20050101 Ver 1_Complete File_20050121

O?O? W AT ?qQG
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
May 20, 2005
Over the Meadow, LLC
7101 Creedmoor Road, Suite 142
Raleigh, NC 27613
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
DWQ Project # 05-0101
Wake County
Subject Property: Meadowood Subdivision
Swift Creek [03-04-02, 27-434.5, WS-III, NSW (nutrient sensitive)]
Approval of 401 Water Quality Certification and Authorization Certificate per the Neuse River
Buffer Protection Rules (15A NCAC 2B.0233) with Additional Conditions
Dear Sir or Madam:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to place fill
within or otherwise impact 0.2538 acres of wetlands, 184 feet\of streams and 22,784 square feet (ft) of
protected riparian buffers for the purpose of a residential subdivision at the subject property, as described
within your application dated January 21, 2005 and received by\the N.C. Division of Water Quality
(DWQ) on January 21, 2005 and all additional information submitted and received on March 11, 2005,
and May 19, 2005. After reviewing your application, we have decided that the impacts are covered by
General Water Quality Certification Number(s) 3402 (GC3402). The Certification(s) allows you to use
Nationwide Permit(s) 39 when issued by the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). This letter shall
also act as your approved Authorization Certificate for impacts to the protected riparian buffers per 15A
NCAC 2B .0233. In addition, you should obtain or otherwise comply with any other required federal,
state or local permits before you go ahead with your project including (but not limited to) Erosion and
Sediment Control, and Non-discharge regulations. Also, this approval to proceed with your proposed
impacts or to conduct impacts to waters as depicted in your application shall expire upon
expiration of the 404 or CAMA Permit.
This approval is for the purpose and design that you described in your application. If you change your
project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application. If the property is sold,
the new owner must be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter and is thereby responsible for
complying with all conditions. If total fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre of
wetland or 150 linear feet of stream, compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A
NCAC 2H.0506 (h). This approval requires you to follow the conditions listed in the attached
certification and any additional conditions listed below.
The Additional Conditions of the Certification are:
1. Impacts Approved
The following impacts are hereby approved as long as all of the other specific and general
conditions of this Certification (or Isolated Wetland Permit) are met. No other impacts are
approved including incidental impacts:
401 OversighVExpress Review Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699.1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Internet http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands
None Carolina
Naturally
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer- 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
Over the Meadow,LLC
Page 2 of 4
5/20/05
Amount Approved
nits Plan Location or Reference
Stream 184 (feet) Figure 1(5119105), figure 2 3/11/05
404 Wetlands 0.2538(acres) Figure 3 (5119105), figure 1& 3
3/11/05
Buffers 22,784 (square ft. Figure 1 (5/19/05), figure 2 3/11/05
2. Erosion & Sediment Control Practices
Erosion and sediment control practices must be in full compliance with all specifications
governing the proper design, installation and operation and maintenance of such Best
Management Practices in order to protect surface waters standards:
a. The erosion and sediment control measures for the project must be designed, installed,
operated, and maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the North Carolina
Sediment and Erosion Control Planning and Design Manual.
b. The design, installation, operation, and maintenance of the sediment and erosion control
measures must be such that they equal, or exceed, the requirements specified in the most
recent version of the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Manual. The devices
shall be maintained on all construction sites, borrow sites, and waste pile (spoil) projects,
including contractor-owned or leased borrow pits associated with the project.
c. For borrow pit sites, the erosion and sediment control measures must be designed, installed,
operated, and maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the North Carolina
Surface Mining Manual.
d. The reclamation measures and implementation must comply with the reclamation in
accordance with the requirements of the Sedimentation Pollution Control Act.
3. Diffuse Flow (DWQ Reviewed Plans)
All stormwater shall be directed as diffuse flow at non-erosive velocities through the protected
stream buffers and will not re-concentrate before discharging into the stream as identified within
15A NCAC 2B.0233(5).
4. Protective Fencing
The outside buffer, wetland or water boundary and along the construction corridor within these
boundaries approved under this authorization shall be clearly marked with orange warning
fencing (or similar high visibility material) for the areas that have been approved to infringe
within the buffer, wetland or water prior to any land disturbing activities to ensure compliance
with 15A NCAC 213.0233 and GC 3402.
5. Construction Stormwater Permit NCG010000
Upon the approval of an Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan issued by the Division of Land
Resources (DLR) or a DLR delegated local erosion and sedimentation control program, an
NPDES General stormwater permit (NCGO10000) administered by DWQ is automatically issued
to the project. This General Permit allows stormwater to be discharged during land disturbing
construction activities as stipulated by conditions in the permit. If your project is covered by this
permit [applicable to construction projects that disturb one (1) or more acres], full compliance
with permit conditions including the sedimentation control plan, self-monitoring, record keeping
Over the Meadow,LLC
Page 3 of 4
5/20/05
and reporting requirements are required. A copy of this permit and monitoring report forms may
be found at http://l12o.enr.state.nc.uslsu/Forms Documents.hon.
6. Deed Notifications
Deed notifications or similar mechanisms shall be placed on all retained jurisdictional wetlands,
waters and protective buffers in order to assure compliance for future wetland, water and buffer
impact. These mechanisms shall be put in place prior to impacting any wetlands, waters and/or
buffers approved for impact under this Certification Approval and Authorization Certificate. A
sample deed notification can be downloaded from the 401[Wetlands Unit web site at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. The text of the sample deed notification may be modified
as appropriate to suit to this project.
7. Culvert Installation
Culverts required for this project shall be installed in such a manner that the original stream profiles
are not altered. Existing stream dimensions (including the cross section dimensions, pattern, and
longitudinal profile) must be maintained above and below locations of each culvert. Culverts shall
be designed and installed to allow for aquatic life movement as well as to prevent head cutting of
the streams. If any of the existing pipes are or become perched, the appropriate stream grade shall
be re-established or, if the pipes installed in a perched, manner, the pipes shall be removed and re-
installed correctly.
8. No Waste, Spoil, Solids, or Fill of Any Kind
No waste, spoil, solids, or fill of any kind shall occur in wetlands, waters, or riparian areas beyond
the footprint of the impacts depicted in the Pre-Construction Notification. All construction
activities, including the design, installation, operation, and maintenance of sediment and erosion
control Best Management Practices, shall be performed so that no violations of state water quality
standards, statutes, or rules occur.
9. No Sediment & Erosion Control Measures w/n Wetlands or Waters
Sediment and erosion control measures shall not be placed in wetlands or waters to the maximum
extent practicable. If placement of sediment and erosion control devices in wetlands and waters
is unavoidable, they shall be removed and the natural grade restored within six months of the date
that the Division of Land Resources has released the project.
10. Certificate of Completion
Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification or applicable
Buffer Rules, and any subsequent modifications, the applicant is required to return the attached
certificate of completion to the 401/Wetlands Unit, North Carolina Division of Water Quality,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC, 27699-1650.
Violations of any condition herein set forth may result in revocation of this Certification and may result in
criminal and/or civil penalties. The authorization to proceed with your proposed impacts or to conduct
impacts to waters as depicted in your application and as authorized by this Certification, shall expire upon
expiration of the 404 or CAMA Permit.
Over the Meadow,LLC
Page 4 of 4
5/20/05
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this Certification (associated with the approved wetland or
stream impacts), you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act within 60 days of the date that
you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition, which conforms to Chapter 150B of
the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center,
Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714. This certification and its conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a
hearing.
Any disputes over determinations regarding this Authorization Certificate (associated with thU approved
buffer impacts) shall be referred in writing to the Director for a decision. The Director's decision is
subject to review as provided in Articles 3 and 4 of G.S. 150B.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water
Act and the Neuse riparian buffer protection rule as described within 15A NCAC 2B .0233. If you have
any questions, please telephone John Dorney or Cyndi Karoly at 919-733-1786.
AWK/dae
Enclosures: GC 3402
Certificate of Completion
Sincerely,
Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
cc: Sean Clark-S&EC, 11010 Raven Ridge Road, Raleigh, NC 27614
USACE Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
Eric Kulz, DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
DLR Raleigh Regional Office
File Copy
Central Files
Filename: 050101 Meadowood(Wake)40 1 +buffer
SENDING CONFIRMATION
DATE MAY-20-2005 FRI 15:21
14AME DWQ?-WETLANDS
TEL [phone]
PHONE : [phone]
PAGES : 5/5
START TIME : MAY-20 15:20
ELAPSED TIME : 01107"
MODE : ECM
RESULTS : OK
FIRST PAGE OF RECENT DOCUMENT TRANSMITTED...

...tl?/=Ti?1 wn.h; (t9GS(L'65 )Yl: N. i ti.+.' 1 .w..'.d
KJ::.rigJ ?+Y'lSMy YSi'1nS Tx ?p?x.:>RO.SS
('al {'F;S Va.: iFxN if.M a-n? uwv;RA f•?l
one nw

J
J
J
:suoprulsul jupads 10 sa1oK
aaays aa?na ?ulPnlaul saoud?o rxlwnN
1L0,, n277 c' mea :duud(uo?
.6v" FLY 16 :4 xo; {
93LPCC:-616 Aaouu :uupeuuojuj jamuo;1
0991.669LZ :Jk'(f'aIBY
xa:aa') aovuas 1?71V OS91 :-jPPV,-Umv Q
(MLIi: tU9L:. J?4?laP'?i
OSZapes ;urnapwF{"114V'.) iZEZ ,?PPV Wails
siiu j] Sulpnuaa1 uoijvPodsuUj jL
pus )uauld01ae3R Ulua2ojj lipaiaj ssaadx3flg2j5aae0 for
?a3anosa21 IssnluN pus prjuawuoatnug3o jualulINda(!
Xj!juno aalu,113o uols!.+!Q
x ronn.u?
n--a di
•r''ll'A\.n' ?. U
H -
Acnfn>) Rxn V L'n cacn.• t P tc-nv^ti? t'x'I^n l J?•M ?i
imap:Hdebbie. [e-mail]:143/...
Subject: revised Meadowood PCN
From: "Sean Clark" <[e-mail]>
Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 13:30:27 -0400
To: "Debbie Edwards" <[e-mail]>
As requested, here's the revised PCN. Give me a call if you have any
questions.
Thanks
Sean Clark
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
919-846-5900
This electronic communication, including all attachments, is intended only
for the named addressee (s) and may contain confidential information. This
electronic communication may not have passed through our standard
review/quality control process. Design data and recommendations included
herein are provided as a matter of convenience and should not be used for
final design. Rely only on final, hardcopy materials bearing the
consultant's original signature and seal. If you are not the named
addressee (s), any use, dissemination, distribution or copying of this
communication is prohibited. If you have received this electronic
communication in error, please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete
the original communication from your system. Thank you.
1 of 1 5/20/2005 4:44 PM
Office Use Only: Form Vcrsion May 2002
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ® Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP 39
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCWRP prior to submittal of PCN), complete
section VIII and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information
Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Over The Meadow, LLC
Mailing Address: 7101 Creedmoor Road
Suite 142
Raleiah. NC 27613
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address:
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Sean Clark
Company Affiliation: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Mailing Address: 11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: SC1ark(a SandEC.com
Page 1 of 8
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Meadowood Subdivision
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only):
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 0771769539, 0771675572
4. Location
County: Wake Nearest Town: Cary
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Meadowood Subdivision
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): The site is located approximately
2000 feet southeast of the intersection of Campbell Road (SR 1383) and Holly Springs Road
(SR 1152) in Wake County, NC.
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): 035043'1 1.37"N/078044'38.61 "W
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Property size (acres): ± 126 acres
7. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Swift Creek
8. River Basin: Neuse
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: The site is currently wooded. Portions of the site that were
formally cultivated fields are in primary to secondary successional stages.
Page 2 of 8
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The
proposed project is a single-family residential subdivision with the typical utilities (i.e.,
sewer, water, electric, etc.). Wetlands, a perennial stream, an intermittent stream, and their
associated riparian buffers will be impacted to provide a road to connect to the eastern end of
the proposed Meadowood Subdivision. Typical excavatingy and grading equipment will be
used during construction activities.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The purpose for this subdivision is to provide
additional housing for the area. The road crossings of the perennial and intermittent stream
are required to connect to the eastern end of this property. The road location is dictated by the
existence of an existing road stub on an adiacent property. Both streams transverse the entire
property which make impacts unavoidable.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
No previous 401/404 permits have been issued for this site. Mr. Mike Horan of the NC-DWQ
has visited the site to make buffer calls. During well drilling activities the two stream channels
were crossed and impacted. Both of these crossings are less than 40 linear feet each and
proposed subdivision roads have been designed so as to cross in these locations and not result in
additional impacts. The wetlands and streams on the property have been flagged by S&EC.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
No additional permits are anticipated at this time.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
Page 3 of 8
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts:
Two buffered stream channels will be impacted by roads within the proposed subdivision.
Proposed permanent stream channel impacts include 119 linear feet of perennial channel and 65
linear feet of intermittent channel. Wetlands impacted on site include 0.2539 acre due to the
construction of required roads.
2. Individually list wetland impacts below:
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Located within
100-year Floodplain**
(es/no) Distance to
Nearest Stream
(linear feet)
Type of Wetland***
1 fill 0.0331 no +/_100 emergent
2 fill 0.1074 no 0 emergent
3 fill 0.0429 no 600' emergent
4 fill 0.0038 no 150' emergent
5 Fill 0.0384 No +/-120 Headwater wetland
6 fill 0.0282 No +/-200 Emergent
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at httn://www.fema.gov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.) Indicate if wetland is isolated (determination of isolation to be made by USACE only).
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: +/- 5 acres
Total area of wetland impact proposed: 0.2538 acre
3. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:
Stream Impact Length of Average Width Perennial or
Site Number Type of Impact* Impact Stream Name** of Stream Intermittent?
(indicate on ma) (linear feet) Before Impact (please secif )
1 Culvert/fill 119 UT to Swift Creek 9-10' perennial
2 Culvert/fill 65 UT to Swift Creek 3' intermittent
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.usgs.gov. Several intcmct sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.topozonacom,
www.mapguest.coin, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 184 linear feet
Page 4 of 8
4. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.) below:
Open Water Impact Area of Name Waterbody Type of Waterbody
Site Number Type of Impact* Impact )
(if applicable) (lake, pond, estuary, sound,
indicate on ma (acres) bay, ocean, etc.)
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
5. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): N/A
Size of watershed draining to pond: N/A Expected pond surface area: N/A
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
The client requested a detailed delineation to minimize and avoid impacts to iurisdictional
waters (including wetlands) to the maximum extent possible. Due to the nature of the property,
the two stream crossings are necessary to access the eastern portion of the property. These
crossings were planned for the areas previously impacted during well-drilling activities. These
proposed crossings are at a nearly perpendicular angle to minimize impacts to the stream
channel and were placed in the location of the previous drill rig crossings. The road resulting in
Impact 3 was redesigned to avoid unnecessary impacts to the wetlands and the buffered stream.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
Page 5 of 8
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://l12o.enr.state.ne.us/ncwetlands/stnngide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
Because the applicant has avoided and minimized stream channel impacts by crossing stream
channels in a perpendicular fashion and the proposed impacts to perennial/important streams
are less than 150 linear feet no stream mitigation is proposed. If mitigation is required,
however,the applicant proposes payment to the EEP.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCWRP at
[phone] to determine availability and to request written approval of mitigation prior
to submittal of a PCN. For additional information regarding the application process for the
NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at http://h2o.enr.state.ne.us/wrp/index.litm. If use of
the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide the
following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): 0
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): 0
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0.25
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): o
Page 6 of 8
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state) funds or the use of public
(federal/state) land?
Yes ? No
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 213 .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 213 .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify
Yes ® No ? If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Crossinn 1 (Perennial Stream)
Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 9,776 3 N/A
2 4,415 1.5 N/A
Total 14,191 N/A
Crossing 2 (Intermittent Stream)
Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 3,348 3 N/A
2 5,245 1.5 N/A
Total 8,593 N/A
Page 7 of 8
* Zone I extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 213 .0242 or .0260.
Because both crossings will impact less than 1/3 acre of riparian buffer the proposed activity is
considered "Allowable" and therefore will not require buffer mitigation.
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
The proposed project will have less than 12% impervious coverage and will therefore not require
a DWQ approved stormwater plan, however the diffuse flow measures will be met and the
required worksheets have been submitted.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Individual Septic System.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ® No ?
*See the Prior Project History Section (Section IV).
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
N/A
Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 8 of 8
Environmental Consultants, PA
Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
May 19, 2005
DWQ Project #05-0101
S&EC Project #8386.W2
NCDENR-DWQ
Attn: Ms. Debbie Edwards
2321 Crabtree Blvd D
Parkview Building I!'1
Raleigh, NC 27604 MAY 1 9 2005
RE: Response to April 11, 2005 request for more information DENR-WATER QUA,LITY
t,=TU,t WAND STQRMATER BRA14CN
Meadowood Subdivision / DWQ Project Number 05-0101
Cary, Wake County, North Carolina
Dear Ms. Edwards:
On behalf of the applicant, Over The Meadow, LLC we are providing you with the
additional information that you requested within your letter dated April 11, 2005 (see
attached copy) and as per our office meeting of May 10, 2005. The original Pre-
construction Notification (PCN) application was received by the Division of Water
Quality (DWQ) on January 21, 2005. The requests listed by your office are below and
are followed by our responses. The additional information provided below should be
considered as appendices and revisions to the January 21, 2005 application.
Additional Information:
1. In the response letter, it was indicated that there world be an energy
dissipater at crossing #1 and at Crossing #2. Crossing #1 is being
constructed on a large watershed, please submit the velocities of water
that will be flowing through this crossing post-construction and the slope
in which the culverts will be placed.
Energy dissipaters are not being proposed for either Crossing 1 or 2. Bank
Stabilization is proposed for the downstream side of Crossing 1 (see
attached map). As per the engineers calculations Crossing 1 will have a
post construction velocity of V25 = 8.51 fps and Vloo = 9.85 fps. Crossing
2 has a post construction velocity of V25 = 4.37 fps and V loo = 4.89 fps.
The Engineer believes that because the main culvert will be buried and in
Charlotte Office:
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C
Concord, NC 28025
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Greensboro Office:
3817-E Lawndale Drive
Greensboro, NC 27455
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Meadowood Subdivision
S&EC Project #8386.W2
May 19, 2005
Page 2 of 3
an effort to avoid additional impacts, bank stabilization is a more
appropriate measure rather than an energy dissipater. This stabilization
will require additional buffer impacts but will not require additional
stream impacts. Please note that the centerline of the stream of crossing 1
is shown and that the buffers are extended from the top-of-bank. The
dashed lines running parallel to the centerline is the "drainage easement"
not the edge of the channel. The channel width in this area is 10 feet.
At the location of Impact 1 the limits of disturbance from the road/wing
wall installation have been reduced however the overall buffer impact at
this crossing has increased due to the proposed placement of rip-rap bank
stabilization (not to be installed in the stream or below the water line).
The buffer impacts for-Impact 1 will total 0.32 acre. Please see the impact
chart on the attached inset of Impact 1.
2. Fill is being proposed for impacts 3, 4, and 5, in order for the hydrology
to not be discontinued a culvert will be needed at impacts 4 and S, please
submit impact maps showing culverts for hydraulic connectivity.
The proposed pipes have been realigned and positioned in the natural
drainage in impact areas 3, 4, and 5. This will make sure that the natural
drainages are not hydraulically bypassed.
3. Nutrient removal efficiencies for grassed swales are only 20%, therefore
you cannot directly discharge this stormwater into a buffered streant, level
spreaders are required outside of the riparian buffers. In addition, the
stormwater management plan that is being proposed (diffuse flow
provisions only) do not require extensive planning or design so a
conditional approval will not be given for this project. Please design level
spreaders at all easements (not plunge pools) that are being directed to
riparian buffers and submit the level spreader worksheets for each.
(Please note: easements are needed around all stormwater BMP's for
maintenance purposes, please include a new site plan that includes all
level spreaders).
Level spreaders have been proposed and designed for all locations where
possible. Scour holes are proposed in other locations where the drainage
area acts as a constraint on the level spreader lengths. The project will not
be using curb and gutter but will have earthen/grassed ditches. Grassed
swales that meet DWQ standards will also be used in all feasible locations.
Because Zone 2 will be grassed in the areas of the proposed level
spreaders these level spreaders where sized using the 13 linear foot per 1
acre of drainage guidelines.
Meadowood Subdivision
S&EC Project #8386.W2
May 19, 2005
Page 3 of 3
Please call me or email me at SClark a,SandEC.cotn if you require any additional
infonnation.
Sincerely,
Sean Clark
Attachments: Figure 1 - Construction Details, of proposed Stream Impact 1
Figure 2 - Profile of Impact 1
Figure 3 - Plan view of Impacts 4 and 5 showing repositioned pipes
Stormwater Devices Worksheets
Overall Map showing crossings and labeled storniwater devices
FIGURE 2
o ?70
O r=
ail r ?
'I
I ? ? ?? to
l O
332.38 I
i ?
+ 331 .6-9
O
330.79 / i
i
i
323.313
f 3.21>_5C C-' ,
.°-i
325.33
i
3214_?2??nc? l _
i-I
322.3
I /
i 322 ?)0__??
r
321.30! 320.50
-_...___._,'
{ tiat\ Im / 1
320.5'
o
320.55
3120.57;
_
FIGURE I
= -I Drn
/
07 rn ?
/
z N0
?
/ / um-0-i
Z x>F,
r rn
z
/
rn
y
Cnrn?
/ o
Z
O
_
-----
D z
?ZX

