs• _'�
��� ��, .,� � ,� ,a �� � ,c^ � �4 � I� r �"3` r '�ll� •o � • � d a , a z�-a a �'• I . � ,� ' �'•�
a�� 5 ,�,� � ca �� e#����y��. �' ''sb � r x t d �'i� � '�� � t�" i ' r j , ' Is• �� rr �I Y,S � - s r arr'r { _ ��r..
:rti�t yr s rx*� ° yw i es r t� I � t _ � ram` I 1'r r' � � + +� ,t'r � •'tip ,p 1
e iy e,1i �-,1�i'x � � i r'q �.. ', +► tr F 1 -,I.r ri +'1? r !, r
4 4'Y4
~ 14
p5,
~
Ex P o r 1 rs �`
{ iax' xy-'- •�.�' a 't wf .r w i ii r M R 1 ; F} ��,� �Y {,.�r s 1 i
V rg.,} 4 Y .�" i j,;, 7� -+". sY,j ,.+ .. d
1 •,Yr� / '..t`3£ rb a ».L r+ S1 t ��•�� �"Z. t' 1 �1 $�• �za�F.i r.y ,.1 �",, z p:Ft. '�
t ,s tip, � fi r 'par �,g' �'� 7 •�rt�� :y` :� 1. * w�F++'Sr14r1 1}
l - . ` . _ . i`'� .. i� f . � •� �". �..' _tx. �� �'.;���'E+,5 . {Frl. s: j" �aa lP �:. _ . �• I--- . , � .,.., i-. .�

LN,
Fr'L 2 '�./�r M%w 3a::i-$ :•' 1�, s -A.R •�e t �` t t .iiy 1}i (/1 �l" yi S
i4J -iit -i S - YiE'r _ e
lb
t' b
��--.s�F'C sTn� � i � 1 fv 'i.� -��'�t i; xr� t�. a� "a r•"a'JR�r - s ti rM.,� _>C�w,Y� K/k r6 w la1 #
r1,r'S� tiii ` 7 T 1a r y1 c '�•�q�e �T{tt Y
tN-
�`5. � � i7 . � ••,r Lw.+" t - �y*T ti't t r-4e+� i s++,; 5�r2 ra. # � +
� : � �"�' �S ! � ` r 'lJ --y', '� �� -_ Fit. t +� °•d _ 1 �-0 lot a c Gt w r k } t { }^a K k# .:r a 1' � awe' 11 .
o � S"ka� t'�l etas �' � tr `'"° - t i1�{� """� r t: �., ,�ir �•W£' r a wa � e it- e i P��.
6' `` �, lw t d c -'+ F. E ° r .s+ ?' ^t•i blx, f 7 1i� +
t �tt ; ��Y :.���rr' :.7•t�''w't�iF + � s -; >r � �r r :�• 1�• Y'�,s '•e � s £.-� 1,-� �1 � �1 5�; 'G,s'r ��r
t•S t+ r*�.r r..�.re S .•. t-,y. s2z• s 7;i' r 1
-�t °
F a r,F�� t; 1.rr j°k ..1! ,, a :,§ (V f ,. , c � P'�•?• `� 5 `rs 1 � 4 i�i � - .k ("t � j
a f. r t` -.s �I.f i rSS x,f �t f tlnl-x, ,t y.•y�'.
ti �4h s-y�P{7,5 r.�y r ti�r.. r ��; ,�,� f` � � � �� # j: \�• � �•l� r• a `�u f'tf 2 i v rc :..� � i d ,. -aj� k� .✓�
�-1V }
��y � ,n. :ai c i• k, j— � � �[ t �I' t Sin � �.
r@�4?a + i • ('Yy �a^77+1.►
is J } •.�Pf
l • )-f� 7 • t F f:�Y 77,
j f_ i r�ri >@I.4C • I t mA
_` , 'lr i��',
`." IT'
r •q 1 a`. 1 - �'t *�1'1r,H : �, ..gym �, r 1 - , 7 -
� i :,. e�'r�� r4.' � 9 f - r ` "7 e y,. f y - •d..'�� i 'y. � to - ' r _ 5
r.-
5 I k?.pr1 � A %r t3 ,tl r i "� �� � rr e �>, r.� ,� SA. s�1t • "ati" r � `)
1�,, x� f �� •zx �V-J v J��;�b• � � x � � pM. 4a -: a ! ik,.}
o r ; :'�;� .` �; ^c ,.^ +(r ,. f_ ,� rl m �-?� �� fir. •,.,r +. Ft ral. :"trr°rr' s)r+a "tea 1�5'r•. � � per.-, �.Vq iy r3-cEY
sla
g
'i'fi?..� ii`
: a, !.•s 'rx ie �; v+k •ry hln4 t1 3
r, five v r r 4yresi c a#
� .r y t%.• r�. l:q„ f _;✓"w7M � .a ��e n. 3 71 1�l IY `�" Fy :� .l r'a: 9 R• 'y' f .ra'�„ r4 ' � � r r 7tir1 r
iii x •.} f ' • i S x,- xi?4 ( � J '1 i � Q S 1 ..j��r n. d + M."Y.�' 4 `•i l li: 1 i
r;cjli rr,•'4�
w r tiv—
gg` ::� i�'��
*" fi:_ -t -:3� wF' �` : r'•.w i tt "" 4r'i',,,�.'h;y.� - ;g-,E Y�rn+w fr �x�t'4 f•'}�% 3[�j ,.a,h:
'`r:: •3`' k' /
1 •-}r '`E y'Y+r w. ,, f° ✓r g7 '` +7 s'S' s` ( rs'. •r, P#+ • t,, 1;c.•:
� � 'fJ < t r , r S'r,.3' ,1 ✓••� { t r f S k,tr s5'a t[ � b::r"f f<�fYi'a `n i•��` � i. t fY r+ {
�• l P t r k c "k a� Y +r✓ rM•.w ! i 7t �T $c/� t {� �y
";k ,. L1i .R( �iJ s' � ! '."- •Y- S i r 9• q. ��. tAty 46,f � d _ ! 1 °"y, • i ��.� 4 �i'Nrf'� t, r i �•. F H:„�
w prC w, t - � _ {. '� - -}�'• -, L r r ,a `k.�'�, '0. 1 � f*,r� rt 3 r r x
�r*l+�'Cr� ' �t L, - .�y-'>� � • 7v.j tom= r.r may <t - ti r '*i •:• a. �. � 3. .,ar�7a 3; QiI c
'4 ilr�' 1 c, y ��4 t S. i , !S r � ln�.... • . _� w �'J :�� :�aw� �Ch,��a 1 Y�:,_ 7 r �-}.•� it f _ Kr 2'#,I
- �. : � ♦= '!r" -i 4 n Y i ✓. '* d i '^rw - 'r r : µ L •t ,1, •} 1'f•+► .di} y�'t 1� 9 N t t � 1�++. '
t-�Y;� r i - IrFH r s� t *Z'%_'C r F 't� .,d � ',�. r .r.• ,
.YL.t c t'S, a �'
l £•..L w r`�1; 1w tt 4�rLs'e,l� rti`+�#`x - 's.�'�^�..•, ` I .t 7 ,'.�.,Y
R.it+"S f t 'yrr4"`+t 3 P ,: k " �.1 : - �_ w I:l ii Air 14 rr -` SQ t r ••i ,I. • 3
I . _,'t i4 �; ZyXr re •` '' + r s '' [ ; tsi'�,y ` �; , s>G r,� r r r x"•iy _ y ✓ f. • e- I'. 1
.rF?•L, •� �'ts�sr}ilr' 1-�+'`: z S ♦,��-ttom' '��y�y�r�' _f - � �'� ,t, t' a� ►.il � .. :�} lrpas,i��: . �i� �.:. V # "I
��:j' ''ram•'. Ft,�a t.:qt 'ieh: rW J"i`''y y`."�r •rr "`kY. J_��•�_' • 1 ;{t If ,,*"Y a _ Is,q ..•--!r�l ,s` f.� rf.._.;X� ee.,�
�, C � " _+xt$+ < � 'ta s3,7"a �C ,. t �r� �,•�.'S�J� e � �!w��tvi r d 'i� ' e z. f . j};yy�'v(.i+- ttr f
�*vW
• ` , . 4 '.
`� G� f� .R, gi ➢ _r fx+b "efiit l '^i �lM yc '�°It 7e.,3 �"'F� j "' r j -� �w if � r `� S�t . 4i VF�
�'j@+H r] '#+-lF 3 .s _�'.:'•�f{' '#e�� '-fJ�. ,t - 1 . ,,H �•f tis rh:. �' z r,.} r !
£; 5� fr �t �^! a } t + y? i _ irk r ,. ,y�''j x � t 1 , � - r• '��.
r' d :} •�'{Yt �"+r�iti i :hire• =e. r^ K , �.. - ; • i. 3 it , +_ � _ `r ay� r:.i�
r,'�S-�•CJy�� 1U'!t•ti�' .'t� k � }r i.r:• sy y L .l �� „ t T�r,�
f- .� r' �'sYj x . J i' t- >a #` �,- k � { t �� xr q'"rZ`3x�'':� " �_•,� .r` i+1 ,: + ' � t f/.?�� i
:. r -rIJ '[ ''�• ` »r it "V'A' t 3 z�'t a � -.!• - .• It" lam.
.r:>tir;:i `ia't•Ir 3 t'•i S .
y,, -: J � �; a� „, .� •;%� 1 � 1 a �.� sty � r { t.�{{•k �•C a ; r i � t w� 'c'.i � �„J� t �.
i w r`f^ ssy1- t _..'? t; tr 'tc% z 1, H1c' Y,i,ij • x .;F: c
r w. yM1 tl 'S j1 d • t„rt# 7• h.� t /� i -�1Pr 1 ;, %, 4.
z 1 er '`a • v �,r! Yi'+�r�yi,>i # `c! t _ 4. t., ts. rl � f_ t.T 'rid, yi:l,� Y•`T r,g a •t n.`: tl �'t_'� J„r✓ � t nw
n t r x 1, 5 r w _ ,;x r4>• Y+L+. r 1�'' � iq f .<!'Ti tI t7 '"'1 -+i�'• � Q i ' N to £_,
6.4
�ettkj�� �.. � 3 � d ��=sf•le f z. "�ed e.��.� j1 � '.
i3 e r�•-Jt! r' '. �.: _��+ri l.`;�rw
i5 - i rl '�+�'tj •. 9
��,�C a �'-►'� r�"• " ;et.�"' e' S ^F�'` .�r3S
zy.l,�5'1;1
. • 7�° Rr1 ,S •' fr :5 r rg s 4tz�.i eai r3, C •y..rti ^'`.- p { >,,.:'" "' n_. •'� ./� 1 I- 1q. i'rr4Y'
{�3.,. •: Y �.. y � } '� ��� �, Iti,.,•� ti r L `"r r +1 4 '��, t° � t_S s��t ,�. �%'` W �'
i'`
,, b �H i•�Jr!'4><€'t~' -' �sF 1• rt•z' K;-a 5; 1,- '#`'s a # .y. Is. r-vS
'L..
•'� d� -7.' '#} � � r t.{r x l r. .� y � r F -a t t 1 {-y, �c. � .. rK �'tr'C+ ;t.� _ z�_St:^_.;.r.,. .i .. ra
� "���� s yst '� ~ r �ri. it zw 3 � rr-trT'Lt ki a c �r/ -,��+{L�t.-�`�•-;r� �, / I�e lei „'� "�� ��i„
a •.# { }f1
'T# 0 1
;••Frti 1 y` 1 a �.� #- e > �� x r . � ��J�'c t #"� I3 e.F- I�� Ite, r/ t'• t a
Expostxre_ _ P i + r F.. r , V+ -4C. w, Qua d k` -v'•. �.' �Q S r
AM
$, - I �� •�+•,r'�.'., �� .'t S't'✓. ,�..tt 4-€>�! yr- � - 7;,� y"r �T�4 a. �..., i.r 1
,� S �! ii .....s.4:1�.��ar-�`., - k-+•. 1!I•. Cti;?,,.��'��':..i t�'N rllnu`S _.v 'v. _�•.a,-:c.a •;

M
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION AGREEMENT
(Needed only It add.i tlomal 2Mnd has to be Seared, etc.)
C _
J
hereby give
permission tvo apply animal waste from his Waste Utilization System
on 3 0 acres of my land for the duration of time shown below.
I understand _hat this waste contains nitrogen, phosphorous,
potassium, and other trace elements and when properly applied
should not harm my land or crops. I also understand that the use
of waste will reduce my need for commercial fertilizer.
Adjacent Landow
Waste Producer:
Technical Repre
r-
ner• Date: G
a Date: I
sentat ive : &?j Date: 1.30
SWCD Representative: Date:
Term of Agreement; 19171 to
(Minimum of Pen Year, oa Coo Q.t.d Itamr)
(See Required Sptcification No. 2.)
20 0
12

WASTE UTI....
LIbA�b4N4P�AN .
Table 2: ACRES WITH AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowner must be attached)
(Required only if operator does not own
adequate land fsee Required specification 21)
Tract Field Soil Crop Lbs. N Acres Lbs. N Month of
# Type Per Ac.* Utilized Application
EVE
•
K!'_ - _
i
See footnote for :able 1.
Totals from above Tables
Acres Lbs. N
Utilized
Table 1 3a
Table 2
Total
Amount of N Produced 1,2 9�20
Surplus or eficit,
NOTE: The Waste Utilization Plan must contain provisions for
periodic land application of sludge at agronomic rates. The sludge
will be nutrient rich and will require precautionary measures to
prevent over application of nutrients or other elements. .
4

•
•
•
......... ... ... .. ......
WASTE_--,UTILIZAT-ION PLAN
Your facili:v _s designed for 1 `% days of temporary storage and
the temporary s orage must be removed on the average of once every
U, MONTHS. In no instance should the volume of waste being
stored in your structure exceed Elevation
Call the local Natural Resources Conservation Service (formerly soil
Conservation 5e�vice) or Soil and Water Conservation District office
after you receive the waste analysis report for assistance in
determining cue amount per acre to apply and the proper application
rate prior to applying the waste.
NARRATIVE OF OPERATION
(Use addicicnal sheets as needed to describe the operation of the
system within the context of the livestock operation)
C� 19
4
I C�
P
i ��l }}1�� RP�1��
r1 C � f `� Drc� � C� C r�.ST r r43
i
M 0.� A�e nn % ►�� �! A A, �,S R ► sk, C, Li, C: G-'lr
5

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift, manmade convevances, direct application, or
direct discharge during operation or land application. -Any discharge of waste which reaches surface water is
prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer either owns or has a notarized agreement for use of
adequate land on which to properly apply the waste. 11 the producer does not own adequate land to properly dispose of
waste, he/she shall provide a copy of a notarized agreement with a landowner who is within a reasonable proximity,
allowing him/her the use of the land for waste application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the facility to secure
an update of the Waste Utilization Plan when there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of animals,
method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the Nitrogen needs for realistic crop yields based on soil type,
available moisture, historical data, climate conditions, and level of management, unless there are regulations that
restrict the rate of application for other nutrients. Actual yields may be used in lieu of realistic yield tables at the
discretion of the planner.
4. Animal waste shall be applied on land eroding less than 5 tons per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land that is
eroding at more than 5 tons but less than 10 tons per acre per year providing grass filter strips are installed where
runoff leaves the field. (See FOTG Standard 393-Filter Strips)
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after waste application. Waste should not be applied when there
is danger of drift from the irrigation field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, it will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled
cropland. When applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application
does not occur during a season prone to flooding. (See "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance.)
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to
surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift from the site during application. No ponding should occur
in order to control odor and flies.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or when the surface is frozen_
9. Animal waste should be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that the crop is not covered with waste to
depth that would prohibit growth. The potential for salt damage from animal waste should also be considered.
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted crops on soils with a high potential for leaching.
Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to
take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of a crop or forages breaking
dormancy..
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with the following: The outer perimeter of the
land area onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from
any residential property boundary and from any perennial stream or river other than an irrigation ditch or canal.
t�J
MRCS, NC
DUNE, 1996

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
(continued)
Animal waste other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995, shall not be applied closer than
25 feet to surface water. This distance may be reduced for waters that are not perennial provided adequate vegetative
filter strips are present (See Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet from wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than those owned by landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public right-of-ways.
15. Animals waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways or wetlands by a discharge or by over -
spraying. Animal waste may be applied to prior converted cropland provided it has been approved as a land
applications site by a "technical specialist". Animal waste applied on grassed waterways shall be at agronomic rates
and in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the
animal waste management system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms,
pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and
other woody species, etc. are limited to areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and
accessible. Lagoon berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence of erosion, leakage, or discharge.
18. If animal production at the facility is terminated, the owner is responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure
plan" which will eliminate the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reeIs, etc., should be inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns,
leaks, and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be kept on site.
20, Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other crops for direct human consumption.
However, if animal waste is used on crops for direct human consumption it should only be applied preplant with no
further applications of animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible permanent markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom elevations of the temporary storage
(pumping volume) of all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid level between the
markers. A marker will be required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste storage ponds.
22. Soil tests shall be made every two years and a liquid waste analysis be taken at least twice each year consistent with
waste utilization plan. Poultry litter shall be tested prior to application. Soil and waste analysis records shall be kept
for five years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets NC regulations.
:7
MRCS, NC
JUNE, 1996

WA%F T
•
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
Name of Farm:
Owner/Manager Agreement
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications
and the operation and maintenance procedures established in the
approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I
(we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the
waste treatment and storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the
North Carolina Division of Environmental Management (NCDEM) before
the new animals are stocked. I (we) also understand that there
muse be no discharge of animal waste from this system to surface
wasters of the state from a storm event less severe than the 25-
year, 24-hour storm. The approved plan will be filed on -site at
the farm office and at the office of the local Soil and water
Conservation District and will be available for review by NCDEM
upon request.
Name of Facility Owner:
(Please print)
Signature ,,
/ Date:
r
Name of M'nager(If
diff` ent fPom owner):
Signature: 'kC' Date:
Name of Technical
Specialist: (Please print) Ct.�
Affiliation:
Address (Agency) :
Ir P) . NC_ 17:��
Signature: COP —A. V"f Date: '
•
11

I L L 11 L L it ! 1, L lY , t l
_AjVaste Management
i ' ICE: C:=i , .. _ . , � ': _: ral F t >:eering I",7orth Carolina State U71i;�ersIfy
LI�FS :OCK WAS .E SA.HTLING , ANALYSIS AND CALCULATION
OF LAND APPLICATION RATES
James C. Barker*
1. SAXPLE COLLECTION
A. Semi -Solid Lot Manure
i. Scraced directly from lot into spreader
a. From loaded spreader, collect about 2 lbs of manure from
diferent locations using nonmetallic collectors.
ii. From storage
a. Collect about 2 lbs of manure from under the surface crust
avoiding bedding materials and using nonmetallic collectors.
B. Liquid Manure Slurry
i. under -slotted -floor pit
a. Extend a 1/2" nonmetallic conduit open on both ends into
manure to pit floor.
b. Seal upper end of conduit (e.g., by placing a thumb over end
of conduit) trapping manure that has entered lower end, remove
and empty slurry into plastic bucket or nonmetallic container.
c. Take subsamples from 5 or more locations or at least l quart.
d. Mix and add about 3/4 pint to nonmetallic sample container.
ii. Exterior storage basin or tank
a. Make sure manure has been well mixed with a liquid manure
chopper -agitator pump or propeller agitator.
b. Take subsamples from about 5 pit locations, from agitator pump
or from manure spreader and place in a plastic bucket.
Professor and Extension Specialist, Biological and Agricultural Engineering
Department, Norn:,. Carolina State University, Raleigh, t4C.

-l1 4U...1 - - - - -
2 ' of 3
-2-
c. Fix and add 3/4 pint to a nonmetallic sample container.
C. iagoon Liquid
J. Collect about 3/4 pint of recycled lagoon liquid —cm inflow pipe
to flush tanks in a nonmetallic sample container.
ii. From lagoon
a. Place a small bottle (1/2 pint or less) on end of 10-15' pole.
b. Extend bottle 10-15' away from bank edge.
c. Brush away floating scum or debris.
d. Submerge bottle. within 1' of liquid surface.
e. Empty into a plastic bucket, repeat about 5 times around
lagoon, mix, and add 3/4 pint to nonmetallic sample container.
D. Broiler or Turkey Litter
i. House litter
a. Visually inspect litter for areas of varying quality, e.g.,
areas around feeders and waterers, and estimate percent of
floor surface in each area.
b. Take about 5 litter subsamples at locations proportionate to
item a. E.g., if 20% of litter of similar visual quality is
around feeders and waterers, take 1 subsample there and the
other 4 subsamples from remainder of floor surface.
c. At each location, collect litter from a 6" by 6" area down to
earth floor and place in a plastic bucket.
d. After 5 subsamples have been added to the bucket, mix, and add
about 2-3 lbs. litter to a nonmetallic sample container such as
a 1-gallon freezer bag and seal.
ii. From stockpile
a. Take subsamples from about 5 locations at least 18" into pile.
b. Mix, add 2-3 lbs to nonmetallic sample container and seal.
0

- 3 -
II. SAu'LE' PREPAR,%!ION AUND TRANSFER
0 01 0
A. Place sample into an expandable container that can be sealed. Rinse
residues from container with clean water but do not use disinfectants,
soaps, or treat in any other way.
3. Pack sample in ice, refrigerate, freeze, or transfer to lab quickly-
C. Hand -delivery is most reliable -way of sample transfer.
D. If mailed, protect sample container with packing material such as
newspaper, box or package with wrapping paper, and tape.
E. Commercial sample containers and mailers are also available, Contacts:
i. AFL Eastern Agricultural Lab, Inc. iii. Polyfoam Packers Corp.
7621 Whitepine Road 2320 S. Foster Avenue
Richmond, VA 23237 Wheeling, IL 60090
Ph: [phone] Ph: [phone]
ii. Fisher Scientific Co. iv. NASCO
3315 Winton Road 901 Janesville Avenue
Raleigh, NC 27604 Fort Atkinson, WI 53538
Ph: [phone] Ph: [phone]
F. Private analytical labs are available, but sample analyses are costly.
G. The NCDA_provides this service for North Carolina residents.
i. Address: North Carolina Department of Agriculture
Agronomic Division
Plant/Waste/Solution Advisory Section
Blue Ridge Road Center
P.O. Box 27647
Raleigh, NG 27611
Ph: [phone]
Attn: Dr. Ray Campbell
ii. Forward $4 along with the sample.
iii. Include the following identification information with sample:
a. Livestock species (dairy, swine, turkey, etc.)
b. Livestock usage (swine -nursery, finishing; turkey -breeders,
brooderhouse, grower, number flocks grown on litter; etc.)
c. Waste type (dairy -lot scraped manure, liquid slurry; swine -pit
slurry, lagoon liquid, sledge; broiler -house litter, stockpile
iv. Routine analyses performed on all samples: N, P, K, Ca, Mg, Na,
S, Fe, Mn, Zn, Cu, B
v. Additional analyses performed upon request: DM, Mo, Cd, Ni, Pb
0

