20080833 Ver 1_Year 5 Monitoring Report_2017_20180131

Fletcher -Meritor Site
(UT to Cane Creek) Stream and Wetland Restoration
Project No: 138
Monitoring Report Year 5 of 5
Henderson County, North Carolina
�i
_1
Prepared for:
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Mitigation Services
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1652
Construction Complete: May 2012
Data Collected: March, May, & November 2017
Report Submission: January 2018

Prepared by:
HDR Engineering
555 Fayetteville Street, Suite 900
Raleigh, NC 27601

Fletcher -Meritor Site
(UT to Cane Creek) Stream and Wetland Restoration
Project No: 138
Monitoring Report Year 5 of 5
Henderson County, North Carolina
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.......................................................................................................
2.0 Methodology.............................................................................................................................
2.1 Morphometric Parameters and Channel Stability.................................................................
2.1.1 Profile ............................................................................................................................
2.1.2 Dimension.....................................................................................................................
2.1.3 Pattern ...........................................................................................................................
2.1.4 Substrate........................................................................................................................
2.1.5 Sediment Transport .......................................................................................................
2.1.6 Photo Documentation....................................................................................................
2.2 Vegetation.............................................................................................................................
2.3 Hydrology.............................................................................................................................
3.0 REFERENCES CITED.............................................................................................................
LIST OF APPENDICES
APPENDIX A GENERAL TABLES AND FIGURES
Figure 1
— Vicinity Map
Figure 2
— Asset Map
Table la
— Project Components
Table lb
— Component Summations
Table 2 —
Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3 —Project
Contacts
Table 4 —
Project Attributes
1
4
4
4
4
5
5
5
6
6
6
8
Fletcher -Meritor Site (UT to Cane Creek) Restoration Project Page i
Monitoring Report Year 5 of 5 January 2018
Project No: 138 Year 5 of 5

APPENDIX B VISUAL ASSESSMENT
Figure 3a — Current Condition Plan View
Figure 3b — Current Condition Plan View
Figure 3c — Current Condition Plan View
Figure 3d — Current Condition Plan View
Table 5a — Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment — Upper Reach
Table 5b — Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment — Lower Reach
Table 5c — Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment - Tributary
Table 6 — Vegetation Condition Assessment
Photos — Permanent Photo Points
APPENDIX C VEGETATION PLOT DATA
Table 7 — Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary
Table 8 — CVS Vegetation Metadata
Table 9 — Vegetation Plot Data
Photos — Vegetation Plots
APPENDIX D STREAM ASSESSMENT DATA
Cross -Sections with Annual Overlays
Longitudinal Profiles with Annual Overlays
Pebble Count Plots with Annual Overlays
Table I Oa — Stream Data Summary — Upper Reach
Table l Ob — Stream Data Summary — Lower Reach
Table l Oc — Stream Data Summary — Tributary
Table 11 a — Monitoring Data — Dimensional Morphology Summary
APPENDIX E HYDROLOGIC DATA
Table 12 — Verification of Bankfull Events
Table 13 — Wetland Gauge Attainment Data Summary
Groundwater Monitoring Gauge Graphics
Fletcher -Meritor Site (UT to Cane Creek) Restoration Project Page ii
Monitoring Report Year 5 of 5 January 2018
Project No: 138 Year 5 of 5

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Fletcher -Meritor Site Stream and Wetland Restoration Project, completed in May 2012, restored
3,575 linear feet of meandering C/E-type stream along an Unnamed Tributary (UT) to Cane Creek plus
648 linear feet of a first order tributary (Tributary) to the Main Stem as well as re-establish hydrology and
hydrophytic vegetation to 6.7 acres of historical wetlands. This natural channel restoration consists of a
Priority II restoration that includes a bankfull bench to allow for flood attenuation before reconnecting to
the natural floodplain. The riparian buffer was planted with species representing an Alluvial Forest
grading to a Bottomland Forest Community (Schafale and Weakley, 1990). This stream was preserved
within the 20.3 acre conservation easement.
Efforts to restore or enhance wetlands on the project site included restoring topography, hydrology, and
habitats of a natural wetland system by excavating overburden/berms and filling agricultural ditches to
promote an increase in ground water elevation. Following excavation, removal of drain tiles and
plugging of drainage ditches, the wetland areas were planted with native hardwoods.
The project goals and objectives are listed below.
Project Goals
■ Improve local water quality by reestablishing stream stability and capacity to transport watershed
flows and sediment load.
■ Provide additional floodplain storage by increasing the capacity of the stream to mitigate flood flows.
■ Restore aquatic and riparian habitat.
■ Reducing non -point source sedimentation and nutrient inputs into the project reaches.
Project Objectives
■ Restore/enhance approximately 4,223 linear feet to stable stream channel morphology, supported by
instream habitat and grade/bank stabilization structures. Restoration and enhancement consists of
restoring the channel pattern and profile and building a floodplain bench along the reaches.
■ Reestablish hydrology and hydrophytic vegetation to 6.7 acres of historic wetlands by removing
overburden/berms, plugging agricultural drainage ditches, and replanting with native grasses, shrubs
and trees.
■ Eliminate accelerated bank erosion by creating a bankfull bench, floodplain, and laying back slopes.
■ Reestablish a native riparian buffer. Revegetation of the buffer was accomplished by planting tree and
shrub species for Alluvial and Bottomland Hardwood Communities.
The project has been divided into segments, which include three stream reaches and four wetland areas:
■ Upper Reach Main Stem — 1796 linear feet
■ Lower Reach Main Stem — 1779 linear feet
■ Tributary — 648 linear feet
■ Wetland A — approximately 2.92 acres
■ Wetland B — approximately 1.43 acres
■ Wetland C — approximately 1.34 acres
■ Wetland D — approximately 0.97 acres
The project site, which is protected by a 20.3 -acre permanent conservation easement held by the State of
North Carolina, is situated in Henderson County in the North Carolina Mountains Physiographic
Fletcher -Meritor Site (UT to Cane Creek) Restoration Project Page 1
Monitoring Report Year 5 of 5 January 2018
Project No: 138 Year 5 of 5

Province. The project is located in the French Broad River Basin, USGS Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC)
06010105 and NCDWQ subbasin 04-03-02. Cane Creek is a North Carolina Class C stream. The final
2014 303(d) and Integrated Report no longer lists as impaired the section of Cane Creek from Cushion
Branch to the French Broad River, to which the restoration project drains (NCDEQ 2014). The restored
reaches drain lands with significant non -point source impacts to water quality from agriculture,
industrial/commercial development, and historical clay strip mining. Land use data indicates that more
than 60 percent of the 1.1 -square mile UT to Cane Creek watershed is currently pervious with a pre-
dominance of open fields/lawn/low-density residential lands, and about 40 percent is impervious
commercial/institutional buildings/roads.
The vegetative success of the restoration site is based on criteria established in the USACE Stream
Mitigation Guidelines (2003). Vegetation monitoring is considered successful if a minimum of 260
planted stems/acre are surviving at the end of five years. The Monitoring Year 5 (MY5) stem counts are
located in Tables 7 and 9 in Appendix C. Currently, 14 of 17 vegetation plots are meeting the measures
of success; however, all of the plots are meeting the five year success criteria with inclusion of the
desirable volunteer species. Vegetation throughout the reach appears to be growing at acceptable rates
and the mortality rate appears to be fairly low. The three plots that are not meeting success criteria
include two along the tributary were not planted at the appropriate density, and the plot closest to the
confluence with Cane Creek which has had backwater impacts numerous times over the monitoring years.
Numerous locations along the reaches have been noted as having sparse vegetation during previous
monitoring events; however, these areas are much smaller than in previous years. These areas are
illustrated on the Current Condition Plan View (CCPV) in Appendix B. In addition to these locations, a
large area of cattails (Typha latifolia) is growing within the upper wetland area. The cattails are not
posing problems to the reaches currently; however, this location provides a seed source and should be
watched. Cattails have created issues when stands grow within streams by out -competing other riparian
herbaceous species and creating potential areas for aggradation. One location of multiflora rose (Rosa
multiflora) was noted near vegetation plot 9. Butterfly bush (Buddleja davidii) is growing in the rock
along the permanent crossing. No other invasive species were noted.
There were no issues with access during the annual site reviews. In previous years there were signs of
encroachment during the visits. Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) installed new signs in 2015 where
farming activities were encroaching on the easement and no new areas of encroachment were noted;
however, the previous farming activities continue to occur in close proximity to the easement boundary.
In addition, the farm access road adjacent to the western side of the tributary reach (within the Wetland C
area) is not gated. A ditch that was cut in 2014 (adjacent to the conservation easement boundary near the
proposed Wetland D on the Lower Reach) appears to be partially draining the proposed wetland and thus
an issue for maintaining hydrology at this location.
The reaches of the restoration project were observed to be in stable condition. The channels access their
floodplain and evidence of bankfull events were observed during Year 5 monitoring. This evidence
included the presence of wrack lines, sediment deposits, and the crest gauge data. In previous years the
substrate has shown a gradual change to more coarse material in the Upper and Lower Reaches, although
the Tributary reach still has a hard clay substrate. This is expected, as the tributary reach has little
available alluvium/substrate to migrate into the system. This year, the Main Stem reaches indicate a more
sandy substrate in the Upper Reach similar to the previous year, but this is likely due to the amount of
ponding caused by the existing and previously -breached beaver dams. Sediment transport analysis and
shear stress fall within acceptable ranges and are similar to those of the baseline condition.
Fletcher -Meritor Site (UT to Cane Creek) Restoration Project Page 2
Monitoring Report Year 5 of 5 January 2018
Project No: 138 Year 5 of 5

Notable areas of concern occur on all project reaches. In previous years one of the greatest areas of
concern were the number of beaver dams on the Main Stem reach; however, most of those have been
breached and the stream system has recovered from their removal. The other notable concern is the past
structure failures along the Tributary Reach. Over half of the log structures along the Tributary Reach are
eroded or completely undermined during low flow periods; however, during normal and higher flows they
structures appear to function as intended. The substrate along the Tributary remains clay and there
doesn't appear to be any larger size particles moving into the reach. The most likely cause of the
structure issues was the heavy rains received between May and December, 2013.
The temporary utility line crossing located on the Lower Reach has been removed and appears to be
stable. It has been replanted since the previous year when the vegetation survivability was questionable.
No issues were noted during the assessment.
Beaver activity is ongoing on the Lower Reach, which was noted in 2016 for the first time. The only
remaining active beaver dams are located on the Lower Reachand beaver activity was evident in the
quantity of eaten trees and shrubs.
The permanent stream crossing near Sta. 24+00 on the Upper Reach has evidence of past erosion at the
access road culvert (and floodplain pipes) due to debris blockages. Removal of the upstream beavers and
their dams may limit some of the debris that reaches this area in the future. In addition to potential
blockages of the permanent crossing, the removal of the beaver dams resulted in recovery of channel
morphology, specifically the riffle cross sections, in the majority of this reach and significantly reduced
past ponding concerns.
Other areas of minor aggradation, erosion, or areas of sparse vegetation are noted in the tables, shown in
the photos, and illustrated on the attached mapping. These areas do not appear to be negatively impacting
the channel morphology.
Summary information/data related to the occurrence of the aforementioned items and statistics related to
performance of various project and monitoring elements can be found in the tables and figures in the
report appendices. Narrative background and supporting documentation formerly found in these reports
can be found in the Baseline Monitoring Report (formerly Mitigation Plan) and in the Mitigation Plan
(formerly the Restoration Plan) documents available on DMS's website. All raw data supporting the
tables and figures in the appendices are available from DMS upon request.
Fletcher -Meritor Site (UT to Cane Creek) Restoration Project Page 3
Monitoring Report Year 5 of 5 January 2018
Project No: 138 Year 5 of 5

2.0 METHODOLOGY AND RESULTS
Channel stability and vegetation survival were monitored on the project site. Post restoration monitoring
will occur for a minimum of five years or until the success criteria are met. The monitoring assessment
was completed using submeter accuracy GPS and Trimble VRS System on March 20 and 21, 2017. This
report details the results of Monitoring Year 5.
2.1 Morphometric Parameters and Channel Stability
2.1.1 Profile
The entire length of the reach was monitored by HDR using the VRS System. Multiple parameters were
located including top of bank, thalweg, and water surface.
The beaver dams on the Upper Reach noted in previous years were absent in Year 5. As a result more
riffles were observed this year and overall water surface slopes returned to values similar to those seen in
years prior to Year 4. Pools on the Upper Reach retained similar depths and lengths as compared to
previous years as well.
The beaver influences on the Lower Reach from Year 4 were also diminished in Year 5. Riffles and
pools were stable overall. One item of note is that an increased number of smaller length pools were
observed this year.
The Tributary profile showed similar measurements compared with Years 3 and 4. Pool depths in
previous years showed a trend in increased depths. With the pool depth values for Year 5 being
exceptionally close to Year 4, the increasing depth trend has leveled out.
Bankfull and water surface slopes remain consistent for the Upper and Tributary channel segments when
compared to previous years of monitoring. Again, in the absence of beaver influence, we did not observe
large areas of pooled water that would alter the overall trend line of the water surface profile.
2.1.2 Dimension
Nine cross sections were measured by HDR staff in March of 2017. The morphological and cross-
sectional data is presented in Tables 10 and 11 in Appendix D. Results from all three cross sections on
the Upper Reach showed little change from the previous year. Looking at the five year monitoring period
as a whole, values for the cross sections did not greatly fluctuate after the first monitoring year. The most
notable changes came in the period from baseline to Year 1.
Permanent riffle and pool cross sections for the Lower Reach continued to perform well in Year 5 and
dimensions have changed little from previous years , despite the increased beaver activity noted on the
Lower Reach in Year 4.
For the Tributary reach, the permanent riffles' (XSC's 7&8) trend of increasing depths has leveled out in
Year 5. The permanent pool cross section (XSC9) depth and other parameters yielded results strikingly
similar to the previous year as well.
Fletcher -Meritor Site (UT to Cane Creek) Restoration Project Page 4
Monitoring Report Year 5 of 5 January 2018
Project No: 138 Year 5 of 5

2.1.3 Pattern
The pattern of the channels was obtained using VRS measurements. The location is illustrated on the
CCPV map in Appendix B. No lateral movement in stream pattern was observed in Year 5 monitoring.
2.1.4 Substrate
Pebble counts were taken for Year 5 monitoring at permanent riffle cross sections on the Upper and
Lower Reaches. The Wolman Pebble Count methodology was used to calculate the D50 and D84 to
assess changes in particle size distributions. Pebble counts were not initially planned for this restoration
and were not performed in baseline monitoring. However, due to changes in substrate seen during Year 1
monitoring, counts were performed to compare with future years. Counts were not performed on the
Tributary reach due to the hard clay material making up the streambed.
The pebble count results from XSC1 and XSC3 were similar to those performed in the previous year. The
D50 results showed sandy bed conditions. Based on counts over the past years, the bed material is
decidedly a coarse sand in this portion of the stream.
The Lower Reach cross sections, XSC4 and XSC6, show a D50 in the medium gravel range. Values for
D50 over the five year period have stayed consistent in the gravel range but with many counts (and visual
observations) of larger gravels and small cobbles.
2.1.5 Sediment Transport
Shear stress values were calculated using riffle cross section measurements obtained in Year 5
monitoring. In Year 5 the shear stress values for the Upper Reach again showed the ability to easily move
the D50 particle obtained from pebble counts (movable particle size predicted using Revised Shields
Diagram, Rosgen, 2002). The predicted movable particle size for the Upper Reach riffle sections were
13mm and 16mm, as compared with D50 values of 0.6 mm and 0.5mm, respectively. These results
remain similar to the previous year despite the area being free of beaver activity in Year 5.
The Lower Reach values for predicted movable particle size versus the D50 from pebble counts are
similar, indicating stable conditions. For both riffle cross-sections (XSC4 and XSC6) the predicted
movable particle size is 12mm as compared to the observed D50 of l Omm.
The Tributary reach has much higher shear stress values, mainly as a product of a high water surface
slope. Predicted movable particle sizes, calculated at the two permanent riffles, indicate movable particle
sizes of 53 to 61mm. The bed material is made up of hard, sticky clay that does not seem to move during
high flows. Also, over the entirety of the 5 -year monitoring period, there has been no evidence that
sediment is being brought into the system from upstream. This lack of sediment supply along with flashy
storm events has impacted in -stream structures by lifting and transporting stream structure backfill
material (No. 57 stone in particular). This backfill material has been deposited on interior meander bends
and other places along the reach.
Fletcher -Meritor Site (UT to Cane Creek) Restoration Project Page 5
Monitoring Report Year 5 of 5 January 2018
Project No: 138 Year 5 of 5

2.1.6 Photo Documentation
Photos were taken at the 52 stream photo stations and 17 vegetation plots on March 20 and May 10 and
11, 2017. The locations of the photos stations and vegetation plots are noted on Figure 3 in Appendix B.
The photos for monitoring Year 5 are also provided in Appendix B.
2.2 Vegetation
The Carolina Vegetation Survey (CVS) Protocol Level 2 methodology was used to sample vegetation on
May 10 and 11, 2017. Monitoring was conducted on seventeen vegetation plots (3 on the tributary, 7 on
the main stem Upper Reach, and 7 on the main steam Lower Reach). The 100 -square meter CVS plots
are permanently marked with galvanized metal pipe. The plots occur within the floodplain/riparian area
with a few running upslope slightly.
According to the data collected, the average plant density among the 17 plots is 409 stems/acre with a
range from 162 to 809 stems/acre. The highest plant density occurred in plot 4 with over 800 stems/acre.
Currently, 14 of the plots are meeting the vegetation success criteria of 260 stems/acre. Year 5
monitoring data is provided in Appendix C. Vegetation throughout the site appears to be growing at
acceptable rates and the mortality rate appears to be fairly low. Herbaceous vegetation, which has been
noted as sparse during previous monitoring events, appears to be filling in with the exception of a few
locations noted on the CCPV. The three plots that are not meeting interim success criteria include two
along the Tributary, which may not have been planted at the appropriate density, as well as the plot
closest to the confluence with Cane Creek, which has had backwater impacts numerous times since
construction. During the monitoring events there has been an unknown species that was documented
during the first year and had continued to be noted. This species was not identifiable in the early years;
however, has been determined to be a pussy willow or goat willow (Salix caprea) following observation
during flowering.
2.3 Hydrology
Thirty-five groundwater wells were installed in June 2013 in the proposed wetland areas to document
hydrology for the remaining years of monitoring. Several of the wells have not been fully operational
since their installation. Two crest gauges were installed and indicated several bankfull events, as well as
evidence of bankfull events in the form of wrack lines.
Data from the groundwater monitoring stations showed 33 stations were in operation for a portion of the
2017 growing season. Well 29 was destroyed by a vehicle during monitoring Year 3 and Well 17 had
been destroyed by a vehicle in Year 2. The data revealed that 29 of the 33 stations met the soil saturation
criterion of groundwater being within 12 inches of the soil surface for at least 5 percent of the growing
season (10 consecutive days). Two wells (24 and 26) malfunctioned during the year and didn't provide
enough data to determine whether they would meet criteria. Two wells (2 and 22) are not meeting the
groundwater criteria. Well 2 is located in the proposed Wetland D in which the adjacent landowner has
excavated a nearby ditch which is potentially drawing down the water table. This was noted as possibly
impacting this proposed wetland in the previous year. Well 22 has not met criteria since it was installed.
According to the NC Drought Monitor, the 2015 and 2016 growing seasons were mostly under drought
conditions in the project vicinity. It is possible that this impacted the water table at the site, leading to the
large number of wells that did not meet the hydrology criteria in 2016 (MY 4). In pulling the historic
drought data for Henderson County, it became clear that 2015 (MY 3) and 2016 (MY 4) were not normal
years. For example, in 2017 the drought data indicated there were 27 weeks that were normal with only 3
Fletcher -Meritor Site (UT to Cane Creek) Restoration Project Page 6
Monitoring Report Year 5 of 5 January 2018
Project No: 138 Year 5 of 5

weeks abnormally dry or moderately dry within the growing season. In contrast, 2016 had only 6 normal
weeks with the remaining 24 weeks abnormally dry to extreme drought for the growing season. Similar
numbers were observed in 2015 with 21 weeks of abnormally dry to extreme drought and 9 normal
weeks. Overall, it is assumed that the drought documented within those two years may have played a role
in the hydrology of the wetlands for MY 4. Monitoring wells will be monitored in 2018 to gather
additional data.
Fletcher -Meritor Site (UT to Cane Creek) Restoration Project Page 7
Monitoring Report Year 5 of 5 January 2018
Project No: 138 Year 5 of 5

