20141127 Ver 1_Year 0 Monitoring Report_2018_20180927

FINAL
AS -BUILT BASELINE
MONITORING REPORT
MUD LICK CREEK MITIGATION SITE
Chatham County, North Carolina
NCDMS Project No. 93482
Contract No. 7683
USACE Action ID No. SAW -2014-00736 & DWR Project No 2014-1127
SCO No. 1209857-01
Data Collection: July 2018
Submission: September 2018
r-
PREPARED FOR:
N.C. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
DIVISION OF MITIGATION SERVICES
1601 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27699-1601

FINAL
AS -BUILT BASELINE
MONITORING REPORT
MUD LICK CREEK MITIGATION SITE
Chatham County, North Carolina
NCDMS Project No. 93482
Contract No. 7683
USACE Action ID No. SAW -2014-00736 & DWR Project No 2014-1127.
SCO No. 1209857-01
Data Collection: July 2018
Submission: September 2018
r-
PREPARED BY:
AXIOM ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
218 SNOW AVENUE
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27603

From: Hauot, Mac
To: Tuawell, Todd J CIV USARMY CESAW (US); Schaffer, Jeff
Cc: andrea.w.hughesCnbusace.army.mil; Kim Browning
Subject: RE: [External] RE: Mud Lick Creek (DMS #93482) As -Built Baseline -Mitigation Plan Amendment Reuest
Date: Thursday, November 01, 2018 10:13:07 AM
Fine with me...
-----Original Message -----
From: Tugwell, Todd J CIV USARMY CESAW (US) [mailto:Todd.J.Tugwell(usace.army.mil]
Sent: Thursday, November 1, 2018 10:07 AM
To: Schaffer, Jeff <jef [e-mail]>; Haupt, Mac <[e-mail]>
Cc: [e-mail]; Kim Browning <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [External] RE: Mud Lick Creek (DMS #93482) As -Built Baseline -Mitigation Plan Amendment Reuest
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless verified. Send all suspicious email as an
attachment to Report Spam.<mailto:[e-mail]>
OK, sounds good.
Thanks
-----Original Message -----
From: Schaffer, Jeff [mailto:jeffschaffer(c�r�ncdenr.gov]
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2018 10:06 AM
To: Tugwell, Todd J CIV USARMY CESAW (US)<[e-mail]>; Haupt, Mac
<mac. haupt@ncdenr. gov>
Cc: Hughes, Andrea W CIV USARMY CESAW (US) <[e-mail]>; Browning, Kimberly
D CIV USARMY CESAW (US) <[e-mail]>
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] RE: [External] RE: Mud Lick Creek (DMS #93482) As -Built Baseline -Mitigation Plan
Amendment Reuest
Todd,
Thank you for getting back to me on this. Here are my responses to your questions:
1. Reductions made to channel leaving the easement? No, the easement boundaries were not changed from approved
mitigation plan to as-built/baseline. For some unexplained reason, during their design Wildlands carried the channel
measurements outside the easement and that was not discovered until the as -built survey was done.
2. Additional culvert added? No, there are only 2 crossings, both of which were shown in the approved mitigation
plan, but the linear footage was not removed from the credit calculations by Wildlands. I did misstate in my memo
in item 2d that the culvert was realigned on East Branch Reach 2 when the culvert is actually on North Branch
Reach 3 (formerly North Branch Reach 2).
3. Updating of the approved mitigation plan - I have updated maps and an updated asset table that are includeed in
the As -built Baseline Report (prepared by Axiom) and are based upon the as -built survey done by North State
(contractor) and approved by Wildlands. The asset table in the As -built Baseline Report shows the mitigation plan
assets (linear footage) as well as the as -built baseline assets and the differences are explained in footnotes and
comments. I will also add a copy the DMS request memo and this email that documents the IRT concurrence with
the requested changes behind the cover page of the As -built Baseline Report.
Based on this email and if you are in agreement with my responses, I will update the assets in our database and have
the As -built Credit ledger prepared, and provide hardcopies of the As -built Baseline Report to both you and Mac.
Jeff Schaffer

Eastern Supervisor, Project Management
Division of Mitigation Services (Blockedhttps://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/mitigation-services)
NC Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ)
[phone] office
[phone] mobile
Jeff. [e-mail]
217 West Jones St., Suite 3000A
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1652
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be
disclosed to third parties.
-----Original Message -----
From: Tugwell, Todd J CIV USARMY CESAW (US) <[e-mail]>
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2018 9:03 AM
To: Schaffer, Jeff <jef [e-mail]>; Haupt, Mac <[e-mail]>
Cc: [e-mail]; Kim Browning <[e-mail]>
Subject: [External] RE: Mud Lick Creek (DMS #93482) As -Built Baseline -Mitigation Plan Amendment Reuest
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless verified. Send all suspicious email as an
attachment to Report Spam.<mailto:report.spam&nc.gov>
Jeff,
Mac and I discussed this yesterday. We don't necessarily have any problems with the changes you discuss, but it
was not clear why were the reductions made for the channel leaving the easement - were the easement boundaries
changed, and was an additional crossing added? We also need to make sure that we get the approved mit plan
updated. Specifically, we need to make sure that we have updated maps and changes made to the credit
determination (table 12 in the approved mitigation plan). I guess in this case these changes can be made in the as -
built report, but we need to make sure that they are memorialized somewhere so when we get around to future credit
releases, it is clear. I would also add a copy of this email, which concurs with the requested changes, to the record
for the site.
Thanks,
Todd Tugwell
Mitigation Project Manager
Wilmington District, US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
[phone] ext. 58
-----Original Message -----
From: Schaffer, Jeff [mailto:jeff.schaffer cnie ncdenr.gov]
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2018 9:41 AM
To: Haupt, Mac <[e-mail]>; Tugwell, Todd J CIV USARMY CESAW (US)
<Todd.J.Tugwell@usace. army. mil>
Cc: Hughes, Andrea W CIV USARMY CESAW (US)<[e-mail]>
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] RE: Mud Lick Creek (DMS #93482) As -Built Baseline -Mitigation Plan Amendment
Reuest
My original email sent on 9/27/18 had and amendment request letter attached. To save you all from hunting for the
original email, please see the attached.
Jeff Schaffer

Eastern Supervisor, Project Management
Division of Mitigation Services (BlockedBlockedhttps://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/mitigation-services)
NC Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ)
[phone] office
[phone] mobile
Jeff. [e-mail] <mailto:Jeff.Schaffer(-,ncdenr.gov>
217 West Jones St., Suite 3000A
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1652
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be
disclosed to third parties.
From: Haupt, Mac
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2018 9:34 AM
To: Schaffer, Jeff <jef [e-mail]>; Todd Tugwell <[e-mail]>
Cc: [e-mail]
Subject: RE: Mud Lick Creek (DMS #93482) As -Built Baseline -Mitigation Plan Amendment Reuest
Jeff,
What was the reason for the reduction? There was nothing to really review other than your email, correct?
Thanks,
IS MI
From: Schaffer, Jeff
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2018 8:15 AM
To: Todd Tugwell <[e-mail] <mailto:Todd.Tugwell(a),usace.army.mil> >
Cc: [e-mail] <mailto:andrea.w.hughes(a,usace.army.mil> ; Haupt, Mac
<[e-mail] <mailto:mac.haupt(a),ncdenr.gov> >
Subject: Mud Lick Creek (DMS #93482) As -Built Baseline -Mitigation Plan Amendment Reuest
Todd,
This email is to notify you of changes in assets from Approved Mitigation Plan to As -Built Baseline for which I am
seeking IRT approval to amend the mitigation plan in accordance with your October 5, 2017 correspondence
regarding Mitigation Credit Calculation. Overall there is a reduction of stream credit from 2,938 at approved
mitigation plan to +/-2,832 at as -built (rounded). Once I receive IRT approval, I will post the As -Built Baseline
Report with the approved changes.
Please let me know if you have any questions or need to discuss this further.
Thanks!
Jeff Schaffer
Eastern Supervisor, Project Management
Division of Mitigation Services (https:Hdeq.nc.gov/about/divisions/mitigation-services> )
NC Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ)

