20190526 Ver 1_401 Application_20190423

W�A
olqiii�-
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Page 1 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit
C,
1 b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: NWP 42 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
TO Yes
® No
1d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General PeRnilp
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
9 Q Jr 2 6
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
❑ Yes ❑ No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes N
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
❑ Yes
�^
1g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes
® No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
® No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
West Meck Optimist Park
2b.
County:
Mecklenburg
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Charlotte
2d.
Subdivision name:
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
The Knothole Foundation, Inc.
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
32516/218 & 33131/216
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
Mr. Alan Barnes
3d.
Street address:
225 Olympic Street
3e. City, state, zip:
Charlotte, NC 28273
3f.
Telephone no.:
704.340.1648
3g.
Fax no.:
3h.
Email address:
Page 1 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b. Name:
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
Bradley S. Luckey
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
Pilot Environmental Inc.
5c. Street address:
PO Box 128
5d. City, state, zip:
Kemersville, NC 27285
5e. Telephone no.:
336.708.4997
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
05551115 & 05551114
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.24476 Longitude: - 80.95433
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1 c. Property size:
11 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
Ticer Branch (Tiser Branch)
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
Class C
2c. River basin:
Catawba
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The site contains a dilipadated residence and associated outbuildings on the northeastern portion of the site. The
remainder of the site contains baseball fields, gravel/grassed parking areas, landscaped areas and wooded land. The
site is located in a residential/commercial area of Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0 acres
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
Streams=-210'
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the project is to construct a recreational baseball complex.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The overall project consists of redevelopment of the site with a baseball complex. Currently, the recretional facility
contains two baseball fields, a small concession outbuiliding, grassed/gravel parking areas and utilizes portable toilets for
human waste. The recretional facility is proposed to be updated to construct three baseball fields with irrigation systems,
a clubhouse for teams, a concession stand, parking areas, pedestrian walkways and restroom facilities that will be
connected to the municipal wastewater system. In order to upgrade the existing recreational facility, a portion of an
intermittent stream must be filled to construct a baseball field. Graders, haulers, excavators and other heavy equipment
will be used during site construction.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past.
Comments: SAW-2018-01025
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
El Preliminary ®Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency/Consultant Company: Pilot Enviromental, Inc.
Name (if known): Brad Luckey
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
February 21, 2019
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
❑ Yes ❑ No ® Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
Page 3 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
The project is not part of a phased project. Impacts to streams, outside of those proposed in this appilication, are not
anticipated as a result of the proposed project.
Page 4 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ — non404, other)
(acres)
Temporary
W1 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W2 ❑ P ❑ T
El Yes
El Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
2h. Comments: Wetland impacts are not proposed.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g•
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non -404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
S1 ®P ❑ T
Fill
Unnamed
❑ PER
® INT
® Corps
❑ DWQ
4
130
S2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
130
3i. Comments: The proposed construction will permanently impact 130 linear feet of intermittent stream channel by soil fill.
Temporary impacts are not proposed.
Page 5 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
4b.
4c.
4d.
4e.
Open water
Name of waterbody
impact number -
(if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary
01 ❑P❑T
02 ❑ PEI T
03 ❑P❑T
04 ❑P❑T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments: Open water impacts are not being proposed.
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
5b.
5c.
5d.
5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland
Pond ID
Proposed use or purpose
(acres)
number
of pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments: Construction of pondsAakes are not proposed.
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ®No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
❑ Neuse El Tar -Pamlico ®Other: Yadkin
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer impact
number-
