20190614 Ver 1_JD Package_REVISED_20190507

Irerracon
August 20, 2018
David Bailey
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
Re: Request for Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination
5300 High Point Road, Tract 4
Greensboro, Guilford County, North Carolina
Terracon Project 71187511
Dear Mr. Bailey:
An behalf of our client, Terracon Consultants, Inc. is requesting a wetland location review of the
approximately 11.79 -acre site located at 5300 High Point Road, Tract 4, in Greensboro, Guilford
County, North Carolina. The review areas of the site are located along two unnamed tributary east
of Reddick's Creek. Please review the following attached information to determine the accuracy
of our wetland delineation:
Jurisdictional Determination
Request
Preliminary Jurisdictional
Determination Form
Depiction of Aquatic Resources
USGS Topographic Map
1998 Infrared Aerial Photograph
USFWS NWI Map
NRCS Web Soil Survey Map
Photo Log Legend
NRCS Hydric Soils Map
Photographs
EMPR Data Forms
If you have any questions regarding the attached information, please contact me at (704)509-
1777, or Mary. Murraa7terracon.com.
Respectfully submitted,
Terracon Consultants, Inc.
0
Timothy P. O'Halloran
Environmental Field Scientist
WAnyRuocco, PWS
Environmental Department Manager, APR
Mary C. Murray, PWS 6-3
Senior Scientist
erracon Consultants, Inc. 2701 Westport Road Charlotte. NC 28208
�:,- F

urisdictional Determination ReQuest
U5 Army Corps
of Engineers
Wilmingicn District
This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (JD) from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
via mail, electronic mail, or facsimile. Requests should be sent to the appropriate project
manager of the county in which the property is located. A current list of project managers by
assigned counties can be found on-line at:
http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Re alatolyPermitProgram/Contact/CountyLocator.gax,
by calling 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below. Once your
request is received you will be contacted by a Corps project manager.
ASHEVILLE & CHARLOTTE REGULATORY
FIELD OFFICES
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
INSTRUCTIONS:
WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
General Number: 910-251-4633
Fax Number: [phone]
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E, F and G.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part H.
NOTE ON PART D — PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that
all JD requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to
proceed with the determination, which may include inspection of the property when
necessary. This form must be signed by the current property owner(s) or the owner(s)
authorized agent to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D - NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for
JD requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
projects will be conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD
may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of
1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in
USDA programs, you should also request a certified wetland determination from the local
office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
Version: May 2017 Page 1

A.
B.
Jurisdictional Determination Request
PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: 5300 High Point Road
City, State:
County:
Greensboro, North Carolina
Guilford
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): 7832786157
REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: Mary C. Murrav
Mailing Address: 2701 Westport Road
Charlotte, NC 28206
Telephone Number: [phone]
Electronic Mail Address: [e-mail]
Select one:
LI am the current property owner.
W1 I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant)
Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
Other, please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION
Name: KSL Sedqefield Pilot, LLC
Mailing Address: 5790 Fleet Street, Suite 300
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Telephone Number: [phone] - Mitch J. Ritschel
Electronic Mail Address:
' Must provide completed Agent Authorization Form/Letter.
2 Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request (copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record).
Version: May 2017 Page 2

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION',4
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on-
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
� L S LLC
Print Name
Capacity: Owner Authorized Agents
f (
Si
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
0✓ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
process.
RI intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
❑ I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
❑ I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
❑ Other:
s For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
a If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
s Must provide agent authorization form/letter signed by owner(s).
Version: May 2017 Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD) TYPE (Select One)
0 I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminM JD for the property identified herein.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) provides an indication that there may
be "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United States"on a property.
PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all
waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional "waters of
the United States". PJDs cannot be appealed (33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is
"preliminary" in the sense that an approved JD can be requested at any time. PJDs do
not expire.
❑ I am requesting that the Corps provide an approved JD for the property identified herein.
An Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) is a determination that
jurisdictional "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United
States" are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of
waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or
Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved JDs are sufficient as the basis for permit
decisions. AJDs are appealable (33 C.F.R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be
posted on the Corps website. A landowner, permit applicant, or other "affected
party" (33 C.F.R. 331.2) who receives an AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years
(subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter 05-
02).
I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information
to inform my decision.
G. ALL REQUESTS
Map of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the
review area.
✓� Size of Property or Review Area 11,79 acres.
❑✓ The property boundary (or review area boundary) is clearly physically marked on the site.
Version: May 2017 Page 4