Mitigation Services
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
September 27, 2018
MEMORANDUM
TO: Todd Tugwell, USACE; Chairman of IRT
FROM: Jeff Schaffer, DMS, Eastern Supervisor/Project Manager
SUBJECT: Amendment to Approved Mitigation Plan
Mud Lick Creek — DMS #93482
Cape Fear 03030003; Chatham County
ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
The assets/credits have changed from Approved Mitigation Plan to As -Built Baseline on the Mud Lick Creek project.
In keeping with the October 5, 2017 correspondence regarding Mitigation Credit Calculation, DMS is requesting IRT
approval to amend the approved mitigation plan for the subject project.
1. All measurements are based on center of the wetted perimeter of the stream channel in accordance with the
October 5, 2017 memorandum.
2. Specific changes are:
a. Decrease of credits on North Branch R1 due to footage removal of stream lengths that were outside the
conservation easement.
b. Increase of credits on North Branch Reach 2 due to channel realignment due to bedrock identified during
construction.
c. Decrease of credits on North Branch Reach 3 due to channel realignment due to bedrock and removal of 20
If/credit to account for an easement break for a crossing.
d. Increase of credits on East Branch Reach 2 due to minor stream channel and culvert realignment because of
bedrock identified during construction.
e. Decrease of credits on East Branch R1 due to footage removal of stream lengths that were outside the
conservation easement.
f. Decrease of credits on Mud Lick Creek R1 due to footage removal of stream lengths that were outside the
conservation easement.
g. Decrease of credits on Mud Lick Creek R2 due to removal of 31 if/credit to account for an easement break
for a crossing.
h. Decrease of credits on Mud Lick Creek R3 due to footage removal of stream lengths that were outside the
conservation easement.
3. Overall there is a reduction of stream credit from 2,938 at approved mitigation plan to ±2,832 at as -built
(rounded). This is a reduction of ±106 stream credits.
DMS looks forward to your approval to amend the approved mitigation plan for the Mud Lick Creek project. Please let
me know if you need any additional information or if you would like to discuss this further. I can be reached at (919)
707-8308, or via email at jeff.schaffer&ncdenr.gov.
cc: Andrea Hughes, USACE
Mac Haupt, DWR
File
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Mitigation Services
1652 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, NC 27699-1652 1 217 W. Jones Street, Suite 3000
919 707 8976 T

Ak
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
September 19, 2018
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
218 Snow Avenue, Raleigh, NC 27603 919-215-1693
Mr. Jeff Schaffer
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Mitigation Services
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1652
RE: Mud Lick Creek (DMS Project # 93482, Contract #7683)
Final Asbuilt Baseline Monitoring Report 12-004.22
Dear Jeff:
Axiom Environmental, Inc. (AXE) is pleased to provide you with 3 hardcopies and 1 CD of digital files for the
Final Mud Lick Creek Asbuilt Baseline Monitoring Report. Axiom received your additional comment letter
dated September 18, 2018 and have addressed them as follows:
1. Digital files:
a. GIS files: Change geographic reference for MudLickGraded from GCS_NAD_1983_CORS96 to
Geographic Coordinate System, NAD 1983 State Plane North Carolina (US Feet).
The geographic referenced was changed for this shapefile.
2. Appendix B, Figure 2: Please identify all reaches as named in the revised Table 1. (3 reaches on North
Branch and 2 reaches on East Branch)
Figure 2 was updated to match the revised Table 1. The centerline shapefile was also updated to reflect the correct reach
breaks.
3. Appendix D: Please have a look at the stream type for the baseline in table 7a. It seems that based on
the W/D ratios it should be a E/C type as the pre -con assessment indicated.
The Rosgen Classification in Table 7a was changed to indicate an E/C type channel.
Please let me know if you have any questions or comments regarding any component of this submittal. Thank
you for the opportunity to continue to assist the Division of Mitigation Services with this important project.
Sincerely,
AX1OM ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
Kenan R. Jernigan
Project Scientist
Attachments: 3 hard copies Final Mud Lick Creek MY0 Baseline Monitoring Report & CD with electronic
copy and digital support files

Axiom Environmental, Inc.
218 Snow Avenue, Raleigh, NC 27603 919-215-1693
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
September 10, 2018
Mr. Jeff Schaffer
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Mitigation Services
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1652
RE: Mud Lick Creek (DMS Project # 93482, Contract #7683)
Final Asbuilt Baseline Monitoring Report
Dear Jeff:
f f►•EIIIL' WIX
Axiom Environmental, Inc. (AXE) is pleased to provide you with an electronic copy of the revised
document and digital files for the Final Mud Lick Creek Asbuilt Baseline Monitoring Report. Axiom
received your comments dated August 31, 2018 and have addressed them as follows:
Digital files:
a. GIS files: Ensure that all data sources are using the correct Geographic Coordinate System, NAD
1983 State Plane North Carolina (US Feet). (CVS _Plot, Invasives, Monitoring—XS, Origins, SAC &
Structures using GCS_NAD1983_2011; Fish_Benthics using GCS —NAD _ 1983_CORS96). Please
also make sure that the stream centerlines are properly segmented to reflect reach breaks, break in
the easement and/or any specialized credit ratios in the shapefile. Attributing these features with
reach IDs, restoration level, and lengths is required. All shapefiles are now using the correct coordinate
ystem. The stream centerline shapefile is now segmented and attributed to indicate reach ID, restoration level, and
length.
b. Spatial Data Reference missing for MLC rationing and MLD_Station Ticks. Spatial data has been
updated to NAD 1983 State Plane North Carolina (US fee) for these shapefiles.
c. Crest gauges and their locations are not included in the digital/GIS files. A shapefile depicting Crest
Gauge locations has been included in the digital submittal.
d. Per your contract the information for Warranty Transects is to be included in the MY1 report not
the Baseline Report. When you submit with MY 1, please include GIS shapefiles and show on
CCPV. Warranty transect information will be submitted with the NIY1 report.
2. Cover Sheets: Please just list the Axiom Monitoring Contract number since this deliverable is specific to
your contract only. The contract number was changed on the cover sheets to 7683.
3. Project Summary, page is insert CU: 03030003 and 14 -digit HUC 03030003070010. These were added to the
first paragraph of page i.
4. Page ii after Visual Assessments: Please insert the following text "As per sections 7.2 and 12.4 of the
Mitigation Plan, physico-chemical and biological parameters may have been included as part of specialized
monitoring, depending on the data that could be obtained during the baseline period. Monitoring of these
parameters was for investigative purposes only and not tied to mitigation success or credit. The sample size
and variability of the pre -con physico-chemical data was inadequate for the purposes of post -construction

comparison and therefor these will not be monitored moving forward. However, fish and macro-benthos will
be monitored at the stations indicated in the asset and monitoring features map." This was added to the text.
Monitoring Summary Table, page 1:
a. Streams: The morphological parameters that will be tallied should include BHR (Calculated by
holding the As -built XSA constant and comparing to subsequent year) and the ER. This was added in
the stream monitoring section of the text.
b. Vegetation Monitoring: Would say vegetation monitoring will be completed after most of the
growing season has passed. This was changed in the vegetation monitoring section of the text.
6. Appendix A, Table 1:
a. North Branch R1: revise reach IDs to differentiate between the Enhancement II and Restoration
sections of this reach (i.e. North Branch R1a and North Branch R1b) or break North Branch into
three reaches. These were broken out into North Branch RI, K2, and K3.
b. East Branch: revise reach IDs to differentiate between the Enhancement II and Restoration
sections of this reach (i.e. East Branch R1 and East Branch R2). These were broken out into East Branch
K1 and K2.
c. Show credits out to 3 decimals. Credits are shown to 3 decimal places.
7. Appendix A, Table 3: make the following changes: add the following contact information:
a. Add Michael Anderson [phone] to contact for Construction Contractor. The contact was
added.
b. Add Stephen Joyce [phone] to contact for Planting Contractor. The contact was added.
c. Delete Turner Land Surveying from As -built Surveyors. They did survey for original construction
plans that were the basis of the redline (record) drawings. Turner had nothing to do with As-builts.
Turner Land Surveying was deleted from the table.
8. Appendix B, Figure 2:
a. Please identify all reaches as named in Table 1. All reaches were labeled on the figure to match Table 1.
b. Please show locations of the three crest gauges installed at the site. Also make sure that these are
included in the digital/GIS files (see comment 1.c. above). These have been added to Figure 2 and the
shapefiles are included in the in the digital submittal.
c. Color code vegetation plots to differentiate between those that are above and below success
criteria. Plots were color coded based on success criteria on the CCl/P.
d. A stream area of concern is shown on Mud Lick Creek Reach 2, but there are no photographs as
described in the Project Boundaries & Visual Assessments section on page 2. Unfortunately, a
photograph of the stream area of concern could not be found. A brief description of the area was added to the Stream
discussion on page 7 of the report Photographs of all areas of concern will be provided during all subsequent
monitoringyears.
e. Please symbolize the sections of Mud Lick mainstem that were graded A layer was added to show the
sections of Mud Lick Creek that were graded.
9. Appendix B, Table 5:
a. Verify this list against the list on sheet 2.1 of the Record Drawings (see next to last page in
Appendix E). There appear to be some differences between the two. The list was verified to be the same;
however, the order of the species listed was different so it was reordered to match the record drawings order.
b. Correct spelling for Eastern Hophornbeam. This was corrected.
10. Appendix B, Table 6:
a. Boxelder, red maple, hazel alder, sugarberry, and willow oak are listed as a planted species in
various plots but are not listed in Table 5 which is the list of planted species provided by the planting
contractor. Explain why these show up in Table 6 as planted. Bare root stems found during asbuilt
monitoring were ident#ied as accurately as possible. Generally, planted stems are easily discernable due to the grid -like

