20051877 Ver 1_Year 7 Monitoring Report_2018_20181128

Dye Branch II
Stream Restoration
MY7 Monitoring Report (2018)
NCDMS Project Number: 92255
Submitted to
North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
November 2018
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699

This Page Intentionally Left Blank

�'��EQU f NOX
bolonce through proper plonning
November 28, 2018
Matthew Reid
Project Manager
DENR Ecosystem Enhancement Program
5 Ravenscroft Dr., #102
Asheville, NC 28801
Subject: Dye Branch Stream Restoration Project #92255 - 2018 MY7 Monitoring Report Comments
Dear Mr. Reid:
The North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) contracted the services of Equinox Environmental to
perform MY7 monitoring services for the Dye Branch Stream Restoration Project Site. Comments provided by
DMS are listed below with the red text indicating how each was addressed by Equinox within the final report.
General
DMS would prefer to call this the MY7 report. The 2017 Port Repair Report can be referred to as the MY6
Post Repair Monitoring Report. The data collected in that report was not a reduced effort and contains
the same cross-sections, veg plots and visual assessment. Please update references of MY6 to MY7 in
this 2018 report (footers, tables, CCPV title, etc.). These changes have been made throughout the
report, footers, tables, CCPV included.
Executive Summary
• Please add the following sentence to the first paragraph on page 5: "Invasive species treatment will
continue until project closeout in 2020." The above sentence has been added to the end of the first
paragraph on page 5.
Table 2:
• Please change "2017 Repair Monitoring" to "Year 6 Monitoring - Post Repair." Please change "2018
Monitoring" to "Year 7 Monitoring". 2017 Repair Monitoring has been changed to Year 6 Monitoring -
Post Repair and 2018 Monitoring has been changed to Year 7 Monitoring.
CCPV:
Please update title to "Monitoring Year 7 - Integrated Current Condition Plan View". The title of the
CCPV has been updated to reflect Monitoring Year 7.
Please include a call out for the planted/ total stems for vegetation plots (ex: 260/1100) and update
legend. Call outs for the planted and total stems for vegetation plots has been added to the CCPV and
the legend has been updated.
Please add locations of the 4 temporary plots and include call out for total stems. The 4 temporary
vegetation plots have been added to the CCPV along with call outs for total stems.
Cross Sections:
• Please add "MY6" before "Post Repair 2017" and change "MY6 2018" to "MY7 2018" in legend. "MY6"
has been added before "Post Repair 2017" and "MY6 2018" has been changed to "MY7 2018" in the
legend of the cross section overlays.
37 Haywood Street, Suite 100 Asheville NC 28801 828.253.6856 www.equinoxenvironmentai.com

��'��EQU f NOX
bolonce through proper plonning
Table iia:
• Please confirm that the MY7 (2018) BHRs have been calculated based on the attached DMS technical
guidance. Please add a note on the table that beginning in MY7, the bankfull elevation and channel
cross section dimensions are calculated using a fixed Abkf as described in the Standard Measurement
of the BHR Monitoring Parameter provided by NCIRT and NCDMS (9/2018). BHRs have been calculated
according to the guidance starting in MY7. A note has been added to the bottom of Table 11a.
Appendix F•
• Please include the attached invasive species treatment logs in the new Appendix F. The attached
treatment logs were added to the report as "Appendix F - Invasive Species Treatment Logs."
The project manager for this project is Mr. Drew Alderman. His contact information is as follows:
Drew Alderman
Natural Resource Specialist
Equinox
37 Haywood Street
Asheville, NC 28801
828-253-6856 ext. 213 office
828-253-8256 fax
Sincerely,
Drew Alderman
37 Haywood Street, Suite 100 Asheville NC 28801 828.253.6856 www.equinoxenvironmentai.com

Monitoring Firm
EQUINOX
balance through proper planning
37 Haywood Street, Suite 100
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
Phone: [phone]
Project Contact: Drew Alderman
Email: [e-mail]

This Page Intentionally Left Blank

Dye Branch II Stream Restoration
2018 MY7 Monitoring Report
Table of Contents
1.0 Executive Summary / Project Abstract
Page 4
2.0 Methodology Page 6
3.0 References Page 6

Appendices
Appendix A. Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables
Figure 1.
Vicinity Map and Directions
Table la.
Project Components
Table lb.
Component Summations
Table 2.
Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3.
Project Contacts
Table 4.
Project Attributes
Appendix B. Visual Assessment Data
Figure 2. Integrated Current Condition Plan View
Table 5. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Table 6. Vegetation Condition Assessment
Photo Station Photos
Appendix C. Vegetation Plot Data
Table 7. Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Table 8. CVS Vegetation Plot Metadata
Table 9. Planted and Total Stem Counts (Species by Plot with Annual Means)
Appendix D. Stream Survey Data
Cross -Sections with Annual Overlays and Photos
Table 10a. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Table 10b. Baseline Stream Data Summary (Substrate, Bed, Bank, and Hydrologic
Containment Parameter Distributions)
Table l la. Monitoring Data — Dimensional Morphology Summary (Dimensional
Parameters — Cross -Sections)
Table 1 lb. Monitoring Data — Stream Reach Data Summary
Appendix E. Hydrologic Data
Table 12. Verification of Bankfull Events
Appendix F. Invasive Species Treatment Logs

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY / PROJECT ABSTRACT
The goals and objectives stated in the Dye Branch Stream Restoration Plan (NCEEP 2005) are as
follows:
• Provide a stable system of stream channels that neither aggrade nor degrade while
maintaining dimension, pattern, and profile with the capacity to transport the watershed's
water and sediment load;
• Improve the overall water quality and aquatic habitat by reducing sediment and waste
inputs into the stream caused by bank erosion, mass -wasting, and stormwater runoff
through stabilization of the stream channel and creation of a stormwater wetland; and
• Improve the overall viability of the riparian vegetative communities through
establishment of native species and elimination of invasive exotic species.
This is the first monitoring report for the Dye Branch Stream Restoration Project since the
completion of Monitoring Year 5 (MY5) in 2015. A MY6 Post -Repair Monitoring Report was
completed in February 2018 and documented the repairs and plantings that were completed in
2017. As a part of the repairs, two small areas were repaired on Upper Dye Branch and five
small areas were repaired on Lower Dye Branch. The repairs consisted of repairing failed
structures, installation of brush toe, streambank grading, installation of coir matting, riffle
construction, and grading of the channel to reestablish the thalweg for proper flow through the
new alignment. A supplemental planting was also performed to revegetate the areas that were
graded during the repairs. A temporary seed mix and 420 bare root seedlings were planted in
areas affected by the repairs to help revegetate.
This report incorporates data that is associated with MY7 monitoring and includes a qualitative
vegetation and stream assessment including vegetation monitoring of seven (7) annual
monitoring plots, four (4) random/ temporary vegetation plots, morphological monitoring of ten
(10) cross-sections, and hydrologic monitoring. This report also includes a visual assessment
which incorporates multiple photo points, visual assessment of the vegetation, easement, and
stream channel to document any problem areas that arise. These problem areas are documented
in Tables 5 and 6 and depicted in Figure 2, the Current Condition Plan View. In addition to this
MY7 monitoring, one additional year of monitoring will be conducted during 2019 with closeout
activities conducted in 2020.
Vegetation monitoring of the Dye Branch Stream Restoration Project includes annual monitoring
of seven permanent vegetation plots, four temporary vegetation plots, and visual assessment of
the easement as a whole. The site includes a diverse assemblage of 15 planted species of native
trees and shrubs. Planted stems range from 4 to 22 per plot with 5 to 57 stems observed when
volunteers are included. Based on the MY7 vegetation data, the average stem density for
planted stems across all plots is approximately 382 stems per acre. This meets the year 7 success
criteria of 210 planted stems per acre. When all planted and natural stems are combined, the
average stem density is 1,012 stems per acre, and all seven plots meet the year seven success
criteria. Four random vegetation plot transects were also performed to evaluate stems throughout
the easement as a whole. The stem counts for the random vegetation transects were 9, 17, 12,
and 32 which extrapolate out to 450, 850, 600, and 1600 stems per acre respectively.
Dye Branch II 4 Equinox
Project No. 92255 November 2018
MY7 Monitoring Report

Regarding invasive -exotics, a contractor was hired to treat the invasive -exotic vegetation in
November 2015. Since 2015 seven treatments have occurred at the Dye Branch site. Treatments
occurred in June and September of 2018 (MY7) and have been effective. Treatments consisted
of cut and stump sprays of a 50% glyphosate solution targeting Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera
japonica), kudzu (Pueraria montana), privet sp, Tree -of -Heaven (Ailanthus altissima), and
multiflora rose (Rosa multiflora), mist blower treatments and foliar backpack sprays of a 2%
clopyralid solution targeting kudzu and lespedeza (Lespedeza cuneate), basal bark in a 15%
solution with diesel fuel targeting Callery pear (Pryus calleryana), Japanese honeysuckle, kudzu,
mimosa (Albizia julibrissin), Privet sp., and multiflora rose, and foliar backpack spray of a 3%
glyphosate solution targeting kudzu and privet sp. While treatments have been effective,
populations of invasive -exotics, specifically kudzu, still persist throughout the easement,
although in smaller quantities. Invasive -exotic treatments will continue until project closeout in
2020. Invasive -exotics will be monitored during future site visits.
Visual assessment of the stream channel was performed to document signs of instability, such as
eroding banks, structural instability, or excessive sedimentation. Multiple areas of bank erosion
were noted on all reaches (Figure 2, CCPV). All of these problem areas have existed since
before the repair work was completed in late 2017. All of the implemented repairs completed in
late 2017 are intact and performing as designed. Photos of all stream problem areas can be seen
in the digital submission.
MY7 morphologic monitoring of the Dye Branch Site included ten (10) cross-sections. Cross-
sectional overlays are located in Appendix D and a summary of the data is located in Table 11 a
and l lb. Cross-sections remained relatively stable between the Post -Construction data and the
MY7 Monitoring efforts. Cross-section 5 showed the most substantial change, where a
depositional bar formed along the left descending bank. Cross-sections 7 and 8 also slightly
aggraded from Post -Repair to MY7. Riffle dimensions for the three different reaches also
remained relatively stable during MY7. The most substantial dimensional changes for Cemetery
Branch were a decrease in the bankfull width by 0.6 foot and lowering of the width/ depth ratio
by 1.2. Dye Branch Upstream also saw a few dimensional changes, most notably the bankfull
width decreased 1.7 feet and the width/ depth ratio increased by 1.6. Dye Branch Downstream
showed an increase in bankfull width of 1.4 feet and the width/ depth ratio also increased by 1.4.
A water level logger was installed in December of 2010 and has since recorded a total of 14
bankfull events. An equipment malfunction led to the loss of pressure transducer between MY5
(2015) and Post -Repair Monitoring (2018). A crest gauge was installed in February 2018 to
monitor for evidence of bankfull events. Wrack lines well above the bankfull elevation were
observed on Dye Branch Upstream, at Station 3+00, during a site visit on May 31St, 2018. While
the crest gauge did not have a reading above bankfull during this visit, consistent wrack lines
throughout the project area indicate a bankfull event occurred. Cross-referenced with gauge data
from NCCRONOS, the suspected date was 4/24/2018. This was at least the fifteenth bankf ill
event since the project completion. The crest gauge will be monitored in future site visits.
Summary information/data related to the occurrence of items such as beaver or easement
encroachment and statistics related to performance of various project and monitoring elements
can be found in the tables and figures in the report appendices. Narrative background and
Dye Branch II 5 Equinox
Project No. 92255 November 2018
MY7 Monitoring Report

supporting information formerly found in these reports can be found in the mitigation and
restoration plan documents available on NCDMS' website. All raw data supporting tables and
figures in the appendices are available from NCDMS upon request.
2.0 Methodology
The stream monitoring methodologies utilized in Post -Repair Monitoring replicate those
employed during the previous monitoring years and are based on standard guidance and
procedures documents (Rosgen 1996; USACE 2003).
Geomorphic measurements were taken during low flow conditions using a Nikon NPR 332 Total
Station. Three-dimensional coordinates associated with cross-sections were collected in the field
and geo-referenced (NAD83 North Carolina State Plane feet FIPS 3200). Geomorphic data
included 10 cross-sections.
Vegetation success is being monitored using 7 permanent monitoring plots and 4 random
temporary transects. Vegetation monitoring follows the CVS-EEP Level 2 Protocol for
Recording Vegetation, Version 4.2 (Lee et al. 2008) and includes analysis of composition and
density of planted species. Data is processed using the CVS data entry tool. In the field, the four
corners of each plot were permanently marked with rebar and photos of each plot taken from the
origin each monitoring year.
3.0 References
Harrelson, Cheryl, C. Rawlins and J. Potyondy. 1994. Stream Channel Reference Sites: An
Illustrated Guide to Field Technique. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM -245. Rocky Mountain Forest
and Range Experiment Station. USDA Forest Service. Fort Collins, Colorado
Lee, M.T., R.K. Peet, S.D. Roberts, and T.R. Wentworth. 2008. CVS-EEP Protocol for
Recording Vegetation. Version 4.2. The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill,
Department of Biology.
NCEEP (North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program). 2005. Dye Branch Stream
Restoration Plan. Raleigh.
Rosgen, D.L. 1996. Applied River Morphology. Wildland Hydrology Books. Pagosa
Springs, Colorado.
USACE (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers). 2003. Stream Mitigation Guidelines. U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, North Carolina Wildlife
Resources Commission, North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural
Resources -Division of Water Quality. Wilmington District.
Dye Branch II 6 Equinox
Project No. 92255 November 2018
MY7 Monitoring Report