3.0 REFERENCES CITED
HDR Engineering, Inc. 2008. Final Stream & Wetland Restoration Plan for the Fletcher -Meritor Site
(UT to Cane Creek).
HDR Engineering, Inc. 2011. UT to Cane Creek Stream Restoration Final Plans (90%).
Lee, Michael T., R. K. Peet, S. D. Roberts, and T. R. Wentworth. 2006. CVS-EEP Protocol for
Recording Vegetation. Version 4.0. (http://cvs.bio.unc.edu/methods.htm.).
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality. 2014. Category 5 Water Quality Assessments -
303(d) List [303(d) and Integrated Report].
North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services. 2015. Fletcher -Meritor Site (UT to Cane Creek) Stream
and Wetland Restoration Monitoring Report Year 3 of 5.
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program. 2011. Baseline Monitoring Document: Format, Data
Requirements, and Content Guidance.
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program. 2013. Fletcher -Meritor Site (UT to Cane Creek)
Stream and Wetland Restoration Monitoring Report Year 1 of 5.
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program. 2014. Fletcher -Meritor Site (UT to Cane Creek)
Stream and Wetland Restoration Monitoring Report Year 2 of 5.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District. 2003. Stream Mitigation Guidelines. North
Carolina Division of Water Quality (DWQ), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IV (EPA),
Natural Resources Conservation Service (MRCS) and the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
(WRC).
Fletcher -Meritor Site (UT to Cane Creek) Restoration Project Page 8
Monitoring Report Year 5 of 5 January 2018
Project No: 138 Year 5 of 5

Appendix A

I t rnio ,
French Broad — • - .4
River Basin _ • r ' • I
Fletcher -Mneritte or Co. • �/ : /. .�btih '' ' + -
RestoratioSi
`irk / •'i •,. .• 1• �l ••�•
tlCe. r � J F
it
•S k. j 's �.� _ j • gra � � � 4
tili p 1 r
,
i Y yy stmt;
1 }.[ UF6
�o7,
\\ ►W�' �I '� r _ Sc .•'age
x\\ ��� F821� r Text-, - ,t •n I
20510
LL •Y �- -�' �.�s-- � �~ . _,?. `� • • Fletcher - Meritor
e 0 t ago 1 — Restoration Site
,, .� .` �� � � to �•+..'�,r— _ ��,.= ��ti' � h;.
41
-'Y - �' -5e �sF• - t
U _ Versa ... Jars . 3 131i a � 1 n. ���! .• - 1
_ •�:-fir � , � a•, ,
� :tea• � � •� r.
=-s �f �I Hyl04l�
Mile''`
a is
Directions to the site: From I-26 take
Exit 44 US 25. Proceed north for approximately
1.25 miles and turn left on Rockwell Drive.
Site is located approximately 500 feet to the west
of US 25 and to the north of Rockwell Drive.
Nap] �•� 1
0 1,000 2,000 4,000
Feet
Vicinity Map
Figure 1
Fletcher -Meritor Site (UT to Cane Creek) Year 5 Monitoring I Henderson County, INC
NC Division of Mitigation Services I Project No. 138

Fletcher -Meritor Co.
Restoration Site
LOWER
1779 FT
END LOWER REACH
STA. 27+79
SEWER LINE
EASEMENT
UPPER REACH
1796 FT
and. Latitude: 35.42
3Tac - a / Lonaitude: -82.511
BEGIN LOWER REACH ✓
STA. 10+00
END UPPER REACH
STA. 27+96
END TRIB REACH
is if STA. 16+48 ------
BEGIN U
PPER REACH
STA.
10+00�
PF, Illy:
TRIB REACH' BEGIN TRIB
REACH
648 FT STA. 10+00
It'
25s
Conservation Easement
As Built Centerline 41
Potential Restored Wetlands 0 125 250 500t
-
Feet
rN 11 CenterforGeograkc Information' -Analysis
Asset Map
Figure 2
Fletcher -Meritor Site (UT to Cane Creek) Year 5 Monitoring I Henderson County, NC
NC Division of Mitigation Services I Project No. 138

Table 1a. Project Components
Fletcher-Meritor Site (UT to Cane Creek) Stream and Wetland Restoration/Project No. 138
Project
Existing
Restoration
Footage
Mitigation
Mitigation
BMP
Component
Feet/Acres
Level
Approach
or
Stationing
Ratio
Units
Elements
Comment
or Reach ID
Acreage
Fully restores pattern, dimension and profile by
excavating a new channel with an adjoining
Main Steam
1520 If
R
P2
1796 If
10+00-28+38
1:1
1796
floodplain bench that grades to the existing
Upper Reach
ground elevation in order to partial restore flood
prone conditions. A 42 foot road crossing was
installed on this reach.
Fully restores pattern, dimension and profile by
excavating a new channel with an adjoining
Main Steam
floodplain bench that grades to the existing
Lower Reach
1320 If
R
P2
1779 If
10+00-27+79
1:1
1769
ground elevation in order to partial restore flood
prone conditions. A 20 foot utility easement
crosses this restoration reach. SMUs were at 1/2
credit in the area of this crossing.
Fully restores pattern, dimension and profile by
excavating a new channel with an adjoining
Tributary
550 If
R
P2
648 If
10+00-16+48
1:1
648
floodplain bench that grades to the existing
ground elevation in order to partial restore flood
prone conditions.
Restores topography, hydrology, and habitats of
Wetland A
0 acres (TBD)
R
2.92 acres
1:1
2.92
a natural wetland system by excavating new
floodplains and filling agricultural ditches to
promote an increase in ground water elevation.
Restores topography, hydrology, and habitats of
Wetland B
0 acres (TBD)
R
1.43 acres
1:1
1.43
a natural wetland system by excavating new
floodplains and filling agricultural ditches to
promote an increase in ground water elevation.
Restores topography, hydrology, and habitats of
Wetland C
0 acres (TBD)
R
1.34 acres
1:1
1.34
a natural wetland system by excavating new
floodplains and filling agricultural ditches to
promote an increase in ground water elevation.
Restores topography, hydrology, and habitats of
Wetland D
0 acres (TBD)
R
0.97 acres
1:1
0.97
a natural wetland system by excavating new
floodplains and filling agricultural ditches to
promote an increase in ground water elevation.

Table 1 b. Component Summations
Fletcher -Meritor Site(UT to Cane Creek) Stream and Wetland Restoration/Project No. 138
Restoration
Level
Stream (If)
Stream
Mitigation
Units (If)
Riparian Wetland (Ac)
Planted
Area (Ac)
Potential
Buffer
Area (sf)
Upland
(Ac)
Total Conservation
Area (Ac)
BMP
Riverine
on-
Riverine
Main Steam
Upper Reach
1796
1796
0.0
0.0
Main Steam
Lower Reach
1779
1769
0.0
0.0
Tributary
648
648
0.0
0.0
Wetland A
0
0
2.92
Wetland B
0
0
1.43
Wetland C
0
0
1.34
Wetland
oas
(Feet/Acres)
4,223
4,213
6.7
18.59
20.3

Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Fletcher -Meritor Site (UT to Cane Creek) Stream and Wetland Restoration/Project No. 138
Elapsed Time Since Grading Complete: 5 yrs 0 months
Elapsed Time Since Planting Complete: 5 yrs 0 Months
Number of Reporting Years: 5
Activity or Deliverable
Data Collection
Completion or
Complete
Delivery
Restoration Plan
December 2007
February 15, 2008
Final Design — Construction Plans
December 2007
May 2011
Construction/Grading
NA
May 2012
Temporary Seeding
NA
Dec. 2011 -April 2012
Permanent Seeding
NA
April 2012
Planting (containerized, bare root)
NA
April 2012
Final Inspection
NA
June 2012
Mitigation Plan / As -built (Year 0
Monitoring — baseline)
September 2012
May 2013
Year 1 Monitoring
May 2013
March 2014
Year 2 Monitoring
May 2014
August 2014
Utility Construction / Planting
Summer 2014
January 2015
Signage/Boundary Marking Improvements
NA
2015
Year 3 Monitoring
May 2015
January 2016
Year 4 Monitoring
March & June 2016
December 2016
Year 5 Monitoring
March & May 2017
January 2018

Table 3. Project Contacts Table
Fletcher -Meritor Site (UT to Cane Creek) Stream and Wetland Restoration/Project No. 138
Designer
HDR Engineering Inc. of the Carolinas
3733 National Drive, Suite 207, Raleigh, NC 27612
Primary project design POC
Jonathan Henderson, PE [phone]
Construction Contractor
Buchanan and Sons, Inc.
P.O. Box 123, Whittier, NC 28789
Construction contractor POC
Chris Buchanan, [phone]
Survey Contractor
Terminus Land Surveying, PLLC
28 Bessie Drive, Fletcher, NC 28724
Survey contractor POC
Christopher J. Gagne, [phone]
Planting Contractor
HARP, Inc.
301 McCullough Drive, 4th Floor, Charlotte, NC 28262
Planting contractor POC
Alan Peoples, [phone]
Seeding Contractor
Buchanan and Sons, Inc.
P.O. Box 123, Whittier, NC 28789
Contractor point of contact
Chris Buchanan, [phone]
Seed Mix Sources
Protech Environmental, Charlotte, NC
Phone: [phone]
Nursery Stock Suppliers
Cure Nursery, Pittsboro, NC - [phone]
Foggy Mountain Nursery LLC, Creston, NC - [phone]
Supertree Nursery, Blenheim, SC - [phone]
Habitat and Restoration Plants, Lexington, NC - [phone]
NC Division of Forest Resources, Greensboro, NC - [phone]
Little River Nursery, McMinnville, TN - [phone]
Virginia Department of Forestry, Crimora, VA - [phone]
Monitoring Performers - Baseline
HDR Engineering Inc. of the Carolinas
3733 National Drive, Suite 207, Raleigh, NC 27612
Vickie Miller, AICP, PWS [phone]
Stream Monitoring POC
Wyatt Yelverton, PE [phone]
Vegetation Monitoring POC
Vickie Miller, AICP, PWS [phone]
Wetland Monitoring POC
NA

Table 4. Project Attribute Table
Fletcher -Meritor Site (UT to Cane Creek) Stream and Wetland Restoration/Project No. 138
Project County
Henderson
Physiographic Region
Mountains
Ecoregion
Blue Ridge (Broad Basins)
Project River Basin
French Broad River Basin
USGS HUC for Project (8 digit)
6010105
NCDWQ Sub -basin for Project
04-03-02
Within extent of EEP Watershed Plan?
No
WRC Hab Class (Warm, Cool, Cold)
Warm
% of project easement fenced or demarcated
100% marked with EEP easement signage
Beaver activity observed during design phase?
No
Restoration Component Attribute Table
Main Steam Upper Reach
Main Steam Lower Reach
Tributary
Wetland A
Wetland B
Wetland C
Wetland D
Drainage area (ac)
480
704
205
NA
NA
NA
NA
Stream order
2nd
1st
NA
NA
NA
NA
Restored length (feet or acreage)
1796
1779
648
2.92
1.43
1.34
0.97
Perennial or Intermittent
NA
NA
NA
NA
Watershed type (Rural, Urban, Developing etc.)
Devel.
Watershed LULC Distribution (e.g.)
Watershed impervious cover (%) (Commercial/Institutional
Buildings/Roads)
Forested
Low Density Residential / Open Fields/ Lawns
Medium -Density Residential
38
20
28
14
NCDWQ AU/Index number
-
NCDWQ classification
C
NA
NA
NA
NA
3034 listed?
No
NA
NA
NA
NA
Upstream of a 303d listed segment?
Yes
NA
NA
NA
NA
Reasons for 3034 listing or stressor
Biological Integrity (Benthos)
NA
NA
NA
NA
Total acreage of easement
20.3
Total vegetated acreage within the easement
18.59
Total planted acreage as part of the restoration
18.59
Rosgen classification of pre-existing
Impaired Ditch
Impaired Ditch
Impaired Ditch
NA
NA
NA
NA
Rosgen classification of As -built
C/E4
C/E4
C/E4
NA
NA
NA
NA
Valley type
VIII
VIII
VIII
NA
NA
NA
NA
Valley slope
0.31%
0.15%
NA
NA
NA
NA
Valley side slope range (e.g. 2-3.%)
-
-
NA
NA
NA
NA
Valley toe slope range (e.g. 2-3.%)
-
-
NA
NA
NA
NA
Cowardin classification
NA
Palustrine
Palustrine
Palustrine
Palustrine
Trout waters designation
No
NA
NA
NA
NA
Species of concern, endangered etc.? (Y/N)
No
Dominant soil series and characteristics
Series
Comus
Codorus
Kinkora
Codorus /
Kinkora
Kinkora
Kinkora
Comus /
Kinkora
Depth
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
Clay%
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
K
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
T
U
U
U
U
U
U
U

Appendix B

LEGEND
LOWER REACH
STA. 10+00
•
Monitoring Wells
V
Structures
8
Rain Gauge
END UPPER REACH
STA. 27+96
Top of Bank
o
Photo Points
Vegetation Plot
•
Crest Gauge
25
p•1
Conservation Easement
Wetland D
Cross Section Pins
As Built Centerline
Cross Sections
Potential Restored Wetlands (A -D)
Stations
� �/�
� +
s �Qfp•- O PERMANENT STREAM CROSSING
15 2-36" CMP
0
Feet 200
DATA SOURCE: NC One Maps
2-24" CMP FLOODPLAIN CULVERTS '
in
195 20 - S
AL•
_ SEWER LINE �� _ - 0.;; ••�
:- EASEMENT O -
41n O
BEGIN LOWER REACH 15 O O
^' U R 3
UR 5
• UR7 / � UR,.2
• O
8 AUR, 6% R..
LOWER REACH
STA. 10+00
r^ O
1779 FT
_
- — -
END LOWER REACH
END UPPER REACH
STA. 27+96
_
STA. 27+79!
- -w
_
r�,
25
p•1
X
-
�
Wetland D
X439 -
�
'I
� �/�
� +
s �Qfp•- O PERMANENT STREAM CROSSING
15 2-36" CMP
2-24" CMP FLOODPLAIN CULVERTS '
in
195 20 - S
AL•
_ SEWER LINE �� _ - 0.;; ••�
:- EASEMENT O -
41n O
BEGIN LOWER REACH 15 O O
^' U R 3
UR 5
• UR7 / � UR,.2
• O
8 AUR, 6% R..
STA. 10+00
r^ O
_
- — -
END UPPER REACH
STA. 27+96
_
END TRIB REACH
ACCESS -
611
Q3a c,Af�3
ROAD
O
Wetland C
(1.34 ac)
f
TRIB REACH
648 FT
BEGIN TRIB REACH - -.�
- - _
-
STA. 10+00
25 '#
,
N,C Cente for Geog aphic Information
& Ana ys's
:.
FLETCHER-MERITOR SITE (UT TO CANE CREEK) MONITORING YEAR 5
F:n
CURRENT CONDITIONS PLAN VIEW
FIGURE 3A
PATH:ZAGMPROJECTS1009177_NCWR M671_FLETCHER\MAP_DOCS\M-MONITORINGWEAR SWIG- MONITORINGLOCATIONB_2017_JG_012718-D - USER: JGARVEY - DATE: 112712018
DIVISION OF MITIGATION SERVICES I PROJECT NO. 138

U
UPPER REACH
1796 FT
F2-24"
NT STREAM CROSSING 'fl
FLOODPLAIN CULVEr 1:113 li -_
NZ3t3 \%
toga
f ,: y 8 Rain Gauge
71
20 NG39D r ff/ " c,
IP �w
O0 .o o • Crest Gauge
Photo Points
CO
O ' •� O Cross Section Pins
NQ5fr1
0 Q O
Sewer Line Easement
BEGIN UPPER REACH
Q.
STA. 10+00.00
J, -
"�° 4
SCC
mr
MOM -
Pv
ACESS
ROAD
0 50 100 200
Feet
O/
Vegetation Plot
Cross Sections
Year 5 (2017) Conditions
Structure Condition Problem Areas Vegetation Plot Condition
Stations
No Bare Vegetation Criteria not met, >10%
Top of Bank
— Silted Beaver Dam Exceeds requirement, <10%
Yes Breached Beaver Dam Exceeds requirement, >10%
Conservation Easement
Bed/Bank Conditions CE Disturbance Monitoring Wells
As Built Centerline
T� Aggradation Cattails • Meeting
® ry�
Delineated Wetlands
® Erosion • Failing
_ Debris • Insufficient Data
Potential Restored Wetlands �
Current Conditions Plan View
Figure 3b
Fletcher -Meritor Site (UT to Cane Creek) Year 5 Monitoring I Henderson County, NC
NC Division of Mitigation Services I Project No. 138

Year 5 (2017) Conditions
EXCAVATED
DITCH 1,
Monitoring Wells Structure Condition Problem Areas
(D Meeting No Bare Vegetation
l �d • Failing Silted Beaver Dam
Insufficient Data Yes Breached Beaver Dam
Bed/Bank Conditions
CE Disturbance
41 C�JUInb IF;leN�J �� Aggradation
Cattails
O� ® Erosion Vegetation Plot Condition
1. Debris Criteria not met, >10%
Exceeds requirement, <10%
LJExceeds requirement, >10%
99 l nr)<a _
TEMPORARY STREAM �R
CROSSING REPAIRED
EMOVTROAD
ED r T
,
a /
--
BEGIN LOWER REACH
STA. 10+00 QMm
END UPPER REACH min
STA. 27+96 } Mq
END TRIB REACH Om
STA. 16+48 Q
Win. 'oo
m Sao 9
8 Rain Gauge O
@3 „��. ACCESS
• Crest GaugeMID � tvxy�� O ROAD
O Photo Points
I,
O Cross Section Pins
Cross Sections
Wetla'ac)
Sewer Line Easement !/ (1`34 ae)/
Vegetation Plot MID J X39 •
Stations O
Top of Bank TRIB REACH
• 648 FT 1
Conservation Easement Im
�'�''r .—� -+•
As Built Centerline BEGIN TRIB REACH w �`
Rockwell Road TSTA. 10+00
® Delineated Wetlands
Potential Restored Wetlands o 50 too zoo
Feet
Current Conditions Plan View
Figure 3c
Fletcher -Meritor Site (UT to Cane Creek) Year 4 Monitoring I Henderson County, NC
NC Division of Mitigation Services I Project No. 138

i
EXCAVATED
DITCH
1779 FT
END LOWER REACH Jia a [L
STA. 27+79 • _ °
20
8 Rain Gauge -
0 Photo Points -
• Crest Gauge
O Cross Section Pins _ ' 0 0
Year 5 (2017) Conditions j
Vegetation Plot
Structure Condition Problem Areas Vegetation Plot Condition
Cross Sections No Bare Vegetation Criteria not met, >10% °
Sewer Line Easement ° SEWER LINE
Silted Beaver Dam Exceeds requirement, <10% �- ft EASEMENT
Stations
Yes
Breached Beaver Dam
Exceeds requirement, >10%
Top of Bank
Bed/Bank Conditions
CE Disturbance
Monitoring Wells
Conservation Easement
�m AggradationMeeting
Cattails
®
Erosion
• Failing
`
As Built Centerline
Potential Restored Wetlands
Debris
Insufficient Data
0 7 100 200
Feet
Current Conditions Plan View
Figure 3d
Fletcher -Meritor Site (UT to Cane Creek) Year 5 Monitoring I Henderson County, NC
NC Division of Mitigation Services I Project No. 138

Table 5
Reach ID
Assessed Length
Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Upper Reach
1796
Adjusted %
Number
Number with
Footage with
for
Major
Stable,
Total
Number of
Amount of
% Stable,
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Channel
Channel
Performing
Number in
Unstable
Unstable
Performing
Woody
Woody
Woody
Category
Sub -Category
Metric
as Intended
1 As -built
Segments
Footage
as Intended
Vegetation
1 Vegetation
1 Vegetation
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
(Riffle and Run units)
1. Aggradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect
flow laterally (not to include point bars)
5
96
95%
2. Degradation - Evidence of downcutting
0
0
100%
2. Riffle Condition
1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate
16
21
76%
3. Meander Pool
Condition
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth > 1.6)
—
17
23
74%
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle)
17
23
74%
4.Thalweg Position
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)
22
22
100%
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander (Glide)
21
21
100%
2. Bank
1. Scoured/Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or
scour and erosion
1
28
99%
99%
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2. Undercut
likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable
0
0
100%
100%
and are providing habitat.
13. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, calving, or collapse
0
0
100%
100%
Totals
1
28
99%
0
0
99%
3. Engineered
Structures
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.
23
23
°
100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill.
6
6
100%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.
23
23
100%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed
15%. (See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document)
23
23
100%
4. Habitat
Pool forming structures maintaining -- Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull
Depth ratio > 1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base -flow.
6
6
100%