pattern in which they are planted, and in many cases during asbuilt monitoring the signs ofplanting (dibble bar holes,
etc.) are obvious. Therefore, when this evidence is observed at a woody stem, it is catalogued as aplanted stem,
regardless of whether the species was found on the planting list or not. Additionally, the red maple and box elder were
changed from planted stems to natural recruits.
b. American elm, Eastern hophornbeam, Elderberry, Witch hazel, Swamp tupelo and Tulip poplar
are listed among the planted stems in Table 5 but do not appear in Table 6. Please explain. These
species were not found in any of the vegetation plots during monitoring. The dense herbaceous layer was an important
factor to consider during asbuilt vegetation monitoring, as it was performed in late summer. Each monitoringyear, all
plots are thoroughly searched for stems, and it is possible some of these species were covered/hidden and will be found
during subsequent monitoringyears.
c. Explain why there are two lines for sweet gum. The species was not listed for one of the sweetgum entries in
the CVS database thatgenerates this table. The species was added to this entry which corrected the issue.
d. Verify if the "unknown" planted stems could be one or more of the missing planted stems in
comment 8.b. The unknown planted stems could certainly be one or more of the missing planted stem species,
however these stems were very small, in some cases leafless, and they could not be identified with confidence.
e. For consistency between Tables 5 and 6, change American hornbeam to Ironwood. This has been
changed in the table.
11. Appendix D: Need to re-evaluate the bankfull cross-sectional areas for Mud Lick mainstem in the context
of the designer's calls. It was acknowledged that the bank height ratios for this reach were not going to be 1
in many places. They would be 1.2, 1.3 in many places, but it was proposed that since the reach had found its
pattern and beltwidth, that an intensive EII with areas of bank reshaping would be pursued. The designer
identified the bankfull XSA for this reach in the 40-50 SF range. The bankfull area calls should probably
better approximate those even if it makes for BHRs of 1.2 or so. This was not a full restoration reach. Re-
examine/ Recalculate in the context of this discussion the XS parameters for Mud Lick mainstem and update
table 7a for Mud Lick The Mud Lick mainstem cross-sections were updated with consideration for the design approach and
where possible were adjusted to the 40-50 sq ft range.
XS 10 seems to be outright incorrect for its XSA calculation. This was incorrect; the correct data was input and
updated throughout.
Also, for Table 7a -c the baseline distribution should be restricted to riffle cross sections. Baseline data is limited
to riffle cross-sections.
Please let me know if you have any questions or comments regarding any component of this submittal.
Thank you for the opportunity to continue to assist the Division of Mitigation Services with this
important project.
Sincerely,
AXIOM ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
Kenan R. Jernigan
Project Scientist
Attachments: electronic copy Final Mud Lick Creek MYO Baseline Monitoring Report & digital
support files

PROJECT SUMMARY
The North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services (NCDMS) has established the Mud Lick Creek
Mitigation Site (Site) located within the Cape Fear River Basin Cataloging Unit (CU) 03030003 in the
Upper Rocky River local watershed planning (LWP) area and 14 -digit HUC 03030003070010. The Site
was identified as a priority mitigation project in the Detailed Assessment and Targeting of Management
Report (Tetra Tech 2005). The main stressors to aquatic resources identified during the watershed
assessments described in the LWP documents include the following.
• Nutrient (nitrogen and phosphorous) loading from farming;
• Sediment loading from overland runoff, disturbed surfaces, and streambank erosion;
• Cattle access to streams increasing bank erosion and fecal coliform contamination; and
• Insufficient bank vegetation.
The project will contribute to meeting management recommendations to offset these stressors as
described above for the LWP area by accomplishing the following primary goals.
• Control and reduce nutrient sources from the Site;
• Reduce sediment loads from disturbed areas on the Site and from eroding stream banks;
• Increased aeration of flows within the project extent promoting increases in dissolved oxygen
concentrations;
• Reduce sources of fecal coliform pollution;
• Improve instream habitat;
• Reduce thermal loadings;
• Reconnect channels with floodplains and raise local water table; and
• Restore riparian habitat.
These goals will be accomplished through the following objectives:
• Restore riparian vegetation on the Site and thereby reduce sediment loads to streams from stream
banks and existing pastures, increase on -Site retention of sediment and nutrients, create riparian
habitat, and provide shade for streams to reduce thermal loadings;
• Stabilize eroding streambanks to reduce sediment inputs;
• Install fencing around the perimeter of the conservation easement to eliminate livestock access
to streams, thereby reducing sediment, nutrient, and fecal coliform inputs;
• Plant restored and stabilized streambanks with native species to improve stability and habitat;
• Install instream structures to improve stability, create habitat, and help aerate stream flows;
• Raise streambeds to reconnect restored channels to floodplains and raise local water tables; and
• Restore streams and vegetation so the Site looks natural and aesthetically pleasing.
Stream Success Criteria: The stream restoration performance criteria for the Site will follow approved
performance criteria presented in the 2015 Mud Lick Creek Mitigation Site Final Mitigation Plan as
described below.
Stream Dimension: Riffle cross-sections on the restoration reaches and enhancement II reaches, where
banks were re -graded (three reaches of Mud Lick Creek), should be stable and should show little change in
bankfull area, maximum depth, and width -to -depth ratio. Bank -height -ratios shall not exceed 1.2 and
entrenchment ratios shall be at least 2.2 for restored channels to be considered stable. All riffle cross-
sections should fall within the parameters defined for channels of the appropriate stream type. If any
changes do occur, these changes will be evaluated to assess whether the stream channel is showing signs
of instability. Indicators of instability include a vertically incising thalweg or eroding channel banks.
Changes in the channel that indicate a movement toward stability or enhanced habitat include a decrease in
Asbuilt Baseline Monitoring Report (Final) Executive Summary page i
Mud Lick Creek Mitigation Site (DMS Project # 93482)

the width -to -depth ratio in meandering channels or an increase in pool depth. Remedial action would not
be taken if channel changes indicate a movement toward stability.
Stream Pattern and Profile: The as -built survey will include a longitudinal profile for the baseline
monitoring report. Longitudinal profile surveys will not be conducted during the seven-year monitoring
period unless other indicators during the annual monitoring indicate a trend toward vertical and lateral
instability.
Substrate: Substrate materials in the restoration reaches should indicate a progression towards or the
maintenance of coarser materials in the riffle features and smaller particles in the pool features.
Hydraulics: Two bankfull flow events, in separate monitoring years, must be documented on the restoration
reaches and enhancement II reaches where banks were re -graded (three reaches of Mud Lick Creek) within
the seven-year monitoring period.
Vegetation Success Criteria: The final vegetative success criteria will be the survival of 210 planted
stems per acre in the riparian corridor along restored and enhanced reaches at the end of the required
monitoring period (year seven). The interim measure of vegetative success for the Site will be the survival
of at least 320 planted stems per acre at the end of the third monitoring year and at least 260 stems per acre
at the end of the fifth year of monitoring. If this performance standard is met by year five and stem density
is trending towards success (i.e., no less than 260 five year old stems/acre), monitoring of vegetation on the
Site may be terminated with written approval by the USACE in consultation with the NC Interagency
Review Team. The extent of invasive species coverage will also be monitored and controlled as necessary
throughout he required monitoring period (seven years).
Photo Documentation: Photographs should illustrate the Site's vegetation and morphological stability on
an annual basis. Cross-section photos should demonstrate no excessive erosion or degradation of the banks.
Longitudinal photos should indicate the absence of persistent bars within the channel or vertical incision.
Grade control structures should remain stable. Deposition of sediment on the bank side of vane arms is
preferable. Maintenance of scour pools on the channel side of vane arms is expected.
Visual Assessments: Visual assessments should support performance standards as described above.
As per Sections 7.2 and 12.4 of the Mitigation Plan, physio -chemical and biological parameters may have
been included as part of specialized monitoring, depending on the data that could be obtained during the
baseline period. Monitoring of these parameters was for investigative purposes only and not tied to
mitigation success or credit. The sample size and variability of the pre -construction physio -chemical data
was inadequate for the purposes of post -construction comparison and therefore, these will not be monitored
moving forward. However, fish and macrobenthos will be monitored at the stations indicated in the asset
and monitoring features map (Figure 2, Appendix B).
Site Background: The Site is located in northwestern Chatham County, north of Siler City and northwest
of Silk Hope (Figure 1, Appendix B). The Site is located within the United States Geological Survey
(USGS) Hydrologic Unit and Targeted Local Watershed 03030003070010 (North Carolina Division of
Water Quality Subbasin 03-06-12) of the Cape Fear River Basin. Prior to construction, the Site was used
for agricultural livestock production. The proposed project will improve water quality as well as provide
numerous ecological benefits within the Cape Fear River Basin. The project will help meet management
recommendations of the Upper Rocky River Local Watershed Plan by restoring a vegetated riparian buffer
zone, stabilizing eroding stream banks, and removing livestock from streams and riparian zones. These
activities will result in reduced nutrient, sediment, and fecal coliform inputs; improved aquatic and riparian
habitat, and other ecological benefits.
Asbuilt Baseline Monitoring Report (Final) Executive Summary page ii
Mud Lick Creek Mitigation Site (DMS Project # 93482)