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or
for
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Temporary
impact
required?
B1 ❑ P ❑ T
El Yes
❑ No
B2 ❑P❑T
F1 Yes
❑ No
63 ❑P❑T
Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments: Buffer impacts are not proposed.
Page 6 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Due to the proposed recretaional facility upgrades, it is necessary to fill a portion of a stream with a baseball field. Several
alternative designs were evaluated in attempts to avoid impacts to streams and wetlands. Initial designs included additional
permanent impact to the stream from post construction stormwater management BMPs and proposed temporary impact to the
stream from sediment basins. The applicant has selected the current design to avoid the aforereferenced additional impacts
to WoUS.
The proposed stream impact area is to the upper reach of a low quality stream. The stream has not contained flowing water,
evidence of aquatic life and little to absent aquatic habitat during visits by Pilot personnel. The proposed development area of
the site has been shifted as far to the north as possible to avoid additional impacts to the stream located on the site. There is
approximately 210 linear feet of intermittent stream located on the site. The remaining approximate 80 linear feet of
intermittent stream channel are being avoided.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
The impact and clearing limits will be staked and silt fence or other sediment retention devices will be used.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ® No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
El Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
Ilinear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 7 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
.6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 8 of 12
PCN Form —Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
10.38%
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
® Yes ❑ No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
The proposed project includes a dry detention basin for retention only. Pre/Post drainge calculcations will be submitted to
the City of Charlotte separate of this applciation.
® Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
Charlotte
❑ Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ NSW
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ® No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a. Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 9 of 12
PCN Form —Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes ® No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1b. If you answered `fres" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes ❑ No
letter.)
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
,
2b. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
We are not aware of additional development that will impact nearby downstream water quality.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Waste water generated by the proposed facility will be treated by municipal services. Impacts to WoUS associated with
wasterwater generation is not proposed.
Page 10 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ® No
impacts?
❑ Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
Pilot consulted the USFWS Mecklenburg County list, dated 6.27.18 to identify protected species that could occur within
the proposed project area. The USFWS list of protected species identifes the bald eagle (BGPA), Northern long eared
bat (T), carolina heelsplitter (E), rusty -patched bumble bee (E), michaux's sumac (E), schwinitz's sunflower (E) and
smooth coneflower (E). Based on our observations, the proposed construction would not contain suitable habitat for the
carolina heelsplitter, rusty-pached bumble bee, michaux's sumac, schwinitz's sunflower and smooth coneflower due to
the current use of the site as maintained baseball fields, excessive sedimentation, lack of necessary stream
characteristics (i.e. substrate, rock crevices and sandbars) and being well shaded. The proposed project area contains
areas of suitable summer roosting habitat for northern -long eared bat (NLEB). It does not contain or is not located within
1/4 mile of hibernacula or 150 of a known summer roosting tree. Blasting or percussion activites are not proposed.
Therefore, the applicant will rely on the final 4(d) rule for NLEB is tree removal activites are necessary during summer
roosting months. Based on the size of the water bodies identified on the USGS Topographic Map in the immediate
vicinity of the site, the proposed project is not likely to disturb the bald eagle.
Based on our observations and understanding of the proposed project, it is our opinion that the proposed project will have
no effect to federally protected species that occur in Mecklenburg County.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
, Based on our knowledge of the site, the site is not located in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat. Best
management practices and the use of temporary sediment and erosion control devices will prevent sediment from entering
down -gradient waterbodies which may contain fish.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
Pilot reviewed the NC SHPO Historic Properties website to determine impact to historic or archeological resources
(attached). The residence on the northwestern portion of the site is identified as a surveyed only property.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA FIRMs 3710451400K & 3710451500K
Page 11 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

