20190425 Ver 1_401 Application_20190403

d
Preliminary ORM Data Entry Fields for New Actions
ACTION ID #: SAW- 2015-01412
Prepare file folder ❑
PAID
Begin Date (Date eceive :
Assign Action ID Number in ORM ❑
1. Project Name [PCN Form A2a]: Line451/Duke Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline
2. Work Type: IV—(]Private ❑ Institutional 1:1Government 1:120 Commercial 1 90 42,5
5
3. Project Description / Purpose [PCN Form 133d and 133e]:
This project involves the installation of 19.5 miles of 20 -inch pipeline from a new Transco Tap and Receipt Station in Lincoln County,
NC to a new Meter and Regulator Station at Marshall Steam Plant in Catawba County, NC. Duke Energy Carolina has requested PNG
to provide a natural gas supply to their Marshall Steam Plant. In order to meet this request, PNG will be expanding the PNG system
through the proposed Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline. The Line 451/Duke Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline Project involves the
construction of a new 19.5 -mile natural gas pipeline to supply Duke Energy's Marshall Steam Plant. The project area starts
4. Property Owner / Applicant [PCN Form A3 or A4]: Jason Brown; 4720 Piedmont Row Drive, Charlotte
5. Agent / Consultant [PNC Form A5 — or ORM Consultant ID Number]:
Flynt Barksdale; Pond & Co; 3500 Parkway Lane Suite 500 Peachtree Corners, GA 30092; 678-31&
6. Related Action ID Number(s) [PCN Form 135b]: N/A
7. Project Location —Coordinates, Street Address, and/or Location Description [PCN Form Bib]:
(35.597, -80.972)
8. Project Location — Tax Parcel ID [PCN Form Bla]: see PCN supplemental information
9. Project Location — County [PCN Form A2b]: Lincoln and Catawba
10. Project Location —Nearest Municipality or Town [PCN Form A2c1: Sherrills Ford, NC
1 l . Project Information —Nearest Waterbody [PCN Form 132a]: Lake Norman, Killians Creek, Anderson
('mi -k Is
12. Watershed / 8 -Digit Hydrologic Unit Code [PCN Form 132c]: 03050101
Authorization: Section 10 ❑ Section 404 ❑✓
Regulatory Action Type:
Standard Permit
✓ Nationwide Permit # 12
✓ Regional General Permit # 198200030
Jurisdictional Determination Request
Section 10 and 404 ❑
❑ Pre -Application Request
❑ Unauthorized Activity
Compliance
No Permit Required
Revised 20150602

3500 Parkway Lane, Suite 500 T: 678.336.7740 ( F: 678.336.7744
Peachtree Corners, Georgia 30092 www.pondco.com
March 15, 2019
Ms. Catherine Janiczak
United States Army Corps of Engineers
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
704-510-1438
[e-mail]
Re: Piedmont Natural Gas
Line 451/Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline Project (SAW -2015-01412)
Catawba and Lincoln Counties, North Carolina
Nationwide Permit 12 — Pre -construction Notification
Dear Ms. Catherine Janiczak
On behalf of Piedmont Natural Gas (PNG), Pond is pleased to submit this Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) and supporting
documentation for the use of a Nationwide Permit (NWP) 12, pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA); General
Regional Permit 198200030 for work affecting waters of the United States; and 401 Certification from North Carolina Department
of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ). An approved Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (SAW -2015-01412) has been
provided for this project (Attachment B).This proposed project would impact jurisdictional waters of the US, including wetlands
and streams associated with the installation of approximately 19.5 miles of 20 -inch pipeline from a new Transco Tap and Receipt
Station in Lincoln County, NC to a new Meter and Regulator Station at Marshall Steam Plant in Catawba County, NC.
The project area starts approximately 1.5 miles west of NC Highway 16 in Lowesville, NC (35.421, -81.024). The proposed route
then travels north along the west side of Lake Norman. The route crosses Lake Norman between Bass Drive and Wilson Road
(35.605, -81.019). The route then turns eastward towards Sherrills Ford, NC where it ends at the Marshall Steam Plant (35.597,
-80.972). The proposed pipeline traverses forestland, commercial and residential zones, and maintained rights-of-way (ROW).
The field delineations identified the presence of fifty-five (55) perennial streams, twenty-five (25) intermittent streams, thirty-five
(35) wetlands, and three (3) open waters located in the survey area. Through project routing, design was able to avoid impacting
eighteen (18) perennial streams, thirteen (13) intermittent streams, eleven (11) wetlands, and three (3) open waters. A total of
1.66 acres of wetlands will be impacted through this project. Permanent impacts of 1.04 acres for the conversion of forested
wetlands to non -forested wetlands and temporary impacts of 0.62 acres. Approximately 4,670 linear feet (LF) of warm -water
streams will be temporarily impacted through this project. Stream crossings will involve a combination of open -cut construction
methods and horizontal directional drilling methods (HDD). All stream crossings will be oriented as close to perpendicular as
practicable to avoid impacts. The crossing of Lake Norman, wetland 75, and perennial stream 76 on the northern section of the
route will be completed through HDD to further avoid impacts to resources. The profile for the lake crossing can be found on
sheets PNG-C-451-0001038 and PNG-C-451-0001039 of the provided plan set (Attachment D).
As part of the project, PNG proposes three (3) permanent, engineered culverts to be installed within permanent access roads
and the pipeline corridor. Approximately 167 LF of warm -water streams will be permanently impacted to accommodate culvert
All Pond & Company marketing materials are printed on papers containing post -consumer recycled fibers and ore FSC Certified.

installation. The installation of these culverts provides stable access to the ROW for maintenance activities as well as protect
the resources from impacts due to crossings of landowner vehicles such as ATVs. Culverts have been designed and sized by
a professional engineer for each crossing with complete hydrologic studies to carry storm flows and maintain a stable access
condition, preventing bank damage and erosion in the crossing areas.
If you have any questions or requests for information please contact Flynt Barksdale (678-459-2470, barksdalef(a)pondco.com)
or Kaili Stevens (912-222-9932, stevensk aQpondco.com).
Respectfully,
Kaili Stevens
W. Flynt Barksdale, PWS
Scientist I Senior Scientist
cc: Alicia DePalma, PNG Environmental Siting and Licensing Support
NC DWR, 401 & Buffer Permitting Branch
Enclosures:
Attachment A: Pre -Construction Notification Form
(Supplemental Information)
In -Lieu Fee Form and Response
Attachment B. Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Letter
Jurisdictional Determination Map Package
Attachment C. Agency Consultation
USFWS Request
USFWS Response
IPaC Species Report
SHPO Request
SHPO Response
Attachment D. Plans

Attachment A: USACE Documents
Pre -Construction Notification Form
(Supplemental Information)
In -Lieu Fee Form and Response

O�O� W A TF9OG
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
❑X Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 12 or General Permit (GP) number: 198200030
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes NX No
1 d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
NX 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular N Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑X Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
❑ Yes ❑X No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ❑X No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
❑X Yes ❑ No
1g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1h
below.
❑ Yes ❑X No
1h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Line451/Duke Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline
2b.
County:
Lincoln and Catawba
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Sherrills Ford
2d.
Subdivision name:
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
See PCN supplemental information
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
See PCN supplemental information
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
Jason Brown
3d.
Street address:
4720 Piedmont Row Drive
3e.
City, state, zip:
Charlotte, NC 28233
3f.
Telephone no.:
[phone]
3g.
Fax no.:
3h.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
MX Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b. Name:
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
Flynt Barksdale
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
Pond & Co
5c. Street address:
3500 Parkway Lane Suite 500
5d. City, state, zip:
Peachtree Corners, GA 30092
5e. Telephone no.:
678-336-7720
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 10

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
See PCN supplemental information
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.597 Longitude: -80.972
1 c. Property size:
353.750014 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
Lake Norman, Killians Creek, Anderson Creek
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
WS-IV/B, C, C
2c. River basin:
Catawba River Basin - 03050101
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The proposed natural gas pipeline traverses maintained ROWs, forestland, light commercial, and residential areas.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 1.66
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 4,670
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
See PCN supplemental information
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
See PCN supplemental information
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (includingall riot phases)in the past?
M Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
0 Preliminary ❑ Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Pond
Agency/Consultant Company: Pond
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
Jurisdictional determination walk 01/16/2019 with Catherine Janiczak. Preliminary jurisdictional determination to be provided by Catherine Janiczak.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
El Yes ❑X No ❑ Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ❑X No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑X Wetlands ❑X Streams —tributaries ❑X Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
2b.
Type of impact
2c.
Type of wetland
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other)
2f.
Area of
impact
(acres)
W1 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W2 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W3 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W4 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No'
-
W5 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W6 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
2h. Comments:
See PCN supplemental information
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
Stream impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
3b.
Type of impact
3c.
Stream name
3d.
Perennial (PER) or
intermittent (INT)?
3e.
Type of
jurisdiction
3f.
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g.
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
S1 -
Choose one
-
-
S2 -
Choose one
-
-
S3 -
Choose one
S4 -
Choose one
-
S5 -
Choose one
-
-
S6 -
Choose one
-
-
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
3i. Comments:
See PCN supplemental information
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01 -
Choose one
Choose
02 -
Choose one
Choose
03 -
Choose one
Choose
04 -
Choose one
Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c. 5d. 5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑X Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other:
6b.
Buffer Impact
number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet)
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet
131 P
permanent utility easement
Lake Norman
Yes
3,600
2,400
B2 -
Yes/No
B3 -
Yes/No
B4 -
Yes/No
B5 -
Yes/No
B6 -
Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
3,600
2,400
6i. Comments:
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
See PCN supplemental information
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
See PCN supplemental information
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑X Yes ❑ No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑X DWQ ❑X Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
❑X Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑X Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
167 linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
warm
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
6,000 square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
1.05 acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
Yes E] No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c.
6d.
6e.
Zone
Reason for impact
Total impact
Multiplier
Required mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Zone 1
permanent utility easement
3,600
3 (2 for Catawba)
7,200
Zone 2
permanent utility easement
2,400
1.5
3,600
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
10,800
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
Buffer mitigation will be accomplished via a payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund.
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑X Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b..If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
Diffuse flow plans are included in the ESPC plan set for the project
❑X Yes ❑ No
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
0
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
No impervious surfaces or stromwater infrastructure will be constructed as part of this project. Other than permanent clearing of the ROW, all
disturbances are temporary and will be restored to pre -construction conditions. No non -404 Jurisdictional General Permits are required for this project
as this project will not result in greater than 24% impervious surface, and does not contain drainage areas with greater than 24% impervious surface.
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which localgovernment's jurisdiction is thisproject?
Lincoln and Catawba County
❑ Phase II
El NSW
3b. Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
[-] USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑X No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑Coastal counties
❑HQW
4a. Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ORW
(check all that apply):
❑Session Law 2006-246
❑X Other: NCG010000
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑X No
attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑X Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑X Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes ❑X No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.)
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ❑X No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑Yes ❑X No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes ❑X No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
There are no prior impacts associated with this project and this project does not anticipate any future impacts given this pipeline is being constructed
solely to source Duke Marshall Steam Plant. Additionally, no impervious surfaces are to be constructed in conjunction with this project that would
impact downstream water quality.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
During construction, portable sanitary units will be provided. Waste will be collected a minimum of one time per week by a licensed portable facility
provided in complete compliance with local and state regulations. All sanitary waste units will be located in upland areas and be easily accessible. this
project does not require sanitary sewer or septic tank service. No sanitary waste maintenance will be necessary post construction.
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑X Yes ❑ No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
0 Yes ❑ No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
USFWS, Information for Planning and Consultation (IPaC): USFWS Lincoln and Catawba Counties Endangered Species, Threatened Species,
Federal Species of Concern, and Candidate Species; NC Natural Heritage Program. See PCN supplemental information.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ❑X No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NOAA Habitat Conservation National Marine Fisheries Service, Essential Fish Habitat Mapper v3.0
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ❑X No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
A Phase I Cultural Survey report for the full corridor has been provided to SHPO for concurrence.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑X Yes ❑ No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
While portions of the underground pipeline construction will occur within FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplains, no above -ground structures or
impervious surfaces will be located in a floodplain; therefore, no flood impacts would occur.
i
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
FEMA Nation Flood Hazard Layer (GIS geodatabase)
h44 4 "eel03-08-2019
Flynt Barksdale
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant isprovided.)
Page 10 of 10

US Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
PCN Supplemental Information
A.3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
The table provided in Attachment 1 of this PCN supplemental information presents property owner information including
name(s) on the recorded deed. Piedmont Natural Gas (PNG) will serve as the owner of the Property Easement crossing
the properties listed in Attachment 1. PNG is granted the authority to acquire by purchase or condemnation ownership
of property for public use or benefit through the North Carolina General Statute, Chapter 40A (Eminent Domain).
Attachment 2 of this PCN supplemental information presents the Property Survey Notification Letter issued by PNG to
property owners within and surrounding the proposed easement.
A.3b. Deed Book and Page No.
Property owner and deed information can be found in the table provided in Attachment 1.
B.3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
This project involves the installation of 19.5 miles of 20 -inch pipeline from a new Transco Tap and Receipt Station in
Lincoln County, NC to a new Meter and Regulator Station at Marshall Steam Plant in Catawba County, NC. Duke
Energy Carolina has requested PNG to provide a natural gas supply to their Marshall Steam Plant. In order to meet
this request, PNG will be expanding the PNG system through the proposed Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline.
B.3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The Line 451/Duke Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline Project involves the construction of a new 19.5 -mile natural gas
pipeline to supply Duke Energy's Marshall Steam Plant. The project area starts approximately 1.5 miles west of NC
Highway 16 in Lowesville, NC (35.421, -81.024). The proposed route then travels north along the west side of Lake
Norman. The route crosses Lake Norman between Bass Drive and Wilson Road (35.605, -81.019). The route then
turns eastward towards Sherrills Ford, NC to its terminus at the Marshall Steam Plant (35.597, -80.972). The proposed
pipeline traverses forestland, commercial and residential zones, and maintained rights-of-way (ROW).
Stream crossings will involve a combination of open -cut construction methods and horizontal directional drilling
methods (HDD). All stream crossings have been oriented as close to perpendicular as practicable to the stream banks
to avoid impacts. The crossing of Lake Norman, wetland 75, and perennial stream 76 on the northern section of the
route will be completed through HDD methods to further avoid impacts to resources. The profile for the lake crossing
can be found on sheets PNG-C-451-0001038 and PNG-C-451-0001039 of the provided plan set. Standard mechanized
construction equipment will be used including, but not limited to, feller bunchers, backhoes, excavators, and other
tracked equipment. Structural and vegetative BMPs will be implemented according to an E&SC Plan designed for this
project and existing site conditions.
Regional Condition 4.1.3 requires justification for corridors exceeding 40 -feet in width. Due to the length and diameter
of this proposed pipeline, this condition is not safely nor efficiently obtainable. The overall width of the corridor has
been minimized by narrowing the originally planned right-of-way clearing from 100 feet to no more than 70 feet in width
at resource crossings. This workspace is comprised of a 60 -foot permanent corridor plus an additional 10 -feet of
temporary workspace at resource crossings along the pipeline route. This corridor exceeds the recommended 40 -foot
wide easement to allow for the safe installation of temporary crossings, dewatering equipment, erosion and sediment
control devices, and pipeline infrastructure. This exceedance in the recommended 40 -foot corridor width is required to
Piedmont Natural Gas — Line 451/Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline Project Pond & Company
PCN Supplemental Information March 2019

safely complete the aforementioned work functions due to the size of the equipment required to install a pipeline of this
magnitude. The clearing of the 60 -foot permanent easement will be maintained after construction to facilitate safe and
efficient maintenance of the PNG infrastructure.
C.2. If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area
impacted.
Wetlands impacted through the construction of this pipeline can be found in Attachment 3 of this PCN Supplemental
Information.
C.3. If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site,
then complete this question for all stream sites impacted.
Streams impacted through the construction of this pipeline can be found in Attachment 3 of this PCN Supplemental
Information.
D.1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project.
Preliminary environmental surveys were conducted during the conceptual phase of this project and included field
delineations along the proposed route to identify all sensitive resources in the area. Using the environmental data
collected, the least impactful route was chosen, and additional route modifications were made to reduce impacts at
resource crossings. The field delineations identified the presence of fifty-five (55) perennial streams, twenty-five (25)
intermittent streams, thirty-five (35) wetlands, and three (3) open waters located in the survey area. Through project
routing, design was able to avoid impacting eighteen (18) perennial streams, thirteen (13) intermittent streams, eleven
(11) wetlands, and three (3) open waters.
As part of the project, PNG proposes three (3) permanent, engineered culverts to be installed within permanent access
roads and the pipeline corridor. The installation of these culverts provides stable access to the ROW for maintenance
activities as well as protect the resources from impacts due to crossings of landowner vehicles such as ATVs. Culverts
have been designed and sized by a professional engineer for each crossing with complete hydrologic studies to carry
storm flows and maintain a stable access condition, preventing bank damage and erosion in the crossing areas.
Regional Condition 4.1.3 requires justification for corridors exceeding 40 -feet in width. Due to the length and diameter
of this proposed pipeline, this condition is not safely nor efficiently obtainable. The overall width of the corridor has
been minimized by narrowing the right-of-way (ROW) clearing from 100 feet to no more than 70 feet in width at resource
crossings. This workspace is comprised of a 60 -foot permanent corridor plus an additional 10 -feet of temporary
workspace at resource crossings along the pipeline route. This corridor exceeds the recommended 40 -foot wide
easement to allow for the safe installation of temporary crossings, dewatering equipment, erosion and sediment control
devices, and pipeline infrastructure. This exceedance in the recommended 40 -foot corridor width is required to safely
complete the aforementioned work functions due to the size of the equipment required to install a pipeline of this
magnitude. The clearing of the 60 -foot permanent easement will be maintained after construction to facilitate safe and
efficient maintenance of the PNG infrastructure. All stream crossings involving open -cut construction methods have
been oriented as close to perpendicular as possible to the stream banks to further minimize impacts.
D.1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction
techniques.
Stream crossings will involve a combination of open -cut construction methods and HDD. All stream crossings have
been oriented as close to perpendicular as practicable to the stream banks to further avoid impacts. The crossing of
Lake Norman, wetland 75, and perennial stream 76 on the northern section of the route will be completed through HDD
methods to further avoid impacts to resources. Corridor width at resource crossings will be kept to a maximum of 70 -
Piedmont Natural Gas — Line 451/Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline Project Pond & Company
PCN Supplemental Information March 2019

feet; 60 -feet permanent easement and an additional 10 -feet of temporary workspace. Erosion and Sediment control
measures will be implemented at all stream crossings to minimize impacts during construction (temporary stream
crossings, bank stabilization, dewatering techniques). Additionally, construction has been sequenced to minimize the
length of time for which excavations of streams remain in disturbed condition and will be stabilized as soon as possible.
F.Sd. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or
Designated Critical Habitat?
A list of threatened and endangered species was obtained from the United States Fish and Wildlife Service Information
for Planning and Consultation (USFWS IPaC) online database. Four (4) federally listed species, northern long-eared
bat (Myotis septentrionalis), Schweinitz's sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzii), dwarf -flowered heartleaf (Hexastylis
naniflora), and Michaux's sumac (Rhus michauxir) were found to potentially occur within Lincoln and Catawba Counties,
according to the IPaC database.
USFWS provided their consultation response on August 1, 2018. Their coordination confirmed the project area
traversed areas likely to contain suitable habitat for Schweinitz's sunflower and dwarf -flowered heartleaf. Dwarf -
flowered heartleaf is known to occur in Catawba and Lincoln Counties and Schweinitz's sunflower is known to occur in
Catawba County only. USFWS recommended a species-specific survey throughout the project area to ensure these
species were not inadvertently lost. Pond ecologists conducted detailed field surveys August 6-10, 2018, August 29-
31, 2018, September 4-6, 2018, September 24-27, 2018, October 29-31, 2018, and December 11-12, 2018 to identify
and locate potential presence and/or suitable habitat for listed species within the project corridor.
Suitable foraging habitat for northern long-eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis) was present within or adjacent to the
project site. However, USFWS 4(d) Rule states incidental take through tree removal activities is not prohibited unless
it results in removing a known, occupied maternity roost tree; removal activities within 150 feet of a known maternity
roost tree from June 1 to July 31, or removing trees within 0.25 miles of a hibernaculum at any time of year. Online
review of USFWS resources from the Raleigh Ecological Field Office for northern long-eared bat (Myotis
septentrionalis) does not indicate presence of roost trees or hibernacula in the project area.
Schweinitz's sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzii) has a survey window from late August — October. Pond conducted
field surveys to identify potential habitat for these species when suitable habitat was identified. Transect surveys for
species presence was conducted. One isolated population of woodland sunflower (Helianthus divaricatus) was
identified; however, no Schweinitz's sunflower were identified within the proposed project area.
Dwarf -flowered heartleaf (Hexastylis naniflora) has a survey window from March — May. Field surveys were completed
outside of this survey window due to project scheduling requirements. Pond conducted field surveys to identify potential
habitat for these species when suitable habitat was identified. Transect surveys for species presence was conducted.
However, no species that are diagnostically similar to dwarf -flowered heartleaf were identified.
Habitat for Michaux's sumac (Rhus michauxii) was not present in the project area.
Piedmont Natural Gas — Line 451/Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline Project Pond & Company
PCN Supplemental Information March 2019

Attachment 1. Project Parcel Table
Piedmont Natural Gas — Line 451/Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline Project Pond & Company
PCN Supplemental Information March 2019

Project Tract
Number
County
Tax ID Number
Vesting Deed
Landowner Name
Mailing Address
LTJ Properties, LLC
1418 NATURE PRESERVE TRAIL,
97.00
Lincoln
33572
1885-514
(Tony Jones Manager)
DENVER NC 28037
409 4TH STREET SW, CONOVER
98.00
Lincoln
57933
813-004
James Henry Morrison, Heirs
NC 28613
7163 OLD PLANK ROAD,
99.00
Lincoln
31561
2344-75
Michael Randy McClain
STANLEY NC 28164
100.00
Lincoln
31562
2782-315
Michael Randy McClain
7163 OLD PLANK ROAD,
STANLEY NC 28164
P.O. BOX 1040 SALISBURY, NC
101.00
Lincoln
78253
1790-51
Lessees of B.V. Hedrek Gravel & Sand Co.
28145
1681-555
7525 OLD PLANK RD
101.01
Lincoln
83991
EDPH, LLC
1681 - 551
STANLEY NC 28164
OLD PLANK ROAD STANLEY, NC
101.02
Lincoln
29761
2487-474
DELLINGER BROTHERS REALTY, LLC.
28164
P.O. BOX 1040 SALISBURY, NC
102.00
Lincoln
30230
2600-882
Lessees of B.V. Hedrek Gravel & Sand Co.
28145
1756 DAYTON LN STANLEY, NC
102.01
Lincoln
34247
1114-821
George Wayne Stapleton
28164
Adam Bell
1780 DAYTON LN
102.02
Lincoln
73030
2407-42
Patty R. Bell
STANLEY NC 28145
Adam Bell
1780 DAYTON LN
102.03
Lincoln
34246
2019-818
Patty R. Bell
STANLEY NC 28145
P.O. BOX 1040 SALISBURY, NC
103.00
Lincoln
78254
1211-666
Lessees of B.V. Hedrek Gravel & Sand Co.
28145
P 0 BOX 33189
104.00
Lincoln
52075
727-570
DUKE ENERGY CAROLINAS, LLC
CHARLOTTE NC 28242
George W. Clark, Trustee of the George W.
Clark Revocable Trust and Barbara H. Clark,
437 S INGLESIDE FARM RD
105.00
Lincoln
31335
2195 65
Trustee of the Barbara H. Clark Revocable
IRON STATION NC 28080
Trust
21 FORMOSA DR
106.00
Lincoln
33155
2760-688
Forester (USA) Real Estate Group, Inc.
CHARLESTON SC 29407
DAVID CLARK JR;
107.00
Lincoln
50192
928-112
ALLISON THORNE CLARK,
PO BOX 9
WALTER CLARK & CAROLINE CLARK
LINCOLNTON NC 28093
7680 TOWNSEND DR
109.00
Lincoln
80840
1370-455
EAGLEWOOD, INC.
DENVER NC 28037-9206
PO BOX 892
110.00
Lincoln
89478
2458-354
WILLIAM C. EDWARDS
DENVER NC 28037-0892
3303 E Hwy 218
111.00
Lincoln
30872
2160-413
JOY LEEILA REEL
Monroe NC 28110
1114 N INGLESIDE FARM RD
112.00
Lincoln
92223
2160-413
JOY LEEILA REEL
IRON STATION NC 28080-9243
1040 N INGLESIDE FARM RD
113.00
Lincoln
91226
2555-411
RONALD E. REEL & RITA REEL
IRON STATION NC 28080-9243
893 N INGLESIDE FARM RD
114.00
Lincoln
91225
2444-960
MARK ANTHONY REEL
IRON STATION NC 28080-0000
RHYNE E. REEL AND FRANCES H. REEL,
TRUSTEES OF THE RHYNE E. REEL &
1062 N INGLESIDE FARM RD
114.01
Lincoln
81630
2142-837
FRANCES H. REEL TRUST, DATED
IRON STATION NC 28080
MARCH 28 2009
RHYNE E. REEL AND FRANCES H. REEL,
TRUSTEES OF THE RHYNE E. REEL &
1062 N INGLESIDE FARM RD
4.02
Lincoln
30865
212&098
FRANCES H. REEL TRUST, DATED
IRON STATION NC 28080
MARCH 28 2009
JONATHAN SCOTT KNOX and Ryan F.
18718 BLUFF PT
115.00
Lincoln
85567
1835.296
Knox
CORNELIUS NC 28034
116.00
Lincoln
31916
1099-245
EDWARD H. KNOX and wife Frances S.
PO BOX 30848
Knox
Charlotte NC 28230
JOHN F MANARD & KATHLEEN A.
7171 WINDY RIDGE DR
117.00
Lincoln
88027
2045-487
MANARD
IRON STATION NC 28080-0000
7163 WINDY RIDGE DR
118.00
Lincoln
88026
2477-521
DONALD S. MOTT & SANDY L. MOTT
IRON STATION NC 28080-0000
119.00
Lincoln
88025
2413-668
RANDALL J. WALLACE & TRACEY L.
7155 WINDY RIDGE DR
WALLACE
IRON STATION NC 28080-0000
JEFFREY GLENN ASHER & JENNIFER
15319 LONG CROSS CT
120.00
Lincoln
88024
2016-284
SMITH ASHER
HUNTERSVILLE NC 28078
19012 SOUTHPORT DRIVE
121.00
Lincoln
90890
2544-13
NICODEMUS, LLC.
CORNELIUS NC 28031
7140 OXFORD HUNT DR
122.00
Lincoln
74606
2201-297
LARRY D. ROSS
STANLEY NC 28164
4375 KENTON POINT
123.00
Lincoln
74607
1701-520
DENISE BROWN
KENNESAW GA 30144
SAMMIE DAVID ROSS
7035 JERRY ROSS LN
124.00
Lincoln
74608
1310-535
& MARGARET A. ROSS
IRON STATION NC 28080-5703
1475 N INGLESDE FARM RD
125.00
Lincoln
32157
1201-414
RICHARD M. PERKINS
IRON STATION NC 28080-0000
125.01
Lincoln
30495
611 -853
Selwyn Ballard Perkins
1475 N INGLESIDE FARM RD
Estate File OOE-18
IRON STATION NC 28080-0000

Project Tract
Number
County
Tax ID Number
Vesting Deed
Landowner Name
Mailing Address
125.02
Lincoln
32175
611 -853
Selwyn Ballard Perkins
1475 N INGLESDE FARM RD
OOE-78
IRON STATION NC 28080-0000
1614 N INGLESDE FARM RD
126.00
Lincoln
58222
2638-181
NORMA K. HESTER, LIFE ESTATE
IRON STATION NC 28080.0000
VERDICT RIDGE HOMEOWNERS
PO BOX 2427
126.01
Lincoln
90885
2541-966
ASSOCIATION OF LINCOLN INC.
HUNTERSVILLE NC 28070
127.00
Lincoln
90727
924-67
THOMAS ROGER KEEVER
7030 KIDVILLE RD
DENVER NC 28037-6447
128.00
Lincoln
32325
503-360
LARRY RANDOLPH NOLEN
6884 KIDVILLE RD
DENVER NC 28037
7030 KIDVILLE RD
129.00
Lincoln
70740
924-065
THOMAS ROGER KEEVER
DENVER NC 28
25834 FAIRVIEW AVE
131.00
Lincoln
70745
1096-189
THOMAS CARSON SHIPP
HAYWARD CA 94542-1410
Waiting for title report from
attorney to identify heirs
ROOSEVELT COATS HEIRS c/o BETTY
2943 WEST CLUB DRIVE
132.00
Lincoln
31608
(Need 04-E-314 & 17-E-
COATES JONES
SALEM VA 24153
456
Christa A. Overcash -13.69863% undivided
1163.767
interest Marburger Family Associates
1163.772
Limited Partnership -10.95890% undivided
2820 SELWYN AVE STE 500
133.00
Lincoln
53910
1163-777
interest Kidville Road NC 16 Bypass, LLC
CHARLOTTE NC 28209
1163-782
72.60275% undivided interest Robert S.
Dodds - 2.73972% undivided interest
134.00
Lincoln
02293
800-110 & 366-053
DENROCK COMPANY
1638 WANZER DRIVE
DENVER, NC 28037
2417 Fay Jones Road
134.01
Lincoln
70744
1996-363
MLG FOREST PRESERVATION
DENVER NC 28037
134.03
Lincoln
33864
2433-157
Jason Lee Wylie
501 FORNEY AVE
Courtney Krause Wylie
LINCOLNTON NC 28092
135.00
Lincoln
02295
367-444
DENROCK COMPANY
1638 WANZER DRIVE
DENVER NC 28037
1638 WANZER DRIVE
135.01
Lincoln
74449
1721-746
DENROCK COMPANY
DENVER NC 28037
135.03
Lincoln
74463
1066-34
JANET M. BROTHERTON
6776 FORNEY HILL ROAD
DENVER NC 28037
136.00
Lincoln
51339
381-627
CALVIN J. MURDOCK
P 0 BOX 745
Estate File 13-E-516
CHERRYVILLE NC 28021
JOHNNY LAWRENCE ROLLINS
6740 PLEASANT OAKS CIRCLE
137.00
Lincoln
31378
514-23
& MAXI MARIE ROLLINS
CHARLOTTE NC 28216-0000
RONALD S. ROGERS & VICKIE E.
6967 FORNEY HILL RD
138.00
Lincoln
56987
788-285
ROGERS
DENVER, NC 28037
139.00
Lincoln
56989
761-782
MICHAEL D. SOMERS
4347 GREENVILLE HWY
BREVARD NC 28712
PO BOX 286
140.00
Lincoln
58875
2458-122
ROBERT D. MUSE
DENVER, NC 28037
JOHN BOONE SHERRILL AND WIFE
7093 FORNEY HILL RD
142.00
Lincoln
29609
2576-422
LAURA SYLVESTER SHERRILL
DENVER NC 28037
6418 WLDWOOD TRL
DARRELL RAY BROOME & NANCY
143.00
Lincoln
32335
547-221
CHARLENE BROOME
PO BOX 11
DENVER NC 28037
6418 WILDWOOD TRL
144.00
Lincoln
32336
577-305
DARRELL RAY BROOME & NANCY
PO BOX 11
CHARLENE BROOME
DENVER NC 28037
7905 NORMAN CT
145.00
Lincoln
30493
2491-731
POWELL ANDREW SMITH
DENVER NC 28037
7905 NORMAN CT
146.00
Lincoln
30568
2491-731
POWELL ANDREW SMITH
DENVER NC 28037
7905 NORMAN CT
147.00
Lincoln
33666
2584-420
POWELL ANDREW SMITH
DENVER, NC 28037
SARA CRONLAND GORE AND STANLEY A.
CRONLAND, AS TRUSTEES UNDER WILL
4415 EVERDEAR CT
148.00
Lincoln
31780
1633.180
OF MURPHY A. CRONLAND, DATED
CHARLOTTE NC 28216
OCTOBER 20,1996
SARA CRONLAND GORE AND STANLEY A.
CRONLAND, AS TRUSTEES UNDER WILL
4415 EVERDEAR CT
149.00
Lincoln
31778
1633-180
OF MURPHY A. CRONLAND, DATED
CHARLOTTE NC 28216
OCTOBER 20, 1997
2161-493
4153 N HWY 16
150.00
Lincoln
89488
LEE B. KILLIAN & ERNESTINE K. KILLIAN
(Need 92-E-225)
P 0 BOX 22, DENVER, NC 28037
SUSAN C. HARRISON & KENNETH C.
5713 MUNDY RD
151.00
Lincoln
55588
853-352
HARRISON
DENVER, NC 28037
5835 MUNDY RD
152.00
Lincoln
30933
926-680
BETTY C. CARPENTER
DENVER NC 28037
153.00
Lincoln
50693
703-595
PHYLLIS B. MUNDY
5671 MUNDY RD
DENVER, NC 28037
PO BOX 3156
154.00
Lincoln
56452
2779-291 (NEW DEED)
THOMAS SHANNON MILLER
MOORESVILLE NC 28117

