20050040 Ver 1_Conceptual Restoration Plan_20050104

January 3, 2005
S&EC Project No. 7238.131
'1,4
)nn5
li'CTLA', ?Sf,'VOST't QUALI1y
1TER s .,,OH
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers NC-DWQ; Wetlands 401 Unit
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office 2321 Crabtree Blvd.
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road, Suite 120 Raleigh, NC 27604
Raleigh, North Carolina 27615
Attn: Ms. Jennifer Burdette Attn: Mr. Bob Zarzecki
Reference: Conceptual Stream & Wetland Restoration Plan
Hammond Street Road Widening
Raleigh, North Carolina
Dear Sir or Madam:
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA has completed the attached Conceptual Stream &
Wetland Restoration Plan for the proposed street widening at the referenced project site.
Please review the enclosed document and provide any comments at your earliest
opportunity.
We thank you for your assistance to date and look forward to the successful completion
of this project. Please contact me if you have any questions or comments.
SOIL & ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, PA
Sincerely,
Patric K. Smit , P.E.
6
Project Manager
Page 1 of 2
Environmental Consultants, PA
Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
www.SandEC.com
Hammond Street Widening
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
January 3, 2005
Project No. 7238.1) 1
Attachments: Wetland and Stream Conceptual Restoration Plan dated January 3, 2005,
2 copies
Cc:
Mr. Victor E. Bell, III, Marjan Limited
Mr. Sean Dolle, P.E., Jones & Cnossen Engineering, PLLC
Page 2 of 2

~

. \

S&
EC

Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road · Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 · Phone: [phone] · Fax: [phone]
WWW.SandEC.com

January 3,2005
S&EC Project No. 7238.D1

i~&@&ow&,~

J/jN n 4? &
, nn~
1'_ DEt\'I~ -I"~
II: TlAJ.'DS I,ND ~1b~~Ql..uALlTY
,", "rERSI>..
'wJCH

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road, Suite 120
Raleigh, North Carolina 27615

NC-DWQ; Wetlands 401 Unit
2321 Crabtree Blvd.
Raleigh, NC 27604

Attn: Ms. Jennifer Burdette

Attn: Mr. Bob Zarzecki

Reference: Conceptual Stream & Wetland Restoration Plan
Hammond Street Road \Videning
Raleigh, North Carolina

Dear Sir or Madam:

Soil & Environmental Consultants, P A has completed the attached Conceptual Stream &
Wetland Restoration Plan for the proposed street widening at the referenced project site.
Please review the enclosed document and provide any comments at your earliest
opportuni ty.

We thank you for your assistance to date and look forward to the successful completion
of this project. Please contact me if you have any questions or comments.

