20160385 Ver 2_Buffer AsBuilt Report_20190502

ID#*
Select Reviewer:*
Katie Merritt
Initial Review
Completed Date
05/02/2019
Mitigation Project Submittal - 5/2/2019
Version* 2
Is this a Prospectus, Technical Proposal or a New Site? *
Type of Mitigation Project:*
r— Stream r Wetlands W Buffer r Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Project Contact Information
Contact Name:*
Catherine Manner
Project Informatio-
Existing 20160385
(DWR) (nunbers only no dash)
ID#:*
Project Type: F DMS r Mitigation Bank
Project Name: Lake Wendell Mitigation Project
County: Johnston
Document Information
r Yes G No
Email Address:*
[e-mail]
Existing
Version: (nurnbersonly)
Mitigation Document Type:*
Mitigation Monitoring Report
File Upload: Lake Wendell _MYO_Rip BMC Only_2018_FINAL.pdf 19.09MB
Rease upload only one RDF of the conplete file that needs to be subr itted...
Signature
Print Name:* Catherine Manner
Signature:

As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report
FINAL VERSION
Lake Wendell Mitigation Project (Riparian Buffer Mitigation)
Monitoring Year 0
Calendar Year of Data Collection: 2018

NCDEQ DMS Project Identification # 97081
NCDEQ DMS Contract # 6826
Neuse River Basin (Cataloging Unit 03020201)
USACE Action ID Number: SAW-2016-00876
NCDEQ DWR Project # 2016-0385
Johnston County, NC
Contracted Under RFP # 16-006477
Data Collection Period: March-May 2018, Submission Date: March 2019

Prepared for:

North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Mitigation Services
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1652

Prepared by:

Table of Contents
1 Project Summary ................................................................................................................................... 1
2 Project Background ............................................................................................................................... 1
2.1 Project Location, Setting, and Existing Conditions ....................................................................... 1
2.2 Mitigation Project Goals and Objectives....................................................................................... 2
2.3 Project History, Contacts, and Timeframe .................................................................................... 2
3 Project Mitigation Components ............................................................................................................ 3
3.1 Riparian Buffer Mitigation Types and Approaches ....................................................................... 3
3.1.1 Tree and Shrub Planting Approaches .................................................................................... 4
3.1.2 Temporary and Permanent Seeding Approaches ................................................................. 4
3.1.3 Invasive Species Vegetation Treatment ................................................................................ 4
4 Performance Standards ........................................................................................................................ 4
4.1 Vegetation ..................................................................................................................................... 4
5 Monitoring Plan .................................................................................................................................... 4
5.1 Monitoring Schedule and Reporting ............................................................................................. 5
5.2 Visual Assessment Monitoring ...................................................................................................... 5
5.3 Vegetation Assessment Monitoring.............................................................................................. 5
6 As-Built (Baseline) Condition ................................................................................................................ 6
6.1 As-built (Baseline) Survey ............................................................................................................. 6
6.2 As-Built (Baseline) Plans/ Record Drawings .................................................................................. 7
6.3 As-Built/ Baseline Assessment ...................................................................................................... 7
6.3.1 Vegetation Assessments ....................................................................................................... 7
7 References ............................................................................................................................................ 8

LIST OF APPENDICES
Appendix A Background Tables
Table 1 Project Attributes
Table 2 Project Areas and Asset Summary
Table 3 Project Contacts

Appendix B Visual Assessment Data
Figure 1 Current Condition Plan View (CCPV)
Table 5a Vegetation Condition Assessment
Photos Vegetation Plot Photographs

Appendix C Vegetation Plot Data
Table 6 Baseline Vegetation – As-Built Stem Counts

Appendix D NC DWR Correspondence and Approvals

Appendix E As-Built Plans/ Record Drawings
Water & Land Solutions

Lake Wendell Mitigation Project (Riparian Buffer Mitigation)
FINAL As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report Page 1

1 Project Summary
Water and Land Solutions, LLC (WLS) completed the construction and planting of the Lake Wendell
Mitigation Project (Project) full-delivery project for the North Carolina Department of Environmental
Quality (NCDEQ), Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) in March 2018. The Project is located in Johnston
County, North Carolina between the Community of Archer Lodge and the Town of Wendell at 35˚ 44’
14.60’’ North and 78˚ 21’ 13.69’’ West. The Project site is located in the NCDEQ Sub-basin 03-04-06, in
the Upper Buffalo Creek Sub-watershed 030202011502 study area for the Neuse 01 Regional Watershed
Plan (RWP), in the Wake-Johnston Collaborative Local Watershed Plan, and in the Targeted Local
Watershed 03020201180050, all of the Neuse River Basin.
The Project involved the restoration, enhancement, preservation and permanent protection of five
stream reaches (R1, R2, R3, R4, and R5) and their riparian buffers, totaling approximately 4,185 linear feet
of streams and approximately 490,477 square feet of riparian buffers. The Project construction and
planting were completed in March 2018 and as-built survey was completed in June 2018. Planting and
baseline monitoring activities occurred between March and April 2018 (Table 2). This report documents
the completion of the construction activities and presents as-built baseline monitoring data (MY0) for the
post-construction monitoring period. Only minor adjustments were made to the final design during
construction. The Project is expected to meet the Year 1 Monitoring Year success criteria.
2 Project Background
2.1 Project Location, Setting, and Existing Conditions
The Lake Wendell Mitigation Project (Project) site is located in the Upper Buffalo Creek Sub-watershed
030202011502 study area for the Neuse 01 Regional Watershed Plan (RWP), in the Wake-Johnston
Collaborative Local Watershed Plan, and in the Targeted Local Watershed 03020201180050, all of the
Neuse River Basin. The Project site is situated in the lower piedmont where potential for future
development associated with the I-540 corridor and rapidly growing Johnston County area is imminent,
as described in the Regional Watershed Plan (RWP) for the Upper Neuse River Basin within Hydrologic
Unit (HU) 03020201.
The RWP identified and prioritized potential mitigation strategies to offset aquatic resource impacts from
development and provided mitigation project implementation recommendations to improve ecological
uplift within the Neuse 01 subbasin, which included traditional stream and wetland mitigation, buffer
restoration, nutrient offsets, non-traditional mitigation projects such as stormwater and agricultural
BMPs, and rare, threatened, or endangered (RTE) species habitat preservation or enhancement.
The project included five stream reaches (R1, R2, R3, R4, and R5) which involved the restoration,
enhancement, preservation and permanent protection of approximately 4,269 linear feet of streams and
approximately 490,477 square feet of riparian buffers permanently protected by a recorded conservation
easement (11.97 acres). The catchment area is 102 acres and has an impervious cover less than one
percent. The dominant land uses are agriculture and mixed forest. Prior to Project construction, livestock
had access to all Project streams, except R4, and the riparian buffers were less than 50 feet wide.
Water & Land Solutions

Lake Wendell Mitigation Project (Riparian Buffer Mitigation)
FINAL As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report Page 2

2.2 Mitigation Project Goals and Objectives
WLS established project mitigation goals and objectives based on the resource condition and functional
capacity of the watershed to improve and protect diverse aquatic resources comparable to stable
headwater stream systems within the Piedmont Physiographic Province. The proposed mitigation types
and design approaches described in the final approved mitigation plan considered the general restoration
and resource protection goals and strategies outlined in the 2010 Neuse River Basin Restoration Priority
Plan (RBRP). The functional goals and objectives were further defined in the 2013 Wake-Johnston
Collaborative Local Watershed Plan (LWP) and 2015 Neuse 01 Regional Watershed Plan (RWP) and
include:
• Reducing sediment and nutrient inputs to the upper Buffalo Creek Watershed,
• Restoring, preserving and protecting wetlands, streams, riparian buffers and aquatic habitat,
• Implementing agricultural BMPs and stream restoration in rural catchments together as “project
clusters”.
With regards to riparian buffer mitigation, the following site specific goals were developed to address the
primary concerns outlined in the LWP and RWP and include:
• Restore and protect riparian buffer functions and habitat connectivity in perpetuity by recording
a permanent conservation easement,
• Implement agricultural BMPs to reduce nonpoint source inputs to receiving waters.
To accomplish these site-specific goals, the following objectives will be measured and included with the
performance standards to document overall project success:
• Increase native species riparian buffer vegetation density/composition along streambank and
floodplain areas that meet requirements of a minimum 50-foot-wide and 260 stems/acre after
monitoring year 5,
• Prevent cattle from accessing the conservation easement boundary by installing permanent
fencing and reducing fecal coliform bacteria from the pre-restoration levels.
2.3 Project History, Contacts, and Timeframe
The Project will provide riparian buffer mitigation credits in accordance with North Carolina
Administrative Code (NCAC), “Consolidated Buffer Mitigation Rule”, Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0295, effective
November 1, 2015. Riparian buffer mitigation site viability was confirmed by DWRs April 28, 2016 letter
entitled “Site Viability for Buffer Mitigation & Nutrient Offset – Lake Wendell Located Near 2869 Wendell
Road, Wendell, NC, Johnston County”. The referenced site viability letter included a determination by
DWR that Project Reaches R1, R2, R3 and R4 were either intermittent or perennial. A separate request
for Stream Origin/Buffer Applicability Determination for Potential Mitigation for Project Reach R5 was
submitted to DWR on May 18, 2017, as required under the referenced site viability letter. On June 1, 2017
DWR performed the requested determination and Reach R5 was determined to be intermittent, as
communicated in the DWR June 8, 2017 letter entitled “On-Site Stream Determination for Applicability to
the Neuse Riparian Buffer Rules and Water Quality Standards (15A NCAC 02B.0233)”, therefore confirming
Water & Land Solutions

Lake Wendell Mitigation Project (Riparian Buffer Mitigation)
FINAL As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report Page 3

Reach R5’s eligibility for riparian buffer mitigation. See Appendix D for DWR correspondence and approval
letters.
In addition to DWR correspondence and approval, WLS investigated on-site jurisdictional waters of the US
(WOTUS) using the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Routine On-Site Determination Method. This
method is defined in the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual and subsequent Eastern
Mountain and Piedmont Regional Supplement. Determination methods included stream classification
utilizing the NCDWQ Stream Identification Form and the USACE Stream Quality Assessment Worksheet.
The results of the on-site field investigation indicated that there are two jurisdictional stream channels
located within the proposed project area. The main unnamed tributary (R1, R2, R4) was determined to
be perennial while R5 was determined to be intermittent. USACE representative John Thomas verified
Jurisdictional Determinations during a field visit on October 16, 2016.
The final mitigation plan and PCN were submitted to DMS August 25, 2017 for submission to DWR and
the NCIRT. The Section 404 General (Regional and Nationwide) Permit Verification was issued October 5,
2017. Project construction started on November 13, 2017 and mitigation site earthwork was completed
on March 13, 2018, and mitigation site planting was completed on March 30, 2018, both by RiverWorks
Construction. Trueline Surveying, PC completed the as-built survey in June 2018. WLS completed the
installation of baseline monitoring devices on April 19, 2018 and the installation of survey monumentation
and conservation easement boundary marking on June 7, 2018.
The project background and attribute summary is presented in Table 1. Refer to Figure 1 and Table 2 for
the project areas and buffer asset information. Relevant project contact information is presented in Table
3.
3 Project Mitigation Components
3.1 Riparian Buffer Mitigation Types and Approaches
Riparian buffer mitigation included restoring, enhancing and preserving the riparian buffer functions and
corridor habitat. The project included planting to re-establish a native species vegetation riparian buffer
corridor, which extended a minimum of 50 feet from the top of the streambanks along each of the project
reaches, as well as permanently protecting those buffers with a conservation easement. Many areas of
the conservation easement had riparian buffer widths greater than 50 feet established along one or both
streambanks to provide additional functional uplift. The only exception is at the upstream end of Reach
R1, where the width of the proposed left riparian buffer varies between 20 feet and 29 feet from the left
top of bank. This narrow area of proposed riparian buffer is due to the site constraint caused by an existing
residential structure. For project reaches proposed for restoration and enhancement, the riparian buffers
were restored through reforestation of the entire conservation easement with native species riparian
buffer vegetation (Appendix C). For project reach sections proposed for preservation, the existing riparian
buffers will be permanently protected via the recorded conservation easement. Additionally, permanent
fencing was installed along with alternative watering systems to exclude livestock from the restored
riparian buffer and conservation easement areas. The permanent fencing system consisting of woven
wire fencing was installed to NRCS technical standards in the pasture areas along and outside of the
Water & Land Solutions

Lake Wendell Mitigation Project (Riparian Buffer Mitigation)
FINAL As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report Page 4

northern conservation easement boundaries of Reaches R1, R2, and R3. Table 1 and Figure 1 (Appendix
A) provide a summary of the project components.
3.1.1 Tree and Shrub Planting Approaches
The riparian buffer planting zones for the project included the streambanks, floodplain, riparian wetland,
and upland transitional areas. The as-built planting boundaries are shown on the as-built vegetation plans
in Appendix E and Figure 1. Plantings were conducted using native species bare-root trees and shrubs,
live stakes, and seedlings that were generally planted at a total target density of 680 stems per acre. WLS
implemented a riparian buffer planting strategy that includes a combination of overstory, or canopy, and
understory species. The site planting strategy also included early successional, as well as climax species.
The vegetation selections were mixed throughout the project planting areas so that the early successional
species will give way to climax species as they mature over time.
3.1.2 Temporary and Permanent Seeding Approaches
Permanent seed mixtures of native species herbaceous vegetation and temporary herbaceous vegetation
seed mixtures were applied to all disturbed areas of the project site. Temporary and permanent seeding
were conducted simultaneously at all disturbed areas of the site during construction utilizing mechanical
broadcast spreaders. The as-built re-vegetation plan lists the utilized species, mixtures, and application
rates for permanent seeding.
3.1.3 Invasive Species Vegetation Treatment
During the project construction, invasive species exotic vegetation was either mechanically removed or
chemically treated both to control its presence and reduce its spread within the conservation easement
areas.
4 Performance Standards
The applied success criteria for the Project will follow necessary performance standards and monitoring
protocols presented in final approved mitigation plan. Annual monitoring and semi-annual site visits will
be conducted to assess the condition of the project throughout the monitoring period. Monitoring
activities will be conducted for a period of five (5) years. Specific success criteria components and
evaluation methods are described below.
4.1 Vegetation
Measurements of the final vegetative restoration success for the project will be achieving a density of not
less than 260, five-year-old planted stems per acre in Year 5 of monitoring. This final performance criteria
shall include a minimum of four (4) native hardwood tree species or four (4) native hardwood tree and
native shrub species, where no one species is greater than fifty (50) percent of the stems. Native
hardwood tree and native shrub volunteer species may be included to meet the final performance criteria
of 260 stems per acre. In addition, diffuse flow of runoff shall be maintained in the riparian buffer areas.
5 Monitoring Plan
The monitoring plan is described in the approved mitigation plan and is intended to document the site
improvements based on restoration potential, catchment health, ecological stressors and overall
Water & Land Solutions

Lake Wendell Mitigation Project (Riparian Buffer Mitigation)
FINAL As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report Page 5

constraints. The measurement methods described below provide a connection between project goals
and objectives, performance standards, and monitoring requirements to evaluate functional
improvement.
5.1 Monitoring Schedule and Reporting
A period of at least six months will separate the as-built baseline measurements and the first-year
monitoring measurements. The baseline monitoring document and as-built monitoring report will include
all information required by the current DMS templates (June 2017) and applicable guidance referenced in
the approved mitigation plan, including planimetric (plan view) information, photographs, sampling plot
locations, a description of initial vegetation species composition by community type, and location of
monitoring stations. The report will include a list of the vegetation species planted, along with the
associated planting densities. WLS will conduct mitigation performance monitoring based on these
methods and will submit annual monitoring reports to DMS by December 1st of each monitoring year
during which required monitoring is conducted. The annual monitoring reports will organize and present
the information resulting from the methods described in detail below.
5.2 Visual Assessment Monitoring
WLS will conduct visual assessments in support of mitigation performance monitoring. Visual assessments
will be conducted twice per monitoring year with at least five months in between each site visit for each of
the five years of monitoring. Photographs will be used to visually document vegetation performance and
any areas of concern related to plant mortality, impacts from invasive plant species or animal browsing,
easement boundary encroachments, and cattle exclusion fence damage. The monitoring activities will be
summarized in DMS’s Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table and the Vegetation Conditions
Assessment Table, which are used to document and quantify the visual assessment throughout the
monitoring period.
A series of photographs over time will be also be compared to evaluate successful maturation of riparian
vegetation. The photographs will be taken from a height of approximately five feet to ensure that the same
locations (and view directions) at the site are documented in each monitoring period and will be shown on
the current conditions plan view map (CCPV). The results of the visual monitoring assessments will be used
to support the development of the annual monitoring document that provides the visual assessment
metrics.
5.3 Vegetation Assessment Monitoring
Successful restoration of the vegetation at the project site is dependent upon successful hydrologic
restoration, active establishment and survival of the planted preferred canopy vegetation species, and
volunteer regeneration of the native plant community. To determine if these criteria are successfully
achieved, vegetation-monitoring quadrants or plots have been installed and will be monitored across the
restoration site in accordance with the CVS-EEP Level I & II Monitoring Protocol (CVS, 2008) and DMS
Stream and Wetland Monitoring Guidelines (DMS, 2017).
The vegetation monitoring plots are approximately 2% of the planted portion of the site with a total of
seven (7) plots established randomly within the planted riparian buffer areas. The sampling may employ
Water & Land Solutions

Lake Wendell Mitigation Project (Riparian Buffer Mitigation)
FINAL As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report Page 6

quasi-random plot locations which may vary upon approval from DMS, DWR and IRT. Any random plots
should comprise more than 50% of the total required plots and the location (GPS coordinates and
orientation) will be identified in the monitoring reports. No monitoring quadrants were established within
undisturbed wooded areas, such as those along Reach R4, however visual observations will be
documented in the annual monitoring reports to describe any changes to the existing vegetation
community. The size and location of individual quadrants is 100 square meters (10m X 10m) for woody
tree species. The vegetation plot corners have been marked and surveyed with a GPS unit. See Figure 1
in Appendix E for the vegetation monitoring plot locations.
Vegetation monitoring will occur in the fall each required monitoring year, prior to the loss of leaves.
Mortality will be determined from the difference between the previous year's living, planted seedlings
and the current year's living, planted seedlings. Data will be collected at each individual quadrant and will
include specific data for monitored stems on diameter, height, species, date planted, and grid location, as
well as a collective determination of the survival density within that quadrant. Individual planted
seedlings were marked at planting or monitoring baseline setup so that those stems can be found and
identified consistently each successive monitoring year. Volunteer species will be noted and their
inclusion in quadrant data will be evaluated with DMS on a case-by-case basis. The presence of invasive
species vegetation within the monitoring quadrants will also be noted, as will any wildlife effects.
At the end of the first full growing season (from baseline/year 0) or after 180 days between March 1st and
November 30th, species composition, stem density, and survival will be evaluated. For each subsequent
year, vegetation plots shall be monitored for seven years in years 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 or until the final success
criteria are achieved. WLS will provide required remedial action on a case-by-case basis, such as
replanting more wet/drought tolerant species vegetation, conducting beaver and beaver dam
management/removal, and removing undesirable/invasive species vegetation, and will continue to
monitor vegetation performance until the corrective actions demonstrate that the site is trending towards
or meeting the standard requirement. Existing mature woody vegetation will be visually monitored during
annual site visits to document any mortality, due to construction activities or changes to the water table,
that negatively impact existing forest cover or favorable buffer vegetation.
6 As-Built (Baseline) Condition
6.1 As-built (Baseline) Survey
An as-built survey, conducted under the responsible charge of a North Carolina Professional Land Surveyor
(PLS), was utilized to document the as-built or baseline condition of the Project post-construction. The
Project construction and planting were completed in March 2018 and as-built survey was completed in
June 2018. Planting and baseline monitoring activities occurred between March and April 2018. The as-
built survey included locating the constructed stream channels, in-stream structures, monitoring device
locations (i.e. veg plots), a longitudinal profile survey, and cross-section surveys. For comparison
purposes, the site reaches and riparian buffer areas were divided into the same reaches that were
established for the project assessment and design (R1, R2, R3, R4, and R5).
Water & Land Solutions

Lake Wendell Mitigation Project (Riparian Buffer Mitigation)
FINAL As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report Page 7

6.2 As-Built (Baseline) Plans/ Record Drawings
The results of the as-built survey are used to establish and document post-construction or baseline
conditions and will be used for comparing post-construction monitoring data each monitoring year. The
as-built survey plan set includes these same plan sheets (cover, legend/construction sequence/general
notes, typical sections, details, plans and profile, and revegetation plan) as the final construction plans.
The as-built survey plan set was developed utilizing the final construction plan set as the “background”,
and then overlaying the as-built survey information on the plan and profile sheets. Any significant
adjustments or deviations made to the final construction plans during construction are shown as redline
mark-ups or callouts on the as-built survey plan sheets, as appropriate, to serve as record drawings. The
as-built survey plan set is located in Appendix E.
6.3 As-Built/ Baseline Assessment
No deviations of significance were documented between the final construction plans and the as-built
condition that may affect channel performance or changes in vegetation species planted. Additionally,
no major issues or mitigating factors were observed immediately after construction which require
consideration or remedial action.
6.3.1 Vegetation Assessments
The MY0 average planted density is 723 stems per acre, which exceeds the interim measure of vegetative
success of at least 260 planted stems per acre at the end of the fifth monitoring year. This density includes
enough native species hardwood tree and shrub species to exceed the final performance criteria and shall
include a minimum of four (4) native hardwood tree species or four (4) native hardwood tree and native
shrub species, where no one species is greater than fifty (50) percent of the stems. In addition, diffuse
flow of runoff is being maintained in the riparian buffer areas. Summary data and photographs of each
plot can be found in Appendix B.

Water & Land Solutions

Lake Wendell Mitigation Project (Riparian Buffer Mitigation)
FINAL As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report Page 8

7 References
Lee, M., Peet R., Roberts, S., Wentworth, T. CVS-NCEEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation, Version 4.1,
2007.
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality, Division of Mitigation Services, Wildlands
Engineering, Inc. 2015. Neuse 01 Regional Watershed Plan Phase II. Raleigh, NC.
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality, Division of Mitigation Services, 2017. As-built
Baseline Monitoring Report Format, Data and Content Requirement. Raleigh, NC.
Schafale, M. P., and A. S. Weakley. 1990. Classification of the natural communities of North Carolina,
third approximation. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program. NCDENR Division of Parks and
Recreation. Raleigh, NC.
United States Army Corps of Engineers. 1987. Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual.
Technical Report Y-87-1. Environmental Laboratory. US Army Engineer Waterways Experiment
Station. Vicksburg, MS.
___. 1997. Corps of Engineers Wetlands Research Program. Technical Note VN-RS-4.1. Environmental
Laboratory. U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station. Vicksburg, MS.
___. 2003. Stream Mitigation Guidelines, April 2003, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Wilmington District.
Water and Land Solutions, LLC (2017). Lake Wendell Stream and Riparian Buffer Mitigation Plan.
NCDMS, Raleigh, NC.