Project Tract
Number
County
Tax ID Number
Vesting Deed
Landowner Name
Mailing Address
PO BOX 3156
155.00
Lincoln
56451
2779-291 (NEW DEED)
THOMAS SHANNON MILLER
MOORESVILLE, NC 28117
PO BOX 3156
156.00
Lincoln
56450
2779-291 (NEW DEED)
THOMAS SHANNON MILLER
MOORESVILLE, NC 28117
56449;56448;56447;
PO BOX 3156
156.01
Lincoln
2779-291 (NEW DEED)
THOMAS SHANNON MILLER
56446 51983
MOORESVILLE NC 28117
156.02
Lincoln
56453;56454
2413-513
DAVID LEE KINNEY (Private Road)
2758 LAKE SHORE RD S
DENVER NC 28037
4622 LAKE SHORE RD N
156.03
Lincoln
56455, 56456, 56457
1084-898
GERALD SCOTT MINTUN (Private Road)
DENVER, NC 28037
139 GREAT OAK DR
156.04
Lincoln
56007
1104-864
BROWN (Private Road)
HAMPSTEAD NC 28443
7098 FOREST HILLS DR
156.05
Lincoln
56461
1848-109
MAX KENNEDY (Private Road)
DENVER NC 28037
4000 CREEKVIEW LN
157.00
Lincoln
77074
2324-841
THOMAS R. CHEEK & JANET M. CHEEK
DENVER NC 28037
965 HOPEWELL CHURCH ROAD
158.00
Lincoln
79328
2740-526
DELLINGER HOLDINGS, LLC
CATAWBA NC 28609
FRANKLIN G. BRIDGES
4625 N NO HWY 16
159.00
Lincoln
29613
810-419
& ELIZABETH E. BRIDGES
DENVER, NC 28037
160.00
Lincoln
33813
2552-405
THE COVE CHURCH, INC.
197 LANGTREE ROAD
MOORESVILLE NC 28117
4703 N NC 16 BUSINESS
161.00
Lincoln
31326
2360-162
MICHAEL S. BUFF & TIFFANY L. BUFF
HIGHWAY DENVER, NC
28037
162.00
Lincoln
33479
2154-513
NINA BLAIR ALEXANDER KNOX &
4684 N NC 16 BUSINESS HWY
THOMAS L. KNOX II
DENVER NC 28037
341 WHIPPORRWILL RD
162.01
Lincoln
51462.00
2670.595
James M. Harper
MOORESVILLE NO 28117
6274 WILLOW FARM DR
163.00
Lincoln
30134
1002-612
JOEL BENTON BARKER
DENVER NO 28037
BEVERLY JEAN HEMBREE FOLSOME &
164.00
Lincoln
34676
1635-559
DELONDA LEA FARMER & CHARLES
315 TENNYSON KNOLL
GRAYSON, GA. 30017
RAVEN FARMER
4914 E NC HWY 10
LEONA M. LITTLE
165.00
Lincoln
33806
495-716
& MELVIN G. LITTLE (DECEASED)
PO BOX 372
CATAWBA NC 28609
463 STONEMARKER RD
166.00
Catawba
3686.2091-4631
3260-1287
QUEENS REAL ESTATE, LLC
MOORESVILLE NO 28117
MARIE M. LITTLE AND TANYA LITTLE
2767-397
HODGE, THE TRUSTEES UNDER THE
100 FOX SQUIRREL CT
167.00
Catawba
3686-2091-5833
3482-1853
MARIE M. LITTLE REVOCABLE LIVING
CARY, NO 27518
TRUST DATED MAY 13 2002.
100 FOX SQUIRREL CT
167.01
Catawba
3686-2092-6132
2588-2000
Melvin L. Little (Recently Deceased)
CARY NC 27518
MARIE M. LITTLE AND JILL L. HUTER, THE
TRUSTEES UNDER THE MARIE M. LITTLE
100 FOX SQUIRREL CT
167.02
Catawba
368620917615
2767-367
REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST DATED MAY
CARY, NC 27518
13 2002.
MARIE M. LITTLE AND JILL L. HUTER, THE
TRUSTEES UNDER THE MARIE M. LITTLE
100 FOX SQUIRREL CT
168.00
Catawba
368620922195
2767-397
REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST DATED MAY
CARY, NO 27518
13 2002.
41 AUTUMN
169.00
Catawba
3686-2092-0134
2916-505
ROBERT H. PAHL & BETTE L. PAHL
MOUNT SINAI, NY 11766
BRENDA (SHAM TURNER
6862 TOMMY SHERRILL RD
170.00
Catawba
3686-2082-6206
1646-731
& GRADY LEON TURNER
SHERRILLS FORD NO 28673
701 HIGHWAY+196+{@[St+198:199
171.00
Catawba
3686-1682-2859
2742-697
WILLIAM FISHER & FARRELL MORRELL
CONCORD, NO 28025
172.00
Catawba
3686-1673-6290
1793-340
MYRA HICKS LITTLE
5590 S NC 16 BUSINESS HWY
MAIDEN NC 28650
1107 FOXCHASE DR
172.01
Catawba
3686-1563-8394
3434-152
NEAL POWELL
NEWTON NO 28658
5720 HICKS DR
172.03
Catawba
3686-1673.5479
2911-1777
CRYSTAL HICKS BROWN
DENVER NC 28037
5720 HICKS DR
172.02
Catawba
3686-1673-6629
2911-1777
CRYSTAL HICKS BROWN
DENVER, NO 28037
THOMAS JEFFERY LITTLE
0.25% UNDIVIDED INTEREST
PO BOX 117
173.00
Catawba
3686-1683-3925
3111-1558
& WILLENE C LITTLE 99.75%
DENVER, NC 28037
UNDIVIDED INTEREST
174.00
Catawba
3686-1694-4892
2013-1933
KENNETH LEON BISSETTE
2465 POOVEY ST
Newton NC 28658
1222.656
CAROLYN PUNTCH CANADY & ANDREW
3257 STONEHAVEN DR
174.01
Catawba
3686-1674-8609
NEED ESTATE FILE
R.PUNTCH
CHARLESTON SC 29420
1354-247
CAROLYN PUNTCH CANADY & ANDREW
3257 STONEHAVEN DR
174.02
Catawba
3686-1275-6190
NEED ESTATE FILE
R.PUNTCH
CHARLESTON SC 29420
7978 VISTA VIEW DR
174.03
Catawba
3686-12757380
3440-1644 & 3436-1354
BSCLSC PROPERTIES LLC
SHERRILLS FORD NO 28673
7978 VISTA VIEW DR
174.04
Catawba
3686-11753259
3436-1354
BSCLSC PROPERTIES LLC
SHERRILLS FORD NC 28673

Project Tract
Number
County
Tax ID Number
Vesting Deed
Landowner Name
Mailing Address
175.00
Catawba
3696-0905-3583
2013-1936
GEORGE HUBERT BISSETTE
1057 OLD OAK DR
YADKINVILLE NC 27055
6254 HIGHWAY 150 E
190.00
Catawba
3697-1711-6277
924-86
CROSS COUNTRY CAMPGROUND, INC,
DENVER NC 28037
191.00
Catawba
3697-0313.2119
2991.652
ARNOLD MAX CAMPBELL FAMILY, LLC.
6327 LINEBERGER RD
SHERRILLS FORD NC 28673
191.01
Catawba
3697-0493-4240
2969-943
ROBERT WRAY BURKE & CHRISTIE LEE
7737 Cambridge Way
BURKE
DENVER NC 28037
191.02
Catawba
3687-0493-4770
2969-946
ROBERT WRAY BURKE & CHRISTIE LEE
7737 Cambridge Way
BURKE
DENVER NC 28037
3864 CARIBOU DR
191.04
Catawba
3687-0493-8615
2749-674
JOHN JEFFREY ICARD
SHERRILLS FORD NC 28673
191.05
Catawba
3687-0493.6816
24031279
THOMAS MORRIS & JANICE MORRIS
3864 CARIBOU DR
SHERRILLS FORD NC 28673
191.06
Catawba
3687-0494-6164
291540
MARLYN INVESTMENT PROPERTIES, LLC.
3864 CARIBOU DR
SHERRILLS FORD NC 28673
193.00
Catawba
3697-0115-2240
2038.206
BARBARA L. MEARES
6126 Lineberger Road
SHERRILLS FORD NC 28673
194.00
Catawba
3697-0115-4687
1897-589
JEFFERY B. LINEBERGER & DONNA B.
6170 LINEBERGER RD
LINEBERGER
SHERRILLS FORD NC 28673
196.00
Catawba
3697-0126.4675
1915.1017
JEFFERY BENSON LINEBERGER &
6170 LINEBERGER RD
DONNA B. LINEBERGER
SHERRILLS FORD NC 28673
199.00
Catawba
3697-0137-9660
2746-821
BRANDON ALAN LOWMAN
6202 LINEBERGER RD
SHERRILLS FORD NC 28673
3171-1936'
6202 LINEBERGER RD
200.00
Catawba
3697-0148-9766
3171-1932;
BRANDON ALAN LOWMAN
3171-1927
SHERRILLS FORD, NC 28673
201.00
Catawba
3698-0474-3141
3056-1219
CATAWBA COUNTY
P 0 BOX 389
NEWTON NC 28658
207.00
Catawba
4608-0312-8456
3323.1618
ROBERT BRENT GABRIEL
P 0 BOX 100
SHERRILLS FORD NC 28673
208.00
Catawba
4608-0311-9903
3276-1317
JERRY Y. BEATTY & JOY C. BEATTY
3161 MT PLEASANT RD
SHERRILLS FORD NC 28673
209.00
Catawba
4608-0332-6630
3256-107
DAVID J. ABERNATHY &
3018 MT PLEASANT RD
STEPHANIE ANNE ABERNATHY
SHERRILLS FORD NC 28673
210.00
Catawba
4608-0331-2520
2367-791 &
MICHAEL HERBERT HILDEBRAN
3158 MT PLEASANT RD
2366-1630
SHERRILLS FORD NC 28673
211.00
Catawba
4608-0340.9934
2046-1479
WALTERS BROTHERS, INC.
102 SHERWOOD DR
HUNTERSVILLE NC 28078
BARBARA WHITENER HILDERBRAN,
TRUSTRR OF THE BARBARA
6999 W NC 10 HWY
211.01
Catawba
4608-0451-4648
3160-126
HILDERBRAN LIVING TRUST, DATED
VALE NC 28168
NOVEMBER 28 2012
OBED DANE BEATTY
8653 SHERRILLS FORD
213.00
Catawba
4608-0470.5245
652-307 & 652-306
Need to confirm Hate's Interest
SHERRILLS FORD NC 28673
310-517
3616 SLANTING BRIDGE RD
214.00
Catawba
4608-0480.8235
WEDDIE LENS GABRIEL
Need 2005-E-0040
SHERRILLS FORD NC 28673
215.00
Catawba
4607-0299-7748
8933
WEDDIE LEWIS GABRIEL
3616 SLANTING BRIDGE RD
Need 2005-E-0040
SHERRILLS FORD NC 28673
216.00
Catawba
4617-0109-0319
1335-64
WILLIE HELEN LITTLE, HEIRS
7974 GREGORY RD
SHERRILLS FORD NC 28673
1408-671 & 652-58
AUDREY ORENE TURNER & BETTY
7983 GREGORY RD
217.00
Catawba
4617-0109-1165
Need 74-E-50
TURNER
SHERRILLS FORD NC 28673
218.00
Catawba
4617-0109-5009
3377-1635
PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS COPANY, INC.
4720 PIEDMONT ROW DRIVE
CHARLOTTE NC 28210
219.00
Catawba
4617-0108.5722
3229.5
ZADA VICTORIA GABRIEL
1011 KEPRECHIAN LN
WINSTON-SALEM, NC 27104
223.00
Catawba
4617-0119.0186
2968-1829
DUKE ENERGY CAROLINAS LLC
400 S TRYON ST STE 30C
CHARLOTTE NC 28202
1011 KEPRECIAN
226.00
Catawba
4617-0118-9474
3229-0005
ZADA VICTORIA GABRIEL
WINSTON-SALEM 2 NC 27104
227.00
Catawba
4617-0128-2272
2662-1588
CATAWBA LAND BANK, LLC.
2718 PEA E RD
E, NC 28625
STATESVILLE NC 6
228.00
Catawba
4618-0342.6350
2954-421
DUKE ENERGY CAROLINAS LLC
8230 E NC HWY 150
TERRELL NC 28682
JIMMY S. LITTLE & RAYNELLE J. LITTLE &
230.00
Catawba
3696-0916-0794
2898-1610
DAVID CARPENTER & SHANA
4631 LITTLE FARD DR
CARPENTER & DALE LITTLE & DANA
DENVER, NC 28037
LITTLE
JIMMY S. LITTLE & RAYNELLE J. LITTLE &
231.00
Catawba
3696-0507-8632
2888.1610
DAVID CARPENTER & SHANA
6047 E NC 150 HWY
CARPENTER & DALE LITTLE & DANA
DENVER, NC 28037
LITTLE
2010E-1167
BRENDA SNIPES DELLINGER (Recently
6087 3 NC 150 HWY
234.00
Catawba
3696-0517-5897
1777-389 (Back Deed)
Deceased) (Son - Matthew Dellinger)
DENVER, NC 28037
6086 E NC 150 HWY
237.00
Catawba
3696-0509-8880
3295.1715
DONALD B. LITTLE
DENVER NC 28037
239.00
Catawba
3697-0269.4053
3174-524
JAMIE D. BRUMLEY
2186 MATHIS CHURCH RD
CATAWBA NC 28609
245.00
Catawba
3698-0480-3430
3378.1426
CLERENCE RACE
1855 BURRIS RD
Combined With 248
(Septic Lot for Lot 12
CONOVER NC 28613
246.00
Catawba
3698-0470.9620
2914-800
MACCABEES LLC
147 KNOXVIEW LN
MOORESVILLE NC 28117

Project Tract
Number
County
Tax ID Number
Vesting Deed
Landowner Name
Mailing Address
3698-0480-1537 and
147 KNOXVIEW LN
247.00
Catawba
3698-0480-4592 (Septic
2914-834 and septic lot
MACCABEES LLC
Lot
MOORESVILLE, NC 28117
3698-0480-3610 and
248.00
Catawba
3698-0480-3430 (Septic
3378-1426 with septic lot
CLERENCE RACE
1855 BURRIS RD
Lot
CONOVER, NC 28613
1127 WINDSOR STREET
251.00
Catawba
3698-0480-6584
3084-302
JUDITH W. ROGERS
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84105-1311
252.00
Catawba
3698-0480-8508
3232-1482
BLUE JAY INVESTMENTS LLC
18 CALVARY TRAIL
MARKHAM, ONTARIO
253.00
Catawba
3698-0480-9612
3232-1482
BLUE JAY INVESTMENTS LLC
18 CALVARY TRAIL
MARKHAM ONTARIO
254.00
Catawba
3698-0480-9699
3232-1482
BLUE JAY INVESTMENTS LLC
18 CALVARY TRAIL
MARKHAM, ONTARIO
255.00
Catawba
3698-0490-0788
3232-1482
BLUE JAY INVESTMENTS LLC
18 CALVARY TRAIL
MARKHAM ONTARIO
FOREST SHORES HOMEOWNERS
P.O. Box 3608
256.00
Catawba
3698-0490-1940
2880-413
ASSOCIATION INC
Mooresville, NC 28117-3608
257.00
Catawba
3698.0490.2967
3091-1769
CATHY L. ALMON
1207-D Crews Rd
PAUL A. HOWARD
Matthews, NC 28105-7582
3698-0491-4192 (Lot
258.00
Catawba
10); 3698-0490-2703
3364-1466
MOORESVILLE BB HOLDINGS LLC
P.O. Box 3608
Lot 10-A
Mooresville, NC 28117-3608
259.00
Catawba
3698-0491-9329
1223-119; 3216-877; 3219
NANCY P. TURNER
1637 Prison Camp Road
1932; 3255-1101
Newton NC
2424-1205
MICHAEL NEIL GABRIEL
P.O. BOX 86
260.00
Catawba
4608-0301-4834
2420-684
NANCY MARTIN GABRIEL
SHERRILLS FORD, NC 28673
261.00
Catawba
4608-0311-3478
3061-338
JERRY Y. BEATTY
3161 MT. PLEASANT ROAD
JOY C. BEATTY
SHERRILLS FORD NC 28673
262.00
Lincoln
83032
2679-85
Brandon Ramy Juhaish Jessica
6896 EVERWOOD LANE
Blair Juhaish
IRON STATION NC 28080
264.00
Lincoln
83028
1616-540
Paul Voina
14726 GRAYVILLE DR
Simona Voina
LA MIRADA CA 90638
265.00
Lincoln
83029
2238-839
Damon Martin
6945 EVERWOOD LANE
IRON STATION NC 28080
266.00
Lincoln
90091
2578-521
Dennis E. Norman
350 N INGLESIDE FARM RD
Kathryn P. Norman
IRON STATION NC 28080
267.00
Lincoln
80838
2578-504
Dennis E. Norman
350 N INGLESIDE FARM RD
Kathryn P. Norman
IRON STATION NC 28080
269.00
Lincoln
56986
770-081
Keith C. Nielsen
1309 GARLAND LN
Cheryl B. Nielsen
LINCOLNTON NC 28092
270.00
Lincoln
58872
853-540
James R. Barnes, Jr.
3449 PETITE LANE
Judy G. Barnes
CATAWBA SPRINGS, NC 28037
271.00
Lincoln
58873
834-302
Robert D. Muse
PO BOX 286
DENVER NC 28037
275.00
Catawba
3698-0491-5050
3416-032
James B. Crume
874 EAGLESKNOLL CT
Catherine A. Crume
CINCINNATI OH 45255
277.00
Catawba
4617-0118.2239
3032-1456
Code Lawrence, III
4642 WEST MARKET ST #182
GREENSBORO NC 27407
278.00
Catawba
4617-0118-3372
2457-564
Thomas Brunelle
7898 GREGORY RD
Mariana Brunelle
SHERRILLS FORD, NC 28673
278.01
Catawba
4617-0118-5236
2220-409
Shirley D. Lawrence
509 27th Street Drive NE
Hickory,NC
278.02
Catawba
4617-0118-7244
2220-407
Pamela L. Stewart
1239 Shannonbrook Drive
Newton, NC
278.03
Catawba
4617-0118-9212
3032-1456
Code Lawrence, III
4642 WEST MARKET ST #182
Greensboro NC 27407
279.00
Catawba
4617-0108-5910
1705-039
Robert Turner, Jr.
173 8TH AVE SW CONOVER, NC
Lillie Mae Turner
28613

Attachment 2. Property Survey Notification Letter
Piedmont Natural Gas — Line 451/Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline Project Pond & Company
PCN Supplemental Information March 2019

011 Piedmont
Natural Gas
DATE
Owner
Adress
City, State, Zip
Re: Piedmont Natural Gas Pipeline Survey Activity Notice - Line 451
PIN Number: County PID#
Dear Landowner,
Piedmont Natural Gas ("Piedmont") will be installing a new pipeline in Lincoln County and Catawba County. Piedmont
is committed to safe, reliable natural gas service, and projects like these are part of our routine pipeline operations
throughout our three -state service territory.
To begin this project, a land survey and engineering study is needed to determine the exact route for the new pipeline.
This letter is to let you know that your property has been identified for inclusion in this survey and to request your
permission for our engineers, surveying contractor, and other individuals (geologists and environmental scientists) to
have access to your property in order to perform the preliminary survey and land assessment. A surveyor's "right -of -
entry" in order to perform the survey is provided for under North Carolina General Statute 40A.
The survey process itself is typically routine and minimally disruptive to the property. It may be necessary in some cases,
however, to take core soil samples during the engineering phase. Should that be the case, Piedmont, or its contractor(s),
will coordinate with individual property owners prior to the sampling process. Piedmont is committed to restoring any
such area to its original state after the survey and assessment process has been completed.
If we determine that your property falls within the proposed pipeline route, a representative of Piedmont Natural
Gas will contact you to negotiate the purchase of those land rights needed to proceed with this project. As a part of
this process, an exhibit of your property will be prepared, showing where the proposed easement for the pipeline project
is situated in relation to your property. This will NOT involve the purchase or relocation of homes.
Our schedule is such that we would ask for your approval within 30 days. If we have not heard from you by that time by
calling the number below, we will assume that we have your permission to access your property for the purposes of this
survey and assessment under the NC General Statute stated above.
If you have any questions, you may contact one of our contracted right of way agents from Professional Property
Services at Land Agent Contact Info.
Piedmont Natural Gas is committed to being as open and transparent as possible throughout this process and to
minimizing any inconvenience to you. We look forward to working with you and thank you in advance for your
consideration.
Sincerely yours,
RV40 qmvez
Ryan Houck
Real Estate Representative
Piedmont Natural Gas

Attachment 3. Resource Impact Tables
Piedmont Natural Gas — Line 451/Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline Project Pond & Company
PCN Supplemental Information March 2019

w
m
w
w
v
w
v
w
m
w
w
cn
v
m
m
cn
co
c
O
OD
co
O
Cb
CD
V
v
v
ti
CA
m
O
m
CS)
w
CT
w
CT
C
CD
'P
A
m
41W
w
W
cn
m
w
N
N
N
m
cn
(n
.
CD
CD
N
41
O
W
v
O
W
Na
O
CD
CT
�I
W W
N
D
O
CD
V
N
O
CO
CA
W
4--O
W
W
N
CD
N
ao
N
N
N
CI1
N
A
--q
--i-1
—1
--q
—1
--i—i
--1
-i
—1
--1
--1
--1
--4
--1
—1
—1
--1
--1
--1
--1
—1
—1
--1--1
—1
—1
—1
—1
—1
—1
—1
CD
3
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
0
0
0
0
0
0
CD
0
0
M
0
0
0
CD
CD
M
0
CD
0
0
CD
0
0
0
CD
CD
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
—{
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
33
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
�..
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.' m
m
@
@
m
ar
v
n�
n�
m
@
@
m
m
v
v
m
v
ig
o..
"O
Z
"D
-0
-0
-0
-0
-U
-O
M
M
M
M
'O
-0
-O
-0
-0
M
"'O
'"O
'D
z
z
z
"D
"[7
' g'
'
m
m
m
z
m
z
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
z
m
m
m
z
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
Z
m
N `
ID
".
C7
C1
n
n
C7
n
C�
C7
C1
C7
C�
C1
C1
C7
C7
C7
C7
C7
C7
C1
C1
C�
n
n
C7
C7
C7
C7
n
n
C1
n
C�
C7
(7
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-
0
0
0
0
0
0_
o_
o_
o_
o_
0
0
0
0
0
0_
o_
o_
0
o
o
o
o
0
N
N
f/!
[A
N
N
(R
fn
(p
fA
f/1
cn
fll
f/)
fn
fn
CA
CD
[A
N
fn
fR
[O
CA
y
N
C/1
N
cn
Ch
fn
fO
[A
fn
f/!
N
f/1
.O
W
?
-A
N
M
W
W
A
M
N
M
M
CD
—I
NO
.A.
CT
M
N
-P-N
N
Na
CD
CT
CT
N
N
N
A
O
O
w
"_ N CD
V'.�
O
O
O
m m..
v
O
O
NO
V
O
OW
Cb
O
V
O
O
O
O
N
N
O
W
V
O
O
CCD
W
CT
O
O
�I
CA p
n �
m
m': -o r
�t.�. m-
O
CT
Oo
(A
C
O
O
O
++
V
W
CO
O'
V
M
�l
v
v
v
co
O
v
m
V
O
m
m
m
CD
(A
Co
V
�I
CO
CA
N
O
CD
M
v
'A'
(n
CD
A
W
V
W
c"
A
W
N
W
O
V
M
V
O
W
Co
CD
.P
CO
N
?
0= CD
e�
,N
n "m
M'
ID tD
3,..CD
Cf• �'
C).
17.

Cl
a,
t
E
LO
(
CD
d i
N W ,�
CO
p
CO
O
CDM
O
p
OOO
M
M
O
a) a-
r --N
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
C, E y'
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
CD
cts
:cc
.E
.� r-,, d
.0) •
O
r-
M
M
O
�
LO
CD
a)
n
CND
co
CD
CMI)
M
N
J :IL
E
cc
Q.
Eg
v
p
M
O
'� ` n•,-
o
0
0
LO
o
O
O
M
N
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
N
O
O
O
O
O
N
O
Q- E L'
m
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
d d'.
a)
R'
O
O
O
0,0
(a'v
U�,
LO
(C')
(D
N
In
'ch
Cl)
O
NO
Cl)
M
M
'•, C n
o„-
(n
w
(n
(n
(n
(n
(n
C
O
0%5
(n
Cn
(n
(n
N
F
d'•_cx
n a
d
`o
`o
o`
o
`o
C/o
`o
`O
(n
`o
(n
`o
(n
`o
d
`o
CD
`O
(n
`O
(n
'� .� •
3
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
C,
ci
U
0
C..i
U
U
Ci
O
C)
C)
C)
Ci
C)
O
C)
O
C)
O
C)
O
0
J
Ld
o, C.
L
s
•_ •-.
F-
F-
F-
--�
O
d
d
d
d
z
d
a
Z
Z
Zcu
v
ID
CL
Z
N
N
O
O
z
n
a)
�-
y
CU
n
a)
rn
a)
to
a)
cD
rn
(U
n
(U
to
a)
n
a)
(n
CU
O
O
(n
a)
w
N
w
a)
'LL. ._
0
oO
LO
LO
`o
`o
m
`O
m
`CL
(a
`o
m
(a
`o
�
(a
LO
c) (a CL CL. -
m
cl
cx
CLo
o
CL
A 'E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
=
E
E
,F- —
N
a)
a)
a)
a)
a)
a)
()
a)
N
a)
a)
-
F-
d
F--
F-
N
E
LL
Z
LO
LO
W W
LL
p
O
p
m
CO
Lo
(n0
LL
W
W
cts
W
LL.
a
IL
LL
a
a.
a
n.
a
a
L
a
o-
a
a
a
a.
a- a.
a
a.
a
o.
n
a
tZ
a)
a,
N W ,�
CO
p
CO
O
CDM
O
p
OOO
M
M
O
O
r --N
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
C, E y'
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
CD
O
:cc
n
E
O
'� ` n•,-
O
m
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
N
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
N
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
Q- E L'
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
0,0
'•, C n
o„-
(n
w
(n
(n
(n
(n
(n
(n
(n
(n
OO
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
CD
O
w
O
w
O
(n
(n
O
(n
O
0
O
(n
O
(n
(n
(n
w
CL
C)
U
Ci
O
C)
C,
ci
U
0
C..i
U
U
Ci
O
C)
C)
C)
Ci
C)
O
C)
O
C)
O
C)
O
0
O
ID
Z
N
N
O
O
z
n
a)
�-
y
CU
n
a)
rn
a)
to
a)
n
a)
rn
(U
n
(U
to
a)
n
a)
(n
CU
O
O
(n
a)
w
N
w
a)
'LL. ._
LL
LL
LL
W W
W W
LL
W
LL
11
(n
LL.
LL
W
W
W
W
LL.
LL
LL
LL
a,
a.
a
n.
a
a
a
a
o-
a
a
a
a.
a- a.
a
a.
a
o.
n
a
tZ
a)
CL
F-
C
p.
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
a)
co
o
N
(6
a)
[D
a)
(6
a)
(6
a)
a)
(9
a)
(O
(9
(D
(6
a)
(9
m
`o
m
`O
m
m
`o
m
o
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E=
E
E
E
E
a
a
F-
a`�
a
a`)
CL
(o
�
n
L
a)
F-
a`-
a
a)
F-
a`-
a
a)
�
a`�
n.
a`�
a
F-
a`-
a
a)
F-
a)
�
�--
a)
F-
L
o-
a)
F-
,
O
LO
I-
I-
co
M
t
Lo
Cf)
oD
N
N
>>
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
CNLO
J
S
CMN')
J
J
J
J
C-03
J
J
C-Cj)
_-j
J
J

Feature,ID
Type ofdmpact
Type of.Wetland
'Forested
fur sd ct onP
Area of'Impact (acres) ,
Temporary
Works" ace =,
Permanent
Easement.
WL35
Temporary
PFO
Yes
Cors
0.07
0
WL103
Permanent
PFO
Yes
Cors
0
0.06
WL103
Temporary
PFO
Yes
Cors
0.01
0
WL102
Permanent
PFO
Yes
Cors
0
0.05
WL102
Temporary
PFO
Yes
Cors
0.01
0
WL101
Permanent
PFO
Yes
Cors
0
0.04
WL111
Permanent
PEM
No
Cors
0
0.02
WL112
Temporary
PEM
No
Cors
0.01
0
WL115
Temporary
PEM
No
Cors
0.12
0
Total Impact Acreage
0.51
1.15
Type of Impact Area of Impact (acres)
Permanent Wetland Conversion 1.04
Temporary Wetland Impacts 0.62
Total Wetland Impacts 1.66

Print Form
DMS ILF Mitigation Request Statement of Compliance with §143-214.11 & 143-214.20
(link to G.S. 143-214.11)
Prior to accessing the Division of Mitigation Services (DMS), all applicants must demonstrate compliance
with G.S. § 143-214.11 and 143-214.20. All requests MUST include this form signed and dated by the
permit applicant or an authorized agent. Please refer to DENR's Implementation Policy for more details.
Compliance Statement:
I have read and understand G.S. § 143-214.11 and 214.20 and have, to the best of my
knowledge, complied with the requirements. I understand that participation in the DMS is
voluntary and subject to approval by permitting agencies.
Please check all that apply:
Applicant is a Federal or State Government Entity or a unit of local government
meeting the requirements set forth in G.S. 143-214.11 and is not required to
purchase credits from a mitigation bank.
X There are no listed mitigation banks with the credit type I need located in the
hydrologic unit where this impact will take place (link to DWR list)
Mitigation bank(s) in the hydrologic unit where the impacts will occur have been
contacted and credits are not currently available.
The DWR or the Corps of Engineers did not approve of the use of a mitigation
bank for the required compensatory mitigation for this project.
o This is a renewal request and the permit application is under review. Bank
credits were not available at the time the application was submitted.
Enter date permit application was submitted for review:
Note: It is the applicant's responsibility to document any inquiries made to private mitigation
banks regarding credit availability.
I have read and understand the DMS refund policies (attached)
initial here
Flynt Barksdale
Signature of Applicant or Agent Printed Name
03/13/2019
Date
Line 451/Duke Marshall Pipeline Project Sherrills Ford, NC
Project Name
Location

Refund Policy for Fees Paid to DMS In -Lieu Fee Programs (9/21/2009)
Purpose: The purpose of this policy is to make clear the circumstances and process under which a
permittee can obtain a refund while simultaneously balancing customer service and responsible
business practices. This policy applies to all refund requests made on or after the publication date of
this policy.
Policy Statement: The policy of DMS is to allow for refunds under certain conditions.
1. All refund requests must be made in writing to the DMS In -Lieu Fee Program Coordinator at
kelly.williams(aD_ncdenr.gov.
2. All refund requests are subject to fund availability. DMS does not guarantee fund availability for
any request.
3. The request must either come from the entity that made the payment or from an authorized agent.
Third parties requesting refunds must provide written authorization from the entity that made the
payment specifying the name and address of the authorized refund recipient.
4. Refund requests related to unintended overpayments, typographical errors or incorrect invoices
should be brought the attention of the In -Lieu Fee Program Coordinator as soon as possible. Such
requests are typically approved without delay.
5. Payments made under the incremental payment procedure are not eligible for refunds.
6. Refund requests made within nine months of payment to DMS will only be considered for requests
associated with projects that have been terminated or modified where the permittee's mitigation
requirements have been reduced. Such requests must be accompanied by written verification from the
permitting agency that the project has been cancelled, the permits have been rescinded or have been
modified, or the mitigation requirements have been reduced.
7. Refund requests made more than nine months from the payment date will only be considered for
permits that were terminated or modified to not require any mitigation. Such requests must be
accompanied by written verification from the permitting agency that the project has been cancelled, the
permits have been rescinded and/or mitigation is no longer required.
8. Refund requests not meeting the criteria specified above are not eligible for a refund.
9. Refund requests that meet the criteria above will be elevated to DMS Senior Management for
review. The following considerations apply to all refund requests:
a. availability of funds after consideration of all existing project and regulatory obligations
b. the date the payment was made
c. the likelihood DMS can use the mitigation procured using the payment to meet other
mitigation requirements
10. Once a refund has been approved, the refund recipient must provide a completed W-9 form to the
DMS In -Lieu fee Program Coordinator within two weeks in order to process the refund though the
State Controller's Office.
11. All decisions shall be final.