CAL :BR-\TI(DN
Applicators can apply manure, litter and wastewater at var ing rates and panerns, deaending on •
forxard travel and/or PTO speed, gear box settings, gate openings. operating pressures, spread
yidLhs grid overlaps. Calibration det_ es tl e cornotnauon of seninCs and travel speed needed to
appiv manure, /Muter or %vaste,.vater at a desired rate and to znsu�~e urnforrn application.
Spreader Ca�aciry
Liquid spreader capacities are no=aHv rated by the manufacturer Ln gallons.-fultiply gallons by
0.0042 to get tons. Solid and semi -solid spreaders are rated by the manufacturer either in bushels
or cubic fee: (multiply bushels by 1.24. to get cubic feet). Most spreaders have :%vo rating
capacities: 1) struck or level full. and 2) heaped. Since manures and litters have difrerent
densities. an on -farm test should be dune. Fill a five -Gallon bucket level full with rnate:ial to be
spread. Do not pack the material in the bucket but ensure that it settles similar to a loaded
spreader. Weigh the bucket full and then empty. -Multiply the weight of the contents by 1.5 to get
pounds per cubic feet. -Multipiv this value times the cubic feet capaciry of the spreader and divide
by 2000 to get the tons of material in a spreader load.
manure weight, lbs x 1.5 x spreader capacity, ft' 2000 = spreader load. tons
Spreader Calibration
Calibration -Method 1: This method is most useful for liquid spreaders but can be used for all
types. Spread at Ieast one full load of manure preferably in a square or rectangular• field pattern
for ease of measuring with normal overlaps. -Measure the length and width of coverage
recognizing that the outer fringe areas of the coverage tiviIl receive much lighter applications than
the overlapped areas. Nfultiply the length by the width and divide by 43560 to determine the
coverage area in acres. Divide the tons of manure in the spreader by the acres covered to
determine the application rate in tons per acre.
spreader manure, tons - (coverage length, ft x VVzdth, ft _ 43560 } = application rate, tons acre
Repeat the procedure at different speeds and/or spreader settings until the desired aonlication rate
is achieved.
0

i�,V"nat ion and speed would be [leeded to appiv 6.0 tons lirter per acre frorn a s7:eader %viih a
6-ton capacity. a o-minute spreading _Ariz. and a 25-fee: spreadinQ'.vidth?
Fc7vvarG sU:ed, mnn capacity, tons x 9j
time (min) x width x rate. tons per acre
6 tons x 495
5 min x 2J ft x 6 ton per acre
4 miles per hour
Calibration lvfethod ?: This method is often used for solid and semi -solid spreaders. A tar_ or
plastic sheet of about 100 square feet (9'x12'. 10'x10', etc.) should be measured for enact sur ace
area (lengTh x wiidth), weighed using a set of sptzng-tension or platform scales, then spread and
pinned on the field surface. The spreader should be operated at its normal settings, speed and
overlap. +Vith a rear discharge spreader, three passes should be made: the first directly over the
center of the sheet, the other ttivo on opposite sides of the center at the normal spreader overiap
spacing. The sheet with the collected manure should again be weighed. Subtract the empty sheet
• weight from the total weight to get the weight of the collected manure. Multiply the pounds of
collected manure by 21.S and divide by the collection area of the sheet in square feat to get the
application rate in tons per acre.
collected manure, Ibs x 21.3 / collection area, ft' = application rate, tons/acre
Repeat the procedure using different settings or speeds to obtain the desired application rate.
Spreader Pattern Uniformity
To determine the uniformity of spread and the amount of overlap needed, place a line of small
pans or trays equally spaced (2-4 feet apart) across the spreader path. The pans should be a
minimum of 12' by 12" or 15" diameter. no more than 24" by 24", and 2"-4" deep. Nfa_k— one
spreading pass directly over the center pan. Weigh the contents caught in each pan or pour the
contents into equally sized glass cvlinders or clear plastic tubes and compare the amount in each.
The er ective spread width can be found by locating the point on either side of the path center
where the manure contents caught in the containers is half of what it is in the center. The distance
between these points is the effective spread width. The outer fringes of the coverage area beyond
these points should be overlapped on the ne :L path to ensure a uniform rate over the area. "NI",
'�V" "steeple", or "lopside" parte:, s are not satisfac.orr and one or more of the spreader
adjustments should be made.
0

�+ ERGENCY ACTION PLAN 0
PHONI NNUNLBERS
D`�'Q H 1 1 i 9- Ll r�"'��
E�IERGE�CY �I.��AGEy �T SYSTEM -
SWCD
MRCS
This plan will be implemented in the event that wastes from your operation are leaking,
overflowing, or running off site. You should not wait until wastes reach surface waters or
leave vour propenv to consider that you have a problem. You should make eve-y effort to
ensure that this does not happen. This plan should be posted in an accessible location for
ail employees at the facility. The following are some action items you should take.
1. Stoo the release of wastes. Depending on the situation, this may or may not be
possible. Suggested responses to some possible problems are listed below.
A. Lagoon overflow -possible solutions are:
a. Add soil to be.-rn to increase elevation of dam.
b. Pump wastes to fields at an acceptable rate.
c. Stop all flows to the lagoon immediately. •
d. Call a pumping contractor.
e. Make sure no surface water is entering lagoon.
B: Runoff from waste application field -actions include:
a. Immediately stop waste application.
b: Create a temporary diversion to contain waste.
c. Incorporate waste to reduce runoff.
d. Evaluate and eliminate the reason(s) that caused the runoff.
e. Evaluate the' application rates for the fields where runoff occurred.
C: Leakage from the waste pipes and sprinklers -action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
c. Close valves to elirrunate further discharge.
d. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
D: Lcakane from flush systems. houses. solid separators -action include:
Sion '-ZCvcie pumc.
S[t?n i�ri''"�EiLi� Yur�D.
gibe no sl!'non
i.� i, ` "I S\'die ;?7�. ��!=:!•.;!i at'y r�
StiJl? }FI

0 e. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
E: Leakage from base or sidcxall of lagoon. Often this is seerage as 0000se1 "c
Rowing leaks- possible action:
Dio a small sump or ditch away from the embankment to catch all set -age.
put in a submersible pump, and pump back to lagoon.
If holes are caused by burrowing animals. trap or remov.- animals and fill
holes and compact with a clay type soil.
Have a professional evaluate the condition or the side walls and lagoon
bosom as soon as possible.
2. Assess the extent of the spill and note any obvious damages.
a. Did the waste reach any surface waters?
b. Approximately how much was released and For what duration?
c. Anv damage noted, such as employee injury, fish kills, or property damage`'
d. Did the spill leave the property?
e. Does the spill have the potential to reach surface waters?
f.. Could a future rain event cause the spill to reach surface waters?
a. Are potable water wells in danger {either on or off of the property)?
h. How much reached surface waters'?
0 3: Contact appropriate agencies.
a. During normal business hours, call your DWQ (Division of Water Quality)
resional office: Phone - - After hours, emergency number: 919-f33-3942.
Your phone call should include: your name, facility, telephone number, the details
of the incident from item 2 above, the exact Iocation of the facility, the location or
direction of movement of the spill, weather and wind conditions. The corrective
measures that have been under taken, and the seriousness of the situation.
b. If spill leaves property or enters surface waters, call local EMS Phone number -
c. Instruct ENIS to contact local Health Department.
d. Contact CES, phone number - - , local SWCD office phone number - -
and local MRCS office for advice/technical assistance phone number - -
4: If none of the above works call 911 or the Sheriffs Department and explain your
problem to them and ask that person to contact the proper agencies for you.
5: Contact the contractor of your choice to begin repair of problem to minimize off -site
damage.
a. Contractors Name:
b. Contractors .�dd�zss:
c. Contractors Phone:
.7

Comae, the technical specialist who ce~iiTle the lagoon (N� ;Consulting
Engineer. e.c.) •
a. Name:
b °hone: / c, ci " t.lcc Ilk
7: Implement proce,�ures as advised by DWQ and technical assistance agencies to
rec,if% the damage. repair the sv stem. and reassess the waste management plan to
Keep problems with re'.ease of wastes from happening again.
•
0

Dairy Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
Source Cause / BMPs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
Farmstead • Dairy production
Paved lots or barn • Wet manure -covered
alley surfaces surfaces
Vegetative or wooded buffers
0 Recommended best management practices
W Good judgment and common sense
Scrape or flush daily
C( Promote drying with proper ventilation
62( Routine checks and maintenance on waterers,
hydrants, pipes, stock tanks
Bedded areas • Urine Promote drying with proper ventilation
Partial microbial E� Replace wet or manure -covered bedding
decomposition
Manure dry stacks • Partial microbial 0 Provide liquid drainage for stored manure
decomposition jf p
Storage tank or basin
• Partial microbial
0
Bottom or mid -level loading
surface
decomposition
O
Tank covers
• Mixing while filling
0
Basin surface mats of solids
Agitation when emptying
E(
Minimize lot runoff and liquid additions
E�
Agitate only prior to manure removal
0
Proven biological additives or oxidants
Settling basin
• Partial -microbial
0
Liquid drainage from settled solids Y
surfaces
decomposition
0
Remove solids regularly 11 f�
• Mixing while filling
• Agitation when emptying
Manure, slurry, or • Agitation when spreading 0 Soil injection of slurry/sludges
sludge spreader . Volatile gas emissions 7"Wash residual manure from spreader after use
outlets 0 Proven biological additives or oxidants
0 0 0

Dairy Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
Source Cause BMPs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
Uncovered manure, • Volatile gas emissions while ❑ Soil injection of slurry/sludges
slurry, or sludge on drying [" Soil incorporation within 48 hours
field surfaces G" Spread in thin uniform layers for rapid drying
❑ Proven biological additives or oxidants
Flush tanks • Agitation of recycled lagoon ❑ Flush tank covers
liquid while tanks are filling ❑ Extend fill lines to near bottom of tanks with W14
anti -siphon vents
Outside drain • Agitation during wastewater ❑ Box covers
collection or conveyance
junction boxes'
Lift stations . Agitation during sump tank ❑ Sump tank covers
filling and drawdown
End of drainpipes at • Agitation during wastewater ❑ Extend discharge point of pipes underneath
lagoon conveyance lagoon liquid level
Lagoon surfaces • Volatile gas emission 4 Proper lagoon liquid capacity
• Biological mixing l/Correct lagoon startup procedures
• Agitation [T inimum surface area -to -volume ratio
(J Minimum agitation when pumping
❑ Mechanical aeration
❑ Proven biological additives

Dairy Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
Source Cause BMPs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
Irrigation sprinkler + High pressure agitation O Irrigate on dry days with little or no wind
nozzles + Wind drift O Minimum recommended operating procedure
Pump intake near lagoon liquid surface
O Pump from second -stage lagoon
0 Flush residual manure from pipes at end of
slurry/sludge pumpings
Dead animals + Carcass decomposition 9 Proper disposition of carcasses
Standing water Improper drainage 9 Grade and landscape such that water drains away
around facilities • Microbial decomposition of from facilities
organic matter
Mud tracked onto • Poorly maintained access 0 Farm access road maintenance
public roads from roads
farm, access
Additional information: Available From :
Cattle Manure Management; .0200 RuleBMP Packet NCSU, County Extension Center
Dairy Educational Unit Manure Management System —Lake Wheeler Road Field Laboratory; EBAE 209-95 NCSU—BAE
igoon Design and Management for Livestock Manure Treatment and Storage; EBAE 103-83 NCSU—BAE
Management of Dairy Wastewater; EBAE 106-83 NCSU—BAE
Calibration of Manure and Wastewater Application Equipment; EBAE Fact Sheet NCSU—BAE
Nuisance Concerns in Animal Manure Management: Odors and Flies; PRO107, 1995 Conference Proceedings Florida Cooperative Extension
0

0 0 0
Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
Source Cause BMPs to Control Insects Site Specific Practices
Liquid Systems
Flush gutters • Accumulation of solids 0 Flush system is designed and operated
sufficiently to remove accumulated solids from
gutters as designed q
0 Remove bridging of accumulated solids at
discharge
Lagoons and pits . Crusted solids Maintain lagoons, settling basins and pits where
pest breeding is apparent to minimize the crusting
of solids to a depth of no more than b to 8 inches
over more than 30 percent of surface
Excessive vegetative • Decaying vegetation Maintain vegetative control along banks of
growth lagoons and other impoundments to prevent
accumulation of decaying vegetative matter along
water's edge on impoundment's perimeter.
Dry Systems
"ceders Feed spillage Design, operate, and maintain feed systems
(e.g., bunkers and troughs) to minimize the
/d ecumulation of decaying wastage
Clean up spillage on a routine basis (e.g., 7- to 10-
day interval during summer; 15- to 30-day interval
during winter)

Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
Source Cause , BMPs to Control Insects Site Specific Practices
Feed storage • Accumulations of feed LY Reduce moisture accumulation within and around
residues immediate perimeter of feed storage areas by
ensuring drainage is away from site and/or
providing adequate containment (e.g., covered bin
for brewer's grain and similar high moisture grain
Wroducts)
nspect for and remove or break up accumulated
lids in filter strips around feed storage as needed
Animal holding • Accumulations of animal f7r Eliminate low areas that trap moisture along fences
areas wastes and feed wastage and other locations where waste accumulates and
tsturbance by animals is minimal
Gr Maintain fence rows and filter strips around animal
holding areas to minimize accumulations of wastes
(i.e., inspect for and remove or break up
accumulated solids as needed)
Dry manure • Accumulations of animal O Remove spillage on a routine basis (e.g.,
handling systems wastes 7- to 10-day interval during summer-, 15- to 30-day
interval during winter) where manure is loaded for W/O
land application or disposal
pp p
0 Provide for adequate drainage around manure
stockpiles
O Inspect for and remove or break up accumulated
wastes in filter strips around stockpiles and manure
handling areas as needed
For more information contact:
Cooperative Extension Service, Department of Entomology, Box 7613, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7613.

`lortahty Management Nlethods
(cN cl which methods) are beina implemented)
'i�/ Burial three feat beneath the surface of the Around within 2-1 hours after
kno-,viedQe of the death. The burial must b at least 300 feet from any flowing
stream or public body of water. ve
�d Rendering at a rende ina plant licensed under G.S. 106-168.7
J Complete incineration
❑ In the case of dead poultry only. placing in a disposal pit of a size and design
approved by the Department of ,�ariculture
�1 Anv method which in the professional opinion of the State Veterinarian would
make possible the salvage of part of a dead animal's value without endangering
human or animal health. (Written approval of the State Veterinarian must be
attached)
•

Form SLUR-1 Slurry and Sludge Application Field Record
For Recording Slurry Application Events on Different Fields
Farm Owner Facility Number -
Spreader Operator
Date Field Size Application # of Loads Volume of Loads 2
Tract # Field # mm/dd! Crop Type t
( r y) (acres) Method Per Field (aallons)
SI = soil incor d (disked); SIR = broadcast (surface applied) .
z Can be foundOinerator's manual for the spreader. Contact a local dealer if you do not have your is manual.

.•
Form SLUR-2
Tract #
Field Size (acres) = (A)
Farm Owner
Owner's Address
Owner's Phone #
II*
Slurry and Sludge Application Field Record
One Form for Each Field Per Crop Cycle
Facility Number
Spreader Operator
Spreader Operator's
Address
Operator's Phone #
From Animal Waste Management Plan
Crop Type Recommended PAN
Loading (lb/acre) = (B)
(1) (2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
Date
(mmlddtyr)
# of Loads Per Field
Volume of Loads t
Total Volume
(gallons)
(2) x (3)
Volume Per Acre
(gallac)
(4) + (A)
2
Waste Analysis
PAN (1b11000 gal)
PAN Applied
(lb/ac)
[(5) x (6)] + 1,000
Nitrogen Balance }
(Iblac)
(B) _ (7)
Crop Cycle Totals
Owner's Signature
Certified Operator (Print)
Operator's Signature
Operator Certification #
' Can be found in operator's manual for the spreader. Contact a local dealer if you do not have your owner's manual.
7 See your animal waste management plan for sampling frequency. At a minimum, waste analysis is required within 60 days of land application events.
Enter the value received by subtracting column (7) from (B). Continue subtracting column (7) from column (8) following each application event.

J. MIKE LINDLEY
614 Mike Lindley Road
Snow Camp, NC 27349
170 COW HOLSTEIN DAIRY
6,460 LBS PAN PRODUCED YEARLY (NRCS)
2 CALUMET LIQUID MANURE SPREADERS
MODEL 3750 - 3750 GALLONS
CALIBRATION:
Each spreader holds about 3 500 gallons when loaded. Attached is a letter
from the manufacturer stating that about 6000-7000 gallons are spread per acre.
This is based on the farmer driving at 2 mph with a PTO speed of 1000 rpm.
Based on information from the manufacturer and the dairy producer/operator in
charge, the value of 7,000 gallons/acre is being used.
WASTE ANALYSIS:
Broadcast - 3.9 lbs/1000 gallons
Soil Incorporated - 5.4 lbs/1000 gallons
x"TOW
Corn Silage - 114.94 acres
Wheat Silage - —50 acres (double cropped with corn for silage)

0
NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT PLAN
This farm has a total of 114.94 acres that are being used to receive manure. The
crops being raised are no -till corn silage on 114.94 acres with about 50 acres per
year being planted to small grain silage.
The dairy will generate 6,588 lbs PAN/year. The animals on this dairy are only on
the lot 50% of the time.
Corn Silage/Small Grain Silage Nutrient Management
• Corn for silage will be no -till planted in late March, April, and May.
The manure used on these fields is broadcast applied. The corn is
harvested in August and September.
* Small grain for silage is planted in September or October on •
approximately 50 acres of the corn land. The manure applied to these
fields is soil incorporated. The small grain is harvested in May as
silage. Late or tropical corn is then planted in these fields.
0

LINDLEY DAIRY
614 Mike Lindley Farm
Snow Camp, NC 27349
Tract
#
Field #
NRCS
Farm
Field #
Acres
Soil
Type
Crop
Yield
Per Acre
Lbs Nitrogen
Per Acre
Lbs
Nitrogen
Corn
Silage/
Field
Lbs
Nitrogen
Sm.Grain
Silage/
Field
Maximum
Nitrogen
per Field
1278
1
2
13.93
232E
Corn & Small Grain Silage
18T/65 bu
216lbs/156 lbs
380.3
526.6
5182.00
1278
2
3
6.3
130C
Corn & Small Grain Silage
17T145 bu
204lbs/108 lbs
172
238.1
1965.60
1278
3
4
2.68
130C
Corn & Small Grain Silage
17T/45 bu
204lbs/108 lbs
73.2
101.3
836.16
1278
4
5
5.87
130C
Corn & Small Grain Silage
17T/45 bu
204lbs/108 lbs
160.3
221.9
1831.44
1278
5
6
30.45
130C
Corn & Small Grain Silage
17T/45 bu
204lbs/108 lbs
831.3
1126.7
9500.40
1278
6
7
16.24
130B
Corn & Small Grain Silage
18T140 bu
216 Ibs/96lbs
443A
1740.5
5066.88
1278
9
1
10.26
130B
Corn & Small Grain Silage
18T/40 bu
216 Ibs/96 lbs
280.1
387.8
3201.12
1310
1
8
7.86
212C
Corn & Small Grain Silage
14T/65 bu
168lbs/156 lbs
214.6
297.1
2546.64
1310
2
9
9.93
131 B2
Corn & Small Grain Silage
18T/40 bu
216 Ibs/96 lbs
271.1
375.4
3098.16
1310
3
9
3.12
131 B2
Corn & Small Grain Silage
18T/40 bu
216 Ibs196 lbs
85.2
117.9
973.44
1310
4
10
6
232B
Corn & Small Grain Silage
18T/65 bu
216lbs/156 lbs
163.8
226.8
2232.00
1310
5
10
1.6
232B
Corn & Small Grain Silage
18T/65 bu
216lbs1156 lbs
43.7
60.48
595.20
1310
6
8
0.7
232B
Corn & Small Grain Silage
18TI65 bu
216lbs/156 Ibs
19.1
26.46
260.40
Totals
114.
1 3138.1
1 5447,04
37289.44
NOTES:
• The amount of Nitrogen applied to corn silage and the small grain silage was made using the liquid manure spreader calibration. it was also
made assuming that only one application (2 loads) was made over the field. With corn silage this means that a total of 3,128 lbs PAN is
applied. if the owners make two passes over the field, then the amount of PAN used is 6,276 lbs PAN which would still not exceed the
amount of N that can be applied to the corn.

• The amount of N used in the calculations is 12 lbs/ton of corn silage and 2.4 lbs/bu of wheat produced. The values used are from the Chatham
and Wake County NRCS offices.
• The figures for the small grain fields list all the acres that could be planted and the amount of Nitrogen applied if'one application (2 loads) is
made over each field. The owner and/or OIC will determine which fields will be planted to the small grain each year. The values are listed so
that they will know the pounds of nitrogen that can be applied based on soil type and yield.
• All deficiencies in nitrogen and other nutrients will be supplied by commercial fertilizer.
• Any changes to this plan will be discussed and made with the assistance of'a Certified Technical Specialist (CES or NRCS representative).

0 0 0
LINDLEY DAIRY
614 Mike Lindley Farm
Snow Camp, NC 27349
Tract
#
Field #
NRCS
Farm
Field #
Acres
Soil
Type
Crop
Yield
Per Acre
Lbs Nitrogen
Per Acre
Lbs
Nitrogen
Corn
Silage/
Field
Lbs
Nitrogen
Sm.Grain
Silage/
Field
Maximum
Nitrogen
per Field
1278
1
2
13.93
232B
Corn & Small Grain Silage
18T/65 bu
216lbs/156 lbs
380.3
526.6
5182.00
1278
2
3
6.3
130C
Corn & Small Grain Silage
17T/45 bu
204lbs/108 lbs
172
238.1
1965.60
1278
3
4
2.68
130C
Corn & Small Grain Silage
17T/45 bu
204lbs/108 lbs
73.2
101.3
836.16
1278
4
5
5.87
130C
Corn & Small Grain Silage
17T/45 bu
204lbs/108 lbs
160.3
221.9
1831.44
1278
5
6
30.45
130C
Corn & Small Grain Silage
17T/45 bu
204lbs/108 lbs
831.3
1126.7
9500.40
1278
6
1 7
16.24
130B
Corn & Small Grain Silage
18T/40 bu
216 Ibs/96lbs
443.4
1740.5
5066.88
1278
9
1
10.26
1308
Corn & Small Grain Silage
18T/40 bu
216 lbs/96 lbs
280.1
387.8
3201.12
1310
1
8
7.86
212C
Corn & Small Grain Silage
14T/65 bu
168lbs/156 lbs
214.6
297.1
2546.64
1310
2
9
9.93
131 B2
Corn & Small Grain Silage
18T/40 bu
216 lbs/96 lbs
271.1
375.4
3098.16
1310
3
9
3.12
131 B2
Corn & Small Grain Silage
18T/40 bu
216 Ibs/96 lbs
85.2
117.9
973.44
1310
4
10
6
232B
Corn & Small Grain Silage
18T/65 bu
216lbs/156 lbs
163.8
226.8
2232.00
1310
5
10
1.6
232B
Corn & Small Grain Silage
18T/65 bu
216lbs/156 lbs
43.7
60.48
595.20
1310
6
8
0.7
232B
Corn & Small Grain Silage
18T/65 bu
216lbs/156 lbs
19.1
26.46
260.40
Totals
1
3138.1
=5447�04
37289.44
NOTES:
• The amount of Nitrogen applied to corn silage and the small grain silage was made using the liquid manure spreader calibration. It was also
made assuming that only one application (2 loads) was made over the field. With corn silage this means that a total of 3,128 lbs PAN is
applied. if the owners make two passes over the field, then the amount of PAN used is 6,276 lbs PAN which would still not exceed the
amount of N that can be applied to the corn.

