20190572 Ver 1_PCN Form Submission_20190429

DR
02*10n of Water R"Ourc"
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
September 29, 2018 Ver 3
Initial Review
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance into the review process?*
r Yes
r No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
r Yes r No
Change only if needed.
BIMS # Assigned *
Version#*
20190572
1
Is a payment required for this project?*
* No payment required
What amout is owed?*
* Fee received
r $240.00
r Fee needed - send electronic notification
r $570.00
Reviewing Office* Select Project Reviewer*
Fayetteville Regional Office - [phone] Chad Turlington:eads\ccturlington
Information for Initial Review
1a. Name of project:
Cross Creek Bank Repair & Stabilization
1a. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Bob Zarzecki
1 b. Primary Contact Email:*
[e-mail]
Date Submitted
4/29/2019
Nearest Body of Water
Cross Creek (Big Cross Creek), Stream Index No. 18-27-(3)
Basin
Cape Fear
Water Classification
C
Site Coordinates
Latitude:
35.056858
A. Processing Information
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Cumberland
Is this project a public transportation project?*
r Yes r No
Longitude:
-78.871840
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
V Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
F Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
1 b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
P Nationwide Permit (NWP)
F- Regional General Permit (RGP)
r- Standard (IP)
1c. Primary Contact Phone:*
[phone]

1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
r Yes r No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number:
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
rJ 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
F Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
F Individual Permit
13 - Bank Stabilization
1e. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
F 401 Water Quality Certification - E)press
r Riparian Buffer Authorization
1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
r- Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r- Yes r- No
Acceptance Letter Attachment
1h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
r Yes r No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
r- Yes r No
B. Applicant Information
1d. Who is applying for the permit?
R Owner r Applicant (other than owner)
1e. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?
r Yes r No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
City of Fayetteville, NC
2b. Deed book and page no.:
4447/0485
2c. Responsible party:
John H. Larch, III
2d. Address
Street Address
433 Hay Street
Address Line 2
Qty
State/ Rmince / Pagion
Fayetteville
NC
Postal / Zip Code
Country
28301
United States
2e. Telephone Number: 2f. Fax Number:
[phone]
29. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
Grove View Terrace Associates, LP (By: Cross Creek Pointe, LLC; ITs: General Partner; By: United
Developers, Inc.)
2b. Deed book and page no.:
4447/0485
r Yes r No
ryes r No

2c. Responsible party:
James B. Smith (President United Developers, Inc.)
2d. Address
Street Address
2939 Breezewood Ave.
Address Line 2
Suite 201
Clty
Fayetteville
Fbstal / Zip Code
28303
2e. Telephone Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
State / Frovince / Rion
INC
(buntry
United States
2f. Fax Number:
[phone]
C. Project Information and Prior Project History U
1. Project Information
1b. Subdivision name:
(if appropriate)
1c. Nearest municipality/ town:
Fayetteville, NC
2. Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number:
0437-85-4509
2c. Project Address
Street Address
325 Grove St & 602 Ann St.
Address Line 2
City
Fayetteville
Fbstal / Zip Code
28301
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:*
Cross Creek (Big Cross Creek), Stream Index No. 18-27-(3)
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:*
C
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Cape Fear
3d. Please provide the 12 -digit HUC in which the project is located.
030300040704
4. Project Description and History
2b. Property size:
5.98
State / Frmince / Region
NC
Country
United States
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application:*
The project site is located along approximately 430 feet of Cross Creek downstream of Grove Street in Fayetteville, Cumberland County, NC. The right bank is vegetated with trees and
shrubs and the the left bank is mostly non -vegetated. The left bank consists of an unstable streambank and vertical cliff face (+/- 40 feet tall). The site is bordered by Cross Creek
Cemetery and City buildings and facilities to the west. Grove Park Terrace Apartments (currently being redeveloped as Cross Creek Pointe, a modern, affordable apartment community)
is located on the east side of Cross Creek. General land use include municipal, cemetery, residential and commercial uses.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?*
f Yes F No r Unknown
4d. Attach an 8 1/2 X11 excerpt from the most recent version of the USGS topographic map indicating the location of the project site. (for DWR)
USGS.pdf 2.55MB
4e. Attach an 8 1/2 X11 excerpt from the most recent version of the published County NRCS Soil Survey map depicting the project site. (for DWR)
Soil Survey.pdf 287.84KB
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property

