20050122 Ver 1_Complete File_20050124

? G?O? W A T?9QG
0 K
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
June 1, 2005
Town of Cary-Engineering Department
318 N. Academy Street
Cary, NC 27513
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
DWQ Project # 05-0122
Wake County
Subject Property: Kildaire Farm Road Widening (SR 1300)
Dutchman's Branch [03-04-02, 27-43-4.5, WS-III, NSW (nutrient sensitive)]
Swift Creek [03-04-02, 27-43-(1), WS-III, NSW (nutrient sensitive)]
Approval of 401 Water Quality Certification and Authorization Certificate per the Neuse River
Buffer Protection Rules (15A NCAC 2B.0233) with Additional Conditions
Dear Sir or Madam:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to place fill
within or otherwise impact 0.04 acres of wetlands, 98 feet of streams and 26,168 square feet (ft) of
protected riparian buffers for the purpose of a road crossing at the subject property, as described within
your application dated January 10, 2005 and received by the N.C. Division of Water Quality (DWQ) on
January 24, 2005 and all additional information submitted and received by the DWQ on April 6, 2005.
After reviewing your application, we have decided that the impacts are covered by General Water Quality
Certification Number(s) 3404 (GC3404). The Certification(s) allows you to use Nationwide Permit(s) 14
when issued by the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). This letter shall also act as your approved
Authorization Certificate for impacts to the protected riparian buffers per 15A NCAC 2B .0233. In
addition, you should obtain or otherwise comply with any other required federal, state or local permits
before you go ahead with your project including (but not limited to) Erosion and Sediment Control, and
Non-discharge regulations. Also, this approval to proceed with your proposed impacts or to conduct
impacts to waters as depicted in your application shall expire upon expiration of the 404 or CAAIA
Permit.
This approval is for the purpose and design that you described in your application. If you change your
project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application. If the property is sold,
the new owner must be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter and is thereby responsible for
complying with all conditions. If total fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre of
wetland or 150 linear feet of stream, compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A
NCAC 2H .0506 (h). This approval requires you to follow the conditions listed in the attached
certification and any additional conditions listed below.
The Additional Conditions of the Certification are:
1. Impacts Approved
The following impacts are hereby approved as long as all of the other specific and general
conditions of this Certification (or Isolated Wetland Permit) are met. No other impacts are
approved including incidental impacts:
401 Oversight/Express Review Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699.1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Internet: htto://h2o,enr.state.no.us/ncwetlands
NhCarolina
one
Natimally
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled/l0% Post Consumer Paper
Town of Cary
Page 2 of 4
6/ 1 /05
Amount Approved
Units Plan Location or Reference
Stream 98 (feet) Sheets 6, 7, 8 and 9 of 10
404/LAMA Wetlands 0.04 acres Sheets 6, 7, 8 and 9 of 10
Buffers 26,168 (square ft.) Sheets 6, 7, 8 and 9 of 10
2. Buffer Mitigation (EEP)
You are required to mitigate for impacts to the protected riparian buffers. The required area of
mitigation to compensate for impacts to the protected riparian buffers is 54,828 square feet as
required under this Authorization Certificate and 15A NCAC 2B .0242. We understand that you
wish to make a payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund administered by the NC
Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) to meet this mitigation requirement. This has been
determined by the DWQ to be a suitable method to meet the mitigation requirement. In accordance
with 15A NCAC 2B .0242(7), this contribution will satisfy our compensatory mitigation
requirements under 15A NCAC 2B.0233(10). Until the EEP receives and clears your check (made
payable to: DENR - Ecosystem Enhancement Program Office), no impacts specified in this
Authorization Certificate shall occur. The EEP should be contacted at [phone] if you have
any questions concerning payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund. You have one month
from the date of this approval to make this payment. For accounting purposes, this
Authorization Certificate authorizes payment into?the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund to
compensate for 54,828 ft2 of required riparian buffer mitigation for impacts to 31,152 ftz of
protected riparian buffers; 03-04-02 river and subbasin."
3. Diffuse Flow
All constructed stormwater conveyance outlets shall be directed and maintained as diffuse flow at
non-erosive velocities through the protected stream buffers such that it will not re-concentrate
before discharging into a stream as identified within 15A NCAC 213 .0233 (5). If this is not
possible, it may be necessary to provide stormwater facilities that are considered to remove
nitrogen. This may require additional approval from this Office.
4. Protective Fencing
The outside buffer, wetland or water boundary and along the construction corridor within these
boundaries approved under this authorization shall be clearly marked with orange warning
fencing (or similar high visibility material) for the areas that have been approved to infringe
within the buffer, wetland or water prior to any land disturbing activities to ensure compliance
with 15A NCAC 213.0233 and GC 3404.
5. Culvert Installation
Culverts required for this project shall be installed in such a manner that the original stream profiles
are not altered. Existing stream dimensions (including the cross section dimensions, pattern, and
longitudinal profile) must be maintained above and below locations of each culvert. Culverts shall
be designed and installed to allow for aquatic life movement as well as to prevent head cutting of
the streams. If any of the existing pipes are or become perched, the appropriate stream grade shall
be re-established or, if the pipes installed in a perched manner, the pipes shall be removed and re-
installed correctly.
Town of Cary
Page 3 of 4
6/ 1 /05
6. Erosion & Sediment Control Practices
Erosion and sediment control practices must be in full compliance with all specifications
governing the proper design, installation and operation and maintenance of such Best
Management Practices in order to protect surface waters standards:
a. The erosion and sediment control measures for the project must be designed, installed,
operated, and maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the North Carolina
Sediment and Erosion Control Planning and Design Manual.
b. The design, installation, operation, and maintenance of the sediment and erosion control
measures must be such that they equal, or exceed, the requirements specified in the most
recent version of the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Manual. The devices
shall be maintained on all construction sites, borrow sites, and waste pile (spoil) projects,
including contractor-owned or leased borrow pits associated with the project.
7. No Waste, Spoil, Solids, or Fill of Any Kind
No waste, spoil, solids, or fill of any kind shall occur in wetlands, waters, or riparian areas beyond
the footprint of the impacts depicted in the Pre-Construction Notification. All construction
activities, including the design, installation, operation, and maintenance of sediment and erosion
control Best Management Practices, shall be performed so that no violations of state water quality
standards, statutes, or rules occur.
8. No Sediment & Erosion Control Measures w/n Wetlands or Waters
Sediment and erosion control measures shall not be placed in wetlands or waters to the maximum
extent practicable. If placement of sediment and erosion control devices in wetlands and waters
is unavoidable, they shall be removed and the natural grade restored within six months of the date
that the Division of Land Resources has released the project.
9. Certificate of Completion
Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification or applicable
Buffer Rules, and any subsequent modifications, the applicant is required to return the attached
certificate of completion to the 401/Wetlands Unit, North Carolina Division of Water Quality,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC, 27699-1650.
Violations of any condition herein set forth may result in revocation of this Certification and may result in
criminal and/or civil penalties. The authorization to proceed with your proposed impacts or to conduct
impacts to waters as depicted in your application and as authorized by this Certification, shall expire upon
expiration of the 404 or CAMA Permit.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this Certification (associated with the approved wetland or
stream impacts), you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act within 60 days of the date that
you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition, which conforms to Chapter 150B of
the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center,
Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714. This certification and its conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a
hearing.
Town of Cary
Page 4 of 4
6/ 1 /05
Any disputes over determinations regarding this Authorization Certificate (associated with the approved
buffer impacts) shall be referred in writing to the Director for a decision. The Director's decision is
subject to review as provided in Articles 3,and 4 of G.S. 150B.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water
Act and the Neuse riparian buffer protection rule as described within 15A NCAC 2B .0233. If you have
any questions, please telephone John Dorney or Cyndi Karoly at 919-733-1786.
Sincerely,
r Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
AWK/dae
Enclosures: GC 3404
Certificate of Completion
EEP form
cc: Ron Johnson-Earth Tech, 701 Corporate Center Drive, Suite 475, Raleigh, NC 27607
USACE Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
DLR Raleigh Regional Office
File Copy
Central Files
Filename: 050122KildaireRD(W ake)401 +buffer
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
401 Water Quality Certification
Summary of Permitted Impacts and Mitigation Requirements
In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H.0500, Town of Cary has permission as outlined below to
impact 0.04 acres of wetlands and 98 linear feet of streams for the purpose(s) of constructing the
proposed road widening in Wake County. All activities associated with these authorized impacts
must be conducted with the conditions listed in the attached Permit transmittal letter. THIS
PERMIT IS NOT VALID WITHOUT THE ATTACHMENTS.
COMPENSATORY MITIGATION REQUIREMENTS, ECOSYSTEM ENHANCEMENT
PROGRAM
LOCATION:
DWQ NO.
COUNTY
BASIN/ SUB BASIN/INDEX NO
Kildaire Farm Road
05-0122
Wake
03-04-02/27-43-4.5 & 27-43-(1)
As required by 15A NCAC 2H.0500, and the conditions of this Permit, you are required to
compensate for the above impacts through the restoration, creation, enhancement or preservation
of wetlands and surface waters as outlined below prior to conducting any activities that impact or
degrade the waters of the state.
Note: Acreage requirements proposed to be mitigated through the Ecosystem Enhancement
Program must be rounded to one-quarter acre increments and linear foot requirements must be
rounded up to the nearest foot according to 15 2R.0503(b).
Impacts:
0.04 Acres of non- riparian wetlands
98 Linear feet of stream
26,168 Square feet of riparian buffer
Mitigation:
54,828 Square feet of riparian buffer
One of the options you have available to satisfy the compensatory mitigation requirement is
through the payment of a fee to the Wetlands Restoration Fund per NCAC 2R.0503. If you
choose this option, please sign this form and mail it to the Ecosystem Enhancement Program at
401 Wetlands Certification Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699.1650 ?7One 7
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 1 ? Qrth CarOllna
Phone: [phone]/ FAX [phone]/ Internet http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands An Equal Opportunity/AttirmatUie Action Employer - 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper Natimally
Applicant:
Page 2 of 3
Date:
the address below. An invoice for the appropriate amount of payment will be sent to you upon
receipt of this form. PLEASE NOTE, THE ABOVE IMPACTS ARE NOT AUTHORIZED
UNTIL YOU RECEIVE NOTIFICATION THAT YOUR PAYMENT HAS BEEN
PROCESSED BY THE ECOSYTEM ENHANCMENT PROGRAM.
Signature Date
ECOSYSTEM ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM
1619 Mail Service Center
RALEIGH, N.C. 27669-1619
[phone]
Filename: 050122KildaireRd(Wake)EEP
MEMORANDUM
TO: John Dorney Regional Contact:
Non-Discharge Branch WQ Supervisor:
Date:
SUBJECT: WETLAND STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Facility Name Town Of Cary : Kildaire Farm Road Widening County Wake
Project Number 05 0122 County2
Recvd From APP Region Raleigh
Received Date 1/24/05 Recvd By Region
Project Type road widening
Certificates Stream Stream Impacts (ft.)
Permit Wetland Wetland Wetland Stream Class Acres Feet 11e-1 L 3rEIV,
Type Type Impact Score Index Prim. Supp. Basin Req. Req. 30t:li
14 Stream O Y O N F__27-43-4.5 WSIII NSW 30,402. 0.04 98.00
BR Buffers O Y O N 27-43-(1) WSIII NSW 30,402. 0.10
N
F _F_
F___F__o Y o -NF-- I-- F__F_ f ?F_ f
Mitigation Wetland
MitigationType Type Acres Feet
Is Wetland Rating Sheet Attached? O Y O N Did you request more info? O Y O N
Have Project Changes/Conditions Been Discussed With Applicant? O Y O N
Is Mitigation required? O Y O N Recommendation: O Issue O Issue/fond O Deny
Provided by Region: Latitude (ddmmss)
Longitude (ddmmss)
Comments:
2/21/05 Recommend ug tting ON HOLD. Buffer numbers wrong; consultant interpreted two impacts
as crossing, but they are not crossings and are thus subject to mitigation. One crossing not listed
for mitigation has 205 L F of buffer imgaet:wires mitigation (some of impacts to be restored
on-site) Also, level spreader in buffer at Impact 2. FWK
cc: Regional Office
Central Office Page Number 1
7 0 1 Cnr1)rAtc Center 1)rivc, Suite }7j, It aIcigh, North Carolina 2 7607
Jt? T t7
u t. ! J
April 4, 2005 ,_
A,PR 0' 20 05)
Ms. Cyndi Karoly
Division of Water Quality
401 Wetlands Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Subject: Response to Request for Information
Kildaire Farm Road Widening: Pre-Construction Notification Application
for stream, wetland, and buffer impacts.
DWQ Project # 05-0122
Telephone
Dear Ms. Karoly,
919.85 4.62oo
This letter and attached sheets provides modifications and additional information regarding the
stream and buffer impacts associated with the Kildaire Farm Road widening project. F «" i "' i I
9 4 . 6
1 9' 8' `' `'
1. Include all impacts to streams - according to information provided by you, stream
impact lengths described in the PCN did not include proposed rip-rap dissipaters.
Please submit revised impact measurements to include all impacts to stream on this
project.
Clarification regarding rip-rap dissipaters was obtained from the Earth Tech Hydraulic
Engineer working on this project. According to the engineer no rip-rap dissipaters are
being proposed for placement in or on the banks of Dutchman's Branch at Site 1. A
floodplain culvert is proposed and the culvert will have a rip-rap dissipater. The
dissipater is in the Zone 2 buffer and not in the stream. Buffer impacts have already been
calculated and included in the PCN.
2. Include all impacts to buffers proposed for mitigation by payment to the Ecosystem
Enhancement Program.
The buffer impacts have been recalculated. A revised page 11 of 13 of the PCN form and
Buffer Impact Table is attached. A request has been made to the EEP for payment into
their program for the increased amount of buffer impacts.
Earth Tech has redesigned the temporary diversion channel at Site 1 (Dutchman's
Branch) to reduce the buffer impacts to a total of 135 liner feet. Since the linear impacts
are now less than 150 feet, it is our understanding that under current buffer regulations
this is allowable and mitigation is not required. Sheet 6 of 10 and sheet 7 of 10 have been
revised to show the changes to the diversion channel and the buffer impacts.
E A R T H = 13 T E C H
A VICO INTERNATIONAL LTD. COMPANY
3. Revise stornnvater control structures at hnpact 2 -15A NCAC 2B .0223 (5) describes the
requirements for diffuse f low within the riparian buffer. The plans for this impact show
stornnvater from road drainage being conveyed to a level spreader within Zone 1 of the
riparian buffer. Please redesign this structure to discharge diffusely outside the 50 foot
riparian buffer.
Clarification regarding the structure proposed for Site 2 was obtained from the Earth
Tech Hydraulic Engineer. A level spreader is not being proposed at this location.
Stormwater discharge is being directed to a bioretention basin on the north side of the
road. Treated stormwater that infiltrates through the bioretention basin will discharge
through a pipe that passes beneath the road. The pipe then discharges directly into the
small unnamed tributary at this location. A preformed scour hole will be constructed in
the stream bed to help dissipate the energy of the water as it discharges from the pipe.
Impacts to the stream from placement of the scour hole and pipe have already been
calculated in the PCN. Eric Kulz with the DWQ Regional Office indicated that this was
an acceptable practice. The bioretention basin and the preformed scour hole have been
labeled on Sheet 8 of 10 for clarification.
I hope that this additional information clarifies the proposed stream and buffer impacts. If there
are any questions regarding this information please contact me at 854-6210.
Thank you for your time and attention.
Sincerely,
Earth Tech, Inc.
-9J Iz-
Ronald G. Johnson
Senior Biologist
Enclosures
cc: Russ Overton - City of Cary
Eric Kulz, DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
Project file - 45990
Master - 45990
E A R T H T E C H
A VICO INTLRNA710NAL LTD CC VANY
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): None required
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state) funds or the use of public
(federal/state) land?
Yes ® No ?
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ® No ?
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ® No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Neuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 213 .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
Yes ® No ? If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
See Attached figures and sheets for greater detail and breakdown of impacts by site.
Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 10,384 3 31,152
2 15,784 1.5 23,676
Total 26,168 54,828
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
Page 11 of 13
BUFFER IMPACTS SUMMARY
IMPACT BUFFER
TYPE Fill and Clearin Allowable REPLACEMENT