SOIL & ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, PA
Sincerely,

~d<
~~~P.E.

Project Manager

Page 1 of2

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

m~@~Dwrn@

.IL} "J f) 4 ?n05

D~".
& t::;'.C\'i'V,~,. "C;""L/TY
" 1\ ~, ~.....~:. ", ....H.
TlAJ,DS MD v I vr;,\.,,~X(EI~ 8R!J iCH

Conceptual Stream
Wetland Restoration Plan

\,\\\11"'11111
\\\ I,
Hammond Street Road Widening/:;~~;}$~~~z.:)
Raleigh, North Carolina ~t{!/ c.;.:': ~.~;,.'.:-::
\;:;}\, .~. ,. . ;...

~~,~:~-:~>:-:' '.", ..' I .-

Prepared for:

.~~~;'f1~:i'~~~~:~~i~ ..

.. f -.::'.... "'-. ':'/~'" ." ~ \~
1/ ..,.;<~{~. ..~:<::2;"~)f::.~,'~ '\'~

J~ {i ,. ..: .~, '"., t. "I ........ ' ,
" ~ :/ (~; ; ~{:;:;t;-:~!~Jj.'l..l'_ '. i
;; . ..... ,. ....".. P. ;;,' !.
,', :\' .:" ::.-:." ~ ~
\ "; '" i._. J"" 9

". . . "':;.~;?/ ~ "
~.:. ,...:\ ' II
\ I.- ,. . ",.'/ .c'.~ :~Z:/)
<;':~~:;:":~'i:' . ....; '-":;'J/

Mr. Victor E. Bell, III
MaIjan Limited
P.O. Box 17274
Raleigh, NC 27619-7274

January 3,2005

S&EC Project No. 7238.Dl

S&
EC

,t'.:'

Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road . Raleigh. North Carolina 27614 · Phone: [phone] · Fax: [phone]
www.SandEC.com

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TITLE PAGE
TABLE OF CONTENTS
LIST OF APPENDICES
LIST OF FIGURES

1. 0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................ I

1.1 Report Summary ................................................................................................. 1

1.2 Proj ect Location.................................................................................................. 1

1.3 Site Description................................................................................................... 1

1.4 Proj ect Background............................................................................................. 2

1.5 Proj ect Obj ccti vcs ............................................................................................... 3

I. 6 Authorization...................................................................................................... 4

1.7 S cope of Services................................................................................................ 4

1.8 Future Design & Consulting Effort..................................................................... 5

1.9 Proj cct Personnel ................................................................................................ 5

2.0 STREAM RESTORATION ........... .................. ........ .......................... ...... ......... ............ 6

2.1 Watcrshed Charactcristics................................................................................... 6

2.1.1 General Description.................................................................................... 6

2.1.2 Surface Waters............................................................................................ 6

2.1.3 Soils. .................................................................................................... ........ 7

2.1.4 Land Use ..................................................................................................... 7

2.2 Existing Stream Conditions................................................................................ 7

2.2.1 Geomorphic Position.................................................................................. 7

- 1 -

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

2.2.2 Si te H ydrolo gy ............................................................................................ 8

2.2.3 Data Collection........................................................................................... 8

2.2.4 S tremn Morphology.................................................................................... 9

2.2.5 Stream Classification................................................................................ 10
2.3 Reference Stream Condition ............................................................................. 10

2.3.1 Geomorphic Position.............................................................. .................. 10

2.3 .2 Site Hydrology.......................................................................................... II

2.3.3 Data Collection......................................................................................... II

2.3.4 Reference Reach Stream Morphology...................................................... 12

2.3.5 Stream Classification................................................................................ 13

2.3.6 Regional Curve Verification ...................... .................... ........................... 14

2.4 Stream & Buffer Restoration ............................................................................ 14

2. 5 Natural Channel Design.................................................................................... 15

2.5.1 Dimension................................................................................................. 16

2.5.2 P attem ....................................................................................................... 16

2.5.3 Profile................................ .... ...... ............ ..... .............. .... ...... ........ ....... ...... 17

2.6 S tream Structures.............................................................................................. 17

2. 7 Riparian Buffer Planting.............................................................. ..................... 18

2.8 S tremn Monitoring............................................................................................ 20

2.8.1 Monitoring Plan........................................................................................ 20

2.8.2 Physical Monitoring.................................................................................. 21

2.8.3 Biological Monitoring............................................................................... 21

2.8.4 Vegetative Monitoring.. ..... ............. ........................ .............. ..... ....... ........ 21

- 11 -

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

3.0 SITE WETLAND RESTORA TION........................................................................... 23

3.1 Existing Wetland Conditions ........................ ........ ....... ............................ ......... 23

3.2 Reference Wetland Conditions ............................................. ............ ......... ....... 23

3 .3 Wetland Creation.............................................................................................. 24

3.3.1 Grading Operations................................................................................... 24

3.3.2 Planting Operations................................................................................... 24

3 .4 Wetland Monitoring.. ....... ............. ........ .......... ....... ............. .............................. 25

3.4 .1 Monitoring Plan........................................................................................ 25

3.4.2 Hydrologic Monitoring .... ....... ........ ........... ............... ..... ...... ............... ...... 26

3 .4.3 Vegetative Monitoring ..... ...... ..... .................... .......... .......... ................. ..... 26

4.0 LIMIT A TI ON S........................................................................................................... 27

APPENDICES
FIGURES

-lll-

I
I
LIST OF APPENDICES
I
A. EXISTING SITE PHOTOGRAPHS
I B. EXISTING SITE DATA
I C. REFERENCE REACH PHOTOGRAPHS
D. REFERENCE REACH DATA
I E. DESIGN SUMMARY DATA TABLE
I F. JURISDICTIONAL WATERS DELINEATION MAP
LIST OF FIGURES
I 1. SITE VICINITY MAP
I 2. SITE SOIL SURVEY MAP
3. REFERENCE REACH VICINITY MAP
I 4. REFERENCE REACH SOILS SURVEY MAP
I 5. OVERALL PROPERTY PLAN
I
6. EXISTING SITE PLAN
I 7. SITE AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH
I 8. PROPOSED SITE PLAN
9. PROPOSED LONGITUDINAL PROFILE
I 10. PROPOSED CHANNEL CROSS-SECTIONS
I 11. TYPICAL STRUCTURE DETAILS
12. TYPICAL STRUCTURE AND PLANTING DETAILS
I 13. TYPICAL WETLAND CROSS-SECTION
I 14. PROPOSED STREAMBANK AND RIPARIAN BUFFER PLANTING
I
- IV-
I

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
!I
I

1.0 INTRODUCTION

The subject reach, an unnamed tributary of Wildcat Branch (a tributary of Walnut Creek)
is located immediately west of Hammond Street in south Raleigh, NC. This reach is
proposed to be relocated and restored in order to accommodate the proposed widening of
Hammond Road near its intersection with Rush Street.

1.1 Report Summary

This report has been prepared by Soil & Environmental Consultants, P A (S&EC) in order
to describe the Stream and Wetland Restoration efforts associated with the stream
relocation on the Hammond Street Road Widening Project.

The proposed relocation and restoration plan will be fundcd and completed by Marjan
Limited of Raleigh, NC, which currcntly owns the property, a significant portion of
which is proposed for development. The restored stream, crcated wetlands, and riparian
buffer acrcage created will be protected through a rccorded conservation easement.

1.2 Project Location

The project site is located immediately northwest of the intersection of Hammond Street
and Rush Street in southern Raleigh, North Carolina (Wakc County). The total property
is under thc sole ownership of Marjan Limited and consists of approximately 49.7 acres
(+/-) much of which is currently under development for mixcd commcrcial usc. See
Figurc I for a Vicinity Map. See Figures 5 and 6 for an overall map of subject property
and the proposed construction boundary.

1.3 Site Description

The subject reach consisting of approximately 510 linear fect of perennial stream channel
is currently in a modified and unnatural state. The tributary currently flows northeast as
it enters the site, and turns due north as it parallels Hammond Road, hugging the toe of
the road fill slope for the length of the project site. Sce Appendix A for Existing Site
Photographs.

At the downstream (north) end of the restoration rcach the stream outfalls to Wildcat
Branch through an cxisting 36-inch diameter reinforced concrete pipe (RCP). This pipc
carries flow beneath an existing unpaved site access road (to rcmain) and daylights
through thc left wingwall (left and right arc rcferenccd whilc looking downstream) of the
headwall for an existing series of concrete box culverts. These box culverts convey
Wildcat Branch beneath Hammond Road in a southeast to northwest direction. No outlet
protection currently exists at the outfall ofthc box culverts, and significant scour has
occurred within the channel bed immediately downstrcam (scc Appcndix A - Photo 8)

- I -

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

exposing the culvert foundation. The 36-inch pipe in its currcnt configuration is
suspcnded (approximately 24-inches) above the downstream channel bed (sec Photo 9).

The eastern edge of the stream consists ofa steep bank (fill slope of Hammond Road)
with moderately dense vcgctation including a few sporadic large hardwood trecs and
mixed understory vegetation. Thc western edge of the strcam has a narrow wooded
buffer ncar the upstream cnd ofthc reach tapcring (in a downstream direction) to a thin
stand of woody vegetation immediately to the west of the existing channel. An existing
sanitary sewer line parallels the wcstern boundary of the site immediately adjacent to a
serics of existing private residences. See Figure 6 for a description of the existing site
conditions.

The current conditions of the strcam are mainly the result of historical modifications
including channelization and likely as a result of the construction of Hammond Road and
subsequcnt road widening operations. Much of the site has undergonc localizcd
disturbance associated with previous activities including homc construction and utility
installation. Preliminary hand auger borings indicatc that portions ofthc site may also
have been used for quarry and waste operations.

In addition to the perennial stream channel on the property, a total of 0.218 acres (or
9,504 square feet) of jurisdictional wetlands also exist on the property. Ofthis,0.133
acres (or 5,812 square feet) will be impacted through the proposed widening of
Hammond Road. See Appendix F for a copy of the site Jurisdictional Waters Delineation
performed by Soil & Environmental Consultants, P A, and surveyed by Smith and Smith
Surveyors.

1.4 Project Background

In May 2004, Soil & Environmental Consultants, P A, (S&EC) was engaged by Marjan
Limited to provide environmental consulting and engineering services associated with the
relocation of the stream as previously described.

On August 19,2004, S&EC met with Ms. Jennifer Burdette of the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (USACE), Raleigh Office, and Mr. Bob Zarzecki of the North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR), Division of Water
Quality (DWQ), Raleigh Office, to observe site conditions, verify the previously prepared
Jurisdictional Waters Delineation, review our findings to date, and discuss our proposed
approach for the relocation and restoration efforts at the site.

During our site mecting, Agency representatives indicated general concurrence with the
proposed relocation and restoration plan, and provided valuable comments and input
which we subsequently incorporated into this Conceptual Restoration Plan.

After our site visit, we also visited the refercncc reach site with both USACE and DWQ
representatives. Both Agencies agreed with the suitability of our selected site as a
refcrence condition for use on this projcct's natural channel design component.

- 2 -

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

1.5 Project Objectives

The current channelized and degraded state of the stream, limited floodplain functionality
due to channel incision, existing and future scdimentation and erosion potential, and
limited native vegetation along the banks and riparian buffer zone indicate, even without
the desired relocation, that this length of stream presents a viable restoration project.

This restoration plan proposes to construct a stream channel that is stable and self-
maintaining, and that will not aggrade or degrade over time, by utilizing Rosgen-based
natural channel design procedures and techniques. In this proccss we intend to
accomplish the following objectives:

I) Develop a restored channel with the appropriate morphological characteristics
(cross-sectional dimension, pattern, and longitudinal profile) utilizing locally
collected refercnce reach data as a guide. Allow for no net loss of overall channel
length in the process.

2) Create and/or improve bed form diversity (riffles, runs, pools, and glides) and
improve aquatic and benthic macroinvertebrate habitat.

3) Construct a floodplain (or local bankfull bench) that is accessible at the proposed
bankfull channel elevation.

4) Ensure channel and stream bank stabilization by integrating in-stream structures
and native vegetation.

5) Establish a native forested or hcrbaceous riparian plant community within a
minimum of30 feet, when possible, from the edge of the restored rcach. This
ncw community will be established in conjunction with the eradication of exotic
and/or undesirable plant species.

6) Allow for no net loss of riparian wetlands through the creation of an equivalent
acreage (0.133 acres) of similar wetlands within the newly established floodplain.
Provide a more desirable wetland vegetative community.

7) Integrate the rcstoration site into the overall development plan providing aesthetic
and education values.

It is our intent to ensure that our client's goals, as well as those of the Agencies, are
incorporated into the planning process and that all necessary permitting requirements are
met. Permitting actions and permit applications (401/404) will be compiled under
separate correspondence by Soil and Environmental Consultants, P A.

- 3 -

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

1.6 Authorization

These services were authorized by acceptance of S&EC Short Form Proposal 7238.D 1,
dated March 10, 2004, and signed by Mr. Victor E. Bell, III, of Mmjan Limited of
Raleigh, NC, on May 21, 2004.

1.7 Scope of Services

Our scope of services was divided into data collection, engineering analysis, conceptual
design development, project coordination, and report preparation to include the
following:

I. We performed a Preliminary Site Evaluation including the location of and
preliminary review and evaluation of available site mapping to include USGS
7.5 Minute Quad sheets, Digital Orthophoto Quad (DOQ) sheets, and County
Soils Survey map sheets. We researched available hydrologic and hydraulic
data for the project site including a review and evaluation of available regional
curve data.

2. We visited the sitc for thc familiarization with site features and
characterization of site soils and vcgetation, and general conditions. Whilc on
sitc we performed a serics of shallow (hand auger) soil borings at selcct
locations along the proposed restored alignment to develop an understanding
of typical sitc soil conditions. We observed plant community types for use in
a qualitative plant community assessment. We observed the characteristics of
the site and surrounding area, verified surface and channel flow conditions,
and observed existing property boundaries, utilities, water conveyance
structures, and other site constraints.

3. We identified and evaluated a natural channel reference reach to be used in
the restored channel design process. We performed a characterization ofthc
reference reach including watershed assessment, sitc mapping and drainage
area calculation, determination of bankfull stage, morphological data
collection including a longitudinal profilc and cross-section data collection,
and channel substrate evaluations.

4. We developed an inventory of pertinent sitc features and performed a limited
engineering site survey using Total Station for incorporation with available
site topographic, service, and utility data. We perfonncd a morphological
cvaluation to includc thc collection of rough longitudinal profilc and cross-
section data and channel substrate data.

- 4 -

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

5. We analyzcd data collected from the project site (existing reach and
restoration alignment) and the referencc reach for the development of this
Conceptual Restoration Plan.

6. We met on site with representatives of both USACE and NCDENR (Division
of Water Quality) to discuss our concept for the stream and wetland
restoration. We incorporated agency input, and using our analyses we
developcd this Conceptual Restoration Plan.

1.8 Future Design & Consulting Effort

Future design efforts to be completed upon review and approval of our Conceptual
Restoration Plan by Agency rcpresentatives include:

I. The preparation of final construction drawings (prepare site plan, construction
details, planting plan, and erosion and sediment control plan), technical
specifications, and a construction sequence.

2. Construction related tasks including a pre-construction meeting, contractor
coordination, daily construction observation, planting observation, and a post
construction review with the Contractor and Agency representatives.

1.9 Project Personnel

Environmental site evaluations and restoration planning have been perfonned solely by
Soil & Environmental Consultants, P A, of Raleigh, NC. Project personnel included:
Patrick K. Smith, P.E., Project Manager, and J. Michael Ortosky, RLA, LSS, Design
Lead, Peter A. Jelenevsky, Strcam Restoration Specialist, Rebccca Wargo, EIT, Stream
Restoration Specialist, Sean Clark, Wetland Scientist, and Elizabeth G. Turner, PLS,
Professional Surveyor.

The design enginecrs for the projcct are Jones & Cnossen Engineering, PLLC, of
Raleigh, NC. Survey and topographic site data were providcd by Smith and Smith
Surveyors of Apex, NC.

- 5 -

,I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

2.0 STREAl\'I RESTORATION

The purpose of this section is to summarize our analyses to date of the subject stream
reach proposcd for relocation and provide a conceptual plan for its restoration. This
section provides a general description ofthe design approach for the proposed stream
restoration; however, details of the restoration plan, including construction drawings and
technical specifications, will be included in a later document once concurrence of our
gencral design approach is received from USACE and NCDENR-DWQ represcntatives.

2.1 \Vatershed Characteristics

2.1.1 General Description

The project site sits approximately two miles due south of the City of Raleigh,
NC. The surrounding landscape topography is charactcrized as gently rolling to
steep or hilly terrain, with side slopes that are generally steep to moderately
sloping. Watershed elevations range from approximatcly 240 fect to 335 feet as
shown on the USGS 7.5 Minute Scrics Topographic Map (Lake Whecler, NC).
See Figure I.

Past development activities, including road construction, culvcrt installation, and
sanitary sewer line installation have partitioned the site and redirccted the channcl
from its natural course. Prior to its manipulation (including the construction of
Hammond Road and Rush Street) the valley type for Wildcat Branch and the
subject tributary would likcly have bccn categorized as Valley Typc VIII as
defincd in Applicd River Morphology (Rosgcn 1996), consisting of a wide, gently
sloping valley with a well-dcfined floodplain.

2.1.2 Surface 'Vaters

The channel is located within the Neuse River Basin, USGS Hydrologic Unit
0302020 I. The unnamed tributary flows immcdiately into Wildcat Branch
(Stream Index Number 27-34-7) aftcr exiting the existing culvert pipe.
Approximately one mile downstream, Wildcat Branch discharges into Walnut
Creek (Stream Index Number 27-34-(4)), a tributary of the Neuse Rivcr. We
understand that the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NC DWQ) has not
assigncd a stream index number to unnamed tributary proposed for restoration.

The currcnt State classification of both Wildcat Branch and Walnut Creek (at that
location) is Class C NSW waters (NCDENR 05/01/1988). Class C waters are
freshwatcrs protcctcd for secondary rccreation, fishing, and aquatic life including
propagation and survival, and wildlifc. The NSW designation is a Nutrient
Sensitivc Waters which are subject to microscopic or macroscopic vegctation
rcquiring limitations on nutrient inputs.

- 6 -

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
, I
I

2.1.3 Soils

The restoration site is located in the Felsic Crystalline System of the Piedmont
physiographic region of North Carolina. According to the published soils survey
for Wake County (USDA Soil Conservation Service - November 1970)
associated soils in this arca consist of Cecil soils, gently sloping to steep, deep,
well-drained soils that have a subsoil of firm rcd clay; dcrived mostly from gneiss
and schist. Specific inspection of the mapped soils within the contributing
watershed indicate primarily Cecil (Ce) Sandy Loam soils of varying slopes (2 to
15 pcrcent) as well as a lesser portion of Appling (Ap) Sandy Loam mapped on
site. Floodplain soils within the restoration area consist primarily of Chewacla
(Cm) and Colfax (Cn) soils. See Figure 2.

2.1.4 Land Use

Currcntly, the project site remains unused with the exccption of the perimeter
services and utilities previously described. The majority of the surrounding
watcrshed area has previously been converted to housing (apartments and single
family homes), light commcrcial, and infrastructure uses (roads, parking lots,
etc.). Areas of forest land exist sporadically throughout thc watershed. The upper
end of the watcrshed includcs a small portion of the Montlawn Memorial Park
Cemctery. Although select portions of the watershed appear to have been
developed within the last 5 to 10 ycars, based on observation, the majority of the
watershed was developed many years ago. Limited opportunity for future
development exists within the watershed. Based on current land usage,
impervious arca is estimated at approximately 25 to 35 percent.

2.2 Existing Stream Conditions

This section provides preliminary data regarding the existing channel based on site data
collected and our evaluation to date.

2.2.1 Geomorphic Position

The site topography is relatively flat adjacent to the stream where landscape
modifications have not occurred ranging in elevation from approximately 240 feet
to 250 feet. Soils present in the riparian areas adjacent to cxisting channel and
along the proposed channel alignment consist ofChewacla (Cm) and Colfax
Sandy Loam (Cn) soils. Extensive grading and filling associated with local
construction (and other) operations has likely modified much of the naturally
occurring soils in the vicinity of the restoration project.

Chewacla soils (Aquic Fluvelltic Dystroclzrepts) are the prevalent map unit along
the channel. Formed in high alluvial deposits of fine loamy material, they are
somewhat poorly drained. They typically have low natural fertility and organic
matter content.

- 7 -

i
II
I
!I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
I
,I
I
I
I

Colfax soils (Aquic Fragiudults) arc prcsent along the channel to a lesser extent.
These soils arc also fonned under forest, in translocated matcrial, from weathered
rock, and are somewhat poorly drained with low natural fertility and organic
matter content.

2.2.2 Site Hydrology

The reach proposed for restoration flows generally south to north towards the
tributary's confluence with the Wildcat Branch. Based on the most recent USGS
quadrangle the subject channel is a First Order stream and thc drainage area at the
terminus ofthc project is approximately 0.143 square miles (mi.2).

2.2.3 Data Collection

A field reconnaissance of the restoration site was performed on June 18, 2004,
prior to thc commencement ofthc site survey and data collection. During our
subsequent sitc visits on July I, July 9, and September 29,2004, we collected a
variety of topographic and site data in the vicinity ofthe restoration reach.
Topographic data was collected through a limited engineering survey using Total
Station equipment.

Data collectcd includcd:

1. A limited longitudinal profile of the existing reach from thc approximate
property boundary at the upstream end of the site to the inlct of the
cxisting pipe culvert beneath the site access road.

2. Three typical channel cross-sections describing thrce distinctly different
reaches of the existing channel (upper, middle, and lower - described
below). Each cross-section was oriented perpendicular to the direction of
flow and surveyed from left to right looking downstream.

3. Various topographic data points including but not limited to existing
ground surface points, culvert inverts, water surface elevations, fill slopes,
and select utilities.

4. Select topographic reference points (installed by Smith & Smith
Surveyors) for tie-in with sitc data provided by Jones & Cnossen, PLLC,
and confirmation of horizontal location of collected topographic data.

5. Substrate material evaluations (pebble counts) at each of the three
aforementioned cross-sections.

6. A photographic record of existing site conditions.

- 8 -

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

Soil & Environmental Consultants, P A surveyed the existing channel conditions
and integratcd our data with Wakc County Topographic Mapping data (2-foot
contours) of the restoration site. Thc map was used to evaluate present landscape
conditions and constraints to determine the final location of the proposcd channel
alignment and floodplain configuration.

Our topographic data was later overlain on available site data provided by Jones
& Cnossen Engineering, PLLC, for use in the developmcnt of this restoration
plan. Site photos arc provided in Appendix A.

2.2.4 Stream Morphology

Available mapping mcasures the length of channel proposed to be rclocated and
rcstored at approximately 510 linear feet of channel (sce delineation map).
Limited discemable bed form appears throughout the existing channel reach due
to various channel modification and off-site influenccs. Thc majority of the
longitudinal profile resembles a riffle/run bed with few pools as is shown on the
longitudinal profile.

The existing stream consists ofthrce distinct channel segments; thc uppcr rcach
approximately 60 feet in length, the middle reach approximately 150 feet in
length, and the lower reach approximately 300 fect in length. Thc uppcr reach
consists of a transitional zone which receives flow from off site. This reach has
bccn severely manipulated due to thc original construction, and subsequent
improvement of the sanitary sewer line. This reach is characterized by significant
scdiment deposition and has varied drastically in appearance and dimension since
the time of our original site visit in May 2004. Banks along this segment are void
of stabilizing vegetation and eroded.

The middle reach is characterized by significant sediment deposition, in excess of
that observed upstream. This reach has also varied in appcarance somewhat over
our evaluation period; however, its general dimension has remained fairly
consistent. This reach bisects a portion of delineated wetlands and is fairly well
vegetated. The lower rcach, while channelized, generally appcars in a more stable
condition than the other two reaches. This reach is has maintained a uniform in
appearance and dimension along its length throughout our study period. Dense
vegetation covers both banks and overhangs much of the stream channel along
this lower stream segment.

Valley fall (downvallcy) from the project origin to end of the proposed reach (just
upstream of the channel's confluence with Wildcat Branch) is just over 3 feet,
resulting in a valley slope of approximately 0.77 percent (0.0077 ftlft) based on
the available topographic mapping. Channel fall (at the invert) is just over 4 feet,
resulting in a channel slope of approximately 0.75 percent (0.0075 ftIft) based on

- 9 -

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,I
:1
I

collected field data. The calculated sinuosity (Valley Slope / Channel Slope) is
1.03 and is considered rcasonable bascd on ficld observation of the straightened
channelized reach which parallels Hammond Road's toe of slopc.

Plots of the existing reach longitudinal profile, cross-section data, and pebblc
count data for each cross-section havc been prepared. Please refer to Appendix B
for data on the existing stream channel.

2.2.5 Stream Classification

Thc channel was classified utilizing thc stream classification system developed by
Dave Rosgen (Rosgen 1996). This classification schcmc utilizes scveral
parameters based on field collected data and site observation, which collectively
determines the stream type. The criteria utilized to determine stream type
includes the slope, width/depth ratio, entrenchment ratio, sinuosity, and bed
materials.

Based on the degraded and non-unifonn condition ofthc cxisting channel reach,
the morphological characteristics described in Appendix B should only be used as
a general description of channel form.

Utilizing the Rosgen Stream Classification System (as possible), the upper-most
portion of the channel has bcen classified as an "E4" (bed material Dso of 3.6 mm
- gravel) typc channel, the middle portion classified as an "E5" (bcd material Dso
of 0.1 0 mm - sand), and the lowermost section classifies as an "E4" (bed matcrial
Dso of7.4 mm - gravel) type channcl. The current channel is in a degraded and
somcwhat incised state, particularly at its uppcr end, and therefore flood flows are
concentrated within the channel. Over much of the reach the floodplain is not
readily accessible at the field determined bankfull elevation.

2.3 Reference Stream Condition

The reference reach used in our design is an unnamed tributary to Middle Creek in
southwestern Wake County, NC, approximately 2 miles northeast of the Town of Holly
Springs. This section provides preliminary data regarding the reference reach based on
site data collected and our evaluations to date.

2.3.1 Geomorphic Position

The reference reach topography is relatively flat adjacent to the stream wherc
landscape modifications have not occurred ranging in elevation from
approximately 320 feet to 330 feet as shown on the USGS 7.5 Minute Scries
Topographic Map (Apex, NC). See Figurc 3.

According to the Wake County Soils Survey, soils present in the riparian areas
adjacent to existing reference reach consist ofWehadkee (Wn) Silt Loam soils.

- 10-

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

Wehadkee soils (Fluventic Haplaquept) are the prevalent map unit along the
channel. Thesc soils are formed in finc loamy alluvial deposits and are poorly
drained. Sec Figure 4. The wooded areas to either side of the channel appear
undisturbed (in recent history bascd on the sizc and dcnsity of woody specics).

2.3.2 Site Hydrology

The rcference reach flows gencrally south towards its confluencc with Middle
Creek. Based on the most recent USGS Quadranglc, the reference reach is a First
Order stream and the drainage area at the tenninus of the project is approximately
0.142 squarc miles (mi2).

2.3.3 Data Collection

A field reconnaissance of the channel was pcrformed on Junc 18, 2004, prior to
the commcncement ofthc sitc survcy. The purpose of the reconnaissance is to
identify the bankfull elcvation utilizing existing indicators. Featurcs that were
utilized when present included depositional features, vcgetation positions, scour
lines, and wrack lines.

During our subsequcnt site visit to the reference reach on July 1,2004, wc
collectcd a variety of topographic and site data in the vicinity of the reference
reach. Topographic data was collected through the conduct of a limited
cnginecring survcy using Total Station equipment. Thc exact elevations along the
refercnce reach are not known as all data collccted at this site was rclative to an
assumed temporary bcnchmark elevation of 100.00 fect.

Referencc reach data included the collection:

1. A longitudinal profilc for approximately 250 linear feet (20 to 30 bankfull
widths as desired) of reference stream channel.

2. Two riffle and two pool cross-sections werc surveyed. Each cross-section
was oricnted perpendicular to the dircction of flow and surveyed from left
to right looking downstream.

3. Various topographic data points including but not limited to existing
ground surface points and water surfacc elevations.

4. Substrate material evaluations (pebblc counts) were taken at each rifflc
and pool cross-section. A representativc pebblc count was also
pcrformed.

5. Photographic record of the reference reach site.

- II -

,I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

Our reference data was later compiled for use in the evaluation of our reference
reach and the development of this restoration plan.

2.3.4 Refercnce Reach Stream Morphology

The reference reach was generally consistent in dimension (riffles and pools),
pattern, and profile along the evaluated lengths of approximately 250 linear feet.
For classification purposes we estimated that the reach consisted of approximately
40 percent riffles and 60 percent pools. Riffles typically were short and steep,
peaking between existing pools as shown in the longitudinal profile. The pools,
typically located within meander bends, were long and deep. In some cases
compound (multiple connected) pools were observed.

Channel banks along the reach are uniformly stable and although steep (and
almost vertical at select locations) are well vegetated banks and a significant
internal root structure. Little to no erosion was observed along the reference
reach segment evaluated. Consistent indications of bankfull elevation were noted
during our site evaluation.

The two riffle cross-sections surveyed were generally consistent in dimension (cross-
sectional area, bankfull width, mean depth, and width/depth ratio) as is shown in the
following table:

Morphological Riffle No. 1 Riffle No.2
Characteristic
Cross-scctional 6.5 6.5
Area, ft.2
Bankfull 8.0 7.3
\Vidth, ft.
Mean 0.8 0.9
Depth, ft.
\Vidth / Dcpth 10.0 8.2
Ratio

- 12 -

il
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

The two pool cross-sections were also generally consistent in dimension (cross-
sectional area, bankfull width, mean depth, and max depth) as shown below:

Morphological Pool No.1 Pool No.2
Characteristic
Cross-sectional 18.7 18.9
2
Area, ft.
Bankfull 8.3 10.4
\Vidth, ft.
Mean 2.3 1.8
Depth, ft.
Max. 3.7 3.5
Depth, ft.

Based on field measurements of channel length and valley length at the reference
reach we calculated a sinuosity (Channel Length / Valley Length) of 1.24 which
appears reasonable based on field observation of the reach. The channel slope
(based on invert elevation) from field measurements (head of riffle to head of
riffle) was calculated at 0.43 percent (0.0043 ft. 1ft.).

A series of pebble counts were performed during our site visit including one at
each riffle and each pool. A representative pebble counts was also perfonned for
classification purposes. Substrate along the reference reach consisted of silt, sand,
and gravel materials. The representative pebble count revealed a bed material Dso
of 10.1 mm (Gravel).

Site photos are provided in Appendix C. Plots of the existing reach longitudinal
profile, cross-section data, and pebble count data for each cross-section is
provided in Appendix D.

2.3.5 Stream Classification

The reference reach was similarly classified utilizing the Rosgen stream
classification system utilizes parameters based on field collected data and site
observation. Again, the criteria utilized to determine stream type includes the
slope, width/depth ratio, entrenchment ratio, sinuosity, and bed materials.
Utilizing the Rosgen Stream Classification System, the reference reach was
classified as an "E4" type channel.

- 13 -

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

2.3.6 Regional Curve Verification

Using data published by North Carolina Stream Restoration Institute (SRI)
(Regional Curves for North Carolina Piedmont Streams - SRI 2000) we
compared our reference data expectant riffle dimension characteristics for a
stream with a watershed area of 0.14 square miles. Cross-sectional Area,
Bankfull Width, and Mean Depth were all compared with the curve line and their
placement in relation to the 95% confidence limits (upper and lower) for each of
the three curves.

The comparisons are presented in the following table:

Regional Curve Data
Morphological Reference
Characteristic Reach Lower Curve Upper
Data Limit Line Limit
Cross-sectional 6.50 2.40 5.60 10.20
2
Area, ft.
Bankfull 7.30 3.10 6.70 10.40
\Vidth, ft.
Mean 0.90 0.50 0.88 1.60
Depth, ft.

2.4 Stream & Buffer Restoration

The implementation of the restoration plan will result in the development of a stable
natural stream channel within a contiguous fully vegetated and protected riparian
corridor.

In order to perform the necessary stream restoration along the impacted reach, natural
channel design methods were employed. This approach is used to develop the
appropriate dimension (cross-section), pattern (sinuosity), and profile (channel slope)
which naturally occurs in a stable channel in the Piedmont physiographic region of North
Carolina. This process incorporates the use of a reference reach for the appropriate
valley type and land form. Design includes the evaluation of both water and sediment
transport requirements to produce a stable stream in dynamic equilibrium.

Restoration of natural channel geometry and structure will not only improve water quality
and habitat within the immediate channel environment but also in the downstream
channel as well. Stream banks will be planted with native vegetation that represents both
woody (trees and shrubs) and herbaceous species. Species selection was based on a

- 14-

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

survcy ofthc vcgctation from thc rcferencc reach and from rcfercncc litcraturc that
dctails nativc spccics.

Restoration of a suitablc riparian buffer will cnhancc thc rccovery and protcction of thc
restorcd strcam. A protcctcd buffcr (minimum of30 fcct, 50+ fcet where possiblc) will
bc restorcd on both sides of the channel rcstoration reach. The wooded corridors that will
bc cstablishcd as part of this restoration will also incrcasc the vertical and horizontal
structurc perpcndicular to the channcl along thc rcach helping to incrcasc species
composition and abundance. Additionally, thc prcscnce of a woodcd buffcr parallcl to
the channel not only incrcascs in-stream habitat quality by cooling watcr and incrcasing
oxygcn content, it also provides cover, travcl corridors, and acccss to adjaccnt natural
arcas for upland and avian specics.

2.5 Natural Channel Design

The rcstoration design for thc sitc strcam is based on natural channel design principlcs
and techniques utilizing rcfcrcnce rcach data and the cxisting channcl conditions survey
data. Rcfcrence data utilizcd in our design includes the unnamed tributary to Middle
Creek (as previously described) and North Carolina Rural Piedmont Regional Curvc (SRI
2000).

The proposed stream design will restore a naturally meandering E type stream channel to
a more appropriate location based on the current site constraints as depicted on the
Proposcd Rcstoration Plan (See Figure 8). A bankfull bench or floodplain will also be
constructed adjacent to channel aligrunent. The resulting restored stream channel will be
approximately 625 linear feet, increasing the overall channel length significantly (roughly
100 fcet).

This restoration is considered to be a Priority II restoration and is being utilized in this
case because the floodplain at its current elevation is not accessible at bankfull flows.
This design is distinguished as a Priority II stream restoration since a bankfull bench (or
floodplain) will be constructed adjacent to the proposed channel aligrunent and will be
located at a lower elevation relative to the historic or existing floodplain elevation. The
existing and proposed morphological characteristics are depicted in the Design Summary
Data Table in Appendix E along with Reference Reach and Regional Curve data.

The restoration design will result in a riffle-pool system with proper pattern and profile.
The new channel will subsequently be vegetated with transplants (of on-site vegetation),
bare-root seedlings, and live stakes. Cross-vanes and ]-hooks will be installed to prevent
bank erosion, provide grade control, and to enhance pool form. Due to the increased
sinuosity and therefore increased length of the restored channel, it will need to be stepped
down to tie into the existing culvert downstream ofthe restored reach. The nccessary
drop was divided between a steeper section at the beginning of the restored reach, and
another at the end of the restored section. Structures located in these steepcr sections will
have an added "step" to allow for a greater drop without excessive scour that would
thrcatcn the integrity of the structures.

- 15 -

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

A large rock cross vane will also be installed in Wildcat Branch immediately downstream
of the box culverts. The upstream end of the cross vane will be lined with large boulders
and rip rap (Class I and 2), undcrlain with nonwoven geotextile and a cushion layer of
NCDOT #57 stone. This structure is intend cd to protect the culvcrt foundation through
the control of scour downstream of the pipe outlet. A step-pool structure will be installed
at the outlct of the perchcd 36-inch culvert at the downstream end ofthe restoration site.
This structure will tie into the outlet elevation of the pipe and stcp it down to the
elevation of the cross vane and the reach's confluence with Wildcat Branch.

Where possible, transplanting of woody vcgetation (from on-site) including root mats