0
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
2,400
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project,*
The project purpose is to stabilize an actively eroding stream bank, stream and cliff -face to repair, restore and protect Cross Creek Cemetery, City buildings and facilities, and the
greenway trail.
41. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:*
The overall project Will include the stabilization of approbmately 430 linear feet of stream bank and Cross Creek, and the stabilization of the +/- 40' tall cliff face. Natural channel design
elements have been included within Cross Creek, while more structural elements are proposed further up the cliff face. The natural channel design elements within Cross Creek include
five (5) boulder cross vein in -channel structures and constructed riffles. Three (3) similar cross vein structures are proposed within a small tributary stream to tie the stream into the
newly stabilized section of Cross Creek. A stacked -boulder toe and bank protection structure is proposed along the left bank of Cross Creek. A sheet pile wall is proposed further up the
cliff face as shown on the plans. Heavy equipment such as excavators and dump trucks will be used.
4j. Please upload project drawings for the proposed project.
Cross Creek Impact Map_04-24-2019.pdf 580.69KB
Cross Creek_2019-04-26 Final Design Team Drawings.pdf 32.45MB
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
r Yes O No 0 Unknown
Comments:
The City is not requesting a JD for this project. However, S&EC staff delineated all potentially
jurisdictional WOTUS within or adjacent to the project area.
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?
O Preliminary 6 Approved r Not Verified r Unknown r NIA
Corps AID Number:
Sc. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Bob Zarzecki, Josh Harvey & Mason Montgomery
Agency/Consultant Company: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Other:
5d1. Jurisdictional determination upload
DP1 wet.pdf 214.1 KB
DP2 up.pdf 208.19KB
Wetland Sketch Map DP locations.pdf 7.08MB
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?*
r Yes r No
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?
The project is proposed to be constructed at one time. However, the funding for the project is shown in two phases associated with FEMA funding from damages occurred from
Hurricanes Mathew and Florence.
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
F Wetlands W Streams -tributaries ❑ Buffers
G Open Waters r Pond Construction
3. Stream Impacts
3a. Reason for impact (?)
3b.lmpact type *
3c. Type of impact*
3d. S. name*
3e. Stream Type *
3f. Type of
3g. S. width*
3h. Impact
❑
M
Jurisdiction*
length*
S7
Stream Repair & Stabilization
P
Permanent
Stabilization
Ui to Cross Creek
Intermittent
Both
8
27
Average (feet)
(ir�rfeet)
S2
Stream Repair & Stabilzation
P
Permanent
Stabilization
Fmss Creek
Perennial
Both
36
430
Average (feet)
(ir�rfeet)
E
Temporary Construction
Temporary
Stabilisation
Cross CreekPerennial
Both
t�f�:]_
Access