• The amount of N used in the calculations is 12 lbs/ton of corn silage and 2.4 lbs/bu of wheat produced. The values used are from the Chatham
and Wake County NRCS offices.
• The figures for the small grain fields list all the acres that could be planted and the amount of Nitrogen applied if one application (2 loads) is
made over each field. The owner and/or O1C will determine which fields will be planted to the small grain each year. The values are listed so
that they will know the pounds of nitrogen that can be applied based on soil type and yield.
• All deficiencies in nitrogen and other nutrients will be supplied by commercial fertilizer.
• Any changes to this plan will be discussed and made with the assistance of a Certified Technical Specialist (CES or NRCS representative).
0 0 9

0
- Sk
INDUSTRIES, INC.
P.O. Box 1685 •Wausau, WI 54402-1685
[phone] • FAX [phone] [phone]
P�� Al I iv v % / ? %a Semis^,L- b
r
/'i7' /j
s'cc; 'q Tom,
L't "o L' F- -D
h )? 4 e' Z} -1D
/p
S� /')7 y/A/& ''i T-
ye,' i-
Plant: 505 Industrial Park Avenue a Mosinee, WI 54455

Animal Waste Management Plan Cert.t:ication
(Please type or print all information that does not require a signature)
Exi�g � or New - or _ Expanded (please circle one)
General Information;
Name of Farm: b cL,rL IJCA LG�--t _ _.Facility No:
r-
Owner(s) Name: Phone No: 1.1 We3_,2�j9
Mailing Address: �� ..JQhr( 1-.i�c�_lC_ 5riyt.) �nir C 7, _
Faun Location: County Farm is located in:
Latitude and Longitude:~
Please attach a copy of a county road map with location identified and describe below (Be specific: road
names, directions, milepost, etc.): 1 f5 47/) - �ocR� A � Ace
� xcel r r ! ohd � J 3.3 � i�x eGd 1 ,3 3 % . '%h 1 `-; i .S i+
Oueration Descrintion:
Type of Swine No. of Animals Type of Poulin, No. of Animals Type of Cattle No. of Animals
J Wean to Feeder 7 Layer A Dairy I `10_
1 Feeder to Finish ❑ Pullets D Beef
J Farrow to Wean
J Farrow to Feeder
D Farrow to Finish Other Type of Livestock. Number of Animals:
Expanding Operation Ouly AW
j Previous Design Capacity: Additional Design Capacrty� R F
Total Design Capacity•:
Acreage Available for Application:_ � `i �+ - - Required Acreage:��
Number of Lagoons 1 Storage Ponds : Total Capaci Cubic Feet
Are subsurface drains present on the farm: YES or NO (please circle one)
If YES: are subsurface drains present in the area of the LAGOON or SPRAY FIELD (please circle one)
Owner 1 Manager Agreement
I (we) verify that all the above information is correct and will be updated upon changing. I (we) understand the operation and
maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste management plan for the farm named above and will
implement these procedures. I (we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the waste treatment and
storage system or construction of new facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of
Environmental ,Management before the new animals are stocked. I (we) understand that there must be no discharge of animal
waste from the storage or application system to surface waters of the state either directly through a man-made conveyance or
from a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour storm and there must not be run-off from the application of animal
waste. 1 (we) understand that run-off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas must be minimized using technical
standards developed by the Natural Resources Conservation Service. The approved plan will be filed at the farm and at the
office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District. 1 (we) know that any modification must be approved by a technical
specialist and submitted to the Soil and Water Conservation District prior to implementation. A change in land ownership
requires written notification to DEVI or a new certification (if the approved plan is chanced) within 60 days of a title transfer.
Name of Lan Owner.: F: J t-A
Signature: k�' %fEI �.� Date:!i
Name of M-anavrif ditferen[ r ow r): i ) "
Signature: ✓ Date:_�!'i�. - -- _
•
.s WC -- January 1. 1997

Technical Specialist Certification
LAs a technical specialist designated by the North Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A
NCAC 6F .0005. 1 certify that the animal waste management system for the farm named above has an animal waste
management plan that meets or exceeds standards and specifications of the Division of Environmental Management (DEM)
as specified in 15A NCAC 2H.0217 and the USDA -Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) and/or the North
Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H.0217 and 15A NCAC 6F .0001-.0005. The
following elements are included in the plan as applicable. While each category designates a technical specialist who may
sign each certification (SD, SI, WLT, RC, I), the technical specialist should only certify parts for which they are technically
competent.
II. Certification of Design
A) Collection, Storage, Treatment System
Checkthe appropriate box
©/ Existing facility without retrofit (SD or WUP)
Storage volume is adequate for operation capacity; storage capability consistent with waste utilization
requirements.
D New, expanded or retrofitted facility (SD)
Animal waste storage and treatment structures, such as but not limited to collection systems, lagoons and ponds,
have been designed to meet or exceed the minimum standards and specifications.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):_ �_Jjrl -j-L Jr
Affiliation; �i `
Address(Ag cy): OC Phone No..:91�-.5�101 �O
Signature: Date: I A 1
B) Land Application Site (WUP)
The plan provides for minimum separations (buffers); adequate amount of land for waste utilization; chosen crop is
suitable for waste management; hydraulic and nutrient loading rates.
Name of Technical
Affiliation:Cbb
Address(Agen ):�
Signature: ��
C) Runoff Controls from Exterior Lots
Check the appropriate box
❑ Facility without exterior lots (SD or WUP or RC)
This facility does not contain any exterior lots.
Facility with exterior lots (RC)
Methods to minimize the run off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas have been designed in
accordance with technical standards developed by NRCS.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation: L._kjR4-kArrx 60'a u,r
Address(Aue cv): bpM NIL, •_4-�S LZ Phone No.l�;
Signature: v Date: +�
AWC -- January 1, 1997

D). Application and Hat«„ing Equipment
Check the appropriate box
�Exi,tina or expanding facility with existin waste a lication a ui meat (WUP or I)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been either field calibrated or evaluated in
accordance with existing design charts and tables and is able to apply waste as necessary to accommodate the .
waste management plan: (existing application equipment can cover the area required by the plan at rates not to
exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates, a schedule for tinning of applications has been
established; required buffers can be maintained and calibration and adjustment guidance are contained as pan of
the plan).
❑ New. expanded. or existing facility without existing waste application eauiprnent for snrav
imaatton. (1)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been designed to apply waste as necessary to
accommodate the waste management plan; (proposed application equipment can cover the area required by the
plan at rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates; a schedule for timing of
applications has been established; required buffers can be maintained; calibration and adjustment guidance are
contained as part of the plan).
❑ New, expanded. or existing facility without existing waste application equipment for land
spreading not usinasprairrigation. (WUP or I)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been selected to apply waste as necessary to
accommodate the waste management plan; (proposed application equipment can cover the area required by the
plan at rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates; a schedule for timing of
applications has been established; required buffers can be maintained; calibration and adjustment guidance are
contained as pan of the plan).
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): To VJ4 A
Affiliation: Cciop,' r ch ip &&Pew Y rrvn do ryi U _
Address(A-ency):400 i-t= 061 1 z e, e kok-,L4, 2761 J -11Phone No.:'114 '.In 110 �
Signature:
"1_rf
E) Odor Control, Insect Control, -Mortality Management and Emergency Action Plan -(SD
SI, WUP, RC or Il
The waste management plan for this facility includes a Waste Management Odor Control Checklist, an Insect Control
Checklist, a Mortality Management Checklist and an Emergency Action Plan. Sources of both odors and insects
have been evaluated with respect to this site and Best Management Practices to Minimize Odors and Best
Management Practices to Control Insects have been selected and included in the waste management plan. Both the
Mortality ;Management Plan and the Emergency Action Planare complete and cap be implemented by this facility.
Name of Technical S
Affiliation:
Address(A2e . cy): P.
r
Signature:
alist (Please Print):
ate:
R• VILi7LlUP-C
F) Written Notice of Neµ• or Expanding Sivine Farm
The followine signature block is onlv�to be used for new or expanding sine farms that begin construction after June
21, 1996. If the facility was built before June 21, 1996, when -was it constructed or last expanded
1 (we) cenify that I (we) have attempted to contact by certified mail all adjoining property owners and all property owners
who own property located across a public road, street. or highway from this new or expanding swine farm. The notice was in
compliance with the requirements of NCGS 106-805. A copy of the notice and a list of the property owners notified is
attached. I (I.
Name of Land Owner.
Signature:
Name of Manaber(if different from owner):
Signature
NVC -- January 1, 1997
Date:
ate:
•

III. Certification of Installation
A) Collection Storage Treatm nt Installation
Ne%v, expanded or retrofitted facility (SI)
Animal waste storage and treatment structures, such as but not limited to lagoons and ponds, have been installed in
accordance with the approved plan to meet or exceed the minimum standards and specifications.
For existing facilities without retrofits, no certration is necessary.
1,14
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation:
Add re ss (Agency): Phone No.:
Signature: Date:
B) Land Application Site (WUP)
Check the appropriate box
R( The cropping system is in place on all land as specified in the animal waste management plan.
❑ Conditional Approval: all required land as specified in the plan is cleared for planting; the cropping system
as specified in the waste utilization plan has not been established and the owner has committed to establish the
vegetation as specified in the plan by (month/day/year)-, the proposed cover crop is appropriate
for compliance with the wasteutilization plan.
❑ Also check this box if appropriate
if the cropping system as specified in the plan can not be established on newly cleared land within 30 days
of this certification, the owner has comritted to establish an interim crop for erosion control;
Nance of Te hnical Specialist (Please Print): 0— r 1 �
Affiliation: — t ►c
Address(Age cy): Phone No. 2-
Signature: G� Date: 1 9
This following signature block is only o be used when the box for conditional approval in III. B
above has been checked.
I (we) cenify that I (we) have committed to establish the cropping system as specified in my (our) waste utilization plan, and
if appropriate to establish the interim crop for erosion control, and will submit to D£M a verification of completion from a
Technical Specialist within 15 calendar days following the date specified in the conditional certification. I (we) realize that
failure to submit this verification is a violation of the waste management plan and will subject me (us) to an enforcement
action from DEM.
Name of Land Owner:
Signature:
Date:
Name of Alanager(if different from owner):
Signature: Date:
AWC -- January 1, 1997

C) Runoff Controls from :terior Lots (RC)
Facility with exterior lots
Methods to minimize the run off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas have been installed as specified
in the plan.
For facilities without exterior lots, no certification is necessary.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation: 0i
Address (Agencv):
Signature: ru
D) A
Check
•
Vo
+ ..
7fopriate block
Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan is on site and ready for use; calibration
and adjustment materials have been provided to the owners and are contained as pan of the plan.
LI Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan has not been installed but the owner
has proposed leasing or third party application and has provided a signed contract; equipment specified in the
contract agrees with the requirements of the plan; required buffers can be maintained; calibration and
adjustment guidance have been provided to the owners and are contained as part of the plan.
❑ Conditional approval: Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan'has been
purchased and will be on site and installed by (monthlday/year); there is adequate storage to
hold the waste until the equipment is installed and until the waste can be land applied in accordance with the
cropping system contained in the plan; and calibration and adjustment guidance have been provided to the
owners and are contained as part of the plan.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): I L A J-dLl AAJ •
Afftliation:.C,)oa('rt,-c,f,Ye-nSi�� 52r\/: cz
Address(Agency):Lk;ni-& LLr4a _,l?:::�z (zo.�e,�4 z�tc-zy,y —Phone No.:�t�
l [
Signature:
';?, •-z'�
The following signature block is only to be used when the box for conditional approval in III D
above has been checked.
1 (we) certify that I (we) have committed to purchase the animal waste application and handling equipment as
specified in my (our) waste management plan and will submit to DEM a verification of delivery and installation
from a Technical Specialist within 15 calendar days following the date specified in the conditional certification. I
(we) realize that failure to submit this verification is a violation of the waste management plan and will subject me
(us) to an enforcement action from DEM.
Name of Land Owner:
Signature: Date:
Name of 11lanager(if different from owner):
Signature: Date:
E) Odor Control, Insect Control and Mortality 1llianagement (SD. SI, WUP, RC or I)
Methods to control odors and insects as specified in the Plan have been installed and are operational. The
mortality management system as specified in the Pla has a50 been installed•and ' operatio
,Nnal.
,Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):__ Erfr� U_ _ _. Z4
Affiliation:
Address(Aaen y): -t'.
Signature:
WC -- January 1. 1997

is
•
Please return the completed form to the Division of Water Quality, at the following address:
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division Of Water Quality
Water Quality Section, Compliance Group
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
Please also remember to submit a copy, of this form along with the complete Animal Waste
Management Plan to the local Soil and Water Conservation District Office and to keep a copy in
your files with your Animal NN"aste Management Plan.
AAVC -- January ], 1997

MAR -

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
May 14, 1999
CERTIFIED MAIL
RE—TURNT REQUESTED
Jonathan m ey
Jonathan Lindley Farm
1800 Johnny Lindley Road
Snow Camp NC_27349
Farm Number:" 19 -16
Dear Jonathan Lindley:
,Tk?W,A
IT
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
You are hereby notified that Jonathan Lindley Farm, in accordance with G.S. 143-215.1 OC, must
apply for coverage under an Animal Waste Operation General Permit. Upon receipt of this letter, your
farm has sixty (60) days to submit the attached application and all supporting documentation. In
accordance with Chapter 626 of 1995 Session Laws (Regular Session 1996), Section 19(c)(2), any
owner or operator who fails to submit an application by the date specified by the Department
SHALL NOT OPERATE the animal waste system after the specified date. Your application must
be returned within sixty (60) days of receipt of this letter. Failure to submit,'the application as required
may also subject your facility to a civil penalty and other enforcement actions for each day the facility is
operated following the due date of the application.
The attached application has been partially completed using information listed in your Animal
Waste Management Plan Certification Form. If any of the general or operation information listed is
incorrect please make corrections as noted on the application before returning the application package.
The signed original application, one copy of the signed application, two copies of a general location
map, and two copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan must be returned to complete the
application package. The completed package should be sent to the following address:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Section
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
Post Office Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please call J R Joshi at [phone] extension
363 or Charles Alvarez with the Raleigh Regional Office at [phone].
Sincerely,
for Kerr T. Stevens
cc: Permit File (w/o encl.)
Raleigh Regional Office (w/o encl.)
P.O. Sox 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Wa4I%
Producer:ft)E al��� �t�
Location
Telephone:
RECEIVED
Type Operation: — ewe WATER QUALITYSFCTION
Number of Animals: /70 _ _ _UU1 0 6 1999
(Design Capacity)
Non•Disd)arge permitting
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a
specified rate to prevent pollution of surface water and/or
groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be
used to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the
crops in the fields where the waste is to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient.
Waste should be analyzed to determine nutrient content before each
application cycle. Annual soil tests are strongly encouraged so
that all plant nutrient's can be balanced for realistic yields of
the crop to be grown.
Several factors are important in implementing your waste
utilization plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of the
waste and to ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe
manner:
1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be
grown and the nutrient content of the waste. Do not
apply more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
2. Soil types are important as they have different
infiltration rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange
capacities, and available water holding capacities.
3. Normally waste shall not be applied to land eroding at
greater than 5 tons per acre per year. With special,
precautions, waste may be applied to land eroding at up
to 10 tons per acre per year.
4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is
raining, or when the surface is frozen. Either of these
conditions may result in runoff to surface waters which
is not allowed under North Carolina Division of
Environmental Management (NCDEM) .0200 regulations.
5. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift
and downwind odor problems.
1

6. To maximize the value of nutrients for crop production
and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste
should be applied to a growing crop or applied to bare
ground not more than 30 days prior to planting.
Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients
and reduce odor problems.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on
typical nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage
requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from your
waste management facility. Attached you will find information on
proper sampling techniques, preparation, and transfer of waste
samples to the lab for analysis.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements
for compliance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217 adopted by the Environmental
Management Commission.
F

- °�'1 rkr i+'�+'ra _f r
I`
�h,a :�� �i?•. ��: S�� Ra"y ' F r f,..h hr�� .� 7�, f L, ., �. •, -t�; q fi: i* �i � ..
Amount of Waste Produced Per Year(gallons, ft3, tons, etc.)
1
I'10 animals xn&d4amt .) waste/animal/year =
O #a,1 (amt .) waste/year
Amount of Plant Available Nitrogen {PAN) Produced Per Year
1-10 animals XA & lbs . PAN/animal /year = jam 30 16:L. lbs . PAN/year. .
(PAN from N. C. Tech. Guide Std. 633)
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan
time and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a tamely
manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on
the nitrogen (N) requirements of the crop to be grown and assuming
surface application:
Table 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
Tract Field Soil. Crop Lbs. N Acres Lbs. N Month of
# No. Type Per Ac.* Utilized Application
i7
• :
it
•,=
��
�
�
=
�
-�
ice•
-�:
«�
"--
�
Total p q: s l 184.3l_ V Q.%&o Z, j
* This N is from animal waste only.. If nutrlents from other
sources such as commercial fertillzer are applied, they,must be
accounted for. N must be based on realistic Yield expectation.
a
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and:K may be over applied
while meeting the N requirements. Beginning in 2996' the Coastal
Zone Management Act will require farmers in. some. eastern counties
of North. Carolina. to have a nutrient management plan that addresses
all nutrients.. This plan only addresses: Nitrogea_
3

­
-=,lip Ime *Penn
Table '2:ACRES ON. TERM 139*99
fAgreeMent with adjacent landowner must: be attached)
(Required only If operator does not own
adequate land (see -Required Specification 2))
Tract Field Soil Crop Lbs. N Acres Lbs. N
# Type Per Ac.* Utilized
Month of
Application
[a -is
19
1 Zg2 C_
RESCUXl
10-aki
tal 11
13
1 Ala a
17
'7all%
14
.521an
0R
1 - GA
al'7
tang
-0-
sagg
I ac;
.340
lao
lais
18
5aSS
_911ag
adle
IWIS
19
su 58
—a..93
3(0&
130 A
!JAS
aq. oi
4igall
0, Z:
W-Fiek
7MW
. Via
IN
5T45
W.. 7,
;-tip
110_1�16
A -
1:4. mri4mWZ
_.."e,
777,
_44
Vw
tn'
•41
:kw,
0
See footnote for., Table, 1'.

_ '4
'�`
k'
�
r
s •1
Ri�:,�, ti:::4� Vie: � .,�` ..r- t;• �.. 1• . _��.r..�

a a1» 'l " tl• '��V•� 9f ��e sr,2r3G-RI
.t
''a.5`rk. .t 'err ale Z.. I.r A.
''!.N ar-f{; y� 1
V' p i t 4'� '4'P4� l,R}K�}}�k�f� � 3d� rrixpj +4,
S FN k..i
1� ,,,.$� _ � ,,, t';4 .3h �5r r•nl J y Y yJ•Y�,' h�'`G
�51 ;w�.cArl•'1 _ rJt� r'rr r r ;� W84 s„ i-�'` r-'r'i��' ri.�d �}"- I'.4. � ,� �n..s+.t1't- �? • l ' 7'tfr�y+ • 1��'"• �• r�
• y r r i1 a +:,. • tly r ; �'+�iC �: r 'ze iµt ''mo�d ."'�' f-Rn'+" r+� r`R !'.,
[0. tS`•��!`yk'1,�f1,!-t�w^S
A - y, :a U $y ,�.iy3'J,, ytT "•. �}}g- REV
�'il�y6 S
•III 5 • ,'S - t �-^�y t t ,1,' >ti 2., _,fir, '3i y, ii F-� r +t{t' Sy,r f1k�:3'�aVl�e�
lost � 'e } S`'f i 4 � [s , a 'r^: ~•.,k r, �l r
la4 i; 4Ar�
'7rFa t4' f r !§ t i es r�t 9 1�k4a �' J H"JCi rif3 r•
i ]` ft r{ v 3t� i Ca r{'"' i.(' R"'. 1r� �i err r i-t i{- f r ;�.,[! • /' -s� r�� l Ef t` j,en 1 f r}
t i N} �'Fd•' yF.�p. Z [� � �' � { M1 Y� r ,jj l�h,�f�''�
y q�iy #�y������� �" - . `�F�.� � ? �'� $ }t+' �+�.� x,� R �i �'i1 d'�1"f'�i r''.'r'i�•�'�t
3: $ �� Y', A4» '� Xi a• #+5. F i41 iT 4 3 ':F` i � +�
3 ""ilv: �1'�ti 'sl ' J r � E✓ a { ° f - �� �
s� � 4 � vra 4 C,�/'�•S- a
A �4f 3l S5: i3 X' rT1T�
S 1 t, a .rr i1sk i P Y. �' ri 7 /a r't 4 p
S jLy:Tr "4 3.h" 't.l:•j i 1?� 4
1�r - .�F'�9, '. a'»t'.i�r,', e`.yh.. 1F'�Jy lJJ•+= •,.;,T•s �r-..r}lli 4 �t�ir r
Y ei• l.x tw yr
5• L� �)�ft y }.-0 �4 f tx% {p r`°uf�.
9 �
�
'•fy $ r+'�j�•-f°"^�i � �`r *' a`F�t'f,��✓�,i. �4 r' ���.ii "�hl } ,#'i,`YI� � sh�?�?."..: s< ��, t.�`
1,
351�. {i� L�M' k� y } at" rf'� r� ,a •Q T 't Z� '» 'S
4: ..,rrr .r 1�.3 i t� t �a Ar^'r�-� Y i1 ! ( I,+i� t� .� � 1 `� � �'.oF}3•{ t
e:'s .. M..s:..,�Rt.+.`�i`5:.'..������1�i?.a�:C:` •liW.53'� �r+�r:'rJ�T4.�:e�.n.r•Z�'.�'L t.�+f.n�.�'!*�;-t{�'.
'ii.^, � f ` l! 1� -.�'r' i+; C'�""',�',€(4rx .o,i •. ` r '•y'•° rr,,, '"e`y��.�l"k'- -. ' i�' +1 rti"z +r.+i= 3 , �3 Fe.� ,�'. ^• i+
��. rr<." �� 1. .w E1�'jr'r-;� w r r tr �'? - � ,rf - Fr-i r "�+ a»a .. �• r . ��xr P .-3r - h' A '.vr.`'T � �
h �''�•. x, k 'd } •, r �r - j' r!" t q-r rc.,.�» �' ,�. r- ,ui3: ��3�.th
•t •$.'. i 'i. r y. W li �t r t, r +, .lr ii/2!.. �'�• r.§`'
J ., 70
Yr €1 yrpla SI t i }' �� 1 r r 5 ..''i ' j ir. r ^'i� p fit �^{
'vE.�,i i„ Is� � i,� 6r �'�` � � - a'.•� t 'Ti4'}�� i' '�lr°J; A.� '?r rr
t€4 l +s a y:. r(i.. d`i'7r o-'a.J'Fe.�k,-.+f�yv+.•j r-I `�T' it
r✓�{��"r5,r �z "',�•qe•�'��^''. �°` R. .y.r5r f�'?r•. ,^ u j. •Tu"�}; ' �P+• 40'��
�•'� r��-: ..�a�.Y� 1 r f4 y tr. � F r F� �•y1-1�..i x4P.r r`.. r if '^' st � ' r 4: �. '� iA _+ P f ,•:_
L r ls• i4t• K @-'.S'' r�i{.,,t„ r t r n t #•� ti ++,, ` •1N »1' r. r'" b ci ' '!`yf'�r� ih (. T yr
k+�.41( r'i�� +y�a'•Y �:-
c h �1 » �,• `� �}'�..t.�'• 'r`�,'� " C7 ' y'' 1r� t i 1j�� \•! /( ��d .*y7 �y}/{r-�t�1y� �x !.';
4. !! 7'Y.b 1d y {{ ~y S 'i";ry �, ;. 1 a •. { iCl i l� l,4 ; y'',` SrJrT 1� P 1 �! " i yS;
1,yiA,y"'•.,y�,�',,t�rF1F.i. 4°'�SN{yt"'}_`�r <+�'I��i �A.0 �7 ,SF'`c�s�•.4y}.e&d '?.rl'�+1. _F r����f�y'r' -I` .+�F
q' "a•,-+ :h '�r'ry�i'x r{F,. F11��"€..r I'«•ti�`yir Kr ;. - „'i'.Y `,R'"1, f�.1 u� 1 . rr �+1� y:x:s -.Ff'
1e'3,w it w � ,'•4"�' �. .l�f r. , rr a d.. �w�1`r "� r� � �
�; � • iC 7' �- • I ' S ",�i"y� � , � A yT � ? S •. • t 't f f € ], y, � ;# s r �' yfj� �,
�,.i ��4i' L..;i '3. � °''7` •,''+�,�i4.�r �`S;w�:�y Ji. "�`j." "�6c,y �" +l ° r rr `� �� �' '`t � r�+i � � rl r t 1' S r � - , �. ; +.Yt/ r ;�;�i�
�f i 4, ':7•., f ! a re,'T. t * _l. ?�.. r „ �..ri �t� e }1 T i +-.t:,+ - 0 r r 3
n`•���ir���rz'� ry >rY ri"r�,tg,•SYjr � F 13tn'r�Rr' ; i1 r t � { S :Tr I " r 't �?.t ; s+€yr, yr. Irr ','' .•F rr;.
A .• p ""r � } r � 3 'k.0 r `} .G- r �1l�1e:r C B .-i t y r s
L ..r„Le.�t U'll"L
�� ut�H� ''r/y 1t 4� wr r'°' SsN3 r Y F'i1,r eyet•Pr�K+� a�°q x`
=rr � � �• ",t 5 ,n,;°s��` �"i 3�� v °. � d++ ri`�" � •�' }d.r, t.� � nit. ��
rr r f � 'li yr rt ;
,`•'"*yy �,_. „sf1'3.t 1;• �' a.r, Y S is ., i ply" r.. 3 y� +t t ` i yay x,,. i ti
h i s ti R �' •i� I,r 5.( � T
i ,'15: ,e r'rti,].�,' 1 r a '[. ♦ ` 1- ti^5L'•{_.1 ... 4 r f t"a ((
y fi _r " 1 "dal - ! Y ,y'• r � •4�. .�1 ,. , .. 1 '�., 1 t," A +-.tva ,; -f. f rM w l r �.�, F9r `^ *• " -•T � •
°1.rr7L I € a i wS-r1t '""+ls , y►1".rx »». 'I.fl •L'` i ";. rY -.5
{Wj . 9srar 4rTe'c k y o f " r 'v r J1u t •q�ra r
as , ,i hti'yY '�1r^� r '1-.' i, -€ r r!- ':f -r .• • 1` r 1 . , ,h`' t � . � , - r r '. € i i + .j�
r y17�� f r+`, ".� "' r5'" il.�, r r �rJ E" t� r w y 3e +z1 r ' S r .� r4 •.l r .�r�. N tr �€ •r r..( "�.-..�' - 14
r 1,y
{e~rtt. krr� �1`,}° �', °'r•• `•.. "'.�'4�"r »w�. Y -� �, 'f �•r r i• '� l�r � K�•, 'f YF >. aj -f S3'•
� �:. r �J / r s, ty 413 � ��. �T f • �,+ j - Y ��' s ' � , ,`Y1,�1 .r _ f F `
S, _ j Sr •s;' yy 9 c 1. . l a r.�r tT Ir r i
•1 ri • w � � Lff• � `'r' H 1i•L'1'� J.r �. � "4tiP" a.�*+1 ! r�,� ,1^Z' r r? '` ,..y"'' j, '�
r•-��S „�t i.�i-» rr t'-A• rr � � .�, � � •'t r � = d¢ i th fi � �ti €'
1;y1'�� d a� •?1�1 j�l'r�FCi.A��}�e.�°,€��S'�1� .tid� �r��Fr�����,�_� ','�1 _big. rlit
�' ,ye�rqiiF fi . ;u rr � > t ; t1 M1y � A`�;�! rr•f rr-I-
PUT +n! y. F •a �e. s y(:�,�?'�r� ' � + F � r �' � :��r
�" h A yµ. ` I' I,�� i.• p.�
k i.t_• 2a.w. W'^ �r '. •?y �t�� » n.,b'_ : A. �i 9Y "�.. .`k .. ee ih�Ltl. r•^. a �,�Cl . �-.:i �'3 .e.. '`€•'f 7"$:r-ti