Digitally signed by Bradley S. Luckey
DN: cn=Bradley S. Luckey, o=Pilot
rF Environmental, Inc., ou,
Bradley S. Luckey email=[e-mail],c=US 4.17.19
, /, /� Date: 2019.04.1715:56:13 -04'00'
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
Page 12 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

AGENT AUTHORIZATION
This form authorizes Pilot to act as our agent in stream/wetland matters including U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers and North Carolina Division of Water Resources field verification and
permitting.
Property Address: 7531-7533 Tuckaseegee Road
Charlotte NC 28214
Owner Information:
Address:
Knothole Foundation
225 Olympic Street
Charlotte NC 28273
Telephone Number: 704-340-1648
Fax Number:
E-mail Address:
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION REQUEST
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on-
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
Alan Barnes
Print Name
Capacity: _Owner X_ Authorized Agent
Date May 19, 2018
W11- Lg-,-�bz
Signature

\..rl 1/11\LV 1 1 LI 1 �V S'IPmNcubp530 Wn94cY OplInYBEaMbKBum E�wm�Nm�tlg0A0-6BuinEmaclmri.O.q, M1tgB1B iB PN. mrx l�rw. Bloc WYpn

6'. WaNcbIBBSSB Ww4'ec� OpIhYBEnWp�bYun EmvtlwrNUpStp. Slrn EnuaBtlur+n.M.p, V t I/1B1B 3:Sa B4. EIBw Mi4. Bb� OB4Bn

r •"
r
e Svc'
•❑
I.,
♦
[7

Q � J _ '� .-, -'s. 7v+s]I.•ek!,,II rEtls,,,.�
� t•j+ L.
:INS\\N\�? •' :... �.��`�_ ". :Y11 •�„! _
I e ...
•
ti is r
-
ras a • ••..,�,�,_
Sewa e
t”
Di
4-0
41
j = _
,
q C�
.,y •• � .a �J lis ...... y
: t
y
°�• z'°'\'��, - LEGEND
-- Site Boundary
Drawing 1 USGS Topographic Map
USGS Topographic Map. Approximate 11 Acre Tract
Charlotte West and Mountain Island f'r Tuckaseegee Road
Lake, NC Quadrangles �'LQ' �,-� Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, NC
j
Scale: 1"-2,000' PILOT PNVIPJ\MEN•AL. NC Pilot Project 3606.2

w
LEGEND
r
Drawing 2 Web Soil Map
Approximate 11 Acre Tract
USDA Web Soil Survey Tuckaseegee Road
of Mecklenburg County, NC ,.>
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, NC
Scale: 1" = 200'
P I l O l F N V I R .'? M F N- A I. . N f Pilot Project 3606.2

85 1.ti E nD EnB
'i�E? Ei)B
WkE CuB
r� �FaE
Wki) CeB f't /
Mk6
EnH M9
C Tt4 .� LJ i
Ce02
Ce6 2 c, M U
�' ep Pat
tc' P aE C ' UR
E r p �jyw c
.r
par
a�- \ CeH
D? f ;eD2 "—
Ge 'aE PaE
WkC G
CeD
L1 q
F Gi��k7
Cee
I
y � t'F3i
cps?
LEGEND
.3E -i�,g NEI
Site Boundary
Drawing 2A Published Soil Map
USDA Soil Survey Approximate 11 Acre Tract
of Mecklenburg County, NC Tuckaseegee Road
Published 1980, Sheet 6 PiLdTCharlotte, Mecklenburg County, NC
Not to Scale NEN-AL, NC Pilot Project 3606.2

4
Drawing 3
USFWS NWI
Wetlands Mapper
Scale: 1" = 200'
PIL01
P I I O i P N V I P .'1 \ M P N A I N C
z
w
a
LEGEND
Site Boundary
Freshwater Emergent
s Freshwater Forested/Shrub
Estuarine and Marine Deepwater
Lstuarine and Marine
NWI Map
Approximate 11 Acre Tract
Tuckaseegee Road
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, NC
Pilot Project 3606.2

