Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout310337_Structure Evaluation_20181004`Yacility Number FIE71 - U"ivision of Water Resources O Division of Soil and Water Conservation O Other Agency Type of Visit: 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review QStructure Evaluation O Technical Assistance Reason for Visit: O Routine O Complaint GrFollow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access Date of Visit: /Q ' -( Arrival Time: ��j® Departure Time: /3 r County: Region: Farm Name: Per IDS �l� Pr fM Owner Email: Owner Name: Phone: Mailing Address: Physical Address: Facility Contact: Title: OnsiteRepresentative: 3(N, SGc✓I< Integrator. Certified Operator: Back-up Operator: Location of Farm: f.. rM Wean to Finish Wean to Feeder Feeder to Finish Farrow to Wean Farrow to Feeder Farrow to Finish Other Other Latitude: Phone: Certification Number: Certification Number: Design Current Design Current Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. IN Non-- La er Design Current Discharges and Stream Impacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other: a. Was the conveyance man-made? b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? _ d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? Longitude: Design Current Cattle Capacity Pop. Dairy Cow Dairy Calf Dairy Heifer Dry Cow Non -Dairy Beef Stocker Beef Feeder Beef Brood Cow ❑ Yes J�FNo ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No [—]Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes [ No ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑NA ONE ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ NA ❑ NE Page I of 21412015 Continued Facili ;Number: 3 1 - 337 Date of Inspection: /p - -/ Waste Collection & Treatment ' 4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes [�] No ❑ NA ❑ NE a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes -]. No ❑ NA ❑ NE Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier. i Spillway?: Designed Freeboard (in): Observed Freeboard (in): ' `g 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes RNo ❑ NA ❑ NE (i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE waste management or closure plan? If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes [0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE (not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes VI No ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? Waste Application 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes [NX No ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? 11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes P No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.) ❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil ❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area 12. Crop Type(s): 13. Soil Type(s): 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA "NE 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA [P NE acres determination? 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE Required Records & Documents 19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA PUNE 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ® NE the appropriate box. ❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other: 21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA [;] NE ❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysts ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code ❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA [UNE 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA 0 NE Page 2 of 21412015 Continued Facility -Number: Date of Inspection: a - 24jDid the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ No the appropriate box(es) below. ❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a PDA for sludge levels ❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ No 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No Other Issues 28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? 29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application) 31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other: 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? 33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? 34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ NA ['M NE ❑NA )MNE ❑ NA [P NE ❑ NA M NE ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA P.NE ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA [TNE ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA [g NE ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes [?[ No ❑ NA ®NE ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ NA ❑ NE Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments. Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary). cJ 3z 1_y z C44 l 6 %fl y 6" Reviewer/Inspector Name: Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Page 3 of Phone: -2-27.6- ZEE Date: /01 41Z'4/09 21412015