0
I
N� - - - -,% .1�
iwt
�Yt
Sky
p s -
PIN
f ;J1- 1�
All
4�p� "0
4- j, k.-, - 1 a,
Al
4�
vA
Fn my not♦ j
, t, . ,., �, .1 . .1, _ . -1 1 1 " � ��. ;. �
yis who.•
lot I W.,
7
ell
W�j Qjj1Z Its, j
J,7�.
7d.,.
NOW
0 RX w;

Table 2:. ACRES WITS AGRLEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(AgreeWent.with adjacent landowner must be attached)
(Required only it operator does not own
adequate land toes Required Specification 21)
Tract Field Soil Crop Lbs. N Acres Lbs.''N Month of
# Type Per Ac.* Utilized Application
See footnote for Table I.
Totals from above Tables
Acres Lbs . , N
Utilized
Table 1 113,,51 30.0
Table 2 3a. E�: to, D'a 19
Total 1416.11 lib.043
Amount of N Pro uced I /a'9.20
surplus or eficit {Q, V, 1
NOTE: The Waste Utilization Plan must contain provisions for
periodic land application of'sludge at agronomic rates. The sludge
will be nutrient rich and will require precautionary measures to
prevent over application of nutrients or other elements.
4

Your facility is designed for ISO of temporary storage and
the temporary storage must be removed on the average of once every
MONTHS. In no instance should the volume of waste being
stored in your structure exceed Elevation
Call the local Natural Resources Conservation Service (formerly Soil
Conservation Service) or Soil and Water Conservation District office
after you receive the waste analysis report for assistance in
determining the amount per acre to apply and the proper application
rate prior to applying the waste.
NARRATIVE OF OPERATION,
(Use additional sheets as needed to describe the operation of the
system within the context of the livestock operation)
9 fled 19 aAC _L"Ct j j Lin ,JA 56--r4 �O 0^ P 5 PO 'Form
Qvn L rG Su, r �4t
at-
L4,JOj01'J-
s

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift, manmade conveyances, direct application, or
direct discharge during operation 'or land application. Any discharge of waste which reaches surface water is
prohibited
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer either owns or has a notarized agreement for use of
adequate land on which to properly apply the waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to properly dispose of
waste, he/she shall provide a copy of a notarized agreement with a landowner who is within a reasonable proximity,
allowing him/her-the use of the land for waste application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the facility to secure
an update of the Waste Utilization Plan when there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of animals,
method of'utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the Nitrogen needs for realistic crop yields based on soil type,
available moisture, historical data, climate conditions, and level of management, unless there are regulations that
restrict the rate of application for other nutrients. Actual yields may be used in lieu of realistic yield tables at the
discretion of the planner.
4. Animal waste shall be applied on land eroding less than 5 tons per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land that is
eroding at more than 5 tons but less than 10 tons per acre per year providing grass filter strips are installed where
runoff leaves the field. (See FOTG Standard 393-kilter Strips)
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after waste application: Waste should not be applied when there
is danger of drift from the irrigation field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, it will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled
cropland. When applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application
does not occur during a season prone to flooding. (See "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance.)
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to
surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift from the site during application. No ponding should occur
in order to control odor and flies.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or when the surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste should be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that the crop is not covered with waste to
depth that would prohibit growth. The potential for salt damage from animal waste should also be considered.
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted crops on soils with a high potential for leaching.
Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should be held to a minimum'and a suitable winter cover crop planted to
take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of a crop or forages breaking
dormancy..
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with the following: The outer perimeter of the
land area onto which waste is applied from a Lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from
any residential property boundary and from any -perennial stream or river other than an irrigation ditch or anal.
NRCS, NC
JUKE, 1996

WASTE UTELI4ZATION PLAN
REQMED SPECIFICATIONS
(continued)
Anirnal waste other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995, shall not be applied closer than
25 feet to surface water. This distance may be reduced for waters that are not perennial provided adequate vegetative
filter strips are present (See Standard 393 -Filter Strips),
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than I00 feet from wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than those owned by landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public right-of-ways.
15. Animals waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways or wetlands by a discharge or by over -
spraying. Animal waste may be applied to prior converted cropland provided it has been approved as a land
applications site by a "technical specialist". Animal waste applied on grassed waterways shall be at agronomic rates
and in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the
animal waste management system.
17.. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms,
pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and
other woody species, etc, are limited to areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and
accessible. Lagoon berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence of erosion, leakage, or discharge.
18. If animal production at the facility is terminated, the owner is responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure
plan" which will eliminate the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
19, Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns,
leaks, and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be kept on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other crops for direct human consumption.
However, if animal waste is used on crops for direct human consumption it should only be applied preplant with no
further applications of animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible permanent markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom elevations of the temporary storage
(pumping volume) of all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid level between the
markers. A marker will be required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste storage ponds.
22. Soil tests shall be made every two years and a liquid waste analysis be taken at least twice each year consistent with
waste utilization plan. Poultry litter shall be tested prior to application. Soil and waste analysis records shall be kept
for five years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets NC regulations.
NRCS, NC
JUNE, 1996

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
Name of Farm:
Owner/Manager Agreement
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications
and the operation and maintenance procedures established in the
approved animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I
(we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the
waste treatment and storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the
North Carolina Division of Environmental Management (NCDEM) before
the new animals are stocked. I.(we) also understand that there
must be no discharge of animal waste from this system to surface
wasters of the state from a storm event less severe than the 25-
year, 24-hour storm. The approved plan will be filed on -site at
the farm office and at the office of the local Soil and Water
Conservation District and will be available for review by NCDEM
upon request.
Name of Facility Owner:
ePlease print)
Signature:
Name of Manager(I
Signature:
Name of Technical
Date: a. I �&) 9-1
er)
Date:a� !A i97
Specialist: (Please print) �itn nl
Affiliation:
Address (Agency) : �. ©. 2mC. _a1-a
Signatures LOLA C-14—'Date:
11

WAS?E_4J��UZ��fy�
Pk -AI
`
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION .AGREEMENT
(Needed only if additional Iand has to be leased, etc.)
I hereby give 3—QX10 PrN1144IL4-yarm
permissil to apply animal waste from his Waste Utilization System
on� acres of my land for the duration of time shown below.
I understand that this waste contains nitrogen, phosphorous,
potassium, and other trace elements and when properly applied
should not harm my land or crops. I also understand that the use
of waste will reduce my need for commercial fertilizer.
Adjacent Landowner: Date:
Waste Producer: J Date: lal IR dqi
Technical Representative: _ "r4 �ux� _Date:
SWCD Representative:_ Date:
Term of Agreement: ,7.9— to
(Minimm of Tea rears On Coat Shared Stela)
(See Required Specification No. 2.1
2a
12

# No. th C:. Agricultural Ext1 s-ion Service Iof 3
AQ7ri-Waste ,Ma--no'gement.
Biologica] Knr Agncui Ural Engineering North Carolhw State University
LIVESTOCK WASTE SAMFLING, ANALYSIS AND CALCUTATION
OF LAND APPLICATION RATES '
James C. Barker*
I. SANTLE COLLECTION
A. Semi -Solid Lot Manure
i. Scraped directly from lot into spreader
a. From loaded spreader, collect about 2 lbs of manure from
diflEerent locations using nonmetallic collectors.
ii. From storage
a. Collect about 2 lbs of manure from under the surface crust
avoiding bedding materials and using nonmetallic collectors.
B. Liquid Manure Slurry
i. Under -slotted -floor pit
a. Extend a 1/2" nonmetallic conduit open on both ends into
manure to pit floor.
b. Seal upper end of conduit (e.g., by placing a thumb over end
of conduit) trapping manure that has entered lower end, remove
and empty slurry -into plastic bucket or nonmetallic container.
c. Take subsamples from 5 or more locations or at least I quart.
d. Mix and add about 3/4 pint to nonmetallic sample container.
ii. Exterior storage basin or tank
a. Make sure manure has been well mixed with a liquid manure
chopper -agitator pump or propeller agitator.
b, Take subsamples from about 5 pit locations, from agitator pump
or from manure spreader and place, in a plastic bucket.
Professor and Extension Specialist, Biological and Agricultural Engineering
Department, North Carolina State University, kaleigh, NC.

-3- 3of3V
II. SA21PLE PREPARATION AND TRANSFER
A. Place sample into an expandable container.that can be sealed. Rinse
residues from container with clean water but do not use disinfectants,
soaps, or treat in any other way.
B. Pack sample in ice, refrigerate, freeze, or transfer to lab quickly.
C. Hand -delivery is most reliable way of sample transfer.
D. if mailed, protect sample container with packing material such,as
newspaper, box or package with wrapping paper, and. tape.
E. Commercial sample containers and mailers are also available. Contacts:
i. AFL Eastern Agricultural Lab, Inc. iii. Polyfoam Packers Corp.
7621 Whitepine Road 2320 S. Foster Avenue
Richmond, VA 23237 Wheeling, IL 60090
Ph: [phone] Ph: [phone]
ii. Fisher Scientific Co. iv. NASCO
3315 Winton Road 901 Janesville Avenue
Raleigh, NC 27604 Fort Atkinson, WI 53538
Ph: (9195876-2351 Ph: [phone]
F. Private analytical labs are available, but sample analyses are costly.
G. The NCDA.provides this service for North Carolina residents.
i. Address: North Carolina Department of Agriculture
Agronomic Division
Plant/Waste/Solution Advisory Section
Blue Ridge Road Center
P.O. Box 27647
Raleigh, NC 27611
Ph: [phone]
Attn: Dr. Ray Campbell
ii. Forward $4 along with the sample.
iii. Include the following identification information with sample:
a. Livestock species (dairy, swine, turkey, etc.)
b. Livestock- usage (swine -nursery, finishing; turkey -breeders,
brooderhouse, grower, number flocks grown on litter; etc.)
c. Waste type (dairy -lot scraped manure, liquid slurry; swine -pit
slurry, lagoon liquid, sludge; broiler -house litter, stockpile
iv. Routine analyses performed on all samples: N, P, x, Ca, Mg, Na,
S, Fe, Mn, Zn, Cu, B
v. Additional analyses performed upon request: DM, Mo, Cd, Ni, Pb

CALIBRATION
Applicators can apply manure, litter and wastewater at varying rates and patterns. depending on
forward travel and/or PTO speed, gear box settings, gate openings, operating pressures, spread
widths and overlaps. Calibration dell es the combination of settings and travel speed needed to
apply manure, litter or %vasiewate, at a desired rate and to ensure uniform application.
Spreader Caoacity
Liquid spreader capacities are normally rated by the manufacturer in gallons. Multiply gallons by
0.0042 to get tons. Solid and semi -solid spreaders are rated by the manufacturer either in bushels
or cubic fee. (multiply bushels by 1.2Y to get cubic feet}. Most spreaders have nvo rating
capacities: I) struck or level full, and 2) heaped. Since manures and litters have different
densities. an on -farm test should be done. Fill a five -gallon bucket level full with material to be
spread. Do not pack the material in the bucket but ensure that it settles similar to'a loaded
spreader. Weigh the bucket full and then empty. Nfultiply the weight of the contents by 1.5 to get
pounds per cubic feet. Nlultiply this value tunes the cubic feet capacity of the spreader and divide
by 2000 to get the tons of material in a spreader load.
manure weight, Ibs x I.5 x spreader capacity, ft3 . 2000 = spreader load, tons
Spreader Calibration
Calibration .Method 1: This method is most useful for liquid spreaders but can be used for all
types. Spread at least one full load of manure preferably in a square or rectangular field pattern
for ease of measuring with normal overlaps. (Measure the length and width of coverage
recognizing that the outer fringe areas of the coverage will receive much lighter applications than
the overlapped areas. Multiply the length by the width and divide by 43560 to determine the
coverage area in acres. Divide the tons of manure in the spreader by the acres covered to
determine the application rate in tons per acre.
spreader manure, tons - (coverage length, ft x width, ft � 43560 ) = application rate, tons/acre
Repeat the procedure at -different speeds and/or spreader settings until the desired application rate
is achieved.
t3PLJIP - Ceccm'oer 6. 1996. ?'_,e - i 7

Example:
What fonvard speed would be needed to apply 6.0 tons litter per acre from a spreader with a
6-ton capacity. a 5-minute spreading time, and a 25-feet spreading Nvidth?
Forward speed. mph capacity, tons x L 95
time (min) x width x rate, tons per acre
6 tons x 495
5 min x 25 ft x 6 ton per ac, e
4 miles per hour
Calibration 1Lfethod ?: This method is often used for solid and semi -solid spreaders. A taro or
plastic sheet of about 100 square feet (9'x12', 10'x10',,etc.) should be measured for enact surface
area (lenmh x width), weighed using a set of spring -tension or platform scales, then spread and
pinned on the field surface. The spreader should be operated at its normal settings, speed and
overlap. With a rear discharge spreader, three passes should be made: the first directly over the
center of the sheet, the other two on opposite sides of the center at the normal spreader overlap
spacing. The sheet with the collected manure should again be weighed. Subtract the empty sheet
weight from the total weight to get the weight of the collected manure. Multiply the pounds of
collected manure by 21.8 and divide by the collection area of the sheet in square feet to get the
application rate in tons per acre.
collected manure, lbs x 21.3 / collection area, ft'- = application rate, tons/acre
Repeat the procedure using different settings or speeds to obtain the desired application rate.
S reader Pattern Uniformity
To determine the uniformity of spread and the amount of overlap' needed, place a line of small
pans or trays equally spaced (2-4 feet apart) across the spreader path. The pans should be a
minimum of 12" by 12" or 15" diameter, no more than 24" by 24", and 2"-4" deep. Make one
spreading pass directly over the center pan. Weigh the contents caught in each pan or pour the
contents into equally sized glass cylinders or clear plastic tubes and compare the amount in each.
The effective spread width can be found by locating the point on either side of the path center
where the manure contents caught in the containers is half of what it is in the center. The distance
beoween these points is the effective spread width. The outer fringes of the coverage area beyond
these points should be overlapped on the next path to ensure a uniform rate overthearea. "l.l",
"W", "steeple", or "topside" patterns are not satisfactory and one or more of the spread --.-
adjustments should be made.
DPLti1P - pc:: -csr 6. 1996, Pav- - 13

Form SLUR-1 Slurry and Sludge Application Field Record
For Recording Slurry Application Events on Different Fields
Farm Owner Facility Dumber
Spreader Operator
Date Field Size Application # of Loads Volume of Loads 2
Tract # Field # Crop Type i
(mmlddlyr) (acres) Method Per Field (gallons)
(r
' SI = soil incorporated (disked); BR - broadcast (surface applied)
2 Can be found in operator's manual for the spreader. Contact a local dealer If you do not have your owner's manual.

Form SLUR-2 Slurry and Sludge Application Field Record
One Form for Each Field Per Crop Cycle
Tract # Field # Facility Number
Field Size (acres) = (A)
Farm Owner Spreader Operator
Owners Address Spreader Operator's
Address
Owners Phone # Operators Phone #
From Animal Waste Management Plan
Crop Type Recommended PAN
Loading (lb/acre) = (B)
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) f61 m rat
Date
(mMdd/yr)
# of Loads Per Field
Volume of Loads I
Total Volume
(gallons)
(2) (3)
Volume Per Acre
() ()
t4) (A)
2
Waste Analysis
PAN (lb/1000 al)
g
PAN Applied
x (Ib/a+)
I(5) (6)1 t �000
Nitrogen Balance
B) - ( )
(B) - (7)
Crop Cycle Totals
Owners Signature
Certified Operator (Print)
Operators Signature
Operator Certification #
Can be found in operators manual for the spreader. Contact a local dealer K you do not have your owners manual.
' See your animal waste management plan for sampling frequency. At a minimum, waste analysis Is required within 60 days of land application events.
Enter the value received by subtracting column (7) from (B). Continue subtracting column (7) from column (8) following each application event.

EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN
PHONTE 1YUMBERS
DwQ S 1- _1
ENIERGEtiCY NIANAGE. v YSTENI — 91
SWCD 9 +9 54a-Sa o
NRCS
This plan will be implemented in the event that wastes from your operation are leaking,
overflowing, or running off site. You should not wait unto wastes reach surface waters or
leave your property to consider that you have a problem. You should make every effort to
ensure that this does not happen. This plan should be posted in an accessible Iocation for
all employees at the facility. The following are some action items you should take.
1. Stop the release of wastes. Depending on the situation. this may or may not be
possible. Suggested responses to some possible problems are listed below.
A. Lagoon overflow -possible solutions are:
a. Add soil to bean to increase elevation of dam.
b. Pump wastes to fields at an acceptable rate.
c. Stop all flows to the lagoon immediately.
d. Call a pumping contractor.
e. Make sure no surface water is enterina lagoon.
B: Runoff from waste application field -actions include:
a. Immediately stop waste application.
b: Create a temporary diversion to contain waste.
c. Incorporate waste to reduce runoff.
d. Evaluate and eliminate the reason(s) that caused the runoff.
e. EvaIuate the application rates for the fields where runoff occurred.
C: Leakage from the waste pipes and sprinklers -action include..
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
c. Close valves to elirrunate further discharge.
d. Repair all leaks p-ior to restarting pumps.
D: Lealcaae from flush systems. houses. solid separators -action. include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
C. :%U-e sure no >iphon occurs.
J. S[op::I1 Ilt)%%; ii1 1l1e house. flush systems. �r seii�i separators.
IS. 19910

e. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
E: Leakage from base or sidewall of lagoon. Often this is seepage as opposed to
flowing leaks- possible action:
a. Dig a small sump or ditch away from the embankment to catch all seepage.
put in a submersible pump, and pump back to lagoon.
b. if holes are caused by burrowing animals; trap or remove animals and sail
holes and compact with a clay type soil.
c. Have a professional evaluate -the condition of the side walls and lagoon
bottom as soon as possible.
2. Assess the extent of the spill and note any obvious damages.
a. Did the waste reach any surface waters?
b. Approximately how much was released and for what duration?
c. Any damage noted, such as employee injury, fish kills, or property damage?
d. Did the spill leave the property?
e. Does the spill have the potential to reach surface waters?
f.. Could a future rain event cause the spill to reach surface waters?
a. Are potable water wells ih danger (either on or off of the property)?
h. How much reached surface waters?
3: Contact appropriate agencies.
a. During normal business hours, call your DWQ (Division of Water Quality)
regional office; Phone - - After hours, emergency number: 919-733-3942.
Your phone call should include: your name, facility, telephone number, the details
of the incident from item 2 above, the exact location of the facility, the location or
direction of movement of the spill, weather and wind conditions. The corrective
measures that have been under taken, and the seriousness of the situation.
b. If spill leaves property or enters surface waters, call local EMS Phone number -
c. Instruct EMS to contact local Health Department.
d. Contact CES, phone number - - , locaI SWCD office phone number
and local NRCS office for advice/technical assistance phone number - -
4: If none of the above works call 911 or the Sheriffs Department and explain vour .
problem to them and ask that person to contact the proper agencies for you.
5: Contact the contractor of your choice to begin repair of problem to minimize off -site
damage.
a. Contractors Name:
b. Contractors address:
c. Contractors Phone:

i
6: Contact the technical specialist who certified the lagoon N�S, Consulting
Engine.-r. etc.)
a. Name: rn' tz- v ,•c
b. Phone: - y0
7: Implement procedures as advised b%, DWQ and technical assistance agencies to
rectih the damage. repair the system. and reassess the waste management plan to
keep problems with release of wastes from happening again.
Cece„ih�: 1996

Dairy Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
Source Cause BMPs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices =- :
Farmstead • Dairy production Vegetative or wooded buffers
0 Recommended best management practices
E( Good judgment and common sense
Paved lots or barn • Wet manure -covered Scrape or flush daily
alley surfaces surfaces
r
i
EI( Promote drying with proper ventilation
5c Routine checks and maintenance on waterers,
hydrants, pipes, stock tanks
Bedded areas • Urine 11 Promote drying with proper ventilation
• Partial microbial i/ Replace wet or manure -covered bedding
decomposition
Manure dry stacks . Partial microbial Cl Provide liquid drainage for stored manure ,
decomposition
Storage tank or basin • Partial microbial 0 Bottom or mid -level loading
surface decomposition 0 Tank covers
• Mixing while -filling 0 Basin surface mats of solids
• Agitation when emptying E( Minimize lot runoff and liquid additions
17( Agitate only prior to manure removal
0 Proven biological additives or oxidants
Settling basin • Partial microbial O Liquid drainage from settled solids
surfaces decomposition 0 Remove solids regularly Nl
• Mixing while filling
• Agitation when emptying
Manure, slurry, or • Agitation when spreading CI Soil injection of slurry/sludges
sludge spreader • Volatile gas emissions Gd" Wash residual manure from spreader after use
outlets O Proven biological additives or oxidants
N

Dairy Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
Source Cause BMPs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
Uncovered manure, • Volatile gas emissions while 0 Soil injection of slurry/sludges
slurry, or sludge on drying Soil incorporation within 48 hours
field surfaces Q' Spread in thin uniform layers for rapid drying
0 Proven biological additives or oxidants
Flush tanks Agitation of recycled lagoon O Flush tank covers
r . liquid while tanks are filling 0 Extend fill lines to near bottom of tanks with
anti -siphon vents
Outside drain • Agitation during wastewater IQ Box covers
collection or conveyance's
junction boxes
Lift stations • Agitation during sump tank 0 Sump tank covers
filling and drawdown 141 14
End of drainpipes at • Agitation during wastewater 0 Extend discharge point of pipes underneath
lagoon conveyance lagoon liquid level
Lagoon surfaces • Volatile gas emission Proper lagoon liquid capacity
• Biological mixing M(/Correct lagoon startup procedures
• Agitation l3' inimum surface area -to -volume ratio
f_--. Ctl Minimum agitation when pumping
0 Mechanical aeration
O Proven biological additives

Dairy Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
Source
Cause
BMPs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
Irrigation sprinkler
a High pressure agitation
13
Irrigate on dry days with little or no wind
nozzles
a Wind drift
C3
0
Minimum recommended operating procedure
Pump intake lagoon liquid
near surface
C7.
Pump from second -stage lagoon
O
Flush residual manure from pipes at end of
slurry/sludge pumpings
Dead animals
a Carcass decomposition -
Proper disposition of carcasses
Standing water_
a Improper drainage
Or
Grade and landscape such that water drains away
around facilities
a Microbial decomposition of
from facilities
organic matter
Mud tracked onto
a Poorly maintained access
C]
Farm access road maintenance
public roads from
roads
farm access
Additional Information: Available From
Cattle Manure Management; .0200 RuleBMP Packet NCSU, County Extension Center
Dairy Educational Unit Manure Management System —Lake Wheeler Road Field Laboratory; EBAE 209-95 NCSU—SAE
lgoon Design and Management for Livestock Manure Treatment and Storage; EBAE 103-83 NCSU—BAE
Management of Dairy Wastewater; EBAE 106-83 NCSU—BAE
Calibration of Manure and Wastewater Application Equipment; EBAE Fact Sheet NCSU—BAE
Nuisance Concerns in Animal Manure Management: Odors and Flies; PRO107, 1995 Conference Proceedings Florida Cooperative Extension

Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
Source Cause BMPs to Control Insects ' Site Specific Practices
Liquid Systems
Flush gutters • Accumulation of solids ❑ Flush system is designed and operated
sufficiently to remove accumulated solids from
gutters as designed �l
❑ Remove bridging of accumulated solids at
- discharge
Lagoons and pits • Crusted solids 11 Maintain lagoons, settling basins and pits where
pest breeding is apparent to minimize the crusting
of solids to a depth of no more than 6 to 8 inches
over more than 30 percent of surface
Excessive vegetative • Decaying vegetation Maintain vegetative control along banks of
growth lagoons and other impoundments to prevent
accumulation of decaying vegetative matter along
water's edge on impoundment's perimeter.
_ Dry Systems _
eeders + Feed spillage El Design, operate, and maintain feed systems
(e.g., bunkers and troughs) to minimize the
accumulation of decaying wastage
Clean up spillage on a routine basis (e.g., 7- to 10-
day interval during summer; 15- to 30-day interval
during winter)

Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
Source Cause , BMPs to Control Insects Site Specific Practices
Feed storage Accumulations of feed 9' Reduce moisture accumulation within and around
residues immediate perimeter of feed storage areas by
ensuring drainage is away from site and/or
providing adequate containment (e.g., covered bin
for brewer's grain and similar high moisture grain
/�roducts)
D In pect for and remove or break up accumulated
lids in filter strips around feed storage as needed
Animal holding • Accumulations of animal
areas wastes and feed wastage
LAY Eliminate low areas that trap moisture along fences.
and other locations where waste accumulates and
isturbance by animals is minimal
Maintain fence rows and filter strips around animal
holding areas to minimize accumulations of wastes
(i.e., inspect for and remove or break up
accumulated solids as needed)
Dry manure • Accumulations of animal 0 Remove spillage on a routine basis (e.g.,
handling systems wastes 7- to 10-day interval during summer; 15- to 30-day
interval during winter) where manure is loaded for f�
land application or disposal
0 Provide for adequate drainage around manure
stockpiles
0 Inspect for and remove or break up accumulated
wastes in filter strips around stockpiles and manure
handling areas as needed
For more information contact:
Cooperative Extension Service, Department of Entomology, Box 7613, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7613.