Jurisdictional Determination Request
H. REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS
Project Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude
36.020397
Longitude: -79.883408
❑✓ A legible delineation map depicting the aquatic resources and the property/review area.
Delineation maps must be no larger than 11x17 and should contain the following: (Corps
signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been
reviewed and approved).6
■ North Arrow
■ Graphical Scale
■ Boundary of Review Area
■ Date
■ Location of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Form or tributary
assessment reach.
For Approved Jurisdictional Determinations:
Jurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404
wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features.
Jurisdictional non -wetland features (i.e. tidal/navigable waters, tributaries,
impoundments) should be labeled as Non -Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water, relatively permanent water, pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear
length of each of these features as appropriate.
Isolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non -
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non -Jurisdictional. Please
include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non jurisdictional (i.e.
"Isolated", "No Significant Nexus", or "Upland Feature"). Please include the acreage
or linear length of these features as appropriate.
For Preliminary Jurisdictional Determinations:
Wetland and non -wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404,
Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be
identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non -wetland Waters of
the United States, wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and
linear length of these features as appropriate.
Completed Wetland Determination Data Forms for appropriate region
(at least one wetland and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type)
6 Please refer to the guidance document titled "Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations" to ensure that the
supplied map meets the necessary mapping standards. htt2://www.saw.usace.2M.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-
Pro gram/Jurisdiction/
Version: May 2017 Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
❑ Completed appropriate Jurisdictional Determination form
• PJDs, please complete a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form' and include the
Aquatic Resource Table
• AJDs• please complete an Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form'
Vicinity Map
Aerial Photograph
❑ USGS Topographic Map
Soil Survey Map
Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
ZLandscape Photos (if taken)
F] NCSAM and/or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets
NC Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms
1_J Other Assessment Forms
' www.saw.usace.2M.mil/Portals/59/docs/regulatory/regdocs/JD/RGL 08-02 App A Prelim _JD_Form fillable.pdf
' Please see http://www.saw.usace.gM.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-Program/Jurisdiction/
Principal Purpose: The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine
whether there are any aquatic resources within the project area subject to federaljurisdiction under the regulatory
authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local
government agencies, and the public, and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by federal
law. Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the
approvedjurisdictional determination (AJD), which will be made available to the public on the District's website
and on the Headquarters USAGE website.
Disclosure: Submission of requested information is voluntary; however, if information is not provided, the
request for an AJD cannot be evaluated nor can an AJD be issued.
Version: May 2017 Page 6

Appendix 2 - PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD:
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD:
Applicant:
Mr. Bob Lewis
Cameron General Contractors
7101 S. 82nd Street
Lincoln, NE 68516
Consultant:
Ms. Mary Murray
Terracon Consultants, Inc.
2701 Westport Road
Charlotte, NC 28206
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The project is located at
5300 High Point Road in Greensboro, NC on the southeastern portion of the parcel.
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: North Carolina County/parish/borough: Guildford City: Greensboro
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat.: 36.0203970 Long.: -79.8834080
Universal Transverse Mercator: NAD 83
Name of nearest waterbody: Reddick's Creek
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO
REGULATORY JURISDICTION.
Estimated amount
Type of aquatic
Geographic authority to
of aquatic resource
resource (i.e.,
which the aquatic
in review area
wetland vs. non-
resource "may be"
Site Number
Latitude
Longitude
(acreage and linear
wetland waters)
subject (i.e., Section 404
feet, if applicaple)
or Section 10/404)
Stream 1
36.020911
-79.88344
1,329 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
Stream 2
36.021509
-79.883458
335 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
Wetland A
36.020335
-79.883206
0.04 acres
Wetland
Section 404
Linear Wetland
36.020408
-79.883212
0.03 acres
Wetland
Section 404

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option
to request and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an
informed decision after having discussed the various types of JDs and their
characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a
Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre -
construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or
other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the
activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has
elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an
official determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the
option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit
authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could possibly result
in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) the
applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can
accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and
conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has
determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject
permit authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance
of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit
authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the
review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and
waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance
or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7)
whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed
as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms
and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively
appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic
jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official
delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will
provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds
that there "may be"waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be" navigable waters of
the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review
area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources
below where indicated for all checked items:
❑■ Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor: Terracon Consultants
Map: Depiction of Aquatic Resources
Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
0 U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
NO
USGS NHD data.
USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:
no Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: SSURGO Soil Data: Enon
❑■ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: USFWS NWI 1994
State/local wetland inventory map(s):
FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100 -year Floodplain Elevation is: .(National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
❑■ Photographs: lr=7 Aerial (Name & Date): Google Earth Pro
or ❑■ Other (Name & Date): Photos provided by Terracon dated 8/7/18
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily
been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional
determinations.
Signature and date of
Regulatory staff member
completing PJD
SignatureLd date of
person requesting PJD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)'
' Districts may establish timeframes for requestor to return signed PJD forms. If the requestor does not respond
within the established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is
necessary prior to finalizing an action.