Lake Wendell Mitigation Project (Riparian Buffer Mitigation)
Appendices

Lake Wendell Mitigation Project (Riparian Buffer Mitigation)
Appendix A – Background Tables

Table 1. Buffer Project Attributes
Project Name Lake Wendell Mitigation Project
Hydrologic Unit Code 03020201
River Basin Neuse
Geographic Location (Lat, Long)35.7373910 N, -78.3538050 W
Site Protection Instrument (DB, PG)85, 148
Total Credits (BMU)375,261
Types of Credits Riparian Buffer
Mitigation Plan Date Aug-18
Initial Planting Date Mar-18
Baseline Report Date Nov-18
MY1 Report Date Dec-18
MY2 Report Date
MY3 Report Date
MY4 Report Date
MY5 Report Date
Table 2. Buffer Project Areas and Assets
RIPARIAN BUFFER (15A NCAC 02B.0295)
Location Jurisdictional Streams Restoration Type Reach ID/
Component
Buffer Width
(ft)
Creditable
Area (sf)*
Initial
Credit
Ratio (x:1)
% Full
Credit
Final Credit Ratio
(x:1)
Riparian Buffer
Credits (BMU)
Convertible to
Nutrient Offset
(Yes or No)
Nutrient
Offset: N
(lbs)
Nutrient
Offset: P
(lbs)
20-29 75%1.33333 0 0.000 0.000
30-100 342525 100%1.00000 342525 0.000 0.000
101-200 33%3.00000 0 0.000 0.000
20-29 75%2.66667 0 0.000 0.000
30-100 44852 100%2.00000 22426 0.000 0.000
101-200 33%6.00000 0 0.000 0.000
387377 364951 0.000 0.000
129125.6667
Location Jurisdictional Streams Restoration Type Reach ID/
Component
Buffer Width
(ft)
Creditable
Area (sf)*
Initial
Credit
Ratio (x:1)
% Full
Credit
Final Credit Ratio
(x:1)
Riparian Buffer
Credits (BMU)
20-29 75%13.33333 0
30-100 103100 100%10.00000 10310
101-200 33%30.00000 0
20-29 75%6.66667 0
30-100 100%5.00000 0
101-200 33%15.00000 0
20-29 75%4.00000 0
30-100 100%3.00000 0
101-200 33%9.00000 0
103100 10310
490477 375261
*All buffers eligible for credit must be at minimum 20' wide
*When preservation areas exceed the total eligible preservation area, select the areas with the best credit ratios as the creditable areas.
Directions to ground-truth riparian buffer areas for filling out table above:
1) Digitize top of bank features.
2) Label each reach as rural or urban and subject or nonsubject in the GIS attribute table.
3) Label each reach by restoration type level by adding this field to the GIS attribute table. Separate reaches by restoration level and attribute separately as necessary using the cut features tool.
4) Use the GIS geoprocessing tool to buffer from top of bank into the three applicable buffer widths that contain potential credit.
5) Clip buffer by conservation easement shape.
6) Cut up asset feature layer by reach, and attribute feature name by adding column to asset table.
7) Add a field for buffer area and run the calculate geometry tool in the GIS attribute table (in square feet).
8) Add blocks of rows for each buffer component (by reach and restoration level) in excel table as necessary and as portrayed in GIS attribute table.
FILLIBLE CELLS, leave blank if N/A
Regulatory direction for Riparian Buffer in this table follows NCAC rule 15A NCAC 02B .0295, effective November 1, 2015.
Regulatory direction for Nutrient Offset in this table follows Nutrient Offsets Payments Rule 15A NCAC 02B. 0240, amended effective September 1, 2010 and
DWR – 1998. Methodology and Calculations for determining Nutrient Reductions associated with Riparian Buffer Establishment.
N.O. calculation based on effectiveness in 30 years, with 146.40 lb/ac P; and 2,273.02 lb/ac N. The N credit ratio used is 19.16325 sf per pound. The P credit ratio used is 297.54098 sf per pound.
*Area eligible for preservation may be no more than 25% of total area, where total area is back-calculated with the equation R+E/0.75.
SUBTOTALS
TOTALS
SUBTOTALS
If Converted to Nutrient
Offset
3
Subject
Nonsubject
Rural
Urban
1
2
10
5Preservation
Subject or Nonsubject
Subject or NonsubjectRural or
Urban
Restoration
Enhancement
ELIGIBLE PRESERVATION AREA
Mitigation Provider Water & Land Solutions, LLC
11030 Raven Ridge Road, Suite 200, Raleigh, NC 27614
Primary Project POC William Scott Hunt, III, PE Phone: [phone]
Construction Contractor RiverWorks Construction
114 W. Main Street, Suite 106, Clayton, NC 27520
Primary Project POC Bill Wright Phone: [phone]
Survey Contractor (Existing
Condition Surveys)
WithersRavenel
115 MacKenan Drive, Cary, NC 27511
Primary Project POC Marshall Wight, PLS Phone: [phone]
Survey Contractor (Conservation
Easement, Construction and As-
Builts Surveys)
True Line Surveying, PC
205 West Main Street, Clayton, NC 27520
Primary Project POC Curk T. Lane, PLS 919-359-0427
Planting Contractor RiverWorks Construction
114 W. Main Street, Suite 106, Clayton, NC 27520
Primary Project POC Bill Wright Phone: [phone]
Seeding Contractor RiverWorks Construction
114 W. Main Street, Suite 106, Clayton, NC 27520
Primary Project POC Bill Wright Phone: [phone]
Seed Mix Sources Green Resource
5204 Highgreen Ct., Colfax, NC 27235
Rodney Montgomery Phone: [phone]
Nursery Stock Suppliers Foggy Mountain Nursery (Live Stakes)
797 Helton Creek Rd, Lansing, NC 28643
Glenn Sullivan Phone: [phone]
Dykes & Son Nursery (Bare Root Stock)
825 Maude Etter Rd, Mcminnville, Tn 37110
Jeff Dykes Phone: [phone]
Monitoring Performers Water & Land Solutions, LLC
11030 Raven Ridge Road, Suite 200, Raleigh, NC 27614
Stream Monitoring POC William Scott Hunt, III, PE Phone: [phone]
Vegetation Monitoring POC William Scott Hunt, III, PE Phone: [phone]
Wetland Monitoring POC William Scott Hunt, III, PE Phone: [phone]

Table 3. Project Contacts
Lake Wendell Mitigation Project (NCDEQ DMS Project ID# 97081)

Lake Wendell Mitigation Project (Riparian Buffer Mitigation)
Appendix B – Visual Assessment Data

Wetland Refernece Gage
Crest Gage
Flow GageXS-4XS-5XS-1XS-3XS-8XS-2XS-6XS-76
5
23
7
1
4688930 52652684989064710+0011+0012+0013+0013+5810+0011+0012+0013+0014+0016+0017+0019+0020+0022+0023+0024+0025+0026+0027+0029+0030+0031+0032+0033+0034+0036+0039+0040+0041+0042+0043+0045+0046+0047+0048+0049+0015+0018+0021+0028+0035+0037+0038+0044+0049+15FIGURE1Lake Wendell Mitigation ProjectJohnston County, North Carolina NAD 1983 2011 State PlaneNorth Carolina FIPS 3200 FT US
Current ConditionsPlan View
Leg en d
Conservation EasementFence LineCrest Ga geFlow G ageWetland G age
Stream Reference Site L ocation
Cross Section PinsCross SectionsCVS Plo t O rig inCVS PlotsWater Qu ality FeaturesCulvert Pip esTop o f Strea mb ankPre-C onstru ction Wetland s (1.16 acres)Stream Mitigation Type
Restoration
Enhancemen t II
Preservation
0 125 250Feet
NCDMS Contract No. 6826NCDMS Project No. 97081April 2018MY0 Wendell RdR1
R5
R2
R3
R4
Access poin t: 35 °44 '15.52"N 78 °20 '55.84"W
CulvertCulvert
Culvert
Ae rial: G oog le Ea rth Spring 20 18
Table 5a.Vegetation Condition Assessment
Project Lake Wendell Mitigation Project (NCDEQ DMS Project ID# 97081)
Planted Acreage1 8.9
1. Bare Areas Very limited cover of both woody and herbaceous material. 1 acre
Pattern and
Color 0 0.00 0.0%
2. Low Stem Density Areas Woody stem densities clearly below target levels based on MY3, 4, or 5 stem count criteria. 0.1 acres
Pattern and
Color 0 0.00 0.0%
0 0.00 0.0%
3. Areas of Poor Growth Rates or Vigor Areas with woody stems of a size class that are obviously small given the monitoring year. 0.25 acres
Pattern and
Color 0 0.00 0.0%
0 0.00 0.0%
Easement Acreage2 9.2
4. Invasive Areas of Concern4 Areas or points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale). 1000 SF
Pattern and
Color 0 0.00 0.0%
5. Easement Encroachment Areas3 Areas or points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale). none
Pattern and
Color 0 0.00 0.0%
CCPV
Depiction
Number of
Polygons
Combined
Acreage
% of Easement
AcreageVegetation Category Definitions
Mapping
Threshold
% of Planted
Acreage
Total
Cumulative Total
Vegetation Category Definitions
Number of
Polygons
Mapping
Threshold
CCPV
Depiction
Combined
Acreage
1 = Enter the planted acreage within the easement. This number is calculated as the easement acreage minus any existing mature tree stands that were not subject to supplemental planting of the understory, the channel acreage,
crossings or any other elements not directly planted as part of the project effort.
2 = The acreage within the easement boundaries.
3 = Encroachment may occur within or outside of planted areas and will therefore be calculated against the overall easement acreage. In the event a polygon is cataloged into items 1, 2 or 3 in the table and is the result of encroachment,
the associated acreage should be tallied in the relevant item (i.e., item 1,2 or 3) as well as a parallel tally in item 5.
4 = Invasives may occur in or out of planted areas, but still within the easement and will therefore be calculated against the overall easement acreage. Invasives of concern/interest are listed below. The list of high concern spcies are
those with the potential to directly outcompete native, young, woody stems in the short-term (e.g. monitoring period or shortly thereafter) or affect the community structure for existing, more established tree/shrub stands over timeframes
that are slightly longer (e.g. 1-2 decades). The low/moderate concern group are those species that generally do not have this capacity over the timeframes discussed and therefore are not expected to be mapped with regularity, but can
be mapped, if in the judgement of the observer their coverage, density or distribution is suppressing the viability, density, or growth of planted woody stems. Decisions as to whether remediation will be needed are based on the integration
of risk factors by EEP such as species present, their coverage, distribution relative to native biomass, and the practicality of treatment. For example, even modest amounts of Kudzu or Japanese Knotweed early in the projects history will
warrant control, but potentially large coverages of Microstegium in the herb layer will not likley trigger control because of the limited capacities to impact tree/shrub layers within the timeframes discussed and the potential impacts of
treating extensive amounts of ground cover. Those species with the "watch list" designator in gray shade are of interest as well, but have yet to be observed across the state with any frequency. Those in red italics are of particular
interest given their extreme risk/threat level for mapping as points where isolated specimens are found, particularly ealry in a projects monitoring history. However, areas of discreet, dense patches will of course be mapped as polygons.
The symbology scheme below was one that was found to be helpful for symbolzing invasives polygons, particulalry for situations where the conditon for an area is somewhere between isolated specimens and dense, discreet patches. In
any case, the point or polygon/area feature can be symbolized to describe things like high or low concern and species can be listed as a map inset, in legend items if the number of species are limited or in the narrative section of the
executive summary.
Veg Plot 1 (MY-00)Veg Plot 2 April 27, 2018 (MY-00)
Veg Plot 3(MY-00)Veg Plot 4 April 13, 2018 (MY-00)
Photo Not Taken at MY-00/Baseline
Photo Not Taken at MY-00/Baseline
Veg Plot 5 April 13, 2018 (MY-00)Veg Plot 6 April 13, 2018 (MY-00)
Veg Plot 7 April 13, 2018 (MY-00)

Lake Wendell Mitigation Project (Riparian Buffer Mitigation)
Appendix C – Vegetation Plot Data

Table 6. Planted Stem Counts
Lake Wendell Mitigation Project (NCDMS Project No. 97081)
Monitoring Year 00-2018
PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T
Acer rubrum Red Maple Tree 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 7 7 7
Alnus serrulata Tag Alder, Smooth Alder, Hazel Alder Shrub Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3
Betula nigra River Birch, Red Birch Tree 1 1 1 4 4 4 3 3 3 4 4 4 12 12 12
Carpinus caroliniana Ironwood Shrub Tree 1 1 1 3 3 3 1 1 1 5 5 5
Cornus amomum Silky Dogwood Shrub Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3
Diospyros virginiana American Persimmon, Possumwood Tree 2 2 2 2 2 2
Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash, Red Ash Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 4 4
Ilex verticillata Winterberry Shrub Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1
Lindera benzoin Northern Spicebush Shrub Tree 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 2 3 3 3 8 8 8
Liriodendron tulipifera Tulip Tree Tree 3 3 3 1 1 1 8 8 8 3 3 3 3 3 3 1 1 1 8 8 8 27 27 27
Magnolia virginiana Sweetbay Magnolia Shrub Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 8 8 8
Platanus occidentalis Sycamore, Plane-tree Tree 4 4 4 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 4 4 4 2 2 2 4 4 4 18 18 18
Quercus michauxii Basket Oak, Swamp Chestnut Oak Tree 1 1 1 3 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 7 7
Quercus nigra Water Oak, Paddle Oak Tree 1 1 1 4 4 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 9 9 9
Quercus phellos Willow Oak Tree 4 4 4 1 1 1 2 2 2 3 3 3 1 1 1 11 11 11
13 13 13 13 13 13 21 21 21 22 22 22 17 17 17 16 16 16 23 23 23 125 125 125
8 8 8 7 7 7 8 8 8 11 11 11 9 9 9 10 10 10 9 9 9 15 15 15
526.1 526.1 526.1 526.1 526.1 526.1 849.8 849.8 849.8 890.3 890.3 890.3 688 688 688 647.5 647.5 647.5 930.8 930.8 930.8 722.7 722.7 722.7
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Stem count
Current Plot Data (MY0 2018)Annual Means
Scientific Name Common Name Species Type
001-01-0001 001-01-0002 001-01-0003 001-01-0004 001-01-0005 001-01-0006 001-01-0007 MY0 (2018)
size (ares)1 1 1 1 71 1 1
0.02 0.02 0.170.02
Stems per ACRE
0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
Species count
size (ACRES)

Lake Wendell Mitigation Project (Riparian Buffer Mitigation)
Appendix D – NC DWR Correspondence and Approvals

Water Resources
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
April 28, 2016
Scott Hunt
Water & Land Solutions, LLC
11030 Raven Ridge Rd, Suite 119
Raleigh, NC 27614
(via electronic mail)
PAT MCCRORY
Governor
DONALD R. VAN DER VAART
Secretary
S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
Director
DWR Project #: 2016-0385
Re: Site Viability for Buffer Mitigation & Nutrient Offset — Lake Wendell
Located near 2869 Wendell Rd, Wendell, NC
Johnston County
Dear Mr. Hunt,
On April 8, 2016, Katie Merritt, with the Division of Water Resources (DWR), assisted you and
others from Water & Land Solutions, LLC at the proposed Lake Wendell Mitigation Site (Site)
in Wendell, NC. The Site is located in the Neuse River Basin within the 8 -digit Hydrologic Unit
Code 03020201. The Site is being proposed as part of a full -delivery stream restoration project
for the Division of Mitigation Services (RFP #16-006477). The Interagency Review Team (IRT)
was also present onsite. At your request, Ms. Merritt performed a site assessment of features onsite
to determine suitability for buffer and nutrient offset mitigation. Features are more accurately shown
in the attached maps signed by Ms. Merritt on April 20, 2016. If approved, mitigating this site could
provide stream mitigation credits, riparian buffer credits and/or nutrient offset credits.
Ms. Merritt's evaluation of features from Top of Bank (TOB) out to 200' for buffer and nutrient
offset mitigation pursuant to Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (effective November 1, 2015) and Rule
15A NCAC 02B .0240 is provided in the table below:
Feature
Classification
15ubiect
Adjacent Landuses
Buffer
2Nutrient
Mitigation Type/Comments
to Buffer
Credit
Offset Viable
Rule
Viable
at 2,273
lbs acre
R1 (above
Modified
Yes
narrow buffer of
Yes"
No
Enhancement per 15A NCAC 02B
pipe)
Natural
Mixed native
.0295 (b)(4) in entire 50' from TOB
Stream
hardwood & pine
forest
R1 (piped
Piped stream
Yes"
managed lawn
Yes"
No
Restoration
portion —
fence line)
R1 (below
Modified
Yes
pasture actively
Yes
Yes
Restoration
fence line —
natural
grazed by cattle
R5
stream
confluence)
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Water Resources
1617 Mail service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
919 807 6300

Lake Wendell Mitigation Site
April 28, 2016
Page 2 of 2
R2
Stream
Yes
Pasture actively
Yes
Yes (outside of
Narrow closed canopy = Enhancement
grazed by cattle and
forested area)
per 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(6);
narrow closed canopy
Outside of forested areas =
of native hardwoods
Restoration
R3
Ag Pond (to
Yes
Pasture actively
Yes3
Yes
Restoration (if pond is drained, a
be drained)
grazed by cattle
stream channel has to develop to be
viable for any credit)
R4
Stream
Yes
Native hardwood
Yes
No
Preservation per 15A NCAC 02B .0295
forest, closed canopy
(o)(5)
R5
Undetermined
Not on
Pasture actively
n/a
Yes
Need stream determination by DWR;
conveyance
maps
grazed by cattle
if feature is a stream, feature is viable
for buffer restoration per 15A NCAC
02B .0295 (o)(3)
'Subjectivity calls were determined using the 1:24,000 scale quadrangle topographic map prepared by USGS and the most
recent printed version of the soil survey map prepared by the NRCS
2For nutrient offset viability to be determined, the landowner must provide proof in writing that the land is being used for
agriculture or has been used for agriculture previously (prior to rule baseline). Dates, supported by photos or other
written records, must be included to confirm that the uses of the open fields onsite are/were for hay crop cultivation/row
crop/cattle.
'Feature has been piped or is a pond, but has potential for buffer mitigation if feature is restored into a stream.
Maps showing the project site and the features are provided and signed by Ms. Merritt on April
20, 2016. This letter should be provided in all future mitigation plans for this Site. In addition,
all vegetative plantings, performance criteria and other mitigation requirements for riparian
restoration, enhancement and preservation must follow the requirements in 15A NCAC 02B
.0295 to be eligible for buffer and nutrient offset credits. Where buffer and nutrient offset credits
are viable in the same area, only one credit type is allowed to be generated for credit, not both.
For any areas depicted as not being viable for nutrient offset credit, one could propose a different
measure other than riparian restoration enhancement, along with supporting calculations and
sufficient detail to support estimates of load reduction, for review by the DWR to determine
viability for nutrient offset according to 15A NCAC 02B .0240.
Please contact Katie Merritt at (919)-807-6371 if you have any questions regarding this
correspondence.
Sincerely,
Karen Higgins, Supervi
401 and Buffer Permitti
KAH/km
Attachments: Site Aerial Map, USGS Topographic Map, NRCS Soil Survey
cc:File Copy (Katie Merritt)
DMS — Jeff Schaffer (via electronic mail)

0
iW
w
O
c.
�yY�y
ca •E to U
O L
U� zo
z
9�
0�
'
�
co 7
O
H
2 C
V.-
(jd U
m
e
N
00
r+
. i
o
A
O
L4r1
rn
.4
o
r4
o
-i
*
O
L�r1
0i3-
rn
rri
v
G
O
O
C
'C
•a
Q �
u
O O
3
c o
y
� O
a
�
y d
v o
W cn
f
Q
E
o
m
O
Y
C A
Em
E
y
NCD
ZZ
ami °
z
©
to U
U w
f0
=
J
G
O L
m
V)
}
C H
u
Z
O
Z
C)
e o
U
c
C
�
n, H
, 0
N L
U
Cc
z
z
m
o
o
Z m
c
Q 0
Q
E
a
CM c
L
.�.
WO
-i
N
O
m
m
Ln
0
V)
c d..
OD
ON
01
00
m
x
M O
W
O
b a
�
O
Q
s
w4
N
m
I�t
u,
'
K
m
cc
cr
v
�
� G
0
iW
w
O
c.
�yY�y
ca •E to U
O L
U� zo
z
9�
0�
= E
y d
W cn
f
Q
E
o
m
O
Em
E
y
NCD
ami °
o m
C
to U
U w
tm
OG1 •
J
0
iW
w
O
c.
�yY�y
ca •E to U
O L
U� zo
z
9�
0�

fl - t ri 4r
jdk
M:� e
�\ tl+ � •�q
mss.
y �c
dd y �i
..;-r i r d�`,. � y,. •, � �. r .4 L�._+v � .sem � + � :~� �, �� ,,� ,.
WD
Ok
0 AN
IA
RL A
p
-.� .� ��l�g� oma-. '' ,��" r'.�' �g � !•' av ,9'i' +� .,✓��'
•
^k �. ., y .2 �+ C \ ~ \�1;4'7���,2,,, � d _3 M l,L.wr�' "i. �'—1 . F'-• �] , :.P, - j
' " `yfc .,. _. �'v�. ,�� ..9i J s ...-•�•. �' i#t , l' -'-F .� q
9 ,.. /• ..� i%,� r y;� a+v-.�'': � � t� 'i Vit/ ' ' J� #'° :.d� .
,l+'•r ray r _� ..�.�•.+� '� ,. A �'' 1' '.�
�n , �". �f���' � _ .>!'�t„ - t. d 4 f. c "':�s�i}!>r�p- _ ;iRfp+ i ' • � �f�l�,
"'": ,�,.�'.�!'°' y�, • � � ��q! ;,1;�* ,' F �i.� a„ �..- Ott' �. sr :.: ��w', . �� ,.,
,T►-, _.
T ,
Vii+. _ •►` 7 I'' Or
CCC \ .4 v z s,�,, t i af" ip ,c ms i i'+✓ < [[,, 'y'`.R-.� • ' R` Eye'!
tiJI
Vul
• 1 N
yrn
FCC
oa-Aw 5, 01, WKij
f
WIN
all,
OMM
a -
ItN
rte: � ++�`+,; �.'•,������ :y,.,l. i"f.�f � �' 1 �\.
' r
` ,�, \ � Frr-•cj,- 1:� y.,.,y � `•, -q� Rr �y, y^i''^��f �'�r Y+'+t. .7��`T 4� � #�%, <. �,�,'#`y
�h t,.a��c�. �L� !,. c- "R"'s'� .S''.L�.^.� i -9- ,u�i r iYwR _ ,�L�►� r 1��"✓ <�tl.Al'� i ".+C'1 � � _

NC USGS Topo & Parcels Map
April 20, 2016
Olfk y jao Itu
ab1Lo-- D3ES
,Lgi Wmol [I she.
1:6,528
0 0.075 0.15 0.3 mi
0 0.1 0.2 0.4 km
Participating NC Counties, NCCGIA, NC One Map, US EPA
bgeorgou

Lake Wendell Mitigation Project (Riparian Buffer Mitigation)
Appendix E – As-Built Plans / Record Drawings