3i. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
3i. Total permanent stream impacts:
457
3i. Total stream and ditch impacts:
497
3j. Comments:
3i. Total temporary stream impacts:
40
All impacts labeled "permanent" will not result in a "loss" of WOTUS. These impacts result from the installation of natural channel design elements
such as cross veins, constructed riffles and boulder toe protection. The structures would remain permanently in place and as such were labeled as
such, but shoudl be considereed "permanent -no loss". The 20 If of temporary impacts above and belowthe project are shown to allow for construction
access only. Any unanticipated stream bed impacts that occur within these areas will be restored to the original stream contours per notes on the
attached plans. While the project is less than 500 If in length, it will required greater than 1 cubic yard per foot of fill (depending exactly howthis is
interpreted/calculated), and fil to special aquatic sites (riffle/pool complex), and as such we request any necessary waivers from the district engineer
as we believe the project would result in no more than minimal adverse environmental effects and will actually be an overall environmental
improvement.
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
S&EC was hired to identify all jurisdictional WOTUS within the project area, and to help develop a repair and stabilization plan that included natural
channel design elements to minimize impacts to Cross Creek, the natural environment and downstream water quality. S&EC consulted the USACE and
DWR with the conceptual designs. The project team believes that stabilizing the streambank without addressing the instability within Cross Creek itself
would not be a permanent solution.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
The project will obtain a sediment and erosion control permit to help protect downstream water quality during construction. Construction of the
instream work will be performed "in -the -wet" as Cross Creek is too large to reroute around the project area during construction. Measures will be taken
similiar to any stream restoration project that occurs "in -the -wet" such as; ensuring all equipment is clean and free of leaks, work is done at low flow
conditions and stream flow and weather forecasts are monitored to ensure this happens, temporary instream, lowflow diversions are constructed
within the project area to divert lowflow around the work areas while installing structures. All upland sources of sediment will be managed so as not to
contribute sediment to Cross Creek. In stream sediment will occur only from the disturbance of existing sediment within the stream itself. Stabilization of
the stream, streambank and cliff face will prevent future long downstream sediment loss and result in an overall positive to downtream water quality.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
r Yes r No
2b. If this project DOES NOT require Compensatory Mitigation, explain why:
The project is a stream repair and stabilization project, will not result in a loss of WOTUS, and is anticipated to improve overall water quality into the future by preventing sedimentation
from an unstable streambank and cliff -face which result from two discrette events (Hurricanes Mathew and Florence).
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
r Yes r No
If no, explain why:
The project is not a development project resulting in concentrated stormwater runoff.
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?
r Yes r No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
r Yes r No
Comments:
The project is not a development project resulting in concentrated stormwater runoff that would otherwise trigger the need for a post -construction stormwater management plan.
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?*
r Yes r No

1b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State (North Carolina)
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? *
r Yes r No
Comments:*
The project involves the use of FEMA and City funding, and is located on City owned property. However, the project is a stream repair and stabilzation
project eligible for the use of Nationwide Permit(s) and General Water Qualtiy Certifications and does not trigger either a NEPA or SEPA review.
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B.0200)?*
r Yes r No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
r Yes r No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The project is a stream repair and stabilization project that will not result in additional development which could impact water quality. The repair and
stabilization of the stream, streambank and cliff -face is anticipated to result in an overal improvement to downstream water quality.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
r Yes r Nor N/A
S. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
r Yes r No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
r Yes r No
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
r Yes r No
What Federal Agency is involved?
FEMA
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
r Yes r No
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
r Yes r No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
r Yes r No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?'
r Yes r No
r Unknown
51. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
r Yes r No
If yes, please provide details to include type of percussive activity, purpose, duration, and specific location of this activityon the property.
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
NC Natural Heritage Program Data Explorer & FWS Websites; No blasting is anticipated, but percussion using proper machinery (impact hammers or
the like) is anticipated to install the sheet pile walls located further upslope and outside of the WOTUS. There are no known elemental occurances
within the project area and no known Federally listed protected species within 1 -mile of the project site. Federal species in potentially affected by the
activities include RCWs (no effect, no cavity trees or habitat within the work area), American Alligator (no effect, none found in Cross Creek), Atlantic
Pigtoe (may effect, not likely to negatively effect, no habitat due to poor water quality, no known in project area or immediately downstream), Saint
Francis' Satyr Butterfly (may effect, not likely to adversely effect, no known in project area, no significant vegetation removal), Michauxs Sumac (no
effect, no known in project area, no species found), Pondberry (no effect, no known in project area), Rough -leaved Loosestrife (no effect, no known in
project area). No anticipated negative effect to Bald Eagles (no nest in project area) or migratory birds (limited to know habitat within project area and
limited vegetation removal).
Consultation Documentation Upload
IPaC_ Explore Location.pdf 279.33KB
NHP Map.pdf 376.48KB
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)