N
PM: MCM
Project No.
71187511
Depiction ofAquatic Resources
P
EXHIBITNO
Drewn By:
Scale:
AS Shown
Irerracon
5300 High Point Road, Tract 4
ChecketlByO
File Path:
Consulting Engineers & Scientists
0 100 200 400
JAR
Greensboro, Guilford County, North Carolina
s Feet
App—ed By:
Date:
2701 Wesport Road Charlotte NC 28216
JAR
Dec. 2018
phone. [phone] Fax. [phone]

{
Nom,_ wlri �,�-
Ifi'rV
on
r
vi"MRS,
o � rAwiw,�,�
'. 71187511
AsShown �Irprr.-.mrr
s
IF Arl ft--qk�
I UL MRWRVI,045�qln W. �j
tl

If
Legend
Project Boundary
OParcel Boundary
.r
4 `
e
N
PM: MCM Proec No. 71187511 1998 Infrared Aerial Imagery EXHI6ITNo
Drawn By: Scale:
,Po AS Sh1rerracQn
own 5300 High Point Road, Tract 4
W . E Checked W: File Path: 3
Consulting Engiucers & Scientists
0 100 200 400 JAR Greensboro, Guilford County, North Carolina
S Feet Approvetl By: pate; 2701 Wesport Road Charlotte, NC 26216
JAR Augus[2018 Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]

N PM. NICNI Proec No. 71187511 USFWS NWI Map EXHIBIT NO
Drewn By: Scale: Irerracon
TPW E ChecketlByO File Path: As5hown 5300 High Point Road, Tract 4
Consulting Engineers & 5cilentists 4
0 100 200 400 JAR Greensboro, Guilford County, North Carolina
S Feet APProved By: Date: 2701 Wesport Road Charlotte NC 28216
JAR August2018 Phone'. 704.509.1777 Fax [phone]

PM:Proecj No. NRCS Web Soil SurveyMa EXHIBITNO
N MCM 71187511 P
Drewn By: Scale: L�Tp0 ASShown Irerracon 5300 High Point Road, Tract 4
W E Checked By: File Path: 5
Consulting Engineers & Scientists
0 100 200 400 JAR Greensboro, Guilford County, North Carolina
d By:
S Feet
App—ed Date: 2701 Wes -port Road Charlotte, NC28216
JAR August 2018 phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]

PM: Proec No. Photo LO Legend
EXHIBIT NO
N MCM 7„875„ g g
Drewn By: Scale: Irerracon
W E ChecketlByO File Path: As5hown 5300 High Point Road, Tract 4
Cons.n[fing Engineers & Scientists 6
0 100 200 400 JAR Greensboro, Guilford County, North Carolina
S Feet APProved By: Date: 2701 Wesport Road Charlotte NC 28216
JAR August 2018 Phone'. 704.509.1777 Fax [phone]

Hydric Rating by Map Unit—Guilford County, North Carolina 3:
(Greensboro Proposed Resort Lifestyle Community)
60D500 6DD560 600620 600680 600740 600800 600860
36o 1'23..N 8 I— II I _ 36o 1'23" N
• Ie# a
d� p 4k _
Ile
r w f it
"'+` > I t
At
r oft.Or 29
1141
-CA MCA
r �+AIL
4rSoi1l M,ap may not he valiel at this scale'. _ ,.
36o 1' 7" N I I 36o 17' N
600500 60D560 600620 600680 600740 600800 600860
3: 3:
in 0
Map Scale: 1:2,430 if printed on A portrait (8.5" x 11") sheet.
N Meters
0 35 70 140 210
Feet
0 100 200 400 600
Map projection: Web Mercator Conermordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: lfrM Zone 17N WGS84
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 8/10/2018
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 5

Hydric Rating by Map Unit—Guilford County, North Carolina
(Greensboro Proposed Resort Lifestyle Community)
MAP LEGEND
Area of Interest (AOI)
0
Area of Interest (AOI)
Soils
A 0
Soil Rating
Polygons
0
Hydric (100%)
0
Hydric (66 to 99%)
0
Hydric (33 to 65%)
0
Hydric (1 to 32%)
0
Not Hydric (0%)
0
Not rated or not available
Soil Rating
Lines
~
Hydric (100%)
0
Hydric (66 to 99%)
.
Hydric (33 to 65%)
r 0
Hydric (1 to 32%)
r r
Not Hydric (0%)
A 0
Not rated or not available
Soil Rating
Points
E
Hydric (100%)
0
Hydric (66 to 99%)
❑
Hydric (33 to 65%)
0
Hydric (1 to 32%)
0
Not Hydric (0%)
0
Not rated or not available
Water Features
Streams and Canals
Transportation
i--1-+ Rails
Interstate Highways
US Routes
Major Roads
Local Roads
Background
Aerial Photography
MAP INFORMATION
The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at
1:20,000.
Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause
misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil
line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of
contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed
scale.
Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
measurements.
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey URL:
Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts
distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the
Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more
accurate calculations of distance or area are required.
This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as
of the version date(s) listed below.
Soil Survey Area: Guilford County, North Carolina
Survey Area Data: Version 15, Sep 26, 2017
Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales
1:50,000 or larger.
Date(s) aerial images were photographed: May 19, 2015—Oct
16, 2017
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor
shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident.
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 8/10/2018
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 5