NC DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY - DIVISION OF MITIGATION SERVICES
LAKE WENDELL MITIGATION PROJECT
VICINITY MAP
N.T.S.
P OJECT
�OCATION ` a
\ �y
W1 LAKE`ENDEILL I
/
4_-1
LAKE WENDELL ROAD /
JQ`
NCDEQ-DMS CONTRACT ADMINISTRATOR:
KRISTIE CORSON
1652 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH, NC 27699-1652
PH:919-707-8935
SHEET INDEX
1
COVER SHEET
2
LEGEND/CONSTRUCTION
Proposed Stream
Mitigation Credits
(SMCs)
SEQUENCE /GENERAL
Stream Restoration
NOTES
3
TYPICAL SECTIONS
4-7
DETAILS
8-14
PLAN AND PROFILE
15-18
REVEGETATION PLAN
SHEET 18---
JOHNSTON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
NCDEQ - DMS PROJECT ID # 97081
NCDEQ - DMS CONTRACT #6826 UNDER RFP 16-006477
NEUSE RIVER BASIN (CU 03020201)
USACE ACTION ID # SAW -2016-00876
TYPE OF WORK: AS -BUILT PLANS FOR STREAM AND RIPARIAN
BUFFER MITIGATION
PROJECT SUMMARY
END CONSTRUCTION R3 -
BEGIN CONSTRUCTION R4
STATION 41+00.00
END CONSTRUCTION R4
STATION 49+22.89
/
SHEET 13 / SHE 1:
�— CE m
GE A
CE CE
30 30
�O
33 33
Project Reach
Designation
Type of Mitigation
Stream Length
(LF)
Ratio (X:1)
Proposed Stream
Mitigation Credits
(SMCs)
R7
Stream Restoration
805
1
806
R2
Stream Restoration
995
1
995
R3
Stream Restoration
1,208
1
1,208
R4 (uppenlower)
Stream Preservation
711
10
71
R4 (middle)
Stream Enhancement II
111
2.5
44
RS (upper)
Stream Restoration
210
1
210
RS Bower)
Stream Enhancement II
144
2.5
58
Total
4,185
3,392
Note 1: No mitigadon credits were calculated outside the conservation easement boundaries.
END CONSTRUCTION R2 -
BEGIN CONSTRUCTION R3
STATION 28+32.00
SHEET 17_\
ET 11 --
/ CE �
/ Ge / GE R3
GF
CERTIFICATE OF AS -BUILT SURVEY AND ACCURACY
I, CURK T. LANE, CERTIFY THATTHE AS -BUILT GROUND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY INFORMATION
DEPICTED ON THESE PLANS WAS PROVIDED FROM AN ACTUAL SURVEY MADE UNDER MY DIRECT
SUPERVISION; THAT THESE AS -BUILT PLANS/RECORD DRAWINGS WERE PREPARED BY WLS
ENGINEERING, PLLC, FOR WATER & LAND SOLUTIONS, LLC, AND WERE CREATED FROM THE AS -BUILT
SURVEY DIGITAL FILES PROVIDED BY TRUE LINE SURVEYING, P.C.; THAT THE REFERENCED SURVEY WAS
PERFORMED AT THE 95% CONFIDENCE LEVEL TO MEET THE FEDERAL GEOGRAPHIC DATA COMMITTEE
STANDARDS; THAT THE REFERENCED SURVEY WAS PERFORMED TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS FOR A
TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY TO THE ACCURACY OF CLASS A HORIZONTAL AND CLASS C VERTICAL, WHERE
APPLICABLE; THAT THE CONTOURS SHOWN AS BROKEN LINES MAY NOT MEET THE STATED STANDARD
AND ALL COORDINATES ARE BASED ON NAD 83 (NSRS 2011) AND ALL ELEVATIONS ARE BASED ON
NAVD 88; THAT THE AS -BUILT GROUND TOPOGRAPHIC MAPPING MEETS THE SPECIFICATIONS FOR
TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEYS AS STATED IN TITLE 21, CHAPTER 56, SECTION 1606; THAT THE AS -BUILT
GROUND TOPOGRAPHIC MAPPING WAS NOT PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH G.S. 47-30, AS
AMENDED, AND DOES NOT REPRESENT AN OFFICIAL BOUNDARY SURVEY.
WITNESS MY ORIGINAL SIGNATURE, REGISTRATION NUMBER, AND SEAL THIS THE 29th DAY OF
NOVEMBER, 2018
OFFICIAL SEAL
CAR �i
\� Q``����rESSlpti�i�il/!/%
7
SEAL = __
L-3990
^� 0
Z) 111 F,4
1
CURK T. LANE, PLS L-3990
BEGIN CONSTRUCTION R1
STATION 10+00.00
SHEET 16� SHEET 15
SHEET 10
— — SHEET 9 SHEET 8
7—
CE �_ CE CE O� 1 �E m 1 cR1 G� sse`
—� CE
w — CE G_ 3 CE C 6- �O
30 _
O C3 00 0 ��- ---30 R2 E —1-11
/ 30 Off,
30 _
is— 30 — 30 30
NF
W.ODELL ELAVAFWS REVOCABLE TRUST
OB 1900 PG 478
DB 910 PG 218
ON 1OK02037A
APPROXIMATE PROJECT CENTER
35.73739100 N
-78.35380500 W END CONSTRUCTION R5
STATION 13+55.51
END RV BEGIN CONSTUCTION R2
STATION 18+37.19
30 — 3O
SHEET 14—J
LU
30
7
DRAFTMITPLAN
Proposed Buffer
Project
FINAL DRAFT MIT PLAN
5/26117
Mitigation Credits
Component
Type of Mitigation
Buffer Area (SF)
Ratio (X:1) (BMCS)
Buffer Group 1
Riparian Buffer Restoration
342,525
1 342,693
Riparian Buffer
Buffer Group 2
Enhancement
44,852
2 22,426
Riparian Buffer
Buffer Group 3
Preservation
103,100
10 10,410
Total
1
490,477
1 375,529
Note 1: No mitigadon credits were calculated outside the conservation easement boundaries.
END CONSTRUCTION R2 -
BEGIN CONSTRUCTION R3
STATION 28+32.00
SHEET 17_\
ET 11 --
/ CE �
/ Ge / GE R3
GF
CERTIFICATE OF AS -BUILT SURVEY AND ACCURACY
I, CURK T. LANE, CERTIFY THATTHE AS -BUILT GROUND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY INFORMATION
DEPICTED ON THESE PLANS WAS PROVIDED FROM AN ACTUAL SURVEY MADE UNDER MY DIRECT
SUPERVISION; THAT THESE AS -BUILT PLANS/RECORD DRAWINGS WERE PREPARED BY WLS
ENGINEERING, PLLC, FOR WATER & LAND SOLUTIONS, LLC, AND WERE CREATED FROM THE AS -BUILT
SURVEY DIGITAL FILES PROVIDED BY TRUE LINE SURVEYING, P.C.; THAT THE REFERENCED SURVEY WAS
PERFORMED AT THE 95% CONFIDENCE LEVEL TO MEET THE FEDERAL GEOGRAPHIC DATA COMMITTEE
STANDARDS; THAT THE REFERENCED SURVEY WAS PERFORMED TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS FOR A
TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY TO THE ACCURACY OF CLASS A HORIZONTAL AND CLASS C VERTICAL, WHERE
APPLICABLE; THAT THE CONTOURS SHOWN AS BROKEN LINES MAY NOT MEET THE STATED STANDARD
AND ALL COORDINATES ARE BASED ON NAD 83 (NSRS 2011) AND ALL ELEVATIONS ARE BASED ON
NAVD 88; THAT THE AS -BUILT GROUND TOPOGRAPHIC MAPPING MEETS THE SPECIFICATIONS FOR
TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEYS AS STATED IN TITLE 21, CHAPTER 56, SECTION 1606; THAT THE AS -BUILT
GROUND TOPOGRAPHIC MAPPING WAS NOT PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH G.S. 47-30, AS
AMENDED, AND DOES NOT REPRESENT AN OFFICIAL BOUNDARY SURVEY.
WITNESS MY ORIGINAL SIGNATURE, REGISTRATION NUMBER, AND SEAL THIS THE 29th DAY OF
NOVEMBER, 2018
OFFICIAL SEAL
CAR �i
\� Q``����rESSlpti�i�il/!/%
7
SEAL = __
L-3990
^� 0
Z) 111 F,4
1
CURK T. LANE, PLS L-3990
BEGIN CONSTRUCTION R1
STATION 10+00.00
SHEET 16� SHEET 15
SHEET 10
— — SHEET 9 SHEET 8
7—
CE �_ CE CE O� 1 �E m 1 cR1 G� sse`
—� CE
w — CE G_ 3 CE C 6- �O
30 _
O C3 00 0 ��- ---30 R2 E —1-11
/ 30 Off,
30 _
is— 30 — 30 30
NF
W.ODELL ELAVAFWS REVOCABLE TRUST
OB 1900 PG 478
DB 910 PG 218
ON 1OK02037A
APPROXIMATE PROJECT CENTER
35.73739100 N
-78.35380500 W END CONSTRUCTION R5
STATION 13+55.51
END RV BEGIN CONSTUCTION R2
STATION 18+37.19
30 — 3O
SHEET 14—J
LU
30
STATION 10+00.00
I
'4WATER 8L LAND
SOLUTIONS
7721 Six Forks Rd., Suite 130
Raleigh, NC 27615
(919)614-51 1 1
watedandsolutions.com
PROJECT ENGINEER
`�Oeo�OF �S eoe �%
_i419
�NGI�F�°
e°
////1111111111
ENGINEERING SERVICES BY
WLS ENGINEERING, PLLC
FIRM LICENSE NO. P-1480
REVISIONS
7
DRAFTMITPLAN
4124117
B
FINAL DRAFT MIT PLAN
5/26117
C
-J
BEGIN CONDUCTION RS
STATION 10+00.00
I
'4WATER 8L LAND
SOLUTIONS
7721 Six Forks Rd., Suite 130
Raleigh, NC 27615
(919)614-51 1 1
watedandsolutions.com
PROJECT ENGINEER
`�Oeo�OF �S eoe �%
_i419
�NGI�F�°
e°
////1111111111
ENGINEERING SERVICES BY
WLS ENGINEERING, PLLC
FIRM LICENSE NO. P-1480
REVISIONS
A
DRAFTMITPLAN
4124117
B
FINAL DRAFT MIT PLAN
5/26117
C
FINAL MIT PLAN
8/21117
D
ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION
11!7117
E
AS -BUILT
11/30118
NO. DESCRIPTION DATE
PROJECT NAME
LAKE
WENDELL
MITIGATION
PROJECT
JOHNSTON COUNTY, NC
DRAWING INFORMATION
PROJECT NO.: 97081
FILENAME .01 LAKE WENDELL_COVER.DWC
DESIGNED BY: KMVM/SH
DRAWN BY: APL
DATE', 11-30-18
HORIZ. SCALE: 1"= 150'
VERT. SCALE : NIA
NORTH
150 75 0 150 300
GRAPHIC SCALE
SHEET NAME
COVER
SHEET
SHEET NUMBER
1

LEGEND
4
ADRAFT
MIT PLAN
ROOTWAD
B
LOG VANE
5126/17
LOG WEIR
\A
LOG STEP -POOL
D
STONE AND LOG STEP -POOL
pD
CONSTRUCTED STONE RIFFLE
00 D o00
11130118
II�III
CONSTRUCTED LOG RIFFLE
GRADE CONTROL LOG J -HOOK VANE
GEOLIFT W1 TOEWOOD
=�=��=i
PROPOSED OUTLET CHANNEL
- FP FP
100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN
OHPL
EXISTING OVERHEAD ELECTRIC
- CE
100
101
- LD
- C/F
U) -
CIF -
TEMPORARY STREAM CROSSING
PERMANENT STREAM CROSSING
PROPOSED CONSERVATION EASEMENT BOUNDARY
EXISTING MAJOR CONTOUR
EXISTING MINOR CONTOUR
PROPOSED MAJOR CONTOUR
PROPOSED MINOR CONTOUR
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
CUTIFILL LIMITS
EXISTING WETLAND BOUNDARY
EXISTING WOODUNE
PROPOSED TOP OF STREAM BANK
EXISTING PROPERTY BOUNDARY
EXISTING FENCE
PROPOSED CENTERLINE (THALWEG)
PROPOSED FIELD FENCE
PROPOSED TREE PROTECTION FENCE
EXISTING FARM PATH
PROPOSED FARM PATH
EXISTING TREE
PROPOSED WATER QUALITY TREATMENT FEATURE
CHANNELBLOCK
CHANNEL FILL
PROPOSED GATE
EXISTING STRUCTURE
EXISTING WETLAND AREA
CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE
THE ENGINEER WILL PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION DURING THE
CONSTRUCTION PHASE OF THIS PROJECT. THE GENERAL CONSTRUCTION
SEQUENCE SHALL BE USED DURING IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT
CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO THE APPROVED PERMITS FOR
SPECIFIC CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE ITEMS AND SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR
FOLLOWING THE APPROVED PLANS AND PERMIT CONDITIONS.
1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY -NC 811" (1-800-632-4949) BEFORE ANY
EXCAVATION BEGINS. ANY UTILITIES AND RESPECTIVE EASEMENTS SHOWN ON THE
PLANS ARE CONSIDERED APPROXIMATE AND THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE
ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR
LOCATING ALL UTILITIES AND ADJOINING EASEMENTS AND SHALL REPAIR OR
REPLACE ANY DAMAGED UTILITIES AT HISMER OWN EXPENSE.
2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MOBILIZE EQUIPMENT, MATERIALS AND PREPARE STAGING
AREA(S) AND STOCKPILE AREA(S) AND HAUL ROADS AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS.
3. CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC SHALL BE RESTRICTED TO THE PROJECT AREA
BOUNDARIES OR AS DENOTED "LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE" OR'HAUL ROADS" ON THE
PLANS.
4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL APPROVED TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATION AND
EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AT LOCATIONS INDICATED ON THE PLANS.
5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL TEMPORARY SILT FENCE AROUND ALL STAGING
AREA(S). TEMPORARY SILT FENCING WILL ALSO BE PLACED AROUND THE
TEMPORARY STOCKPILE AREAS AS MATERIAL IS STOCKPILED THROUGHOUT THE
CONSTRUCTION PERIOD.
6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ALL TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT STREAM
CROSSINGS AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SEDIMENTATION
AND EROSION CONTROL PERMIT. THE EXISTING CHANNEL AND DITCHES ON SITE
WILL REMAIN OPEN DURING THE INITIAL STAGES OF CONSTRUCTION TO ALLOW FOR
DRAINAGE AND TO MAINTAIN SITE ACCESSIBILITY.
7, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSTRUCT ONLY THE PORTION OF THE PROPOSED
CHANNEL THAT CAN BE COMPLETED AND STABILIZED WITHIN THE SAME DAY. THE
CONTRACTOR SHALL APPLY TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT SEEDING, MATTING AND
MULCHING TO ALL DISTURBED AREAS AT THE END OF EACH WORK DAY.
8. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CLEAR AND GRUB AN AREA ADEQUATE TO CONSTRUCT
THE STREAM CHANNEL AND GRADING OPERATIONS AFTER ALL SEDIMENTATION AND
EROSION CONTROL PRACTICES HAVE BEEN INSTALLED AND APPROVED. IN
GENERAL, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL WORK FROM UPSTREAM TO DOWNSTREAM AND
IN -STREAM STRUCTURES AND CHANNEL FILL MATERIAL SHALL BE INSTALLED USING
A PUMP -AROUND OR FLOW DIVERSION MEASURE AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS,
9. THE CONTRACTOR WILL BEGIN CONSTRUCTION BY EXCAVATING CHANNEL FILL
MATERIAL IN AREAS ALONG THE EXISTING CHANNEL. THE CONTRACTOR MAY FILL
DITCHES WHICH DO NOT CONTAIN ANY WATER DURING THE GRADING OPERATIONS.
ALONG DITCHES WITH WATER OR STREAM REACHES, EXCAVATED MATERIAL SHOULD
BE STOCKPILED IN DESIGNATED AREAS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. IN ANY AREAS
WHERE EXCAVATION DEPTHS WILL EXCEED TEN INCHES, TOPSOIL SHALL BE
SEPARATED, STOCKPILED AND PLACED BACK OVER THESE AREAS TO A DEPTH OF
EIGHT INCHES TO ACHIEVE DESIGN GRADES AND CREATE A SOIL BASE FOR
VEGETATION PLANTING ACCORDING TO THE DESIGN PLANS AND CONSTRUCTION
SPECIFICATIONS.
10. CONTRACTOR SHALL BEGIN DESIGN CHANNEL CONSTRUCTION AT STATION 10+00
AND PROCEED IN A DOWNSTREAM DIRECTION. THE DESIGN CHANNEL SHOULD BE
CONSTRUCTED OFFLINE AND/OR IN THE DRY WHENEVER POSSIBLE.
11. AFTER EXCAVATING THE CHANNEL TO DESIGN GRADES, INSTALL IN -STREAM
STRUCTURES, GRASSING, MATTING, AND TEMPORARY VEGETATION IN THIS SECTION,
AND READY THE CHANNEL TO ACCEPT FLOW PER APPROVAL BY THE ENGINEER.
12. FLOWING WATER MAY BE TURNED INTO THE CONSTRUCTED CHANNEL ONCE THE
AREA IN AND AROUND THE NEW CHANNEL HAS BEEN STABILIZED. IMMEDIATELY
BEGIN PLUGGING, FILLING, AND GRADING THE ABANDONED CHANNEL, AS INDICATED
ON PLANS, MOVING IN A DOWNSTREAM DIRECTION TO ALLOW FOR DRAINAGE OF THE
OLD CHANNELS. NO FLOWING WATER SHALL BE TURNED INTO ANY SECTION OF
RESTORED CHANNEL PRIOR TO THE CHANNEL BEING COMPLETELY STABILIZED WITH
ALL IN -STREAM STRUCTURES INSTALLED.
13. THE NEW CHANNEL SECTIONS AND FARM POND AREA SHALL REMAIN OPEN ON THE
DOWNSTREAM END TO ALLOW FOR DRAINAGE DURING RAIN EVENTS.
14. ANY GRADING ACTIVITIES ADJACENT TO THE EXISTING OR LIVE STREAM CHANNEL
SHALL BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO TURNING WATER INTO THE NEW STREAM CHANNEL
SEGMENTS. GRADING ACTIVITIES SHALL NOT BE PERFORMED WITHIN 10 FEET OF
THE NEW STREAM CHANNEL BANKS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT GRADE OR
ROUGHEN ANY AREAS WHERE EXCAVATION ACTIVITIES HAVE NOT BEEN
COMPLETED.
15, ONCE A STREAM WORK PHASE IS COMPLETE, APPLY TEMPORARY SEEDING TO ANY
AREAS DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION WITHIN HOURS AND ALL SLOPES
STEEPER THAN 3:1 SHALL BE STABILIZED WITH GROUND COVER AS SOON AS
PRACTICABLE WITHIN 7 CALENDAR DAYS, ALL OTHER DISTURBED AREAS AND
SLOPES FLATTER THAN 3:1 SHALL BE STABILIZED WITHIN 14 CALENDAR DAYS FRO
THE LAST LAND -DISTURBING ACTIVITY.
16. PERMANENT SEEDING SHALL BE PLACED ON ALL DISTURBED AREAS WITHIN 15
WORKING DAYS OR 90 CALENDAR DAYS (WHICHEVER IS SHORTER) FOLLOWING
COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHOULD HAVE
ESTABLISHED GROUND COVER PRIOR TO DEMOBILIZATION. REMOVE ANY
TEMPORARY STREAM CROSSINGS AND TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL MEASURES.
17. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TREAT AREAS OF INVASIVE SPECIES VEGETATION
THROUGHOUTTHE PROJECT AREA ACCORDING TO THE DESIGN PLANS AND
CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS PRIOR TO DEMOBILIZATION.
18. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PLANT WOODY VEGETATION AND LIVE STAKES,
ACCORDING TO PLANTING DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL
COMPLETE THE REFORESTATION PHASE OF THE PROJECT AND APPLY PERMANENT
SEEDING AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME OF THE YEAR.
19. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OFF-SITE REMOVAL OF ALL TRASH.
EXCESS BACKFILL, AND ANY OTHER INCIDENTAL MATERIALS PRIOR TO
DEMOBILIZATION OF EQUIPMENT FROM THE SITE. THE DISPOSAL AND STOCKPILE
LOCATIONS SELECTED MUST BE APPROVED TO THE ENGINEER AND ANY FEES SHALL
BE PAID FOR BY THE CONTRACTOR.
GENERAL NOTES
1. THE PROJECT SITE IS LOCATED IN JOHNSTON COUNTY,NORTH CAROLINA,
APPROXIMATELY 3.0 MILES SOUTH OF THE TOWN OF WENDELL AS SHOWN
ON THE COVER SHEET VICINITY MAP. TO ACCESS THE SITEFROM
RALEIGH, TAKE 1-440 E AND US -264 EIUS-64 E TO MARKS CREEK. TAKE EXIT
427 FROM US -264 E/US-64 E (14.7 MI) AND CONTINUE ON WENDELL FALLS
PARKWAY. TAKE EAGLE ROCK ROAD AND STOTTS MILL ROAD TO WENDELL
ROAD. TAKE A RIGHT ONTO THE GRAVEL ENTRANCEAT 2869
WENDELL ROAD. FOLLOW THE FARM ROAD TO THE SITE BOUNDARY.
2. THE PROJECT SITE BOUNDARIES ARE SHOWN ON THE DESIGN PLANS AS THE PROPOSED
CONSERVATION EASEMENT. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM ALL RELATED WORK
ACTIVITIES WITHIN THE PROJECT SITE BOUNDARIES AND/OR WITHIN THE LIMITS OF
DISTURBANCE (LOD). THE PROJECT SITE SHALL BE ACCESSED THROUGH THE DESIGNATED
ACCESS POINTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR
MAINTAINING PERMITTED ACCESS THROUGHOUT ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.
3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE ALL NECESSARY PRECAUTIONS AND MEASURES TO
PROTECT ALL PROPERTIES FROM DAMAGE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR ALL DAMAGE
CAUSED BY HIS/HER OPERATIONS TO ALL PUBLIC AND PRIVATE PROPERTY AND LEAVE THE
PROPERTY IN GOOD CONDITION AND/OR AT LEAST EQUIVALENT TO THE
PRE -CONSTRUCTION CONDITIONS. UPON COMPLETION OF ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES,
THE AREA IS TO BE RESTORED TO A CONDITION EQUAL TO OR BETTER THAN FOUND PRIOR
TO CONSTRUCTION.
4. THE TOPOGRAPHIC BASE MAP WAS DEVELOPED USING SURVEY DATA COLLECTED BY
WITHERSRAVENEL, INC. (WR) IN THE FALL OF 2016. THE HORIZONTAL DATUM WAS TIED TO
NA083 NC STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM, US SURVEY FEET AND NAVD88 VERTICAL
DATUM USING VRS NETWORK AND NCGS MONUMENT. IT IS POSSIBLE THAT EXISTING
ELEVATIONS AND SITE CONOTIONS MAY HAVE CHANGED SINCE THE ORIGINAL SURVEY WAS
COMPLETED DUE TO EROSION, AND/OR SEDIMENT ACCRETION. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S
RESPONSIBILITY TO CONFIRM EXISTING GRADES AND ADJUST QUANTITIES, EARTHWORK,
AND WORK EFFORTS AS NECESSARY.
5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VISIT THE CONSTRUCTION SITE AND THOROUGHLY FAMILIARIZE
HIM/HERSELF WITH ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS. PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION. THE
CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE ACCURACY AND COMPLETENESS OF THE CONSTRUCTION
SPECIFICATIONS AND DESIGN PLANS REGARDING THE NATURE AND EXTENT OF THE WORK
DESCRIBED.
S. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BRING ANY DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN THE CONSTRUCTION
PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND/OR FIELD CONDITIONS TO THE ATTENTION OF THE
SPONSORS ENGINEER BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BEGINS.
7. THERE SHALL BE NO CLEARING OR REMOVAL OF ANY NATIVE SPECIES VEGETATION OR
TREES OF SIGNIFICANCE, OTHER THAN THOSE INDICATED ON THE PLANS OR AS DIRECTED
BY THE ENGINEER.
8. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL EXERCISE CARE DURING GRADING ACTIVITIES IN THE VICINITY OF
NATIVE VEGETATION AND TREES OF SIGNIFICANCE AT THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. ALL
GRADING IN THE VICINITY OF TREES NOT IDENTIFIED FOR REMOVAL SHALL BE MADE IN A
MANNER THAT DOES NOT DISTURB THE ROOT SYSTEM WITHIN THE DRIP LINE OF THE TREE.
9, WORK ACTIVITIES ARE BEING PERFORMED AS AN ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION PLAN
NEAR PRIVATE RESIDENCES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE ALL REASONABLE EFFORTS
TO REDUCE SEDIMENT LOSS, PROTECT PUBLIC SAFETY, AND MINIMIZE DISTURBANCE OF
THE SITE WHILE PERFORMING THE CONSTRUCTION WORK. ALL AREAS SHALL BE KEPT
NEAT, CLEAN, AND FREE OF ALL TRASH AND DEBRIS, AND ALL REASONABLE PRECAUTIONS
SHALL BE TAKEN TO AVOID DAMAGE TO EXISTING ROADS, VEGETATION, TURF,
STRUCTURES, AND PRIVATE PROPERTY.
10. PRIOR TO START OF WORK, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT THE SOURCE OF MATERIALS,
INCLUDING AGGREGATES, EROSION CONTROL MATTING, WOOD AND NATIVE PLANTING
MATERIAL TO THE ENGINEER FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL. NO WORK SHALL BE
PERFORMED UNTIL THE SOURCE OF MATERIAL IS APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER.
11. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE HELD SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY NECESSARY
COORDINATION BETWEEN THE VARIOUS COUNTY, STATE OR FEDERAL AGENCIES, UTILITY
COMPANIES, HISIHER SUB -CONTRACTORS, AND THE ENGINEER FOR THE DURATION OF THE
PROJECT.
12. PRIOR TO START OF WORK, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT THEIR DETAILED PLANTING
SCHEDULE TO THE ENGINEER FOR REVIEW. NO WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED UNTIL THIS
SCHEDULE IS APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. THE DETAILED PLANTING SCHEDULE SHALL
CONFORM TO THE PLANTING REVEGETATION PLAN AND SHALL INCLUDE A SPECIES LIST
AND TIMING SEQUENCE.
13. THE CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO INSTALL IN -STREAM STRUCTURES AND CULVERT PIPES
USING A BACKHOEIEXCAVATOR WITH A HYDRAULIC THUMB OF SUFFICIENT SIZE TO PLACE
STRUCTURES INCLUDING LOGS, STONE, BOULDERS, ROOT WADS. AND TEMPORARY WOOD
MAT STREAM CROSSINGS.
GRADING NOTES
1. NO GRADING ACTIVITIES SHALL OCCUR BEYOND THE
PROJECT LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE (LOD) AS SHOWN ON THE
DESIGN PLANS.
2. ONCE PROPOSED GRADES ARE ACHIEVED ALONG THE
CONSTRUCTED STREAM CHANNEL, BANKFULL BENCHES
AND FLOODPLAIN AREAS AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS,
GRADED AREAS SHALL BE ROUGHENED USING TECHNIQUES
DESCRIBED IN THE CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS.
3. ALL SUITABLE SOIL MATERIAL REQUIRED TO FILL AND/OR
PLUG EXISTING DITCHES AND/OR STREAM CHANNEL SHALL
BE GENERATED ON-SITE AS DESCRIBED IN THE
CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS. ANY EXCESS SPOIL
MATERIAL SHALL BE STOCKPILED IN DESIGNATED AREAS
AND OR HAULED OFF-SITE AS APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER.
1iWATER & LAND
SOLUTIONS
10940 Raven Ridge Rd., Suite 200
Raleigh, NC 27614
[phone]
waterlandsolutions.com
PROJECT ENGINEER
``1111111111/// ,
` CARO
�
Q�
' L =
22 67
• o oi41*
j'°��GINEF-�,^° �
'
SCOTT °\'O
"1 11111111111
ENGINEERING SERVICES BY
WLS ENGINEERING, PLLC
FIRM LICENSE NO. P-1480
REVISIONS
ADRAFT
MIT PLAN
4/24/17
B
FINAL DRAFT MIT PLAN
5126/17
C
FINAL MIT PLAN
&21/17
D
ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION
11/7/17
E
AS -BUILT
11130118
NO. DESCRIPTION DATE
PROJECT NAME
LAKE
WENDELL
MITIGATION
PROJECT
JOHNSTON COUNTY, NC
DRAWING INFORMATION
PROJECT NO.: 97081
FILENAME: 02_ WWtNDBl_GEN9KNOTES•SYWL M7DWG
DESIGNED BY: KMVAMSH
DRAWN BY APL
DATE: 11-30.18
HORIZ. SCALE: N.T.S.
VERT.SCALE: NA
SHEET NAME
LEGEND/
CONSTRUCTION
SEQUENCE/
GENERAL NOTES
SHEET NUMBER
2