Ni lortality Management Methods
(check which methods) are being implemented)
Burial three feet beneath the surface of the ground within 24 hours after
knowledge of the death. The burial must b at least 300 feet from any flowinc
stream or public body of water. ye, -
Rendering at a rendering plant licensed under G.S. I06-168.7
Complete incineration
In the case of dead poultry only. placing in a disposal pit of a size and design
approved by the Department of Agriculture
J Anv method which in the professional opinion of the State Veterinarian would
mad e possible the salvage of part of a dead animal's value «without endangering
human or animal health. (Written approval of the State Veterinarian must be
attached)
0

1
J. MIKE LINDLEY
614 Mike Lindley Road
Snow Camp, NC 27349
170 COW HOLSTEIN DAIRY
69460 LBS PAN PRODUCED YEARLY (NRCS)
2 CALUMET LIQUID MANURE SPREADERS
MODEL 3750 - 3750 GALLONS
CALIBRATION:
Each spreader holds about 3500 gallons when loaded: Attached is a letter
from the manufacturer stating that about 6000-7000 gallons are spread per acre.
This is based on the farmer driving at 2 mph with a PTO speed of 1000 rpm.
Based on information from the manufacturer and the dairy producer/operator in
charge, the value of 7,000 gallons/acre is being used.
WASTE ANALYSIS:
Broadcast - 3.9 lbs11000 gallons
Soil Incorporated - 5.4 1bs/1000 gallons
CROPS:
Corn Silage - 114.94 acres
Wheat Silage - —50 acres (double cropped with corn for silage)

NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT PLAN
This farm has a total of 114.94 acres that are being used to receive manure. The
crops being raised are no -till corn silage on 114.94 acres with about 50 acres per
year being planted to small grain silage.
The dairy will generate 6,588 lbs PAN/year. The animals on this dairy are only on
the lot 50% of the time.
Corn Silage/Small Grain Silage Nutrient Management
• Corn for silage will be no -till planted in late March, April, and May.
The manure used on these fields is broadcast applied. The corn is
harvested in August and September.
• Small grain for silage is planted in September or October on
approximately 50 acres of the corn land. The manure applied to these
fields is soil incorporated. The small grain is harvested in May as
silage. Late or tropical corn is then planted in these fields.

� w-
LINDLEY DAIRY
614 Mike Lindley Farm
Snow Camp, NC 27349
Tract
#
Field #
NRCS
Farm
Field #
Acres
Soil
Type
Crop
Yield
Per Acre
Lbs Nitrogen
Per Acre
Lbs
Nitrogen
Corn
Silage/
Field
Lbs
Nitrogen
Sm.Grain
Silage/
Field
Maximum
Nitrogen
per Field
1278
1
2
13.93
232E
Corn & Small Grain Silage
18T/65 bu
216lbs/156 fbs
380.3
526.6
5182.00
1278
2.
3
6.3
130C
Corn & Small Grain Silage
17T/45 bu
2041bs/108 lbs
172
238.1
1965.60
1278
3
4
2.68
130C
Corn & Small Grain Silage
17T/45 bu
204lbs/108 Ibs
73.2
101.3
836.16
1278
4
5
5.87
130C
Corn & Small Grain Silage
17T/45 bu
204lbs/108 lbs
160.3
221.9
1831,44
1278
5
6
30.45
130C
Corn & Small Grain Silage
17T/45 bu
204lbs/108 lbs
831.3
1126.7
9500.40
1278,
6
7
16.24
130B
Corn & Small Grain Silage
-18T/40 bu
216 Ibs/96lbs
443.4
1740.5
5066.88
1278
9
1
10.26
130B
Corn & Small Grain Silage
18T/40 bu
216 lbs/96 lbs
280.1 .
387.8
3201.12
1310 '
1
8
7.86
212C
Corn & Small Grain Silage
14T/65 bu
168lbs/156 lbs
214.6
297.1
2546.64
1310.
2
9
9.93
131 B2
Corn & Small Grain Silage
18T/40 bu
216 Ibs/96 lbs
271.1
375.4
3098.16
1310 '
3
9
3.12
131 B2
Corn & Small Grain Silage
18T/40 bu
216 Ibs/96 lbs
85.2
117.9
973.44
1310
4
%
6
232B
Corn & Small Grain Silage
18T/65 bu
216lbs/156 lbs
163.8
226.8
2232.00
-1310
5
10
1.6
232B
Corn & Small Grain Silage
18T/65 bu
216lbs/156 lbs
43.7
60.48
595.20
131.0
6
8
0.7
232B
Corn & Small Grain Silage
18T/65 bu
216lbs/156 lbs
19.1
26.46_
260.40
Totals
114.94
3138.1
5447.04
37289.44_
NOTES:
• The amount of Nitrogen applied to corn silage and the small grain silage was made using the liquid manure spreader calibration. It was also
made assuming that only one'application (2 loads) was made over the field. With corn silage this means that a total of 3,128 lbs PAN is
applied. If the owners make two passes over the field, then the amount of PAN used is 6,276 lbs PAN which would still not exceed the
amount of N that can be applied to the corn.
i

The amount of N used in the calculations is 12 Ibs/ton of corn silage and 2.4 lbs/bu of wheat produced. The values used are from the Chatham
and Wake County NRCS offices.
• The figures for the small grain fields list all the acres that could be planted and the amount of Nitrogen applied if one application (2 Ioads) is
made over each field. The owner and/or OIC will determine which fields will be planted to the small grain each year. The values are listed so
that they will know the pounds of nitrogen that can be applied based on soil type and yield.
• All deficiencies in nitrogen and other nutrients will be supplied by commercial fertilizer.
Any changes to this plan will be discussed and made with the assistance of a Certified Technical Specialist (CES or NRCS representative).
r`-
_i

(Imperl'al 0
INDUSTRIES, INC. v � !
P.O. Box 1685 • Wausau, WI 54402-1685
[phone] • FAX [phone] • [phone]
f if .Lz;— C 04� U Ai F /' / ,; ! S,,F k/A L 741 W �,�'�.�
Wj1.L SJ`���,�1� /� � ,� Ie�'Ti��� ��J'G�4x : ✓4C��� (�-L,
hRee"A")-D
Gr�C� TG o G4
Ya
L'�q / n" d 'E"t
Plant: 505 Industrial Park Avenue • Mosinee, Wl 54455

Realistic Yield Expectations by Soil and Crop
50IL5ERIE5
Cnm-
Gram
Com
Silas
Sor-
ghum
Cotton
Wheat
Oats
Barley
Tob,
FC
Tob.
But.
Soy-
bean
Berm
P
Berm
Hay
Fes
Pas
Fes
Hay
Pasture
Alfalfa
Over
Rye
Summer
Ana
BO AC S • FSL; L.:. • .:
120 .
•
•
900
45
•
•
1900
1900
40
4.7
5.5
•
•
•
+
'
OJAC LF5; IS
90
•
730
40
0
0
18D0
1800
30
•
+
•
�B (O( LING FLGOD; NONE; -
120
•
•
•
60
80
•
•
•
40
5.4
63
3.4
4.5
+
'
•
• -
BG G gCCAS. Fi OOD.
100
•
•
•
so
6$
•
•
•
35
•
•
•
'
•
•
•
+
G :. -
85
+
•
100
2600
26M
30
4.7
3.5
130
29
•
so
6.7
6.7
•
Ile
+
•
45
•
3000
4.3 -
4.5
•
•
$RIWSO .GRAVELLY
SS
35
2600
'
•
•
3.S
3.5
•
•.
e
•
•
•
.
•
•
•
•
.
.
2.9
4
12
2
•
'
•
• ..
BRA55rOWN
8i
•
•
60
4
4
-
B VARD,,:: t .:
108
•
•
'
65
75
•
•
2600
•
•
,
•
3.8
3.5
B OO UNORAINED
•
•
•
•
•
.
.
s
+
•
3A
4
3.
3.5
•
•
•
• -
DO DRAINED-
13e
•
55
60
45
•
•
.
•
1$ EAN -.;,_
7p
•
.
•
•
s
s
•
.
.
.
3.1
3.1
COMBS _;--...
60
•
45
•
20
55
•
1700
1700
•
•
'
'
2.0
2,0
m MBE OCCAS
•
•
•
1.5
1.5
BUNCOMBEFREQ
•6
6
6
0
1.5
1.5
•
• -
$
100
'
•
'
50
•
•
2400
2400
35
4.7
5.5
•
'
•
•
•
•-
BYARS DRAINED
Ito
•
•
•
•
65
•
40
3.4
4
J
3.5
•
'
•
• - .
OY_ c;,.;.,..
55
•
s
a
•
20
•
20
3.2
3.9
•
• .
s
• _
GITIDOR. ,.
45
•
•.
•
•
•
1700
1700
20
4.7
5
r
FEAR DRAINED.140
•
'
•
•
45
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
WIPWIINDRAINED
•
•
•
•
•
•
3.4
4
3
- 3.5
•
+
•� OLINE FSL; S14 L; SIL; '
115
•
•
'
60
'
•
•
'
40
5.1
6
3.2
3.8
•
•
' _
CAROLING C14 SCL .
so
•
•
•
40
•
•
34
•
•
•
•
•
• --
CB..=a;r
95..
•
•
750
90
'
3100
2100
35
3.4
4
3.8
4.5
4.9
'
•
'
CECILGRA-VELLY-
70.
•
'
500
'
70
•
16W
1600
25
3.4
4
3.8
4.5 -
3.3
•
'
ARY. ;,
6S -•.
•
•
2000
2DD0
20
4.7
3.5
•
+
�+
O DRAINED
13D :.
•
•
•
55
•
•
•
•
45
4.7
5.5
3.9. 1
4.5
•
-'
•
4CHARLESTON.
90
•
!
•
•
•
•
40
4.7
5.5
3.7
4.3
•
-
t AiN.00CAS .
50....
•
•
•
'
'
25
'
'
2.5
3
..
•
'
7EE ..
3
b.
135..
27
,.
50
.
45
•
•
.
2,9
'
75 _
.
.
•
40
•
.
•
.
.
.
.
•
2.
2.8
•
•
' ._
CLA RARE; OCCAS
..100 _
•
•
•
50
70
•
•
•
35
4.2
5
3.8
06.6..
_
!
'
_ •
C ACLA FREQ
to
•
•
30
40
30
0
0
•
4.5
.0 CKAHOMMY D ED
80
•
•
•
40
•
•
•
25
•
•
s
3.5.
4_
- _
,
MUMMY Y
tftkA &b -
•
.
s
.
.
•
•
.
•
•
•
•
2.7
3.1
•
'
"
..
-•� _
C
50
•
•
•
•
'
2000
2000
20
4.7
5.5
•
•
.
•
•
G
90
16
'
•
40
•
45
'
•
35
•
•
•
•
4.8 -,-.
•
•
•.�.
"s
CLEVELAND
70
s
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
CLTWN
100
•
•
•
•
•
24DO
•
'
J.5
3.5
•
•
•m
CODOR S
130
26
'
'
45
80
•
•
'
•
•
'
4.2
4.2
•
•
4.5 _
COLFAX
75
15
•
•
40
60
•
•
30
L'
•
4.9
NCSUINCCES Nutrient Management Manual --- Reference Section
66

W4
rM3: i
far
Realistic Yield Expectations by Soil and Crop
SOIL SERIES
n t# Y,; r: ; _•: ;';...:.f
Corn-
Gain
Com
Silas
Sat-
8hum
GAlon
Wheal
Oars
Sisley
Tab.
FC
Tob.
Bur.
Soy
bean
Berm
P
Berm
Hay
Fes
Pas
Fes
Flay
Pasture
Alfalfa
Over
Rye
Summer
Ahh
V
bS
•
•
40
•
30
•
•
•
3.5
'
•
•
IOR NONE; RARE ..
100
•
•
523
45
•
•
2200
2200
40
4.51
5.3
3.8
4.5
•
'
IOR OCCAS ,..
•
•
•
35
a
0J5
•
•
.
•
s .
N717 '* 5 77`e ! .
50
•
•
3.4
4
2.9
3.3
•
s
DEL UNDRAWED
'
•
'
•
•
•
•
•
•
'
3.4
4
3.9
4.5
•
,
DRAINED'-.
120
•
'
550
•
•
•
•
45
•
•
•
•
•
•
90
18
'
•
40
40
1 '
•
35
2.3
3
2.5
3
2.LILL
!
•
+
INGTON _ ,
80
0
•
650
•
10
1 •
2100
2100
30
3.7
4.3
2.5
3
5
•
•
'
Tfsr_-
40
•
•
400
•
50
•
•
.
.
•
2.7
•
.
•
LQNON ►s'i
95
19
«
.
•
•
•
,
_
.
•
•
3.9
3.9
«
.LONON GRAVELLY
90
18
•
•
•
,
•
•
•
•
•
3.5
3.5
,LOUISBURG:..;'-;
55
•
•
•
•
70
•
•
30
3
3.5
2.5
3
s
a
,LOUISB GGRAVELLY
20
•
•
'
•
so
•
'
20
3
3.5
2.5
3
'
'LO ISBUROSTONY
•
'
'
•
'
'
'
'
'
2.5
3
3
3.5
1.8
BURG VERY STONY
'
•
• _
'
•
•
•
'
'
•
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
LUCYa_„
so
•
•
650
•
•
'
•
33
4.7
5.5
'
'
5.5
•
• '
.LUMBER DRAINED.
110
70
45
3.3
4.5
3.8
4.5
• .
-
CIiBURG �a :,
115
•
•
675
•
75
'
2800
1 2800
45
4.7
5.5
3.9
4.5
•
'
'
LYNN HAVEN ,
70
•
•
•
'
'
'
•
•
•
3.4
4
2.4
2.8
iSON
90
!
55
760
•
85
=
2100
2100
J
3.5
2.5
3
4.5
bLMUSORO
100
'
'
100o
•
2500
2$00
40
5.1
6
3.2
3:8
'
'
•
•
'MARLBORO WET
100
•
`
1000
•
'
•
2300
2500
40
5.1
6
3.2
3.9
'
•
'
VYN � R:. ; .
75
•
•
900
'
50
5.1
6
3.2 1
3.8
•
•
20
24
1 0
50
75
5.1
6
3.2
3.8
3.8
'
•
4.5.
JdASADAGFLAVELLY
115
22
•
•
45
70
'
'
•
5.1
6
32
32
33
•
`
4
M�aAr�SAD.A ERODED;
90
20
•
40
60
2.7 .
2.7
2.7
•
3.8
..
a$=A.STONY
'
:
•
•
•
•
3.4
4
3.8
4.5
4.5
ONTOWN UNDRAINM,
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
25
3
IMASONTOWN DRAINED; •..
90
•
'
•
•
•
•
30
95
'
55
650
•
85
2100
2100
3.8
.4.3
3.4
4
4.5
•
'
.±JAYODAN STONY
'
•
'
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
3.5
41CCOLL DRAINED
90
•
•
•
•
65
•
35
3.4
4
2.5
3
-----------
,!AEqKLWOURG :;
90
•
55
550
•
70
'
•
'
40
3.4
4
3.9
4.5
3A)
•
MEGGV T.NONE; RARE
75
•
•
•
•
•
'
40
'
•
2.5
3
. MEGGETT DRAINED
100
•
•
•
•
s0
•
60
•
40
•
30
•
•
•
•
20
•
•
•
3
3
-MOCKSVUIE
85
•
•
50
•
•
•
•
35
•
`
'
•
5.1
•
'
ONACAN DRAINED
120
'
'
•
60
So
•
•
•
•
'
•
•
4
•
+
5
,MQNACAN UNDAAWED
•
'
50
So
•
'
•
•
3.5
•
• _
4 ,
.MONACAN OCCAS
80
•
•
•
50
50
'
•
•
3.3
•
•
4
MONACAN FREQ
8o
•
50
SO
•
'
•
•
'
J.5
•
4
NCSUINCCES Nutrient Management Manual - Reference Section
70

Realistic Yield Expectations by Soil and Crop
SOIL SERIES
com-
Grain
Com
silat
e
Sur-
Chum
Conan
Wheat
0215
Barley
Tob,
FC
' Tab.
But.
Soy-
bean
Bens
P
Berm
Hay
Fes
Pas
Fes
[Jay
Pwturc
Alfalfa
Over
Rye
Summer
Ann
WO-NMN _IA .
3.9
4
4.3
MOUSHAUNEE,
93
40
2300
2300
30
3.2
4.3
W-C
•FSL4
4
3.8
4.3
3.4
4
4
MUNDE4 514 L
130
F 50•
•1
0
40
5.1
6
3.4
4
4
EN LS-,LFS
105
45
•
-
30
bmVIIAL.".
3.4
4
2-4
2.9
A7T NONFti RARE.
115
23
70
35
3.9
4.3
3.9
4.5
WA-77 ONE; RARE; occAs.
,HAHUHTA
120
675
2900
2900
45
4.7
5.5
3.8
4.5
RAW DRAINER
140
*
40
50
4.2
4.3
3
3.5
7RANKRUNDILA1NED
so
4
2300
2300
1 35
5-4
6.3
3.4
4
jKAHTAHALA_,o..
120
2$
2300
•
4.0
4.0
5
90
LE
45
70
0
30
3
3.5
3A
4
3
ON,GRAVELLY
90
Is
•
4$
70
0
30
3
3.5
3.4
4
4.3
4NASON GRAVELLY, GR-SICL
To—
14
30
60
4
23
4
95
45
30
4.2
3.9
"0 14 FSL, SL; DRAINED
130
t
50
a
40
3.9
4.5
3.4
4.2
4NIMMO LS-. LFS. DRAINED
110
0
45
.•35
•NIXONTON.
140
6
55
50
5.4
6.3
3.4
4
5.6
cNOBOCOA.,,!_
113
0
700
60
3000
3000
45
3.4
6.3
3.4
4
NORFOLK?
110
700
3000
3000
-NORTHCOVEA,.
1-3
13
MAKBOR0 OCCAS.
90
•
43
70
60
•
35
6.
,OAKIMO fUQ -
so
•
so
30
4.8
73_
2600
2600
35
4.3
5-1
75
30
3.4
4
3A
4
115
2500
2500
40
5.5
6.5
3.7
4.3
so
16
•
t
25
2.5
J
t 2.4
2.8
It
GRAVELLY
80
16.
•
45
50
25
.2.5
3
1 2.4 1
2.8
3.1
•
t•••
••••2.4
2.9
2.5 1
3
.3
JRO i i.,
120
900
•
1400
2400
45
5.4
6.3
3.4
4
•
iqWGEBURG LOVERWASH
120
900
2400
2400
45
5,4
6.3
3.4 1
4
70
3.4
4
3.4 1
4
1.0
2,0
70
2.8
2.8
50
20
31
4.5
A
so
7D0
2200
2200
6
3
3.5
215
4.2
4.5
,PACOLET. GRAVELLY; GR-SL-.
go
t
•
700
2200
2200
4
3
3.5
2.5
3.9
4.3
ACO GRAVELLY; GR-
j
500
1900
1900
3.3
3.9
•
:S, .
65
1800
1990
25
4.7
5.4
'PAMI ICO UNDRAINED
FA-AUC-0 DRAINED
115
so
40
PAMUCO LOAMY
NcSU/NCCES Nutrient Management Manual - Reference Section
71
k--.

Realistic
,.OIL SEP'M- COM- Cain Solt- I Cotten
I It M.,
„ Grain Sills gh
••63
VNI110 25 DOX
-.SAUiXT'0-wP -1 W-- ! 0, 4
,SAW,SL4 OR-Sr-L
75
100 It
105
go 375
;SHELDCTA
9
Yield
Wheat
•
35
45
4
40
40
4S
4S
Oats
4
••30
30
40
65
6
Expectations
parley
4
*
•0
• 1
0
Tob.
FC
0
2000
by Soil
Tab,
Dui.
2800
- --
2400
2000
1500 1
and
Soy -
bean
30
25
-
35
30
35 1
crop
Venn
P
0
0
4,7
1.4
Berm
Hay
5.4
3.3
3.9
2.8 1
Fes
Pas
.5
2.5
1
Fes
I
Hay
4.4
3.5
0
44
Pasture
4m 4
3.5
3.6
44
Alfalfa I
4
L
Over
lky4
a
•
•
swumet
AM
4
.7E
.SP�PAAY.
45
2 5
25
2.7
a
'STALUNGS
100
550
.
2500
2500
2'.
375
4.7
4.7
S.5
7
3.7
43
U
Ila
•
00
6900
•
75
40
4.9
5.1
NONE; RARE
130
60
30M
3000
45
SA
63
3.4
4
5.1
3.1
%lE ,
T r OCCAS
110
2700
2700
35
0
5
4.6
SATLeRKONE, RARE
130
55
2400
45
0
318
3.8
I rAM
125
t -
50
2300
45
0 7
3.9
TLEIiFREQ
100
40
3.3
3,5
85
60
6
3.3
51
3.9
3
3.5
SiU
90
so
1600
1600
35
0
5.5
•
LS
111
40
_26()0
_1601
30
4
4SL• .L
125
45
2800
2800
35
5.4
6.3
3.4
4
•
75
12
2
2
2:5
330
•
50
2.1
2.4
ti
so
20
32
1 4.5
105
65
75
2600
3-5
315.
jAn GRAVELLY,
100
60
70
2500
3.5
3.5
& X .
.90
so
70
-)o
3.4
4
3
3.5
-3-
JAIUMPMVELLY
'90
Ig
1
50
70
10
3.4
4
3
3-S
3
90
45
35
6,
6
9
4
.110
RAR1r;
90
•
63
900
3.9
9
75
3.9
.75
t
23
3.8
4.5
3
3.3
•
3
4
A (PONDED
75
23
3.8
4.5
3
35
3
4
75
Soo
2400
2400
23
4.5
3.3
.3
4
&MMUTLEXI)RAINO.;
130
0
6
40
3.3
4.5
3.8
4.5
3,
4
APRHUNTA DR"ED.
120
45
70
0
40
3.8
4.5
2.3
3 .
J
4
UWAXIDRAD6D
110
20
5
5
.9 XA 4!.UMPAMM.
3
3
IJWSYLVANA
12-5
24
4.3
4.3
-77--
,TMU)C NONE; RARF;
30
•
23
.3.7
4.3
3.8
4.5
3
4
NCSU/NCCES Nutrient Management Manual - Reference Section
73

SCS—CONS— 228 low. 6.71
(file Cos. CONS-14) CONSERVATION PLAN Mi.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE SOIL CONSERVATIONS WCE
cooperating with
�� / Conservation District
Owner _ L/ D.N/�/G ��i on/ �iN��� 5i _ Pian No. _ - /2 7 g pate 3 -5-9 6
Operator ��� Scale , �= �00 Acres
Apprasinwrle Approximate
/y, C� Photo No.
County Stull
Location (community, watershed, road & distance, etc.)
--fir-- �
Vovl4i'IJ� r e4

od" rt L
N,
Y
ilt.
A�,
SCS-ENG- TU. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE',*
."Rev. 540 SOIL CONSERVATION CSERVICE
S�
.1N TOETERMNESUITABIs� i 'ROPOSED POND SITE
FARMER'S IJAME' DISTRf&—
DATE �Coumff
S. C. S. PHOTO SlIgET NO. — WORK UNIT
WATERSHED -AREA MEASUREMENTS
CROPLAND ACRES PASTURE —ACRES
WOODLANDACRESTOTAL' ACRES POND CLASS,, -WORK. IT CONSEEiVATIOi IST..' S
SKETCH OF PROPOSED POND SHOWING WHERE BORINGS WERE MADE (ApproX. aisle 1', fiat)
Locale reference point in center line of dam and identify an sketch.
L
%
SHOW BORING NUMBER AND PROFILE
DEPTH Make and' list dam -site and spillway borfogs first - then Pcmded arm and bo"vw pit borings - separate with wrtical "d line-
(ContYromed on back where noccuary) Show um&r table elevations an dam -site barines.
SCALE -
I j 2 4 5 It 1 7 11 8 1 9 J*�-j 111112 JJA# 14 0 15 116 q_$ 118 1191120 q 21 22
SC
WRIMINNINSIMS
I
Ilia
ayse