will be performed to assist in the stabilization of meander bends Erosion control matting
(coir matting), temporary seeding, and live stakes will be utilized to reduce bank crosion
immediately following completion of the channel and providc bank stabilization.

2.5.1 Dimcnsion

Based on reference reach data, and subsequent Regional Curve confirmation,
restored channel riffles will be constructed with a bankfull cross-sectional area of
6.5 square feet. The channel bankfull width will be constructed at 7.7 fcet and the
mean depth at 0.85 feet. Riffles will have a maximum depth of 1.5 feet. The
proposed dimensions will result in an E channel type. A depiction of the
proposed riffle cross-section is shown in Figure 10.

Pools will be constructed with a maximum depth of3.5 feet and bankfull width of
10.3 feet. The mean pool depth will be 1.7 feet. A depiction of the proposed pool
cross-section is also shown in Figure 10.

A minimum entrenchment ratio (floodprone area width / bankfull width) of 3.5
will be established along the length of the restored reach. Where possible, based
on site constraints, the channel will be constructed with an increased
entrenchment ratio.

2.5.2 Pattcrn

The current pattern of the existing project reach is essentially straight, with a
measured sinuosity of approximately 1.0. Channel pattern will be significantly
altered resulting in a substantial increase in sinuosity. The proposed sinuosity as a
result of the proposed alignment will be approximately 1.25. See Figure 8.

Varying meanders have becn integrated along the length of the restored reach to
mimic the variability of a natural channel and utilize the available project area to
the maximum extent possible based on cxisting site constraints. Restored radius
of curvature will vary from 8 feet to 20 feet and meander wavelength will vary
from 30 feet to 52 feet. The integration of meanders into the proposed restoration
design reduces overall channel slope by increasing channel length.

- 16 -

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

2.5.3 Profile

The restoration design incorporates riffles, runs, pools, and glides into the
longitudinal profile providing bed form characteristics observed within the
reference reach. Riffles will be located along straight segments ofthc channel,
runs connect the riffles to the pools which are located along the outside meander
bcnds, and glides conncct the pool to thc next successivc riffle. An avcrage pool
to pool spacing of 25 feet has been incorporated based on reference conditions.

As described previously, the overall vertical drop from upstream to downstream
on thc project site is slightly over 4 feet. In order to construct a more desirable
slope, a portion of this drop (approximately 1.25 feet) will be distributed over
grade control (step-pool) structures at the upstream and downstream ends of the
site (approximately 0.65 feet at each). This will allow for a desirable average
channel slope of 0.45 percent (0.0045 ft. 1ft.) to be constructed along the channel
length.

The proposed longitudinal profile (with structure type, location, and invert
elevation) is depicted on Figurc 9. The as-built profile may differ slightly based
on unforeseen site constraints or limitations that may be discovered during
construction.

2.6 Stream Structures

In order to providc grade control for the restorcd reach, rock and log cross-vanes and j-
hooks (with or without steps), have been integrated with the design and will be utilized to
reinforce and stabilize thc proposed channel. All structures will be constructed out of
natural matcrials typically consisting of locally quarried boulders or logs.

Cross-vane and J-Hooks arc in-stream grade control structures that concentrate strcam
energy toward the center of the channel and away from the near-bank areas. In doing so,
the structure reduces shear stress along the banks and prevents bank erosion. These
structures serve as grade control within the bed of the channel and reduce the potential of
headcutting, create a stable width/depth ratio, while promoting sediment transport
capacity.

The upstream side of these structures will be lined with a non-woven fabric and
backfilled with excavated channel material and in some cases importcd stone aggregate to
improve stability and reducc the potential for piping. Where a larger drop in elevation is
needed, a step may be added to either a cross vane or j-hook, and this step will also be
lined with a non-woven fabric on the upstream end. Some of the structures depicted in
Figure 8 may bc omitted or relocated during construction.

Typical structurc details, based on Rosgen designs, are provided on Figures 11 and 12
(Rosgen 2001).

- 17 -

,I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

2.7 Riparian Buffer Planting

A riparian buffer area will be established immediately adjacent to the restored stream
channel. The riparian zone will include the entire floodplain and toe slope, which will tie
the surrounding existing topography with the proposed bankfull bench elevation. Buffer
width to either side of the restored channel will vary based on site constraints; however, a
minimum of 30 feet is desired. A 50 feet buffer will be achieved where possible. These
areas will be seeded and planted with the appropriate native riparian vegetation and will
provide channel stability and treatment of surface waters traveling laterally through the
buffer. Species will consist primarily of native trees and shrubs.

A significant portion of the riparian zone along the west side of the restored reach will be
located within the permanent sewer line easements. The sewer easement is currently
vegetated with various herbaceous species. Depending on the extent of the disturbance
along the easement due to construction activities, these areas may require replanting. If
necessary disturbed portions of the easement will be re-vegetated with transplanted sod
mats consisting of native herbaceous plants that will not be adversely affected by annual
mowing. Riparian zones outside of the maintained corridors will be planted with bare
root seedlings consisting of bottomland hardwood species.

Native trees and shrubs that are currently located along the current channel clcaring and
excavation limits will bc rcmoved with as much of the root ball intact and transplanted
adjacent to the restored stream channel or within the new floodplain. Following the
complction of the stream channel, the bare root seedlings will be planted during the fall
or early spring seasons to maximize the survivability of planted individuals. During the
following fall, supplemental shrub and tree species will be planted if survival rates of
previously planted seedlings are below target densities as determined in late summer
(August-September).

The restored stream channel will be planted with the appropriate channel bank spccies in
the fonn oflive stakcs, bare-root seedlings, and transplants consisting primarily of black
willow (Salix nigra), silky dogwood (Camus amomum), and elderbcrry (Sambucus
canadensis). If quantities from on site sources are not plcntiful, the live stakes will be
supplcmcnted by locally identified plant sources or purchased from local, reputable
nurseries.

Tree and shrub species will be obtained from nearby reputable nurseries if possible.
Other sources, outsidc ofthe local area, may be used dcpcnding on the availability of
plant material. Trce species individuals will be planted randomly at an 8 ft. by 8 ft.
spacing in order to cnsure a desircd planting density of 680 stems per acre outsidc of the
existing sewer right-of-way. This will incrcase the potential for the desired 5-year
survivability density of at least 260 stems per acre.

Shrub species will be planted at a higher density and closer spacing (6 ft. by 6 ft.) to
achieve a desired planting density of approximately 1,200 shrubs per acre here again

- 18 -

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

improving the potential for the desired 5-year survivability. Pleasc rcfer to Figure 14 for
details of the proposed riparian planting. The planting plan consists of at a minimum,
five of the tree species and three of the shrubs listed in the tables below.

Riparian Trce Planting List*

Scientific Name Common Name
Fraxinus pellllsylvanica Grccn ash
Platanus occidentalis Amcrican sycamorc
Quercus pagoda Chcrrybark oak
Betula nigra Rivcr birch
Quercus phellos 'Villow oak
Acer negundo Box cIder
Quercus nigra 'Vatcr oak
Liriodendron tulipifera Tulip trec
Ulmas Americana American Elm

* Spccies composition may be adjusted based on local availability.

Riparian Shrub Planting List*

Scicntific Namc Common N amc
Cornus amomum Silky dogwood
CephalantllUs occidentalis Buttonbush
Alnus serrulata Tag aldcr
Salix nigra Black willow
Sambucus canadensis Eldcrbcrry

* Species composition may be adjusted based on local availability.

- 19 -

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

Temporary and/or permanent seeding measures (brown top millet, rye grass, or thc most
appropriate erosion control grass as dictated by the season) will bc applied to areas
disturbed during grading operations to allow for localized stabilization while riparian
species establish themselves. A representative of Soil & Environmental Consultants, P A,
will bc on site to observc and direct planting efforts associated with the buffer restoration.

2.8 Stream Monitoring

Thc project will bc monitored for five consecutive years or until the required success
criteria has been met as determined by NC DWQ and the USACE. Monitoring activities
will initiatc immediately following the complction of the strcam construction in order to
alleviate any potential problems as they occur.

Success criteria for stream stability will be met if; for the period of five years in
conjunction with vegetation and biological success, the stream bedform features and
cross-sections remain stable (i.e. the stream retains its restored Rosgen stream-type
classification). During the monitoring period, no less than three bankfull flow events
must be documented. Ifless than three bankfull events occur during the monitoring
period, monitoring will continue until three bankfull events arc documented. The
bankfull events must occur during separate monitoring years.

Parameters that will be included in the annual stream monitoring to ensure the success of
thc restoration activities will includc stream channel surveys (longitudinal and cross-
sectional profiles), pebblc counts, photographs, plant density, diversity and survival
inventories, and qualitative benthos sampling.

This section includes information concerning; I) thc proposed monitoring plan, 2)
biological monitoring, and 3) vegctative monitoring.

2.8.1 Monitoring Plan

We proposc that stream monitoring be performed as follows:

1. The monitoring period for the stream is fivc (5) years.

2. Perform onc (1) annual site visit during thc growing season during which
thc restored rcach will be observed and evaluated. In Wake County, NC,
the growing scason is generally between early March and October.

3. Physical, biological, and vegetative cvaluation of the restored reach will
bc performed during thc annual sitc visit.

4. Maintain photographic records of the restored reach with photos taken
during each sitc visit. Locate photo points at key locations on stream
reach including but not limited to, permanent cross-section locations.

- 20-

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

5. Submit annual monitoring report to both Agencies at the end of each
calendar ycar. The monitoring report will summarize the general site
conditions, the results of physical, biological, and vegetativc monitoring,
and any recommendations for necessary maintenance.

2.8.2 Physical Monitoring

An as-built engineering survey of the site will be conducted upon completion of
thc site restoration work to ensure that site grading work was performed in a
manncr consistent with the restoration plan. This survey will include a
longitudinal profile of the restored reach as well as a minimum of four (4)
permanent cross-sections (two riffles and two pools) along the reach.

We propose that the annual physical monitoring plan be performed as follows:

I. Perform by Total Station a longitudinal profile for comparison with the
as-built survey data and subsequent annual surveys.

2. Perform by Total Station a cross-section survey at each pennanent cross-
section location for comparison with the as-built survey data and
subsequent annual surveys. Photographs of each cross-section will be
taken during annual surveys.

3. The reach will be walked and observed for indications of deterioration or
failure of any components (crosion, structures, etc.) of the restoration.

2.8.3 Biological Monitoring

We propose that the success of the biological component be evaluated using a
qualitative evaluation. In this evaluation the length of the restoration rcach we
will observe and record benthic macro-invertebrate species during our annual site
visits. A similar evaluation will be performed in the adjacent (upstream) reach.
Spccies and number will be comparcd to provide an opinion of the biological
hcalth of the restored channel relative to the reference reach.

2.8.4 V cgctativc Monitoring

We propose that the vcgetative success monitoring be performed as follows:

1. A total of two (2) vegetation monitoring plots will be installed and
monitored in the restored buffer to evaluate thc success of plantcd riparian
speCIes.

2. Vegetative monitoring plots will be 10m x 10m square will be established
in the riparian zones for vegetative monitoring. This size is in keeping
with the current monitoring standards used on other restoration sites.

- 21 -

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

3. Monitoring plots will evaluate the success of tree and shrub species within
a given plot.

4. A vegetative success criterion of260 stems per acre will be required at the
cnd of the five (5) year monitoring period for forest and woody shrub
planting plots.

5. A vegetative success critcrion of 50% coverage will be required at the end
of the five (5) year period for the live stakes installed in channel banks.

Following thc submittal of the monitoring rcports to the Agency represcntatives, the
rccipicnts of the report will be contacted for the purpose of discussing the monitoring
data, required success criteria and whether or not the site is functioning as expected. If
the site is not functioning as expccted a site visit will be schedulcd with the review
agcncics so that a remediation plan can be crcated and implemented. The remediation
plans, if required, will dircctly reflect the requested alterations suggested by thc
regulatory agencies.

- 22-

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

3.0 SITE \VETLAND RESTORATION

The purpose of this section is to summarize our analyses of the impacted wetland arc a
and provide a Conceptual Plan for its restoration and integration with the stream
restoration plan. This section includes information conccrning; I) Existing Wetland
Conditions, 2) Reference \Vetland Conditions, 3) Wetland Creation, and 4) Wetland
Monitoring.

3.1 Existing Wetland Conditions

In January 2003, a detailed wctland delineation was pcrformed by Soil & Environmental
Consultants, P A, during which we examined and evaluatcd site soils, vegctation, and
hydrology of sclect areas by procedures dcscribcd in the 1987 Corps ofEnginecrs
Wetland Delineation Manual. Areas on the site with positivc indicators of hydric soils
and evidence of wetland hydrology and hydrophytic vegetation were flaggcd with
scqucntially numbcrcd. Proof ofwctland hydrology would be the existcnce of hydric
soils with oxidized root chmmels in the upper 12 inches of the "A" horizon, water borne
dcposits, drift lincs, scour marks, drainage patterns, rcgional indicators of soil saturation,
ctc.

This delineation was surveycd by Smith and Smith Surveyors and a wetland map was
prcpared. This delincation was later revicwcd and approvcd by USACE. A copy of the
approved delineation is providcd in Appendix F.

As des crib cd previously a total of 0.133 acrcs or 5,812 square fect of jurisdictional
wctlands will be impacted through the placcment of fill associated with roadway
construction from the widening of Hammond Road. In order to meet Agcncy preferenccs
for on sitc restoration of similar wetlands we are proposing the integration of constructed
riparian wetlands immediately adjacent to the restored channel within the newly
established floodplain area.

3.2 Reference Wetland Conditions

In order to facilitatc restoration plan developmcnt as well as streamline restoration efforts
we used the existing site wctland (to be impacted) as a template for rcfercnce conditions.
In this process we evaluatcd reference for both surface elevation (and subsequent
proximity to the adjacent channel invert) and vegetation. And, while other wetland
pockcts have becn delineated on site, these areas are relatively small in size and do not
appear to be drivcn by the adjacent stream (dircctly or through overbank flooding).
These smaller areas do not, in our opinion, reprcsent a refcrence condition to which thc
creation of the proposcd wetlands should be pcrfonned.

Based on our observation and invcstigation during field visits it was determined that the
two factors governing wetland hydrology was pcriodic ovcr bank flooding events and
surface elevation relative to ground water (or indicators of ground watcr). The wetland

- 23 -

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

area was qualitatively assessed for vegetative conditions. However, based on the
disturbed condition of the site and the poor condition of the existing vegetative
community, it is our opinion that it would be suitable to construct a vegetative
community (trees, shrubs, and herbaceous) and structure similar to that of a Bottomland
Hardwood Forest as described in the NCDENR Field Guide to North Carolina Wetlands
(Report 96-0 I).

3.3 \V ctIand Creation

Wetland creation will be performed through the conduct of localized grading of the
ground surface (within the new floodplain), the transfer of existing wetland soils, and the
planting of appropriate native vegetative species. Please refer to Figures 13 and 14 for
further details on the proposed construction.

3.3.1 Grading Operations

At the northern end of the construction site, a significant surface area within the
newly constructed floodplain wiII be available (east and west) of the restored
stream for use in the construction of riparian wetlands. Once thc floodplain is
graded, a scries ofwctland cells wiII be excavated within the floodplain. The
exact depth of these cclls will be dctermined during final design. The relative
depth shown on the cross-section is approximate and may vary depending on local
topography and conditions observed in the field at the time of construction.

These cells, roughly 12 to IS-inches in depth, wiII be backfilled with materials
excavated from within the impacted wetland area. The transfer of material wiII
serve to "jump start" created wetlands through the placement of hydric soils, in
addition to the relocation of a seed source for wetland plant species. The surface
of these wetland pockets will be fine-graded to provide micro-topographic
variation within the created wetland areas. A representative of Soil &
Environmental Consultants, P A, wiII be on site to observe and direct grading
efforts associated with the restoration and make adjustments as deemed necessary.

3.3.2 Planting Operations

Once appropriate grading is performed, exposed areas within the created wetland
pockets wiII be planted with the bare-root seedlings of tree and shrub species
listed in the previous tables. Others may be substituted upon approval of the
designer depending upon availability.

Wetland tree and shrub species wiII be planted at a similar density as previously
described in this report to achieve the desired survivability. Tree and shrub
species will be generally intermixed, however, zonal densities of select species
may occur based on grading conditions, standing water bodies (or those likely to
hold standing water during wetter periods) or other factors observed on site.

- 24-

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

Herbaceous species such as Soft Rush (Juncus effusus), Woolgrass (Scirpus
cyperinus), Sedges (Carex sp.), and Lizard's Tail (Saururus cernuus) will be used
to over-plant portions of restored wetland areas. This, in conjunction with native
seed sources, will allow for a dense stand of herbaceous growth. Details of
herbaceous species planting will bc described in the construction drawings.

Herc again, temporary andlor permanent seeding measurcs (brown top millet, rye
grass, or the most appropriate crosion control grass as dictated by the season) will
be applied to areas disturbed during grading operations to allow for localized
stabilization while wetland species cstablish themselves. A representative of Soil
& Environmental Consultants, P A, wiII be on site to observe and direct wetland
planting efforts associated with thc restoration.

3.4 Wetland lVlonitoring

The success of the restored wetland areas will be based on thc restoration of hydrology
within 12 inches of the ground surface and the survival of canopy tree, understory shrub,
and herbaceous species for a five year monitoring period. Sample vegetative success
plots will be established in the restored areas for vegetative monitoring. All monitoring
will occur within these observation plots throughout the monitoring period as long as
thcy continue to be reprcsentative of the community.

This section includes information conccrning; I) thc proposed monitoring plan, 2)
hydrologic monitoring, and 3) vcgetative monitoring.

3.4.1 Monitoring Plan

We propose that wetland monitoring bc perfonned as follows:

1. The monitoring period for the constructed wetlands is five (5) years.

2. Perform onc (I) annual site visit (in conjunction with thc stream
monitoring) during the growing season during which the wctlands will bc
observed and cvaluated. In Wake County, NC, thc growing scason is
generally between early March and October.

3. Hydrologic and vegetative evaluation of the created wetlands will be
performed during the annual site visit.

4. Maintain photographic records of the wetland with photos taken during
each site visit. Locate photo points at key locations.

- 25 -

'I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

5. Include annual monitoring details as part of the stream monitoring report
to both Agencies at the end of each calendar year. The wetland portion of
the report will summarize the general site conditions, the results of
hydrologic and vegetative monitoring, and any recommendations for
necessary maintenance.

3.4.2 Hydrologic Monitoring

We propose that the hydrologic site monitoring be perfonned as follows:

1. Locate, via Total Station, an approximate boundary of restored wetlands.

2. Hydrology will be monitored during annual site visit. Hydrologic
monitoring will bc by visual observation and with soil evaluation.
Hydrology will be monitorcd based on soil characteristics (hydric soils
indicators) observed using shallow hand augcr borings.

3.4.3 Vegetative Monitoring

We propose that the vegetative success monitoring be performed as follows:

1. A total of two (2) vegetation monitoring plots will be installed and
monitored on the restored wetlands.

2. Vegetative monitoring plots will be 10m x 10m square. This size is in
keeping with the current monitoring standards used on other rcstoration
sites.

3. Monitoring plots will evaluate the success oftrec, shrub, and herbaceous
species within a given plot.

4. A vegetative success criterion of260 stems per acre will be required at the
end of the five (5) year monitoring period for forest and woody shrub
planting plots.

5. Vegetative success criterion of 50% coverage will be required at the end
of the five (5) year period for the herbaceous species.

In conjunction with the Agency review of the report, if the wetland is not functioning as
expected a site visit will be scheduled with the review agencies so that a remediation plan
can be created and implemented. The remediation plans, if required, will directly reflect
the requested alterations suggested by the regulatory agencies.

- 26-

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

4.0 LIl\'IITATIONS

Our evaluations, conclusions, and recommendations arc based on project and site
information available to us at the time of our analysis and may require modification if
there are any changes in the sitc conditions, or if additional data about the site becomes
availablc in the future. Additionally, dccisions regarding any outstanding permit issues
or policies issued by governing regulatory agencies are beyond our control, and as such
modifications to our evaluation, conclusions, and/or rccommendations may be necessary.
Additional data may become available during futurc dcsign and construction as site and
projcct conditions are further invcstigatcd or exposcd by construction.

Wc can not accept responsibility for thc recommendations in this report unless we are
engaged to observe construction to ascertain that, in general, our recommendations are
being properly implcmented. This report is intcnded for usc by Marjan Limitcd and
Jones & Cnossen Engineering, PLLC, on this project. Thcse findings are not intended or
recommcnded to be suitablc for reusc on cxtensions ofthc project or on any other project.
Reusc on extensions of the projcct or on any othcr projcct shall be donc only after written
verification or adaptation by SOIL & ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, PA, for
the spccific purpose intendcd. Our professional services for this projcct have becn
performed in accordancc with gencrally acccpted enginecring practiccs; no warranty,
cxpressed or implied, is made.

- 27-

~

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
I
II

Marjan Limited
Conceptual Restoration Plan

December 2, 2004
S&EC Project No. 7238.Dl

Photo 1 - Upstream End of Existing Reach, Looking
Upstream (Southwest) off Property, Head
of Wetland Area, March 2004

Photo 2 - Upstream End of Existing Reach, Looking
Downstream (East) into Wetland Area, Note
Guardrail from Hammond Road at Top of Slope

I

Page 1 of5

I

t~_

I
,1
I
I
I
I
II
I
II
I
I
I
I
I
II
I
I
I
I

Marjan Limited
Conceptual Restoration Plan

December 2, 2004
S&EC Project No. 7238.01

Photo 3 - Midpoint of Existing Reach, Looking
Upstream (South) into Wetland Area, Note
Hammond Road Embankment Slope to Left

Photo 4 - Midpoint of Existing Reach, Looking
Downstream (North), Note Limited Woody Buffer Vegetation
And Hammond Road Embankment to Right

Page 2 of 5

.._1_ _

I
II

I

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,I
I
I
I
I
I
I

Marjan Limited
Conceptual Restoration Plan

December 2, 2004
S&EC Project No. 7238.Dl

Photo 5 - Upstream End of Proposed Restoration
Area Looking North Along Existing Sanitary
Sewer Easement (to Left)

Photo 6 - Downstream End of Proposed Restoration
Area Looking South Along Existing Sanitary
Sewer Easement (to Right)

Page 3 of5

Ic_1

I

I

Marjan Limited
Conceptual Restoration Plan

December 2, 2004
S&EC Project No. 7238.Dl

I
I

I

I

I

I
I

Photo 7 - Existing Reach and Proposed Restoration
Area, Looking Upstream (South) from Site Access
Road on Hammond Road

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

Photo 8 - Existing Concrete Box Culverts Along
Wildcat Branch Beneath Hammond Road,
Unnamed Tributary Outfalls Through Headwall
Immediately to the Right (Off Photo)

I

I

Page 4 of5

I

I
,I
II
:1

I
I
I
II
I
,I
I
:1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

Marjan Limited
Conceptual Restoration Plan

December 2, 2004
S&EC Project No. 7238.01

Photo 9 - Existing Concrete Pipe Passing Unnamed
Tributary Beneath Site Access Road, Outfalls to
Wildcat Branch Through Headwall Shown
in Photo 8

Page 5 of5

-~

I

I.

I

I

I

I.

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

Stream Classification Form

;l.~"~;~ :::~~:;;,~:~:'~.i?>~'.;-;~~;:~i,~~~~<.;._'"
~_ ""'~"":'f"t:,~ "'''''S-:.l:-t~'''' #".<.. -~;S::;!'--~'-'----"fto
~,:< '~::~~:' ~,r.':',__~_~.~)_;';"'''i-~''':; '~'.c:c1~"'JV,.

A yl() -io
Drainage AREA:

Stream NAME:
Basin NAME:
Location:

~
!2v. /./ " ~ A J NL.

Long:
Date: 01 J oZ- / 0 t./

Twp:
Observers:

Rge: Sec:

/-;f:,S J j/j)J J Lb7

Qtr:

Lat:

,<.... _ _~ ". ._~ ~ "',,,":_"'...,..,, _,.,.~...' ,~_,. ~. !._,>._._.-;_.."".....- -" '.'_,~" :....'. C.";'''- _ -, f.,,:- ~ :"_'.-':+---' .......\~ :'T_' .......;'-:"f""r~:--.i '-""...-: _l.~~ ~.~.... "'._"..;."::,,,,-.~.

-"_"""':"~- OJ_;...,__ '.-....,...., t- .'- ~"

~,..-...~ ~-,,,," 'C"'"

0;, B "'20,3 Feet

Bankfull WIDTH (WbU)
WIDTH ofthe stream channel, at bankfull stage elevation, in a rime section.

. _: ,_"......"t!.,' ,.. '_,' ... ,"", . ....-":f".....~.., ~.v., J 'It !~_..,.'....,._' ........-,-.">........ of.. 1._., .'.,. _"-~ -,--~ :;'0...."._. ..,.....~~~.-, . .... ,.....-;'

1'-~~:'-'" _...._ '!"_L ! ~" _".,...... -_,' ,r~ .-.,:,"-.". '"'-'.-n' ..,..-i ~,

Mcan DEPTH (dbU) O,U - 1./ Feet
Mean DEPTH of the stream channel cross-section, at bankfull stage elevation, in a rime section.
(dblFAbufWblf)

,. ,'" ~.,"'l' _--,,,'.;-'".''' ~....; ~-"',,,,-j.." :._..., .,~..-.,~.,~:, l"", ";"., ,_","",,~ c_,"",-'.-.',"'" 0'-'" ''''''-_~'' "..1 ~..~-..,..;..--.",- ..,- -.",,-., :.~

Bankfull Cross Scction Arca (AbU) t'f,!., - 1/. t.J Fecr
AREA of the stream channel cross-section, Ilt bankfull stage elevation, in a rime section.

........-...... ;_.",,~...-.,.-..,...,-.,

'o,.,~_. ..~_,,__.._., ~'!t.;' T_",*._.""",'"'~";;;'i'r"!':""""-'" "~,,_,_,,,."-"":-'...-',",,"," ,.' ....:.,"'....~." r.'':'"

,/, z. ~ 3b,4 FtlFl

WIDTH I DEPTH RATIO (WbkC/dbU)
Bankfull WIDTH divided by bankfull mean DEPTH. in a rime section.,

. .,.~.... .r....~ """ '''~.; ....... ""'. "'_.' ,. ~_,....~....".~ -- ,_"k"'#,- ....r....._ 0# .__",.. ,4 _ .... _. . .' ''\--_....._. -H': ".-.0--<-',. ...".....".._ _. ."", ~ -,>~- ~.."'" ..,.. ~".....,; ,-. ... ,~.'" -t." ,,:a., '.,,<'..> ~ -, ~~ ~

Maximum DEPTH (dmbU) 2.0- 2.5Feet
Maximum depth of the bankfull channel cross-section, or distance between the bankfull stage and
. thalweg elevations, in a rime section.

. .J' c'." .~___ ,_'._<:,-' ..;."- ,.'J - . _ " ,_.' ..... '-.'~'_;'''' "~c' ,. OJ'" ,~,.. "l"-"' ,'..J '. _',: ..---___: .._.. > '-',Y -.........-::_..."__"! ~ '~. ". ~ ~.. . ~,. r) "~__'" "-" !,."'<""" . .. . "_'';' .,... -" ,-:..,,~'.; -..:. ',..I .' ~C'--

'WIDTH of Flood-Prone Arca (WC"a)
Twice maximum DEPTH, or (2 x dmblf) = the stage/elevation at which flood-prone area WIDTH is
detennined in a rime section.

. .';.__......"..-t<._'.. ~..A:,-_l;. ..-t!.~~".,...:,.....--' -.;_'te, ,.-..-:._..... .. ~~..t- '_ ..,T-'. __"'~'- 0-'" ~.~ .:. _,,'. ,T".....:.., ,,'. ""'., ....."...d. '!.;...""."" 'l""""'''' _:.......,...'-'1... f>'.' .",- .;..; 1",-'

Entrcnchmcnt Ratio (ER)
The ratio of flood-prone area WIDTH divided by bankfull channel WIDTH. (WfpIWblf) (rime
section)

, . .' ,: ~ "'..._'--;. '"'~"~'~,~~~.., ,_. ?<__.". "-", '. :-"''c.- ~""".-',;j~ "; .;.~~ ..' ;'1.:~. ;'.._'., .... .~~r .,";r _....; '!'. ~ .',,>., ~~. ';""..' ._' <.\ ...~~..O: ' ----'.~-.........,.. ;'..-,l .'cl_-.~,,-:-'=,~-'_"" ~-':"~, - . "Y. -~.....: ~ '.'- -:-~~..,.-, ;--~

" Channcl Matcrials (particlc Sizc Indcx) DSO f!}JJ --1,4 mm
The D50 particle size index represents the mean diameter of channel materials, as sampled from the
channel surface, between the bankfull stage and thalweg elevations.

~..,_' .' ,""'_"-:--';"'_~' .- _'" _....":. .........,.___._ ,r ~ ;.l-- 1 ~ '_,' ?'t_ """,'_.... ..,!_ _ ".' ,~.. ~. .... . .._.,-,' -..:--' " ... ""-:-~~--f'-"~r' '~_" - - -......' \-".- .---~ --,",',- .'''- ,""'-:",-I-! ',<'.;.

Watcr Surfacc SLOPE (S) tJ,DO 15 FVFt
Channel slope = "rise over run" for a reach approximately 20 - 30 bankfull channel widths in length,
with the "rime to rime" water surface slope representing the gradient at bankfull stage.

. ,-'-

\;;.;J''''''-~'"-'~' ,_.,,'_............._~,..-,_.,._.'''---~., u~ .",~.~..>.'.~ "-,, ~._"." ...._--" """c,' .-- ..., ".,.,".'" ,~".....,

'{..' Channel SINUOSITY (K) 'I. 0.3 .
;-r+ Sinuosity is an index of channel pattern, detennined from a ratio of stream length divided by valley
t:,,: length (SUVL); or estimated from a ratio of valley slope divided by channel slope ('IS! S).

1:::,::~:'~-~~~,~~~:,~':":'::r;4 ,j~~ l::~ R~,~~~~;:~:~~

....._;~ . _., ,~,.;.. ,;, F' .""_', ._ ..._...:....,...~~.' ,-.. "-.',r!,.,., -.,,, ,--"- ~'._ "_"'. '_~' Y1'; ,.; ,,,. ...___'....,....c_....._:-!>" ;.__:1.: "i"" ,co..-J,-<..+r-,", t-;_"_.. ".-",____-..'

Feet

FtlFt

-

-

2247
-

c:
2246
ro
>
lI.l
w245

-

-

-

li

cross section

250

249

-~_t_ I I
I -1__ I I
I I --1_'
--

248

. . .

244

243

I
:~
I

242
0.0

100.0

c"o~~, S~-h~ '"
:t\

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

9

Unnamed Tributary to Wildcat Branch Neuse River Basin Raleigh, NC
thalwag 0 WS X BKF ~ TOB EI +. . . . . . Linear (BKF) - - - Linear (TOB) I

,
,
I
,
. . L
,
I
,

-'-
I
,
I
,
.... -.-..
, .
,

I
I-
I

I
---
,
,
,
,
'. ,
"I- ..

I
, I I
-r--'&'_,
1 I ""T'-_
, , ,
, , I
I I ,
..... I I
Ii-.. I
'X"I'"
:0

,
,
,
I I I
....._1 I
I ,..-.....
I I I -r-_
1 I I I
, I
, I ,
.... ...1.. I I
I ........... I

,
:~
I

200.0

300.0
Channel Distance (ft)

["us~- ~lL- ~'XJV\
~L.

I
,
,
-.....

-,-
I -1-- _ _ I I
:: -:-~-

.. "',-
,
,

I I
..... "'I.... I I
I ...,.... I
. .

400.0

500.0

600.0

~'O~~ - S el- -h bV'l
-Jl-~

-

-

Cross-sectlon #1

notes

X1
X1
X1
X1
X1
X1
X1EW
X1
Xl EW
X1
X1
X1
X1
X1

-

-

northing easUng
(ft) (ft)

725689.8 2106515
725683.1 2106514
7256n.9 2106513
725674.7 2106513
725672.8 2106513
725672.4 2106512
725672.2 2106512
725671.8 2106512
725671.4 2106512
725670.8 2106512
725669.2 2106512
725666.6 2106511
725661.2 2106510
725655.3 2106509

-

-

distance e/evaUon
(ft) (ft)

0.00
6.73
12.01
15.18
17.14
17.57
17.78
18.14
18.64
19.25
20.78
23.50
28.90
34.97

247.892
248.304
248.762
248.254
248.006
247.71
246.92
246.654
246.712
247.132
247.91
248.434
248.848
250.656

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

cc:- S~11'u~0

Impaired Reach Cross-sectlon #1

251
250.5
250
~ 249.5
""
~ 249
,g 248.5
i'; 248
W 247.5
247
246.5
246
0.00

5.00

10.00

15.00 20.00 25.00
Width from River left to Right (Il)

30.00

35.00

40.00

Impaired Reach Cross-section #1

249

248.5

2'
~ 248
o
~
'" 247.5
W

247

246.5
15.00

16.00

17.00

18.00

19.00 20.00 21.00
Width from River left to Right (Il)

22.00

23.00

24.00

-

-

25.00

-

-

Cross-sectlon #2

notes

X2
X2
X2
X2
X2
X2
X2
X2
X2
X2
X2
X2
X2

-

northing
(ft)

725820
725818.1
725816.1
725815
725814.6
725814.4
725814.3
725814'
725813.8
725813.4
725812.8
725811.1
725809.8

-

easting
(ft)

2106653
2106658
2106664
2106666
2106666
2106667
2106667
2106668
2106668
2106670
2106672
2106676
2106681

-

-

distance elevation
(ft) (ft)

0.00
4.73
10.85
13.31
13.67
14.52
14.93
15.49
16.11
17.38
19.61
24.55
29.09

246.05
245.556
245.614
245.388
244.664
243.49
243.478
244.004
245.39
245.48
245.848
246.474
247.706

-

-

Cross-section #3

notes

X3
X3
X3
X3
X3
X3
X3EW
X3
X3
X3
X3
X3EW
X3
X3
X3
X3

-

northIng
(ft)

726062.8
726060.1
726058.1
726056.8
726056
726055.4
726055.1
726055
726054.7
726054.2
726053.8
726053.4
726053.3
726052.6
726051.4
726048.9

-

eastlng
(ft)

2106787
2106792
2106796
2106798
2106799
2106799
2106800
2106800
2106801
2106801
2106802
2106803
2106803
2106804
2106807
2106812

-

-

dIstance elevation
(ft) (ft)

0.00
5.66
9.76
12.01
13.59
14.44
14.80
15.02
15.69
16.73
17.47
18.05
18.44
20.11
22.83
28.59

245.992
245.534
245.278
244.344
243.848
243.32
242.74
242.53
242.472
242.472
242.548
242.812
243.456
244.05
244.984
246.618

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

LUJ':J~- SlL.-h'evl ~3

Impaired Reach Cross-section #3

247
246.5
246
~ 245.5
""
~ 245
~ 244.5
a-; 244
w 243.5
243
242.5
242
0.00

5.00

10.00

15.00 20.00 25.00
Width from River LeilIa Right (II)

30.00

35.00

40.00

Impaired Reach Cross-section #3

245

244.5

g 244
c:
,g 243.5
ro
>
'"
W 243

242.5

242
12.00

14.00

13.00

15.00

16.00 17.00 18.00
Width from River Lell to Right (II)

19.00

20.00

21.00

22.00

-

-

-------------------

j:W\~ iANi.d \Ll"L.i~ 6u ~~ -tv~k Su~M"v''.:l ILt ~\e.

Impaired Reach Hints
Stream: Unnamed Tributary to Wildcat Branch
Watershed: Neuse River Basin
Location: Raleigh, NC
Latitude: -
Longitude: -
County: Wake County
Date: July 2, 2004
Observers: EGT, PKS, ED
Channel Type: E Channel
Drainage Area (sq mi): 0.143
Channel Materials )(S -!\;. J '/..Sii1- 'i.S~~
total Upstream Mid-Point Downstream
D16 0.815 1.154 #N/A 0.102 0.000 -
D35 2.37 1.96 0.09 4.28 0.00 -
D50 5.4 3.6 0.1 7.4 0.0 -
D84 13 10 0 15 0 -
D95 22 19 0 27 0 -
Largest of Bar Sample
% SilVClay 5% 0% 19% 11% - -
% Sand 27% 36% 81% 18% - -
% Gravel 67% 64% 0% 70% - -
% Cobble 0% 0% 0% 1% - -
% Boulder 0% 0% 0% 0% - -
% Bedrock 0% 0% 0% 0% -

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Lvo~~ .- ~ ~{\OVl -t-(

?e6bl~ ~1AVlt

Immediatel U stream of Reach
Material Size Ran e (mm)
sill/cia 0 0.062
very fine sand 0.062 0.13
fine sand 0.13 0.25
medium sand 0.25 0.5
coarse sand 0.5 1
ve coarse sand 1 2
very fine gravel 2 4
fine gravel 4 6
fine gravel 6 8
medium gravel 8 11
medium gravel 11 16
coarse gravel 16 22
coarse gravel 22 32
very coarse gravel 32 45
ve coarse ravel 45 64
small cobble 64 90
medium cobble 90 128
large cobble 128 180
ve lar e cobble 180 256
small boulde 256 362
small boulde 362 512
medium boulde 512 1024
large boulde 1024 2048
ve la e boulde 2048 4096
bedrock

Count
o
o
o
o
11
25
17
12
12
11
6
4
3

Unnamed Tributary to Wildcat Branch
Neuse River Basin
Ralei h NC

#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#

Note:

Unnamed Tributary to Wildcat Branch

100%
, I 11111
90%
IIIII
80% 11111
I1II1
c: IIIII
ro 70%
.c , I IIIII
~
Q; 60% 11111
c: 50% 11111
u:
C , IIIIII
(1.) 40%
u , I 11111
Q; 30% 1 IIII
a.
20% IIIII
I 111111
10%
IIII1
0% I '"
0.01 0.1

I IIIII1

I I I II

I I IIIII

I I I I I II

IIIII
IIII1
IIIII
11111

'"
, II
, "
'"

IIIII
1'111
IIIII
IIIII

IIIII
IIIII
IIIII
1 IIII

I IIIIII

I I III

I I II1II

I I I 1111

11111
IIIII

'"
, "

IIIII
I1III

11111
IIIII

I IIIIII

I I III

I I II1II

I I11III

I I I II

I IIIIII

I 111111

'"
I II I

IIIII
11111

IIIII
IIIII

, ,

I I I II I

I IIIIII

I I I I III

I I III I
." ,

III1I
1"1

I IIIII
1'111

10

100

1000 10000
. Percent Item I

Particle Size (mm)

-II- Cumulative Percent

016
1.154

bedrock
01.

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

c.~thL, , St.,",'h. 1:I{1 ~1-

ve hb\t twr'\f

mm
0.062 #
0.13 #
0.25 #
0.5 #
1 #
2 # 100%
4 # 90%
6 #
8 # 80%
11 # c: 70%
ro
.c
16 # I- 60%
....
22 # CIJ
c: 50%
32 # u:
45 # c: 40%
~
64 # CIJ 30%
90 # Q.
128 # 20%
180 # 10%
256 # 0%
362 # 0.01
512 #
1024 #
2048 #
ve 4096 #
# 016
Total Particle Count: 54 #N/A

0.1

1
Particle Size (mm)

\

Vsu ~ St,~j

Unnamed Tributary to Wildcat Branch

I IIIIII

I 111111

I , I11I1 I I III1I
, I 11111 , I I111I
IIIII 11111
IIIII IIIII
, I IIIII , , , IIII
I , IIIII I I IIIII
, IIII IIII
11111 IIII
, , IIIII , , IIIII
I , IIIII I I IIIII
I1I1I I11II
IIIII IIIII
IIIII 11111
IIIII IIIII
1000 10000

I I IIIII

1 I IIIII
I
IIIII
I III'

II1II
II1II

I I 11111

I I I 1111

I IIIIII

I I 11111

III1I
IIII1

11111
IIIII

I I 11111

I I IIIII

I I I1III

I 111111

IIIII
IIIII
IIIII
III11

10

100

-- Cumulative Percent

. Percent Item

095
o

bedrock
0%

sill/cia
19%

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

[\[Q~L:1" StL1'~ 'I l\'!7

v~_th'~ (Oul1t

Downstream End of Reach (Near Culvert)
Material Size Range (mm) Count Unnamed Tributary to Wildcat Branch
silVclav 0 0.062 11 # Neuse River Basin
very fine sand 0.062 0.13 7 # Raleioh. NC
fine sand 0.13 0.25 3 # Note:
medium sand 0.25 0.5 2 #
coarse sand 0.5 1 2 # Unnamed Tributary to Wildcat Branch
verY coarse sand 1 2 4 #
very fine gravel 2 4 5 # 100% , ." , , ". , . , ~Il .
fine gravel 4 6 6 # 90% , , I I I I II , I I III , , I I II , , I IIIII , , , I I I II
fine gravel 6 8 14 # , , III1II , , , '" , , I III " , 1111 , , I I 1111 , , , IIIII
c: 80% {
medium gravel 8 11 20 # ro , I IIIIII , , I III , , , , " , , I I II , , I IIIII I , I IIIII
medium gravel 11 16 13 # J:. 70%
I- , , I IIIII I , I III , , " , ~ : ~ , ~ ~ I I ~ ; , , 111111 , , I IIIII
.... 60%
coarse gravel 16 22 6 # (I) , , I IIIII , I I III I , , I I I ~d~ , , , '" , , I I : III , : I IIIII
coarse gravel 22 32 4 # c: 50% , , , '" , . . ,. , "
u: , I , IIIII , , I III I I , I ':1. I , , , " , , I IIIII , I , IIIII
very coarse gravel 32 45 1 # C 40% , , , IIIII , , 1111 I , I I I I I I I 1 '" , 1 , "111 , , , " "~I
8 , , , 11111 , , I I II I , ~ll , , , , " I , , , IIIII I , , IIIII
verY coarse oravel 45 64 1 # 30% , I , IIIII , , I III I , I II I , 1 , , " 1 , , , 11111 , , , 11111
Qj , , I IIIII , , I I II -- I I I II I I , , '" , , , , IIIII , , , IIIII
small cobble 64 90 1 # ll. 20% , , , IIIII I , , I I II I I , , , " , , I , IIIII , , , IIIII
medium cobble 90 128 # -- , I ,
10% , , , , r.vr , , 111111 , , I "... +, I I I II I , , I IIIII , I I I 1111
large cobble 128 180 # 1+ I J.; ''1 ' . ;+:" it ,
, , , IIIII ,+, + + '~I '."1 ... ....' ...1...1 IIIII I , , IIIII
verY laree cobble 180 256 # 0% '" '"
small boulder 256 362 # 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
small boulder 362 512 #
medium boulde 512 1024 # Particle Size (mm) I -a-Cumulative Percent + Percentllem I
large boulder 1024 2048 #
verY laree boulde 2048 4096 # Size percent less than (mm) Percent bY substrate tvoe
bedrock # 016 I 035 I 050 I 084 I 095 silVclav I sand I oravel I cobble I boulder I bedrock
Total Particle Count: 100 0.102 I 4.28 I 7.4 I 15 I 27 11% I 18% I 70% I 1% I 0% I 0%

\

'DC;b -~ G~LA-J e. \

II
I
I
II
I
I
I
I
II
il
I
:1
I
I
II
:1

I

I
I
I
I
I
I

Marjan Limited
Conceptual Restoration Plan

December 2, 2004
S&EC Project No. 7238.Dl

~' r

'..

\" .. '.0 ~
l ;:,
.... ..{f~c -~
~~ .,~,
" .
~. I

(of. ..:':-:~
J ~ ~ ':';., _~
'.- ~ "'"
.Jt. f ~::~.;, .
::.I~.'
.-' 1:"

:~

~

~..

Ii
t ~ ).

.;~~~ ]
'7...

..;:i~"'_io-,,"" -~.';~.
. ..

: i

...

. ..'t'.\
", ,.'

:.,
...... -<I.
f ~.
,

l .;""

'.

j
I'
\

~

. .... S I -' -.
:~. -'.of ",'"

,
-..

'\1
,..
1"\ p' ,
", . fr.\" l
j.,~ .J' ; - . .\
......'j;....'.tii.' i. }.' "'<~i' " ~i~
_ IJJl 'i ~.~ ,'. ~ I ~.:.. ;, .,~ ~~. _~ t .\"'t:,^ ~'_'" .,:' ~ ..::~-.
..~r,;,..,.-:. .,,,.~.'...;.r' ;.' '~.~,".' ~;' I'/< . ."o~.r '. .\..( \ ,
.... ..'..~.i ./. '. ,. '''''. .,'~.ql" .. "f
,," J',- :,\7.'::f."", :":';i >i'; . ,},:,~\~;
.' .' ,. y . .tt~V '-" Jot .... \"
. i '. ~.;Y<t~ ~ _: t ,~. , Ii . :'., ," .. IJ,
'" _~_'"''''I;{~''' ",\ ",1... " ""'.......l
. .,;.. I.'~~:~r" ..~-: ''':.~~;., <~ ,.....~:t-,.:. ~: J' '. "::
.-;~,~;;..::.;;'-i ). .....',. ;: .-l~~n ttJ
'.r~~; ~ :~,~,.~:.!~~:.;=~..\~~,:-... '}~~.:~.~-:'''';.:" ~;:t~
.\~'I,)I'~ ,,'~'f~ ,.t; .,: ..~~~i'~:'} "', ~;'If~;~.-",",~, '., \~ ': - -\.:'~

I,

........
:.-:-~-!

! :"- :." . ..t':. . ~

~.' .' ..,-.......; ""
'. .........:... 'l'-

. ~ ~~~,

~ .'...
,..' -

"....

. .. ' .

'.
.

"'J.'f,:..

.~
..,;.1..

Photo 1 - Reference Reach at Midpoint of Reach, Looking
Upstream, Note Dense Canopy and Understory Vegetation,
Stable Banks, and Accessible Floodplain, July 2004

Photo 2 - Reference Reach at Midpoint of Reach,
Looking Downstream along Meander Bend, Note Dense
Vegetation, Stable Banks, and Accessible Floodplain

Page 1 of2

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
:1
I
I

II
I
;1

I
I

Marjan Limited
Conceptual Restoration Plan

December 2, 2004
S&EC Project No. 7238.D I

Photo 3 - Reference Reach Pool Cross-Section,
Looking Upstream, Note Depth of Water Approximately
Two Feet at time of Survey (see rod)

Photo 4 - Reference Reach Riffle Cross-Section, Looking
Downstream, Note Relatively Uniform Bank Height
Channel Bed Width and Stable Vegetated Banks

Page 2 of2

_ L

I

I

~+-el/t\1{t lLQaCi~
Stream Classification Form

. ',""" ~,~.~ _..~.,"' ,....~_"._...,..........' -'--4-.__'

'~~::~~~~'~';-a:~}J~:;\:i
~~~1~ 't. J-~7,',:l..t';""~- r:
:.'~~~1.;,~'";t'~/f4.:,;;.;