6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
r- Yes r No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?*
The NOAA Fisheries Essential Fish Habitat Mapper was used. This project is located in Cumberland County NC, far away from any identified EFH
areas.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
r Yes r No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
See attached NC SHPO project map. The proposed project will only provide further protection to the eAsting Cross Creek Cemetery and avoid the
potential for future loss of cemetery land and relocation of graves. The NC State Historic Preservation Office HPOWEB GIS Service was referenced on
April 10, 2019.
7c. Historic or Prehistoric Information Upload
SHPO Map.pdf 311.95KB
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?*
r Yes r- No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
S&EC working with the City to ensure compliance with all FEMA floodplain regulations. A "no -rise" determination is anticipated as the proposed project
Wil not have a significant change to the cross sectional area of Cross Creek or backwater area from the Cape Fear River.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
NC Floodplain Mapping Program's Flood Risk Insurance System
Miscellaneous
Comments
Cross Creek is currently full of debris. The project team has DEQ to include DWR, DEMLR and DWM/Solid Waste Section. It's not practicable for the projet to remove all of the eAsting
debris, but attempts will be made to remove all hazardous debris (metal, etc.) and as much asphalt as possible, the remaining debris will be incorporated into the streambed (as it is
currently) or otherwise left in place. However, the end result will be a "clean" stream section within newly constructed cross veins, riffles and pools and stable banks, which is a far better
condition then it's currently in.
Miscellaneous attachments not previously requested.
Floodplain Map.pdf 249.19KB
Cross Creek Pre -application Meeting Info Packet 05-14-2018 RFS.pdf 7.54MB
Signature �'
m By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
• I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
• I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Bob Zarzecki - S&EC, PA
Signature
&W-4_ILf,.ZEYf�
Date
4/29/2019

Environmental Consultants,
8412 Falls
of Nense Road, state
104, Rateigh, NC 27615 • Phone:
[phone] • Far:
[phone]
sandec.com
PROPERTY OWNER CERTIFICATION /AGENT AUTHORIZATION
Project Name/Description: CROSS CREEK BANK STABLIZATION S&EC Project #13185
Date: 2018
The Department of the Army
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
Attn: Emily Greer Field Office: USACE Wilmin on Re ug latory Field Office
I, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property/properties identified herein, do
authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) and Soil &
Environmental Consultants, PA (S&EC) staff (as my agent) to enter upon the property herein described
for the purpose of conducting on-site investigations and issuing a determination associated with Waters
of the U.S, subject to Federal jurisdiction under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of
the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. This document also authorizes S&EC (as my agent) to act on my
behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance and acceptance of a permit or
certification and any and all associated standard and special conditions. This notification supersedes any
previous correspondence concerning the agent for this project.
NOTICE: This authorization, for liability and professional courtesy reasons, is valid only for government
officials to enter the property when accompanied by S&EC staff. You should call S&EC to arrange a site
meeting prior to visiting the site.
PARCEL IN
FORMATION:
Parcel Index Numbers) (PIIS: 0437-85-4509 (5.98 acres) & 0437-87-3286 (39.31 acres)
Site Address: 325 Grove St. & 602 Ann St., Fayetteville, Cumberland County, NC
Deed Book/Page: 4447/0485
Watershed: Cross Creek (Big Cross Creek), 18-27-(3), "C", Cape Fear River 03030004
PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION:
Name: City of Fayetteville, NC
Address: 433 Hay Street, Fayetteville, NC 28301
Phone No.: ( ) Fax No.: ( ) Mobile No.: ( )
Email:
�OiLN L/./2tN
Property Owner (please print) Date
We hereby certify the above information submitted in this app/ication is true and accurate to
the best of our know/edge,