o ? 07

\ -- ? Z
I

r

S \
\
rTl

r
\
v / r
_

\ ? Frr `?u6 `? yZ c^D r
_
CA ?? . ! N

U / a tv .D O ?{
• 1 / / / 5Z,
o ` ,. I .110 II II n

/ Y U1
70
C -: E E _
E 70
c:
E C
<
I
CD -
F-n
\ ' E E /.
E ul ?. D /
I ; L (?
E
` E E E
E -E7}
E E E / / I\
,
?E E E E -Ti Z
E E E

'
/ w
+ `\\ E E E E E E
E
` f. -E• ..F . /
E O
0 \ E E

\ E E

E
E E E
?
E E
E E E E
E E
E E E
E
E
E E i
-
77.
--

~
,
(
rn -----------
?.." tee. ,r, n
? CP
O
rn
rn

b
Z t t ?'
n m Tl
f
O o DC
n
x cn fi
'•r

a 00+1 N 00+0 p Fri
,n

N ####### #################Yrt , ' C O ?
C) 7U
?
1 r

FIGURE 3
? j
* 70
\ ??-/Z1
OCDct
'? \ O CD Q? D
?0IP0 CD D
S-i -crn cn
OZT <0 k \ -NiacT
r 00 { rn \ D n G
0 Z O w N * += c
Gl -+ O? ':+ NZ
Nrn? :t.? ? -Q ?Z 71
om 500
lp ?<??
o G 1 z rn
? d7? Off- ? ' Iti rn ? ..
/ y X015 ?c J' D (P
dN - ? 2 <al Q rn-rD ? rn>
? n rn
r-n
'SOD /,or- rn
Gib ??? •+' `ci < G V
?? C ?? y W y I )>
t'o C? W':0 rnl
2. y y = O -. S 7u It
y
?'' Je! a z IL
y y 0.,; ? W y
y y IrW,?. ?: y ? ? ? r z
W y o? y _/a0IO
y y ` z Crn un rn \?.
L yfTl y y y 1 { 1 1' 1 / < W` IuI^l
y r y Z 6Ny 9 -U D V O -?
y y y fTiv y ?' ' O !n rn
yz r„ _
V y z
V
II y ,? y? y m I ?N rn O<
'? y '? (p ? ]0 fTl
y y " y y I N D N
y y y ' N N
y W y
LrT
v y y y - U' r?
.yam y y ?
y `W \\\ lJ?
W
W J,
W y • \ y1?`1 `V`\
y y y ? \? ??' I / \ 0".
". T
7 -cl IZl.PP' J RF P T P Sauo 1J2naq dP'+. : a.n en cn PRIA
DWQ Project No. Q 5- y( U I,
1. PROJECT INI
Project Name :
Contact Person:
Level Spreader ID:.
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY - LEVEL SPREADER WORKSHEET
(please complete the following information):
Level Spreader Length
Drainage Area
Impervious Area
Maximum Filter Strip/Buffer Slope
grass
ft.
D.? a
c.
ac.
Max. Discharge from a 10 Year Storm cfs
Max. Discharge to Level Spreader cfs
Filter Strip/Buffer Vegetation
Pre-treatment or Bypass Method ? 14
REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Phone Number.
(perpendicular to flow)
(on-site and off-site drainage to the level spreader)
(on-site and off-site drainage to the level spreader)
(6% for forested, leaf littler cover, 8% for thick ground cover)'
(thick ground cover or grass, canopied forest with leaf litter
groundcover)
I:?7t'f' ?GL-a•!/ v(/11-1- C]' IBS Gf ??2?? - o rtI;_ri1 At49
rf, ltu?, qlvril wsyvi_ -> ;tom/o r->?/ nA ? ! ?117
Initial in the space provided to indicate the following design requirements have been met and supporting documentation is attached. If a
requirement has not been met; attach an explanation of why. At a minimum, a complete stormwater management plan submittal includes
a worksheet for each BMP, design calculations, plans and specifications showing all BMPs and outlet structure details, a detailed
drainage plan and a fully executed operation and maintenance agreement An incomplete submittal package will result in a request for
additional information and will substantially delay final review and approval of the project
Armlicants Initials
G Level spreader is at least 13 ft per cfs for thick ground cover or grass or 100 ft per cfs in canopied forest with leaf
litter.
Pre-Form Scour Holes are on flat slopes only
No structures are located in protected buffers* Zo?6 g 44-1 Uy
If bypass method specified in the Draft Level Spreader Design Option Document
method is specified (if applicable) and plan details and calculations are provided
go to level spreader and subsequent filter strip is hydraulically and spatially separate from the bypass
discharge.
No structures are located in protected buffers.
Plan details for the bypass and outlets are provided.
The operation and maintenance agreement includes annual erosion and vegetation repair.
The operation and maintenance agreement signed and notarized by the responsible party is provided.
* Level spreaders in series can be used on slopes of up to 15% in forested areas with leaf littler cover or on slopes of up to 25% in areas
with thick ground cover or grass if designed according to the Draft Level Spreader Design Option Document This potentially requires a
minor variance in protected buffer areas. In any event the second level spreader cannot be located in Zone 1 of a protected buffer area.
DWQ Project No. U (:?_ ^ U ( U t
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY - LEVEL SPREADER WORKSHEET
PROJECT INFORMATION (please complete the following information):
Project Name :
Contact Person:
Level Spreader ID:. Z
Level Spreader Length
Drainage Area
Impervious Area
Maximum Filter Strip/Buffer Slope
grass
ft
o r ac.
c. ac.
Max. Discharge from a 10 Year Storm ? is cfs
Max. Discharge to Level Spreader cfs
Filter Strip/Buffer Vegetation
Pre-treatment or Bypass Method
REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
(perpendicular to flow)
(on-site and off-site drainage to the level spreader)
(on-site and off-site drainage to the level spreader)
(6% for forested, leaf littler cover, 8% for thick ground cover)"
(thick ground cover or grass, canopied forest with leaf litter
groundcover)

Initial in the space provided to indicate the following design requirements have been met and supporting documentation is attached. ff a
requirement has not been met; attach an explanation of why. At a minimum, a complete stormwater management plan submittal includes
a worksheet for each BMP, design calculations, plans and specifications showing all BMPs and outlet structure details, a detailed
drainage plan and a fully executed operation and maintenance agreement An incomplete submittal package will result in a request for
additional information and will substantially delay final review and approval of the project
AnDlicants Initials
Level spreader is at least 13 ft per cfs for thick ground cover or grass or 100 It per cfs in canopied forest with leaf
d1A litter.
Pre-Form Scour Holes are on flat slopes only
No structures are located in protected buffers'
If bypass method specified in the Draft Level Spreader Design Option Document:
Phone Number
method is specified (if applicable) and plan details and calculations are provided
ge to level spreader and subsequent filter strip is hydraulically and spatially separate from the bypass
discharge.
No structures are located in protected buffers.
Plan details for the bypass and outlets are provided.
.The operation and maintenance agreement includes annual erosion and vegetation repair.
The operation and maintenance agreement signed and notarized by the responsible party is provided.
' Level spreaders in series can be used on slopes of up to 15% in forested areas with leaf littler cover or on slopes of up to 25% in areas
with thick ground cover or grass if designed according to the Draft Level Spreader Design Option Document. This potentially requires a
minor variance in protected buffer areas. In any event the second level spreader cannot be located in Zone 1 of a protected buffer area.
DWQ Project No. 6 5- 010 t
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY - LEVEL SPREADER WORKSHEET
PROJECT INFORMATION (please complete the following information):
Project Name : i
Contact Person: _
Level Spreader ID:.
Level Spreader Length
Drainage Area
Impervious Area
Maximum Filter Strip/Buffer Slope
grass
ft
O, S ac.
o? ac.