Hydric Rating by Map Unit—Guilford County, North Carolina
Hydric Rating by Map Unit
Greensboro Proposed Resort
Lifestyle Community
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 8/10/2018
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 5
Map unit symbol
Map unit name
Rating
Acres in AOI
Percent of AOI
EnB
Enon fine sandy loam, 2
to 6 percent slopes
0
4.4
37.2%
EnC
Enon fine sandy loam, 6
to 10 percent slopes
0
7.4
62.8%
Totals for Area of Interest
11.8
100.0%
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 8/10/2018
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 5

Hydric Rating by Map Unit—Guilford County, North Carolina
Description
Greensboro Proposed Resort
Lifestyle Community
This rating indicates the percentage of map units that meets the criteria for hydric
soils. Map units are composed of one or more map unit components or soil
types, each of which is rated as hydric soil or not hydric. Map units that are made
up dominantly of hydric soils may have small areas of minor nonhydric
components in the higher positions on the landform, and map units that are made
up dominantly of nonhydric soils may have small areas of minor hydric
components in the lower positions on the landform. Each map unit is rated based
on its respective components and the percentage of each component within the
map unit.
The thematic map is color coded based on the composition of hydric
components. The five color classes are separated as 100 percent hydric
components, 66 to 99 percent hydric components, 33 to 65 percent hydric
components, 1 to 32 percent hydric components, and less than one percent
hydric components.
In Web Soil Survey, the Summary by Map Unit table that is displayed below the
map pane contains a column named 'Rating'. In this column the percentage of
each map unit that is classified as hydric is displayed.
Hydric soils are defined by the National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils
(NTCHS) as soils that formed under conditions of saturation, flooding, or ponding
long enough during the growing season to develop anaerobic conditions in the
upper part (Federal Register, 1994). Under natural conditions, these soils are
either saturated or inundated long enough during the growing season to support
the growth and reproduction of hydrophytic vegetation.
The NTCHS definition identifies general soil properties that are associated with
wetness. In order to determine whether a specific soil is a hydric soil or nonhydric
soil, however, more specific information, such as information about the depth and
duration of the water table, is needed. Thus, criteria that identify those estimated
soil properties unique to hydric soils have been established (Federal Register,
2002). These criteria are used to identify map unit components that normally are
associated with wetlands. The criteria used are selected estimated soil properties
that are described in "Soil Taxonomy" (Soil Survey Staff, 1999) and "Keys to Soil
Taxonomy" (Soil Survey Staff, 2006) and in the "Soil Survey Manual" (Soil Survey
Division Staff, 1993).
If soils are wet enough for a long enough period of time to be considered hydric,
they should exhibit certain properties that can be easily observed in the field.
These visible properties are indicators of hydric soils. The indicators used to
make onsite determinations of hydric soils are specified in "Field Indicators of
Hydric Soils in the United States" (Hurt and Vasilas, 2006).
References:
Federal Register. July 13, 1994. Changes in hydric soils of the United States.
Federal Register. September 18, 2002. Hydric soils of the United States.
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 8/10/2018
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 4 of 5

Hydric Rating by Map Unit—Guilford County, North Carolina
Greensboro Proposed Resort
Lifestyle Community
Hurt, G.W., and L.M. Vasilas, editors. Version 6.0, 2006. Field indicators of hydric
soils in the United States.
Soil Survey Division Staff. 1993. Soil survey manual. Soil Conservation Service.
U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 18.
Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for
making and interpreting soil surveys. 2nd edition. Natural Resources
Conservation Service. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436.
Soil Survey Staff. 2006. Keys to soil taxonomy. 10th edition. U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
Rating Options
Aggregation Method: Percent Present
Component Percent Cutoff.- None Specified
Tie-break Rule: Lower
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 8/10/2018
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 5 of 5