I

Stream Channel Classification (Level II) ...

I

Location:
Twp:
Observers:

1'7hn>,1 j /Y,blA ;;.,.!J -J-.., wl/d
ill! II{~ g" ~/V> Drainage AREA:
Apl)( ./ Nt
Rge: Sec: Qtr:
i//L~ ~ t?t! } J ~j-?r

P, /1/'3 mi2

Lat:

Long:
Date: 01101/ oc./

I

I

~41~~~"'f'" ",,'~'1' ~ ;<_- ~.-:!' ~'" _,Y('~"'~'~~~}'>-"_' "-"'~":"Il:"".....~1 ~-""-I,.::~""""~--';' Noi',,"'" '\"'~r,"''\ ,- ""*"'" "."",,~"I.,~t<i.l.\..Il,j;,J

~tf; Bankfull WIDTH (Wbu)1,,3, f),D Feet ~tl,:
I~ WIDTII ofth' rueom ,bon,d," b""'full ,tog, ,Iml;o";,, rim, ",Hoo. f~

~~; ~ca-n ~'iYri;(~:~)'.~' .nnOM ~~_".V,.-w~n .'~".~~"""~~'~"'~'-~~g~':--;~"~~:~"'.~:;~~

, I Mean DEPTH of the stream channel cross-section, at bankfull stage elevation, in a rime section. .~.;:.
t d A ,IUJ ) ~.-:
~(~~"W ~

~_ 4. .,'......_."'.......^".....oc'...n. ~"'.. ~ _.......... . "",..--- ....,.. ...-~'"-. - '~Y' ...-~ -"...-.,'. golf

~~! Bankfull Cross Scction Arca (AbU) !G, (Feet2 f~j
-~ AREA of the stream channel cross-section, at bankfull stage elevation, in a rime section. ;.~;.

iwi;;;i"I' ~E;i-;AAiio~:~d::;;- ,..____-..'_"'c..,-..-'.. -S,'.c;;-;.;;;.,,-ii1

l~;: Bankful1 WlDTH divided by bankfull mean DEPTII, in a rime section. ;',:::'
t.:{ >;r,~'

, ...-......,_--' ~~....,..~,.,.~__ ~...,....~.. ..,~.~""'A~...._',......~._....".,.~.._.,.... .;_.."....~..".~..," ,.,c. ",., .-.-. . 'A."....'" "-'.' ~......:;;.f.:~

~W~ Maximum DEPTH (dmbu) 'I.J - J.7 Feet:y::'
l!f~'~ Maximum depth of the bankfull channel cross-section, or distance between the bankfull stage and ';r~~
~J thalweg elevations, in a rime section.~~':?

:..;.;,~:"'A _ \.,.......~_.;,....,_~,,~......;<;3'.. ~}I_""'~~..:.rc-'_.__..... -". ,'>11.'. ~..:~' .,~ r-.~H "~,,,'-_".-.'_~_~"','''-.'''_~ ,,:;..-. ~ ,~\.~.:';-:--.-""'._ ._....~-T_ i' ..' ."':;...........{.. ,~.- ~......_.J...11.~..... ':; .:'""Oll 'l'1k'.l_r"-..;.~..x T.\.<..~-.....,.............,.- ,""'-'.,'~"~" "'''>'~1:?'.~~.

\~;~j WIDTH of Flood-Pronc Arca (W fpa) '/ /00 Feet .:.;,;....~.__}
oJ/vi Twice maximum DEPTH, or (2 x dmbu) = the stage/elevation at which flood-prone area WIDTH is ,t ~
;iZl" detennined in a rime section. ::i.;:P

........_...w""......"",_.~.....~".;.<..-" ~_.,.~_..,.."_'4~ ..,,~.............. ,,",' .. ..,......"..""'........ ......~~~.,-~.......,...._.,... _...,."..~ ,..,.....'''''~,.~..'''''.,......'';....,~~

:~~i Entrc.nchmcnt Ratio (ER) . . . :> J 0 FVFt,.,\...
i~;~ The ratio offload-prone area WIDTH divided by bankfull channel WIDTH. (Wrp/WbU) (nme :;::.'

-I{-.i~, section) '.','~. .;;~:'.',;.',~,i:
4~T......~_.~",-;;fE...l;~_o;-' ~~;I-.'_ -:f~--~, -:P'~'>t."" '~~J>',"'k.''''':,,~.o,..,~.,-.:,..,_,..,'t~i.,~;(l~~J!_ ~\,I).-~,;"'''''.~p>, .~............~.,....._-r-'-"'_(..."'_;,"'-,'_"'~._''''''~;-;~'l,;",,''! ,-.+-..;,:,+..,,- ...T"....' ''''--. - ,-~
'l)iJ

r!] ~:';;,~e::.~::;~:~d<::~:~~:, ~~~~:I~' of ,bon,,, mol";", "' =>pled fwm th, 10. I mm ",,,,,,,,->,,~,-:,:.,,:~,:,~:',',,",~,~,,,,,,~,".,.,~',-}':~'."..:..':""".'.
,it~\' channel surface, between the bankfull stage and thalweg elevations. . ~',
..,.~_..~:
~~ <.~~ ~M ,..,.." '"' ......".... ."........~ ......." -..... ~... "~~""",~",,,,,,~~,,,~,,,,-,,,,,,-,,..,,,,,~~-,...,.,,.".-.""

~$: Water Surfacc SLOPE (S) . tJ 0 ,," FUFt >:;~'
~f{t Channel slope = "rise over run" for a reach approximately 20 - 30 bankfull channel widths in length: O:.l 'r:i~.
t~! with the "rime to rime" water surface slope representing the gradient at bankfull stage. ,~::;

~~_"""\J~~.~' ~'IWt""'~-""I',o.;_\'t'>"""""""'."i"_'''''''''~~#'''''''''''..-'''\"'''''''''.~''''';oo...,''~~'':'''''''''-_''''''''_.oJ--_~Tr.-+f$.;>.' ~... 't.'.'l~-I!"'\J"lI~ /;>":1l',1"''''~~'W".' ..........-..... ..'-'l;,~?,r,:,

~~} Channcl SINUOSITY (K) J. l L/ i>ki
iff Sinuosity is an index of channel pattern, determined from a ratio of stream length divided by valley :~:~;%
hi:l~:' length (SUVL); or estimated from a ratio of valley slope divided by channel slope (Vst S). . ;~,i';j:
~. .;t..... :t~.'-'.;r:...,..J.\l" e~.. ~.~.~....W.h;>.i.(.';\\';:l...>."I' . "':tf".''tu. ".~'.~.~.._~._~-' "J\<i... ......... ",. ;.,~. .<m""'",-"",,-- ,""''''','''' '"'.....'..'...
~~> .. -.'>. .. - ,,~~'~'. ~.,c''' . '.\ .~'u. t~_~~~( I ~f-r.<'''' ., 'F~~'f';;;;';':;'" .;;.;.;. -;'7 'O' ig,;
~;ii"";;'''fi"::;~.:;;:;m~;,.."t&Pi'Xi\_.'!:Lf:""_._lg~""",,,~,~;,~:;,::~~::::;'~=;"y,~!;'

I

I

I.

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Unnamed Tributary to Middle Creek Neuse River Basin Apex, NC

I li. cross section 9 thalwag 0 WS X BKF ): TOB . R-BKF + . . . . . . Linear (BKF) - - - . Linear (TOB)
102
,
b. b. ~: ~
): I
101 ,):
100 "XI
g ~-L- I I I
, I -.,..- _, I
c: . X " . . . .~..' I ~ i1;-~-
I ......... ..
.Q 99 I I I I .- .. .. .. ~ .. ..
co I I I
> I I I
OJ I I
W I I
,
98
97
, b.
b. b.
96
0 50 100 150 200 250
Channel Distance (ft)

170 a I tl

u,.{f\t t I

\Ii a't ~'L

y DtJ i~

-

-

-

-

Riffle #1

-

-

notes

northing eastlng distance elevation
(ft) (ft) (ft) (ft)

4961.085 8030.433
4984.87 8015.691
4990.288 6012.4
TOB/BKF 4991.831 8011.531
4992.17 8011.222
4992.422 8011.123
4993.861 8010.444
WS/GS 4994.464 8010.079
TW 4995.023 6009.617
REOW 4995.175 6009.456
BKF 4995.428 6009.351
TOB 4995.98 6008.69
4997.n4 8007.989
5005.323 6003.51
5038.797 7985.031

0.00
27.98
34.32
36.09
36.54
36.81
38.39
39.10
39.81
40.03
40.30
41.01
43.01
51.79
89.97

100.22
100.16
100.43
100.17
99.58
99.01
98.92
98.90
98.70
98.76
99.64
100.21
100.51
100.05
98.93

~bkt " L.~ t}'L
..
W"lLC -:. &.0 11,
d melt Y\ - l01~ SJ-,
,
WID '" 10,0
,

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

IL~\-i * 1

Cv~~'>' 5luJ''v~1\

B~~IL.h\l EleJ.