Max. Discharge from a 10 Year Storm -? cfs
Max. Discharge to Level Spreader cfs
Filter Strip/Buffer Vegetation
Pre-treatment or Bypass Method A 1A
REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
(perpendicular to flow)
(on-site and off-site drainage to the level spreader)
(on-site and off-site drainage to the level spreader)
(6%for forested, leaf littler cover, 8% for thick ground cover)"
(thick ground cover or grass, canopied forest with leaf litter
groundcover)
ANt? ?? ??1??
Initial in the space provided to indicate the following design requirements have been met and supporting documentation is attached. If a
requirement has notbeen met, affach an explanation of why. At a minimum, a complete stommrater management plan submittal includes
a worksheet for each BMP, design calculations, plans and specifications showing all BMPs and outlet structure details, a detailed
drainage plan and a fully executed operation and maintenance agreement An incomplete submittal package will result in a request for
additional information and will substantially delay final review and approval of the project
ADDlicants Initials
L Level spreader is at least 13 ft per cfs for thick ground cover or grass or 100 ft per cfs in canopied forest with leaf
utter.
Pre- Form Scour Holes are on flat slopes only
?G No structures are located in protected buffers*
If bypass method specified in the Draft Level Spreader Design Option Document:
Phone Number
method is specified (if applicable) and plan details and calculations are provided
1e to level spreader and subsequent filter strip is hydraulically and spatially separate from the bypass
discharge.
No structures are located in protected buffers.
Plan details for the bypass and outlets are provided.
The operation and maintenance agreement includes annual erosion and vegetation repair.
The operation and maintenance agreement signed and notarized by the responsible party is provided.
* Level spreaders in series can be used on slopes of up to 15% in forested areas with leaf littler cover or on slopes of up to 25% in areas
with thick ground cover or grass if designed according to the Draft Level Spreader Design Option Document This potentially requires a
minor variance in protected buffer areas. In any event the second level spreader cannot be located in Zone 1 of a protected buffer area.
DWQ Project No. US -016 1
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY - LEVEL SPREADER WORKSHEET
1. PROJECT INFORMATION (please complete the following information):
Project Name :
Contact Person: Phone Number.
Level Spreader ID:. I
Level Spreader Length g ft.
Drainage Area o ac.
Impervious Area ac.
Maximum Filter Strip/Buffer Slope - %
grass
Max. Discharge from a 10 YearStorm cfs
Max. Discharge to Level Spreader cfs
Filter Strip/Buffer Vegetation
Pre-treatment or Bypass Method
REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
(perpendicular to flow)
(on-site and off-site drainage to the level spreader)
(on-site and off-site drainage to the level spreader)
(6% for forested, leaf littler cover, 8% for thick ground coverp
(thick ground cover or grass, canopied forest with leaf litter
groundcover)
Initial in the space provided to indicate the following design requirements have been met and supporting documentation is attached. If a
requirement has not been met; attach an explanation of why. At a minimum, a complete stommwater management plan submittal includes
a worksheet for each BMP, design calculations, plans and specifications showing all BMPs and outlet structure details, a detailed
drainage plan and a fully executed operation and maintenance agreement An incomplete submittal package will result in a request for
additional information and will substantially delay final review and approval of the project
Applicants Initials
L Level spreader is at least 13 ft per cfs for thick ground cover or grass or 100 ft per cfs in canopied forest with leaf
litter.
Pre-Form Scour Holes are on flat slopes only
No structures are located in protected buffers'
If bypass method specified in the Draft Level Spreader Design Option Document:
method is specified (if applicable) and plan details and calculations are provided
ge to level spreader and subsequent filter strip is hydraulically and spatially separate from the bypass
discharge.
No structures are located in protected buffers.
Plan details for the bypass and outlets are provided.
The operation and maintenance agreement includes annual erosion and vegetation repair.
The operation and maintenance agreement signed and notarized by the responsible party is provided.
Level spreaders in series can be used on slopes of up to 15% in forested areas with leaf littler cover or on slopes of up to 25% in areas
with thick ground cover or grass if designed according to the Draft Level Spreader Design Option Document This potentially requires a
minor variance in protected buffer areas. In any event the second level spreader cannot be located in Zone 1 of a protected buffer area.
DWQ Project No. C)5-- 010 k
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY - LEVEL SPREADER WORKSHEET
1. PROJECT INFORMATION (please complete the following information):
Project Name : 1? ?A t?c? .dne ma
Contact Person: Phone Number.
Level Spreader ID:. ,5
Level Spreader Length 1115 ft. (perpendicular to flow)
Drainage Area G ;El ac. (on-site and off-sito drainage to the level spreader)
Impervious Area 2. I ac. (on-site and off-site drainage to the level spreader)
Maximum Filter StripBuffer Slope % (6% for forested, leaf littler cover, 8% for thick ground cover)'
grass
Ma)L Discharge from a 10 Year Storm cfs
Max. Discharge to Level Spreader cfs
Filter Strip/Buffer Vegetation (thick ground cover or grass, canopied forest with leaf litter
groundcover)
Pre-treatment or Bypass Method Ft ? IMI,t, V1,11-r4 ? P?'--?` j"o r S' 4AW
?-? ? wins I.ILv?- - ? pl?i p??dt??b ?--
II. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST ? •, rL,4/ pStAe-1701-1 Ill I•_vfv- 1?1t'ti?
Initial in the space provided to indicate the following design requirements have been met and supporting documentation is attached. !f a
requirement has not been met; attach an explanation of why. At a minimum, a complete stormwater management plan submittal includes
a worksheet for each BMP, design calculations, plans and specifications showing all BMPs and outlet structure details, a detailed
drainage plan and a fully executed operation and maintenance agreement An incomplete submittal package will result in a request for
additional information and will substantially delay final review and approval of the project
ADDlicants Initials
G Level spreader is at least 13 ft per cfs for thick ground cover or grass or 100 ft per cfs in canopied forest with leaf
litter.
G- Pre-Form Scour Holes are on flat slopes only
No structures are located in protected buffers"
If bypass method specified in the Draft Level Spreader Design Option Document
method is specified (if applicable) and plan details and calculations are provided
go to level spreader and subsequent filter strip is hydraulically and spatially separate from the bypass
discharge.
No structures are located in protected buffers.
Plan details for the bypass and outlets are provided.
The operation and maintenance agreement includes annual erosion and vegetation repair.
The operation and maintenance agreement signed and notarized by the responsible party is provided.
' Level spreaders in series can be used on slopes of up to 15% in forested areas with leaf littler cover or on slopes of up to 25% in areas
with thick ground cover or grass if designed according to the Draft Level Spreader Design Option Document This potentially requires a
minor variance in protected buffer areas. In any event the second level spreader cannot be located in Zone 1 of a protected buffer area.
DWQ Project No. O 6-- Ot Q
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY - LEVEL SPREADER WORKSHEET
PROJECT INFORMATION (please complete the following information):
Project Name : 4!_
Contact Person:
Level Spreader ID:.
Level Spreader Length
Drainage Area
Impervious Area
Maximum Filter Strip/Buffer Slope
grass
?!o ft
D ac.
ac.
o?
Max. Discharge from a 10 Year Storm Cfs
Max. Discharge to Level Spreader cfs
Filter Strip/Buffer Vegetation
Pre-treatment or Bypass Method
II. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Phone Number.
(perpendicular to flow)
(on-site and off-site drainage to the level spreader)
(on-site and off-site drainage to the level spreader)
(6%for forested, leaf littler cover, 8%for thick ground covert'
(thick ground cover or grass, canopied forest with leaf litter
groundcover)
• ?r1 ?t ov ,v Ll.
y t lT? =t- 1yf4= It-? rtr
• ° {`- % ?I-P/? r %Tbt? II.L u9-Vfti 1y12r-PVJE f
Initial in the space provided to indicate the following design requirements have been met and supporting documentation is attached. if a
requirement has not been met; attach an explanation of why. At a minimum, a complete stonnwater management plan submittal includes
a worksheet for each BMP, design calculations, plans and specifications showing all BMPs and outlet structure details, a detailed
drainage plan and a fully executed operation and maintenance agreement. An incomplete submittal package will result in a request for
additional information and will substantially delay final review and approval of the project.
ADDlicants Initials
Level spreader is at least 13 ft. per cfs for thick ground cover or grass or 100 ft per cfs in canopied forest with leaf
litter.
f Pre-Form Scour Holes are on flat slopes only
No structures are located in protected buffers'
If bypass method specified in the Draft Level Spreader Design Option Document
method is specified (if applicable) and plan details and calculations are provided
go to level spreader and subsequent filter strip is hydraulically and spatially separate from the bypass
discharge.
No structures are located in protected buffers.
details for the bypass and outlets are provided.
operation and maintenance agreement includes annual erosion and vegetation repair.
operation and maintenance agreement signed and notarized by the responsible party is provided.
• Level spreaders in series can be used on slopes of up to 15% in forested areas with leaf littler cover or on slopes of up to 25% in areas
with thick ground cover or grass it designed according to the Draft Level Spreader Design Option Document. This potentially requires a
minor variance in protected buffer areas. In any event the second level spreader cannot be located in Zone 1 of a protected buffer area.
DWQ Project No. 05--010
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY - LEVEL SPREADER WORKSHEET
PROJECT INFORMATION (please complete the following information):
Project Name
Contact Person:
Level Spreader ID:. 7
Level Spreader Length
Drainage Area
Impervious Area
Maximum Filter Strip/Buffer Slope
grass
? 2 ft
o, ac.
Max. Discharge from a 10 Year Storm Cf3
Max. Discharge to Level Spreader cfs
Filter Strip/Buffer Vegetation
Pre-treatment or Bypass Method
REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
(perpendicular to flow)
(on-site and off-site drainage to the level spreader)
(on-site and off-site drainage to the level spreader)
(6% for forested, leaf littler cover, 8%forthick ground cover)'
(thick ground cover or grass, canopied forest with leaf fitter
groundcover)
Initial in the space provided to indicate the following design requirements have been met and supporting documentation is attached. !f a
requirement has not been met, attach an explanation of why. At a minimum, a complete stommrater management plan submittal includes
a worksheot for each BMP, design calculations, plans and specifications showing all BMPs and outlet structure details, a detailed
drainage plan and a fully executed operation and maintenance agreement An incomplete submittal package will result in a request for
additional information and will substantially delay final review and approval of the project
6ca Initials
Level spreader is at least 13 ft per cfs for thick ground cover or grass or 100 ft per cfs in canopied forest with leaf
fitter.
Pre-Form Scour Holes are on flat slopes only
No structures are located in protected buffers*
If bypass method specified in the Draft Level Spreader Design Option Document
Phone Number
method is specified (if applicable) and plan details and calculations are provided
go to level spreader and subsequent filter strip is hydraulically and spatially separate from the bypass
discharge.
No structures are located in protected buffers.
Plan details for the bypass and outlets are provided.
The operation and maintenance agreement includes annual erosion and vegetation repair.
The operation and maintenance agreement signed and notarized by the responsible party is provided.
* Level spreaders in series can be used on slopes of up to 15% in forested areas with leaf littler cover or on slopes of up to 25% in areas
with thick ground cover or grass if designed according to the Draft Level Spreader Design Option Document This potentially requires a
minor variance in protected buffer areas. In any event the second level spreader cannot be located in Zone 1 of a protected buffer area.
Grassed Swales & Other Questions
Subject: Grassed Swales & Other Questions
From: "Bob Zarzecki" <[e-mail]>
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 10:39:56 -0400
To: "Debbie Edwards \(DWQ\)" <[e-mail]>, "Cyndi Karoly \(DWQ\)"
<[e-mail]>, "John Hennessy \(DWQ\)" <[e-mail]>
CC: "Torn Reeder \(DWQ\)" <torn.reed [e-mail]>, "Sean Clark" <[e-mail]>
Cyndi, Debbie & John H.,
Sean received a request for additional information for Meadowood (DWQ 05-0101). He asked me to take a look at
the letter. I have a few questions.
1. Question 1 asks about the velocities of water that will be flowing through the pipe, slope of the pipe and
seems to be inferring that a rock energy dissipater below Crossing #1 should be used. The engineer is
proposing to use two 84" pipes. One will be aligned with the 5 to 6 foot wide stream and buried 1 foot. The
other will be raised. This design will ensure that the normal, low flows will pass through the pipe aligned
with the stream and higher flows (above bankfull) will flow through the raised pipe. The use of a dissipater
will increase impacts to the perennial stream. Also, I typically recommend that engineers avoid dissipaters if
at all possible (it depends on what DOT, Land Quality or the local municipalities will allow) to aid in the
compliance with the certification conditions of aquatic life passage and channel stability. I'm not an engineer,
but I think that it is reasonable to assume that velocities through twin 84" pipes on a 600+ acre watershed will
not be an issue for channel stability. The slope of the pipe can be taken from the cross sections provided in
the last package of additional infornation. It's approximately a 6" drop over 100 feet or a slope of 0.005. If
you still want the velocities, then we will need to know what storni events and discharges that you would like
us to use. Please advise.
2. Impacts 4 & 5 have culverts just not at the location of the wetlands. Basically, what would have occurred
would be a diversion of the overland flow into the road side ditches, through the culverts, into the road side
ditch along the other side of the road and back to the wetland below the road. The overland flow would not
have been diverted away from the downstream wetlands. Other sources of hydrology (subsurface flow,
groundwater, rain water, etc.) would most likely not be effected by this design. We'll discuss relocating the
culverts to align with the wetlands with the engineer, but I don' think that the current design would have
significantly discontinued the hydrology of the wetlands.
3. The Big Question: Is DWQ no longer accepting the sole use of grassed swales as stormwater
management facilities that remove nitrogen to allow for stormwater conveyances through the buffer?
If so, what has DOT been proposing in similar situations where diffuse flow can not be achieved? The second
part of this question states that, "the stormmater management plan that is being proposed (diffuse low
provisions only) do not require extensive planning or design so a conditional approval will not be given for
this project". This is the first that I have heard this statement used. Is DWQ no longer approving projects
with the diffuse flow review conditions? As of the date that our information was submitted, it was my
understanding that you were?
Most of the issues raised above have not been issues on previously approved projects. This is a large lot subdivision
(average lot sizes around 1 acre), proposing less than 12% built upon area, no curb and gutter and what I think is a
reasonable request for impacts. The only real issue that I see is diffuse flow. It will be difficult to achieve this in
some locations. That is why grassed swales have been proposed. The diffuse flow provision is a performance based
requirement. The engineer believes that the current design will comply with the requirement, with the exception of
the direct discharge /grassed Swale locations. In the pastas long as the general concepts seems reasonable, the 401s
have been approved and Todd worked out the diffuse flow issues later. If that is no longer going to be the case, then
please let us know and we'll advise our clients that we'll need stormwater management plans prior to submitting the
PCN for all future developments. (One thing that bugs me about this one is that I've seen other approvals issued for
projects with much higher percentages of BUA and little to no stormwater management plans.) Please advise us on
the issues discussed above. Sean is still the project manager for this project. I'll discuss your responses to the
questions above with him and we'll do our best to relay your concerns to the engineer.
1 of 2
4/20/2005 11:27 AM
N1ATF9Q Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
7 North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
A.m
p Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
April 11, 2005
DWQ Project # 05-0101
Wake County
CERTIFIED MAIL: RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Over The Meadow, LLC
7101 Creedmoor Road, Suite 142
Raleigh, NC 27613
Subject Property: Meadowood Subdivision
REQUEST FOR MORE INFORMATION
On January 21, 2005, the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) received your application dated January 21,
2005 to impact 0.161 acres of wetlands, 245 linear feet of stream, 14,373 square feet of Zone 1 buffers
and 9,417 square feet of Zone 2 buffers to construct the proposed residential construction. On March 11,
2005 the DWQ received that additional information that was submitted for the "Request for More
Information" letter that was written on February 17, 2005. The DWQ has determined that your
application was incomplete and/or provided inaccurate information as discussed below. The DWQ will
require additional information in order to process your application to impact protected wetlands and/or
streams on the subject property. Therefore, unless we receive the additional information requested below,
we will have to move toward denial of your application as required by 15A NCAC 2H .0506 and will
place this project on hold as incomplete until we receive this additional information. Please provide the
following information so that we may continue to review your project.
Additional Information Requested:
1. In the response letter, it was indicated that there would not bean energy dissipater at crossing #1
and at crossing #2. Crossing #1 is being constructed on a large watershed, please submit the
velocities of water that will be flowing through this crossing post-construction and the slope in
which the culverts will be placed.
2. Fill is being proposed for impacts 3, 4 and 5, in order for the hydrology to not be discontinued a
culvert will be needed at impacts 4 and 5, please submit impact maps showing culverts for
hydraulic connectivity.
3. Nutrient removal efficiencies for grassed swales are only 20%, therefore you cannot directly
discharge this stormwater into a buffered stream, level spreaders are required outside of the riparian
buffers. In addition, the stormwater management plan that is being proposed (diffuse flow
provisions only) do not require extensive planning or design so a conditional approval will not be
given for this project. Please design level spreaders at all drainage easements (not plunge pools)
that are being directed to riparian buffers and submit the level spreader worksheets for each.
(Please note: easements are needed around all stormwater BMP's for maintenance purposes, please
include on new site plan that includes all level spreaders.)
401 Oversight/Express Review Permits Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699.1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Internet: htto://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetiands
one
N Carolina
,?timrillif
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
Over the Meadow, LLC
Page 2 of 2
April 11, 2005
Please respond within three weeks of the date of this letter by sending this information to me in writing
and Eric Kulz of the DWQ Raleigh Regional Office. If we do not hear from you within three weeks, we
will assume that you no longer want to pursue this project and we will consider the project as withdrawn.
This letter only addresses the application review and does not authorize any impacts to wetlands, waters
or protected buffers. Please be aware that any impacts requested within your application are not
authorized (at this time) by the DWQ. Please call Ms. Cyndi Karoly or Mr. Deborah Edwards at 919-
733-1786 if you have any questions regarding or would like to set up a meeting to discuss this matter.
Sincerely,
( ?1/4
Cyndi Karoly, Supervisor
401 Oversight/Express Review Permits Unit
CBK/bs
cc: Eric Kulz, DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
USACE Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
File Copy
Central Files
Sean Clark, Soil and Environmental Consultants, 11010 Raven Ridge Road, Raleigh, NC 27614
Filename: 050101 Mea dowoo d(W ake)401+ho1d2
NCDENR-DWQ
Attn: Ms. Cyndi Karoly
2321 Crabtree Blvd
Parkview Building
Raleigh, NC 27604
Environmental Consultants, PA
Road - Raleieh. North Carolina 27614 - Phone: [phone] - Fax: [phone]
aDp, @ 9:1 M F= 5
MAR 1 1 2005
DENR - vJATrR QUALITY
t,t",DSN40STCr ?`JATER6?tW?CH
March 11, 2005
DWQ Project #05-0101
S&EC Project #8386.W2
RE: Additional Information per your Request dated February 17, 2005
Meadowood Subdivision / DWQ Project Number 05-0101
Cary, Wake County, North Carolina
Dear Ms. Karoly:
On behalf of the applicant, Over The Meadow, LLC we are providing you with the,
additional information that you requested within your letter dated February 17, 2005 (see
attached copy). The original Pre-construction Notification (PCN) application was
received by the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) on January 21, 2005. The requests
listed by your office are below and are followed by our responses. The additional
information provided below should be considered as appendices and revisions to the
January 21, 2005 application.
Additional Information:
1. Site Plan Details
a. You have provided inipact maps in sets showing the proposed buffer
impacts for crossings I and 2. Please provide details of the impacts
including but not limited to culverts, dissipaters, headwalls eta and at a
scale of I "=50
The engineer has provided sketch maps (see Figures 1 & 2) depicting the
extent of the fill slopes required for the construction of the roads within
the location of the stream crossings. Pending your approval, these designs
and limits of disturbance will be incorporated within the final construction
drawings.
Charlotte Officer Greensboro Office:
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C 3817-E Lawndale Drive
Concord, NC 28025 Greensboro, NC 27455
Phone: [phone] Phone:, [phone]
Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone]
Meadowood Subdivision
S&EC Project #8386.W2
March 11, 2005
Page 2 of 5
Crossing 1 (see Figure 1) - A steep slope exists on the west side of the
stream in the location of the proposed crossing. This will require the fill
slopes to extend outside of the right of way. The updated designs have
resulted in changes to the impacts proposed within the original
application. The revised impacts have been provided in the attached
Revised Impact Table (see Appendix 1). To further reduce stream
impacts, head walls will be used and are depicted on the attached sketch.
Proposed channel impacts have been reduced from 130 feet to 119 feet.
Dissipaters will not be used.
Please note that the total impacts to Neuse River Buffers proposed for
Crossing 1 equal 0.325 acres. We understand that the total buffer impacts
approved for this crossing may not exceed 0.325 acres and that buffer
mitigation will be required for this crossing if the impacts exceed 1/3 acre.
The final construction plans for this crossing will ensure that the buffer
impacts do not exceed 0.325 acres.
Crossing 2 (see Figure 2) - The engineer has depicted the extent of the fill
slopes. The slopes will need to extend slightly outside of the proposed
right of way. The updated designs have resulted in changes to the impacts
proposed within the original application. The revised impacts have been
provided in the attached Revised Impact Table (see Appendix 1). By
utilizing headwalls, proposed channel impacts have been reduced from
115 feet to 65 feet.
Impact 3 (see Figure 3) - Wetland impacts proposed for the construction
of the intersection of Street I & H have been modified from the original
PCN and are included in the attached Revised Impact Table (see Appendix
1).
Impacts 4 & 5 (see Figure 4) - Wetland impacts proposed for the
construction of the intersection of Street J (previous impact 4) and Street I
(previous impact 5) have been modified from the original PCN and are
included in the attached Revised Impact Table (see Appendix 1).
b. You have road crossings I and 2, and several "20 feet drainage
easements" along both streams to be impacted Please provide
provisions for diffuse flow. If level spreaders are to be proposed, provide .
the level spreader worksheets that can be found on our fveb site.
The engineer has provided a conceptual stormwater management plan and
worksheets (see Appendix 2) to address how this project will comply with
Meadowood Subdivision
S&EC Project #8386.`'V2
March 11, 2005
Page 3 of 5
the diffuse flow provision of the Neuse Buffer Rule. Please note that this
conceptual plan includes the use of grass swales in many locations where
diffuse flow will also be provided.
However, there are two locations where diffuse flow will not be provided.
These include the discharges between lots 11 & 12 and between lots 30 &
31. Additional buffer impacts will be required at these two locations. The
conceptual design calls for continuing the grass swales through the buffer
and discharging directly into the stream. Rip-rap protection / dissipaters
may be required within the swale just prior to entering the stream to
prevent erosive velocities. The grass swales will be designed as per the
N.C. DENR Stormwater BMP Manual and should be considered as
stormwater management facilities that control nitrogen. The swales will
have side slopes of 3:1 or flatter and will be at least 100 feet long for every
acre of drainage to them. These direct discharges are required due to steep
slopes within the buffer.
We request that if you require additional information regarding this
conceptual stormwater management plan, that you issue a conditional
approval including the "Diffuse Flow - DWQ Review Required" standard
condition that you have required for other low density development
projects similar to this one.
G Please contact Eric Kulz at the Raleigh Regional Office to conftrrrt
existing impacts and to stake an intermittent/perennial stream
determination on stream B.
Mr. Mike Horan of the Raleigh Regional Office has already been to the
site to determine the applicability of the Neuse Buffer Rules. We have
contacted Mr. Horan and lie has informed us that there is no need to revisit
the site to determine whether this stream is intermittent or perennial as it
pertains to the mitigation requirements of General Water Quality
Condition No. 3402 (GC3402). Mr. Horan has determined based on his
previous site visit that this stream is "intermittent" and should not require
stream mitigation under GC3402. Please contact Mr. Horan if you have
any additional questions regarding his determination.
d In set map 1 shows the proposed street A impacting a wetland 'These
impacts are not included ivith your application. Please revise the PCN
to include these proposed impacts.
Meadowood Subdivision
S&EC.Project #8386.W2
March 11, 2005
. Page 4 of 5
The engineer has provided details (see Figure 1) of the proposed wetland
impact required for the construction of Street A. These wetland impacts
have been included within the attached Revised Impact Table (see
Appendix 1).
e. Please provide the total built-out percent impervious proposed for the
recreation area.
The recreation area is only proposed to contain playground equipment,
park benches, picnic tables, etc. and is not anticipated to exceed 12%
impervious cover. The subdivision is a low-density development with
grass roadside swales (not curb and gutter), with an average lot size of
0.89 acres for Phase 1 and 1.08 acres for Phase 2. Also, there will be over
35 acres of open space. The total site will contain less than 12% built
upon area or impervious cover. (This information is described in detail
within the attached conceptual stormwater management plan.)
f. Please provide cross section details showing the provisions for aquatic
life passage.
Crossing 1 (see Figure 5A & 513) - The engineer has provided cross
section details for this crossing. Two 84" pipes are proposed for this
crossing. The pipes will be aligned with the stream such that the low
flows utilize only one of the two 84" pipes. The primary pipe will be
buried one foot below the bed of the stream to allow for the passage of
aquatic life.
Crossing 2 (see Figure 6A & 613) - The engineer has provided cross
section details for this crossing. Two 48" pipes are proposed for this
crossing. The pipes will be aligned with the stream such that the low
flows utilize only one of the two 48" pipes. Although the stream is
intermittent, the primary pipe will be buried accordingly in the bed of the
stream to allow for the passage of aquatic life.
g. Please provide a site map for the entire site at a scale of I "=100'scale.
The attached conceptual stormwater management plan includes a site map
at 1 "=200' scale. This map should provide you with a large enough scale
for your evaluation. A 1":100' scale map would not easily fit on a
standard 36" plan sheet. Please let us know if this is not acceptable to
you.
Meadowood Subdivision
S&EC Project #8386.W2
March 11, 2005
Page 5 of 5
2. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
This office believes that the wetland impact labeled on the plans as
impact #3 can be moved or reconfigured to minimize the impacts to the
wetland Please revise the plans to minimize the impacts
The engineer evaluated the alternatives to impacting this wetland. Design
requirements for the intersection require that Street I connect to Street H at
a 90° angle. Moving Street I to the east to avoid wetland impact would
require the street to infringe on Lots 54, 55, 56 and 57. The configuration.
of these lots is dependent on the suitable soils for septic systems. Street
infringement on to these lots would affect the ability to build on the lots.
In addition, the realignment of Street I would infringe on the Recreation
Area. The preferred design for the recreation area is for it to be as large of
an area as possible for the usable enjoyment of the members of the
community. Relocating the road to the west would bisect this area into
two smaller parcels. The functions of the wetland area being impacted are
low compared to the other high quality riparian wetlands and streams that
are being avoided and preserved within the open, space areas of the
subdivision.
Please call me or email me at SClark(a_SandEC.com if you require any additional
information.
Sincerely,
Sean Clark
Attachments: Figure 1- Construction Details, Stream Crossing 1 (Fielding Drive) & Street A
Figure 2 - Construction Details, Stream Crossing 2 (Fielding Drive)
Figure 3 - Construction Details, Street I & H
Figure 4 - Construction Details, Street J & I
Figure 5A & 5B - Cross Sections, Crossing 1
Figure 6A & 6B - Cross Sections, Crossing 2
Appendix 1 - Revised Impact Table
Appendix 2 - Conceptual Stormwater Management Plan & Worksheets
cc: Eric Kulz, DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
USACE Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
D
Michael F. Easley, Governor
.
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
February 17, 2005
CERTIFIED MAIL: RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Over The Meadows, LLC
7101 Creedmoor Road, Suite 142
Raleigh, NC 27613
Subject Property: Meadowood Subdivision
REQUEST FOR MORE INFORMATION
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
DWQ Project # 05-0101
Wake County
On January , 21, 2005, the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) received your application dated January 21,
2005 to impact 0.161 acres of wetlands, 245 linear feet of stream, 14,373 square feet of Zone 1 buffers-
and 9,417 square feet of Zone 2 buffers to construct the proposed residential construction. The DWQ has
determined that your application was incomplete and/or provided. inaccurate information as discussed
below. The DWQ will require additional information in order to process your application to impact
protected wetlands and/or streams on the subject property. Therefore, unless we receive the additional .
information requested below, we will have to move toward denial of your application as required by 15A
NCAC 211.0506 and will place this project on hold as incomplete until we receive this additional
information. Please provide the following information so that we may continue to review your project.
Additional Information Requested:
1. Site Plan Details
wArF9
a. You have provided impact maps in sets showing the proposed buffer impacts for crossings 1
and 2. Please provide details of the impacts including but not limited to culverts, dissipaters,
head walls etc. and at a scale of 1"=50'.
b. You have road crossings 1 and 2, and several "20 feet drainage easements" along both
streams to be impacted. Please provide provisions for diffuse flow. If level spreaders are to
be proposed, provide the level spreader worksheets that can be found on our web site.
c. Please contact Eric Kulz at the Raleigh Regional Office to confirm existing impacts and to
make an intermittent/perennial determination on stream B.
d. In set map 1 shows the proposed street A impacting a wetland. These impacts are not
included with your application. Please revise the PCN to include these proposed impacts.
e. Please provide the total built-out percent impervious proposed for the recreation. area.
L Please provide cross section details showing the provisions for aquatic life passage.
g. Please provide a site map for the entire site at a scale of 1"=100' scale.
2. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization).
This office believes that the wetland impact labeled on the plans as impact #3 can be moved or
reconfigured to minimize the impacts to the wetland. Please revise the plans to minimize the
impacts.
No Carolina
/!l12;
401 oversighUExpress Review Permits Unit
1650 Mai Service Center, Raleigh, Nato Carofuu 27699-1650
2321 Crabtreo Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] /FAX [phone]/ Internet http•Ilh2o L nr state nc Us/ncwetlinds
env,n Emolover-50% Recydedlto% Post Consumer Paper
Over the Meadow, LLC
Page 2 of 2
February 17, 2005
Please respond within three weeks of the date of this letter by sending this information to me in writing
and Eric Kulz of the DWQ Raleigh Regional Office. If we do not hear from you within three weeks, we
will assume that you no longer want to pursue this project and we will consider the project as withdrawn.
This letter only addresses the application review and does not authorize any impacts to wetlands, waters
or protected-buffers.. Please be aware that any impacts requested within your application are not
authorized (atlhis time) by the DWQ. Please call Ms. Cyndi Karoly or Mr. John Dorney at 919-733-1786
if you have any questions, regarding or would like to set up a meeting to discuss this matter.
Sincerely,
Cyndi Karoly, Supervisor
401 Oversight/Express Review Permits Unit
CBKlbs
cc: Eric Kulz, DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
USACE Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
File Copy
Central Files 1
Sean Clark, Soil and Environmental Consultants, 11010 Raven Ridge Road, Raleigh, NC 27614
Filename: 05-0101 Meadowood Subdivision (Wake) On Hold
?, I I
I I ?
,
' ' ? -FIGURE 1 \?
,l f
E ? f. Q
E _ /_ •? E `+ •``h? f / E E
-- /y E ~ ----..- E
E E E /%' ' Jf fE E E E E E E E f ??/ E E E
// E f E E f
E E E E / (+f) E E E E E E E E
E E E E E E E Ef 1
f E E E f I E E E f
E E E E E E i f
\` E f
?\ E E E f
.. '_ . .....t
---? ----
- 00+ i+o
?t-`--- ----
------ ---------
-----------------
7T\ -- - - --------
I
T
1 { ? 1 ?
1 { _ 1,
FIGURE 2
1 t
1 \ ?
\ t `
t •
t ? \
1 \
t IW ?
8
l t
,
,
I8 1 '
.? E E E \
E?` E < C t
E \.
/' f E E f \T T e ' r E < ? / I..ir-- „?_ f•?N?\ ?\
• E f f_-..-E? E f
f
I (U ----------- --
-
! ----- ---- ----- ?_
?y ji
t I '
,
V \
O
, I
/
,
i
/
,
/
,
!r
r
r
r
1
rr
t
e
e
r
r
r
W :Ell
r
1
1
1
o?
T
{
i
1
s+
ni
i
g
u
1 I
1
i
1
o?
0
n
?'..? 7f
FIGURE 3
4?
r
i ?
1
t
i ?
•1
i?
ol>
N 1
1
1
1 /
r
/
!
!
!
/
/
/ VV fffff _____
!
/
!
!
r ,
r ,
r `
r ,
r
rV