Appendix A
Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables

Appendix A
Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables
Dye Branch II A-1 Equinox
Project No. 92255 November 2018
MY7 Monitoring Report
v+
< The srtpject pojecl Rite is an eRvuofnllental [BslOfd of
. —
llte h'CDEQ Dmirton of Mitigation Servicer and is e¢compasaed
.
-,d d wnservation easement, bnt u bordered by lard order p
'
- ->srship A-,odng the site may req¢ve traversing ere�s oes, or
\
- I ier eaeettlent b—dmy ,,d tl—RO occas by dle ge-1 publto r
tted A—s thorized 1 of state and federal
' penin by au personne age:
they w the development, wetsig7t
-
-
stewardship of the —s—tion ,site it permitted wnhin the te¢¢a
.- I. timef—of+—defined roles_ Anyintendedsitevi6tuionor-
Dye Branch II
by any person outside of these pevi—ly sanctioned rales and ecti
ragnims pnnr carrdination w;th N(`DMS.
Stream Restoration Site
EQUINOX
g:
N
bn,anre through proper olenning
Directiena. Fano Raleigh, proceed west on 140 rewinds
Statesville, Take &A lit A f1-7733 tr—ds Charlotte.
0 0,5 'j 2
Mlles
t
i,1
t,
1Cede,11 COUnty, NOrtl-1 Car011na
.150
7
for aPpraximatcly lzrailer. rhesiteislocaednnd—stride
7.5 Minute Series Mooresville
Dye Branch II 152
Stream Restoration Site
Quadrangle
21
- -
1
1
`ra
e
Dye Branch II A-1 Equinox
Project No. 92255 November 2018
MY7 Monitoring Report
3v. f
Figure 1 -Vicinity Map
Dye Branch II
Stream Restoration Site
EQUINOX
Project No. 92255
N
bn,anre through proper olenning
Directiena. Fano Raleigh, proceed west on 140 rewinds
Statesville, Take &A lit A f1-7733 tr—ds Charlotte.
0 0,5 'j 2
Mlles
Proceed on 1-17S to Brit 36 (NG150) tin & Mooeesville_
From NC -150 hen sligRt right orffo McLeliandAvenne/NC-1 �2
t,
1Cede,11 COUnty, NOrtl-1 Car011na
for aPpraximatcly lzrailer. rhesiteislocaednnd—stride
7.5 Minute Series Mooresville
of McLelland Averme NC -152.
Quadrangle
Dye Branch II A-1 Equinox
Project No. 92255 November 2018
MY7 Monitoring Report

Appendix A
Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables
Table la. Project Components
Dye Branch II / Project No. 92255
Project
Restoration
Level
Stream
(10
Non- Upland Buffer
Riparian Wetland (ac) Riparian (ac) (ac) BMP
(ac)
Footage
Oct 2005
Riverine Non-Riverine
Restoration
3,685
Component
Existing
Restoration
Approach
Enhancement 1
Stationing
Buffer
BMP Elements
Comment
or
Feet/Acres
Level
0.0 0.0
or
0
Acres
HQ Preservation
0
Reach ID
Nov 2011
Jan 2012
0.0 0.0
Acreage
3,685
0 0 0 0 3
Nov 2013
Dec 2013
Cemetery Branch
968 if
R
P3
1,0141f
0+00-10+14
Invasive -Exotic Vegetation Treatment
Stormwater wetlands
Nov 2015
Dye Branch
1,772 If
R
P2
1,500 if
0+00-15+00
Invasive -Exotic Vegetation Treatment
Stormwater wetlands
July 2017
Upstream
Aug 2017
2017 Repair - Stream
Nov 2017
2017 Repair - Planting
Feb 2018
Dye Branch
1,2321£
R
P2
1,1711f
16+00-27+71
Invasive -Exotic Vegetation Treatment
-
Sep 2018
Downstream
Oct 2018
Nov 2018
Information unavailable
=Non -Applicable
=Non -applicable
Table 2. Project Activity & Reporting History
Dye Branch II / Project No. 92255
Table lb. Component Summations
Dye Branch II / Project No. 92255
Restoration
Level
Stream
(10
Non- Upland Buffer
Riparian Wetland (ac) Riparian (ac) (ac) BMP
(ac)
Oct 2005
Riverine Non-Riverine
Restoration
3,685
0.0 0.0
Enhancement
July 2010
0.0 0.0
Enhancement 1
0
Temporary S&E mix applied
Enhancement Ti
0
Permanent seed mix applied
Creation
Summer 2010
0.0 0.0
Preservation
0
0.0 0.0
HQ Preservation
0
0.0 0.0
Nov 2011
Jan 2012
0.0 0.0
Totalsl
3,685
0 0 0 0 3
=Non -applicable
Table 2. Project Activity & Reporting History
Dye Branch II / Project No. 92255
Activity or Report
Data
Collection
Complete
Actual
Completion or
Delivery
Restoration Plan
Oct 2005
Final Design - Construction Plans
April 2006
Final Design - Repair Plans
July 2010
Construction Repairs
Dec 2010
Temporary S&E mix applied
Summer 2010
Permanent seed mix applied
Summer 2010
Phruing
Feb 2011
Mitigation Plan / As -built (Year 0 Monitoring - Baseline)
Mar 2011
Aug 2011
Year 1 Monitoring
Nov 2011
Jan 2012
Year 2 Monitoring
Dec 2012
Jan 2013
Year 3 Monitoring
Nov 2013
Dec 2013
Year 4 Monitoring
Dec 2014
Dec 2014
Year 5 Monitoring
Nov 2015
Nov 2015
Invasive -Exotic Vegetation Treatment
-
Nov 2015
Invasive -Exotic Vegetation Treatment
Mar 2017
Invasive -Exotic Vegetation Treatment
Apr 2017
Invasive -Exotic Vegetation Treatment
July 2017
Invasive -Exotic Vegetation Treatment
Aug 2017
2017 Repair - Stream
Nov 2017
2017 Repair - Planting
Feb 2018
Year 6 Monitoring - Post Repair
Feb 2018
Feb 2018
Invasive -Exotic Vegetation Treatment
-
June 2018
Invasive -Exotic Vegetation Treatment
-
Sep 2018
Year 7 Monitoring
Oct 2018
Nov 2018
- Information unavailable.
N/A - Item does not apply.
Dye Branch II A-2 Equinox
Project No. 92255 November 2018
MY7 Monitoring Report

Appendix A
Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables
Table 3. Project Contacts
Dye Branch II / Project No. 92255
Designer
Mulkey Engineers & Consultants
6750 Tryon Road
Cary NC, 27518
Primary Project Design POC
Emmett Perdue [phone]
Construction Contractor
Fluvial Solutions
P.O. Box 28749
Raleigh, NC 27611
Construction Contractor POC
Peter Jelenevsk [phone]
Repair Construction/ Planting Contractor
Baker Grading
2018
970 Bat Cave Rd
Old Fort, NC 28762
Repair Construction Contractor POC
Charles Baker [phone]
Planting Contractor
Fluvial Solutions
P.O. Box 28749
Raleigh, NC 27611
Planting Contractor POC
Peter Jelenevsk 919 605-6134
Seeding Contractor
Fluvial Solutions
P.O. Box 28749
Raleigh, NC 27611
Seeding Contractor POC
Peter Jelenevsky [phone]
Seed Mix Sources
Hanes Geo Components
Winston-Salem, NC 27101
Nursery Stock Suppliers
North Carolina Forest Service
Goldsboro, NC 27530
Monitoring Performers (MYO-MY7)
Equinox Environmental
2010 - 2015, 2017 - 2018
37 Haywood Street, Suite 100
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
Stream Monitoring POC
Drew Alderman [phone]
Vegetation Monitoring POC
Drew Alderman [phone]
Post -Repair Monitoring Performers (MY6)
Equinox Environmental
2017
37 Haywood Street, Suite 100
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
Stream Monitoring POC
Drew Alderman [phone]
Vegetation Monitoring POC
I Drew Alderman [phone]
Dye Branch II A-3 Equinox
Project No. 92255 November 2018
MY7 Monitoring Report

Appendix A
Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables
Table 4. Project Attributes
Dye Branch II / Project No. 92255
Project County
hedell
Physiographic Region
Piedmont
Ecore ion
Southern Outer Piedmont
River Basin
Yadkin - Pee Dee
USGS HUC
03040105010010
NCDWQ Sub -Basin
03-07-11
Within Extent ofEEP Watershed Plan
Upper Roc
River Local Watershed Plan
WRC Class
Warm
% of Project Easement Fenced or Demarcated
100%
Beaver Activity Observed During Design Phase
No
Restoration Component Attributes
Dye Branch
Cemetery Branch
Drainage Areas .mi.
0.60
0.06
Stream Order
First / Second
First
Restored Length (feet)
2,671
1,014
Perennial or Intermittent
Perennial
Perennial
Watershed Type
Urban
Watershed LULC Distribution
Urban
Other
85%
15%
Watershed hnpervious Cover
-
NCDW AU/IndexNumber
13-17-2
NCDW Q Classification
C
303d Listed
Yes
Upstream of303dlisted Segment
Yes
Reasons for 303d Listingor Stressor
Poor Bioclassification
Total Acreage of Easement
12.0
Total Vegetated Acreage within Easement
12.0
Total Planted Acreage as Part of Restoration
8.9
Ros en Classification of Pre -Existing
E4/ G4c
E4
Ros en Classification of As -Built
C
C
Valley Type
-
-
Valley Sloe
0.0097 / 0.0125
0.0217
Valley Side Slope Range
-
-
Valley Toe Slope Range
-
-
Cowardin Classification
N/A
N/A
Trout Waters Designation
No
No
Species of Concern, Endangered, Etc.
None
Dorninant Soil Series and Characteristics
Series
Depth
Clay%
K
T
Chewacla / Cecil / Colfax
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Information unavailable.
N/A - Item does not apply.
Dye Branch II A-4 Equinox
Project No. 92255 November 2018
MY7 Monitoring Report

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data

This Page Intentionally Left Blank

Figure 2. Integrated Current Condition Plan View
Legend
Easement Boundary
Roads
As -Built Centerline
As -Built Top of Bank
Cross Sections
–
Longitudinal Profile Start / End
Photo Points
Crest Gauge
/
Control Points
Root Wad
Log Sill
Rock S'II
Post -Repair Conditions
In -Stream Structure Condition
�. Failed
Stressed
Failed Log Sill
Stressed Rock Sill
Bank / Bed Condition
Bed Degradation
Bed Aggradation
m Bank Scoured / Eroding
Mass Wasting
Vegetation Plots
- Criteria Met
- Criteria Not Met
- Impacted - No Data Collected
�4�i .
Catawba Avenue 4
3 P_—
n * `. / _•\
� t /
�s
e
i ;• Gid` //
n
Yy
1
Cross Vane Vegetation Problem Areas
® Invasives - Dense
n - rSD Rock Vane
Invasives - Present
® Invasives - Treated
_ — —
1
4
c
i
T
_
Ae nue ❑ �� �'
v
--- - ---- Lrell -- - -
�.. ■
sR
. ac
T
r
.. 5
Dye Branch Upstream r ^ r
.� $.
V .
Dye Branch Downstream
'ham
l
ry�qq f
Prepared for Project: Dye Branch Stream Restoration Notes: 1) Base Map Data Provided by Mulkey Engineers & Consultants Prepared by
Post Repair -Integrated Current Condition Plan View 2) NC OneMap 2010 Aerial Photo3) Dominant Invasive Species Include Ligustrum sp.,
Iredell County, North Carolina Lonicera japonica, Pueraria montana var. lobata, and Lespedeza cuneata.`
Sheet 1 of 1
/'Nothing Compares— October 2018 Project Number
NORTH CAROLINA = Q U I N O X
NCDMS # 92255

Appendix B Visual Assessment Data
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
Dye Branch II B-2 Equinox
Project No. 92255 November 2018
MY7 Monitoring Report

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Table 5. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Dye Branch II / Project No. 92255 - Cemetery Branch
Assessed Len th 1,014 feet
Major Channel
Category
Channel
Sub Category
Metric
Number
Stable'
Performing
ass Int
Total
Number in
As -built
Number of
Unstable
Segments
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
% Stable,
Performing
as Intended
Number
with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footage
with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjusted %
for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
1. Awadation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly
deflect flow laterally (not to include point bars).
0
0
100%
2 Deaadation - Evidence of downcutting
0
0
100%
(Riffle and Run Units)
2. Riffle Condition
L Texture/Substrate -Riffle maintains coarser substrate.
14
14
100%
3. Meander Pool
1. Depth Sufficient (MaxPool Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth >: 1.6).
15
15
100%
Condition
2. Leneth appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstream riffle).
15
15
100%
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run).
15
15
100%
4. Thalweg Position
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander bend (Glide).
14
14
100%
2. Bank
1. Scoured/Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply frompoorgrowth
and/or scour and erosion.
1
12
99%
0
0
0%
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2. Undercut
likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear
0
0
100%
0
0
0%
sustainable and are providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping calving or collapse.
0
0
100%
0
0
0%
Totals
1
12
99%
0
1 0
1 0%
3. Engineered
Structures
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.
32
32
100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill
28
28
100%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.
28
28
100%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does NOT
exceed 15%.
4
4
100%
Pool forming structures maintaining - Max Pool Depth: Mean
4. Habitat
Bankfull Depth Ratio > 1.6. Rootwads/logs providing some cover at
13
13
100%
base -flow.
N/A - Item does not apply.
Dye Branch II B-3 Equinox
Project No. 92255 November 2018
MY7 Monitoring Report