SITE NO.
STRUCTURE SIZE /TYPE
STATION (FROMITO) ROAD
CROSSING PARALLEL
IMPACT ZONE 1
(acres) ZONE 2
(acres) TOTAL
(acres) ZONE 1
(acres) ZONE 2
(acres) TOTAL
(acres) ZONE 1
(acres) ZONE 2
(acres)
1 Culvert -L- Sta 31+50 to 32+50 X 0.15 0.06 0.21 0.15 0.06 0.21
2 Culvert -L- Sta 68+00 to 70+20 X X 0.17 0.18 0.35 0.00 0.00 0.00
3 Single Family Drive -L- Sta 76+20 to 78+70 X 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.00 0.00 0.00
4 Road widening -L- Sta 82+00 to 85+50 X 0.02 0.08 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00
5 Bride -L- Sta 96+10 to 97+60 X 0.12 0.01 0.13 0.12 0.01 0.13
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00

TOTAL: 0.51 0.44 0.94 0.27 0.07 0.34 0.00 0.00
l??l
D
a
C
2
M
y
A
N
A
O
O

?G
T
T
INCODIPL E PLANS
00 MOT 0n 10 f Acouwrl M

PRELIbtIN
00 MVf us
l
RY PLANS
x
omwn
0 0
0 ,o I
0
O
+
ro
d
ti
W
2
Z
U
Q
ortu«<
..lx

V
F ERS
$? EX. R/W
PR G
a.iI:?ZL ? ,?h1
REV //O!
LINED DIVERSION CHANNEL
( Not to Scale)
Naturq1
2' FILTER 3' Grountl
AT BEGINNING AND END OF DIVERSION CHANNEL KEY FABRIC INTO
FABRIC EXISTING GROUND A MIN. OF 4'. SECURE WITH CLASS B RIP RAP. A MIN.
1' 4' OF OVERLAP WILL BE PROVIDED AT FABRIC JOINTS. AT JOINTS, THE
UPSTREAM SECTION OF FABRIC SHALL BE INSTALLED OVER THE
TACK DOWN FABRIC WITH MIN. 10' STAPLES DOWNSTREAM FABRIC. PROVIDE CLASS B CHECKS AT FABRIC JOINTS.
PLACED EVERY 4' LONGITUDINALLY. PERP.
SPACING OF STAPLES IS 2' ON CENTER.
KEY IN FABRIC AS SHOWN.
AFTER RCBC CONSTRUCTION GR UT 6 '
4 AT INLET AND OUTLET ENDS TS FLOOD
If E 101
3
C -
TEMPORARY
ey HANNEIOLN
EE DETAIL
PLP E ppTESMSP RARY
EXI TNGUCHANNGG ELIN
ELEVATION. g SITE 1
PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
snow
ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAUUCS
ENGINEER ENGINEER
INCOMPLI FE PLANS
DO NOT USE FOR t/R' ACQUISITION
11RELI2MIN4 RY PLANS
DO NOT USE FU CONSTRUCTION
LEGEND
BUFFER IMPACTS
® ZONE IBUFFER IMPACTS
® ZONE 2 BUFFER IMPACTS
U. U-350 ••PPp' v
C
F

. 12l SO' -Ek-FEW ?,.3' .fi`?
S? , of s•q s? 9t, 'D• ?y - - _.y,._,1
?v?r'?tiJx.r ?-4?'???.i^v 4f' 4l•_,vrt<rr?_'vi_-r'v?
??? -'?.?
T
w _ _ _- _ _ - _