3JlYf i'-o'd nwV3VIC ;Jf a
4'KATEIR tAL(ENCOUNGS
.TEED IN, T
IJZ, IIPQ(Use.i.of.systems.
' &t4T
_---UNIFIED. CLASSIFICATION-__'rrY'J �.t
_VWA.JCLASSjFIPAT1Oq1_,�z__ I A
r.*iu
sand. iiiiigravel
G1W i'd a elii�-jiiv—el—,
7-3'42ri? CIT.01(17. a :t
GP- Poorly graded gravels
M43KVTk.,.1.TN �XIA
GM -Silty gravels; gravel -sand -silt mix I
vfs -very fine sand
,-%Clayey_grav6ls;_ graW.Isand-��Y.. mix.
GC.,
­A­'?7
S W iQ1"Rd­` 4jraivel,mii�--Z
ine
Nfe-1` j sandyjo --L
SP'- Poorly. graded isands,A)
SM -Silty sand
gi - gravelly loam -
SC' -Clayey sands;8- 'a' inid -'c a y M J L a ores r-; 5
ML.% S i Its;. 4 i Iti, fin e ands; s a!ndj.orq jay 'silt"
!Sil-sililoam
CL -Clays 'of low to medium plasticity
cl -clay loam
-CH ;--Inccganic clays -of high pla'
sicl -silty clay
MH - Elastic; silts I
scl -sandy clay: loam
OL'-Organic silts and ays, pla�iticitiF­
;'... ,
_ii" __ sic -silty clay'!"
C-S
OH -Organic clays, medium to high plasticity _c.-Clay
1. -Suitable material for embankm nt is available Yen No !Indicate wlte. w,located on ih. 3"frA an
ruurse side}
REMARKS.
2. Explain .ba zarde­ requiring special attention in design (seewo4r, spring, -Fuck &)r.)
GENERAL REMARKS.
7:-
24
25
116
27
1281.29
30
j j 31,1321133-1134
.10 11
38 1137
1314
39.
40
41
42,
43
11.44
1 45
1 46
147
148
149
1150
161
h
-7
T-
IF
FT
FT
-7
1,
n
71
7-
7=
k

� r
Cot, 437 tu.
SEF, Armr-Hco
N C.:-,EN';. 40
1/Ir/N i
v�i�.Ile, -.
SXo r
LX)7%4 -,-� e,
XIgo lnys v-
' ,-� U
ON LOT ,aHwlaA�
- .S
AaopW U41e,)-
X 170 6> u�
7,y8,'016
If
3
s ZD1- 5_5 #
759 4- `ifs
i I-
mQ r'c
_. 0��r;l
31,45
-
_
J. A9 _
,97
z7 _
ZD, q 3 Div eltPS
L
:.. � w Z �_..S�arr►� OAJ
4t
ON 1,91V1
/- - .. r.
{jJ �337
.Aly
D•-)i.0 PO Ava/, C �.�� vA Y STORAGE �R�op�:'�
ZG .r . �.-78 o. s7'
q, zG
5
z /osy/s
� 8

x'.
-
i

U. S. Department of Agriculture' NC-EAG-34
Sail Conservation Service. Se tember 1980
Me Code: 210
^to c J6,4­192110,HAZARD _CLASSIFICATION iQATA
qf4t,noqi�s-f nei.i9q -d
)'I&y IS 'r. jf�,
Landowner �Fouqv
Community qr.-Lqrq4p NoConservati on .?
-Plan Na.
Estimated Ft.
bod.-ftdl: .pth of Waterto ToP:6f,Dam_­ �5, t.; Length ofJ1
Date of Field Hazard Investigation. &7LIt,
n downstream to the.,point,of.-estimated minor ,,,,effect
Evaluation byi-reach.offl , ood.,plai top
the
--A -1 nnc"�,
from sudden­t. am-failuri.
Est. ElevFtion
Est..Elev.
,,!Kin mprovemen of ts' of Breach
p n , Reach: Length: Width:, •Sl�k­' 'Land Use, Im ro eit6i is'', -Above :Floodwater dwa - ter Above
'-Flood Plain' :-,"Flo d Plain
Ft. �Ft. % Ft.
Aj
-70
2
30 rd5kZ4L
• 7p* poll/el
3
Describe potential for loss of life and damage to existing or probable fu
improvements from a sudden breach 411 oij aLe au,Z ___6y
r
Mt1j __
Hazard Classification of Dam (a, b, c) (see NEM-Part 520.21)
Dam Classification (1, 11, 111, IV, V)
By
Concurred By
(name) (title)
NOTE: 1. Instructions on reverse side.
2. Attach additional sheets as needed.
re downstream
'A. 2 114 --1
Date tZZ
Date

�-su3f�ot•fpA io 3ns��sGeEi .2 .� -
CS2I ^�odrtWd e 30fi7se noi3sv^�saR03 fie?
CIS :sboO alf INSTRUCTIONS
A11 dams built w thTechriical�assistance'l rom,rthec§ f,1'.-`Conservation Service
must have_a hazard classification assigned by the person responsible for
----- approving -the-desi'gnf.'o'Most farm. ponds,_except-'in'borderl.ine-cases:,�can"��€iwobr,r:�:.
be classified after a�complete,field investigation without assuming, failure
and--making.--breaE •studfesJ'Y fki" data sheet is-to_be_used�for
the information obtained through field studies and for documenting the
--' hazard' cla"Yfi'catfon.� F�Where there:.i's::..a.-possiail ity for-,1'oss` of'I fferor
major property damage from a dam failure, an approved breach routingr
procedure is to be used. ---.(Consult•.with -the -area. engi neer:') b' s=5
�.. .':, �, �, -.rl !'"i" i`�'�"--'+n.Xn f."f Li' nr4$ _.'• n:.^.r-at- �, ..1. -. .. ,. ..
Hazard 'dlassificatidns- of' -dams -,are made, by evacuating`��the poss�ibi•I"ity
for loss of 1 i fe and the extent of damage that would result if ltlfg'dam _;�111`-
s.- ,;--should-•suddenly--breach--that is--a-section-of_.the._dam-.be..suddenly_and_ _,._._
,completely.WasheVout.- It.,is,to.,be assumed that a wall of water Will be
. w released equal :to -`the height: of * the dam. 'This flood wave will be 'reduced:
,in -height as :it•"moves down -the'flood plain.'- The Wave',height:(-depth'-f
i
:flooding)-'shoul'd be-evaluated•.for a. -sufficient -distance downstream until-.:....- _.
the estimated flood level will not cause significant damage to'improvements,
- -such as -homes, -buildings, roads, utilities,•reservoirs, etc. The breach
flood level will be reduced depending on the valley storage, slope, and
- openess of the:°flood-plain; however, in a narrow-steep..valley slopes.
steeper than 10% should be given special consideration. One method of
evaluation is -to compare available valley storage (under flood conditions)
to impoundment storage (figured to the top of the dam) for each reach
evaluated with a judgment estimate made of the flood wave hei.ght.at all
critical points downstream.
Should there be any questions about the hazard classification for a dam,
-the area engineer should be consulted before making design commitments.
rti
ZZ 2.Jn'sd7. 1-40'li:L'.�'}:`.

U. S. DEPARTMENT 0,- AGRIMTURE
Soil Conservation Service
LARTHWORK COWMATION SHEET
EARTH EMBA1l1Ql,ENT
NC-ENG-12
Rev. 6/82
TpP//of z)�Ip 9%'
Fo-� 0 YYt S4 ,
Address /I z
Embankment: Top Width lz _ _ Side Slopes
STATION
FILL
HEIGHT
( Peet)
SUH OP
END AREA END AREAS
(Sq. Pt.) (Sq. Ft.)
DISTANCE
(Feet)
DOUBLE
VOLUME
ICU -Ft.)
.
8z5
a ±3 3
z S
3 0
397$0
s
41
3795D
3 0
5 0
z sb
2- -F-�
7
3 z 7
70
/ / 7, 56,5
1. Double Volume of Fill t 2g� 7 �Z,S Cu. Ft.
2. Volume of embankment fill (line 1 f 27) z 177 Cu. Yds .
3. Allowance for -settlement (5 or 10X of line 2) _.j O Q Cu. Yds.
4. Total cubic yards (line 2 + line 3) '° 2 Z 8 �_ Cu. Yds.
Computed by � Date G 7 93
Checked by ti Date 6-

U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Soil Conservation Service
EARTHWORK COMPUTATION SHEET
EARTH EMBANKMENT
NC-ENG-12
Rev. 6/82
Name To w4 Y L 1 N D LC Y
Address Cw1ATHAM CO.
Embankment: Top Width ) 2 Side Slopes 2 3 : 1
T^a nG 71.a nn 44.0
STATION
FILL
HEIGHT
(Feet)
END AREA
(Sq. Ft.)
SUM OF
END AREAS
(Sq. Ft.)
DISTANCE
( Feet)
DOUBLE
VOLUME
(Cu. Ft. )
0+00
o
O
0+33
2.0
3
11zZ
35
42
04- hB
�L. D
8 8
2 5 0
37
250
1+ os
(D. 0
16z.
y-I 8
o
z �o
�
g. o
zs�
51Z
5
0 0
i+�10
`�.D
�5�
18
S 0
3 4+0
z + So
(,.0
to 2-
z50
52
3 000
3f OZ
�!. a
8R
122
µ3
52d
3+
2.0
3+ t3�,_
0
0
q8 1 2
1. Double Volume of Fill + 2 a _49,9 99 1 _ Cu'. Ft.
2. Volume of embankment fill (line 1 + 27) m f. Cu. Yds.
3. Allowance for settlement (5 or 10% of line 2) _ 9� _ Cu. Yds.
4. Total cubic -yards (line 2 + line 3) 9 Cu. Yds.
Computed by Date
3

U . S . DEPARTMENT l , 'AGRICULTURE NC--ENG-12
Soil Conservation Service'' Rev.-6/82.
EATaMMRK COMPUTATION SHEET I
EARTH
Name
Addre
Embankment:
TQP_U"taa__ - Side Slopes e z : / 3111 -
STATION
FILL
HEIGHT
(Peet)
END AREA
i 8q. Ft.)
sum OF
END AREAS
(Sq. Ft.)
DISTANCE
(Feet)
DOUBLE
VOLUME
(Cu. Ft. )
�..I �.�'I: a'I.r•:i
•- --
-r
D+SS
-
5lob
�o
;sd
o00
tD5
Zo
7 63
o9�Z
t 49,
z 8 3
s
l38 59
1. Double Volume of XUl t Cu._ Ft.
2. Volume -of QV&n
a �o fill (line I t 27) Z Co % Cu. Yds.
3. Allowance for- seeclummat- (5 or 10% oKline 2) _ Cu. Yds.
4. Total cubic yards (line 2 + line 3) _ 25 % 7 Cu. Yds.
Computed by 4�-to] 3
Checked by yTp Date

US`. DEPARTMENT OF AGR1CL . J .�
NC-ENG- 40
Soil Conservation Service 5/83
LOCATION CODE
PLAN OF EXCAVATED WASTE STORAGE POND
NAME ToLINNY Li N DL.EY ACP Ir` DATE 9 3 DISTRICT C N ATH A M
LENGTH
81DE SLOPE 2 TO 1
Aj
q �V
Co` * o ti AVE. TOP ELEV.
o fV I i
— --- — "—
yt,� �� 't3.% MID SECTION
CL
1 �m AVE. BOTTOM ELEV.
I. LENGTH
Al EJt✓a��ati7 91, 3
5.3 " 11+. szcn 9 �7 09 4 8, 02 0
Volume - depth [area of top) + (area of bottom) + (4 x area midsection] - 63 O ZS Cu.Ft.
6
Use of facility
Capacity Gallons
Volume Cost -sharing Cu. Ft.
Soil type
B. M. description
Elev.
SUMMARY
Bottom
Elev.
S(a.O
Normal liquid level
Elev.
9 1. 3
Storage for normal precip.(Ft)
+ 0.;0
Maximum liquid level
Elev.
�.
Storage for:
25 yr. freq. precip.
(Ft.)
+
Crest ESW
Elev.
_ 9T j
Stage (Ft.)
+
Freeboard (Ft.)
+
Top of Dam
Elev.
9 �± Q ,

Operation and Maintenance Plan
For
Waste Storage Pond
The purpose of this plan is to provide guidelines for
carrying out the routine maintenance work needed to keep the
waste storage pond operating as planned. Routine maintenance
is considered to be normal good care of the waste storage
pond and the surrounding area. Good maintenance adds to the
usefullness and permanence of the facility.
The routine maintenance of this waste storage pond involves
but is not limited to the following:
1. Maintenance of a vegetative cover on the embankment and
the surrounding areas: FESC E .. is being established on
these areas. Beginning in IV * and each year thereafter,
the embankment and surrounding areas should be fertilized
with .—TDQ pounds of /b -10-10 or ' " inch of effluent
from the waste storage pond per acre to maintain a vigorous
stand.
2. Control of weeds, brush and trees in the grassed spillway
and on the embankment: This may be done by mowing, spraying,
or chopping, or a combination of all three. This will be
done at least once each year and possibly twice in those
years favorable to a heavy growth of vegetation. The local
Extension Agent or SCS office can supply the latest
information on spray materials and the best time to apply
them.
3. Protection of the grass on the embankment. and surrounding
areas: Uncontrolled vehicular traffic can create trails or
ruts. Runoff from storms can enlarge these ruts into
gullies. if ruts appear to be forming, stop the traffic
doing the damage.
4. At the end of the designed storaged period 11Bo days,
it will be necessary to completely empty this storage
facility. This. will be accomplished by agitating, hauling
and applying the effluent onto designated areas as noted on
the Waste Utilization Plan Map. Spring and early fall
applications will maximize the fertillizer benefit of the
effluent. A marker will be used in the waste storage pond to
show when the maximum liquid level is reached.

S. Maintenance inspections of this facility should be made
during the initial filling, at least annually, and after
every major storm event.
1. Embankment
a. settlement, cracking or "jug" holes
b. side slope stability- slumps or bulges
c. erosion and/or wave action
d. rodent damage
e. seepage or other leakage
f. condition of vegetative cover
2. Reservoir Area
a. undesirable vegetative growth
b. undesirable floating debris
c. check liquid level to determine if
disposal of effluent is needed
3. Fences and Gates
a. loose or damaged posts
b. loose or broken wires
c. open or damaged gates
6. Additional specific items of importance for the
maintenance this structure are:

G ,,\ * � U ,-, rA 1 0' i ,f {:1 ,•yLn ' _ , .�A .f ;< �, f . ' r - �' 7+ F 3 a y
u t ,,. �,,•• '9 ,a 55-ty
• �8 � xHr � � � i.,,,�� + .y, r r F� �t � "�k a i`•ry„� 1.�t �� ' . '
� .i Ly. -? 5 i���.IIY �_iei�.. N� .r r.t :1.�f. ,,�tr,-.: .�..t..'1,':•GtI..�Gr^.4 1„t.S�%y,.'�F _�x y.'. YES �'�t :g.._hS...:tfi`i,....u: a_t __ %'.^ - a 'f}�"':f.
91 o
o
z
o -
T
1 N
al, `a o
OSu 91 . 4u i o
o oo -o 00 $
'
A
I
OEM==oil
.
mm
i'
.f+;

4 � .12t, ,.�V.
��u�■�■�■�■�
���■�ii�®ate
��r
s

Ill
f�
m
N
�
x
Q
I
`
\LZI
p
IV
i
N
7 rn
a�
I
III
I it
I
i J
i
I
i
II
I
!
I
i
,
I I
I
4
!
I
a
I
I
'
i
3 .

I
\
�
,
4
1
'
f
f
_ YY' •i�; -i ' fi t -1t .".i i ..,if �ts'F(' �,4- L x-, 's� f tir�._'_t�,•—.r -..axe -w �• r; �r 5 - 7.•{ita' ,u: N rer.'l•.'' a'•` .r,

ME
I
1
it
i
1
l
f
11
11
�
i`•,
rit ,.
#
t
u
ulluluu
.:�
1
11111111111
11
v
!
k
f,

1 " Stat&'ofJNorth°:Carolina `;a
�.
' ' ,:Department°off::Environment
and Natural. Resources
Division" o#'Water'Qualify • .
James,B:'Hunt, Jr:, Govemor
.a 9.,s
Bill. Holman,. Secretary
Kerr T.-,Stevens, Director -
James Mike Lindley
James Mike Lindley Farm
614 MIKE LINDLEY ROAD
SNOW CAMP NC 27349
Dear James Mike Lindley:
NORTH CAROUNA DEPAR_TE MNT OF
ENVIRONMENT ANo NATURAL RESOURCES
Subject: Application No. AWC190016
Additional Information Request
James Mike Lindley. Farm
Animal Waste Operation -
Chatham County
The Non -Discharge Permitting Unit has completed a preliminary engineering review of the subject application. Additional
information is required before we can continue our review. Please address the following by
1. Please lease agreement between W. B. Johnson and the Jonathan Lindley Farm does not indicate a term of
agreement. Please provide a new lease agreement that includes a term of agreement, and signature of both
the landowner and the lessee.
Please note that all WUP revisions mast be signed and dated by both the owner and the technical specialist. Please
reference the subject permit application number when providing the requested information. All, information should be signed,
sealed, acid submitted in.duplicate to my attention at the address below. The information requested by this letter must be
submitted on or before or the Division will return your application as incomplete in accordance with 15A N.C.A.C. 2H .0200
and your facility will be considered to be operating without a permit.
Please be advised that operation of the subject animal waste management system without a valid permit is a violation of North
Carolina General Statute I43-215.1 and will subject you to the enforcement authority of the Environmental Management
Commission.
If you have any questions regarding this request, please call me at [phone], extension 546.
cc: Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality.
Permit File
r
Sincer ly,
/") ..
Susan Cauley
Environmental Engineer
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative. Action Employer
Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

(Meadod '=Ij.:i adds tIonal land baa to be le"od. •Lc.) _
I ...:hereby give
permission d10 apply'animal waste from his Waste Utilization System
�j
on J (9 acres of my land for the duration of time shown below.
I understand that this waste contains nitrogen, phosphorous,
potassium, and other trace elements and wheri properly applied
should not harm my land or. crops. I also understand that the use
of waste will reduce my need for commercial fertilizer.
Adjacent Landow
Waste Producer:
Technical Repre
Date
Date:
Date: 30An
SWCD Representative: Date:
Term of Agreement:
,19q� to 20��
. fr+^-•••• er 7'an raara as Coat teau)
(See. Required Specification No. 2.1.
sC.

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPTREQUESTED
Jonathan Lindley
1800 JohnnyLindley Rd
Snow Camp NC, 27349
Dear Jonathan Lindley:
Aploftft 900W1%ft0VRi7)A
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
September 11, 1998
Subject: Special Agreement
Certified Animal Waste Management Plan
Jonathan Lindley Farm
Facility Number: 19-16
Chatham County
As per Senate Bill 1217, which was ratified on June 21, 1996, and your application for
Special Agreement which was received on March 9, 1998, the Environmental Management
Commission (EMC) hereby proposes to enter into a special agreement with Jonathan Lindley in
order to allow additional time for Jonathan Lindley to obtain and implement a certified animal
waste management plan (CAWMP) for the subject facility.
Please find enclosed the proposed Special Agreement. If you agree to abide by the. dates and
terms of the attached schedule, you must sign, date and return the enclosed documents to the
attention of "Shannon Langley" at the letterhead address within fourteen (14) calendar days of
your receipt of this letter.
If you have already implemented your CAWMP or do not wish to enter into the Special
Agreement, please provide us with a response to Mr. Shannon Langley within fourteen (14)
calendar days of your receipt of this letter.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the
responsibility or liability for failure to comply with all terms and conditions of the North
Carolina General Statutes 143-215.1 and the relevant rules promulgated thereunder. All dates
and conditions of this agreement that are not met shall be subject to civil penalties, criminal
penalties, injunctions and all other enforcement tools available to the Division of Water Quality.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Therefore, in order to avoid such enforcement actions, I urge you to read the Agreement
carefully, make sure you understand your commitments under the Agreement, and contact Mr.
Langley, if you do not understand or are confused about any condition of the agreement.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr.
Shannon Langley at [phone] ext. 581 or Mr. Steve Lewis at [phone] ext. 539.
k
Attachment
Sincerely,
A. Preston Howard, Jr. P.E.
cc: Facility File — Non -Discharge Compliance/Enforcement Unit
RRO Regional Office
Dewey Botts — Division of Soil and Water
Shannon Langley
Central Files

NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
COUNTY OF CHATHAM
IN THE MATTER OF )
SPECIAL AGREEMENT
FACILITY NUMBER: 19-16
JONATHAN LINDLEY
Pursuant to provisions of North Carolina General Statutes (G.S.) 143-215.2(a) this
Special Agreement is entered into by Jonathan Lindley, hereinafter referred to as
"OWNER", and the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission, an agency
of the State of North Carolina created by G.S. 143B-282, and hereinafter referred to as the
Commission:
1. "OWNER" and the Commission hereby stipulate the following:
(a) "OWNER" has previously been deemed permitted in accordance with 15A
NCAC 2H .0217 for the operation of an animal waste treatment works, but was
unable to comply with 15A NCAC2H .0217 (a)(1)(E) requiring an approved
animal waste management plan to be submitted by December 31, 1997.
(b) Failure to obtain and implement a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan in
accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(E) is a violation of State Water
Quality Regulations -and "OWNER" is within the jurisdiction of the
Commission as set forth in G.S. Chapter 143, Article 21.
(c) "OWNER" desires to continue to operate the animal waste treatment works as a
Non -Discharge system.
(d) "OWNER" has secured assistance from a certified technical specialist to
develop an animal waste management system which, once certified, will meet or
exceed all applicable guidelines and standards and will be able to comply with
all aspects of the Commissions animal waste general permit.
(e) During the term of this Agreement there will be no increase in Steady State Live
Weight (SSLW) at the facility. Any new construction will be designed to
accommodate only the SSLW for which the facility was registered in
accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(D).
(e) Since this Special Agreement is by Consent, neither party will file a petition for
a contested case or for judicial review concerning its terms.
(f). Nothing in this Special Agreement shall be taken as absolving or relieving
"OWNER" from any responsibility or liability for discharges of animal waste to
surface waters of the State of North Carolina.
2. "OWNER" desiring to comply with the Permit identified in paragraph 1(a) above,
hereby agrees to do the following:
(a) Undertake all necessary activities in order to obtain and implement a certified
animal waste management plan by October 1, 1998.

Farm Number: 19-16
Special Agreement
Page 2
(b) "OWNER" shall comply with all terms and conditions of the North Carolina
General Statutes 143-215.1 and the relevant rules promulgated thereunder
except 15A NCAC 2H ,0217(a)(1)(E).
(c) No later than fourteen (14) calendar days after the date identified in 2(a) above,
submit to the Director of DWQ written notice of compliance or noncompliance
therewith. In the case of noncompliance, the notice shall include a statement of
the reason(s) for noncompliance, remedial action(s) taken, andd-a statement
identifying the extent to which subsequent dates or times for r accomplishment of
listed activities may be affected.
3. "OWNER" agrees that unless excused under paragraph four (4), "OWNER" will pay
the Director of DWQ, by check payable to the North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources, stipulated penalties according to the following
schedule for failure to meet the deadline set out in paragraph 2(a) above.
Failure to obtain and fully implement a Certified $100.00 for the first seven days
Animal Waste Management Plan by the date past the date identified in 2(a)
identified in 2(a) above: $500.00 for each additional
day
4. "OWNER" and the Commission agree that stipulated penalties are not due if
"OWNER" satisfies the Division of Water Quality that noncompliance was caused
solely by:
a. An act of God;
b. An act of war•,
c. An intentional act or omission of a third party, but this defense shall not be
available if the act or omission is that of an employee or agent of the
defendant or if the act or omission occurs in connection with a contractual
relationship with the "OWNER";
d. An extraordinary event beyond the "OWNER'S" control. Contractor delays or
failure to obtain funding will not be considered as events beyond the
"OWNER's" control; or
e. Any combination of the above causes.
Failure within thirty (30) days of receipt of written demand to pay the penalties, or
challenge them by a contested case petition pursuant to G.S. 150E-23, will be grounds
for a collection action, which the Attorney General is hereby authorized to initiate.
The only issue in such an action will be whether the thirty (30) days has elapsed.
5. This Special Agreement and any terms and conditions contained herein, hereby
supersedes 15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(E).
6. Noncompliance with the terms of this'Special Agreement are subject to enforcement
action in addition to the above stipulated penalties, including injunctive relief
pursuant to G.S. 143-215.6(C).