/
Reference Reach Riffle #1 /
101.00 /
100.50
- ---
, ./ -
g 100.00 " /
c
0 99.50
~ \ . /
.,
jjj 99.00
98.50 --....
98.00
34.00 35.00 36.00 37.00 38.00 39.00 40.00 41.00 42.00 43.00 44.00
WIdth Left to Right (ft)

Reference Reach Riffle #1

100.75
100.50
100.25
g 100.00
.2 99.75
~ 99.50
.,
jjj 99.25
99.00
98.75
98.50
0.00

A
.A /.............
......
..............
--.........
...............
--.........
~
.

70.00

90.00

100.00

80.00

10.00

20.00

30.00

40.00 50.00 60.00
WIdth Left to Right (ft)

-

-

-

-

RlffJe#2

-

-

notes

northing eastlng distance elevatJon
(ft) (ft) (ftJ (ftJ

4976.432 7934
4993.821 7956.189
5001.402 7965.759
5004.392 7969.092
TOB/BKF 5004.874 7969.78
5005.202 7970
LEOW 5005.246 7970.181
5005.556 7970.6n
5008.475 7971.679
5007.048 7972.444
TW 5007.3 7972.93
5007.852 7973.658
BKF 5007.981 7974.045
TOB 5008.686 7974.976
5014.096 7980.997
5019.503 7987.758
5046.791 8023.11

0.00
28.19
40.40
44.87
45.71
46.08
46.25
46.83
48.19
49.15
49.68
50.60
50.98
52.15
60.22
68.88
113.54

~ b\Lt ~ &)~ tft
lJb\t C ~ 1. ~ I}.
d mDM') --;. 0/1 ft
wiD - g,1.
,

98.81317
98.98912
99.67159
99.81291
99.55079
99.00547
98.50505
98.50169
98.61495
98.57614
98.48506
98.53134
99.55909
99.81074
99.50758
99.28529
101.2942

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

\ll g \.t Jtrz.

[\lO~~" S PL..h'OIl\

~UllL.kfU \l 1d x:! V .

/
Reference Reach Riffle #2 /
101.50
101.00 /
100.50
g /
c 100.00
0
., ---- ----
~ 99.50
., "\ /
W
99.00 \ J
98.50 ~
98.00
44.00 45.00 46.00 47.00 48.00 49.00 50.00 51.00 52.00 53.00 54.00
Width Len to Right (n)

Reference Reach Riffle #2

101.5
101

~ 100.5
!:.
g 100
~ 99.5
W 99

98.5

98
0.00

60.00
Width Len to Right (n)

80.00

100.00

120.00

20.00

40.00

-

-

Pool #1

notes

TOB

BKF
LEOW
TW

REOW
BKF

-

-

-

-

northing east/ng distance e/evat/on
(ft) (ft) (ft) (ft)

4967.001 8035.296
4975.132 8038.449
4981.564 8040.754
4983.258 8041.323
4983.65 8041.528
4983.798 8041.641
4983.938 8041.505
4985.035 8042.293
4985.933 8042.458
4987.231 8043.121
4988.09 8043.632
4988.957 8044.178
4988.922 8044.392
4989.865 8044.316
4991.346 8044.953
4998.955 8047.987
5018.381 8055.301
5043.676 8065.198
4924.421 8016.287

0.00
8.72
15.54
17.33
17.77
17.95
18.03
19.34
20.23
21.69
22.67
23.68
23.63
24.48
26.09
34.28
55.03
82.19
211.08

100.16
100.69
100.94
100.44
100.18
99.82
97.48
97.03
97.17
97.70
98.18
98.92
99.88
100.41
100.74
100.68
100.38
103.50
99.78

~ '\ r 1<6,1 JJ:
D L1-- ('au 1-:'

W b't~ ~I)\l) -, g, j Ll.

d ., 'L J 1J .
Tr\ ut'} P.oo'

l -: ~,1 U.
Nil ~. ?oo'

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Vvn)

~1

Lvo~l;, '" SPc.- ~CVl

J2J k~LtI" fJi~

/ ~II.
Reference Reach Pool #1 I
101.00
100.50 ~ --
~ ~
100.00 ~ i
€ 99.50 \
c: 99.00 ./
0
""
OJ 98.50
> ../
'"
ijj 98.00
~
97.50 --- ---
97.00
96.50
16.00 17.00 18.00 19.00 20.00 21.00 22.00 23.00 24.00 25.00 28.00
Width Left to Right (n)

Reference Reach Pool #1

104.00

103.00

102.00
€ 101.00
c:
o
~
'"
iii

100.00
99.00
98.00
97.00
96.00
0.00

50.00

100.00
Width Left to Right (n)

150.00

200.00

-

-

-

-

Pool #2

-

-

notes

northing easting distance elevation
(ft) (ft) (ft) (ft)

4936.892 7978.578
4964.013 7987.544
4972.343 7990.195
TOB 4977.587 7991.938
BKF 4978.629 7992.528
4979.285 7992.706
4979.756 7992.723
4980.738 7992.932
4981.656 7993.513
4983.247 7993.939
4984.266 7994.208
4985.025 7994.52
4985.518 7994.637
4985.597 7994.793
BKF 4986.604 7995.171
TOB 4988.706 7995.888
4995.173 7997.998
5011.43 8002.96
5022.337 8006.725
5051.695 8014.655

A bkC VtlO \ -:.

U hu! eu,,\ -:.

aM" II.It } ":.
f(DP

d
rn",'I. POD \

0.00
28.56
37.30
42.83
44.01
44.68
45.14
46.13
47.19
48.83
49.88
50.70
51.21
51.33
52.41
54.63
61.43
78.42
89.96
120.31

99.40028
99.87299
1 00.2048
1 00.2046
99.7986
99.19211
97.39077
96.70883
96.97714
97.65997
97.95236
98.20321
98.25792
99.51598
99.93916
100.2317
100.1231
99.93
99.69
101.03

\ g I q III

1 (J. 4 tt.

\. B ~t

~.~ .cl,

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

~ 00 \ lJ 1

C \J o'->~ - Sl f., ..}; ~tI\

tMnkt.11 ~)~.

/
Reference Reach Pool #2 /
100.5 ,
100 -'
-..... ~ -- ----
99.5 ~
g 99
c: \
0 98.5
"" \ ~
~ ~
'" 98 -~
Uj .-.. ~
97.5
............. ~ -
97 ........ -
96.5 ....-
43.00 44.00 45.00 46.00 47.00 48.00 49.00 50.00 51.00 52.00 53.00
Width lell to Right (II)

Reference Reach Pool #2

101.5
101
100.5
100
g 99.5
g 99
~ 98.5
m 98
97.5
97
96.5
96
0.00

--
...... ... -- ..--
1
"
.,
J
Ii

40.00 60.00 80.00

Width from River lell to Right (II)

100.00

120.00

20.00

-------------------

Tl.e.-k'J ~II\Ll 12i' II, h S Vi bs1v tt+t

Reference Reach I Hints
Stream: Unnamed Tributary to Middle Creek
Watershed: Neuse River Basin
Location: Apex, NC
Latitude: -
Longitude: -
County: Wake County
Date: July 1, 2004
Observers: EGT,PKS,ED
Channel Type: E Channel
Drainage Area (sq mi): 0.143
Channel Materials
total Riffle #1 Pool #1 Riffle #2 Pool #2
D16 #N/A 0.125 #N/A 0.157 0.747 -
D35 5.35 1.41 6.56 1.23 5.62 -
D50 10.1 3.8 7.9 3.3 8.4 -
D84 25 17 18 18 29 -
D95 36 30 23 29 39 -
Largest of Bar Sample
% SilVClay 18% 11% 16% 10% 4% -
% Sand 10% 28% 3% 32% 18% -
% Gravel 71% 61% 81% 58% 78% -
% Cobble 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% -
% Boulder 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% -
% Bedrock 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%

t
1L { ~ v { s-t~ \ "t\J l Y l \ \, \ 1
(0 \J ~ ~ J V!;O ~ ) o. ,
CoVfA\j{ \ S", bst,,~~

"'ww'\

~
~~"^uJ'j t 4\,Je

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
12 ~ ~ \-t ~I 171' h~}l CD~w1 +
Riffle #1
Material Size Range (mm) Count Unnamed Tributary to Middle Creek
silt/cia 0 0.062 11 # Neuse River Basin
very fine sand 0.062 0.13 5 # ex, NC
fine sand 0.13 0.25 5 # Note:
medium sand 0.25 0.5 6 #
coarse sand 0.5 1 4 # Riffle Pebble Count, Unnamed Tributary to Middle Creek
ve coarse sand 1 2 8 # 100% TTTTT
very fine gravel 2 4 12 # , I IIIII , I 11111 , I IIIII 1 I 11111 , I I II
90%
fine gravel 4 6 3 # IIIII II1II IIIII IIIII , "
80% I III' 1'111 I II II IIIII , II
fine gravel 6 8 6 # IIIII IIIII IIIII IIIII , "
c: 1 IIII IIIII IIII1 IIIII '"
medium gravel 8 11 12 # ro 70%
medium gravel 11 16 11 # r= , I IIIII , I I II II , , IIIII , I I II II I I I II
60%
coarse gravel 16 22 6 # Cii IIIII IIIII IIII IIIII , "
c: 11111 IIIII IIII IIIII I III
coarse gravel 22 32 7 # u: 50%
'E I I I I I II , I , , 11111 , I I 1111 , I I III
very coarse gravel 32 45 3 # 40%
ravel 45 64 1 # ~ , I IIIII , , I1III , I IIIII , 11111
ve coarse 30%
(I) 11111 IIIII I III
small cobble 64 90 # c.. IIIII 11111 I III
medium cobble 90 128 # 20%
I I IIIII I I I I I II 1 I I III
large cobble 128 180 # 10% ., IIIII
lar e cobble 180 256 # :.: '.'111 . II1II I I III
ve 0% ' 11111 , ,... I , III I III
small boulde 256 362 #
small boulde 362 512 # 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
medium boulde 512 1024 # Particle Size (mm) I---Cumulative Percent . Percent Item I
large boulde 1024 2048 #
ve lar e boulde 2048 4096 #
bedrock # D16 D95 silt/cia bedrock
Total Particle Count: 100 0.125 30 11% 0%

l'Dv ..v~J

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

? 00 \

.t\

-

-

-

-

-

V t \J b}~

-

-

-

-

-

COlA~ ~

Pool #1
Matenal ::SIze Kange (mm) Count Unnamed Tnbutary to Middle CreeK
silUclav 0 0.062 15 # Neuse River Basin
very fine sand 0.062 0.13 0 # Aoex, NC
fine sand 0.13 0.25 2 # Note:
medium sand 0.25 0.5 0 #
coarse sand 0.5 1 0 # Pool Pebble Count, Unnamed Tributary to Middle Creek
very coarse sand 1 2 1 # 100% -
, '" I I I TO I fr"7 - , TT~
very fine gravel 2 4 4 # I , III1I1 I , I IIIII , , , IIII1 I IIIII , , IIIIII , I 111111
90%
fine gravel 4 6 4 # , , , II1II , , I I ~ I I I , , , IIIII f. , I 11111 , , I IIIII , I I I I I i ~ I
80% ' "
fine gravel 6 8 21 # c: , I , 11111 I I , IIIII , , I IIIII ,.: , , , IIII I I , III1I , I , " ,,'!
<0 70% I , I IIIII I I I 11111 , I , IIIII I , , IIII I I , IIIII I I , I I lid
medium gravel 8 11 5 # t=. , I , IIIII I , , IIIII , I I I1III / I , , I III1 , I , IIII1 I I , :: :::1
medium gravel 11 16 19 # I , IIIIII , , , 1 IIII , , I IIIII I , , I IIII , , , , IIII I I ,
Q; 60% .- ..I , . , 1,;;1
coarse gravel 16 22 17 # c: , , I IIII1 , I I IIIII , , , lll~ , I I IIIII I , I IIIII , I , ,
u: 50% 11111
coarse gravel 22 32 5 # I , 1 IIIII , I I III1I , , , I I f~ I , , I I till , , I I I I " I , , I
'E ' '"
very coarse gravel 32 45 # fl 40% , , I 11111 , , , , III1 , I , I ~I' , I I I III' , , I IIIII I , , , I1II
very coarse oravel 64 # 30% , I I I1III , , I , IIII , , I I I II , , I IIIII I I I IIIII , I I , IIII
45 Q; , I , 11111 , I , , IIII I ~~II , I , III1I I , , IIIII , , I 11111
small cobble 64 90 # a.. I I I IIIII I , , , IIII I , , ... ....' , , IIIII I , , IIIII , I , IIIII
20% ~, "
medium cobble 90 128 # , I , ,'lI"fTl -- , , I IIIII , I I IIIII I IIIII , , , , III1 , I I IIIII
large cobble 128 180 # 10% , .~.:" . .' , , , , , IIII
~ I I IIIII '....' 1 IIIII 1 , IIIII , , 11111
very larqe cobble 180 256 # 0% .
small boulder 256 362 # 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
small boulder 362 512 # Particle Size (mm)
medium boulder 512 1024 # I _ Cumulative Percent I
.... C.o,,..nnt Un...".,
large boulder 1024 2048 #
very larqe boulder 2048 4096 # Size percent less than (mm) Percent by substrate tvpe
bedrock # 016 I 035 050 I 084 I 095 silUclav I sand I oravel I cobble boulder I bedrock
Total Particle Count: 93 #N/A I 6.56 I 7.9 I 18 T 23 16% I 3% I 81% I 0% 0% I 0%

\

Use ~ Cov "''' .d

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

fL -l .fh i-

~1

I7i-Lbli

[JUVl 1

Riffle #2
Material Size Range (mm) Count Unnamed Tributary to Middle Creek
silt/clav 0 0.062 10 # Neuse River Basin
very fine sand 0.062 0.13 4 # Aoex. NC
fine sand 0.13 0.25 6 # Note:
medium sand 0.25 0.5 7 #
coarse sand 0.5 1 5 # Run Pebble Count, Unnamed Tributary to Middle Creek
very coarse sand 1 2 10 #
very fine gravel 2 4 11 # 100% T I I I I III I ITr I~;IIII "
I 1 IIIIII , I I II1II , , IIIIII 1 , , IIIII , , I I I III
fine gravel 4 6 4 # 90% /1
fine gravel 6 8 3 # , , I I I I II , , IIIIII , , I I 1111 I I 1111 1 , , IIIII , I I IIIII
80%
medium gravel 8 11 12 # c , , I IIIII , , I I I III , , I IIIII r/ , , I IIIII I I , IIIII , I , IIIII
co 70%
medium gravel 11 16 9 # .c , I II~Y , , 111111 , , , IIIII , , I IIIII
I- , , I ~ I I I I , , I IIIII
60% , ,
coarse gravel 16 22 7 # Q; , , I IIIII 1 , I IIIII , I~II , , I I I I II , , I IIIII , 1 IIIIII
22 32 9 # c 50% . ., , . , ... , '" , " " , , '"
coarse gravel u:: , , , IIIII , , IIIIII -~111111 , , , I1III I 1 I IIIII , , I IIIII
very coarse gravel 32 45 2 # 'E 40% , , I 11111 , , I I I " I I I I till , I , 11111 , , I 1 IIII I I , II1II
8 , , , IIIII , I IIIIII /' , I IIIII I I , IIIII , 1 , II1II , , , IIIII
very coarse Qravel 45 64 1 # 30% , , , IIIII , , IIIII , , I I "II 1 , I IIIII , , , IIIII , , , IIIII
Q; , I I IIIII 1~11 I , I I 1111 , 1 , IIIII I , , IIIII , , , IIIII
small cobble 64 90 # c.. 20% , , I IIIII I IIIII , , I IIIII , , , IIIII , , I I 1111 , , , IIIII
medium cobble 90 128 # , : i::l ~'" '" l , J..:' :::. , I I III I I I " "
10% , , I I I 11111 , , I IIIII I , I , I III , , I I 1111
large cobble 128 180 # , ,+, ''':II~ , :.:.. "'~;""'6'~1I
, , , , IIII + , , , , , IIIII I , I IIIII
very larQe cobble 180 256 # 0%
small boulde 256 362 # 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
small boulde 362 512 #
medium boulde 512 1024 # Particle Size (mm) I---cumulative Percent + Percent Iteml
large boulde 1024 2048 #
very lar~e boulde 2048 4096 # Size percent less than-iinm) Percent bv substrate type
bedrock # 016 I 035 I 050 I 084 I 095 silt/clav I sand I ~ravel I cobble I boulder I bedrock
Total Particle Count: 100 0.157 I 1.23 I 3.3 I 18 I 29 10% I 32% I 58% I 0% I 0% I 0%
l
\

VGu -=- ~\JIA-J~ \

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

\700\

!1'L

\I ~~bl { [DU~-t

Pool #2
Material Size Range (mm) Count Unnamed Tributary to Middle Creek
silUclav 0 0.062 4 # Neuse River Basin
very fine sand 0.062 0.13 3 # IAoex, NC
fine sand 0.13 0.25 5 # Note:
medium sand 0.25 0.5 2 #
coarse sand 0.5 1 4 # Glide Pebble Count, Unnamed Tributary to Middle Creek
very coarse sand 1 2 4 # 100% , '" , 1'-: IIII
very fine gravel 2 4 7 # , I I IIIII , , I I 1111 , I , 11111 I , , , 11111 I , , IIIII
90%
fine gravel 4 6 8 # , , , IIIII , , I IIIII I , , IIIII , 1'11111 , I , IIIII , , , IIIII
80% I , , IIIII I I , I I III , , I I I tll , I I I I I II , , I IIIII , , , IIIII
fine gravel 6 8 13 # I , , IIIII , , , 11111 , , , IIIII .}l: I IIIII , , , IIIII , , I IIIII
<: , , , IIIII , , , IIIII , , , IIIII I IIIII , , , IIIII , , , IIIII
medium gravel 8 11 7 # ~70% j'
medium gravel 11 16 13 # , , , IIIII I , I 11111 , , I IIIII , , , IIII , I , IIIII , , I 11111
coarse gravel 16 22 6 # Q; 60% , , , , IIII , , I , IIII , , , IIIII ., I I , , IIII , , , , IIII , I , IIIII
~50% , , , , IIII , , I , III1 I , , , " , I , , IIII , I , , IIII I , , IIIII
coarse gravel 22 32 14 # I I , , IIII , , , I IIII I , , I ~r:: , I , I IIII I I , , 1111 I , , IIIII
g40% , , , , IIII , , , , III1 I , I I I II , I , , 1111 , , , , 1III , , , IIIII
very coarse gravel 32 45 12 # I~;II -.-
very coarse oravel 45 64 # 0 I , " 1111 , I I IIIII , , , , I IIIII , , I 11111 I , I IIIII
Qj 30% . . ,
small cobble 64 90 # a. , , , I IIII , , I II1II ~11111 , , I I rill , , , I IIII , , , , IIII
20% , , , , III1 , , I I I III I I I I III , , I IIIII I , , , I III I I I , IIII
medium cobble 90 128 # , , , , IIII I~ , , I IIIII , , I IIIII I , , , IIII , , , , IIII
10% , , , , 1111 , --.L " , , , , , "+' .' . '.' "" , , , , IIII I I I , IIII
large cobble 128 180 # -r ,+;~~"~ ..
very laree cobble 180 256 # , I , '........ '.' '.' "\ . , , , 1111 , , , IIIII ~ I ~ ~ I ~ ~ I
small boulder 0% ~ .""
256 362 # 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
small boulder 362 512 #
I_Cumulative Percent Percent Item I
medium boulder 512 1024 # Particle Size (mm) .
large boulder 1024 2048 #
very laree boulder 2048 4096 # Size percent less than (mm) Percent bv substrate tvoe
bedrock # 016 I 035 I 050 I 084 I 095 silUclav I sand I oravel I cobble I boulder I bedrock
Total Particle Count: 102 - 0.747 I 5.62 I 8.4 I 29 I 39 4% I 18% I 78% I 0% I 0% I 0%

\

II 50 ':.

fov " \.I L ,

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

Design Summary Data Table

Reach Impaired Site Regional Curve Local Reference Proposed Restored
Reach Data (SRI) Reach Reach
Stream Name Unnamed Tributary to Various Piedmont Unnamed Tributary to Unnamed Tributary to
Wildeat Branch Streams Middle crcek Wildcat Branch
.' <, '.: ''.,->\:::,':~,,:'':''i~;:;::::.:','.;''.' :X;,:;".,_':,<<:;"'.'./t'" 1::;'.;,,':,:;,,:; -." :. . .I....'; ','.', . _~. ....... ' .', :,' J:...... " , ,
, -',:;.-,:, ',.' ._.~':. \:' '-, ._, - . .
Survey Crew Smith / Turner - Smith / Turner -
Survey Date 07/02 & 09/29/04 - 07/01/04 -
i " : .::::';:<\ '. -:::.:~',:'\'~l""""-" T L'. r .' '" .o.'t ::;,...,;,'.: "'::. z'." '!:";':.i'(';";\>;';';'~ " 1:;,ti: ,." ;~. " .. .,
Variables ; ,'c .\'.',':;":-" . .~,:..,,: ,'i'.>.; ;..': " ':;:<:""";:"',.' 'c. .
Stream Type E4/E5 - E4 E4
Drainage Arca (mi") 0.143 0.0143 0.142 0.143
Dramage Area (aeres) 91.5 91.5 90.9 91.5
Bankfull Width (Wbkf) 9.8 - 20.3 3.1 - 10.4 7.3 - 8.0 7.7
Bankfull Mean Depth (Dbk.1) 0.6 - 1.1 0.5 - 1.6 0.8 - 0.9 0.85
WidtllJDepth Ratio 9.2 - 36.4 3.5 -11.8 8.8 - 10.0 9
Max Rime Depth (Dmax) - - 1.3 - 1.7 1.5
Max Rime Depth Ratio (DmaxlDbkf) - - 1.4 - 2.1 1.7
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area (Abkf) 9.6 - 11.4 2.4 - 10.2 6.5 6.5
Bankfull mean velocity (Vbkf) (ft.lsce.) - - 3.1 3
Bankfull Discharge (Qbkf) (cfs) - 6.7 - 70 20 20
Width of Flood Prone Area (Wfpa) - - >100 >28
Entrenchment Ratio (Wfpa/Wbk.1) - - >10 >3.5
Min Meander Length (Lm) - - 29 30
Max Meander Length (Lm) - - 54 52
Min Meander Length Ratio (LmJ\Vbk.1) - - 3.9 4
Max Meander Length Ratio (LmJ\Vbkf) - - 6.8 6.8
~Iin Radius of Curvature (Rc) - - 7.3 8
Max Radius of Curvature (Rc) - - 16.8 20
Min Radius of Curvature Ratio (RcI\Vbkf) - - 1.0 I
Max Radius of Curvature Ratio (RcI\Vbk.1) - - 2.1 2.6
Min Belt Width (\Vbll) - - 15.2 15
Max Belt Width (\Vbll) - - 19.8 19
Min Meander Width Ratio (\Vblt/\Vbkf) - - 1.9 2
Max Meander Width Ratio (\Vblt/\Vbkf) - - 2.5 2.5
Sinuosity (stream length/valley length) 1.03 - 1.24 1.25
Valley Slope 0.0077 - 0.0174 0.0077
Avg. Stream WS Slope (bkf) 0.0075 - 0.0043 0.0045
Rime Slope/Ave Slope (SriIDSave) - - 9.2 1
Pool Slope (Spool) - - 0.0012 0.0012
Pool Depth (Dpool) - - 3.7 3.5
Pool Depth Ratio (DpooVDbk.1) - - 4.1 4.1
Pool Area (Apool) - - 18.9 18.8
Pool Area Ratio (ApooL'Abkf) - - 2.9 3.9
Pool Length (Lpool) - - 10 11
Pool Length Ratio (Lpoo1/\Vbk.1) - - 1.3 1.43
Pool Width (Wpool) - - 10.4 IOJ
PoollPool Spacing (p-p) - - 23.3 26
Pool Spacing Ratio (p-p/\Vbk.1) - - 3.1 3.4