EXISTIN
GROUNI
EXISTING
GROUND Wbkf
� D -max y
IV
PROPOSED
GROUND Wb
RIFFLE
N.T.S
EXISTING
GROUND
EXISTING Wbkf
GROUND
T
D -max
PROPOSED
GROUND Wb
POOL
N.T.S
PROPOSED
GROUND
RIFFLE WITH BANKFULL BENCH
N.T.S
TOP OF
POOL WITH BANKFULL BENCH
N.T.S
VARIES
OUTLET CHANNEL
N.T.S
Reach Name
R1
R2
R3
R4
R5
Feature
Riffle
Pool
Riffle
Pool
Riffle
Pool
Riffle
Pool
Riffle
Pool
Outlet Channel
Width of Bankfull, Wbkf
(ft)
5.9
7.3
6.8
8.4
7.8
10.5
8.5
11.0
4.4
5.7
3.0
Average Depth, Dbkf (ft)
0.5
0.7
0.5
0.8
0.6
0.9
0.7
1.1
0.3
0.6
N/A
Maximum Depth, D -Max
(ft)
0.6
1.2
0.7
1.5
0.7
1.7
1.0
1.9
0.5
1.1
0.5000
Width to Depth Ratio, bkf
W/D
13.0
10.3
13.0
10.1
14.0
11.1
12.0
10.2
13.0
9.2
N/A
Ban kfull Area, Abkf (sq ft)
2.7
5.2
3.6
7.0
4.4
9.9
6.0
11.9
1.5
3.5
N/A
Bottom Width, Wb (ft)
2,8
1.3
3.3
0.9
4.2
1.2
3.5
1.5
2.1
0.8
N/A
PRELIMINARY PLANS - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
WATER & LAND
SOLUTIONS
10940 Raven Ridge Rd., Suite 200
Raleigh, NC 27614
[phone]
waterlandsolutions.com
PROJECT ENGINEER
111111111111///,
1:10 CAROB
_ 22 67
e 0.99 0
e�vcINE�� °
SCOTT°
//11111111111
ENGINEERING SERVICES BY
WLS ENGINEERING, PLLC
FIRM LICENSE NO. P-1480
REVISIONS
A DRAFT MIT PLAN 4/24/17
B FINAL DRAFT MIT PLAN W6117
C FINAL MIT PLAN 8/21/17
D ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION 11/7/17
E AS RI 11/30/18
NO. DESCRIPTION DATE
PROJECT NAME
LAKE
WENDELL
MITIGATION
PROJECT
JOHNSTON COUNTY, NC
DRAWING INFORMATION
PROJECT NO.: 97081
FILENAME : O LAKE WENDELL_TYPICAL-SECT10NS.DWC
DESIGNED BY: KMVANSH
DRAWN BY. APL
DATE: 11.30.18
HORIZ. SCALE: N.T.S.
VERT. SCALE: N.T.S.
SHEET NAME
TYPICAL
SECTIONS
SHEET NUMBER
3

TOP OF EROSION CONTROL MATTING
STREAMBANK TOP OF STREAM BANK
BERM (0.5' MAX. HT.) BERM(S) TOP OF r WATER LA N C
RESTORED O NOT TO EXTEND BEYOND STREAMBANK INVERT
FLOW
STREAMBANK LIMITS OF ROOTWADS. •y ELEVATION
r0 \ SCOUR STREAMBED SOLUTIONS
`i _ _ _ _ _ _ S BANKFULL STAGE 213 BANKF L POOL
rypwy STONE BACKFILL
�Q HEADER NON -WOVEN 10940 Raven Ridge Rd., Suite 20C
OPTIONAL ` i \ LOG GEOTEXTILE FABRIC Raleigh, NC 27614
COVER LOG > EL OF ROOT MASS = BASE FLOW
IS BELOW BASE FLOW ` (919)614511 1
ROOTWAD _ ` BOULDER \ FOOTER LOG '.MINIMUM waterlandsolutions.com
(OPTIONAL) (OPTIONAL)
�(qZ _ / A�jC�Q PROJECT ENGINEER
SCOUR ENTIRE ROOTWAD TRUNK IS INVERTI / NON -WOVEN
POOL BELOW STREAMSED. COVER LOG GRADE POINT (OPTIONAL) �GEOTEXTILE FABRIC SECTION A -A
0
011 ���
SECTION A -A , ��N°
l _ ROOTWADS WITHOUT TRANSPLANTS 1 O <ES ee
- / ARM ANGLE \ ° �c
- '20' TO 30' eo� -
` ROOTWAD (TYP.) I
SCOUR
°�� L
_� 213 BANKFULL STAGE -
TRANSPLANTS BERM (0.5' MAX. HT.) TOP OF e 2 ) r `
NOT TO EXTEND BEYOND STREAMBANK / - FLOW- 4°�ZpT OQ - e O .01
•1 �°
TRANSPLANTS LIMITS OF ROOTWADS. S� e
RESTORED
RBANK l _ RESTORED STREAMBED ELEVATION PRM = e
e ^ GINE
VBANKFULL STAGE _ _ ` BOULDER �,t/ eeeoe oo oe 'eo_o `'` ' ♦`
(OPTIONAL) 1. / o,
\� TOP OF STREAM BANK �B ROOT WAD _ // C07
> 1/2 OF ROOT MASS BASE FLOW _ DOT WAD /"11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1111
PLAN VIEW IS BELOW BASE FLOW _ _ S _ _ BURY LOGS INTO
BANK AT LEAST 5' HEADER ENGINEERING SERVICES BY
ROOTWAD LOG WLS ENGINEERING, PLLC
FIRM LICENSE NO. P-1480
FOOTERLOG
PLAN VIEW (OPTIONAL) PROFILE 13-13 REVISIONS
ENTIRE D TRUNK IS COVER LOG A DRAFT MIT PLAN 4124117
BELOWSTREAMBED.
STREAMTREAMBED. (OPTIONAL) NOTES. B FINAL DRAFT MIT PLAN 5/26117
1. LOGS SHOULD BE AT LEAST 1 VIN DIAMETER, RELATIVELY STRAIGHT, HARDWOOD,
AND RECENTLY HARVESTED. C FINAL MIT PLAN B/2V17
SECTION A -A 2. SOIL SHOULD BE COMPACTED WELL AROUND BURIED PORTIONS OF LOGS. D ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION 11f7f17
NOTES:ROOTWADS WITH TRANSPLANTS 3. ROOTWADS SHOULD BE PLACED BENEATH THE HEADER LOG AND PLACED SO THAT
1. THE TRENCHING METHOD REQUIRES THAT A TRENCH BE EXCAVATED FOR IT LOCKS THE HEADER LOG INTO THE BANK. SEE ROOTWAD DETAIL. E AS -BUILT 11130118
THE LOG PORTION OF THE ROOTWAD. A COVER LOG SHOULD BE INSTALLED 4. BOULDERS OF SUFFICIENT SIZE CAN PLACED ON TOP OF HEADER LOG FOR ANCHORING,
UNDERNEATH THE ROOTWAD IN A TRENCH EXCAVATED PERPENDICULAR PER DIRECTION OF ENGINEER.
TO THE BANK AND BELOW THE RESTORED STREAMBED. ONE-THIRD OF THE 5. LOGS SHOULD BE BURIED INTO THE STREAM BED AND BANKS AT LEAST 5 FEET. NO, DESCRIPTIONDATE
ROOTWAD SHOULD REMAIN BELOW NORMAL BASE FLOW CONDITIONS. 6. GEOTEXTILE FABRIC SHOULD BE NAILED TO THE LOG BELOW THE BACKFILL.
7. TRANSPLANTS CAN BE USED INSTEAD OF ROOTWADS, PER DIRECTION OF ENGINEER. PROJECT NAME
ROOTWADS LOG VANE LAKE
NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE
p B SET INVERT ELEVATION ORLIVEW E N D E L L
BEGIN STEP INVERT BASED ON DESIGN PROFILE
ELEVATION
EROSION CONTROL TOP OF STREAM BANK
mp - MATTING v BANKFULL STAGE } TOP OF STREAM BANK TOP OF STREAM BANK MITIGATION
SCOUR O SET INVERT ELEVATION TRANSPLANTS PROJECT
POOL \ 1 _ _ _ _p BASEFLOW 1/ LL BASED ON DESIGN PROFILE OR LIVE STAKES
STONE ` I L 0 J 1- w - ,1 J LOG
EROSION CONTROL
JOHNSTON COUNTY, NC
BACKFILL MATTING
' FOOTER -® BANKFULL STAGE
LOG I DRAWING INFORMATION
1% - 2% CROSS SLOPE PROJECT NO.: 97081
_ BURY INTO NOTCH (SEE B \ _� BASEFLOW /
NOTCH (SEE BANK 5, NOTE 13) - - - FILENAME :04-07 W(E WENDELL DETAIL SHEETS.DW(
q�ACri NOTE 13) c
I MINIMUM SECTION A -A
/ \ i LARGE CrYP.) -1.7X CHANNEL WIDTH _ DESIGNED BY: KMVM/SH
POOL WIDTH 1 1 STONE � DRAWN BY: APL
BACKFILL a"T�'AN�FULL�T STEP INVERT I DATE: 11-30-18
(1.3X BANKFULL ALONG TOE AG-� BURY INTO HORIZ. SCALE: N.T.S.
WIDTH I ELEVATION NOTCH (SEE POOL TO POOL SPACING ,7{,{�yj+'�--�'
FLOW- NOTE 13) VARIES. SEE NOTE #9 FOR POOL ?r'' A ' SCOUR HEADER
POOL BANK 5' LOG VERT. SCALE : N.T.S.
SCOUR _ SPACING REQUIREMENTS. MINIMUM
POOL - y 1 y� SECTION
H =SA-A
TEP BASEFLOW MINIMUM
FOOTER
H I(�HT � � � _ � I
LOG
TOP OF � LiG��R, ¢ - - © \ _
STREAM BANK r 1 If . / / n' i �?' POOL
BURY INTO
TOE OF >I 5' MINIMUM fi, Vii. ` 'r BANK 5'
STREAM BANK ` J I END STEP INVERT NON -WOVEN \ \ x MINIMUM TOP OF STREAM BANK
B I ELEVATION GEOTEXTILE \ (TYP.) ��Atly INVERT
FABRIC PROFILE 13-13RESTORE ` ^� �_ ` Y ELEVATION FLOW
STREAMBED LARG ONE INVERT STREAMBED
BACKFILL ELEVATION SCOUR
PLAN VIEW POOL STONE BACKFILL
NOTES: PLAN VIEW NON -WOVEN
1. LOGS SHOULD BE AT LEAST 12 INCHES IN DIAMETER, RELATIVELY STRAIGHT HARDWOOD AND 10. INTERIOR LOGS SHOULD BE AT A SLIGHT ANGLE (-70 DEGREES) FROM THE HEADER LOG GEOTEXTILE FABRIC SHEET NAME
RECENTLY HARVESTED.STREAMBANK AND CROSS SLOPES SHOULD BE 1-2%.
2. LOGS >24 INCHES IN DIAMETER MAY BE USED ALONE WITHOUT AN ADDITIONAL LOG FILTER FABRIC 11. PLACE FOOTER LOGS FIRST AND THEN HEADER (TOP) LOG. SET HEADER NOTES.
SHOULD STILL BE USED TO SEAL AROUND LOG. LOGS SHOULD EXTEND INTO THE BANKS 5' ON EACH LOG AT A MAXIMUM OF 3 INCHES ABOVE THE INVERT ELEVATION. 1. LOGS SHOULD BE AT LEAST 12 INCHES IN DIAMETER, RELATIVELY STRAIGHT FOOTER LOG 5' MINIMUM
SIDE. 12. AVERAGE STEP HEIGHTSIDROPS SHALL NOT EXCEED 0.5 UNLESS SHOWN HARDWOOD AND RECENTLY HARVESTED.
3. SOIL SHALL BE WELL COMPACTED AROUND BURIED PORTION OF FOOTER LOGS WITH BUCKET OF OTHERWISE. 2. LOGS >24 INCHES IN DIAMETER MAY BE USED ALONE WITHOUT AN
TRACK HOE. 13. CUT A NOTCH IN THE HEADER LOG APPROXIMATELY 30% OF THE CHANNEL ADDITIONAL LOG FILTER FABRIC SHOULD STILL BE USED TO SEAL AROUND
4. INSTALL GEOTEXTILE FILTER FABRIC UNDERNEATH LOGS. BOTTOM WIDTH AND EXTENDING DOWN TO THE INVERT ELEVATION. NOTCH LOG, AT THE DIRECTION OF THE ENGINEER. DETAILS
5. UNDERCUT POOL BED ELEVATION 8 INCHES TO ALLOW FOR LAYER OF STONE. INSTALL LARGE STONE SHALL BE USED TO CENTER FLOW AND NOT EXCEED 31NCHES IN DEPTH. 3. PLACE FOOTER LOGS FIRST AND THEN HEADER (TOP) LOG, SET HEADER PROFILE B -B
BACKFILL ALONG SIDE SLOPES. 14. THE NUMBER OF STEPS MAY VARY BETWEEN BEGINNING AND END LOG AT A MAXIMUM OF 3 INCHES ABOVE THE INVERT ELEVATION.
6. INSTALL EROSION CONTROL MATTING ALONG COMPLETED BANKS SUCH THAT THE EROSION CONTROL STATIONING. SEE LONGITUDINAL PROFILE FOR STATION AND ELEVATION, 4. CUT A NOTCH IN THE HEADER LOG APPROXIMATELY 30% OF THE CHANNEL
MATTING AT THE TOE OF THE BANK EXTENDS DOWN TO THE UNDERCUT ELEVATION. 15. USE GEOTEXTILE FABRIC FOR DRAINAGE TO SEAL GAPS BETWEEN LOGS. BOTTOM WIDTH AND EXTENDING DOWN TO THE INVERT ELEVATION. NOTCH
7. INSTALL LARGE STONE BACKFILL ALONG SIDE SLOPES. 16. PLACE VEGETATION TRANSPLANTS FROM TOE OF STREAMBANK TO TOP OF SHALL BE USED TO CENTER FLOW AND NOT EXCEED 31NCHES IN DEPTH.
8. FINAL CHANNEL BED SHAPE SHOULD BE ROUNDED, COMPACTED, AND CONCAVE, WITH THE ELEVATION STREAMBANK. S. USE GEOTEXTILE FABRIC FOR DRAINAGE TO SEAL GAPS BETWEEN LOGS..
OF THE BED APPROXIMATELY 0.5 FT DEEPER IN THE CENTER THAN AT THE EDGES. 17. SEE TYPICAL SECTION FOR CHANNEL DIMENSIONS. S. INSTALL VEGETATION TRANSPLANTS FROM TOE OF STREAM BANK TO TOP
9. BASEDAVERAGE POOL TO TINGPOOLCCONDITIONS
SUCH S SLOPE AN SUITABN THE LE
FI OR MATERIAL
RIF LE ENGISTEP-POOLS
OF STONE AND LOG STEP POOL SEE TREAM YPICAL EC LOG WEIR SHEET NUMBER
BASED ON EXISTING CONDITIONS SUCH E SLOPE AND SUITABLE FILL MATERIAL. RIFFLE STEP -POOLS 7. SEE TYPICAL SECTION FOR CHANNEL DIMENSIONS.
OR CASCADE POOLS MAY BE SUBSTITUTED IN AREAS WHERE EXISTING SLOPES EXCEED 10% AS
DETERMINED BY THE ENGINEER. NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE
4

TOP OF STREAM BANK
HEADER
`OG PRIMARY
LOGS
rr APPLY CLASS B STONE
NATURAL / TO FILL SLOPES
GROUND / AROUND FLOOD PLAIN
CULVERTS.
INSTALL B' THICK ABC
STONE OR EQUIVALENT
FOR FARM PATH COVER
MATTING FOR EROSION
CONTROLSLOPES
r -19
4 WATER & LAND
SOLUTIONS
10940 Raven Ridge Rd., Suite 200
Raleigh, NC 27614
[phone]
waterlandsolutions.com J
I� A
I PROJECT ENGINEER
�1 111111
RELOCATED FARM
PATH
BACKFILL WITH
1. INSTALL PIPE CULVERT(S) IN ACCORDANCE WITH DETAIL BANKFULL ELEVATION
SPECIFICATIONS. SEE PLANS FOR NUMBER, SIZE AND LENGTH.
B1 _
S v • y�'�9c�O�G�G1c�G1c�P�I�9i�0���®�6�G�O�GO�O�c�O�®���®�G<G�A01.`/i�0<®�01�®D�~�j��j��j,1�o.
SET INVERT ELEVATION BASED
'
AND WOODYNON-WOVEN
SPACING IN ACCORDANCE WITH DETAIL SPECIFICATIONS.
ON DESIGN PROFILE
TOP OF STREAM BANK
p
BEGIN INVERT
! �!�L L '!
t t 1 �. i t! .L7 -L! vel L i•• L Lam•
••;•••II •1O.1�.11IIy�I•II,••�
ELEVATION
OR LIVE STAKES
EROSION CONTROL
MATTING _ _ LL STAGE_
� BANKFU
B
LOG
[HEADER
— A§,E_FLOW
-
`
HEADER
- - -
LOG
FOOTER
LOG
5' MINIMU 5' MINIMUM
BURIED INTO BURIEDINTO
I
BANK BANK
SECONDARY LOGS
PRIMARY LOGS SPACE
SECTION A -A
AND WOODY DEBRIS I
I
EVERY 8-12'
TOE OF STREAM BANK
TOP OF STREAM BANK
HEADER
`OG PRIMARY
LOGS
rr APPLY CLASS B STONE
NATURAL / TO FILL SLOPES
GROUND / AROUND FLOOD PLAIN
CULVERTS.
INSTALL B' THICK ABC
STONE OR EQUIVALENT
FOR FARM PATH COVER
MATTING FOR EROSION
CONTROLSLOPES
r -19
4 WATER & LAND
SOLUTIONS
10940 Raven Ridge Rd., Suite 200
Raleigh, NC 27614
[phone]
waterlandsolutions.com J
I� A
I PROJECT ENGINEER
�1 111111
RELOCATED FARM
PATH
BACKFILL WITH
1. INSTALL PIPE CULVERT(S) IN ACCORDANCE WITH DETAIL BANKFULL ELEVATION
SPECIFICATIONS. SEE PLANS FOR NUMBER, SIZE AND LENGTH.
B1 _
S v • y�'�9c�O�G�G1c�G1c�P�I�9i�0���®�6�G�O�GO�O�c�O�®���®�G<G�A01.`/i�0<®�01�®D�~�j��j��j,1�o.
'
AND WOODYNON-WOVEN
SPACING IN ACCORDANCE WITH DETAIL SPECIFICATIONS.
i MINIMUM
•II •f•f••I •111 •••I ••�•�
��
'I•'"Q3'
! �!�L L '!
t t 1 �. i t! .L7 -L! vel L i•• L Lam•
••;•••II •1O.1�.11IIy�I•II,••�
PLAN VIEW
S MINIMUM FOOTER
NOTES. LOG / 1
1. PRIMARY LOGS SHOULD BE AT LEAST 17' OR MORE IN DIAMETER, RELATIVELY STRAIGHT HARDWOOD BACKFILL WITH J/ 2q" MINIMUM DEF
AND RECENTLY HARVESTED AND EXTENDING INTO THE BANK SON EACH SIDE. SUITABLE ONSITE
2. SECONDARY LOGS SHOULD BE AT LEAST 4" IN DIAMETER AND NO LARGER THAN 10" AND EXTEND INTO ALLUVIUM
THE BANK 7 ON EACH SIDE WOODY DEBRIS MATERIAL SHALL BE VARYING DIAMETER TO ALLOW PROFILE B -B
MATERIAL TO BE COMPACTED.
3. NON -WOVEN GEOTEXTILE FABRIC SHOULD BE NAILED TO THE HEADER LOG BELOW THE BACKFILL
4. ROOT WADS AND EROSION CONTROL MATTING CAN BE USED INSTEAD OF TRANSPLANTS OR LIVE
STAKES PER DIRECTION OF ENGINEER.
5. AFTER TRENCH HAS BEEN EXCAVATED A LAYER OF SECONDARY LOGS AND WOODY DEBRIS SHOULD BE
PLACED WITH MINIMAL GAPS, A LAYER OF ONSITE ALLUVIUM SHOULD BE APPLIED TO FILL VOIDS
BETWEEN SECONDARY LOGS BEFORE ADDITIONAL LAYERS ARE PLACED,
S. SEE TYPICAL SECTION FOR CHANNEL DIMENSIONS.
CONSTRUCTED LOG RIFFLE
NOT TO SCALE
END POST 6" DIAMETER
BY 8' LONG
10 GAUGE WIRE
BRACE WIRE (2
F/1 STRAND STRAPS OF 9
BARB WIRE GUAGE WIRE(
BRACE POST 6"
DIAMETER BY B' LONG
3 (n'P )
GRADUATED IN SIZE
FROM TOP TO BOTTOM
GETTING LARGER IN
SIZE TOWARD THE TOP
^^^' IND LINE
NOTE:
1. END POSTS SHALL BE INSTALLED ATA SPACING OF 10-15 FEET.
WOVEN FIELD FENCE
NOT TO SCALE
I
0.3'
� NOTES'
STREAM BED_ e' �0 "✓ °
67 z
GINEF',o
TT
SC°N
ENGINEERING SERVICES BY
WLS ENGINEERING, PLLC
FIRM LICENSE NO. P-1480
Q 7R
1. INSTALL PIPE CULVERT(S) IN ACCORDANCE WITH DETAIL BANKFULL ELEVATION
SPECIFICATIONS. SEE PLANS FOR NUMBER, SIZE AND LENGTH.
B1 _
2. INSTALL COIR FIBER MATTING FOR EROSION CONTROL ALONG BURY PIPE BELOW THE STREAM BED ELEVATION AS SHOWN ON PLANS
FILL SLOPES IN ACCORDANCE WITH DETAIL SPECIFICATIONS.
3. PIPE CULVERTS ARE TO BE A MINIMUM OF 24" COVER AND
SPACING IN ACCORDANCE WITH DETAIL SPECIFICATIONS.
i MINIMUM
PERMANENT CULVERT STREAM CROSSING
NOT TO SCALE
GRADE SIDE SLOPES NO STEEPER THAN 3H.
INFLOW SHALLOW
POOL SHALLOW f
/ POOL
PLAN VIEW
INFLOW
18- POOL DEPTHd
STORAGE VOLUME ELEVATION
� ,�IN�O GRADE
i
a.
OUTLET CHANNEL
(WIDTH VARIES)
4' WIDE EMBANKMENT WITH
STONE COVER (OPTIONAL AS
DIRECTED BY ENGINEER)
8" THICK STONE SPILLWAY
(OPTIONAL AS DIRECTED
BY ENGINEER)
PROPOSED BOTTOM
OUTLET CHANNEL
NOTES: EXISTING GRADE—A I
i. CONSTRUCT EMBANKMENT WITH COMPACTED SOIL AND L
SUITABLE MATERIAL IN ACCORDANCE WITH TECHNICAL CONSTRUCTEMBANKMENT WITH
SPECIFICATIONS. SECTION A - A COMPACTED SOIL AND SUITABLE
2. WATER QUALITY TREATMENT FEATURE VARIES IN 612E AND BACKFILL MATERIAL (TYPJ
SHAPE AS SHOWN ON PLANS.
3. PLANT APPROPRIATE WETLAND SPECIES VEGETATION
AS SPECIFIED IN THE PLANTING PLAN.
WATER QUALITY TREATMENT FEATURE
NOT TO SCALE
REVISIONS
A DRAFT MIT PLAN 4/24/17
B FINAL DRAFT MIT PLAN 5126117
C FINAL MIT PLAN 8/21117
D ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION 11RI17
E AS -BUILT 11/30118
NO. DESCRIPTION DATE
PROJECT NAME
LAKE
WENDELL
MITIGATION
PROJECT
JOHNSTON COUNTY, NC
DRAWING INFORMATION
PROJECT NO.: 97081
FILENAME _ 007 LAKE WENDELL_DETAIL_SHEETS.DWG
DESIGNED BY: KMV/WSH
DRAWN BY: APL
DATE, 11-3D-18
HORIZ. SCALE: N.T.S.
VERT.SCALE- N.T.S.
SHEET NAME
DETAILS
SHEET NUMBER
5