Attachment 1 — Figures

MWONNO 1w
♦ • .. v
Long: -81.023
IF
.» .' e 1 -.
Long: -81.0651
Pk
41 • ' D°i..e �� Jnr t , {, t: u"iy.
fk
iL
�' ..\ • .fig * . _ ' ] � , 1. ,iIYY �� •.. � i �
r. r ..� • tom'` a I �' �:%
rr 41,s 1 • U s.
Legend
Pipeline

ipd ra Rv
snq
Fa
Lat:35.5978
Long: -80.9721
°w !
ti
ar. e
< � Lat:35.602
N Long: -81.023 ,e
14
Lat:35.5516 k,<,, •< 7 E` ���
Long: -81.0651
Aiik46 a a
to .•K�.R° � .k g } oY
e�r� °r 4• PA �
t �!
n
C
.�
1< Mpall� _"i a 4^
s
� i a
� tt
Lat:35.4206
Legend Long: -81.0244 i
Pipeline Route iii k*
Service Layer Credits: Esri, HERE, Garmin, © OpenStreetMap contributors
Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN,
Figure 2
Early Coordination Map - Topo
e 0 1,000,000 2,000,000 Feet Piedmont Natural Gas - Line 451, Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline
Catawba and Lincoln Counties
November 2018
0 340,000 680,000 Meters

ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
TIM BAUMGARTNER
Director
Jason Brown
Piedmont Natural Gas
PO Box 33068
Charlotte, NC 28233
STM
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
March 13, 2019
Expiration of Acceptance: 9/13/2019
Project: Line 451 Duke Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline County: Lincoln
This is a conditional acceptance letter.
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) is willing to
accept payment for compensatory mitigation for impacts associated with the above referenced project as
indicated in the table below. Please note that this decision does not assure that participation in the DMS in -
lieu fee mitigation program will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts.
It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact permitting agencies to determine if payment to the DMS will
be approved. You must also comply with all other state, federal or local government permits, regulations or
authorizations associated with the proposed activity including G.S. § 143-214.11.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. If we have not
received a copy of the issued 404 Permit/401 Certification within this time frame, this acceptance will
expire. It is the applicant's responsibility to send copies of the permits to DMS. Once DMS receives a copy
of the permit(s) an invoice will be issued based on the required mitigation in that permit and payment must
be made prior to conducting the authorized work. The amount of the in -lieu fee to be paid by an applicant is
calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and policies listed on the DMS website.
Based on the information supplied by you in your request to use the DMS, the impacts for which you are
requesting compensatory mitigation credit are summarized in the following table. The amount of mitigation
required and assigned to DMS for this impact is determined by permitting agencies and may exceed the
impact amounts shown below.
River Basin Impact Location Impact Type Impact Quantity
(8 -digit HUC)
i Catawba 03050101 Zone 1/Zone 2 3,600/2,400
Catawba
03050101 Non -Riparian Wetland* 1.05
03050101 Warm Stream 167
*DMS does not have non -riparian wetland credit available in this service area. In accordance with the
directive from the February 8, 2011 IRT meeting, non -riparian wetland impacts located in the
mountains and piedmont areas of North Carolina can be accepted as requested, but mitigated
utilizing riparian wetland mitigation credits. Upon receipt of payment, DMS will take responsibility for
providing the compensatory mitigation. The mitigation will be performed in accordance with the In -Lieu Fee
Program instrument dated July 28, 2010 and 15A NCAC 02B .0295 as applicable. Thank you for your
interest in the DMS in -lieu fee mitigation program. If you have any questions or need additional information,
please contact Kelly Williams at [phone].
cc: Flynt Barksdale, agent
Sincerely,
Zar�s. B Stanfillanagement Supervisor
r. air E QW
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Dtvtsion of Mitigation Services
217 W _jones Street I kbS2 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1652
419.707.8976

Attachment B. Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Letter.
Jurisdictional Determination Map Package

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. SAW -2015-01412 County: Catawba U.S.G.S. Quad: NC- Lake Norman North
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Requestor: Jason Brown
Address: 4720 Piedmont Row Drive
Charlotte, NC 28210
Telephone Number: 704-731-4681
E-mail: Jason.brown664duke-enerev.com .
Size (acres) 406.86
Nearest Town Sherrills Ford
Nearest Waterway Beaverdam Creek
River Basin Santee
USGS HUC 03050101
Coordinates Latitude: 35.5971
Longitude: 40.9727
Location description: The review area is located 0.426 miles East of the intersection of Sherrills Ford Rd and McDonald Dr. in
Catawba County.
Indicate Which of the Following Annly:
A. Preliminary Determination
® There appear to be waters, including wetlands on the above described project area/property, that may be subject to Section 404
of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403). The
waters, including wetlands have been delineated, and the delineation has been verified by the Corps to be sufficiently accurate
and reliable. The approximate boundaries of these waters are shown on the enclosed delineation map dated 1/1/2019. Therefore
this preliminary jurisdiction determination may be used in the permit evaluation process, including determining compensatory
mitigation. For purposes of computation of impacts, compensatory mitigation requirements, and other resource protection
measures, a permit decision made on the basis of a preliminary JD will treat all waters and wetlands that would be affected in any
way by the permitted activity on the site as if they are jurisdictional waters of the U.S. This preliminary determination is not an
appealable action under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process (Reference 33 CFR Part 331). However, you may
request an approved JD, which is an appealable action, by contacting the Corps district for further instruction.
❑ There appear to be waters, including wetlands on the above described project area/property, that may be subject to Section 404
of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403).
However, since the waters, including wetlands have not been properly delineated, this preliminary jurisdiction determination
may not be used in the permit evaluation process. Without a verified wetland delineation, this preliminary determination is
merely an effective presumption of CWA/RHA jurisdiction over all of the waters, including wetlands at the project area, which
is not sufficiently accurate and reliable to support an enforceable permit decision. We recommend that you have the waters,
including wetlands on your -project area/property delineated. As the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland
delineation in a timely manner, you may Wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that can be verified by the Corps.
B. Approved Determination
❑ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described project area/property subject to the permit
requirements of Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403) and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
(CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for
a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ There are waters, including wetlands on the above described project area/property subject to the permit requirements of Section
404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) (33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this
determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.,
❑ We recommend you have the waters, including wetlands on your project area/property'delineated. As the Corps may not be
able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that
can be verified by the Corps.

SAW -2015-01412
❑ The waters, including wetlands on your project area/property have been delineated and the delineation has been verified by
the Corps. The approximate boundaries of these waters are shown on the enclosed delineation map dated DATE. We strongly
suggest you have this delineation surveyed. Upon completion, this survey should be reviewed and verified by the Corps. Once
verified, this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to CWA jurisdiction on your property which, provided
there is no change in the law or our published regulations, may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years.
❑ The waters, including wetlands have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat signed by the
Corps Regulatory Official identified below on DATE. Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this
determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described project area/property which are subject to the
permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA).
You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in Morehead City, NC, at [phone] to determine their
requirements.
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US, including wetlands, without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311). Placement of dredged or fill material, construction or
placement of structures, or work within navigable waters of the United States without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Sections 9 and/or 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (33 USC § 401 and/or 403). If you have any questions
regarding this determination and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact Catherine M. Janiczak at 704-510-1438 or
Catherine.M.JaniczakCa,,usace. armv.mil.
C. Basis For Determination: Basis For Determination: See the Preliminary jurisdictional determination
form dated 3/14/2019.
D. Remarks: None.
E. Attention USDA Program Participants
This delineation/determination has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps' Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the particular site
identified in this request. The delineation/determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security
Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in USDA programs, you should request
a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
F. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in B.
above)
This correspondence constitutes an approved jurisdictional determination for the above described site. If you object to this
determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331. Enclosed you will find a
Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal this determination you
must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Jason Steele, Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW, Room 10M15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for appeal
under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP. Should you
decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by Not applicable.
**It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Division Office if you do not object to the determination in this correspondence.**
JANICZAK.CATHERINE.MARIE.153 Digitallysio= bGovernm ntou= oD, ABIE7535587066
`DN:c=US,o US. Governmentou=DOD,ou=Pq,ou=USA
7� 587066 u1_�ANICZAKCA7HEBINEMABIE1535587066
Corps Regulatory Official: Date: 2019A3.1411.4229-0600•
Date of JD: 3/14/2019 Expiration Date of JD: Not applicable

SAW -2015-01412
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we
continue to do so, please complete the Customer Satisfaction Survey located at
http://corpsmapu.usace.army.mil/cm_apex/f?p=136:4:0
Copy furnished:
Agent: Pond Co
Flynt Barksdale
Address: 3500 Parkway Lane
Peachtree Corners, GA 30092
Telephone Number: 678-336-7740
E-mail: barksdalef(at,pondco.com

NOTIFICATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL OPTIONS AND PROCESS AND
I.JitE .UE , _ OR APPEAL
Applicant: Jason Brown File Number: SAW-2015-01412 Date: 3/1.4/2019
Attached is: See Section below
❑ INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT Standard Permit or Letter ofpermission) A
❑ PROFFERED PERMIT Standard Permit or Letter ofpermission) B
❑ PERMIT DENIAL C
❑ APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION D
® PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION E
SECTION I - The following identifies your rights and options regarding an administrative appeal of the above decision.
Additional information may be found at or http://www.usace.army.mil/Missions/CivilWorks/Re ug latoryProgramandPermits.asi2x
or the Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331.
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request
that the permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section II of this form and return the form to the district
engineer. Your objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will
forfeit your right to appeal the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your
objections and may: (a) modify the permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your
objections, or (c) not modify the permit having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After
evaluating your objections, the district engineer will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in
Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein,
you may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of
this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days
of the date of this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by
completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division
engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or provide new
information.
• ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the
date of this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
• APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers
Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the district engineer. This form
must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps regarding the
preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved JD (which may be appealed),
by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new information for further consideration by the
Corps to reevaluate the JD.

SECTION 11- REQUEST FOR APPEAL or OBJECTIONS TO AN INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your objections to an initial
proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to this form to clarify where your reasons or
objections are addressed in the administrative record.)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps memorandum for the
record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the review officer has determined is needed to
clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps may add new information or analyses to the record.
However, you may provide additional information to clarify the location of information that is already in the administrative
record.
POINT OF CONTACT FOR QUESTIONS OR INFORMATION:
If you have questions regarding this decision and/or the
If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you may
appeal process you may contact:
also contact:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division
Mr. Jason Steele, Administrative Appeal Review Officer
Attn: Catherine M. Janiczak
CESAD-PDO
Charlotte Regulatory Office
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, South Atlantic Division
U.S Army Corps of Engineers
60 Forsyth Street, Room 10M15
8430 University Executive Park Drive, Suite 615
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Charlotte, North Carolina 28262
Phone: [phone]
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any government
consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You will be provided a 15 day
notice of any site investigation, and will have the opportuni to participate in all site investiations.
Date:
Telephone number:
Signature of appellant oragent.
For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits send this form to:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, Attn: Catherine M. Janiczak, 69 Darlington Avenue, Wilmington, North
Carolina 28403
For Permit denials, Proffered Permits and Approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this form to:
Division Engineer, Commander, U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic, Attn: Mr. Jason Steele, Administrative Appeal
Officer, CESAD-PDO, 60 Forsyth Street, Room 10M15, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]

PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: 3/14/2019
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Jason Brown, 4720 Piedmont Row Drive,Charlotte, NC
28210
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: Wilmington District, Marshall Steam Plan PJD, SAW -
2015 -01412
D. PROJECT LOCATIONS) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The review area is located 0.426 miles East
of the intersection of Sherrills Ford Rd and McDonald Dr. in Catawba County.
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County: Catawba City: Sherrills Ford
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Latitude: 35.5971 Longitude: -80.9727
Universal. Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: Beaverdam Creek
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk). Determination. Date:.
® Field Determination. Date(s); 01/16/2019
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES INREVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Estimated�amount of
Geographic authority to
Type of aquatic
Latitude (decimal
Longitude (decimal
aquatic resources in
resources (i.e.,
which the aquatic resource
Site Number
review area (acreage
"maybe" subject (i.e.,
degrees)
degrees)
wetland vs. non-
and linear feet, if
Section 404 or Section
'
applicable
wetland waters)
10/404) .
PS1
35.425988
-81.028258
182 linear feet
Non -wetland
Sec. 404
P52
35.425192
-80.028541
146 linear feet
Non -wetland
Sec. 404
PS3
35.433337
-81.031214
156 linear feet
Non=wetland
Sec. 404
IS5
35.433386
-81.030964
103 linear feet
Non -wetland
Sec. 404
WL4
35.434029
-81.031041
0.89 acres
Wetland
Sec. 404
PS6
35.438127
-81.034086
134 linear feet
Non -wetland
Sec. 404
WL7
35.438521
-81.034219
0.05 acres
Wetland
Sec. 404
WL10
35.447602
-81.034394
0.04 acres
Wetland
Sec. 404

Site Number
Latitude (decimal
degrees)
Longitude (decimal
degrees)
Estimated amount of
aquatic resources in
review area (acreage
and linear feet, if
applicable
Type of aquatic
resources (i.e.,
wetland vs. non-
wetland waters)
Geographic authority to
which the aquatic, resource
"maybe" subject (i.e.,
Section 404 or Section
10/404)
PS14
35.468061
-81.035249
112 linear feet
Non -wetland
Sec. 404
WL15
35.468234
-81.035157
0.13 acres
Wetland
Sec. 404
WL16
35.471963
-81.035035
0.17 acres
Wetland
Sec. 404
PS17
35.473439
-81.035209
181 linear feet
Non -wetland
Sec. 404
PS21
35.484257
-81.040801
153 linear feet
Non -wetland
Sec. 404
PS24
35.489531
-81.041935
69 linear feet
Non -wetland
Sec. 404
WL25
35.489531
-81.041935
0.01 acres
Wetland
Sec. 404
IS22
35.496987
-81.040832
211 linear feet
Non -wetland
Sec. 404
WL23
35.496933
-81.040627
0.03 acres
Wetland
Sec. 404
IS26
35.497243
-81.040357
197 linear feet
Non -wetland
Sec. 404
IS27
35.501117
-81.038884
101 linear feet
Non -wetland
Sec. 404
PS28
35.503521
-81.039058
174 linear feet
Non -wetland
Sec. 404
PS29
35.508906
-81.039056
107 linear feet
Non -wetland
Sec. 404
PS30
35.521463
-81.040089
159 linear feet
Non -wetland
Sec. 404
PS31
35.523136
-81.043993
156 linear feet
Non -wetland
Sec. 404
PS34
35.526247
-81.047294
142 linear feet
Non -wetland
Sec. 404
WL37
35.530995
-81.052993
0.04 acres
Wetland
Sec. 404
IS36
35.527671
-81.049473
197 linear feet
Non -wetland
Sec. 404

Site Number
Latitude (decimal
degrees)
,
Longitude (decimal
degrees)
Estimated amountof
aquatic'resources in
review area (acreage
and linear feet, if
applicable.
Type of aquatic
resources (i.e.,
wetland vs. non-
,wetland waters)
Geographic authority to
which the aquatic resource
"may be" subject (i.e.,
Section 404 or Section
,10%404)
PS39
35.531474
-81.054032
104 linear feet
Non -wetland
Sec. 404
PS40
35.531879
-81.054461
156 linear feet
Non -wetland
Sec. 404
PS42
35.535475
-81.055041
325 linear feet
Non -wetland
Sec. 404
PS44
35.536514
-81.053606
123 linear feet
Non -wetland
Sec. 404
IS47
35.551187
-81.053016
175 linear feet
Non -wetland
Sec. 404
PS49
35.552332
-81.054966
139 linear feet
Non -wetland
Sec. 404
PS50
35.556306
-81.056347
325 linear feet
Non -wetland
Sec. 404
PS52
35.567609
-81.046598
123 linear feet
Non -wetland
Sec. 404
PS53
35.572389
-81.04887
134 linear feet
Non -wetland
Sec. 404
PS57
35.579677
-81.051393
129 linear feet
Non -wetland
Sec. 404
WL63
35.596234
-81.039192
0.13 acres
Wetland
Sec. 404
PS61
35.596096
-81.039206
141 linear feet
Non -wetland
Sec. 404
PS65
35.521463
-81.040089
164 linear feet
Non -wetland
Sec. 404
OW67
35.525952
-81.044873
0.33 acres
Non -wetland
Sec. 404
PS69
35.530995
-81.052993
145 linear feet
Non -wetland
Sec. 404
PS71
35.527671
-81.049473
39 linear feet
Non -wetland
Sec. 404
PS70
35.531474
-81.054032
120 linear feet
Non -wetland
Sec. 404
PS72
35.531879
-81.054461
189 linear feet
Non -wetland
Sec. 404

Site Number
Latitude (decimal
degrees)
Longitude (decimal,
degrees)
Estimated: amount of
aquatic resources in
review. area. (acreage'
and Iinear feet, if
applicable
Type of aquatic
resources (i.e.,
wetland"vs. non -
wetland waters)
Geographic authority to.
which.the aquatic resource ;
„
� maybe "subject'(i.e.,'
Section 404 or'Section
10/404)
PS73
35.535412
-81.055128
252 linear feet
Non -wetland
Sec. 404
WL74
35.535475
-81.055041
0.02 acres
Wetland
Sec. 404
WL75
35.535824
-81.054894
.0.05 acres
Wetland
Sec. 404
IS86
35.536514
-81.053606
156 linear feet
Non -wetland
Sec. 404
WL85
35.545358
-81:054644
0.01 acres
Wetland
Sec. 404..
PS87
35.551187
-81.053016
52 linear feet
Non -wetland
Sec. 404
WL88
35.552252
-81.055021
0.16 acres
Wetland
Sec. 404
IS93
35.556306
-81.056347
157 linear feet
Non -wetland
Sec. 404
WL92
35.567609
-81.046598
0.03 acres
Wetiand
Sec. 404
PS90
35.462420
-81.037313
116 linear feet
Non -wetland
Sec. 404
PS84
35.516915
-81.041896
136 linear feet
Non -wetland
Sec. 404
PS83
35.517171
-81.042475
75 linear feet
Non -wetland
Sec. 404
IS82
35.524601
-81.047131
218 linear feet
Non -wetland
Sec. 404
WL35
35.527423
-81.048195
0.09 acres
Wetland
Sec. 404
PS79
35.527719
-M.047856
54 linear feet
Non -wetland
Sec. 404
IS80
35.527921
-81.048172
10 linear feet
Non -wetland
Sec. 404
IS45
35.540029
-81.053463
218 linear feet
Non -wetland
Sec. 404
PS77
35.583638
-81.052884
26 linear feet
Non -wetland
Sec. 404

Site Number
Latitude (decimal
degrees)
Longitude (decimal
degrees)
Estimated amount of
aquatic resources in
review area (acreage
and linearfeet, if
_.applicable
Type of aquaticwhich
resources (i.e.,
Wetland vs. non-
wetland waters)
Geographic authority to
the aquatic resource
"may be" subject (i.e.,
Section.404 or Section
10/404)
PS51
35.583638
-81.052884
26 linear feet
Non -wetland
Sec. 404
WL107
35.482918
-81.037031•
0.14 acres
Wetland
Sec. 404
WL105
35.482648
-81.037322
0.04 acres
Wetland
Sec. 404
PS106
35.482680
-81.037170
51 linear feet
Non -wetland
Sec. 404
PS104
35.479154
-81.039202
139 linear feet
Non -wetland
Sec. 404
WL103
35.479080
-81.029925
0.12 acres
Wetland
Sec. 404
WL102
35.425866
-81.029925
0.08 acres
Wetland
Sec. 404
WL101
35.424785
-81.034087
0.04 acres
Wetland
Sec. 404
PS100
35.425254
-81.034037
136 linear feet
Non -wetland
Sec. 404
PS97
35.419831
-81.032389
108 linear feet
Non -wetland
Sec. 404
IS96
35.4196321
-81.032344
120 linear feet
Non -wetland
Sec. 404
IS32
35.523189
-81.044214
22linear.feet
Non -wetland
Sec. 404
IS38
35.531126
-81.052989
38 linear feet
Non -wetland
Sec. 404
PS59
35.582094
-81.050669
184 linear feet
Non -wetland
Sec. 404
PS76
35.598154
-80.977048
95 linear feet
Non -wetland
Sec. 404
WL111
35.597900
-80.979689
0.04 acres
Wetland
Sec. 404
WL112
35.534893
-81.053708
0.03 acres
Wetland
Sec. 404
WL 114
35.517064
-81.042211
0.01 acres
Wetland
Sec. 404

1) The Corps of Engineers- believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review
area, and the requestor of this. PJD is hereby advised of his. or her, option to request and obtain an
approved JD (AJD) for that'review area based on an informed -decision after having discussed the
various _types of JDs and their characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide General
Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre- construction notification" (PCN), or -
requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant has
not requested an 'AJD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby, made -aware that :.(1) the permit
applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an official
determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the option to request an AJD
before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing a permit
authorization on an AJD cot ld possibly result in'less compensatory mitigation being required or
different special conditions; (3) the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than
accepting .the terms and conditions of the NWP or other, general permit authorization;. (4) the applicant
can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that
permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5)
undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting an. AJD
constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g.,
signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps
permit authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the review area
affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and waives any challenge to such
jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement action, or. in any
administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7). whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD
or a PJD, the JD will be processed as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual
permit (and all terms and conditions contained. therein); or individual permit denial can be
administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic jurisdiction exists over
aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional -aquatic
resources in the review area, the Corps will provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is
practicable. This PJD finds that there "may be" waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be"
navigable waters of the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the
review area that could.be affected by the .proposed activity, based on the following information:
Estimated amount=of
Geographic authority to
aquatic -resources in
Type of aquatic
which the aquatic resource
Site.Number
Latitude (decimal
Longitude (decimal
review area (acreage
resources (i.e.,
"maybe" subject (i.e.,
degrees)
degrees)
and linear feet, if
wetland vs. non-
Section 404 or Section
applicable.
wetland waters)
10/404)
WL115
35.517542
-81.042216
0.12 acres
Wetland
Sec. 404
IS109
35.526478
-81.046135
296 linear, feet
Non -wetland
Sec. 404
IS110
35.597911
-81.038281
115 linear feet
Non -wetland
Sec. 404
1) The Corps of Engineers- believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review
area, and the requestor of this. PJD is hereby advised of his. or her, option to request and obtain an
approved JD (AJD) for that'review area based on an informed -decision after having discussed the
various _types of JDs and their characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide General
Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre- construction notification" (PCN), or -
requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant has
not requested an 'AJD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby, made -aware that :.(1) the permit
applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an official
determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the option to request an AJD
before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing a permit
authorization on an AJD cot ld possibly result in'less compensatory mitigation being required or
different special conditions; (3) the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than
accepting .the terms and conditions of the NWP or other, general permit authorization;. (4) the applicant
can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that
permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5)
undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting an. AJD
constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g.,
signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps
permit authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the review area
affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and waives any challenge to such
jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement action, or. in any
administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7). whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD
or a PJD, the JD will be processed as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual
permit (and all terms and conditions contained. therein); or individual permit denial can be
administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic jurisdiction exists over
aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional -aquatic
resources in the review area, the Corps will provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is
practicable. This PJD finds that there "may be" waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be"
navigable waters of the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the
review area that could.be affected by the .proposed activity, based on the following information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources below where
indicated for all checked items:
® Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map: Figure 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 3-4, 3-5, 3-6, 3-7, 3-8, 3-9, 3-10, 3-11, 3-12, 3-13, 3-14, 3-15, 3-16,
3-17, 3-18, 3-19, 3-20, 3-21, 3-22, 3-23, 3-24, 3-25, 3-26, 3-27, 3-28, 3-29, 3-30, 3-31, 3-32, 3-33
(Dated January 2019)
® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
® Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
® USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
® U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: 7.5 Minute Quad
® Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: USDA NRCS SSURGO_
®National wetlands inventorymap(s). Cite name: USFWS NWI Mapper.
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100 -year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
®Photographs: ®Aerial (Name & Date): Figure 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 3-4, 3-5, 3-6, 3-7, 3-8, 3-9, 3-10, 3-11, 3-12, 3-13, 3-14,
3-15, 3-16, 3-17, 3-18, 3-19, 3-20, 3-21, 3-22, 3-23, 3-24, 3-25, 3-26, 3-27, 3-28, 3-29, 3-30, 3-31, 3-32, 3-33 (Dated January 2019)
or ®Other (Name & Date): Photopages (Dated Aug -December 2018)
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily been
verified by the Coras and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional determinations.
Digitally signed by
JANICZAK.CA JANICZAK.CATHERINE.MARIE.153
5587066
THERINE.MARI DN:c=US,o=U.S.Government,
ou=DoD, ou=PKI, ou=USA,
EA 535587066 1535587066 K.CATHERINE.MARIE.
Date: 2019.03.1411:43:02 -04'00'
Signature and date of Regulatory
staff member completing PJD
3/14/2019
Signature and date of person requesting PJD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining the signature is
impracticable)1
1 Districts may establish timeframes for requester to return signed PJD forms. If the requester does not respond within the
established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is necessary prior to finalizing an
action.

� Yadd«r
ncoin
Project End (35.597, -81.972)
11,111, r
n
A 2
► °� Lake Norman f
';,�'�Terrell of Catawba
r
/
s
Denver
� i t
h � �
I
CT �
A til
� firy
/
/
n
Pontnsula
y i Club
NPV1yw'2y iJ
C7
4a �#
01
r t
t
d
Proposed Access Road ---
Project Start (35.421, -81.024)
Proposed Pipieline Corridor --
Service Layer Credits: Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan, Esri
Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand), Mapmylndia, NGCC, © OpenStreetMap
Figure 1
Project Location Map
QN DUKE 0 5,000 10,000 Feet Line 451 /Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline
Lincoln and Catawba Counties
C ENERGY. December 2018
Piedmont
Natural Gas 0 1,600 3,200 Meters
��
3
i
T
IF
0.
Project End (35.597, -81.972)
11,111, r
n
A 2
► °� Lake Norman f
';,�'�Terrell of Catawba
r
/
s
Denver
� i t
h � �
I
CT �
A til
� firy
/
/
n
Pontnsula
y i Club
NPV1yw'2y iJ
C7
4a �#
01
r t
t
d
Proposed Access Road ---
Project Start (35.421, -81.024)
Proposed Pipieline Corridor --
Service Layer Credits: Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan, Esri
Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand), Mapmylndia, NGCC, © OpenStreetMap
Figure 1
Project Location Map
QN DUKE 0 5,000 10,000 Feet Line 451 /Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline
Lincoln and Catawba Counties
C ENERGY. December 2018
Piedmont
Natural Gas 0 1,600 3,200 Meters
��

tires*�"w �a'��/rE��+►/rr►`� � �:_
r���i► ai+rlrt�st�������,'►
SGS
Lin _ —
0
Service Layer Credits: Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, LISGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan, Esri
Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand), Mapmylndia, NGCC, © OpenStreetMap
Figure 2 - Index
Waters Map - Topographic
■•��\� DUKE 0 5,000 10,000 Feet Line 451/Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline
r/L Lincoln and Catawba Counties
ENERGY January 2019
��P!edmont 0 1,600 3,200 Meters
Natural Gas

�\A
/, / •,,, - �_ _� Proposed Access Road III
Proposed Pipeline Corridor
-�/ - Stream
/ a ® Open Water
l!bJ,
.. A,Aw ®Wetland
state buffer
a
e,, "'d,. • Data Point Location
Service Layer Credits: Copyright:© 2013 National Geographic Society, i -cubed
Figure 2-1 of 33
Waters Map - Topographic
DUKE 0 200 400 Feet Line 451/Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline
ENERGY Lincoln and Catawba
January 2019
^' Piedmont 0 62.5 125 Meters
(11�I Natural Gas

7 r
40
lit. 4bK
Proposed Access Road
QProposed Pipeline Corridor
stream
A-,* Open Water
P Iq Wetland
µ�
state buffer
• Data Point Location
Service Layer Credits: Copyright:© 2013 National Geographic Society, i -cubed
Figure 2-2 of 33
Waters Map - Topographic
DUKE 0 200 400 Feet Line 451/Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline
ENERGY Lincoln and Catawba
January 2019
^. Piedmont 0 62.5 125 Meters
tY�l Natural Gas

-.*0000"
Service Layer Credits: Copyright:© 2013 National Geographic Society, i -cubed
L_ _I Proposed Access Road
QProposed Pipeline corridor
- stream
open Water
_ i Wetland
state buffer
® Data Point Location
Figure 2-3 of 33
Waters Map - Topographic
DUKE 0 200 400 Feet Line 451/Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline
ENERGY
Lincoln and Catawba January
uary 2019
��Piedmont 0 62.5 125 Meters
Natural Gas

Service Layer Credits: Copyright:© 2013 National Geographic Society, i -cubed
Figure 2-4 of 33
Waters Map - Topographic
�M t
DUKE 0 200 400 Feet Line 451 /Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline
Lincoln and Catawba Counties
ENERGY January 2019
al�■
`Piedmont 0 62.5 125 Meters
Natural Gas

Service Layer Credits: Copyright:© 2013 National Geographic Society, i -cubed
Proposed Access Road
OProposed Pipeline Corridor
- Stream
F72 Open Water
s
® Wetland
.: slate buffer
• Data Point Location
Figure 2-5 of 33
Waters Map - Topographic
M (� DUKE 0 200 400 Feet Line 451/Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline
�
ENERGY.. Lincoln and Catawba
January 2019
ramPiedmont 0 62.5 125 Meters
Natural Gas

Service Layer Credits: Copyright:© 2013 National Geographic Society, i -cubed
�•.� DUKE ® 0 200 400 Feet
C ENERGY
Piedmont 0 62.5 125 Meters
Natural Gas
Figure 2-6 of 33
Waters Map - Topographic
Line 451/Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline
Lincoln and Catawba Counties
January 2019

Service Layer Credits: Copyright:© 2013 National Geographic Society, i-cubed
Figure 2-7 of 33
Waters Map - Topographic
DUKE 0 200 400 Feet Line 451/Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline
C ENERGYi III
Lincoln and Catawba Counties
January 2019
al^' Piedmont 0 62.5 125 Meters
Natural Gas

Service Layer Credits: Copyright:© 2013 National Geographic Society, i -cubed
Figure 2-8 of 33
Waters Map - Topographic
(•� DUKE 0 200 400 Feet Line 451/Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline
ENERGY Lincoln and Catawba
Coaryunties
s
r',edmont 0 62.5 125 Meters
[G� Natural Gas

Service Layer Credits: Copyright:© 2013 National Geographic Society, i -cubed
Figure 2-9 of 33
Waters Map - Topographic
�M•� DUKE ® 0 200 400 Feet Line 451/Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline
' � C ENERGY Lincoln and Catawba Counties
January 2019
Piedmont 0 62.5 125 Meters
Natural Gas

Pro posed Access Road
. ""'*w• •..�
OProposed Pipeline Corridor
Stream
Open Water
® Wetland
state buffer
• Data Point Location
o-'
^t
A-
-04
top
„�A 41.
Ot.
k
"
Service Layer Credits: Copyright:© 2013 National Geographic Society, i -cubed
L DUKE
�C ENERGY
ralPiedmont
{{�� Natural Gas
Figure 2-10 of 33
Waters Map - Topographic
0 200 400 Feet Line 451/Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline
Lincoln and Catawba Counties
January 2019
0 62.5 125 Meters
. ""'*w• •..�
• -tet
Service Layer Credits: Copyright:© 2013 National Geographic Society, i -cubed
L DUKE
�C ENERGY
ralPiedmont
{{�� Natural Gas
Figure 2-10 of 33
Waters Map - Topographic
0 200 400 Feet Line 451/Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline
Lincoln and Catawba Counties
January 2019
0 62.5 125 Meters