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Table 5 cont'd. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Dye Branch II / Project No. 92255 - Dye Branch - Upstream
Assessed Length 1,500 feet
Number
Footage
Adjusted %
Number
Total
Number of Amount of
% Stable,
with
with
for
Major Channel
Channel
Metric
Stable'
Number in
Unstable Unstable
Performing
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Category
Sub Category
Performing
As -built
Segments Footage
as Intended
Woody
Woody
Woody
as Intended
Vegetation
Vegetation
Vegetation
1. Bed
1. Awadation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly
1 28
98%
1. Vertical Stability
deflect flow laterally (not to include point bars).
2 Deaadation - Evidence of downcutting
0 0
100%
(Riffle and Run Units)
2. Riffle Condition
L Texture/Substrate -Riffle maintains coarser substrate.
17
17
100%
1. Depth Sufficient (MaxPool Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth >: 1.6).
20
20
100%
3. Meander Pool
Condition
2. Leneth appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstream riffle).
16
20
80%
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run).
17
17
100%
4. Thalweg Position
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander bend (Glide).
16
16
100
2. Bank
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth
1. Scoured / Eroding
and/or scour and erosion.
9
224
93%
0
0
93%
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2. Undercut
likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear
0
0
100%
N/A
N/A
N/A
sustainable and are providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slump ingcalving orcollapse.
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
Totals
9
224
93%
0
0
93%
3. Engineered
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.
29
30
97
Structures
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill
7
8
88%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.
8
8
100%
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does NOT
3. Bank Protection
exceed 15%.
20
23
87%
Pool forming structures maintaining - Max Pool Depth: Mean
4. Habitat
Bankfull Depth Ratio > 1.6. Rootwads/logs providing some cover at
5
5
100%
base -flow.
N/A - Item does not apply.
Dye Branch II B-4 Equinox
Project No. 92255 November 2018
MY7 Monitoring Report

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Table 5 cont'd. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Dye Branch II / Project No. 92255 - Dye Branch - Downstream
Assessed Length 1,171 feet
Number
Footage
Adjusted %
Number
Total
Number of Amount of
% Stable,
with
with
for
Major Channel
Channel
Metric
Stable'
Number in
Unstable Unstable
Performing
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Category
Sub Category
Performing
As -built
Segments Footage
as Intended
Woody
Woody
Woody
as Intended
Vegetation
Vegetation
Vegetation
1. Bed
1. Awadation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly
1 34
97%
1. Vertical Stability
deflect flow laterally (not to include point bars).
2 Deaadation - Evidence of downcutting
0 0
100%
(Riffle and Run Units)
2. Riffle Condition
L Texture/Substrate -Riffle maintains coarser substrate.
1 l
11
100%
1. Depth Sufficient (MaxPool Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth >- 1.6).
10
10
100%
3. Meander Pool
Condition
2. Leneth appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstream riffle).
10
10
100%
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run).
10
10
100%
4. Thalweg Position
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander bend (Glide).
10
10
100%
2. Bank
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply frompoorgrowth
1. Scoured/Eroding
and/or scour and erosion.
3
82
96%
0
0
0%
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2. Undercut
likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear
0
0
100%
0
0
0%
sustainable and are providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping calving or collapse.
0
0
100%
0
0
0%
Totals
3
82
96%
0
0
96%
3. Engineered
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.
21
22
95
Structures
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill
7
8
88%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.
8
8
100%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does NOT
14
14
100%
exceed 15%.
Pool forming structures maintaining - Max Pool Depth: Mean
4. Habitat
Bankfull Depth Ratio > 1.6. Rootwads/logs providing some cover at
5
5
100%
base -flow.
N/A - Item does not apply.
Dye Branch II B-5 Equinox
Project No. 92255 November 2018
MY7 Monitoring Report

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Table 6. Vegetation Condition Assessment
Dye Branch II / Project No. 92255
Planted Acreage 9.0
Vegetation Category
Definitions
CCPV Depiction
Number of
Combined
% of Planted
Polygons
Acreage
Acreage
1. Bare Areas
Very limited cover of both woody and herbaceous material.
Stipple
0
0.00
0%
Black Dots White Background
2. Low Stem Density Areas
Woody stem densities clearly below target levels based on MY7
N/A
0
0.00
0%
stem count criteria.
Totals
0
0.00
0%
Areas with woody stems of a size class that are obviously small
3. Areas of Poor Growth Rates or Vigor
given the monitoring year.
N/A
0
0.00
0%
Cumulative Totals
0
0.00
0%
Easement Acreage 12.01
% of
Vegetation Category
Definitions
CCPV Depiction
Number of
Combined
Easement
Polygons
Acreage
Acreage
4. Invasive Areas of Concern
Areas or points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale).
Cross Hatch
10
1.84
15%
(Red - Dense/Yellow - Present)
5. Easement Encroachment Areas
Areas or points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale).
Stipple
0
0.00
0.0o/o
Orange Dots White Background
N/A - Item does not apply.
Dye Branch II B-6 Equinox
Project No. 92255 November 2018
MY7 Monitoring Report

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Cemetery Branch — Permanent Photo Station 1
Downstream
Cemetery Branch — Permanent Photo Station 2
Upstream
Dye Branch II B-7 Equinox
Project No. 92255 November 2018
MY7 Monitoring Report

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Cemetery Branch — Permanent Photo Station 2
Downstream
Dye Branch — Permanent Photo Station 3
Downstream
Dye Branch II B-8 Equinox
Project No. 92255 November 2018
MY7 Monitoring Report

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Dye Branch — Permanent Photo Station 4
Upstream
Dye Branch — Permanent Photo Station 5
Upstream
Dye Branch II B-9 Equinox
Project No. 92255 November 2018
MY7 Monitoring Report

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Dye Branch — Permanent Photo Station 6
Upstream
Dye Branch — Permanent Photo Station 7
Downstream
Dye Branch II B-10 Equinox
Project No. 92255 November 2018
MY7 Monitoring Report

'. k -f `d �' 1 ✓�„ � �y� f - � 4�
I
Sw
� I

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Dye Branch — Permanent Photo Station 10
Upstream Repair Area 6 STA 10+50
Dye Branch — Permanent Photo Station 11
Downstream Repair Area STA 19+00
Dye Branch II B-12 Equinox
Project No. 92255 November 2018
MY7 Monitoring Report

This Page Intentionally Left Blank

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data

Appendix C
Table 7. Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment
Dye Branch H /-Project No. 92255
Vegetation
Plot ID
Vegetation
Survival
Threshold
Met?
Tract Mean
1
No
57%
2
Yes
3
Yes
4
No
5
No
6
Yes
7
Yes
Vegetation Plot Data
Dye Branch II C-1 Equinox
Project No. 92255 November 2018
MY7 Monitoring Report

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 1
MY7 Monitoring — October 91h, 2018
(MY6 2017 Photo) (2018 Photo Missing)
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 2
MY7 Monitoring — October 9th, 2018
Dye Branch II C-2 Equinox
Project No. 92255 November 2018
MY7 Monitoring Report

-► '• `l1 t
AL
111
�-
V-
AW
fa '�

7 IQ6�,
. 1' 'su A" �'
ri
pi �'Vl
k b
21204 z ,,
'
�
7�1
�kfi-� - . 5
. 1' 'su A" �'

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 7
MY7 Monitoring — October 9th, 2018
Dye Branch II C-5 Equinox
Project No. 92255 November 2018
MY7 Monitoring Report

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data
Dye Branch II C-6 Equinox
Project No. 92255 November 2018
MY7 Monitoring Report
Table 8. CVS Vegetation Plot Metadata
Dye Branch II / Project No. 92255
Report Prepared By
Drew Alderman
Date Prepared
10/22/201812:32
Database name
Equinox-2018-A-DyeBranch MY6 2018.mdb
Database location
Z:\ES\NRI&M\EEP Monitoring\Dye Branch\DB-MY6-2018\Data\Veg
Computer name
FIELD -PC
File size
46333952
DESCRIPTION OF WORKSHEETS IN THIS DOCUMENT
Metadata
Description of database file, the report worksheets, and a summary of project(s) and
project data.
Proj, planted
Each project is listed with its PLANTED stems per acre, for each year. This
excludes live stakes.
Proj, total stems
Each project is listed with its TOTAL stems per acre, for each year. This includes
live stakes, all planted stems, and all natural/volunteer stems.
Plots
List of plots surveyed with location and summary data (live stems, dead stems,
missing, etc.).
Vigor
Frequency distribution of vigor classes for stems for all plots.
Vigor by Spp
Frequency distribution of vigor classes listed by species.
Damage
List of most frequent damage classes with number of occurrences and percent of
total stems impacted by each.
Damage by Spp
Damage values tallied by type for each species.
Damage by Plot
Damage values tallied by type for each plot.
Planted Stems by Plot and Spp
A matrix of the count of PLANTED living stems of each species for each plot; dead
and missing stems are excluded.
ALL Stems by Plot and spp
A matrix of the count of total living stems of each species (planted and natural
volunteers combined) for each plot; dead and missing stems are excluded.
PROJECT SUMMARY
Project Code
92255
project Name
Dye Branch
Description
River Basin
Yadkin -Pee Dee
Length(8)
Stream -to -Edge Width (ft)
Area (sq m)
Required Plots (calculated)
Sampled Plots
17
Dye Branch II C-6 Equinox
Project No. 92255 November 2018
MY7 Monitoring Report

Appendix C
Vegetation Assessment Data
TnoLS: No livestakes included in tally; P -all: All planted stems included in tally; T: Total stems including recruitment.
Dye Branch II C-7 Equinox
Project No. 92255 November 2018
MY7 Monitoring Report
Table 9. Planted Stem and Total Stem Counts (Species by Plot)
Dye Branch / Project No. 92255
Current Plot Data (MY7 2018)
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species
Type
Plot 1 Plot 2
PnoLS P -all T PnoLS P -all
Plot 3
T PnoLS P -all
T
Plot 4
PnoLS P -all
T PnoLSIP-all
Plot 5
T
Plot 6
PnoLS P -all
T
Plot 7
PnoLS P -all
T
Acer negundo
Boxelder
Tree
Acer negundo var. negundo
Boxelder
Tree
Acer rubrum
Red Maple
Tree
4
1
3 3
3
8
8
8
Acer rubrum var. rubrum
Red Maple
Tree
Albizia julibrissin
Silktree
Exotic
Betula nigra
River Birch
Tree
1 1
2
2
1 1
1
1
1
1
Carpinus caroliniana
AmericanHombeam
Tree
Carya
Hickory
Tree
Carya alba
Mockemut Hickory
Tree
Carya ovata
Shagbark Hickory
Tree
Cercis canadensis
Eastern Redbud
Tree
1 1
1
2
2
2
Cornus amomum
Silky Dogwood
Shrub
Cornus florida
Flowering Dogwood
Tree
Cornus kousa
Kousa Dogwood
Crataegus
Hawthorn
Tree
Diospyros virginiana
Common Persimmon
Tree
1
1
1
2
1 1
1
Fagus grandifolia var. grandifolia
American Beech
Tree
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Green Ash
Tree
3 3
3 1
1
1
4
2
5 5
5
9
9
14
Hibiscus
Rosernallow
Shrub
Juglans nigra
Black Walnut
Tree
1 1 I
1
Juniperus virginiana var. virginiana
Eastern Redcedar
Tree
1 1
1
2 2
2
Liquidambar styracii lua
Sweetgum
Tree
5
14
23
Liriodendron
Tuhptree
Liriodendron tulipifera
Tuliptree
Tree
1
6
5
6
6
Liriodendron tulipifera var. tulipifera
Tulip -tree, Yellow Poplar, Whitewood
Tree
1 1
1
Nyssa sylvatica
Blackgum
Tree
Pinus virginiana
Virginia Pine
Tree
2 2 2
1 1
1
2 2
2
Platanus occidentalis
American Sycamore
Tree
3
1 1
6
2
2
3
Platanus occidentalis var. occidentalis
Sycamore, Plane -tree
Tree
1 1
1
Populus deltoides
Eastern Cottonwood
Tree
Prunus
Phan
Shrub or Tree
Prunus serotina
Black Cherry
Tree
Prunus serotina var. serotina
Black Cherry
Tree
Prunus serrulata
Japanese Flowering Cherry
Pyrus calleryana
Caffery Pear
Exotic
Quercus
Oak
Tree
Quercus alba
White Oak
Tree
Quercus coccinea
Scarlet Oak
Tree
Quercus falcata
Southern Red Oak
Tree
Quercus nigra
Water Oak
Tree
2 2
5
2
Quercus pagoda
Cherrybark Oak
Tree
Quercus phellos
Willow Oak
Tree
1 1
1 7
7
7
3 3
5
Quercus rubra
Northern Red Oak
Tree
Quercus velutina
Black Oak
Tree
1 1 1
1
1
1
Salix caroliniana
Coastal Plain Willow
Tree
Salix nigra
Black Willow
Tree
5
Sambucus canadensis
Common Elderberry
Shrub
Unknown
Shrub or Tree
Stem count
4 4 5 71 7
9 101
10
23
51 51
27
5 5
14
131 131
40
221
221
57
size (ares)
1 1
1
1
1
1
1
size (ACRES)
0.02 0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
Species count
31
31
4 5
56
4
4
7
4
4
10
3
3
6
5
5
7
5
5
7
Stems per ACRE
162
162
202 283
283
364 405
4051
9311
2021
2021
1093
2021
2021
567
5261
5261
1619
8901
890
2307
TnoLS: No livestakes included in tally; P -all: All planted stems included in tally; T: Total stems including recruitment.
Dye Branch II C-7 Equinox
Project No. 92255 November 2018
MY7 Monitoring Report