603
ZONE X LIQ
FUTURE I ZONE X
EXISTING AND FUTURE LAND USE
CONDIT ONS I% ANNUAL CHANCE
EL000 DISC LARGE CONTAINED IN
CULVERT43R DOE
FAO393
rum
ROAD
I
aes.
ZONE X aJGu E E fo.0
A
KEIEFfvg{I.� CRC:E
Mecklenburg County
IInincorporated Areas
370158
ZONE X
1 t:
�OI+Q4J FA7574
i
u9 0
m9 U
�o
/lt
EXISTINGAND FUTURE LAND -USE CONOITIONS In ANNUAL
CHANCE FLOOD DISCHARGE CONTAINED IN CULVERTARIDGE
Drawing 4
FEMA FIRM Panels
3710451400K and 3710451500K
Effective 9.2.15
Not to Scale
(TRACE Mi AQ1M
i
E��t7�✓E
1
FC •gPCK TNN
i
C ItV ofCharlotte
370159
¢' 4`
kye*° �
LEGEND
= OIHtR AREAS
ZONE 610(
low ■A.a.a ra.�..a IA r x e v V.'~ 0101..01 e1w.Ye M1Wepu.
IEUt VREI � i��i1
Site Boundary
!in•r
HnnA. /r.
Yrl•Ket90N
EMSPFCW r1Or1D FWARD ARrAG (VIVA) 4iRIfrT TO
i
INl1NDATION sY THE i% ANNuAI QNNQ now rVF NT
1}OulhY AFJ
� !
hu a 1% CIEaAOE A aallE /N1aMd vF A(M0a0 n aAr pNpn spM I 1p',v¢.11 I bm HNsed
60i
AMW a UK aFY 4a0101t W 1100da10 Or tht 1% acrur 0WK! nWa MNM 0 5Wdl HOW
I XOP0' N.1*4"
feaNd aY■Ida A11Ea1 A AL. MI. AO. M AW V M.v VL IM INV! 100 LWVNWa s dr
_ — _ .leF.vil1•■Iwaawv
nnar11N01LeaMra0a11 OE OIe 1'A uxrwlFAr.:e.UoO.
.__ Irraoowra.ra z
b
L-'
•O La'
- ''
ZONE AE
O�Mn...
�i
TONE AO fIR.1 hYAI '. •/ r h1 I MI 1rl...aE Y•nf M1.w a� •Y4rp I....x.;, r..v..�
�'""� ST9 -""w`w- a.v. •Rol ryw.;y..l rp ww vr.xrn rNwl•
eglNa 6Yn�•elrtl. Fo WFa4 d alanHl M Ibmrlp, +.loceea Nc
rkVwnn'w
SL 96. Rnr Fan FAwra•
h
•t1
!ExY Try n M1val IOnlyd M I dl/t w.n LIOK'�IEIMF dRRMRI IUr AA
EXISTING AND I
CONDITIONS I':
`.. f 1 .m toter 0101
'
IvMnl.n h�n� tlw IM ArtNI FIw.Tn G.M. 4.0
FLOOD DACHA.
ZONE A99 MNS 10 EX OIv1 tW adm lw Ila W &.We daod IN a Federal Rom
n..•f ewFAA
ZONECULV_F
r. ,, a +qql+/r .vrawW.a r4.r<el :o aw Neta Anwv� Crw Y
ZONE Vt caa1W Now Ime vAxh mom ■aAMO (.Wn aaw1 am rlom Ue1Wo1N1
LX
ZONE x
alt}• • 107p.vl1N Jre'W nanrra.'YYId ab tpa. dle 1.
Mecklenburg Courcy
I- L IURL I
Unincorporated Areas
nr npodn'aF a EFW 0-0191 a "IMmIN V" aM Ad11t01A 1■IadaAa ~ IIW rlwat Ix Lnd
+rMe c. asv u.voM. ar... aro .w ;w rlory .eo.w
370158
EXISTINGAND FUTURE LAND -USE CONOITIONS In ANNUAL
CHANCE FLOOD DISCHARGE CONTAINED IN CULVERTARIDGE
Drawing 4
FEMA FIRM Panels
3710451400K and 3710451500K
Effective 9.2.15
Not to Scale
(TRACE Mi AQ1M
i
E��t7�✓E
1
FC •gPCK TNN
i
C ItV ofCharlotte
370159
¢' 4`
kye*° �
LEGEND
= OIHtR AREAS
low ■A.a.a ra.�..a IA r x e v V.'~ 0101..01 e1w.Ye M1Wepu.
2001E D AWw esc■ rme vNlda w 4ta19aTrr.v. w pcvl
Site Boundary
® WAWAL aARlntR Rt•' )RCES SYSTEM (COILS) ARIAS
EMSPFCW r1Or1D FWARD ARrAG (VIVA) 4iRIfrT TO
Q (M-EMV15F PW-MTFD AREAS(OPAR)
INl1NDATION sY THE i% ANNuAI QNNQ now rVF NT
LDRS aNN1 aM 0F1W ar naN111RF IvvTad MVV W a01NWd b SptW Fbm PU MO Arpp.
P. IM Yw1aI OIEIKa Roel 13001— Ibm4 00 -p n Or ala abm. ! ar Atm am
hu a 1% CIEaAOE A aallE /N1aMd vF A(M0a0 n aAr pNpn spM I 1p',v¢.11 I bm HNsed
--------- l4 aw■ aYN! hol+owh bvr. 4-