~,I.~\5eG2V_7-ll"723e.O IIC",,_,",I OWG'o\l-4 V___ll-30-04.<lw<a

o
~ 6 ,I .. A' ... g't.. r~ '~~\nhrT '111,q~G~
t ~'~')~i1~~1..~~.~~.'I~\~~ ,,/~:'\~~r~~~~,~~ ,. -;jir~ery; l\~ j\l..~\. \ ~e,:) . (nIl,);:'
~\~. ~~... -'.\B):";...=-..:;: r~ ~~ r. I ~l.\. '......R ~ '--. .. _. I.. I~' ~ ii 1 ,{-
~ Mr"-, /'.~ ~;<'\.:l ,~~ ,./[ ,,- !~~ -~.. ~ ~.... !' \ -..L J~ . .\ ,.- a~- l/', .
);: ~-. .....IIL... ~ //'1 ?l~ I'Jk6~ -- .)~ J. .: -)...,' "..........~." ~ 111 7 ,"""
\Jl 'v ,~\ '\ -=&. ~....Hi (....u C/l,L:4. "'U';: ~~4il;~b. . ',>,; \, ~\ \. ~,' . Iii."" ,. r
~ ~ II i / ,I"ii\ ,~' b<~-" 6;'.\~( ~8'a1; Q~.-: ~~ 'f,!_tlA 't ,- '" \ ~~ . ~.j . ~: ~ ~"'N
I ~.~~;;~\ r:;' i ':71~: 't}l~~~~ ~"1 ~ ~~', ,1 ~ ' ,~-.- .." ~ 1 ~r ~ '~rz' ~': I .._
3 '~<~i~' "'::vl< ,;or ~l\: ~ ~ \ \ , I " ' I <>~ I .~ -~J; ...r
~ ) ~iJff~Z- I'~ .~.a!-'~ " ..1~~; J I \. \~l:..I!J1 _ ~o ,'- ~'t - -; ~ J \~ I
~ J~~"., ~~ "'''''''. .~ ._/~~~"" .l\..\''''~ ~ " ~.- '') ~..'. "'\\\\. ;rr~'~
~ .;1~ttSl(~-~~~~~~l~ ~ . ~_~!\__ -". ,. ~~.~)\\\

~ ~)1W~&I~(Jif~~ '~.. ~-. ~i.., 'I/:;~ ~~..~~~.*;
~ ;:J~ff!1!It7fl. ~~~~~ /..._ff;::~ n~ t(:C~~AN~E"lic , ~~ ~) fit...~ ..77.1 '" Il:iiil.~
& -,,,\)~ >~~~ ;~~cc '-;:'-C:'-or ~N !..) ~ 2 8\". (;; ~ . ~ r~ _ I, li h ).l.:a~:'-~ ~).~?)HV~~
II ~/l.~ ~-~f'~~~~~'""lf. "'~IIJ ',~ """\.,.:~__-::-. 'oi ....... ,It ~ 1///1. ~~. \ ~.. --.jl)jI~r~
~ '~~-")" ,. 1I)/2/-?!..1~" , ".... ~""It. 't(:l' ~ I ''''PI':C (< ,flirt
a ~\ \~~~~-"~F~'" ;;'tl~ ~-v. '1 ~>>; ,;~ ~ I, j { ~~h~ !f~~ I
;;:.'I~~:J . .T:);~(~~'J~1(/ \.,?~,~.~~ ~~.,~( ">lll' ~ I ."c, '" ~~)'~~Jl~r.~~
.~ -~~~;:::~2'~:~ ~..~-.. ~'~r,hf,) '~1 \\ Ii" )) r) " ,,,-~, r..-\ I:'; ~ \ \' ~
~Iq~W~~~~Y~\]!f~'~':~E/~;~~ ~\ ., ;jIJ ,>}:::-~~~,~~'W~~
;~.\ ~)~~~ \ ~ ch7~ ~A)j4 ~ ~~ L~,'lJ - o~ -:..:::<,'(, .f(f.flJRiI ~ ~ '"\ \~\'. ,~
~::{~~i,~~~ v;i)';r~~~..'\ ~~~'~/~')J~' l/:::~'f~'V~lllt{(~~'~.\~~
~.~~ '\~~~ ~~..~.oh.~rs~lb.. ~~ ~!))).lJ ',,1 I(~~(.'(~~./{J ;~.~.\
~~~!!&~;,~~~~\ L ':;<hUI. I < ]:~)~\~~~~~~I..~~;/ ~ --~
~1 ;~.~~." .'~.~~' 1 v q~(~~"'~~.D; -~Q '\ '~T ~ :..M~tr;~ 01;. I~Q.~.'. ~ '-.-~. ,,~~~. .,. ~1r.~;
~lli"1W~ !::..~~, "- \.,~ r""fI7v~ ,'d~:"~I~~.-:,~ \ii
,~2~~~~W ;~ "I~~ J, "~'~~/'My(cN...~r
;~H'is"""'; llll~\\"""'Iv0~JI~' ~"_V~//0~ /...._~.35 ..,....~ '~~\lfJ~~:)~\~l). "~.'~~ ~l
~ \~\ ~)) ~\~V\.) '\~q \.. r./// / I --:~ .., ~ . .:.t,rl:' r'...H (~'~Ll.!,\\\~'~ I~"~~\, .' ~
~~~\'" '<\;~Y7 '.11 . '. ''t;l({:'''~..-<? "./) ~/I~ . ~r.1f I\~~ ~.1 . ~r ); .)\1I~)i. r~~~. -I. /. \, (roe.
~~~ ~\~.-': \ \ ~ , u, 111' . . .mu/( '"'\. ~ ........ \\~
~i~~":'~~ Jl-, il( I};'/ ~LI :'~~;afl~'r>) v' -. '::'~:".\
.,)IJU ~)~
'::/""5~ \~ ~f~\ ~ )116 \.S~'''r __/0j~',~ "lI'.'~ \'fiJ: i \)~ v~~ t\'~ ~-=,~~~-=~~~ \
\.. "J ~ c!... 0l~ \ ,; J !.!L7.Ef.f~J.fd.st f-'-~_'::::": ). . .,' ",I'] V~ p~.p ,-jJ.a .~~.,> ~ \~Ii i" ~
I}..'), '-..::: __. . ~) ,1~ '~;JP7___ v~~ '"IJ.- ~~-lf~~J ,,:--":!,rc,-, ;'~~u..~~f;flli(~~t~)\C.,'~
'I~I',-/""" -"1\'r:~"ljli!.lfll. \f'~_ .

, .. "-
~ ....
.

2000 I 000 0 2000

NORTH

I'1!DJ=NO.,
7238.DI

..,nou~ 9trrTTmt, SITE VICINITY MAP
USGS 7.5 MIN. QUAD.
L3ke'Wheeler, NC rROJ.a, CONCEPTUAL STREAM
~"- 2000' RESTORATION PLAN
euom MARJAN, L TD.

PRQJfi:T MGR.I
PK5

ioU a ~ eoa.n......, J:A
11010 Ra>eIlIUdp RDOd . RaJd&b, Nord! CaroIiDa 27614
_(919)846-'900 . File (919)~ I
www.smlllC.oom I

I
L_l_

DRAWN:

EGT

II
I

I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I

500 Feet
I

SITE SOILS MAP
CONCEPTUAL STREAM
RESTORA TION PLAN
MARJ AN LTD.

fCT NO. I
7238.D1
PROJECT...... ,
PKS
llAA"'" ,
RSW

WAKE COUNTY
SSURGO MAPPING

PROJECT ,

SCAl.f ,

1" = 500'
"".mON, WAKE COUNTY, NC

a.IENT:

I

St-EET NO. 1
. Of' ...

Soll &; Bnvlronment.tl ConaulWlb, P A
11010 RMn Ridge Rd.. Rallijjl, HC 21614
(919) 84&-5900' [phone]
We PIge: www.SlndEC.com

I
1 j

o
z
~
3
8"
..,
I\)
~

VI
R
...
"'
"
s
a
"
3
(\
[
~
51
c:
C'
~
~
~
:l
Ul
U
~
l

I

I

~,I.~\5ec2\Jol>o7 -!lk\7231l.0 I \Concept..1 OWG'", ,.... V"""ty _5ooIs !l-3O-<l4.dw<j

"'-,
~ ...
" I

2000 I 000 0

2000

REFERENCE REACH

NORTH

pROJfi:T MGR.1
PKS

U5G5 7.5 MIN. QUAD.
Apex, NC

5HU1' ~,
REFERENCE REACH VICINITY MAP
~ROJ'CT, CONCEPTUAL 5TREAM
RE5TORA TION PLAN
MARJAN, L TD.

CUfNTr

8oI1a~~tPA
11010 Raveo IUdp RDod . \la1cIIl>. Nmb CoroIiDa 27614
PIloae: (1119) 1146-'900 . Fa: (1119) 1146-9467
www.5lDd1!C.com I

I I
1 1

PWJ~ NO.'
7238.DI

M"-" ~.a,

DRAWN:

~
I . - 2000'

II
II
I

II

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

SHEeT NO.:
40f 14

A

o
I

500 Feet
I

500
I

son & Bnvlronment.tl Consultant., IPA
11010 RawrRidgl Rd.. RlIlelg1, He 27614 I
(919) 846-6llOO '(919) a~7
Web Page: www.SnlEC.ccm I
I

J j

WAKE COUNTY
SSURGO MAPPING

EFERENCE REACH SOILS MAP
CONCEPTUAL STREAM
RESTORA TION PLAN
MARJ AN LTD.

SCAU: ,

1" = 500'

LOCATION, WAKE COUNTY, NC

r,

_______~____IRI_____

Flle:\\Sec2\Jobs7 -9k\7238.D 1 \Dr<lwln"ls\CONCEPT Dwq 9-29-04.dwq

- , '---'"
1
i
l
r
,
,
.)
)
)
.

().)
() 0
0 0
Z
-I U'l
0 Ul () ~O)
C 0 )>
?O r-
n1
Z
-I 0
n1 1/
~
)> ().)
r- 0
1/ Q
I\)
().)
0
0
f'roJat:

n
- I

. .

o
<
nl
70
)>
I
I
\J
70
o
\J
nl
~
\J
I
)>
Z

..

(fl/u(fl(;J~[\)
)>nlC~)>~
hiO/U-I7\O
(flO<:rnlo
. E:3~Q)oz
)>)>-00-1
-Iz(flC
OOZZC
z_o~/U
. (fl-l 0
Oz)>9:2~
~OOJ~)>
-10 -I
<.,c )>
~Oz 7\
)>/UO nl
Z )> Z
o 7'J .,
nl -< /U
. 0
o $:
/U

~

8
1;~~
}l~~
~~ l:'
00 P-
..,
cat/)
8
...
r+
:::r

,-z
O~O
00-1
)>/Unl
-I_(fl
o 9:2 ..
ZZ
$:f':
)>OJ
-00
-oc
/Uz
00
<)>
~~
0)>
OJZ
-j:0

~

')

if

'~

"

CONCEPTUAL 5TREAM
RESTORATION PLAN
WAKE CO., NC

f'roJect No.:
7238.D 1
t'r"OJ _or_
f'KS EGT

SoU &: Environmental Consultants, PA lnc.tlon:

11010 Raven Ridge Road . Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 . Phone: [phone] . Fax: [phone]heet Title:
www.SllIldEC.oom

Iient:

::;.ca)e:
I' = 300

MARJAN L TD.

",he

OVERALL PROPERTY PLAN

5 OF /4

________1__________

2 /
./"
~
~
3
1f
.,
I\)
8
~
Ul
2-
,.,.
rn
~
a
:J
3
~
[
(')
0
~
c:
IT
~
.U\
~
~
:J
c.S:l
:r "-
rr
U\
.,
~
[

rn
X
-)
(j)
-\

-

z
GJ

.........

(j) "~~" ~

-

-\
rn
U
I
):>
Z

\

'"'-,
~
'-....
~"
"

~

~

'''--
,
\,
(\1
\ ()~~)
t>,
'\

.........

~ I{~it.~: ~ "
\ ~,y~ <#

\ ""~~~~

\
'\,
\
\

l
O(JlQ
~ ~--; U)
Z --;
Z -
rn Z
r G)

~"- ~
" ,~
~, "
',' ~
~ "
,~ ~
~ "
, "'"
~'"

----

.
.

()
c
~
rnQ
~U)
........--;
11-
-L'Z
IIzJ>G)

"

~
~
b\
>?:9
,,<:J <)

.........

"-
"-

cpA>
00-0
cz-O
ZUl~O
o --; /'
>~?7
~

,

"-
"-

V":

"- \

"~\
~O)

........
........
........
........
........
........
........ ........
........ ........
........ ........
........
........
........

"\

\\ U1
'(:) 0
Q.
z\
-I (\)
~ U1
iU
z
rrlO
~
J>
r
II
~

........

~

........

/'

~Of71
lItJ~u

II
U1
Q

~~
~~
zZ
oG)
(Jl

coo>
00-0
cz-O
Z(Jl~
0--;><
> ;Al .
~B
o
Z

~~
~(Jl
>::!
~~
o
:r
>
Z
Z
rn
r

U1
o

FroJ~t:

PrOject No.:
7238.D I
rOJ. M'3I-.: rawn:
FKS EGT

~c.le:
I" - 50'

~r,eet 1\0.:

CONCEPTUAL STREAM
RESTORATION PLAN
WAKE CO., NC II~nt:
MARJAN LTD.
EXISTI NG SITE PLAN

G OF /4

SoU &: Environmental Consultants, PA Loc.t,on:
11010 Ra\'en Ridge Road . Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 . Phone: (919) 846-S900 . F~: [phone] ' . _
www.SandEC.coIll :>n~~, "t~:

__________________r-

ual DWG's\G-8 CONCEPT IO.5-04.dw

2
~
3
1f
..,
N
8
-l>-
(Jl
~
-I'>
n1
~
S
a
~
3
~
[
(")
0
a
c
cr
~
~
~
:J
~
::r
[t
~
~
~(j)
-
--1
n1
)>
n1
j\J
-
)>
,
--0
=r
0
--1
0
(i)
~ '"
--0 ~
=r )
~

,--

~

'"

~,

m......:....
--
',- .

\
(Jl :
0
l\) ~BrJ
(Jl
z
0 0 ~~ Ol(,)~ ~n~
II ~ 00
Cz:-O A1~
(Jl :r S;::j Z(j)E3 )>-
Q ZZ 0-\>< s:~
00 )> iU .
(j) ~~ \ (')
:r
)>
(Jl Z
ZI Z
0 I rn
r-

Project:

CONCEPTUAL STREAM I
RESTORATION PLAN
SoU &: Environmental Consultants, PA Lac.tlon: WAKE CO NC lent:
11010 Raven Ridge Road . Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 . Phone: [phone] . Fax: [phone] Sheet Title: . , MtRJAN I L TD.
www.SandEC.com SITE AERIAL PHOTOGRP!PH
I ,

_ ____J__

7 OF 14

NORTH
///-' SCALE J" = 50'
/

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

~ /;/
~~ L//
// t; /
/ ~/
/~
// Q / (0 0
O~ / 5:-~~v
#~~
/ Lr\ ~
~~~ / ~#
\
/'

;
--- --'
,-
,C;{
r,J6 '-
/' /'
/ \-
/
)

/

~

/
/

\

TIE ORED CHANNEL
TO EXIS
INVERT E

~
~
't
o
J.,
o

Ii:
I1J
U
Z
o
U
<0
J,
-;n
~
o

t:
~
"
9

o
<ri
<'l
C\J
r--
":fi
(j)
r-:
'"
.n
o
:J
C\J
U
\l
~

~ @-Jovember 2004 5011 ~ EnVIronmental Consultants. PA. All nghts reserved.

/

-..

/
/

50 25 0 50
CONTOUR INTERVAL = 2'

~
~
OJ

RESTORED
WETLANDS

RESTORED
STREAM CHANNEL

NEW FLOODPLAIN
BOUNDARY

~ LOG J-HOOK (UH)

~ ROCK J-HOOK
W~ WI STEP (RJHS)

\ ~ CROSS ROCK VANE
~ (CRV)

r CROSS ROCK VANE
~ WI STEP (CRVS)

~

::>
o~::>- 0 "t
": <0 ~ G l!)
~~, unci lL
t>r--ttn..:.. ~ 0
u ~ ~ \)
n~ ~CLX ~<O

gz
<(
-1
(L
lLJ
~
(f)
D
lLJ
(f)
o
(L
~
(L

z
2Z <(
<( <f'" iiZ
lU.....J <(
~(L :2
I- .:;
(f)z ~
-10)
<(-
~~
(L
lUO u
Ul- z
Z(f) =
OlU 0
U~~
~
~

t
0'
rt

;;
C .1
2 ~
~ \l
o L
..J 'n

~~
...
...00
fI} ~
...e
= ~
~ ~
:=~
:= ....
fI} ~
=~
O~
uj
"'"
.... . g
~ ...u
... :0 ~
= ~~
a ~ ~
= ~
o~
~~
~.
~!
~~
=~
o ~
~::

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

::>
- "2 Z -.:t
0 ~ - ~
..t- O -
':<C ~
~~ OJ 1: lL
f~ \I) 0
tit'-- .~~
\l
0' ~n.. Q)
ct "
BED BKF STRUCTlRE STRUCTURE BED BKF STRUCTlRE STRUCTlRE BED BKF STRl.CTillE STRl.CTlRE BED BKF STRl.CTlRE STRl.CTlRE .f)
STATON FACET INVERT TYPE STATION INVERT ElEVATION FACET INVERT TYPE STATION INVERT El.EVA TION FACET STATON El.EVA TON FACET
INVERT El.EVA TON INVERT TYPE NVERT NVERT TYPE
0.0 246.9 247.8 RIFFLE tl5.3 245.8 246.5 RIFFLE 334.5 2<1-42 245.7 Rl.N 2<1-4.3 WH !;()4.5 2<1-4.1 2<1-4.9 RFFLE lU
4.5 246.8 247.7 RIFFLE fl7.5 2458 246.4 RIFFLE 3-C3B 242.7 245.7 POOl 514.3 2<<D 2<1-4.9 RFFLE 0 -1
7.8 246.1 247.6 Rl.N 2462 CRV 1118 2<1-4.9 246.4 Rl.N 245.0 WH 352D 2<1-48 2456 RIFFLE 5tl9 2434 2<<9 Rl.N 243.5 WH :J IL
9.9 245.9 247.6 STEP POOl 112.1 243.3 ~.3 POOl 354.5 2<1-4.7 2458 RIFFLE 5272 2418 2<1-4.11 POOL Z ~
n4 246.1 247.6 Rl.N 2462 STEP '!l9] 245.5 246.3 RIFFLE 373.11 2<1-4.0 245.5 Rl.N 2<1-4.1 CRV 532.5 2<1-4D 2<1-4.11 RFFLE 2Z <(
'5.6 2<1-4.5 247.5 POOL 2no 2454 2<46.3 RIFFLE 38-1.3 242.5 2455 POOL 5396 243.9 2<1-4.11 RFFLE L5::; 02 (L
292 245.7 2472 Rl.N 245.8 RJHS 214.7 2<1-4.7 2<462 Rl.N 2<1-4.8 WH 3919 2<<.6 245.4 RIFFLE 5439 243.3 2<1-4.11 Rl.N 243.4 CRV <( -1
313 245.5 2472 STEP POOL =.9 2432 2<462 POOL 4039 2<1-4.5 245.4 RIFFLE 553D 2417 2<1-4.7 POOL ~(L 2 <(
33.1 2456 247.1 Rl.N 245.7 STEP 229.4 245.3 2462 RIFFLE 406.1 243.9 245.4 Rl.N 2<1-4D WH 557.9 243.11 2<1-4.7 RFFLE l- Z
U)z c
37.9 2<1-4.0 247.0 POOL 240.7 245.3 2<46.1 RFFLE 4'5.4 242.3 245.3 POOL 567.9 2438 2<1-4B RFFLE \l 0
45.4 248.1 247.0 RIFFLE 2442 244.5 24&.1 Rl.N 244.7 UH oC214 244.5 245.3 RIFFLE 5743 243.1 2446 R1.J'l 2432 CRV -10 L ::J
2<46.1 POOL <(-
58.1 246.1 246.9 RIFFLE 252.0 243.1 4302 2<1-4.4 245.3 RIFFLE 58-1.1 2418 2<1-4B POOL ~~ l-
662 2454 2<46.9 Rl.N 245.5 WH 257.9 2452 2<46.0 RIFFLE 4333 2438 2453 Rl.N 2439 WH 588.4 243.7 2<1-4.8 RFFLE
75.5 2439 2<46.9 POOL 266.5 2452 2<46.0 RFFLE 440.5 2422 2452 POOL 595.8 243.8 2<<.4 RFFLE (.9
82.0 246.0 246.8 RFFLE 2704 244.5 2<46.0 Rl.N 2<<.8 WH 446.9 2<1-4.3 2452 RFFLE 598.7 242B 2<1-4.3 Rl.N 242.9 RJHS (LO Z
94.7 245.9 246B RFFLE 279.0 242.9 245.9 POOL 459.9 2<1-4.3 245.1 RIFFLE 0002 242.8 2<<.3 SITP POOL lUl- U 0
UU) Z -1
00.3 245.3 246.8 Rl.N 245.4 WH 284.5 245.1 245.9 RIFFLE 4662 243.6 245.1 Rl.N 243.7 WH l302.1 242.8 2<1-4.3 RLff 242.9 STEP
tJ9.4 243.7 2<46.7 POOL 296.9 245.0 245.9 RIFFLE 4742 242.1 245.1 POOL 006.5 2412 2442 POOL ZlU 0 0
tV.l 2458 246.7 RIFFLE 3038 244.3 245.8 RLff 2<1-4.4 WH 478.9 2<1-42 2450 RIFFLE 614.8 242.5 2<1-4D RLff 242.8 CRV O~ U lU
129.1 2458 2465 RIFFLE 3n5 242.8 245.8 POOL _2 2<1-42 245.0 RIFFLE 511D 242.3 2<1-4D STEP POOl. U llJ U)
~ 0
009 245.1 2468 Rl.N 2452 CRV 311.5 2<1-49 245.8 RIFFLE 490.5 2435 2450 Rl.N 243.6 WH 8tlB 242.4 243.9 RLff 242.5 STEP ~
146] 243.5 246.5 POOL 329.8 2<1-4.9 245.7 RIFFLE 4972 242.0 245.0 POOL 6215 2409 243.9 POOl. (L
6242 243.0 2438 RIFFLE ~
ij
" ..
~ 0 >=
~ \l (L
e' " \l
0... .s 'S)
~ ....
260 ~
'"
-b
~
.. 00
~
f#) ~
.... e
= ~
C'S ~
.
250 .= ~
- = on
- -b
a.o .. '.. f#) ..,.
.- ::..0... ~ ,-- ---.. 00
= ~
. , -", .- .- i .- ~'" .2. ~ -~ ..~--..--.--", c _ '- -- '"
& - -
'. .- c5!> .- .- & - 0 e
, , , "'-I !R:- aR.,(
" " u
~ .' U "
240 0
~ ~ ~
"t ,....
0 C'S
6 ~u
<'l .... :o~
d, = ~ g
~ ~ ~]
~ a
Iu 230
0 I I I I I I I I I I I 1!
N =
- 0
d, 0 z
"' 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 650 ~ -:i
~ 'ii
~ ;2
0 ~
" PROFILE
::>
1\ "'S
~ ~ ~
t: 1 " 50'H, 1 " 10'V PROPOSED BAN KFU LL CRV CROSS ROCK VANE
0 SCALE: = - u
U - ~ 00
-0
] PROPOSED THALWEG RJH ROCK J-HOOK Pi!
t: - B
~ - =
" ~
9 ~ STRUCTURE LOCATION LJH - LOG J-HOOK 0 0
- - ~
0 tI)
cO
<'l
N
t'--
:Si.
(l)
r.:.
'" PROPOSED LONGfTU Df NAL PROFf LE 4
-"
0
::J
N
<J
"
~
~ @-.lovember 2004 5011 * EnVlronment.:J1 Consult.:Jnts. PAc All nghts reserved.
u:

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

~ ~
- ..:::; ~
0 ~ -
..I- 0
-,<0 ~ -, lL
0(1) :r::
z(\j f\2 0) ~o
tit--
" ~~ ~ 0
2' 2'0- " n -
IL J)
TYPICAL RIFFLE CROSS-SECTION z
0 0
~ I-
U
'-'ARIES 7.7' \ ARIES 2Z z lL.I
- <{ (f)
i5s nz I
<{ (f)
ELEVATION .. "'~A"'~ ~(L 2 (f)
'-' ~ .." U LI -J ,U1- 1- ~
(VARIES BY , (f)z L
I ---10 U
LOCATION) '-... I.~' VIA>< un '1M <(- .....J
I ~~ lL.I
I I Z
I I (La z
llJ~ U <(
U(f) :z I:
ZllJ U
0 BANKFULL CHANNEL WIDTH 7.7 FEET o~ 0 D
u
. U ~ lL.I
0 RIFFLE CROSS-SEcrION AREA G.5 SQUARE FEET (f)
~ 0
0-
0 RIFFLE MAX DEPTH 1.5 FEET ijO
~ C' ~~
0
0 RIFFLE MEAN DEPTH .85 FOOT 2' ] ~ 0-
IL cI)
~~
...~
TYPICAL POOL CROSS-SECTION :l~
d ~
~ ~
~ VARIES >>-oe: 10' ~ All( VARIES i~
CI} ~
~ . ." -, II I C.T^r'1= d~
'-' ~ Q ~
~ ELEVATION , UJ
~ '" I
-.t (V ARIES BY ""- / -:) !::I ~A ,v (; . ~
q
0 ......... / oJ...... 'VII , '-'I-' I ... :! U
(1) "- / d ~]
en LOCATION)
~ .......... / 9 ~ l
4: ............. It /
t:;
0
(\j
en Q~
<il
~ 0 BANKFULL CHANNEL WIDTH 10.3 FEET ~~
0 ~.
..
:> 0 POOL CROSS-SECTION AREA I 8.8 SQUARE FEET
t. ~l
s
c
0 0
u 0 POOL MAX DEPTH 3.5 FEET ~;f
<il
~
~ e POOL MEAN DEPTH 1.7 FEET =6
" Q ~
9
0 fI.):':
cO
(1)
(\j
t--
:si.
(l)
r:
on PROPOSED CHANNEL CROSS-SECTION 4
.l:>
0
;:l
(\j
u
"
~
~ o November 2004 5011 t El1Vlronmental COI15u!t3nt5. fA. All nght5 r=rved.
Il..

