20190432 Ver 1_More Info Received_20190507

Homewood, Sue
From: Mularski, Eric <[e-mail]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 7, 2019 2:40 PM
To: [e-mail]; Homewood, Sue
Cc: Vena, Dave; DePalma, Alicia ([e-mail]); Rogers, Carl
Subject: [External] RE: Request for Additional Information; PNG Pleasant Garden Looping
Project, Guilford Co.; SAW -2018-02075 (UNCLASSIFIED)
Attachments: Fig 6b_Pleasant_Garden_JD_FINAL_REV_20190429.pdf, Stream_Form_S21.pdf,
Section B.2and3_PleasantGardenLooping LinelmpactTables_REV.docx; W17-Wetland8_
20181205.JPG; ER 18-1259 Final Response.pdf, PNG Pleasant Garden Road Looping
Project revised Acceptance.pdf
External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to
[e-mail]
Dave,
We appreciate the comments to the submitted Pre -Construction Notification for PNG's Pleasant Garden Road Project.
Below are responses to your questions and comments.
1) Per NWP 12 Regional Condition 4.1.1, please explain why the avoidance of direct impacts due to one or more
wetland/stream crossings cannot be avoided by HDD or directional drill methods?
• With the exception of Stream S10, the other 14 streams impacted by the project range between 2' and 5' in
width. Six of these 14 streams are intermittent in nature and will likely not have significant flow during
construction of the project. These streams are proposed for open -cut trenching operations due to their small size,
to reduce the amount of additional clearing within the regulated riparian stream buffer and adjacent forested
wetlands required for HDD, to reduce impacts to affected landowners, and to reduce impacting additional
landowners.
• Stream 10 was evaluated for an HDD crossing; however, preliminary designs of the HDD indicated that impacts to
an adjacent stream (labeled as Stream 5) depicted on Drawing PNG-C-330-0001018 would occur due to
additional workspace to conduct the HDD (stringing area, additional easement, or drill pad area). An HDD would
have resulted in more significant impacts to landowners and potentially fragmented their properties. The current
alignment through this area was chosen to follow existing property lines and reduce impacts to landowners.
• The potential for an inadvertent return during trenchless crossing operations which could result in impacts to the
stream lasting several weeks as opposed to a conventional open -cut crossing which should be completed in 24
hours, or less.
2) Please provide the permanent seeding specs for wetland and stream impact areas.
NC Piedmont Riparian Mix - (ERNMX-307) (20 lbs/acre) NC Piedmont FACW Mix (ERNMX-308) (20 lbs/acre)
Botanical Name
Common Name
% of mix
Botanical Name
Common Name
Sorghastrum nutans
Indiangrass
26
Panicum anceps
Beaked Panicgrass
Panicum anceps
Beaked Panicgrass
25
Elymus virginicus
Virginia Wildrye
Elymus virginicus
Virginia Wildrye
20
Carex vulpinoidea
Fox Sedge
Panicum clandestinum
Deertongue
20
Carex lupulina
Hop Sedge
Chamaecrista fasciculata
Partridge Pea
4
Rhynchospora globularis
Globe Beaksedge
Hibiscus moscheutos
Crimsoneyed Rosemallow
2
Juncus effusus
Soft Rush
Juncus effusus
Soft Rush
1
Hibiscus moscheutos
Crimsoneyed Rosemallow