.,, S71-24 20'DA !22'-24EX R/1L--. ? S2m35 -- _- ==_ ---_-__ ___--
77
_
_ ? IG
<P IT
Luve:
P
Gw_ L n'
T ?t _r: - % EX. R/W
. W SCAT-]
Si I'll CITE M1
.1916/n ?)
P ACE "TEMPORARY ewe"?`Iz
4 1 I XISTI UCHANNELI
z? I , I
lob I I I •- •u?? ?`=
CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE
TEMPORARY
11)p) PCCLAC 66C' RCP DIVERSION/FLO OPLAIN PIPE IVERSEEIOLN
3I POA ER MPERCVCIOIIUOpSSIP77?F??N??UV N XLISTRING CHANNEL NENDETAIL
) L TfDIVERTPSIA- EpRN CH NNELDWITHUNAISIVE MAHANNEL C®NSTRUCTIDN SEQUENCE DETAIL TERIAL
AND V GETAS5T?j 0 LL T EE -L- 32 + 87
7I GROUETT6AN 1 OUTLET ENDS TOAINLOODPLAIN
ELEVATION. 12'%6° RCBC

2 ? I l?i ?lww :%e
.J I I It? / E.199(/Y(;t1
1 ? ? "I 1
IS I I? )
I ?
I I C
l1 I li__-? ?_
1__y I
TOWN O CARP
WAKE COUNTY
PROJECT: ST-108/
STREADI/ WETLAND IMPACTS
[1LDAIRE FARM ROAD WIDENING
&WSOU7'H OF AUTUHNOATE DRIVE
TO LOCHMERE DRIVE
REV 1/OS
.Awet1and\Sh07_ConstSegDt1.wet 4/4/20059:17:19 AM
Q In J7 Cr cl Ir In ll .11A

PROJECT NQ NO. SNEE' NO.
IIWUWAI U[Y4f1 IIfUMAlUU
ENGINEER INGMEER

INCOMPLE E PLANS
DO MT VB FOR /• AWVWIION
PRELIMIN
DO AIII un RY PLANS
CONdARTpN
LEGf_ \
s
PUFFER IMPACT
ZONE 1 BUFFER WACTS \
® ZONE 2 BUFFER KIPACTS D 0 0 Igo
SITE Z SITE 3 I \
ZONE )BUFFER IMPACTS 1123 SG. it, 2t32 S0. Fl. I \
,OJT Acres) 10.05 Acres) ad

I'

(NO WETLAND IMPACTS) I TOWN OF CARY
WAKE COONTT
PROTEUT,Bi•I11I1
UFFER IMPACTS
[ILDAIRB )ARM ROAD WIDENING
,W30U1L OP AUTUINOATE DRIVE
TO IACIEMERK DRIVE
?0? W ATF/?0 Michael F. Easley, Governor
,0 0 William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
UJ North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
0 -? Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
March 9, 2005
Town of Cary
Engineering Department
318 N. Academy Street
Cary, NC 27513
DWQ Project # 05-0122
Wake County
Subject Property: Town of Cary: I0daire Farm Road Widening
Dutchman's Branch [03-04-02, 27-43-4.5, WS-III, NSW (nutrient sensitive)]
Swift Creek [03-04-02, 27-43-(1), WS-III, NSW (nutrient sensitive)] *303(d)
REQUEST FOR MORE INFORAIATION
Dear Sir or Madam:
On January 24, 2005, the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) received your application dated January 10, 2005 to
impact 0.04 acres of wetlands, 98 feet of stream and 4,356 square feet (ff) of protected riparian buffers to construct
the proposed road widening. Based on a site visit on February 14, 2005. and information provided by you, the DWQ
has determined that your application was incomplete and/or provided inaccurate information as discussed below.
The DWQ will require additional information in order to process your application to impact protected wetland,
streams and/or buffers on the subject property. Therefore, unless we receive the additional information requested
below, we will have to move toward denial of your application as required by 15A NCAC 2H.0506 and 2B .0233(8)
and will place this project on hold as incomplete until we receive this additional information. Please provide the
following information so that we may continue to review your project.
Additional Information Requested:
1. Include all impacts to streams
According to information provided by you, stream impact lengths described in the PCN did not include proposed
rip-rap dissipaters. Please submit revised impact measurements to include all impacts to streams on this project.
2. Include all impacts to buffers proposed for mitigation by payment to the Ecosystem Enhancement Program.
According to information provided in the PCN, the following revisions are requested:
Impact 1: According to measurements made by you in your office, impacts (temporary and permanent) associated
with this crossing exceed 150 linear feet of buffer (205 LF). As a result, impacts must be mitigated in accordance
with the Table of Uses in 15A NCAC 02B .0233 (6). Please include the permanent buffer impacts in your total to
be used to calculate mitigation payment; please indicate that the temporary impacts will be mitigated on-site, and
provide details on the restoration of the riparian buffer.
Impact 2: These impacts have been determined to not be considered a road crossing, and are considered to be
"Road impacts other than crossings of streams and other surface waters subject to this rule", as indicated in the
Table of Uses in 15A NCAC 02B .0233 (6). Please include the permanent buffer impacts in your total to be used
to calculate mitigation payment
401 Oversight/Express Review Permits Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone]/ FAX [phone]/ Internet: httn://12o.enr.state.ne.us/ncwctlands
N i Carolina
Naturally
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer- 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
Town of Cary
Page 2 of 2
3/9/05
Impact 3: These impacts have been determined to not be considered a road crossing, and are considered to be
"Road impacts other than crossings of streams and other surface waters subject to this rule", as indicated in the
Table of Uses in 15A NCAC 02B .0233 (6). Please include the permanent buffer impacts in your total to be used
to calculate mitigation payment
Impact 4: These impacts have been determined to not be considered a road crossing, and are considered to be
"Road impacts other than crossings of streams and other surface waters subject to this rule", as indicated in the
Table of Uses in 15A NCAC 02B .0233 (6). Please include the permanent buffer impacts in your total to be used
to calculate mitigation payment
Impact 5: These impacts appear to total greater than 40 but less than 150 LF of buffer, and are considered
allowable. Mitigation will not be required for these impacts.
3. Revise stormwater control structures at Impact 2
15A NCAC 2B .0223 (5) describes the requirements for diffuse flow within the riparian buffer. The plans for this
impact show stormwater from road drainage being conveyed to a level spreader within Zone 1 of the riparian
buffer. Please redesign this structure to discharge diffusely outside the 50-foot riparian buffer.
Please respond within three weeks of the date of this letter by sending this information to me in writing and to Eric
Kulz at the DWQ Raleigh Regional Office. If we do not hear from you within three weeks, we will assume that you
no longer want to pursue this project and we will consider the project as withdrawn.
This letter only addresses the application review and does not authorize any impacts to wetlands, waters or protected
buffers. Please be aware that any impacts requested within your application are not authorized (at this time) by the
DWQ. Please call me at 919-733-1786or Eric Kulz at 919-571-4700 if you have any questions regarding or would
like to set up a meeting to discuss this matter.
This letter only addresses the review of Pre-Construction Notification related to proposed impacts associated with
this road-widening project. The impacts described within your PCN are not authorized (at this time) by the DWQ.
Please call me at 919-733-1786 or Eric Kulz at 919-571-4700 if you have any questions regarding or would like to
set up a meeting to discuss this matter.
Sincerely,
Cyndi Karoly
401 Oversight/Express Permitting Unit
CBKIEWK
cc: Eric Kulz, DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
File Copy
Central Files
Ron Johnson-Earth Tech, 701 Corporate Center Drive, Suite 475, Raleigh, NC 27607
05 0122KildaireFarmsRdW idening(W ake)401 +hold
MEMORANDUM
TO: John Dorney Regional Contact:
Non-Discharge Branch WQ Supervisor:
Date:
SUBJECT: WETLAND STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Facility Name Town Of Car
Project Number 05 0122
Recvd From APP
Received Date 1/24/05
Project Type road widenin

Stream
Permit Wetland Wetland Wetland Stream Class
Type Type Impact Score Index Prim. Supp.
County Wake
County2
Region Raleigh
Acres Feet
Basin Req. Req.
14 Stream O Y O N F--27-43-4.5 FVSill NsTV 30,402. 0.04 98.00
NBR Buffers O Y _0N F_ 27-43-(1) Wstlt NS?V 30,402. 0.10 F
Mitigation Wetland
MitigationType Type Acres Feet
Is Wetland Rating Sheet Attached? O Y O N Did you request more info? O Y O N
Have Project Changes/Conditions Been Discussed With Applicant? O Y O N
Is Mitigation required? O Y ON Recommendation: O Issue O Issue/Cond O Deny
Provided by Region: Latitude (ddmmss) Longitude (ddmmss)
Comments:
2/21/05 Recommend tpt_tting ON HOLD. Buffer numbers wrong: consultant interpreted two im ap cts
as crossings. but they are not crossings and are thus subject to mitigation. One crossing not listed
for mitigation has 20._5 L F of buffer impact; requires mitigation (some of impacts to be restored
cn-site). Also, level spreader in buffer at Impact 2. EWK
: Kildaire Farm Road `Videnin
Recvd By Region
cc: Regional Office
Central Office Page Number 1
Triage Check List
Date: Project Name: 7?,?t""VI of
DWQ#: C; ok 2,z
County:
To: ? ARO Kevin Barnett ? WaRO Tom Steffens and Kyle Barnes
? FRO Ken Averitte ? WiRO Noelle Lutheran
? MRO Alan Johnson ? WSRO Daryl Lamb
RRO MA- n
CV.•lc r-617
From: i Telephone : (919) ?37- -q 50 Z
The file attached is being forwarded to dour for your evaluation.
Please call if you need asst}stance.
1
,Stream length impacted
? Stream determination
? Wetland determination and distance to blue-line surface waters on USFW topo maps
Minimization/avoidance issues --?
12Uuffer Rules (Meuse, Tar-Pamlico, Catawba, Randleman)
? Pond fill
Mitigation Ratios I • ?
? Ditching
? Are the stream and or wetland mitigation sites available and viable?
? Check drawings for accuracy
? Is the application consistent with pre-application meetings?
? Cumulative impact concern
Comments: 4b N ??rcac i V,-e,A 5,(A7. T-1 <? I- -?- + ems
Z, 3 ?--
7() 1 Cnrporatc Center 1) rive, Suite 475, It aIcigh, North Carolina 276() 7
January 17, 2005
Division of Water Quality
401 Wetlands Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Subject: Kildaire Farm Road Widening: Pre-Construction Notification Application
for stream, wetland, and buffer impacts.
To Whom It May Concern:
Please find seven copies of the Pre-Construction Notification Application form for stream,
wetland, and buffer impacts associated with the widening of Kildaire Farm Road. Also enclosed
is a check from the Town of Cary for $200. A copy of this permit has also been submitted to the
US Army Corps of Engineers. A request for payment to the Ecosystem Enhancement Program for
the buffer impacts has been submitted. Their response will be forwarded to the DWQ 401
Wetlands Unit upon receipt.
If there are any questions regarding this permit application please contact me at 854-6210.
Thank you for your time and attention.
Very truly yours,
Earth Tech, Inc.
Ronald G ohnson
Senior Biologist
Enclosures
cc: Russ Overton - City of Cary
Project file - 45990
Master - 45990
P fi /e Il? p /,,r11
JAN 2 -?U
.H
E A R T H = T E C H
A tgCO INTERNATIONAL LTD. COMPANY
Telephone
919.854.62()0
Facsimile
919-854.6259

ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
November 10, 2004
Tom Shearin, P.E. D [gk9 V D
Earth Tech
701 Corporate Center Drive JAN 2 4 2005
Suite 475
Raleigh, N.C. 27607 EIVIR-wATERQUALITY
V.ZTW,' SnIOSTOg'mit,1TER6Rh18rt1
Subject: Kildaire Farm Road Widening - Agent Authorization Letter
Town of Cary Project Number: ST 1084
Dear Mr. Shearin:
The Town of Cary hereby designates Earth Tech the authority to sign and submit the
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) application on behalf of the Town of Cary for the
Town's Kildaire Farm Road widening project.
Should you have any questions or need any additional information feel free to contact
me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Russ Overton, P.E.
Senior Engineer
cc: Ron Johnson, Earth Tech
.1
TOWN Of CARY "
318 North Acadenry Street -Cary, NC 27513-PO Box 8005-Cary, NC 27512-8005
tel [phone] - fax [phone]- www.townofcary.org
Office Use Only: Form Version May 2002
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ® Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP 14, WQC 3402
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCWRP prior to submittal of PCN), complete
section VIII and check here: ® Request submitted awaiting reply.
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Town of Cary
Mailing Address: Town of Cary _ Engineering Department
318 N Academv Street
Cary, North Carolina 27513
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: russ.overton(a,townofcarorg
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Ron Johnson - Earth Tech
Company Affiliation: Senior Biologist
Mailing Address: 701 Corporate Center Drive, Suit 475
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
Telephone Number: _ [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: ron.johnson(a)earthtech.com
Page 5 of 13
111. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Kildaire Farm Road (SR 1300) widening
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): NA
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): NA
4. Location
County: Wake Nearest Town: Cary
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): NA
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): See attached vicinity map
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): See attached sheet
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Property size (acres): 22.5 acres within right-of-way
7. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake):Swift Creek and Dutchman's Branch
8. River Basin: Neuse River Basin - HUC 03020201
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.statc.nc.us/admin/neaps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: Widening and realimnment of existing road. Adjacent land
consists of residential areas, commercial, parkland, and undeveloped land.
Page 6 of 13
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Widening of Kildaire Farm Road from 2 lane to 4 lane and replacement of bridge over
Swift Creek. Typical road and bridge construction equipment will be used such as track hoe,
front end loader, crane, and bulldozer.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: Widening and realignment of Kildaire Farm
Road will improve safety conditions and alleviate congestion
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
No previous permits or certifications requested or issued.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
N/A
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Page 7 of 13
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts:
Small wetland within a cleared right-of-way will be filled by the widening of the road.
2. Individually list wetland impacts below:
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Located within
100-year**
Floodplain
(yes/no) Distance to
Nearest Stream
(linear feet)
Type of Wetland***
No. 1 Fill 0.04
(1760 sq. ft.) Yes adjacent Emergent non-woody

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, ctc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at http:/hvww.fenia.gov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, ctc.) Indicate if wetland is isolated (determination of isolation to be made by USACE only).
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: Unknown
Total area of wetland impact proposed: 0.04 acres
3. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:
Stream Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Length of
Impact
linear feet)
Stream Name** Average Width
of Stream
Before Impact Perennial or
Intermittent?
(please secif
No. 1 Culvert 15 Dutchman's Branch 10 Perennial
No. 2 Fill 83 UT to Swift Creek 2 Intermittent

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, ctc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at I-800-358-9616, or online at
www.usgs.sgov. Several internct sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.topozone.cotn,
www.mapquest.com, ctc.).
Page 8 of 13
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 98 feet
4. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.) below: Not Applicable
Open Water Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
acres Name of Waterbody
(if applicable) Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound,
bay, ocean, etc.

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
5. Pond Creation Not Applicable
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
See attached sheet with additional information
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
Page 9 of 13
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwet]ands/stnns,,ide.litm1.
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
No stream or wetland mitigation proposed. Impacts less than 0.1 acres of wetlands and
150 liner feet of stream.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCWRP at
[phone] to determine availability and to request written approval of mitigation prior
to submittal of a PCN. For additional information regarding the application process for the
NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at httn://112o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.litni. If use of
the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide the
following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): None required
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet):
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): None required
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): None required
Page 10 of 13
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): None required
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state) funds or the use of public
(federal/state) land?
Yes ® No ?
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ® No ?
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ® No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Neuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
Yes ® No El If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
See Attached figures and sheets for greater detail and breakdown of impacts by site.
Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 871 3 2613
2 3485 1.5 5228
Total 4356 7841
T Gone I extends out So feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
Page 11 of 13
G
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 213.0242 or.0260.
Payment to EEP - Request to EEP has been made but an answer has not vet been received.
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
Use of bioretention basins and level spreaders at outfalls - see attached plans
XIL Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).

Zoos
Appli(t/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 12 of 13
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
7 Nearest Body of Water
Dutchmans Branch UTM 17 700984E 3955712N
UT to Swift Creek UTM 17 700242E 3955438N
Swift Creek UTM 17 699902E 3954397N
Note on stream impacts at Dutchman's Creek - will replace existing culverts which are 89 feet in length
with a 104 foot culvert for an additional stream impact of 15 feet.
Swift Creek - No stream impacts will occur at this crossing, as entire creek will be bridged.
Buffer Impacts at Dutchman's Branch - clearing of buffer is necessary for construction of diversion
channel and construction of floodplain culvert. Areas that are cleared will be allowed to revegetate
naturally.
Buffer impacts at Swift Creek are less than 150 liner feet:
• Zone 1 - 81 on south side of creek and 89 on north side of creek
• Zone 2 - 130 feet on south side of creek and 112 feet on north side of creek
Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
A number of Alternatives have been evaluated for the widening of Kildaire Farm Road. These
Alternatives are documented in the Environmental Assessment. On September 1, 2001, Earth Tech met
with DWQ personnel (Steve Zarzecki and Steve Mitchell) to discuss the stream buffer impacts, the
various Alternatives, and methods to minimize the impacts. All Alternatives evaluated would impact
buffers to some extent.
Design constraints include a public park on the west side of the alignment, a greenway and stream
paralleling the alignment to the east, steep topography along the stream, and a sharp curve that requires
flattening to meet current design standards. Realignment to the west of the existing roadway would
decrease the impacts to the stream and greemvay. However, federal funds are involved at the northern
terminus of the project for the bridge replacement and the segment of roadway that would be affected by
the bridge replacement. A shift to the west would encroach on the park and raise 4(f) issues.
The alignment was shifled as far to the west as was practical. Following shift of the alignment retaining
walls were designed in several locations to reduce the footprint of the roadway and reduce clearing and
filling of buffers.
Page 13 of 13
BUFFER IMPACTS SUMMARY
IMPACT BUFFER
TYPE Fill and Clearing Allowable REPLACEMENT

SITE NO.
STRUCTURE SIZE /TYPE
STATION (FROM/TO) ROAD
CROSSING PARALLEL
IMPACT ZONE 1
(acres) ZONE 2
(acres) TOTAL
(acres) ZONE 1
(acres) ZONE 2
(acres) TOTAL
(acres) ZONE 1
(acres) ZONE 2
(acres)
1 Culvert -L- Sta 31+50 to 32+50 X 0.18 0.06 0.24 0.18 0.06 0.24
2 Culvert -L- Sta 68+00 to 70+20 X 0.17 0.18 0.35 0.17 0.18 0.35
3 Single Family Drive -L- Sta 76+20 to 78+70 X 0.05 0.01 0.06 0.05 0.12 0.17
4 Road widening -L- Sta 82+00 to 85+50 X 0.02 0.08 0.10 0.02 0.08 0.10
5 Bride -L- Sta 96+10 to 97+60 X 0.12 0.01 0.13 0.12 0.01 0.13
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00