STAKE TOP LAYER OF
EROSION CONTROL
MATTING IN 6" TRENCH
(SEE COIR FIBER MATTING
DETAIL)
BACKFILL 1,5' LIFT OF COMPACTED
ON-SITE SOIL (TYP.)
ADD BOULDERS OR OTHER APPROVED
COUNTERWEIGHT TO PREVENT WOOD
FROM FLOATING
01
EXTEND WOODY DEBRIS MATERIAL
TO 114 BANKFULL WIDTH
TOP OF RESTORED STREAM
PLACE THICK LAYER
OF 1"-6"DIAMETER
WOODY DEBRIS
COVER LOGS AND/OR ROOT WADS -
INSTALLED IN LOCATIONS AS SHOWN ON
PLANS AND PER RESPECTIVE DETAILS
0
PLAN VIEW
/ FLOW
SCOUR
` POOL
RESTORED STREAMBED
NA—M
i•
i
j INSTALL FOUNDATION LOGS
SUCH THAT AT LEAST HALF OF
THE LOG DIAMETER IS BELOW
THE RESTORED STREAMBED
SECTION A - A ELEVATION.
GEOLIFT W/ TOE WOOD
TOE OF STREAM BANK
NOTES:
1. DIG A TRENCH BELOW THE RESTORED STREAMBED
FOR THE STONE BACKFILL.
2. FILL TRENCH WITH STONE BACKFILL.
HEAD OF RIFFLE
INVERT ELEVATION
J
TOP OF STREAM BANK
16" MIN. THICKNESS
STONE BACKFILL
NOT TO SCALE
OF STREAM BANK
-- B T ULL STAGE_
f. RIFFLE Dmax = MAX DEPTH J
16" MIN. THICKNESS
STONE BACKFILL
SECTION A -A
TOE OF STREAMBANK
EROSION CONTROL
MATTING SHOULD BE
PLACED BENEATH STONE
BACKFILL
FOUNDATION LOGS TO BE INSTALLED
AT ANGLES SHOWN BETWEEN 15-25'
OF RESTORED STREAM BANK
PLAN VIEW
4' DEEP P.
2' TO 3' LENGTH
NEW STREAMBANK
__________
BANKFULL STAGE — —
— — — — — `
TAIL OF RIFFLE
HORIZONTAL SETBACK FOR LIFT IS
---------
INVERT ELEVATION
APPROX. 1 FT. POINT BAR
RESTORED STREAMBED
LIVE BRANCH CUTTINGS (SEE (SEE TYPICAL SECTIONS)
_
PLANTING PLAN FOR SPECIES)
k�,-----
t
EROSION CONTROL MATTING
X - � �7�
i
ENCOMPASSES LIFT
BY ENGINEER
�•i r _-.P.._.,........._-rte_—iii
—Z_WS9FLOW
CHANNEL INVERT
RESTORED STREAMBED
NA—M
i•
i
j INSTALL FOUNDATION LOGS
SUCH THAT AT LEAST HALF OF
THE LOG DIAMETER IS BELOW
THE RESTORED STREAMBED
SECTION A - A ELEVATION.
GEOLIFT W/ TOE WOOD
TOE OF STREAM BANK
NOTES:
1. DIG A TRENCH BELOW THE RESTORED STREAMBED
FOR THE STONE BACKFILL.
2. FILL TRENCH WITH STONE BACKFILL.
HEAD OF RIFFLE
INVERT ELEVATION
J
TOP OF STREAM BANK
16" MIN. THICKNESS
STONE BACKFILL
NOT TO SCALE
OF STREAM BANK
-- B T ULL STAGE_
f. RIFFLE Dmax = MAX DEPTH J
16" MIN. THICKNESS
STONE BACKFILL
SECTION A -A
TOE OF STREAMBANK
EROSION CONTROL
MATTING SHOULD BE
PLACED BENEATH STONE
BACKFILL
PLAN VIEW OF STREAM BANK
TOP OF STREAMBANK
STREAMBANK
PLANT LIVE
STAKES FROM
TOP OF
STREAM BANK
TO TOE OF
STREAM BANK
IN A DIAMOND
SHAPED,
STAGGERED
PATTERN TO
SPECIFIED
SPACING
OFSTREAMBANK
NO LIVE STAKES ON POINT BAR
OF STREAMBANK
THALWEG
\MBANK O V TO B' SPACING =T TO T SPACING NO LIVE STAKES
LIVE STAKE SPACING PLAN VIEW
SECTION A -A
�B�KFU=L
SQUARE CUT TOP
TAIL OF RIFFLE Sr'GE
INVERT ELEVATION .�
2' TO 3' LENGTH
NEW STREAMBANK
FLOW
SHALL BE TREATED AS
— — — — — `
TAIL OF RIFFLE
SPECIFIED IN PLANS
E
\
INVERT ELEVATION
'
RESTORED STREAMBED
OPTIONAL ROOT WAD
45 DEGREES
BASEFLOW
PLACEMENT AS DIRECTED
HEAD OF RIFFLE
PLAN VIEW OF STREAM BANK
TOP OF STREAMBANK
STREAMBANK
PLANT LIVE
STAKES FROM
TOP OF
STREAM BANK
TO TOE OF
STREAM BANK
IN A DIAMOND
SHAPED,
STAGGERED
PATTERN TO
SPECIFIED
SPACING
OFSTREAMBANK
NO LIVE STAKES ON POINT BAR
OF STREAMBANK
THALWEG
\MBANK O V TO B' SPACING =T TO T SPACING NO LIVE STAKES
LIVE STAKE SPACING PLAN VIEW
SECTION A -A
�B�KFU=L
SQUARE CUT TOP
TAIL OF RIFFLE Sr'GE
INVERT ELEVATION .�
2' TO 3' LENGTH
NEW STREAMBANK
FLOW
SHALL BE TREATED AS
— — — — — `
TAIL OF RIFFLE
SPECIFIED IN PLANS
E
\
INVERT ELEVATION
'
ANGLE CUT 30 TO
OPTIONAL ROOT WAD
45 DEGREES
BASEFLOW
PLACEMENT AS DIRECTED
HEAD OF RIFFLE
RVH
BY ENGINEER
INVERT ELEVATION
1. LIVE STAKES SHOULD BE CUT AND INSTALLED ON THE SAME DAY.
CHANNEL INVERT
2. DO NOT INSTALL LIVE STAKES THAT HAVE BEEN SPLIT.
POOL
3. LIVE STAKES MUST BE INSTALLED WITH BUDS POINTING UPWARDS.
PROFILE B -B
16" MIN. THICKNESS
5, LIVE STAKES SHOULD BE 12 TO 2 INCHES IN DIAMETER AND 2 TO 3 FEET LONG.
STONE BACKFILL
-
LIVE STAKING
STAKE ABOVE GROUND.
NOTES'
CHANNEL TO BE
1. COMPACT BACKFILL USING ON-SITE
RELOCATED
HEAVY EQUIPMENT IN 10 INCH LIFTS.
TOP OF STREAMBANK
\
2. FILL DITCH PLUG TO TOP OF BANKS
NEW FLOW DIRECTION
Ci�3 -
OR AS DIRECTED BY ENGINEER.
CONSTRUCTED STONE RIFFLE
CHANNELBLOCK
NOT TO SCALE
UNCOMPACTED
FILL 1.5' MINIMUM
6a010G:0j>OMOs0O�M9INsOr:O,�PP��O1O:O
�i:OGfi y
SECTION A -A
CHANNEL BLOCK
NOT TO SCALE
OLD FLOW—
SECTION
LOW_
WATER & LAND
SOLUTIONS
10940 Raven Ridge Rd., Suite 200
Raleigh, NC 27614
(919614-5111
waterlandsolutions.com
L_ J
PROJECT ENGINEER
\\\1111111111 j1j
CARO
epF:ss
A =
�Yj9 o 4'0 IN
,� SCOTT a N�
1"1/1111111\\\
ENGINEERING SERVICES BY
WLS ENGINEERING, PLLC
FIRM LICENSE NO. P-1480
REVISIONS
A DRAFT MIT PLAN 4/24117
B FINAL DRAFT MIT PLAN 5126117
C FINAL MIT PLAN 8121117
D ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION 1117117
E AS -BUILT 11/30/18
NO. DESCRIPTION DATE
PROJECT NAME
LAKE
WENDELL
MITIGATION
PROJECT
JOHNSTON COUNTY, NC
DRAWING INFORMATION
PROJECT NO.: 97081
FILENAME 04-07 LAKE WENDELL DETAIL SHEETSAW(
DESIGNED BY - KMVMISH
DRAWN BY: APL
DATE 11.30-18
HORIZ. SCALE : N.T.S.
VERT.SCALE: N.T.S.
SHEET NAME
DETAILS
SHEET NUMBER
6
SQUARE CUT TOP
BUDS FACING UPWARD
2' TO 3' LENGTH
LIVE CUTTING
MINIMUM 12"
DIAMETER
'
ANGLE CUT 30 TO
ED
45 DEGREES
LIVE STAKE DETAIL
NOTES:
1. LIVE STAKES SHOULD BE CUT AND INSTALLED ON THE SAME DAY.
2. DO NOT INSTALL LIVE STAKES THAT HAVE BEEN SPLIT.
3. LIVE STAKES MUST BE INSTALLED WITH BUDS POINTING UPWARDS.
'
4. LIVE STAKES SHOULD BE INSTALLED PERPENDICULAR TO BANK.
5, LIVE STAKES SHOULD BE 12 TO 2 INCHES IN DIAMETER AND 2 TO 3 FEET LONG.
6. LIVE STAKES SHOULD BE INSTALLED LEAVING 115 OF THE LENGTH OF THE LIVE
LIVE STAKING
STAKE ABOVE GROUND.
NOT TO SCALE
CHANNEL TO BE
RELOCATED
TOP OF STREAMBANK
\
NEW FLOW DIRECTION
Ci�3 -
CHANNELBLOCK
yiy
oy
40\
PLAN VIEW
\40�\
\ SS
UNCOMPACTED
FILL 1.5' MINIMUM
6a010G:0j>OMOs0O�M9INsOr:O,�PP��O1O:O
�i:OGfi y
SECTION A -A
CHANNEL BLOCK
NOT TO SCALE
OLD FLOW—
SECTION
LOW_
WATER & LAND
SOLUTIONS
10940 Raven Ridge Rd., Suite 200
Raleigh, NC 27614
(919614-5111
waterlandsolutions.com
L_ J
PROJECT ENGINEER
\\\1111111111 j1j
CARO
epF:ss
A =
�Yj9 o 4'0 IN
,� SCOTT a N�
1"1/1111111\\\
ENGINEERING SERVICES BY
WLS ENGINEERING, PLLC
FIRM LICENSE NO. P-1480
REVISIONS
A DRAFT MIT PLAN 4/24117
B FINAL DRAFT MIT PLAN 5126117
C FINAL MIT PLAN 8121117
D ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION 1117117
E AS -BUILT 11/30/18
NO. DESCRIPTION DATE
PROJECT NAME
LAKE
WENDELL
MITIGATION
PROJECT
JOHNSTON COUNTY, NC
DRAWING INFORMATION
PROJECT NO.: 97081
FILENAME 04-07 LAKE WENDELL DETAIL SHEETSAW(
DESIGNED BY - KMVMISH
DRAWN BY: APL
DATE 11.30-18
HORIZ. SCALE : N.T.S.
VERT.SCALE: N.T.S.
SHEET NAME
DETAILS
SHEET NUMBER
6

PLAN VIEW
NOTES:
1. LOGS SHOULD BE 12" TO 18• IN DIAMETER, RELATIVELY STRAIGHT, HARDWOOD, HEADER HEADER
AND RECENTLY HARVESTED. LOG BOULDER
2. LOGS SHOULD BE BURIED INTO THE STREAM BED AND BANKS
AT LEAST 5 FEET.
3. SOIL SHOULD BE COMPACTED WELL AROUND BURIED PORTIONS OF LOGS. FOOTER LOG
4. INSTALL GEOTEXTILE FABRIC BEGINNING AT THE TOP OF THE HEADER LOG AND (OPTIONAL) PROFILE B -B
EXTEND DOWNWARD TO THE DEPTH OF THE BOTTOM FOOTER LOG AND THEN
UPSTREAM TO A MINIMUM OF FIVE FEET. GEOTEXTILE FABRIC SHOULD BE NAILED TO THE
LOG BELOW THE BACKFILL.
5. EXCAVATE A TRENCH BELOW THE BED FOR FOOTER LOG AND PLACE FILL ON
UPSTREAM SIDE OF VANE ARM, BETWEEN THE ARM AND STREAMBANK-
6. START AT BANK AND PLACE FOOTER BOULDERS FIRST AND THEN HEADER BOULDERS.
7. CONTINUE WITH STRUCTURE, FOLLOWING ANGLE AND SLOPE SPECIFICATIONS.
8. AN OPTIONAL COVER LOG CAN BE PLACED IN SCOUR POOL FOR HABITAT IMPROVEMENT
AT DIRECTION OF ENGINEER.
9. USE HAND PLACED STONE TO FILL GAPS ON UPSTREAM SIDE OF HEADER AND FOOTER
BOULDERS.
10. AFTER ALL STONE BACKFILL HAS BEEN PLACED, FILL IN THE UPSTREAM SIDE OF THE
STRUCTURE WITH ON-SITE ALLUVIUM TO THE ELEVATION OF THE TOP OF THE HEADER
BOULDER AND LOG.
11. VEGETATION TRANSPLANTS CAN BE USED INSTEAD OF ROOTWADS, PER DIRECTION OF ENGINEER.
GRADE CONTROL LOG J -HOOK VANE
NOT TO SCALE
TRENCH LIMITS I --(q )j 24" MAX TYP (TRENCH ONLY)
® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ®
�Q 36" MAX TYP
SMALL MATTING STAKES Lo LARGE MATTING STAKES
PLAN VIEW OF STREAM BANK
TOP OF STREAM BANK
EROSION CONTROL
MATTING TO BE
EXTENDED TO TOE
OF SLOPE
ROOTWAD
TYPICAL LARGE MATTING STAKE
rNGTH
1.
1. 1
,
�I
INSTALL EDGE OF EROSION CONTROL MATTING IN 12 INCH DEEP
TRENCH, AND SECURE BY STAKING, BACKFILLING. AND COMPACTING
SOIL TO FINISHED GRADE. il�
TOP OF STREAM BANK 1i(
p SANKFULLSTAGE V
TRANSPLANTED VEGETATION,
113 113
/- -�
TYPICAL SMALL MATTING STAKE
SMALL MATTING STAKES (TVP.)
(TYP.)
BOTTOM BOTTOM
11.0 N . 4 M
OF STREAM BANK
1 .1
RESTORED STREAMBED
L(A�
WIDTH OF WIDTH OF
INVERT! GRADE POINT
0. I 1POINT)
LEG THICKNESS 1
w
Y CFkANNEL CHANNEL
12.00 1 30.
B ITYP)
STONE BACKFILL
NOTES:
RESTORED STREAMBED
1. RESTORED STREAM BANKS MUST BE SEEDED AND
MULCHED PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF EROSION CONTROL
HEADER
Ni
¢
/ TB
` ` �n\.y �.. ,�
STONE
LOG
SECURE EROSION CONTROL
3. PLACE LARGE STAKES ALONG ALL MATTING SEAMS, IN
w
ARM AN b�
THE CENTER OF STREAM BANK, AND TOE OF SLOPE.
BACKFILL
_
y
EROSION CONTROL MATTING
20' TO /
NOT TO SCALE
NON -WOVEN
<
O
HEADER
GEOTEXTILE FABRIC
m
w
BOULDER
FOOTER LOG
GEOTEXTILE
,.�
0
(OPTIONAL)
FABRIC
,7p1
f
5' MINIMUM
q
/
SECTION A -A
LOGS BURTDIN
STREAMBANK
I
SCOUR\
l
AT LAST
/
POOL
m
e
2/3 BANKFULL STAGE
'p
FLOW OP
PAIS
RESTORED STREAMBED ELEVATION s
ROOTWAD
Y
(OPTIONAL)
PLAN VIEW
NOTES:
1. LOGS SHOULD BE 12" TO 18• IN DIAMETER, RELATIVELY STRAIGHT, HARDWOOD, HEADER HEADER
AND RECENTLY HARVESTED. LOG BOULDER
2. LOGS SHOULD BE BURIED INTO THE STREAM BED AND BANKS
AT LEAST 5 FEET.
3. SOIL SHOULD BE COMPACTED WELL AROUND BURIED PORTIONS OF LOGS. FOOTER LOG
4. INSTALL GEOTEXTILE FABRIC BEGINNING AT THE TOP OF THE HEADER LOG AND (OPTIONAL) PROFILE B -B
EXTEND DOWNWARD TO THE DEPTH OF THE BOTTOM FOOTER LOG AND THEN
UPSTREAM TO A MINIMUM OF FIVE FEET. GEOTEXTILE FABRIC SHOULD BE NAILED TO THE
LOG BELOW THE BACKFILL.
5. EXCAVATE A TRENCH BELOW THE BED FOR FOOTER LOG AND PLACE FILL ON
UPSTREAM SIDE OF VANE ARM, BETWEEN THE ARM AND STREAMBANK-
6. START AT BANK AND PLACE FOOTER BOULDERS FIRST AND THEN HEADER BOULDERS.
7. CONTINUE WITH STRUCTURE, FOLLOWING ANGLE AND SLOPE SPECIFICATIONS.
8. AN OPTIONAL COVER LOG CAN BE PLACED IN SCOUR POOL FOR HABITAT IMPROVEMENT
AT DIRECTION OF ENGINEER.
9. USE HAND PLACED STONE TO FILL GAPS ON UPSTREAM SIDE OF HEADER AND FOOTER
BOULDERS.
10. AFTER ALL STONE BACKFILL HAS BEEN PLACED, FILL IN THE UPSTREAM SIDE OF THE
STRUCTURE WITH ON-SITE ALLUVIUM TO THE ELEVATION OF THE TOP OF THE HEADER
BOULDER AND LOG.
11. VEGETATION TRANSPLANTS CAN BE USED INSTEAD OF ROOTWADS, PER DIRECTION OF ENGINEER.
GRADE CONTROL LOG J -HOOK VANE
NOT TO SCALE
TRENCH LIMITS I --(q )j 24" MAX TYP (TRENCH ONLY)
® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ®
�Q 36" MAX TYP
SMALL MATTING STAKES Lo LARGE MATTING STAKES
PLAN VIEW OF STREAM BANK
TOP OF STREAM BANK
EROSION CONTROL
MATTING TO BE
EXTENDED TO TOE
OF SLOPE
ROOTWAD
TYPICAL LARGE MATTING STAKE
rNGTH
1.
1. 1
,
�I
INSTALL EDGE OF EROSION CONTROL MATTING IN 12 INCH DEEP
TRENCH, AND SECURE BY STAKING, BACKFILLING. AND COMPACTING
SOIL TO FINISHED GRADE. il�
TOP OF STREAM BANK 1i(
p SANKFULLSTAGE V
TRANSPLANTED VEGETATION,
WITH ROOTMASS, AND SOIL
MATERIAL
STONE BACKFILL I \ I
OR SUITABLE I I
SOIL MATERIAL ,
POOL WIDTH `
(-1.3X BANWIDTH
3�
OF STREAM BANK
S BANKFULLSTAGE
TOE OF STREAM BANK
BASE FLOW _
SECTION A -A
NOTES:
1. EXCAVATE A HOLE IN THE RESTORED STREAM BANK THAT WILL
ACCOMMODATE THE SIZE OF TRANSPLANT TO BE PLANTED.
BEGIN EXCAVATION AT TOE OF THE STREAM BANK.
2. EXCAVATE THE ENTIRE TRANSPLANT ROOT MASS AND AS
MUCH ADDITIONAL SOIL MATERIAL AS POSSIBLE. IF ENTIRE
ROOT MASS CAN NOT BE EXCAVATED AT ONCE, THE
TRANSPLANT IS TOO LARGE AND ANOTHER SHOULD BE
SELECTED.
3. PLANT TRANSPLANT IN THE RESTORED STREAM BANK SO THAT
VEGETATION IS ORIENTATED VERTICALLY.
4. FILL IN ANY HOLES OR VOIDS AROUND THE TRANSPLANT AND
COMPACT.
5. ANY LOOSE SOIL LEFT IN THE STREAM SHOULD BE REMOVED.
6. WHEN POSSIBLE, PLACE MULTIPLE TRANSPLANTS CLOSE
TOGETHER SUCH THAT THEIR ROOT MASSES CONTACT.
VEGETATION TRANSPLANTS
NOT TO SCALE
BEGIN STEP INVERT
ELEVATION SET INVERT ELEVATION
BASED ON DESIGN PROFILE
TRANSPLANTED VEGETATION,
WITH ROOTMASS, AND SOIL
/- -�
TYPICAL SMALL MATTING STAKE
SMALL MATTING STAKES (TVP.)
(TYP.)
11.0 N . 4 M
OF STREAM BANK
1 .1
RESTORED STREAMBED
L(A�
VAIJ N Q. M
TOE OF STREAM BANK
0. I 1POINT)
LEG THICKNESS 1
12.00 1 30.
B ITYP)
' BASEFLOW_
NOTES:
RESTORED STREAMBED
1. RESTORED STREAM BANKS MUST BE SEEDED AND
MULCHED PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF EROSION CONTROL
MATTING.
' 1
,�.
2. SEE TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS FOR MATTING STAKE
i '` ` •
` ` �n\.y �.. ,�
SPACING REQUIREMENTS.
SECURE EROSION CONTROL
3. PLACE LARGE STAKES ALONG ALL MATTING SEAMS, IN
MATTING AT TOE OF SLOPE
THE CENTER OF STREAM BANK, AND TOE OF SLOPE.
SECTION A -A
WITH LARGE MATTING STAKES.
EROSION CONTROL MATTING
NOT TO SCALE
TRANSPLANTED VEGETATION,
WITH ROOTMASS, AND SOIL
MATERIAL
STONE BACKFILL I \ I
OR SUITABLE I I
SOIL MATERIAL ,
POOL WIDTH `
(-1.3X BANWIDTH
3�
OF STREAM BANK
S BANKFULLSTAGE
TOE OF STREAM BANK
BASE FLOW _
SECTION A -A
NOTES:
1. EXCAVATE A HOLE IN THE RESTORED STREAM BANK THAT WILL
ACCOMMODATE THE SIZE OF TRANSPLANT TO BE PLANTED.
BEGIN EXCAVATION AT TOE OF THE STREAM BANK.
2. EXCAVATE THE ENTIRE TRANSPLANT ROOT MASS AND AS
MUCH ADDITIONAL SOIL MATERIAL AS POSSIBLE. IF ENTIRE
ROOT MASS CAN NOT BE EXCAVATED AT ONCE, THE
TRANSPLANT IS TOO LARGE AND ANOTHER SHOULD BE
SELECTED.
3. PLANT TRANSPLANT IN THE RESTORED STREAM BANK SO THAT
VEGETATION IS ORIENTATED VERTICALLY.
4. FILL IN ANY HOLES OR VOIDS AROUND THE TRANSPLANT AND
COMPACT.
5. ANY LOOSE SOIL LEFT IN THE STREAM SHOULD BE REMOVED.
6. WHEN POSSIBLE, PLACE MULTIPLE TRANSPLANTS CLOSE
TOGETHER SUCH THAT THEIR ROOT MASSES CONTACT.
VEGETATION TRANSPLANTS
NOT TO SCALE
BEGIN STEP INVERT
ELEVATION SET INVERT ELEVATION
BASED ON DESIGN PROFILE
TRANSPLANTED VEGETATION,
WITH ROOTMASS, AND SOIL
/- -�
MATERIAL
TOP OF STREAM BANK
(TYP.)
JTOE
OF STREAM BANK
RESTORED STREAMBED
L(A�
PLAN VIEW OF STREAM BANK
TRANSPLANTED VEGETATION,
WITH ROOTMASS, AND SOIL
MATERIAL
STONE BACKFILL I \ I
OR SUITABLE I I
SOIL MATERIAL ,
POOL WIDTH `
(-1.3X BANWIDTH
3�
OF STREAM BANK
S BANKFULLSTAGE
TOE OF STREAM BANK
BASE FLOW _
SECTION A -A
NOTES:
1. EXCAVATE A HOLE IN THE RESTORED STREAM BANK THAT WILL
ACCOMMODATE THE SIZE OF TRANSPLANT TO BE PLANTED.
BEGIN EXCAVATION AT TOE OF THE STREAM BANK.
2. EXCAVATE THE ENTIRE TRANSPLANT ROOT MASS AND AS
MUCH ADDITIONAL SOIL MATERIAL AS POSSIBLE. IF ENTIRE
ROOT MASS CAN NOT BE EXCAVATED AT ONCE, THE
TRANSPLANT IS TOO LARGE AND ANOTHER SHOULD BE
SELECTED.
3. PLANT TRANSPLANT IN THE RESTORED STREAM BANK SO THAT
VEGETATION IS ORIENTATED VERTICALLY.
4. FILL IN ANY HOLES OR VOIDS AROUND THE TRANSPLANT AND
COMPACT.
5. ANY LOOSE SOIL LEFT IN THE STREAM SHOULD BE REMOVED.
6. WHEN POSSIBLE, PLACE MULTIPLE TRANSPLANTS CLOSE
TOGETHER SUCH THAT THEIR ROOT MASSES CONTACT.
VEGETATION TRANSPLANTS
NOT TO SCALE
BEGIN STEP INVERT
ELEVATION SET INVERT ELEVATION
BASED ON DESIGN PROFILE
SCOUR STONE
POOL BACKFILL \ FLOW-
NUN-WUVtN
\ GEOTEXTILE
TOP OF I I I FABRIC
STREAMBANK I
TOE OF
STREAMBANK I �� I END STEP INVERT 5' MINIMUM
L(p> I ELEVATION
PLAN VIEW
NOTES:
1. LOGS SHOULD BE AT LEAST 12 INCHES IN DIAMETER, RELATIVELY STRAIGHT HARDWOOD
AND RECENTLY HARVESTED.
2. LOGS >24 INCHES IN DIAMETER MAYBE USED ALONE WITHOUT AN ADDITIONAL LOG FILTER
FABRIC SHOULD STILL BE USED TO SEAL AROUND LOG. LOGS SHOULD EXTEND INTO THE
BANKS TON EACH SIDE.
3. SOIL SHALL BE WELL COMPACTED AROUND BURIED PORTION OF FOOTER LOGS WITH
BUCKET OF TRACK HOE.
4. INSTALL NON -WOVEN GEOTEXTILE FABRIC UNDERNEATH LOGS.
5. UNDERCUT POOL BED ELEVATION 81NCHES TO ALLOW FOR LAYER OF STONE. INSTALL
STONE BACKFILL OR SUITABLE ALLUVIUM ALONG SIDE SLOPES,
6. INSTALL EROSION CONTROL MATTING ALONG COMPLETED BANKS SUCH THAT THE EROSION
CONTROL MATTING AT THE TOE OF THE BANK EXTENDS DOWN TO THE UNDERCUT
ELEVATION.
7. INSTALL STONE BACKFILL OR SUITABLE SOIL MATERIAL ALONG SIDE SLOPES.
8. FINAL CHANNEL BED SHAPE SHOULD BE ROUNDED, COMPACTED, AND CONCAVE, WITH THE
ELEVATION OF THE BED APPROXIMATELY 0.5 FT DEEPER IN THE CENTER THAN AT THE
EDGES.
9. AVERAGE POOL TO POOL SPACING SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE PROFILE OR SPECIFIED BY
ENGINEER BASED ON EXISTING CONDITIONS SUCH AS SLOPE AND SUITABLE FILL MATERIAL.
RIFFLE STEP POOLS OR CASCADE POOLS MAY BE SUBSTITUTED IN AREAS WHERE EXISTING
SLOPES EXCEED 10% AS DETERMINED BY THE ENGINEER.
TRANSPLANTS
OR LIVE STAKE
TOP OF STAEIANK�
BANKFUL
_Z BASEFLW/
HEN
LOG
_ FOO
__ _ - LOG
1%- 2% CROSS SLOPE
SECTION A -A
-STEPINVERT
ELEVATION RESTORED POOL TO POOL SPACING
STREAMBED VARIES. SEE NOTE #9 FOR POOL
SPACING REQUIREMENTS.
H = STEP _
H IGHT ��
® Z BASEFL2W �
V ,
POOL -4A
PROFILE B -B
10. INTERIOR LOGS SHOULD BE AT A SLIGHT ANGLE (-70 DEGREES) FROM THE
STREAMBANK AND CROSS SLOPES SHOULD BE 1-2%.
11. PLACE FOOTER LOGS FIRST AND THEN HEADER (TOP) LOG. SET HEADER LOG
AT A MAXIMUM OF 31NCHES ABOVE THE INVERT ELEVATION.
12. AVERAGE STEP HEIGHTS/DROPS SHALL NOT EXCEED 0.5 UNLESS SHOWN
OTHERWISE
13. CUT A NOTCH IN THE HEADER LOG APPROXIMATELY 30% OF THE CHANNEL
BOTTOM WIDTH AND EXTENDING DOWN TO THE INVERT ELEVATION. NOTCH
SHALL BE USED TO CENTER FLOW AND NOT EXCEED 3 INCHES IN DEPTH.
14. THE NUMBER OF STEPS MAY VARY BETWEEN BEGINNING AND END
STATIONING. SEE LONGITUDINAL PROFILE FOR STATION AND ELEVATION.
15. USE GEOTEXTILE FABRIC FOR DRAINAGE TO SEAL GAPS BETWEEN LOGS.
16. PLACE VEGETATION TRANSPLANTS FROM TOE OF STREAMBANK TO TOP OF
STREAMBANK.
17. SEE TYPICAL SECTION FOR CHANNEL DIMENSIONS.
LOG STEP POOL
NOT TO SCALE
4 WATER & LAND
SOLUTIONS
10940 Raven Ridge Rd., Suite 200
Raleigh, NC 27614
[phone]
waterlandsolutions.com
PROJECT ENGINEER
`111111111,,,! /
N CARp�
s/o
° SE
SCOTT ° N 1��`,
//111111111111
ENGINEERING SERVICES BY
WLS ENGINEERING, PLLC
FIRM LICENSE NO. P-1480
REVISIONS
A DRAFT MIT PLAN 4/24/17
'i B FINAL DRAFT MR PLAN 5126117
C FINAL MIT PLAN 8/21117
D ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION 11!7117
E AS -BUILT 11/30118
NO, DESCRIPTION DATE
PROJECT NAME
LAKE
WENDELL
MITIGATION
PROJECT
JOHNSTON COUNTY, NC
DRAWING INFORMATION
PROJECT NO.: 97081
FILENAME:U4 LAKEWENDELL DETAIL SHEETS.DWC
DESIGNED BY' KMVMSH
DRAWN BY: APL
DATE: 11-30-18
HORIZ. SCALE N.T.S.
VERT.SCALE: N.T.S_
SHEET NAME
DETAILS
SHEET NUMBER
7
BURY INTO
BANK 5'
MINIMUM
(TYP.)
SCOUR STONE
POOL BACKFILL \ FLOW-
NUN-WUVtN
\ GEOTEXTILE
TOP OF I I I FABRIC
STREAMBANK I
TOE OF
STREAMBANK I �� I END STEP INVERT 5' MINIMUM
L(p> I ELEVATION
PLAN VIEW
NOTES:
1. LOGS SHOULD BE AT LEAST 12 INCHES IN DIAMETER, RELATIVELY STRAIGHT HARDWOOD
AND RECENTLY HARVESTED.
2. LOGS >24 INCHES IN DIAMETER MAYBE USED ALONE WITHOUT AN ADDITIONAL LOG FILTER
FABRIC SHOULD STILL BE USED TO SEAL AROUND LOG. LOGS SHOULD EXTEND INTO THE
BANKS TON EACH SIDE.
3. SOIL SHALL BE WELL COMPACTED AROUND BURIED PORTION OF FOOTER LOGS WITH
BUCKET OF TRACK HOE.
4. INSTALL NON -WOVEN GEOTEXTILE FABRIC UNDERNEATH LOGS.
5. UNDERCUT POOL BED ELEVATION 81NCHES TO ALLOW FOR LAYER OF STONE. INSTALL
STONE BACKFILL OR SUITABLE ALLUVIUM ALONG SIDE SLOPES,
6. INSTALL EROSION CONTROL MATTING ALONG COMPLETED BANKS SUCH THAT THE EROSION
CONTROL MATTING AT THE TOE OF THE BANK EXTENDS DOWN TO THE UNDERCUT
ELEVATION.
7. INSTALL STONE BACKFILL OR SUITABLE SOIL MATERIAL ALONG SIDE SLOPES.
8. FINAL CHANNEL BED SHAPE SHOULD BE ROUNDED, COMPACTED, AND CONCAVE, WITH THE
ELEVATION OF THE BED APPROXIMATELY 0.5 FT DEEPER IN THE CENTER THAN AT THE
EDGES.
9. AVERAGE POOL TO POOL SPACING SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE PROFILE OR SPECIFIED BY
ENGINEER BASED ON EXISTING CONDITIONS SUCH AS SLOPE AND SUITABLE FILL MATERIAL.
RIFFLE STEP POOLS OR CASCADE POOLS MAY BE SUBSTITUTED IN AREAS WHERE EXISTING
SLOPES EXCEED 10% AS DETERMINED BY THE ENGINEER.
TRANSPLANTS
OR LIVE STAKE
TOP OF STAEIANK�
BANKFUL
_Z BASEFLW/
HEN
LOG
_ FOO
__ _ - LOG
1%- 2% CROSS SLOPE
SECTION A -A
-STEPINVERT
ELEVATION RESTORED POOL TO POOL SPACING
STREAMBED VARIES. SEE NOTE #9 FOR POOL
SPACING REQUIREMENTS.
H = STEP _
H IGHT ��
® Z BASEFL2W �
V ,
POOL -4A
PROFILE B -B
10. INTERIOR LOGS SHOULD BE AT A SLIGHT ANGLE (-70 DEGREES) FROM THE
STREAMBANK AND CROSS SLOPES SHOULD BE 1-2%.
11. PLACE FOOTER LOGS FIRST AND THEN HEADER (TOP) LOG. SET HEADER LOG
AT A MAXIMUM OF 31NCHES ABOVE THE INVERT ELEVATION.
12. AVERAGE STEP HEIGHTS/DROPS SHALL NOT EXCEED 0.5 UNLESS SHOWN
OTHERWISE
13. CUT A NOTCH IN THE HEADER LOG APPROXIMATELY 30% OF THE CHANNEL
BOTTOM WIDTH AND EXTENDING DOWN TO THE INVERT ELEVATION. NOTCH
SHALL BE USED TO CENTER FLOW AND NOT EXCEED 3 INCHES IN DEPTH.
14. THE NUMBER OF STEPS MAY VARY BETWEEN BEGINNING AND END
STATIONING. SEE LONGITUDINAL PROFILE FOR STATION AND ELEVATION.
15. USE GEOTEXTILE FABRIC FOR DRAINAGE TO SEAL GAPS BETWEEN LOGS.
16. PLACE VEGETATION TRANSPLANTS FROM TOE OF STREAMBANK TO TOP OF
STREAMBANK.
17. SEE TYPICAL SECTION FOR CHANNEL DIMENSIONS.
LOG STEP POOL
NOT TO SCALE
4 WATER & LAND
SOLUTIONS
10940 Raven Ridge Rd., Suite 200
Raleigh, NC 27614
[phone]
waterlandsolutions.com
PROJECT ENGINEER
`111111111,,,! /
N CARp�
s/o
° SE
SCOTT ° N 1��`,
//111111111111
ENGINEERING SERVICES BY
WLS ENGINEERING, PLLC
FIRM LICENSE NO. P-1480
REVISIONS
A DRAFT MIT PLAN 4/24/17
'i B FINAL DRAFT MR PLAN 5126117
C FINAL MIT PLAN 8/21117
D ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION 11!7117
E AS -BUILT 11/30118
NO, DESCRIPTION DATE
PROJECT NAME
LAKE
WENDELL
MITIGATION
PROJECT
JOHNSTON COUNTY, NC
DRAWING INFORMATION
PROJECT NO.: 97081
FILENAME:U4 LAKEWENDELL DETAIL SHEETS.DWC
DESIGNED BY' KMVMSH
DRAWN BY: APL
DATE: 11-30-18
HORIZ. SCALE N.T.S.
VERT.SCALE: N.T.S_
SHEET NAME
DETAILS
SHEET NUMBER
7