Table 5
Reach ID
Assessed Length
Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Lower Reach
1779
Adjusted %
Number
Number with
Footage with
for
Major
Stable,
Total
Number of
Amount of
% Stable,
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Channel
Channel
Performing
Number in
Unstable
Unstable
Performing
Woody
Woody
Woody
Category
Sub -Category
Metric
as Intended
1 As -built
Segments
Footage
as Intended
Vegetation
1 Vegetation
1 Vegetation
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
(Riffle and Run units)
1. Aggradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect
flow laterally (not to include point bars)
10
192
89%
2. Degradation - Evidence of downcutting
0
0
100%
2. Riffle Condition
1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate
14
16
88%
3. Meander Pool
Condition
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth > 1.6)
—
12
16
75%
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle)
12
16
75%
4.Thalweg Position
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)
16
16
100%
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander (Glide)
16
16
100%
2. Bank
1. Scoured/Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or
scour and erosion
4
83
98%
98%
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2. Undercut
likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable
1
28
99%
99%
and are providing habitat.
13. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, calving, or collapse
0
0
100%
100%
Totals
5
111
97%
0
0
97%
3. Engineered
Structures
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.
18
18
°
100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill.
4
4
100%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.
16
17
94%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed
15%. (See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document)
17
17
100%
4. Habitat
Pool forming structures maintaining -- Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull
Depth ratio > 1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base -flow.
4
4
100%

Table 5
Reach ID
Assessed Length
Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Tributary
648
Adjusted %
Number
Number with
Footage with
for
Major
Stable,
Total
Number of
Amount of
% Stable,
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Channel
Channel
Performing
Number in
Unstable
Unstable
Performing
Woody
Woody
Woody
Category
Sub -Category
Metric
as Intended
1 As -built
Segments
Footage
as Intended
Vegetation
1 Vegetation
1 Vegetation
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
(Riffle and Run units)
1. Aggradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect
flow laterally (not to include point bars)
2
37
94%
2. Degradation - Evidence of downcutting
0
0
100%
2. Riffle Condition
1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate
7
11
64%
3. Meander Pool
Condition
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth > 1.6)
—
10
11
91%
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle)
10
11
91%
4.Thalweg Position
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)
11
11
100%
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander (Glide)
11
11
100%
2. Bank
1. Scoured/Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or
scour and erosion
14
188
85%
0
0
85%
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2. Undercut
likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable
0
0
100%
100%
and are providing habitat.
13. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, calving, or collapse
0
0
100%
100%
Totals
14
188
85%
0
0
85%
3. Engineered
Structures
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.
12
12
°
100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill.
9
11
82%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.
4
12
33%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed
15%. (See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document)
7
12
58%
4. Habitat
Pool forming structures maintaining -- Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull
Depth ratio > 1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base -flow.
11
11
100%

Table 6
Planted Acreage'
Vegetation Condition Assessment
18.59
Easement Acreage
20.3
% of
Mapping
CCPV
Number of
Combined
Planted
Vegetation Category
Definitions
Threshold
Depiction
Polygons
Acreage
Acrea e
4. Invasive Areas of Concern
Areas or points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale).
none
Pattern and
1
0.01
0.0%
1. Bare Areas
Very limited cover of both woody and herbaceous material.
0.001 ac.
Color
3
0.01
0.1%
Color
5. Easement Encroachment Areas3
Areas or points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale).
none
Pattern andColor
0
0.00
Pattern and
2. Low Stem Density Areas
Woody stem densities clearly below target levels based on MY3, 4, or 5 stem count criteria.
0.001 ac.
3
0.06
0.3%
Color
Total
6
0.07
0.4%
Pattern and
3. Areas of Poor Growth Rates or Vigor
Areas with woody stems of a size class that are obviously small given the monitoring year.
0.1 ac.
0
0.00
0.0%
Color
Cumulative Total
6
0.07
1 0.4%
Easement Acreage
20.3
1 = Enter the planted acreage within the easement. This number is calculated as the easement acreage minus any existing mature tree stands that were not subject to supplemental planting of the understory, the channel acreage,
crossings or any other elements not directly planted as part of the project effort.
2 = The acreage within the easement boundaries.
3 = Encroachment may occur within or outside of planted areas and will therefore be calculated against the overall easement acreage. In the event a polygon is cataloged into items 1, 2 or 3 in the table and is the result of encroachment,
the associated acreage should be tallied in the relevant item (i.e., item 1,2 or 3) as well as a parallel tally in item 5.
4 = Invasives may occur in or out of planted areas, but still within the easement and will therefore be calculated against the overall easement acreage. Invasives of concern/interest are listed below. The list of high concern spcies are
those with the potential to directly outcompete native, young woody stems in the short-term (e.g. monitoring period or shortly thereafter) or affect the community structure for existing, more established tree/shrub stands over timeframes
that are slightly longer (e.g. 1-2 decades). The low/moderate concern group are those species that generally do not have this capacity over the timeframes discussed and therefore are not expected to be mapped with regularity, but can
be mapped, if in the judgement of the observer their coverage, density or distribution is suppressing the viability, density, or growth of planted woody stems. Decisions as to whether remediation will be needed are based on the
integration of risk factors by EEP such as species present, their coverage, distribution relative to native biomass, and the practicality of treatment. For example, even modest amounts of Kudzu or Japanese Knotweed early in the projects
history will warrant control, but potentially large coverages of Microstegium in the herb layer will not likley trigger control because of the limited capacities to impact tree/shrub layers within the timeframes discussed and the potential
impacts of treating extensive amounts of ground cover. Those species with the "watch list" designator in gray shade are of interest as well, but have yet to be observed across the state with any frequency. Those in red italics are of
particular interest given their extreme risk/threat level for mapping as points where isolated specimens are found, particularly ealry in a projects monitoring history. However, areas of discreet, dense patches will of course be mapped as
polygons. The symbology scheme below was one that was found to be helpful forsymEofzing invasives polygons, particulalry for situations where the conditon for an area is somewhere between isolated specimens and dense, discreet
patches. In any case, the point or polygon/area feature can be symbolized to describe things like high or low concern and species can be listed as a map inset, in legend items if the number of species are limited or in the narrative section
of the executive summary.
% of
Mapping
CCPV
Number of
Combined
Easement
Vegetation Category
Definitions
Threshold
Depiction
Pol ons
Acreage
Acrea e
4. Invasive Areas of Concern
Areas or points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale).
none
Pattern and
1
0.01
0.0%
Color
5. Easement Encroachment Areas3
Areas or points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale).
none
Pattern andColor
0
0.00
0.0%
1 = Enter the planted acreage within the easement. This number is calculated as the easement acreage minus any existing mature tree stands that were not subject to supplemental planting of the understory, the channel acreage,
crossings or any other elements not directly planted as part of the project effort.
2 = The acreage within the easement boundaries.
3 = Encroachment may occur within or outside of planted areas and will therefore be calculated against the overall easement acreage. In the event a polygon is cataloged into items 1, 2 or 3 in the table and is the result of encroachment,
the associated acreage should be tallied in the relevant item (i.e., item 1,2 or 3) as well as a parallel tally in item 5.
4 = Invasives may occur in or out of planted areas, but still within the easement and will therefore be calculated against the overall easement acreage. Invasives of concern/interest are listed below. The list of high concern spcies are
those with the potential to directly outcompete native, young woody stems in the short-term (e.g. monitoring period or shortly thereafter) or affect the community structure for existing, more established tree/shrub stands over timeframes
that are slightly longer (e.g. 1-2 decades). The low/moderate concern group are those species that generally do not have this capacity over the timeframes discussed and therefore are not expected to be mapped with regularity, but can
be mapped, if in the judgement of the observer their coverage, density or distribution is suppressing the viability, density, or growth of planted woody stems. Decisions as to whether remediation will be needed are based on the
integration of risk factors by EEP such as species present, their coverage, distribution relative to native biomass, and the practicality of treatment. For example, even modest amounts of Kudzu or Japanese Knotweed early in the projects
history will warrant control, but potentially large coverages of Microstegium in the herb layer will not likley trigger control because of the limited capacities to impact tree/shrub layers within the timeframes discussed and the potential
impacts of treating extensive amounts of ground cover. Those species with the "watch list" designator in gray shade are of interest as well, but have yet to be observed across the state with any frequency. Those in red italics are of
particular interest given their extreme risk/threat level for mapping as points where isolated specimens are found, particularly ealry in a projects monitoring history. However, areas of discreet, dense patches will of course be mapped as
polygons. The symbology scheme below was one that was found to be helpful forsymEofzing invasives polygons, particulalry for situations where the conditon for an area is somewhere between isolated specimens and dense, discreet
patches. In any case, the point or polygon/area feature can be symbolized to describe things like high or low concern and species can be listed as a map inset, in legend items if the number of species are limited or in the narrative section
of the executive summary.

Upper Reach Photo Station 1 Downstream (3/20/2017 Year 5)
Upper Reach Photo Station 1 Upstream (3/20/2017 Year 5)
Fletcher -Meritor Restoration Project December 2017
Year 5 of 5 Monitoring Report DMS Project #138

rrrT
f

71� 1 11Ja
1% 1 fZ-41t L-Tbk %,

k
r
0
FIR
- p
t,:
1 �

Upper Reach Photo Station 5 Downstream (3/20/2017 Year 5)
Upper Reach Photo Station 5 Upstream (3/20/2017 Year 5)
Fletcher -Meritor Restoration Project December 2017
Year 5 of 5 Monitoring Report DMS Project #138

64 a c � �.s �•1 I���t. j'% � %r ����° r�`� S�F��ws�T��'r��'/ �'� � IfAT'A
7y r

R'
1 f
1,yCf R
J1 �
I
y-
IX
4 1 _
r
- �.•
II
R'
1 f
1,yCf R
J1 �
I

+il`'�'�>�!r
t A
c
��� � � '�f�� /1� ', iib ��' � � �� •% --�
k fit{ 3A�R i 'f'j r �• k __
el

171
` Uhl
All
7R a n� f d r r
A
AMR
sho 1
tkteJl
r

PRE
" �1 1 i! �t� i r • � J 1 1 ! �
If
v
� 1 1

Upper Reach Photo Station 13 Downstream (3/20/2017 Year 5)
Upper Reach Photo Station 13 Upstream (3/20/2017 Year 5)
Fletcher -Meritor Restoration Project December 2017
Year 5 of 5 Monitoring Report DMS Project #138

Upper Reach Photo Station 14 Downstream (3/20/2017 Year 5)
Upper Reach Photo Station 14 Upstream (3/20/2017 Year 5)
Fletcher -Meritor Restoration Project December 2017
Year 5 of 5 Monitoring Report DMS Project #138

t
t"
- \ • � �_ C� � i ,. Rif' a `�' ``yy � �.
-
\f R
m

Upper Reach Photo Station 18 Downstream (3/20/2017 Year 5)
Upper Reach Photo Station 18 Upstream (3/20/2017 Year 5)
Fletcher -Meritor Restoration Project December 2017
Year 5 of 5 Monitoring Report DMS Project #138

I A mw IF;5
jIA
� al
cz
� 1
%S 1
1

� 1
d ,1
� Lf��l�� �� Mia •�- � �, f��. �+ �.
dux

r � y
`'� `> -
-
i
10
r , I

Ok
x�L
t sz ,,tea
!WA`s
Confluence with Cane Creek (3/20/2017 Year 5)
Looking upstream of Confluence with Cane Creek (3/20/2017 Year 5)
Fletcher -Meritor Restoration Project January 2017
Year 4 of 5 Monitoring Report DMS Project #138

Lower Reach Photo Station 1 Downstream (3/20/2017 Year 5)
Lower Reach Photo Station 1 Upstream (3/20/2017 Year 5)
Fletcher -Meritor Restoration Project January 2017
Year 4 of 5 Monitoring Report DMS Project #138

Lower Reach Photo Station 2 Downstream (3/20/2017 Year 5)
Lower Reach Photo Station 2 Upstream (3/20/2017 Year 5)
Fletcher -Meritor Restoration Project January 2017
Year 4 of 5 Monitoring Report DMS Project #138

f va Skur
T�rp41
FFF

Lower Reach Photo Station 4 Downstream (3/20/2017 Year 5)
Lower Reach Photo Station 4 Upstream (3/20/2017 Year 5)
Fletcher -Meritor Restoration Project January 2017
Year 4 of 5 Monitoring Report DMS Project #138

Lower Reach Photo Station 5 Downstream (3/20/2017 Year 5)
Lower Reach Photo Station 5 Upstream (3/20/2017 Year 5)
Fletcher -Meritor Restoration Project January 2017
Year 4 of 5 Monitoring Report DMS Project #138

Lower Reach Photo Station 6 Downstream (3/20/2017 Year 5)
Lower Reach Photo Station 6 Upstream (3/20/2017 Year 5)
Fletcher -Meritor Restoration Project January 2017
Year 4 of 5 Monitoring Report DMS Project #138

Lower Reach Photo Station 7 Downstream (3/20/2017 Year 5)
Lower Reach Photo Station 7 Upstream (3/20/2017 Year 5)
Fletcher -Meritor Restoration Project January 2017
Year 4 of 5 Monitoring Report DMS Project #138
ry
t
Lower Reach Photo Station 7 Upstream (3/20/2017 Year 5)
Fletcher -Meritor Restoration Project January 2017
Year 4 of 5 Monitoring Report DMS Project #138

Lower Reach Photo Station 8 Downstream (3/20/2017 Year 5)
Lower Reach Photo Station 8 Upstream (3/20/2017 Year 5)
Fletcher -Meritor Restoration Project January 2017
Year 4 of 5 Monitoring Report DMS Project #138

Lower Reach Photo Station 9 Downstream (3/20/2017 Year 5)
Lower Reach Photo Station 9 Upstream (3/20/2017 Year 5)
Fletcher -Meritor Restoration Project January 2017
Year 4 of 5 Monitoring Report DMS Project #138

Lower Reach Photo Station 10 Downstream (3/20/2017 Year 5)
Lower Reach Photo Station 10 Upstream (3/20/2017 Year 5)
Fletcher -Meritor Restoration Project January 2017
Year 4 of 5 Monitoring Report DMS Project #138

Lower Reach Photo Station 11 Downstream (3/20/2017 Year 5)
Lower Reach Photo Station 11 Upstream (3/20/2017 Year 5)
Fletcher -Meritor Restoration Project January 2017
Year 4 of 5 Monitoring Report DMS Project #138

Lower Reach Photo Station 12 Downstream (3/20/2017 Year 5)
Lower Reach Photo Station 12 Upstream (3/20/2017 Year 5)
Fletcher -Meritor Restoration Project January 2017
Year 4 of 5 Monitoring Report DMS Project #138

m

►'IAS'- -_ . � I
(J � I •� � € '`- �[ 3•Y, I �.✓ter' r\'�..
Jl-
Ilt-
-
r
1 Y y�„ f � � 'C\t �rj : �� ` � f i ' #ems , � •'� .
k -L ' 1' V 'l 1%� � � ll' J � .Yj i • � � 1 1 •�' F - r �. 1 - _

Lower Reach Photo Station 15 Downstream (3/20/2017 Year 5)
a
�.� Z"WkI -.1
Lower Reach Photo Station 15 Upstream (3/20/2017 Year 5)
Fletcher -Meritor Restoration Project January 2017
Year 4 of 5 Monitoring Report DMS Project #138

xj �x/� •
r ,
v 1I
1
I'MIlk
,_ p1
NI
0�iw0\

• t 'rMr
• 5 f.w I
� t
a � � R r�V�. h ) ✓
' '.. s' � y � y T '�• "5 a�nf Sti' '� ; t i +4 T,,,�!° i,1 ,t Ai
� v' -r�4_l �Y'� a'.i �.� �>> J;�� Ii�+W,- � N � - +•Tref•:
10
RM
t,. Y
}
i� R

1
AV�,�,�•, Vii.>J. ' „

4k. II
l t r ;
�i t i.,.�•'k�a t j � ] a � a t � vn•_ ,d ,a.' Y 4 J,� ��r
� ' � _ F��' �. �. � � a"• ,fit -
Y I
��__-e• � _ - p� it i .. i �� ��>� �� J
r,t
�+ ,' S• � \ �,; �y�l `�,;� �a�:1 tEtk , �1.K ��r,� u2ra€c,It��,G�[` � l . `R�r"•.

Tributary Reach Photo Station 7 Downstream (3/20/2017 Year 5)
Tributary Reach Photo Station 7 Upstream (3/20/2017 Year 5)
Fletcher -Meritor Restoration Project January 2017
Year 4 of 5 Monitoring Report DMS Project #138

M

*�� ♦ e��Xx
-- '"`�_ � .' ) ;rim �;v' -
t
3� Wf.�.
--

4� � �✓ 8 i �' �y � i tea. 5
k
r

Appendix C

Fletcher -Meritor Site (#138)
Year 5 (10 -May -2017)
Vegetation Plot Summary Information
Plot #
Riparian
Buffer
Stems'
Stream/
Wetland
StemsZ
Live Stakes Invasives
Volunteers3
Tota 14
Unknown
Growth
Form
1
n/a
4
0 21
30
19
0
2
n/a
8
0 22
17
11
0
3
n/a
4
0 1
4
7
0
4
n/a
20
0 1
26
46
0
5
n/a
14
0 11
23
27
0
6
n/a
8
0 23
36
21
0
7
n/a
18
0 5
26
39
0
8
n/a
11
0 10
106
107
0
9
n/a
9
0 2
23
30
0
10
n/a
10
0 14
18
14
0
11
n/a
12
0 0
305
317
0
12
n/a
9
0 0
84
93
0
13
n/a
10
0 3
204
211
0
14
n/a
8
0 9
318
317
0
15
n/a
15
0 0
206
221
0
16
n/a
8
0 0
269
277
0
17
n/a
4
0 0
309
313
0
Plot #
Wetland/Stream Vegetation Totals
(per acre)
Stream/ Success
Wetland Criteria
StemsZ Volunteers3 Tota 14 Met?
1
162
1214
769
No
2
324
688
445
Yes
3
162
162
283
No
4
809
1052
1862
Yes
5
567
931
1093
Yes
6
324
1457
850
Yes
7
728
1052
1578
Yes
8
445
4290
4330
Yes
9
364
931
1214
Yes
10
405
728
567
Yes
11
486
12343
12829
Yes
12
364
3399
3764
Yes
13
405
8256
8539
Yes
14
324
12869
12829
Yes
15
607
8337
8944
Yes
16
324
10886
11210
Yes
17
162
12505
12667
No
Project Avg
409
4771
4928
Yes

Stem Class
1Buffer
Stems
2Stream/
Wetland
Riparian Buffer Vegetation Totals
(per acre)
Riparian Success
Buffer Criteria
Plot # Stems' Met?
1
n/a
2
n/a
3
n/a
4
n/a
5
n/a
6
n/a
7
n/a
8
n/a
9
n/a
10
n/a
11
n/a
12
n/a
13
n/a
14
n/a
15
n/a
16
n/a
17
n/a
Project Avg
n/a
characteristics
Native planted hardwood trees. Does NOT include shrubs. No pines. No vines.
Stems Native planted woody stems. Includes shrubs, does NOT include live stakes. No vines. Excl. exotics.
3Volunteers Native woody stems. Not planted. No vines.
4Total Planted + volunteer native woody stems. Includes live stakes. Excl. exotics. Excl. vines.