,TOTAL:, 1 0.54 0.35 0.88 0.54 0.45 0.99 0.00 0.00
SR 1300 (Kildaire Farm Road)
Bridge No. 525 Over Swift Creek
Cary
Wake County
Town of Cary Project Number ST1084
ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/
FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
PREPARED FOR THE
TOWN OF CARY
In Compliance with the
North Carolina Environmental Policy Act
December 2004
Document Prepared For The Town Of Cary By:
EarthTech
A Tyco Intemational Ud. Cwparry
Yvoythe,P.G. Howell, P.E.
Project Planning Engineer, Earth Tech
Wake County
SR 1300 (Kildaire Farm Road)
Bridge No. 525 Over Swift Creek
Federal Aid Project No. BRSTP-1300(7)
State Project 8.2407601
TIP Project No. B-3523
CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION
AND
DRAFT SECTION 4(F) EVALUATION
US DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION
AND
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
APPROVED:
DATE regory J. Thorpe D., Environmental Management Director
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch, NCDOT
VZO/a ` 100,1
AT John F. Sullivan III, P.E. Division Ad mini ?j-? Federal Highway Administration
1
Wake County
SR 1300 (Kildaire Farm Road)
Bridge No. 525 Over Swift Creek
Federal Aid Project No. BRSTP-1300(7)
State Project 8.2407601
TIP Project No. B-3523
Town of Cary Project No. ST1084
CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION
AND
DRAFT SECTION 4(F) EVALUATION
August 2004
Document Prepared for the Town of Cary by:
E A R i M 7 E C M
A I- nhoitncive S . C>.ovo
Yv ne G.G. Howell, P.E., Project Planning Engineer
E *h Tech
Wake County
SR 1300 (Kildaire Farm Road)
Bridge No. 525 Over Swift Creek
Federal Aid Project No. BRSTP-1300(7)
State Project 8.2407601
TIP Project No. B-3523
Town of Cary Project No. ST1084
FINAL SECTION 4(F) EVALUATION
US DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION
AND
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
APPROVED:
12.16 • o4
DATE Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph. ., Environmental Management Director
Project Developmeift and Environmental Analysis Branch, NCDOT
DATE +John F. Sullivan III, P.E. Division Administrator
Federal Highway Administration
> rte--
17.
1 17
??
r
_ ? . ? l- A cricJi Park
6 11
POND PROJECT
U Fr
SITE
11 fm?
ti.. L(SITE..2 L ITE 4 '
SITE `? •rl' '. v a i `?,?r
•455 (_L J ,t t • "'i: 1.
To
P0nnj,
?? ql 1 `.tea fir")
lJ
Lookout,,.,
oM"lOnCl R''".". i / `? ,•/( {` r d ` <G6 ;±?_/? 1J?
cpv v it )? r i
i
BEG N P OJE T
Teh
46
err-
oedi
'Nk
440
? - 1.
TOWN OF CARP
r ' " % \I J \
cl_
WAKE COUNTY
PROJECT:ST-1084
=• ?? i,+ ?? ?r ,\?\?\\ MIS,'I STREAM/WETLAND IMPACTS
KILDAIRE FARM ROAD WIDENING
p Ij? ` n p?q .r u' \ 500,SOUTH OF AUTUMNGATE DRIVE
TO LOCHMERE DRIVE
1 t.
j t.
SHEET 1 OF 10 11104
..\CADD\wetland\ShOI_Vic9uad.dgn 11/16/20043:06:17PM
\\ 0 50 100
IE327
r
44,
32B DENOTES FILL
IN WETLANDS
M ?h 24
c? ?1 \ FILL IN WETLANDS
1760 Sa. Ft.
?? ?I?i??L9 fl 204 Acres) f
y -323 163 j 1 ?t 2
11632%??
30" ? .
Q 0G
r TOWN OF CAR
i f d ?cti2:!'
WAKE COUNTY
PROJECT:ST-1084
t' STREADI/ WETLAND IMPACTS
DETAIL -SITE 1
1,•
KILDAIRE FARM ROAD WIDENII
i 500'SOUTH OF AUTUDINCATE DR
I TO LOCHMERE DRIVE
\wetland\Sh02_Site7_SWlmp.dgn 11/15/2004 2:06:57 PM
0 50 100 ?l
r
l i f
BEGIN
FILL END FILL
? TOWN OF CAR Y
AWAKE COUNTY
PROJECT:ST-1081
STREAbI/WETLAND IMPACTS
DETAIL - SITE 2
/ KILDAIRE FARM ROAD WIDENING
'c 500,SOUTH OF AUTUbiNGATE DRIVE
TO LOCHbIERE DRIVE
/ kL ,rJ /arY ...: ?
SHEET 3 OF 10 11/01
\wetland\Sh03_Site2_Swlmp.dgn 11/16/2004 3:07:49 PM

!J

\wetland\Sh04_Site5_SWImp.dgn 1 1 /15/2004 2:09:52 PM
TOWN OF CARRY
!m SL
.f, aL MH
c 11
o I ? , f, fav ???
r?1? 1 L
-TI
t
I] L ? ,? D fa
BEG N PPROJEECCT
VICINITY MAP FOR PROJECT
KILDAIRE FARM
WETLANDS/ BUFFER
ROAD
IMPACTS
LOCATION. WIDENING OF 1.7 MILES OF KILDAIRE FARM ROAD (SR 1300)
FROM 500' SOUTH OF AUTUMNGATE DRIVE TO
LOCHMERE DRIVE

TYPE OF WORK GRADING, DRAINAGE, PAVING, STRUCTURES

N ?
A f
?
Site 2 r

y \\Ft 6. ROAD
4? 5
(SR 13
-
Site 1
g
O ?
ti

-U STA. L0+00.00 BEGIN PRO?

ti
U
,4
O
THIS PROJECT IS WITHIN THE MUNICIPAL LIMITS OF THE TOWN OF CARP.
W n
• Site 4
U ?
Er
1
G?
410
TP
11
END BRIDGE
STA 97+90.00
BEGIN BRIDGE INCOMPLETE PLANS
w NOf 4'18 I R" ?cou-f '-N
-I- STA 95+88.00 PRELIMINARY PLANS
w NOT um post CONS111VCTNIN
Site 3
1
r
li
C?
?l
I
'I
LI II ?I III

r
2
1•,S

A
+ U
-
I I
?r 1
y n?
E

??E E E E-

9
V

---E X- iv- - -
ti'R"?FFs?- --
i----? I E
T
\ F?
r v
I \`
I
I I ?.
I y ?
i II
m
INCOMPLE E PLANS
00 NOT um fm /f Acov DN
PRELIMIN
00 NOT V16 RY PLANS
ceN..
D D 0 10
LEGEND
BUFFER IMPACTS
I
AREA GEARED NOR
DI f ?I I
DIVERSION CHANNEL. J
SEE SHEET 5A, y
j
E -
t
E
I
t j
f/
E?l+ K
onurc
S t-4.;
I
II ! ?I
I
g? -?r' >
I !?" .,?RS
E
nu
SITE I
-E --?
E
WALLS ARE
SITE I
ZONE IBUFFER IMPACTS
7880 Sq. Ft. (0.18 Acres)
ZONE 2 BUFFER WPACTS
2596 Sa.Ft.(0.O6 Acres)
F? -E-
C
1-- E
C

ab--;r --F><?t r y ?

ADDED ?T THIS LOCATION.-^? ------ A
y fj /
% r!
LEGEND
ZONE IBUFFER IMPACTS
?zx[ z &efER WPACTS
IMurr[nwv [?s
® ZONE 2 BUFFER IMPACTS
ti
W
2
J
rwoo rt.a .,,
+s?r
mrKn
EX. R/W
?r
LINED DIVERSION CHANNEL
( Not to Scale)
Natural
?` FILTER 3' Ground
FABRIC
8'
TACK DOWN FABRIC WITH MIN. 10' STAPLES
PLACED EVERY 4' LONGITUDINALLY. PERP.
SPACING OF STAPLES IS 2' ON CENTER.
KEY IN FABRIC AS SHOWN.
AT BEGINNING AND END OF DIVERSION CHANNEL , KEY FABRIC INTO
EXISTING GROUND A MIN, OF 4'. SECURE WITH CLASS B RIP RAP. A MIN.
4' OF OVERLAP WILL BE PROVIDED AT FABRIC JOINTS. AT JOINTS, THE
UPSTREAM SECTION OF FABRIC SHALL BE INSTALLED OVER THE
DOWNSTREAM FABRIC. PROVIDE CLASS B CHECKS AT FABRIC JOINTS.
AT INLET AND OUTLETC EOD? GRQUFLOOD
E01
I
x
0 DPLAIN PIPE
Al ELEVATION.
LS
PROJECT MPERENDE NO.
SHEET NO.
SnO84
ROADWAY DESIGN "m2A LICS
ENGINEER ENG: EER
TEMPORARY
I DIVERSION
CHANNEL
SEE DETAIL
PLACE TEMPORARY
( " I IMP RVIOUS PLUG IN
® EXITING CHANNEL
SITE 1
? i ?` o ? 'fir rl lS
INC®N PLE E PLANS
DO NOT USE FOR /W ACQUISITION
PRELIMINA RY PLANS
DO NOT USE FO CONSTRUCTION
LEGEND
BUFFER IMPACTS
® ZONE I BUFFER IMPACTS
® ZONE 2 BUFFER IMPACTS

F _..?. Pp( ;r GV DR h_
' r
.
-30'
Zn
- - - _-
TV T
b <? I I
v ?: 1
• ;,- - -
? ---_---- -
!4 20'=DR ?4EX,R/Vl x 6 -- - __--- ._ __-7= _:. _- _-
F
M'i
?. ??' r ?a 7 f•Il 2C' X<

"'?l
CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE
E.CAPE ?-??; h-F• ;?-'i ? I
??.1 1.
1-6/P t2
v L' I SCN ESMT
I/ / h.,VAiE, ?,,
/ + , eu 99o?PI Gr!2
-P,LACE;TEMPORARY
IMPERVIOUS PLUG I I I *.?,-`
?XISTING CHANNEL
ti a z ? I '
I k I F ,
Gf^ {?
1) PLACE 66' RCP DIVERSION/FLOODPLAIN PIPE
2) CONSTRUCT DIVERSION CHANNEL
3) PLACE IMPERVIOUS PLUGS IN EXISTING CHANNEL
4) CONSTRUCT CONCRETE BOX CULVERT
5) REMOVE IMPERVIOUS PLUGS IN EXISTING CHANNEL
6) FILL DIVERSION CHANNEL WITH NATIVE MATERIAL
AND VEGETATE
7) GROUT 66' DIVERSION/FLOODPLAIN PIPE AT
INLET AND OUTLET ENDS TO FLOODPLAIN
ELEVATION.
?- TEMPORARY
DIVERSION
CHANNEL
SEE DETAIL
CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE
-L- 32 + 87
12'm69 RCBC
TOWN OF CARY
DETAIL
WAKE COUNTY
PROJECT: ST-1084
STREADi/WETLAND IbIPACTS
KILDAIRE FARM ROAD WIDENING
S00'SOUTH OF AUTUMNGATE DRIVE
TO LOCHMERE DRIVE
SHEET 7 OF 10 11104
.?.\WCIIUIIU%OIIU/ wiwlJCyuu.wel II/10/[uWJ:10:JV YIVI
{
I \

INCOMPL E PLANS
00 NOT W18 FOR /W AWI,LRWIN
j
PRELIMIN
e0 MDT 0!e c?3"Rucr?N
RY PLANS
EFEFNO \

BUFFER IMPACTS
\
ZONE I BUFFER IMPACTS
® ZONE 2 BUFFER IMPACTS Q 0 1 0

SITE 2 SITE 7 \
LINE IBUFFEfl IMPACTS 7123
2132 S Ft.
(0.11 Acres) sl 10.05 Acres)
Acres)
ZONE 2 BUFFER IMPACTS 7824 S0. Ft. 4799 S0. Ft.
(0.18 Acres) (0.10 Acres)

(NO WETLAND IMPACTS)

I
I
\ EL GENO
BUFFER IMPACTS /
\ 206E (BUFFER IMPACTS
\ ® ZONE 2 BUFFER (PACTS
0
G

` -E
\ 'KO ? ???E
\/ _ \
E,
C--
GIN R FANING WAIL 4- p/
0,00 I

ME w /
KILDAIRE FARM RD.
16700 21DW
30.300 100 4.400 38000
200 7.900
4500
8J00
LOCH HIGHLANDS DR.