Service Layer Credits: Copyright:© 2013 National Geographic Society, i-cubed
Figure 2-11 of 33
Waters Map - Topographic
ENERGY DUKE ® 0 200 400 Feet Line 451 /Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline
Lincoln and Catawba Counties
464�
January 2019
^' Piedmont 0 62.5 125 Meters
Ua' Natural Gas

-----
�_--� Proposed Access Road
OProposed Pipeline Corridor
0\- stream
?` - Open Water
® Wetland
state buffer
,, •Data Point Location
Service Layer Credits: Copyright:© 2013 National Geographic Society, i -cubed
Figure 2-12 of 33
Waters Map - Topographic
f•� DUKE 0 200 400 Feet Line 451/Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline
Lincoln and Catawba Counties
ENERGY January 2019
�' Piedmont 0 62.5 125 Meters
Natural Gas

Service Layer Credits: Copyright:© 2013 National Geographic Society, i -cubed
ICOM (•� DUKE
�C ENERGY.
Piedmont
Natural Gas
4111=1 1117�i
62.5 125 Meters
Figure 2-13 of 33
Waters Map - Topographic
Line 451/Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline
Lincoln and Catawba Counties
January 2019

Service Layer Credits: Copyright:© 2013 National Geographic Society, i -cubed
Figure 2-14 of 33
Waters Map - Topographic
�M
tENERGY
DUKE 0 200 400 Feet Line 451/Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline
Lincoln and Catawba Counties
January 2019
R31P edmont 0 62.5 125 Meters
Natural Gas

Service Layer Credits: Copyright:© 2013 National Geographic Society, i -cubed
���i (•� DUKE ® 0 200 400 Feet
ENERGY
piedmont 0 62.5 125 Meters
Natural Gas
Figure 2-15 of 33
Waters Map - Topographic
Line 451/Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline
Lincoln and Catawba Counties
January 2019

Service Layer Credits: Copyright:© 2013 National Geographic Society, i -cubed
Figure 2-16 of 33
Waters Map - Topographic
DUKE 0 200 400 Feet Line 451/Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline
ENERGY Lincoln and Catawba Counties
January 2019
Piedmont 0 62.5 125 Meters
t Natural Gas

Service Layer Credits: Copyright:© 2013 National Geographic Society, i -cubed
����'", (•� DUKE � 0 200 400 Feet
ENERGY V
Piedmont 0 62.5 125 Meters
Natural Gas
Figure 2-17 of 33
Waters Map - Topographic
Line 451/Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline
Lincoln and Catawba Counties
January 2019

Service Layer Credits: Copyright:© 2013 National Geographic Society, i -cubed
���, %•� DUKE � 0 200 400 Feet
�C ENERGY `V
0 62.5 125 Meters
Figure 2-18 of 33
Waters Map - Topographic
Line 451/Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline
Lincoln and Catawba Counties
January 2019

Service Layer Credits: Copyright:© 2013 National Geographic Society, i -cubed
Figure 2-19 of 33
Waters Map - Topographic
�� •� DUKE v 0 200 400 Feet Line 451/Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline
4 ENERG 1E) i Lincoln and CatawbaCountiesJanuary 2019
A' Piedmont 0 62.5 125 Meters
Ua' Natural Gas

Service Layer Credits: Copyright:© 2013 National Geographic Society, i -cubed
DUKE e o 200 400 Feet
ENERGY i Ill
ralPiedmont 0 62.5 125 Meters
Natural Gas
Proposed Access Road
OProposed Pipeline Corridor
_ Stream
Open Water
P79Wetland
state buffer
Data Point Location
Figure 2-20 of 33
Waters Map - Topographic
Line 451/Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline
Lincoln and Catawba Counties
January 2019

�_--� Proposed Access Road
OProposed Pipeline Corridor
- Stream
Open Water
® Wetland
state buffer �.
• Data Point Location
�.I
2
W-
'-!91
.`4
�
r]
IFA
Service Layer Credits: Copyright:© 2013 National Geographic Society, i -cubed
Figure 2-21 of 33
Waters Map - Topographic
�M•� DUKE 0 200 400 Feet Line 451/Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline
C ENERGY Lincoln and Catawba Counties
January 2019
�' Piedmont 0 62.5 125 Meters
Natural Gas

Service Layer Credits: Copyright:© 2013 National Geographic Society, i -cubed
Figure 2-22 of 33
Waters Map - Topographic
tENERGY
DUKE ® 0 200 400 Feet Line 451/Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline
Lincoln and Catawba Counties
January 2019
^■ Redmont 0 62.5 125 Meters
Ual Natural Gas

sem'
r
ML W111
Proposed Access Road
Proposed Pipeline Corridor
- Stream
® Open Water
Wetland
Ostate buffer
® Data Point Location
Service Layer Credits: Copyright:© 2013 National Geographic Society, i -cubed
Figure 2-23 of 33
Waters Map - Topographic
�M
tENERGY
DUKE 0 200 400 Feet Line 451/Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline
�� Lincoln and Catawba January 2019
RI'Piedmont 0 62.5 125 Meters
Natural Gas

Service Layer Credits: Copyright:© 2013 National Geographic Society, i -cubed
Figure 2-24 of 33
Waters Map - Topographic
�� •� DUKE 0 200 400 Feet Line 451/Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline
ENERGY Lincoln and Catawba Counties
January 2019
Piedmont 0 62.5 125 Meters
Natural Gas

Service Layer Credits: Copyright:© 2013 National Geographic Society, i -cubed
p��, 4)ENERGY
DUKE 0 200 400 Feet
ra'Piedmont 0 62.5 125 Meters
Natural Gas
Figure 2-25 of 33
Waters Map - Topographic
Line 451/Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline
Lincoln and Catawba Counties
January 2019

a
Service Layer Credits: Copyright:© 2013 National Geographic Society, i -cubed
ENERGY
Piedmont
Natural Gas
Figure 2-26 of 33
Waters Map - Topographic
0 200 400 Feet Line 451/Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline
Lincoln and Catawba Counties
January 2019
0 62.5 125 Meters

Service Layer Credits: Copyright:© 2013 National Geographic Society, i -cubed
Figure 2-27 of 33
Waters Map - Topographic
(g DUKE 0 200 400 Feet Line 451/Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline
ENERGY0 Lincoln and Catawba Counties 2019
ONP edmont 0 62.5 125 Meters
Natural Gas

Service Layer Credits: Copyright:© 2013 National Geographic Society, i-cubed
Figure 2-28 of 33
Waters Map - Topographic
tENERGY
DUKE ® 0 200 400 Feet Line 451/Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline
Lincoln and Catawba Counties
January 2019
a^' Piedmont
0 62.5 125 Meters
l Natural Gas

Vi
n
t
O
Proposed Access Road
OProposed Pipeline Corridor
y - Stream
R' ® Open Water
Wetland
Ostate buffer
• Data Point Location
I
Service Layer Credits: Copyright:© 2013 National Geographic Society, i -cubed
Figure 2-29 of 33
Waters Map - Topographic
��N'.� (•�
DUKE
�+ G0 200 400 Feet Line 451/Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline
ENERGY Lincoln and Catawba Counties
January 2019
Piedmont 0 62.5 125 Meters
lW Natural Gas

Service Layer Credits: Copyright:© 2013 National Geographic Society, i -cubed
Figure 2-30 of 33
Waters Map - Topographic
4*5
DUKE ® 0 200 400 Feet Line 451 /Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline
ENERGY: Lincoln and Catawba Counties
January 2019
RVIPiedmont 0 62.5 125 Meters
Natural Gas

J
AFA
V
Service Layer Credits: Copyright:© 2013 National Geographic Society, i -cubed
Figure 2-31 of 33
Waters Map - Topographic
FPC)M •� DUKE ® 0 200 400 Feet Line 451/Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline
C ENERGY Lincoln and Catawba Counties
January 2019
��Piedmont 0 62.5 125 Meters
Natural Gas
nor
Proposed Access Road
QProposed Pipeline Corndor
- Stream
rIA Open water
®Wetland
Ostate buffer
Data Point Location
Service Layer Credits: Copyright:© 2013 National Geographic Society, i -cubed
Figure 2-31 of 33
Waters Map - Topographic
FPC)M •� DUKE ® 0 200 400 Feet Line 451/Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline
C ENERGY Lincoln and Catawba Counties
January 2019
��Piedmont 0 62.5 125 Meters
Natural Gas

Service Layer Credits: Copyright:© 2013 National Geographic Society, i -cubed
Figure 2-32 of 33
Waters Map - Topographic
p�N'.1 •� DUKE 0 200 400 Feet Line 451/Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline
ENERGY0 Lincoln and Catawba Counties
January 2019
Pedmont 0 62.5 125 Meters
l Natural Gas

Service Layer Credits: Copyright:© 2013 National Geographic Society, i -cubed
Figure 2-33 of 33
Waters Map - Topographic
DUKE® 0 200 400 Feet Line 451/Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline
Lincoln and Catawba Counties
ENERGY
January 2019
Piedmont 0 62.5 125 Meters
Natural Gas

L Malden Rd I
In—co—Ir —
,733
I i�1MjwnLAn
Jir9�7�,�Y
x
4�
Q
D
a
A/
�
�
�r
3
�4t
�
7
1
r
2
z
rs
P
,733
I i�1MjwnLAn
Jir9�7�,�Y
_ J
Project End (35.597, -81.972)
Lake Norman I
Twrall O1Catopa
r
C /
l
Lake crt
— — -- — -.. — � — W rman
a
Denver
i
/
}
F'a mn
l ub
s �
i
/
1
O � r
i
1
4
t
- 1 Project Start (35.421, -81.024)
n SA = Proposed Pipieline Corridor - - •-
0 -
Service Layer Credits: Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan, Esri
Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand), Mapmylndia, NGCC, © OpenStreetMap
Figure 3 - Index
Waters Map -Aerial
DUKE e 0 5,000 10,000 Feet Line 451/Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline
a C ENERGY Lincoln and Catawba Counties
January 2019
/ASI Piedmont 0 1,600 3,200 Meters
lua Natural Gas
4�
Q
D
a
A/
�
�
�r
�4t
�
_ J
Project End (35.597, -81.972)
Lake Norman I
Twrall O1Catopa
r
C /
l
Lake crt
— — -- — -.. — � — W rman
a
Denver
i
/
}
F'a mn
l ub
s �
i
/
1
O � r
i
1
4
t
- 1 Project Start (35.421, -81.024)
n SA = Proposed Pipieline Corridor - - •-
0 -
Service Layer Credits: Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan, Esri
Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand), Mapmylndia, NGCC, © OpenStreetMap
Figure 3 - Index
Waters Map -Aerial
DUKE e 0 5,000 10,000 Feet Line 451/Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline
a C ENERGY Lincoln and Catawba Counties
January 2019
/ASI Piedmont 0 1,600 3,200 Meters
lua Natural Gas

Ir. 'I I
, 'AWL -
m

Llvt
ung-
I-
a.
41 AL
to

,N�u .R -Y _ + �� 1'�� �t1I''_...� ••� amu.
vk
yr a
J�r�
- i z't"R: C .�- , tai a" �e1t +_l�^� �1k"` til t► � we- ,f;
%4'
Ali
ii -pec ` �. ,1!`� ._.t�.k, t► �llC' �yLn►- a'- .�a�j�Ge„91�p
''Mi4 1' •4�„ �,�{y�,� t `� Nr. ski
w` ••,K _ F i.?rte `ie
If
PS97'
cA
r ,
-fid
Say ,� ►�,.�:. ti 4 • { . '.+mer . s " S�y� ♦ ♦ ,• �w
jr
00
ProposedAccess Road
, u �
...� ` .. •k 14 y
zv Proposed Pipeline Corridor
Open Water
4 Wetland
50' State Buffer
2
ti
V ■� 'sData Point Location
? y' • a„�., 'k .+��T' ��.'µ- 4 , _ >.. 4 Nay
n. 0

7-10
a
rot
. �, ` � . +� � - its -Al
Proposed Acce
Proposed Pipet
Stream
OL k. Open Water
Wetland
50'State Buffer
Data Point Loc�

'Ai
aL
14-
w.
Ak�
RAP
PS6'
.FAA.
4W� b'
f. 0
xv�
TP
PS,3
f. 0

�t
.any 1- ,��j ^ 1'�i�A.."•_. 'oil
,s �e .. M .d
' � �,F/ �. `�' S � � • . Y � � x 5�� ''!rte ��1�'� , �
� • , [ � � • .tea 4 . :� 4� `I 4 a . - l� Y •1•..,.�u'+' ���•�:�' • ,�wv -� � ..�
IdtOil
i � .•� � r .3 • �, fir. r . . �� � .� . • w'r' / r # � �•ii'r a ••�� w!
0 . y
Niel
`^ ,
\ r
�t
.any 1- ,��j ^ 1'�i�A.."•_. 'oil
,s �e .. M .d
' � �,F/ �. `�' S � � • . Y � � x 5�� ''!rte ��1�'� , �
� • , [ � � • .tea 4 . :� 4� `I 4 a . - l� Y •1•..,.�u'+' ���•�:�' • ,�wv -� � ..�
IdtOil
i � .•� � r .3 • �, fir. r . . �� � .� . • w'r' / r # � �•ii'r a ••�� w!
0 . y
Niel

pglpgll fft; DUKE

At'. ~ ^ tet 'u:,y,. ! R �� �" 1 I♦ x ♦ * ;,
' �-': _� t "•_.o+rte^ -ti. ...'��:
92
op
' � � its -� a .. !� � _ 'V.' t y�6';� � i � � � � l-.-•'' f � � - y, ' `� � �s!,,.P•:
y, � � '`�' "Fad l'� ,� ����' 1 � _ Y ^i•• #j �` !�, • r � ' �� a•� Y
v,� w yr' � '+r Tom, '- 1�`' � 7 'il-•���.= 1 ', �.�L,-y'' � . �"-'f - .
4� v.,,•�. 1 lx�" �� __.� �i�i' . �. � -pix' �r. �"�.J
r
i •moi • � ♦� Y
tK
m •

Fr -
Ti*
-� it
DUKE
FNFR(-,Y
Milli a
r
L*

f 11
Data Point Location
Jr
A Iv
r
'All
x
t
Pa WJVA
'? 4

1 _ 4o v"'. �t �SZ1`+ C . -'_ f rl♦�S' est • ...,
.Ni. � . jS •^ r,t � r` �ii ,��, `,S�a"ye _ Ch1
'`� � , _ � 'fin. " „ .. . •y„ f +"se - ' •4
w M' t� �• yl�
imp Kk
mks
x... ��, z - i ' ' G • _ a�, or 'lam . ' w • '•Y
IIvL 107
106
WL 105
. �• a. 'a ate` . -'..: K -` �:
1 1
i
M
7 4 ti
. �• a. 'a ate` . -'..: K -` �:
1 1
i
M

114%
IP
. 77;�
_ s _r , yrs_ - v^ '�' w'•.a„S s �
ys, a
`,.?+►—` .
�weF''. .'i, f - 1'� • .,«.-'b'' ��_�'+ �`.".t; /ey�+cp �t"^iF.-�1�Fy♦ _ p , ' i` Vey 4 -.
I 'Ilk
Wr
��C �Ir
�. PS24 ti its
X586 ♦ ♦ ♦ . ,�,, '' .q �� �-V�;�'XVE
At
Y_ f' ..yam" �`� ♦ .dam f T.
r
k.
L85
Proposed Access Road
Proposed Pipeline Corridor
C`' `•R � "ice �� r
Open Water
Wetland
k50' State Buffer
Data Point Location
�n+ tf ,,
��' (� DUKE

sit
jL
pS2B
VIP
-7
A
C',
1L �4_ .4
41,
Vx—
Zf!'
iS26,
VVL23
IC*
IIS22 p4pOF,.:�P-

�.• �.• .''�'11110
(� ��,,,- M ! �+. mss,•(. � �iil�' L C37 ♦.� ,,,viii vt � '_` �' �' � ~
c y.
,
i�`��f��`in,� • tiw�� � •y.,.,r �r p Y� ��..."�7Y J� . `.p -' - � �!'�f s
�,!��'''•"ar'•„�J;yiy •y,.• ti�y�I T. f - '.v s*gyi '�:- MS'r1� • a;., ,• ,�• �.
Irl ..r �'� ��.I �.. :• „r r^ ��- ������� � �..-- Ali �,�'`. .. - 9�. �
16
41 N
w `�,', �. _ ✓r . �' r� � +rim +. u�. �` � f . �� `�
R� -. •fir• a ., '��'��� ' •a � f � j� � •' �'S �,/'� r, • fit. '•� t, ♦ �,.,� y�y�_��uv t�.,
`y •vi■^ ifs` w/�y , y�:�� a, ^�• •f
10 .•`r-w� it 14. ''r�- �"a_. M• wL •_ ! ry..-t�N� �•itiy��`"~♦♦♦T'�j�v:�,.y'�•` t' �-f 'LY
a • {
'..F,.� � .A��'••� 1 yi � .��+y��� ,yr i�K
w.. ., j Li 1I ► r
a� •...J�•'•�''r
:y9r A~ , .? a `M' ' l - �Y. y,,�r.. "�. -A-mot,
,'t�M f•_'�.`-` �` -'� ti.•• r� • j"+�
'.. • �`Yr ri .•"y,.r't� �'r►J',�w�i�. ..• _ +!. Pi , ,+,r �,�y,1's ,t' _ ��., y�
� --gv ;fib' -s�_.''S�.• �i. � �fir�� !. 2 `-+� _ W1 �. �o.' ,�'"'r r.._. s t,:.. . ✓ �; �'..a `` %' •�
n, y,Ak S.� •�' {2� r• « Vr0.� '� +s:y„�. '{,: • ��" ��' + K,.�„ '� r, ,� ,.a'r cs+ , � *`�� .. w �:'fI e �.
���� .1• - 7 � ��_ aYi" � ...�„� j�Y M a � Y ! JI,�V ��y►Y .''L�r � `. .'r ,-.�
�`�M'. +•,i��K�;?�� � i 's��� .� `S. �-`moi. y� � a. .;y r�•.'
AO
►�' . d ti� Y ' Yr A yF�} Rte► ► i 'Yi�� Y "*
'. `� taw �Ji•��•:, ••. M_yy�'yr�„ �r' -'" T i -a lea.+'`~r` Y •!.
.j . 1., v0. w�� ." Tit r \ t R +,� ♦ 1 1, '� f�- lJy,� -�• �,+
41.
' �•��y,.�':.. ,• •.►•Y + y.ya ,-, �,+ v �Y1y..1, ,�' �f `' . °r Y}si, •• a�j r•411TT�.Y �y a Yv
.,c"' �R''�•• t' .o+� -� � �,_ _ Nom. ,. � ai �" •vr� .. s�. �',if•� ,,,
` { ie'
Vt
ProposedAccess Road
EMProposed Pipeline Corridor
Stream
yr' ry,
Open Water
{{,,..���' SFr j � Tii'�. c �.;� - � �y,,,,,,i•+��r.���?-.
50' State Buffer
Data Point Location
MA 0

♦ ♦ .rte ;'t�;;,,r'.�
PS30 ♦ ♦'�'
eftv
.. fit, " F - - `� ♦ b
_y rY, r.•.�w�.- -.t,"� ♦JRA.. �i 1] '���'"s. L' � •
���..INS
�• y_�v' y�� F' � .•�S„'ti{��-'.'.�ii�+�L" y�{�. f _..,r� . � � �{^ �g, _4y.,� .Art N•�..' _
�' awe � � � •y!9 • � _ - �.� "..'T' ,•�iiF}
x WL 115 '' Y►' sy w (r
PS84 -"
PS83
WSK
N
moi-'. ,+-� •�=,, y �. j„- w
` e
} ' vie
t
(( py . �f RTTT `�6'�•yp�4"- � `may
-kw� •: i s�-y� � g wr. x - _-� ' w„� _ .. .�.. �. Mf 1 � �.. . lli
---. A 0

� s�Y Asp
`x
7 �
iK�rk�
'vy ► :' i" '
7gnN■' %•; DUKE
1J
:14"
w
1�
( A
4a
MN
qr.
it 1w,•,
,

.1 'AL 4.

!�
e7,
PS44 A,fi
IC
44
It
Service Layer Credits: © 2019 Microsoft Corporation © 2019 DigitalGlobe ©ONES (2019) Distribution
Airbus DS © 2019 HERE
Proposed Access Road
OProposed Pipeline Corridor
- Stream
® Open Water
® Wetland
50' State Buffer
Data Point Location
Figure 3-19 of 33
Waters Map -Aerial
( DUKE e 0 200 400 Feet Line 451 /Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline
Lincoln and Catawba Counties
%. ENERGY January 2019
0 62.5 125 Meters

''� � .,. jilt '� .a. a � t� +•
Iry
1. � .:� �.�• �, v^« ��, 1t ,•id[' 'i'. .. � �,``�� � , ��' ' '➢�.,� s
}go
y
iU1 s
• L;ve ,� b 1 AL t
Air
,� v. - • ' 1 ti � '$`-: fir• M �.'
�. ', .� l�,�``•" �' Proposed Access Road
X - •'. ,� _ r�- �'• _ O Proposed Pipeline corridor
Stream
• �',*„�S••�-+�•a ���- . -t Open Water
as �• -° �:, '� ��.�_ fWelland
��• is - l� lr yyI R. R �" LJ 50' State Buffer
i _ f-`' f -� ,♦ t,i t. Data Point Location
Service Layer Credits: © 2019 Microsoft Corporation © 2019 DigitalGlobe ©CNES (2019) Distribution
Airbus DS © 2019 HERE
Figure 3-20 of 33
Waters Map -Aerial
If-, DUKE ® 0 200 400 Feet Line 451 /Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline
ENERGYLincoln and Catawba Counties
i 11 January 2019
0 62.5 125 Meters

Proposed Access Road '
P
QProposed Pipeline Corridor
_ Stream71,
Open Water mow}
n. 0

A..
.7jF
A , 101
qMo
r Per;
.1P
'A
1k,
41 ;1k
Z'Y -
4, �0
"AC
mi0 iia .A,
Proposed Access Road
01•
Proposed Pipeline Corridor
Stream
Open Water
Welland
50- State B.ffa,
Data Point Location

n. 49
7v �
i
- c vA, r
,mow.6 VA:.K,..
PS53 a te. ,W iL _
4r. ,
• 5
i
r
• •Proposed Access Road
��� •R+ X14' ��a '�•
Proposed PipeStreamOpen Water
♦ +_ _ �. +moi.Wetland
r
State Buffe
10
- -
{,
50
Data Point Location

iii ► 4. ..•"' �*ys�` - ��t `• f �"\^e'�val
�� _ �Y�`'•► ��•` ., PST � ` .yps
t;
`\
•0... •'
+
♦ , i. l.` \ ,�
( �^�. � � h .r �
w f �"\z•.►IN-
��s ��•ca � ��
�4lt M' _ 1 . ".
AP
h •-(t i✓r`
��•. � +l ,'�..... r}A T
�;
y,.a -'V. �41ta-`�u_ `F• •A. ♦ �
i 7 ti
i ``�
'
1,r
+ 4 `�� _— ►w y'E"`
_. �^k ` . r_ ,� y b ye �., y y .►` iW
U1 Iii T
n. 0
`i"C •• a,� � r i•
•'
k T'�'f,
i•
t,a� �•
vr5
r •�.
;LZIT
••1.
--
V --A.

Service Layer Credits: © 2019 Microsoft Corporation © 2019 DigitalGlobe ©CNES (2019) Distribution
Airbus DS © 2019 HERE
Figure 3-25 of 33
Waters Map -Aerial
DUKE 0 200 400 Feet Line 451/Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline
ENERGY Lincoln and Catawba Counties
January 2019
Ptec""iOr-, 0 62.5 125 Meters
Natural G�.

.t
Proposed Access Road
Proposed Pipeline Corridor
- Stream
.� Open Water
Wetland
50' State Buffer
Data Point Location
Figure 3-26 of 33
Waters Map -Aerial
if DUKE 0 200 400 Feet Line 451/Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline
Lincoln and Catawba Counties
r. ENERGY January 2019
0 62.5 125 Meters

♦
Proposed Access Road
Proposed Pipeline Corridor
Stream
open water
Wetland' : �;;+' 7
50' State Buffer
r•' i d .'ib��%/ I�
Data Point Location
,�J •+ � ,%fir i � J � ri.+.
♦
06� + �.►
1• .
z �
rel •
A• �
•1
s.
% k
C O �
Zr
i I a.

Service Layer Credits: © 2019 Microsoft Corporation © 2019 DigitalGlobe ©CNES (2019) Distribution
Airbus DS © 2019 HERE
%DUKE
ENERGY
MI
®0 200 400 Feet
i ll
0 62.5 125 Meters
Figure 3-28 of 33
Waters Map -Aerial
Line 451 /Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline
Lincoln and Catawba Counties
January 2019

Service Layer Credits: © 2019 Microsoft Corporation © 2019 DigitalGlobe ©CNES (2019) Distribution
Airbus DS © 2019 HERE
Figure 3-29 of 33
Waters Map -Aerial
DUKE ® 0 200 400 Feet Line 451/Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline
Lincoln and Catawba Counties
�C'ENERGY
January 2019
P,eoraont 0 62.5 125 Meters
ra Natural Gr

• �3 `'��i%�� ��f v � � ��5� T - T��� � Y�. � ,�!![' � `�w�'i � �'T '�`��ye'� ►ed �"taii
, S►�T9i�. {A?i+ .
f.
w KD't�rrX�14
t! nit! . �� t• '� ,_.;
Mr
tY '�;• l
! i !L ♦ 'a A�+ w` i' �. 'Air
•moi7F
Qv
r 1 `�. �7 +' } ti "_..��••�. �* • .I � j �� � � ' . yry a ..LMS \ •.
xb
it
Nil
- • ..A
4 iR. •,�. T y , yr.�
�• • 'i •� s.r� .i e - i ».F , ♦ - � i „y,w� �'�.� �'1\. 1. 1Y'i _ ., .
z ` 1
ProposedAccess Road
C3Proposed Pipeline Corridor
Stream
2Z Open Water
E2 Wetland
50'State Buffer
t r J
^ ..Data Point Location
a
0

• 1'4
1.
jy <It
TO
�S r R♦♦�r H.
. LS - �4. �:�.`. • �_ •' w`. nY'` 4* « Z..'. �..: �TJ1�r�[S' �t�
« ;IU
, 4.,.-
IA
V.
It
!' �1(s. (.. _ _+x..11,.: , _ -�. ► '�•'.'T
�+ 4 �* r +l� ,�y ��• I� % 'r,� i �i n �'1'rfe�. A' • •f,p
�� C � : % ~ ; y'yr�l,,.. �� - �_ , ( L e - y;��`.' E.... �.j+�R4y i9 . +if, ♦..i, �•• s,F���Y �• .
4.4
44
cces
L—J Proposed s Road
Proposed Pipeline Corridor
Stream
Open Water
4.
50'State Buffer
Wetland
Data Point Location
r � • ..d w � .7 4fr�''z+l\� � ♦ , ii. �Y`�,eSr Ti ~s ` •:
}
��` •� (+

��_ ear •: �a , � ,►". if a. - ��,
.r
f
�{ f iti� s r �� •L .
"1 �'L 'sem dS "•pS,`il:e
.. ' kit * ! .*,� ' +� o� r ti �t
zy`y�
Cit +•; t� ': ; ; �� .�'" .`�' y �
Proposed Access Road
Proposed Pipeline Corridor
s • �, •�
4wStream
,
V— Open Water
01 Welland
•'.i . �, 1 fit•. ih 4 50- State Buffer` 7♦ K

Service Layer Credits: © 2019 Microsoft Corporation © 2019 DigitalGlobe ©CNES (2019) Distribution
Airbus DS © 2019 HERE
Figure 3-33 of 33
Waters Map -Aerial
DUKE® 0 200 400 Feet Line 451 /Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline
Lincoln and Catawba Counties
ENERGY
January 2019
t( '.ed 0 62.5 125 Meters
Natural G.

�itJdaidw, Rq
--,—Catawba
T, n—W-4 r
tyoq',W'v
I Project End (35.597, -81.972)
Lake Ncrman
Terrell of Catv#ba
La k�
ig
Denver 2X
4, �
ly
Project Start (35.421, -81.024)
Service Layer Credits: Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, LISGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan, Esri
Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand), Mapmy1ndia, NGCC, @ OpenStreetMap
Figure 4 - Index
NRCS Soils Map
DUKE 0 5,000 10,000 Feet Line 451 /Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline
p���C
EI Lincoln and Catawba Counties
NERGY.. I January 2019
Piedmont 0 1,600 3,200 Meters
Natural Gas

Service Layer Credits: © 2019 Microsoft Corporation © 2019 DigitalGlobe ©CNES (2019) Distribution
Airbus DS © 2019 HERE
Figure 4-1 of 33
Soils Map -Aerial
V%MMOJ 'DUKE ® 0 200 400 Feet Line 451/Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline
V ENERGY Lincoln and Catawba Counties
January 2019
Re -in -'Of c 0 60 120 Meters
ra Natural G<.

Service Layer Credits: © 2019 Microsoft Corporation © 2019 DigitalGlobe ©CNES (2019) Distribution
Airbus DS © 2019 HERE
Figure 4-2 of 33
Soils Map - Aerial
DUKE 0 200 400 Feet Line 451/Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline
Lincoln and Catawba Counties
ENERGY January 2019
p 0 60 120 Meters
VIN,

Service Layer Credits: © 2019 Microsoft Corporation © 2019 DigitalGlobe ©CNES (2019) Distribution
Airbus DS © 2019 HERE
Figure 4-3 of 33
Soils Map -Aerial
DUKE ® 0 200 400 Feet Line 451/Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline
Lincoln and Catawba Counties
• ENERGY January 2019
MIN 0 60 120 Meters

Service Layer Credits: © 2019 Microsoft Corporation © 2019 DigitalGlobe ©CNES (2019) Distribution
Airbus DS © 2019 HERE
Figure 4-4 of 33
Soils Map -Aerial
DUKE ® 0 200 400 Feet Line 451/Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline
ENERGY Lincoln and Catawba Counties
January 2019
v' Pear'°r; 0 60 120 Meters
Natural Ge

Service Layer Credits: © 2019 Microsoft Corporation © 2019 DigitalGlobe ©CNES (2019) Distribution
Airbus DS © 2019 HERE
Figure 4-5 of 33
Soils Map - Aerial
� lip
40)
DUKE ® 0 200 400 Feet Line 451 /Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline
ENERGY Lincoln and Catawba Counties
January 2019
raPiedmont 0 60 120 Meters
Natural Gas

v'.
#
Proposed Access Road
Proposed Pipeline Corridor
Soil Map Unit
Stream 01
R
Open Water A.�
L
50'State Buffer
Data Point Location
Welland

Service Layer Credits: © 2019 Microsoft Corporation © 2019 DigitalGlobe ©CNES (2019) Distribution
Airbus DS © 2019 HERE
Figure 4-7 of 33
Soils Map - Aerial
DUKE 0 200 400 Feet Line 451/Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline
4C' ENERGY �}_� Lincoln and CataJanuaryCounties
2019
0 60 120 Meters

1& 4
17
m
wo

Service Layer Credits: © 2019 Microsoft Corporation © 2019 DigitalGlobe ©CNES (2019) Distribution
Airbus DS © 2019 HERE
Figure 4-9 of 33
Soils Map - Aerial
`� ENERGY
® 0 200 400 Feet Line 451 /Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline
Lincoln and Catawba Counties
�
January 2019
(O'' 0 60 120 Meters

Service Layer Credits:© 2019 Microsoft Corporation @2019 Dig italGlobe ©CNES (2019) Distribution
Airbus DS © 2019 HERE
Figure 4-10 of 33
Soils Map - Aerial
(> DUKE ® 0 200 400 Feet Line 451 /Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline
I ENERGY: Lincolnln a and Catawba Counties
January 2019
raPiedmont 0 60 120 Meters
Natural Gas

Service Layer Credits: © 2019 Microsoft Corporation © 2019 DigitalGlobe ©CNES (2019) Distribution
Airbus DS © 2019 HERE
Figure 4-11 of 33
Soils Map -Aerial
Line 451/Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline
DUKE
Lincoln and Catawba Counties
ENERGY January 2019
0 200 400 Feet
Pear, or,t
Natural Gas
0 60 120 Meters

Service Layer Credits: © 2019 Microsoft Corporation © 2019 DigitalGlobe ©CNES (2019) Distribution
Airbus DS © 2019 HERE
Figure 4-12 of 33
Soils Map - Aerial
P4CWNO if DUKE 0 200 400 Feet Line 451/Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline
ENERGY Lincoln and Catawba
January 2019
0 P:eumon1 0 60 120 Meters
1 Natural Gas

77
• 'T'.� •_ `� Y �.. ,` mow. - \y .• �_
_ d^
Proposed Acces:
Proposed Pipelin
r
Soil Map Unit
4:'f• - Stream
® Open Water
Wetland
50' State Buffer
- ^ _ Data Point Locat
. d
c.41l . t.
WL25
�
♦
s
x
. t _ ♦ PS24, i
w188 ?587
—�
♦ •r
_ d^
Proposed Acces:
Proposed Pipelin
r
Soil Map Unit
4:'f• - Stream
® Open Water
Wetland
50' State Buffer
- ^ _ Data Point Locat

Service Layer Credits: © 2019 Microsoft Corporation © 2019 DigitalGlobe ©CNES (2019) Distribution
Airbus DS © 2019 HERE
Figure 4-14 of 33
Soils Map -Aerial
�M ('DUKE 0 200 400 Feet Line 451/Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline
ENERGY Lincoln and Catawba Counties
January 2019
Pteumort 0 60 120 Meters
Natural Gas

PS29
MA
JL
Ar
OWE,
tDinq
11
7.0

Service Layer Credits: © 2019 Microsoft Corporation © 2019 DigitalGlobe ©CNES (2019) Distribution
Airbus DS © 2019 HERE
Figure 4-16 of 33
Soils Map - Aerial
& DUKE 0 200 400 Feet Line 451/Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline
Lincoln and Catawba Counties
'ENERGY January 2019
0 60 120 Meters

Service Layer Credits: © 2019 Microsoft Corporation © 2019 DigitalGlobe ©CNES (2019) Distribution
Airbus DS © 2019 HERE
��� (•� DUKE�„] 0 200 400 Feet
ENERGY V
P:edr„Uf,; 0 60 120 Meters
Natural Gas
Figure 4-17 of 33
Soils Map -Aerial
Line 451/Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline
Lincoln and Catawba Counties
January 2019

Service Layer Credits: © 2019 Microsoft Corporation © 2019 DigitalGlobe ©CNES (2019) Distribution
Airbus DS © 2019 HERE
Figure 4-18 of 33
Soils Map - Aerial
DUKE 0 200 400 Feet Line 451/Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline
ENERGY Lincoln and Catawba
Countiesary 2019
0 60 120 Meters

f®.
Service Layer Credits: © 2019 Microsoft Corporation © 2019 DigitalGlobe ©CNES (2019) Distribution
Airbus DS © 2019 HERE
Proposed Access Road
OProposed Pipeline Corridor
Q Soil Map Unit
_ Stream
® open Water
Wetland
O 50' State Buffer
Data Point Location
Figure 4-19 of 33
Soils Map - Aerial
'DUKE® 0 200 400 Feet Line 451 /Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline
Lincoln and Catawba Counties
ENERGY
January 2019
�' Pedmora 0 60 120 Meters
Natural G.. .