Mitigation Components: Project mitigation efforts will generate 2832 Stream Mitigation Units (SMUs)
as the result of the following.
• Restoration of 1215 linear feet of Site streams
• Enhancement (Level II) of 2426 linear feet of Site streams
Site design was completed in June 2015. Site construction occurred May 24—August 25, 2017 (final
walkthrough) and the Site was planted in February 2018. Completed project activities, reporting history,
completion dates, project contacts, and project attributes are summarized in Tables 1-4 (Appendix A).
Asbuilt Baseline Monitoring Report (Final)
Mud Lick Creek Mitigation Site (DMS Project # 93482)
Executive Summary page iii

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 METHODS.......................................................................................................................................1
2.0 REFERENCES................................................................................................................................. 3
APPENDICES
Appendix A. Background Tables
Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Units
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3. Project Contacts Table
Table 4. Project Attributes Table
Appendix B. Visual Assessment Data
Figure 1. Site Location
Figure 2. Current Conditions Plan View
Vegetation Plot Photographs
Appendix C. Vegetation Data
Table 5. Planted Bare Root Woody Vegetation
Table 6. Total Stems by Plot and Species
Appendix D. Stream Measurement and Geomorphology Data
Cross-section Plots
Tables 7A -7C. Baseline Morphology and Hydraulic Summary
Tables 8A -8F. Morphology and Hydraulic Monitoring Summary
Appendix E. As -built Plan Sheets
Asbuilt Baseline Monitoring Report (Final)
Mud Lick Creek Mitigation Site (DMS Project # 93482)
Table of Contents page i

1.0 METHODS
Monitoring of restoration efforts will be performed for seven years, or until success criteria are fulfilled.
Monitoring is proposed for the stream channel and vegetation. In general, the restoration success criteria,
and required remediation actions, are based on the Stream Mitigation Guidelines (USACE et al. 2003).
Monitoring features are summarized in the following table and described below; monitoring features are
depicted on Figure 2 (Appendix B).
Monitoring Summary
Parameter Monitoring Feature I Quantity
Frequency
Streams
Dimension Cross-sections
7 riffles & 3 pools
annually
Substrate Pebble counts
3 riffles
annually
Hydrology Crest gauges
3
annually
Vegetation Vegetation Plots
Warranty Plots
12
10
annually
MY1
Visual assessments
Entire Site
biannually
Exotic & nuisancespecies
Entire Site
annually
Project boundary
Entire Site
annually
Reference photographs
22
annually
Supplement I Monitoring
Biological
Macrobenthos
5 sites (Preconstruction only)
3 sites (MY3, MY5, & MY7
Fish
3 sites (Preconstruction only)
2 sites (MY4 & MY7
Streams
The restored stream reaches are proposed to be monitored for geometric activity as follows.
• 7 permanent riffle cross-sections
• 3 permanent pool cross-sections
• 3 riffle pebble count samples for substrate analysis
• 3 stream crest gauges
The data will be presented in graphic and tabular format. Data to be presented will include 1) cross-
sectional area, 2) bankfull width, 3) average depth, 4) maximum depth, and 5) width -to -depth ratio.
Substrate analysis will be evaluated through pebble counts at three riffle cross-sections and data presented
as a D50 for stream classification and tracking purposes. The stream will subsequently be classified
according to stream geometry and substrate (Rosgen 1996). Significant changes in channel morphology
including bank -height -ratios and entrenchment ratios will be tracked and reported by comparing data to
asbuilt measurements in addition to each successive monitoring year. Annual photographs will include 22
fixed station photographs (12 vegetation plots and 10 cross-sections) (Appendix B). In addition, the Site
contains three stream crest gauges to assist with documentation of bankfull events.
One stream area of concern was observed along a large bend in Mud Lick Creek Reach 2 (Figure 2,
Appendix B). Approximately 50 feet of the right bank and 20 feet of the left bank have eroded to the point
of bank sloughing. This area currently appears relatively unstable, and it will be closely monitored during
year 1.
Asbuilt Baseline Monitoring Report (Final) Page 1
Mud Lick Creek Mitigation Site (DMS Project # 93482)

Vegetation
Restoration monitoring procedures for vegetation will monitor plant survival and species diversity.
Planting occurred within the entire Site. After planting of the area was completed, 12 vegetation plots were
installed and monitored at the Site; baseline results can be found in Appendix C. Annual measurements of
vegetation will consist of the following.
• 10 plant warranty inspection plots (only MY 1)
• 12 CVS vegetation plots
A photographic record of plant growth should be included in each annual monitoring report; baseline
photographs are included in Appendix B. During the first year, vegetation will receive a cursory, visual
evaluation on a periodic basis to ascertain the degree of overtopping of planted elements by nuisance
species. Subsequently, quantitative sampling of vegetation will be performed as outlined in the CVS-EEP
Protocol for Recording Vegetation, Version 4.2 (Lee et al. 2008) in late fall/early winter of the first
monitoring year and annually toward the end of the growing for the remainder of the monitoring period
until vegetation success criteria are achieved.
Locations of exotic and nuisance vegetation will be recorded using a GPS and included on mapping.
Proiect Boundaries & Visual Assessments
Locations of any fence damage, vegetation damage, boundary encroachments, etc. will be recorded using
a GPS and included on mapping.
Visual assessments will be performed along all streams on a bi-annual basis during the seven year
monitoring period. Problem areas will be noted such as channel instability (i.e. lateral and/or vertical
instability, in -stream structure failure/instability and/or piping, headcuts), vegetated buffer health (i.e. low
stem density, vegetation mortality, invasive species or encroachment), beaver activity, or livestock access.
Areas of concern will be mapped and photographed accompanied by a written description in the annual
report. Problem areas will be re-evaluated during each subsequent visual assessment.
Supplementary Monitoring
Supplemental monitoring will include biological monitoring in the Spring as follows.
• 3 benthos sampling sites (MY3, MY5, & MY7)
• 2 fish sampling sites (MY4 & MY7)
These parameters are being monitored for analytical purposes and are not tied to mitigation success and
associated credit releases. The primary criteria for indication of improvement for the benthos and fish will
be an increase of at least one bioclassification between the pre -con assessment and the post -con monitoring.
Richness and EPT metrics will be analyzed as well.
Asbuilt Baseline Monitoring Report (Final) Page 2
Mud Lick Creek Mitigation Site (DMS Project # 93482)

2.0 REFERENCES
Lee, M.T., R.K. Peet, S.D. Roberts, and T.R. Wentworth. 2008. CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording
Vegetation. Version 4.2. North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources,
Ecosystem Enhancement Program. Raleigh, North Carolina.
North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services (NCDMS) 2015. Mud Lick Creek Mitigation Site Final
Mitigation Plan.
Rosgen D. 1996. Applied River Morphology. Wildland Hydrology. Pagosa Springs, Colorado.
Tetra Tech, 2005. Upper Rocky River Local Watershed Plan Preliminary Findings Report. Prepared for
the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program.
United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), United States Environmental Protection Agency
(USEPA), North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC), Natural Resources
Conservation Service (MRCS), and North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ). 2003.
Stream Mitigation Guidelines. State of North Carolina.
Asbuilt Baseline Monitoring Report (Final) Page 3
Mud Lick Creek Mitigation Site (DMS Project # 93482)

Appendix A.
Background Tables
Table 1. Project Mitigation Components
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3. Project Contacts Table
Table 4. Project Attributes Table
Asbuilt Baseline Monitoring Report (Final) Appendices
Mud Lick Creek Mitigation Site (DMS Project # 93482)

Table 1. Mud Lick Creek (ID -93482) - Mitigation Assets and Components
Project
Component
(reach ID, etc.)
Wetland
Position and
HydroType
Existing
Footage
Stationing
Mitigation
Plan
Footage
As -Built
Footage
*
Restoration
Level
Approach
Priority
Level
Mitigation
Ratio (X:1)
Mitigation
Credits
Notes/Comments
North Branch R1
Enhancement
318
100+10 - 103+28
327
318
Ell
1.5
212.000
Planting, fencing
North Branch R2
522
103+28 - 108+66
520
538
R
PI
1
538.000
North Branch R3
351
108+66 - 111+51
303
265
R
P2
1
265.000
20 LF of restoration was removed from North Branch Reach 3 in order to
account for an easement break
East Branch R1
165
200+05 - 201+69
168
164
Ell
1.5
109.333
Planting, fencing
East Branch R2
315
201+69 - 205+81
409
412
R
P2
1
412.000
Mud Lick Creek R1
525
300+72 - 306+23
623
551
Ell
1.5
367.333
Planting, fencing, bank repairs
Mud Lick Creek R2
718
306+23 - 313+14
693
660
Ell
1.5
440.000
Planting, fencing, bank repairs; 31 LF of enhancement II was removed from
Mud Lick Creek Reach 2 in order to account for an easement break
Mud Lick Creek R3
733
313+14 - 320+47
748
733
Ell
1.5
488.667
Planting, fencing, bank repairs
*Reach start and end stationing may differ slightly from the mitigation plan due to removal of stream lengths that are outside the conservation easement. The upstream ends of Mud Lick Creek, North Branch, and East Branch experienced
footage reductions of 72', 10', and 5' respectively, while the downstream end of Mud Lick Creek experienced a footage reduction of 17'.
Length and Area Summations by Mitigation Category
Restoration Level
Stream
(linear feet)
Riparian Wetland
(acres)
Non -riparian
Wetland
(acres)
Riverine Non-Riverine
Restoration
1215
Enhancement
Enhancement I
Enhancement II
2426
Creation
Preservation
High Quality Pres
Overall Assets Summary
Overall
Asset Category Credits
Stream 2,832.333

Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Mud Lick Creek (ID -93482)
Elapsed Time Since Grading Complete: 1 year 1 month
Elapsed Time Since Planting Complete: 5 months
Number of Reporting Years: 0
Activity or Deliverable
Data Collection
Complete
Completion
or Deliver
Project Institution
--
February 13, 2013
Mitigation Plan
--
December 2015
404 Permit Date
--
March 25, 2016
Final Desi — Construction Plans
--
June 2015
Construction
--
August 25, 2017
Bare Root; Containerized; and B&B Plantings for the
Entire Project Site
February 2018
February 2018
Baseline Monitoring Document (Year 0 Monitoring
Baseline
July 2018
August 2018
Table 3. Project Contact Table
Mud Lick Creek (ID -93482)
Designer
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. (License No. F-0831)
312 West Millbrook Rd, Suite 225
Raleigh, NC 27609
Angela N. Allen, PE 919 851-9986
Construction Plans and Sediment and
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. (License No. F-0831)
Erosion Control Plans
312 West Millbrook Rd, Suite 225
Raleigh, NC 27609
Angela N. Allen, PE [phone]
Construction Contractor
North State Environmental, Inc.
2889 Lowery Street
Winston Salem, NC 27101
Michael Anderson 336 725-2010
Planting Contractor
North State Environmental, Inc.
2889 Lowery Street
Winston Salem, NC 27101
Stephen Joyce 336 725-2010
As -built Surveyors
Allied Associates, PA
4720 Kester Mill Road
Winston Salem, NC 27103
David Alley 336 765-2377
Baseline Data Collection
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
218 Snow Avenue
Raleigh, NC 27603
Grant Lewis 919 215-1693
Asbuilt Baseline Monitoring Report (Final) Appendices
Mud Lick Creek Mitigation Site (DMS Project # 93482)

Table 4. Project Baseline Information and Attributes
Mud Lick Creek (ID -93482)
Project Information
Project name Mud Lick Creek Mitigation Site
Project county Chatham County, North Carolina
Project area Acres 11.2
Project coordinates lat/long) 35.8128°N, 79.4350°W
Planted Acres 9.6
Project Watershed Summary Information
Physiographic region
Carolina Slate Belt of the Piedmont Physiographic Province
Project river basin
Cape Fear River Basin
USGS hydrologic unit (8 digit/14-
digit)
03030003/03030003070010
NCDWR Sub -basin
03-06-12
Project drainage area (mi2)
3.64
% Drainage area impervious
< 1%
CGIA land use classification
Developed, Forested/Scrubland, Agriculture/Managed Herb., Open Water
Reach
Summary Information
Parameters
Mud Lick
Creek —
RI
Mud Lick
Creek —
R2
Mud Lick
Creek —
R3
North
Branch —
Rl
North
Branch —
R2
East
Branch
Restored length linear feet
551
660
733
856
265
576
Valley confinement
Sliahtly confined - unconfined
Drainage area acres/miz
1747/2.73
2170/3.39 2330/3.64 236.8/0.37 416/0.65
172.8/0.27
Perennial P, Intermittent I
P
P P P P
P
NCDWR water quality
classification
WS -III, CA
Stream Classification(existing)
E4
C4
E4
E4
134c
134c
Stream Classification (proposed)
E4
C4
E4
C4
C4
C4
Evolutionary trend (Simon &
Hu
IV/V
IV/V
IV/V
IV
IV
IV
FEMA classification
AE
AE
AE
AE
AE
AE
Reg latory Considerations
Regulation
Applicable?
Resolved?
Supporting Documentation
Waters of the US — Section 404
Yes
Yes
SAW -2014-00736
Waters of the US — Section 401
Yes
Yes
SAW -2014-00736
Endangered Species Act
Yes
Yes
No Effect —
CE Document
Historic Preservation Act
No
NA
CE Document
Coastal Zone Management Act
CZMA/CAMA
No
NA
NA
FEMA Floodplain Compliance
Yes
Yes
Chatham County Floodplain
Development Permit #14-001
Essential Fisheries Habitat
No
NA
NA
Asbuilt Baseline Monitoring Report (Final)
Mud Lick Creek Mitigation Site (DMS Project # 93482)
Appendices

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Figure 1. Site Location
Figure 2. Current Conditions Plan View
Vegetation Plot Photos
Asbuilt Baseline Monitoring Report (Final)
Mud Lick Creek Mitigation Site (DMS Project # 93482)
Appendices

t }.�Iky I � — {a )l� 1 t'� l� _. —�Sf I .* .: •C'ir' �y-. ��. � J�����'1�1� ,51�� AI
.Cilmp
- ��� - .µ'" _ � _ �j ��� ,�!^J �r` 't gar '� _ 'T i `t �• .�;�;-,
{ ' - HIS Iv {r- {� '." _ Site Location I
,.". 35.8128, -79.4350 X11;
J.
y II �M1 f
� � •� '-S-' - { � }-i� .tel f} �." { �>t _
• k {�� `��. '- ,� � � � ,f.�� _moi
yo
rty 1,
:yam
Cj
421
64
0 1 2 4 Siler.Cit' - -
-..
Miles �
Directions from Silk Hope:
-Take Silk Hope -Liberty Road west for 4.1 miles
-Turn right on Siler City -Snow Camp Road; travel 0.2 mile
-The Site/farm entrance is located on the left/east side of the road ..} .- * .. - -, r -------..... }"
Axiom Environmental
218 Snow Avenue
Raleigh, NC 27603
[phone]
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
SITE LOCATION
MUD LICK CREEK MITIGATION SITE
DMS PROJECT NUMBER 93482
Chatham County, North Carolina
Dwn. by.
CLF
FIGURE
Date:
July 2018
Project:
12-004.22

Mud Lick Creek Stream Restoration Site
Baseline Vegetation Monitoring Photographs
Taken July 2018
Asbuilt Baseline Monitoring Report (Final)
Mud Lick Creek Mitigation Site (DMS Project # 93482)
Appendices

Mud Lick Creek Stream Restoration Site
Baseline Vegetation Monitoring Photographs
Taken July 2018
Asbuilt Baseline Monitoring Report (Final)
Mud Lick Creek Mitigation Site (DMS Project # 93482)
Appendices

Appendix C.
Vegetation Plot Data
Table 5. Planted Bare Root Woody Vegetation
Table 6. Total Stems by Plot and Species
Asbuilt Baseline Monitoring Report (Final)
Mud Lick Creek Mitigation Site (DMS Project # 93482)
Appendices

Table 5. Planted Bare Root Woody Vegetation
Mud Lick Creek (ID -93482)
Species
Quantity
Green Ash Fraxinus enns lvanica
300
Sycamore Platanus occidentalis
400
Eastern Redbud Cercis canadensis
400
Cottonwood Po ulus deltoides
300
River birch Betula nigra)
300
Hackbe Celtis occidentalis
300
Black Gum ssa s lvatica
300
American Elm lmus americana
300
Eastern Ho hornbeam (Ostrya vir inica
300
Elderberry Sambucus s
300
Black Locust Robinia suedoaccia
300
Silky Dogwood Cornus ammomum
300
Witch Hazel Hamamelis vir inica
550
Buttonbush Ce halanthus occidentalis
300
Persimmon (Diospyros vir iniana
300
Ironwood (Carpinus caroliniana
400
Swamp Tupelo ssa bi ora
100
Swamp Chestnut oak(Quercus michauxii
100
Water oak(Quercus nigra)
100
Tulip Poplar Liridendron tuli i era
300
TOTAL
5950
Asbuilt Baseline Monitoring Report (Final)
Mud Lick Creek Mitigation Site (DMS Project # 93482)
Appendices