01
OT O� - EXIST 24" DIA. RCP
�Jmv INV.OUT=300.92
v Q
^o :: BEGIN CONSTRUCTION Rt DO NOT DISTURB
STA. 10+00.00 EXISTING STRUCTURES
m rq (TYP.) G.
7
INSTAL tj
\\ ` LOG WEIR (TYP.)
1400
Ce) PROPOSED FLOODPLAIN—
BENCH LIMITS
SITE ENTRANCE
4cu
% REMOVE EXISTING RCP INSTALL GATE (TYP)
SYSTEM AND DAYLIGHT NEW
CE'
VEG
PLOT k
#1 /12.0 AS -BUILT THALWEG
p (TYP.) 13+00
GRADE CONTROL LOG
J -HOOK VANE (TYP.)
REMOVE EXISTING FENCE
WITHIN CONSERVATION
EASEMENT (TYP.)
30 RCP
INV 290.22
INSTALL STONE AND
LOG STEP -POOL (TYPE
k
EXISTING FARM PATH TO BE
RELOCATED
REMOVE EXISTING 24" RCP AT STA 14+86J
INSTALL (1) 30" DIA. RCP PERMANENT CULVERT
STREAM CROSS; G AT STA 13+681
APPROXIMATELY 0.4' BELOW STREAMBED 28'LONG
INV IN = 290.40
INV OUT = 289.30
AS -BUILT TOP OF
BANK (TYP.)
C INSTA E CONST�OTED
FLE P
9010
N:72396
�[
E:21927-19,06
r 290.72
INV.=29.08 �� \
t
INSTALL GEOLIFT WITH
/ TOEWOOD (TYP.)
9007
14:724016.43
E:2192721f1f
291.24
8111
N1F N:723830.68
P
WILLIAM ODELL EDWARDS (. E-2192538.73
DB 1900 PG 47B �`:L284.92
G PN 16KO2037A
INSTALL
TREE PROTECTION p ./
FENCING (TYP.)
v 1, r
-SECT #1 /I/
EXISTING
WETLANDS (TYP.) /
EXISTING CPP TO REMAIN
_= V'OUT:288.74
k -��-
k
REMOVE EXISTING SPOIL
WITHIN CONSERVATION -tom/
EASEMENT. co
INSTALL WATER QUALITY 1
TREATMENT FEATURE (TYP.)
Ib+YY
WATER & LAND
SOLUTIONS
10940 Raven Ridge Rd., Suite 20C
Raleigh, NC 27614
[phone]
waterlandsolutions.com
PROJECT ENGINEER
\11111111////
CARO''''
aoFEss/ °
wee
2 67 "
`
_ �liyo
CINES°��
SCOTT
111111111111\'
ENGINEERING SERVICES BY
WLS ENGINEERING, PLLC
FIRM LICENSE NO. P-1480
REVISIONS
A DRAFT MIT PLAN 4117117
B FINAL DRAFT MIT PLAN 5/26117
C FINAL MIT PLAN 812107
D ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION 1117!17
E AS -BUILT 11130118
NO. DESCRIPTION DATE
PROJECT NAME
LAKE
WENDELL
MITIGATION
PROJECT
JOHNSTON COUNTY, NC
DRAWING INFORMATION
PROJECT NO.: 97081
FILENAME - 08-14__WE WENDED_ PP_SHEETS.DW(
DESIGNED BY: KVS/WSH
DRAWN BY: APL
DATE - 11-30-18
HORIZ. SCALE: 1"= 50'
VERT. SCALE : 1"= 6'
NORTH
30 15 0 30 60
GRAPHIC SCALE
SHEET NAME
mu
PLAN AND
PROFILE
SHEET NUMBER
8
PROPOSED (
) 30" DIA. RCP 28' L
-i.73 ;�
300
300
14
�
2 U)
_
z
z
\
K
w
L
EXISTING GROUND
Z
U
Z
Om
o
W
U+
go
Z�
LU
m
U)
AS -BUILT THALWEG
RCP
290
290
ANKFULL
97b I
N
rn
II O
7 rn
z_ co
N D
SIGN THALWEG
8
z_
38se0
.70-
280
280
Ib+YY
WATER & LAND
SOLUTIONS
10940 Raven Ridge Rd., Suite 20C
Raleigh, NC 27614
[phone]
waterlandsolutions.com
PROJECT ENGINEER
\11111111////
CARO''''
aoFEss/ °
wee
2 67 "
`
_ �liyo
CINES°��
SCOTT
111111111111\'
ENGINEERING SERVICES BY
WLS ENGINEERING, PLLC
FIRM LICENSE NO. P-1480
REVISIONS
A DRAFT MIT PLAN 4117117
B FINAL DRAFT MIT PLAN 5/26117
C FINAL MIT PLAN 812107
D ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION 1117!17
E AS -BUILT 11130118
NO. DESCRIPTION DATE
PROJECT NAME
LAKE
WENDELL
MITIGATION
PROJECT
JOHNSTON COUNTY, NC
DRAWING INFORMATION
PROJECT NO.: 97081
FILENAME - 08-14__WE WENDED_ PP_SHEETS.DW(
DESIGNED BY: KVS/WSH
DRAWN BY: APL
DATE - 11-30-18
HORIZ. SCALE: 1"= 50'
VERT. SCALE : 1"= 6'
NORTH
30 15 0 30 60
GRAPHIC SCALE
SHEET NAME
mu
PLAN AND
PROFILE
SHEET NUMBER
8

VEG
PLOT
#2
-- CE -
sobs
N77� 8 23
E:29531. 5
28 .62 A
A
aI
7
X -SECT #8
8111
N:723830.68
E:2192538.73
284.92
4:
h I
CE
INSTALL CONSTRUCTED LOG
RIFFLE (TYP.)
VEG
PLOT
#3
f:
INSTALL
LOG WEI
REMOVE EXISTING SPOIL
WITHIN CONSERVATION
EASEMENT
INSTALL GEOLIFT WITH
TOE WOOD (TYP )
AS BUILTTHALWEG
(TYPO
I INSTALL GRADE
ONTROL LOG J -HOOK
VANE(TYP)
CE
17038
N:723813.79
EY21,92217.75
276.91
X -SECT #2
N723859.35
E:2192235.02
277.08
N/F
WILLIAM ODELL EDWARDS
DB 1900 PG 478
PN 16KO2037A
CE
INSTALL CONSTRUCTED CE
STONE RIFFLE (TYP.)
AS BUILT TOP OF VEG
BANK (TYP.) PLOT
TpJ-
X \REMOVE EXISTING FENCE ay
X WITHIN CONSERVATION
`k EASEMENT (TYP.) INSTALL GRADE
CONTROL LOG J -HOOK
END CONSTRUCTION RS VANE (TYP.)
STA. 13+55.51 x
END CONSTRUCTION R1 INSTALL FIELD �1
BEGIN CONSTRUCTION R2 FENCE (TYP.)
STA 18+37.19
I
WATER & LAND
WINSTALL WATER QUALITY SOLUTIONS
■ TREATMENT FEATURE WITH
■ OUTLET CHANNEL (TYP.)
co
Lw 10940 Raven Ridge Rd., Suite 20C
Raleigh, NC 27614
[phone]
waterlandsolutions.com
2
PROJECT ENGINEER
0
`111111111111//
CARO'
WATE
�_.. QUALITY
�1Cc FEATURE
C
_ t SCOTT ° �
-� '11111111111`
- ENGINEERING SERVICES BY
WLS ENGINEERING, PLLC
FIRM LICENSE NO. P-1480
REVISIONS
A DRAFT MIT PLAN 07117
INSTALL ROOT B FINAL DRAFT MIT PLAN 5126117
WADS (TYP.) %i C FINAL MIT PLAN 8121117
D ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION 1117117
n E AS -BUILT 11/30118
j' NO. DESCRIPTION DATE
PROJECT NAME
290
zu+uu
21+00
22+00
23+00
LAKE
WENDELL
MITIGATION
PROJECT
JOHNSTON COUNTY, NC
DRAWING INFORMATION
PROJECT NO.: 97081
FILENAME: 08-14 LAKE WENDELL_PP_SHEETS.DW(
DESIGNED BY: KVSNVSH
DRAWNBY: APL
DATE: 11-30.18
HORIZ. SCALE: 1"= 60'
VERT. SCALE: 1" = 6'
NORTH
30 15 0 30 60
GRAPHIC SCALE
SHEET NAME
PLAN AND
PROFILE
260
SHEET NUMBER
24+00 9
s°
1,
280
280
°
I\
2.53 2.4p t
P.37
1°
2.39
v \j
�.
z7,
°
EXISTING GROUND
265°
AS -BUILT Th
LWEG DESIGN
2.80
`%
of z
BANKFULL
z O
2.76
270
~
270
L
DESIGN THALWEG
Elf
1(o
\
o(J±
v I�
Uzi
wd
L
wlm (1)
260
zu+uu
21+00
22+00
23+00
LAKE
WENDELL
MITIGATION
PROJECT
JOHNSTON COUNTY, NC
DRAWING INFORMATION
PROJECT NO.: 97081
FILENAME: 08-14 LAKE WENDELL_PP_SHEETS.DW(
DESIGNED BY: KVSNVSH
DRAWNBY: APL
DATE: 11-30.18
HORIZ. SCALE: 1"= 60'
VERT. SCALE: 1" = 6'
NORTH
30 15 0 30 60
GRAPHIC SCALE
SHEET NAME
PLAN AND
PROFILE
260
SHEET NUMBER
24+00 9

CE
VEG
PLOT
#4
7A0
INSTALL ROOT
WADS (TYP.)
P dFn
INSTALL GRADE
CONTROLLOG
J -HOOK VANE
(TYP.)
fall
CE CE
INSTALL CONSTRUCTED
LOG RIFFLE (TYP.)
TIE DIVERSION SWALE
INTO NEW CHANNEL
(SEE TYPICAL SECTJS?*' 4582
-AS-BUILT THALWEGj`. N:723912.6L1
(TYP.) _�� • E:2191598.16
4.41
INSTALL WATER QUALITY
TREATMENT FEATURE WITH
OUTLET CHANNEL (TYP.)
e�
CE
INSTALL GEOLIFT WITH
TOE WOOD (TYP.)
y
INSTALL CONSTRUCTED
STONE RIFFLE (TYP.)
-OG STEP -POOL (TYP.) END CONSTRUCTION R2
BEGIN CONSTRUCTION R3
STA. 28+32.00
REMOVE EXISTING FENCE
WITHIN CONSERVATION
EASEMENT(TYP.)
- AS -BUILT TOP OF ` !r
BANK (TYP.) w k,
CE
DO NOT DISTURB
EXISTING WETLAND 117,
�t
--=t;j X
INSTALL FIELD �
FENCE (TYP.)
EXISTING FARM
/ PATH TO REMAIN
X -SECT #3.1
4592
N:723962.57
E:2.191599,25
INST)ALL.STOI AND
28475'
INSTALL WATER QUALITY
TREATMENT FEATURE WITH
OUTLET CHANNEL (TYP.)
e�
CE
INSTALL GEOLIFT WITH
TOE WOOD (TYP.)
y
INSTALL CONSTRUCTED
STONE RIFFLE (TYP.)
-OG STEP -POOL (TYP.) END CONSTRUCTION R2
BEGIN CONSTRUCTION R3
STA. 28+32.00
REMOVE EXISTING FENCE
WITHIN CONSERVATION
EASEMENT(TYP.)
- AS -BUILT TOP OF ` !r
BANK (TYP.) w k,
CE
DO NOT DISTURB
EXISTING WETLAND 117,
�t
--=t;j X
INSTALL FIELD �
FENCE (TYP.)
EXISTING FARM
/ PATH TO REMAIN
L6.Uu
Zy uu
I
1iWATER & LAND
SOLUTIONS
10940 Raven Ridge Rd., Suite 20C
Raleigh, NC 27614
[phone]
waterlandsolutions.com
PROJECT ENGINEER
\111111111111111
°oFESS °9
AL -
SCOTT ° N0�1,.
11"IllI 11111\\1
ENGINEERING SERVICES BY
WLS ENGINEERING, PLLC
FIRM LICENSE NO. P-1480
REVISIONS
A DRAFT MIT PLAN 4117117
B FINAL DRAFT MIT PLAN 5126117
C FINAL MIT PLAN 8121117
D ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION 1117!17
E AS -BUILT 1113011E
NO. DESCRIPTION DATE
PROJECT NAME
LAKE
WENDELL
MITIGATION
PROJECT
JOHNSTON COUNTY, NC
DRAWING INFORMATION
PROJECT NO.: 97081
FILENAME :08.14 LAKE WENDELL PP SHEETS.DM
DESIGNED BY: KVSNVSH
DRAWN BY: APL
DATE11-3D-18
HORIZ. SCALE: 1" = 60'
VERT. SCALE : 11=6'
NORTH
30 15 0 30 50
GRAPHIC SCALE
SHEET NAME
R2&R3
PLAN AND
PROFILE
SHEETNUMBER
10
N �
m
Z
OV
U �
K N g
inZc)
o0+
U Z N
03
270
Z LU
W 0] N
270
.64
257
�263j
F
I I I
z.65
2 .
-.439,
4 N
I
,l �I
-1.94110
w
_• "�
— .i-
2.17^
AS -E
JILT THALWEG
✓
09 ° 218
07"��
EXISTING GROUND
DESIGN
2.06
1.9s
11
BANKFULL
2 00
260
DESIGN THALWEG
- •85
260
250
250
L6.Uu
Zy uu
I
1iWATER & LAND
SOLUTIONS
10940 Raven Ridge Rd., Suite 20C
Raleigh, NC 27614
[phone]
waterlandsolutions.com
PROJECT ENGINEER
\111111111111111
°oFESS °9
AL -
SCOTT ° N0�1,.
11"IllI 11111\\1
ENGINEERING SERVICES BY
WLS ENGINEERING, PLLC
FIRM LICENSE NO. P-1480
REVISIONS
A DRAFT MIT PLAN 4117117
B FINAL DRAFT MIT PLAN 5126117
C FINAL MIT PLAN 8121117
D ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION 1117!17
E AS -BUILT 1113011E
NO. DESCRIPTION DATE
PROJECT NAME
LAKE
WENDELL
MITIGATION
PROJECT
JOHNSTON COUNTY, NC
DRAWING INFORMATION
PROJECT NO.: 97081
FILENAME :08.14 LAKE WENDELL PP SHEETS.DM
DESIGNED BY: KVSNVSH
DRAWN BY: APL
DATE11-3D-18
HORIZ. SCALE: 1" = 60'
VERT. SCALE : 11=6'
NORTH
30 15 0 30 50
GRAPHIC SCALE
SHEET NAME
R2&R3
PLAN AND
PROFILE
SHEETNUMBER
10