Juncus tenuis I Path Rush 1 1 1 Veronia noveboracensis I New York Ironweed
Vernonia noveboracensis I New York Ironweed I 1 I Scirpus cyperinus I Woolgrass
3) The plan sheets show an impact to Stream 21 (Stream Impact S8), however this stream does not appear on the
updated delineation map.
Figure 6b has been updated to illustrate Stream 21 also attached is the NCDWR Stream Identification Form.
4) The Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District, Raleigh Regulatory Field Office (Corps) typically requires
compensatory mitigation for permanent conversion of one wetland type to another, including the conversion of
shrub -scrub wetlands - or those that have been recently cleared and would otherwise regenerate as shrub -scrub
or forested wetlands - to herbaceous wetlands. As such, the areas of the following Wetland Impacts within the
proposed permanent maintenance corridor will require compensatory mitigation at a 1:1 ratio unless otherwise
justified based on aquatic function (i.e. NCWAM evaluation): W4, W7, W8, W9, W10 (which appears to be
partially forested?), and W17).
The PCN Section B.2 and B3 Impact tables have been revised for crossings W4, W7, W8, W9, and W10 (see
attached). Crossing W17 - Wetland 8 has already been clear cut by others. See Photograph below taken on
12/5/2018.
5) Typically, permanent discharge of fill material (including rock) into a wetland would warrant compensatory
mitigation at a 2:1 ratio (e.g. Wetland Impact W29).
A revised mitigation calculation includes a 2:1 ratio for permanent fill impacts at crossing W29.
6) Please provide the NCDMS acceptance letters, itemized for each HUC (03030002 and 03030003), showing that
NCDMS can provide the appropriate amount of compensatory mitigation in each HUC.
Please see attached revised NCDMS Acceptance Letter.
7) The SHPO letter indicates that additional items are required for their review. Has an updated letter been
requested following submittal of this additional information?
Yes. Please see attached letter from SHPO dated 1/17/2019.
After your review of our responses, please let us know if your require additional information to process our request.
Thank you,
Eric Mularski, Pws
D 704-973-6878 M 704-806-1521
hdrinc.com/follow-us
From: Bailey, David E CIV USARMY CESAW (USA)[mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2019 4:19 PM
To: Mularski, Eric <[e-mail]>; Vena, Dave <[e-mail]>
Cc: Homewood, Sue <[e-mail]>
Subject: Request for Additional Information; PNG Pleasant Garden Looping Project, Guilford Co.; SAW -2018-02075
(UNCLASSIFIED)
CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED
Messrs. Clayton and Gonzales,

Thank you for your PCN and attached information, dated and received 4/4/2019, for the above referenced project. I
have reviewed the information and need clarification before proceeding with verifying the use of Nationwide Permit 12
(http://saw-reg.usace.army.mil/NWP2017/2017NWP12.pdf). Please submit the requested information below (via e-mail
is fine) within 30 days of receipt of this Notification, otherwise we may deny verification of the use of the Nationwide
Permit or consider your application withdrawn and close the file:
1) Per NWP 12 Regional Condition 4.1.1, please explain why the avoidance of direct impacts due to one or more
wetland/stream crossings cannot be avoided by HDD or directional drill methods?
2) Please provide the permanent seeding specs for wetland and stream impact areas.
3) The plan sheets show an impact to Stream 21 (Stream Impact S8), however this stream does not appear on the
updated delineation map.
4) The Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District, Raleigh Regulatory Field Office (Corps) typically requires
compensatory mitigation for permanent conversion of one wetland type to another, including the conversion of
shrub -scrub wetlands - or those that have been recently cleared and would otherwise regenerate as shrub -scrub
or forested wetlands - to herbaceous wetlands. As such, the areas of the following Wetland Impacts within the
proposed permanent maintenance corridor will require compensatory mitigation at a 1:1 ratio unless otherwise
justified based on aquatic function (i.e. NCWAM evaluation): W4, W7, W8, W9, W10 (which appears to be
partially forested?), and W17).
5) Typically, permanent discharge of fill material (including rock) into a wetland would warrant compensatory
mitigation at a 2:1 ratio (e.g. Wetland Impact W29).
6) Please provide the NCDMS acceptance letters, itemized for each HUC (03030002 and 03030003), showing that
NCDMS can provide the appropriate amount of compensatory mitigation in each HUC.
7) The SHPO letter indicates that additional items are required for their review. Has an updated letter been
requested following submittal of this additional information?
Please let me know if you have any questions.
-Dave Bailey
David E. Bailey, PWS
Regulatory Project Manager
US Army Corps of Engineers
CE -SAW -RG -R
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
Phone: [phone], Ext. 30.
Fax: [phone]
Email: David. [e-mail]
We would appreciate your feedback on how we are performing our duties. Our automated Customer Service Survey is
located at: http://corpsmapu.usace.army.mil/cm apex/f?p=136:4:0
Thank you for taking the time to visit this site and complete the survey.
CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED

North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona M. Bartos, Administrator
Governor Roy Cooper
Secretary Susi H. Hamilton
January 17, 2019
Kimberly Nagle
S&ME, Inc.
134 Suber Road
Columbia, SC 29210
Office of Archives and History
Deputy Secretary Kevin Cherry
knagleksmeinc.com
Re: Pleasant Garden Road 12" Looping Gas Line, Line 450, Guilford County, ER 18-1259
Dear Ms. Nagle:
Thank you for your January 3, 2019, letter transmitting the final report for the above -referenced undertaking.
We have reviewed the report and offer the following comments.
We note that all editorial comments were addressed and have accepted the submitted document as the final
compliance report. We concur that no further archaeological investigation is needed for the project area.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 and 110 of the National Historic Preservation Act and
the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36
CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact Renee Gledhill -Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-814-6579 or
environmental.reviewnncdcr.gov. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the above
referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
6;*,Ramona M. Bartos
Location: 109 East Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 Telephone/Fax: [phone]-6599

10
MAP LOCATION
Stream 8 - Potential Non -
Wetland Waters of the U.S.
370 linear feet
0
1
i
Stream 21 - Potential Non -
Wetland Waters of the U.S.
140 linear feet
Approximate Total Jurisdictional RPW Tributary: 6,309 linear feet (0.568 acres) 1 LEGEND
Approximate Total Jurisdictional Wetlands: 5.45 acres Study Area
Approximate Total Jurisdictional Pond: 0.27 acres
Approximate Total Uplands: 137.20 acres 11`� Photograph Location
Approximate Total Site Acreage: 143.49 acres
Upland Data Point
11 Mimi
IIII I" ® Wetland Data Point
Wetland 4 - Potential WetlandTr Culvert
�Illp
�IIIIIIII III Waters of the U.S. I\ Potential Jurisdictional Waters of the U
0.06 ac.
Delineated Stream -Intermittent
llpIIIIIIIIII °0p��
III Delineated Stream - Perennial)
Delineated Wetland
I,►
Delineated Ponds
Wetland 5 -Potential Wetland DATA SOURCE: Aerial Imagery Bing Maps Hybrid
GIS Service
Waters of the U.S. GPS POINTS WERE COLLECTED USING TRIMBLE
0.09 ac. GE07X AND POST -PROCESSED
6
0 e
� I �1�11� 111111 IIIIII ��. a
Feet 300
Wetland 6 � -Potential Wetland I�
Waters of the U.S. u
1 III 0.05 ac. ""
',��aat����i �- ��► � Wil-._ �
it
Name: Pleasant Garden Road Looping (Line 450) Project
Wetland 7 - Potential Wetland ' Applicant: Duke Energy
Waters of the U.S. Location: Location: The town of Pleasant Garden and Vicinity
0.04 ac. Date: 4/29/2019
Study Area: 143.49 acres
Center Coordinatp- -7A 7Rinwi, ,is aFaRnR,
PLEASANT GARDEN ROAD LOOPING (LINE 450) PROJECT
FNC611I Piedmont Natural Gas ,r, DUKE
'�� ENERGYY DELINEATED WATERS OF THE U.S.
Energy that shows' FIGURE 613
PATH: HAGISTROJECTSM72_DUKEENERGY110110236_ PLEASANTGARDEN\l.2_WORK _IN_PROGRESS\MAP_DOCSIMXDIWORKINGIJD_PERMITIFINAL_PJDIFIG6B_PLEASANT_GARDEN-JD-FINAL REV-20190429.MXD - USER: EMULARSK - DATE: 4/29/2019 JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION REQUEST

ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
TIM BAUMGARTNER
Director
David Vena, PE
Piedmont Natural Gas
PO Box 33068
Charlotte, NC 28233
�Y. �A�•
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
May 7, 2019
Expiration of Acceptance: 11/7/2019
Project: PNG Pleasant Garden Road Looping Project County: Guilford
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) is willing to
accept payment for compensatory mitigation for impacts associated with the above referenced project as
indicated in the table below. Please note that this decision does not assure that participation in the DMS in -
lieu fee mitigation program will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts.
It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact permitting agencies to determine if payment to the DMS will
be approved. You must also comply with all other state, federal or local government permits, regulations or
authorizations associated with the proposed activity including G.S. § 143-214.11.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. If we have not
received a copy of the issued 404 Permit/401 Certification within this time frame, this acceptance will
expire. It is the applicant's responsibility to send copies of the permits to DMS. Once DMS receives a copy
of the permit(s) an invoice will be issued based on the required mitigation in that permit and payment must
be made prior to conducting the authorized work. The amount of the in -lieu fee to be paid by an applicant is
calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and policies listed on the DMS website.
Based on the information supplied by you in your request to use the DMS, the impacts for which you are
requesting compensatory mitigation credit are summarized in the following table. The amount of mitigation
required and assigned to DMS for this impact is determined by permitting agencies and may exceed the
impact amounts shown below.
River Basin Impact Location Impact Type Impact Quantity
digit HUCj
Cape Fear 03030003 1Riparian Wetland 1 0.796
Cape Fear 1 03030002
Riparian Wetland
0.249
Upon receipt of payment, DMS will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. The
mitigation will be performed in accordance with the In -Lieu Fee Program instrument dated July 28, 2010 and
15A NCAC 02B.0295 as applicable. Thank you for your interest in the DMS in -lieu fee mitigation program.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Kelly Williams at [phone].
cc: Eric Mularski, agent
Sincerely,
1:��S;44
James. B Stanfill
Asset Nt�nagement Supervisor
e:.xo::fDff Q>
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Mitigation Services
217 W. )ones Street 11652 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1652
919.707.13976