Appendix C
1PnoLS: No livestakes included in tally; P -all: All planted stems included in tally; T: Total stems including recruitment.
Vegetation Assessment Data
Table 9 Con't. Total Planted and Natural Stem Recruits (Temporary Random Plots)
Dye Branch II / Project No. 92255
Temporary Plot 1
l Om x 10M
Temporary Plot 2 Temporary Plot 3
10m x 10m 10m x 10m
T ble 9 Con't. Planted Stem and Total Stem Counts (Annual Me am)
Dye Branch/Project No. 92255
Stem Count
9
17 12
32
Size (Ares)
1
1 1
1
Size (Acres)
0.02
0.02 0.02
0.02
Stems Per Acre
450
850 600
1600
ORION
Nor
00000000
Ste-
1PnoLS: No livestakes included in tally; P -all: All planted stems included in tally; T: Total stems including recruitment.
Vegetation Assessment Data
Table 9 Con't. Total Planted and Natural Stem Recruits (Temporary Random Plots)
Dye Branch II / Project No. 92255
Temporary Plot 1
l Om x 10M
Temporary Plot 2 Temporary Plot 3
10m x 10m 10m x 10m
Temporary Plot 4
10m x 10m
Stem Count
9
17 12
32
Size (Ares)
1
1 1
1
Size (Acres)
0.02
0.02 0.02
0.02
Stems Per Acre
450
850 600
1600
*Specific species were not collected per plot however the majority of the stems included Plantanus occidentalis,Betula nigra, Acer
rubrum, Salix nigra, Juglans nigra, Quercusphellos, Liriodendron tulipifera, and Liquidambarstyracii lua.
Dye Branch II C-8 Equinox
Project No. 92255 November 2018
MY7 Monitoring Report

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data

Appendix D
840
839
838
837
d
w
0 836
R
Y
FTa
835
834
833
Cemetery Branch
Cross -Section 1 - Pool
Station 1 + 04.27
Stream Survey Data
832 1 I I
0+00 0+05 0+10 0+15 0+20 0+25 0+30 0+35
Station (feet)
As4AW2010 - MY12011 —MY22012 �MY32013—W42014
MY52015 - MY6Post Rcnair2017 —MY72018 - - - Bkf
Upstream
Downstream
Dye Branch II D-1 Equinox
Project No. 92255 November 2018
MY7 Monitoring Report

Appendix D
825
824
823
w
0 822
R
Y
FTa
821
820
819
818
0+00
As-buitt2010
MY52015
Cemetery Branch
Cross -Section 3 - Riffle
Station 8 + 77.10
0+05 0+10 0+15
Station (feet)
MY12011 MY22012
MY6PostRei)&2017 ZMY72018
Upstream
0+20
MY32013
---Bid
Stream Survey Data
0+25 0+30
- MY42014
Downstream
Dye Branch II D-2 Equinox
Project No. 92255 November 2018
MY7 Monitoring Report

4
arr - I
s
:fk� 39..'x•'' � �
IVA
Jb,
_ rpt /■ �5,r X� } �,Y e'
i
�?' � il ��:._ � , •� �, ��' , kir r/�'
d<
IAW ` JF 41.,
ry

Appendix D
Dye Branch - Upstream
Cross -Section 5 - Pool
Station 7 + 74.58
821
820
819
818
0 817
W
816
Stream Survey Data
815
I
814
813
0+00 0+05 0+10 0+15 0+20 0+25 0+30 0+35 0+40 0+45 0+50
Station (feet)
As-bt&2011—MY12011 —MY22012—MY32013—MY42014
MY52015—MY6Post-RepFk2017_MY72018 — — -Bkf
Upstream
Downstream
Dye Branch II D-4 Equinox
Project No. 92255 November 2018
MY7 Monitoring Report

Appendix D
821
820
819
818
0 817
W
816
815
814
Dye Branch - Upstream
Cross -Section 5 - Pool
Station 7 + 74.58
Stream Survey Data
813 ; i I I I I I I I I
0+00 0+05 0+10 0+15 0+20 0+25 0+30 0+35 0+40 0+45 0+50
Station (feet)
As-bt&2011—MY12011 —MY22012—MY32013—MY42014
MY52015 _ MY6Post-Rep&2017 _MY72018 — — - Bkf
Upstream
Downstream
Dye Branch II D-5 Equinox
Project No. 92255 November 2018
MY7 Monitoring Report

Appendix D
Dye Branch - Upstream
Cross -Section 5 - Pool
Station 7 + 74.58
821
820
819
818
0 817
W
816
Stream Survey Data
815
I
814
813
0+00 0+05 0+10 0+15 0+20 0+25 0+30 0+35 0+40 0+45 0+50
Station (feet)
As-bt&2011—MY12011 —MY22012—MY32013—MY42014
W52015—MY6Post-Repair2017_MY72018 — — -Bkf
Dye Branch II
Project No. 92255
MY7 Monitoring Report
Bank
Upstream Downstream
D-6 Equinox
November 2018

Appendix D
818
817
816
815
d
v 814
a
0
R
813
W
812
811
810
809
Dye Branch - Upstream
Cross -Section 7 - Riffle
Station 13+ 85.87
Stream Survey Data
0+00 0+05 0+10 0+15 0+20 0+25 0+30 0+35 0+40 0+45 0+50 0+55 0+60 0+65 0+70
Station (feet)
AOm*2010 MV12011 =MY22012 —MY32013 —MY42014
MY52015 � MY6Pm9lq)ak2017 �MY72018 — — _ HLf
Upstream
Downstream
Dye Branch II D-7 Equinox
Project No. 92255 November 2018
MY7 Monitoring Report

Appendix D
Dye Branch - Downstream
Cross -Section 8 - Riffle
Station 17 + 27.43
Stream Survey Data
814
813
812
811
d
810 Woo
Imen
-
e
0
809
W
808
807
806
805
0+00 0+05 0+10 0+15 0+20 0+25 0+30 0+35 0+40 0+45 0+50 0+55 0+60 0+65 0+70 0+75 0+80 0+85
Station (feet)
A9lydt2010MY12011 — MY22012 — NM 2013 — MY42014
MY52015 = MY6Pasf-IttW2017 — MY72018 — — - Bkf
Upstream
Downstream
Dye Branch II D-8 Equinox
Project No. 92255 November 2018
MY7 Monitoring Report

Appendix D
Dye Branch - Downstream
Cross -Section 9 - Pool
Station 19 + 80.80
811
810
809
808
807
806
ca
W 805
804
803
802
801
0+00
0+05 0+10 0+15 0+20 0+25 0+30 0+35
Station (feet)
As4nnW2010 MY12011-MY22012
MY52015 _MY6PosWep 2017-MY72018
Upstream
Stream Survey Data
0+40 0+45 0+50 0+55 0+60 0+65
-MY32013 MY42014
---Rd
Downstream
Dye Branch II D-9 Equinox
Project No. 92255 November 2018
MY7 Monitoring Report

Appendix D
Dye Branch - Downstream
Cross -Section 10 - Riffle
Station 24 + 85.22
809
808
807
806
805
m 804
w
a
0 803
W 802
801
800
799
798
797
Stream Survey Data
0+00 0+05 0+10 0+15 0+20 0+25 0+30 0+35 0+40 0+45 0+50 0+55 0+60
Station (feet)
M,4 2010 � MY12011 : MY22012 — MY32013 — MY42014
MY52015 MY6Past 2017 — MY72018 — — - Bld'
Upstream
Downstream
Dye Branch II D-10 Equinox
Project No. 92255 November 2018
MY7 Monitoring Report

Appendix D
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
Stream Survey Data
Dye Branch II D-11 Equinox
Project No. 92255 November 2018
MY7 Monitoring Report

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
- Information unavailable.
N/A - Item does not apuly.
Non -Applicable.
Dye Branch I1
Project No. 92255
MY7 Monitoring Report
D-12
Equinox
November 2018
Table 10a. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Dye Branch II / Project No. 92255 - Cemetery Branch 977 feet
Parameter
Regional Curve
Pre -Existing Condition
Reference Reach Data
Design
Monitoring Baseline
Dimension & Substrate -Riffle
LL UL Eq. Min Mean Med Max
SD
N
Min Mean Med Max SD
N
Min Mean Max
Min Mean Med Max
SD
N
Bankfull Width (ft)
7.0
7.0
7.0 7.0
N/A
1
8.9
11.1
11.3 14.1 1.8
7
10.0
5.5
7.2
7.2
8.9
N/A
2
Floodprone Width (ft)
14.2
14.2
14.2 14.2
N/A
1
19.0
54.0
36.0 100.0 38.1
5
28.0
>30
>30
>30
>30
N/A
2
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.0
1.0
1.0 1.0
N/A
1
0.7
0.9
0.8 1.6 0.3
7
0.7
0.5
0.7
0.7
0.8
N/A
2
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.5
1.5
1.5 1.5
N/A
1
1.0
1.5
1.3 2.4 0.5
7
0.8
1.1
1.6
1.0
1.2
1.2
1.4
N/A
2
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft)
6.8
6.8 1
6.8 6.8
N/A
1
6.8
9.6
8.4 18.4 3.9 1
7
-
7.0
-
3.0
5.0
5.0
7.0
N/A
2
Width Depth Ratio
7.2
7.2
7.2 7.2
N/A
1
6.9
11.2
11.7 15.0 NA
3
14.3
10.310.8
10.8
11.2
N/A
2
Entrenchment Ratio
2.0
2.0
2.0 2.0
N/A
1
3.8
6.8
7.7 8.9 NA
3
2.8
>3.4
>4.4
14.4
>5.4
N/A
2
Bank Height Ratio
1.5
1.5
1.5 1.5
N/A
1
1.0
1.1
1.0 1.2 NA
3
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
N/A
2
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
-
-
- -
-
-
- - -
-
-
-
-
6.8
23.4
19.5
53.9
14.84
14
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
0.012 0.034
0.088
0.006 0.027 0.026 0.052 0.016
6
-
0.048
-
0.004 0.023 0.022 0.049 0.01
14
Pool Length (ft)
4.7
8.2
11.9
3.5
19.3
19.6 32.8 11.5
6
13.8
20.7
27.6
5.8
16.2
16.9
39.1
7.17
24
Pool Max Depth (ft)
-
2.6
1.8
2.6
2.9 3.2 0.5
7
-
2.0
-
1.8
3.0
2.9
3.7
0.48
18
Pool Spacing (ft)
22.8
86.0
228.2
18.0
52.7
40.2 140.81 41.7
7
18.4
27.6
32.2
4.5
38.7
36.4
111.0 24.40
24
Pattern
Channel Belt Width (ft)
5.3
10.8
22.6
26.0
49.1
40.0 119.0 29.8
9
23.0
32.2
41.4
11.3
30.6
37.0
46.7
12.3
16
Radius of Curvature (ft)
3.9
19.6
37.0
5.0
23.8
22.0 48.0 14.6
9
18.4
27.6
36.8
8.3
13.7
12.0
29.9
5.7
16
Rc: Bankfull Width (ft/ft)
0.6
2.8
5.3
0.6
2.1
1.8 4.3 1.3
9
1.8
2.8
3.7
2.4
2.4
2.4
2.4
N/A
1
Meander Wavelength (ft)
13.6
42.0
71.0
26.0
72.9
69.0 155.0 47.6
9
46.0
55.2
64.4
38.8
77.4
79.1
167.0 36.1
11
Meander Width Ratio
0.8
1.5
3.2
2.5
4.7
3.6 10.1 2.7
7
2.3
3.2
4.1
4.9
6.6
6.6
8.2
N/A
2
Transport Parameters
Reach Shear Stress (Competency) lb/ftZ
-
Max Part Size (nun) Mobilized at Bankfull
45-180
Stream Power (Transport Capacity) W/mZ
-
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
E4
E4 / C4 / C5
C4
C
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
6.6-7.8
4.1-7.0
5.5-6.7
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
44.3-52.8
35.0-128.1
38.4-46.6
Valley Length (ft)
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
-
-
977
Sinuosity
1.14
1.15-2.22
1.14
1.08
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)
0.0190
0.0057 - 0.0130
0.0190
-
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
-
-
0.0191
Bankf dl Floodplain Area (acres)
% of Reach with Eroding Banks
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
- Information unavailable.
N/A - Item does not apuly.
Non -Applicable.
Dye Branch I1
Project No. 92255
MY7 Monitoring Report
D-12
Equinox
November 2018