r1

V ,
1 I
FIGURE 4
\
'i
\ t{
1 ` 1
i 1
t
1
t
1 1 ?
l i
\ 1 ?
1
I j I
1 \ 1 ?
r - ,11 1 1
_ _ ? [71M7 '1 1 1
1 1
1
1 f E t `? 1
` I 1
f f E f e ? 1
f E E 1 ? 1
i
f E E fE E (?t(x\ ??? i
`\ f E E
E E
\\\ E E E f r
E f E ? ?` ? /I
?` E E f E ?? a1 ? !r
•?,\ 11 E E E E E f f to S /?
RJR E f E E E f E f E f f ?? ''
' f f E E f f f ,
\\ \\\•\ U`!_ `` ?E E E E f E/ \ E E f f ? ,I I /

CbX E
1 *s ? : .
-- --- <
f f
E E
E E 1
f
f
E A
E
C?
C?
Ul
4-1?51

h? NA
r?

FIGURE 5A
1
Q

Q
k
T
I "`

ji x;41!.
' I ' Cq
Mar 09 05 05:05p Stuart Jones "FIGURE 5B P* 2
JONES
CNOSSEN
& DOLLS
ENGINEERING. PLLC
LAND DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT
LAND PLANNING
e
,

.
.

j f

P.O. BOX 1062 - 106 W. CHATHAM ST. - APEX, NC • 27502
PHONE: [phone] - FAX: [phone]

Q
i
Mar 09 05 05:05p Stuart Janes 91E FIGURE 6B p.3
`..JONES
CNOSSEN
& DOLLS
ENGINEERING, PLLC

I I
i
LAND DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT
LAND PLANNING
........ '
, I I I 1 I
j?` - - L-
y j '•. i .._ _ - _...
1- --? _ I _j -? -
1 - ? 1

i
.

r -
i ( 1 I 1
:
-1 A
i
1 -?
-- i i I a I
: f
-- --
t
I
i .
I ?.
I
?I
-__...'
P.O. BOX 1062 • 106 W. CHATHAM ST. • APEX, NC • 27502
PHONE: [phone] • FAX: [phone]
APPENDIX 1
REVISED IMPACT TABLE
(* Bold items have been modified from the original PCN.)
W tl d I acts•
e an m
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)

Type of Impact*
Area of
Impact
(acres)
Located within
100-year Floodplain**
(yes/no)
Distance to
Nearest Stream
(linear feet)

Type of Wetland***
1 fill 0.033* no 25' emergent
2 fill 0.11* no 0 emergent
3 fill 0.043* no 600' emergent
4 (Street 1) fill 0.004* no 150' emergent
5 (Street 1) fill 0.038* no 150' emergent
6 (Street A) Fill 0.028* yes 100' emergent
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: +/- 5 acres
Total area of wetland impact proposed: 0.256 acres* (previously listed as 0.161 acres)