2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of
Type of
Type of
number—
impact
wetland
Forested
jurisdictional
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
(Corps 404,
(acres)
Temporary (T)
10 DWQ—
non 404,
other)
W1 (P)
Clearing and
Bottomland
Yes
Corps 404
0.08
Open Cut
Hardwood
W2 (T)
Clearing
Bottomland
Yes
Corps 404
0.04
Hardwood
W3 (P)
Clearing and
Headwater
Yes
Corps 404
0.009
Open Cut
No — (Scrub -
W4 (P)
Open Cut
Headwater
Shrub-
Corps 404
0.02
Maintained
ROW)
W5 (P)
Clearing and
Headwater
Yes
Corps 404
0.06
Open Cut
Forest
W6 (T)
Clearing
Headwater
Yes
Corps 404
0.01
Forest
No (Scrub -
W7 (P)
Open Cut
Headwater
Shrub
Corps 404
0.16
Logged)
No (Scrub -
W8 (P)
Open Cut
Headwater
Shrub
Corps 404
0.24
Logged)
W9 (P)
Open Cut
Headwater
No
(Emergent)
Corps 404
0.02
Forested/
W10 (P)
Open Cut
Headwater
Corps 404
0.02
Emergent
W11 (P)
Clearing and
Bottomland
Yes
Corps 404
0.01
Open Cut
Hardwood

2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of
Type of
Type of
number—
impact
wetland
Forested
jurisdictional
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
(Corps 404,
(acres)
Temporary (T)
10 DWQ—
non 404,
other)
W12 (T)
Clearing
Bottomland
Yes
Corps 404
0.01
Hardwood
W13 (P)
Clearing and
Bottomland
Yes
Corps 404
0.13
Open Cut
Hardwood
W14 (T)
Clearing
Bottomland
Yes
Corps 404
0.03
Hardwood
W15 (P)
Clearing and
Bottomland
Yes
Corps 404
0.12
Open Cut
Hardwood
W16 (T)
Clearing
Bottomland
Yes
Corps 404
0.04
Hardwood
Headwater
No (Clear-
W17 (T)
Open Cut
Forest
Cut)
Corps 404
0.003
W18 (T)
Clearing
Headwater
Yes
Corps 404
0.02
Forest
W19 (P)
Clearing
Headwater
Yes
Corps 404
0.02
Forest
W20 (P)
Clearing
Headwater
Yes
Corps 404
0.006
Forest
W21 (T)
Clearing
Headwater
Yes
Corps 404
0.01
Forest
W22 (P)
Clearing
Headwater
Yes
Corps 404
0.01
Forest
W23 (T)
Clearing
Headwater
Yes
Corps 404
0.01
Forest
W24 (P)
Clearing and
Headwater
Yes
Corps 404
0.03
Open Cut
Forest
W25 (T)
Clearing
Headwater
Yes
Corps 404
0.01
Forest

2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of
Type of
Type of
number—
impact
wetland
Forested
jurisdictional
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
(Corps 404,
(acres)
Temporary (T)
10 DWQ—
non 404,
other)
W26 (P)
Clearing and
Headwater
Yes
Corps 404
0.03
Open Cut
Forest
W27 (T)
Clearing
Headwater
Yes
Corps 404
0.01
Forest
Fill (Timber
No (Scrub -
W28 (T)
Matting)
Headwater
Shrub)
Corps 404
0.009
Fill
No (Scrub-
W29 (P)
(Permanent
Headwater
Shrub)
Corps 404
0.04
Rock Fill)
W30 (T)
Fill (Timber
Headwater
No
Corps 404
0.10
Matting)
(Emergent)
2g. Total wetland impacts
1.005 (P) 0.302 (T)
*0.965 acres
permanent
conversion of
forested and
scrub -shrub
wetlands &
0.04 acres of
permanent fill