AMW a UK aFY 4a0101t W 1100da10 Or tht 1% acrur 0WK! nWa MNM 0 5Wdl HOW
I XOP0' N.1*4"
feaNd aY■Ida A11Ea1 A AL. MI. AO. M AW V M.v VL IM INV! 100 LWVNWa s dr
_ — _ .leF.vil1•■Iwaawv
nnar11N01LeaMra0a11 OE OIe 1'A uxrwlFAr.:e.UoO.
.__ Irraoowra.ra z
SONE A No Ease Food EM -t- 64F. wd
,0116 aro
ZONE AF W FEmd 1W.0— IBMN W &
TOME AM FbW dplha ad t m T 11E1 (OU1rl ANYR M 7alalgi: !Yr Flnorl FW.MEaa
L^— ' v'+l"r0 #r E'00a .I1EM! A•Y lO.w. Vd OPY9Eh
( S A ahrr Ear rbm
O�Mn...
E . • ..• •. + • . iS!-� E �a
TONE AO fIR.1 hYAI '. •/ r h1 I MI 1rl...aE Y•nf M1.w a� •Y4rp I....x.;, r..v..�
�'""� ST9 -""w`w- a.v. •Rol ryw.;y..l rp ww vr.xrn rNwl•
eglNa 6Yn�•elrtl. Fo WFa4 d alanHl M Ibmrlp, +.loceea Nc
rkVwnn'w
SL 96. Rnr Fan FAwra•
IONE AR Can Ml FVvW M-Ird Am IWf Mp ,N&vtld hon Er IX mwwA ct—v
bt'
�Y.MtaO baM EIM W'It✓ IT•OLY 71M d IiFE
!ExY Try n M1val IOnlyd M I dl/t w.n LIOK'�IEIMF dRRMRI IUr AA
v�A..a•-. 'M !M A.rrt IhT1 .ralrtl WA— bop --d Nr m.
`.. f 1 .m toter 0101
'
IvMnl.n h�n� tlw IM ArtNI FIw.Tn G.M. 4.0
ZONE A99 MNS 10 EX OIv1 tW adm lw Ila W &.We daod IN a Federal Rom
@--------- *r+aEt 0101
`l
mI0
vVAcK. woorN w4a vwvoWtoft Eon FWW [a SWn CEIwIIrrd.
r. ,, a +qql+/r .vrawW.a r4.r<el :o aw Neta Anwv� Crw Y
ZONE Vt caa1W Now Ime vAxh mom ■aAMO (.Wn aaw1 am rlom Ue1Wo1N1
••
IaallNao all
OnerTlnEd
alt}• • 107p.vl1N Jre'W nanrra.'YYId ab tpa. dle 1.
FLCM)WAY ARIAS IN ZONt At
SOOD.av aV .atr1 .nrv. (row SrW 1wp (opO.wW rFXr
W7 SOC FEET PFf1V.1 /.i0. A.1. Nn..IN.T al IlMI
nr npodn'aF a EFW 0-0191 a "IMmIN V" aM Ad11t01A 1■IadaAa ~ IIW rlwat Ix Lnd
+rMe c. asv u.voM. ar... aro .w ;w rlory .eo.w
W- .1 W.Ga hwwd .o MIA Nr 1% —.0 'k—, Rvm tan Ir --I -I— w�nJ.rlMl
ISMSSIO Y„y tl00t:IIOI�L]16A1NIv-'%Ja1
V
IApallei w Rom bow".
+.eao.r F.saWc ;01++01 tNrc^ w (la -ae oar.�sa vw1
OTHER FLOOD AREAS
V'
Ilt 4flt]4.m M.ear C.neM M.navf .r.v[•IIWw
=Mle X P -M of E.N■ 401..0 040M fbal. a of 1% a .A ch~ M.W -0
BM5510 W.- V-1
A*Qp dnn o1"em 1 N01 a IWn oanap. AIeAa ■•aa Nun IW r
'Y.:ercwr�...Ita�.o$ •. 1•� a
.ft: atd awe.nIW 10 b I— Rea 1%.-11 cI— 4
• M7 5 40101 011
i'
PIL OT "`
PILOT E N V I R O\ MENTAL • S NC
FA0208
FEMA FIRM
Approximate 11 Acre Tract
Tuckaseegee Road
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, NC
Pilot Project 3606.2

i rr-Gwn
FLAG NUMBERS/INFO
Site Boundary
WETLAND FLAGS = >;
STREAM FLAGS = , Intermittent Stream
,_
Stream Flags = 9 Wetland
Wetland Flags = 0
Total Flags = 9
DP -1 A Data Point
il
iE LOCATIONS OF FEATURES SHOWN ON THIS MAP ARE HAVE BEEN VERIFIED BY MR. DAVID SHAEFFER WITH THE USACE ON JULY 13, 2018.
11S EXHIBIT INCLUDES GPS LOCATIONS OF JURISIDICTIONAL FEATURES. DELINEATION CONDUCTED ON 4.10.18.
Drawing 3 Wetland Map
Aerial Imagery from ESRI Approximate 11 Acre Tract
and Pilot GPS Data Tuckaseegee Road
Scale: 1" = 150' p�L,�1' Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, NC
v�PILOT FNv1R""°NT"`•'N` Pilot Project Date: 7.16.18