,A S,c F -oil
F RED 71ST.
BUFFERS
,?,d3r4
,
f
1 ?
SY 1??
1
.
E 111 1
1t
PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
sn0B6 9
ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAUUCS
ENGINEER ENGINEER
INCOMPLE E PLANS
DO NOT 000 PoR /. A[IXIOR,ON
PRELIMIN
Do NOT Es Po RY PLANS
EONTJROCTvN
°°'" ^ R. Q EarthTech
OFF- of
?
iOCwoar v'.C : 21WT Sull. 115
.a
1491 R5/-6200100 . 1160t
• 49,91 651-615 96 6 01
a o a t0
F 1'
v?
, fl,

s?
?7
j /
1
1 /
11 ??
I
ne
1 _
o(? I
TOWN OF CARY
WAKE COUNTY
PROJECISST-IDH
BUFFER IMPACTS
I [(FAIRS FARM ROAD WIDENING
,w SOUTH OF AUTUMNGATE DRIVE
(NO STREAM/WETLAND IMPACTS) TO LOCH14E LE DRIP[

SITE

SITE 4 /
ZONE IBUFFER Ft 40 WPAe /
829 5q.4Ft 10.02 Acrcres) IfJ/J
ZONE 2 BUFFER IMPACTS
3561S4Ft (0.08 Acres)
I
?j
z
I
y
?QI ?1? / k1
Y. V
eUFFFRS \

INCObIPLE E PLANS
w NOT ea rat n AOOUISMOM
PRELIMIN RY PLANS
oo MOT VS ro cGMrmcnoM
G ND
BUFFER IVPACTs
ZONE I BUFFER IMPACTS
® ZONE 2 BUFFER IMPACTS
SITE S
ZONE IBUFFER IMPACTS
5147 SQ.Ft.(0.12 Acres)
ZONE 2 BUFFER IMPACTS
44TB Sq. Ft. (0.10 Acres)
r
---?FE
SITE 5
:.
;li
i? .
? a
?a l I

1

.i
(NO STREAM/METLANO IMPACTS)

L
D 0 _0 1 0 I

if
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
November 10, 2004
Tom Shearin, P.E.
Earth Tech
701 Corporate Center Drive
Suite 475
Raleigh, N.C. 27607
Subject: Kildaire Farm Road Widening - Agent Authorization Letter
Town of Cary Project Number: ST 1084
Dear Mr. Shearin:
The Town of Cary hereby designates Earth Tech the authority to sign and submit the
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) application on behalf of the Town of Cary for the
Town's Kildaire Farm Road widening project.
Should you have any questions or need any additional information feel free to contact
me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Russ Overton, P.E.
Senior Engineer
cc: Ron Johnson, Earth Tech
TOWN Of CARY

JA jv

yJi` y

318 North Academy Street -Cary, NC 27513-PO Box 8005-Cary, NC 27512-8005
tcl 919-469-4030 - fax [phone]- wmv.townofcary.oT
*?? . Al?
rMM . i n, u?, xw»M
Office Use Only: Fornn Version May 2002
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ® Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Pennit ? Isolated Wetland Pennit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP 14, WQC 3402
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCWRP prior to submittal of PCN), complete
section VIII and check here: ® Request submitted awaiting reply.
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information
Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Town of Cary
Mailing Address: Town of Cary - Engineering Department
318 N Academy Street
Cary, North Carolina 27513
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: ntss.overtonntownofcary.org
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Ron Johnson - Earth Tech
Company Affiliation: Senior Bioloyist
Mailing Address: 701 Corporate Center Drive, Suit 475
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: ron johnson(a carthtech.com
Page 5 of 13
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Kildaire Farm Road (SR 1300) widening
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): NA
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): NA
4. Location
County: Wake Nearest Town: Cary
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): NA
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): See attached vicinity map
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): See attached sheet
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Property size (acres): 22.5 acres within right-of-way
7. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/oceail/lake):Swift Creek and Dutchman's Branch
S. River Basin: Neuse River Basin - HUC 03020201
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at littp://112o.enr.st<ite.ilc.us/a(iiiiiii/illaps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: Widening and realignment of existing road. Adjacent land
consists of residential areas, commercial, parkland and undeveloped land
Page 6 of 13
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Widening of Kildaire Farm Road from 2 lane to 4 lane and replacement of bridge over
Swift Creek. Typical road and bridge constriction equipment will be used such as track hoe,
front end loader, crane, and bulldozer.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: Widening and real is"nment of Kildaire Fann
Road will improve safety conditions and alleviate congestion
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
No previous pennits or certifications requested or issued.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
N/A
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United. States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Page 7 of 13
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts:
Small wetland within a cleared right-of-way will be filled by the widenint; of the road.
2. Individually list wetland impacts below:
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Located within
100-year**
Floodplain
(yes/no) Distance to
Nearest Stream
(linear feet)
Type of Wetland***
No. 1 Fill 0(1760.04
4 ft.)
sq.
Yes
adjacent
Emergent non-woody

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, 611,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local Floodplain maps. Maps arc available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at http://N"vw.fenia'gov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.) Indicate if wetland is isolated (determination of isolation to be made by USACE only).
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: Unknown
Total area of wetland impact proposed: 0.04 acres
3. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:
Stream Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Length of
Impact
linear feet)
Stream Name** Average Width
of Stream
Before Impact Perennial or
Intermittent?
(please secif )
No. 1 Culvert 15 Dutchman's Branch 10 Perennial
No. 2 Fill 83 UT to Swift Creek 2 Intermittent

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
rnrw.uses.i?ov. Several intemet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.topozone.com,
www.mapquest.com, etc.).
Page 8 of 13
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site
98 feet
4. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.) below: Not Applicable
Open Water Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
acres
Name Wat)
(if applicable) Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound,
bay, ocean, etc.)

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
5. Pond Creation Not Applicable
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
See attached sheet with additional information
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
Page 9 of 13
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://112o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetIands/strm?ide.11tm1.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
No stream or wetland mitigation proposed. Impacts less than 0.1 acres of wetlands and
150 liner feet of stream.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCWRP at
[phone] to determine availability and to request written approval of mitigation prior
to submittal of a PCN. For additional information regarding the application process for the
NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at http://li2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.11tni. If use of
the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide the
following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): None required
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet):
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): None required
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): None required
Page 10 of 13
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): None required
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state) funds or the use of public
(federaUstate) land?
Yes ® No ?
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ® No ?
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ® No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 213 .0233
(Neuse), 15A NCAC 213 .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 213 .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
Yes ® No ? If you answered "yes", provide the following inforniation:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
See Attached figures and sheets for greater detail and breakdown of impacts by site.
Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 871 3 2613
2 3485 1.5 5228
Total 4356 7841
Gone I extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone I.
Page 11 of 13
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 213.0242 or.0260.
Payment to EEP - Request to EEP has been made but an answer has not yet been received.
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
Use of bioretention basins and level spreaders at outfalls - see attached plans
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).

Zooj-
Applic tt/Agent's Signature I Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 12 of 13
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
7 Nearest Body of Water
Dutchmans Branch UTM 17 700984E 3955712N
UT to Swift Creek UTM 17 700242E 3955438N
Swift Creek UTM 17 699902E 3954397N
Note on stream impacts at Dutchman's Creek - will replace existing culverts which are 89 feet in length
with a 104 foot culvert for an additional stream impact of 15 feet.
Swift Creek - No stream impacts will occur at this crossing, as entire creek will be bridged.
Buffer Impacts at Dutchman's Branch - clearing of buffer is necessary for construction of diversion
channel and construction of floodplain culvert. Areas that are cleared will be allowed to revegetate
naturally.
Buffer impacts at Swift Creek are less than 150 liner feet:
• Zone 1 - 81 on south side of creek and 89 on north side of creek
• Zone 2 - 130 feet on south side of creek and 112 feet on north side of creek
Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
A number of Alternatives have been evaluated for the widening of Kildaire Farm Road. These
Alternatives are documented in the Environmental Assessment. On September 1, 2001, Earth Tech met
with DWQ personnel (Steve Zarzecki and Steve Mitchell) to discuss the stream buffer impacts, the
various Alternatives, and methods to minimize the impacts. All Alternatives evaluated would impact
buffers to some extent.
Design constraints include a public park on the west side of the alignment, a greenway and stream
paralleling the alignment to the east, steep topography along the stream, and a sharp curve that requires
flattening to meet current design standards. Realignment to the west of the existing roadway would
decrease the impacts to the stream and greenway. However, federal funds are involved at the northern
terminus of the project for the bridge replacement and the segment of roadway that would be affected by
the bridge replacement. A shift to the west would encroach on the park and raise 4(f) issues.
The alignment was shifted as far to the west as was practical. Following shift of the alignment retaining
walls were designed in several locations to reduce the footprint of the roadway and reduce clearing and
filling of buffers.
Page 13 of 13
BUFFER IMPACTS SUMMARY
IMPACT BUFFER
TYPE Fill and Clearing Allowable REPLACEMENT