3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream
Type of
Average
impact
Type of
Stream
Perennial
jurisdictional
stream
Impact length
number—
impact
name
(PER) or
(Corps 404,
width
(linear feet)
Permanent
intermittent
10 DWR —
(feet)
(P) or
(INT)?
non 404,
Temporary
other)
(T)
Tributary
S1 (T)
De-watering
to Polecat
INT
Corps 404 &
2
30
and Open Cut
DWR
Creek
Tributary
S2(T)
De-watering
to Polecat
PER
Corps 404 &
3
51
and Open Cut
DWR
Creek
Tributary
S3 (T)
De-watering
to Big
PER
Corps 404 &
5
58
and Open Cut
Alamance
DWR
Creek
Tributary
S4 (T)
De-watering
to Big
INT
Corps 404 &
3
107
and Open Cut
Alamance
DWR
Creek
Tributary
S5 (T)
De-watering
to Big
PER
Corps 404 &
4
64
and Open Cut
Alamance
DWR
Creek
Tributary
S6 (T)
De-watering
to Little
PER
Corps 404 &
5
57
and Open Cut
Alamance
DWR
Creek
Little
S7 (T)
De-watering
Alamance
PER
Corps 404 &
4
55
and Open Cut
DWR
Creek
Tributary
S8 (T)
De-watering
to Little
INT
Corps 404 &
3
53
and Open Cut
Alamance
DWR
Creek
Tributary
S9 (T)
De-watering
to Little
PER
Corps 404 &
4
53
and Open Cut
Alamance
DWR
Creek
Tributary
S10 (T)
De-watering
to Little
PER
Corps 404 &
15
53
and Open Cut
Alamance
DWR
Creek

3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream
Type of
Average
impact
Type of
Stream
Perennial
jurisdictional
stream
Impact length
number—
impact
name
(PER) or
(Corps 404,
width
(linear feet)
Permanent
intermittent
10 DWR —
(feet)
(P) or
(INT)?
non 404,
Temporary
other)
(T)
Tributary
S11 (T)
De -watering
to Little
INT
Corps 404 &
3
55
and Open Cut
Alamance
DWR
Creek
Tributary
S12 (T)
De -watering
to Little
INT
Corps 404 &
3
54
and Open Cut
Alamance
DWR
Creek
Tributary
S13 (P)
Fill (Culvert
to Little
PER
Corps 404 &
4
19
Replacement)
Alamance
DWR
Creek
Tributary
S14 (T)
De -watering
to Little
PER
Corps 404 &
4
30
Alamance
DWR
Creek
Tributary
S15 (T)
De -watering
to Little
INT
Corps 404 &
3
31
and Open Cut
Alamance
DWR
Creek
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
19(P)720(T)

NC Division of Water Quality -Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 C� Vaw1 Z I 'I r i 6 10- Lek le hqmwt
Date: ozZ
Absent
ProjecVSite: Rftoo4 6afdeA
Latitude: 3 �'� "1107
Evaluator:�,
� �GI�C (7,
County: C t iV0rG (00AJ
Longitude: TC Sot j
Other &CUo, 4 -
e.g Quad Name:
C1a
Total Points:
Steam is at least intermittent Z 5
Stream Deter irc[e one)
Ephemeral I termittent erennial
if _ 19 orperennial if z 30
0
4_4 E�
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = d � 5
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
aj
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
01Q
0
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
1
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0)
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1 71.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No
0
Yes = 3
Sketch: Z� if
Zl �
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal =
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
D
1
2 3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
D
0.5
1 1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1 1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
0
No = 0
Yes 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = LO )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3)
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
M
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
Other 0
"perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch: Z� if
Zl �
iIAACiYi(e-
34"
�• "` ;
Al
41