SOURCE: DAVE POSCE'i OF ',\"LO!.J.!iD HYDROLOGY, 2002
F[l/SED BY /SC:C. 2003

.llilIES;

,. lOG OR ROCK STEP IL6.Y BE USED WITH J-HOOK vmrs J.S SHOWN ON CROSS ROCK VmE
WITH STEP POOL DETNL mo J-HOOK WITH STEP POOl OETNl

::;;
D~::>' ~
..~~t; 0
~~, IW ~
~~ 1;>
~'- \2 ij~
e- ~ Q.., ~
Il..

'\t

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

lL
o

LOG J-HOOK DETAIL
NO srA..E

FLOW -

VAt ~E AC\'A

r~!,t

GRAVEl FILL

z
2Z <(
<( <f' ii2
lU -.J <(
~(L :2
\- v
(f)z ~
-10
<(-
~~
(L
lUO U
U \- ::z:
Z(f) :
OlU 0
U~~
~

~~~~~RJ)>-:':<::':' .
.ffiQEll.E

RIGHT BANK

GEOTEXTILE FABRiC

\/l,~~:.. t~~~,~

fWlKFULl STAGE

-

SCOUR POOL

LOG

STREAI~ CHAr~r;EL BED

GEOTEXTlLE FABRIC

moss SECTlON

LEFT BANK

.ELm

~
~
Il..

J-HOOK WITH STEP-POOL DETAIL
I<<l SCIU

~
"I:l
~
q
o
(1)
m
~
4:
t:;
D
N

A /~I~'!-Il
. 1/

SCOUR POOL

STREAM CHANNEL BED

PLAN

FLOW - \0l>~FOOTER
~~-:__...__ 00' ROCKS

~- - .-.:::---.

FOOTER ;- --' ~ 0 .__~~TEP
ROC K S ....../'
SCOUR
PROFILE

BANKFULL STAGE

..
..
o
.Q
- ':' ~
~ .... (j
... ;0 ~
d ~~
a ~ ~
d~
Q ~
~~
~.
~!

..
~f
B
=~
Q <:>
fI)~

m
-.;
~
D
..
:>
....
~
~
t:
o
~

t:
~
"
9

~ FOOTER
ROCK
~BA."KFULL~

am
(MAY BE RiGHT Ok Lt:.FT BN,K OFFSET)

POOL

1roIES;

,. lOG N?JI.S WAY BE USED roo moss VANES Ki SHOWN ON lOG VM! J-HOOK DErM.
2. LOG STEP NAY BE SU8STITUTEO roo ROCK, Nf) CEOTEXTU: filJ3RIC WU BE ATTIffiED TO LOG STEP Ki SHOWN ON LOG J-HOOK DErAIl
3. LOGS WAY BE SUBSTlTUltD roo VmE N?JI.S Ki SHOWN IN lOG VmE! J-HOQK DErM.

D
<0
(1)
N
l'-
:Ii:
(l)
r.:.

~ TYPICAL STRUCTURE DETAILS

~
~ CNovembcr 2004 5011 ~ ElMronment<l1 Con5ult<lnt5, fA. All nght5 re5erved.
IL.

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

CROSS ROCK VANE WITH STEP-POOL DETAIL
NO SCALE

RIGHT BANK

LEfT BANK

RIGHT BANK

LEfT BANK

200-300

STRENA CHANNEL BED

NOTES:

l '<.~~,/}c:

BANKFULL STAGE

FLO\'1-

yl'",\____.
_S\..'0?- . ..... .... ~-FO.OTER
~ ..____ ROCKS

.. -----

...~.....~SCOUR POOL

FOOTER ./
ROCKS---""""

PROFlLE

t

t

1. lOG ARMS MAY BE USED fOR CROSS VANES AS SHOWN ON lOG J-HOOK DETAIL
2. GEOTEXTlLE FABRIC WILL BE ATTACHED TO lOG STEP AS SHOWN ON lOG J-HOOK DETAIL

PlAN

PLAN

LIVE STAKE PLANTING DETAIL
PROFILE VIEW
(NOT TO SCALE)

COIR MATTING DETAIL
(NOT TO SCALE)

~
"'\l
"t
q
o
<<l
en
~
~
Ii:;
o
(\J
en
-.n
\')
lS

BANKfULL BENCH

BANKfULL BENCH

COIR MATIlNG

"
::>

ANGLE-CUT END

BASE FLOW

BASE FLOW
WATER ElEVATION

PROFILE VIEW

. UVE 5TAKES IN5TAllfD IN BANK
WITH DEAD-BLOW HAMMER
. 4/5 OF 5TAKE IN GROUND
. BUD5 ORIENTED UFWARD5
. 3' CENTERS (APPROX.)
. CUT EXP05ED END OF UVE 5TAKE
AFTER IN5TAllATION IF DAMAGED
DUE TO INSTAllATION
(I.e. darTl3ged bark. split ends. etc.)

. TRENCHED TOP OF MATTING TO A
DEPTH OF AT LEAST G", 5TAKE
OR 5TAPLE IN F'lACE. ~ BACKfILL
TO DE51GN GRADE
MINIMUM 12" ECO-5TAKES0
OR NOTCHED GRADE 5T AKE
IN5TAlLED ALONG TOE OF MATTING
(Intercept betw=n water surface and bank)

c
~
"
9

o
~
<<l
(\J
~
m
r.:.
'"
-"
o
:;J
(\J
~
~
..\i (;November 2004 5ot! * ErMronmental Consultants. PA. All nghts reserved.
\L.

<-r:."<): <':~-.

.~\~

12" ECO- 5TAKE 0

" ECO-5T ME 0
FRONT VIEW OR METAL 5TArlE
, . ECO-5TAK.Es00R G" 5TAPlE5
. MINIMUM 2 CENTERS ALONG BOTTOM IN5TALLED IN BANK fW5H WITH
. MINIMUM "OVERlAP AT JOINING COIR MATTING ABOVE BOTTOM
SECTIONS OF COIR MATTING ROW OF 12" 5TAKES
. ECO-STAKES0 OR 5TAPlE5 5PACED AT
MAXIMUM 3' CENTERS (APPROX.)

TYPICAL STRUCTURE <$ PLANTING DETAILS

;:;:
D~~ ~ "t
..~~::, 0
ci <<l "-l :c.: lL
:;(\J~ \0-00
~l'--::i\2u\O~
~ o-a..~<(~(\J
CL..... n -

D ~
~ <{
I-
LU
o
o
Z
I-
Z
5
D-
~

z
2z <(
<( oc::( ~
ll.J -.J <(
~(L 2
1- u
U)z~
-10
<(-
~~
{bo u
U 1- :z:
zlO ~
OlU 0
U~U
~
~

~
0'
<t

~
=>
I-
o
=>
~
?-
m
-1
<(
..0
tl-
8 ~ 0-
~ l~

~~
'"
..00
:l~
= :i
t'S':'
:::~
=Son
fI.)~
=~
O~
U~
.... . ~
t'S "'~.
"'::0
= ~ V1
e ~ ~
=~
O~
J=~
~.
~]
~f
fl
=>
o :
~~

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

::>
o~~ ~ ~
.-.o~0 0
0(1) IU I: lL
z(\J.' tfl 0
n":f~'3(j)
2' t<L~<( ('()
<L ~ Sl

EXISTING RESIDENTIAL
PROPERTIES

z
g 0
I-
U
u.J
U)
I
U)
U)
~
U
o
z
5
I-
u.J
;;:

EMBANKMENT SLOPE

z
2z ~
<( <f" il2
u.J -.J ~
~D- 2
I- ;;
u)z~
---10)
<(-
2~
fbo u
Ul- z
ZU) ~
ou.J 0
U~~
l.L ---1
~ (5
~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~
.9 ,})

~
~
'<t
o
.n

o

~~
.. ;l;
rn ~
....e
= :i
~ ~
.-=~
= '?
rn ~
= ~
o ~
u g
f
,...". . ~
~ ...tj
.... ;0 ~
fIII4 ~ ~
~n
= ~
o~
~~
~.
~J
~~
=~
o ~
fI'J;::

30' SANITARY
SEWER EASEMENT

WETLAND SURfACE
TO BE GRADED W1TI1
MICRO-TOPOGRAPHIC
VARIATION AS
DETERMINED BY
DESIGNER AT TIME OF
CONSTRUCTION

PROPOSED RESTORED
STREAM CHANNEL

NEW FLOODPAIN

t
D'
ri:

~
:.:{
Iu
o
(1)

CREATED WETLANDS.
EXCAVATE TO DEPTH OF
APPROX. 12'-18'.
BACKfiLL WITH EXISTING
SITE WETLAND SOILS

BANKFULL
\/IDTH

-
m
on
~
3;
o
~

"
"
to
o
~
"
~
'<
"
9

TYPICAL WETLAND CROSS-SECTION
(LOOKr NG DOWNSTREAM)
NOT TO SCALE

q
<<l
(1)
(\J
r--
:si
Q)
r:.
"
-8
:J
(\J
"
"
~
~ o-.lovember 2004 5011 ~ ErMronmental Consultants. fA. NI nghts reserved.
u..

/ //
/ A\
// //
// 1/ \
/ //
//
/ // ~ WETLAND TREES. SHRUBS. \
~ HERBACEOUS SPECIES
/ / / / TO BE PLANTED \1

/\
6)\

~f
/
/
/
/
~O~\) /
'01>--~Rol>--\) /

~
/

"

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

/
/

/ "/
// i;- /
/ ~~/
///:9 ~/

/ /hO
/ ~V/
/ .;f //
/

/

t:
~
'"
9

RIPARIAN BUFFER
PLANTING BOUNDARY

/

~
<l)
(Y)
(\J
l'-
-::i
(l)
r-.:.
on
-"
o
;:l
(\J
"
\l
~
~ <<:November 2004 5011 t ErMronmental Consultants. PA. All nghts reserved.
u...

'\

~

~
D
~
LSJ

RIPARIAN BUFFER
PLANTING BOUNDARY

SHRUBS PLANTED IN
SEWER EASEMENT

.l..

~~~
~~
(;fIR
~t(f
~if^
/ f!) rff
/ "-........ dj if)
<IS'
/ -:

WETLANDS
PLANTING

STREAM BANK
PLANTING

/

NOTE:

/ I) OPEN AREA5 WITHIN RIPARIAN
/ BUFFER PLANTING BOUNDARY
/ TO BE PLANTED WITH TREES,
/ 5HRUB5, AND HERBACEOU5
k.~ 5PEClE5.
/./
/ /.~~
/. / /
/./
//.~/ /
/
/

/
/

2) REFER TO DE51GN REPORT FOR
DETAILS ON PLANT 5PECIES AND
QUANTITIE5.

@

NORTH

5CALE I" = 50'

/
/

50

25

o

50

\ . - #j / //
PROPOSED STREAM BANK $ RIPARIAN BUFFER PLANTING PLAN

L
(; ~~ 0 "'t
.. cO ~0 U')
,g~LIU II 0
~l'-f\2i!:" "'t
[ e- Do- X

o 2
~ ~::]
-.::::::: z ~[L
"'::::::Z <( 2<..9
<(lLj <f' n2 <( 2
-:! <( CO-
~(L :2:2~
tnz~ <(::]
-.JO J ~[L
<(- i-o(
~~ U)lf:
l--~ DlL
(LO u.J:)
tj l-- ~ U) [[)
ZlD : 22
ottZ 8 o~
U lU 0(<(
~ [L[L
~ 0(

~
ci~
rt

\j
.. ~
c >=
Q .>
.... ~
~ C
--J ~J)
~~

.. ~

~~
= :i
~ ~
~~
= ".'
fI) :;
=~
o ~
ug
f
.... . ~
CIS ... (j
.... :0 ~
,... :::; ~
~n
= ~
o~
~~
~ ~
~ ~
~~
=~
o ~
m::

r NV
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
r North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources

() Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
August 26, 2005
DWQ # 20050040
Wake County
CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Marjan Limited
Attn: Mr. Victor E. Bell, III
Post Office Box 17274
Raleigh, NC 27619-7274
Subject Property: Hammond Street Road Widening Project, Raleigh, NC
Wildcat Branch [03-04-02, 27-34-7, C NSW]
NOTICE OF WITHDRAWL
Dear Mr. Bell:
On January 4, 2005, you requested a 401 Water Quality Certification from the Division of Water
Quality (DWQ) for your project. We wrote to you on January 18, 2005 discussing concerns that we
have regarding the design of the project and stating that it would be placed on hold for three weeks
giving you time to address DWQ's concerns. As of today, DWQ has not received a response to this
request. Therefore, your file is hereby considered withdrawn and will not be reviewed until DWQ's
earlier concerns are addressed. Once you have collected sufficient information to have a complete
application (please see our January 18, 2005 letter for the missing information), you will need to
reapply for DWQ approval. This includes submitting a complete application package with the
appropriate fee.
Please be aware that you have no authorization under Section 401 of the Clear Water Act for this
activity and any work done within waters of the state would be a violation of North Carolina General
Statuses and Administrative Code. Please call Mr. Ian McMillan at 919-715-4631 if you have any
questions or concerns.
Ir
'evi Permitting Unit
cc:
Raleigh DWQ Regional Office
Raleigh Corps of Engineers
Central Files
File Copy
Patrick Smith, S&EC, 11010 Raven Ridge Road, Raleigh, NC27614
Filename: 5:\2005 Correspondence\05-0040 Hammond St Widening (Wake) Withdrawl.doc
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Internet: http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/newetlands
N14 Carolina
Naturally
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled/l0% Post Consumer Paper
Sincerely,
v Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
v Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
` v Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
1. Article Addressed to:
Soil and Environmental Consultants
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh,. NC-276'14--,-
A. Signa re
Agent
X-? / z"-
f3. eceiv by ("fed Name)/ C. Date of Delivery
???? i G L. I? r7 ,
D. Is delivery address diffemrjt from ttem 11 11 Yes
If YES, enter delivery address below: ? No
3. Service Type
Certiflod-Nall ? Express Mail
? Regi ed ? Return Receipt for Merchandise
CO Insure ail ? C.O.D.
4. Restricted delivery? (Extra Fee) ? Yes
2. Article Number '-------
i-- 7 O O Lf: 11, 6 Q II [] D 2., 2?kj6 738q
-
PS Form 3811, February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE

• Sender: Please print your name, address, and ZIP+4 in this box •
NC DENR Division of Water Quality
401 Oversight/Express Unit
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604
First-Class Mail
Postage & Fees Paid
LISPS ,
Permit No. G-10
O
N
~ s4 EIP ti CHANNE CHANNEL 3
~ ?a.~'• c~N s 3s9rt9• E IR S 35'07'19• E 9.61' 5-12
8-1268 5 12 S 377732' E ~ S-,3 s or43'1o• N -12 S 3732'52' E 16.64' 5-13 -13 S 07'43'10' W 18.66' S-14
SITE 8-1298 S-14 S 0306'J5' Y -14 S 0306'35' W 23.33' 5-15
70 IPS 6-i~ S-15 S /0'15'46' N 8-1308 8-129A S-16 S 65'56'19' M -15 S 4095'48' W 14.95' 5-16 -16 S 6516'19' W 11.38' 5-17
40 5-17 N 6936'55' , -17 N 6958'55' W 8.41' S-18
8-1318 B-130A 5-16 S 79'49'3e' N 8-131A 5-19 S 6633'09' N -18 S 79'49'56* W 10.75' S-19 -19 S 8833'09' W 10.09' CRS
50 ~ ~ ~ CDR
'h,• B-1J28 ~ 8-132A 5-12
~
8-,338 B-1JJA WETLANDS AREA 3 ~ 2663 S-13
B_„~ 3,049 SQ. FT. sa ~ B-t34A
8-1368 B-,J58 B-1JS11 ~ CDR 5-14
WETLANDS AREA 3 dP s B-t378 a-,JeA CHANNEL 3
8-1398 8-130A S 07'01'22' W 10.50' 8-140A 19 5-15 5-18
~ 8-136A S 198J'J1' W iJ.23' B-139A si* B-137A 5 23'21'46' w 2233' 6-136A 5-17 5-16
~ 8-137A B-13eA S 22'56'33' W 36.00' 8-137A ~ ~ B- 3 A B-,3eA ~ 1 s S 2t 4526 W 23.76'
VICINI'T'Y MAP 8-,36A a-t34A S 2716'50' W 2273' 8-i35A 8-13JA S 1A'49'S2' W 20.62' 8-134A ~ 8-139A 8-132A S 22'59'00' W 26.15' 8-133A
B-1J1A S 203733' W 24.65' 8-132A
8-,4,8 B-14oA ANDS AREA Z B-13oA S 26'5693• W 14.77 8-131A S 39'49'34' E 8-,41A 8-129A S 2106'39' W 14.16' 8-,JOA
16.49' 8-1428 643 SQ. FT. 8-126A S 274746" W 19.67 8-129A
8-1438 8-142A 8-1268 S 5735'10' E 3.17 8-126A 8-143A 8-1298 N 4182'J9' E 18.73' 8-1268
WILDCAT BRANCH B_'"6 B-13oe N ae•43'3r E te.~' 6-1298 B 1458 B-i44A B-1318 N 2709'44' E 24.41' 8-1J08
TRAVERSE TABLE e-14e8 8-1328 N 21./6'is; E J7.64' 8-,3,8
B-14SA 8-1338 N 2334'51 E 29.00' 8-1328 8-1478 8-1348 N 2490'47' E 21.99' B-1J38 BRANCH
U10 N 2085'40' W 97.91' 8-1188 B-146A 8-1358 N 34'4063' E 26.95' B-1J4B Ui1 N 0313'02" E 6256' 8-1368 N J17987' E 29.88' B-1358 L138 N 70'3442' W 21.63'
L112 N 16'4746' E 10292' 8-,498 8-,50 B-,J76 N 4236'56' E 13.67 8-1368 L139 S 59'02'37' W 14.87' L140 N 77'09'43' W 53.18'
U13 N 24'43'4J' E 90.03' B-151 8-132 8-1398 N 29'49'25' E 24.2J' 8-1378 U14 N 3396'02' E ,40.16' B-1408 N 1091'44' W 25.31' B-1J98 L141 N 4/ 33'41' W 35.21'
1115 N 1e'40'3J' E 97.0.9' 8-1418 N 67'00'30' W 11.06' 8-1108 111e N 0016'J9' W 10.95' 8-1/0A S 60'26'23' W 9.02' 8-1418 L142 N 68'01'03' W 21.21'
~ry L117 N 27'21'36' E 77.40' 8-153 L1t6 N 09'36'16' E 54.41'
~ X119 N 24'00',0• E ~.eo' 6-'~ CHANNEL 2
L120 N 4101$6' E 44.43' Q L121 N 127712' E 79.16'
~q• U22 N 0012'27• W 14.2e' WETLANDS AREA 2 P~ 0 U23 N 0482'30' E 11292' ~ CENTEIRME 1flRJNE
Li24 N 13'42'55' W 46.OJ' 8_150 N 80'10'56' W 3.17 8-1498 • r OF BFIANCNES L125 N 1936'15 W 49.6J' 8-1498 N 468737' W 8.08' 8-,168 RSECTION !RANCHES
L126 N 0919'06' E 26.95' G' 0 L127 N 26'OJ'S1' E 4207 8-1168 S 668497' W 7.66' 8-1478
w ~ L128 N 0710'42' E 1J1.9e' 8-1478 N 168713' NI 6.96' 8-1168 T. CNANIRI
B-1 N ,614'J2' W 6.72' f U29 S 663716' E 56.95' 168 8-1466 U30 N 62'45'52' E 5223' 8-1168 N 2890'31' W 6.15' 8-1418 ~
U31 N 71'40'51' E 151.57 8-1448 N 4586'00' W 7.23' 8-1438 / U32 N 4J'04'41' E 56.05' B-143B N ,210'57' W 9.37 8-1428 CHANNEL 2 101,
~9'' L13J N 1086'24 E 75.31' 8-1428 N 1504'36' E 6.67 8-141A U31 N J634'SJ' E 90.56' ~ a
U3S N 274721' E 31.06' 8-141A S 6716'42' E 1207 8-142A 8-,50 S 5J'18'08' E 5.96' 8-151 8-142A S J28S'2r' [ 1.63' 8-1/3A
UJ6 N 4013'54' E 64.16' 6-143A S 15'16'31' [ 13.06' 6-t44A h151..,.;,31194'28' E 8.23' 8-162 UJ7 N J603'St' E 75.22' 8-144A S 5179'07' E 10.97 6-145A 6_162 S 58'4718' f 21.13' 6-153
8-116A S 2614'16' E 11.14' 8-146A 6-153 S 33'31'01' f 1.51' 8-154 CEWYUAJNE OF
8-146A S 0694'12' W 7.65' 8-150 8-1'~ S 6676'29' E 56.55' T-01ANNEl 6• w1DE sRAIICII
DID OF 36'
\ TIE LINE: / S 59'0500' W
N.C.D.O.T. EX. R/W
DRAM. MONUMENT \ ESMT. \
CHANNEL 1
`t~, V}, ego
PdNT dV R S 7713'41' E 7.,0' 8-156 8-120.1 ¦ 8-120.TT N 1413'45' E 13.8J' 8-120.2 B-120.14 8-i5e N 50'34'29' E 27.67 6-157 8-120.2 N 249J'41' E 17.66' 8-120.J
8-157 N 6282'36' E 25.36' 8-156 6-120.3 N 2e17'39' E 2J.0r 8-120.4 8-120.1 6.120.13 1Q Q• ~~10
8-156 N 6233'42' E 17.61' B-iS9 8-120.4 N 2675'06' E 16.90' 8-120,6 B-159 N 5603'56' E 1e.91' 8-160 8-120.e N 2e'39'26' E 20.37 8-120.7 04
8-160 N 5715'19' E 5.41' 8-161 6-120.7 N 3077'12' E J2.5r 8-120.8 8-120.1 B-161 N 3900'49' E 24.66' B-162 6-120.6 N J13590' E 34.66' 8-120.9 8-120.11
8-162 N 1385'15' E 31.66' 8-163 6-120.9 N 3084'22' E 22.54' 8-120.10
8-163 N 32'36'57' E 37.66' 8-164 8-120.10 N 069J'16" W 5.27 8-120.11 B_1~o 8-164 N 2631'23' E 14.09' 8-165 8-120.11 N 3435'14' E ,5.04' 8-120.12 / ' \ ~1• LOOP .
B-165 N 418723' E 27.40' B-16e 8-120.12 N 3910'14' E 22,64' 8-120.1) 8-120.6 / O
8-166 N 40'31'21' E 10.59' B-1e7 8-120.13 N 328731' E 26,00' 8-120.14 8-167 N 17'50'57' E 6.52' 8-120.1¦ 8-120.7
8-120.TT
B-,20.6 CHANNEL 1 1HE MEILAA~S SIHONN HEREON MERE DEUNEAIED BY SpL
B-,20.5 ~ ENNROMIMENTAL COWS7/CTANIx P.A. 11010 RAbE)V R106~
B-,20.4 ROAD RALEIAY, N.G ?7614. GRAPHIC SCALE
B_t20 WETLANDS AREA 1 WETLANDS AREA 1 B_1~,, 60 8-119 so 0 26 D6 100 200
5,8~ 2 SQ. 8-116 8-120.2 POINT oN E S 6990'30• E 7.21' 8-103
NT 1 8-167 8-120.1¦ B 10 S 0610'33' E 15.16 B-102 ~ e-103 B-1t7 6- °5 B-12o.TT B- s 3e'3o',s• E e.e9' B-1d SHEET No.
ON R 8-101 S 6134'22' E 16.61' 8-100 / "1e6 8-100 N 690720' E 25.02' 8-11 0
8-102 -8411 8-116 8-164 8-121 8-110 N 731r2,~ E 16.69' 8-111 1 inch - 50 &
b^q ~ 8-101 8-113 B-111 N 26'J6'11 E 19.69' 8-112 ~ 8-112 N 259J'J6' E 16.36' 8-113 h•,• 8-112 B-16J 8-122 8-113 N 46'42'23' E 7.70' 1
8-100 8-1 4 WETLAND DELINEATION FOR
? 8-156 8-110 B-111 8-12J 8-114 N J119'S9' E ,1J3' 8-115 ~ Cj~o ~ B-,1s N 3,7706 E 1S.e6' 6-„e
8-137 8-160 B-te 8-116 N 14'4290' E 24.47 B-117 EIP B_1~ , . Q E MARJAN , LTD
` 8'159 8-161 8-124 8-117 N 088421 E 17.14' 8-116 S 8-116 N 5296'23' E 31.79' 8-119 O ed'4y33. ~ ~ A NORTH CAROLINA CORPORATION
133.J0• it w 3Z6J' 8-119 N e586'23' E 20,23' 8-120 B-120 N 6e73'or E 6.37 B-,2o., • e12o.rr CITY OF RAU TY OF RALEIGH RALEIGH TOWNSHIP, WAKE COUNTY, N.C.
8-125 = AT R IPS 8-120.1 ¦ 8120.Tt S 1119'SJ' W 24.10' 8-121
B-121 S 3386'42' W J0.54' 8-122 8-122 S 2000'55' W 26,64' B-12J
8-123 5 24'53'02' W 33.27 8-124 111 8-124 S 23'35'31' W 23.24' 8-125 POINT ON R Smith and Smith DATE FEBRUARY 03, 2003 SCALE 1' - 50-
ZONE I-t e1 I-2 surveyors DRAWN BY J.A.B.
805-12 P.O. 80X 487 APE1I~ N.C. 27502 2.0. BOX 457 P.O. BOX 277 CL N.C. 27502 PI TSBORO. N.C. 27912 PROJECT NO. 96-2116
P.I.N. 1702.11-88-9819 [phone] 119) 962-7111 [phone]
ZIP DISK ~ JA82003A

