310351_Compliance Inspection_20181127

UDivision of Water Resources
� i
Ili1V�itmbei - S O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
;t " O Other Agency
Type of Visit: ^ommpliance Inspection 0 Operation Review O Structure,Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: W Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time:I-[.� Departure Time: Id/ County:
Farm Name: xrM 6'Iptp Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative: C-1 I CA K/10`Jl (iS
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feede
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
Other
Phone:
Title:
Latitude:
Phone:
Integrator•
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Design Current Design Current .
Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
IN
Non--
La er
Design Current
Dry Poultry Capacity Pon.
La ers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Pouets
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
& Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
Region:
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 1 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facili Number: j - 3TJ Date of Inspection: •I
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequatev
❑ Yes
4 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier: / %
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): 23 2
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes]
No
0
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
raj No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
TT��
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental
threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
06� No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
r No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
T�
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
I� No
I —]NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Aoolication
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge
into
Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift [:]Application
Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
�] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
[� No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
[] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19 Did the facility fail to have Certificate
No
the of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
[�
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
[ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.] Yes [—]No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard Waste Analysis El soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
Page 2 of
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA P NE
21412015 Continued

FacHi Number: N - 3 Date of Inspection: / - 2 7 /$
24. Did the faccility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes rt"T No
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes P No
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ONO
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
se drawings of facility to better explair
fvo WA 7h 2c�1�
v ko"'Ci„ 3vIlVI&
any r ra answers anaior any agar
situations (use additional naves as
❑NA ONE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
[� NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes M� No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes M No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA PNE
or any
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
comments.
Ptarn(IdL-vie- sczjcQ he seat sew l�_
Go dAys 5e�G,re. 'd 'y
00 POA ap �6 /-/t:, tt� ac_
Lj tO - 16 '' 7 - r S `/ e a6l-rr �l klwvy6e .e
JV&'M Fr 1 t"
9(16-�77o
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone: 90IG-7,-733--
Date: 11-27-lg
21412015