U ll l.Ulll 1111 NV1J•
Stream Impact
Length of
Average Width
Perennial or
Site Number Type of Impact* Impact Stream Name** of Stream Intermittent?
(indicate on ma) (linear feet) Before Impact (pleasespecify)
1 Culvert/fill 119* UT to Swift Creek 5-6' perennial
2 Culvert/fill 65* UT to Swift Creek 3' intermittent
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 184 ft* (previously 245')
Buffer Impacts:
Crossinp- 1 (Perennial Stream)
Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 9,252* 3 N/A
2 4,910* 1.5 N/A
Total 14,162* N/A
Crossing 2 Intermittent Stream)
Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 5,245* 3 N/A
2 3,348* 1.5 N/A
Total 8,593* N/A
Mitigation (Payment into the Ecosystem Enhancement Program):
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): 119*
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0.228*
Appendix 2
CONCEPTUAL STORMWATER
MANAGEMENT PLAN &
WORKSHEETS
DWQ Project No. 05--0101
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY • LEVEL SPREADER WORKSHEET
1. PROJECT INFORMATION (please complete the following information):
Project Name : I 1=? a
Contact Person: o%s a Phone Number. ?3
Level Spreader ID:
Level Spreader Length 5?'o ft. (perpendicular to flow)
Drainage Area o ac. (on-site and off-site drainage to the level spreader)
Impervious Area O, ac. (on-site and off-site drainage to the level spreader)
Maximum Filter Strip/Buffer Slope Ce % (6% for forested, leaf littler cover, 8% for thick ground cover)*
grass
Max. Discharge from a 10 Year Storm ,, cfs
Max. Discharge to Level Spreader cfs
Filter Strip/Buffer Vegetation 4--A%: (thick ground cover or grass, canopied forest with leaf litter
groundcover)
Pre-treatment or Bypass Method IAI
II. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Initial in the space provided to indicate the following design requirements have been met and supporting documentation is attached. If a
requirement has not been met, attach an explanation of why. At a minimum, a complete stormwater management plan submittal includes
a worksheet for each BMP, design calculations, plans and specifications showing all BMPs and outlet structure details, a detailed
drainage plan and a fully executed operation and maintenance agreement. An incomplete submittal package will result in a request for
additional information and will substantially delay final review and approval of the project.
A lica?p nts Initials
Level spreader is at least 13 ft. per cfs for thick ground cover or grass or 100 ft per cfs in canopied forest with leaf
litter.
f?/A Pre-Form Scour Holes are on flat slopes only
No structures are located in protected buffers*
If bypass method specified in the Draft Level Spreader Design Option Document:
Bypass method is specified (if applicable) and plan details and calculations are provided
Discharge to level spreader and subsequent filter strip is hydraulically and spatially separate from the bypass
discharge.
No structures are located in protected buffers.
Plan details for the bypass and outlets are provided.
The operation and maintenance agreement includes annual erosion and vegetation repair.
The operation and maintenance agreement signed and notarized by the responsible party is provided.
* Level spreaders in series can be used on slopes of up to 15% in forested areas with leaf littler cover or on slopes of up to 25% in areas
with thick ground cover or grass if designed according to the Draft Level Spreader Design Option Document. This potentially requires a
minor variance in protected buffer areas. In any event the second level spreader cannot be located in Zone 1 of a protected buffer area.
DWQ Project No. 05--010 t
1. PROJECT INFORMA
Project Name : I
Contact Person: _
Swale ID: A
Grass Swale Length
Tributary Drainage Area
Impervious Area
Max. Velocity from 2 Yr. Storm
Max. Velocity from 10 Yr. Storm
Min. side slopes
Steepest Effective Slope
Cover Crop
II. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
0o ft.
ac.
ac,
fps
l .6 fps
ratio
Oh ftift
Phone Number.
(at least 100 ft. per tributary acre)
(on-site and off-site drainage to the swale)
(on-site and off-site drainage to the swale)
(2 fps max.)
(3:1 min.)
(check dams may be used)
Initial in the space provided to indicate the following design requirements have been met and supporting documentation is attached. If a
requirement has not been met, attach an explanation of why. At a minimum, a complete stormwater management plan submittal includes
a worksheet for each BMP, design calculations, plans and specifications showing all BMPs and outlet structure details, a detailed
drainage plan and a fully executed operation and maintenance agreement. An incomplete submittal package will result in a request for
additional information and will substantially delay final review and approval of the project.
Applicants Initials
I?G Vegetation Plan provided on plans
?L The underlying soils are permeable and non compacted
?QG Swale carries only stormwater flow
d Water table depth is greater than 1 foot.
G Plan details for the Swale provided.
.Aa Plan details for the inlets and outlets are provided.
Check dams provided.
The operation and maintenance agreement includes annual erosion and vegetation repair, and at least twice
I annual mowing.
N ?A The operation and maintenance agreement signed and notarized by the responsible party is provided.
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY - GRASSED SWALE WORKSHEET
(please complete the following information):
DWQ Project No. L057- 0/ of
1. PROJECT INFORMA
Project Name:
Contact Person: _
Swale ID: 0
Grass Swale Length
Tributary Drainage Area
Impervious Area
Max. Velocity from 2 Yr. Storm
Max. Velocity from 10 Yr. Storm
Min. side slopes
Steepest Effective Slope
Cover Crop
II. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY - GRASSED SWALE WORKSHEET
complete the following information):
X6o ft.
o, ac.
o ac.
fps
fps
ratio
O.orb Tuft
Phone Number.
(at least 100 ft. per tributary acre)
(on-site and off-site drainage to the swale)
(on-site and off-site drainage to the Swale)
(2 fps max.)
(3:1 min.)
(check dams may be used)
Initial in the space provided to indicate the following design requirements have been met and supporting documentation is attached. If a
requirement has not been met, attach an explanation of why. At a minimum, a complete stormwater management plan submittal includes
a worksheet for each BMP, design calculations, plans and specifications showing all BMPs and outlet structure details, a detailed
drainage plan and a fully executed operation and maintenance agreement. An incomplete submittal package will result in a request for
additional information and will substantially delay final review and approval of the project.
Applicants Initials
Vegetation Plan provided on plans
1`?G The underlying soils are permeable and non-compacted
Swale carries only stonnwater flow
1111Z Water table depth is greater than 1 foot.
L Plan details for the swale provided.
lA Plan details for the inlets and outlets are provided.
Check dams provided.
/4 /A The operation and maintenance agreement includes annual erosion and vegetation repair, and at least twice
annual mowing.
The operation and maintenance agreement signed and notarized by the responsible party is provided.
DWQ Project No. 05- - 010 1
1. PROJECT INFORMA
1
Project Name:
Contact Person:
Swale ID: Z-
Grass Swale Length
Tributary Drainage Area
Impervious Area
Max. Velocity from 2 Yr. Storm
Max. Velocity from 10 Yr. Storm
Min. side slopes
Steepest Effective Slope
Cover Crop
II. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
&cs'o ft.
O. ac.
C>, ac.
?o fps
fps
?. ( ratio
a, la fUft
r
Phone Number.
(at least 100 ft. per tributary acre)
(on-site and off-site drainage to the swale)
(on-site and off-site drainage to the swale)
(2 fps max.)
(3:1 min.)
(check dams may be used)
Initial in the space provided to indicate the following design requirements have been met and supporting documentation is attached. If a
requirement has not been met, attach an explanation of why. At a minimum, a complete stormwater management plan submittal includes
a worksheet for each BMP, design calculations, plans and specifications showing all BMPs and outlet structure details, a detailed
drainage plan and a fully executed operation and maintenance agreement. An incomplete submittal package will result in a request for
additional information and will substantially delay final review and approval of the project.
G Vegetation Plan provided on plans
G The underlying soils are permeable and non-compacted
Swale carries only stormwater flow
G Water table depth is greater than 1 foot.
?G Plan details for the swale provided.
A Plan details for the inlets and outlets are provided.
Check dams provided.
I The operation and maintenance agreement includes annual erosion and vegetation repair, and at least twice
LA annual mowing.
The operation and maintenance agreement signed and notarized by the responsible party is provided.
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY • GRASSED SWALE WORKSHEET
(please complete the following information):
DWQ Project No. O5- - O / 0
1. PROJECT INI
Project Name :
Contact Person:
Swale ID: 0
Grass Swale Length
Tributary Drainage Area
Impervious Area
Max. Velocity from 2 Yr. Storm
Max. Velocity from 10 Yr. Storm
Min. side slopes
Steepest Effective Slope
Cover Crop
II. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
(?7Ov ft.
P. ac.
o ac.
1.o fps
I. fps
ratio
o O? fUft
Phone Number.
(at least 100 ft. per tributary acre)
(on-site and off-site drainage to the Swale)
(on-site and off-site drainage to the swale)
(2 fps max.)
(3:1 min.)
(check dams may be used)
Initial in the space provided to indicate the following design requirements have been met and supporting documentation is attached. If a
requirement has not been met, attach an explanation of why. At a minimum, a complete stormwater management plan submittal includes
a worksheet for each BMP, design calculations, plans and specifications showing all BMPs and outlet structure details, a detailed
drainage plan and a fully executed operation and maintenance agreement. An incomplete submittal package will result in a request for
additional information and will substantially delay final review and approval of the project.
L Vegetation Plan provided on plans
Z The underlying soils are permeable and non-compacted
G Swale carries only stormwater flow
pt?G Water table depth is greater than 1 foot.
Plan details for the swale provided.
Plan details for the inlets and outlets are provided.
ti Check dams provided.
The operation and maintenance agreement includes annual erosion and vegetation repair, and at least twice
annual mowing.
d/A The operation and maintenance agreement signed and notarized by the responsible party is provided.
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY - GRASSED SWALE WORKSHEET
(please complete the following information):
DWQ Project No. d O / O
1. PROJECT INFORMA
Project Name:
Contact Person: --1
Swale ID: P
Grass Swale Length
Tributary Drainage Area
Impervious Area
Max. Velocity from 2 Yr. Storm
Max. Velocity from 10 Yr. Storm
Min. side slopes
Steepest Effective Slope
Cover Crop
II. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
I ?o ft.
G ac.
o. ac.
I fps
fps
?= I ratio
0.02 Tuft
Phone Number.
(at least 100 ft. per tributary acre)
(on-site and off-site drainage to the swale)
(on-site and off-site drainage to the swale)
(2 fps max.)
(3:1 min.)
(check dams may be used)
Initial in the space provided to indicate the following design requirements have been met and supporting documentation is attached. if a
requirement has not been met, attach an explanation of why. At a minimum, a complete stormwater management plan submittal includes
a worksheet for each BMP, design calculations, plans and specifications showing all BMPs and outlet structure details, a detailed
drainage plan and a fully executed operation and maintenance agreement. An incomplete submittal package will result in a request for
additional information and will substantially delay final review and approval of the project.
1 tyA Vegetation Plan provided on plans
L The underlying soils are permeable and non-compacted
15M Swale carries only stormwater flow
?Vz Water table depth is greater than 1 foot.
G Plan details for the swale provided.
Plan details for the inlets and outlets are provided.
Check dams provided.
A The operation and maintenance agreement includes annual erosion and vegetation repair, and at least twice
I annual mowing.
The operation and maintenance agreement signed and notarized by the responsible party is provided.
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY - GRASSED SWALE WORKSHEET
(please complete the following information):
DWQ Project No. 0 5-" O /y
1. PROJECT INI
Project Name :
Contact Person:
Swale ID: - 1?--
Grass Swale Length
Tributary Drainage Area
Impervious Area
Max. Velocity from 2 Yr. Storm
Max. Velocity from 10 Yr. Storm
Min. side slopes
Steepest Effective Slope
Cover Crop
II. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
O ft.
13_ ac.
o,P, ac.
/L fps
fps
- I ratio
o, 01 fUft
(at least 100 ft. per tributary acre)
(on-site and off-site drainage to the swale)
(on-site and off-site drainage to the swale)
(2 fps max.)
(3:1 min.)
(check dams may be used)
Initial in the space provided to indicate the following design requirements have been met and supporting documentation is attached. If a
requirement has not been met, attach an explanation of why. At a minimum, a complete stormwater management plan submittal includes
a worksheet for each BMP, design calculations, plans and specifications showing all BMPs and outlet structure details, a detailed
drainage plan and a fully executed operation and maintenance agreement. An incomplete submittal package will result in a request for
additional information and will substantially delay final review and approval of the project.
A licants Initials
G Vegetation Plan provided on plans
G The underlying soils are permeable and non-compacted
G Swale carries only stormwater flow
Water table depth is greater than 1 foot.
G Plan details for the swale provided.
r? Plan details for the inlets and outlets are provided.
t4 1h Check dams provided.
The operation and maintenance agreement includes annual erosion and vegetation repair, and at least twice
I annual mowing.
The operation and maintenance agreement signed and notarized by the responsible party is provided.
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY - GRASSED SWALE WORKSHEET
(please complete the following information):
?OF WAT?,4P Michael F. Easley, Governor
`Q G William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Cq North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
p Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
February 17, 2005
DWQ Project # 05-0101
Wake County
CERTIFIED MAIL: RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Over The Meadow, LLC
7101 Creedmoor Road, Suite 142
Raleigh, NC 27613
Subject Property: Meadowood Subdivision
REQUEST FOR MORE INFORMATION
On January 21, 2005, the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) received your application dated January 21,
2005 to impact 0.161 acres of wetlands, 245 linear feet of stream, 14,373 square feet of Zone 1 buffers
and 9,417 square feet of Zone 2 buffers to construct the proposed residential construction. The DWQ has
determined that your application was incomplete and/or provided inaccurate information as discussed
below. The DWQ will require additional information in order to process your application to impact
protected wetlands and/or streams on the subject property. Therefore, unless we receive the additional
information requested below, we will have to move toward denial of your application as required by 15A
NCAC 2H.0506 and will place this project on hold as incomplete until we receive this additional
information. Please provide the following information so that we may continue to review your project.
Additional Information Requested:
1. Site Plan Details
a. You have provided impact maps in sets showing the proposed buffer impacts for crossings 1
and 2. Please provide details of the impacts including but not limited to culverts, dissipaters,
head walls etc. and at a scale of 1"=50'.
b. You have road crossings 1 and 2, and several "20 feet drainage easements" along both
streams to be impacted. Please provide provisions for diffuse flow. If level spreaders are to
be proposed, provide the level spreader worksheets that can be found on our web site.
c. Please contact Eric Kulz at the Raleigh Regional Office to confirm existing impacts and to
make an intermittent/perennial determination on stream B.
d. In set map 1 shows the proposed street A impacting a wetland. These impacts are not
included with your application. Please revise the PCN to include these proposed impacts.
e. Please provide the total built-out percent impervious proposed for the recreation area.
f. Please provide cross section details showing the provisions for aquatic life passage.
g. Please provide a site map for the entire site at a scale of 1"=100' scale.
2. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
This office believes that the wetland impact labeled on the plans as impact #3 can be moved or
reconfigured to minimize the impacts to the wetland. Please revise the plans to minimize the
impacts.
401 Oversight/Express Review Permits Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Internet: htto://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands
NhCarolina
on`
Aaltaully
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer- 50% Recycled/100"o Post Consumer Paper
Over the Meadow, LLC
Page 2 of 2
February 17, 2005
Please respond within three weeks of the date of this letter by sending this information to me in writing
and Eric Kulz of the DWQ Raleigh Regional Office. If we do not hear from you within three weeks, we
will assume that you no longer want to pursue this project and we will consider the project as withdrawn.
This letter only addresses the application review and does not authorize any impacts to wetlands, waters
or protected buffers. Please be aware that any impacts requested within your application are not
authorized (at this time) by the DWQ. Please call Ms. Cyndi Karoly or Mr. John Dorney at 919-733-1786
if you have any questions regarding or would like to set up a meeting to discuss this matter.
Sincerely,
Cyndi Karoly, Supervisor
401 Oversight/Express Review Permits Unit
CBK/bs
cc: Eric Kulz, DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
USACE Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
File Copy
Central Files
Sean Clark, Soil and Environmental Consultants, 11010 Raven Ridge Road, Raleigh, NC 27614
Filename: 05-0101 Meadowood Subdivision (wake) On Hold
OFVA?FR
4G
. O?
-1
c') r
0 ?
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
February 17, 2005
CERTIFIED MAIL: RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Over The Meadow, LLC
7101 Creedmoor Road, Suite 142
Raleigh, NC 27613
Subject Property: Meadowood Subdivision
REQUEST FOR MORE INFORMATION
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
DWQ Project # 05-0101
Wake County
On January. 21, 2005, the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) received your application dated January 21,
2005 to impact 0.161 acres of wetlands, 245 linear feet of stream, 14,373 square feet of Zone 1 buffers
and 9,417 square feet of Zone 2 buffers to construct the proposed residential construction. The DWQ has
determined that your application was incomplete and/or provided inaccurate information as discussed
below. The DWQ will require additional information in order'to process your application to impact
protected wetlands and/or streams on the subject property. Theiefore, unless we receive the additional .
information requested below, we will have to move toward denial of your application as required by 15A
NCAC 211.0506 and will place this project on hold as incomplete until we receive this additional
information. Please provide the following information so that we may continue to review your project.
Additional Information Requested:
1. Site Plan Details
a. You have provided impact maps in sets showing the proposed buffer impacts for crossings 1
and 2. Please provide details of the impacts including but not limited to culverts, dissipaters,
head walls etc. and at a scale of 1"=50'.
b. You have road crossings 1 and 2, and several "20 feet drainage easements" along both
streams to be impacted. Please provide provisions for diffuse flow. If level spreaders are to
be proposed, provide the level spreader worksheets that can be found on our web site.
C. Please contact Eric Kulz at the Raleigh Regional Office to confirm existing impacts and to
make an intermittent/perennial determination on stream B.
d. In set map 1 shows the proposed street A impacting a wetland. These impacts are not
included with your application. Please revise the PCN to include these proposed impacts.
C. Please provide the total built-out percent impervious proposed for the recreation. area.
f. Please provide cross section details showing the provisions for aquatic life passage.
g. Please provide a site map for the entire site at a scale of 1"=100' scale.
2. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization).
This office believes that the wetland impact labeled on the plans as impact #3 can be moved or
reconfigured to minimize the impacts to the wetland. Please revise the plans to minimize the
impacts.
No Carolina
Irrra!!?
401 oversighVapress Review Permits Unit
1650 Mad Service Center, Raleigh, North Carorin3 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] FAX [phone] intemet httpJ/h2o enr state nc us/ncwotlinds
Artinn Emolover- 50% Recyde lo% Post Consumer paper
Over the Meadow, LLC
Page 2 of 2
February 17, 2005
Please respond within three weeks of the date of this letter by sending this information to me in writing
and Eric Kulz of the DWQ Raleigh Regional Office. If we do not hear from you within three weeks, we
will assume that you no longer want to pursue this project and we will consider the project as withdrawn.
This letter only addresses the application review and does not authorize any impacts to wetlands, waters
or protected. buffers.. Please be aware that any impacts requested within your application are not
authorized (at-this time) by the DWQ. Please call Ms. Cyndi Karoly or Mr. John Dorney at 919-733-1786
if you have any questions regarding or would like to set up a meeting to discuss this matter.
Sincerely,
Cyndi Karoly, Supervisor
401 Oversight/Express Review Permits Unit
CBKlbs
cc: Eric Kulz, DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
USACE Raleigh Regulatory Field Office 1
File Copy
Central Files 1
Sean Clark, Soil and Environmental Consultants, 11010 Raven Ridge Road, Raleigh, NC 27614
Filename: 05-0101 Meadowood Subdivision (Wake) On Hold
0-',/)9/"005 14:10 FAX -? U11•fl UORtiET 0001/003
n C ,_?
D '
Soil & Environmental'Coa,5, lta ts, PA
11010 Ra-i•cn Ride Road - Raleigh, Nonh Carolina 27614 ??11r ifl;{ 3?1 k? t8 >?00 Fax: [phone]
www.SandE(j.'Ain
FACSIMILE SHEET
FAX NO- (91,9)846-9467
DA'T'E: el-a-d? Project Number: S p" '0 TO: NAME: 0'ulA??1y CC'
COMPANY:___AL_J)WQ
FAX NUMBER:
IQ?C?
FROM: L'o Qt SUBJECT: Ye kl?uy'
The following items are bei €, faxed. Number of pages including transmittal sheet `
For Your Comments/Approval
Per Our Conversation
Please Advise
Would Like To Discuss
HARD COPY SENT:
US Regular Mail
Overnight
Hand Delivery
No Hard Copy Sent
REMARKS: nn 1
( t0ALt ?? l?fQdOulol)cl?
f?
\r V
IF YOU HAVE ANY fRO LEMS WITH THIS 'T'RANSMISSION, PLEASE
CONTACT AT [phone].
*CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE*
This transmission is intended only for rte ace of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain
information that is privileged and confit ential. If the reader of this messagr is not the intended recipient, you src hereby
notificd that any disclosure, distribution or copying of this information is strictly prohibited If yon have received this
tr•an51ui5siou in error, please notify us immediately by telephone and return the fazed documents to us at the above address
via the united States Postal Service.
455 '
38
236 LePhitlip Court, Suite C Gtccn17-sHboro, NC Lo, NC C 277455
Concord, NC 25025
Phone' [phone] V.--. . (33G) 540 5234
V.--. raaci4An_c'17¢
FEB-9-2005 WED 13:40 TEL:[phone] NAME: DWQ-WETLANDS P. 1
For Your Information
Per Your Request
Please Call
Please Handle
02i 39!2005 11:10 F.t1
DWQ DORNEY IM 00-21' 003
.? Acolipelmellent
PROGRAM
David Gainey
Soil & Environmental Consultants
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
Project: Meadowood Subdivision
County_ Wake
January 27, 2005
JA r1 i!005
The purpose of this letter is to notif
willing to acce t Y you teat the North Carolina Erns
p payment for stream and wetlands impacts associated with the above eferEnce
note that the decision by the NC EEP to acce gram
WC gyp) is
payment will be approved by the U.S. ,a, Pt the mitigation m9uirements of this project does notrassure that this
Wetlzndsl40l Unit. It i5 the responsibility Corps of Engineers and the N.C.
to NC BEP for impacts associated with this p oject applicant appropriate. Division of ermine Quality
app to contact these agencies to determine if payment to
This acceptance is valid for six Monts from the date of this letter, If We hive
404 Permit/40,1 Certification within this time frattle, this acceptance Will responsibility to send copies of the 4041401 tc a not received a copy of the issued
the 401 Certification an invoice will be issued, NC 1rEP. Once NC EEP receives pa co it is the applican t's
PY of the 404 Permit and/or
Based on the information supplied b
you on the in lieu fee request fo
wetlands restoration that is necessary by
summarized in to following essary to mp,y the COMP ensato '? dated January, 24, 2005, the stream and
project is also indicated in this table, rY Lion ha requirements for r this project is
table. The amount of mitigation that the NC EEP will accept for this
Stream Riparian
linear feet) Wetlands Non-Riparian Wetlands
E 130 acres
on Maximum (acres)
260 0.161 -'
'hc stream and lion-riparian wetlands 0.32
'ertifxcation and/Or Section 404 Permit fo gr pac sl e provided ovi specified in the the referenced
3020201 of the Neuse River Basin. The mitigation associated e 401 e Water Quality
greement between the N. C. Depart ment of will be Performed to accordance with the Cataloging Unit
Environment and Natural Resource, to U S Memorandum of
Department of Transportf.tion Signed July 22, 2003, Army Corps of
pro"
Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program,
1619 IA" SCrViCe NCb?
Center, Ftafeigfl
, NC 27RCa_,e,n 1
FEB-9-2005 WED 13:40 TEL:[phone] NAME:DWQ-WETLRMDS
P. 2
02 09/2005 11:10 FAX -? D41'9 DORNEI U003/003
j t
David Gaincy
Soil & Environmental Consultants
January 27, 2005
Page 2.
If you have any questions or need ae'.ditional information, please contact Carol Shaw at [phone].
Sincerely,
biam D. Gilmore, PE
Director
cc, Cyndi Karoly, Wetlands/40: Unit
Jennifer Burdette, USACOE-Raleigh
Eric Kulz, DWQ Regional Clfftce-Raleigh
File
e?-
p rot" our State- 46ENR
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement tlrogram, 1619 Mail Servico Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1619 / 919-733-5208 /vnvw.nceep.not
FEB-9-2005 WED 13:40 TEL:[phone]e93 NAME:DWQ-WETLANDS P. 3
Environmental Consultants, PA
Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
U IR ? v d C.com
.
JAN 2 1 2005 v
1s DENR - ST WATER Q IBrl, CH January 21, 2005
S&EC Project #: 8386.W2
NCDENR-DWQ US Army Corps of Engineers
Attn: Ms. Cyndi Karoly Attn: Ms. Jennifer Burdette
2321 Crabtree Blvd 6508 Falls of the Neuse Rd., Ste. 120
Parkview Building Raleigh, NC 27615
Raleigh, NC 27604
RE: Request for NWP 39,401 Certification, and Buffer Compliance
Meadowood
Cary, Wake County, North Carolina
Dear Ms. Karoly and Ms. Burdette:
On behalf of Over the Meadow, LLC, we hereby request authorization from the US Army
Corps of Engineers and NC-DWQ to use Nationwide Permit 39 and its associated 401
certification to cover impacts to jurisdictional stream channels and wetlands (see attached
overall map). We also request written concurrence from the North Carolina Division of
Water Quality for GC 3402 that the project complies with the Neuse Buffer Rules for
impacts associated with the proposed road crossings. A Pre-construction Notification
Application (PCN) is attached, which includes an agent authorization form.
Site Location
The site is + 126 acres in size and is located approximately 2000 feet southeast of the
intersection of Campbell Road (SR 1383) and Holly Springs Road (SR 1152) in Wake
County, NC.
Project History
No previous 401/404 permits have been issued for this site. Mr. Mike Horan of the NC-
DWQ has visited the site to make buffer calls and his calls are reflected on the site plan.
A letter from Mike Horan has not yet been received. During well drilling activities two
stream channels were crossed and impacted. Both of these crossings are less than 40
linear feet each and are culverted. The wetlands and streams on the property have been
flagged by S&EC.
S&EC delineated the wetlands and stream channels located on the property so that a site
plan could be developed that would avoid and minimize impacts to the maximum extent
Charlotte Office:
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C
Concord, NC 28025
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Greensboro Office:
3817-E Lawndale Drive
Greensboro, NC 27455
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
January 21, 2005
S&EC Project #: 8386.W2
Page 3 of 3
Please call or email me at SClarkpSandEC.com if you have any questions.
Sincerely, cDGy ,?l??
GLG?
Sean Clark David Gainey
Environmental Scientist Environmental Technician
Attachments:
Pre-construction (PCN) notification form
Agent Authorization Form
Site Location Map-USGS (Figure 1)
Site Location Map - Soil Survey (Figure 2)
Proposed Wetland Impact Maps
Office Use Only: Form Version May 2002
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1. Processing
Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ® Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP 39
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCWRP prior to submittal of PCN), complete
section VIII and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Over The Meadow, LLC
Mailing Address: 7101 Creedmoor Road
Suite 142
Raleigh, NC 27613
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address:
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Sean Clark
Company Affiliation: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Mailing Address: 11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: _SClarkgSandEC.com
Page 1 of 8
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Meadowood Subdivision
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only):
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN):_ 0771769539, 0771675572
4. Location
County: Wake Nearest Town: Cary
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Meadowood Subdivision
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): The site is located approximately
2000 feet southeast of the intersection of Campbell Road (SR 1383) and Holly Springs Road
(SR 1152) in Wake County, NC.
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): 035°43' 11.37"N/078044'38.61 "W
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Property size (acres): f 126 acres
7. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Swift Creek
8. River Basin: Neuse
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr. state. nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: The site is currently wooded. Portions of the site that were
formally cultivated fields are in primary to secondary successional stages.
Page 2 of 8
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The
proposed project is a single-family residential subdivision with the typical utilities (i.e.,
sewer, water, electric, etc.). Wetlands, a perennial stream an intermittent stream and their
associated riparian buffers will be impacted to provide a road to connect to the eastern end of
the proposed Meadowood Subdivision. Typical excavating; and grading equipment will be
used during construction activities.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work:- The purpose for this subdivision is to provide
additional housing for the area. The road crossings of the perennial and intermittent stream
are required to connect to the eastern end of this property. The road location is dictated by the
existence of an existing road stub on an adjacent property. Both streams transverse the entire
property which make impacts unavoidable.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
No previous 401/404 permits have been issued for this site. Mr. Mike Horan of the NC-DM
has visited the site to make buffer calls. During well drilling activities the two stream channels
were crossed and impacted. Both of these crossings are less than 40 linear feet each and
proposed subdivision roads have been designed so as to cross in these locations and not result in
additional impacts. The wetlands and streams on the property have been flagged by S&EC
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
No additional permits are anticipated at this time.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
Page 3 of 8
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts:
Two buffered stream channels will be impacted by the proposed road. Proposed impacts include
130 linear feet of perennial channel, 115 linear feet of intermittent channel, 14,383 square feet of
Zone 1 Neuse Buffer, and 9,418 square feet of Zone 2 Neuse Buffer. Wetlands impacted on site
include 0.161 acres due to the construction of the road.
2. Individually list wetland impacts below:
Wetland Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
acres Located within
100-year Floodplain**
es/no Distance to
Nearest Stream
linear feet
Type of Wetland***
2 fill 0.133 no 0 emergent
3 fill .025 no 600' emergent
4 fill .003 no 150' emergent
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but arc not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at http://www,fema.aov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.) Indicate if wetland is isolated (determination of isolation to be made by USACE only).
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: +/- 5 acres
Total area of wetland impact proposed: 0.161
3. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:
Stream Impact Length of Average Width Perennial or
Site Number Type of Impact* Impact Stream Name** of Stream Intermittent?
indicate on ma linear feet Before Impact leasespecify)
1 Culvert/fill 130 UT to Swift Creek 5-6' perennial
2 Culvert/fill 115 UT to Swift Creek 3' interinittent
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps arc available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.uses.gov. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.topozone.com,
www.mapquest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 245 linear feet
Page 4 of 8
4. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.) below:
Open Water Impact Area of Name of Waterbody Type of Waterbody
Site Number Type of Impact* Impact (if applicable) (lake, pond, estuary, sound,
indicate on ma acres bay, ocean, etc.
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
5. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): N/A
Size of watershed draining to pond: N/A Expected pond surface area: N/A
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
The client requested a detailed delineation to minimize and avoid itnnacts to iurisdictional
waters including wetlands) to the maximum extent possible. Due to the nature of the property,
the two stream crossings are necessary to access the eastern portion of the property. These
crossings e planned for the areas previously impacted during well-drilling activities. These
proposed crossings are at a nearly perpendicular angle to minimize impacts to the stream
channel and were placed in the location of the previous drill rig crossings. The road resulting in
Impact 3 was redesigned to avoid unnecessary impacts to the wetlands and the buffered stream.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
Page 5 of 8
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetiands/strmgide.htm1.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
Because the applicant has avoided and minimized stream channel impacts by crossing stream
channels in a perpendicular fashion and only 130 linear feet of "important" channel is
proposed, S&EC believes that compensatory mitigation should not be required from the
USACE. However, if mitigation is required the applicant proposes payment to the EEP.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCWRP at
[phone] to determine availability and to request written approval of mitigation prior
to submittal of a PCN. For additional information regarding the application process for the
NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of
the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide the
following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): 130
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): 0
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0.161
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): o
Page 6 of 8
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state) funds or the use of public
(federal/state) land?
Yes ? No
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 213 .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 213 .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify
Yes ® No ? If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Crossing 1 (Perennial Stream)
Zone* Impact
(square feet Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 7,708 3 N/A
2 5,275 1.5 N/A
Total 12,984 N/A
Zone 1 extends out 3U tcet perpendicular trom near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
Crossing 2 (Intermittent Stream)
Zone* Impact Multiplier Required
(square feet) Mitigation
Page 7 of 8
1 6,675 3 N/A
2 4,142 1.5 N/A
Total 10,817 N/A
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or.0260.
Because both crossings will impact less than 1/3 acre of riparian buffer the proposed activity is
considered "Allowable" and therefore will not require buffer mitigation.
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
The proposed protect will have less than 12% impervious coverace and will therefore not require
a DW approved Stormwater plan.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Individual Septic System.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ® No ?
*See the Prior Project History Section (Section IV).
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
N/A
Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 8 of 8
RuC '2G 04 10:22a
08/24/2004 15:06 FAX

