HomeMy WebLinkAbout20190584 Ver 1_PA 17-09-0041 Wilson (NSR)_20190502Project Tracking No.:
17-09-0041
NO ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY REQUIRED FORM
:.'IIt� .
Q..;
"q` ^ This form only pertains to ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES for this project. It is not i�
;p {: � ._
valid for Historic Architecture and Landscapes. You must consult separately with the
Historic Architecture and Landscapes Group.d.
PROJECT INFORMATION
Project No.
WBS No.
F.A. No:
Bridge 105
17BP.4.R.95
Federal Permit Required?
County: Wilson
Document: MCC
Funding: ® State ❑ Federal
® Yes ❑ No Permit Type: USACE
Project Description: The project involves the replacement of Bridge No. 105 on SR 1418 (Bridgersville
Road) over Cattail Swamp in Wilson County, North Carolina. The archaeological Area of Potential
Effects (APE) measures 600 feet in length (300 feet from each bridge end -point) and 150 feet in width (75
feet from the SR 1418 center -line).
SUMMARY OF CULTURAL RESOURCES REVIEW
Brief description of review activities, results of review, and conclusions.
Permitting and funding information was reviewed for determining the level of archaeological input required by
state and federal laws. Based on the submitted "request for cultural resources review" form, the project is state -
funded with federal permit interaction. As such, Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act will apply
and the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) will serve as the lead federal agency. Next, construction
design and other data was examined (when applicable) to define the character and extent of potential impacts to
the ground surfaces embracing the project locale. Because the project appears to be an in -place replacement of
the structure, the APE was primarily designed to capture any federal permit area.
Once an APE was outlined, a map review and site file search was conducted at the Office of State Archaeology
(OSA) on Friday, October 13, 2017. No previously documented archaeological sites are located in the APE.
Examination of National Register of Historic Places (NRHP), State Study Listed (SL), Locally Designated (LD),
Determined Eligible (DE), and Surveyed Site (SS) properties employing resources available on the NCSHPO website
is important in establishing the location of noteworthy historic occupations related to a perspective construction
impact area. A cross-check of these mapped resources concluded that none of the above properties with potential
contributing archaeological components are situated within or proximal to the APE. In addition, historic maps of
Wilson County were appraised to identify former structure locations, land use patterns, cemeteries, or other
confirmation of historic occupation in the project vicinity. Archaeological/historical reference materials were
inspected as well. In general, the cultural background review established that no previously recorded
archaeological sites, NRHP properties, or cemeteries are located within the APE. Based on cultural -historical
factors, the APE is considered to have a low potential for the documentation of archaeological resources.
Further, topographic, geologic, flood boundary, and NRCS soil survey maps (Bb) were referenced to evaluate
pedeological, geomorphological, hydrological, and other environmental determinants that may have resulted in
past occupation at this location. Aerial and on -ground photographs (NCDOT Spatial Data Viewer) and the Google
Street View map application (when amenable) were also examined/utilized for additional assessment of
disturbances, both natural and human induced, which compromise the integrity of archaeological sites.
Environmental/impact factors do not suggest a heightened potential for archaeological resource recovery.
"No ARCHAEOLOGY SURVEY REQUIRED "form for the Amended Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2015 Programmatic Agreement.
1 of2
rroject i racrang tvo.:
17-09-0041
Brief Explanation of why the available information provides a reliable basis for reasonably predicting
that there are no unidentified historic properties in the APE:
Nearly the entire APE is underlain by frequently flooded and very poorly drained soils. While the very northern
portion of the APE holds some minor potential for artifact recovery, agricultural and residential impacts would
have likely disturbed any intact archaeological deposits. The APE is unlikely to contain significant and preserved
archaeological deposits eligible for NRHP inclusion. As currently proposed as a state -funded project with federal
permit interaction, no further consultation is advocated. A finding of "no archaeological survey required" is
considered appropriate.
SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
See attached: ® Map(s) ® Previous Survey Info
❑ Photocopy of County Survey Notes
FINDING BY NCDOT ARCHAEOLOGIST
NO A RCHA EOL OG Y S UR VEY REQ UIRED
❑ Photos ❑Correspondence
Other:
"No ARCHAEOLOGY SURVEY REQUIRED" form for the Amended Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2015 Programmatic Agreement.
2 of 2
`�
97
ro3ax
r
.. 1343
1340
1411 •.d�',�1` Jr.c-r tt
14O4 1}2r`
z �
� Rd
.4t
--
- Elm City
Rd
I _
J
t
1331
'�sYille3{a �
. 1128 -
.'
a2
Wilbanks
_ ;.
-ton College ' C t
i
Wilson '� %
W�pFiLakeRu
f;ALT;�
�-'�acjSRi1
k;nd�1 i '
'
•.� 1 11
I Parker's Barbecue
FARTJ
; 1507
tI
t
L�
it
d
� „ r
_
264
6151
i 1
.�
Saratoga
—I_
Elm City
7 — �ML
' % - 96
1
Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics,
CNES/Airbus IDS, USDA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping, Aerogrid,
I;GN, IGP, swisstopo, andithe GIS User Communi;y i
Portion of the Elm City topographic map relating the location and boundaries
of the archaeological APE in Wilson County, North Carolina
ARC-GIS image relating the location and boundaries
of the archaeological APE in Wilson County, North Carolina
AaA—Altavista fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, rarely flooded, Southern Coastal Plain
Map Unit Setting
• National map unit symbol: 2vx8w
• Elevation: 0 to 520 feet
• Mean annual precipitation: 39 to 61 inches
• Mean annual air temperature: 47 to 74 degrees F
• Frost -free period: 175 to 280 days
• Farmland classification: All areas are prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
• Altavista, rarely flooded, and similarsoils: 80 percent
• Minor components: 20 percent
• Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mopunit.
Description of Altavista, Rarely Flooded
Setting
• Landform: Ridges, stream terraces
• Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread, riser
• Down -slope shape: Linear, convex
• Across -slope shape: Linear
• Parent material: Loamy alluvium derived from igneous and metamorphic rock
Typical profile
• Ap - 0 to 7inches: fine sandy loam
• E - 7 toll inches: fine sandy loam
• Bt -11 to 37 inches: sandy clay loam
• BC-37to54inches: sandy loam
• C - 54 to 80 inches: sandy loam
Properties and qualities
• Slope: 0 to 3 percent
• Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
• Natural drainage class: Moderately well drained
• Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately low to moderately high (0.14 to 1.42 in/hr)
• Depth to water table: About 18 to 30 inches
• Frequency of flooding: Rare
• Frequency of ponding: None
• Salinity, maximum in profile: Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0 mmhos/cm)
• Available waterstorage in profile: Moderate (about 8.4 inches)
Bb—Bibb loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded
Map Unit Setting
• National map unit symbol: 3x4m
• Elevation: 80 to 330 feet
• Mean annual precipitation: 38 to 55 inches
• Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
• Frost free period: 210 to 265 days
• Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
• Bibb, undrained, and similar soils: 80 percent
• Johnston, undrained, and similar soils: 10 percent
• Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Bibb, Undrained
Setting
• Landform: Flood plains
• Landform position (two-dimensional): Toeslope