Report Prepared By Vickie Miller
Date Prepared 3/23/2018 16:26
database name cvs-eep-entrytool-v2.3.1 Fletcher Year 5.mdb
database location R:\EEP-WRP\20671 Fletcher\Monitoring\Year 5 (2017)\Fletcher_Meritor_Site_138_2017_MY5\Support Files\Vegetation Plot Data
computer name RAL-CND5304LNJ
file size 60985344
DESCRIPTION OF WORKSHEETS IN THIS DOCUMENT------------
Metadata
Proj, planted
Proj, total stems
Plots
Vigor
Vigor by Spp
Damage
Damage by Spp
Damage by Plot
Planted Stems by Plot and Spp
ALL Stems by Plot and spp
PROJECT SUMMARY ---------
Project Code
project Name
Description
River Basin
length(ft)
stream -to -edge width (ft)
area (sq m)
Required Plots (calculated)
Sampled Plots
Description of database file, the report worksheets, and a summary of project(s) and project data.
Each project is listed with its PLANTED stems per acre, for each year. This excludes live stakes.
Each project is listed with its TOTAL stems per acre, for each year. This includes live stakes, all planted stems, and all natural/volunteer stems.
List of plots surveyed with location and summary data (live stems, dead stems, missing, etc.).
Frequency distribution of vigor classes for stems for all plots.
Frequency distribution of vigor classes listed by species.
List of most frequent damage classes with number of occurrences and percent of total stems impacted by each.
Damage values tallied by type for each species.
Damage values tallied by type for each plot.
A matrix of the count of PLANTED living stems of each species for each plot; dead and missing stems are excluded.
A matrix of the count of total living stems of each species (planted and natural volunteers combined) for each plot; dead and missing stems are excluded.
138
Fletcher -Meritor Site
Wetland and Stream mitigation in Henderson County, NC.
French Broad
17

EEP Project Code 138. Project Name: Fletcher -Meritor Site
Current
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
138-01-0001
138-01-0002
138-01-0003
138-01-0004
138-01-0005
138-01-0006
138-01-0007
138-01-0008
PnoLS P -all T PnoLS P -all T PnoLS P -all T PnoLS P -all T PnoLS P -all T PnoLS P -all T PnoLS P -all T PnoLS P -all T
Acer
maple
Tree
Acer negundo
boxelder
Tree
1
1
1
3
3
3
7
7
9
Acer rubrum
red maple
Tree
1
6
1
1
3
2
1
3
Acer saccharinum
silver maple
Tree
1
1
1
Alnus serrulata
hazel alder
Shrub
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
7
7
9
2
2
2
1
1
1
3
3
3
4
4
4
Carya
hickory
Tree
Cornus
dogwood
Shrub or Tree
Cornus amomum
silky dogwood
Shrub
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
Cornus florida
flowering dogwood
Tree
1
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
2
2
16
3
3
3
3
3
4
4
4
18
1
3
3
6
3
3
19
5
5
94
Juglans nigra
black walnut
Tree
3
3
3
3
3
3
1
1
1
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
1
1
1
3
3
4
5
5
7
3
3
12
4
4
12
2
2
4
1
1
3
Populus
cottonwood
Populus deltoides
eastern cottonwood
Tree
Prunus serotina
black cherry
Tree
2
1
1
1
Pyrus
pear
Tree
1
1
1
2
Salix
willow
Shrub or Tree
Salix caprea
goat willow
Exotic
6
6
21
8
8
22
1
1
1
1
11
23
5
10
Salix nigra
black willow
Tree
1
1
1
3
Salix sericea
silky willow
Shrub
Sambucus canadensis
Common Elderberry
Shrub
Unknown
Shrub or Tree
1
1
1
Unknown Prunus/Ilex
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
101
101 40
161
161 33
41
4 8
211
21 47
15
15 38
8
81 44
18
18 44
111
111 117
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
4 41 5 4 4 6 2 2 4 6 6 8 7 7 9 3 3 5 7 7 9 4 4 6
404.7 404.7 1619 647.5 647.5 1335 161.9 161.9 323.7 849.8 849.8 1902 607 607 1538 323.7 323.7 1781 728.4 728.4 1781 445.2 445.2 4735
Salix caprea was not planted or in the seed mix. Is a volunteer.

EEP Project Code 138. Project Name: Fletcher -Meritor Site
Plot Data (MY5 2017)
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
138-01-0009
138-01-0010
138-01-0011
138-01-0012
138-01-0013
138-01-0014
138-01-0015
138-01-0016
Pnol-S P -all T Pnol-S P -all T Pnol-S P -all T Pnol-S P -all T Pnol-S P -all T Pnol-S P -all T Pnol-S P -all T Pnol-S P -all T
Acer
maple
Tree
Acer negundo
boxelder
Tree
1
1
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
3
1
1
1
1
Acer rubrum
red maple
Tree
2
6
Acer saccharinum
silver maple
Tree
Alnus serrulata
hazel alder
Shrub
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
3
3
303
2
2
29
2
2
202
3
3
303
3
3
203
1
1
251
Carya
hickory
Tree
Cornus
dogwood
Shrub or Tree
Cornus amomum
silky dogwood
Shrub
1
1
1
5
5
6
3
3
3
4
4
4
10
10
15
3
3
3
Cornus florida
flowering dogwood
Tree
2
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
3
3
21
3
3
4
2
2
2
46
1
1
1
1
1
2
8
Juglans nigra
black walnut
Tree
1
1
1
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
1
2
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
4
4
4
5
5
6
3
3
8
1
2
2
2
1
1
1
3
3
12
Populus
cottonwood
Populus deltoides
eastern cottonwood
Tree
Prunus serotina
black cherry
Tree
Pyrus
pear
Tree
1
1
1
2
Salix
willow
Shrub or Tree
Salix caprea
goat willow
Exotic
2
14
3
9
Salix nigra
black willow
Tree
1
2
Salix sericea
silky willow
Shrub
Sambucus canadensis
Common Elderberry
Shrub
Unknown
Shrub or Tree
Unknown Prunus/Ilex
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
91
9 32
10
10 28
12
12 317
91
91 93
10
10
214
8
8 326
151
15
221
8
8 277
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
4 4 6 4 4 6 6 6 6 3 3 8 5 5 7 3 3 8 4 4 5 4 4 6
364.2 364.2 1295 404.7 404.7 1133 485.6 485.6 12829 364.2 364.2 3764 404.7 404.7 8660 323.7 323.7 13193 607 607 8944 323.71 323.7 11210
Salix caprea was not planted or in the seed mix. Is a volunteer.

EEP Project Code 138. Project Name: Fletcher -Meritor Site
Salix caprea was not planted or in the seed mix. Is a volunteer.
Annual Means
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
138-01-0017
MYS (2017)
MY4 (2016)
MY3 (2015)
MY2 (2014)
MY1 (2013)
MYO (2012)
Pnol-S P -all T Pnol-S P -all T Pnol-S P -all T Pnol-S P -all IT Pnol-S P -all T Pnol-SIP-all T Pnol-S P -all IT
Acer
maple
Tree
42
Acernegundo
boxelder
Tree
17
17
26
17
17
20
20
20
37
22
22
68
27
27
27
22
22
22
Acer rubrum
red maple
Tree
1
1
24
1
1
4
2
2
11
2
2
30
9
Acer saccharinum
silver maple
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
Alnus serrulata
hazel alder
Shrub
5
5
5
11
4
4
9
1
1
1
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
1
1
301
32
32
1611
33
33
982
32
32
1110
31
31
1225
29
29
832
26
26
481
Carya
hickory
Tree
1
1
1
Cornus
dogwood
Shrub or Tree
1
1
11
1
Cornus amomum
silky dogwood
Shrub
1
1
1
32
32
38
33
33
35
34
34
34
31
31
31
31
31
31
30
30
30
Cornus florida
flowering dogwood
Tree
3
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
1
1
1
34
34
246
33
33
153
36
36
160
37
37
80
40
40
40
36
36
36
Juglans nigra
black walnut
Tree
1
1
1
9
9
9
9
9
12
9
9
11
81
8
8
7
7
7
6
6
6
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
3
1
1
1
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
37
37
77
37
37
91
36
36
67
34
34
75
33
33
59
35
35
70
Populus
cottonwood
5
Populus deltoides
eastern cottonwood
Tree
1
1
1
2
2
2
1
1
1
Prunus serotina
black cherry
Tree
1
1
3
1
1
1
2
Pyrus
pear
Tree
2
2
6
1
1
4
Salix
willow
Shrub or Tree
15
15
107
Salix caprea
goat willow
Exotic
15
15
122
Salix nigra
black willow
Tree
3
1
1
10
1
1
5
1
1
10
1
1
11
Salix sericea
silky willow
Shrub
2
2
2
Sambucus canadensis
Common Elderberry
Shrub
11
1
1
Unknown
Shrub or Tree
1
11
1
1
1
1
13
13
106
16
161
33
3
3
3
4
4
4
Unknown Prunus/Ilex
1
1
1
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
4
4 313
188
1881
2192
188
188
1428
187
187
1558
186
186
1608
1701
170
1008
160
160
650
1 17 17 17 17 17 17
0.02 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.42
7 7 8 8 8
41 41 714 14 17 15 15 17 12 12 15 12 1LJ
8
161.9 161.9 12667L44.5 447.5 5218 447.5 447.5 3399 445.2 445.2 3709 442.8 442. 404.7 404.7 2400 380.9 380.9
1547
Salix caprea was not planted or in the seed mix. Is a volunteer.

Vegetation Plot 1— l Om x IOm (5/11/2017 Year 5)
Vegetation Plot 2 — 1 O x 1 O (5/11/2017 Year 5)
Fletcher -Meritor Restoration Project (Year 5 of 5) December 2017
Monitoring Report DMS Project #138

04
7FI,
�51
7FI,
�51

� a
+ r

Vegetation Plot 7 — 10m x 10m (5/11/2017 Year 5)
Vegetation Plot 8 — l Om x l Om (5/11/2017 Year 5)
Fletcher -Meritor Restoration Project (Year 5 of 5) December 2017
Monitoring Report DMS Project #138

.� .. di
s
p x p
_ -�'AilR`

'RINI

Vegetation Plot 13 — 10m x 10m (5/11/2017 Year 5)
Vegetation Plot 14 — IOm x IOm (5/11/2017 Year 5)
Fletcher -Meritor Restoration Project (Year 5 of 5) December 2017
Monitoring Report DMS Project #138

Vegetation Plot 17 — 10m x 10m (5/11/2017 Year 5)
Fletcher -Meritor Restoration Project (Year 5 of 5) December 2017
Monitoring Report DMS Project #138

Appendix D

Reach
Fletcher -Meritor, Upper Reach
River Basin
French Broad
Cross Section ID
XSC-1, Riffle, Upper Reach, 12+02
Drainage Area (Sq Mi)
0.75
Date
3/20/2017
Observers
V. Miller, W. Yelverton, K. Bell
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation, ft
2058.90
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area, ft
14.00
Bankfull Width, ft
11.40
Max Depth at Bankfull, ft
2.41
Mean Depth at Bankfull, ft
1.23
Width/Depth Ratio
9.28
Flood Prone Width, ft
101.80
Flood Prone Area Elevation, ft
2061.31
Entrenchment Ratio
8.93
Bank Height Ratio
1.13
2063.00
2062.00
2061.00
2060.00
2059.00
2058.00
2057.00
2056.00
0.00
Stream Type I C/E4
Sta. 12+02 Looking Downstream
Fletcher -Meritor XSC 1- Riffle, Upper Reach, Sta. 12+02
MY4 03/22/16 MY3 05/07/15 —MY2 05/14/14 MY105/13/13 Baseline 09/17/12 --- Baseline Bankfull Datum —*(— MYS 03/20/17
20.00 40.00 60.00 80.00 100.00

Reach
Fletcher -Meritor, Upper Reach
River Basin
French Broad
Cross Section ID
XSC-2, Pool, Upper Reach, 14+69
Drainage Area (Sq Mi)
0.75
Date
3/20/2017
Observers
V. Miller, W. Yelverton, K. Bell
SUMMARY DATA
Fletcher -Meritor XSC
MY3 05/07/15 MY2 05/14/14
Bankfull Elevation, ft
2058.61
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area, ft
18.40
Bankfull Width, ft
19.00
Max Depth at Bankfull, ft
2.96
Mean Depth at Bankfull, ft
0.97
Width/Depth Ratio
19.62
Flood Prone Width, ft
>86.00
Flood Prone Area Elevation, ft
2061.57
Entrenchment Ratio
>4.00
Bank Height Ratio
0.93
Stream Type I C/E4 I ISta. 14+69 Looking Downstream
MY4 03/22/16
2062.00
Fletcher -Meritor XSC
MY3 05/07/15 MY2 05/14/14
2 - Pool,
MY105/13/13
Upper Reach, S
Baseline 09/17/2012 -
2061.00
2060.00
01
2059.00
2058.00
2057.00
2056.00
2055.00
0.00 10.00
20.00 30.00
40.00
50.00 60.(
ta. 14+69
– Baseline Bankfull Datum --X— MY5 03/20/17
70.00 80.00 90.00

Reach
Fletcher -Meritor, Upper Reach
River Basin
French Broad
Cross Section ID
XSC-3, Riffle, Upper Reach, 15+23
Drainage Area (Sq Mi)
0.75
Date
3/20/2017
Observers
j V. Miller, W. Yelverton, K. Bell
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation, ft 1
2058.74
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area, ft
19.90
Bankfull Width, ft
14.07
Max Depth at Bankfull, ft
2.65
Mean Depth at Bankfull, ft
1.41
Width/Depth Ratio
9.95
Flood Prone Width, ft
>86.00
Flood Prone Area Elevation, ft
2061.39
Entrenchment Ratio
>6.00
Bank Height Ratio
1.00
2062.00
2061.00
2060.00
2059.00
2058.00
2057.00
2056.00
Stream Type 1 7/E4 Sta. 15+23, Looking Downstream
Fletcher -Meritor XSC 3 - Riffle, Upper Reach, Sta. 15+23
—MY4 03/22/16 —MY3 05/07/15 —MY2 05/14/14—MY105/13/13 —Baseline 09/17/12 —Baseline Bankfull Datum --)-FMYS 03/20/17
2055.00 �—
0.00
10.00 20.00 30.00 40.00
50.00 60.00 70.00 80.00 90.00

Reach
Fletcher -Meritor, Lower Reach
River Basin
French Broad
Cross Section ID
XSC-4 Riffle, Lower Reach, 14+55
Drainage Area (Sq Mi)
1.1
Date
3/20/2017
Observers
di V. Miller, W. Yelverton, K. Bell
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation, ft
2053.74
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area, ft
24.58
Bankfull Width, ft
19.67
Max Depth at Bankfull, ft
2.71
Mean Depth at Bankfull, ft
1.25
Width/Depth Ratio
15.74
Flood Prone Width, ft
138.50
Flood Prone Area Elevation, ft
2056.45
Entrenchment Ratio
7.04
Bank Height Ratio
0.93
2060.00
2059.00
2058.00
2057.00
2056.00
2055.00
2054.00
2053.00
2052.00
2051.00
2050.00
Stream Type 1 7/E4 Sta. 14+55 Looking Downstream
Fletcher -Meritor XSC 4 - Riffle, Lower Reach, Sta. 14+55
MY403/22/16-MY305/07/15 MY205/14/14 --MY105/13/13 - -Baseline 09/17/12 -- - Baseline Bankfull Datum --OK- MY5 03/20/17
0.00 20.00 40.00 60.00 80.00 100.00 120.00 140.00 160.00

Reach
Fletcher -Meritor, Lower Reach
River Basin
French Broad
Cross Section ID
XSC-5, Pool, Lower Reach, 16+15
Drainage Area (Sq Mi)
1.1
Date
3/20/2017
Observers
V. Miller, W. Yelverton, K. Bell
SUMMARY DATA
Fletcher -Meritor XSC 5 - Pool,
Bankfull Elevation, ft
2053.32
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area, ft
31.98
Bankfull Width, ft
25.66
Max Depth at Bankfull, ft
3.35
Mean Depth at Bankfull, ft
1.25
Width/Depth Ratio
20.59
Flood Prone Width, ft
85.20
Flood Prone Area Elevation, ft
2056.67
Entrenchment Ratio
3.32
Bank Height Ratio
1.00
•r
rL
Stream Type 1 7/E4
Sta. 16+15 Looking Downstream
Fletcher -Meritor XSC 5 - Pool,
Lower Reach, Sta.
16+15
— MY4 03/22/16
MY3 05/07/15 —MY2 05/14/14 MY105/13/13
Baseline 09/17/12 ---
Baseline Bankfull Datum --0E—MYS 03/20/17
2060.00
2059.00
2058.00
2057.00
2056.00
2055.00
2054.00
'7�
2053.00 — — — — — — —
V------------- --------------------------------------
2052.00
2051.00
2050.00
2049.00
0.00
20.00 40.00
60.00
80.00 100.00

Reach
Fletcher -Meritor, Lower Reach
River Basin
French Broad
Cross Section ID
XSC-6, Riffle, Lower Reach, 17+89
Drainage Area (Sq Mi)
1.1
Date
3/20/2017
Observers
V. Miller, W. Yelverton, K. Bell
SUMMARY DATA
I
I
Bankfull Elevation, ft
2053.03
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area, ft
24.70
Bankfull Width, ft
18.65
Max Depth at Bankfull, ft
2.74
Mean Depth at Bankfull, ft
1.32
Width/Depth Ratio
14.08
Flood Prone Width, ft
102.70
Flood Prone Area Elevation, ft
2055.77
Entrenchment Ratio
5.51
Bank Height Ratio
0.98
2059.00
2058.00
2057.00
2056.00
2055.00
2054.00
2053.00
2052.00
2051.00
2050.00
2049.00
r'
I
I
�rn
Stream Type 1C/E4
Sta. 17+89 Looking Downstream
Fletcher -Meritor XSC 6 - Riffle, Lower Reach, Sta. 17+89
MY4 03/22/16 MY3 05/07/15 —MY2 05/14/14 MY105/13/13 Baseline 09/17/12 --- Baseline Bankfull Datum ­0E—MYS 03/20/17
0.00 20.00 40.00 60.00 80.00 100.00 120.00

Reach
Fletcher -Meritor, Tributary
River Basin
French Broad
Cross Section ID
XSC-7, Riffle, Tributary, 12+10
Drainage Area (Sq Mi)
0.32
Date
3/20/2017
Observers
V. Miller, W. Yelverton, K. Bell
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation, ft
2059.00
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area, ft
11.18
Bankfull Width, ft
10.09
Max Depth at Bankfull, ft
2.19
Mean Depth at Bankfull, ft
1.11
Width/Depth Ratio
9.11
Flood Prone Width, ft
>46.05
Flood Prone Area Elevation, ft
2061.19
Entrenchment Ratio
>4.56
Bank Height Ratio
1.12
2063.00
2062.00
2061.00
2060.00
2059.00
2058.00
2057.00
2056.00
0.00
Stream Type I C/E4 I I Sta. 12+10 Looking Downstream
Fletcher -Meritor XSC 7 - Riffle, Tributary, Sta. 12+10
— MY4 03/22/16 MY3 05/07/15 —MY2 05/14/14 MY105/13/13 Baseline 09/17/12 --- Baseline Bankfull Datum --w—MY5 03/20/17
5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 30.00 35.00 40.00 45.00

Reach
Fletcher -Meritor, Tributary
River Basin
French Broad
Cross Section ID
XSC-8, Riffle, Tributary, 12+72
Drainage Area (Sq Mi)
0.32
Date
3/20/2017
Observers
V. Miller, W. Yelverton, K. Bell
SUMMARY DATA
Fletcher -Meritor XSC 8 - Riffle, Tributary, Sta. 12+72
MY3 05/07/15 MY2 05/14/14 — - MY105/13/13 -Baseline 09/17/12 - - Baseline Bankfull Datum ---X— MYS 03/20/17
Bankfull Elevation, ft
2058.45
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area, ft
13.23
Bankfull Width, ft
10.00
Max Depth at Bankfull, ft
2.28
Mean Depth at Bankfull, ft
1.32
Width/Depth Ratio
7.56
Flood Prone Width, ft
52.16
Flood Prone Area Elevation, ft
2060.73
Entrenchment Ratio
5.22
Bank Height Ratio
0.98
Stream Type I I Sta. 12+72 Looking Downstream
MY4 03/22/16
2062.00
2061.00
2060.00
Fletcher -Meritor XSC 8 - Riffle, Tributary, Sta. 12+72
MY3 05/07/15 MY2 05/14/14 — - MY105/13/13 -Baseline 09/17/12 - - Baseline Bankfull Datum ---X— MYS 03/20/17
2059.00
2058.00
2057.00
2056.00
2055.00
0.00
10.00 20.00 30.00 40.00 50.00

Reach
Fletcher -Meritor, Tributary
River Basin
French Broad
Cross Section ID
XSC-9, Pool, Tributary, 13+07
Drainage Area (Sq Mi)
0.32
Date
3/20/2017
Observers
V. Miller, W. Yelverton, K. Bell
SUMMARY DATA
Fletcher -Meritor XSC 9 - Pool, Tributary, Sta. 13+07
Bankfull Elevation, ft
2057.55
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area, ft
15.00
Bankfull Width, ft
9.45
Max Depth at Bankfull, ft
3.08
Mean Depth at Bankfull, ft
1.59
Width/Depth Ratio
5.95
Flood Prone Width, ft
35.00
Flood Prone Area Elevation, ft
2060.63
Entrenchment Ratio
3.70
Bank Height Ratio
0.99
Stream Type 1 7/E4 1 Sta. 13+07 Looking Downstream
Fletcher -Meritor XSC 9 - Pool, Tributary, Sta. 13+07
- MY4 03/22/16
-MY3 05/07/15 • -MY2 05/14/14 MY105/13/13 Baseline 09/17/12 --- Baseline Bankfull Datum --�(-MYS 03/20/17
2062.00
2061.00
2060.00
2059.00
2058.00
2057.00
2056.00
2055.00
2054.00
0.00 5.00
10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 30.00 35.00 40.00 45.00 50.00