Name:
Addres:
Stuart Jones
919 3£37 3375
0005
P.3
Soil & Envirronm.ental Consultants, PA,
11010 Rave= Ridge Road • Raleigh, North Caroli=a 27614 • Phouc: [phone] Fax: [phone]
www.SandEC.com
Phone: NX - 727h . ? ?/ ?/ / /
Project l?Tame/Description: k4z)y .41 Ay 7? L,,;-, Y4/?l6 ( ,il(Y h090ty
P
Date: -011,16
The Department of the Axany
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
P.O. Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402
Attn: ..: 3,, eUk
Field Office: '0-,1 L"j L-
Re: Wetlands Related Consulting and. Permitting
To Whom It May Concern:
I, the current property owner, hereby designate and authorize Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA to
act in my behalf as my agent in the processing of permit application,, toYurr sh upon request
supplemental inforu- ation in support of applications, etc. fTom this day forward. The day of
This notification supersedes any previous correspondence conceniing the agent for this project.
NOTICE This authorization, for liability and professional courtesy reasons, is valid only for
government officials to enter the property when accompanied by S&EC staff. You should call S&-EC
to arrange a site meeting pr ior to visiting the site:
fiver-?4-c- L=c, 1-?-c
Print Property Owner ame
cc: Mr. John Domey
NCDENR - DWQ
2321 Crabtree Boulevard
Raleigh, NC 27604
Prope y Qwnees Sigiature
cc: \4r. Sean Clark
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Lhadolt Ql 1' Grccn?barn Otfot_
,236 UThillip Court, Suite C 3917-E I-iwndalc Drive
Concord, NC 28025 Greensboro, KC 27455
Phone: [phone] Phone:. [phone]
Fax: [phone] F-"- [phone]
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
w

, 7'-?-Fl?`?' OIJIA RO ?'f?µ? t3' 1 ° ? •-i' / G ?? 1 I?j ?-i? / ?l 1^-? - ?- r `? \P \ ,\h?._. J'
17 • ?4Cr J _? ??-_ ? ; T(.f F ? ?? 0144E0' / 1 i / 1' i r 1 i? -1 ? \?? ^`' `
7 ..
l -
.1
- ,,1-_ I y ? i?+ ? p JI ,? iii ? / - _ ? `l't ? •? • • `' ??/ ,./
- ` /~ a J Wi't' - ? ? --s `•Y- - ? T ? i ?'? ? ti? ?___ l:?- ('?
. a t ??" ''? : !??' -- S 1`l}{ t g' - t': 3' F - fy 7? k . yy?? ?* •' t??
IN,
? /+ ? ? • ? '?.. ?`?? \ 1 ? _ ,? i? ? gat
\? - # t S r Y f `? • . ///111 ?
Project No.
Figure 1 s USGS Ma 03-8386.W1
a->i r
Burke Tract 0r Soil & Environmental Consultants, 'A.
}
Project flPgr.: 11010 Raven Ridge Rd.- Raleigh, NC 27614
SG Jones & Cnossen Engineering, PLLC [phone] - [phone]
Wake County, NC '•;?` Web Page:
4'v1S"lJ.SanwdEC c
Scale:
Ya
1" = 2,000' f f'
IMPACT 1:
CHANNEL: 1 30 LIN. IT.
BUFFER:
ZONE 1: 7708 5Q. IT.
(0. 1 77 AC.)
ZONE 2: 5275 5Q. FT.
(0.121 AC.)

5
8
RAPHj SCALE
1 " 50'
50 100
WEUL
I t2t 1172
I N
R e
x
x
? x
r-

5
?

7 U

a

O

0 D
IMPACT 2:
WETLAND: 5794 SQ. IT.
(0.133 AC.) N -
CHANNEL: 115 LIN. IT.
W
BUFFER: rN
Z
ONE I :6675 SQ. FT. (0. 153 AC.)
ZONE 2:4142 SQ. FT. f
(0.095 AC.)
W?
z
•O
2
7
h

OF PiR
0
t\t c
GRAPHIC SCALE
1" = 50'
of o
I 50 0 50 1 C
SE
3 Itt Ic
IMPACT 3:
WETLAND: i i 10 SQ. ff. AREA =8.
G4 (0.025 AC.) G5 °27>
A 25;`7fsf
Octl'
_V
_u }-'T
04c1
_J05c11'?
Sc l 2 q0+"
cl2'tt4 and b
?p+5
% GRAPHIC SCALE
1 = 50'
1
50 ? 0 SO 100
1
'a 1-l cl RECREA
,.]3c 2
A E?
?I;hl t
<f}14 c l
INSET 3
RAP H I C SCALE
PACT 4: 1" 50'
WETLAND: 146 5Q. FT. l ei 5 o so ,oo
(0.003 AC.) 8
i --- 5c[
-"---
/ 65
1
.0 ? j
i
r
i
67
9 73
AR
ARE
7 ' S G5
i
I M PACT 5:
WETLAND: 1427 SQ. FT.
"J (0.032 AC.)
I N5E
56
:
,
r
: r
,
,
i
t
S "
r
r
\L
'r
0
.. u
_, dog
m I: ?
i 1
l
S '
,
u
Ln/
r : \
\ a ??
v A ?\ v o`?S v <
0
v 1 t v v - -0
i 1 O
•??. ?r-.\ ? :.-_-" /,W'a iOOiu DS?ai?ius 'do?? i ???
t _
i
r I _ 0
,
\
\
u
,
? f t
.- t
\
,
0
oT
W C)
J ?
U0
U) O
II
a-
<
0 0
0
0
DWQ# Date Who Reviewed:
Plan Detail Incomplete
? Please provide a location map for the project.
? Please show all stream impacts including all fill slopes, dissipaters, and bank stabilization on the site plan.
? Please show all wetland impacts including fill slopes.on the site plan.
? Please indicate all buffer impacts on the site plan.
? Please indicate proposed lot layout as overlays on the site plan.
? Please indicate the location of the protected buffers as overlays on the site plan.
? Please locate all isolated or non-isolated wetlands, streams and other waters of the State as overlays on the site plan.
NT' Please provide cross section details showing the provisions for aquatic life passage. - - - --:
? Please locate any planned sewer lines on the site plan.
? Please provide the location of any proposed stormwater management practices as required by GC
? Please provide detail for the stormwater management practices as required by GC
? Please specify the percent of project imperviousness area based on the estimated built-out conditions.
? Please indicate all stormwater outfalls on the site plan.
? Please indicate the diffuse flow provision measures on the site plan.
? Please indicate whether or not the proposed impacts already been conducted.
Avoidance and/or Minimization Not Provided
? The labeled as on the plans does not appear to be necessary. Please eliminate the or provide additiohal
information as to why it is necessary for this project.
? This Office believes that the labeled on the plans as can be moved or reconfigured to avoid the impacts to the
Please revise the plans to avoid the impacts. .,
This Office believes that the labeled on the plans as 1 can be moved or reconfigured to minimize the impacts to the
a?Please revise the plans to minimize the impacts.
? The stormwater discharges at the location on the plans labeled will not provide diffuse flow through the buffer because
Please revise the plans and provide calculations to show that diffuse flow will be achieved through the entire buffer. If it
is not possible to achieve diffuse flow through the entire buffer then it may be necessary to provide stormwater management
practices that remove nutrients before the stormwater can be discharged through the buffer.
Other
? The application fee was insufficient because over 150 feet of stream and/or over I acre of wetland impacts were requested. Please
provide $ . This additional fee must be received before your application can be reviewed.
? Please complete Section(s) on the application.
? Please provide a signed copy of the application.
? Please provide
Mitigation
copies of the application, copies of the site plans and other supporting information.
? of compensatory mitigation is required for this project. -Please provide a compensatory mitigation plan. The
plan must conform to the requirements in 15 A NCAC 2H.0500 and must be appropriate to the type of impacts proposed.
? Please indicate which 404 Permit the USACE would use to authorize this project.

U

p ?
--Q UVN
C9 o,
??{z• < I-,
Z
r ?7 Vp?11CS YOVA5 <, ?
U
0
s L ?_Cv-"
? ccm
CV?
- 1r tnn ?QK? ??` L Ok
?-
p PC S-?
I/'
aP ?
?v.a P a _
SOIL & ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, PA
NC Division of dater Quality
Tran # Invoice Type Date Reference
5674 0118052 Invoice 01/18/05 8386.W2
Check Number: 17323
Date: 01/18/05 Check Amt: $475.00
Balance Discount Pay Amount
$475.00 $0.00 $475.00
I )D iCo
D
.lA N 2 1 7005
Y
4rEh ? 'Tl^R QU40T
DS'V,D'
STOR!d10-fER SRANCH