Farm Number: 19-16
` Special Agreement
Page 3
7. The "OWNER", upon signature of this Special Agreement, will be expected to
comply with all schedule dates, terms, and conditions of this document.
8. This Special Agreement shall expire upon owners submittal of a certified animal
waste management plan.
For Jonathan Lindley Farm
Print Name of Owner
Date
Signature of Owner
For the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission:
Date
Chairman of the Commission

k
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REOUESTED
Jonathan Lindley
Jonathan Lindley Farm
1800 JohnnyLindley Rd
Snow Camp NC 27349
Dear Jonathan Lindley:
1 � •
10
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
February 11, 1998
[FEB 1719,49
i,-' ...__. I
-DEHNR ;,,�EiGH RE:,IOWL 0J L__
Subject: Request for Status Update
Certified Animal Waste Management Plan
Jonathan Lindley Farm
Facility Number: 19-16
Chatham County
In accordance with State Regulations (15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(E)) adopted by the Environmental
Management Commission on February 1, 1993, the owner of the subject facility was required to submit a
Certification Form for the facility's animal waste management system by December 31, 1997.
This letter is to advise you that this office has no record of having received the required Certification for
the subject facility. Please provide this office with an explanation as to why this Certification was not
submitted as required. This explanation must be received within 30 days following the receipt of this letter.
Any existing facility owner which did not submit the required certification by the deadline is no longer
deemed permitted to operate their animal waste management system. Therefore, if the certification was not
submitted as required and the facility is still in operation, this facility is being operated without a valid
permit. N.C.G.S. 143-215.6(b) allows the Secretary of the Department of Environment and Natural
Resources to take appropriate enforcement actions for this violation for as long as the violation continues.
As per Senate Bill 1217, which was ratified on June 21, 1996, the Environmental Management .
Commission (EMC) may enter into a special agreement with facilities that did not meet the December 31,
1997 deadline. These special agreements can only be issued to facility owners which signed up for assistance
with their local Soil and Water Conservation District Office by September 1, 1996 and which can
demonstrate that they made a good faith effort to meet the December 31, 1997 deadline. The special
agreement, if issued, would contain a specific schedule for the facility to follgw to develop and/or implement
an approved animal waste management plan. Attached is an application for a special agreement between the
EMC and the subject facility. If you can demonstrate that this facility can meet the conditions for a special
agreement, you may send this request along with your explanation as to why the plan has not been developed
and implemented. This request would also be due within 30 days from receipt of this letter.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Also attached is a form (Form RR 2198) that must be filled out if the facility is no longer in operation or is
below the threshold established inl 5A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(A). Facilities which maintain the number of animals
below certain thresholds are not required to be certified. These thresholds are:
100 head of cattle
75 horses
250 swine
1000 sheep
30,000 birds with a liquid system
Please submit this form if the subject facility is not operating or is below the threshold limit established in 15A
NCAC 2H.0217(a)(1)(A).
Please submit all responses to this matter to the following address:
Attn: Shannon Langley
Division of Water Quality
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh NC 27626-0535
Once your response is received, it will be evaluated in detail along with any supporting information that
you may wish to submit. Following this review, you will be advised of the results of the review and of any
additional actions that must be taken to bring your facility into compliance.
Please he advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with the requirement to develop and implement a certified animal waste
management plan by December 31, 1997. Please also be advised that the submittal of a request for a special
agreement does not assure that one will be issued. Each facility will be reviewed on a case by case basis and
appropriate actions will be taken to bring each facility into compliance.
Thank you for your immediate attention to this issue. If you have any questions concerning this matter,
please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Shannon Langley of our staff at [phone] ext. 581.
Sincerely,
A. Preston Howard,
cc: Facility File — Non -Discharge Compliance/Enforcement Unit
DWQ Regional Office
Shannon Langley
Central Files
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycledA0% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Attn: Jonathon Lindley
Jonathon Lindley Farm
1800 Johnny Lindley Road
Snow Camp, NC 27349
Dear Mr. Lindley:
mcas'A'A
IT * 0
A&61a
10 ft%00_ft=W0
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
October 12, 1998
Subject: Special Agreement
Facility Number: 19-16
Jonathon Lindley Farm
Chatham County
Attached for your records is a copy of the signed Special Agreement approved by the
Environmental Management Commission.
The terms and conditions of the Special Agreement are in full effect. If you have any
questions concerning this matter, please contact Mr. Shannon Langley, of our staff, at (919) 733-
5083, extension 581.
Sincerely,
M I jr'­l /a_�
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
ATTACHMENTS
cc: Raleigh-Regional-Office-w/attacl ents_l
Chatham County Soil and Water Conservation District w/attachments
Facility File w/attachments
Central Files w/attachments
Shannon Langley w/attachments
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
COUNTY OF CHATHAM
IN THE MATTER OF
SPECIAL AGREEMENT
FACILITY NUMBER: 19-16
JONATHAN LINDLEY
Pursuant to provisions of North Carolina General Statutes (G.S.) 143-215.2(a) this
Special Agreement is entered into by Jonathan Lindley, hereinafter referred to as
"OWNER", and the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission, an agency
of the State of North Carolina created by G.S. 143B-282, and hereinafter referred to as the
Commission:
"OWNER" and the Commission hereby stipulate the following:
(a) "OWNER" has previously been deemed permitted in accordance with 15A
NCAC 2H .0217 for the operation of an animal waste treatment works, but was
unable to comply with 15A NCAC2H .0217 (a)(1)(E) requiring an approved
animal waste management plan to be submitted by December 31, 1997.
(b) Failure to obtain and implement a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan in
accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(E) is a violation of State Water
Quality Regulations -and "OWNER" is within the jurisdiction of the
Commission as set forth in G.S. Chapter 143, Article 21.
(c) "OWNER" desires to continue to operate the animal waste treatment works as a
Non -Discharge system.
(d) "OWNER" has secured assistance from a certified technical specialist to
develop an animal waste management system which, once certified, will meet or
exceed all applicable guidelines and standards and will be able to comply with
all aspects of the Commissions animal waste general permit.
(e) During the tern of this Agreement there will be no increase in Steady State Live
Weight (SSLW) at the facility. Any new construction will be designed to
accommodate only the SSLW for which the facility was registered in
accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(D).
(e) Since this Special Agreement is by Consent, neither party will file a petition for
a contested case or for judicial review concerning its terms.
(f). Nothing in this Special Agreement shall be taken as absolving or relieving
"OWNER" from any responsibility or liability for discharges of animal waste to
surface waters of the State of North Carolina.
2. "OWNER" desiring to comply with the Permit identified in paragraph l(a) above,
hereby agrees to do the following:
(a) Undertake all necessary activities in order to obtain and implement a certified
animal waste management plan by October 1, 1998.

Farm Number: 19-16
Special Agreement
Page 2
(b) "OWNER" shall comply with all terms and conditions. of the North Carolina
General Statutes 143-215.1 and the relevaiit rules promulgated thereunder
except 15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(E).
(c) No later than fourteen (14) calendar days after the date identified in 2(a) above,
submit to the Director of DWQ written notice of compliance or noncompliance
therewith. In the case of noncompliance, the notice shall include a statement of
the reason(s) for noncompliance, remedial action(s) taken, and a statement
identifying the extent to which subsequent dates or times for accomplishment of
listed activities may be affected.
3. "OWNER" agrees that unless excused under paragraph four (4), "OWNER" will pay
the Director of DWQ, by check payable to the North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources, stipulated penalties according to the following
schedule for failure to meet the deadline set out in paragraph 2(a) above.
Failure to obtain and fully implement a Certified $100.00 for the first seven days
Animal Waste Management Plan by the date past the date identified in 2(a)
identified in 2(a) above: $500.00 for each additional
day
4. "OWNER" and the Commission agree that stipulated penalties are not due if
"OWNER" satisfies the Division of Water Quality that noncompliance was caused
solely by:
a. An act of God;
b. An act of war;
c. An intentional act or omission of a third party, but this defense shall not be
available if the act or omission is that of an employee or agent of the
defendant or if the act or omission occurs in connection with a contractual
relationship with the "OWNER";
d. An extraordinary event beyond the "OWNER'S" control. Contractor delays or
failure to obtain funding will not be considered as events beyond the
"OWNER's" control; or
e. Any combination of the above causes.
Failure within thirty (30) days of receipt of written demand to pay the penalties, or
challenge them by a contested case petition pursuant to G.S. 15013-23, will be grounds
for a collection action, which the Attorney General is hereby authorized to initiate.
The only issue in such an action will be whether the thirty (30) days has elapsed.
5. This Special Agreement and any terms and conditions contained herein, hereby
supersedes 15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(E).
6. Noncompliance with the terms -of this Special Agreement are subject to enforcement
action in addition to the above stipulated penalties, including injunctive relief
pursuant to G.S. 143-215.6(C).

Farm Number: 19-16
Special Agreement
Page 3
7. The "OWNER", upon signature of this Special Agreement, will be expected to
comply with all schedule dates, terms, and conditions of this document.
8. This Special Agreement shall expire upon owners submittal of a certified animal
waste management plan.
For Jonathan Lindley Farm
j C,4�0, D
of •;0111, Date
,#kMint ain7e �n u- 2
. • •
For the Noah Carolina Environment a! M4,nagemcn, Commission:
Date /4 -z-- 9�
e.—Chairman of the Commission

��L r r�r C�—�f��/�fiG.� �'1✓-rc.r�=�.--4 'CI*r r�_tr—� 7" � — -
9 2007

State of North Carolina
Department 4- Envjronrnent and' Natural` Resources
DWWO' ri,of Water'Quality
Non=Discharge°Permit Application Form
(THIS FORM MAY BE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGINAL)
General.Pe"rmit -� Existing. Animal' Waste Operations,
The following questions have been, completed utilizing information on file with the Division. Please
review the. information for completeness and make any corrections that are appropriate. If a .
question has not been completed by the Division, please complete as best as possible. Do not leave
any question unanswered.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
1.1 Facility Name: lanad.hind " a M a K t I A + -4 rm rrn _ -
1.2 Print Land- Owner's name: Ileg Lo
1.3 Mailing address: 1080 ielfflnj bindiey AooW 1914 D&a U,41A_ QbPA _ T
City, State: Snow Camp NC Zip: 27349
Telephone Number (include area code): [phone]
1.4 County where facility is located: Chatham
1.5 Facility Location (Directions from nearest major highway. Please include SR numbers for state roads. Please include a
copy of a county road map with the location of the farm identified): County Road 1336, 1/16 mi. south of the intersection
of coun roads 1336 and 1337. Johnny Lindley Road.
1.6 Print Farm Manager's name (if different from Land Owner):
1.7 Lessee's / Integrator's name (if applicable; please circle which type is listed):
1.8 Date Facility Originally Began Operation: 01/01/40
1.9 Date(s) of Facility Expansion(s) (if applicable): _ h1 ohtE_
2. OPERATION INFORMATION:
2.1 Facility No.: 19 (county number); 16 (facility number).
2.2 Operation Descnp for Cattle operation
Dairy
170- Certified Design Capacity
Is the above information correct? yes; no. If no, correct below using the design capacity of the facility
The "No. of Animals" should be the max um num er or which the'waste management structures were designed.
Type of Swine No. of Animals _Type of Poultry No. of Animals Type of Cattle No. of Animals
0 Wean to Feeder 0 Layer 0 Dairy 70
0 Feeder to Finish 0 Non -Layer 0 Beef
0 Farrow to Wean (# sow) 0 Turkey
0 Farrow to Feeder (# sow)
0 Farrow to Finish (# sow)
Other Type of Livestock on the farm: No. of Animals:
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98 Page I of 4 19 - 16

3.
2.3 Acreage cleared and available for application (excluding all required buffers and areas not covered by the application -
system): 146 ; Required Acreage (as listed in the AWMP): 36.7
2.4 Number of lagoons/ storage ponds (circle which is applicable):
2.5 Are subsurface drains present within 100' of any of the application fields? YES or NO (please circle one)
2.6 Are subsurface drains present in the vicinity or under the lagoon(s)? YES or N (please circle one)
2.7 Does this facility meet all applicable siting requirements? (Swine Farm Sitinct, NRCS Standards, etc.) (Swine Only)
YES or NO (please circle one)
What was the date that this facility's swine houses and lagoon were sited? I9
What was the date that this facility's land application areas were sited? I QQ e1.
REQUIRED; ITEMS CHECKLIST
Please indicate'that you have included the following required items by signing your initials in the space provided next to each
item.
3.1 One completed and signed original and one copy of the application for General Permit - Animal
Waste Operations;
3.2 Two copies of a general location map indicating the location of the animal waste facilities and
field locations where animal waste is land applied;
3.3 Two copies of the entire Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If the facility
does not have a CAWMP, it must be completed prior to submittal of a general permit
application for animal waste operations.
The CAWMP must include the following components. Some of these components may not
have been required at the time the facility was certified but should be added to the
CAWMP for permitting purposes:
3.3.1 The Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) must include the amount of Plant Available
Nitrogen (PAN) produced and utilized by the facility.
3.3.2 The method by which waste is applied to the disposal fields (e.g. irrigation,
injection, etc.)
3.3.3 A map of every field used for land application.
3.3.4 The soil series present on every land application field.
3.3.5 The crops grown on every land application field.
3.3.6 The Realistic Yield Expectation (RYE) for every crop shown in the WUP.
3.3.7 The PAN applied to every land application field.
3.3.8 The waste application windows for every crop utilized in the WUP.
3.3.9 The required NRCS Standard specifications.
3.3.10 A site schematic.
3.3.11 Emergency Action Plan.
3.3.12 Insect Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.
3.3.13 Odor Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.
3.3.14 Mortality Control Checklist with the selected method noted.
3.3.15 Lagoon/storage pond capacity documentation (design, calculations, etc.). Please be
sure to include any site evaluations, wetland determinations, or hazard classifications
that may be applicable to your facility.
3.3.16 Operation and Maintenance Plan.
If your CAWMP includes any components not shown on this list, please include the
additional components with your submittal.
Applicants Initials
7AI L
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98, Page 2 of 4 19 - I6

Facility Number: 19 - 16.
Facility Name: Jonathan Lindley Farm
4. APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATION:
ff, ke L i c.-A l e" (Land Owner's name listed in question 1.2), attest that
this application for 10(nC-s MkE WAA I Imo+ l�Arm (Facility name listed in question 1.1)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and -complete to the of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all re ired supporting information and attachments are not included, this application
package willnturned�r��
to me plet
SignatureDate
5. MANAGER'S CERTIFICATION:. (complete only if different from the Land Owner)
1, _ (Manager's name listed in question 1.6), attest that this
application for (Facility name listed in question I:1)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application
package will be returned as incomplete.
Signature Date _
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND MATERIALS,
SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTION
NON -DISCHARGE PERMITTING UNIT
POST OFFICE BOX 29535
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27626-0535
TELEPHONE NUMBER: [phone]
FAX NUMBER: [phone]
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98 Page 3 of 4 19 -16

Asbeviil a Regional.WQ.Supavisor
59 Woodfin Place
Asbrae, NC 29801
(S2g} 251-6208
Fax (sn)251- 452
Avery Macon
Buncombe Madison
Burke McDoweA
Caldwell Mitebell
Chemkce Polk
Clay Rutherford
Graham Swain
Haywood Transylvania
Henderson Yancey
Jackson
Fayetteville Regional WQ Supervisor
Wachovia Building, Suite 714
Fayetteville, NC 28301
(910) 48&1541
Fax [phone]
Anson Moore
Blades Richmond
Cumberland Robeson
Harnett Sampson
Hoke Scotland
Montgomery
Wasbistgwe Regional WQ Swavi=
943' Washington Square Mall
Washington, NC 27889
(:ts) 946-M I-
Fax.(,5t; 975-3716
Beanfart . Jones
Bede Lenoir
Cbowan
Pamlico
Craven
Pasquotank
Gmmtndr
Perquimaas
Dare
Pitt
Crates
Tynll
G:+eeae
Washington
Hatfad
Wayne
Hyde
Mooresville Regional WQ Supervisor
919 North Main Suraes
Mooresville, NC 29115
[phone]
Fax [phone]M
Alexander Lincoln
Cabarrus Mecklenburg
Catawba Rowan
Cleveland Stanly
Gaston Union
Iredell
Winston-Salem Regional WQ SupwAvor
585 Waughtown Street.
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
Wiz7714600
Fax L33L) 771-4631
Alammaae Rockingham
Allegbany Randolph
Asbe Stokes
Caswen Surry .
Davidson Watauga
Davie Wilkes
Forsyth Yadkin
Guilford
Raleigh Regional WQ Supervisor
38W Bata Dr.
Raleigh, NC X7611-
[phone]
Fax [phone]
C3atham Nash
Durham " Northampton
Edgw= be Orange
Franklin Person
Granville: Vane'
Halifax Wake
Johnston Waaen
Lee Wilsm
Wilmington Region WQ Supervisor
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405-3845
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Bnutswick New Hanover
Carteret Onslow
Columbus Fender
Duplin
FORM: AWO-G-E 5122&99 Page 4 of 4

1
\NV 6�
617 H �\
x �
yo �• s �Plaipfye
Sqh
�� �� sFx Spa"• .� -�5�� s T!y `Y 4{�.&� -.l .�
Caw-� �`, #!1"��� 2� " � � f iC�r�x • F ..
} v 3967
ii Co
_ TAmEs (n, y rirm
3966
\\ ` i
\ws�
��V 1 600
3965
�'• !
a• 3 9! 'fie s, ..,++,. ° , Q. W �LX671,:
�r � � ''MA7! I i 4i! yl_ 4. , "� , 'L 'S.Irf� f'.e• •r 1 • .� :}� j`.4 r � h y � � -
�. ```, u`a^,ryp 'r }' E.,r..;. ,�i •i�'. � �fr�t.. � 4
C • �1, / 9 ,r'-�� .� r Y." 41 `l[1 1. M f: ./ „
.t � A
�} .14�{ g� � 1 .. 4 I �+ .� yriR 'ter L. ryf • •/ ^ rr/. r 1 4vt
I-
o •' i t w ' µ a' ?.�r�,�, �;41�t• i,, x;$+�h" r � v.+,�c:.
J o !r$ ' t, � r _ � ••i 1 � ;i�n x.�l, r r��3i,�"_� f�r'r ,r']�. `S.
ci. � :,aY J , � h '�I q •+5", . d�� l �� ��h.•"% r C xm��•1 �V.��C��'" �}.0
�a' � „�M' J+i '� �! Z'zi7 �.� "k L'.. � ��-I.k ,�� �'r ���••y �, �Y'�' ,�,.,;.
335 ,` ,'' 11 �` Ar:T4f1. 396p - -, ,sN, �f• • .P-Z �z 1
o ,a :" c�•; _, J _ _ _ :ds
IWINKIRti
WE

Animal�IAI"te,Management,.Plan: Cer.Y1rkation: J
(Pleaseaype:or:prini all inforniation:that'does not require a signature)
... i. {
[Existing) or New or *Expanded ' (please circle one) R E C C I v: n
General information:
vvR f t:H QUAL':TY SECTION
Name of Farm: E Facility No:
Name:-
Mailing Address:
N
� � �� E�•f IrtiC3• cJl`I
Farm Location: County Farm is located in:
ii o '0.
Latitude and Longitude: 'AID 1 ZF av- 38
Phone N
Please attach a copy of a county road map with location identified and describe below (Be specific: road
names, directions, milepost, etc.): _ -A S farm i s f acAid _A- Ar2-;,4kr sgC_AaW b
&XA-H, t .MA 6 133& x�d 13 3 7 . 77ii s i a � do9L nz .Y,.
Operation Description:
Type of Swine No. of Animals Type of Poultry No. of Animals Tyre of Cattle No. of Animals
D Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer A Dairy 11740
:3 Feeder to Finish ❑ Pullets r3 Beef
�3 Farrow to Wean
Z! Farrow to Feeder
7 Farrow to Finish Other Type of Livestock: Number of Animals.
Expanding Operation. Only..;
Previous Design Capacity.• Additional Design Capacity �� �A'{
x�
-—T'otal Design Ca�racin'.-., . s z fl ql
Acreage Available for Application:_ NU - - Required Acreage:_ ��p ►� _
Number of Lagoons I Storage fonds : Total Capaci qD o/ 9 Cubic Feet (ft3•)
Are subsurface drains present on the farm: YES or NO (please circle one)
If YES: are subsurface drains present in the area of the LAGOON or SPRAY FIELD (please circle one)
Owner I Manager Agreement
1 (we) verify that all the -above information is correct and will be updated upon changing. i (we) understand the operation and
maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste management plan for the farm named above and will
implement these procedures. I (we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the waste treatment and
storage system or construction of new facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of
Environmental Management before the new animals are stocked. I (we) understand that there must be no discharge of animal
waste from the storage or application system to surface waters of the state either directly through a man-made conveyance or
from a storm event less: severe than the 25-year,24-hour storm and there must not be run-off from the application of animal
waste. 1 (we) understand that run-off "of'pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas must be minimized- using. technical
standards developed by the Natural Resources Conservation Service. The approved plan will be filed. at the farm and at the
office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District. I (we) know that any modification must be approved by a technical
specialist and submitted to the Soil and. Water Conservation District prior to implementation. A change in land ownership
requires written notification to DEM. or a new certification (if the approved plan is changed) within 60 days of a title -transfer.
Name of Lan Ownel
Signature
Name of A hazer& t
A«rC -- January 1.1997
Date:

Techlriical Specialist• Certif cation .
:..:v y .. - .. '
I. As a technical specialist'desigtiated:by the'Norih Carolina Soil and Water Coriservation'Comrrussion pursuant to 15A
NCAC' 6F .0005, 1 certify- that the anima waste management system for the farm named above has an animal waste
management plan that meets or exceeds standards and specifications of the Division of Environmental Management (DEM)
as specified in 15A NCAC 2H.021.7 and the USDA -Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) and/or the North
Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H.0217 and 15A NCAC 6F .0001-.0005. The
following elements are included in the plan as applicable. While each category designates a technical specialist who may
sign each certification (SD, Sl, WUP, RC,'1), the technical specialist should only certify parts for which they are technically
competent.
IL Certification of Design
A) Collection, Storage, Treatment System
Checkthe appropriate box
a/tin- fac'1�-ity oLbout retrofit (SD or WUP)
Storage volume is adequate for operation capacity; storage capability consistent with waste utilization
requirements.
❑ New, expanded or Mtrofitted facility (SD)
Animal waste storage and treatment structures, such as but not limited to collection systems, lagoons and ponds,
have been designed to meet or exceed the minimum standards and specifications.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation:0irla1 rm :�ni l Acld
Address(A
Signature:
My
B) Land Application Site (WUP)
The plan provides for minimum separations (buffers); adequate amount of land for waste utilization; chosen crop is
suitable for waste management; hydraulic and nutrient loading rates.
Name of Technical
Affiliation: O-VP�
Address(Agen ) J
Signature:
C) Runoff Controls from Exterior_ L
Check the appropriate box
a Faciitv without exterioE 1911 (SD or WUP or RC)
This facility does not contain any exterior lots.
Facility -with exterior lots (RC)
N•tethods to minimize the run off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas have been designed in
accordance with technical standards developed by NRCS.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):,
Affiliation: 0-64-kpmn —'X:Ij CL-r
. Date -Li �� �. , !..,
MRS � l
AWC -- January 1, 1997'

Tin
.t
D). Alication AndHariul�nQ Equipment: -�
I'
. 'Check the,
L�l Eisist�n f expandm,g facility' with existing waste aRpIiciltion equipment (WUP or I)
Animal waste application equipment specified, in the plan has been either field calibrated' or evaluated in
accordance -with existing design charts and tables and is able to apply waste as necessary to accommodate the
waste management -plan; (existing application equipment can cover the area required by the plan at rates not to
exceed either the -specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates, a schedule for timing of applications has been
established; required buffers can be maintained and calibration and adjustment guidance are contained as part of
the plan).
❑ New. expanded or existing facility without existing, waste application equipment_ _for spray
jnr ation. (I)
Animal waste application equipment specified -in the plan has been designed to apply waste as necessary to
accommodate the waste management plan; (proposed application equipment can cover the area required by the
plan at rates not to exceed either .the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates; a schedule for timing of
applications has been established; required buffers can be maintained; calibration and adjustment guidance are
contained as part of the plan).
O New expanded.-or—existile_fa_cility withou-texisting wale _app is io Qui=ent_for land
spreadingnot using spray_irri atg, ion. (WUP or I)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been selected to apply waste as necessary to
accommodate the waste management plan; (proposed application equipment can cover the area required by the
plan at rates not to exceed either the specified- hydraulic or nutrient loading rates; a schedule for timing of
applications has been established; required buffers can be maintained; calibration and adjustment guidance arc
contained as part of the plan).
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): b LJAo VJa
Affiliation: 606 r r df ►-v1r U
Address (Agency) -too [ - ea 1�, _c 14(ej--4, 2.761 �Phone No.:` h?;•Sb - It D
Signature: ��,,6, .t.. a..-1 Date: 1 z - ,19 - 4 7
E) Odor Control, Insect Control, Mortality Management and Emergenty_Actiou Plan-(Q.
SI, WUP, RC or D
The waste management plan for this facility includes a Waste Management Odor Control Checklist, an Insect Control
Checklist, a Mortality Management Checklist and an Emergency Action Plan. Sources of both odors and insects
have been evaluated with respect to this site and Best Management Practices to Minimize Odors and Best
Management Practices to Control Insects have been selected and included in the waste management plan. Both the
Mortality Management PIan and the Emergency Action Plan are complete and calf be implemented by this facility.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please
Affiliation:
M` iie.ILtUtc
Signature:
F) Written Notice f NeworEx andin-Swine ar
The following signature block is only to be used for new or expanding swine farms that begin construction after June
21,1996. If the facility was built before June 21,1996, when was it constructed or last expanded
I (we) certify that I (we) have attempted to contact by certified mail all adjoining property owners and all property owners
who own property located across a public road, street, or highway from this new or expanding swine farm. The notice was in
compliance with the. requirements of NCGS 106-805. A copy of the notice and a list of the property owners notified is
attached.
Name of Land Owner
Signature:
Date:
Name of I1lanager(if different from owner):
Signature Date:
A1CC -- January 1, 1997 3