ry* ' Iti; •r'�y.., �M^.• 1 -�� + �x� . ri 1°{ � � � h �,� # _
.. qq IC `fir, I� .ti ff
TF
womi
4k f4
AV
- 1 1 t. e. I , �• \i �\ *: 1 yr •+�., �,�., ."'' .'' i1 - I,^ .. ! . �. �J
LLLLLq TO \41 h
} * "7 ( y �.� n� PN' est . r x a 3� \ ,l
..�?.. -- ` '� d'fi,•�1 _ ]. Ip,. \� .`C ✓ •�i`J r I �i^ f' '/"'Y�.-•i� �'���fl :*�,
7`I IT
•
.
Will
IS `\' Q.f •� `'f,., �..,r�'' tMIT
;,'} x \ 3"•+�i2►
b
e , ,' �). \ -m.\ ' '.ter. , � ;� !�1 .•Q � ` r�` �x � �.,
`14
`' ` f'A' , •' .` '-, 'S! ,a,. 1 .. _ f ;r -'{I�!� t gr. iw ,A"/ All
^
r �$•t y � � . r. a\. ! ; '. ,,.._ •,\ _ •• +�(;i`rf• � �" `" ,` .+-ter, ,.�+®.,'a%
E/
Qr
r 16
...r 1: /�1, °�L ;r� � +1 t - � �1•..
Ali
h dq NIPVi Ali A
TAP
* • _ ,dN
aor
IT
1;ESI1�rir
*~ r Nut •� S\ a x y�r, xM' '. u tP 11Toll
v
ft
k"owl
1�
t
_F
'VoTkill
.. -
Y '�.'�'� '.,`' �;�t�y,,\4• r i y; p f C '.�..q F ,ip ��.r. - r '„ ,`+ .;,,.i;� x r:_,. .:
—41l Mor
all
a,3; ""e'°" rte•.• '' ' v� 1Y' _-,Y7 - - v'_r ' -�( -',..
aPD.A,Ir41
!�� .\ `. "%M?.� .`.., `�1r +,yiy• +gyp•, v. .'i'•�-r _ � .�' - �. \, =s
t-
Amok-ec•..•. Q, 1.'�„ t(= v�, 5,."� +.;• i�. �-?' x,m
al•,, r L_c�y 'fia.. #:!�r. =.3.� -
'' '\r., x � -.✓ 1. )yam .r�<. 4, ..::C IT
.
/ ` Ate': a'q'.0 "' .t,"+.+�V \.
•.�_ i. }A •Vol
r• ` `� ri . ,, - �'�� ..%� � . MvrT ^�, _
\R►:2 , a :e.:.t'rs!"- 3"' ai !:'awe i .L • f`ir•tk P ,
1
5
3' • . 7
��y� y' r, : , :yde�_•. � �I _;�.. =iia }:. � ` ` ,. , ,V47 •c' t _.;, r r � r . +� .��,i.
•y+ , .. _. !W 1 v +;,c, _ _'. ! .H-"'�: ?.` ' , • _e • ;x1>,,. v . erg •�. • .r � = "p�_Y
M•. _ �=r•\ t r ,. :am •;: 1 'n.. :a.,pt 1 c .. �� '.\, .� `-^•
Tom
kwwphil
oil
61, Ror
"S ate. 3
A r�:
6 ..
7
. K+eroa .
.. 1.. S•: ' ::-rte •"v. `.�1+ t s� /+ wY', ,.•y,.W.'..
�� iii.. ...�� , �: .!� -�• , W ^� , 1 ! y .,
...,� ..''\ ..,. ..,.� Vr v. h�. .L,..J'.- i _11. _ l- .L'•
^e
5
4
� t
i
1
�;'^• ., \.. .: ^L _ ,, • _A.: A ... , 4. moi\'.1. •. y;� ,r+. ..il y.,4 .T. . r y. .` , j - :�,, '3o-' ,,.', wiz•} •, ,..•a ... J.. .."<'
i'
Z.
Y
�?•�...�y ,oi.az.� y/ ,. , ,.b,.- r.. -• '.'� - . -,. ._.. ,i p.. •�. ...; it 1 u'. �1�'_ ,1 � '1 - v"�,t`� .�,,. {.,, •..,:d�
'.d• .epi-_ ,_ -�r:_ .. - 1.:<. _ .v - ?,
ITT,
Fill
_ir, Now
� xiit. s. S ;r 1, .,�.
,
n
.y.r "�
r1 fir-•
rr
rool
! I J y1
r
LL
ILA