9 I ~0 ~ ~ , ,
1 \
. I I ~~I 1, ~ ~ ~ ~
1 ~ ~1`d~S Nd~?1~ ~ •1 I 1 ~ 1 ,1 ~ \ ~1
I 1 ~ / I 1 ~ , y y i I ! ! \ \ 1 / I / , \ l / ~i
I I I I I ! , I//// ~ \ 1 /
OOf~ OOZ 001 0 ~ / / ~ / ~ ~ I , I I I / \ 1 I ! / , ! I Ill(( \r
i I ! I \ I \ I \ I I I I I I I , ~ II I \I ! ? ! , , ' , ' ~ 1 1A \ ,v v I I
, 1 , ! I , 1 1 \ \ \I I / ! I I 1 ' I , \ \ 1\\ \ I \ 111
I I I , I I I I ~ I i
I I I I ~ ~ ~ \ 1 1 i i ~ ~ I \ ~ ! ~ 11 1 \
I y, ~ ~~\c ~ / ll \ ~ I NQtSi \ i '1 ~ I I I I i I \ 1 t I 1 1\ \ 1 \ I 1 I ~ \ ! \ ~ I I i I I I V I I I \
l \\\~\`f/ / / 11 I 1 ~ / / / / \ ~ / I I `
, / / \ ~ i 11 I ~ 5002 £I ~ldW ; / ~i \ I / ' ! \ I ~ ~ I I \ I / \ 1\ I I I I \ I
ova ~ / I \ S ~ 1, III ~ 1S I\ ! I ! I I \ I \ ~I \ ~~\`11. ~ I \ ! I I . ' I \ I 1 \ \ \ \~t'~ I
\ ~ 1 / I ( 1 d~119 S~I~1Nflla ~ ~ / -IIII OOd ,OOZ=..I ,x I 1 VnN ~ \ I ! I ~ I \ ~ I \ I I I I ! \
11 l II I ~ v ~ - NMtr?! ~y i J I I I c N D 1. ~ z ! ~ I c ~ ~ z I \I ! ~ Z N? z0 1 ~ Z rn0 I rn ~~DO I N z rnZ I I I I\ 1 1('C\ 1\\\\ c D~ I rn I o NOISI/1149f1 I I\ ~
i J ! I I I ~ \ tly.Q III } \ ~rnrn~iN~- p C~ O~ N I rn fv I S I 1 p D N I \ ~~~-oz t po3D , ~,o Za I ocn-~ , I I \ , \I \ rn cn~~'A~I_ z.lrn~,o , zJ Do ~o.lDAo ! ~`Jal~ S?J31N(lN I I 1 \ ?
/ / } I / ..DVOrnr D . i IIII I \ \ D-•,c,of \ J \ I nAO,D / ~'DVOrnrnoA I crnJO1A zrn~{a~7oA 1 ZrnV7o. A I 1 \ (10~ rn 00~ Drn I 4~D-rnDT I (A I I \ I \ \ D - U~ I D r•• 4~0- I 1 I\ \
f~11 ~J DA-I'1~f / \ \ , -rnr I C1A~D~ p, ~nj~JZ~O ~ rnAVNNO I ~DDO I I ' I \ ~ I DA?'1rnm~ I rn~A~ I rn9.ADrn~ 1 rnpA~7~A i I I I I
/ / \ zOroO t zOroO7p C D ~ D N~ I 1 I , -a rn! O ~rn i O rnrn D ~ 1 I \ \ `Lj'ZN~~f I ~ O DA I ~ -^~3A i SOW. Zrn ! I I I , I \ \ J _,r r N r r J rnr I A I I ~
1 , i I I ! I \ ! \
I ! , ! \ • I ! ~ \ \ \
_ \
? I , i I I \ ,
/ / ~ T ~ ti - ~
/ ~ \ \ ~ d,W ('00 I LLOOZL£M dvW I ~ I , 1 1 / / / ~ \ ~ \ \ \ ~ dW3d NO a35V9 Y3u10 u9tl3 I I I I 1 I
C \ \ r I t' ~ , - / ~ ~ • • ~ • \ ~ ~ Ol .IIlIWIXObd NI 35019 X211+ I I j ' '
, ~ \ \ ~ - d~. ti./\~Il I I I to , NIN1da001d b'W3d YbO.I-OOS aMd I I I
l~C 1 \ ~ ti II ~ NI~da0o1~ dwarf ~~-oo I aul I i ' ! ' 1 11~ ~ r I /1 ~ i i ~ 1
r~ ~ / \ \ 1 I ~ J gs ~ I 11 ~ I ! I L , ~ \ I NolSlnlcl~ens
I ~ ~l - \ \ I I tdJ~l} ~ 4L OOZL 1 I I I / 6~
u~i~p ~n od~,~ s ~ I ~ s# ( / I r ~ _ 1 1 I / ,r _ 1 I d'dw Wad NO l ~ I , ~ev~ No / - /r I I OOMJN N(}N i ! I
~ ~ " ~ I 0 Sde N Il n 40014 / / ~ / I/I / L5 / ~ I I 1 ~ ~ ~ ,f ~ l d-~! NOIla3S / I ivw o~dd,+ i~ i I ~ 5 ' ~ a3stre NI 1 I I ~ I 1 I ' \
p \ I I I ~ ~ r ( r/ / / ! ~ dw~~v I ~ I / - I it ! , , I \ / l ~`I ll ll I
1 ! I ~ / 95 C I E I } / ! /l 1. 1 r I ( I I / \ I \
I I / / ~ 1 \
~ I I 1 1 I .Ill `dd a I~ ~asn I ~ ~ / / / ~ / 1 I 1 1 f I \ \ \ y~_ ~ t ~i J f i 1 1 \ ~ T / / ~ ( / .-tee
r. I 1 I 1
/ q lp su~.''~o ss~y / I I~r Nplw / ~ \ n/ ~ 55 .
~ / / I I I 1 } Ill-IOf 96Td 21 IMI v 1 I ( ~ / III 11
w t~~l~!~ ,~o} I I III ~ ; ~ ? , u~ous you sod 1 I I I I ~ ~ A I • I I I I J1 . G ~ I / r. I \ i III
- ~ - r x I I / / I I I I I r, I ~5 a !a I I I I I ~ I I ~ I / \ \ I
dc,r ~ I I I I 1 I i I I ~ c mo ~ / I I I t~' HSd~ ep+~ a, I ~ I I
~k . / I I I I l t addna I ? I ~ c~uao~e:d a,QncS / I I I ~ I I , I z / I 1 1 ~ nra 3 N ,05 I I
/ / / 1 / / I I III d921 I \ 1 ~ ~ ~ r.
1 I l I 1 I I l a ~ d~ / 1 ~ II / ! / / l I I ~ I 1 A La! 3~1d Nf / / / / 1 \ La! 3~1d VYNOlS 1 1 \ \ ~ \ \ \ I \
~ / / / } ~ ~ \ ~ / \ I \ 111 \ `l.f~ \ ! / ~ ~ ! - - - 1
/ / ~ / J / ~ I- II v / / / / / / / \ I I, s5 ' - - 11
~ / i / l / I \ ~l I rn ~ ~ w / / / / I II
- ~ ~ ~ \ I
'DUnOabpm~ou ul~:~t . 1"fir ~ uo~IC .10 adld / ~ ~ / ~i r ~ I I \ , ? r l ~ ~ / , , r _ ~ / ~ \ 1 / I ~ 11 1~ I '
Us~~ t~uu!a~alro~su~ a~ S ~ / / /I I ~ t•-? l( ,'-},~p1ss y ~ , / , / , I ~ \ I ~ lam'
i A ~ ~ ~ /t \ (I ~ I ~ , d~ .tiz V / ~ - ~ ~ / I / / I
` ~ i - i+ I , ~ ~ c ~ I ~ I ~ 9t 3dld 9f 3dld W2lO1S ,I / - ~ ~ / I I / I
M31A Ndld ~ ~ \ \ , I ~ I I I r ~ / / 1
Z ~ ~ A 1 ` ~ " A~` \ V ~ ~ ' ~ ~ £9 < < \ / \ / I I i- b9 ~ 1\ / i I / I I I ( ? \
_ \ 1~ / I / ~ it ~I I \
-I } /
a , ~ \ \ \ r ~ rll.. I~. z I I ~ / , ~ I_, ,
1 ~ I / i / ~ /I \ ,
i7 ~,VC?ISI ICI S , J~ r ~ ~ - 1 r~l ~ 1 ' ~ / I' ~ r
~ \ 332~J X19 ~ I I ~ 1 .I 1 ~ / ~ o I I I I A~11 1 ~ 1. \ 69 ' I ? / 1 ~ / / I \ r
\ ~ I 1 ~ 1 \ U / ~ !s ~ Z \ / I ~ 1 / r, l I I ~ } I I ~ ~ / ,ba \ r' / ~ I ! ~ / I r \
~ k\ ~ 1, I I \ 1 _ D ~ J I ~ 1 l I ~ / ~ b'/ Nl~d4S ,bZ I l l ! ~ I ! r / 1 1 / I , \ w2~5 , \ I I / , ~ , , \ , \
\ ~ I l I y I ~ \
l I(\ i ~ ~ / ~ L9 L9 \ / ~ I / / ' r SL 9'99- IV10 Nld ~ I I I ~ / ~ r \
\ 1 ~ ,e4v! 1 Nld R!9 NNM Of ~ V I 1 / / ~ r \ , t• of I I / / ~ , I
_ / ~ , / ~a~dn9 ~ 1/ U a' , \ ATd3NRlOd MON ~ml~''t ply I / / I ~ I
o I _ , ~ l ( I ~ y / /lib / \
v X , / / ~ ~ ~ 1 I \ ? 1HINN3?13d-NON .OS ,'1 i / ~ ~ / ~ v /
~ / \ \ / 1 ~ \ T I / X ~i d l / Lb Ef 3dld 015 l / / ~ / f I I \ 1^~I ~ tit - / / ~ /
to ~ I~ 1 ~ ~ ~ i \ \ I~ ~ - / l -1~_,,
~ OL ~ ::r.' ' v / , / / - ~ 1' . ~ t/ / r
~.~I~~ ~ / / / / J I 1/ 1
m y ~ J \ l ~ ~ z ~ / / ~ / ll ~ ~ \ :\L. II zL L \ I~• ~ ~ I . I
- ' ~ J,'dW ~ 7` ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' l l l l ~ SOLI b / ~ / / Y~ / / . ~ 4 1 \ \ ( ) ' ! ~ - ~ Z# 3did 21015 - I ' I 1 I / i
\ f ~ I~~ \r r. / I ~ n
~ \ 5^\ Y / I, / ~ i \ , SI d I 1111' ~ I / I \ ~
z Z ,a. i/ -~1 s
it Cli ~l~ rn m ~J ~
o ~ I X / 1 I / , / / ~ / ~ Z . / Y / _ ~ ~ / ( ~ / z ~
endJo~ 1 1 _ ~ _ \ 1 1 I I y / ~ ~ =~1St/110 \ ~
~V 1 i l ~ ~ ~ 'T - \
rn l I ~ 'Gr ~ . ~ ~ / / x
Z ~ . ~ ? / ~ / / + / Z y / rn - . I , ~ I , - /
a/_ r9VN~~ \ 5V I I 1 \ 1 ,I y1111 • ~ ( r ~ \ . j91 9fld ~0`C / I 11 ~ / 1 11 \ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ \ / / r~ ll I II ~I, I ,
1 I r ~ ) 1 !ill I ? I \ , r ~ 1 11~ f I III ~1 I
~ ~ ~ JL9 -~~-ll L~ I"Idl IIII ( ~ I - . r 1 , ~ I I ~ r I 1 ~h 1 1 X11 / , r I~ ~ L:
D / _ 111 \ \ £ ~ > } 1 I I I s~ 3414 W i I I I z G~ 111 11 u I £ o I 11
I \ d o 1 it I I 1 ~ D 111 _ ~ I ~s I IIII 1 \ \ \III k-~ -I 1 1 ~ ~ / / ~ ~ Old I I I I I ~ ~ \ I / ~ ~ / / I 1 11 II • •:1:•:~•I•. 1 ICI I'w I < I r / I
~\}III } 1 ft - I/ m ~ ~ ~ II l ~1~ I r"" / / / / ' ~ / / 8 1 I 1 9 I I I III I I~ I \ \ / I
\ of I I ~ ~ ill I , ~ ~ - ~ ~ 3 ~ 1111 / o I I II I ~ ~ ~ - I ~ I 11111 ~ ~ / \ I
m I I it ll I I? I II I I I II1 IIII / I I I II II I \ Ill z r , II ~ lI IIII 1 I I I 1 1 1 //II ~ ~ / \ 1 I ~I ~ \ 't-
II III ll ,I 1 I III 1 Ill //I O I 0£ 6'£Z tr'0 £'g I III I I I I I I I I I I £ B Z L g I ?III 1 1 ?I 1 I I I ! O\ ~ ne~a~ - \ / / / 1 1 1 fi o ld,~ ~sv~ I - \ ~ \ 1 I I I \ /III ' ~ \ 1 I I 1 1 , / ~sA~i~ y / / / , I I I I M I 1 1 NINba ~oZ
0'I 111 IIII J I }III 11 I I / IIII , / o£ 191 v o 9 5 9'S Z'L I II ~ ~ ~ .1 1~ 1 I I ~ I l l r ~ I11 III J 1 111 I /!1 _ _ \ 1 III I ) l I II I I h ~ \ Il / / \ 1 1 111 \ I IIIII ? I , \
0' I t7Z £'S1 ~"0 I l I1 / J / ~ 111 III\~' I l , £5 £5 Z'L 9 I I l1 ~ I I i, ~ 111 1 Ili ll I / ~ / 1 I 1 II / I fil 1 \ \ , \ / 1 I I III I I/ 1 I / ii ~ 1 / / / \ \ I II\ \11 I /r !IIIII I 1 \ ~ _ l I /,/iii 1 / 1 1 ( I Ill I I II \ ^._•G'
01 81 6Z ~0 0'I 0'I Z'L ?I l / I ~ /~~/,~i } II ~ / / } / , / / / ~ \ 1 11 1 1\ \ 11 Ill l I \ I / / III II / 1 J 1 1 I I ll I I
17Z i~ I ~b 0 I I l ~ ~ i~ I t- ~i Duo 6t7 6i~ ZL ~ !l IIII / / ~ ~~X \ IIII /o \ , /,w f _ ~ ~,1 1 1 1 1 \ I I III 1 1 1 Ill II ~ I I ~i// _ I : ~ 1 \ I I 11 lI I 11 I ~ - ~ 0 ,Y 319N S I p 1 \ 1 \ 1 I I I ~ I r~ 0
\ \ r D'~~ £'Z ~ 111 / l/ ~ / / 1 / l \ - , Z 051 170 Z5 1 I I / / / ~ / ~ ) ~ 111 ~ ~ ~ \ ~ / - - ~ II \ \ III / I I _ ~ II / 1 )Ill III / / rr~o--b~laoz 1 \ I I I I 1 1 1 I
x m 0~ ZS ZL £ I Ill ~l / Ill / / / r i I - „x. ~b6Z t70 Z01 Z01 Z'L ll I I / I lI , / / I / i i/ ~ - - I 1 I I 11 \ 1 1 I I III II '1 \ / ll 1 I I, / y`.~, ~ , ~ - _ _ / ~ >~~~L- I LLO ~N1~ I 1 t III I l I I I I I ! - % - . / ~ S3uvar 'o2ronn2ro I l l I I 1 1 I I I I II I ~ I I / ! 11, ' / / \ .
5'i I I I 1/ 1 1 I/ \ ~ E ~ ~bZ Z 6 ~ 0 Z£ Z'£ Z'L I III I I I I I I 1 I I ~ ~ i,,// i ~ 1 \ ~ E!'`--- / I 1 I I III V IIIII I J II 1 r -`r_ !'~9~ / I III IIIII I I II II DTI ,
- 00 2 3dOlS sayaul s}a oe or? ~ I I I i l I \ 1 l / / / 11 I I / / li ~w ~ , - ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ non 0 d3~tl `43214 ~I/u # l~1Nl I I I I 11 I l I 1 ~ / ~ o _ ~ \ _ _ ~ ~ ,
X I 11 i/ I /J I Ill i i ~ „ I = 3did 010 '?~a 14101 '21a 1.31N1 ,111SN31Nl III III 111 I I I ! / ` \ ~ ~ ~ - / / / / , I I I 111 ~ ~ ~ 1 I III I I r I ~ ~ ~ ~ / / , III 1 /ll ll I II I \ III '1 ,r-__
D I 1 I / 1 l l / / i/ / / / \ \ ~ ~ , =ro- //l I ll~ I l/l / ll / / / ~ ~ ~ ~ / / i - ~ / / / / / I III 1 4111 1 / ~ , / , ~ / / / / / I I ~ Ill - / I I ~ III t
V . , alS-lb I ~~1HNIH~In wyn I c - I C-lr^ui t t - ntni~i n innnr- r,r,.,...~.,,, / I ~ II I I ~ I I I r ~ r I l ~ i / / I ~ I I / I r l / ~ / i / l ~ - ~ - ~ ~ ~ , ~ / / 1 _ 7
UI 0 L, , ~7~vrC3 ivvlloinluttl 110 Ul)V/YIVUV~VV
v D 1(/ 1 1 1 I l l I I 1 1 ( - 06 I oN 1 1 W ( I I !I I I I\ I I/ vv v / / ~ / ~ lil 1 ( \ ~ r
3/(o I I 11 W N l 1~ 1 1 1 w I I I( l 1 r l I ~ ~ - 1-1 ~ 1 o I I l 11 l I I 10 I I I i 17
~ \ I 1 1\ \ 1 I ~l > 1 C IIJ
~ 11 I \ 1( ) 11 \ 11 \ I 1 ~ N I i 1 1 _J I I I 1 11 I\ \ 1 \ti \ t ~ S-1
III
I