VEG
R�
PLOT
\ INSTALL CONSTRUCTED
AS-BUILTTHALWEG STONE RIFFLE (TYP.)
\•� �' ��� INSTALL GRADE
v Y // CONTROL LOG J -HOOK
- - VANE (TYP j
INSTALL GEOLIFT WITH VERNAL POOL INSTALL OUTLET CHANNEL
TOE WOOD (TYP.) (SEE TYPICAL SECTION)
+ X _--
DIVERSION SWALE INTO
►t J PROPOSEDVERNALPOOL
_ (SEE TYPICAL SECTION)
Rif:
CE
CE
5043
N:723845.97
E:2191050.98 VERNAL POOL
255.15
X -SECT #4
1
" 5051
N:723 10.79
E:219 030.86
INSTALL CONSTRUCTED
LOG RIFFLE (TYP.)
INSTALL WATER QUALITY
TRE ATT INENTFEATUREWITH
OUTLET CHANNEL (TYP.)
_ CE JY 11
�Y CE
15016 VERNAL POOL
N:723800.50
E:2190846.65
ip 252.34
\� 3?G �� , •�z?� AS -BUILT TOP OF
BANK (TYP.)
X-SECT#5 �1 JNV36°
INSTALL LOG VANE
\
15014
N:723874.86
E:2190844.23 36• RCP
VEG
253.44 ERNAL POOL INV.<247p9
PLOT w'
#7
v�
n
270
EXISTING FARM
INSTALL FIELD
PATH TO REMAIN
FENCE (TYP.)
INSTALL WATER QUALITY
TRE ATT INENTFEATUREWITH
OUTLET CHANNEL (TYP.)
_ CE JY 11
�Y CE
15016 VERNAL POOL
N:723800.50
E:2190846.65
ip 252.34
\� 3?G �� , •�z?� AS -BUILT TOP OF
BANK (TYP.)
X-SECT#5 �1 JNV36°
INSTALL LOG VANE
\
15014
N:723874.86
E:2190844.23 36• RCP
VEG
253.44 ERNAL POOL INV.<247p9
PLOT w'
#7
v�
n
270
1
1iWATER & LAND
SOLUTIONS
10940 Raven Ridge Rd., Suite 200
Raleigh, NC 27614
[phone]
waterlandsolutions.com
PROJECT ENGINEER
\1111111111111
CARo
°Q�SS/
°
AL
21967
p'q
SCOTT, N
11'11111111111111
ENGINEERING SERVICES BY
WLS ENGINEERING, PLLC
FIRM LICENSE NO. P-1480
REVISIONS
A DRAFT MIT PLAN 4117117
B FINAL DRAFT MIT PLAN 5/26117
C FINAL MIT PLAN 8121117
D ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION 1117117
E AS -BUILT 11/30118
NO. DESCRIPTION DATE
PROJECT NAME
LAKE
WENDELL
MITIGATION
PROJECT
JOHNSTON COUNTY, NC
DRAWING INFORMATION
PROJECT NO.: 97081
FILENAME A&14_LAKE WENDED_ PP_SHEETS.DWC
DESIGNED BY: KVSNVSH
DRAWN BY APL
DATE: 11-30.18
HORIZ. SCALE: 1"=60'
VERT. SCALE:
0_�
NORTH
30 15 0 30 so
GRAPHIC SCALE
SHEET NAME
R3
PLAN AND
PROFILE
SHEET NUMBER
11
EXISTING GROUN
260
260
2/ -1.74°
1.96
1.92°
1.91
93%
-1.73% -1.81% '
AS -BUILT THALWEG
1.96°
.96 ,
-1.66^/,
� •
1.88 6
"
-.8 %
1.66%
zev
DESIGN
250
B
NKFULL
T
AS -BUILT THALWI
G DESIGN THALWEG
240
240
1
1iWATER & LAND
SOLUTIONS
10940 Raven Ridge Rd., Suite 200
Raleigh, NC 27614
[phone]
waterlandsolutions.com
PROJECT ENGINEER
\1111111111111
CARo
°Q�SS/
°
AL
21967
p'q
SCOTT, N
11'11111111111111
ENGINEERING SERVICES BY
WLS ENGINEERING, PLLC
FIRM LICENSE NO. P-1480
REVISIONS
A DRAFT MIT PLAN 4117117
B FINAL DRAFT MIT PLAN 5/26117
C FINAL MIT PLAN 8121117
D ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION 1117117
E AS -BUILT 11/30118
NO. DESCRIPTION DATE
PROJECT NAME
LAKE
WENDELL
MITIGATION
PROJECT
JOHNSTON COUNTY, NC
DRAWING INFORMATION
PROJECT NO.: 97081
FILENAME A&14_LAKE WENDED_ PP_SHEETS.DWC
DESIGNED BY: KVSNVSH
DRAWN BY APL
DATE: 11-30.18
HORIZ. SCALE: 1"=60'
VERT. SCALE:
0_�
NORTH
30 15 0 30 so
GRAPHIC SCALE
SHEET NAME
R3
PLAN AND
PROFILE
SHEET NUMBER
11

REMOVE EXISTING POND DAM TO RESTORE
NATURAL VALLEY CROSS-SECTION
E CE
VERNAL POOL INSTALL GRADE
CONTROLLOG
J -HOOK VANE
h AS -BUILT G (TYP.)
X -SECT'*$ (TYP.) AS -BUILT TOP OF 36". C
BANK (TYP.) INV.=24
36" RCPm
INV.=247.09
�
RNAL POOL INSTALL GEOLIFT
WITH TOE
VEG WOOD(TYP.)
PLOT
#7
265
+2600
X X
+260.0
REMOVE EXISTING 12" DIA. CMP s, "
INSTALL PERMANENT CULVERT STREAM CROSSING
(2) 36" DIA. RCP AT APPROXIMATELY 0.5' BELOW CF
STREAMBED40'LONG
INV 1N =247,50 !
INV OUT = 24650 TIE DIVERSION SWALE INTO EXISTING G`
(SEE DETAIL ON SHEET 5) CHANNEL, DIVERTING FLOW AROUND
PROPOSED CHANNEL BLOCK (SEE TYP.
CE SECTION)
DO NOT DISTURB
CE EXISTING WETLAND
WATER & LAND
SOLUTIONS
10940 Raven Ridge Rd., Suite 200
Raleigh, NC 27614
CHANNEL BLOCK END CONSTRUCTION R3
(TYP.) CE waterlandsolutions.com ` (919)614-51 1 1
` .
BEGIN CONSTRUCTION R4 � �
STA. 41+00.00 GROUNDWATER f
36" RCP GAUGE 131675
�\ !
INV.=246.53 N:723739.52 \\,Y V24'1.53
300.31
X -SECT #6�t— 1673723781.14
36"RCP �,_�f`�N:723787.43 2190285.31
INV.=246.50 E:2190309.00 243.17
243.48 41
INSTALL CONSTRUCTED
STONE RIFFLE (TYP.) EXISTING ERODED SPILLWAY OUTLET CHANNEL TO
E ABANDONED, FILLED AND STABILIZED WITH
SEEDING AND EROSION CONTROL MATTING. 3�
REMOVE EXISTING FENCE WITHIN
0SERVATION EASEMENT (TYP.) 3,J 30
INSTALL FIELD
EXISTING RIP -RAP FENCE (TYP.)
TO REMAIN
PROJECT ENGINEER
\1111111111///
o�\N CARP
O
SCOTT
/'//111111111111
ENGINEERING SERVICES BY
WLS ENGINEERING, PLLC
FIRM LICENSE NO. P-1480
REVISIONS
A DRAFT MIT PLAN 4/17/17
B FINAL DRAFT MIT PLAN 5/26/17
C FINAL MIT PLAN 8/21/17
D ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION 11(7/17
E AS -BUILT 11130/18
NO. DESCRIPTION DATE
PROJECT NAME
LAKE
WENDELL
MITIGATION
PROJECT
JOHNSTON COUNTY, NC
DRAWING INFORMATION
PROJECT NO.: 97081
FILENAME :08.14 LAKE WENDELL PP_SHEETS, DWG
DESIGNED BY: KVS/WSH
DRANN BY: APL
DATE; 11-30-18
HORIZ. SCALE: 1"= 60'
VERT. SCALE: 1"= 6'
NORTH
30 15 0 30 $0
GRAPHIC SCALE
SHEET NAME
R3&R4
PLAN AND
PROFILE
SHEETNUMBER
12
/ I
/ \
PROPOSED (2) 36" DI
. RCP 40'L
w
\ O
L_
U
U
=
�
255
255
Nzo
/
Zoo
O
"Z�
I ❑
Z
W
LIJWf
O]U)
01/
° I
1.90
u
°
1.76 , (2)36" RC
I
� 577
I
(V
DESIGN + I, v
14/
"
245
B
NKFULL " o r
.280
-
245
? -rn
w n a N N
.p
°-273 j
LU
I
A
F Z Z
v LU
DESIGN THALWEG\,,2,7
I
_ _ 1.8
°
Z _
LU o
EXISTING GROUN
Z
W
✓\
I\
\
235
235
PROJECT ENGINEER
\1111111111///
o�\N CARP
O
SCOTT
/'//111111111111
ENGINEERING SERVICES BY
WLS ENGINEERING, PLLC
FIRM LICENSE NO. P-1480
REVISIONS
A DRAFT MIT PLAN 4/17/17
B FINAL DRAFT MIT PLAN 5/26/17
C FINAL MIT PLAN 8/21/17
D ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION 11(7/17
E AS -BUILT 11130/18
NO. DESCRIPTION DATE
PROJECT NAME
LAKE
WENDELL
MITIGATION
PROJECT
JOHNSTON COUNTY, NC
DRAWING INFORMATION
PROJECT NO.: 97081
FILENAME :08.14 LAKE WENDELL PP_SHEETS, DWG
DESIGNED BY: KVS/WSH
DRANN BY: APL
DATE; 11-30-18
HORIZ. SCALE: 1"= 60'
VERT. SCALE: 1"= 6'
NORTH
30 15 0 30 $0
GRAPHIC SCALE
SHEET NAME
R3&R4
PLAN AND
PROFILE
SHEETNUMBER
12

DO NOT DISTURB
EXISTING WETLAND
8 7hM
m J*
1.14
35.31
4f.*
INSTALL FIELD
FENCE (TYP.)
255
REMOVE WOODY DEBRIS AND
REGRADE STREAM BANKS, SLOPE,
SEED AND MAT FROM APPROXIMATE
STA. 46+26 TO 47+37 TO REPAIR
HURRICANE MATTHEW DAMAGE
A
APPROXIMATE
LOCATION OF 100 YEAR
FEMA FLOOD ZONE'AE'
(FIRM PANEL 1792)
3O
3.7
STA. 49+22.89
LAKE WENDELL
45+UU 46+UO 47+00
48+00
49+00
WATER & LAND
SOLUTIONS
10940 Raven Ridge Rd., Suite 200
Raleigh, NC 27614
[phone]
waterlandsolutions.com
PROJECT ENGINEER
\\�\11111111///
CARj,
°SOF ES 0/ °
E L
9 . �9
''GIN�F�^ °
SCOTT°N
ENGINEERING SERVICES BY
WLS ENGINEERING, PLLC
FIRM LICENSE NO. P-1480
REVISIONS
A DRAFT MIT PLAN 4117117
B FINAL DRAFT MIT PLAN 5/26117
C FINAL MIT PLAN 8/21117
D ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION 1117117
E AS -BUILT 11/30118
DATE
PROJECT NAME
LAKE
WENDELL
MITIGATION
PROJECT
JOHNSTON COUNTY, NC
DRAWING INFORMATION
PROJECT NO.: 87081
FILENAME:06.14 LAKEWENDELL_PP_SHEETS.DWC
DESIGNED BY: KVS/WSH
DRAWN BY APL
DATE: 11-30-18
HORIZ. SCALE: 1" = 60'
VERT. SCALE: 1.=6'
NORTH
30 15 0 30 $0
GRAPHIC SCALE
SHEET NAME
m,
PLAN AND
PROFILE
SHEETNUMBER
13
Q
z
O
245
F
U
245
m
N N
Z 0
O o
U
O Q
2 F-
W U)
� n
l
A
I
235
L_
\
/ \
235
EXISTIN
GROUND \
225
225
45+UU 46+UO 47+00
48+00
49+00
WATER & LAND
SOLUTIONS
10940 Raven Ridge Rd., Suite 200
Raleigh, NC 27614
[phone]
waterlandsolutions.com
PROJECT ENGINEER
\\�\11111111///
CARj,
°SOF ES 0/ °
E L
9 . �9
''GIN�F�^ °
SCOTT°N
ENGINEERING SERVICES BY
WLS ENGINEERING, PLLC
FIRM LICENSE NO. P-1480
REVISIONS
A DRAFT MIT PLAN 4117117
B FINAL DRAFT MIT PLAN 5/26117
C FINAL MIT PLAN 8/21117
D ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION 1117117
E AS -BUILT 11/30118
DATE
PROJECT NAME
LAKE
WENDELL
MITIGATION
PROJECT
JOHNSTON COUNTY, NC
DRAWING INFORMATION
PROJECT NO.: 87081
FILENAME:06.14 LAKEWENDELL_PP_SHEETS.DWC
DESIGNED BY: KVS/WSH
DRAWN BY APL
DATE: 11-30-18
HORIZ. SCALE: 1" = 60'
VERT. SCALE: 1.=6'
NORTH
30 15 0 30 $0
GRAPHIC SCALE
SHEET NAME
m,
PLAN AND
PROFILE
SHEETNUMBER
13

18" RCP
INV.=289.19
PROPOSED 12' WIDE
FARM PATH (TYP.)
-4
INSTALL (1) 18" DIA RCP
PERMANENT CULVERT
STREAM CROSSING 20' L
IN=290.40
INV. OUT=290.50
BEGIN CONSTRUCTION R5
I STA. 10+00.00
INSTALL FIELD FENCE
(TYP.)
CE
J REMOVE EXISTING
I RCP SYSTEM INSTALL LOG WEIR (TYP.)
AS -BUILT THALWEG /
00 (TYP.)
11+00
18" RCP -....
NV.=288.79
EXISTING FARM PATH TO
BE RELOCATED. DO NOT
DISTURB EXISTING BARN
L INSTALL STONE AND
LOG STEP -POOL (TYP.)
VEG
PLOT
#2
INSTALL CONSTRUCTED
STONE RIFFLE (TYP.)
37- -
END CONSTRUCTION R5
STA. 13+55.51
ce
TREE PROTECTION
FENCE (TYP.)
80 81„
N 7 I81
E:21 2531.651% FLOW
285 2 GAUGE
d1r�s
CE
VEG
PLOT
#3
✓A
AS -BUILT TOP OF 00 `// REMOVE EXISTING FENCE
X -SECT #8 BANK (TYP.) ,gr, WITHIN CONSERVATION
EXISTING (j EASEMENT (TYP.)
8111 WETLANDS/
N:723830.68 r
2:2192538.73 r7
284.92 .�
7 y f,
295
P P SED (1) 18"
295
O
N
U
0 Un
N N
Z +
O
18" RCP
o
2 F
W sd
W (/]
a"
DESIGN
BANKFULL
4' o
$ 30
N DESIGN THALWEG
Z {
?.9? "
285
285
AS -BUILT TF
ALWEG-J
Z
LD
U
� g
Zo
op
Z�
w�
275
m
275
1iWATER & LAND
SOLUTIONS
10940 Raven Ridge Rd., Suite 200
Raleigh, NC 27614
[phone]
waterlandsolutions.com
� J
PROJECT ENGINEER
\\111111111]
N°� s R��
FIVO I N
SCOTT ° N
,'/111111111\\\\
ENGINEERING SERVICES BY
WLS ENGINEERING, PLLC
FIRM LICENSE NO. P-1480
REVISIONS
A DRAFT MIT PLAN 4/17117
B FINAL DRAFT MIT PLAN 5/26117
C FINAL MIT PLAN 8/21/17
D ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION 11!7/17
E AS -BUILT 11/30/18
DESCRIPTION j DATE
PROJECT NAME
LAKE
WENDELL
MITIGATION
PROJECT
JOHNSTON COUNTY, NC
DRAWING INFORMATION
PROJECT NO. * 97081
FILENAME: M14_LAKE WENDELL PP_SHEETS.DWG
DESIGNED BY: KVSMSH
DRAWN BY APL
DATE: 11-30-18
HORIZ. SCALE: 1"=60'
VERT. SCALE: 1" = 6
(D
NORTH
30 15 0 30 60
GRAPHIC SCALE
SHEET NAME
R5
PLAN AND
PROFILE
SHEET NUMBER
14

PLANTING NOTES
1. THE FOLLOWING TABLES LIST THE PROPOSED VEGETATION SPECIES
SELECTION FOR THE PROJECT REVEGETATION. THE TOTAL PLANTING
AREA IS APPROXIMATELY 8.9 ACRES AND WILL VARY BASED ON SITE
CONDITIONS DURING CONSTRUCTION.
2. FINAL VEGETATION SPECIES SELECTION MAY CHANGE DUE TO
REFINEMENT OR SPECIES AVAILABILITY AT THE TIME OF PLANTING.
SPECIES SUBSTITUTIONS WILL BE COORDINATED BETWEEN ENGINEER AND
PLANTING CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO THE PROCUREMENT OF PLANTISEED
STOCK
3. IN GENERAL, WOODY SPECIES SHALL BE PLANTED AT A DENSITY OF 680
STEMS PER ACRE AND A MINIMUM OF 50 FEET FROM THE TOP OF
RESTORED STREAMBANKS TO THE REVEGETATION LIMITS. EXACT
PLACEMENT OF THE SPECIES WILL BE DETERMINED BY THE
CONTRACTOR'S VEGETATION SPECIALIST PRIOR TO SITE PLANTING AND
BASED ON THE WETNESS CONDITIONS OF PLANTING LOCATIONS.
4. SUPPLEMENTAL PLANTING ACTIVITIES SHALL BE PERFORMED WITHIN THE
EXISTING BUFFER ENHANCEMENT AREA (BUFFER GROUP 2) USING
SPECIES DESCRIBED IN RIPARIAN BUFFER PLANT MIXTURE.
5. ANY INVASIVE SPECIES VEGETATION, SUCH AS CHINESE PRIVET
(LIGUSTRUM SINENSE), MULTIFLORA ROSE (ROSA MULTIFLORA), AND
MICROSTEGIUM (MICROSTEGIUM VIMINEUM), WILL BE INITIALLY TREATED AL
AS DESCRIBED IN THE CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS PRIOR TO
PLANTING ACTIVITIES TO ALLOW NATIVE PLANTS TO BECOME
ESTABLISHED WITHIN THE CONSERVATION EASEMENT. i .% +
6. LARGER NATIVE TREE SPECIES TO BE PRESERVED WILL BE FLAGGED BY v r} «+ `+kms � +
THE ENGINEER PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. ANY TREES 1 `.' «' .r .fir . F . . .
HARVESTED FOR WOODY MATERIAL WILL BE UTILIZED TO PROVIDE BED ''+ l �F,},+` .n
AND BANK STABILIZATION, COVER AND/OR NESTING HABITAT.+%'++++.' `''+' « A
',',
7. ALL DISTURBED AREAS WILL BE STABILIZED USING MULCHING AND ,', « '
SEEDING AS DEFINED IN THE CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS AND THE « yl I�.+ +DD.+` `
APPROVED SEDIMENTATION AND EROSION CONTROL PLANS. +` 'h' '.',`..',`+' " ° +`+`.
+
1 a3;';+;`+++R
'
tl+.... . .��"�++ + ++ +.++.+.+.++
+ .
.� r. l
0` '�'�F
.\ `
...+
`` Piot. RL4T 11th.
+++++ +y++ `«9. `+)
«90``-��'`3�' `«O` -'♦fig -'30♦+'
Botanical Name Common Name
Application Rate
(lbs/acre)
September to
`'`'` `..'«.+.. p
g,. ... fiof
130
March
'`
`x'33 +++
:`
April to August
Urochloa ramosa Browntop Millet (Wane
Season)
40
mLLJI
Quercus michauxii Swamp Chestnut Oak
7%
Permanent Herbaceous Seed Mixture-Streambank, Floodplain, Wetlands and
=SCOCO
PERMANENT SEEDING
10%7Wy
FACW
(Proposed Seed Rate a 15 lbs/acre)
5%
Andropogon gerard/i
<'U'
10%
SCHEDULE
FAC
2.0
Deer Tongue
15%
1.50
TEMPORARY SEEDING
SCHEDULE
Planting Dates
Botanical Name Common Name
Application Rate
(lbs/acre)
September to
Secale cereale Rye Grain (Cool Season)
130
March
I for Planting
(Iblacre)
April to August
Urochloa ramosa Browntop Millet (Wane
Season)
40
PLANTING ZONES
RIPARIAN BUFFER RESTORATION (BUFFER GROUP 1)
MRIPARIAN BUFFER ENHANCEMENT (BUFFER GROUP 2)
o p o 0 o RIPARIAN BUFFER PRESERVATION (BUFFER GROUP 3)
a'4*4
w .+. i .
V` . . /
441
`
Q�,',', /
i t 2170' o '
a .. ,P4D ♦, : �
&t Y
30 �� ` nr0
PLANTING SCHEDULE
Botanical Name
Common Name
%Proposed
Seeding Rate
Wetland
Botanical Name
Common Name
I for Planting
(Iblacre)
Tolerance
Betula nigra River Birch
7%bk
by Species
Quercus michauxii Swamp Chestnut Oak
7%
Permanent Herbaceous Seed Mixture-Streambank, Floodplain, Wetlands and
Riparian
Buffer Areas
Platanusoccidentalis American Sycamore
10%7Wy
FACW
(Proposed Seed Rate a 15 lbs/acre)
5%
Andropogon gerard/i
Big blue stem
10%
1.50
FAC
Dichanthelium
Deer Tongue
15%
1.50
FACW
clandestinum
(Proposed 8'x 8' Planting Spacing 680 Stems/Acre)
Diospyros virginiana Persimmon
3%K
FAC
Carex cnnata
Fringed sedge
10%
2.25
FACW+
Chasmanthium
River cats
5%
1.50
FACU
latifolium
FACW
Alnus semulata Tag Alder
8%bWy
Elymus virginicus
Virginia wild rye
15%
1.50
FAC
Juncus effusus
Soft rush
5%
2.25
FACW+
Panicum virgatum
Switchgrass
10%
1.50
FAC+
Eutrochiumhstulosum Jae-pye-weed
5%
0.75
FACW
Schizachyrium
Little blue stem
scoparium
10%
0.75
FACU
Tripsacum dactyloides
Eastern
gamagrass
5%
0.75
FAC+
Sorghaslrum nutans
Indiangrass 1
10% 1
0.75
FACU
PLANTING ZONES
RIPARIAN BUFFER RESTORATION (BUFFER GROUP 1)
MRIPARIAN BUFFER ENHANCEMENT (BUFFER GROUP 2)
o p o 0 o RIPARIAN BUFFER PRESERVATION (BUFFER GROUP 3)
a'4*4
w .+. i .
V` . . /
441
`
Q�,',', /
i t 2170' o '
a .. ,P4D ♦, : �
&t Y
30 �� ` nr0
PLANTING SCHEDULE
Botanical Name
Common Name
% Proposed
for Planting
by Species
Wetland
Tolerance
Riparian Buffer Bare Root Plantings - Overstory
FINAL DRAFT MIT PLAN
(Proposed 8'x 8' Planting Spacing @ 680 StemslAcre)
Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
6%'M
FACW
Betula nigra River Birch
7%bk
FACW
Quercus michauxii Swamp Chestnut Oak
7%
FACW
Platanusoccidentalis American Sycamore
10%7Wy
FACW
Acer rubrum; Red Maple
5%
FAC
Linodendron tulipifera Tulip -poplar
io%'Pk
FACU
Quercus nigra Water Oak
a%741x
FAC
Quercus phellos, WllowOak
7%3k
FACW
Riparian Buffer Bare Root Plantings - Understory
(Proposed 8'x 8' Planting Spacing 680 Stems/Acre)
Diospyros virginiana Persimmon
3%K
FAC
Carpnuscaroliniana Ironwood
8%bwy
FAC
VMcIt-ha"L
Magnolia virginiana Sweetbay Magnolia
bqr
8%
-P*GJL
FACW
7ks;MtN04RA9ba
Ilex verticillata Wnterberry
K
3%
-PAG,
FACW
Lindera benzoin Spicebush
7%11ury
FACW
Alnus semulata Tag Alder
8%bWy
Laiyhrsa neacaaa FiazelnuL
Comus amomum Silky Dogwood
lid
3%
AIS
SU
FACW
Riparian Buffer Live Stake Plantings - Streambanks
(Proposed 2'J' Spacing @ Meander Bends and 6'-8' Spacing @ Riffle
Sections)
Sambucus canadensis Elderberry
20%
FACW
Salix sencea Silky Willow
30%
OBL
Salix nigra Black Willow
10%
OBL
Comus amomum Silky Dogwood
40%
FACW
WATER & LANE
SOLUTIONS
7721 Six Forks Rd., Suite 130
Raleigh, NC 27615
[phone]
waterlandsolutions.com
PROJECT ENGINEER
\\111111111/rrr
CARP
°ao
6FESS% ° to
o\
°°
° ° GINE a °
SCOTT
/jrri111111t1t
ENGINEERING SERVICES BY
WLS ENGINEERING, PLLC
FIRM LICENSE NO. P-1480
REVISIONS
A
DRAFT MIT PLAN
4124117
B
FINAL DRAFT MIT PLAN
5/26/17
C
FINAL MIT PLAN
8121117
D
ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION
11/7117
E
AS -BUILT
1113011E
NO. DESCRIPTION DATE
PROJECT NAME
LAKE
WENDELL
MITIGATION
PROJECT
JOHNSTON COUNTY, NC
DRAWING INFORMATION
PROJECT NO.: 97081
FILENAME : 1518 LN(EAENOELL_REVEGETATION-PLANS.DW
DESIGNED BY: KMVIWSH
DRAWN BY: APL
DATE: 11-30-18
HORIZ. SCALE: 1" = 80'
VERT. SCALE: NIA
Z`��
NORTH
40 20 0 40 so
GRAPHIC SCALE
SHEET NAME
REVEGETATION
PLAN
SHEETNUMBER