Service Layer Credits: © 2019 Microsoft Corporation © 2019 DigitalGlobe ©CNES (2019) Distribution
Airbus DS © 2019 HERE
P
e
Proposed Access Road
QProposed Pipeline Corridor
Q Soil Map Unit
- Stream
® Open Water
Wetland
50' State Buffer
Qlll Data Point Location
Figure 4-20 of 33
Soils Map - Aerial
�M(•� DUKE 0 200 400 Feet Line 451/Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline
�! Lincoln and Catawba
ENERGY January 2019
C�,' 0 60 120 Meters

Service Layer Credits: © 2019 Microsoft Corporation © 2019 DigitalGlobe ©CNES (2019) Distribution
Airbus DS © 2019 HERE
Figure 4-21 of 33
Soils Map - Aerial
'DUKE ® 0 200 400 Feet Line 451 /Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline
�C ENERGY Lincoln and Catawba Counties
January 2019
/Ar) Pieurnont 0 60 120 Meters
l[441�♦ Natural G.-
Service
r

Service Layer Credits: © 2019 Microsoft Corporation© 2019 Dig italGlobe ©CNES (2019) Distribution
Airbus DS © 2019 HERE
Figure 4-22 of 33
Soils Map -Aerial
1:1103ff4n %. DUKE® 0 200 400 Feet Line 451 /Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline
t ENERGY Lincoln and Catawba Counties
January 2019
0 60 120 Meters

Service Layer Credits: © 2019 Microsoft Corporation © 2019 DigitalGlobe ©CNES (2019) Distribution
Airbus DS © 2019 HERE
Figure 4-23 of 33
Soils Map -Aerial
��• DUKE 0 200 400 Feet Line 451/Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline
ENERGY �� Lincoln and Catawba Counties
January 2019
0 60 120 Meters

Service Layer Credits: © 2019 Microsoft Corporation © 2019 DigitalGlobe ©CNES (2019) Distribution
Airbus DS © 2019 HERE
Figure 4-24 of 33
Soils Map -Aerial
' DUKE ® 0 200 400 Feet Line 451 /Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline
4ENERGY Lincoln and Catawba Counties
January 2019
ra'P„°�,: 0 60 120 Meters
Naie° tural Gr.

Service Layer Credits: © 2019 Microsoft Corporation © 2019 DigitalGlobe ©CNES (2019) Distribution
Airbus DS © 2019 HERE
a DUKE 400 200 400 Feet
`C ENERGY
Pecir,on: 0 60 120 Meters
Natural Gt;
Figure 4-25 of 33
Soils Map -Aerial
Line 451/Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline
Lincoln and Catawba Counties
January 2019

Service Layer Credits: © 2019 Microsoft Corporation © 2019 DigitalGlobe ©CNES (2019) Distribution
Airbus DS © 2019 HERE
DUKE/.� 0 200 400 Feet
ENERGY V+
0 60 120 Meters
Natural Gas
Figure 4-26 of 33
Soils Map - Aerial
Line 451/Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline
Lincoln and Catawba Counties
January 2019

Service Layer Credits: © 2019 Microsoft Corporation © 2019 DigitalGlobe ©CNES (2019) Distribution
Airbus DS © 2019 HERE
Figure 4-27 of 33
Soils Map - Aerial
Line 451 /Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline
V%innim > ENERGY DUKE
Lincoln and CatawbaJanuary 2019
G i i 0 200 400 Feet
PiedmOrt
ra' Natural Gas
0 60 120 Meters

Service Layer Credits: © 2019 Microsoft Corporation © 2019 DigitalGlobe ©CNES (2019) Distribution
Airbus DS © 2019 HERE
Figure 4-28 of 33
Soils Map - Aerial
=(� DUKE 0 200 400 Feet Line 451/Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline
Lincoln and Catawba Counties
�''► ' ENERGY0 January 2019
0 60 120 Meters

Service Layer Credits: © 2019 Microsoft Corporation © 2019 DigitalGlobe ©CNES (2019) Distribution
Airbus DS © 2019 HERE
Figure 4-29 of 33
Soils Map - Aerial
Line 451/Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline
'DUKE
Lincoln and Catawba Counties
ENERGY January 2019
® 0 200 400 Feet
Natural Gas
0 60 120 Meters

Service Layer Credits: © 2019 Microsoft Corporation © 2019 DigitalGlobe ©CNES (2019) Distribution
Airbus DS © 2019 HERE
Figure 4-30 of 33
Soils Map - Aerial
'DUKE ® 0 200 400 Feet Line 451/MarshallSteam Plant Pipeline
' � ENERGY Lincolnlna and Catawba Counties
January 2019
ra'P C :;„°r, 0 60 120 Meters
Natural Gas

Service Layer Credits: © 2019 Microsoft Corporation © 2019 DigitalGlobe ©CNES (2019) Distribution
Airbus DS © 2019 HERE
Figure 4-31 of 33
Soils Map -Aerial
A
fftl DUKE ® 0 200 400 Feet Line 451 /Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline
Lincoln and Catawba Counties
';k:' ENERGY �-{--q January 2019
F631 ;,'', 0 60 120 Meters

Service Layer Credits: © 2019 Microsoft Corporation © 2019 DigitalGlobe ©CNES (2019) Distribution
Airbus DS © 2019 HERE
Figure 4-32 of 33
Soils Map - Aerial
DUKE 0 200 400 Feet Line 451/Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline
"`C' ENERGYG Lincoln and Catawba
January 2019
0 60 120 Meters

Service Layer Credits: © 2019 Microsoft Corporation © 2019 DigitalGlobe ©CNES (2019) Distribution
Airbus DS © 2019 HERE
Proposed Access Road
QProposed Pipeline Corridor
O Soil Map Unit
- Stream
® Open Water
Wetland
50' State Buffer
C Data Point Location
Figure 4-33 of 33
Soils Map -Aerial
/1,11114, DUKE 0 200 400 Feet Line 451 /Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline
�ba Counties
� " ENERGYG Lincoln and CataJanuary 2019
A- P.•, 0 60 120 Meters
(al Natl.f,

Project End (35.597, -81.972)
`� yY Lake Norman,�
G��r� Terrell of Catawba
E
i
tl .aidwRd f
�akF -
LIRCOlRfah+r"an
0-0
•
s Deriver
i
_ • �s 1
it
�h4. q� T
O�
P ,
:
Nr�hw�r r:
01 •
.Q
7
Q {
a° 4 a
r
Proposed Access Road
Project Start (35.421, -81.024)
h S Proposed Pipieline Corridor
Q
r
Service Layer Credits: Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, LISGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan, Esri
Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand), Mapmylndia, NGCC, © OpenStreetMap
Figure 5 - Index
NWI Map
DUKE 0 5,000 10,000 Feet Line 451/Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline
Lincoln and Catawba Counties
■ ENERGY. January 2019
�' Piedmont 0 1,600 3,200 Meters
Natural Gas

Alt
f
7 -
rL,
vll•
e%
air
to'

r.
f
K
�vo
wt 101
Z, 0
PS3
, o
pow-*
A I
Is
10
46'
IF I
;IK
WL 102
W, -ml I fries
PS,

v
P.*:
��•�� iy 14i+•1� i
�►�. `' 4 Vic: ., :.. a ,� "F.�s i
Op00
10
4%0 IP14 Io
Iot
��� � t-^'�?,�• thy;- �i� .r � �:°� � `�i ' � y ,i y R + �lY - � `�'. - '� ♦
fi
10
4A.7""`"may +&�►'. r �„ j. /
I
r
PS97 do
of
01
ip 40
10
tF
V.
.44
40
IA
14
Proposed Access Road
Propsed Pipeline Corridor
A� Stream
open water
Welland
R
'v
:► s, �C' q d FIs t
' State Buffer
r�•�_�•��y� ,.tom .Ia.. '�... b a

is T Ir
t' ,
lie I
r •
r
r�
1* '; Via- �� •' t� r;. � �`� `" ��� , ; `� r s. , Ly - ��
•'- Z '��,.. e • r {f, j ,• P Al" (J l�•� • It 444
Proposed Access Roa
Propsed Pipeline Con,
% Open Water
Wetland
50'State Buffer
2zNWI Resource
00\ e Data Point Location
,'r 1; ♦ ' '
f
1 p' �, ♦♦
+' 1 t

�•,. e, _ .�,.. ��., ��.,, �.... .T +�� _ „' I fir. ,� 11E , • �,{'4" ■
i t o
t��'�
.0
•..
/og ol-
op
/
Y.
It, It
.01
IL 10
S6 a
oo
. 1. � • ••• �
_�:�. ,�•` '► �. eta .' ; %'+`,.+ X- - .
9 '
/
00,
w 1
e� �\" ' �'�. � }.' i ■ 1 .�• / IAS
VI OL
t �. L • i i
w t�i—-±r.... v: • !, • o: � ri�� r�Y� tea"`
,'� pr
� . o.0.
Ploj
�4•sl
/
1
F/fI
%/
10
1 psi
■ i
__s i

r
tip
MI 0
v
40
OF
0',,
x If
4
00,
. #4
J
Proposed Access Road
v
or
Propsed Pipeline Corrid
op
10
OF
J#
VvLio
1110
0'
40
======311
op
10
MI 0
v
40
OF
0',,
x If
4
00,
. #4
J
Proposed Access Road
v
or
Propsed Pipeline Corrid

Ur.19
f. 0
/,J i ME/,
., ;
.01
\ / 'n :• -
-4,4
00
do
��'' ./ ♦ .rte � -
00
/
4 14
t -
1 00
1 / �
Is
1 /
/
t /
t /
t /
t %
/
01 ,
`... k - 0 r
/ t
I �
/ \ /
/ t / Proposed Access Road
/ Propsed Pipeline Corridor
' / 1 i
Stream
u Open Water
0 t � _
Wetland
04 50' State Buffer
/ 2z NWI Resource
*1 10 Data PointLocation
N

II ,
..'"" ��... .:� .+fry+. `"" 4 .. - , • . �� - �� .. }mil.14w.
_+yam 1JFirr • _
r r� Zl. .�� •
_41i"+'�-'tel i,• may. 4�-.
�� . i` ����.;`, . ♦ �,Y' ;.'t`r' .. •• Vit' •� .y' ,�(pS�7 ♦ III
-41
I OW
INI
• y`„- `.,fir.,•_._ .� r,s it-� �.0 ,
- y.l+ �Y.: � �/�%� r. ^✓ .cam `3•l.�ets+i), -
' J
Elie .�`� ' � '�- • /
.• rrrtr.•
_ _ .•- :� � r.- • i� � j -yam' a r - --��. 1
M

t •�j� � r . � ` ,
,r
i r
µ'ti •`• � Asf .! p... rN•t �' 4 ,
IF• ,u ♦ 1
1• i .� fl 9r 11 � s
�[-i�r�-'�� 1� ..•', � 'per'.
V'•r rr r i
•
� r �`./'
♦
� to r
so
_T�+.�,,,,,�'�"""
_ �

• =„ ,•PS21,.
w�- «y s s . "fit " `�'6. a •� t.'!.
d�
WL 107
PS1p6 ti

n, 0
a
_ `•? s _ -do2w o
Io
K
irk +• .`�. >. ,� t-�
F --
' ' r, ' �'► ' t.
f.
Proposed Access Road
j
StreamProps ad Pipeline Corridor
Open Water
bO'State Buffer
i'NW)Data Point Location
Resource
Y •

. el -
4P'
--k
46-
41
N
4
P324'
L8s
ol
Al
5 Sol
ww— �
"Pal.
big lu
r 10
7-16

ice- (- •.�'v4 9 ��� ,!�'• ,A
. � ► •� r�.s�.--T" ��L�� � ,,.i!it' •L:.. �� ��'+ � .fir' � • ; .. _ { � tk.� � IC��F :'. __ �. 1
Tit
pS28
f
jr
rx"� f*y ,L� ,� - Jj� , `�e(L��r'•_ mow?' y
, . •+1 �r•,r ` S. �eiEay g� ��r��r} n. l ' 41 ss "•" �1
1
'O'• �4•rT Y4 •• Iw :� ��'; _ �t `L .Y v'l•,�' fe. ..moi �.
I'Z; ; r • / ,tea. ` �
4.
,..,, - � ' �,y„�h *� W �.E f w•� ♦ {moi.-'^Ttrw ,�w.
�ariil►T_ ?dam' ''._ �" .� .. 1
y 626
ti
.Y R IS22 ♦♦
Propsed Pipeline Corridor
4f Stream
_�,,.,�,�`. •cis Ksi ♦ %/, ..
Wetland50' State Buffer
.{ I �. M� LII ♦
Data Point Location
tA� ,� r_ -.r'. i ♦ h* %'' .� �..• - Sar •
0

r,. ,1 rti, I � M t V.d�•y� �•' •f••
C
r _
11
r - � 4r v
//7 /' - 7T
1
;7'-.W, ire. "
loing
Stream
41,
Open Water
Wetland
50' State Buffer
'blrfs.�T V'1Data
Point Location

�1„��y�,. >�yi.hi y.-�y r:. i1'-�,�s•?�'• y � �v Y• y�i�?"�F��S� ..�
• ' --�i..r - c. ' r':. A. " r+r }'/q'aL ♦ kJ �l may,•., "� .. ♦. _
�', rv.c.--i. •r s �,. •- Sy�4;'l''.•r«.. `?- , t16
_, �..'1 ,� w ass ��+, � . ;y � �. �,� � �•G � . >.t`. ',
Ilk j
_ ",.� �,'^�". � � 4 * � .�► a •-,.Y L
x WL115
�"r t
PS83 PS84 t r� _44
wo-
oo
WL114
"1 I
1 YjP
y� �r� ��Y}.•.'i.�["N :iia I y v '`
%�� `' �" � - �^�`1i`t 1 � �� >�`►�`''' `fit►. ~�
//op
..
0, 0or
0.4 01
a/ �. .y }� SIF} v Propsed Pipeline Corridor
L—J Proposed Access Road
10
Stream
Aw P7� Open Water
Welland
'• �« 16 ��//I / d�;'{ ��•i`,«a .fir /
bingData Point Location

1*
7v
A -A
4N
k �4L
.11�
P.
Proposed Access Road
Propsed Pipeline Corridor
Stream
Open Water
;L Welland
50' State Buffer
Z2� NVA Resource

7-10
LN�k .0
16 #A
- ;a*,
, It
ZO
-O"g Proposed Access Road
Propsed Pipeline Corridor
Stream

---. —. J
• } �: t6
CA406
��• # ■ ��' � ,dpi �- ' ` Amw
Z� �x 4' � " + •'' � �,�, .�
Ik
y�S � y �'� ■ �" � ,+� 0
:'ao �,��, .fir .,+�, � .,•
Ale
�- —
� Proposed Access Road
OPropsed Pipeline Corridor
Stream
• ,, t ® Open Water
�� \ �� ♦ Wetland
50' State Buffer
®NWI Resource
0 Data Point Location
Service Layer Credits: © 2019 Microsoft Corporation © 2019 DigitalGlobe ©CNES (2019) Distribution
Airbus DS © 2019 HERE
Figure 5-19 of 33
NWI Map
DUKE 0 200 400 Feet Line 451/Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline
Lincoln and Catawba Counties
';;"ENERGY
January 2019
NO !' 0 60 120 Meters

Service Layer Credits: © 2019 Microsoft Corporation © 2019 DigitalGlobe ©CNES (201 b) Distribution
Airbus DS © 2019 HERE
I-% DUKE
Nk" ENERGY
e0
200
400 Feet
0
60
120 Meters
Figure 5-20 of 33
NWI Map
Line 451 /Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline
Lincoln and Catawba Counties
January 2019

y�1
�w
�y rip. 1'►..� +__.fin'. � 1 `1
lo
PSSU
- `^� f ' .. +.+„ : v+ � •. �F� y - ,�' `_ ire'' /
10
ry
i
,�►�!''� �y..,�'9!M _ r- L `'r"�-�! .� � �'� �' L �� Via.,, • �
..,+ � '""-^t� I .may`.. •:vs�y��.,�—+iT � � i •
:.y
. m
4
xd
�9-

f. 0

M
ti
r
►�i
aril yw '
Am
Sti.4�. ♦ Y..
t
14,
-v. •.� - V ,1.�
'��+-stn' '�i ,y �\ ;'��r •�_� i.,�.-
Vk_'l
( r.
.aS
L_J Proposed Aa
Propsed Pipe
\
Stream
Open Water
'Aetland
• •_, 1a.F
d0' State Buf
NWI Resourc
V
Data Point Lr
J'%
S�
3L 'A

NA,
♦ At
%
♦
PS59
9b M.
4p,
Ot
NA
IL V.
Am
A 1*
'vr
t., "�w-
16"
'oe
fo
St
Al 4r,
'A. 0
M, 0
I

` � '� •> • ;ice;f
IT
M Y
;.• �� ^ _ _.� _ I fir..-...,,,�.� M,�,_ �..
• 'r i`, ,
�fr
- s sirs• t � ,�•tl: ,� � ,.tt,��1►► A,� �.L` ♦ �'• ! � .
Ilk
Ilk
Ilk
ask Proposed Access Road
Propsed Pipeline Corridor
Stream
Open Water
'.1f._ i 50' State Buffer_
♦♦
VZ NVA Resource
l l rrj:r 1
Data Point Location
Its 1 } ♦
■

ailr
�yIlIlk r4*
ilk I
I.
•rte z y
i���as-` s � ! .e..,w, �,�♦1-♦:`tit-lrY '�' _�,re�
I -A t -4-V .!p
s ig)f
r
r
fit__+• yf
ii`. �. t��7� % ♦moi +E y M r
f,fa-r ,4 7111C rr
Proposed Access Road
Propsed Pipeline Corridor
PCOM �� otir fd

Propsed Pipeline Corridor
Proposed Access Road
Stream
Open Water
%/.Wetland
50' State Buffer
A.
NWI Resource
Data Point Location
INII
�.-
t4 t��%,tom I "5y' 3 int L�
P' k ' f� .Z ►Y r
t
0
w
'sa„a
a�
1,

Service Layer Credits: © 2019 Microsoft Corporation © 2019 DigitalGlobe ©CNES (2019) Distribution
Airbus DS © 2019 HERE
A%., DUKE
V -" ENERGY
ON
® 0 200 400 Feet
0 60 120 Meters
Figure 5-28 of 33
NWI Map
Line 451/Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline
Lincoln and Catawba Counties
January 2019

Service Layer Credits: © 2019 Microsoft Corporation © 2019 DigitalGlobe ©CNES (2019) Distribution
Airbus DS © 2019 HERE
(' DUKE
ENERGY
® 0 200 400 Feet
0 60 120 Meters
Figure 5-29 of 33
NWI Map
Line 451/Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline
Lincoln and Catawba Counties
January 2019

'�{, a'�#i �` 'd� �(.ti. � �7' , r � - .ice; l�• '"� it � `;�- �. ��
•��� •'�-'+����� i S�1S.'...�''+.r�..:�5: '�� ; s.� >- `�:lF �r T. f y�����1✓•���'�by�4 '�*+� �145'�
�.l!! R r • Q L{�+,y J�%I � awl � � � � • ' 1 -Y~ - � -.
r
� • 4
a4V If
fp
jw Ilk
c .,�r� .ice' �� ,..• •.� .
'
10 'It
AaA
x
Proposed Access Road
ol
Propsed Pipeline Corridor
Stream
Open
nd
Wetla
Ye50' State Buffer
NW1 Resource
illih
'' r^ • Point

• thy' � � L ! j •i.\ f � � s
R A` c • tt ti+ ^}its:¢ - ' �. �' �, s � - .:�t
„
�`.t _ -t+� "Sy T, ' ,� F S , . ,t. ' w gar 'w •.t`!�.'
all
XV
_24
-� i}- k♦♦ �j �. sem. � i i. ��b �. ! _ _ '� '+:� ,.!',, '� �.
a
_ �� �<' '* ti- � .ase • r "" - � - � � '� � "�
RY f 1
4a.• e. t. ".• w} 'S s"sn i it •`.�� � .� •mac 'i
i7f \ J

tAl
MI 0
fW Alf
Ilk
0 % ki
,1y rho .a
X W
4b
NT.

' A.
r-
6.. fik t
Service Layer Credits: © 2019 Microsoft Corporation © 2019 DigitalGlobe OCNES (2019) Distribution
Airbus DS © 2019 HERE
Proposed Access Road
OPropsed Pipeline Corridor
- Stream
Open Water
Wetland
50' State Buffer
NWI Resource
jillk Tata Point Location
Figure 5-33 of 33
NWI Map
�� • �� DUKE 0 200 400 Feet Line 451/Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline
,ENERGYG Lincoln and Catawba Counties
January 2019
0 60 120 Meters

mull
•►moi,'►` r�1►�;,��wa��.n�j��y�,-�►j
— >•r11f��t���a w-••
v�
2-
r5
9
C'
i
Service Layer Credits: Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, IJSGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan, Esri
Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand), Mapmylndia, NGCC, © OpenStreetMap
1W
Figure 6 - Index
NHD Map
DUKE 0 5,000 10,000 Feet Line 451 /Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline
AC ENERGYLincoln and Catawba Counties
2019
!��Piedmont 0 1,600 3,200 Meters
Natural Gas
O
4®
h
J
n
a'
i
Service Layer Credits: Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, IJSGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan, Esri
Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand), Mapmylndia, NGCC, © OpenStreetMap
1W
Figure 6 - Index
NHD Map
DUKE 0 5,000 10,000 Feet Line 451 /Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline
AC ENERGYLincoln and Catawba Counties
2019
!��Piedmont 0 1,600 3,200 Meters
Natural Gas

44 i '�, ei , ,. '' �•' i�..
' ? � � ,�.� L via S�Oi► A5,2 � ; . i r '• �
Ll
to,
AW
k • i4" �. s�jp: alje
t �
yy'!�� \�e'b/i. - .. �y,.vim•.
r r
«• �L,�t����� .�, +���y` : ;i"r'w , r >� �� �,�t,� � r.��� ��, ice•,
Mt�.�'I�yb�� �' ► S " �+ .• H ��'B i ' r � •'ice + � Mjr ; . b
•�v v�� �'i� ..� , K".} t,`� 1Yt.� Viii � � r �1r�. */t.� �
w'• iI �_b . y
]" •yeA, X , 7-z^ `�.-lam �•..� =J y j j" i ,•� 1'`� ,r'RZ''
'' �_ yeti: �`•�,'. _
ovo
R�
�'.. � Y yr•i •n
IF
• N + 1 A
� A

W,

D "- �� x'` .�/ }�' '' �'�'�'„' ♦� 7 ICY
y�-�ae.,f ry ♦�Rr� 1 �w
. 1
.!f aq, .• 1 ��+i.4e�'. .1�., rte. -
+1►a'K
97 \
4.
w► , Al `r , �a •rt 1 !
7wie - +• .
Qetiinq� s Rd - -
Proposed Access Road
Proposed Pipeline Corridor
_ r-
'
�A
Stream
open water
,

;Y t
1 •i

7.10
1 ��

xfVL A 0
44
J&
af
qL
4116
N,
Proposed Access Road
Proposed Pipeline Corridor lo -
Stream
P7� Open Water
Weiland
50' State Buffer
NHD Stream
Data Point Location

Service Layer Credits: © 2019 Microsoft Corporation © 2019 DigitalGlobe ©ONES (2019) Distribution
Airbus DS © 2019 HERE
(' DUKE
ENERGY
0111
® 0
200
400 Feet
0
60
120 Meters
Figure 6-7 of 33
NHD Map
Line 451/Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline
Lincoln and Catawba Counties
January 2019

•
��'�
0.44-41'
-OP
Kv
51; 07
4k'
4.
.4L
WWI I
to
Asw
•
•
m

Service Layer Credits: © 2019 Microsoft Corporation © 2019 DigitalGlobe ©CNES (2019) Distribution
Airbus DS © 2019 HERE
Figure 6-10 of 33
NHD Map
DUKE ® 0 200 400 Feet Line 451/Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline
Lincoln and Catawba Counties
ENERGY January 2019
Piedmont 0 60 120 Meters
Natural Gas

PS21
VVL 107
106 0 � te'Ov--
m
Aw
los
.
1A.
OL
ce e.
Ps 104
VVL 107
106 0 � te'Ov--
m

-� •, � • >� ..fie- � w •.
44
♦�.{ t.'k ,ter <,,. "'4:.. . - .'",7,�'Mi'< >
1114 �j�"�yCfli�! r4'. y r '4
44
I ow
IL
f _ ♦ ,� t Proposed Access Road
Proposed Pipeline Corridor
-Stream
- • �� t, . ® Open Water
A'.
•, ,.i. t� yam', , • Wetland
50' State Buffer
NHD Stream
1
• S Data Point location
Service Layer Credits: © 2019 Microsoft Corporation © 2019 DigitalGlobe OCNES (2019) Distribution
Airbus DS © 2019 HERE
Figure 6-12 of 33
NHD Map
�M •� DUKE ® 0 200 400 Feet Line 451/Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline
ENERGY Lincoln and Catawba Counties
January 2019
�' Piedmont 0 60 120 Meters
Natural Gas

Service Layer Credits: © 2019 Microsoft Corporation U 2019 DigitalGlobe ©CNES (2019) Distribution
Airbus DS © 2019 HERE
Figure 6-13 of 33
NHD Map
' DUKE ® 0 200 400 Feet Line 451/Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline
A ENERGY,
Lincoln and Catawba Counties
January 2019
ra'Piedmont 0 60 120 Meters
Natural Gas

i
• 1 �` � �� ..r rix'` r'�
i
Service Layer Credits: © 2019 Microsoft Corporation © 2019 DigitalGlobe ©CNES (2019) Distribution
Airbus DS © 2019 HERE
1W�
Ale
'�..
Proposed Access Road
QProposed Pipeline Corridor
- Stream
open Water
® Wetland
50' State Buffer
NHD Stream
Data Point Location
Figure 6-14 of 33
NHD Map
44*)
ENERGY DUKE ® 0 200 400 Feet Line 451/Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline
Lincoln and Catawba Counties
January 2019
raAS
I Piedmont 0 60 120 Meters
Natural Gas

Service Layer Credits: © 2019 Microsoft Corporation © 2019 DigitalGlobe ©CNES (2019) Distribution
Airbus DS © 2019 HERE
�•,�DUKE - ENERGY
raPiedmont
Natural Ga,.
® 0 200 400 Feet
0 60 120 Meters
Figure 6-15 of 33
NHD Map
Line 451/Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline
Lincoln and Catawba Counties
January 2019

Service Layer Credits: O 2019 Microsoft Corporation O 2019 DigitalGlobe OCNES (2019) Distribution
Airbus DS O 2019 HERE
�•, DUKE
"' ENERGY
/AU Piedmont
tUww Natural G::
® 0
200
400 Feet
0
60
120 Meters
Figure 6-16 of 33
NHD Map
Line 451/Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline
Lincoln and Catawba Counties
January 2019

Y
rV14
;
PIP*'!
Proposed Access Road
A• O Proposed Pipeline Corridor
j 4
-Stream
i
-'� Open Water
Wetland
- T. j 50' State Buffer
-• NHD Stream
• •� _++• - Data Point Location
Service Layer Credits: © 2019 Microsoft Corporation © 2019 Dig italGlobe ©CNES (2019) Distribution
Airbus DS © 2019 HERE
Figure 6-17 of 33
NHD Map
% DUKE
�+�/ ® 0 200 400 Feet Line 451 /Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline
V ENERGY Lincoln and Catawba Counties
January 2019
A, Piedmont 0 60 120 Meters
la) Natural Gas

Service Layer Credits: © 2019 Microsoft Corporation © 2019 DigitalGlobe ©CNES (2019) Distribution
Airbus DS © 2019 HERE
/' DUKE
•' ENERGY.
l611I PNaturali tura)r-not
Gas
® 0 200 400 Feet
0 60 120 Meters
Figure 6-18 of 33
NHD Map
Line 451 /Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline
Lincoln and Catawba Counties
January 2019

�W
0%
--�.A
i•
irk � � � � • . �
lk
Pr
jo
�i
M
F"e�*
--
�:.A,aAr"„ iii � It
11
y ,>'r"`� � L_- I Proposed Access Road
Proposed Pipeline Corridor
+fit
•+, -{},0, Ij
v - Stream
l�4•" ' ~ `\ )� �':'�+ CllJ open water
Wetland
50' State Buffer
NHD Stream
Data Point location
Service Layer Credits: © 2019 Microsoft Corporation © 2019 DigitalGlobe ©CNES (2019) Distribution
Airbus DS © 2019 HERE
Figure 6-19 of 33
NHD Map
5:0(:Mj� DUKE 0 200 400 Feet Line 451/Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline
Lincoln and Catawba Counties
ENERGY January 2019
�' Piedrl)Ont 0 60 120 Meters
Natural Gas

4W
.0 736
N&S0_ S
IM
r
y
w j r
y, 1
� ,fir.• ��'` <.. !,`�i , 4��
PIK
a r T n
Ake
-��
41
40
�, _ , %. ` ~s '{�- • .4-i �•� a y`� t__.l Proposed Access Road
a R .•
• . ti ' n" � Q, ;�t ��K` *•r�- .:' O Proposed Pipeline Corridor
Stream
A. s,� • e 4 ® open Water
14
®Wetland
50' State Buffer
NHD Stream
r l.t:_yr til .
• - � i , - � � � Data Point Location
ILService Layer Credits: © 2019 Microsoft Corporation © 2019 DigitalGlobe ©CNES (2019) Distribution
Airbus DS © 2019 HERE
Figure 6-20 of 33
NHD Map
% DUKE ® 0 200 400 Feet Line 451 /Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline
Lincoln and Catawba Counties
ENERGY January 2019
ra)Piedmont 0 60 120 Meters
Natural Gas

Service Layer Credits: © 2019 Microsoft Corporation © 2019 DigitalGlobe ©CNES (2019) Distribution
Airbus DS © 2019 HERE
Figure 6-21 of 33
NHD Map
�M (•� DUKE 0 200 400 Feet Line 451/Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline
Lincoln and Catawba Counties
'
ENERGY, January 2019
Pedmont 0 60 120 Meters
Natural G.-
Service
:

Service Layer Credits: © 2019 Microsoft Corporation © 2019 DigitalGlobe ©CNES (2019) Distribution
Airbus DS © 2019 HERE
% DUKE
• ENERGY
031 Piedmont
[(�) Natural Gas
0 200 400 Feet
0 60 120 Meters
Figure 6-22 of 33
NHD Map
Line 451/Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline
Lincoln and Catawba Counties
January 2019

AL
AL
li« fir• "yam'- -:p ,
. �'�.' ,$ tit- ! y •- :� ,. � •r.
J
All,�
k
e-OVOL �♦ �. �y
�• �_- I Proposed Access Road
\rJa r e Q Proposed Pipeline corridor
�'�'� „�, ♦, •'" * -Stream
F * • +1
Open Water
+ '�+•y` $,_.t ��. ` Wetland
«,OL
a - - �. r -I 50' State Buffer
�"':
I0 i 4,- NHD Stream
In � Data Point Location
Service Layer Credits: © 2019 Microsoft Corporation © 2019 DigitalGlobe ©CNES (2019) Distribution
Airbus DS © 2019 HERE
' DUKE
> N RGY
tl
/0111 Piedmont
` Natural Gas
I , .. 11,1 _" a
® 0 200 400 Feet
0 60 120 Meters
Figure 6-23 of 33
NHD Map
Line 451/Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline
Lincoln and Catawba Counties
January 2019

...-.,- ..�._ �..:--y .,..• - - _..gym_. �,
K
7 ,tom
yM1 �~
t••u1�'J
�. '! i rV.
J.
r
fir:: � � '� •^s'"r .<+• ;~
�►
F,
r
Ar
IW
OWN
t
� J � �r s. w ♦ ,, � .
C
Service Layer Credits: @2019 Microsoft Corporation @2019 DigitalGlobe ©CNES (2019) Distribution
Airbus DS © 2019 HERE
r
S
Proposed Access Road
OProposed Pipeline Corridor
- Stream
Open Water
Wetland
50' State Buffer
NHD Stream
Data Point Location
Figure 6-25 of 33
NHD Map
•� DUKE® 0 200 400 Feet Line 451/Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline
ENERGY Lincoln and Catawba Counties
January 2019
��Piedmont 0 60 120 Meters
Natural Gas

a
Service Layer Credits: © 2019 Microsoft Corporation © 2019 DigitalGlobe ©CNES (2019) Distribution
Airbus DS © 2019 HERE
t_- I Proposed Access Road
OProposed Pipeline Corridor
- Stream
Open water
Wetland
50' State Buffer
- NHD Stream
Data Point Location
Figure 6-26 of 33
NHD Map
DUKE 00 200 400 Feet Line 451 /Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline
ENERGY, Lincoln and Catawba Counties
January 2019
Piedmont 0 60 120 Meters
Natural Gas
I ,. r.,. .