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
- Information unavailable.
N/A - Item does not apply.
Non -Applicable.
Dye Branch II
Project No. 92255
MY7 Monitoring Report
D-13
Equinox
November 2018
Table 10a. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Dye Branch II / Project No. 92255 - Dye Branch -Upstream 1,465 feet
Parameter
Regional Curve
Pre -Existing Condition
Reference Reach Data
UT to Ostin Creek
Design
Monitoring Baseline
Dimension&Substrate -Riffle
LL UL Eq. Min Mean Med Max SD
N Min Mean Med Max SD
N Min Mean Max Min Mean Med Max
SD
N
Bankfull Width (ft)
11.2
16.0
18.5
20.6
-
20.1
- 25.7
28.4
26.9 32.7
N/A
3
Floodprone Width (ft)
89.5
67.2
70.2
72.8
70.9
76.9
88.8 54.4
64.9
58.6 81.8
N/A
3
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.7
1.5
1.1
1.3
1.3 1.4
N/A
3
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
2.8
1.5
1.9
2.4
1.5
1.8
2.2 2.2
2.8
2.5 3.6
N/A
3
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft')
18.1
20.2
19.7 22.9 NA
3 27.4
30.3
33.4
31.0
29.5
36.3
32.5 46.9
N/A
3
Width/Depth Ratio
6.2
7.0
7.0 7.9 NA
3 9.3
11.4
12.7
13.0
20.3
22.6
22.8 24.6
N/A
3
Entrenchment Ratio
>3.2
##
>4.4
>5.0 >5.0 NA
3 3.5
3.8
4.4
3.53.8
4.4 1 2.0
2.3
2.3 2.5
N/A
3
Bank Height Ratio
-
LO
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.0
1.0
1.0 1.0
1.0
1.0 1.0
N/A
3
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
-
-
6.1
17.6
30.2
6.6
19.1
32.7 20.1
51.6
47.1 97
29.5
8
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
0.002 0.014
0.042
0.006 0.028
0.066
0.007 0.030 0.070 0.002 0.006 0.005 0.016 0.005
8
Pool Length (ft)
18.3
35.1
62.9
19.9
38.1
68.1 8.761
24.6
22.4 66.4
13
20
Pool Max Depth (ft)
2.2
2.9
3.3
2.1
2.7
3.1 2.1
3.44
3.61 4.48
0.67
20
Pool Spacing (ft)
50.3
78.9
105.8
54.5
85.5
114.7 24.1
66.8
65.3 125
28.6
19
Pattern
Channel Belt Width (ft)
6.6
24.3
56.9
36.0
67.0
150.0
39.0
72.6
162.6 28.5
45.0
48.4 54.1
8.34
17
Radius of Curvature (ft)
14.5
52.4
148.8
19.0
49.0
115.0
20.6
53.1
124.6 23.6
31.3
31.2 39.6
4.75
14
Re: Bankfull Width (ft/ft)
1.3
4.7
13.3
1.0
2.7
6.2
1.0
2.7
6.2 2.3
2.3
2.3 2.3
N/A
1
Meander Wavelength (11)
40.1
79.7
172.7
33.0
94.0
155.0
35.8
102
168.0 100.5 130.0 138.2 153.3
18.2
12
Meander Width Ratio
0.6
2.2
5.1
1.9
3.6
8.1
1.9
3.6
8.1 1.7
1.9
1.9 2.1
0.21
3
Transport Parameters
Reach Shear Stress (Competency) lb/ft2
Max Part Size (mm) Mobilized at Bankfull
30- 100
Stream Power (Transport Capacity) W/mz
-
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
E4
C4
C5
C
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
6.2-6.9
4.2
3.5
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
112.2 - 124.8
128
110
Valley Length (ft)
-
-
-
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
2,086
1,034
2,405
2,455
Sinuosity
1.04
1.20
1.20
1.21
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
0.0090
0.0088
0.0080
0.0080
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
-
-
-
0.0083
Bankfull Floodplain Area (acres)
% of Reach with Eroding Banks
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
- Information unavailable.
N/A - Item does not apply.
Non -Applicable.
Dye Branch II
Project No. 92255
MY7 Monitoring Report
D-13
Equinox
November 2018

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
- Information unavailable.
N/A - Item does not apply.
Non -Applicable.
Dye Branch II
Project No. 92255
MY7 Monitoring Report
D-14
Equinox
November 2018
Table 10a. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Dye Branch II / Project No. 92255 - Dye Branch -Downstream 870 feet
Parameter
Regional Curve
Pre-Fkisting Condition
Reference Reach Data
UT to Ostin Creek
Design
Monitoring Baseline
Dimension & Substrate - Riffle
LL UL Eq. Min Mean Med Max
SD
N
Min Mean Med Max SD
N Min Mean Max
Min Mean Med Max
SD
N
Bankfull Width (ft)
14.8
14.8
14.8 14.8
NA
1
16.0
18.5
20.6
-
20.1
-
18.4
18.6
18.6 18.8
N/A
3
Floodprone Width (ft)
22.0
22.0
22.0 22.0
NA
1
67.2
70.2
72.8
70.9
76.9
88.8
48.7
61.8
61.8 74.8
N/A
3
Bankfill Mean Depth (ft)
1.2
1.2
1.2 1.2
NA
1
1.6
1.6
1.7
1.5
1.9
2.0
2.0 2.0
N/A
3
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
2.4
2.4
2.4 2.4
NA
1
1.5
1.9
2.4
1.5
1.8
2.2
2.9
3.0
3.0 3.1
N/A
3
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft)
17.4
17.4
17.4 2.4
NA
1
27.4
30.3
33.4
31.0
34.0
36.1
36.1 38.1
N/A
3
Width/Depth Ratio
12.5
12.5
12.5 2.4
NA
1
9.3
11.4
12.7
13.0
9.3
9.6
9.6 9.9
N/A
3
Entrenchment Ratio
1.5
1 1.5
1 1.5 1 2.4
NA
1
3.5
3.8 1
4.4
3.5
1 3.8 1
4.4
2.7
3.4
3.4 1 4.0
N/A
3
Bank Height Ratio
4.9
4.9
1 4.9 2.4
NA
1
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0 1 1.0
N/A
3
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
-
-
- -
6.1
17.6
30.2
6.6
19.1
32.7
15.7
50.3
55.7 79.3
20.2
7
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
0.003 0.021
0.121
0.006 0.028
0.066 -
0.007 0.030 0.070 0.001 0.006 0.006 0.014 0.004
7
Pool Length (ft)
2.9
24.8
120
18.3
35.1
62.9
19.9
38.1
68.1
10.1
19.9
15.9 39.6
8.91
14
Pool Max Depth (ft)
-
3.1
-
2.2
2.9
3.3
2.1
2.7
3.1
3.3
3.91
3.77 5.05
0.59
12
Pool Spacing (ft)
79.0
162.0
261.0
50.3
78.9
105.8
54.5
85.5
114.7
15.3
57.5
38.8 130
41.5
14
Pattern
Channel Belt Width (ft)
15.6
30.6
67.7
36.0
67.0
150.0
39.0
72.6
162.6 28.3
49.2
57.5 65.4
15.4
9
Radius of Curvature (ft)
11.0
42.1
81.9
19.0
49.0
115.0
20.6
53.1
124.6 32.7
40.7
42.2 50.1
5.6
7
Re: Bankf ill Width ft/ft
0.7
2.9
5.6
1.0
2.7
6.2
1.0
2.7
6.2
1.7
1.7
1.7 1.7
N/A
1
Meander Wavelength (ft)
62.0
103.0
157
33.0
94.0
155.0
35.8
102
168.0 138.9 162.2 157.3 210.5 27.2
6
Meander Width Ratio
1.1
2.1
4.6
1.9
3.6
8.1
1.9
3.6
8.1
2.4
2.8
2.8 3.1
0.51
2
Transport Parameters
Reach Shear Stress (Competency) lb/ft2
-
Max Part Size (mm) Mobilized at Bankfull
30-100
-
-
-
Stream Power (Transport Capacity) W/m2
-
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
G4c
C4
C5
C
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
6.1-7.2
4.2
3.5
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
105.4 - 126.0
128
110
Valley Length (ft)
-
-
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
-
-
-
870
Sinuosity
1.14
1.46
1.09
1.10
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)
0.0110
0.0090
0.0095
-
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
-
-
-
0.0106
Bankfull Floodplain Area (acres)
% of Reach with Eroding Banks
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
i
Biological or Other I
I
I
-
i
i
- Information unavailable.
N/A - Item does not apply.
Non -Applicable.
Dye Branch II
Project No. 92255
MY7 Monitoring Report
D-14
Equinox
November 2018

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Table 10b. Baseline Stream Data Summary
(Substrate, Bed, Bank, and Hydrologic Containment Parameter Distributions)
Dye Branch II / Project No. 92255 - Cemetery Branch 977 feet
Parameter Pre -Existing Condition
Reference Reach Data Design Monitoring Baseline
Ri% / Ru% / P% / G% / S%
- - - - - - - - - - - - 28% 15% 34% 20% 3%
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be%
- - - - - -
dl / D35 / d50 / d84 / d95 / dip / di'p (mm) 0.9 1.2 2.0 8.0 10.1 88.9
0.21 0.5 3.5 13.9 26.6 45.0
Entrenchment Class
<1.5/1.5-1.99/2-4.9/5.0-9.9/>10 - - - - -
- - - - -
Incision Class
<1.2/1.2-1.49/1.5-1.99/>2.0 - - - -
- - - -
- Information unavailable.
N/A - Item does not aonly.
Non -Applicable.
Table 10b. Baseline Stream Data Summary
(Substrate, Bed, Bank, and Hydrologic Containment Parameter Distributions)
Dye Branch II / Project No. 92255 - Dye Branch -Upstream 1,465 feet
Parameter Pre-Rdsting Condition
Reference Reach Data Design Monitoring Baseline
Ri% / Ru% / P% / G% / S% - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - 28% 15% 34% 20% 3%
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be% - - - - - -
- - - - - -
d16 / D35 / d50 / d84 / d95 / di' / di'p mm 0.15 0.4 3.3 10.3 13.7 45.7 -
- - - - - - -
Entrenchment Class
<1.5/1.5-1.99/2-4.9/5.0-9.9/>10
Incision Class
<1.2/1.2-1.49/1.5-1.99/>2.0 - - - -
- - - -
- Information unavailable.
Non -Applicable.
Table 10b. Baseline Stream Data Summary
(Substrate, Bed, Bank, and Hydrologic Containment Parameter Distributions)
Dye Branch II / Project No. 92255 - Dye Branch -Downstream 870 feet
Parameter Pre -Fisting Condition
Reference Reach Data Design Monitoring Baseline
Ri% /Ru%/P%/G%/S%
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be% - - - - - -
- - - - - -
d16 / D35 / d50 / d84 / d95 / diP / del mm 0.15 0.28 0.56 10.7 13.0 45.7 -
- - - - - - -
Entrenchment Class
<1.5/1.5-1.99/2-4.9/5.0-9.9/>10
Incision Class
<1.2/1.2-1.49/1.5-1.99/>2.0 - - - -
- - - -
- Information unavailable.
N/A - Item does not apply.
Non -Applicable.
Dye Branch II D-15 Equinox
Project No. 92255 November 2018
MY7 Monitoring Report

Appendix D
N/A - Item does not apply.
* Beginning in MY7 (2018), the bankfull elevation and channel cross-section dimensions have been calculated using a fixed Abkf as described in the Standard Measurement of the BHR Monitoring Parameter provided by NCIRT and NCDIV
Stream Survey Data
Table Ila. Baseline Morphology & Hydraulic Monitoring Summary
Dye Branch II / Project No. 92255 - Cemetery Branch (971 Feet)
Table Ila. Baseline Morphology & Hydraulic Monitoring Summary
Dye Branch II / Project No. 92255 - Dye Branch -Upstream (1,471 Feet)
Parameter
Cross Section 1
Pool
Parameter
Cross Section 2
Riffle
Cross Section 4
Riffle
Cross Section 3
Riffle
Cross Section 5
Pool
Dimension
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4 MY5
Post-
Repair
MY6
MY7
MY8 Base
MY1
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5
Post-
Repair
MY6
MY7 MY8 Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
Post -
MY5 Repair MY7 MY8
MY6
Record Elevation (datum) Used 836.3 836.3 836.3 836.3 836.3 836.3
836.3
836.4
826.3 826.3 826.3 826.3 826.3 826.3
826.3
826.0
821.7 821.7 821.7 821.7 821.7 821.7
821.7
821.7
Low Bank Height Elevation (datum) Used
-
-
-
-
- -
-
836.4
-
-
824.2
817.4 817.4 817.4 817.4 817.4 817.4
817.4
1826.3
1 -
-
-
-
-
-
-
821.9
Bankfull Width (ft)
9.7
10.2
9.4
9.2
9.2 9.3
9.4
10.0
8.9
10.6
8.0
8.4 5.9 6.0
6.4
5.5
5.5
6.0
6.5
6.1
5.7
5.8
6.2
5.9
Floodprone Width (ft)
>50
>50
>50
>50
>50 >50
>50
>50
>30
>30
>30
>30 >30 >30
>30
>30
>30
>30
>30
>30
>30
>30
>30
>30
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.9
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.6 1.5
1.4
1.3
0.8
0.6
0.5
0.5 0.7 0.8
1.0
1.2
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.6
0.7
0.7
0.8
0.8
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
3.1
2.7
2.4 1
2.2
2.4 1 2.1
1.8
1.8
1.4
1.2
1.2
1.2 1.4 1.5
2.0
1.7
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.9
1.1
1.1
1.2
1.2
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft Z
18.9
15.2
14.3
14.0
15.1 14.2
13.1
13.1
7.0
6.3
3.9
4.1 4.2 4.7
6.6
6.6
3.0
2.8
4.0
3.6
4.2
4.3
5.0
5.0
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
5.0
6.8
6.2
6.1
5.6 6.2
6.7
7.7
11.2
18.1
16.4
17.3 8.3 7.5
6.3
4.6
10.3
12.7
10.6
10.4
7.6
7.9
7.7
7.0
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>5.1
>4.9
>5.3
>5.4
>5.5 >5.4
>5.3
>5
>3.4
>2.8
>3.8
>3.6 >5.1 >5.0
>4.7
>5.5
>5.4
>5.0
>4.6
>4.9
>5.3
>5.1
>4.8
>5.1
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0 1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0 1.0 1.0
1.0
1.2
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.1
1 1.1
d50 (mm)
N/A
5.7
4.8
4.1
1.5 1.1
-
-
N/A
8.4
14.0
2.1 4.7 48
-
-
N/A
6.0
5.0
6.0
6.2
1.7
1.0
-
N/A - Item does not apply.
* Beginning in MY7 (2018), the bankfull elevation and channel cross-section dimensions have been calculated using a fixed Abkf as described in the Standard Measurement of the BHR Monitoring Parameter provided by NCIRT and NCDIV
Stream Survey Data
N/A - Item does not apply.
* Beginning in MY7 (2018), the bankfull elevation and channel cross-section dimensions have been calculated using a fixed Abkf as described in the Standard Measurement of the BHR Monitoring Parameter provided by NCIRT and NCDM S (9/2018)
Dye Branch II D-16 Equinox
Project No. 92255 November 2018
MY7 Monitoring Report
Table Ila. Baseline Morphology & Hydraulic Monitoring Summary
Dye Branch II / Project No. 92255 - Dye Branch -Upstream (1,471 Feet)
Parameter
Cross Section 4
Riffle
Cross Section 5
Pool
Cross Section 6
Riffle
Cross Section 7
Riffle
Dimension
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4 MY5
Post-
Repair
MY6
MY7
MY8 Base
W1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
Post-
Repair
MY6
MY7
MY8 Base MY1
MY2 MY3
MY4
MY5
Post-
Repair
MY6
MY7
MY8 Base
W1
MY2
MY3
MY4
Post -
MY5 Repair MY7 MY8
MY6
Record Elevation (datum) Used 824.3 824.3 824.3 824.3 824.3 824.3
824.3
824.2
817.4 817.4 817.4 817.4 817.4 817.4
817.4
817.7
815.5 815.5 815.5 815.5 815.5 815.5
815.5
815.5
812.5 812.5 812.5 812.5 812.5 812.5
812.5
812.7
Low Bank Height Elevation (datum) Used
-
-
-
-
- -
-
824.5
-
- - - -
-
817.4
- -
- -
-
-
-
815.1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
812.4
Bankfull Width (ft)
25.7
23.8
22.9
20.8
21.5 20.7
13.2
11.3
17.1
17.0 16.8 16.4 15.6 15.1
21.8
22.0
32.7 28.7
27.7 26.9
26.7
27.2
17.5
21.3
26.9
24.1
21.3
20.1
19.9
17.1
12.0
15.0
Floodprone Width (ft) >58.6 >52.8 >52.8 >52.8 >52.8 >52.8
>52.8
>52.8
>50
>47.1 >47.1 >47.1 >47.1 >47.1
>47.1
>47.1
>81.8 >78.2
.78.2 >78.2 >78.2 >78.2
>78.2
>78.2
>54.4 >52.6 >52.6 >52.6 >52.6 >52.6
>52.6
>52.6
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.3
1.1
1.0
1.1
1.0 1.0
1.2
1.4
1.7
1.4 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.0
1.9
1.9
1.4 1.3
1.3 1.3
1.3
1.2
2.0
1.6
1.1
1.0
0.9
1.1
1.0
1.0
1.8
1.4
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
2.5
2.0
2.1
2.3
2.2 2.3
1.9
2.1
3.4
2.8 3.6 3.6 3.4 3.0
3.5
3.5
3.6 3.2
3.2 3.3
3.3
3.0
3.3
3.3
2.2
2.0
2.1
2.4
2.3
2.2
2.4
2.3
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ft2
32.5
27.1
23.1
22.4
21.1 21.0
15.8
15.8
28.8
23.7 35.0 35.1 33.1 29.7
41.9
41.9
46.9 37.5
36.2 36.0
34.2
31.3
34.2
34.2
29.5
24.2
19.9
21.3
19.4
17.9
21.1
21.1
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
20.3
20.9
22.6
19.3
21.9 20.4
11.0
8.1
10.2
12.2 8.1 7.7 7.4 7.7
11.3
11.5
22.8 22.0
21.2 20.0
20.8
23.6
9.0
13.2
24.6
24.0
22.9
18.9
20.4
16.3
6.8
10.6
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>2.3
>2.2
>2.3
>2.5
>2.5 >2.6
>4.0
>4.7
>2.9
>2.8 >2.8 >2.9 >3.0 >3.1
>2.2
>2.1
>2.5 >2.7
>2.8 >2.9
>2.9
>2.9
>4.5
>3.7
>2.0
>2.2
>2.5
>2.6
>2.6
>3.1
>4.4
>3.5
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio*
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0 1.0
1.1
1.1
1.0
1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
1.1
0.9
1.0 1.0
1.0 1.0
1.0
1.0
1.1
0.9
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.9
d50 (mm)
N/A
1.2
1.2
1.0
1.9 0.42
-
-
N/A
6.0 1.7 13.0 1.6 1.9
-
-
N/A 1.9
4.5 1.6
1.2
1.5
-
-
N/A
2.7
8.0
7.4
2.4
1.3
-
-
N/A - Item does not apply.
* Beginning in MY7 (2018), the bankfull elevation and channel cross-section dimensions have been calculated using a fixed Abkf as described in the Standard Measurement of the BHR Monitoring Parameter provided by NCIRT and NCDM S (9/2018)
Dye Branch II D-16 Equinox
Project No. 92255 November 2018
MY7 Monitoring Report