Table 6. Total Stems by Plot and Species
EEP Proiect Code 93482. Proiect Name: Mud Lick Creek
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Pnol-S = Planted excluding livestakes
P -all = Planting including livestakes
T = All planted and natural recruits including livestakes
T includes natural recruits
Current Plot Data (MYO 2018)
Annual Means
93482-01-0001
93482-01-0002
93482-01-0003
93482-01-0004
93482-01-0005
93482-01-0006
93482-01-0007
93482-01-0008
93482-01-0009
93482-01-0010
93482-01-0011
93482-01-0012
MYO (2018)
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
PnoLS P -all T
Pnol-S P -all T
Pnol-S P -all T
Pnol-S P -all T
Pnol-S P -all T
PnoLS P -all T
PnoLS P -all T
Pnol-S P -all T
Pnol-S P -all T
Pnol-S P -all T
Pnol-S P -all T
Pnol-S P -all T
Pnol-S P -all T
Acer negundo
boxelder
Tree
1
1
3
3
1
1
2
1 1
10
Acer rubrum
red maple
Tree
4
3
1
1
1
10
Alnus
alder
Shrub
1
2
3
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
1
1
1
2 2
2
1
1
1
4 4
4
Carpinus caroliniana
American hornbeam
Tree
1
1
1 3
3
3
1 1
1
1 1
1 1
1
1 5 5
5
1
1
1
2
2
2 15 15
15
Carya
hickory
Tree
1
1
Celtis laevigata
sugarberry
Tree
1
1
1
1 1
1
1
Celtis occidentalis
common hackberry
Tree
2
2
2
1
1
1
3 3
3
Cephalanthus occidentalis
common buttonbush
Shrub
1
1
1
1 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
4 4
4
Cercis canadensis
eastern redbud
Tree
2
2
2
1 1
1 1
1
1 1 1
1
1
1
1
6 6
6
Cornus amomum
silky dogwood
Shrub
1
1
1
3
3
3
1
1
1
3
3
3 8 8
8
Diospyros virginiana
common persimmon
Tree
2
2
2
1
1
1
2
2
2 5 5
5
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
2
2
2 1
1
1
1
1
1 7 7
81
1
1
1 12 12
13
Juglans nigra
black walnut
Tree
5
5
Liquidambar styraciflua
sweetgum
Tree
1
1
3
3
3
10
Nyssa biflora
swamp tupelo
Tree
4
4
4
1 1
1
1
1
1
6 6
6
Ostrya virginiana
hophornbeam
Tree
1 1
1
1 1
1
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
1
1
1
4 4
4 1
1
1
1
1
1
7 7
7
Populus deltoides
eastern cottonwood
Tree
1 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 3 3
3
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
3
3
3
1
1
1
2
2
2
1
1
1 7 7
7
Quercus nigra
Iwater oak
ITree
1 1
1
1 1
1 1
1
1
3 3
3
Robinia pseudoacacia
I black locust
ITree
1
1
1
1 1
1
Unknown
I
IShrub or Tree
1
1
1
2 2
2
48
3 3
3
Stem count
7
7
7 9
9
11 5 5
8 9
9
9 8 8
10 6 6
13
77
5 5
12 8
8 6 61
7 9
91
14
81
8
11
10
10
19 90 90
129
size (ares)
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
12
size (ACRES)
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.30
Species count 51
Stems per ACRE 283.3
51 51
283.3 283.3
41
364.2
41 61
364.2 445.2
21 21 41
202.3 202.3 323.7
71 71 71 21 21 31 41 41 61 51 51 81 61 61 61
364.2 364.2 364.2 323.7 323.7 404.7 242.8 242.8 526.1 202.3 202.3 485.6 323.7 323.7 323.7
21 21 3
242.8 242.8 283.3
7
364.2
71 91 71
364.2 566.6 323.7
71 8 61 61 9
323.7 445.2 404.7 404.7 768.9
181 181
303.5 303.5
23
435
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Pnol-S = Planted excluding livestakes
P -all = Planting including livestakes
T = All planted and natural recruits including livestakes
T includes natural recruits

Appendix D.
Stream Measurements and Geomorphology Data
Cross Section Plots
Tables 7A -7C. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Tables 8A -8F. Monitoring Data -Dimensional Data Summary
Asbuilt Baseline Monitoring Report (Final)
Mud Lick Creek Mitigation Site (DMS Project # 93482)
Appendices

River Basin:
Cape Fear
Site Name
Mud Lick Creek
XS ID
XS - 1, Riffle Mud Lick Cr
Drainage Area (sq mi):
3.64
Date:
7/25/2018
Field Crew:
Perkinson, Smith
Station
Elevation
0.00
99.85
4.71
99.89
8.04
99.95
10.30
99.90
12.12
99.12
13.68
98.19
15.15
97.45
16.19
97.09
18.00
96.16
19.55
95.43
20.72
94.82
21.88
94.45
22.83
94.19
24.88
93.96
25.93
93.79
27.76
93.77
29.45
93.47
31.00
93.48
32.39
93.51
33.02
93.54
34.05
97.26
35.49
97.74
37.53
98.43
40.21
98.69
43.17
98.79
45.90
99.00
47.39
99.09
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
97.3
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area:
49.8
Bankfull Width:
18.3
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
101.1
Flood Prone Width:
100.0
Max Depth at Bankfull:
3.8
Mean De th at Bankfull:
2.7
W / D Ratio:
6.7
Entrenchment Ratio:
5.5
Bank Height Ratio:
1.3
Stream Type E
Cape Fear River Basin, Mud Lick Creek, XS - 1, Riffle (Mud Lick Cr)
102
101
100
99
98
s;
---------------------
------------------------ ------------------
97
96
-- • Bankfull
• Flood Prone Area
95
94
--I-- MY -00 7/25/18
93
0
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Station (feet)

River Basin:
Cape Fear
Site Name
Mud Lick Creek
XS ID
XS - 2, Riffle Mud Lick Cr
Drainage Area (sq mi):
3.64
Date:
7/25/2018
Field Crew:
Perkinson, Smith
Station
Elevation
0.00
99.33
4.49
99.11
8.40
98.88
9.81
98.72
11.51
98.18
13.54
97.49
14.98
97.07
16.26
96.66
17.44
96.15
18.32
95.58
19.24
94.75
19.71
94.32
20.59
93.96
21.44
93.61
22.12
93.67
22.96
93.75
23.83
93.99
24.58
94.09
25.58
94.71
26.63
95.61
28.13
96.46
30.95
96.73
32.79
96.96
36.10
97.42
36.44
97.29
39.40
97.34
97
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation: MENU
97.3
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area:
33.0
Bankfull Width:
21.0
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
101.0
Flood Prone Width: 100.0
Max Depth at Bankfull: ff 1 3.7
Mean Depth at Bankfull: 1.6
W / D Ratio: 13.3
Entrenchment Ratio:
4.8
Bank Height Ratio:
m 1 1.0
Cape Fear River Basin, Mud Lick Creek, XS - 2, Riffle (Mud Lick Cr)
102
101
100
99
98
s
97
ti
96
Bankfull
W
Flood Prone Area
95
� MY -00 7/25/18
94
93
0
5 10 15 20 25 30
35 40 45
Station (feet)

River Basin:
Cape Fear
Site Name
Mud Lick Creek
XS ID
XS - 3, Pool(North Branch
Drainage Area (sq mi):
0.65
Date:
7/25/2018
Field Crew:
Perkinson, Smith
Station
Elevation
0.00
98.43
4.32
98.50
8.51
98.38
10.42
98.21
12.60
97.81
13.98
97.34
14.61
97.10
15.27
96.66
16.19
96.41
17.01
96.30
17.68
96.24
18.77
96.13
19.60
96.44
20.43
96.56
21.44
97.42
22.24
97.84
23.48
98.26
24.60
98.78
25.51
98.85
28.85
98.72
31.70
98.92
34.51
99.10
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
98.3
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area:
15.5
Bankfull Width:
14.2
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
NA
Flood Prone Width:
NA
Max Depth at Bankfull:
2.2
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
1.1
W / D Ratio:
NA
Entrenchment Ratio:
NA
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
Stream Type E
Cape Fear River Basin, Mud Lick Creek, XS - 3, Pool (North Branch)
100
99
98 -- -
s;
0
97
ti
fit] - � � � Bankfull
96
MY -00 7/25/18
9$
0 10 20 30 40
Station (feet)

River Basin:
Elevation
Cape Fear
98.76
2.51
98.93
Site Name
0.65
Mud Lick Creek
7/25/2018
Field Crew:
Perkinson, Smith
XS ID
98.28
XS - 4, Riffle (North Branch
98.13
12.37
97.86
Drainage
97.38
13.73
97.17
14.19
97.25
14.52
97.10
15.36
97.14
15.99
97.34
16.60
97.65
17.30
97.81
A•'
t
98.04
19.07
98.18
19.77
98.48
21.91
98.92
23.48
99.07
25.39
99.05
26.82
99.13
$ - F
Stream Type C
Cape Fear River Basin, Mud Lick Creek, XS - 4, Riffle (North Branch)
101
100
5 99 ------------------------------------------
----------
0
98
W
- - -- Bankfull
97
Flood Prone Area
MY -00 7/25/18
96
0 5
10
15 20
25 30
Station (feet)
Station
Elevation
0.00
98.76
2.51
98.93
Area (s mi):
0.65
Date:
7/25/2018
Field Crew:
Perkinson, Smith
Station
Elevation
0.00
98.76
2.51
98.93
4.46
98.94
6.31
98.65
8.79
98.38
10.22
98.28
11.38
98.13
12.37
97.86
13.11
97.38
13.73
97.17
14.19
97.25
14.52
97.10
15.36
97.14
15.99
97.34
16.60
97.65
17.30
97.81
17.95
98.04
19.07
98.18
19.77
98.48
21.91
98.92
23.48
99.07
25.39
99.05
26.82
99.13
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
98.9SAM
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area:
14.2
Bankfull Width:
17.7
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
100.7
Flood Prone Width:
100.0
Max Depth at Bankfull:
1.8
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
0.8
W / D Ratio •
22.1
Entrenchment Ratio:
5.6
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0