Environmental Consultants,
8.112 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 10.1, Raleigh, NC 27615 • Phone
sindec.com
PROPERTY OWNER CERTIFICATION / AGENT AUTHORIZATION
Project Name/Description: CROSS CREEK BANK STABLIZATION S&EC Project #13185
Date: 2018
The Department of the Army
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
Attn: Emily Greer Field Office: USACE Wilmington Re ug latory Field Office
I, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property/properties identified herein, do
authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) and Soil &
Environmental Consultants, PA (S&EC) staff (as my agent) to enter upon the property herein described
for the purpose of conducting on-site investigations and issuing a determination associated with Waters
of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of
the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. This document also authorizes S&EC (as my agent) to act on my
behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance and acceptance of a permit or
certification and any and all associated standard and special conditions. This notification supersedes any
previous correspondence concerning the agent for this project.
NOTICE: This authorization, for liability and professional courtesy reasons, is valid only for government
officials to enter the property when accompanied by S&EC staff. You should call S&EC to arrange a site
meeting prior to visiting the site.
PARCEL INFORMATION:
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): 0437-95-1760 (30.03 acres) / "Cross Creek Pointe Apartments"
Site Address: 1 Grove View Terrace, Fayetteville, Cumberland County, NC
Deed Book/Page: 4447/0485
Watershed: Cross Creek (Big Cross Creek), 18-2743), "C", Cape Fear River 03030004
PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION:
Name: Grove View Terrace Associates, LP
Address: 100 North Greene Street, Suite 600, Greensboro, NC 27401 7-939 13rcc.2tLio,,d Awe .SA. 2o/,
Phone No.: (9(0 )N65- (, (000 Fax No.: (Iia )4p,7-'1L_TN Mobile No.: ( ) 1VcZB3_Q.3
Email:
?)'�: doss Cr��k ('o,'�,(� LLC_
Property Owner
-�(-pl_ea-se print) Date
10
Property Owner Signature �]Q,,,� /�. �,,/Its, ,
We hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to
the best of our knowledge.

Project Number:
PKS
Project Manager:
1" = 1000'Scale:
3/29/2019Date:
Map Title:
Source:
USGS Map
City of Fayetteville
Cumberland County, NC
Fayetteville & Vander USGS Quads
¯0 1,000 2,000
Feet
13185.D3
PROJECT AREA

Project Number:
PKS
Project Manager:
1" = 500'Scale:
4/10/2019Date:
Map Title:
Source:
Soil Survey Map
City of Fayetteville
Cumberland County, NC
Cumberland County
Soil Survey Sheets 11 & 12
¯0 500 1,000
Feet
13185.D3

!!
##
""
"$$
GG
^^
GG
CD0379 Houses
CD0614 Houses
CD0661 Grove View Terrace CD1030 Brookside Cemetery
CD0636 Cross Creek No. 2 Cemetery
CD0518 Saint Ann's Catholic Church
CD0206 Cross Creek Cemetery No. 1 1988
NC Center for Geographic Information & Analysis
Project Number:
PKS
Project Manager:
1" = 250'Scale:
4/10/2019Date:
Map Title:
Source:
NC SHPO Map
City of Fayetteville
Cumberland County, NC
NC State Historic
Preservation Office
¯0 250 500
Feet
13185.D3
Legend
Project Area
NCHPOpoints
Status, LocalStat, HDstatus
!!National Register individual listing
""Study List individual entry
##SL and DOE
"$$Surveyed, Local Landmark
GG Blockface
^^Surveyed Area center point
Local_District_Boundaries

NC Center for Geographic Information & Analysis
Project Number:
PKS
Project Manager:
1" = 250'Scale:
4/10/2019Date:
Map Title:
Source:
Floodplain Map
City of Fayetteville
Cumberland County, NC
NC Flood Insurance Risk System
¯0 250 500
Feet
13185.D3
Legend
Project Area
Stream Centerline
0.2 PCT ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD HAZARD
AE
Floodway