Appendix D
N/A - Item does not apply.
* Beginning in MY7 (2018), the bankfull elevation and channel cross-section dimensions have been calculated using a fixed Abkf as described in the Standard Measurement of the BHR Monitoring Parameter provided by NCIRT and NCDM S
Stream Survey Data
Dye Branch II D-17 Equinox
Project No. 92255 November 2018
MY7 Monitoring Report
Table Ila. Baseline Morphology & Hydraulic Monitoring Summary
Dye Branch II / Project No. 92255 - Dye Branch -Downstream (869 Feet)
Parameter
Cross Section 8
Riffle
Cross Section 9
Pool
Cross Section 10
Riffle
Dimension
Base
MYl
MY2
Post-
MY3 MY4 MY5 Repair
MY6
MY7
MY8 Base
MYl
MY2
MY3 MY4
MY5
Post-
Repair
MY6
MY7
MY8 Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Post -
Repair
MY6
MY7 MY8
Record Elevation (datum) Used
809.3
809.3 809.3 809.3 809.3 809.3
809.3
809.4
806.1
806.1 806.1 806.1 806.1
806.1
806.1
806.1
801.1
801.1
801.1
801.1
801.1
801.1
801.1
801.0
Low Bank Height Elevation (datum) Used
-
-
-
- - I -
- 1
809.1
-
-
- I
- - I
- I
-
806.1
-
I -
-
I -
I -
- I
-
801.1
Bankfull Width (ft)
18.8
18.8
19.6
18.6 19.6 19.6
19.3
22.1
26.3
26.3
24.3
24.6 23.8
23.7
27.7
29.2
18.4
18.5
17.7
17.9
17.8
16.6
17.4
17.4
Floodprone Width (ft)
>74.8 >73.5 >73.5 >73.5 >73.5 >73.5
>73.5
>73.5
>70
>70
>70
>70 >70
>70
>70
>70
>48.7 >47.6 >47.6 >47.6 >47.6 >47.6
>47.6
>47.6
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
2.0
1.9
2.1
2.0 2.2 2.1
2.2
1.9
1.8
1.7
2.3
2.6 2.6
2.6
1.5
1.4
1.9
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
3.1
3.0
3.9
3.3 3.9 3.9
3.9
3.4
3.5
3.5
3.5
4.1 3.4
3.6
2.1
2.3
2.9
2.4
2.5
2.7
2.8
2.6
2.8
2.6
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft 2
38.1
35.9
41.0
36.8 43.2 41.8
42.3
42.3
48.4
43.6
55.3
63.5 61.1
62.7
42.1
42.1
34.0
29.5
27.8
29.4
31.6
29.4
32.0
32.0
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
9.3
9.9
9.3
9.4 8.9 9.2
8.8
11.6
14.3
15.9
10.7
9.6 9.3
9.0
18.2
20.3
9.9
11.7
11.3
11.0
10.0
9.4
9.4
9.4
Bankf ill Entrenchment Ratio
>4.0
>3.9
>>] 8
>4.0 >3.8 >3.7
>3.8
>3.3
>2.7
>2.7
2.9
>2.8 >2.9
>2.9
>2.5
>2.4
>2.7
>2.6
>2.7
>2.7
>2.7
>2.9
>2.7
>2.7
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio*
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0 1.0 1.0
1.0
0.9
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0 1.0
1.0
0.9
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
d50 (mm)
N/A
1.3
1.1
0.9 2.0 0.26
-
-
N/A
0.72
6.4
1.7 1.4
0.32
-
-
N/A
1.0
0.9
0.1
1.8
2.7
-
N/A - Item does not apply.
* Beginning in MY7 (2018), the bankfull elevation and channel cross-section dimensions have been calculated using a fixed Abkf as described in the Standard Measurement of the BHR Monitoring Parameter provided by NCIRT and NCDM S
Stream Survey Data
Dye Branch II D-17 Equinox
Project No. 92255 November 2018
MY7 Monitoring Report

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
N/A - Information does not apply.
Ri = Riffle / Ru = Ran / P = Pool / G = Glide / S = Step
SC = Silt -Clay / SA = Sand / G= Gravel / C = Cobble / B = Boulder / Be = Bedrock
*Percentages based on riffle and pool pebble counts.
1 Corrected Values
Dye Branch II D-18 Equinox
Project No. 92255 November 2018
MY7 Monitoring Report
Table llb. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Dye Branch 11 / Pro'ect No. 92255 - Cemetery Branch 971 feet
Parameter
Baseline
MY -1
MY - 2
MY - 3
MY - 4
MY -5
MY - 6
MY - 7
MY - 8
Dimension&Substrate - Rime
Min Mean
Med Max
SD
n
Min Mean
Med Max
SD
n
Min Mean
Med Max
SD
n
Min Mean
Med Max
SD
n
Min Mean Med Max
SD
n
Min Mean
Med Max
SD
n
Min Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min MeanN58
Max
SD
n Min Mean Med Max SD n
Bankfull Width ft
5.5
7.2
7.2 8.9
N/A
2
6.0
8.3
8.3 10.6
N/A
2
6.5
7.3
7.3 8.0
N/A
2
6.1
7.3
7.3 8.4
N/A
2
5.9 6.0 6.0 6.1
N/A
2
5.8
5.9
5.9 6.0
N/A
2
6.2
6.3
6.3
6.4
N/A
2
5.5
5.7
5.9
N/A
2
Floodprone Width (ft)
>30
>30
>30 >30
N/A
2
>30
>30
>30 >30
N/A
2
>30
>30
>30 >30
N/A
2
>30
>30
>30 >30
N/A
2
>30 >30 >30 >30
N/A
2
>30
>30
>30 >30
N/A
2
30.0
30.0
30.0
30.0
N/A
2
30.0
30.0
30.0
N/A
2
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft
0.5
0.7
0.7 0.8
N/A
2
0.5
0.6
0.6 0.6
N/A
2
0.5
0.6
0.6 0.6
N/A
2
0.5
0.6
0.6 0.6
N/A
2
0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7
N/A
2
0.7
0.8
0.8 0.8
N/A
2
0.8
0.9
0.9
1.0
N/A
2
0.8
1.0
1.2
N/A
2
Bankfull MasDepth (ft
1.0
1.2
1.2 1.4
N/A
2
1.0
1.1
1.1 1.2
N/A
2
1.0
1.1
1.1 1.2
N/A
2
0.9
1.1
1.1 1.2
N/A
2
1.1 1.3 1.3 1.4
N/A
2
1.1
1.3
1.3 1.5
N/A
2
1.2
1.6
1.6
2.0
N/A
2
1.2
1.5
1.7
N/A
2
Bankfall Cross -Sectional Area (ftp
3.0
5.0
5.0 7.0
N/A
2
2.8
4.6
4.6 6.3
N/A
2
3.9
4.0
4.0 4.0
N/A
2
3.6
3.9
3.9 4.1
N/A
2
4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2
N/A
2
4.3
4.5
4.5 4.7
N/A
2
5.0
5.8
5.8
6.6
N/A
2
5.0
5.8
6.6
N/A
2
Ratio
10.3
10.8
10.8 11.2
N/A
2
12.7
15.4
15.4 18.1
N/A
2
10.6
13.5
13.5 16.4
N/A
2
10.4
13.9
13.9 17.3
N/A
2
8.3 8.5 8.5 8.7
N/A
2
7.5
7.7
7.7 7.9
N/A
2
6.3
7.0
7.0
7.7
N/A
2
4.6
5.8
7.0
N/ARatio34
>4.4
>4.4 >5.4
N/A
2
>2.8
>3.9
>3.9 >5.0
N/A
2
>3.8
>4.2
>4.2 >4.6
N/A
2
3.6
4.3
4.3 4.9
N/A
2
4.9 5.0 5.0 5.1
N/A
2
5.0
5.1
5.1 5.1
N/A
2
4.7
4.8
4.8
4.8
N/A
2
5.1
5.3
.
5.5
N/A
2
Bank Hei t Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0 1.0
N/A
2
1.0
1.0
1.0 1.0
N/A
2
1.0
1.0
1.0 1.0
N/A
2
1.0
1.0
1.0 1.0
N/A
2
1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
N/A
2
1.0
1.0
1.0 1.0
N/A
2
1.0
1.1
1.1
1.1
N/A
2
1.1
1.2
1.2
1.2
N/A
2
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
6.8
23.4
19.5 53.9 1
14.8
14
6.9
22.9 1
22.7 1 50.3
13.3
17
6.4
1 24.3
15.2 53.7
17.0
13
8.4
24.4
13.2
1 53.7
17.8
12
7.7 1 23.4 18.2 48.8
15.2
12
5.2
1 27.2 1
29.1 48.7
17.6 1
9
Riffle Slope ft/ft
0.0041 0.0231 0.0221 0.0491 0.0131
14
1 0.0021 0.0201 0.018 1 0.0521 0.0151
17
1 0.0021 0.0271 0.0221 0.0641 0.0201
13
1 0.005 1 0.0251 0.021
1 0.0571 0.0171
12
1 0.005 1 0.0191 0.018 1 0.0371 0.011 1
12
1 0.0061 0.0171 0.0141 0.0291 0.0091
9
Pool Len h (2
5.8
16.2
16.9 39.1
7.2
24
4.9
13.0
12.5 38.9
6.8
25
8.4
16.5
14.8 39.0
6.9
26
6.8
16.6
14.8
39.2
7.2
26
5.1 16.4 14.3 37.5
7.3
26
4.5
16.4
14.7 39.8
7.7
27
Pool MaxDepth (ft)
1.8
3.0 1
2.9 3.7
0.5
18
1.0
2.8
2.9 3.4
0.6
19
1 1.0
2.5
2.5 3.6
0.8
24
1 0.8
2.2
2.4
3.4
0.8
24
1.0 1 2.2 2.2 3.2
1 0.7
25
1.2
1 2.5
2.8 3.5
0.8
26
Pool Spacing (ft)
4.5
1 38.7 1
36.4 1 111.01
24.4 1
24
1 12.0
1 39.1 1
33.3 1 110.21
24.0 1
24
1 12.0
1 36.9 1
30.1 1 86.7 1
20.6 1
25
1 11.0
1 36.7 1
27.9
1 96.6 1
22.5 1
25
1 14.9 1 36.6 1 27.8 1 89.3
1 20.9 1
25
1 9.9
1 35.6 1
28.6 1 93.4 1
20.4 1
26
Pattern
Channel Belt Width ft
11.3
30.6 1
37.0 1 46.7 1
12.261
16
Radius of Curvature ft
8.3
13.7 1
12.0 1 29.9 1
5.70 1
16
Rc: Bankfull Width (ft/ft,2.4
2.4
2.4 2.4
N/A
1
Meander Waveleu h (ft
38.8
77.4
79.1 167.0 36.08
11
Meander Width Ratio
4.2
5.4 1
5.4 1 6.7 1
N/A 1
2
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
C
C4
C4
C4
C4
C4
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
977
971
970
969
970
958
Sinuosity (ft)
1.08
1.08
1.08
1.07
1.12
1.06
Water Surface Sloe Channel ft/ft
-
0.0200
0.0203
0.0203
0.0177
0.0186
Bankfull Slope ft/ft
0.0191
0.0195
0.0198
0.0189
0.0183
0.0190
Ri% /Ru% /P% /G% /S% 35%
4%
42% 13%
7%
42%
6%
34% 13%
6%
34%
4%
46% 11%
6%
32%
3%
47% 13%
6%
31% 4% 47% 12%
6%
27%
4%
48%
6%
SC%/SA%/G%/C%/B%/Be%*
0%
38%
54% 7%
0%
0%
0%
30%
67% 3%
0%
0%
1%
41%
53% 4%
0%
0%
0% 49% 45% 6%
0%
0%
0%
52.5% 26.2% 2
�65
0%
0%
dl / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 (man)
0.86 1.5 4.1 7.0
28.3
71.7
0.2
1.35
24.85
93
% of Reach with Eroding Banks
0%
0%
0%
0%
1%
1%
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Biological or Other
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A - Information does not apply.
Ri = Riffle / Ru = Ran / P = Pool / G = Glide / S = Step
SC = Silt -Clay / SA = Sand / G= Gravel / C = Cobble / B = Boulder / Be = Bedrock
*Percentages based on riffle and pool pebble counts.
1 Corrected Values
Dye Branch II D-18 Equinox
Project No. 92255 November 2018
MY7 Monitoring Report