Project No. 71187511
Date Photos Taken: August 7, 2018
lrerracon
Camsmlttmg Engineers & Scknthh
Photo 1: View of DP -1 upland soil.
Photo 2: View of upland area surrounding DP -1 facing north.
Greensboro Proposed Resort Lifestyle Community— Greensboro, North Carolina

Project No. 71187511
Date Photos Taken: August 7, 2018
lrerracon
Cansmlttmg Engineers & Scknthh
Photo 3: View of upland area surrounding DP -1 facing east
Photo 4: View of upland area surrounding DP -1 facing south.
Greensboro Proposed Resort Lifestyle Community— Greensboro, North Carolina

t
of
r x y
Ell
Vr
S�
-Ak
1.
AAL j�
' lrrk -
t
of
r x y
Ell
Vr

"� ! �F f i 1' � J� "?•R
- 4 ry t l h th *
� r
14,
IL
4
} R c
1 S ,
• ��, „� r ti—.'�yr� i ,,,� �' ,•"fir
i�
4-0 f
At
E
Joe
s• Y �R M, ` rya • '

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Proposed Resort Lifestyle Community City/County: Greensboro Sampling Date: 8/7/18
Applicant/Owner: Cameron General Contractors State: NC Sampling Point: DP -1; Upland
Investigator(s): Tim O'Halloran & Mary Kay Murray Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): HIIISIope Local relief (concave, convex, none): none
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P Lat: 36.019478418 Long: -79.885474084
Soil Map Unit Name: Enon NWI classification: N/A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes _❑✓ No ❑. (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation 0✓ Soil ❑, or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes 0 No ❑✓
Are Vegetation= Soil ❑, or Hydrology.= naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
_ Slope (%): 5-10%
Datum: NAD 83
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes 0 No 0✓ Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ Nowithin a Wetland? Yes 0 No 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes .0- No
Remarks:
"Normal Circumstances" are not present because the area that this data point was taken is maintained, which is also
why the vegetation is considered to be significantly disturbed.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
,❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Drainage Patterns (1310)
❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
.❑ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
❑ Water Marks (131) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (132) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (133) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
❑ Iron Deposits (135)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑ Water -Stained Leaves (139)
❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
_❑Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑ FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No= Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No= Depth (inches):
=_
Saturation Present? Yes ❑ No = Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP -1
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
30 ft radius Tree -Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
1. Bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon) 60 yes FACU (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
2. Fescue (Festuca paradoxa) 20 yes FAC Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
3. IrnnwPPrl (Vemnnia gjgantea) 10 no FAC approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
5. Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
6 approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
7. Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
$ herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
pplants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
9. ft (1 m) in height.
10.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
11.
90 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 45 20% of total cover: 18
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius )
1.
3.
4.
Hydrophytic
= Total Cover Vegetation /
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Present? Yes = No�
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius )
% Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A)
2.
Total Number of Dominant
3.
Species Across All Strata: 2 (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 50 (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
= Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
0 0
30 ft radius
OBL species x 1 =
Sapling Stratum (Plot size:
)
0 0
FACW species x 2 =
1.
FAC species 30 x 3 = 90
2.
FACU species 60 x 4 = 240
3.
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
4.
Column Totals: 90 (q) 330 (g)
5.
6.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.67
= Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
❑ 1 Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
-
Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
30 ft radius )
❑ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
1
_❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
❑ 4 Morphological Adaptations'
2
- (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
3.
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
4.
5.
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
6.
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
= Total Cover
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
30 ft radius Tree -Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
1. Bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon) 60 yes FACU (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
2. Fescue (Festuca paradoxa) 20 yes FAC Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
3. IrnnwPPrl (Vemnnia gjgantea) 10 no FAC approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
5. Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
6 approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
7. Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
$ herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
pplants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
9. ft (1 m) in height.
10.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
11.
90 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 45 20% of total cover: 18
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius )
1.
3.
4.
Hydrophytic
= Total Cover Vegetation /
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Present? Yes = No�
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP -1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Loc Texture Remarks
0-6" 10YR 3/4 100 Loamy
6-20" 10YR 4/4 100 Loamy
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_❑ Histosol (Al)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
.❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11:
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soi
❑ Dark Surface (S7)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
0 Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
❑ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
.❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No ✓❑
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Proposed Resort Lifestyle Community City/County: Greensboro Sampling Date: 8/7/18
Applicant/Owner: Cameron General Contractors State: NC Sampling Point: DP -2; Wetland
Investigator(s): Tim O'Halloran & Mary Kay Murray Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P Lat: 36.021831360 Long: -79.882660578
Soil Map Unit Name: Enon NWI classification: N/A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes _❑✓ No ❑. (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ❑ Soil ❑, or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes= No ❑
Are Vegetation= Soil ❑, or Hydrology.= naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
_ Slope (%):
Datum: NAD 83
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes �0✓ No 0 Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes I v l Nowithin a Wetland? Yes 0 No 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes .0- No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
,❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
❑ Surface Water (Al)
❑ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
❑ High Water Table (A2)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Drainage Patterns (1310)
❑ Saturation (A3)
❑✓ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
.❑ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
❑✓ Water Marks (131)
❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (132)
❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑✓ Drift Deposits (133)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
❑ Iron Deposits (135)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
.❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial
Imagery (137)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
LJ Water -Stained Leaves (139)
❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
_❑Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑ FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present?
Yes ❑ No= Depth (inches):
Water Table Present?
Saturation Present?
Yes ❑ No= Depth (inches):
Yes ❑ No= Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes E—Z] No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP -2
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
30 ft radius Tree -Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
1 (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
2. Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
3. approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
5.
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius )
% Cover
Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1. Sweetqum (Lipuidambarstyraciflua)
25
yes FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6 (A)
2. Red Maple (Acer rubrum)
25
yes FAC
Total Number of Dominant
3.
Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
50 = Total Cover
25
10
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
20% of
total cover:
0 0
30 ft radius
OBL species x 1 =
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: )
FACW species 10 x 2 = 20
1. Blackqum (Nessa sylvatica)
15
yes FAC
FAC species 85 x 3 = 255
2. Silky Dogwood (Cornus amomum)
10
yes FACW
0 0
FACU species x 4 =
3.
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
4.
Column Totals: 95 (A) 275 (B)
5.
6.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.89
25
= Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
12.5
5
❑ 1 Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of
total cover:
-
30 ft radius
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
❑✓ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
1
_❑✓ 3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
❑ 4 Morphological Adaptations'
2
- (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
3.
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
4.
5.
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
6.
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
= Total Cover
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
30 ft radius Tree -Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
1 (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
2. Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
3. approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
5.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
6
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
7.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
$
9.
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
pplants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
10.
11.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius )
1. Muscadine (Vitis rotundifolia) 10 yes FAC
2. Greenbrier (Smilax rotundifolia) 10 yes FAC
3.
4.
Hydrophytic
20
= Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover: 10 20% of total cover: 4 Present? Yes ELI No�
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP -2
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Loc Texture Remarks
0-8" 10YR 3/3 100 Loamy
8-20" 10YR 5/3 80 7.5YR 4/4 20 C M Loamy
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_❑ Histosol (Al)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
.❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11:
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soi
❑ Dark Surface (S7)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
0 Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
❑✓ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
.❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑✓ No ❑
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