Longitudinal Profile
Fletcher - Upper Reach
Project Number - 138
Station 10+25.00 - 28+37.86
2061
2060
2059
2058
2057
2056
0
cC
y 2055
W
2054
2053
2052
2051
x
Xx X
X X
X
X
x
X X
>4C X
x xx x Break in ons rvati n Easemen
x xXX X X x x x
X X x X
x x x
x
x x x x � x x
_ x x � x
x
,d v
x
—
_—�
ulve
x
t Location
x
x
X
<
XX
X x
x
X
1�
'OnLV
2050
1000 1050 1100 1150 1200 1250 1300 1350 1400 1450 1500 1550 1600 1650 1700 1750 1800 1850 1900 1950 2000 2050 2100 2150 2200 2250 2300 2350 2400 2450 2500 2550 2600 2650 2700 2750 2800 2850
Station (ft)
Baseline 9/17/12 MY1 5/13/13 MY2 05/14/14 MY3 5/7/15 MY4 03/22/16
— — Water Surface MY5 x Bankfull/TOB MY5 ♦ Cross Sections A Structures MY5 03/20/17

Longitudinal Profile
Fletcher - Lower Reach
Project Number - 138
Station 10+00.00 - 26+45.00
2056
-
X
x x
2055
X
X
xx
x
x
2054
X
x
X
X
X
x x
X
X
2053
X
x
X
>XI
X
X X
�+
.� 2052
-
_
x
X
X
x
X
_ _
--------
--_ ------
------
X
XX
X
X
X
A 11 Id
-
-
-
X
2051
2050
2049
2048
2047
1000 1050
1100 1150 1200
1250 1300 1350 1400 1450 1500 1550
1600 1650 1700 1750 1800 1850 1900 1950 2000 2050 2100
2150 2200
2250 2300 2350 2400 2450 2500 2550 2600 2650 2700 2750
Station (ft)
Baseline 9/17/12
MY1 5/13/13 _MY2 05/14/14 MY3 5/7/15
MY4 03/22/16
— — Water Surface MY5 x
Bankfull/TOB MY5 ♦ Cross Sections A Structures
MY5 03/20/17

Longitudinal Profile
Fletcher - Tributary
Project Number - 138
Station 10+00.00 - 1647.65
2062 ---------- ----------.
Profile Begins at Outlet of
Double -48" CMP (Station 10+00)
2061
X
-
X X
X
2060
X
X
X
2059
X
X X
2058
XX
2057
X
X X X
O
C�
X X
y2056
......... ............. ............
....................................
............. ............. .............
............. ............
............. .............
................. ...... ......... ................. X
W
X
X
/
2055
,
X
2054
.............
2053
2052
2051
1000 1050 1100 1150 1200 1250 1300 1350 1400 1450 1500 1550 1600 1650
Station (ft)
Baseline 9/17/12—MY 1 5/13/13 MY2 05/14/14 MY3 5/7/15 MY4 03/22/16
— — Water Surface MY5 X Bankfull/TOB MY5 ♦ Cross Sections 0 Structures MY5 03/20/17

Fletcher - Upper Reach XSC-1 Riffle -Pebble Count
Location: STA 12+02
Inches
Particle
Millimeters
MY3
Count
%Total
% Cum.
0.6
0.9
Silt/Clay
<.062
SILT/CLAY
4
4.0
4.0
7.7
6.5
Very Fine
0.062-.125
S
A
N
D
1
5
5.0
9.0
9
Fine .125-.25
8
8.0
17.0
Medium .25 - .50
26
26.0
43.0
Coarse .50- 1.0
29
29.0
72.0
.04 - .08
Very Coarse 1 1.0-2
1 281
28.01
100.0
.08 -
.16
Very Fine
2 - 4
G
R
A
v
E
0
0.0
100.0
.16-.22
Fine 4-5.7
0
0.0
100.0
.22 - .31
Fine 5.7-8
0
0.0
100.0
.31 .44
Medium 8 - 11.3
0
0.0
100.0
.44 - .63
Medium 11.3 - 16
0
0.0
100.0
.63 - .89
Coarse 16-22.6
0
0.0
100.0
.89 - 1.26
Coarse 22.6-32
0
0.0
100.0
1.26- 1.77
Very Coarse 32-45
0
0.0
100.0
1.77-2.5
Very Coarse 45-64
0
0.0
100.0
2.5-3.5
Small
64-90
C
B
B
E
0
0.0
100.0
3.5-5.0
Small 90-128
0
0.0
100.0
5.0 - 7.1
Large 128- 180
0
0.0
100.0
7.1 -10.1
Large 180-256
0
0.0
100.0
10.1 -
14.3
Small
256-362
B
0
u
L
D
E
R
0
0.0
100.0
14.3-20
Small 362-512
0
0.0
100.0
20-40
Medium 512-1024
0
0.0
100.0
40-80
Large - Very Lg 1024-2048
I Ol
0.01
100.0
Bedrock
I Bedrock
I
1 0
0.0
100.0
Total Counted
1 100
Summary Data
MY5
MY4
MY3
MY2
MY1
D50
0.6
0.9
2.4
2.1
3
D84
1.3
6.9
7.7
6.5
7
D95
1.8
12
15
10
9

40.0
35.0
30.0
25.0
-a
H 20.0
0-
0
15.0
10.0
5.0
0.0
Pebble count at XSC-1-Riffle
L000' �rl� �h �O �O O L �'l Ri ��O ��o ���o O`L ph OR q 0 N00 ��O OO`L ��`L ,O�,D� 0�2> Io��
Particle Size (mm)
100.0
90.0
80.0
70.0
60.0
R
50.0 E
IRU
40.0
30.0
20.0
10.0
0.0

Fletcher -Upper Reach - XSC-3 Riffle Pebble Count
Location: STA 15+23
Inches
Particle
Millimeters
MY3
Count
%Total
% Cum.
0.5
0.3
Silt/Clay
<.062
SILT/CLAY
12
12.0
12.0
8.7
8.3
Very Fine
0.062-.125
S
A
N
D
1
0
0.0
12.0
10
Fine .125-.25
17
17.0
29.0
Medium .25 - .50
21
21.0
50.0
Coarse .50- 1.0
29
29.0
79.0
.04 - .08
Very Coarse 1 1.0-2
1 141
14.01
93.0
.08 -
.16
Very Fine
2 - 4
G
R
A
v
E
5
5.0
98.0
.16-.22
Fine 4-5.7
1
1.0
99.0
.22 - .31
Fine 5.7-8
1
1.0
100.0
.31 .44
Medium 8 - 11.3
0
0.0
100.0
.44 - .63
Medium 11.3 - 16
0
0.0
100.0
.63 - .89
Coarse 16-22.6
0
0.0
100.0
.89 - 1.26
Coarse 22.6-32
0
0.0
100.0
1.26- 1.77
Very Coarse 32-45
0
0.0
100.0
1.77-2.5
Very Coarse 45-64
0
0.0
100.0
2.5-3.5
Small
64-90
C
B
B
E
0
0.0
100.0
3.5-5.0
Small 90-128
0
0.0
100.0
5.0 - 7.1
Large 128- 180
0
0.0
100.0
7.1 -10.1
Large 180-256
0
0.0
100.0
10.1 -
14.3
Small
256-362
B
0
u
L
D
E
R
0
0.0
100.0
14.3-20
Small 362-512
0
0.0
100.0
20-40
Medium 512-1024
0
0.0
100.0
40-80
Large - Very Lg 1024-2048
I Ol
0.01
100.0
Bedrock
I Bedrock
I
1 0
0.0
100.0
Total Counted
1 100
Summary Data
MY5
MY4
MY3
MY2
MY1
D50
0.5
0.3
3.2
0.5
3
D84
1.3
0.4
8.7
8.3
8
D95
2.6
0.5
11
11
10

50.0
40.0
R
30.0
0-
0
20.0
10.0
I
Pebble count at XSC-3-Riffle
MY5 03/21/17
MY3 05/07/15
MY2 05/14/14
MY1 05/09/13
MY4 03/22/16
—MY5 03/21/17
—MY3 05/07/15
—MY2 05/14/14
MY1 05/09/13
MY4 03/22/16
r
GO�`L ��h Ip �O NO C L ti 11 4'1 4� ��� ,�Io ���o �`L ph �D� �O ��Ib ��O ���o ��`I < ,(Z,
Q) NQI
Particle Size (mm)
100.0
90.0
80.0
70.0
60.0
c�
50.0 E
IRU
40.0
30.0
20.0
10.0
0.0

Fletcher -Lower Reach - XSC-4 Riffle Pebble Count
Location: STA 14+55
Inches
Particle
Millimeters
MY3
Count
%Total
% Cum.
10
7
Silt/Clay
<.062
SILT/CLAY
0
0.0
0.0
42
40
Very Fine
0.062-.125
S
A
N
D
1
0
0.0
0.0
61
Fine .125-.25
0
0.0
0.0
Medium .25 - .50
5
5.0
5.0
Coarse .50- 1.0
8
8.0
13.0
.04 - .08
Very Coarse 1 1.0-2
1 261
26.01
39.0
.08 -
.16
Very Fine
2 - 4
G
R
A
v
E
0
0.0
39.0
.16-.22
Fine 4-5.7
2
2.0
41.0
.22 - .31
Fine 5.7-8
5
5.0
46.0
.31 .44
Medium 8 - 11.3
6
6.0
52.0
.44 - .63
Medium 11.3 - 16
5
5.0
57.0
.63 - .89
Coarse 16-22.6
14
14.0
71.0
.89 - 1.26
Coarse 22.6-32
15
15.0
86.0
1.26- 1.77
Very Coarse 32-45
10
10.0
96.0
1.77-2.5
Very Coarse 45-64
3
3.0
99.0
2.5-3.5
Small
64-90
C
B
B
E
1
1.0
100.0
3.5-5.0
Small 90-128
0
0.0
100.0
5.0 - 7.1
Large 128- 180
0
0.0
100.0
7.1 -10.1
Large 180-256
0
0.0
100.0
10.1 -
14.3
Small
256-362
B
0
u
L
D
E
R
0
0.0
100.0
14.3-20
Small 362-512
0
0.0
100.0
20-40
Medium 512-1024
0
0.0
100.0
40-80
Large - Very Lg 1024-2048
I Ol
0.01
100.0
Bedrock
I Bedrock
I
1 0
0.0
100.0
Total Counted
1 100
Summary Data
MY5
MY4
MY3
MY2
MY1
D50
10
7
20
13
10
D84
30
32
42
40
38
D95
43
49
64
54
61

30.0
25.0
20.0
OR
0
10.0
5.0
II
Pebble count at XSC-4-Riffle
� MY5 03/21/17
� MY4 03/22/16
� MY3 05/07/15
MY2 05/14/14
MY1 05/09/13
MY5 03/21/17
MY4 03/22/16
—MY3 05/07/15
I —MY2 05/14/14
MY1 05/09/13
I �
r
pO0, X00 �0 00 '`� p L 0,' D 01 b �'`3 ,�0 �`L0 p`L ph pD� 00 ��R� X00 0.00 OO`L ��`1' O0'D 0�4� �o
p' ca' 00; N0' Op' p• 0, p,�a
Particle Size (mm)
100.0
90.0
80.0
70.0
6 0. 0
c�
50.0 E
U
IR
0
40.0
30.0
20.0
10.0
0.0

Fletcher -Lower Reach - XSC-6 Riffle Pebble Count
Location: STA 17+89
Inches
Particle
Millimeters
MY3
Count
%Total
% Cum.
10
7
Silt/Clay
<.062
SILT/CLAY
0
0.0
0.0
28
26
Very Fine
0.062-.125
S
A
N
D
1
0
0.0
0.0
20
Fine .125-.25
2
2.0
2.0
Medium .25 - .50
6
6.0
8.0
Coarse .50- 1.0
11
11.0
19.0
.04 - .08
Very Coarse 1 1.0-2
1 181
18.01
37.0
.08 -
.16
Very Fine
2 - 4
G
R
A
v
E
0
0.0
37.0
.16-.22
Fine 4-5.7
1
1.0
38.0
.22 - .31
Fine 5.7-8
5
5.0
43.0
.31 .44
Medium 8 - 11.3
13
13.0
56.0
.44 - .63
Medium 11.3 - 16
15
15.0
71.0
.63 - .89
Coarse 16-22.6
21
21.0
92.0
.89 - 1.26
Coarse 22.6-32
8
8.0
100.0
1.26- 1.77
Very Coarse 32-45
0
0.0
100.0
1.77-2.5
Very Coarse 45-64
0
0.0
100.0
2.5-3.5
Small
64-90
C
B
B
E
0
0.0
100.0
3.5-5.0
Small 90-128
0
0.0
100.0
5.0 - 7.1
Large 128- 180
0
0.0
100.0
7.1 - 10.1
Large 180-256
0
0.0
100.0
10.1 -
14.3
Small
256-362
B
0
u
L
D
E
R
0
0.0
100.0
14.3-20
Small 362-512
0
0.0
100.0
20-40
Medium 512-1024
0
0.0
100.0
40-80
Large - Very Lg 1024-2048
I Ol
0.01
100.0
Bedrock
I Bedrock
I
1 0
0.0
100.0
Total Counted
1 100
Summary Data
MY5
MY4
MY3
MY2
MY1
D50
10
7
19
17
0.6
D84
19
18
28
26
16
D95
25
22
34
31
20

40.0
35.0
30.0
25.0
R
0
020.0
15.0
10.0
5.0
0.0
Pebble count at XSC-6-Riffle
� MY5 03/21/17
MY4 03/22/16
� MY3 05/07/15
MY2 05/14/14
MY1 05/09/13
MY5 03/21/17
MY4 03/22/16
MY3 05/07/15
—MY2 05/14/14
MY1 05/09/13
1
j(b`L �rL4j , �Fj h� �O o �'� cb ^"� �� ��� �`L �h �R (O �p ^�O
o' o' oti' '
Particle Size (mm)
100.0
90.0
80.0
70.0
m
60.0
c�
E
50.0 V
IR
0
40.0
30.0
20.0
10.0
0.0

Parameter
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle only
Bankfull Width
Floodprone Width
Bankfull Mean Depth
'Bankfull Max Depth
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area
Width/Depth R.
Entrenchment R.
'Bank Heiaht R
Riffle Length
Riffle Slope (f
Pool Length
Pool Max depth
Pool Spacing
Channel Beltwidth
Radius of Curvature
Rc:Bankfull width (f
Meander Wavelength
Meander Width R.
ial Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classifical
Channel Thalweg length
Sinuosity
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (f
BF slope (ft/f'
Ri% / Ru% / P% / G% / S`.
>C% / Sa% / G% / C% / B% / Be°
d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95
2% of Reach with Eroding Bank
Channel Stability or Habitat Metri
Biological or OthE
11.48 25.61 23.29 45.54 1 14.93
0.0025 0.0075 0.0040 0.0203 0.7100
14.20 28.75 21.87 63.10 18.63
2.63 2.93 2.83 3.56 0.36
61.00 70.58 68.71 89.47 21.50
33.00 48.40 1 44.80 75.00 1 11.08
30.00
Baseline
40.00
40.00
4.30
Min
Mean
Med Max SD'
14.50
14.80
15.10
53.00
130.00
>86.00
1.26
1.37
1.47
1.80
2.00 1
1 2.20
19.10
2020
21.30
9.87
10.91
11.94
3.50
14.80 2
>6.00 2
1.00
1.00
1.00
11.48 25.61 23.29 45.54 1 14.93
0.0025 0.0075 0.0040 0.0203 0.7100
14.20 28.75 21.87 63.10 18.63
2.63 2.93 2.83 3.56 0.36
61.00 70.58 68.71 89.47 21.50
33.00 48.40 1 44.80 75.00 1 11.08
30.00
37.70
40.00
40.00
4.30
2.03
2.55
2.70
2.70
0.29
101.00
129.70
130.00
180.00
16.68
0.75
Fletcher -Meritor
5.05 15.63 1 15.69 30.45 1 6.75
0.0014 0.0069 0.0056 0.0143 0.0039
16.08 26.33 26.06 45.58 7.52
2.89 3.48 3.40 5.08 0.50
48.97 72.69 72.45 139.12 20.52
Exhibit Table 1Oa. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
1T to Cane Creek) Stream and Wetland Restoration/Pro'. No. 138 - Uppei
0.0027 0.0126 0.0092 0.0266 0.0087
MY -1
MY -2
32.47
72.47
n Min
Mean
Med Max SD' n
2 14.00
14.20
14.40 2
2 65.20
96.85
>86.00 2
2 1.19
1.33
1.47 2
2 2.01
2.15
2.29 2
2 16.70
18.95
21.20 2
2 9.78
10.76
11.74 2
2 4.70
14.80 2
>6.00 2
2 0.99
1.01
1.03 2
5.05 15.63 1 15.69 30.45 1 6.75
0.0014 0.0069 0.0056 0.0143 0.0039
16.08 26.33 26.06 45.58 7.52
2.89 3.48 3.40 5.08 0.50
48.97 72.69 72.45 139.12 20.52
Exhibit Table 1Oa. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
1T to Cane Creek) Stream and Wetland Restoration/Pro'. No. 138 - Uppei
0.0027 0.0126 0.0092 0.0266 0.0087
18.83
MY -2
32.47
72.47
17.89
MY- 3
3.32
3.32
3.94
0.49
54.28
96.85
92.86
Min
Mean
Med Max SD'
n
Min
Mean
Med Max SD' n
12.60
13.15
13.70
2
11.60
13.20
14.80 2
>86.00
1.01
98.40
2
>86.00
9.95
94.40 2
1.13
1.30
1.47
2
1.22
1.31
1.39 2
2.23
2.57
2.91
2
2.29
2.62
2.95 2
14.20
17.15
1 20.10 1
2
14.20
14.50
14.80 2
9.34
10.26
11.18
2
9.48
10.08 1
1 10.68 2
>6.00
7.81
2
>6.00
8.14 2
0.95
0.99
1.03
2
0.99
1.02
1.05 2
6.09 12.22 1 10.87 21.75 1 5.02
0.0027 0.0126 0.0092 0.0266 0.0087
18.83
37.53
32.47
72.47
17.89
2.50
3.32
3.32
3.94
0.49
54.28
96.85
92.86
153.10
30.88
7.76 15.12 14.70 26.01 1 6.29
0.0065
0.0150
0.0145
0.0264
0.0066
11.42
27.82
28.01
42.64
9.34
3.12
3.63
3.52
4.68
0.44
54.52
72.12
71.04
88.50
10.68
Reach (1838
6.57 12.38 1 11.29 24.39 1 7.02
0.0018 0.0091
MY- 4
13.02 26.97
27.34 50.92 9.85
3.14 3.81
Min
Mean
Med Max SID
12.30
13.05
13.80
>86.00
12.74
96.90
1.20
1.39
1.57
2.30
2.65
2.99
14.70
18.15
21.60
8.82
9.56
10.29
>6.00
2 14.00
7.88
1.01
1.02
1.02
6.57 12.38 1 11.29 24.39 1 7.02
0.0018 0.0091
0.0084 0.0220 0.0078
13.02 26.97
27.34 50.92 9.85
3.14 3.81
3.56 5.02 0.57
44.79 78.29
76.80 121.81 23.01
Pattern data will not typically be collected unless visual data, dimensional data or profile data indicate significant shifts
from baseline
3.51 10.03 1 9.77 23.26
0.0029 0.0140 0.0107 0.0412
MY- 5
18.29
15.77
33.91
2.92
3.82
1
n Min
Mean
Med Max SD'
n
2 11.40
12.74
14.07
2
2 >86.00
1.18
101.80
2
2 1.23
1.32
1.41
2
2 2.41
2.53
2.65 1
2
2 14.00
16.95
19.90
2
2 9.28
9.62
9.95
2
2 >6.00
8.93
2
2 0.98
1.06
1.14
2
3.51 10.03 1 9.77 23.26
0.0029 0.0140 0.0107 0.0412
5.22
18.29
15.77
33.91
2.92
3.82
1
3.85
4.7
25.49
73.52
60.83
100.15
C/E4
C/E4
C/E4
C/E5
C/E4
C/E5
1838
1838
1838
1838
1838
1838
1.18
1.18
1.18
1.18
1.18
1.18
0.0025
0.0025
0.0027
0.0033
0.0034
0.0027
0.0027
0.0025
0.0028
0.0028
0.0029
0.0026
4
3
3
I%
1