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
N/A - Information does not apply.
Ri = Riffle / Ru = Ran / P = Pool / G = Glide / S = Step
SC = Silt -Clay / SA = Sand / G= Gravel / C = Cobble / B = Boulder / Be = Bedrock
*Percentages based on rime and pool pebble counts.
Corrected Values
Dye Branch II D-19 Equinox
Project No. 92255 November 2018
MY7 Monitoring Report
Table llb. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Dye Branch 11 / Project No. 92255 - Dye Branch -U stream (1,471 feet
Parameter
Baseline
MY -1
MV -2
MY -3
MV -4
MV -5
MY -6
MV -7
MY -8
Dimension&Substrate - Rime
Min Mean
Med Max
SD
n
Min Mean Med Max
SD
n
Min Mean
Med Max
SD
n
Min MeanJ36.0
x
SD
n
Min Mean
Med
n
Min Mean
Med Max
SD
n
Min Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min Mean
Med
Max
SD
n Min Mean Med Max SD n
Bankfull Width ft
25.7
28.4
26.9 32.7
N/A
3
23.8
25.5
24.1 28.7
N/A
3
21.3
24.0
22.9 27.7
N/A
3
20.1
22.6
N/A
3
19.9
22.6
21.5
3
17.1
21.7
20.7 27.2
N/A
3
12.0
14.2
13.2
17.5
3.0
3
11.3
15.9
15.0
21.3
5.1
3
Floodprone Width (ft
54.4
64.9
58.6 81.8
N/A
3
52.6
61.2
52.8 78.2
N/A
3
52.6
61.2
52.8 78.2
N/A
3
52.6
61.2
N/A
3
52.6
61.2
52.8
3
52.6
61.2
52.8 78.2
N/A
3
52.6
61.2
52.8
78.2
15.0
3
52.6
61.2
52.8
78.2
14.7
3
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft
1.1
1.3
1.3 1.4
N/A
3
1.0
1.1
1.1 1.3
N/A
3
0.9
1.1
1.0 1.3
N/A
3
1.1
1.2
N/A
3
1.0
1.1
1.0
J9N/A
3
1.0
1.1
1.0 1.2
N/A
3
1.2
1.7
1.8
2.0
0.4
3
1.4
1.5
1.4
1.6
0.1
3
BankfullMasDepth (ft
2.2
2.8
2.5 3.6
N/A
3
2.0
2.4
2.0 3.2
N/A
3
2.1
2.5
2.1 3.2
N/A
3
2.3
2.7
N/A
3
2.2
2.6
2.3
3
2.2
2.5
2.3 3.0
N/A
3
1.9
2.5
2.4
3.3
0.7
3
2.1
2.6
2.3
3.3
0.6
3
Bankfall Cross -Sectional Area (ft)
29.5
36.3
32.5 46.9
N/A
3
24.2
29.6
27.1 37.5
N/A
3
19.9
26.4
23.1 36.2
N/A
3
21.3
26.6
N/A
3
19.4
24.9
21.1
3
17.9
23.4
21.0 31.3
N/A
3
15.8
23.7
21.1
34.2
9.5
3
15.8
23.7
21.1
34.2
9.5
3
Ratio 20.3
22.6
22.8 24.6
N/A
3
20.9
22.3
220 24.0
N/A
3
21.2
22.2
22.6 22.9
N/A
3
18.9
19.4
N/A
3
204
21.0
20.8
3
16.3
20.1
20.4 23.6
N/A
3
6.8
8.9
9.0
110
2.1
3
8.1
10.6
10.6
13.22.Ratio
2.0
2.3
2.3 2.5
N/A
3
2.2
2.4
2.2 2.7
N/A
3
2.3
2.5
2.5 2.8
N/A
3
2.5
2.7
N/A
3
2.5
2.7
2.6
3
2.6
2.9
2.9 3.1
N/A
3
4.0
4.3
4.4
4.5
0.3
3
3.5
4.0
3.7
4.7
0.6
3
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0 1.0
N/A
3
1.0
1.0
1.0 1.0
N/A
3
1.0
1.0
1.0 1.0
N/A
3
1.0
1.0
1.0 1.0
N/A
3
1.0
1.0
1.0 1.0
N/A
3
1.0
1.0
1.0 1.0
N/A
3
1.0
1.1
1.1
1.1
0.1
3
0.9
1.0
0.9
1.1
0.1
3
Profile
Riffle Length (ft) 1
20.1 1
51.6
47.1 97.0 1
29.5
8
17.5
40.6
75.1
19.0
11
15.5
37.5
34.6 58.6
14.4
9
16.8
41.4
47.0 54.0
16.2
6
19.4
40.3
39.6 63.9
18.1
6
10.1
32.9
25.6 58.3
21.1
7
Riffle Slope ft/ft
0.002 0.006 0.005 0.016 0.005
8
0.002 0.007 0.019 0.005
1 l
0.001 0.007 0.004 0.016 0.005
9
0.002 0.008 0.006 0.016 0.006
6
0.003 0.007 0.005 0.016 0.005
6
0.004 0.011 0.007 0.031 0.010
7
Pool Length (ft
8.8
24.6
22.4 66.4
13.0
20
10.7
29.8
75.6
M-1-28.2
15.9
20
8.8
29.5
23.2 76.3
18.7
20
7.7
26.2
21.8 81.6
17.7
21
8.9
26.9
20.6 85.8
19.4
21
8.1
28.3
21.7 94.0
19.5
21
Pool Max De th(ft
2.1
3.4
3.6 4.5
0.7
20
1.8
3.3
4.7
0.8
20
2.2
3.7
3.8 5.0
0.8
20
1.6
3.1
3.1 4.3
0.8
20
1.4
3.0
3.4 4.4
0.9
20
2.00
3.55
3.64 4.88
0.84
20
Pool Spacing (ft) 24.1
66.8
65.3 124.9
28.6
19
31.7
67.7
27.5
19
20.7
62.1
55.7 127.6
29.6
19
13.2
65.1
64.0 127.5
30.7
18
11.7
58.7
48.2 118.6
30.8
20
15.1
57.9
45.8 114.4
30.1
20
Pattern
Channel Belt Width (ft)
28.5
45.0
48.4 54.1
8.3
17
Radius of Curvature ft
23.6
31.3
31.2 39.6
4.7
14
Rc: Bankfull Width (ft/ft'
2.0
2.0 2.0
N/A
1
Meander Wavelength (ft) 100.5 130.0 138.2 153.3
18.2
12
Meander Width Ratio
1.5 1
1.7
1.8 1 1.9
N/A
3
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
C
C5
C4
C4
C4
C4
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
1,465
1,471
1,465
1,447
1,448
1,437
Sinuosity (ft)
1.15
1.16
1.15
1.14
1.13
1.13
Water Surface Sloe Channel ft/ft
-
0.0092
0.0091
0.0092
0.0093
0.0092
Bankfull Slope ft/ft
0.0091
0.0094
0.0095
0.0091
0.0094
0.0093
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S% 28%
15%
34% 20%
3%
31%
10%
41% 15%
4%
23%
14%
40% 19%
3%
17%
15%
38% 26%
3%
17%
23%
39% 17%
4%
16%
21*
42% 16%
4%
SC%/SA%/G%/C%/B%/Be%*
0%
50%
47% 3%
0%
0%
2%
45%
50% 3%
0%
0%
3%
43%
48% 6%
0%
0%
5%
58%
35% 2%
0%
0%
2.3% 77.5% 19% 1.1%
0%
0%
dl / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 mm)
0.48
1.08
1.8 3.3
6.7
23.0
0.235
0.89
1.07 3.47
23.7
% of Reach with Eroding Banks
0%
0%
7%
10%
10%
9%
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Biolc 'cal or Other
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A - Information does not apply.
Ri = Riffle / Ru = Ran / P = Pool / G = Glide / S = Step
SC = Silt -Clay / SA = Sand / G= Gravel / C = Cobble / B = Boulder / Be = Bedrock
*Percentages based on rime and pool pebble counts.
Corrected Values
Dye Branch II D-19 Equinox
Project No. 92255 November 2018
MY7 Monitoring Report