�-. .-•rad.��r^ aa�:'"F�I�a�+Wa'�e «,We�aa,L. Ja
P.
t2""k�0� �._ J'� r �� PLOT .'
- 1 �+±,
j
++ 4+ ` " ,nom++ �:.'
LULLJ
WATER'
PLANTING ZONES
RIPARIAN BUFFER RESTORATION (BUFFER GROUP 1)
RIPARIAN BUFFER ENHANCEMENT (BUFFER GROUP 2)
0 o c RIPARIAN BUFFER PRESERVATION (BUFFER GROUP 3)
-SEEM
A
_ r
WATER & LAND
SOLUTIONS
10940 Raven Ridge Rd., Suite 200
Raleigh, INC 27614
[phone]
waterlandsolutions.com
PROJECT ENGINEER
``111111111111/,
`��N CARO
- A -
o e°,
NEF� `
''11,111111111`1
ENGINEERING SERVICES BY
WLS ENGINEERING, PLLC
FIRM LICENSE NO. P-1480
REVISIONS
A DRAFT MIT PLAN 4124117
B FINAL DRAFT MIT PLAN 5126117
C FINAL MIT PLAN 8/2V17
D ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION 1117117
E AS -BUILT 11130!18
NO. DESCRIPTION DATE
PROJECT NAME
LAKE
WENDELL
MITIGATION
PROJECT
JOHNSTON COUNTY, NC
DRAWING INFORMATION
PROJECT NO.: 97081
FILENAME 1518_UIQ:WTNGBL_REVEGETATION_PUNS.BWG
DESIGNED BY: KMVM/SH
_ DRAWN BY: APL
DATE 11-30.18
HORIZ SCALE: 1"= 80`
VERT. SCALE: NIA
40 20 0 40 80
GRAPHIC SCALE
SHEET NAME
REVEGETATION
PLAN
SHEET NUMBER
W

WATER & LAND
SOLUTIONS
— — — 10940 Raven Ridge Rd., Suite 20C
Raleigh, NC 27614
[phone]
— — — waterlandsolutions.com
PLANTING ZONES - -
PROJECT ENGINEER
RIPARIAN BUFFER RESTORATION (BUFFER GROUP 1)
■ _ss/of /
i = -
RIPARIAN BUFFER ENHANCEMENT (BUFFER GROUP 2)
I- e e
[.�RIPARIAN BUFFER PRESERVATION (BUFFER GROUP 3) _ -' � •+ ■ yi%�+ �� ee°° NGiNE��°'° \
SCM
Y 7
ENGINEERING SERVICES BY
- - / .�'�✓' WLS ENGINEERING, PLLC
" • _� ,',J,i+',,.h—/�,+'/ ,+FIRM
,'.✓_+''.,''+ma+
FIRM
LICENSE P-1 ''ISIONS---- + REV
` `---- `-----------\ Z A DRAFT MIT PLAN
4/24/17+ ,
%/�
B FINAL DRAFT MIT PLAN 5/26/17 %
`
'.'y..+.. C FINAL MIT PLAN 8/21/17
+, «' D ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION 1117/17
�a`�`+ «' _ _ J G + + i �+ ++MiJ E AS -BUILT 11/30/18
+ + + . ++` +++ `'+ ` ' •`•'`+ . VEG.+,' ff + + + �'`f NO. DESCRIPTION DATE
+`+ -r-' • ,POT, « { `' A' `
aLOT ' _i__. +f r ,'.'.'.'fi +au +' PROJECT NAME
°cOooDOooG I I '1' +'4J'«' . + + 'y +++``+`•`+`+`+`+`+`+`+`+'+' ��„•v ,
■ \,. -- —0 GOG°OOGO Or`^nGp„G D°D C' \ ; t ,, + w^+ LAKE
! D o o°o°o°o°o°o°o'o°o°o-000 SC -D 1 I I{ + ',1`, / ■
■ - osv vLoo-
".-o.
°s°o o s°ao-a•.o o -C o o -o o- o. °• 1 I i
8c.0 O 1-'. o 0 0 0 G O U 0 0 O- D O O D O !/,',e ``
O O O' 0 0 0 0 0 '] O O b'•O--O��� O O O O 1 I ++I,•`'..+a ha� ,/^�
O OD O C D G D O D G".- Gp G G G G G D G G-OTi G -O -C' I - - / ~■ WENDELL
°O°C°O°O°O° o�N°'S'G-V°o•'-B°�°D°o°D°G°o°G°o°c°.Ore,°D I I ff, ` ` ` ` '.+f+`•`+`•'
! "D c°o°c°o°c°o°°°o°c°o°c°o° °boo°^°o°o°o cOo�'C•Oo° °odic°o°'o°o°o°b°d \ I I ''"+ `,�`�+''' « - / W !
° o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o° o. 0 6 0 0 0 o cboyc 0 0 0 0 0 0 �� +•I,++• • `+ y
c o c o c o G o c o c o c o c o c o c c D o o G o o o c G ooe o c o c c
.. _O D G D G D D D D D O D D D D D D D D O D O D G D D G G G G O. O D G O Dtl,\ D 1 p a:a �✓ ` '` +```++/' _!
.;;GGG°O°O°000°O°O°O°O°O°O°Oc0°O°O°000°O° O0000°o00°0°O°O°O°O°O orb °D•°O QQG°G-O° 1 , /j �.. ``+' �+, {{t{t���`�.`�•�•h* // U� ■ MITIGATION
J"O°O°D°O°°°O°°°O°O°O°000°O°O°O°O°000°O°O °O°O0o°O°O°O°O°O°O°D O°�'pO°O O°O° �O I «/'♦' +`t + `+ +` +�+1 +(-+]
♦'X-sET rs4'«'.'.`+`�i'a'+''
�., oc�coo°cOo°cOo°c0°°c0DOc0o°o°°°°°o°coo°0000°° .o0 0 oho-°p°9°o°0°0°o Doo XG°Goo 000�o.o I a , «`�♦ «`�'`' + ++ j `«� \U ■
C G O G O G O G O G O C O G O G O c O G O G - 0 0 0 O D G O 0 0 O O G O O ' 1) 1�- _+�- Y': 4:.� i+ +L-=-r1a '+'♦'`'`' '`'♦'''+' ' .'�+ / I
o ° o D_o 0 0 0 o D o D o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o D o0 0 0 �..�bc
0 0 0 q, D o o 0 0 t'1q ; \ ,. ...++!
>DGOOO,,� GOD°vO00G000GODODODO°0°00000°00O°000°00O°00 C�.O°D°D°O D°O�D�D° �D� o oo il� --„' «'.' �,i ':�•'`''':`•`:`: `:`:�•i:4:}:':':':` / (fJ. PROJECT
O G O=G O G O G O G O G O G O G O G o G O G O G 0 G -GO { `
'o.
'o'
OOOOOO00000000 0 0 0 0 O O '+++`+
O G,,,pG o G O G O G O G O G O G O G O G
O O O O O O O O°XlgO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O _ aOQ� '` `.'+Y /
O G O� G O O D G o O G O G O G O O r.. ` `•`+`++•`•`+♦+`+`+```+`
° o 0 0 ° o o 0 0 0 ° 0 0 0 o o 0 0 .•(,' . + . , , + f , f + « .''`'``.'.``'`'''`'' / Lll ■ JOHNSTON COUNTY, NC
O O O O O O O O O O o 0 0 0 0 f�� O
a� 0 0 0 0 ° o ° o o ° /b o ,.o e• -'b I I � +spar . +a, + +yf•,f.+«++ ,'.'. f .'.'+'.'_f'.`+'`+`'`j / Z_ ■
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0, o G° c '+','.'
00000 0°0°000000 D oo°o° o 0 0 oo°r bry a°o°C°o°'o°o(,1C �°ool\ G GeogoG, it + p ' `
0 0 008 0 0° 0 0 0 0�`�'�o o• �°0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0� J o o`ip, _ o t D No �° II I J,'+'+',`«`«'+'+'.'`'-`'+``4`+
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 _ o G o o G C G O o O o O o o O D o o O o 0 0 `+�,"`','`'`'```•�,` _
°O°O° O°O°O°O ° O°O°O°O°O°� °^°O°G•° G°O °00°Oo0°G . O°O° o0 O 1
0 0 0 0 0 0 ` I � O o ,�0 0 0 o O ,��0 0 o D 000 o O• O' O$o q I+ `«%'.`+','.'.'+'.'.`,-'+/ ` DRAWING INFORMATION
O G G O O O C O O O— O G O C• CYO- O O G o O C- O O G 0 0 ++ +�1:+l
;+.... 0 0 0 0 �•d 0 0 0 o e o o q. ° o o° -o °° ,Q";o 0 0 0 0 0 0° i `�h.'::.+.}`{'+✓ I- ■
c• o C o c o c o G D G• tl o 0 0 0 0 G D- o o •G�o -."o Quo o - 0 0 0° G o { I+y+' / PROJECT NO.: 87081
0 0 0 0`0 ° 0 0 0 0 0 0 0° 0 0 0 -6 0o 0 o G o c _o 0 0 0 ° I ++++ . + + ++O O G O C O C O. 09G O G O G O OO "O D-�O O O CO G G O a'+'++`,'f+++'.+a QOO O O O OO° O O O O O. 0 0 0 O O O O O O� O;o o O �°O �f +'+'+'+'+'+'f'.'f'+'+'.'+'.'.' +�.! c o c o c o.�-.%"E+ o Dgo c•qb o o�c• o ° °. o;;,c o D o C G G o L .4.�cooDGDo 11 . ( `+•+'•'+'•'+`+++`•` +`+`•`+`+`'`'` / FILENAME: 15-16 UKEWENDBL_RMGETATION-PLANS.DM
o o o 0 0 0 0 0 0-0 o D o 0 o a o 0 0 0 o- o c o o •0 o +.+, ,
O O i 0 0 O O O O c• o G 0 c o 0 O O G O O O O 0 0 0 0 O• O O O O O G O • J• /�M�
D o o O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 "O q,.,0 O s O.� C+ O O Q„O O -O O ,'O O O O O O�„ 1I ( I h *+\*.'fh+1a++++,a+,•. ♦+..'+'a+ '
o° /G o^�' o \r o° G G o --e o o G o(y o° o :�'o "'Oo 0 o C o G o. o oe91" a`+' DESIGNED BY KMVM/6H
° o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 T°o O o 0 0 o D o 0 0 0.0 0 o 0 0 0 o,.D D o -o -
G o 0 o G o G o o 0 0"� � o c o 0 0 0 o c o ypo o° 080 o c o o c o 0 o I i +• % I
O.t0o 0 00000 000 OG° Ap °O°D°O°O°O°v°O°O°O° OC°o°O°O°O°O °G°Oo0°O°O°O°O°O ; I
eF'o 0 o deo o°i5 o apoJ-.o `fib _c�p`'c`o 0 0° 0 0 0 0„0 0•° a°° o a o"b o 0 o D o D I II i (.'+++ +'+\`' ' / DRAWN BY: APL
o QJ4UG o c o e o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o e o dQo o G o°j° I /
O°000�fj `•O°O°•O°OCO°O°O°^ O v 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0-O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O�'D' O I
o c• o c G c° o c o o o c o -o o D o o G o 0 o e o G o 0 0 0 o°C°..aa��nnytl� DATE: 11-30.18
O° O`er o' O Occt�..,, O Oma- ') 0 0 0 0 D_O O O O OJ O C O G 0 0 0 0"_O O O O O�O�O I
o uY o ,G D e d" O o 0 o e o_� o 0 o D o"f'._o„o _o„o o_o_G I / 1
000coa� oOGco Ac G o_o c o •_o I I
'Mo
i° A-- o HORIZ. SCALE: 1"=8D'
oo° o 000000 : / I ; 1 a \ / / VERT.SCALE: MA
O GOO o0°ooccII
�.°GGO GO
°0000
1 /
.®p / ; I \ \tip,-� - /•� / / � �
LU
■ 1 1 ; \ \ `4 �" -� NORTH
■ ;I ;1 \ ` 4D 2D 0 40 80
■Lu
UJ
■ j - f GRAPHIC SCALE
■ W
J i,1 � � � � � }� SHEET NAME
{
\
.1
■
REVEGETATION
1 •,
PLAN
SHEET NUMBER
17

I
i
/
/ PLANTING ZONES
RIPARIAN BUFFER RESTORATION (BUFFER GROUP 1 }
RIPARIAN BUFFER ENHANCEMENT (BUFFER GROUP 2)
0 D
LL 00000 RIPARIAN BUFFER PRESERVATION (BUFFER GROUP 3).000
/ 4Q
/a
I
/ I 1
LL
■
o°0p°0�°0000
■ \.1 o°o°o°°000a00°o°o°goo-o YOOD°bG
LL O -7-0 O O O O D O O O O
■ �;10-5g.�
on°°S°o 0 25°'. ae-,. o• ° o o .. 0 0
"0 0 o 0 o a o 0 0 o G oo o D o o. c
0 0 0 0 0 O O J 0 O O O° O O J -O O J O O
G -o 000 OoOo°00070000 0 ° o ° o7oO000°o JooDOoOo'oo°.Qac Doo
o °-o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0' o 0 bona°o'Qo 0 0 0° 0
'O OJO000000J000J00000000000°0000 co��000 TOO 00°0°00000000 00.
O J 0 0 0 J O J O J O J O J O J O J Og0 O O O O 0 0 0 0 ' 9O O J 0 0 0 0
0000°000000000000000°00000000000700000 -0000000000000000000ro•00000 000000 Or
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O• o 0 o D o o D D o D o 0 o b J D O °O�°O
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O J O O 0 0 0 0 0 0. O O O o 0 O O Q' 0 0 Q
O O O O O D O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O 0 O O O O O D O O �{ 0 0 0
O O O O O J O •] O D O O O J O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0�n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O
O O°O°O°O°O°O°.°O°O°O°O°O°O°O°O°O°O°O°.°O°.°O°O°O O '— -g'O O 00000000 000 °O°O°q°O°O�°O
J O D O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O°J'g0 0 0 0 O O O O J
0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O J O O O O O O O O O J D O 0 0 0 O o O J O O O O O J O O O O O
0 0 0 0 0 0 O D D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ° 7 O O O q'o �p O O O O
0°000°000°0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 00 Op P00000c0o;o000° O O•.�A
000000000.0000000000 0000000.00 J O O 000000°000°000°0°0°000°00 O O .n00 °
O. 0 0 0 O o 0 0 o Opp,,� 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0� 0�
J O°.°O°J°O°O°O°J°O°O°O°O°00y�O�OJ°�O�JOOOJOOO OOOO,IL�=�O' o� coo
V \ °` ' 0:;• OQ.
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0/
O J O J O J O O O J O J O 0 0 O OJ� O 0 0 is
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0���] -` ��O k ((�C117{
'1ZO OBD O°O°O°O°O°O°O°O°D°O°D°o°O°O°D°000°O°O°O°O°O°O°O°O°O°O° OODOQOQOo° J O°O�OU��- og 0 00^0- �JpO�O�O�J00�0�0�00 � �OQOO JOoo OJQOOOQ4y6
O O OJ O O D�.p°D°O°O°O°O°O°O°O°O°O°O°O°D°O°O°O°O°O°O°O°O°O°O°O°O°0000000 O% \ O°.°J�G�f-O°?°0°O°°°DJ°0°000 OOOOJOOOOOOOO]°O coo
0"O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O� I �/
O J O O O J O O O J O O O O J O 0 O J O J o J O J O 0 O°°] O. J O O O O O D O O J O J O � D O J D O O O C ] 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O ! O�'O 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 O O O
] O] O J O J 0 0 0 O O 7 O O. O. O. O. O J O J 0 0 0 O O o O O .Q,� OOO
0000000000000700000007000700 00.0000000000000007000700°000000000 00.00. O 00 O 000000,7000 ° .�O°J O°O°O°.°O°O°O°O,�°{(J 60°O'V �•T°O°'�,6$�°O°°°J°�O°q
00000000000°0°7°0000000°0°7°000 000000000700°O°O°J°O°J°O°J°O°O°O°> 7 00, -Jrc 7 00000000,0,0 �O� 0 000 00000 000 00200000°0•"7°O°0000000-0_00000000 000.'it
o°.°o°J°o°J°o°.°o°D°o°.°o°]°o°o°oa,,a°o°o°o°J°°07000°°007000000000 0° °0 0 0 •070 o oc°, °•0`.6`Go,o.0"b 000o,7o obco�oo�°oo oD°0°°.0'°0°7°00°o��°oO°J°o°° °•vsoQe-°o°o°o
°°O0O°OJO°OJOOOJOOOOOOO°00070000000]0 0000O0OJOOOJO°O°0°070000° �O], G°O°O°0 00 o7•°O C�00°'Y0.,o., p . 000`jO°o2Y= O°000°J°0°0000°jo0oJ0 OO�bo]o0o0oDo 0o0o000000000°
O O O J O J O J O 0 0] O J O D O 0 0^ O J O J O O 0 0 0 7 0 L' L' O O 3., -
0 0 0 0. o. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0, o° q,,o�o� 0 0 o O o° o�y��o,,yo,,c•- o a o 0 0 ° o9'D o °�'0 0 0 0�0 °° D° 0 0 0 co
°°o°J°o°°O°J°o°�°o°o°o°�°o°�°o°o°o°J°o°J o°o°o°O°O°�°o°O°o 0 o°p q/b°o°cyD �Jo°dpo°�°y5° °op oo° �o-40 �p���QT.�J9o°°00g°00�.00g°0°��0.,°0oo°oojo°0b�° coo
J°O°]00°J°O°O°O°.°O° °O°.°.00°.°O°O°J°O°7 °J°O°J°O°°°O°J° O°O°O 7°O°]°O°J°C co°J00°.00°J°O° 0 0°J°O-C"O O"00070000000700000000•.0°000°0 -00]C007000 00w.J.n000
O O O AO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 �O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0O O O OO O D O •. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O G O.�G 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O-
J_- O O. O J O •] 0] 0 0 0 go O O O O J O J O O J O '2' O O O°� b 0 O$'. O. O J O J O O O J O J O 0 0 J 0 0 O J O. o. O J„O D O J_iecr O
\ °o°.°o°°°o o°J°°o°o°°°D°°°o°. (.°0°�7°0°0°0°o�o°E°o°o°o ° J°o°-Oo°o°o°.°o°o°o°.°o°°o°o°°°=J°o o_G_o o
'e3-� o D o o ° 0 00 0 0 0° o o °° 0 0 ° D o J o 0 0 0 0
c�.� °o ooamo0J0 oo7oo0D°oc0000° ]oDODo-coO]dIDO..°o160 ° D OoOoc]°o, -
o°o°o°°°°°o°o°°°o°oy'U"o"o'7` \`.%�°° o°.°o°o°o°o°o°c°o°o ] 0°0°070°0°000000°o°o°o°.
o°o°°°0°060°0°°°0°0 °o°°°J°o'Jo°d°o°o°cq°°.Qr+'o°o °°o'.°o°o°o°c°
O •] O] O O ] O C O O J,�O O J O] C •7 O �] O O �•] O O O• O O D O J
O G 0 0 0 0 0 0 Oi O„0, 0. , O O O O O O O O O O O G O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
C] O] C J O O_C�O O O O O O G O. O. O. ] 0 0 0 •7 O O O D C O O O
LAKE WENDELL D°0000a° F3oo°oco ,.,oOocoo.,70° \o ° ^ o 'oco°oJo0oco0oc000°°Oo c°oco
J O O O D O OMf� 0 0 0 0 0 / L"O O O O O J O 0 0 O
i O J C 7 J • O O loo J v 0 0 0 0 0 J O J C 0 0 0
]°O°•J°O°•] O° - 000,7000,700 G •0 ]00000000000,7000.000000 ,4`0
I O O G O O O O O O D O 'go
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
•7000'70• ']♦ , .700010000000.700°p O00.JO0O.7000°o0O]000.70o C�..
•� O •J O G 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 J D •0 O O O J O J O
0°O°0°°°.� r00°O°O°O°.°0°000°J°000°0°000°O°O°,]°�
D O D Oa] ]O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O�
1 . 0 0 0 0 0. 0 •] O J O J 0 0 0 •J„O
]_o„o � �� o 0 o D o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
_.],.,. 000 000 .000.000. 00000000000.7
JO00°0°0000000°O°O°D?O� e
a.0j000 o'00000000000000'
0 0. o D o c
�`,].°•.7°°0000°° •
d 9
� u
r '
� w
4
� Z
W
(Fe
1
d�
WATER & LAND
SOLUTIONS
10940 Raven Ridge Rd., Suite 200
Raleigh, NC 27614
(919)614-51 1 1
waterlandsolutions.com
PROJECT ENGINEER
1111\1111111//
�N CA
L
2296-
SCOTT° N��\'�
//111111111```
ENGINEERING SERVICES BY
WLS ENGINEERING, PLLC
FIRM LICENSE NO. P-1480
REVISIONS
A DRAFT MIT PLAN 4/24/17
B FINAL DRAFT MIT PLAN 5/26/17
C FINAL MIT PLAN 8/21/17
D ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION 11/7/17
E AS -BUILT 11/30/18
NO. I DESCRIPTION I DATE
PROJECT NAME
LAKE
WENDELL
MITIGATION
PROJECT
JOHNSTON COUNTY, NC
DRAWING INFORMATION
PROJECT NO.: 97081
FILENAME: 15-18 LAKE WENDELL-REVEGETATION PINIS.ON1
DESIGNED BY: KMVMSH
DRAWN BY: APL
DATE: 11-30-18
HORIZ.
LE: 1"= 80'
VERT.SCALE: N/A
Q_p
NORTH
40 20 0 40 80
GRAPHIC SCALE
SHEET NAME
REVEGETATION
PLAN
SHEET NUMBER
IiK