Proposed Access Road
QProposed Pipeline Corridor
- Stream
Open Water
® Welland
50' State Buffer
NHD Stream
Data Point Location
Service Layer Credits: © 2019 Microsoft Corporation © 2019 DigitalGlobe ©CNES (2019) Distribution
Airbus DS © 2019 HERE
Figure 6-27 of 33
NHD Map
�� 4*5
DUKE 0 200 400 Feet Line 451 /Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline
ENERGY0 Lincoln and Catawba Counties
January 2019
/A�� Piedmont 0 60 120 Meters
l4� Natural Gas

Service Layer Credits: © 2019 Microsoft Corporation © 2019 DigitalGlobe ©CNES (2019) Distribution
Airbus DS © 2019 HERE
Figure 6-28 of 33
NHD Map
DUKE ® 0 200 400 Feet Line 451 /Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline
ENERGY. Lincoln and Catawba Counties
January 2019
Pedmont 0 60 120 Meters
[ Natural Gas

' ,.
IAN
d
,
406
At
if I
.s.
�t
V,
0 -- I Proposed Access Road
J t f ♦ r` ! - 1
. 'i�'J C«,L • Q Proposed Pipeline Corridor
} ` - Stream
j'
r �i ®Open Water
Wetland
50' State Buffer
NHD Stream
• • • Data Point Location
Service Layer Credits: © 2019 Microsoft Corporation © 2019 DigitalGlobe ©ONES (2019) Distribution
Airbus DS © 2019 HERE
Figure 6-29 of 33
NHD Map
DUKE 0 200 400 Feet Line 451/Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline
Lincoln and Catawba Counties
AP ENERGY,
ENERGY, January 2019
/A ' Piedmont 0 60 120 Meters
[(� Natural Gas

►!„r • *•` ��,1 r� r, r to • w''j-'�+• L,�`' f . 1,k.:� .1
KA
"� X71, �• ',' •a.,1- .'r�wl#, s� .. a�, •-
JA.
ZI, 4i
d * wr+_ .tel' -%w” .L l -� a� -.� •r
e' `� V ;'�• r �y ,�Y fit`• ' Y �, � P
Service Layer Credits: © 2019 Microsoft Corporation © 2019 DigitalGlobe ©CNES (2019) Distribution
Airbus DS © 2019 HERE
e
a:.
L_ _I Proposed Access Road
QProposed Pipeline Corridor
- Stream
® Open Water
® Wetland
50' State Buffer
NHD Stream
Data Point Location
Figure 6-30 of 33
NHD Map
PCM•� DUKE ® 0 200 400 Feet Line 451/Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline
V ENERGY Lincoln and Catawba Counties
January 2019
Piedmont 0 60 120 Meters
ll Natural Gas

Service Layer Credits: © 2019 Microsoft Corporation © 2019 DigitalGlobe ©CNES (2019) Distribution
Airbus DS © 2019 HERE
(4 DUKE
ENERGY
ralPiedmont
Natural Gas
® 0 200 400 Feet
0 60 120 Meters
Figure 6-31 of 33
NHD Map
Line 451/Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline
Lincoln and Catawba Counties
January 2019

Service Layer Credits: © 2019 Microsoft Corporation © 2019 DigitalGlobe ©CNES (2019) Distribution
Airbus DS © 2019 HERE
Figure 6-32 of 33
NHD Map
t
DUKE ® 0 200 400 Feet Line 451 /Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline
M
PCO
ENERGY, Lincoln and Catawba Counties
January 2019
ra'Piedmont 0 60 120 Meters
Natural Gas
I , " - -

11111111101
Service Layer Credits: © 2019 Microsoft Corporation © 2019 DigitalGlobe ©CNES (2019) Distribution
Airbus DS © 2019 HERE
9
lc•�
Proposed Access Road
QProposed Pipeline Corridor
- Stream
open Water
® Wetland
50' State Buffer
-� NHD Stream
Data Point Location
Figure 6-33 of 33
NHD Map
DUKE® 0 200 400 Feet Line 451 /Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline
Lincoln and Catawba Counties
ENERGY:
January 2019
rt1l�Piedmont 0 60 120 Meters
Natural Gas
r A ',
11111111101
Service Layer Credits: © 2019 Microsoft Corporation © 2019 DigitalGlobe ©CNES (2019) Distribution
Airbus DS © 2019 HERE
9
lc•�
Proposed Access Road
QProposed Pipeline Corridor
- Stream
open Water
® Wetland
50' State Buffer
-� NHD Stream
Data Point Location
Figure 6-33 of 33
NHD Map
DUKE® 0 200 400 Feet Line 451 /Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline
Lincoln and Catawba Counties
ENERGY:
January 2019
rt1l�Piedmont 0 60 120 Meters
Natural Gas

Attachment C. Agency Consultation
USFWS Request
USFWS Response
IPaC Species Report
SHPO Request
SHPO Response

rte•:; R;
Responsive People. Real Partners. Architects 3500 Parkway Lane P678.336.7740
Engineers Suite 500 F 678.336 . 7744
Planners Peachtree Comers, GA 30092 www.pondco.com
Constructors
May 8, 2018
Byron Hamstead
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville, NC 28801
Subject: Information request for known occurrences of federal and state listed species
Piedmont Natural Gas — Line 451, Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline Project
Catawba and Lincoln County, NC
On behalf of the applicant, Piedmont Natural Gas (PNG), Pond is conducting an evaluation of potential impacts
to natural resources for the proposed natural gas pipeline located in Catawba and Lincoln Counties, NC.
Duke Energy Carolina has requested PNG to provide a natural gas supply to their Marshall Steam Plant. The
project proposes to install approximately 20 miles of new pipeline which would generally be collocated with
existing utility and road rights-of-way. I am respectfully requesting your assistance in providing information
pertaining to any known locations of federal and state listed species within a three-mile radius of the proposed
project. Please see the attached North Carolina Natural Heritage Program information request form and both
aerial and topographic figures for your reference.
Any information you can provide will assist in project avoidance and minimization to rare species and their
habitats.
If you have any questions or require any additional information, please contact me at 423.506.0689 or
barnetti(ED pond Co. com.
Sincerely,
James E. Barnett
Scientist II 1 Environmental Services
Enclosures: Attachment 1 — Information Request Form
Attachment 2 — Figures

Attachment 1 — Information Request Form

NORTH CAROLINA
Natural
Heritage
Program
SCIENCE GUIDING CONSERVATION
Please submit this form by email:
natural. heritage() ncdcr.gov
Or mail:
N.C. Natural Heritage Program
Information Request
1651 Mail Service Center
Raleigh NC 27699-1651
Information Request DATE SUBMITTED 5/8/18 DATE RECEIVED
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program provides information on the distribution of rare animals, rare plants, natural
communities, Natural Heritage Natural Areas, Dedicated State Nature Preserves, and Registered Heritage Areas. To
request information, please complete this form and submit to NCNHP. Responses to information requests will typically be
provided in two weeks; however, complex requests or requests received during periods of heavy workload may require
additional time.
Contact Information
Name
James E. Barnett
Company
Pond & Company
Street Address
3500 Parkway Lane, Suite 500
City ST Zip Code
Peachtree Corners, GA 30092
Phone
423-506-0689
Fax
E -Mail Address
[e-mail]
Project Information
Project Number
Project Location Latitude 35.537859 Longitude -81.058493 (in decimal degrees)
County Catawba and Lincoln Topographic Quad Lake Norman North,
Denver, and Lowesville
Project Type: Sensitive Environment _ Transportation _ Forestry _ Energy X Other
Project Description: Please provide all of these * items with your request.
*1. This completed information request form.
*2. A cover letter describing the proposed activity, including existing vegetation cover, structures
at the site, and the type of data requested. Additional pages may be provided by email attachment or
through the mail.
*3. A copy of appropriate USGS topographic map with the project area clearly outlined.
Additional information that would be useful:
a. GIS shape files of the project area.
b. A county map with major highways, rivers, creeks, and towns labeled is acceptable if
accompanied by a project site map.
c. Project boundary overlaid on a recent aerial photo
d. Parcel identification number(s) for the project area

Attachment 2 -_ Figures

V
J� w
�.., ♦♦

La :35.
Long: -80.9721
Service Layer Credits: Esri, HERE, Garmin, © OpenStreetMap contributors
Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN,
Figure 2
Early Coordination Map - Topo
e 0 1,000,000 2,000,000 Feet Piedmont Natural Gas - Line 451, Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline
Catawba and Lincoln Counties
May 2018
0 337,500 675,000 Meters
n
}
'Ib
S
an
,Plrrt
Lat:35.5516
k.#p C,.+
ID
i
a 4
P r^�4
•�"
Long: -81.0651
3
` ""4°
# N �'%
e
s-
c
r
` Chabdti pl
T.
�
•.
SIaVcG°Mn� t4.
k
�
ww �,
v�q �• -R4^
�
S
CIS
Q
♦
Y
rkn�nlu�y
f LL
•
� V
N.+let�Fe«y
Rv � L1Y#Nueaan
I
r.nd
Lat:35.4206
Le end
9
Long: -81.0244
Pipeline Route
F
�p,e nr.
Service Layer Credits: Esri, HERE, Garmin, © OpenStreetMap contributors
Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN,
Figure 2
Early Coordination Map - Topo
e 0 1,000,000 2,000,000 Feet Piedmont Natural Gas - Line 451, Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline
Catawba and Lincoln Counties
May 2018
0 337,500 675,000 Meters

Q��gNT OR lye'
FIbuSE[ v[ E
s United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
• �gRCH 3 1aa9 . Asheville Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street Suite #B
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
August 1, 2018
Mr. James Barnett
3500 Parkway Lane, Suite 500
Peachtree Corners, Georgia 30092
I97; r 0►Oil: ,,'ii in
Subject: Federally Listed Species Assessment, Proposed Piedmont Natural Gas (PNG) 20 -Mile
Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline — Line 451 Project, located in Catawba and Lincoln
Counties, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Barnett:
On April 21, 2017, we received (via e-mail) a copy of your letter requesting our review and
comments on the subject project. We have reviewed the information you presented and are
providing the following comments in accordance with the provisions of the National Environmental
Policy Act (42 U.S.C.§4321 et seq.) (NEPA); the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act, as amended
(16 U.S.C. 661-667e), and section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C.
1531-1543) (Act).
According to the information that you presented, PNG is proposing to install about 20 -miles of new
natural gas pipeline to provide natural gas supply to the Marshall Steam Plant. Your letter indicates
that the new pipeline will be predominantly collocated within existing right-of-way easement. Your
letter did not include specific siting for the pipeline corridor, specific details regarding construction
plans, and potential impacts to natural resources.
Federally Listed Species. According to our records and the information that you provided, the
proposed project will occur in areas of suitable habitat for Schweinitz's sunflower (Helianthus
schweinitzii) which is currently federally listed as endangered, and dwarf -flowered heartleaf
(Hexastylis nan flora) which is currently federally listed as threatened. Dwarf -flowered heartleaf is
currently known to occur in Catawba and Lincoln Counties and Schweinitz's sunflower is currently
known to occur in Catawba County only. We have current occurrence records for both of these
species within close proximity .to the project alignment. Unless the project corridor has been
specifically surveyed for these species or no appropriate habitat exists, a survey should be
conducted to ensure that these species are not inadvertently lost. In accordance with the Act, it is
the responsibility of the appropriate federal agency or its, designated representative to review its
activities or programs and to identify any such activities or programs that may affect endangered

Mr. James Barnett — POND
or threatened species or their habitats. If it is determined that the proposed activity may
adversely affect any species federally listed as endangered or threatened, formal consultation
with this office must be initiated.
FA
Utility Line _Crossings. In the interest of reducing impacts to natural resources, utility crossings
(i.e., sewer, gas, and water lines) should be kept to a minimum, and all utility infrastructure
(including manholes) should be kept. out of riparian buffer areas. We recommend that PNG assess
every stream and wetland crossing associated with the project for the use of the horizontal directional
boring installation method. Directional boring under streams significantly minimizes impacts to
aquatic resources and riparian buffers. If directional boring cannot be used and trenching is
determined to be the only viable method, every effort should be made to ensure that impacts to
in -stream features are minimized and stable upon completion of the project. Our past experiences
with open -trench crossings indicate that this technique increases the likelihood for future lateral
movement of the stream (which could undercut or erode around the.utility line), and the correction of
such problems could result in costly future maintenance and devastating impacts to natural resources.
Therefore, as'much work as possible should be accomplished in the dry, and the amount of
disturbance should not exceed what can be successfully stabilized by the end of the workday.
In -stream work should avoid the spring fish -spawning season and should consider forecasted
high-flow events. Regardless of the crossing method, all utility lines should cross streams
perpendicularly. We strongly encourage that a qualified biologist monitor the work area until the
work is complete, in order to identify any, additional on-site impact -minimization measures. The
Service may be available to assist you in this effort. To determine if any maintenance is required, the
work site should be monitored at least every 3 months during the first 24 months and annually
thereafter. Moreover, we recommend.the development of a riparian monitoring and maintenance
program that would outline procedures for the prompt stabilization of streambanks near the utility
crossing (should any streambank erosion or destabilization occur) throughout the life of this project.
Project Recommendations - We are concerned about the introduction and spread of invasive exotic
species in association with the proposed project. Without active management, including the
rev egetation of disturbed areas with native species, project corridors will likely be sources of (and.
corridors for) the movement -of invasive exotic plant species. Exotic species are a major contributor
to species depletion and extinction, second only to habitat loss. Exotics are a factor contributing to
the endangered or threatened status of more than 40 percent of the animals and plants on the Federal
List of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife 'and Plants.' It is estimated that at least 4,000 exotic
plant species and 2,300 exotic animal species are now established in the United States, costing more
than $130 billion a year to control.2 Additionally, the U.S. Government has many programs and laws
in place to combat invasive species (see www. invasivespecies.gov). Specifically, Section 2(a)(3) of
Executive Order 13112 - Invasive Species (February 3, 1999) directs federal agencies to "not
authorize, fund, or carry out actions that it believes are likely to cause or promote the introduction or
spread of invasive species in the United States or elsewhere." Despite their short-term
erosion -control benefits, many exotic species used in soil stabilization seed mixes are persistent once
they are established, thereby preventing the reestablishment of native vegetation. Many of these
'D.S. Wilcove, D. Rothstein, J. Dubow, A. Phillips, and E. Losos. 1998. Quantifying threats to imperiled species in
the United States. Bioscience 48:607-615.
2D. Pimentel, L. Lach, R. Zuniga, and D. Morrison. 2000. Environmental and economic costs of nonindigenous
species in the United States. BioScience 50:53-65.

Mr. James Barnett — POND 3
exotic plants are also aggressive invaders of nearby natural areas, where they are capable of
displacing already -established native species. Therefore, we strongly recommend that only species
native to the natural communities within the project area be used in association with all aspects of
this project.
We also recommend that seeds for native plants that are beneficial to pollinators be included in the
erosion control seed mixes. Pollinators, such as most bees, some birds and bats, or other insects,
including moths and butterflies, play a crucial role in the reproduction of flowering plants and in the
production of most fruits and vegetables. Over 75 percent of flowering plants and about 75 percent
of crops are pollinated by these pollinators. A recent study of the status of pollinators in North
America by the National Academy of Sciences found that populations of honey bees (which are not
native to North America) and many wild pollinators are declining. Declines in wild pollinators are a
result of loss, degradation, and fragmentation of habitat and disease; while declines in honey bees has
also been linked to disease. Because loss of habitat and diminished native food sources have
decreased the populations and diversity of pollinators throughout the country, we recommend that
development projects be sited in areas that are previously disturbed (fallow fields, closed industrial
sites, etc.) or sites that do not impact mature forests, streams, or wetlands. To offset the overall
impacts of development and/or to increase the habitat and species diversity within the project area,
we further recommend the following measures be implemented into project design:
1. Throughout the site, sow native seed mixes with plant species that are beneficial to
pollinators. Taller -growing pollinator plant species should be planted around the
periphery of the site and anywhere on the site where mowing can be restricted during the
summer months. Taller plants, not mowed during the summer, would provide benefits to
pollinators, habitat to ground-nesting/feeding birds, and cover for small mammals.
Low-growing/groundcover native species should be planted in areas that need to be
maintained. This would provide benefits to pollinators while also minimizing the amount
of maintenance, such as mowing and herbicide treatment. Using a seed mix that includes
milkweed species (milkweed is an important host plant for monarch butterflies) is
especially beneficial. The following Web site provides a comprehensive list of native
plant species that benefit pollinators:
http://www.xerces.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/MidAtlanticPlantList web.pdf
Additional information regarding plant species, seed mixes, and pollinator habitat
requirements can be provided upon request. Attachment 1 of this letter includes a sample
upland mix that can be used in conjunction with a fast growing annual seed mix for
overall soil stability and pollinator benefits. We also offer our assistance with developing
seed mixes that can be used in conjunction with fast growing erosion control seed mix for
overall soil stability and pollinator benefits.
2. Implement a mowing and maintenance program that restricts mowing during the
summer months. Mowing at the site should be restricted to the smallest area possible to
manage the edges of the easement for early successional habitat. We recommend that
PNG evaluate its maintenance plan to target ecological/habitat benefits to other wildlife
species, especially pollinators and birds that require early successional habitats. One of
'Lists of invasive exotic plants can be found at http:11www. tneppc. org/ and http:11www. invasive. org/eastern/srs/
(exotic wildlife links)

Mr. James Barnett — POND
4
the best ways to accomplish this objective is to use Integrated Vegetation Management
(IVM) practice using low-volume herbicide applications when planning management
activities. Pollinator nest sites in ROWs managed with IVM practices have been found to
contain about 30% more pollinator nesting sites and species richness than traditionally
mowed maintenance areas. Aside from removing problem vegetation, the primary focus
should be placed on establishing compact flowering shrubs and managing for native
grasses and wildflowers. The overall objective is to reach a sustainable level of grasses,
forbs, and flowering shrubs (wherever feasible) throughout the project area.
3. Provide nesting sites for pollinator species. Different pollinators have different needs
for nesting sites. Therefore, we recommend managing the pipeline easements in a manner
that creates or maintains a diverse array of habitats to accommodate varied pollinators,
from hummingbirds to butterflies to bees. Hummingbirds typically nest in trees or shrubs
while many butterflies lay eggs on specific host plants. Most bees nest in the ground and
in wood or dry plant stems. For additional information and actions that can be taken to
benefit pollinators please visit the following Web site:
http://www: vs.gov/pollinators/p ollinatorpages/yourhelp.html.
We appreciate the opportunity to provide these comments. If we can be of assistance or if you have
any questions, please contact Mr. Bryan Tompkins of our staff at 828/258-3939, Ext. 240. In any
future correspondence concerning this project, please reference our Log Number 4-2-18-371.
Sincerely,
- - original signed - -
Janet Mizzi
Field Supervisor
Attachment 1— Sample Upland Meadow Seed Mix for NC Piedmont
This is an example upland pollinator seed mix that is suitable for the project site. This list is not
an all-inclusive list nor does a pollinator planting project need to include all of these species. I
can help to customize a seed mix for the project area which could decrease costs if requested.

Mr. James Barnett — POND
• 20% Indiangrass, NC Ecotype (Sorghastrum nutans, NC Ecotype
• 18% Beaked Panicgrass, SC. Ecotype (Panicum anceps, SC Ecotype
• 14% Little Bluestem, Piedmont NC Ecotype (Schizachyrium scoparium, Piedmont NC
Ecotype)
• 10% Virginia Wildrye, PA Ecotype (Elymus virginicus, PA Ecotype)
• 6% Purpletop, Southeastern VA Ecotype (Tridens flavus, Southeastern VA Ecotype
30Xo Bi tgtop Lovegrass, VA Ecotype (Eragrostis hirsuta, VA Ecotype),
• 3% Blackeyed Susan, Coastal P1ain.NC Ecotype (Rudbeckia hirta, Coastal Plain NC
Eco e
• 2.5% Sensitive Pea, NC Ecotype (Chamaecrista n-ictitans, NC Ecotype)
• 2%,Lanceleaf Coreopsis, Coastal Plain NC Ecotype (Coreopsis lanceolata, Coastal Plain
NC Ecotype)
• 2% Spiked Wild Indigo, NC Ecotype (Baptisia albescens, NC Ecotype)
• 2% Winter Bentgrass, NC Ecotype -(A ros�tis hyeinalis, NC Ecotype
• 2% Slender Bushclover, VA Ecotype (Lespedeza virginica, VA Ecotype)
• .2% Scaly Blazing Star, VA Ecotype (Liatris squarrosa, VA Ecotype)
2% Appalachian Beardton"e, SC Ecotype (Penstemon laeviaatus, SC Ecotvpe)
• 2% Wild Ouini
2% Slender Indiangrass, NC Ecotype (Somhastrum elliottii, NC Ecotype)
• 1% Grassleaf Blazing Star, NC Ecotype (Liatris graminifolia (L. pilosa), NC Ecotype)
• 1% Mistflower, VA Ecotype (Eupatorium coelestinum (Conoclinium c.), VA Ecotype)
• 1% Splitbeard Bluestem, VA Ecotype (Andropogon ternarius, VA Ecotype)
• 1% Spotted Beebalm,'Coastal Plain SC Ecotype (Monarda punctata, Coastal Plain SC
Eco e
• 1% Orange Coneflower, Northern VA Ecotype (Rudbeckia fulgida var. fulgida, Northern
VA Ecotype)
• 0.5% Late Purple Aster, NC Ecotype (Aster patens, NC Ecotype),
• 0.5% Wild Indigo, Coastal Plain SC Ecotype (Baptisia tinctoria, Coastal Plain SC .
Eco e
• 0.5% Anise Goldenrod, GA Ecotype (Solidago odora, GA Ecotype)
• 0.5% Gray Goldenrod, VA Ecotype (Solidago nemoralis, VA Ecotype)
• 0.5%_ Swamp (Narrowleaf) Sunflower, Coastal Plain NC Ecotype (Helianthus
angustifolius, Coastal Plain NC Ecotype)
Total: 100%

1/29/2019 IPaC: Explore Location
IPaC U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
IPaC resource list
This report is an automatically generated list of species and other resources such as critical habitat (collectively referred to as trust resources)
under the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's (USFWS)jurisdiction that are known or expected to be on or near the project area referenced below.
The list may also include trust resources that occur outside of the project area, but that could potentially be directly or indirectly affected by
activities in the project area. However, determining the likelihood and extent of effects a project may have on trust resources typically requires
gathering additional site-specific (e.g., vegetation/species surveys) and project -specific (e.g., magnitude and timing of proposed activities)
information.
Below is a summary of the project information you provided and contact information for the USFWS office(s) with jurisdiction in the defined
project area. Please read the introduction to each section that follows (Endangered Species, Migratory Birds, USFWS Facilities, and NWI
Wetlands) for additional information applicable to the trust resources addressed in that section.
Location
Catawba and Lincoln counties, North Carolina
>85 h
Lenoir
Wrpnlon Slelesvill,
5 -Brook►
Moores
2269 R N rpt
Shelby
'Charlol
Local office
Asheville Ecological Services Field Office
oyll"*
V [phone]
IR(828)258-5330
https://ecos.fws.govf pac/location/XATFHTU4XNGG5BBV FPQKVGHS7A/resources 1/8

1/29/2019 IPaC: Explore Location
Endangered species
This resource list is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an analysis of project level impacts.
The primary information used to generate this list is the known or expected range of each species. Additional areas of influence (AOI) for
species are also considered. An AOI includes areas outside of the species range if the species could be indirectly affected by activities in that
area (e.g., placing a dam upstream of a fish population, even if that fish does not occur at the dam site, may indirectly impact the species by
reducing or eliminating water flow downstream). Because species can move, and site conditions can change, the species on this list are not
guaranteed to be found on or near the project area. To fully determine any potential effects to species, additional site-specific and project -
specific information is often required.
Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act requires Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary information whether any species which is listed
or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of such proposed action" for any project that is conducted, permitted, funded, or licensed
by any Federal agency. A letter from the local office and a species list which fulfills this requirement can only be obtained by requesting an
official species list from either the Regulatory Review section in IPaC (see directions below) or from the local field office directly.
For project evaluations that require USFWS concurrence/review, please return to the IPaC website and request an official species list by doing
the following:
1. Draw the project location and click CONTINUE.
2. Click DEFINE PROJECT.
3. Log in (if directed to do so).
4. Provide a name and description for your project.
5. Click REQUEST SPECIES LIST.
Listed speciesl and their critical habitats are managed by the Ecological Services Program of the U.S.0 nd d Service (USFWS) and the
fisheries division of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA Fisheries?)
Species and critical habitats under the sole responsibility of NOAA Fisheries are not sh on i ase contact NOAA Fisheries for
species under their jurisdiction.
for listing. See the listing status page for more information.
2. NOAA Fisheriesalso known as the National Marine FisljWe
Dwarf -flowered Heardeaf Hexastylis naniflora
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
httos://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2458
Michaux's Sumac Rhus michauxii
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.f ms.goy/eco/species/5217
Schweinitz's Sunflower Helianthus schweinitzii
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.eov/ecp/spec*es/3849
Critical habitats
shows species that are candidates, or proposed,
f the National Oceanic and Atmospheric
STATUS
Threatened
STATUS
Threatened
Endangered
Endangered
Potential effects to critical habitat(s) in this location must be analyzed along with the endangered species themselves.
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS AT THIS LOCATION.
https://ecos.fws.govfipac/location/XATFHTU4XNGG5BBV FPQKVGHS7A/resources 218

IPaC: Explore Location
Migratory birds
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Actl and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act2.
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to migratory birds, eagles, and their habitats should
follow appropriate regulations and consider implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described below.
1. The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918.
2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
Additional information can be found using the following links:
• Birds of Conservation Concern http://www.fws.gov/birds/management/managed-s eR cies/
b i rd s -of -conservation -concern. o h o
• Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds http:/ANww.fws.gov/birds/manaeement/(Lject-assessment-tools-and-guidance/
conservation-measu res. oh o
• Nationwide conservation measures for birds
http://www.fws.goV/migrato birds/pdf/management/nationwidestandardconservationmeasures.pdf
The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) list or
warrant special attention in your project location. To learn more about the levels of concern for birds on your list and how this ' is
generated, see the FAQ below. This is not a list of every bird you may find in this location, nor a guarantee that every bird on s i be
found in your project area. To see exact locations of where birders and the general public have sighted birds in and a ur pr c rea,
visit the E -bird data mapping tool (Tip: enter your location, desired date range and a species on your list). For pro' that e
Atlantic Coast, additional maps and models detailing the relative occurrence and abundance of bird species our are ailable. Links to
additional information about Atlantic Coast birds, and other important information about your migra it i cl ng how to properly
Interpret and use your migratory bird report, can be found below.
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization meas e o reduc impacts to migratory birds on your
list, click on the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE SUMMARY at the top of your list to see whe hes i Omost likely to be present and
breeding in your project area.
NAME BREEDING SEASON (IF A BREEDING SEASON IS
N444 -
GO
Bald Eagle Haliaeetuikuco u0s
This is not a Bir onservat Concern (BCC) In this area, but warrants attention because of the
Eagle Act�afLpot al susce bilines in offshore areas from certain types of development or
Warbler Vermivora pinus
TMs is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the
continental USA
Cerulean Warbler Dendroica cerulea
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska.
hnps://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2974
Eastern Whip -poor -will Antrostomus vociferus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska.
Golden Eagle Aquila chrysaetos
This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, but warrants attention because of the
Eagle Act or for potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or
activities.
hhttos://ecos.fws.eov/eco/species/1680
Kentucky Warbler Oporornis formosus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska.
INDICATED FOR A BIRD ON YOUR LIST, THE BIRD
MAY BREED IN YOUR PROJECT AREA SOMETIME
WITHIN THE TIMEFRAME SPECIFIED, WHICH IS A
VERY LIBERAL ESTIMATE OF THE DATES INSIDE
WHICH THE BIRD BREEDS ACROSS ITS ENTIRE
RANGE. "BREEDS ELSEWHERE" INDICATES THAT
THE BIRD DOES NOT LIKELY BREED IN YOUR
PROJECT AREA.)
Breeds Sep 1 to Jul 31
Breeds May 1 to Jun 30
Breeds Apr 28 to Jul 20
Breeds May 1 to Aug 20
Breeds elsewhere
Breeds Apr 20 to Aug 20
https://ecos.fws.govfpac/location/XATFHTU4XNGG5BBVTPQKVGHS7A/resources 3/8