River Basin:
Cape Fear
Site Name
Mud Lick Creek
XS ID
XS - 5, Pool(North Branch
Drainage Area (sq mi):
0.65
Date:
7/25/2018
Field Crew:
Perkinson, Smith
Station
Elevation
0.00
97.97
2.50
98.15
5.59
98.21
6.74
97.80
7.86
97.32
9.36
96.74
10.36
95.86
11.25
95.43
12.45
95.29
14.03
95.17
14.89
95.49
16.35
96.69
17.72
97.03
18.91
97.50
19.85
97.75
23.53
97.94
26.70
97.90
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
97.8
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area:
18.6
Bankfull Width:
14.2
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
NA
Flood Prone Width:
NA
Max Depth at Bankfull:
2.6
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
1.3
W / D Ratio:
NA
Entrenchment Ratio:
NA
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
99
98
m
5
0 97
ti
W
96
Stream Type C
Cape Fear River Basin, Mud Lick Creek, XS - 5, Pool (North Branch)
95 1 I I I �!
0 10 20 30 40
Station (feet)

River Basin:
Cape Fear
Site Name
Mud Lick Creek
XS ID
XS - 6, Riffle(North Branch
Drainage Area (sq mi):
0.65
Date:
7/25/2018
Field Crew:
Perkinson, Smith
Station
Elevation
0.00
98.15
3.55
98.09
5.91
97.92
7.58
97.58
9.22
97.02
10.94
96.61
11.91
96.25
13.16
96.25
14.44
96.21
15.60
96.14
17.17
96.95
18.98
97.60
20.84
97.99
24.24
98.05
27.10
98.10
28.68
98.10
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
97.9
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area:
14.5
Bankfull Width:
14.6
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
99.7
Flood Prone Width:
100.0
Max Depth at Bankfull:
1.8
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
1.0
W / D Ratio:
14.8
Entrenchment Ratio:
6.8
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
100
W-14�1
Stream Type C
Cape Fear River Basin, Mud Lick Creek, XS - 6, Riffle (North Branch)
L---------------------------------------------------------
99
95
5 98
--------- - ------
0
5 10
0
f..
Lit -
Stream Type C
Cape Fear River Basin, Mud Lick Creek, XS - 6, Riffle (North Branch)
L---------------------------------------------------------
99
95
5 98
--------- - ------
0
5 10
0
97
W
96
95
0
5 10
15 20
Station (feet)
-- Bankfull
Flood Prone Area
MY -00 7/25/18
25 30 35

River Basin:
Cape Fear
Site Name
Mud Lick Creek
XS ID
XS - 7, Riffle East Branch
Drainage Area (sq mi):
0.27
Date:
7/25/2018
Field Crew:
Perkinson, Smith
Station
Elevation
0.00
98.92
2.40
99.07
4.06
99.10
5.44
99.13
6.92
98.70
7.81
98.64
8.63
98.08
9.20
97.62
9.70
97.64
11.18
97.47
12.52
97.66
13.61
97.58
14.53
98.08
15.73
98.41
17.08
98.74
20.63
98.76
22.50
98.92
24.21
98.93
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
98.6
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area:
6.7
Bankfull Width:
8.9
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
99.8
Flood Prone Width:
100.0
Max Depth at Bankfull:
1.2
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
0.8
W / D Ratio:
11.8
Entrenchment Ratio:
11.3
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
TO"
�s- - . a
-. w =
".• i�. - � j �y 1
Cape Fear River Basin, Mud Lick Creek, XS - 7, Riffle (East Branch)
100
---------------------------------------------------------
99
5
0
ti
W 98
----Bankfull
Flood Prone Area
MY -00 7/25/18
97
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Station (feet)

River Basin:
Cape Fear
Site Name
Mud Lick Creek
XS ID
XS - 8, Pool East Branch
Drainage Area (sq mi):
0.27
Date:
7/25/2018
Field Crew:
Perkinson, Smith
Station
Elevation
0.00
100.94
1.47
101.37
3.75
101.35
6.10
101.02
7.45
100.85
9.30
100.30
9.86
99.36
10.96
99.21
11.64
99.16
12.54
98.84
13.18
97.81
14.15
97.57
15.20
98.04
16.03
98.42
16.50
98.80
17.10
100.00
17.80
100.15
19.69
100.54
21.62
100.75
24.06
100.95
27.19
101.11
0 10 20 30 40
Station (feet)
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
100.0
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area:
10.5
Bankfull Width:
7.6
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
NA
Flood Prone Width:
NA
Max Depth at Bankfull:
2.4
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
1.4
W / D Ratio:
NA
Entrenchment Ratio:
NA
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
Cape Fear River Basin, Mud Lick Creek, XS - 8, Pool (East Branch)
102
101
100
s;
0
ti
99
W
Bankfull
98
MY -00 7/25/18
97
0 10 20 30 40
Station (feet)

River Basin:
Cape Fear
Site Name
Mud Lick Creek
XS ID
XS - 9, Riffle East Branch
Drainage Area (sq mi):
0.27
Date:
7/25/2018
Field Crew:
Perkinson, Smith
Station
Elevation
0.00
101.08
2.92
101.15
5.86
101.18
8.17
101.10
10.21
100.70
12.06
100.27
12.92
99.89
14.09
99.64
15.13
99.80
16.07
99.88
17.37
100.17
19.06
100.56
21.60
100.85
25.65
101.17
29.56
100.99
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
101.1
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area:
10.6
Bankfull Width:
16.6
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
102.6
Flood Prone Width:
100.0
Max Depth at Bankfull:
1.5
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
0.6
W / D Ratio •
25.8
Entrenchment Ratio:
6.0
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
103
102
100
99 +
0
Stream Type C
Cape Fear River Basin, Mud Lick Creek, XS - 9, Riffle (East Branch)
5 10 15 20
Station (feet)
-- Bankfull
Flood Prone Area
MY -00 7/25/18
25 30 35
I
,
Stream Type C
Cape Fear River Basin, Mud Lick Creek, XS - 9, Riffle (East Branch)
5 10 15 20
Station (feet)
-- Bankfull
Flood Prone Area
MY -00 7/25/18
25 30 35

River Basin:
Cape Fear
Site Name
Mud Lick Creek
XS ID
XS - 10, Riffle Mud Lick Cr
Drainage Area (sq mi):
3.64
Date:
7/25/2018
Field Crew:
Perkinson, Smith
Station
Elevation
0.00
97.79
3.09
97.60
4.21
97.87
5.48
97.66
7.11
97.01
8.13
96.25
9.24
95.54
10.74
95.22
11.50
94.66
12.73
94.40
13.79
94.49
14.96
94.14
15.78
93.98
17.46
94.04
18.50
95.06
19.75
95.63
21.13
96.19
22.88
96.55
25.29
97.55
26.80
98.23
28.27
98.75
29.41
99.04
30.75
99.55
32.96
99.42
34.80
99.38
97
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
97.6
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area:
40.4
Bankfull Width:
19.8
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
101.2
Flood Prone Width:
100.0
Max Depth at Bankfull:
3.6
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
2.0
W / D Ratio:
9.7
Entrenchment Ratio:
5.1
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
Stream Type E
Cape Fear River Basin, Mud Lick Creek, XS - 10, Riffle (Mud Lick Cr)
102
101_____________________________________________________________
100
99
98
--------------------------------- ----------------
o--
97
ti
96
Bankfull
W
Flood Prone Area
95
94
� MY -00 7/25/18
93
0
5 10 15 20 25 30
35 40
Station (feet)