I .
Y 1 r ~ ~ • . ! U ( ~ , :
I r Iii ~ ~ _ ~.~1, -t~ )r~ I I I ~ ~~_''//.'ii=~~ ~ / - / / _ 1 ~ . 1 , . 1 I ~ % t / _ / ~ ~r I ~ ~
ii ~ _
\ ~ I N ~
- ~ r - ~ r , - ~ i , - pAD N 10 ~ [ i I: GAMPfjt F I 1 1 ~ NO
_ ~ ~ , I } ~r Q,p~,~l`
/ . I 1 1 . 1 1. 1 i~ / / ' ~ ' h' LI1LY ATKINS ROAD ~ ~ ~ ~ r'
; _ - I ;I ~X.;wE1Lr~ITF 1 ~ f----~-_ - A_ ~ I i~ + f ~ / ~ / ~ ~ _ y : ~ I ; / _ , > + ~~I ~ I X ~
r~. _ ~ I _ _ - ~ ~ f Q V tDU ~ / 1 F ~ ~
i ~ ; i / I / ~ , I ~ ; - I ~ i~ ~ I 1I ~ ~ / ,'I ~ v
/ ~ - t-- _ ~ ~ , - i 1 i II f - I i i ~ ~ , ' ~ ! I ~ ; ~ I ~ NOW ~OR F{SRMERLY ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ % ~ ~ / w 3 . „ ~ ~ x
- 1 t i~ I ~ I I I e ' ~ ~ ~ , ~ ; ' I 1 ~ ~ _ ~ NARWARD. JAMES ~ ~ ~ - - - i i I ~ r • i , I ~ r a 0w~'x
~ 1 _ i ~ ~ / ~ ~ I I ' ~ I PIN: 0771 _ 55,1 ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ , j j r ~ I o . Q ~
i,,- ~ Y i, ~ . ~ I ~ C ~ • ~ ~ ~ ~ ZONED: R-AOyG _ _ ; ~i ~ i / . - ~ ~ ~ ~ \S~ ~ % r--- i' 1 f ' _ li i ~ I USE: SINGLE PAkIILY'/ i ' i ` is ~ _ ~ .r V. ~ - 1-,- , Z
- ~ i I ' ~ : ~ / ~ ~ , ~ i I `V li \ 1 i i - ~ - i E - ~ 1 ,,'t ~ Tf~E'AM IS IN COMP f CE, A ~ ~ ~ i • r ~ , ~ ! ~ - ~ , ;~I - ~ , / / ~ , ~ ; - SITE
, _ 1 ~ ; - - ~ ~ I i ~r ~ - ~ ~ ~ - - . I ~r hl ~UIR,EF~ D(J~r~RS ~ , ' ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ T ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' - f ~ A i - . I i i ~ ' ' ~
, , liar r,, I - ~ ~ ;1 t ` 1 - ~ .I r A ~ i y! + ~ /~'OR ~1 ~RBNN~A~ S~RPAM I j I 1~ _ / ~ ~ - /,r i ~ ~ s ~ - ~ ~;,i~ / ;i, r //I ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ -
+ ~ ~ ~ ~ I -r ~ ~ - ~ _ F- U ~v y ~ I~ ~ ~ _ ~ ~ - ~ ~'i I I l i a _ Z
~ 1 V ~ _ r ~ / ~3 y'E~.IML~'CR - "~N~E - I I i ~ I'I . --a- _ 1 - • , ~ I ~ , i 1 I 1 I ~ ~ - 'P,I E-R BUf~~P, • . ~ , ~ I I _ _ i ~ ~ ` I \ ~ ~ ~ V _ W I ~ ~
t- _ I ~ ~ f ~ - - _ _ - I I ~ ~ ~ W
~ ! _ ~ ~ r ~ ~ OPEN SPACE I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -.c ~ r7- _ - I ~ ; ~ ~ r, , ~ - , ~ , . - - - - I i ~ ~ - fN
- + r ~ ,I ~ III I I 8 1:• - ~ ~ 1 ~ 1 1 ~ ~ ; : I Q 9 ~ ~ ~ „ ~ -{'1 I I / - ~ U c I AD Z
, ~ ti , ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I 3 36 II i A `,NOW OR F{1RMfRLT - ~ . ~ ' I ~ ~ ' 35 ~ ' y ~i ~ I ' ~ucw;rcxrZ. rou:~A~,w: ~ ~ ~ ~ ' L' ~ ; )-~i I Q
1 _ 1 . 1 _1 Op' PERENNIAL ~ ~ ~ i~ V i J y , ~ ~ t ~ , ~ l ~ , \ , STREAM BUFFCR rig i ~ ~ I~ ~ ~ E ~'I(4 'PU ~ ~ t ~t, f r ~ ~ i - - ~ Y , ` , ~ I d PAEAEI.AS Y~=\ , ~ ~ ~ ` y y I ~ ~ ~ ~ .y . 1 ~ l ~
1 ` I, ~ ~ I , a ~ , ~ - P~; 0~, I -ss~~z';7` - ~ - VICINITY MAP BONED: R-4 . - ~ - -
` ~ ~ v' ~ + . I - ; ~ ~ 1 I ~ ~ I . , ~ t ~ ~ I ~ a ~ Qu Ic P,l'N1 STREET- ~ Iha ~ ~ r ~IN~~ F r= , N.T.S. W I, , U. ~ ~:L_ L I ~ ~ ~ . ,1 ~ (7
~ - + O iV~NSE RIVER ~ 1 ~ I , ~ i ~ , • ~ o I~ • ~ • ~ 4 r--~ r v 1 \ \ ~ P5 ~ ~ r ) uJ z ~ _ • ~ .II ~ . Z
v ~ i. A - . I r 1 LL a _ t - . ~ Z ~ ~ 'i , I I ~ ( ~ PH E I IT A A Z ~ ~ K• A5 5 EDT W Z
~1,,. ~ I ' ? l!'`'/ ~ y; • 2 ,111 ~ ~ 1 ~ a~,' ~ \ ~ ~ o ~7 8: t+ ~ - 8' ~ y~i 'l ~ / iii I ~ : ~ ` N a i i ~ \ ,
I ~ x ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~~~,r _ ~ ~ - TOTAL ACREAGE - 42.37 AC - ~ ~ ~ r r ~ ~ l ~ ~ ~ ~ ; ZONING - R 40W
' ~ 1 . . 1
~ , 1 ~ ~ I ~ ~ 40~ ~ I ~ I ~ ~ _ ~ _ I 2~ ~ 1 I - 1~~ ?I I I - ALLO~b'ABLE LOTS - 42 I.0 LOT/ACRE) , , ~ ~ 1 _ ~ ~
- ~ i ~ , I ; ` , ~ " , ~ , < ~ i ' , PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL LOTS - 28 Z Z 4" 4 I ~ ~ ~ \ ~ ~ _ _ \ l` ~ MIN, LOT SIZE ALLOWED - 20,000 5F Q ~
~ 1. _ ~ i p ~ ` ~ ~ i ~ MiN. LOT SIZE PROVIDED - 30,045 SF W
~ ~t ~ ~ ~ 20' DRAINAGE I ; . ~ 1 ~ 17 _ v~` V ~ • 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ at'c' I , v~ ~ ~ ~rEASEMENT (TYP) ,1 v ~ ~ w f ~ r ~ - ~ ~ - _ - 1 ~ c~ ~ ~ , ~ ` ~ ~ r ~ AVERAGE LOT SIZE - 38,924 SF Z
~ 1 EX._w~tLSiTE~ ~ , r , / ' WE~L`,(E ~ ~ / 2c } ~ ~ 1 ; ~ ~ - \ , - - c- ~ WELL SITE AREA - 2.18 AC ~
t ~ ~Et p ~ _ t J. I r ~ - I r ~ ` r ~ ' `v AREA IN NEW R.O.W. - .97 AC Z R, , .r, l f , t ~ ~ - ~ 3
/ \ ~ ~ ~ rNG , ~ ~ 1 ~ • i~ ~ 23 42 2 ' i l i _ , ~ -t - ~ ~ REQUIRED OPEN SPACE 10.6 AC (25.0 %a) W
I % ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ A~~, PROPOSED OPEN SPACE - I I . I AC (26.2 I-
I I , _ ~ _ 1 ~ 2 ~ ~ _ , i ~ ~ L NEAR FEET OF STREET 3 453 LF ~ W ! ' ~ i~ r ~ _ WAKE COUNTY PIN -
I 1 tr OPEN SPP.CE ~ _ ~ ~6 t I r t I 1,1 i ) a 74 7 1, 1 ~ 4 ~ 44 i'- ~ r ~ r,~ ~ ' _ 07X.02-76-9539 a
~ ~ ~ _ 0771.02-67-5572 ~
I- I / t r / ~ ~ I ~m__ OPEN P~ E 70 ` r t
, ~ ~i y ~ ~ ! ~ ~ ~ Pt1A,~E 2 SITE DATA W
f 1 ~ 1 • ~ ~ 1 , ~ ~ I ~ 1 1 ~ • ~r y ~ ~ l ~ ( p
+ ~ ~ ZM cfl ~ ~ ~ 50' NON-; ~ R, NN~AL 1 ~ ' ~ 1 1 r ~.r ~ ~ I ~ , ~ ~ I I -y~ TOTAL ACREAGE - 83.63 AC
1 t I \ 1 I I } N OR f0 ERLY \ RCOU 5~ 1 : 1., ~F ~ ~~G + 1 I t 1 ~ 1 I ""P''~ BUFFER + I ~ t ~~i ~ J0 ! 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ s ~ ! t,- ~ - ~ 1 I i .r'~~ I P,~401h , 8.55 AC. Q
r ' r, 1 \ f C ELL. CARLT L. JR d \ 1 • I ti ~ 1 Jt 1 v\ ~ 1 ~ f JO ANN C. GRIFFIN 1 ~ G~ 46 ~ ~ ~ 1 I I - + / ' ~ ~ ~ ~ , I , i I R~80W .5.08 AC. , / ~ ~ ~ l ~ ~ - ' / I a-- ZONING R 40W ~ - W
~ r ~ t I V I ~ ~ PI ~ ~ ~ ~2 ~ I l ~ I t I v 1 ~ ~ , N 0771-66- 75 t : / 67 F ~ 1 I ~ I
~ t ~ t 1 V 1 ' / ,Z~AIED: R-40 ~ / ~ 1,1 j ~ y ~ i / i i Allot, ABLE LOTS 80 LOTS { V I ~ / 1`~ ~ ! ' R 40W - 78 (I.0 LOT/ACRE)
1 t I \ I I USE~VACANT I~ • ~ ~ \ ~ I Jl ~ ~G \ . ~ ~ ! /,j ! ~ ~ i 'I R 80W ~ 2 0.5 LOT ACRE z
~ , ~ r ~ ~ ~ `d J ~ ~ ~ f ~ PP,OPO`~ED P,ESIDENTIAL LOTS 45 ~ ~ t ~ ~ I 0
- r i i \ • 1 ~ I ~ ` BUFF R SI10WN ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ \ I ~ / \ 1 ~ ALONG . , ~ ~ 5 ~ . 1 t I 1, WATEf~COURSE IS INCOMPLIANCE ~ j 69 ~ 66 _ - / \ 1 ~ \ ~ ~ y ~ . 1 I I _ _ MIN. LOT SILE ALLOWED
1 1 j 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ WIl h QUIREU BUFFEKS POK A I ~ 1 ' ~ Y , EA~I~~ CREEK ~ R~40W - 20 000 SF ~
I l \ I ~ I ~ / ~ 1, I t ~ 1' \ 1 i NON-P RENNIAL WATERCOURSE (5 I' 1 L' I _ ; _ , ~ ~ FORD Noce AREAS > z5 s, ~ J ~ • L ~ - / ` SUF~~I ISIQN ; ~ _ _ - - ~ R 80W 40,000 SF ~ - _ c ~ ~ ~ r ~ ~ o[
r , \ ~ 1 r t I \ ~ 130' DRAHJAGE AREAS < 5 : r ~ ; , ~ ~ , , ~ \ , , 2a Bu1LnINC s~sac 52 , 1' ti ~ ) ~ r- - ~ : r ~ 1 MIN. LOT ~iZE PROVIDED 0
I , , I i ~ ~ , 1' ~r ' \ i ` r I OW - 30,000 5F ~ ~ + f ` + ~ r R-80W - WA
+ i~ 1 v 1 ~ ~ 1 1 ~ BUFFER ~ ~ ~t / o , , ~ 1 I ~ ~ I t 11 ~ / • / t / , r A A i i ~ r AVERA r \ ~ 1 ` ~ + + GE LOT SIZE
I / ~ ~I ~ r ~ Fir-. / ~ . _ _ I , i . r Z / - - r i \ o ~ ` i ~ ~ ~ i ~ : R 40W 47,3 16 5F _ _
i 1 1, t r , , , I ~ ~ ~ 1 I
r ~ 1 CASC1AEk' (IYPI .I • ~ L PlH~ 1 , 1 I 1 U IG I S~ {~VA r r ~ \ + y + MIN. LOT WIDTH ALLOWED ~ ,
/ ~ 1 Itl~i 5~ Y/11 , ~ y r 1 _ ~ - 75 lF n s r ~--------~--t_,L, , , ~ r r trJ.~ ~ y r , 11 r R-80W - 110 LF
~ I 1 1 ~ ~ ~ I~ ~ / ` ~ r + ' l ' ' AREA IN NEW R. .W. - .55 AC
- - ~ d~ ~ _ ~ ~ ,l ' r I ~ , , 0 7 I r I r REQUIRED OPEN SPACE - 20.9 AC (25.0 °~o) ,l -----1 ~
1 ' , / ~ + / ~ ` I --L----- r . - + PROPOSED OPEN SPACE - 24.6 AC (29.4 ~o)
' RE ATI 1 + ,I 1 , _ t,,,~F CRE ON I + ~ ~ _ + PROP05ED RECREATION AREA ~ 2.6 AC 81J~fER~H041M'ALONC /
` ~ : I OPEN .,PACE AREA + 1 i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 (24.6 AC) (2.6 AC1 53 i 1 i ~ LINEAR FEET OF STP,EET 6,233 LF 5?P.EIAMI~I CONt;;J,~r°,!
~ ~ ~ , I~ _ _ \ i ~ ENS t1F I 'if ~ . F . ; WAKE COUNTY PIN - wlrn ~eQUIR~,D Burr,.+ W I,r ~ ~ ~ FoR A P.~R~rfnlra,L srReAM 0771.02 ~76 9539
I v .1 1 , a ~ 'I ~ I ~ ~ . (100} ~ ~ 0771.02-67-5572
v _ . 11 I 5~ ~ + + ~ ~ ~ ; 1~ ~ , ~1 ,,~n I I ,I ~ • I~';~~~
~ 1 1 62 ~ , • I I ~ ~ • I 50' N ~E RIVER
~ ~ ~ t ~ 1 + , I ' \ ~ ~ y~~- ~\c ply , ~ ~ ' I \ ~ + ' -I-I \ BU"F[ I~1YP} ~ ' I i W ~ I i
I ~1 II I I,. • ~ 0' D IN,~GE II I I ~
EASE NTI (fYP} I ~~~ewrri ~ . I I ~ p hiy i I i 1~OW FOf'MERI:r ~ ~ _
~ J ~ 1 ~ I i 1 • ' ~ I ~ ~ ~ / ~ / t bls le , + 1 ~ << ~ ~ • N r IMI;LIA~1 N, CA'F'ER1NE ~ i~ ~ ~ ~ESS
I ~ - - to ,1 r PHASE I IMPERVIOUS SURFACE CALCULATIONS: , ~ ~ ~ J / ~ ~ ~ _ ~ I • w
\ ~ ~ MIEN JR. ~ ~ • V ~ / PIN: b7~ i -95 55;~~, • •
TOTAL AREA = I ,845 439 SF 42.37 AC ~ - I ~ , ~ i i ? I ~ -1 ~
ALLOWABLE IMPERVIOUS % = 12.00% = 221,453 SF ~ _ , ' , t • • ~ ' \ \ ROADWAY AREA = 71,535 SF {3.88 %y ~ I ~ ~ ' t.• t ~0 i - i ~~ti ~ s--~ ' I , r ~ USE: ~i LE FAMILY ~ ~ , .,A .FN
F S ,v ~
REMAINING ALLOWABLE IMPERVIOUS SURFACE 1 ~ / ' ~ I ? ~ t ~ 56 / ,yt ~ - • L I i ~ ~ I~ ~ • 1 oo~a~a o / ` ooppaoo
I ~ = 12.00% - 3.88% = 8. (2% (I 49,9 18 SF} 1 _ . ~ ~ ~ .-y 1 ~ / , r, ! i i, / 4~~
- I 1,
II 11 ~ : , 1~'', ~ i ~ ~ 1`1 ~ WELL SITE # 1 ~ #2 ALLOWABLE IMPERVIOUS AREA HUNT N6W00 ,I I ~ ~ , , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I W
- 4,000 sF E TATES - t ~ 59 + ( \ ice, i
A vll 1:1 ~ I~ ~ I ~ v 58 ~ ~i / SUBDIVISION I , ~ , ALLOWABLE IMPERVIOUS SURFACE PER RESIDENTIAL LOT 1 ~ I + ~ < f I ~ f 0(7 PERI:NalAL;
TOTAL # LOTS = 28 LOT5 + , ~ : ~ ~ / G / 5TRFAM °L'FF~R j
I = 145,9 i 8 SF 128 LOTS = 5,2 I I SF /LOT 1 , 100' P[RLNNIAI ~ \ ` % ~ _ - i t ~ y • ~ ~ ~ ~ GENERAL NOTES:
I I STREAM BUFFER ~ \ . • ' V ~ _ i t ~ I I p J
+ I 1 ~ Y \ ~ ~ i~ ) I 5d NEUSE RIVE \ \ ~ \ • ~ :~I • ~ I , TOPOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION TAKEN FROM WAKE COUNTY DIGITAL MAPS.
PHASE 2 IMPERVIOUS SURFACE CALCULATIONS: + I ~ - ~ i ~ ~ , BUFFER (TYP) ~ ~ \ ~ \ ~ t ~ _ / AR ~ ~ 20 2. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH All APPLICABLE WAKE M
L Rl= 2,900,2 I 0 5F (66.58 AC) ~ I ~ \ ~ ~ ~ ~ • ~ • • ~ ~ ~ ( i / COUNTY SEDIMENTATION AND EROSION CONTROL ORDINANCES AND FLOOD ~<~UALIT!
- - I 7.0' DRAINAGE ~ ~ \ ` _ \ ~ t ALLOWABLE IMPERVIOUS % - 12.00% - 348,025 SF 1 I EASEMENT ` ~ ~ ~ _ ~ I ~ HAZARD REGULATIONS. DENR•WAtE ^~la AND 3. ROADWAYS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH NCDOT YIE'
\ ~ , 11 . ROADWAY AREA = 138,202 SF {4.77 j ~-------------------T__ ~ ~ ~ v I f STANDARDS AND WILL BE MAINTAINED BY NCDOT UPON ACCEPTANCE, z
I i 1 ~ r I I ~ - ~ 4. BOUNDARY INFORMATION TAKEN FROM A MAP BY ELINGBURG LAND 0
REMAINING ALLOWABLE IMPERVIOUS SURFACE 1 I I ~ ~ ~ J~= m J N~ 1 o 1 U SURVEYING CO. w
= 12.00%-4.77%=7.23%{209,685SFy i 1 i °uz~~oQ 1 WSW-o~ i wN oo~ i w~ z~3~ ~ 1 + 1 1 ~w~cuvn I jai •~~a z~~ONOz / 5. ALL OPEN SPACE AREAS SHALL REMAIN UNDISTURBED TO PRESERVE NATURAL ~
1 I 1 OQ6~.l~4Kw I K~~ajV~~' , p[UC~cj~~ ~ Km ~-QPIj 1 ~ I ~~a~0~ 1 0 ~f W 1 OFQI`. W 1 0 ~Q~OKa \ r, ALLOWABLE IMPERVIOUS SURFACE PER RESIDENTIAL LOT I , ~ , m n w z 1 W _ o 0 1 a v o ~ ~ o v _ > -r ~ VEGETATION. THESE AREAS SHALL BE OWNED AND MAINTAINED BY THE ~
OTAL#LOTS=39 T + - I 1 , potQ~z~ 1 o[~+~zz I o[zwrzz -~~ot~wOr`°~~ 'I -1/ LOS REC. LOT - 40 LOTS} 1 I F1UNT~~,S RIDGE , ~ , 0 0 1 o a z • o ~ ~ e ~ r ~ , HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION. cue RA.wti 6. ALL LOTS SHALL HAVE DRIVEWAY ACCESS FROM INTERNAL STREETS ONLY. n-
-209,685 SF/40 LOTS=5,2425FILOT + I 1 o z ~ 1 t~~..^'w 1 50 .N'w , ~_=a•.N~ t 7. A MINIMUM BUILDING SETBACK OF 20' SHALL BE REQUIRED ALONG ALL I -200 SAD
, I SUBDIVISION 1 z ~ ~ ~ b a ~ ? ~ 1 0 ~ z 1 0 ~ ~~1~ , I , ~ I zm ~ ~ 1 z ~ ~ 1 z ~ WATERCOURSE BUFFERS.
1 I 1 ~ , I I , ~ , + ~ 1 HUNTERS BELIEF DATF_ 8. THIS SUBDIVISION IS WITHIN THE SWIFT CREEK LAND MANAGEMENT PLAN.
PI1A5E 2 CRITICAL AREA IMPERVIOUS SURFACE CALCULATIONS: i i 1 + i i \1 T + , , 1 SUBDIVISION 9. THIS SUBDIVISION IS DESIGNED TO NOT IXCEED THE ALLOWABLE 6 % AND 120 FEBRUARY 16, 2005
(LOS #56 - #6 I} 1 I 1 1 1 i 1----------\ IMPERVIOUS LIMITATIONS. THEREFORE, NO ADDITIONAL STORMWATER DEVISES ktwsior~
I ~ 1 ~ 1 , .1 a TOTAL AREA = 742,656 SF (17.05 AC) ~ r I i + i i i ~ ~ 1v ARE REQUIRED. 10. NO BUILDING IS PERMITTED WITHIN TWENTY FEET (20~ OF A DRAINAGEWAY OR
\ , ALLOWABLE IMPERVIOUS % = 6.00% = 44,559 SF i + i + i 1 i ~ ~ WATERSHED BUFFER.
ROADWAY AREA = 4,424 SF (0.60 % 1 ~ i 1 i 1 ~ 1 ' vv v, 1 1 1 I 1 1! ~ I I .DEVELOPER: OVER THE MEADOW, LLC
1 ~ 1 i 1 I I v , 1 + 1 ~ 1 1 li v 71 O I CREEDMOOR RD, SUITE 142
REMAINING ALLOWABLE IMPERVIOUS SURFACE + , 1 1 I I 1 RAIEiGH, NC 276 13 o I o0 200 400
'
I i I I I i t \ ALLOWABLE IMPERVIOUS SURFACE PER LOT I I 1 i I I I
I 1 1 , I I 1 1 ~ (TOTAL # LOTS = 6 LOTB)
= 40,103 SF! 6 LOTS = 6,684 SF! LOT I I I I i ` GRAPHIC SCALE G- I
i~ ~ I I 1 I ~ \
A I ~ i I 1 1 ~ \
0316