1/29/2019
IPaC: Explore Location
Prairie Warbler Dendroica discolor Breeds May 1 to jui 31
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska.
Prothonotary Warbler Protonotaria citrea Breeds Apr 1 to Jul 31
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska.
Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus Breeds May 10 to Sep 10
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska.
Rusty Blackbird Euphagus carolinus Breeds elsewhere
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska.
Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina Breeds May 10 to Aug 31
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska.
Probability of Presence Summary
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be present in your project area. This inforrrhion
can be used to tailor and schedule your project activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read and and e
FAQ "Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before using or attempting to interpret this report.
Probability of Presence (a)
Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your project over s du a icular week of
the year. (A year is represented as 12 4 -week months.) A taller bar indicates a higher probability of spe ' pr T survey effort (see
below) can be used to establish a level of confidence in the presence score. One can have higher co d ce i e Bence score if the
corresponding survey effort is also high.
How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three ste
1. The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number o#2ere
week where the species was detected divided
by the total number of survey events for that week. For example, if i ere 20 survey events and the Spotted Towhee was
found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted T e25.
2. To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, e re presence is calculated. This is the probability of
presence divided by the maximum probability of pre ss all aple, imagine the probability of presence in week 20
for the Spotted Towhee is 0.05, and that the probabi of p t week 12 (0.25) is the maximum of any week of the year. The relative
probability of presence on week 12 is 0.25/ = 1; a ee 0 it is 0.05/0.25 = 0.2.
3. The relative probability of presence calk to the pre ous step undergoes a statistical conversion so that all possible values fall
between 0 and 10, inclusive. This ' I f presence score.
To see a bar's probability ofenc core im ly hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
Breeding Season
Yellow bars depotrdoe�ot
libera stimate of the time -frame inside which the bird breeds across its entire range. If there are no yellow bars
shown for'Ok
breed in your project area.
Su ey Ve uperimposed on probabilityof presence bars indicate the number of surveys performed for that species in the 10km grid
cell( ou roject area overlaps. The number of surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys.
To see a bar's survey effort range, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
No Data (—)
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
Survey Timeframe
Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant information. The exception to this is areas off the
Atlantic coast, where bird returns are based on all years of available data, since data in these areas is currently much more sparse.
SPECIES JAN
Bald Eagle
Non -BCC Vulnerable (This is not $000
a Bird of Conservation Concern
(BCCI in this area, but warrants
._..__._..._.__._._......................_......_......le'
attention because of the Eagle
.................................................................. ...
Ad or for Potential
..........................................
susceptibilities_ In offshore
areas from certain types of
........................... or _ _..
developmentt or activities.)
......................................................
■ probability of presence breeding season I survey effort — no data
FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
W1111 0ill IM ILII II+1 11++ 1111 Illi 1111 1111 1111
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/XATFHTU4XNGG5BBVTPQKVGHS7A/resources 4/8

1/29/2019
IPaC: Explore Location
++++
++++
++++
Mt..
01"11.4
-11
+}}}
++14
BCC -BCRged (ThisisarBidof
Conservation Concern(BC_C)
only in particular Blyd
Conservation Regions (BCRs) in
�"
the continental USA)
Cerulean Warbler
BCC Rangevride (CON) (This is a T (+++
++++
++++
+y
+*T
I I
I I++
1 1 1 4
i i+}
Bird of Conservation Concem
(BCC) throughout its range In
the continent_a_I USA and
Alaska.)
Eastern Whip -poor -will
++++
++++
yy
++*T
i�
IIII
,y
I1,�}
I® } 4"
1++}
b+4 "i
BCC RanBewide (CON))(This is a
Bird of Canservatlan Concern
(BCC) throughout its range In
the continental USA and
Alaska.)
Golden Eagle
Non -BCC Vulnerable (This is not
a Bird of Conservation Concern
(BCC) In this area, butwarrants
attention beaux of the Eagle
Act or for pataralal
suscepdblMes In offshore
areas from certain es o!
development ar!51 v es.)
K kywar
++++
+'}++
++}+
jj
+++T
+++4
+} ++
++++
'
}4 +
BCC RaRa ngewide (CSON) (This Is a
.q
Bird of conservation Concem
(BCC) throushout Its range.in
............
the continental USA and
Alaska.) Naska.)
Prairie Warbler 04 ++++ +++y mill 1"T W* 1T1+ 1111
BCC, RangevAde (CON) (This isa T T T
Bird of Conservadon Concern
++i1 1111 ++++ 1111
+ ++++ ++++
(BCC) throw out fts ra a In
lh......................Ai In
the.......co.. ntlnemal USA and
........—. _
Alaska. + r
Prothonotary Warbler ++++ ++++ ++++ ■111 ■111 111 ++++
BCC Rangewide (CON). (This,fs a
Bird of Conservation Concern
...............---'---•
!13CQ.throUP9".!An1tin
the continental USA and
......_.................................................
Alaska.)
Red-headed Woodpecker il�I +1T■ T+I+ 1T + +�i{� �1+I •*11
BCC,Rangevnde (CON). (Thisha *+TT �r a
Bird of Conxrvatlon Concem
(BCq throw out Its ran a In
the condnenW USA and
/Jaska.l
..................
Rusty Blackbird++ +++} }+++ }}}} ++++
BCC Raniewlde (C.ON) (This, is a T
Bird of Conservatlon Concem
(BCq throw out hs ran e in
................._—. ..._.......b........
the continent USA and
..............................____.......... d
Alaska.)
R gewa0&#V0V4F&
Ilii Jill IIII Jill
Bird of Co hrou
the
Tell me more about conservation measures I can Implement to avoid or minimize Impacts to migratory birds.
IID X00+ 1111111+
++++ ++I+ +SII
�M IIf+ ++++ ++++
Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize Impacts to all birds at any location year round. Implementation of these
measures is particularly important when birds are most likely to occur in the project area. When birds may be breeding in the area, identifying the locations of any
active nests and avoiding their destruction is a very helpful impact minimization measure. To see when birds are most likely to occur and be breeding in your
project area, view the Probability of Presence Summary. Additional measures and/or permits may be advisable depending on the type of activity you are conducting
and the type of infrastructure or bird species present on your project site.
What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location?
The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of LISFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) and other species that may warrant special attention in your project
location.
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKNI. The AKN data is based on a growing
collection of survey. banding. and citizen science datasets and is queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as occurring in the 10km grid cell(s)
which your project intersects, and that have been identified as warranting special attention because they are a BCC species in that area, an eagle (Eagle A
requirements may apply), or a species that has a particular vulnerability to offshore activities or development.
Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your project area. It is not representative of all birds that may occur in your
project area. To get a list of all birds potentially present in your project area, please visit the E -bird Explore Data Tool.
What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location?
https://ecos.fws.govfipac/location/XATFHTU4XNGG5BBVTPQKVGHS7A/resources 5/8

IPaC: Explore Location
The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). This data is derived
from a growing collection of survey. banding. and citizen science datasets .
Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information becomes available. To learn more about how the probability of presence
graphs are produced and how to interpret them, go the Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me about these graphs" link.
How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering, migrating or present year-round in my project area?
To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding, wintering, migrating or year-round), you may refer to the following
resources: The Cornell Lab of Ornithology All About Birds Bird Guide, or (if you are unsuccessful in locating the bird of interest there), the Cornell Lab of Ornithology
Neotropical Birds guide. If a bird on your migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated with it, if that bird does occur in your project area, there may
be nests present at some point within the timeframe specified. If "Breeds elsewhere" is indicated, then the bird likely does not breed in your project area.
What are the levels of concern for migratory birds?
Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern:
1. "BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) that are of concern throughout their range anywhere within the USA (including Hawaii, the
Pacific Islands, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands);
2. "BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA; and
a "Non -BCC -Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species In your project area, but appear on your list either because of the Eagle Act requirements (for eagles) or (for
non -eagles) potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or activities (e.g. offshore energy development or longline fishin
Although it is Important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made, In particular, to avoid and minimize impacts to the bir n t
list, especially eagles and BCC species of rangewide concern. For more Information on conservation measures you can implement to help avoid a n
migratory bird Impacts and requirements for eagles, please see the FAQs for these topics.
Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects 0-,% \ -�-
For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species and groups of birds es yot�irojec area off the
Atlantic Coast, please visit the Northeast Ocean Data Portal. The Portal also offers data and Information about oth besl thTTat may be helpful to you In
your project review. Alternately, you may download the bird model results files underlying the portal maps th ugh the i
M Predictive Marine r Distributions n Abundance n Atlantic i fpr ebpage.
Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use through t ear, I Igration. Models relying on survey data may
not Include this Information. For additional information on marine bird tracking data, see th vi Bi n the nanotag studies or contact Caleb Spiegel or
Pam Loring.
What If 1 have eagles on my list?
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may in r to avoid violating the Eagle Act should such Impacts occur.
Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory ort
The migratory bird list generated Is not a II b r project area, only a subset of birds of priority concern. To learn more about how your list Is
generated, and see options for Identl 'n at o rds m y be In your project area, please see the FAQ "What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds
potentially occurring In my specifi cat ". Ple b aware this report provides the "probability of presence" of birds within the 10 km grid cell(s) that overlap
your project; not your exact proj fo n e graphs provided, please also look carefully at the survey effort (indicated by the black vertical bar) and for the
existence of the "no da icato red horizontal bar). A high survey effort is the key component. If the survey effort Is high, then the probability of presence
score can be viewed re depen le. In contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar means a lack of data and, therefore, a lack of certainty about presence
of the specie is perfect; t Is simply a starting point for Identifying what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might
be ther. an they rught breeding (which means nests might be present). The list helps you know what to look for to confirm presence, and helps guide you In
kn wing to im ment conservation measures to avoid or minimize potential impacts from your project activities, should presence be confirmed. To learn
m o ion measures, visit the FAQ "Tell me about conservation measures I can Implement to avoid or minimize Impacts to migratory birds" at the
bolt o migratory bird trust resources page.
Facilities
National Wildlife Refuge lands
Any activity proposed on lands managed by the National Wildlife Refuge system must undergo a 'Compatibility Determination' conducted by
the Refuge. Please contact the individual Refuges to discuss any questions or concerns.
THERE ARE NO REFUGE LANDS AT THIS LOCATION.
Fish hatcheries
THERE ARE NO FISH HATCHERIES AT THIS LOCATION.
https://ecos.fws.govApac/location/XATFHTU4XNGG5BBV rPQKVGHS7A/resources 6/8

1/29/2019
IPaC: Explore Location
Wetlands in the National Wetlands Inventory
Impacts to NWI wetlands and other aquatic habitats may be subject to regulation under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, or other
State/Federal statutes.
For more information please contact the Regulatory Program of the local U.S. Army Corps of Engineers District.
Please note that the NWI data being shown may be out of date. We are currently working to update our NWI data set. We recommend you
verify these results with a site visit to determine the actual extent of wetlands on site.
This location overlaps the following wetlands:
The area of this project is too large for IPaC to load all NWI wetlands in the area. The list below may be incomplete. Please contact the local
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service office or visit the NWI map for a full list.
FRESHWATER EMERGENT WETLAND
PEM1A
PEM1Ad
PEM1 Ch
PEIVI1Cd
PEM1Ah
PEM1 Cx
PEM1 C
P M
PEM1 Fh
PEM1Ax
FRESHWATER FORESTED/SHRUB WETLAND
PF01A
PSS1A
PF01Ah
PF01C
PFO1Ch
PSS 1Ah
PSS1C
PF01Ax
PSS 1Ax
PS51Ch
PFO1 /3B
PSS1/4B
PSS1B 00
PSS1Fh
PF02Fh
PF01F
PSS3A
FRESHWATER POND
PUBHh
PUBHx
PUBFh
PUBF
PUBKx
PUBFb
LAKE
L1UBHh
RIVERINE
RSUBH
A full description for each wetland code can be found at the National Wetlands Inventory website
Data limitations
https://ecos.fws.govf pac/location/XATFHTU4XNGG5BBV FPQKVGHS7A/resources 7/8

1/2912019
IPaC: Explore Location
The Service's objective of mapping wetlands and deepwater habitats is to produce reconnaissance level information on the location, type and size of these
resources. The maps are prepared from the analysis of high altitude imagery. Wetlands are identified based on vegetation, visible hydrology and geography. A
margin of error is inherent in the use of imagery; thus, detailed on -the -ground inspection of any particular site may result in revision of the wetland boundaries or
classification established through image analysis.
The accuracy of image interpretation depends on the quality of the imagery, the experience of the image analysts, the amount and quality of the collateral data and
the amount of ground truth verification work conducted. Metadata should be consulted to determine the date of the source imagery used and any mapping
problems.
Wetlands or other mapped features may have changed since the date of the imagery or field work. There may be occasional differences in polygon boundaries or
classifications between the information depicted on the map and the actual conditions on site.
Data exclusions
Certain wetland habitats are excluded from the National mapping program because of the limitations of aerial imagery as the primary data source used to detect
wetlands. These habitats include seagrasses or submerged aquatic vegetation that are found in the intertidal and subtidal zones of estuaries and nearshore coastal
waters. Some deepwater reef communities (coral or tuberficid worm reefs) have also been excluded from the inventory. These habitats, because of their depth, go
undetected by aerial imagery.
Data precautions
Federal, state, and local regulatory agencies with jurisdiction over wetlands may define and describe wetlands in a different manner than that used In this inventory.
There is no attempt, in either the design or products of this inventory, to define the limits of proprietary jurisdiction of any Federal, state, or local government or to
establish, the geographical scope of the regulatory programs of government agencies. Persons intending to engage in activities involving modifications viti'in or,
adjacent to wetland areas should seek the advice of appropriate federal, state, or local agencies concerning specified agency regulatory progra "siandjpropnetary
jurisdictions that may affect such activities.
https://ecos.fws.govriipac/location/XATFHTU4XNGG5BBV rPQK\/GHS7A/resources 8/8

—
3500 Parkway Lane. Suite 500 T. 678.336.77401 F: 678.336.7744
Peachtree Comers. Georgia 30092 www.wndco.cam
13 November 2018
Renee Gledhill -Earley
State Historic preservation Office
109 East Jones Street, Room 258
Raleigh, NC 27601
SUBJECT: Agency Consultation Request
Piedmont Natural Gas — Line 451, Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline Project
Catawba and Lincoln County, NC
Dear Ms. Gledhill -Earley,
On behalf of the applicant, Piedmont Natural Gas (PNG), Pond is conducting an evaluation of potential impacts to
natural and cultural resources for the proposed natural gas pipeline located in Catawba and Lincoln Counties, NC.
Duke Energy Carolina has requested PNG to provide a natural gas supply to their Marshall Steam Plant. The project
proposes to install approximately 20 -miles of new pipeline which would generally be collocated with existing utility
and road rights-of-way. I am respectfully requesting your assistance in providing information pertaining to any known
locations of historic and or cultural resources. Please see the attached figures and report for your reference.
Additionally, a Phase 1 Cultural Resource Survey will begin Monday, November 26, 2018. Methods for completing
this Phase 1 include the following. Land coverage requirements will be achieved by walking and visually inspecting
the entire survey area. Any exposed surfaces will be carefully examined for cultural material. Subsurface testing will
be performed along transects comprised of shovel tests spaced 30 -meters apart. When cultural materials are
discovered, delineations will be performed at 10 -meter intervals. Standard shovel tests will consist of 30 -centimeter
(cm) diameter cylindrical holes excavated to the top of the sterile subsoil layer. Soils from each test will be screened
through 1/4 -inch hardware cloth for the purpose of recovering any cultural material that may exist at that location.
When cultural material is encountered, the material will be sorted by provenience and placed into bags labeled with
the pertinent excavation information before being transported to TerraX's laboratory. Sites will be defined as two or
more artifacts within 25 -meters of each other or otherwise confined on the same landform. Single recoveries will be
considered isolated finds. Prior to conducting fieldwork, background research was conducted, including examining
older soil and topographic locations looking for previous historic structures within the project corridor. Our
investigation strategy is aimed for a 100 percent survey of the proposed corridor.
If possible, please provide comments regarding known resources within 30 days of receiving this letter. If you have
any questions or require any additional information, please contact me at 678-459-2470 or barksdalefapondco.com.
Thank you for your timely response.
Sincerely,
Flynt Barksdale, PWS
Senior Scientist
Pond and Company

Attachment 1: Figures
Attachment 2: TerraX Desktop Screening Report
CC:
Alicia DePalma
Environmental Siting and Licensing Support
4720 Piedmont Row Drive
Charlotte, NC 28210
[phone] Office
[phone] Mobile
alicia.depalma((Dduke-energy.com

Attachment 1

•. P' fLat:35.5978 �
Long: -80.9721
w �
F� • !'T
� r
4- N
.0 a • 1 •. VN Y.O� y "�"'iii5 •L
Long: -81.02
•
• •: -810651
j- `i I
1,P.
t
NO—
a, �.. LFA ♦• '1.. 1 , - ,,,,�n. • Y. '. ��'b
47
bd
i
y 1
4Fr ry
Lon
Legend
Pipeline Route
M.. 0

5�5
Fo,
1
Lat:35.5978
Long: -80.9721
a
Lat:35.602 ' s
Long: -81.023
4
Lat:35.5516 e.�u•r
• Long: -81.0651 '„
It .0 ' %
6JP
Ei.
CLQ► r~
IoM K:Innn .
> s �
1 An
h r
n
Lat:35.4206
Legend Long: -81.0244 '6 ' t p
`♦, T
>r . Pipeline Route -
Service Layer Credits: Esri, HERE, Garmin, © OpenStreetMap contributors
Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN,
Figure 2
Early Coordination Map - Topo
�M e 0 1,000,000 2,000,000 Feet Piedmont Natural Gas - Line 451, Marshall Steam Plant Pipeline
Catawba and Lincoln Counties
November 2018
0 340,000 680,000 Meters

Attachment 2

JTERRAXPLORATIONS
Leading the Future in Recording America's Past
October 4, 2018
Mr. Flynt Barksdale, PWS
Senior Scientist
POND
3500 Parkway Lane, Suite 500
Peachtree Corners, Georgia 30092
Re: Desktop survey to locate previously recorded historic and prehistoric resources within or near the
proposed Duke Marshall Steam Plant project area located in Catawba and Lincoln Counties, North Carolina.
Mr. Barksdale,
Per your request for a desktop survey to locate previously recorded historic and prehistoric resources within
or near the proposed Duke Marshall Steam Plant project area located in Catawba and Lincoln Counties,
North Carolina, TerraXpl orations, Inc. (TerraX) provides the following information.
BACKGROUND RESEARCH
The Duke Marshall Steam Plant project consists of an approximate 18.6 mile proposed pipeline route and
11.6 miles of proposed access roads. A literature and document search was conducted in order to gather
pertinent background information regarding the subject property and its surroundings. This research
included a visit to the North Carolina Office of State Archaeology (OSA) in Raleigh. A one -mile (1.6 km)
radius search was conducted around the proposed project area for previously recorded archaeological sites
and previous cultural resources surveys. The search area was also inspected for historic resources recorded
within the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (HPO) online historic property files (HPOWEB
Map Service 2018) and in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) (National Park Service 2018).
Research conducted at OSA identified 80 previously recorded archaeological sites and nine previous cultural
resources surveys within a mile of the proposed project area (Figures 1-3). Of the 80 sites, 14 appear to lie
within the proposed project area (31 LN92, 31 LN93, 31 LN 102, 31 LN 103, 31 LN 107, 31 LN 108, 31 LN l 09,
31 LN 150, 31 LN 152, 31 LN 153, 31 LN 165, 31 LN l 66, 31 LN 167, and 31 LN 177) and six others (31 LN 148,
31 LN 149, 31 LN 151, 31 LN 162, 31 LN 163, and 31 LN 164) appear to lie adjacent to it. Four of these sites
(31LN148, 31LN149, 31LN150, and 31LN152) are considered eligible for NRHP inclusion, while the
3130 East University Blvd
Tuscaloosa, Alabama 35404
www. terraxplorations. com

2 - Duke Marshall Steam Plant Desktop Surrey
t _► 42%`
31 L
>;1
F'ik t
FR 9/7319
t 153 f I( 73,
•i
i )
11 N20_ v %
31LN204 +>� ER06-0770C_
_ /5825` -F.
f-` -
AER 06-1538
31LN203 J ER Ofi-0770 /5748
31LN88 31LN19.' x/5825 '31 t..%1
-
rE r
•,r 31 LN87
311_N80 • _ 0 t 1217-0875
ER 91-8128 •. 2923 '
. /2923.2731
3u1J82-31LN85 \
,':�. 31LN99 V
31 LN,,
IR 17-0575
31LN79 31l^.1(17 /2923.
1,81 31 L(`:97 -
•
31Lr.,101 P@y''�` .�
31 L�^:1G2 r' MER O6-0770 31LN207 y�
-311_N111 i /5825 4:,.tf 7 i
31 LN104 31LN93,r
`'S L R 94 8949
1:15,10
31L^:10
71LN91 • 1 �_,. •�
311 N95 S
t7
'
31 LN92 i • • � 114/
-- Proposed Pipeline Route ♦ - Previous Site (Eligible)
-- Proposed Access Road ♦ - Previous Site (Not Eligible)
Q- 1 -Mile Search Radius A - Previous Site (Unassessed)
- Previous Site (Not Eligible) Q - Previous Cultural Resources Survey
_ - Previous Cultural Resources Survey
TERRAX "
Meters
Base Map: 1970 Lowesville, NC w e
USGS 7.5' Topographic Quadrangle 0 800 1,600
s
Figure 1. Topographic Map showing the proposed pipeline route, proposed access roads, the I -mile search radius,
previously recorded archaeological sites, and previous cultural resources surveys.

4 - Duke Marshall Steam Plant Desktop Survey
Figure 3. Topographic Map showing the proposed pipeline route, proposed access roads, the I -mile search radius,
previously recorded archaeological sites, and previous cultural resources surveys.

aTERRAXPLORKHONS -5
rest are recommended as ineligible. The four eligible sites consist of two 19th -20th century house sites
(31 LN 148 and 31 LN 149), one 20th century house site (31 LN 150), and one site containing Middle Woodland
and Mississippian components (31 LN 152). For additional information on the 80 previously recorded
archaeological sites, refer to Table 1.
Of the nine previous cultural resources surveys identified, four (ER 91-8128/2731, ER 97-7310/3954, ER
97-7319/3953, and ER 06-0770/5825) cross sections of the proposed project area. For additional information
on the previous cultural resources surveys identified, refer to Table 2.
Inspections of the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office online historic property files (HPOWEB
Map Service 2018) identified 126 previously recorded historic resources (Figures 4-6). These resources
consist primarily of historic residences but also include historic districts, farms, commercial properties, a
cotton gin, a grist mill, churches, a cemetery, a school, and Marshall Steam Station. The northern section
of the proposed project area ends within the property boundary of the Marshall Steam Station (CT1303),
a 1965-1970 power plant which is considered eligible for NRHP inclusion (see Figure 6). The proposed
pipeline route also appears to lie very close to a previously recorded early 20th century house (CT1512 -
recommended ineligible for the NRNP) located northeast of Killian Crossroads at 6087 East NC Hwy 150
(see Figure 5). For additional information on the previously recorded historic resources identified, refer to
Table 3.
Research of the NRHP (National Park Service 2018) identified four listed resources within the 1 -mile search
radius (see Figures 4 and 6). These include Ingleside (72000967), William A. Graham Jr. Farm (77001004),
Terre] I Historic District (86001685), and Mount Welcome (91001413). Though a few proposed access roads
lie in close proximity to Ingleside (72000967) and Terrell Historic District (86001685), none appear to extend
onto the recorded property boundaries for these resources. For additional information on the listed NRHP
resources identified, refer to Table 4.
TerraX appreciates the opportunity to provide this information to you. If you have any questions, please
don't hesitate to contact us.
Sincerely,
Paul D. Jackson
Principal Investigator

6 - Duke Marshall Steam Plant Desktop Survey
TABLE 1. PREVIOUS ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES RECORDED WITHIN A 1 -MILE RADIUS OF THE PROJECT AREA.
SITE
NUMBER
COMPONENTS
ELIGIBILITY
RECORDING ENTITY/ DATE
31CT49
Unknown Prehistoric
Unassessed
Recorder unknown, 1962
31CT51
Woodland and Unknown Prehistoric
Unassessed
Recorder unknown, 1962
31CT181
Early through Late Archaic
Not Eligible
New South Associates, 1996
31CT182
Late Paleoindian/Early Archaic and Post -Archaic
Not Eligible
New South Associates, 1996
31CT183
Late Archaic and Middle Woodland
Not Eligible
New South Associates, 1996
31CT184
Middle to Late Archaic
Not Eligible
New South Associates, 1996
31CT185
Early and Late Archaic
Not Eligible
New South Associates, 1996
31CT187
19th -20th Century
Not Eligible
New South Associates, 1996
31CT190
Late Archaic
Not Eligible
New South Associates, 1996
31CT191
Unknown Prehistoric
Not Eligible
New South Associates, 1996
31CT192
Unknown Prehistoric
Not Eligible
New South Associates, 1996
31CT193
Unknown Prehistoric
Not Eligible
New South Associates, 1996 "
31CT266
20th Century
Not Eligible
S&ME, 2016
31LN78
Unknown Prehistoric and Late 19th -Early 20th Century
Eligible
Brockington &Associates, Inc., 1989
31LN79
Late Archaic, Woodland, and 19th -20th Century Domestic
Not Eligible
Brockington & Associates, Inc., 1989
31LN80.
Unknown Prehistoric and 19th -20th Century
Not Eligible
Brockington &Associates, Inc., 1989
31LN81
Late Archaic
Not Eligible
Brockington &Associates, Inc., 1989
31LN82
Unknown Prehistoric
Not Eligible
Brockington &Associates, Inc., 1989
31LN83
Unknown Prehistoric and 18th -20th century,
Not Eligible
Brockington &Associates, Inc., 1989
31LN84
Unknown Prehistoric
Not Eligible
Brockington &Associates, Inc., 1989
31LN85
Archaic and 18th -20th Century
Not Eligible
Brockington &Associates, Inc., 1989
31LN86
Unknown Prehistoric
Not Eligible
Brockington & Associates, Inc., 1989
31LN87
Unknown Prehistoric and Post -Archaic
Not Eligible
Brockington &Associates, Inc., 1989
31LN88
Unknown Prehistoric and historic
Not Eligible
Brbckington &Associates, Inc., 1989
31LN89
Unknown Prehistoric
Not Eligible
Brockington &Associates, Inc., 1989
31LN90
19th -20th Century
Not Eligible
Brockington &Associates, Inc., 1989
31LN91
Unknown Prehistoric and 19th -20th Century Domestic
Not Eligible
. Brockington &Associates, Inc., 1989
31LN92
Unknown Prehistoric and 19th -20th Century Domestic
Not Eligible
Brockington &Associates, Inc., 1989
31LN93
Unknown Prehistoric and 18th -20th century
Not Eligible
Brockington &Associates, Inc., 1989
31LN94
Early Archaic, Middle Archaic, and 19th -20th Century Domestic
Not Eligible
Brockington &Associates, Inc., 1989
31LN95
Early Archaic, Late Archaic, and 19th -20th Century Domestic
Not Eligible
Brockington &Associates, Inc., 1989
31LN96
Unknown Prehistoric and 19th -20th Century Domestic
Not Eligible
Brockington &Associates, Inc., 1989
31LN97
Unknown Prehistoric and 19th -20th Century
Not Eligible
Brockington &Associates, Inc.; 1989

G
TERRAXPLoRnTIONS - 7
TABLE 1. PREVIOUS ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES RECORDED WITHIN A 1 -MILE RADIUS OF THE PROJECT AREA
(CONT.).
SITE
NUMBER
COMPONENTS
NRHP
ELIGIBILITY
RECORDING ENTITY/DATE
31LN98
Unknown Prehistoric and 19th -20th Century
Not Eligible
Brockington & Associates, Inc., 1989
31LN99
Unknown Prehistoric
Not Eligible
Brockington & Associates, Inc., 1989
31LN100
Early Archaic and 19th -20th Century
Not Eligible
Brockington &Associates, Inc., 1989
31LN101
Unknown Prehistoric and 19th -20th Century
Not Eligible
Brockington &Associates, Inc., 1989
31LN102
Unknown Prehistoric, Post -Archaic, and 19th -20th Century
Not Eligible
Brockington &Associates, Inc., 1989
31LN103
Unknown Prehistoric and 19th -20th Century
Not Eligible
Brockington & Associates, Inc., 1989
31LN104
Unknown Prehistoric
Not Eligible
Brockington & Associates, Inc., 1989
31LN105
Unknown Prehistoric and 19th -20th Century
Not Eligible
Brockington &Associates, Inc., 1989
31LN106
Unknown Prehistoric and 19th -20th Century
Not Eligible
Brockington &Associates, Inc., 1989
31LN107
Early Archaic
Not Eligible
Brockington & Associates, Inc., 1989
31LN108
Early Archaic
Not Eligible
Brocki ngton &Associates, Inc., 1989
31LN109
Unknown Prehistoric
Not Eligible
Brockington & Associates, Inc., 1989
31LN110
Unknown Prehistoric
Not Eligible
Brockington & Associates, Inc., 1989
31LN111
Unknown Prehistoric
Not Eligible
Brockington &Associates, Inc., 1989
31LN147
Middle Archaicand 20th Century to Present Domestic
Not Eligible
New South Associates, 1996
31LN148
Unknown Prehistoric and 19th -20th Century Domestic
Eligible
New South Associates, 1996
31LN149
Early 19th through Early 20th Century Domestic
Eligible
New South Associates, 1996
31LN150
20th Century Domestic
Eligible
New South Associates, 1996
31LN151
Early to Mid -20th Domestic
Not Eligible
New South Associates, 1996
31LN152
Middle Woodland and Mississippian
Eligible
New South Associates, 1996
31LN153
Unknown Historic Agricultural
Not Eligible
New South Associates, 1996
31LN154
Middle Archaic, Late Archaic, Early Woodland, Middle
Woodland, and Mississippian
Not Eligible
Coastal Carolina Research, 2005
31LN155
19th Century Domestic
Not Eligible
New South Associates, 1996
31LN157
19th -20th Century Domestic
Not Eligible
New South Associates, 1996
31LN162
Unknown Prehistoric
Not Eligible
New South Associates, 1996
31LN163
Unknown Prehistoric
Not Eligible
New South Associates, 1996
31LN164
Unknown Prehistoric
Not Eligible
New South Associates, 1996
31LN165
Middle Archaic and Post -Archaic
Not Eligible
New South Associates, 1996
31LN166
Unknown Prehistoric
Not Eligible
New South Associates, 1996
31LN167
Unknown Prehistoric
Not Eligible
New South Associates, 1996
31LN168
Middle Archaic and Past -Archaic
Not Eligible
New South Associates, 1996

8 - Duke Marshall Steam Plant Desktop Survey
TABLE 1. PREVIOUS ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES RECORDED WITHIN A 1 -MILE RADIUS OF THE PROJECT AREA
(CONT.).
SITE
NUMBER
COMPONENTS
EL NRHP ITY
RECORDING ENTITY/DATE
31LN171
Unknown Prehistoric
Not Eligible
New South Associates, 1996
31LN172
Early to Late 20th Century Domestic
Not Eligible
New South Associates, 1996
31LN176
Mid -19th to Mid -20th Century
Not Eligible
New South Associates, 1996
31LN177
20th Century
Not Eligible
New South Associates, 1996
31LN195
Unknown Prehistoric, Post -Archaic, and 19th -20th Century
Not Eligible
Coastal Carolina Research, 2005
31LN196
Unknown Prehistoric and 20th Century Domestic
Not Eligible
Cultural Resource Assessment Group, 2006
31LN197
Early Archaic and 19th -20th Century Domestic
Not Eligible
Cultural Resource Assessment Group, 2006
31LN198
Unknown Prehistoric and 19th -20th Century Agricultural
Not Eligible
Cultural Resource Assessment Group, 2006
31LN199
Unknown Prehistoric and 20th Century
Not Eligible
Cultural Resource Assessment Group, 2006
31LN200
Unknown Prehistoric and 20th Century Domestic/Agricultural
Not Eligible
Cultural Resource Assessment Group, 2006
31LN201
20th Century Domestic
Not Eligible
Cultural Resource Assessment Group, 2006
31LN202
Unknown Prehistoric and 19th Century Domestic
Unassessed
Cultural Resource Assessment Group, 2006
31LN203
Early 20th Century Mine
Not Eligible
Cultural Resource Assessment Group, 2006
31LN204
Unknown Prehistoric and 19th -20th Century Domestic
Not Eligible
Cultural Resource Assessment Group, 2006
31LN206
Unknown Prehistoric
Not Eligible
Archaeological Consultants of the Carolinas,
2006
31LN207
19th -20th Century Domestic
Not Eligible
Archaeological Consultants of the Carolinas,
2006

6 TERRAXPLoRAFIoNs - 9
TABLE 2. PREVIOUS CULTURAL RESOURCES SURVEYS CONDUCTED WITHIN A I -MILE RADIUS OF THE PROJECT
AREA.
OSA SURVEY/
REPORT TITLE/RESULTS
REFERENCE
REPORT NUMBER
MonogementSummory, Survey Site 12, Lowesville Tract, Lincoln County, North Carolina. This
Brocki ngton &Associates,
ER 91-8128/2731
document describes the evaluation of Site 31LN78 (aka Site 12), which was recommended as
Inc. (Espenshade 1990)
eligible for NRHP listing.
Archaeological Survey and Testing at the Lowesville Tract, Lincoln County, North Carolina.
ER 91-8128 and ER 17-
Archaeological survey and testing of the 712 acre Lowesvil le Tract resulted in the location
Brockington & Associates,
0575/2923
and evaluation of 34 archaeological sites and 23 isolated finds. Cultural components
Inc. (Gardner et al. 1990)
identified during the investigation include both prehistoric and historic.
Archaeological Sample Survey, NC 16, North of Lucia to NC 150 Gaston, Lincoln, and Catawba
Counties, North Carolina, T.I. P. Number R-2206: A Study of Sail Type and Erosion as Variables
ER 97-7310/3954
or the Prediction of Archaeological Site Eligibility Potential. This survey consisted of a sample
New South Associates
of approximately 1,631.12 acres within a proposed corridor for NC Hwy 16 improvements.
(Abbott and Sanborn 1996)
The survey resulted in the discovery of 49 archaeological sites. Thirty of these sites, which
include prehistoric and historic components, lie within a mile of the proposed project route.
An Intensive Archaeological Survey of the Proposed Transco Maiden Lateral Gas Pipe Line
Expansion Corridor, Lincoln County, North Carolina. The survey examined an approximate 10
ER 97-7319/3953
mile (125 ft. wide) pipeline right-of-way. A total of three archaeological sites and five
New South Associates
isolated finds were recorded during the investigation. Two of the sites and two of the
(Adams 1996)
isolated finds lie within a mile of the proposed project route. Both historicand prehistoric
occupations were identified.
Archaeological Reconnaissance Survey of Clark Tract (517ocres), Lincoln County, North
Cultural Resources
ER 06-1538/5748
Carolina. The investigation recorded nine archaeological sites, all of which lie within a mile
Assessment Group (Edwards
of the proposed project area. The sites contain prehistoric and historic components.
2006)
Archaeological Survey of Proposed Improvements to the East Lincoln County Wastewater
Treotmentond Collection System, Lincoln County, North Carolina. The survey area
Archaeological Consultants
ER 06-0770/5825
encompassed a 50 acre tract for the proposed wastewater treatment plant and an associated
of the Carolinas, Inc. (Reid
8.3 mile long pipeline corridor. The survey identified one archaeological site and two
2006)
isolated finds. The two isolated finds, representing an unknown prehistoricfind and a
19th/20th century find, lie within a mile of the proposed project route.
Cultural Resources Survey Reportfor the Proposed Piedmont -Duke Metering and Regulating
Chesapeake Quaternary, Inc.
ER 948949/3500
Station, Lincoln County, North Carolina. This 1.84 acre survey failed to identify any cultural
(Haynes 1994)
resources.
Cultural Resources Survey, Grassy Creek TowerSite, Denver, Catawba County, North Carolina.
S&ME,Inc. (DeAngelis and
CT16-0890/7530
This cell towersurvey identified one archaeological site, a 20th century historic foundation,
Carpini2016)
located within a mile of the proposed project route.
Archaeological Reconnaissance Survey Report for Proposed NC 73 Connector from NC 16 at
North Carolina Department
Unknown (?)/2740
Lucia to US 321 near Lincolnton, Gaston and Lincoln County, Project 6.804322 R-207. This
of Transportation dy
proposed highway survey identified three archaeological sites; however, none lie within a
and Padgett 19981)81)
mile of the proposed project route.