Parameter
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle only
Bankfull Width
Floodprone Width
Bankfull Mean Depth
'Bankfull Max Depth
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area
Width/Depth R.
Entrenchment R.
'Bank Heiaht R
Riffle Length
Riffle Slope (f
Pool Length
Pool Max depth
Pool Spacing
Channel Beltwidth
Radius of Curvature
Rc:Bankfull width (f
Meander Wavelength
Meander Width R.
ial Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classificai
Channel Thalweg length
Sinuosity
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (f
BF slope (ft/f'
Ri% / Ru% / P% / G% / S`.
>C% / Sa% / G% / C% / B% / Be°
d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95
2% of Reach with Eroding Bank
Channel Stability or Habitat Metri
Biological or OthE
7.73 23.60 1 24.49 43.50 1 11.37
0.0035 0.0094 0.0094 0.0172 0.4000
22.25 37.41 1 38.04 56.23 11.18
3.13 3.44 3.42 3.85 0.22
44.30 74.46 82.61 90.34 16.55
36.00 65.30 1 69.00 83.00 1 13.68
35.00
Baseline
45.00
45.00
3.64
Min
Mean
Med Max SD'
17.20
18.49
19.77
97.90
117.63
137.36
1.36
1.56
1.75
2.20
2.34
2.47
23.40
28.95
34.50
11.32
11.99
12.65
5.69
6.32
6.95
1.00
1.00
1.00
7.73 23.60 1 24.49 43.50 1 11.37
0.0035 0.0094 0.0094 0.0172 0.4000
22.25 37.41 1 38.04 56.23 11.18
3.13 3.44 3.42 3.85 0.22
44.30 74.46 82.61 90.34 16.55
36.00 65.30 1 69.00 83.00 1 13.68
35.00
42.20
45.00
45.00
3.64
1.89
2.28
2.43
2.43
0.20
128.00
167.70
172.00
193.00
18.30
Fletcher -Meritor
9.66 20.98 1 19.59 33.68 1 8.34
0.0013 0.0099 0.0080 0.0309 0.0096
MY -1
36.61
37.07
57.69
11.80
3.39
n Min
Mean
Med Max SD'
n
2 16.10
19.35
22.60
2
2 101.50
117.20
132.80
2
2 1.21
1.41
1.61
2
2 2.46
2.51
2.56
2
2 26.00
26.65
27.30
2
2 9.97
14.34
18.71
2
2 4.50
6.35
8.20
2
2 1.00
1.02
1.04
2
9.66 20.98 1 19.59 33.68 1 8.34
0.0013 0.0099 0.0080 0.0309 0.0096
16.53
36.61
37.07
57.69
11.80
3.39
3.74
3.66
4.22
0.26
53.27
90.62
89.29
130.65
23.89
Exhibit Table 1Ob. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
UT to Cane Creek) Stream and Wetland Restoration/Pro'. No. 138 - Lower Reach (1779 feet)
0.0036 0.0115 0.0090 0.0267
0.0070
19.43
MY -2
64.25
I
3.11
MY- 3
3.85
MY- 4
75.37
102.42 94.74
139.50
26.67
2 1.25
1.29
1.32
2 2.71
2.73
2.74
Min
Mean
Med Max SID
n
Min
Mean
Med Max SID
n Min
Mean Med
Max SID
15.50
15.80
16.10
2
17.70
17.75
17.80
2 17.30
18.50
19.70
98.50
115.50
132.50
2
102.00
120.15
138.30
2 102.60
120.65
138.70
1.39
1.46
1.53
2
1.40
1.44
1.48
2 1.28
1.39
1.49
2.39
2.43
2.47
2
2.65
2.68
2.71
2 2.70
2.70
2.70
22.40
23.05
23.70
2
25.00
25.60
26.20
2 25.20
25.50
25.80
10.14
10.86
11.57
2
11.96
12.32
12.67
2 11.60
13.50
15.40
6.12
7.34
8.55
2
5.73
6.77
7.81
2 5.21
6.62
8.02
1.04
1.05
1.05
2
0.97
0.98
0.99
2 0.94
0.98
1.01
7.10 13.65 1 12.21 30.00 1 6.29
0.0036 0.0115 0.0090 0.0267
0.0070
19.43
39.46 42.71
64.25
14.61
3.11
3.45 3.47
3.85
0.23
75.37
102.42 94.74
139.50
26.67
7.98 16.62 1 14.15 1 34.20 7.57
0.0010
0.0087
0.0080 0.0142 0.0035
11.13
31.06
25.58 62.56 17.33
3.06
3.78
3.76 1 4.52 0.40
1
34.23
84.98
74.46 1139.12 36.67
8.76 16.65 1 16.75 25.37 1 6.23
0.0022 0.0061
0.0060 0.0111
0.0032
11.53 39.30
37.24 65.91
17.95
3.48 3.93
3.94 4.58
0.34
59.93 99.33
98.43 143.64
28.58
Pattern data will not typically be collected unless visual data, dimensional data or profile data indicate significant shifts from
baseline
C/E4
MY- 5
C/E5
C/E4
C/E4
n Min
Mean
Med Max SID
2 18.65
19.16
19.67
2 102.70
120.60
138.50
2 1.25
1.29
1.32
2 2.71
2.73
2.74
2 24.58
24.64
24.70
2 14.08
14.91
15.74
2 5.51
6.28
7.04
2 0.93
0.97
1.01
4.35 11.85 1 9.09 35.44 1 7.67
0.0015 0.0117 0.0067 0.0699 0.0149
8.05 25.03 15.86 82.32 19.89
3.05 3.77 3.68 4.57 0.45
24.75 81.80 89.43 153.52 34.28
C/E4
C/E4
C/E4
C/E5
C/E4
C/E4
1779
1779
1779
1779
1779
1779
1.23
1.23
1.23
1.23
1.23
1.23
0.0027
0.0022
0.0021
0.0021
0.0017
0.0022
0.0024
0.0026
0.0023
0.0025
0.0023
0.0024
14
3
3
2
0
n

Parameter
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle only
Bankfull Width
Floodprone Width
Bankfull Mean Depth
'Bankfull Max Depth
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area
Width/Depth R.
Entrenchment R.
'Bank Heiaht R
Riffle Length
Riffle Slope (f
Pool Length
Pool Max depth
Pool Spacing
Channel Beltwidth
Radius of Curvature
Rc:Bankfull width (f
Meander Wavelength
Meander Width R.
ial Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classifical
Channel Thalweg length
Sinuosity
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (f
BF slope (ft/f'
Ri% / Ru% / P% / G% / S`.
>C% / Sa% / G% / C% / B% / Be°
d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95
2% of Reach with Eroding Bank
Channel Stability or Habitat Metri
Biological or OthE
13.84 18.32 18.80 21.90 1 2.89
0.0087 0.0142 0.0144 0.0220 0.5800
13.03 22.26 17.58 36.76 9.30
1.45 1.89 1.93 2.40 0.32
36.53 52.91 56.00 60.11 9.09
26.00 39.20 1 38.00 55.00 8.33
25.00
Baseline
25.00
25.00
0.00
Min
Mean
Med Max SD'
8.33
8.79
9.24
22.32
23.62
24.91
0.82
0.83
0.83
1.19
1.22
1.25
6.80
7.22
7.63
10.21
10.70
11.19
2.68
2.69
2.70
1.00
1.00
1.00
13.84 18.32 18.80 21.90 1 2.89
0.0087 0.0142 0.0144 0.0220 0.5800
13.03 22.26 17.58 36.76 9.30
1.45 1.89 1.93 2.40 0.32
36.53 52.91 56.00 60.11 9.09
26.00 39.20 1 38.00 55.00 8.33
25.00
25.00
25.00
25.00
0.00
2.84
2.84
2.84
2.84
0.00
77.00
92.90
96.00
102.00
8.63
2.96
4.46
4.32
6.26
0.95
7.12 11.92 1 11.85 18.65 1 4.00
0.0043 0.0168 0.0164 0.0365 0.0110
Exhibit Table 1Oc. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Fletcher -Meritor (UT to Cane Creek) Stream and Wetland Restoration/Pro'. No. 138 - Trib
19.42
18.89
MY -1
5.52
2.38
2.88
MY -2
3.39
0.39
27.34
MY- 3
57.06
78.07
15.28
1.31
2.09
2.26
2.42
11.60
12.30
13.00
7.54
8.80
10.06
n Min
Mean
Med Max SD'
n
Min
Mean
Med Max SD'
n
Min
Mean
Med Max SD'
n
2 7.90
8.15
8.40
2
7.40
7.50
7.60
2
9.20
9.55
9.90
2
2 25.20
26.70
28.20
2
27.40
28.30
29.20
2
34.02
39.51
45.00
2
2 0.86
0.96
1.06
2
0.80
0.98
1.15
2
1.12
1.20
1.27
2
2 1.34
1.56
1.78
2
1.67
1.82
1.96
2
1.87
2.07
2.26
2
2 7.20
7.80
8.40
2
6.10
7.30
8.50
2
10.30
11.45
12.60
2
2 7.43
8.67
9.90
2
6.44
7.96
9.47
2
7.78
8.00
8.22
2
2 3.00
3.30
3.60
2
3.61
3.78
3.95
2
3.70
1
4.13
4.55
2
2 1.00
1.15
1.30
2
0.97
1.07
1.16
2
0.89
0.96
1.03
2
7.12 11.92 1 11.85 18.65 1 4.00
0.0043 0.0168 0.0164 0.0365 0.0110
11.93
19.42
18.89
30.90
5.52
2.38
2.88
2.90
3.39
0.39
27.34
55.55
57.06
78.07
15.28
4.10 8.67 1 6.61 17.57 1 5.14
0.0117 0.0223 0.0224 0.0307 0.0064
11.47
15.70
13.06
27.45
5.25
2.31
2.81
2.72
3.44
0.37
35.86
54.00
53.54
77.56
12.96
3.68 7.60 1 4.76 20.13 1 6.22
0.0048 0.0226 0.0168 0.0612 0.0199
10.90
15.36
13.72
25.08
4.70
2.69
3.28
3.24
4.22
0.54
31.53
51.44
52.94
63.56
12.03
4.21 8.37 1 9.61 12.19 1 3.40
0.0029 0.0101
MY- 4
6.64 15.50
15.12
28.12
Min
Mean
Med Max SD'
9.90
10.40
10.80
37.22
44.61
52.00
1.07
1.19
1.31
2.09
2.26
2.42
11.60
12.30
13.00
7.54
8.80
10.06
3.45
4.35
5.25
0.97
1.03
1.09
4.21 8.37 1 9.61 12.19 1 3.40
0.0029 0.0101
0.0042 0.0304 0.0102
6.64 15.50
15.12
28.12
6.71
2.72 3.49
3.43
4.12
0.51
28.46 53.88
53.95
76.54
15.15
Pattern data will not typically be collected unless visual data, dimensional data or profile data indicate significant shifts
from baseline
3.44 6.19 5.37 12.61 1 3.69
0.0023 0.0110 0.1090 0.0255 0.0090
5.15 10.33 8.40 19.62 5.23
2.70 3.33 3.24 4.39 0.48
19.01 58.61 50.28 100.65 28.91
C/E4
C/E4
MY- 5
C/E4
C/E4
C/E4
n Min
Mean
Med Max SD'
2 10.00
10.05
10.09
2 37.20
44.68
52.16
2 1.11
1.22
1.32
2 2.19
2.24
2.28
2 11.18
12.21
13.23
2 7.56
8.34
9.11
2 3.69
4.46
5.22
2 1 0.98
1.01
1.03
3.44 6.19 5.37 12.61 1 3.69
0.0023 0.0110 0.1090 0.0255 0.0090
5.15 10.33 8.40 19.62 5.23
2.70 3.33 3.24 4.39 0.48
19.01 58.61 50.28 100.65 28.91
C/E4
C/E4
C/E4
C/E4
C/E4
C/E4
648
648
648
648
648
648
1.22
1.22
1.22
1.22
1.22
1.22
0.0114
0.0118
0.0119
0.0112
0.0112
0.0114
0.0118
0.0120
0.0116
0.0116
0.0112
0.0115
3
19
19
18
20
n

Record elevation (datum) u:
Bankfull Width
Floodprone Width
Bankfull Mean Depth
Bankfull Max Depth
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area
Bankfull Width/Depth R.
Bankfull Entrenchment R
d50
1 = Widths and depths for monitoring resurvey will be based on the baseline bankfull datum regardless of dimensional/depositional development. Input the elevation used as the datum, which should be consistent and based on the baseline datum established. If the performer has inherited the project and cannot acquire the datum used
for prior years this must be discussed with EEP. If this cannot be resolved in time for a given years report submission a footnote in this should be included that states: "it is uncertain if the monitoring datum has been consistent over the monitoring history, which may influence calculated values. Additional data from a prior
performer is being acquired to provide confirmation. Values will be recalculated in a future submission based on a consistent datum if determined to be necessary."
2 = Based on the elevation of any dominant depositional feature that develops and is observed at the time of survey. If the baseline datum remains the only significant depositional feature
then these two sets of dimensional parameters will be equal, however, if another depositional feature of significance develops above or below the baseline bankfull datum then this should be tracked and quantified in these cells.
Table 11 a. Monitoring Data - Dimensional Morphology Summary (Dimensional Parameters - Cross Sections)
Fletcher -Meritor UT to Cane Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration/Pro'. No. 138 - Upper Reach 1838 ft , Lower Reach 1779 ft), Tributary
648 ft
Cross Section 1 (Upper, Riffle)
I
Cross Section 2 (Upper, Pool)
I
Cross Section 3 (Upper, Riffle)
Cross Section 4 (Lower, Riffle)
Cross Section 5 (Lower, Pool)
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation'
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY+ Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY+ Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY+ Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY+ Base
MY1 MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY+
Record elevation (datum) used 2058.90
2058.90
2058.90
2058.90
2058.90
2058.90
2058.61
2058.61
2058.61
2058.61
2058.61
2058.61
2058.74
2058.74
2058.74
2058.74
2058.74
2058.74
2053.74
2053.74
2053.74
2053.74
2053.74
2053.74
2053.32
2053.32 2053.32
2053.32
2053.32
2053.32
Bankfull Width (ft)
15.10
14.00
12.60
11.60
12.30
11.40
21.90
21.90
21.40
19.50
18.80
19.00
14.50
14.40
13.70
14.80
13.80
14.07
19.77
16.10
15.50
17.70
17.30
19.67
26.16
25.70 23.60
27.10
27.20
25.66
Floodprone Width (ft)
53.00
65.20
98.40
94.40
96.90
101.80
>86.00
>86.00
>86.00
>86.00
>86.00
>86.00
>86.00
>86.00
>86.00
>86.00
>86.00
>86.00
137.36
132.80
132.50
138.30
138.70
138.50
83.70
84.30 83.00
84.90
85.60
85.20
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.26
1.19
1.13
1.22
1.20
1.23
1.25
1.18
1.17
1.08
1.05
0.97
1.47
1.47
1.47
1.39
1.57
1.41
1.75
1.61
1.53
1.48
1.49
1.25
1.45
1.38 1.23
1.25
1.24
1.25
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.80
2.01
2.23
2.29
2.30
2.41
3.10
3.07
3.03
3.08
3.25
2.96
2.20
2.29
2.91
2.95
2.99
2.65
2.47
2.46
2.47
2.71
2.70
2.71
3.31
3.22 3.19
3.34
3.37
3.35
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ft2
19.10
16.70
14.20
14.20
14.70
14.00
27.40
25.80
25.10
21.00
19.70
18.40
21.30
21.20
20.10
20.50
21.60
19.90
34.50
26.00
23.70
26.20
25.80
24.58
37.88
35.50 29.00
33.80
33.80
31.98
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
11.94
11.74
1 11.18
1 9.48
1 10.29
9.28
1 1 17.50
1 18.59
18.25
18.11
17.94
19.62
9.87
9.78
9.34
10.68
8.82
9.95
11.32
9.97
10.14
11.96 1
11.60
15.74
18.07
18.61 19.21
21.73
21.89
20.59
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratiol
3.50
1 4.70
1 7.81
1 8.14
1 7.88
8.93
1 1 >4.00
1 >4.00 1
>4.00
1 >4.00
>4.00
>4.00
>6.00
>6.00
>6.00
>6.00
>6.00
>6.00
6.95
8.20
8.55
7.81
8.02
7.04
3.20
3.30 3.52
3.13
3.15
3.32
Bankfull Bank Height Ratiol
1.00
1 0.99
1 0.95
1 0.99
1 1.02 1
1.13
1 1 1.00
1 1.15 1
0.94
1 1.06
1 0.90 1
0.93 1
1 1.00
1 1.03 1
1.03
1 1.05
1 1.01 1
1.00 1
1.00
1.04
1.05
0.99
1.01
0.93
1.00
1.00 1.08
0.98
1.01
1.00
Based on current/developing bankfull feature2
Record elevation (datum) used
Bankfull Width (ft)
Floodprone Width (ft)
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ftZ
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
■
Cross Sectional Area between end pins ftZ
d50 (mm)
Cross Section 6 (Lower, Riffle)
Cross Section 7 (Tributary, Riffle)
Cross Section 8 (Tributary, Riffle)
Cross Section 9 (Tributary, Pool)
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation'
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY, Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY+ Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY+ Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY+ Base
MY1 MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used 2053.03
2053.03
2053.03
2053.03
2053.03
2053.03
2059.00
2059.00
2059.00
2059.00 2059.00
2059.00
2058.45
2058.45
2058.45
2058.45
2058.45
2058.45
2057.55
2057.55
2057.55
2057.55
2057.55
2057.55
Bankfull Width (ft)
17.20
22.60
16.10
17.80
19.70
18.65
9.24
8.40
7.60
9.20
10.80
10.09
8.33
7.90
7.40
9.90
9.90
10.00
12.81
10.50
7.40
8.10
10.10
9.45
Floodprone Width (ft)
97.90
101.50
98.50
102.00
102.60
102.70
24.91
25.20
27.40
34.02
37.22
>46.05
22.32
28.20
29.20
45.00
52.00
52.16
25.89
31.00
32.60
34.70
35.30
35.00
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.36
1.21
1.39
1.40
1.28
1.32
0.83
0.86
0.80
1.12
1.07
1.11
0.82
1.06
1.15
1.27
1.31
1.32
0.93
1.13
1.32
1.60
1.49
1.59
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
2.20
2.56
2.39
2.65
2.70
2.74
1.25
1.34
1.67
1.87
2.09
2.19
1.19
1.78
1.96
2.26
2.42
2.28
2.04
2.51
2.62
2.94
3.12
3.08
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ft2
23.40
27.30
22.40
25.00
25.20
24.70
7.63
7.20
6.10
10.30
11.60
11.18
6.80
8.40
8.50
12.60
13.00
13.23
11.96
11.90
9.80
13.00
15.00
15.00
Bankfull Width/De2th Ratio
12.65
18.71
11.57
12.67
15.40
14.08
11.19
9.90
9.47
8.22
10.06
9.11
12.21
7.43
6.44
7.78
7.54
7.56
13.71
9.26
5.59
5.05
6.80
5.95
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
5.69
4.50
6.12
5.73
5.21
5.51
2.70
3.00
3.61
3.70
3.45
>4.56
2.68
3.60
3.95
4.55
5.25
5.22
2.02
2.90
4.41
4.28
3.50
3.70
Bankfull Bank Heiqht Ratio
1.00
1.00
1.04
0.97
0.94
0.98
1.00
1.30
1.16
1.03
1.09
1.12
1.00
1 00
0.97
1 0.89
1 0.97 1
0.98
1.00
0.89
0.95
0.98 1
0.96
0.99
Record elevation (datum) u:
Bankfull Width
Floodprone Width
Bankfull Mean Depth
Bankfull Max Depth
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area
Bankfull Width/Depth R.
Bankfull Entrenchment R
d50
1 = Widths and depths for monitoring resurvey will be based on the baseline bankfull datum regardless of dimensional/depositional development. Input the elevation used as the datum, which should be consistent and based on the baseline datum established. If the performer has inherited the project and cannot acquire the datum used
for prior years this must be discussed with EEP. If this cannot be resolved in time for a given years report submission a footnote in this should be included that states: "it is uncertain if the monitoring datum has been consistent over the monitoring history, which may influence calculated values. Additional data from a prior
performer is being acquired to provide confirmation. Values will be recalculated in a future submission based on a consistent datum if determined to be necessary."
2 = Based on the elevation of any dominant depositional feature that develops and is observed at the time of survey. If the baseline datum remains the only significant depositional feature
then these two sets of dimensional parameters will be equal, however, if another depositional feature of significance develops above or below the baseline bankfull datum then this should be tracked and quantified in these cells.