Property Report
Guilford County, Nom- roperty Ric
Parcel ID Property Address
0156629 5300 High Point Rd
_8/13/2018'
.egal Descriptioi
Lot # SEE DEED
or
Mobile
Maps
D�TN cnuoti�
Page 1 of 11
Owner Information
Owner Name Mailing Address City, State Zip
KSL SEDGEFIELD PILOT LLC 5790 FLEET STREET CARLSBAD, CA 92008
Par ormation
PIN Zoning Use Tax District
7832786157-000 GO -M
OFFICE 100
Parcel Size
Appraisal Nbrhood
Plat/Condo Bk & Pg
131.33
7832A04
N/A
Recent Sales
Book & Page Sale Date Sale Price Qualified? Improved?
00692001579 7/15/2008 $9,800,000 Yes Yes
Appraisal V es
Land Buildings Extra Features Total Value
$8,183,800 $2,805,000 $223,500 $11,212,300
http://gis. guilfordcountync.gov/PropertyCardj s/Default. aspx?pin=0156629&maplmage=_a... 8/13/2018

Property Report
Page 2 of 11
6.Extra Feature Summary
Feature Description Size/Count
Measure
Yearl Value
METAL FENCE -COMMERCIAL
1462
UNITS
1 $600
POOUAVERAGE QUALITY SWIMMING POOL
4375
UNITS
$14,700
ELEVATOR PASSENGER/FLOOR STOPS
1
UNITS
$3,600
METAL FENCE -COMMERCIAL
912
UNITS
$1,100
TENNIS CRT
12960
UNITS
$5,800
STORAGE BUILDING
100x40
DIMENSIONS
$7,800
POOUCUSTOM QUALITY SWIMMING POOL
5424
DIMENSIONS
$6,500
ELEVATOR PASSENGER/FLOOR STOPS
1
UNITS
$7,800
PAVING ASP
560560
UNITS
$151,400
ELEVATOR PASSENGER/FLOOR STOPS
1
UNITS
$3,600
ELEVATOR FREIGHT/FLOOR STOPS
1
UNITS
$2,600
ELEVATOR PASSENGER/FLOOR STOPS
2
UNITS
$7,200
ELEVATOR PASSENGER/FLOOR STOPS
1
UNITS
$3,600
ELEVATOR PASSENGER/FLOOR STOPS
1
UNITS
$3,600
ELEVATOR PASSENGER/FLOOR STOPS
1 1
UNITS
I $3,600
Disclaimer. Map and parcel data are believed to be accurate, but accuracy is not guaranteed. This is not a legal document
and should not be substituted for a title search, appraisal, survey, or for zoning verification.
Appraisal Detail (Building 1 oll 9)
Bldg# Description Bldg Use Yr Built Eff Yr Bit Units
1 OFFICE OFF CONST 1928 1960 0
provement tai
Style Foundation Exterior Wall Air Cond. Type Comm. Roof Struct. Heating Type
1.0 Story SPRDFOOT FACE BRK CENTRAL I Gable Forced air -ducted
Heated SgFt
Bedrooms
Bathrooms
Fireplace
Building Grade
Bldg Value
42,026
0
FULL:O HALF: 0
No
B+5 130%
$704,817
http://gis. guilfordcountync.gov/PropertyCardj s/Default. aspx?pin=0156629&maplmage=_a... 8/13/2018

Property Report
Page 3 of 11
Building Are
Code Description
/FACE BRK/SPRDFOOT
FUS Upper Story Fin
FBMO Basement, Finished
UATO Attic, Unfinished
Feet
9,064
23,540
7,612
1,810
Appraisal Detail (Building 2 of 9)
Bldg# Description Bldg Use Yr Built Eff Yr BitUnits
2 OFFICE OFF CONST 1928 1960 1 0
provement ai
Style I Foundation Exterior Wall Air Cond. Type Comm. Roof Struct. Heating Type
1.0 Story I SPRDFOOT FACE BRK CENTRAL Gable Forced air -ducted
Heated SgFt Bedrooms Bathrooms Fireplace Building Grade Bldg Value
16,504 0 N/A No B+5130% $1,134,829
http://gis. guilfordcountync.gov/PropertyCardj s/Default. aspx?pin=0156629&maplmage=_a... 8/13/2018

Property Report
Page 4 of 11
Building Are
Code Descripti
/FACE BRK/SPRDFOOT
UBMO Basement, Unfinished
CANO Canopy
Appraisal Detail (Building 3 of 9)
Feet
14,594
1,910
2,442
Bldg# Description Bldg UseYr Built Eff Yr Bit Units
3 OFFICE OFF CONST 1928 1960 0
provementi
Style Foundation Exterior Wall Air Cond. Type Comm. Roof Struct. Heating Type
1.0 Story SPRDFOOT FACE BRK CENTRAL Gable Forced air -ducted
Heated SgFt
Bedrooms
Bathrooms
Fireplace
Building Grade
Bldg Value
19,019
0
N/A
No
B+5130%
$426,825
http://gis. guilfordcountync.gov/PropertyCardj s/Default. aspx?pin=0156629&maplmage=_a... 8/13/2018

Property Report
Page 5 of I I
Building
Code
Feet
5,489
968
1,672
10,978
317
1,267
Improvement
Style Foundation Exterior Wall Air Cond. Type Comm. Roof Struct. Heating Type
1.0 Story SPRDFOOT FACE BRK CENTRAL Gable Forced air -ducted
Heated SgFt
/FACE BRK/SPRDFOOT
FSTO
Storage, Fin
FOPO
Porch, Open Fin
FUS
Upper Story Fin
FBMO
Basement, Finished
UBMO
Basement, Unfinished
Feet
5,489
968
1,672
10,978
317
1,267
Improvement
Style Foundation Exterior Wall Air Cond. Type Comm. Roof Struct. Heating Type
1.0 Story SPRDFOOT FACE BRK CENTRAL Gable Forced air -ducted
Heated SgFt
Bedrooms
Bathrooms
Fireplace
Building Grade
Bldg Value
35,985
0
N/A
No
B+5130%
$559,639
http://gis. guilfordcountync.gov/PropertyCardj s/Default. aspx?pin=0156629&maplmage=_a... 8/13/2018

Property Report
Code
FUS
FBMO
Page 6 of I I
10 21
BAS
50
10 10
Building Area Totals
Description Sq Feet
/FACE BRK/SPRDFOOT 7,197
Upper Story Fin 21,591
Basement, Finished 7,197
Appraisal Detail (Building 5 of 9)
Bldg# Description Bldg Use Yr Built Eff Yr Bit Units
5 OFFICE OFF CONST 1960 1960 0
provement i
Style Foundation Exterior Wall Air Cond. Type Comm. Roof Struct. Heating Type
1.0 Story SPRDFOOT FACE BRK CENTRAL Gable Forced air -ducted
Heated SgFt
Bedrooms
Bathrooms
Fireplace
Building Grade
Bldg Value
80,528
0
N/A
No
B+5130%
$1,021,144
http://gis. guilfordcountync.gov/PropertyCardj s/Default. aspx?pin=0156629&maplmage=_a... 8/13/2018