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
N/A - Information does not apply.
Ri = Riffle / Ru = Run / P = Pool / G = Glide / S = Step
SC = Silt -Clay / SA = Sand / G= Gravel / C = Cobble / B = Boulder / Be = Bedrock
*Percentages based on riffle andpool pebble counts.
Dye Branch II D-20 Equinox
Project No. 92255 November 2018
MY7 Monitoring Report
Table llb. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Dye Branch Il / PMiect No. 92255 - Dye Branch -Downstream 869 feet
Parameter
Baseline
MY -1
MY -2
MY -3
MY -4
MV -5
MY -6
MY -7
MY -8
Dimension&Substrate - Riffle Mn. Mean
Med Max
SD
n
Mn Mean
Med Max
SD
n
Mn Mean
Med Max
SD
n
Mn Mean
Med Max
SD
n
Mn Mean
Med Max
SD
n
Mn Mean Med Max
SD
n
Min Mean Med
Max
SD
n
Min Mean Med
Max
SD
n Mn Mean Med Max SD n
Bankfull Width (ft) 18.4
18.6
18.6 18.8
N/A
2
18.5
18.7
18.7 18.8
N/A
2
17.7
18.7
18.7 19.6
N/A
2K43.2
4
18.6 24.6
N/A
2
17.8
18.7
18.7 19.6
N/A
2
16.60 18.10 18.10 19.60
N/A
2
17.4
18.4
18.4
19.3
N/A
2
17.4
19.8
19.8
22.1
N/A
2
Floodprone Width (ft) 48.7
61.8
61.8 74.8
N/A
2
47.6
60.6
60.6 73.5
N/A
2
47.6
60.6
60.6 73.5
N/A
27
70.0 73.5
N/A
2
47.6
60.6
60.6 73.5
N/A
2
47.60 60.55 60.55 73.50
N/A
2
47.6
60.6
60.6
73.5
N/A
2
47.6
60.6
60.6
73.5
N/A
2
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 1.9
2.0
2.0 2.0
N/A
2
1.6
1.8
1.8 1.9
N/A
2
1.6
1.9
1.9 2.1
N/A
21
2.0 2.6
N/A
2
1.8
2.0
2.0 2.2
N/A
2
1.80 1.95 1.95 2.10
N/A
2
1.8
2.0
2.0
2.2
N/A
2
1.8
1.9
1.9
1.9
N/A
2
Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 2.9
3.0
3.0 3.1
N/A
2
2.4
2.7
2.7 3.0
N/A
2
2.5
3.2
3.2 3.9
N/A
2
3.3 4.1
N/A
2
2.8
3.4
3.4 3.9
N/A
2
2.60 3.25 3.25 3.90
N/A
2
2.8
3.4
3.4
3.9
N/A
2
2.6
3.0
3.0
3.4
N/A
2
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft) 34.0
36.1
36.1 38.1
N/A
2
29.5
32.7
32.7 35.9
N/A
2
27.8
34.4
34.4 41.0
N/A
22
36.8 63.5
N/A
2
31.6
37.4
37.4 43.2
N/A
2
29.40 35.60 35.60 41.80
N/A
2
32.0
37.2
37.2
42.3
N/A
2
32.0
37.2
37.2
42.3
N/A
2
Width/D th Ratio 9.3
9.6
9.6 9.9
N/A
2
9.9
10.8
10.8 11.7
N/A
2
9.3
10.3
10.3 11.3
N/A
2.0
9.6 11.0
N/A
2
8.9
9.5
95 10.0
N/A
2
9.20 930 930 9.40
N/A
2
8.8
9.1
9.1
9.4
N/A
2
9.4
10.5
10.5
11.6
N/A
2
Entrenchment Ratio 2.7.4
3.4 4.0
N/A
2
2.6
3.3
3.3 3.9
N/A
2
2.7
3.3
3.3 3.8
N/A
2
2.8 4.0
N/A
2
2.7
3.3
3.3 3.8
N/A
2
2.90 3.30 3.30 3.70
N/A
2
2.7
3.3
3.3
3.8
N/A
2
2.7
30
3.0
3.3
N/A
2
Bank Height Ratio 1.0
1.0
1.0 1.0
N/A
2
1.0
1.0
1.0 1.0
N/A
2
1.0
1.0
1.0 1.0
N/A
20
1.0 1.0
N/A
2
1.0
1.0
1.0 1.0
N/A
2
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
N/A
2
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
N/A
2
0.9
1.0
1.0
1.0
N/A
2
Profile
Riffle Len h (ft) 15.7
50.3
55.7 79.3
20.2
7
14.4
48.7
43.0 87.0
24.1
7
14.7
37.3
39.9 54.7
18.2
4
18.9
42.8 1
41.0 1 70.4 1
23.4 1
4
18.1
43.4
39.0 77.7 1
26.5 1
4
18.7 46.6 44.0 77.2
29.3
3
Riffle Slope (ft/ft) 0.001 0.006 0.006 0.014 0.004
7
0.001 0.0031 0.003 10.006 1 0.0021
7
10.003 1 0.0071 0.007 10.010 1 0.0041
4
10.00110.0051 0.005 10.008 1 0.0041
4
1 ##### 1 0.0041 0.001 10.0141 0.0071
4
10.002 0.007 0.004 0.015 0.007
3
Pool Length (ft) 10.1
19.9
15.9 39.6
8.9
14
9.7
17.6
17.5 26.1
5.8
15
7.6
26.2
31.4 44.2
13.0
14
8.7
26.6
30.2 56.6
15.7
15
8.0
23.4
23.7 43.3
10.7
16
5.9 23.1 20.2 57.9
15.0
16
PoolMmD th(ft 3.3
3.9
3.8 5.1
0.6
12
3.2
3.9
4.0 4.9
0.5
13
3.0
4.2
3.8 6.7
1.0
13
3.0
3.9
3.8 5.3
0.7
12
1.8
3.4
3.4 5.0
0.8
14
3.4 4.3 4.2 5.8
0.7
14
Pool Spacing (ft) 15.3
57.5 1
38.8 130.2
41.5
14
10.8
56.8 1
40.6 1 129.11
40.4 1
14
1 10.0
1 60.6 1
61.6 1 109.91
34.9 1
13
1 12.0
1 57.3 1
48.3 1 114.81
36.8 1
14
1 9.7
1 53.4 1
39.2 1122.81
38.0 1
15
1 10.9 53.5 38.4 116.5
36.2
15
Pattern
Channel Belt Width (ft) 28.3
49.2
57.5 65.4
15.4
9
Radius of Curvature ft32.7
40.7
42.2 50.1
5.6
7
Rc: Bankfull Width ft/ft1.6
1.6
1.6 1.6
N/A
1
Meander Wavelength ft 138.9 162.2 157.3 210.51
27.2
6
Meander Width Ratio 3.1
3.1
3.1 3.1 1
N/A
2
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
C
C5
C5
C5
C5
C5
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
870
869
875
867
868
855
Sinuosity (ft)
1.10
1.09
1.10
1.09
1.09
1.07
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
-
0.0099
0.0094
0.0099
0.0098
0.0095
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
0.0106
0.0104
0.0101
0.0089
0.0103
0.0088
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S% 43%
6%
34% 13%
3%
39%
]0%
31% 18%
2%
17%
19%
42% 19%
3%
20%
11%
46% 20%
4%
20%
14%
43% 20%
3%
19% 19% 42% 18%
2%
SC%/SA%/G%/C%/B%/Be%*
3%
75%
22% 0%
0%
0
3%
59%
38% 0%
0%
0%
12%
52%
36% 0%
0%
0%
5%
56%
38% 1% 1
0% 1
0%
24.6%146.5%127.9%10.9% 10%
0%
dl6 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 (mm) I
I
I 1
1.1
1.5
1.9 3.9 1
8.3 1
31
0.062 0.705 1.48 1 4.72 18.955
of Reach with Eroding Banks
0%
0%
8%
10%
10%
11%
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Biolo 'cal or Other
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A - Information does not apply.
Ri = Riffle / Ru = Run / P = Pool / G = Glide / S = Step
SC = Silt -Clay / SA = Sand / G= Gravel / C = Cobble / B = Boulder / Be = Bedrock
*Percentages based on riffle andpool pebble counts.
Dye Branch II D-20 Equinox
Project No. 92255 November 2018
MY7 Monitoring Report

Appendix D Stream Survey Data
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
Dye Branch II D-21 Equinox
Project No. 92255 November 2018
MY7 Monitoring Report

Appendix E
Hydrologic Data

Appendix E
Table 12. Verification ofBankfull Events
Dye Branch II / Project No. 92255
Date of Occurrence
Method
Feet Above Average
Bankfull Elevation
7/8/2011
Water level logger
1.07
9/21/2011
Water level logger
1.14
9/24/2011
Water level logger
0.52
5/16/2012
Water level logger
1.63
7/11/2012
Water level logger
0.21
9/29/2012
Water level logger
0.22
4/12/2013
Water level logger
0.08
6/28/2013
Water level logger
0.81
6/30/2013
Water level logger
0.72
7/9/2013
Water level logger
1.62
7/31/2013
Water level logger
0.53
1/11/2014
Water level logger
1.29
5/14/2014
Water level logger
0.07
6/8/2014
Water level logger
0.21
Between 6/5/2015 and
11/7/2015
Wrack Lines
0.5
4/24/2018
Wrack Lines
Unknown
Dye Branch II E-3 Equinox
Project No. 92255 November 2018
MY7 Monitoring Report

Appendix E
Appendix F
Invasive Species Treatment Logs

Carolina Silvics, Inc. Pesticide Application Log
CarSily - 0551
Client NC Division of Mitigation Services
Project Site Dye Branch II (NCDMS #92255)
Date 06-04-2018
Start Time 10:00 End Time
Only PAL for Site for This Day? Yes If NO, this is PAL # of ##
Sky Cover Clear Temp (F)
Wind Direction NNW Wind Speed
Applicators Joshua G Merritt (NC 026-33717)
Application Method
Herbicide
Herbicide Rate (%)
Surfactant or Adjuvant (1)
Surfactant/Adjudivant 1 Rate
Other
Other Rate/Amt
Diluent
Total Solution
Species Controlled
Area Description
Additional Comments
Grainger Coughtrey (NC 026-34612)
Cut and Stump Spray
Refuge® (glyphosate)
50 Total Concentrate
Water
IM
16:30
78
1-5 mph
1111111M
Jap. Honeysuckle
Kudzu
Privet spp.
Tree -of -Heaven
Multiflora Rose
Som kudzu vines still alive throughout the site. Patches of privet along the edge of
the easement.

Carolina Silvics, Inc. Pesticide Application Log
CarSily - 0552
Client
NC Division of Mitigation Services
Project Site
Dye Branch II (NCDMS #92255)
Date
06-05-2018
Start Time
9:00
End Time
Only PAL for Site for This Day?
No
If NO, this is PAL # of ##
Sky Cover
Clear
Temp (F)
Wind Direction
SE
Wind Speed
Applicators
Joshua G Merritt (NC 026-33717)
Application Method
Mist Blower
Herbicide
Transline® (clopyralid)
Herbicide Rate (%)
2
Total Concentrate
Surfactant or Adjuvant (1)
Hel-fire®
Surfactant/Adjudivant 1 Rate
5
N
Other
Other Rate/Amt
Diluent Water
Total Solution 3 gallons
10:00
1 of 3
80
1-5 mph
8 fl oz
Species Controlled Kudzu
Lespedeza spp.
Area Description Both Kudzu and Lepedeza were found growing sporadically throughout the entire
easement. Most of the Kudzu vinese were regrowth from previous treatments.
Overall the site was in great shape.
Additional Comments

Carolina Silvics, Inc. Pesticide Application Log
CarSily - 0553
Client
NC Division of Mitigation Services
Project Site
Dye Branch II (NCDMS #92255)
Date
06-05-2018
Start Time
9:00 End Time
15:00
Only PAL for Site for This Day?
No If NO, this is PAL # of ##
2 of 3
Sky Cover
Clear Temp (F)
80
Wind Direction
SE Wind Speed
1-5 mph
Applicators
Grainger Coughtrey (NC 026-34612)
Application Method
Foliar Spray (Backpack)
Herbicide
Refuge® (glyphosate)
Herbicide Rate (%)
3 Total Concentrate
15.5 fl oz
Surfactant or Adjuvant (1)
Hel-fire®
Surfactant/Adjudivant 1 Rate
5
N
Other
Blue Dye
Other Rate/Amt
1 fl oz
Diluent
Water
Total Solution
4 gallons
Species Controlled
Jap. Honeysuckle
Johnson Grass
Privet spp.
Multiflora Rose
Area Description
Most of the species mentioned were sapling regrowth from previous
treatments.
Additional Comments

Carolina Silvics, Inc. Pesticide Application Log
CarSily - 0554
Client NC Division of Mitigation Services
Project Site Dye Branch II (NCDMS #92255)
Date 06-05-2018
Start Time 11:00 End Time
Only PAL for Site for This Day? No If NO, this is PAL # of ##
Sky Cover Clear Temp (F)
Wind Direction SE Wind Speed
Applicators Joshua G Merritt (NC 026-33717)
Application Method Basal Bark
Herbicide Other (see comments)
Herbicide Rate (%) 15 Total Concentrate
Surfactant or Adjuvant (1)
Surfactant/Adjudivant 1 Rate
N
Other Blue Dye
15:00
3 of 3
80
1-5 mph
38 fl oz
Other Rate/Amt
1 fl oz
Diluent
Diesel fuel
Total Solution
2 gallons
Species Controlled
Callery Pear
Jap. Honeysuckle
Kudzu
Mimosa
Privet spp.
Multiflora Rose
Area Description
There were large Callery Pear Treets growing sporadically throughout the
easement. Most of the species we small rewgrowth plants from previous
treatments. Downstream the root nodes for kudzu were basal barked. I am not
sure how effective this will be but I wanted to try it out.
Additional Comments
Garlon XRT was the chemical used for basal barking

Carolina Silvics, Inc. Pesticide Application Log
CarSily - 0586
Client NC Division of Mitigation Services
Project Site Dye Branch II (NCDMS #92255)
Date 09-11-2018
Start Time 12:00 End Time
Only PAL for Site for This Day? Yes If NO, this is PAL # of ##
Sky Cover Clear Temp (F)
Wind Direction ESE Wind Speed
Applicators Joshua G Merritt (NC 026-33717)
Application Method
Herbicide
Herbicide Rate (%)
Surfactant or Adjuvant (1)
Surfactant/Adjudivant 1 Rate
Other
Other Rate/Amt
Diluent
Total Solution
Species Controlled
Area Description
Additional Comments
Grainger Coughtrey (NC 026-34612)
Cut and Stump Spray
Roundup® Custom (glyphosate)
50 Total Concentrate
Water
irlpffiffeTA
16:30
80
1-5 mph
51 fl oz
Kudzu
Privet spp.
Multiflora Rose
Small kudzu patches found along the stream of the main branch and the cemetery
branch.

Carolina Silvics, Inc. Pesticide Application Log
CarSily - 0587
Client
NC Division of Mitigation Services
Project Site
Dye Branch II (NCDMS #92255)
Date
09-12-2018
Start Time
7:30 End Time
Only PAL for Site for This Day?
No If NO, this is PAL # of ##
Sky Cover
Cloudy Temp (F)
Wind Direction
NE Wind Speed
Applicators
Joshua G Merritt (NC 026-33717)
Grainger Coughtrey (NC 026-34612)
Application Method
Foliar Spray (Backpack)
Herbicide
Transline® (clopyralid)
Herbicide Rate (%)
2 Total Concentrate
Surfactant or Adjuvant (1)
Hel-fire®
Surfactant/Adjudivant 1 Rate
5
Other
Other Rate/Amt
12:00
1 of 2
76
1-5 mph
23 fl oz
Diluent
Water
Total Solution
9 gallons
Species Controlled
Kudzu
Lespedeza spp.
Area Description
Small patches of kudzu along the stream of the main branch and the cemetery
branch.
Additional Comments

Carolina Silvics, Inc. Pesticide Application Log
CarSily - 0588
Client
NC Division of Mitigation Services
Project Site
Dye Branch II (NCDMS #92255)
Date
09-12-2018
Start Time
11:00 End Time
Only PAL for Site for This Day?
No If NO, this is PAL # of ##
Sky Cover
Cloudy Temp (F)
Wind Direction
NE Wind Speed
Applicators
Joshua G Merritt (NC 026-33717)
Grainger Coughtrey (NC 026-34612)
Application Method
Foliar Spray (Backpack)
Herbicide
Roundup® Custom (glyphosate)
Herbicide Rate (%)
3 Total Concentrate
Surfactant or Adjuvant (1)
Hel-fire®
Surfactant/Adjudivant 1 Rate
5
Other
Other Rate/Amt
12:00
2of2
76
1-5 mph
res I[s
Diluent
Water
Total Solution
1.5 gal.
Species Controlled
Kudzu
Privet spp.
Area Description
Treated the smaller branch across the street, small privets were scarce but
scattered along the branch. Some smaller kudzu vines were present.
Additional Comments