Appendix E

Table 12. Verification of Bankfull Events
Fletcher
Meritor Site (UT
to Cane Creek)/ 138 Segment/Reach: feet
Date of Data Collection
Date of Occurrence
Method
Photo
Visual observation of bankfull
9/18/2012
9/18/2012
event during monitoring
Visual observation of bankfull
5/7/2013
5/6/2013 - 5/7/2013
event during monitoring
5/7/2013
Unknown
Stream gauges
Stream gauges (3 events on the
5/13/2014
Unknown
tributary reach and 2 on the main
See below
reach
Stream gauges and observation
5/7/2015
Unknown
See below
of bankfull event debris
Stream gauges and observation
3/22/2016
Unknown
See below
of bankfull event debris
Stream gauges and observation
5/10/2017
Unknown
See below
of bankfull event debris
1 41
.-v. �C y
2014
,ql" ��-.amo
w
� y
y ��
ASI

�\ `, :' .
1
__ _ - ,.fir_ •���si, ,� � - Vii' �
�'� `
Vn _ .s� ` \ r:�
J:�•� n -
�s i _ ..
" � � $, aim a �

Table 13. Wetland Gauge Attainment Data
Summary of Groundwater Gauge Results for Years 1 to 5
Success Criteria Achieved / Max Consecutive Days During Growing Season
(Percentage)
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
Gauge
(2013)
(2014)
(2015)
(2016)
(2017)
No/9
Yes/14
No/6
Yes/29
1
4%
7%
3%
14%
Yes/18
Yes/17
No/1
No/8
2
9%
8%
1%
4%
No/4
No/7
No/3
Yes/ 11
3
2%
3%
2%
5%
4
Yes/10
No/6
Yes/23
5%
3%
11%
Yes 19
No/3
No/8
No/4
Yes/10
5
9%
2%
4%
2%
5%
6
-
Yes / 26
Yes / 22
Yes / 10
Yes / 36
13%
11%
5%
18%
Yes / 26
Yes / 76
Yes / 13
Yes / 38
7
-
13%
37%
6%
19%
Yes / 63
Yes / 19
Yes / 31
Yes / 14
Yes / 55
8
31%
9%
15%
7%
27%
Yes / 18
Yes / 22
Yes/ 11
Yes / 41
9
9%
11%
5%
20%
Yes / 17
Yes / 29
Yes / 34
Yes / 17
Yes / 116
10
8%
14%
17%
8%
57%
11
_
No/6
Yes/13
No/5
Yes/22
3%
6%
2%
11%
12
_
Yes/26
Yes/23
No/9
Yes/29
13%
11%
4%
14%
13
_
Yes / 17
Yes / 25
Yes/ 10
Yes / 30
8%
12%
5%
15%
Yes/18
Yes/25
No/8
Yes/25
14
-
9%
12%
4%
12%
Yes / 17
Yes / 27
No/9
Yes / 25
15
_
8%
13%
4%
12%
Yes / 20
Yes / 34
Yes / 28
Yes / 176
16
_
10%
17%
14%
86%
17
-
-
-
-
-
18
Yes / 24
Yes / 28
Yes / 34
Yes / 14
Yes / 62
12%
14%
17%
7%
30%
Yes/16
Yes/22
No/7
Yes/37
19
8%
11%
3%
18%
Yes / 25
Yes / 33
Yes / 36
Yes / 18
Yes / 64
20
12%
16%
18%
9%
31%

Table 13. Wetland Gauge Attainment Data
Summary of Groundwater Gauge Results for Years 1 to 5
Success Criteria Achieved / Max Consecutive Das During Growing Season
(Percentage)
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
Gauge
2013)
(2014)
(2015)
2016
(2017)
Yes/40
Yes/12
Yes/20
No / 7
Yes/24
21
20%
6%
10%
3%
12%
No/4
No/3
No/4
No/5
22
_
2%
2%
2%
2%
Yes/10
No / 7
Yes/24
23
_
5%
3%
12%
24
Yes/26
Yes/20
No / 8
13%
10%
4%
25
Yes/13
No/9
No/5
Yes/13
6%
4%
2%
6%
26
Yes/28
Yes/10
No/4
_
14%
5%
2%
27
Yes/29
Yes/23
Yes/11
Yes / 31
14%
11%
5%
15%
28
No/8
No/4
Yes/13
4%
2%
6%
29
Yes/19
No/5
_
9%
2%
30
_
Yes/26
Yes/23
No / 6
Yes/30
13%
11%
3%
15%
31
_
_
Yes/10
Yes/69
Yes/28
5%
34%
14%
32
Yes/16
Yes/22
No / 6
Yes/23
8%
10%
3%
11%
33
_
Yes/18
Yes/21
No / 7
Yes/24
9%
10%
3%
12%
Yes/ 16
Yes/ 15
Yes/21
No/8
Yes/94
34
8%
7%
10%
4%
46%
Yes/38
Yes/29
Yes/10
Yes/32
35
_
19%
14%
5%
16%
A blank cell indicates that there was not enough data to determine if the well was meeting
the hydrology criteria for that year.

Project:
EEP Project ID:
Wetland Component
Growing Season:
Units
Gauge Type
Serial #
Gauge ID
Fletcher -Meritor
138
Project Riparian Wetlands
April 9 -October 29
Inches
Groundwater
13D4CA2A
1
WE
-5.0
10.0
3.5
Daily Precipitation (in)
—o --Average Daily Groundwater (in)
3 12" below ground surface
2.5
-25.0
-30.0
r- r- r- r- r- r- r- r- r- r- r` r- r- r- r- r- � r" � � r- r- r- r- r- r- r- r- r- r- r- r- r- r -
N N N N N 0 N 0 N 0 0 N N N N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N 0 0 0 0 0
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
O r, M O r, � r\-1 0000 Ln N M Ln N 0\1 l.D M O r, � r\-1 n � r\-1 0000 � -1 0000 LLn N O\1 kDD M O kDD
M M IZT IZT ZT Ln Ln U-) lO lO lO 00 00 00 a> a> D> r-1 r-1 O O O ri
r-1 r-1 r-1
1
0.5
0

Project:
EEP Project ID:
Wetland Component
Growing Season:
Units
Gauge Type
Gauge ID
Fletcher -Meritor
138
Project Riparian Wetlands
April 9 -October 29
Inches
Groundwater
11311987
2
-5
-10
3.5
M Daily Precipitation (in)
—*--Average Daily Groundwater (in)
3— 12" below ground surface
2.5
-30
-35
-40
0000000000000000000000000000000000
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
0 n M 0 n M -i W M N M Ln N M lDD M 0 n-zt -4 n zt -1 W Kt -1 W Ln N M l.D M 0 lDD
r'4 r4 �\\M!\\�\\n\\ \\\ \ \ \ \ \ M \ \ \ O O
m m v v v n Ln Ln k.0 kD kD r, r" r" r" 00 00 00 M M M 0 0 0
1-1 1-4 -1
1 1
0.5
0

Project:
EEP Project ID:
Wetland Component
Growing Season:
Units
Gauge Type
Serial #
Gauge ID
Fletcher -Meritor
138
Project Riparian Wetlands
April 9 -October 29
Inches
Groundwater
1130DD07
3
M
-5.0
-10.0
-30.0
-35.0
-40.0

Project:
Fletcher -Meritor
EEP Project ID:
138
Wetland Component:
Project Riparian Wetlands
Growing Season:
April 9 -October 29
Units
Inches
Gauge Type
Groundwater
Serial #
14E17875
Gauge ID:
4
0
-5
-10
3.5
1 Daily Precipitation (in)
—*--Average Daily Groundwater (in)
3 12" below ground surface
2.5
c
0
2
Q
-30
-35
-40
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
O N M O N i --I 0�0 Lf N Q\1 Lf N M 0 N
M m v vIZT Ln Ln Ln ko ko I'D � � r, r� 00 00 0o M M M 0 0 0
­� -1 1-4
1
0.5

Project:
EEP Project ID:
Wetland Component:
Growing Season:
Units
Gauge Type
Serial #
Gauge ID
Fletcher -Meritor
138
Project Riparian Wetlands
April 9 -October 29
Inches
Groundwater
138BE816
5
0.0
-5.0
-10.0
3.5
I Daily Precipitation (in)
—o --Average Daily Groundwater (in)
3 12" below ground surface
M
V,
o -20.0
25.0
1111490]
-35.0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
O n M O N i\-1 0�0 11 N M Ln N M l,D M O r, -1 n� i\-1 0\0 � -i 0\0 Ln N M lO M O lDD
M M 1:T IZT ct Ln 1n ul lO (.0 lO I, N N N 00 00 00 0) 01 M r-1 r-1 O O O r -I
r-1 r-1 -1
1 1
0.5
0

Project:
EEP Project ID:
Wetland Component
Growing Season:
Units
Gauge Type
Serial #
Gauge ID
Fletcher -Meritor
138
Project Riparian Wetlands
April 9 -October 29
Inches
Groundwater
11313657
6
5.0
M
we]
10.0
3.5
Daily Precipitation (in)
—*--Average Daily Groundwater (in)
3 12" below ground surface
Mr
3 -20.0
O
-30.0
-35.0
-40.0
ri r-1 ri ri ri ri r-1 r1 r1 r-1 r-1 r-1 ri ri ri ri ri ri ri ri -1 -1 -1 r1 ri ri ri ri ri ri r-1 r1 r1 r-1
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N (N
O r, M O r, r\-1 W Ln N (n Ln N M l.O M O r,I:t r\-1 r,lzt r\-1 0000 Itt r\-1 0�0 L! N a) ip m O ,6
r14 r1J ------ Ln Ln ------ "DD � � � n � � � � 0000 ------ 0) ------ O O �---- r\-1
M M ��� L n L n L n lD lD lD 1- r- r- r- 00 00 00 M M M .-1 .-1 O O O r-1
r-1 r-1 r-1
1
0.5
0

Project:
EEP Project ID:
Wetland Component
Growing Season:
Units
Gauge Type
Serial #
Gauge ID
Fletcher -Meritor
138
Project Riparian Wetlands
April 9 -October 29
Inches
Groundwater
9BEA475
7
5.0
Me,
5.0
3.5
ML Daily Precipitation (in)
--*—Average Daily Groundwater (in)
3 12" below ground surface
2.5
will
-25.0
0000000000000000000000000000000000
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
O r� M O r� IZT\-1 00 Ln N M V) N m l0 M O nzi \-I r� :zr\-I 00 -zt i\ -I 0o V1 N 01 l0 M O l0
\\ \\\ Ln L1 \\\ � \\\ n \\\\ 000 \\\ D\l \\\ O O \\\
M M Vl Vl V) lD lD lD r� r, n n 00 0o 00 Dl M 0) ri ri O O O ci
ci ci ci
1
0.5
0

Project:
EEP Project ID:
Wetland Component
Growing Season:
Units
Gauge Type
Serial #
Gauge ID
Fletcher -Meritor
138
Project Riparian Wetlands
April 9 -October 29
Inches
Groundwater
9BEBF83
8
5.0
HO
-5.0
v
-10.0
L
3
M
o -15.0
V
3
0
v
CO -20.0
v
s
u
r-
-25.0 -25.0
-35 0
Begin Growing Season End Growing Season
(4/9/17) (10/29/17
I ,
I ,
I
I
I
I
I ,
I ,
I ,
1 ,
I ,
I ,
I ,
I ,
I ,
I ,
I ,
I r
I + ,
I ,
I ,
I ,
I ,
1 ,
I ,
I
I ,
I ,
I ,
I ,
I ,
I
1 ,
1 ,
I ,
I
1 ,
I ,
1
I ,
I ,
I ,
1
I ,
I ,
I '
I '
I '
I '
0000000000000000000000000000000000
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
0 N M 0 N \-I W Ln N M Ln N Mt.D M 0 N-zt c\ -I N t\ -I W 't\ -I W if N M lDD M 0�.D
I n I n \ \ \ LD \ \ \ � \ \ \ \ 0 0 \ \ \ \ \ \ 0 0 \ \ \
In In Ln Ln Ln LD lD lD I, n n n 00 00 00 M M M r-1 r -i 0 0 0 rl
3.5
L Daily Precipitation (in)
—*--Average Daily Groundwater (in)
3 12" below ground surface
2.5
1 1
NEI

Project:
EEP Project ID:
Wetland Component
Growing Season:
Units
Gauge Type
Serial #
Gauge ID
Fletcher -Meritor
138
Project Riparian Wetlands
April 9 -October 29
Inches
Groundwater
EBD106E
9
5.0
HE
-5.0
v
M -10.0
L
o -15.0
IL^
V
3
0
W
CO -20.0
N
v
s
u
C
-25.0
Kell]
-35.0
3.5
EL Daily Precipitation (in)
—Average Daily Groundwater (in)
3 12" below ground surface
`w
0000000000000000000000000000000000
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
0 r- M 0 r -'t c\-1 M II N M 11 N M lDD M 0r� -zt c\ -I r M W Ln N Mt.D M 0 l.D
(14 r4 — \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 0\0 \ \ \ \ \ \ 0 0
m m ��Itt Ln Ln Ln lD LD LD r, r, r, r, 00 00 00 M M M 0 0 0
r-1 r-1 r-1
1 1
0.5
0

Project:
EEP Project ID:
Wetland Component
Growing Season:
Units
Gauge Type
Serial #
Gauge ID
Fletcher -Meritor
138
Project Riparian Wetlands
April 9 -October 29
Inches
Groundwater
10FACBB4
10
3.5
M Daily Precipitation (in)
—Average Daily Groundwater (in)
3 12" below ground surface
OW
1
0.5
0

Project:
EEP Project ID:
Wetland Component
Growing Season:
Units
Gauge Type
Serial #
Gauge ID
Fletcher -Meritor
138
Project Riparian Wetlands
April 9 -October 29
Inches
Groundwater
AB37304
11
5.0
ME
-5.0
i[IM
3.5
Daily Precipitation (in)
—*--Average Daily Groundwater (in)
3 12" below ground surface
2.5
C7
3 -20.0
O
-30.0
-35.0
-40.0
r, r, r, r, r, r, r, r, r, r, r, r, r, r, r, r, r, r, r, r, r, r, r, r, r, r, r, r, r, r, r, r, r, r,
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
O N M O n't c\-1 M II N M Lnn N M lDD M 0 n-zt c\ -I N:I- M W Ln N Mt.D M 0 LD
\ \ Ln Ln \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 0000 \ \ \ rn \ \ \ O 0
m m � -tt Ln Ln Ln iO LO LO r` r` r` r` 00 00 00 M rn M 0 0 0
r-1 r-1 r-1
1
0.5

Project:
EEP Project ID:
Wetland Component
Growing Season:
Units
Gauge Type
Serial #
Gauge ID:
Fletcher -Meritor
138
Project Riparian Wetlands
April 9 -October 29
Inches
Groundwater
10FAA7C4
12
5.0
HE
-5.0
v
-10.0
L
C
o -15.0
`L^
V
3
0
0
0° -20.0
v
s
V
C
-25.0
-30.0
-35.0
3.5
Daily Precipitation (in)
--*—Average Daily Groundwater (in)
3 12" below ground surface
2.5
0000000000000000000000000000000000
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
O r� M O n 1:T r-1 00 Lr) N 0) u1 N 01 l0 M O r� 1:T "I r� -tT r-1 00 zT r-1 00 u1 N 01 l0 M O l0
\\ \\\ �f1 �/1 \\\ �D \\\ I- \\\\ 00 \\\ Ql \\\ O O \\\
M M Lr) Lr) Lr) lD lD lD 1- r- n r- 00 00 00 0) Q) a) r-1 c -I coo c-1
1-1 c-1 c-1
1 1
0.5
0

Project:
EEP Project ID:
Wetland Component
Growing Season:
Units
Gauge Type
Serial #
Gauge ID
Fletcher -Meritor
138
Project Riparian Wetlands
April 9 -October 29
Inches
Groundwater
10FADD4C / A278DE1
13
5.0
HE
-5.0
v
-10.0
L
C
o -15.0
`L^
V
3
0
0
0° -20.0
v
s
V
C
-25.0
-30.0
-35.0
Begin Growing Season
(4/9/17)
End Growing Season
(10/29/17)
3.5
Daily Precipitation (in)
--*—Average Daily Groundwater (in)
3 12" below ground surface
2.5
0000000000000000000000000000000000
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
O r� M O n 1:T r-1 00 Lr) N 0) Ln (N a) l0 M O r� 1:T "I r� -tT r-1 00 zT r-1 00 u1 N a) to M O l0
\\ \\\ �f1 �/1 \\\ �0 \\\ I- \\\\ 00 \\\ Ql \\\ O O \\\
M M Lr) Lr) Lr) l0 l0 l0 1- r- n r- 00 00 00 0) a) a) r-1 c -I coo c-1
1-1 c-1 c-1
1
0.5
C

Project:
EEP Project ID:
Wetland Component
Growing Season:
Units
Gauge Type
Serial #
Gauge ID
Fletcher -Meritor
138
Project Riparian Wetlands
April 9 -October 29
Inches
Groundwater
A28ABBO
14
5.0
-5.0
10.0
U
w
-15.0
C
7
0
c7
3 -20.0
0
v
m
s -25.0
u
C
-30.0
-35.0
3.5
IL Daily Precipitation (in)
—*--Average Daily Groundwater (in)
3, 12" below ground surface
2.5
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
O N M O N tT -1 M M N M M N M lD M O N zt -1 N R* -1 M R* -1 M Lf N M LD M O 1..0
1:T \\\ Lr) Lr) \\\ l\0 \\\N\\\\ 0000 \\\ 00) \\\ O O
M M RZT RZT RZT Ln Ln Ln 00 00 00 0) 0) 0) ri ri O O O ri
1--1 1--1 1--1
1
0.5
In

Project:
EEP Project ID:
Wetland Component
Growing Season:
Units
Gauge Type
Serial #
Gauge ID
Fletcher -Meritor
138
Project Riparian Wetlands
April 9 -October 29
Inches
Groundwater
9DE54F2
15
5.0
all
-5.0
10.0
3.5
Daily Precipitation (in)
--*—Average Daily Groundwater (in)
3 12" below ground surface
2.5
-30.0
-35.0
-40.0
0000000000000000000000000000000000
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
O r� M O n 1:T r-1 00 Lr) N 0) u1 N 01 l0 M O r� 1:T "I r� -tT i--1 00 zT i--1 00 u1 N 01 l0 M O l0
\\ \\\ Ln Ln \\\ �D \\\ I- \\\\ 00 \\\ M \\\ O O \\\
M M Lr) Lr) Lr) lD lD lD 1- r- n r- 00 00 00 0) Q) a) r-1 c -I O O O c-1
1-1 c-1 c-1
1 1
0.5
0

Project:
EEP Project ID:
Wetland Component
Growing Season:
Units
Gauge Type
Serial #
Gauge ID
Fletcher -Meritor
138
Project Riparian Wetlands
April 9 -October 29
Inches
Groundwater
138BD91 E / 11 30EA33
16
3.5
Daily Precipitation (in)
♦Average Daily Groundwater (in)
3 12" below ground surface
2.5
1
0.5
0

Project: Fletcher -Meritor
EEP Proje, 138
Wetland C Project Riparian Wetlands
Growing S April 9 -October 29
Units Inches
Gauge Tyr Groundwater
Serial # destroyed
Gauge ID: 17
NO DATA NO DATA NO DATA NO DATA NO DATA NO DATA NO DATA NO DATA
NO DATA NO DATA NO DATA NO DATA NO DATA NO DATA NO DATA NO DATA
NO DATA NO DATA NO DATA NO DATA NO DATA NO DATA NO DATA NO DATA
NO DATA NO DATA NO DATA NO DATA NO DATA NO DATA NO DATA NO DATA
NO DATA NO DATA NO DATA NO DATA NO DATA NO DATA NO DATA NO DATA
NO DATA NO DATA NO DATA NO DATA NO DATA NO DATA NO DATA NO DATA
NO DATA NO DATA NO DATA NO DATA NO DATA NO DATA NO DATA NO DATA
NO DATA NO DATA NO DATA NO DATA NO DATA NO DATA NO DATA NO DATA
NO DATA NO DATA NO DATA NO DATA NO DATA NO DATA NO DATA NO DATA
NO DATA NO DATA NO DATA NO DATA NO DATA NO DATA NO DATA NO DATA
NO DATA NO DATA NO DATA NO DATA NO DATA NO DATA NO DATA NO DATA
NO DATA NO DATA NO DATA NO DATA NO DATA NO DATA NO DATA NO DATA
NO DATA NO DATA NO DATA NO DATA NO DATA NO DATA NO DATA NO DATA
NO DATA NO DATA NO DATA NO DATA NO DATA NO DATA NO DATA NO DATA