71
III C&'ti, ,zeatry f' of Izs'47114 on-
A) election, Storage, reatrrient Installation
New, expanded or retrofitte&facility (SI)
Animal waste storage and treatment structures, such as but not limited to lagoons and ponds, have been installed in
accordance with the approved plan to meet or exceed the minimum standards and specifications.
For existing facilities without retrofits, no certi ation is necessary.
Naive of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation:
Address(Agency): Phone No.:
Signature: Date:
B) X.,and Application Site (�YUP)
Check the appropriate box
51 The cropping system is in place on all land as specified in the animal waste management plan.
❑ Conditional Approval: all required land as specified in the plan is cleared for planting; the cropping'system
as specified in the waste utilization plan has not been established and the owner has committed to establish the
vegetation as specified in the plan by (month/day/year); the proposed cover crop is appropriate
for compliance with the wasteutilization plan.
❑ Also check this box if appropriate
if the cropping system as specified in the plan can not be established on newly cleared land within 30 days
of this certification, the owner has committed to establish an interim crop for erosion control;
Name of Te hnical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation:
Address(Ace y): .�• Phone No. 42-
Signature: Date:
This following signature block is onlyY
be used when the box for conditional approval in III. B
above has been checked,
I (we) certify that I (we) have committed to establish the cropping system as specified in my (our) waste utilization plan, and
if appropriate to establish the interim crop for erosion control, and will submit to DEM a verification of completion from a
Technical Specialist within 15 calendar days following the date specified in the conditional certification. I (we) realize that
failure to submit this verification is a violation of the waste management plan and will subject me (us) to an enforcement
action from DEM.
Name of Land Owner:
Signature: Date:
Name of Manager(if different from owner):
Signature:
Date:
AAVC -- January 1,1997 4

C) Runoff Con trol fr m er b • ts:,(RC),
Facility with exterior -lots
Methods to miniirtine:ttie.ruri off'of.polluta its -from lounging and heavy use areas have been installed as specified.
in the plan.
For facilities without- exterior lots, no certification is necessary.
Name of Technic
Affiliation: Ch t '
Address(Agency):
Signature:
D} Applicatioll at
Check the an onria
Animal
and adjustment materials have been provided to the owners and are contained as part of the plan.
❑ Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan has not been installed but the owner
has proposed leasing or third party application and has provided a signed contract; equipment specified in the
contract agrees with the requirements of the plan; required buffers can be maintained; calibration and
adjustment guidance have been provided to the owners and are contained as part of the plan.
❑ Conditional approval: Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan'has been
purchased and will be on site and installed by (month/day/year); there is adequate storage to
hold the waste until the equipment is installed and until the waste can be land applied in accordance with the
cropping system contained in the plan; and calibration and adjustment guidance have been provided to the
owners and are contained as part of the plan.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):5E_I &A A J-QF aA-YJ _
Affiliation: eo neye±,�L Extii3i4, SQrVi ca_
Address(Agency):4!�01-c- itrua Dave PZdAe: „t, to-zgry PhoneNo.: iI-LO-1/0G
Si4nature: c Date: A--x4 -q!
The following signature block is only to be used when the box for conditional approval in M-D
above has been checked.
I (we) certify that i (we) have committed to purchase the animal waste application and handling equipment as
specified in my (our) waste management plan and will submit to DEM a verification of delivery and installation
from a Technical Specialist within 15 calendar days following the date specified in the conditional certification. 1
(we) realize that failure to submit this verification is a violation of the waste management plan and will subject me
(us) to an enforcement action from DEM.
Name of Land Owner:
Signature: Date:
Name of Manager(if different from owner):
Signature: Date:
E) Odor Control, Insect Control and Mortality Management (SD, ST. WUP, RC or )1)
Methods to control odors and insects as specified in the Plan have been installed and are operational. The
mortality management system as specified in the Plap�has aI<so been installed and }s�opelational.
Name of Technical Specialist Tease Print):
A , 1 r t _
Affiliation:
IN
Q:.. .i
.�

'-
Please, return. the completed, form, to' .the"Division"of. Water Quality -at the following address:
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division Of Water Quality
Water Quality Section, Compliance Group
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
Please also remember to submit a copy of this form along with the complete Animal Waste
Management Plan to the local Soil and Water Conservation District Office and to keep a copy in
your riles with your Animal Waste Management Plan.
AVC -- January 1, 1997 6

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
NIEM0RANDUN1
TO: Regional Water Quality Supervisor
IJ MAR 1 719% %
N
FROM: Shannon Lanaley
DE1! R RALE1 H1 I'FCIC. 0t
SUBJECT: Application for special agreement p
Please find attached a copy of application for special agreement for facility number
If you have any questions, please call me at 733-5083, ext. 581.
ATTACHMENT
16E o t Y �;,,�s f e e 9u v
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity AfTwmative Action Employer 50 % recycled/10 % post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural ResouruS,� {�
Division of Water Quality !f
APPLICATION FOR A SPECIAL AGREEMENRAR 0 9 1998
(INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR ANIMAL OPERATIONS REQUESTING A SPECIAL AGREE
tri.,,i rs' ��lAl.1�Y 5
I. GENERAL INFORMATION: ,, L,iro ComP4Wce Eni.
I., Applicant (Owner}} of the F`acility): _ �
2. Facility No.: I —
3. Facility Name:
4. Print or Type Owner's or Signing Official's Name and Title (the person who is
legally responsible for the facility and its compliance):
M'. � « I : _ ,, 14- r J
5. Mailing Address: LP t` i 1 1 1 i.K L_ Li
-1C13 �j KC�
City:: rJ DW C AMA State: Zip: y a-7 a 9
Telephone No.: (�) 6 (v a40 �9
6. County where facility is located:
7. Operation Type (Swine, Poultry,
8. Application Date:
A h6t:)- ry-1
�attle): L
., .n
H. ELIGIBILITY FOR A SPECIAL AGREEMENT:
As per Senate Bill 1217 which was ratified on June 21, 1996, the Environmental Management
Commission (EMC) may enter into a special agreement with an operator who registered by
September 1, 1996 with their local Soil and Water Conservation District office and who makes
a good faith effort to obtain an approved animal waste management plan by December 31,
1997. This special agreement shall set forth a schedule for the operator to follow to obtain an
approved animal waste management plan by a date certain and shall provide that the EMC shall
not issue a notice of violation for failure to have an approved animal waste management plan so
long as the operator complies with the special agreement. Operators who did not register by
September 1, 1996 with their local Soil and Water Conservation District office or who can not
document that they made a good faith effort to obtain an approved animal waste management
plan by December 31, 1997, will not receive a Special Agreement from the EMC. These
facilities will be subject to civil penalties, criminal penalties, injunctions and all other
enforcement tools available to DWQ.
1. Date facility requested assistance from their local Soil & Water Conservation District
01-
FORM SPAG 1/98
Page 1 of 4

2. Efforts made since February 1, 1993 to develop and implement a certified animal
waste management plan (Use additional sheets if necessary). This summary must
include:
A. All contacts made with technical specialist
B. Dates and types of plans developed
C. Contracts signed
D. Funds expended
E. Improvements made to the system
F. Animals removed and not retoacked at the facility
G. Other actions taken
FORM SPAG 1/98
Page 2 of 4

"The purpose of this attachment is to summarize items II
and III of the "Application for a Special Agreement".
II. ELIGIBILITY FOR A SPECIAL AGREEMENT
1. Date facility requested assistance from local Soil
and Water Conservation District: 05/05/93
2. Efforts made to implement waste management plan:
A. All contacts made with technical specialist:
5/5/93, 5/10/93, 5/13/93, 8/25/93, 10/18/93,
12/20/93, 1/14/94, 1/19/94, 5/31/94, 6/2/94,
8/3/94, 11/15/94, 1/25/95, 1/26/95, 2/14/95,
2/27/95, 7/19/95, 8/25/95, 8/21/96, 6/11/97,
6/16/97, 6/18/97, 6/30/97, 9/2/97, 9/11/97,
12/8/97, 1/13/98, 2/18/98, 3/4/98,
(Copies'of these notes are attached)
B. Dates and types of plans developed:
6/3/93 - Waste Management Plan
12/18/97 - Revised waste Management Plan
C. Contracts signed:
5/13/93 - Waste Storage Pond, Push Off Ramp
11/29/93 - Components of Waste Management
System, Gutters, Livestock Exclusion
9/2/97 - Stock Trail, Livestock Exclusion,
Critical Area Planting
1/13/98 - Waste Application System
D. Funds expended:
6/7/94 - Waste Storage Pond
6/7/94.- Roof Runoff Management,'Livestock Exclusion
around waste storage structure
12/8/97 - Stock Trail, Livestock Exclusion,
Critical Area Planting (Buffers)
E. Improvements made to the system:
Waste Storage pond and push off ramp constructed,
lot runoff diverted into waste storage pond. Roof
runoff measures installed to reduce polluted runoff
on feedlot. Stock trail, critical areas planted
(buffers), these buffers have been fenced to
exclude cattle from buffers. Start pump elevation
marker has been installed in waste storage pond.
F. Animals removed and not restocked at the facility:
Animals are present on farm. None have been removed,
present milking herd population 170 dairy cattle.
III. Proposed schedule for obtaining certification:
1. Livestock exclusion fencing to be installed in

IT. PROPOSED SCHEDULE FOR OBTAINING CERTIFICATION:
Please list each of the specific things that will be done at your facility to implement a
certified animal waste management plan and the date you will have each activity
completed. This must include a review of the possibility of not restocking animals that
are scheduled to be removed from the facility until such time as a certified plan can be
implemented. Please also list the date on which animals were most recently restocked at
this facility. The EMC reserves the right to deny any proposed schedules that are
excessively long. (Use additional sheets if necessary).
Applicant's Certification:
I, 0-v k E LtA E u , attest this application for a Special Agreement
with the EMC has been revieweb by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my
knowledge. I understand if all required parts of this application are not completed and if all
required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application package will
Print Name of Owner
,eA,-L� 61 Date
3 /S 9
Signature of O er
FORM SPAG V98 Page 3 of 4

Required Items:
One-(!) original and two (2) codes of the completed and appropriately executed
application form, along with any attachments.
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING
INFORMATION AND MATERIALS, SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTION
NON -DISCHARGE COMPLIANCE/ENFORCEMENT UNIT
POST OFFICE BOX 29535
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27626-0535
FORM SPAG 1/98 Page 4 of 4

U.S. DEPARTMENT'OF AGRICULTURE Page 1 of 4
NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE Mar 05, 1998
Chatham County, Pittsborc Field Office [phone]
Technical Assistance Notes for Date Range
08/21/96 - 03/05/98
Client Name: Lindley, Jonathan
Business Name: Jonathan Lindley
Business ID: lindjo
Client Address
------------------------------
1800 Johnny Lindley Rd
SNOW CAMP, NC
27349-
Client Phone Ext Description
Business Address
------------------------------
1800 Johnny Lindley Rd
Snow Camp, NC
27349-
Business Phone Ext Description
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTES
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assistance Type: Technical Assistance Assisted By: SLM
Fund ID: C01 Date: 03/04/98
Note:
Henry and I visited Johnathan and Mike Lindley. We went to find out the
progress of the livestock exclusion fencing that is to provide a buffer
between a lounging area and a stream. The Lindleys had not yet begun
work on this fencing and said that they would start on it within the
month. Mr Lindley has received the standard letter concerning
certification from DWQ. We will be mailing a copy of the waste
management plan to Mike as requested.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assistance Type: Technical Assistance Assisted By: SLM
Fund ID: 7CS Date: 02/18/98
Note:
Mailed copy of Request for Payment to Mr. Lindley for contract
19-98-09-02, approved 12/8/97.

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Page 2 of 4
NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE Mar 05, 1998
Chatham County, Pittsboro Field Office [phone]
Technical Assistance Notes for Date Range
08/21/96 - 03/05/98
Client Name: Lindley, Jonathan
Business Name: Jonathan Lindley
Business ID: lindjo
Assistance Type: Technical Assistance Assisted By: CHO
Fund ID: 7CS Date: 02/11/98
Note:
Received pending checklist from the division of soil and water. Corrected
item pended and mailed back to the division of soil and water.
Assistance Type: Technical Assistance Assisted By: CHO
Fund ID: 7CS Date: 01/13/98
Note:
Visited farm, ag cost contract application signed by Mr. Lindley, is
applying for assistance with waste application equipment. Application
number is 19-98-17-02. Discussed certification form and that additional
parts needed to be completed, discussed installation of liquid level
marker in storage pond, and additional buffer widths needed in lounging
area bordering the creek. Also reviewed insect control, odor control, and
emergency action plan with Mr. Lindley. Ask if any areas needed to be
added or taken off form, there were none.
Assistance Type: Technical Assistance Assisted By: CHO
Fund ID: 7CS Date: 12/08/97
Note:
Visited dairy, request for signed on 98-09, stock trail, fencing, and
critical areas sown and are complete. Fencing west of waste storage pond
has one strand of high tensile wire on it. Discussed with Micheal
Lindley, he stated that additional strands of wire would be strung if
needed. Trail that was graded measured 200 ft., cloth and gravel was not
used, concrete instead, 190 by 10, figuired 222 sq yd, 53 ton of gravel.
Fencing in this area (south of waste storage pond) measured 653 feet in
length. Area seeded measured 128 by 115. Area west of waste storage pond
fencing measured 333 feet in length. Area seeded measured 260 feet by 75
feet, and 282 feet by 126 feet. Total area seeded equals 1.6 acres. Total
amount requested on this date, $2305.00.

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE
Chatham County, Pittsboro Field Office [phone]
Technical Assistance Notes for Date Range
08/21/96 - 03/05/98
Client Name: Lindley, Jonathan
Business Name: Jonathan Lindley
Business ID: lindjo
Page 3 of 4
Mar 05, 1998
Assistance Type: Technical Assistance Assisted By: CHO
Fund ID: 7CS Date: 09/11/97
Note.
Ag cost contract approved by district board.
------------------------------------------------_--------------------------------
Assistance Type: Technical Assistance Assisted By: CHO
Fund ID: 7CS Date: 09/02/97
Note:
Ag cost application signed by applicate, contract number 19-98-09-02.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assistance Type: Technical Assistance Assisted By: CHO
Fund ID: ACS Date: 06/30/97
Note.
Visited dairy farm, Micheal nor Sheryld around, Jonathan at farm. Gave
Jonathan ag cost contract in order for him to obtain signatures from
Micheal and Sheryld. Mr. Lindley is retiring, is going to put operation
in Micheal and Sheryld's mames.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assistance Type: Technical Assistance Assisted By:. CHO
Fund ID: ACS Date: 06/18/97
Note:
Completed operational review form, made three copies, one for division of
water quality, two for division of soil and water, one for Caroll Pierce,
the other for Margaret O'keefe.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assistance Type: Technical Assistance Assisted By: CHO
Fund ID: ACS Date: 06/16/97
Note:
Visited dairy farm, present Jonathon Lindley, Mike Lindley, Mike
Sturdivant, Bill Woods, and myself. Waste management system looked at, it
was decided by all parties involved that stock trail, criticl area, and
fencing was needed to comply with .0200 regulations. Additional buffers
needed, the fore mentioned items would provide the needed buffers at the
feedlot. Operational review completed at farm. A copy was given to

i
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Page 4 of 4
NATURAL, RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE Mar 05, 1998
Chatham County, Pittsboro Field Office [phone]
Technical Assistance Notes for Date Range
08/21/96 - 03/05/98
Client Name: Lindley, Jonathan
Business Name: Jonathan Lindley
Business ID: lindjo
producer.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assistance Type: Technical Assistance Assisted By: CHO
Fund ID: ACS Date: 06/11/97
Note:
Annual spot check by district board conducted today. Present Dallas
Hurley, Chuck Miller, and myself. Looked at waste storage pond, livestock
exclusion, push off ramp, and guttering system. All systems maintained
properly at this time.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assistance Type: Technical Assistance Assisted By: CHO
Fund ID: ACS Date: 08/21/96
Note:
Division of soil and water staff conducted spotcheck on contract
19-94-28-02 and 19-93-34-02, livestock exclusion storage pond, push off
ramp, and roof water management. All BMP's checked are being maintained.
District board and office staff to be notified by written letter from
division. Present on review was Sarah Birdsong, David Cashen, Mike
Sturdivant, and myself. No follow up visit or documentation needed on
this spotcheck.

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE
Chatham County, Pittsboro Field Office [phone]
Technical Assistance Notes for Date Range
05/05/93 - 08/28/95
Client Name: Lindley, Jonathan
Business Name: Jonathan Lindley
Business ID: lindjo
Client Address
------------------------------
1800 Johnny Lindley Rd
SNOW CAMP, NC
27349-
Client Phone Ext Description
-------------- ------ --------------
Page 1 of 5
Mar 05, 1998
Business Address
------------------------------
1800 Johnny Lindley Rd
Snow Camp, NC
27349-
Business Phone Ext Description
-------------- --------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTES
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assistance Type: Technical Assistance Assisted By: CHO
Fund ID: ACS Date: 08/28/95
Note:
Mr. Lindley visited office, brought waste sample by, reported that 233
loads of waste had been pumped from the waste storage pond in the spring
and resently. Mr. Lindley stated that each load was approxiamately 3500
gallons. A waste analysis and request for payment were filled out.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assi_stance Type: Technical Assistance Assisted By: MS
Fund ID: COI Date: 07/19/95
Note:
Animal waste storage facility reviewed by Mike and Henry. Looks good.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assistance Type: Technical Assistance Assisted By: CHO
Fund ID: ACS Date: 02/27/95
Note:
Received waste analysis from waste analysis section. Stapled to request
for payment, provided to Brenda Williams to be mailed to the Division of
Soil and Water in Raleigh.

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Page 2 of 5
NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE Mar 05, 1998
Chatham County, Pittsboro Field Office [phone]
Technical Assistance Notes for Date Range
05/05/93 - 08/28/95
Client Name: Lindley, Jonathan
Business Name: Jonathan Lindley
Business ID: lindjo
Assistance Type: Technical Assistance
Fund ID: ACS
Assisted By: CHO
Date: 02/14/95
Note:
Visited farm, informed Mr. Lindley that waste analysis needed to be
completed before request for payment could be requested. Sample taken
from storage pond. Mr. Lindley wrote check for $4.00 to NCDA. Provided
sample to Ag Dept in order for sample to be delivered to Raleigh.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assistance Type: Technical Assistance Assisted By: CHO
Fund ID: ACS Date: 02/14/95
Note:
Visited farm, informed Mr. Lindley that waste analysis needed to be
completed before request for payment could be honored by the Division of
Soil and Water. Samples where taken from storage pond. Mr. Lindley wrote
check for $4 to the NCDA. Provided sample to Extension Service in order
for it to be delivered to the Waste Analysis Section in Raleigh.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assistance Type: Technical Assistance Assisted By: CHO
Fund ID: ACS Date: 01/26/95
Note:
Mr. Lindley visited office and reported that 200 loads at an average of
3500 gal per load was hauled, filled request for payment out and Mr.
Lindley signed it. Amount $2800.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assistance Type: Technical Assistance Assisted By: CHO
Fund ID: ACS Date: 01/25/95
Note:
Mr. Lindley visited office and reported that 200 loads at an average of
3500 gallons per laod was hauled, filled request for payment out and Mr.
Lindley signed the request.

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Page 3 of 5
NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE Mar 05, 1998
Chatham County, Pittsboro Field Office [phone]
Technical Assistance Notes for Date Range
05/05/93 - 08/28/95
Client Name: Lindley, Jonathan
Business Name: Jonathan Lindley
Business ID: lindjo
Assistance Type: Technical Assistance Assisted By: CHO
Fund ID: C01 Date: 11/15/94
Note:
Frank Evans ENG and Larry Stevenson and myself reviewed waste management
system, everything looks goods. Working as designed.
--------------------------------_------------------------------------------------
Assistance Type: Technical Assistance Assisted By: CHO
Fund ID: ACS Date: 08/03/94
Note:
Met with Mr. Lindley, he signed request for payment 19-93-34-02 for
$4951.00. Also rode over farm and looked at conservation tillage planted
corn. Yield appears to be greater in conservation tillage planted corn.
Mr. Lindley at present time appears to be pleased with conservation
tillage planting.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assistance Type: Technical Assistance Assisted By: CHO
Fund ID: ACS Date: 08/03/94
Note:
Met with Mr. Lindley, he signed request for payment 19-93-34-02 for waste
storage pond.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assistance Type: Technical Assistance Assisted By: CHO
Fund ID: C01 Date: 06/02/94
Note:
Visited and discussed with ASCS payment on waste storage pond. Total
payment from ASCS is 3500.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assistance Type: Technical Assistance Assisted By: CHO
Fund ID: C01 Date: 05/31/94
Note.
Visited farm, drain line from milk room has been covered and compacted.
Discussed and reviewed conservation plan with Mr. Lindley. Field
4,5,6,7,8,2,4 have been planted to conservation tillage, 30t residue on
soil surface. Reported progress on these fields, waste storage pond and

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE
Chatham County, Pittsboro Field Office (919)§42-8240
Technical Assistance Notes for Date Range
05/05/93 - 08/28/95
Client Name: Lindley, Jonathan
Business Name: Jonathan Lindley
Business ID: lindjo
Page 4 of 5
Mar 05, 1998
all parts or items very well constructed and are being maintained at this
time.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assistance Type: Technical Assistance Assisted By: CHO
Fund ID: C01 Date: 01/19/94
Note.
Visited farm, Mr. Lindley and myself reviewed receipts of work completed,
he does not have receipts for labor and metal obtained for safety bar,
has cancelled check. Got figures for this items from Mr. Lindley,
recorded on receipt (Terry's Welding and Repair Shop).
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assistance Type: Technical Assistance Assisted By: CHO
Fund ID: C01 Date: 01/14/94
Note:
Shots taken on milk room drain line, measured gutters installed,
downspouts, drain lines for gutters.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assistance Type: Technical Assistance Assisted By: CHO
Fund ID: C01 Date: 12/20/93
Note:
Visited farm for scheduled appoint. Mr. Lindley wanted to start
installation of milk room drain. Discussed, measured areas needing
gutters, also measured fence (wovwn wire) and area seeded.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assistance Type: Technical Assistance Assisted By: CHO
Fund ID: ACS Date: 10/18/93
Note.
Visited farm, staked holding pond, talked to contractor.

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE
Chatham County, Pittsboro Field Office [phone]
Technical Assistance Notes for Date Range
05/05/93 - 08/28/95
Client Name:'Lindley', Jonathan
Business Name: Jonathan Lindley
Business ID: lindjo
Assistance Type: Technical Assistance
Fund ID: ACS
Page 5 of 5
Mar 05, 1998
Assisted By: CHO
Date: 08/25/93
Note:
Mr. Lindley visited office and would like copy.of design for contractor,
made copies of the design and provided to Mr. Lindley.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assistance Type: Technical Assistance Assisted By: CHO
Fund ID: ACS Date: 05/13/93
Note:
Met Mr. Lindley at tract. Reviewed ag cost share contract and fsa plan,
both were signed by Mr. Lindley.
-_--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assistance Type: Technical Assistance Assisted By: CHO
Fund ID: ACS Date: 05/10/93
Note:
Entered FSA plan into computer, visited farm to start on survey for
design purposes. Mr. Lindley would like for us to return tomorrow to give
him a chance to put up electric fence to exclude cattle from this area.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assistance Type: Technical Assistance Assisted By: CHO
Fund ID: ACS Date: 05/05/93
Note:
Met with Mr. Lindley, DC discussed components of a waste management
system, also reviewed conservation cropping sequences needed to treat the
fields.