SITE NO.
STRUCTURE SIZE /TYPE
STATION (FROM/TO) ROAD
CROSSING PARALLEL
IMPACT ZONE 1
(acres) ZONE 2
(acres) TOTAL
(acres) ZONE 1
(acres) ZONE 2
(acres) TOTAL
(acres) ZONE 1
(acres) ZONE 2
(acres)
1 Culvert -L- Sta 31+50 to 32+50 X 0.18 0.06 0.24 0.18 0.06 0.24
2 Culvert -L- Sta 68+00 to 70+20 X 0.17 0.18 0.35 0.17 0.18 0.35
3 Single Family Drive -L- Sta 76+20 to 78+70 X 0.05 0.01 0.06 0.05 0.12 0.17
4 Road widening -L- Sta 82+00 to 85+50 X 0.02 0.08 0.10 0.02 0.08 0.10
5 Bride -L- Sta 96+10 to 97+60 X 0.12 0.01 0.13 0.12 0.01 0.13
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00

TOTAL: 0.54 0.35 0.88 0.54 0.45 0.99 0.00 0.00
SR 1300 (Kildaire Farm Road)
Bridge No. 525 Over Swift Creek
Cary
Wake County
Town of Cary Project Number ST1084
ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/
FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
PREPARED FOR THE
TOWN OF CARY
In Compliance with the
North Carolina Environmental Policy Act
December 2004
Document Prepared For The Town Of Cary By:
EarthTech
A Tyco Intemational Ud. Compaq
Yvoy i5AG. Howell, P.E.
Project Planning Engineer, Earth Tech
Wake County
SR 1300 (Kildaire Farm Road)
Bridge No. 525 Over Swift Creek
Federal Aid Project No. BRSTP-1300(7)
State Project 8.2407601
TIP Project No. B-3523
CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION
AND
DRAFT SECTION 4(F) EVALUATION
US DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION
AND
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
APPROVED:
g- 6•-0 4- 4--? - V
DATE regory J. Thorpe D., Environmental Management Director
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch, NCDOT
vlela'?4 I -10?
AT John F. Sullivan III, P.E. Division Admini
V6 -- Federal Highway Administration
1
Wake County
SR 1300 (Kildaire Farm Road)
Bridge No. 525 Over Swift Creek
Federal Aid Project No. BRSTP-1300(7)
State Project 8.2407601
TIP Project No. B-3523
Town of Cary Project No. ST1084
CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION
AND
DRAFT SECTION 4(F) EVALUATION
August 2004
Document Prepared for the Town of Cary by:
E A R i N `, T E C N
• ry.. ni a?Mn.s s...?., co.oo?
Yv ne G.G. Howell, P.E., Project Planning Engineer
E h Tech
Wake County
SR 1300 (Kildaire Farm Road)
Bridge No. 525 Over Swift Creek
Federal Aid Project No. BRSTP-1300(7)
State Project 8.2407601
TIP Project No. B-3523
Town of Cary Project No. ST1084
FINAL SECTION 4(F) EVALUATION
US DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION
AND
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
APPROVED:
12.16•x4 h-1-- -2,
DATE Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph. ., Environmental Management Director
Project Developme and Environmental Analysis Branch, NCDOT
(ZIZI?D¢ .? ?
DATE +. John F. Sullivan III, P.E. Division Administrator
Federal Highway Administration
? ??' ?- ? + ?. ti `? fi _..Y- \.gvy?'V ?-??/? r!r_"'k _. \ 1 `??.-?"? i 'mac' :,
?B'FT_??,-ice` 1'S • ?? ? -"i ' L ?? ° i L?~ ?•? ? J?'•, ^!' r( 0`?.C1 ` ,` i Illrrl,? ? ??+:5.
.IIJ?I - ,? ? v Y?' ? ???'?? ? A r li, l r ?r r• ? V ? 1 i" «I _ ?,?? 5 l?Jtc' 1i
f? / ,I> ??? _-? moo., ? __ lr?; ??? ?\//'?`.''! ? r .•- i? r? / -??? ?\ i_ // f /?? 199911 (//?Ij n il' ?? mar
«'?;, r ( ?'. I?`, 1 ? ?'?r/ r?' 1? ? - ?\ `: ?`1 ? 'r/ n ( r?.? L??e \ ` ti?,4 ?. r ? l • t ..
1 t tl.'i
Fs '1 r i! ?..I f fl! t ?1 / ?` v.i L ? r/? ? .r Sc?\ • (l/???. ? ??1' )"?!, C .._? ?}, 1'i 1(.
?• ii 1 h f , .? a"l ry i '.?, / t• v J 7 t ???.J. ? \ t ??? i / / j
, t .. ,t""\ r I ` \ ! '''' ~ / •.` % I ' ? /\ Imo," { ^ 1 + I i ? l r! J?' -
?'7 7? 1'\ = .? ???_ ._' ll.% r l -? r :n I-? rte,' ?j i.l!! ? ? 1`? \ 1, ? ? - l ?., / ( i?...fl? ., : _' ? [ !?-/ V .? f
tlj,.?-•_'?
? `\ / / ,r` /? *.J ?"? 1. _i---? / ,, , ? `f^?s..,,? ? _. _ 1 , ?,,,,? .,,s1 I 1_?+. l I ?' f? _. 1t? ?,?, 1
? -?? l ? / r \, ?./ ` ? -err r-_'"? `'? `' ? ? ? •3 , ? ' ? ,
?t? ",y//? 7 r ?/??\., ????? ?? ._ : I? R?_
/ , i rr i r I l ?1 !? r i '
"yT7t?ffA7C,IkA At't7 i o \
?-? ? rn 1 li 1 t ? l? ?
.r r t l \ l ?, l ?w ?.
iTE?2- • j •ITE ?4???
/Y Y dGr70 ? ~ ?/ 1t,'lii ?', •?'t r?' tl ::?,t '?35 l'? ? ? a/?? i '•\(?i n -yet •v
J . I /? 71>g _ y? rli
f r+ ` ` r ?j 11 --? _
L0Q_ u ny Ro `-mss,'' a _ ?U / i I
480 ? ???: ( /?? j/ ?t? J ? ? ?0????t77i \7?\ N •// ???/ `' I" r ?.z';?
,\\ ?\ ?;? /_.?--'? ?,? Jul. ? i???.?j •`?\?--? \_\,,•\ f,?: ?:! I / r ?:?` ? Vc? ;?`.`•,
DEG N; P OJT
//? 1 ?`l 1 It i,/??/ ??? J ?? t ,• ??!jQ j v / J
r t ??yr .. •(1 July r, I i J? 1 , t / /
nn 0 i` r
.l ?J ? ? y 1 ? • ?,- r ?.-?.`, 4 ? ? /?. /? A- __ , ,, i ? l? mo=t ?%?.? t . i A?? ? / r .,? ? \ ?A??-'?.? ( t
?---?/?"„j r ?? •• it ? ? } U? ? ? ? ? F + ?? 1l{I•: til??% Y? ??IZ' ? ?h `. ,'. ? ? \?
TOWN OF CARY
WAKE COUNTY
to %t \ r. •. 1\
l'\?°v +. ?!; ^.,? ??? ••a \:, t PROJECT: ST-1084
STREAM/WETLAND IMPACTS
=? l l? r t ` ?• \ ,` li KILDAIRE FARM ROAD WIDENING
_ t , (S /rJ `r / ?,E3tdr( ,?i u' 500'S0UTH OF AUTUMNGATE DRIVE
c li \ ,, l e `?•?`, \` \ TO LOCHMERE DRIVE
I l _ .. __ \ ?, \ n i • !?, I 1 i 1 r J !% i? / `•. ` - `\ SHEET 1 OF 10 11 / 04
...\CADD\wetland\Sh0l_Vic9uad.dgn 1 1 /1 6/2004 3:06:17 PM
\\ 0 50 100
16;27
%
O V: C?
nQ y -.,y 1 ?r?3 28 rKv
y \'K? DENOTES FILL
??t9 N WETLANDS
T t16316I ? ?r>3 • ??..-.?, ???
` r
p Q 24
ac - ` FILL IN WETLANDS
1
r 1 JY 1760 SG. Ft.
!51,}IO?L9 ?l 10.04 Acres)
Z
y \ "323 fi 1{6 \F,, ?V
116322„
bpd 1 ; ?' ?•? ?: ?• •'. ??. ? ,
%I
QV 0 /
G
TOWN OF CAR
D
WAKE COUNTY
\ \? ? ? ? /: ; ' \ ! PROJECT: ST-108
f STREAM/ WETLAND IMPACTS
DETAIL - SITE I
KILDAIRE FARM ROAD WIDENI]
/ 500, SOUTH OF AUTUMNGATE DR
k/ TO LOCHDIERE DRIVE
\wetland\Sh02_Site7_SWlmp.dgn 11/15/20042:06:5/PM
0 50 100
/ ? / <. ?? ' fit, ? ?. e'/?• ?,? '///
i
i
/ L
BEGIN
,• f` ` ,°'r // FILL END FILL
TOWN OF CARP
r 1
WAKE COUNTY
/ C n PROJECT: ST-1084
' l
STREADI/ N1'ETLAN
Ji;:'. DETAIL - SI'
KILDAIRE FARM RO.
500'SOUTH OF AUTUM
TO LOCHMERE
i /
\d
/
SHEET 3 OF 10
,•\wet1and\Sh03_Site2_SW1mp.dgn 11/16/2004 3:07:49 PM
L1!
CL
Ji

TOWN OF CARP
WAKE COUNTY
PROJ ECT: ST-1084
STREAM/WETLAND IMPACTS
DETAIL -SITE S
KILDAIRE FARM ROAD WIDENING
S00'SOUTH OF AUTUMNGATE DRIVE
TO LOCHMERE DRIVE
SHEET 4 OF 10 11/04
\wetland\Sh04_Site5_SWlmp.dgn 11 /15/2004 2:09:52 PM
ROJEC
1
i
TOWN OF CARP
r
\ 3 ?o j1 a I \ ?? ?\
BEGIN PROJECT
VICINITY MAP FOR PROJECT
KILDAIRE FARM
WETLANDS/ BUFFER
3
TYPE OF TFORK GRADING, DRAINAGE, PAVING, STRUCTURES ?,Pa $
ROAD
IMPACTS
LOCATION. TVIDENING OF 1.7 MILES OF KILDAIRE FARM ROAD (SR 1300)
FROM 500' SOUTH OF AUTUMNGATE DRIVE TO
LOCHMERE DRIVE