NC Center for Geographic Information & Analysis
Project Number:
PKS
Project Manager:
1" = 1000'Scale:
4/10/2019Date:
Map Title:
Source:
NC NHP Map
City of Fayetteville
Cumberland County, NC
NC Natural Heritage Program
¯0 1,000 2,000
Feet
13185.D3
Legend
Project Area
Elemental Occurrence
Animal
Natural Community
Plant
EX. 10' DIRT DRIVECMCMEX. ASPHALT WALKProject:
Client:Location:
Project No.:
Proj. Mgr.:Drawn:
Scale:
Sheet Title:Sheet No.:
REV.DESCRIPTION APPR.DATE
REVISIONSã 2019 Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA. N.C. FIRM LICENSE NO. C-2141846-94678412 Falls of Neuse Rd., Suite 104Raleigh, North Carolina 27615 (919)Phone:
www.SandEC.com
846-5900 Fax:(919)
JWSPKS
FAYETTEVILLE, NC CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, NC.
13185.D3CROSS CREEK BANK REPAIR
AND STABILIZATION PLAN
N:\13185\D3\Drawings
1"=40'IMPACT MAP1 OF 1IMPACT MAPEXISTING CHANNELTHALWEGEXISTINGWETLAND (TYP.)EXISTING TRIBUTARYCHANNEL (S1)START STREAM &STREAMBANK REPAIRAND STABILIZATIONNOTES:1.SITE WETLANDS DELINEATED BY SOIL & ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, PA ON 01/22/2019.2.SITE OHWM GPS LOCATED WITH A TRIMBLE 7X BY SOIL & ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, PA ON 03/29/2019.3.SITE DATA INCLUDING EXISTING CONTOURS AND PROPERTY BOUNDARY PROVIDED BY M.A.P.S. SURVEYING, INC. OF FAYETTEVILLE, NC.4.AREAS WITHIN CROSS CREEK PROPOSED FOR TEMPORARY IMPACT ARE NECESSARY TO ALLOW FOR HEAVY EQUIPMENT TRAFFIC REQUIRED TO REPAIR STREAM ASPROPOSED.5.NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS TO THE STREAMBED ARE ANTICIPATED WITHIN THE DEFINED TEMPORARY IMPACT AREA WITHIN CROSS CREEK. HOWEVER IF ANY IMPACTS TOTHE CHANNEL BED DO OCCUR THESE AREAS WILL BE RETURNED TO APPROXIMATE ORIGINAL DIMENSION AND ELEVATION UPON COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION.6.ALL LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE. THIS IS NOT A SURVEY.CROSS CREEK IMPACTSPERMANENT IMPACT (NO PERMANENT LOSS)TEMPORARY IMPACTS430 FT.40 FT.0.358 AC.0.033 AC.TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTIONIMPACT (TYP.), SEE TABLEPERMANENTSTREAM IMPACT,SEE TABLECROSS CREEK CEMETERYLAMON STREETTERMINUSEXISTING FAILED ASPHALTGREENWAY TRAILEXISTING OVERLOOKPLATFORMSCALE 1" = 40'NORTH40CONTOUR INTERVAL = 1'20040TRIBUTARY S1 IMPACTSPERMANENT IMPACT (NO PERMANENT LOSS)27 FT.0.005 AC.END STREAM &STREAMBANK REPAIRAND STABILIZATIONVOLUME CALCULATIONSTOTAL FILL = 1,593 CYAVERAGE FILL = 3.83 CY/LFVOLUME CALCULATIONSTOTAL FILL = 6 CYAVERAGE FILL = 0.22 CY/LF
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region – Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region

Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? Yes No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No
Remarks:

HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface Water (A1) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
High Water Table (A2) Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U) Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (B1) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (B3) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Geomorphic Position (D2)
Iron Deposits (B5) Other (Explain in Remarks) Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe)

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:

Remarks:

US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region – Version 2.0
VEGETATION (Four Strata) – Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point:
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)

Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)

Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)

Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is ≤3.01
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)

1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:

Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.

Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.

Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.

Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.

Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No

Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region – Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks

1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (A1) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon (A2) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) Redox Dark Surface (F6) (MLRA 153B)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Red Parent Material (TF2)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) Redox Depressions (F8) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) Marl (F10) (LRR U) Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface (A12) Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present,
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S) Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (S6) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):

Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:

US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region – Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region

Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? Yes No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No
Remarks:

HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface Water (A1) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
High Water Table (A2) Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U) Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (B1) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (B3) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Geomorphic Position (D2)
Iron Deposits (B5) Other (Explain in Remarks) Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe)

Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:

Remarks:

US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region – Version 2.0
VEGETATION (Four Strata) – Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point:
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)

Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)

Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)

Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is ≤3.01
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)

1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:

Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.

Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.

Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.

Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.

Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No

Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region – Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks

1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (A1) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon (A2) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) Redox Dark Surface (F6) (MLRA 153B)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Red Parent Material (TF2)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) Redox Depressions (F8) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) Marl (F10) (LRR U) Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface (A12) Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present,
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S) Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (S6) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):

Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:

Q�1221z0��r�-
!3 100
nN ���v =--_ �-v �o•o ��Q aJ
• _,;.� _ _ '__�\ ti f w — —' \ F AA
yf
r
60
r
_
-
?5310• \\
'-- ___ _ �_-- -_ - - \ �_-_ --_ `- __--�-"`\.� _\\\� _ _ _ _ ��� ___-__ \:\\ \moi^•'=\ � \ \\ �(Y TOT \\ � � \\\ \\ _
Az
L ^7
��� � _.I �\� \ ,��\���\tet\��\.��\��\�\��\ \ • � \ OX/,{�7� \
fs
NORTH
--
�1
1 4
Ak
ool
\
\
\ O S
\
,jam
TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY i
100 — 11-7 A- t 1$ — l'ja � �c- S�1GL a ��� <<`��S 2,60 —2-0-S ®rk.,..�c
►°�5 _ too P"A\L