Project:
EEP Project ID:
Wetland Component
Growing Season:
Units
Gauge Type
Fletcher -Meritor
138
Project Riparian Wetlands
April 9 -October 29
Inches
Groundwater
Serial # 9BEBCFO
Gauge ID : 18
5.0
0.0
1 -5.0
3.5
no. Daily Precipitation (in)
--*—Average Daily Groundwater (in)
3— 12" below ground surface
2.5
v
m
a
s
U
-20.0
-25.0
-30.0
0000000000000000000000000000000000
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
O r j M O Ii t r-1 00 -i N Mu') N 01 r1.0j M O n � m I� i r-4 00 � -i 00 r,4 N al LD M O l0
\ \ \ \ \ Ln i f 1 \ \ \ l0 \ \ \ I - \ \ \ 00 \ \ \ M \ \ \ O O \ \ \ �--�
M M �t mt Ln Ln Ln l0 lD UJ I, r, r- r- 00 00 00 M M Dl -i -A O O O c -I
-i -i -i
1
0.5
0

Project:
EEP Project ID:
Wetland Component
Growing Season:
Units
Gauge Type
Serial #
Gauge ID
Fletcher -Meritor
138
Project Riparian Wetlands
April 9 -October 29
Inches
Groundwater
136ACA3C
19
Oul
of
-5.0
a,
-10.0
3
N
M
C
o -15.0
rL^
V
3
0
a
CO -20.0
a
t
u
C
-25.0
-30.0
-35.0
3.5
Daily Precipitation (in)
—o --Average Daily Groundwater (in)
3 12" below ground surface
2.5
0000000000000000000000000000000000
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
O 1, M O r, -zt -i 0o Ln N M u1 N al l0 M O r, RZT i--1 r, zT r-1 00 RzT r-1 00 N N 0) 1,0 M O (.0
\\ \\\ 11 Lr) \\\"D \\\ n \\\\ 0000 \\\ a) \\\ O O \\\ r"1
M M Kt Kt Lfl Lfl Lfl l0 l0 l0 1, n n n 00 00 00 Ql Ql Ql c-1 c-1 O O O r-1
r-1 -1 -1
1
0.5
0

Project:
EEP Project ID:
Wetland Component
Growing Season:
Units
Gauge Type
Serial #
Gauge ID
Fletcher -Meritor
138
Project Riparian Wetlands
April 9 -October 29
Inches
Groundwater
B651924
20
5.0
M
-5.0
-10.0
L
i
o -15.0
IL^
V
3
0
W
00 -20.0
H
v
s
u
C
-25.0
-30.0
-35.0
Begin Growing Season
(4/9/17)
End Growing Season
(10/29/1 I)
I
I ,
I
I
1
I
I ,
I ,
1 ,
I ,
I ,
I ,
I ,
I
I ,
I ,
I ,
I
I I
I �
I
I
I
I ,
I ,
I
I ,
I ,
I ,
I
I ,
I ,
I
I ,
I ,
I11A ,
1
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
O r, M O M -1 0000 I j N M Ln N a)
(.0 Mn O M S -1MM zT \r-1 0000 IZT -1 0000 11 NO O0) .l0 M O 1110
\\\\ii \\\\\\\ \L � \ \ M \ \ \ \ \
r -1
M M 111 111 111 l0 l0 l0 1- n n r, 00 00 00 M M M r-1 r -I O O O r-1
-1 -1 ri
3.5
Daily Precipitation (in)
--*—Average Daily Groundwater (in)
3 12" below ground surface
2.5
1
0.5
C

Project:
EEP Project ID:
Wetland Component
Growing Season:
Units
Gauge Type
Serial #
Gauge ID
Fletcher -Meritor
138
Project Riparian Wetlands
April 9 -October 29
Inches
Groundwater
138BB5AA
21
10
5
0
-5
3.5
Daily Precipitation (in)
—*--Average Daily Groundwater (in)
3— 12" below ground surface
2.5
-25
-30
-35
r-1 r-1 r-1 r-1 ri - r-1 r-1 r-1 r-1 r-1 r-1 r-1 r-1 r-1 ri -1 r1 ri ri ri r1 r1 ri ri r-1 r-1 ri - r-1 r-1 r-1
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
0 n M 0 N� r\ -I 0000 M N M LLn N M LO M 0 N� r\ -I N� r-1 00 0000 v\-1 0000 Lf N M k.0 M 0 t.0
M M 1:T Ln Ln Ln LO LO LO 1- r- r- r, 00 00 00 M rn rn r-1 r-1 0 0 0 r-1
ri ri ri
1
0.5
F1,

Project:
Fletcher -Meritor
EEP Project ID:
138
Wetland Component:
Project Riparian Wetlands
Growing Season:
April 9 -October 29
Units
Inches
Gauge Type
Groundwater
Serial #
11312837
Gauge ID:
22
10
5
0
-5
W
U
-10
c
'0 -15
L
C7
3
0
v -20
CO
V,
v
s
u
E -25
-30
-35
-40
Begin Growing Season
(4/9/17)
1
End Growing Season
(10/29/17
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N (4 N
O I� M O r� RZT �1 00 LO N M Lr) N D1 l0 M O r� RZT r-1 r� 1:T r-1 00 lzt r-1 00 Lr) N M l\D M O lD
re) M Rt v Lr) Lr) Lr) lD lD lD 1, r" r, N 00 00 00 rn 41 rn -1 r1 0 0 0 r -I
r -i r-1 1-1
3.5
Daily Precipitation (in)
—*--Average Daily Groundwater (in)
3 12" below ground surface
2.5
r-
0
ca
2
CL
1
0.5
M

Project:
Fletcher -Meritor
EEP Project ID:
138
Wetland Component:
Project Riparian Wetlands
Growing Season:
April 9 -October 29
Units
Inches
Gauge Type
Groundwater
Serial # 182727 / ED1396D7
Gauge ID: 23
10
;
Begin Growing Season End Growing Season
(419117) (10/29/17)
5
0
-5
1
v
,
V
,
'
-10
3
'
'
H
C
1
o
-15
V
�
3
'
o
v -20
M
v
,
5
`� -25
c
,
'
-30
'
-35
-40
I-
0000000000000000000000000000000000
N N N N N N N N N N N N (N (14 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
O 1, M O n 1:T r-1 00 Lr) N M Ln N a) l0 M O 1, 1:T r-1 1, -ZT r-1 00 zT 1-1 00 u1 N a) to M O l0
\ \ \ \ \ 1.!) V) \ \ \ �D \ \ \ r- \ \ \ \ 00 \ \ \ a) \ \ \ O O \ \ \
M M Lr) Lr) Lr) to to I'D 1- N n N 00 00 00 a) a) a) .-I c -I O O O c-1
1-1 c-1 c-1
3.5
Daily Precipitation (in)
--*—Average Daily Groundwater (in)
3 12" below ground surface
2.5
1
0.5
U

Project:
EEP Project ID:
Wetland Component
Growing Season:
Units
Gauge Type
Serial #
Gauge ID
Fletcher -Meritor
138
Project Riparian Wetlands
April 9 -October 29
Inches
Groundwater
1314D206
24
10
9
9
v
M -5
L
0 -10
IL^
V
3
0
v
CO -15
H
ar
s
u
C
-20
-25
-30
3.5
Daily Precipitation (in)
+Average Daily Groundwater (in)
3 12" below ground surface
2.5
0000000000000000000000000000000000
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
O r, M O M -1-1 0000 Ln N M Ln N 0\1 lO M O M -tT\-1 M zT i\-1 0000 IZT\-1 0000 Ln N 00) l.0 M O 1110
\\ \\\ Li Li \\\'DD \\\ n \\\\M\\\M\\\ O O \\\
M M Ln Ill Ill l0 l0 l0 N n n N 00 00 00 M M M -1 1-1 O O O r -I
-1 -1 -1
1 1
0.5
Ell

Project:
EEP Project ID:
Wetland Component
Growing Season:
Units
Gauge Type
Serial #
Gauge ID
Fletcher -Meritor
138
Project Riparian Wetlands
April 9 -October 29
Inches
Groundwater
9BEBF22/131D413149
25
10
5
0
-5
a
u
-10
LA3
_
o -15
C7
3
O
d -20
m
v
s
a -25
Bill
-35
-40
3.5
Daily Precipitation (in)
♦Average Daily Groundwater (in)
3— 12" below ground surface
2.5
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
O 1, M O r, ZT -1 00 Ln N M Ln N 0) L.0 M O r, ZT r-1 1, 1:T r-1 00 -It r-1 00 Ln N M l0 M O l0
\\ \\\ L1 L7 \\\ l0 \\\ I, \\\\ 00 \\\ O1 \\\ O O \\\ r-1
M M IZT ZT ZT Ln Ln Ln lD lD lD 00 00 00 a) a) T r-1 r-1 O O O r -I
r-1 r-1 r-1
1
0.5
0

Project:
EEP Project ID:
Wetland Component
Growing Season:
Units
Gauge Type
Serial #
Gauge ID
Fletcher -Meritor
138
Project Riparian Wetlands
April 9 -October 29
Inches
Groundwater
1314D1 F1 / 1130FAA2
26
10
5
0
-5
-30
-35
40
Begin Growing Season End Growing Season
(419117) (10129117)
illi�lli_iff.
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N N N N N N N N (N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
O n M 0 n-zt -1 W M N O\1 LM N 00) lDD M 0 r-1 -11 -1 M1:31 -1 M 1-1 M LM N 00) l.0 M 0 1%%0
\ \ � \ \ \ M LM \ \ \ l\0 \ \ \ M \ \ \ \ 0 0 \ \ \ O\l \ \ \ O O \ \ \ "�
M m v v v n n �n k.0 k.0 t.0 r- r- r- r- 00 00 M M M M 0 0 0
"I "I "I
3.5
D
t A
3 1
2.5
1
0.5
W

Project:
EEP Project ID:
Wetland Component
Growing Season:
Units
Gauge Type
Serial #
Gauge ID
Fletcher -Meritor
138
Project Riparian Wetlands
April 9 -October 29
Inches
Groundwater
1131181`8/14E1603B
27
10
5
C
5
v
U
co
L
M -10
c
3
O
,L^
V
3 -15
O
v
CO
s -20
u
C
-25
-30
-35
3.5
Daily Precipitation (in)
—*--Average Daily Groundwater (in)
3 12" below ground surface
2.5
0000000000000000000000000000000000
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
O r, M O n 1:T rl 00 Ln N 0) Ln N 0) lO M O I, -zT r -I I, -zT rl 00 IZT rl 00 Ln N M lO M O lO
\ \ \ \ \ L f 1 �! 1 \ \ \ l O \ \ \ I - \ \ \ \ 00 \ \ \ Ol \ \ \ O O \ \ \
M M Ill U) V) lD lD lD I, r, r, r, 00 00 00 0) M Ol rl rl O O O rl
ci ci ci
1
0.5
0

Project:
Fletcher -Meritor
EEP Project ID:
138
Wetland Component:
Project Riparian Wetlands
Growing Season:
April 9 -October 29
Units
Inches
Gauge Type
Groundwater
Serial #
9BEA4DB / 9BEA426
Gauge ID:
28
10
5
0
-5
v
V
f0
-10
M
C
o -15
`L^
V
3
0
a -20
CO
V,
v
s
-25
Begin Growing Season
(4/9/17)
1
End Growing Season ;
(1012_q117)
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N (14 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
O 1, M O n 1:T r-1 00 Lr) N M Ln N 01 l0 M O r, 1:T r-1 1, -tT r-1 00 zT 1-1 00 u1 N 01 to M O l0
\\ \\\ Lf) L/) \\\ �D \\\ I- \\\\ 00 \\\ Q) \\\ O O \\\
M M Lr) Lr) Lr) to to I'D 1- N n N 00 00 00 0) a) a) r-1 c -I O O O c-1
c-1 -4 c-1
3.5
Daily Precipitation (in)
--*—Average Daily Groundwater (in)
3 12" below ground surface
2.5
1 1
0.5
C

Project:
EEP Project ID:
Wetland Component
Growing Season:
Units
Gauge Type
Serial #
Gauge ID
Fletcher -Meritor
138
Project Riparian Wetlands
April 9 -October 29
Inches
Groundwater
9DE69AB
29
5
Begin Growing Season
(4/9/15);
0
-5
-10
-15
End Growing Season
(10/29/15)
WELL
DESTROYED
VEHICLE
Ln Ln
Ln
Ln
Ln
Ln Ln Ln
Ln
Ln Ln
Ul Ln
Ul
Ul
Ul
Ul
Ul
-20
Ul
Ln
Ln Ln Ln
Ln Ln
Ln
Ln Ln Ln
Ln
Ul
-1 r1
—1
-1
—1
-1 —1 -1
ri
-25
-1 r1
—4
r1
—A
-1
—1
-1
—1
-1
r1 -1 r1
-1 r1
—1
-1 —1 -1
—1
-1
0 0
-30
0
0
0 0 0
0
0 0
0 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0 0
0 0
0
0 0 0
1,J1.1
0
N N
N
N
N
N N N
Ln Ln
Ln
Ln
Ln
Ln Ln Ln
Ln
Ln Ln
Ul Ln
Ul
Ul
Ul
Ul
Ul
Ul
Ul
Ln
Ln Ln Ln
Ln Ln
Ln
Ln Ln Ln
Ln
Ul
-1 r1
—1
-1
—1
-1 —1 -1
ri
-1 r1
-1 r1
—4
r1
—A
-1
—1
-1
—1
-1
r1 -1 r1
-1 r1
—1
-1 —1 -1
—1
-1
0 0
0
0
0
0 0 0
0
0 0
0 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0 0
0 0
0
0 0 0
0
0
N N
N
N
N
N N N
N
N N
N N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N N N
N N
N
N N N
N
N
ri
"I
ri
O
O N N
N
r -i r -i
r -i .--i
r -i
r-1
ri
O
O
O
O
O
O 0) 0)
0) 00
CO
00 00 00
00
n
\
\
\
\
\ M \
\
4 \
\ Ln
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\ Oho \
\ a)
\
\ O \
\
r-1
ri
c -I
ri
N
N M
M
U)
U)
V1
W
lD
W
r-
r-
r, 00
0o
a)
a) ri O
O
ri
ri
-1
2.5
2
Daily Precipitation (in)
♦Average Daily Groundwater (in)
12" below ground surface
0
0.5
X

Project:
EEP Project ID:
Wetland Component
Growing Season:
Units
Gauge Type
Serial #
Gauge ID
Fletcher -Meritor
138
Project Riparian Wetlands
April 9 -October 29
Inches
Groundwater
138BE066
30
5
0
5
3.5
Daily Precipitation (in)
♦Average Daily Groundwater (in)
3 12" below ground surface
2.5
Q)
u
N
i
V) -10
C
3
O
IL^
V
c -15
W
m
ar
s
V
-20
-25
-30
0000000000000000000000000000000000
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
O r, M O r, - rl 00 u1 N 0) u1 N M lD M O I, -zt rl r, 't r-1 00 -zt rl 00 Ln N M lD M O W
\ \ \ \ \ Ln Ln \ \ \ UJ \ 00 \ \ \ Ol \ \ \ O O \ \ \ �--�
M M in Ln Ln I'D lD W r, n n n 00 00 00 Ol Ol Ol -i rl O O O rl
-1 -1 -1
1
0.5
0

Project:
EEP Project ID:
Wetland Component
Growing Season:
Units
Gauge Type
Serial #
Gauge ID
Fletcher -Meritor
138
Project Riparian Wetlands
April 9 -October 29
Inches
Groundwater
182724 / 13D4CFD5
31
5
E
-5
3.5
Daily Precipitation (in)
—Average Daily Groundwater (in)
3 12" below ground surface
2.5
-25
-30
-35
0000000000000000000000000000000000
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
O r, M O n 'zT r -I 00 Ln N M u1 N 0) 1,0 M O r, 'zT r -I I' 'tT r -I 00 'ZT r -I 00 u1 N M l0 M O l0
\\ \\\ �f1 �/1 \\\ �D \\\ I- \\\\ 00 \\\ a) \\\ O O \\\
M M U) U) U) lD lD I'D r- r- n r- 00 00 00 0) 0) M .--I ci O O O c-1
ci c -I c -I
1 1
0.5
0

Project:
Fletcher -Meritor
EEP Project ID:
138
Wetland Component:
Project Riparian Wetlands
Growing Season:
April 9 -October 29
Units
Inches
Gauge Type
Groundwater
Serial #
EBDD9130
Gauge ID:
32
5
M
-5
-10
-30
-35
-40
Begin Growing Season
(4/9/17)
.A_ _i ^
End Growing Season
(10/29/171
0000000000000000000000000000000000
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
O r, M O r, � -1 0000 LI N 0) Lr) r4 N Q\1 LO M O r, � � 1 M � 0000 � � 1 0000 Lr) r4 N Q\1 LD M O l.o
\ \ \ \ \ �M 00\M\O\\LLr) LO t.0 \00 \ \ \ \ O \
M M Ln Ln Ln Lo Lo Lo 1- n N N 00 00 00 Ql Ql a) O O O r-1
r -I r -I r -I
3.5
Daily Precipitation (in)
—e—Average Daily Groundwater (in)
3 12" below ground surface
2.5
1
0.5
C

Project:
EEP Project ID:
Wetland Component
Growing Season:
Units
Gauge Type
Serial #
Gauge ID
Fletcher -Meritor
138
Project Riparian Wetlands
April 9 -October 29
Inches
Groundwater
EBDCF48
33
5
-5
a,
-10
3
N
M
C
o -15
rL^
V
3
0
QJ
CO -20
a
s
u
C
-25
-30
-35
3.5
Daily Precipitation (in)
—o --Average Daily Groundwater (in)
3 12" below ground surface
2.5
0000000000000000000000000000000000
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
O 1, M O r, -zt -i 0o u1 N M u1 N al l0 M O r, RZT i--1 r, zT r-1 00 RzT r-1 00 N N 0) 1,0 M O (.0
\\ \\\ 11 Lr) \\\"D \\\ n \\\\ 0000 \\\ a) \\\ O O \\\ r"1
M M Kt Kt Lfl Lfl Lfl l0 l0 l0 1, n n n 00 00 00 Ql Ql Ql c-1 c-1 O O O r-1
r-1 -1 -1
1
0.5
C

Project:
EEP Project ID:
Wetland Component
Growing Season:
Units
Gauge Type
Serial #
Gauge ID
Fletcher -Meritor
138
Project Riparian Wetlands
April 9 -October 29
Inches
Groundwater
EBDB81A
34
5
0
-5
3.5
M Daily Precipitation (in)
Average Daily Groundwater (in)
3— 12" below ground surface
2.5
a,
u
M
L
-10
C
7
0
/L^
V
c -15
v
m
ar
s
u
-20
-25
-30
r` r` r` r` n n r` r` r` r` r` r` r` r` r` r` n r` n r" r- r` r` r` r` r` r` r` r` r` r` r` r` r`
r-1 –1 �1 r1 r1 r1 r1 r1 r1 ri ri r1 r1 r1 r-1 r-1 r1 r1 r1 r1 ri ri r1 r1 r1 r1 r-1 r-1 r1 r1 r1 r1 ri
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
O N ro O N -tT -i 0�0 Ln N 0\1 L! N M tDD rn O n -tT -i N -tt -i 0�0 -,t -1 W Ln N a) lO M O l.0
Ln Ln \\\ l\0 \\\ n \\\\ 0000 \\\ 0) \\\ O O \\\ ri
M M ZT IZT LO Ln Ln L.0 lD I'D r- r- r- r- 00 00 00 0) 0) 0) .-1 .-1 O O O r -i
r-1 r-1 r-1
1 1
0.5
0

Project:
Fletcher -Meritor
EEP Project ID:
138
Wetland Component:
Project Riparian Wetlands
Growing Season:
April 9 -October 29
Units
Inches
Gauge Type
Groundwater
Serial # 174146 / 14E1531D2
Gauge ID: 35
5
0
-5
CU
-10
C
'o -15
c7
3
0
v
C° -20
v
s
U
C
-25
-30
-35
3.5
M Daily Precipitation (in)
—Average Daily Groundwater (in)
3 12" below ground surface
2.5
N N 0 N N N 0 0 0 0 N N N N 0 N N N 0 0 0 0 N N N N 0 N N N 0 0 0 0
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
O I� M O r,1:T -1 00 M N M Ln N M l0 M O r-IZT 1� -It i --I 00 � i --I 00 M N M l0 M O l0
\ \ � \ \ \ L1 L1 \ \ \ l0 \ \ \ I" \ \ \ \ W \ \ \ M \ \ \ O O \ \ \
M M 1:T 1:T 1:T Ln Ln Ln 1.0 1.0 l0 1- r- N r- CO 00 00 M M M ri 1-1 O O O a -I
"I "I a--1
1
0.5
Ii]