Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20190590 Ver 1_SR 3426 Pipe 402221 Guilford No Archaeological Survey Required Form_20190507Project Tracking No.: 17-10-0008 oa NO ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY REQUIRED FORM :. ,,.,....:: p This form only pertains to ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES for this project. It is not (fit � i. valid for Historic Architecture and Landscapes. You must consult separately with the ; 0 Historic Architecture and Landscapes Group. Q PROJECT INFORMATION Project No: Pipe# 40 2221 WBS No: 17BP.7.C.11 F.A. No: N/A Federal Permit Required? County: Guilford Document: Federal PCE Funding: ® State ❑ Federal ® Yes ❑ No Permit Type: USACE Project Description: NCDOT's Division 7 proposes to replace Pipe# 40 2221 carrying an unnamed tributary of Polecat Creek under East Sheraton Park Road (SR 3426) in Guilford County. Pipe# 40 2221 is located about 0.6 mile east of the intersection of East Sheraton Park Road (SR 3426) and Randleman Road (SR 1007) and consists of two (2) 84" corrugated metal pipes, 65' in length with concrete headwalls. Since Final Plans have not been developed yet, the Study Area for the project will be centered on the pipe location and measure about 150 feet wide (i.e. 75 feet from centerline) and about 400 feet from either side of the pipe location. A Permanent Drainage Easement (PDE) will probably be necessary on both sides of the road, but will be contained within the Study Area. Overall, the Study Area will encompass about 115,016 square feet (2.64 acres), inclusive of the existing roadway and structure to be replaced. SUMMARY OF CULTURAL RESOURCES REVIEW Brief description of review activities, results of review, and conclusions: This project was accepted on Friday, October 20, 2017. A map review and site file search was conducted at the Office of State Archaeology (OSA) on Wednesday, October 25, 2017. An archaeological survey has never been conducted at this particular location, and no archaeological sites have been recorded within one (1) mile of the project area. Digital copies of HPO's maps (Pleasant Garden Quadrangle) as well as the HPOWEB GIS Service (http://gis.ncdcr.gov/hpoweb/) were last reviewed on Monday, October 30, 2017. There are no known historic architectural resources located within or adjacent to the Study Area for which intact archaeological deposits would be anticipated within the footprint of the proposed project. In addition, topographic maps, historic maps (NCMaps website), USDA soil survey maps, and aerial photographs were utilized and inspected to gauge environmental factors that may have contributed to historic or prehistoric settlement within the project limits, and to assess the level of modern, slope, agricultural, hydrological, and other erosive -type disturbances within and surrounding the archaeological APE. Brief Explanation of why the available information provides a reliable basis for reasonably predicting that there are no unidentified historic properties in the APE: Although this is a State -funded project, a Federal permit will be required. A permanent drainage easement (PDE) will be necessary; however, additional ROW should not be needed. The size and shape of the Study Area have been drawn in a way to capture any possible impacts beyond the NCDOT's existing 60-foot ROW. At this time, we are in compliance with NC GS 121-12a, since there are no eligible (i.e. National Register -listed) archaeological resources located within the project's Study Area `No ARCHAEOLOGYSURVEYREQUIRED"form far Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 200712015 Programmatic Agreement. 1 of 3 Project Tracking No.: 17-10-0008 that would require our attention. Based on the description of the proposed project, activities will take place beyond the NCDOT's existing 60-foot ROW along East Sheraton Park Road (SR 3426), most likely within the area of the PDE. From an environmental perspective, the Study Area falls within a rural, overgrown wooded section along East Sheraton Park Road (SR 3426) on either side of an unnamed drainage, in the Piedmont physiographic region of North Carolina. The northern half of the Study Area also consists of a water treatment facility, downstream from the reservoir and dam for Wood Lake. As with similar projects, portions of the Study Area that would fall beyond the existing ROW because of a PDE are composed of one (1) soil type: Enon fine sandy loam, 10-15% slopes (EnD), a well -drained soil located on long, narrow side slopes. Based on the topography and industrial development, preservation of intact archaeological resources would not be anticipated under such environmental conditions. The Office of State Archaeology (OSA) has reviewed only one (1) project within the vicinity of Pipe# 40 2221 for environmental compliance, that being the Greybridge subdivision (ER 89-8415). At the time, no archaeological survey was required for that project because it had already been started so it was cleared, despite the fact the upland -like settings were to be impacted by the residential development. Within five (5) miles of the Study Area, NCDOT's Archaeology Group has reviewed thirteen (13) transportation - related projects for environmental compliance under the Programmatic Agreement (PA) with the State Historic Preservation Office (NC-HPO), none of which is located within one (1) mile of the proposed project. More importantly, no archaeological surveys were recommended for any of these transportation - related projects, based on the limited nature of what was being proposed (i.e. not to extend beyond existing ROW) and/or the degree of disturbance or erosion present within each Study Area. Given the limited nature of the Study Area beyond the existing ROW and the suspect soil conditions and topography within and along the drainage, there is a low probability for significant prehistoric and/or historic archaeological materials to be present. Therefore, it is believed that the current Study Area, as depicted, is unlikely to contain intact and significant archaeological resources. No archaeological survey is required for this project. If design plans change or are made available prior to construction, then additional consultation regarding archaeology will be required. At this time, no further archaeological work is recommended. If archaeological materials are uncovered during project activities, then such resources will be dealt with according to the procedures set forth for "unanticipated discoveries," to include notification of NCDOT's Archaeology Group. SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION See attached: ® Map(s) ❑ Previous Survey Info ❑ Photocopy of County Survey Notes FINDING BY NCDOT ARCHAEOLOGIST NO AR CHAEOL OG Y SUR VEY REO UIRED I CA NCDOT ARCI3 ❑ Photos ❑Correspondence Other: October 31, 2017 Date `No ARCHAEOLOGYSURVEYREQUIRED "form far Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 200712015 Programmatic Agreement. 2of3 Project Tracking No. - 17-10-0008 IR ' r' _- } h •Pipe# 40 2221under SR 3426 u Figure 1: Pleasant Garden, NC (USGS 1970[PR82]). i � { frail a r. a i _ ~ .ice ) ip 1; 4 "No ARCHA EOLOG Y SURVEY REQUIRED "form,for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 200712015 Programmatic Agreement. 3 of 3