4/10/2019 IPaC: Explore Location
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/LXRFINQADNE55ILKI2UMQFQBFM/resources#wetlands 1/11
IPaC resource list
This report is an automatically generated list of species and other resources such as critical habitat
(collectively referred to as trust resources) under the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's (USFWS)
jurisdiction that are known or expected to be on or near the project area referenced below. The list
may also include trust resources that occur outside of the project area, but that could potentially be
directly or indirectly a
4/10/2019 IPaC: Explore Location
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/LXRFINQADNE55ILKI2UMQFQBFM/resources#wetlands 2/11
Raleigh, NC 27606-1487
4/10/2019 IPaC: Explore Location
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/LXRFINQADNE55ILKI2UMQFQBFM/resources#wetlands 3/11
Endangered species
This resource list is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an analysis of
project level impacts.
The primary information used to generate this list is the known or expected range of each species.
Additional areas of in
4/10/2019 IPaC: Explore Location
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/LXRFINQADNE55ILKI2UMQFQBFM/resources#wetlands 4/11
Reptiles
Clams
Insects
Flowering Plants
Red-cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/7614
Endangered
NAME STATUS
American Alligator Alligator mississippiensis
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/776
SAT
NAME STATUS
Atlantic Pigtoe Fusconaia masoni
There is proposed critical habitat for this species. Your location is
outside the critical habitat.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5164
Proposed Threatened
NAME STATUS
Saint Francis' Satyr Butter
4/10/2019 IPaC: Explore Location
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/LXRFINQADNE55ILKI2UMQFQBFM/resources#wetlands 5/11
Critical habitats
Potential e
4/10/2019 IPaC: Explore Location
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/LXRFINQADNE55ILKI2UMQFQBFM/resources#wetlands 6/11
Probability of Presence Summary
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be
present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project
activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read and understand the FAQ
“Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report” before using or attempting to
interpret this report.
Probability of Presence ()
BREEDING SEASON (IF A
BREEDING SEASON IS INDICATED
FOR A BIRD ON YOUR LIST, THE
BIRD MAY BREED IN YOUR
PROJECT AREA SOMETIME WITHIN
THE TIMEFRAME SPECIFIED,
WHICH IS A VERY LIBERAL
ESTIMATE OF THE DATES INSIDE
WHICH THE BIRD BREEDS
ACROSS ITS ENTIRE RANGE.
"BREEDS ELSEWHERE" INDICATES
THAT THE BIRD DOES NOT LIKELY
BREED IN YOUR PROJECT AREA.)
American Kestrel Falco sparverius paulus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird
Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA
Breeds Apr 1 to Aug 31
Eastern Whip-poor-will Antrostomus vociferus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in
the continental USA and Alaska.
Breeds May 1 to Aug 20
Prairie Warbler Dendroica discolor
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in
the continental USA and Alaska.
Breeds May 1 to Jul 31
Prothonotary Warbler Protonotaria citrea
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in
the continental USA and Alaska.
Breeds Apr 1 to Jul 31
Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in
the continental USA and Alaska.
Breeds May 10 to Sep 10
Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in
the continental USA and Alaska.
Breeds May 10 to Aug 31
4/10/2019 IPaC: Explore Location
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/LXRFINQADNE55ILKI2UMQFQBFM/resources#wetlands 7/11
 no data survey e
4/10/2019 IPaC: Explore Location
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/LXRFINQADNE55ILKI2UMQFQBFM/resources#wetlands 8/11
Eastern Whip-
poor-will
BCC Rangewide
(CON) (This is a Bird
of Conservation
Concern (BCC)
throughout its range
in the continental
USA and Alaska.)
Prairie Warbler
BCC Rangewide
(CON) (This is a Bird
of Conservation
Concern (BCC)
throughout its range
in the continental
USA and Alaska.)
Prothonotary
Warbler
BCC Rangewide
(CON) (This is a Bird
of Conservation
Concern (BCC)
throughout its range
in the continental
USA and Alaska.)
Red-headed
Woodpecker
BCC Rangewide
(CON) (This is a Bird
of Conservation
Concern (BCC)
throughout its range
in the continental
USA and Alaska.)
Wood Thrush
BCC Rangewide
(CON) (This is a Bird
of Conservation
Concern (BCC)
throughout its range
in the continental
USA and Alaska.)
Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory birds.
Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize impacts to all birds at
any location year round. Implementation of these measures is particularly important when birds are most likely to
occur in the project area. When birds may be breeding in the area, identifying the locations of any active nests and
avoiding their destruction is a very helpful impact minimization measure. To see when birds are most likely to
occur and be breeding in your project area, view the Probability of Presence Summary. Additional measures and/or
permits may be advisable depending on the type of activity you are conducting and the type of infrastructure or
bird species present on your project site.
What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my speci
4/10/2019 IPaC: Explore Location
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/LXRFINQADNE55ILKI2UMQFQBFM/resources#wetlands 9/11
intersects, and that have been identi
4/10/2019 IPaC: Explore Location
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/LXRFINQADNE55ILKI2UMQFQBFM/resources#wetlands 10/11
Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use throughout the year,
including migration. Models relying on survey data may not include this information. For additional information on
marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study and the nanotag studies or contact Caleb Spiegel or Pam
Loring.
What if I have eagles on my list?
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid violating the
Eagle Act should such impacts occur.
Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report
The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of birds of priority
concern. To learn more about how your list is generated, and see options for identifying what other birds may be
in your project area, please see the FAQ “What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring
in my speci
4/10/2019 IPaC: Explore Location
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/LXRFINQADNE55ILKI2UMQFQBFM/resources#wetlands 11/11
Data limitations
The Service's objective of mapping wetlands and deepwater habitats is to produce reconnaissance level
information on the location, type and size of these resources. The maps are prepared from the analysis of high
altitude imagery. Wetlands are identi