• Down -slope shape: Concave
• Across -slope shape: Linear
• Parent material: Sandy and loamy alluvium
Typical profile
• A - 0 to 6 inches: sandy loam
• Cg1 - 6 to 60 inches: sandy loam
• Cg2 - 60 to 80 inches: loamy sand
Properties and qualities
• Slope: 0 to 2 percent
• Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
• Natural drainage class: Poorly drained
• Runoff class: Low
• Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): High (1.98 to 5.95 in/hr)
• Depth to water table: About 0 to 12 inches
• Frequency of flooding: Frequent
• Frequency of ponding: None
• Available waterstorage in profile: Moderate (about 7.2 inches)
StA—State loamy sand, 0 to 3 percent slopes, rarely flooded
Map Unit Setting
• National map unit symbol: 3x5c
• Elevation: 80 to 330 feet
• Mean annual precipitation: 38 to 55 inches
• Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
• Frost free period: 210 to 265 days
• Farmland classification: All areas are prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
• State and similar soils: 75 percent
• Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of State
Setting
• Landform: Stream terraces
• Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread
• Down -slope shape: Convex
• Across -slope shape: Linear
• Parent material: Old loamy alluvium derived from igneous and metamorphic rock
Typical profile
• Ap - 0 to 6 inches: loamy sand
• E - 6 to 10 inches: loamy fine sand
• Bt1 -10 to 38 inches: sandy clay loam
• Bt2 - 38 to 42 inches: fine sandy loam
• C- 42 to 90 inches: fine sandy loam
Properties and qualities
• Slope: 0 to 3 percent
• Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
• Natural drainage class: Well drained
• Runoff class: Low
• Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
• Depth to water table: About 48 to 72 inches
• Frequency of flooding: Rare
• Frequency of ponding: None
• Available waterstorage in profile: Moderate (about 7.2 inches)
PI
CH 17 I2
cicel arm Rd
i CuU'
Mace �a
�1 0
LangI Rd a'
4-1
�,�� S ttr•Nw,f-.pn �.:�. �` +`L—.—.rAr..l, a!�wi}`
EDGEC DI
PIVOK
\. OHO.
�R CherOkec
White bridge - 0
~`" ` ` n — AP •. Fr f' EI Ciikjt ' y a P etops
1:-
IfWa 6
I1
J bert.Ln
VVILSOi l Y WL337
Js
v
�I`� Q �Ro.
helIn tons411 _«n
3 Evi1Pi +
r
S �—
_ .
ISO
ft ud
. �r fi -' s r Il.r� Crr�sraia,
pit
Qf
tit
GJ.J` .�_ Cwm ••fi
�avr"u6r Rd
eCO
t
E 10
ACChDnpinev I•ON, ZAa:fIFI(ATIGN �
svLte t.2e rrr ru 109 E. lersos sl, a Ir t.1 4-25 1 101 dcN IMI ;—d
hYf
—t —.--
- — - rbleigil. H. C. fib=1 r IJ 5l/lal;r. i11Dl:e,h1 cu base
101p � ID�c xc Aye• rau i�7:, ree. �'� ,
—r I:GNt �ttB W IERW1 �FEiT t\ ' )Inkn r. Hnul t �� U C. Pae[E A,_,''C
MAT:CW', at —wit; htC r�'cat—wit;VERT11A rV. flr 197i \ 'p
w ' •` ER131018 a
crrv, N.C. 0�j` .e4 NfKf Pt1L'•-� •% iY�WA:O E yJ }
�J Fountain
M3'v35-W77551l.5
n110 •AY OCMPI-F-:t Will, vAr,4NAI MAP .r":aun ."INVAROP, t
D. rCR 51'IE BY ll-$.RCO.O3IGA: SURVEY FEE ('N,YYIGINIA 2N%2 aratoga CO t977 ter•
n f@LOPP 11Y.il:BlwG rnwuUnnh,IC YA^4 Ali])C,'r+w_ m AV4.AULC n� N
4M3 ter: Iv r::.-95.4:Ef
cu
J C �f
1 01 f
Er;tlg��suit!e �d
a
a:
`+VL-- Bridge 2005 A
c
4g
WILSON �r
tir
Ervin of
X wL0591 Joseph Joh
;Pander House 1985
•
NCSHPO website map illustrating that no historic properties with potential archaeological contributing elements are situated within or adjacent: to the APE.