^ N ??
CCC A
Icy 9??. Site 2
x o ??,7 8
t
6 n
(SR
?O
O
P44
(on
ti
U
W
O
h
e
-L- STA. 10+00.00 BEGIN PROJECT
ti
5 Site 4 WW
Q ? Z U t
i
Site 1 Site 3
O
as
10
za x
I x Site 5
S.
d
N
THIS PROJECT IS WITHIN THE MUNICIPAL LIMITS OF THE TOWN OF CARY.
ro
x
d
/' er
In/? , Il
-L- STA. 103+88.50 END PRO ECT
END BRIDGE
r STA 97+90.00
BEGIN BRIDGE INCOMPLETE PLANS
-L- STA 95+88.00 PRELDIINARY PLANS
w War m r l CUNSiI ION
GRAPHIC SCALES

0 25 0 50 100 DESIGN DATA

ADT 1999 = 17500
ADT PROJECT LENGTH rrepareO In rre urnce 0:
?
E A R T H` J T E C H
A-tyCO INTERNATIv)L LTD. COMPANY
2025 = 33300 LENGTH ROADWAY PRO
ECT
1
740 MILES 2001 STAIM"D S
C
C
J
=
. PC
IFI
AnONS
PLANS
0 25 0 50 100 DHV = 10 %
D = 60 %
LENGTH STRUCTURES PROJECT = 0.038 MILES
RIGI[T OF II'AY DATE
TO,W SIIEARIN
P
E

T = 5 % '
TOTAL LENGTH PROJECT = 1
778 MILES . ,
.
.
PROJECT EYLIAEER
PROFILE (HORIZONTAL) V = 50 MPH .
LETTING DATE.
JOHN MCHOLS,P.E.

' TTST 2% DUAL 3% mDRA1ucT ENGLYF2R
PROFILE (VERTICAL) A
TOWN Or CARY
WAKE COUNTY
PROJECT: ST•108/
STREAM/WETLAND IMPACTS
CILDAIRE FARM ROAD WIDENING
S00'SOUTH OF AUTUMNGATE DRIVE
TO LOCHMERE DRIVE
SHEET S OF 10 11104
R0
FARM ? W M
11' li
31 I ? l
I?!I I

D
y
C)
I
r
s
m
Ln
p
N
A
-t
O
O

Ij e`:,?U?FEK'
e=I
p L-
i
J
0
O
CD
PI)
d
W
s
J
Z
V
Q

T
`?a a
INCOMPLE E PLANS
0o Not um W4 /¦ ACQUIM N
PRELIMIN
Do Nof Uf6 RY PLANS
OONTfRUCfpN
li' I I! o O o ,oI
LINED DIVERSION CHANNEL
(Not to Scale)
Natural
2' FILTER 3' Ground
FABRIC
8'
TACK DOWN FABRIC WITH MIN. 10" STAPLES
PLACED EVERY 4' LONGITUDINALLY. PERP.
SPACING OF STAPLES IS 2' ON CENTER.
KEY IN FABRIC AS SHOWN.
AT BEGINNING AND END OF DIVERSION CHANNEL , KEY FABRIC INTO
EXISTING GROUND A MIN. OF 4'. SECURE WITH CLASS B RIP RAP. A MIN.
4' OF OVERLAP WILL BE PROVIDED AT FABRIC JOINTS. AT JOINTS, THE
UPSTREAM SECTION OF FABRIC SHALL BE INSTALLED OVER THE
DOWNSTREAM FABRIC. PROVIDE CLASS B CHECKS AT FABRIC JOINTS.
f AFTER RCBC CONSTRUCTION GROUT 66" FLO DPLAIN PIPE -
} AT INLET AND 01 ENDt TO FLOODP?AI ELEVATION.
4 I
t F
I
TEMPORARY
/I DIVERSION
CHANNEL
SEE DETAIL
PLAICE TEMPORARY
IMPERVIOUS PLUG IN
EXISTING CHANNEL

SITE I
PROJECT MFERENCE NO.
SnGE4
BOND WAY DESIGN
ENGINEER
SHEET NO.
Hm7AULUCS
ENGINEER
INCOMPLE E PLANS
DO NOT USE FOR _k/ W ACQUISITION
PRELIMINA RY FLANS
DO NOT USE FO CONSTRUCTION
I FrP-Nin
BUFFER IMPACTS
® ZONE I BUFFER IMPACTS
® ZONE 2 BUFFER IMPACTS

rf T1 PPG- Cn-- -i-? - -
- ZB?R IT l'-30` X. /W
-2 DR

Sn' 1T
Ij7?El.LIN?
CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE
Il PLACE 66" RCP DIVERSION/FLOODPLAIN PIPE
2) CONSTRUCT DIVERSION CHANNEL
3) PLACE IMPERVIOUS PLUGS IN EXISTING CHANNEL
4) CONSTRUCT CONCRETE BOX CULVERT
5) REMOVE IMPERVIOUS PLUGS IN EXISTING CHANNEL
6) FILL DIVERSION CHANNEL WITH NATIVE MATERIAL
AND VEGETATE
7) GROUT 66" DIVERSION/FLOODPLAIN PIPE AT
INLET AND OUTLET ENDS TO FLOODPLAIN
ELEVATION.
el / _ ?? ?. f e Ll
0
(V i Lj
I
"a
I I
p {
F
L-p
0Is
28
r-PA ?? IVVy:? ?I I 1 b fn
S.C-N SV', SGN iS
A I?PotiA'-;
`8V'99S vA/P0-12 `MPORARY PLUG I HANNEL i'I?
--
"
P. I :.9s c`? I
TEMPORARY
DIVERSION
CHANNEL
SEE DETAIL
CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE
-L- 32 + 87
]129m69 RCBC
TOWN OF CAR Y
WAKE COUNTY
PROJECT: ST-1084
DETAIL STREAM/WETLAND IMPACTS
1Ls KILDAIRE FARM ROAD WIDENING
S00'SOUTH OF AUTUMNGATE DRIVE
TO LOCHMERE DRIVE
SHEET 7 OF 10 11104

e°
mbr° O ? N
J ??y c
,c a
mF
, oz
..Vrvcuunu viwwcyvu.wCi 111IU/4UV4U:I0:UYrM

INCOMPLE E PLANS
w Nei NY Nll /¦ AW4'DIIIeN
PRELIMIN
DO WOr DNt RY PLANS
WNSf ucmN
IcrFNn \
BUFFER IMPACTS
\
ZONE IBUFFER IMPACTS
® ZONE 2 BUFFER IMPACTS 0 0 0 1 0

SITE 2 SITE 1 \
ZONE IBUFFER IMPACTS 7421 So. Ft. 2132 S
Ft.
]
(037 Acres) 10.05 A
ZONE 2 BUFFER IMPACTS 7824 S0. Ft. 4399 S
(038 Acres) (030 Ac
(NO WETLAND IMPACTS)

1
I
\ I
\ EL GEND
EUFFER IMPACTS
\ ZONE IBUFFER IMPACTS /
\ ® ZONE 2 BUFFER IMPACTS
(1 C f
E E
'o /
u1
1

1
SITE
1e
I ai
I BUFFERS
a
KILDARE FARM RD.
16700 2(000
30_300
100 1 4?oo 38DW
200 7,900
4.?
8.107
LOCH HIGHLANDS DR.
2001 ADr
2025 A7r
I ¢¢
III '!
1 II I .
11
?1 1
?' i 11 1 1
1 11Y?.
SITE / /
ZONE aFt IBUFFER IMPACTS
829 50.Ft 10.02 Acres)

ZONE 2 BUFFER IMPACTS /
756150. Ft (0.08 Acres)

I

i

1? ?` oqaa??
©

\ 1/

FAOIER REFERENCE NO.
SHEET 140.
STIOBI 9
ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAUUCS
ENGINEER ENGINEER
INCOMPLE E PLANS
W NOT W FOR /W 100DBtiWN
PRELIDIIN
w NOT 119 PO I PLANS
ODNsmuc w
N'°"'' I. " Q EarthTech
Ofli? of; 20cm ., c.-: c:1-sdl. Vs
14Y115/-62W • 159115"2991F.[l
0 0 0 10
F
X
6
E?\

ItzI k2 Q1
\\ s
TOWN OF CARY
6(/FF2V WAKE COUNT?
S 1r PROJECr,3r 104
BUFFER ENPACES
to
[[LDAIAB FARM ROAD ItD¢NINO
GW30UTH OP AUTUHNOATE DRIVE
(NO STREAM/WETLAND IMPACTS) TO E.OCTIH¢RB DRIVE
SHFrT 9 OF to 11164

INCOMPLE E PLANS
0o NOT um 104 /V AOIUMffWN
PREL[D1IN
ro Nor vi I PLANS
wNmucrnN
EL GEND
BUFFER IMPACTS
ZONE I BUFFER IMPACTS
® ZONE 2 BUFFER IMPACTS
SITE 5
ZONE IBUFFER IMPACTS
5147 SQ.Ft.(OJ2 Acres)
ZONE 2 BUFFER IMPACTS
4478 SG.Ft.(0.10 Acres)

x

SITE 5
s--u i
a
k 1
? r
Jl
(Zil
i du aw r
a??yur /

l
L
0 0 0 10
?fl. X11 ?
? ,? 1 1,?z 1
/\ ,f I 00 NOT 'TURB
1 /qm c E%1$i. KR"I NALL cerca.u
0- TO -0 OR SHRUBS S W
E
S
E C
1. 5L
mot:
'fzP707sto, [,(U.SS YEpw ..
?-
' ? Frl?j I
- ?x
e" - PDE ? POE POE
e ?

m
S
E
[a E ? ?' ?
0
? L
rJ ,?"w I
I
f I I
L? I
(NO STREAM/NETLANO IMPACTS) I
SNCCr m OF 16 t1164
I
TOWN OF CARY
316 N. Academy St. - P.O. Box 8005
Cary, North Carolina 27512-8005 CA J
[phone] CHECK NO.
&L I PO VOUCHER INVOICE DESCRIPTION r7w
01/12/2000 PI5558 KILDAIREFARMRDW MISC SERVICES
200.0
t -- zq-os