~ [t'~ ~ 'rna o.fmr. nar ana spy or our par arwronry alaar. e?. eandwy or a~. o ~ V ~lrokhbrr o/ Sira6bn ~W of rM Ara+ Nbhr Act ar atNmAnd Dy fM unarr~rr~d
N 6 ~ RALEIGH STORAGE an rnw ar~ urA,a. ein a a fi rn. A„? or oar rkn, me ~y ~ ~ ~ \ RICHMOND atw?N~rona+ e<s~ ~ r~a~r nra e. rwrd Ara gar to
~ ~j ASSOgATES, I) .rc«er At. n,r", sMr ar' ~ arrm~arran `~a ~r?n~°" raa~ / a0'a D.e. eats, Pc. sae GRAVURE, INC. ai ~~r.~ I~eaNa ar~rar~? ~arN,a' o ~ CURVE DATA TABLE
40 64 B.M. 19th. PQ 1709 ~ D.B. 2e56, P0. eso / . Al4iALT ~ CURVE RADIUS LENGTH CHORD BEARING
G ~AVEHENT HA ~ ~ / C1 1603.25' 98.70' 96.68' N 17'37'53' W
~ ~ ~ FUNERAL G • e C2 160.23' 61.95' 61.57' N 25'51'05' W C3 160.23' 32.50' 32.44' N 4744'16' W
sITE ~ ° + a HOM INC. ~ nW. ~ ~ 16` ~ ~ y D.a. 601 Pc. sae . . C4 5899.58' 311.48' 311.42' N 17'06'20' E C5 1462.39' 100.47' 100.45' N 83'18'21' W
70 1~ B.N. t9a4, PG. nD9 FIRE ~ an. wb' a' HYDRANT C6 918.51' 161.31' 161.10' N 48'42'11' E C7 918.51' 297.44' 296.14' N 29'55'34' E
J `ti (2~ ~ s ~ o. aol 0 / ~ m ~ ~ , ro so' C.P. t 1. ee Icv
(3~ /e. ~b *e, rAP UNE ESMt: SUNBELT DIX, INC. / ~
50 'I d~„~, D.B. Se7ti, PG. 106 (1 ~9 ~ 44 \ 4 a ~ 2 SUNBELT DI INC.
q SO / \ \ (5\ ~ IN Eswt \ o,a se7a va tae / ~s~ ~tuw ) ~ ~
\ s \ r wA \ \ I / (6 ~ S wANN~t \
~ ~ sR ~ ' (~1 s a~ /
~ 2ee3 ~ ~ 'e , 0' / ~ ~ R/W MON. Co MP
(g / ov " ~ ~ 0~a~' ~ F /
~1 ~ l ~ NATHAN A. COUCH (s ~ ~ eggyM 1M ZO (jb~~ MOK
o.e. sass Pc. ale 7 ? Eb \ ~ <P MIN
~ ~ ' Poltnoil aF NEWBOID S7itEET ~\~0 a>r ~ \ l w G 2 • y~.,.~ ~ aosEO PER c,o,R. ttESOLUttoN / S s RA R, \ 4 c~' MID N P E8Y DRIVE
''o ~ 1977 472, DATED 11-15-77 096 ~ 0 lgYf N MA"`'M \ ~ 72, .e rEli ~ air \ / D.B. 257e, P0. 370 ~ p~ S0. FT, S 0,1 'e44 1; / ~C p~rp
11E LINE: IN ESMT. ~ BM>FO• al.~` b~ r04Q 1 A/w HOII ~1 / ~ , ~ i r ll"~ / . o MID
VICINITY MAP S 790,'4 ~ ~ ~ ~ /?«E / c, . DELORES H. HENDERSHOTT 79.esr E ~ ' / ~ ~ ~ R^" 101 1.712 ACRES c TOTAL
D.B. 3742, P0. 426 4p ` ~ ~ ' ~ / g
v S0. FT. ~ ~ ~0, .1r rye M ESMT. 0• b I, STACEY C. SMITH . do hereby certify that this plat ~ ~ ~ MP LE=
was drawn under my supervision from an actual survey made \ 40.502 ACRES TOTAL ~ / / R ~ POR110M OF KNOWLES SiREET (1~ a1 4 \ ~ /M o ~ >Y ~ ~ ~ EIP - Existing iron Pipe 4 Q $ EIS - Existing Iron Stake
under my supervision using references shown hereon; that aost:a PER ao.R.ltlsoLUnoN w°~ RA I l "011 the boundaries not surveyed ore shown os broken lines platted R 11n/~t2, DATED o9-zo-n / \ ~~q i r ~t IPS - Iron Pipe Set
from information shown hereon; that the ratio of pprecision 612 ~ u' ti~5i 4r 6n41 tRAal t ECM - Existing Concrete Monument
• 64 929 \ rR't w I All s:T AT ~ uo as calculated by latitudes and departures is 1. ~7`r~ / ~ 0 1 a ~ t>~snaeEa or I~7 L2A Zp P-K - Parker-Kolon Nall Set
that this lest was ared in accordance with G.S. 47-30 ~ (3 ~ y / 1 te1 P Prof ~ \ ~ a / a' s . 1R. iD~tMo as amended. Witness my original signature, license number ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ / ~ IN ESMT. R~ "0N' RRS - Railroad Spice Set MP - Mathematical Point (Not Set)
and seal this 22 ND day of APRIL A.D., 2003. r ~i " r. ~ l~ \ ~ 3. ~ / 1 ba.1P • Existing Iron Pipe
1 w fig, ~F + / / o Iron Pipe Set(Unless Otherwise Designated)
~ 1D / ¦ Existing Concrete Monument
\'q ~ b< ~ 25,6e2 / 6 446 urveyor NK >R ^o ~ c < S0. FT. / Sd f7 ~ IPS re O Concrete Monument Set Ir ® Sanitary Sewer Manhole
l ~ ~ er ESMT, / ~,~,IT. 7 .'58.2 ~ L-3788 ~ \ ~ ~ ~ t3e / / is,3 aTV or RA1t1011 q u utility Pole
License Number (J~ ~ ' ~ ~ / ~ r ~~f~ n+ Es~1T\ + Control Of Access
h ~ 1F" SEAR ESMT. / 3 k • Raw Water Manhole
i iii l °e d' ~ ~ ~ r / 3 dt ~ 0 ~ / ,~ir~ ~ b ~ 7.514 AC. TOTAL Raw Water Witness Post
1Nf N£IUNOS SNONN HEREON N£RE DELlNEAlEO BY SOYL ~ ~ i R O
d~ £NNRON11ENtAL CONSULrAN1~ P.A. 11010 RAH7V R/OGiE ~h' l / 5 a, / / 4r / ~ 0 . RDAD RALE/GN, N. ~ 27614. O,a? 14,7n ~ / p ~p LINE DATA TABLE
J (5\ ar sa Pr J ~ + ~ ~ UNE DIRECTION DISTANCE
U0' s / / Pg•~ 1 _ r L48 S 27104'41' Of 37.67 L40 S 279741• w 1328.65'
~ i ~ ~ ti ~ ~ ~ o`~ LINE I LINE DATA TABLE Lw s WOW* W 96.16' LSi s 2445434'"15• w 98.70'
f ~ (7~ y ob p, / / BRANCH 0 ~ UNE 01REt ~ . ~ / d' UNE D1115=10N DISTANCE L52 S 2211'25' W 9&04'
/ ~ ~ s p /N.C.O.0.T. 0 o' ~ Tp DIIAN. EX. R/w r v~ Lt N OD'2 8 ~ ~ L2 N 0097 Lt N 00"10'19' E 77.42' L53 S 199708' w 93.68' L2 N 003731' w 32.08' L5 S 16'23'14' w 92.37
/ \ tl1 ESMT. y~. YONUME?IT r (1 / ~ ~ ~ / ?1 W N 09'41 L3 N 0949'04' E 26.95' W5 8 S /320'27' w 96.26'
/ ~0 9 4 1 ~ ~ L4 N 1011 L4 N 1094'38' E 90,24' Lw S 1012917' w 98.39' LS N 099!0'08' E 119.81' 1.58 S 04'30'38' IN 102.40'
. ~0 +6 Oti 1A ~ ~ la N 01'41 q ~ / v" ~ ,7 ~ L7 N ,0'I~ L6 N 09'45'17' E 90.05' L59 N 7418'13' W 10152' L7 N 1093'23' E 119.42' L60 N 0553'34' E 30.14'
` ht` ~ Q~~+~ ~ ~ c~~' ~ Le N o1~ ~ ~a. S o ? ~ / 0•~ ~ ky ~~M1 / y 1 . ~ L9 N 100 L8 N 091054' E 300.35' L61 N 05'33'34' E 54.79' L9 N 100451' E 135.08' L82 N 0728'45' E 101.34'
V~ / / ~ L10 N 74'2 ~ 3` ~ . ~ ~ / ~ A C / by y t. Lit N 05'5; L10 N 7473'09' W 40.23' L83 N 10'29'27' E 100.65'
~ N. D.0.T. M E91T, 10' RAM ~ ~p10 ? Q N MONUMENT W1 6'QO• G P U2 N Oe71 1.11 N 0532'54' E 75.96' L64 N 13'30'27' E 101.43' L12 N 06'26'42' E 74.58' L65 N 16'23'14' E 97.41'
Dr qp c5 ~ O / L1a N os9~ / 1 ~v S~ 1 t` L14 N 0591 b4 ~ / /1,~ , dTY aP Raalal AG ~ t~ y~ L13 N 05'38'31' E 68.47 L66 N 1917'06' E 100.56' L14 N 0536'28' E 64.61' L67 N 2211'25' E 98.49'
\ / S0. FT. + ~ 30' SANITARY 0 r ~ L15 N Oe , [IP / IN ESMT. / M1• I ~r~' L16 N 0016 L15 N 0812'14' E 110.23' L68 N 2434'36' E 106.72' L16 N 0916'OT W 143.26' L69 S 0833'20' W 7.41'
~J' I `A SEWER ESMT. Lt7 N o19a \ t~~ 1,060 S0. FT. / G1 ~ ~ . l ~ /o ~ $ ~ ~ ) ~ / Lie N 0001 L17 N 0930'07' W 60.12' L70 S 09'49'56' W 47.37 L18 N 09910'35' W 119.89' L71 S 10'30'17' W 47.04'
fl8 1 eo m u9 N orn L19 N 09'26'34' W 130.14' L72 S 11'04'51' W 46.33'
/ ~ \ ~ / ~ / w G L20 N 14'31 pTY OF RALEIGH ~ / + , ~ ~ 7 20' SANITARY \~J ~ i~ ~ ti'ty' r/~ PA L21 N 1797 '~j ~ ~ ~ TIiIS SURVEY WAS BALANCED USING THE COM SS RULE L20 N 14'32'21' W 62.07 L73 S 11'25'14' W 45.11' L21 N 17'37'45' W 43.10' 1.74 S 11'40'54' W 45.91'
SEWER EASEMENT ~ y~~ ~ L22 N 241; ~ ~ ~ T ~ a~ ADJUSTMEN . D.e, te4z. Pc. es ~ ~8 ar + / •l Lea s 7e'41 L22 N 2413'03' E 1.85' L75 S 11'35'31' w 42.32' L23 S 78'46'35' E 65.57 L76 N 8391'01' W 70.97
~ ~y DAiS: 02-11-e5 ~ ~ ~ I c~ EWl1M0 ~ y ~ L24 N 004. Q9 -o + ~ ~ ~ r ALL DISTANCES ARE HORIZONTAL GROUND MEASUREMENTS. Les s 2e91 L24 N 09 43'35' W 154.27 L77 N 7532'28' W 28.74' L25 S 2838'51' w 159.43'
~~+0 ~ R/w HON. ~ QCr O (T + . FL / Sl ~ L2e N D411 / ~ ESM ~ I ~y ~ L27 N Se'4 1.26 N 0416'17' W 51.94' L27 N 56146`13* E 61.13' L89 N 2857'06' E 98.75'
Q~ ~ / ~ ~ AREA DETERMINED USING D.M.D. METHOD. Lee N s27 L28 N 5218'31' E 55.75' L90 N 271741' E 1329.05'
e° / bM+• \ . ce~•~' R~ ~9~y ~1 v / E10l1M9 tip L20 N 500 /`~t . ~ ~ / R~r HON. . REFERENCES: DEED BOOK 3871, PAGE 800 L3o N 401 L29 N 5001'27' E 57.89' L91 N 27914'41' E 36.89' L30 N 4916'20' E 48.39' L92 N 2624'15' E 9&47
4,0+• ~e ~-R / DEED BOOK 3087, PAGE 711 Lit N 41'0 4g` ow g~r L31 N 4909'24' E 48.05' L93 N 24.44'35' E 94.42' L32 N 4893'22' E 50.18' L94 N 22'41'44' E 93.64'
R nE L91E: a / DEED BOOK 3087 PAGE 715 1"12 C ~ ~ , L33 N 4e1~ 'k' 'S N aon9'z4' w ~ +cP L33 N 4694'40' E 26.55' L95 N 2079'06' E 98.68' L34 S 1104'51' W 42.50' L96 N 1883'55' E 93.79'
~Q 1a3r ss ~ r DEED BOOK 3087, PAGE 718 Lao s n'a •e g ~ ~o° BOOK OF MAPS 1974, PAGE 115 Las s ttx \ .a ~o ~ s u Sao' w ~m1at r / NOTES: BOOK OF MAPS 1974, PAGE 458 Lae s tr4c L35 S 1175'14' W 22.32' L97 N 1815'50' E 94.31'
4 3 ~ ~ / E10Sip0 L37 S 119; \ ?L1 \ M ~ O 4 A/IM HON. / Wes S 11'4( L38 S 11'40'54' W 45.76' 1.98 N 1480'23' E 95.37 L37 S WNW W 42.32' L99 N 1234'07' E 93.06'
VV 49.728 ACRES TOTAL AREA FOR THREE TRACTS ry~~?`"~w N.a pas ooaloMArES Lag S 11'4f y ~ / . 1 \ v'P L38 S 11'40'49' W 247.74' 1.100 N 11'4049' E 204.01' L39 S 11'40'49' W 613.79' 1.101 S 34'43'12' W i&17
N T79,9T1,73 ~ ~ P.K. NAILS WERE SET IN THE CENTERLINE OF MAIN RAILROAD Loa s try ~ N ~ E ¦ 2,107,3rL41 ~'j d e ~ ~ aN + TRACK, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. L41 S 14'2f L40 S 1234'07' W 95.39' L102 S 3904'40' w 46.83' L41 S 14'20'23' W 9&60' L103 S 43'46'18' W 45.75'
/ ~ m' e4 L42 S 1695'50' W 97.85' L104 S 4614'40' W 47.93' L43 S 182315' W 97.47 L105 S 4613'22' W 46.15'
F.B. INVESTMENT \ o• s w ~ POINTS ALONG RIGHT-OF-IMAM OF R.R. SPUR ARE L43 s le'2; COMPANY 231.ee' sy ~ MATHEMATICAL POINTS. L44 s 201 L44 S 20'29'08' W 102.43' L106 S 4909'24' W 47.32'
D.B. 3044, PG. e99 y LIe S 24'M e WETLAND AREAS 1, 2, AND 3 SHOWN AS SHADED. SHEET No. L45 S 22'41'44' W 97.35' L107 S 4916'20' W 47.78' L46 S 24'4435' W 97.68' 1.108 S 508305' W 67.38'
~ r L47 S 26'2 L47 S 26105' W 100.50' L109 N 11'40'49' E 161.19'
Sr 1DOSiMrO e/w NoMwtNr ~ TRACT 1 IS WITHIN THE NEUSE RIVER BASIN. N.a aes coalaNAtES
T~41°•J6 r LOT N0. 1 SHOWN HEREON IS WITHIN THE 100 YEAR FLOODPLAIN E ¦ ~to4,t17e.s3 ~ PER FEMA FiRM MAP No. 3718300533 E, EFFECTIVE DATE MARCH
~ 3 199. IMA ~ a ~ 2 FLOODPLAIN LINE S SCALED FROM MAP. WETLAND DELINEATION FOR
r NOTES: e'~ ~~O
(a) THE PROPERTY SHOWN HEREON IS SUBJECT \P ~`P )hh stynvy b o/ an e,rbtArg buldATy or oMsl? thvcturw Q? TO ALL EASEMENTS AND RESTRIC110NS OF or not'urot IboturR svaA os o woter+course. O E ~ MARJAN , LTD
RECORD AFFECTING SAME. r ~ : NO A t>asn?a ~h. A NORTH CAROLINA CORPORATION
(b) NO T1TLE SEARCH HAS BEEN PERFORMED BY THIS ~ R/N Hat APRIL 22, 2003 M =
FiRM DURING THE COURSE OF THIS SURVEY. °o Profess! LonO SLnvya? Dote t CITY OF RI (c) THIS SURVEYOR DOES NOT CERTIFY TO THE CITY OF RALEIGH RALEIGH TOWNSHIP, WAKE COUNTY, N.C.
EXISTENCE OR NON-EXISTENCE OF ANY UNDER ~ GRAPHIC SCALE
GROUND UTILITIES THAT MAY OR MAY NOT BE ~ n PRESENT ON THIS SITE. ~ o loo 2ao 490 e6o ~ O Smith and Smith DATE FEBRUARY 03,2003
ZONE i-t e~ I-2 surve SCALE - 200' 37'ors DRAWN BY
805-12 P.O. BO% 467 ( IN P'!~T) 11P~ N.C. 276 P.O. BOX 467 P.O. BOX 277 J.A.B.
1 inch .x00 P.I.N. 170211-88-9819 (919) 962-711 APE L N.C. 27602 P11TSBORO, N.C. 27312 PROJECT NO. 96-2118 [phone] [phone]
21P DISK ~ JA82003A

I g Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
it6m 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
g Print YOL;~ Ilame and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
g Attach this card to the back of the mail piece,
or on the front if space permits.

[ 1. Article Addre:;sed to:

Soil and Environmental Consultants
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh,.NC-2?,6'1'4----.

-'-.... .--- --,--

-~. .. --...-

-_...._~...... -.._--~-~"

A. signyure I
X-~~ {/iZ "- /0flLt

BJ:e~it by (Ffinted Name) ~ C. Date of Delivery
C~i c:~ L4r;}1 n, '
D. Is delivery address differeflt from ~em 1? DYes
If YES, enter delivery address below: D No

O/~ent
C.-

D Express Mail
D Return Receipt for Merchandiso
D C.O.D.

DYes

2. ArticleNu~..,_ "'-~>'--7-004' 1160 '00' .02,,\2-.7';,(6 7384
(TransferJ~[JUPrYlcol,~~'" ,,' _.tI
PS Form 3811, February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt

.
First-Class Mail
Postage & Fees Paid
USPS
Permit No.. G-10

UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE

· Sender: Please print your name, address, and ZIP+4 in this box ·

.NC DENR Division of Water Quality
40l Oversight/Express Unit
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604