Property Report
Code
PT OO
SFBO
CLPO
FUS
UOPO
UBMO
Page 7 of I I
-Building Area Total
/FACE BRK/SPRDFOOT
13,132
Patio
3,024
Base, Semi -Finished
1,736
Loading Platform, Cover
135
Upper Story Fin
52,528
Porch, Open Unfin
1,736
Basement, Unfinished
13,132
Appraisal Detail (Building 6 of 9)
Bldg# Description Bldg Use Yr Built Eff Yr Bit Units
6 OFFICE OFF CONST 1 1967 1967 1 0
Improvement Details
Style Foundation I Exterior Wall Air Cond. Type Comm. Roof Struct. Heating Type
1.0 Story SPRDFOOT I FACE BRK T7CENTRALA Steel I Forced air -ducted
Heated SgFt
Bedrooms
Bathrooms
Fireplace
Building Grade
Bldg Value
23,760
0
N/A
No
C 100%
$670,090
http://gis. guilfordcountync.gov/PropertyCardj s/Default. aspx?pin=0156629&maplmage=_a... 8/13/2018

Property Report
Code
FUS
FSTO
SFBO
Page 8 of I I
�_'STO FBd �
10 10
Building Are
Description Sq Feet
/FACE BRK/SPRDFOOT 8,780
Upper Story Fin 8,780
Storage, Fin 1,500
Base, Semi -Finished 4,700
Appraisal Detail (Building 7 of 9)
dg# Description Bldg Use FYr Built Eff Yr Bit Units
7 OFFICE OFF CONST 1965 1965 0
provement ai
Style Foundation Exterior Wall Air Cond. Type Comm. Roof Struct. Heating Type
1.0 Story SPRDFOOT FACE BRK CENTRAL Steel RADIANT ELEC
Heated SgFt Bedrooms Bathrooms Fireplace Building Grade Bldg Value
12,194 0 N/A No C 100% $456,543
http://gis. guilfordcountync.gov/PropertyCardj s/Default. aspx?pin=0156629&maplmage=_a... 8/13/2018

Property Report
M
35
4
BAS
42
Page 9 of 11
Building Area Total
Code
Description Sq Feet
UBMO
/FACE BRK/SPRDFOOT 6,097
Basement, Unfinished 6,097
Appraisal Detail (Building 8 of 9)
Bldg# Description Bldg Use Yr Built Eff Yr Bit Units
8
CLUBS/LODGES COMM CONST 1953 1960
0
Iprovement D tails
Style Foundation Exterior Wall Air CondJ.
. Type Comm. Roof Struct. Heating Type
1.0 Story SPRDFOOT FACE BRK CENTRAL Wd tr Forced air -ducted
Heated SgFt Bedrooms Bathrooms Fireplace Building Grade Bldg Value
21,254 0 N/A No D+5 80% $1,097,291
http://gis. guilfordcountync.gov/PropertyCardj s/Default. aspx?pin=0156629&maplmage=_a... 8/13/2018

Property Report
Page 10 of 11
Building P
Code
/FACE BRK/SPRDFOOT
FEPO Porch, End Finish
FBMO Basement, Finished
on
Feet
11,502
1,125
8,627
Appraisal Detail (Building 9 of 9)
Bldg# Description Bldg Use Yr Built Eff Yr Bit Units
9 SFR SFR CONST 1953 1970 1
provement i
Style Foundation Exterior Wall Air Cond. Type Comm. Roof Struct. Heating Type
1.0 Story CONTFOOT FACE BRK CENTRAL Forced air -ducted
Heated SgFt
Bedrooms
Bathrooms
Fireplace
Building Grade
Bldg Value
1,113
2
N/A
Yes
C 100%
$86,335
http://gis. guilfordcountync.gov/PropertyCardj s/Default. aspx?pin=0156629&maplmage=_a... 8/13/2018

Property Report
Page I I of I I
Code
Building Area Totals
Description
/FACE BRK/CONTFOOT
FOPO Porch, Open Fin
STPO Stoop
Sq Feet
1,113
224
40
Disclaimer. Map and parcel data are believed to be accurate, but accuracy is not guaranteed. This is not a legal document
and should not be substituted for a title search, appraisal, survey, or for zoning verification.
http://gis.guilfordcountync.gov/PropertyCardj s/Default.aspx?pin=0156629&maplmage=_a... 8/13/2018