10 - Duke Marshall Steam Plant Desktop Survey
77001001
I N0001 _
Property r.
Boundary LN0511
4; • Property
Boundary
LN,
—72000967
LN0007
LN0003�
Property
Boundary_ r
L
r
pduunt Wulcoine
M„
— - Proposed Pipeline Route
— - Proposed Access Road
�- 1 -Mile Search Radius cat—ib
- Previously Recorded Historic Resource Unwin
0 Previously Recorded Historic Resource
* - NRHP Listed Resource
Meters
TERRAX NRHP Listed Resource
0 800 1,600
Base Map 1 1970 Lowesville, NC
USGS 7.5' Topographic Quadrangle
0 --
Figure 4. Topographic Map showing the proposed pipeline route, proposed access roads, the 1 -mile search radius,
previously recorded historic resources, and NRHP listed resources.

; ( 1�1_/U
` • O •CT0668 •
CW5 4
� Property ® •
Boundary ,..I ICT1489 •
-` _'T1487
L. N0489
?`. Property-
. /'' .Boundary i
508
aTERRAXrLORATIONS- 11
•
���,,,��r • '0,
xn
�.BM
8morial ; �
— - Proposed Pipeline Route
— - Proposed Access Road
�- 1 -Mile Search Radius
"
C
• - Previously Recorded Historic Resource
W E
- Previously Recorded Historic Resource
Meters
TERRAX
Base Map: 1993 Denver, NC 0
800 1,600
& 1970 Lowesville, NC
USGS 7.5' Topographic Quadrangles
Figure S. Topographic Map showing the proposed pipeline route, proposed access roads, the I -mile search radius,
and previously recorded historic resources.

12 - Duke Marshall Steam Plant Desktop Survey
Figure 6. Topographic Map showing the proposed pipeline route, proposed access roads, the 1 -mile search radius,
previously recorded historic resources, and NRNP listed resources.

G
TERRAXPLORATIONS- 13
TABLE 3. PREVIOUSLY RECORDED HISTORIC RESOURCES WITHIN A 1 -MILE RADIUS OF THE PROJECT AREA.
RESOURCE
NRHP ELIGIBILITY
NAME
ADDRESS AND/OR LOCATION
DESCRIPTION
ID NUMBER
STATUS
Jct. of NC 150 and SR 1848Sherrill's Ford
Listed on NRHP (NRNP ID No.
CT0378
Terrell Historic District
Mid -19th to Mid -20th Century Historic District
Rd, Terrell
85001685)
Coleman -Caldwell-
West Side of SR 1848, 0.1 Miles North of
Part of NRHP Historic District
CT0379
C. 1854Traditional/Vernacular House
Gabriel Farm
Jct. With NC 150, Terrell
(Terrell Historic District)
East Side SR 1848, 0.1 Miles North of Jct.
Part of NRHP Historic District
Ci0380
T.F. Connor House
With NC LSO, Terrell Vicinity
C. 1886 House
(Terrell Historic District)
Connor Store & Post
Northwest Corner, Jct. SR 1648 & NC 150,
C. 1891; 19th -20th Century Traditional/Vernacular
Part of NRHP Historic District
CT0381
Office
Terrell Vicinity
Building
(Terrell Historic District)
Cotton Storage Building
North Side of NC M, Just West of Jct.
Part of NRHP Historic District
CT0382
C. 1930 Cotton Storage Building
(Gone)
With SR 1848, Terrell Vicinity
(Terrell Historic District)
Gabriel Cotton Gin
North Side of NC 150, Just West of Jct.
Part of NRHP Historic District
Ci0383
(Gone)
With SR 1848, Terrell Vicinity
C. 1932 Colton Gin
(Terrell Historic District)
East Side of SR 1848, 0.1 Miles South ofJct.
C. 1902; 19th -20th Century Traditional/Vernacular
Part of NRHP Historic District
CT0384
Walter Gabriel House
With NC 150, Terrell Vicinity
House
(Terrell Historic District)
East Side of SR 1848, 0.3 Miles South of Jct.
1908; 19th -20th Century Traditional/Vernacular
Part of NRHP Historic District
Ci0385
James Gillin House
W/NC 150, Terrell Vicinity
House
(Terrell Historic District)
North Side of NC 150, Just West of Jct.
Part of NRHP Historic District
CT0386
Grist Mill (Gone)
Grist Mill
With SR 1848, Terrell Vicinity
(Terrell Historic District)
Kermit Lee Howard
North Side of NC 150, 0.2 Miles East of Jct.
Part of NRHP Historic District
CT0387
C. 1970 Ranch House
House
With SR 1848, Terrell Vicinity
(Terrell Historic District)
Rehobeth Methodist
West Side of SR 1848, 0.1 Miles South of
Part of NRHP Historic District
Ci0386
Church &Parsonage
Jct. With NC 150, Terrell Vicinity
C. 1889 Church
(Terrell Historic District)
North Side of NC 150, 0.25 Miles East of
C. 1890; 19th -20th Century Traditional/Vernacular
Part of NRHP Historic District
CT0389
Jason Sherrill House
Jct. With SR 1848, Terrell Vicinity
House
(Terrell Historic District)
Southwest CornerofJct. SR 1848and NC
C. 1880; 19th -20th Century Traditional/Vernacular
Part of NRHP Historic District
CT0390
Sherrill -Gabriel House
150, Terrell Vicinity
House
(Terrell Historic District)
West Side of SR 1848, Just South of Jct.
Part of NRHP Historic District
CT0391
Jesse Stutts House
With NC 150, Terrell Vicinity
C. 1959 Ranch House
(Terrell Historic District)
North Side of NC 150, 0.1 Miles West of
Part of NRHP Historic District
Ci0392
Warehouse
C. 1940 Commercial Building
Jct. With SR 1848, Terrell Vicinity
(Terrell Historic District)
Rehobeth Methodist
West Side of SR 1848, 0.1 Miles South of
Part of NRHP Historic District
CT0393
Church Cemetery
Jct. With NC 150, Terrell Vicinity
C. 1805 Cemetery
(Terrell Historic District)
NC 16, 0.5 Miles North of Jct. With NC 150,
CT0463
Elliott Log Building
0.5 Miles Eastof NC 16, Killian's
Log Building
Unassessed
Crossroads
SR 1841, 0.5 Miles South of Jct. With NC
CT0466
Farm Site
150, Terrell Vicinity
Farm
Unassessed
CT0561
None Given
SR 1848, 0.5 Miles South of Sherrill's Ford
House
Unassessed
CT0567
House
SR 1853, 0.25 Miles South of Jct. With NC
House
Unassessed
150, Killian's Crossroads
CT0568
House
SR 1851, 0.5 Miles West of Jct. With SR
House
Unassessed
1849, Mt. Pleasant Church
SR 1849 at Its Jct. With SR 1815, Mt.
CT0573
Little House
Pleasant Church Vicinity
House
Unassessed
Mid to Late 19th Century 2 -Story Hip Roof Greek
Zebulon Little House
South Side of NC 150, 0.3 Miles East of Jct.
Revival Frame House With Rear Ell, 2 Rear Exterior
Ci0574
Eligible
(Gone)
With NC 16, Killian's Crossroads
Stone Chimneys and Wraparound Porch. House No
Longer Extant Per 2004 Aerial.
Mott's Grove
East Side of SR 1848, 0.4 Miles North of Jct.
C. 1872; Late 19th Century "Camp Meeting" site of
CTO580
Eligible
Campground
With SR 1844, Terrell Vicinity
African Methodist Episcopal Church
Sherrill House
Part of NRHP Historic District
CT0595
End of SR 1843 on take Terrell Vicinity
House
(Approximate Site)
(Terrell Historic District)
Sherrill -Reagan Farm Site
SR 1841, 0.3 Miles South of NC 150, Terrell
Ci0642
(Gone?)
Vicinity
Farm
Unassessed
North Side of NC 150, 0.25 Miles East of
C. 1910; 19th -20th Century Traditional/Vernacular
Part of NRHP Historic District
CT0644
Early Sherrill House
Terrell, Terrell Vicinity
House
(Terrell Historic District)

94 - Duke Marshall Steam Plant Desktop Survey
TABLE 3. PREVIOUSLY RECORDED HISTORIC RESOURCES WITHIN A 1 -MILE RADIUS OF THE PROJECT AREA (CONT.).
RESOURCE
ID NUMBER
NAME
ADDRESS AND/OR LOCATION
DESCRIPTION
NRHP ELIGIBILITY
STATUS
Ci0648
Mott's Grove School
SR 1848 WestSide 0.75 Miles North of
Terrell, Terrell Vicinity
School
Unassessed
CT0657
H.S. Gabriel House
SR 1849 at Jct. With SR 1850, Hopewell
Church Vicinity
House
Unassessed
CT0658
W.D. Whitener House
SR 1849, 0.25 miles South of Jct. With SR
1850 on East Side of Hopewell Church
House
Unassessed
- CT0659
M.M. Gabriel House
(Gone 7) .
NC 150, 0.3 Miles Southwest of Terrell,
Terrell Vicinity
House
Unassessed
CT0668
Killian's Store (Gone)
1ct.NC150and NC16150Yards
Southwest, Killian's Crossroads Vicinity
Store No Longer Extant Per2010Aerials
Unassessed
&0671
Sherrill -Robinson House
SR 1851 atict. With SR 1849, Mt. Pleasant
Church Vicinity
House
Unassessed
CT0672
Eckerd -bass House
SR 1815, 0.5 Miles West of Jct. With SR
1859, Mt. Pleasant Church Vicinity
House
Unassessed
CT1303
Marshall Steam Station
8320 East NC Hwy 150, Terrell
1965-1970 power plant
.Eligible
CT1484
House
5250 East NC Hwy 150, Denver Vicinity
House Built 1956
Ineligible
CT1485
House
5436 East NC Hwy 150, Denver Vicinity
House Built 1960
Ineligible
CT1486
House
5452 East NC Hwy 150, Denver Vicinity
House Built 1956
Ineligible
CT1487
House
SS08 East NC Hwy 150, Denver Vicinity
House Built 1953
Ineligible
CT1488
House
5524 East NC Hwy 150, Denver Vicinity
House Built 1947
Ineligible
CT1489
House
5575 East NC Hwy 150, Denver Vicinity
House Built 1956
Ineligible
CT1490
House
5534 East Maiden Road, Denver Vicinity
House Built 1940
Ineligible
CT1491
House
5703 East NC Hwy 150, Denver Vicinity
House Built 1956
Ineligible
CT1492
House
5718 East NC Hwy 150, Denver Vicinity
House Built 1947
Ineligible
CT1493
House
5767 East NC Hwy 150, Denver Vicinity
House Built 1962
Ineligible
CT1494
House
5760 East NC Hwy 150, Denver Vicinity
House Built 1958
Ineligible
CT1495
House
5785 East NC Hwy 150, Denver Vicinity
House Built 1949
Ineligible
CT1496
House
5780 East NC Hwy 150, Denver Vicinity
House Built 1937
Ineligible
CT1497
House
5788 East NC Hwy 150, Denver Vicinity
House Built 1945
Ineligible
CT1498
Commercial Building
5794East NCHwy 150, Denver Vicinity
Commercial Structure Built 1954
Ineligible
CT1499
House
5814 East NC Hwy 150, Denver Vicinity
House Built 1948
Ineligible
CT1500
House
5838 East NC Hwy 150, Denver Vicinity
House Built 1952
Ineligible
CT1501
House ,
5852 East NC Hwy 150, Denver Vicinity
House Built 1959
Ineligible-
CT1502
House_
5858 East NC Hwy 150, Denver Vicinity
House Built 1957
Ineligible
CT1503
House
-5860EastNCHwy150,DenverVicinity
House Built 1949
Ineligible
CT1504
House
5872 East NC Hwy 150, Denver Vicinity
House Built 1900
Ineligible
CT1505
House
5947 East NC Hwy 150, Denver Vicinity
House Built 1961
Ineligible
CT1506
House/Office
5961 East NC Hwy 150, Denver Vicinity
Structure Built 1950
Ineligible
CT1507
House
6037 East NC Hwy 150, Denver Vicinity
House Built 1957
Ineligible
CTI508
House
6022 East NC Hwy 150, Denver Vicinity
House Built 1940
Ineligible
CT1509
House
6047 East NC Hwy 150, Denver Vicinity
House Built 1920
Ineligible
CT1510
House
6032 East NC Hwy 150, Denver Vicinity
House Built 1960
Ineligible
CT1511
House
6052 East NC Hwy 150, Denver Vicinity
House Built 1940
Ineligible
CT1512
House
6087 East NC Hwy 150, Denver Vicinity
House Built 1928
Ineligible
CT1513
House
6086 East NC Hwy 150, Denver Vicinity
House Built 1948
Ineligible

aTERRAXPLoRATloNs- 15
TABLE 3.
PREVIOUSLY RECORDED HISTORIC RESOURCES WITHIN A 1 -MILE RADIUS OF THE PROJECT AREA (CONT.).
RESOURCE
ID NUMBER
NAME
ADDRESS AND/OR LOCATION
DESCRIPTION
NRHP ELIGIBILITY
STATUS
Cr1514
House
6153 East NC Hwy 150, Denver Vicinity
House Built 1961
Ineligible
Crisis
House
6169 East NC Hwy 150, Denver Vicinity
House Built 1961
Ineligible
CT1516
House
6221 East NC Hwy 150, Denver Vicinity
House Built 1942
Ineligible
CT1517
House
6300 East NC Hwy 150, Denver Vicinity
House Built 1917
Ineligible
Cr1518
House
4409 Mt. Pleasant Rd, Denver Vicinity
House Built 1925
Ineligible
Cr1519
House
6375 East NC Hwy 150, Denver Vicinity
House Built 1956
Ineligible
Cr1520
House
6445 East NC Hwy 150, Denver Vicinity
House Built 1927
Ineligible
Cr1539
House
7780 East NC Hwy 150, Terrell
House Built 1965
Ineligible
Cr1540
House
7844 East NC Hwy 150, Terrell
House Built 1964
Ineligible
Cr1541
House
7856 East NC Hwy 150, Terrell
House Built 1964
Ineligible
Cr1542
House
7869 East NC Hwy 150, Terrell
House Built 1963
Ineligible
Cr1543
House
7921 East NC Hwy 150, Terrell
House Built 1947
Ineligible
CF1544
Gas Station
7970 East NC Hwy 150, Terrell
Gas Station Built 1950
Ineligible
Cr1545
Gas Station
7995 East NC Hwy 150, Terrell
Gas Station Built 1950
Ineligible
CT1546
Commercial Building
7985 East NC Hwy 150, Terrell
Commercial Structure Built 1956
Ineligible
Cr1547
House
8033 East NCHwy 150,Terrell
House Built 1962
Ineligible
Cr1548
House
8049 East NC Hwy 150, Terrell
House Built 1965
Ineligible
CT1549
House
8163 East NC Hwy 150, Terrell
House Built 1956
Ineligible
Cr1550
House
8162 East NC Hwy 150, Terrell
House Built 1946
Ineligible
Cr1551
House
8226 East NC Hwy 150, Terrell
House Built 1947
Ineligible
Cr1552
Barn
8273 East NC Hwy 150, Terrell
Barn Built 1930
Ineligible
Cr1553
House
3742 Slanting Bridge Rd, Terrell
House Built in 1900
Ineligible
Cr1554
House
3644SIanting Bridge Rd, Terrell
House Built in 1950
Ineligible
Cr1555
House
3616SIanting Bridge Rd, Terrell
House Built in 1960
Ineligible
Cr1556
House
3609 Slanting Bridge Rd, Terrell
House Built in 1960
Ineligible
Cr1557
House
3604SIanting Bridge Rd, Terrell
House Built in 1946
Ineligible
CT1558
Church
9010Sherrills Ford Rd, Terrell
Church Built in 1960
Ineligible
Cr1559
House
9091 Sherrills Ford Rd, Terrell
House Built in 1954
Ineligible
Cr1560
House
9098 Sherrills Ford Rd, Terrell
House Built in 1954
Ineligible
C 1561
House
9123 Sherrills Ford Rd, Terrell
House Built in 1961
Ineligible
CT1562
House
9155 Sherrills Ford Rd, Terrell
House Built in 1964
Ineligible
CF1563
House
9187 Sherrills Ford Rd, Terrell
House Built in 1960
Ineligible
Cr1564
House
3915 Hob lane, Terrell
House Built in 1961
Ineligible
Cr1565
House
3961 Hob lane, Terrell
House Built in 1900
Ineligible
Cr1566
House
4007 Hob lane, Terrell
House Built in 1946
Ineligible
Cr1567
Bridge #117
NC Hwy Mover Duke Power Canal,
Terrell
Bridge Built in 1963
Ineligible
Cr1S68
House
8411 East NC Hwy 150, Terrell
House Built in 1946
Ineligible
Cr1569
House
8846 Greenwood Rd, Terrell
House Built in 1963
Ineligible
Cr1570
House
8629 East NC Hwy 150, Terrell
House Built in 1965
Ineligible
LN0001
William A. Graham Jr.
Farm
SR 1360, 1.2 Miles South of Jct. With SR
1382, Kidville Vicinity
1890s 2 -Story Frame Victorian House and Round
Barn
Part of NRHP Listed William
Graham Jr. Farm (NRHP ID
No. 77001004)

16 - Duke Marshall Steam Plant Desktop Survey
TABLE 3. PREVIOUSLY RECORDED HISTORIC RESOURCES WITHIN A 1 -MILE RADIUS OF THE PROJECT AREA (CONT.).
RESOURCE
NRHP ELIGIBILITY
ID NUMBER
NAME
ADDRESS AND/OR LOCATION
DESCRIPTION
STATUS
Part of NRHP Listed William
William A. Graham Jr.
SR 1360, 1.2 Miles South oflct.With SR
LN0002
-
C. 18922 -Story 16 -Sided Barn With 8 -Sided Cupola
Graham Jr. Farm (NRHP ID
Farm Round Barn
1382, Kidville Vicinity
No. 77001004)
West Side of SR 1383, 0.1 Miles South of
Listed on the NRHP (NRNP ID
LN0003
Ingleside
18172 -Story Federal Style Brick House
Jct. With Hwy 73, Iron Station Vicinity
No. 72000967)
Thomas Jefferson Poole
West Side of SR 1360, 0.1 Miles North of
LN0487
House
Jct. With SR 1381, Denver Vicinity
House
Unassessed
LN0488
John Wash! ngton Lowe
southeast CornerJct. of NC 16 and SR1372,
House
Ineligible
House
Denver Vicinity
LN0489
Robert M. Mundy House
Northwest CornerJct. of NC 16and SR
19th Century 2 -Story Frame I -House
Eligible
1349, Denver Vicinity
East Side of NC 16, 0.7 Miles North of1d.
LN0490
Killian Family House
House
Ineligible
With SR 1373, Denver
LND491
Beatty -Rhodes House
East Side of NC 16, 0.1 Miles North of Jct.
House
Ineligible
With SR1373, Denver
-
Eligible - Part of Denver
Thompson -Howard
East Side of SR 1373,.075 Miles North of
LN0492
House
Historic District (ID No.
House
Jct. With NC 16, Denver
LN0560)-
N0560)
Eligible -Part
Eligible-Part of Denver -
LN0493
Abernethy Family House
East Side of SR 1373, 0.1 Miles North of Jct.
House
Historic District (ID No.
With NC 16, Denver
LN0560)
Eligible - Part of Denver
LN0496
Lowe -Shelton -Caldwell
West Side of SR 1373,.075 Miles North of
House
Historic District (ID No.
House
Jct. With NC 16, Denver
LN0560)
Eligible, -Part of Denver
LN0497
Mundy -Brotherton
West Side of SR 1373, 0.1 Miles North of
House
Historic District (ID No.
House
Jct. With NC 16, Denver
LN0560)
LN0506
Nixon -Howard House
Northeast Corner at Jct. of NC 16 and SR
House
Unassessed
(Gone?)
1380, Denver
LN0510
Bellinger-Schronce Farm
East Side of SR 1383, 0.5 Miles North of Jct.
Farm
Unassessed
With NC73, 0.1 Miles Up Private Lane
East Side of SR 1383, 1.0 Miles North of Jct.
LN0511
Jacob Forney House
With NC 73, Iron Station. House moved
C. 18172 -Story Side Gable Frame I -House
Eligible
(Original Site)
8.5 Miles Northwest to Madison Iron
Furnace Site (LN0481) in 2002:
LN0527
John R. Asbury House
West Side of SR 1383, 0.1 Miles North of
House
Eligible
. Jct. With SR 1511,Machpelah
Mt. Welcome (John
West Side of Jct. of SR 1511 and SR 1412,
Listed on the NRHP (NRNP ID
W0528
Franklin Reinhardt
Mariposa Vicinity
18852 -Story Frame House
No. 91001413)
House)
North Side of SR 1381, 0.6 Miles West of
LN0530
Catawba Springs Spa
Antebellum ResortArea
Eligible
Jct. With SR 1380, Denver Vicinity
LN0531
Kelley -Sherrill House
East Side of SR 1380, 0.9 Miles North of Jct.
House
Unassessed
With SR 1381, Denver Vicinity
West Side of NC 16, 0.1 Miles South of Jct.
19072-StorySide Gable Frame Colonial Revival
LN0540
Kincaid Family House
House With 3 Hip Roof Dormers Above 1 -Story Hip
Eligible
With SR1S11, Lowesville
Roof Front Porch
LN0560
D enver Historic District
Denver, Uncoln County
Historic District
Eligible
LN0790
House
6996 East NC Hwy 150, Denver Vicinity
House Built 1954.
Ineligible

6
TERRAXPLORATIONS- 17
TABLE 4. PREVIOUSLY LISTED NRHP RESOURCES WITHIN A 1 -MILE RADIUS OF THE PROJECT AREA.
NRHP ID
NRHP ELIGIBILITY
NAME
ADDRESS AND/OR LOCATION
DESCRIPTION
NUMBER
STATUS
Westside of SR 1383, 0.1 Miles South of
72000967
Ingleside
18172 -Story Federal Style Brick Mansion
Listed 1972
Jct. With Hwy 73, Iron Station Vicinity
Late 19th Century Farm Complex Comprised of a
77001004
William A. Graham Jr.
SR 1360, 1.2 Miles South of Jct. With SR
Large 1890s 2 -Story Frame Victorian Farm House, a
Listed 1977
Farm
1382, Kidville Vicinity
Wooden Round Barn, aBoard-and-Batten Smoke
House, and a Small Log Outbuilding
86001685
Terrell Historic District
Jct. of NC 150 and SR 1848, Terrell
Mid -19th to Mid -20th Century Historic District
Listed 1986
West Side of Jct. of SR 1511 and SR 1412,
91001413
Mount Welcome
1885 2 -Story Frame House and Eight Outbuildings
Listed 1991
Mariposa Vicinity

18 - Duke Marshall Steam Plant Desktop Survey
REFERENCES
Abbott, Lawrence E. and Erica E. Sanborn
1996 Archaeological Sample Survey, NC 16, North of Lucia to NC 150 Gaston, Lincoln, and Catawba
Counties, North Carolina; T.I.P. Number R-2206: A Study of Soil Type and Erosion as Variables
for the Prediction ofArchaeological Site Eligibility Potential. Prepared for Post, Buckley,
Schuh, and Jernigan, Inc., Charlotte, North Carolina. Prepared by New South Associates,
Stone Mountain, Georgia. Report on file at OSA office in Raleigh, North Carolina. Report,
No. 3954.
Adams, Natalie P.
1996 An Intensive Archaeological Survey of the Proposed Transco Maiden Lateral Gas Pipe Line
Expansion Corridor, Lincoln County, North Carolina. Prepared for Transco, Houston, Texas.
Prepared by New South Associates, Stone Mountain, Georgia. Report on file at OSA_ office
in Raleigh, North Carolina. Report No. 3953.
Baroody, Chris and Thomas J. Padgett
1981 Archaeological Reconnaissance Survey Report for Proposed NC 73 Connector from NC 16 at
Lucia to US 321 near LincoInton, Gaston and Lincoln County, Project 6804322R-207. Prepared
in house by archaeologists with the North Carolina Department of Transportation. Report on file
at OSA office in Raleigh, North Carolina. Report No. 2740.
DeAngelis, Joseph A. and Heather Carpini
2016 Cultural Resources Survey, Grassy Creek Tower Site, Denver, Catawba County, North Carolina.
Prepared for VZW HQ - NEPA Regulatory Compliance, Westlake, Texas. Prepared by S&ME,
Inc., Colwnbia, South Carolina. Report on file at OSA office in Raleigh, North Carolina.
Report No. 7530.
Edwards, Briece R.
2006 Archaeological Reconnaissance Survey of Clark Tract (517 acres), Lincoln County, North
Carolina. Prepared for Len Rindner, Environmental Consultant. Prepared by Cultural Resources
Assessment Group, Raleigh, North Carolina. Report on file at OSA office in Raleigh, North
Carolina. Report No. 5748.
Espenshade, Christopher T.
1990 Management Summary, Survey Site 12, Lowesville Tract, Lincoln County, North Carolina.
Prepared for Duke Power Company, Charlotte, North Carolina. Prepared by Brockington
& Associates, Inc., Atlanta, Georgia. Report on file at OSA office in Raleigh, North Carolina.
Report No. 2731.
Gardner, Jeffrey W., Christopher T. Espenshade, Ruthanne L. Mitchell, Bobby L. Southerlin, and Marian
D. Roberts
1990 Archaeological Survey and Testing at the Lowesville Tract, Lincoln County, North Carolina.
Prepared for Duke Power Company, Charlotte, North Carolina. Prepared by Brockington
& Associates, Inc., Atlanta, Georgia. Report on file at OSA office in Raleigh, North Carolina.
Report No. 2923.

dTERRAXPLORATIONS- 19
National Park Service
2018 National Register of Historic Places. Department of the Interior, Washington, D.C. Electronic
document available online at http://www.nls.gov/nr/research/.
North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office
2018 HPOWEB Map Service. North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office, Department of
Natural and Cultural Resources, Office of Archives and History. Available online at http://
gis.ncdcr.gov/hpoweb/.
Reid, Dawn
2006 Archaeological Survey of Proposed Improvements to the East Lincoln County Wastewater
Treatment and Collection System, Lincoln County, North Carolina. Prepared for Robert
J. Goldstein and Associates, Inc., Raleigh, North Carolina. Prepared by Archaeological
Consultants of the Carolinas, Inc., Clayton, North Carolina. Report on file at OSA office
in Raleigh, North Carolina. Report No. 5825.

North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona Ni. Bartos, Administrator
Governor Roy Cooper
Secretary Susi 11. Hamilton
January 28, 2019
W. Flynt Barksdale
POND
3500 Parkway Lane, Suite 500
Peachtree Corners, GA 30092
Office of Archives and I listory
Deputy Secretary Kevin Cherry
[e-mail]
Re: Install Natural Gas Pipeline 451 to Marshall Steam Plant, Catawba and Lincoln Counties,
ER 18-3571
Dear Mr. Barksdale:
Thank you for your letter of November 1, 2018, regarding the above -referenced undertaking. We apologize for
the delay in our response.
We have reviewed the submittal, as well as additional information supplied on November 29, 2018, and offer
the following comments.
Based on the proposed corridor route, this project has the potential to adversely affect historic properties. To
determine the impact of this project we are requesting an architectural survey be performed along the proposed
route. We look forward to receiving your survey plans.
For more information and resources regarding SHPO guidelines for architectural survey, please visit our online
resources page (htip://www.hi2o.ncdcr.gov/digital/NCHPO Digital Start Paage.htmI).
Eight previously recorded archaeological sites are located within or partially within the project corridor, all of
which have been determined not eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). Much
of the proposed pipeline corridor appears to be new location. While portions of the project corridor have been
archaeologically surveyed, most has not yet been surveyed.
Prior to the initiation of any ground disturbing activities within the project area, we recommend that a
comprehensive archaeological survey be conducted by an experienced archaeologist in portions of the project
area that were not previously surveyed. The purpose of this survey will be to locate archaeological sites and
make recommendations regarding the eligibility status of each site in terms of the NRNP. Please note that our
office now requests consultation with the Office of State Archaeology Review Archaeologist to discuss
appropriate field methodologies prior to the archaeological field investigation.
One paper copy and one digital copy (PDF) of all resulting archaeological reports, as well as one paper copy
and one digital copy (MS Word) of the North Carolina site form for each site recorded, should be forwarded to
the Office of State Archaeology through this office for review and comment as soon as they are available and
in advance of any construction or ground disturbance activities.
Location: 109 East Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 Telephone/Fax: [phone]-6599

A list of archaeological consultants who have conducted or expressed an interest in contract work in North
Carolina is available at www.archaeology.ncdcr.gov/ncarch/resource/consultants.htm. The archaeologists
listed, or any other experienced archaeologist, may be contacted to conduct the recommended survey.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 and 110 of the National Historic Preservation Act and
the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36
CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact Renee Gledhill -Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-814-6579 or
environmental.reviewa,ncdcr.gov. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the above
referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
"%AkduL&&�
Ramona M. Bartos