Table 7a. Baseline Stream Data Summary (Mud Lick Creek)
Mud Lick Creek Mitigation Project - NCDMS Project Number 93482
Parameter Gauge Regional Curve
Pre -Existing Condition (Mud Lick
Creek)
Reference Reach(es) Data
Design (Mud Lick
Creek) Monitoring Baseline (Mud Lick Creek)
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle Only LL UL Eq.
Min
Mean Med
Max SD
Min
Mean Med
Max SD
Min Max Med Min
Mean Med
Max SD
n
BF Width (ft)
18.2
22.0
24.6
5.3
10.8
12.3
18.3
19.8
21
3
Floodprone Width (ft)
250.0
306.0
378.0
14
60
125
100
100
100
3
BF Mean Depth (ft)
1.9
2.1
2.3
0.8
1.0
1.8
1.6
2.0
2.7
3
BF Max Depth (ft)
3.0
4.0
4.2
1.0
1.5
2.6
3.6
3.7
3.8
3
BF Cross Sectional Area (ft)
41.3
46.3
47.5
5.4
10.6
19.7
33.0
40.4
49.8
3
Width/Depth Ratio
8.0
10.5
12.8
5.2
8.6
14.4
6.8
9.9
13.1
3
Entrenchment Ratio
12.4
13.7
17.2
1.7
4.3
>10.2
4.8
5.1
5.5
3
Bank Height Ratio
1.1
1.2
1.2
1.0
1.0
1.1
1.0
1.0
1.3 1
3
Profile
Riffle length (ft)
Riffle slope (ft/ft)
0.0040
0.0188
0.0704
Pool length (ft)
Pool Max depth (ft)
3.7
4.4
5.2
1.2
1.8
3.3
Pool spacing (ft)
9.0
46.0
73.0
Pattern
Channel Bcltwidth (ft)
26.1
52.9
69.9
10
41
102
Radius of Curvature (ft)
9.9
24.8
58.8
11
21
85
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft)
0.5
1.1
2.39
1.3
2
9.1
Meander Wavelength (ft)
59.9
159.6
244.4
-
-
-
Meander Width ratiol
1.4
2.2
3.8
1.6
4.4
8.9
Transport parameters
Reach Shear Stress (competency) lbs/ft'
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
Stream Power (transport capacity) W/m'
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
E/C4
E/C4
E/C-type
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
3.0-3.4
2.2-5.6
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
123.9 - 157.42
20-97
Valley Length (ft)
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
Sinuosity
1.20 - 1.37
1.0 - 2.3
Water Surface Slope ft/ft
BF slope ft/ft
Bankfull Floodplain Area acres
% of Reach with Eroding Banks
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other

Table 7b. Baseline Stream Data Summary (North Branch)
Mud Lick Creek Mitigation Project - NCDMS Project Number 93482
Parameter Gauge Regional Curve
Pre -Existing Condition (North Branch)
Reference Reach(es) Data
Design (North Branch)
Monitoring Baseline (North Branch)
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle Only LL UL Eq.
Min
Mean Med
Max SD
Min
Mean Med
Max
SD Min
Max Med
Min
Mean Med
Max SD
n
BF Width (ft)
8.3
10.4
5.3
10.8
12.3
13.8
14.0
14.6
16.2
17.7
2
Floodprone Width (ft)
33.3
80.0
14
60
125
30
70
100
100
100
2
BF Mean Depth (ft)
0.7
1.5
0.8
1.0
1.8
1.0
1.2
0.8
0.9
1.0
2
BF Max Depth (ft)
1.5
2.3
1.0
1.5
2.6
1.3
2.0
1.8
1.8
1.8
2
BF Cross Sectional Area (ft 2)
7.7
12.7
5.4
10.6
19.7
14.4
16.3
14.2
14.4
14.5
2
Width/Depth Ratio
5.4
14.0
5.2
8.6
14.4
12.0
13.0
14.6
18.4
22.1
2
Entrenchment Ratio
1.9
10.1
1.7
4.3
>10.2
2.2
5.0
5.6
6.2
6.8
2
Bank Height Ratiol 1
1.7
2.0 1
1.0
1 1.0
1.1
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0 1
1.0 1
2
Profile
Riffle length (ft)
Riffle slope (ft/ft)
0.0040
0.0188
0.0704
0.0060 0.0340
Pool length (ft)
Pool Max depth (ft)
2.1
2.7
1.2
1.8
3.3
1.3
4.7
Pool spacing (ft)
9.0
46.0
73.0
19.0
92.0
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth ft
11
26
38.5
10
41
102
41
125
Radius of Curvature (ft)
6.1
17
37
11
21
85
25
42
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft)
0.73
1.6
4.46
1.3
2
9.1
1.8
3
Meander Wavelength (ft)
37.9
64.1
100.6
-
-
-
41
168
Meander Width ratio
1.1
2.8
4.6
1.6
4.4
8.9
3
15
Transport parameters
Reach Shear Stress (competency) lbs/ft2
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
Stream Power (transport capacity) W/m2
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
E5B5c
E/C4
C4
C-type
Bankfull Velocit s
3.3 -3.5
2.2-5.6
2.4-4.3
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
25.41 - 44.45
20-97
34.6 - 70.1
Valley Length ft
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
Sinuosity
1.22-1.32
1.0-2.3
1.2- 1.3
Water Surface Slope ft/ft
BF slope ft/ft
Bankfull Floodplain Area acres
% of Reach with Eroding Banks
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other

Table 7c. Baseline Stream Data Summary (East Branch)
Mud Lick Creek Mitigation Project - NCDMS Project Number 93482
Parameter Gauge Regional Curve
Pre -Existing Condition (East Branch)
Reference Reach(es) Data
Design (East Branch)
Monitoring Baseline (East Branch)
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle Only LL UL Eq.
Min Mean
Med Max SD
Min
Mean Med
Max
SD Min
Max
Med
Min
Mean Med
Max SD
n
BF Width (ft)
4.3
5.3
10.8
12.3
11.0
8.9
12.8
16.6
2
Floodprone Width (ft)
23.0
14
60
125
24
55
100
100
100
2
BF Mean Depth (ft)
1.1
0.8
1.0
1.8
0.9
0.6
0.7
0.8
2
BF Max Depth (ft)
1.4
1.0
1.5
2.6
0.9
1.5
1.2
1.4
1.5
2
BF Cross Sectional Area (ft)
4.8
5.4
10.6
19.7
9.7
6.7
8.7
10.6
2
Width/Depth Ratio
3.9
5.2
8.6
14.4
12.4
11.1
19.4
27.7
2
Entrenchment Ratio
2.1
1.7
4.3
>10.2
2.2
5.0
6.0
8.6
11.2
2
Bank Height Ratio
1.9
1.0
1.0 1
1.1
1.0
1.0
1.0
1 1.0
1.0
2
Profile
Riffle length (ft)
Riffle slope (ft/ft)
0.0040
0.0188
0.0704
0.0156
0.0442
Pool length (ft)
Pool Max depth (ft)
1.6
1.2
1.8
3.3
1.0
3.5
Pool spacing (11)1
9.0 1
1 46.0 1
73.0
1 15.0
1 73.0
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
--
10
41
102
22
98
Radius of Curvature (ft)
--
11
21
85
20
30
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft)
--
1.3
2
9.1
1.8
3
Meander Wavelength (ft)
--
-
-
-
33
132
Meander Width ratio
--
1.6
4.4
8.9
3
12
Transport parameters
Reach Shear Stress (competency) 1bS/ft2
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
Stream Power (transport capacity)W/m2
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
B4c
E/C4
C4
C-type
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
4.2
2.2-5.6
3.3
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
20.2
20-97
32
Valley Length (ft)
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
Sinuosity
1
1.0-2.3
1.20-1.30
Water Surface Slope ft/ft
BF slope ft/ft
Bankfull Floodplain Area acres
% of Reach with Eroding Banks
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other

Table 8a. Monitoring Data - Dimensional Morphology Summary (Dimensional Parameters - Cross Sections)
Mud Lick Creek Mitigation Proiect - NCDMS Protect Number 93482
Table 8b. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Mud Lick Creek Mitigation Project - NCDMS Project Number 93482
Cross Section 1 (Mud Lick Cr)
Cross Section 2 Mud Lick Cr Cross Section 10 Mud Lick Cr)
Parameter
Riffle
Riffle Riffle
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle Only
Dimension
MYO
MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY5+ MYO
MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY5+ MYO MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY5+
BF Width ft
18.3
21.0
19.8
Floodprone Width (ft) (approx)
100.0
100.0
100.0
BF Mean Depth (ft)
2.7
1.6
2.0
BF Max Depth (ft)
3.8
3.7
3.6
Low Bank Height
5.0
3.7
3.6
BF Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
49.8
33.0
40.4
Wid"epth Ratio
6.7
13.4
9.7
Entrenchment Ratio
5.5
4.8
5.1
Bank Height Ratio
1.3
1.0
1.0
d50 mm
9.9
9.9
9.9
Table 8b. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Mud Lick Creek Mitigation Project - NCDMS Project Number 93482
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle Only
BF Max Depth (ft)
BF Cross Sectional Area (ft)
Entrenchment Ratio
Bank Height Ratio
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
,
% of Reach „.
StabilityChannel ,

Table 8c. Monitoring Data - Dimensional Morphology Summary (Dimensional Parameters - Cross Sections)
Mud Lick Creek Mitis ation Proiect - NCDMS Protect Number 93482
Table 8d. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Mud Lick Creek Mitigation Project - NCDMS Project Number 93482
Cross Section 3(North Branch
Cross Section 4 North Branch
Cross Section 5 North Branch Cross Section 6 North Branch
Parameter
Pool
Riffle
Pool Riffle
JL -
Dimension
MYO
MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY5+ MYO
MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY5+ MYO
MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY5+ MYO MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY5+
BF Width ft
14.2
17.7
14.2
14.6
Floodprone Width (ft) (approx)
NA
100.0
NA
100.0
BF Mean Depth (ft)
1.1
0.8
1.3
1.0
BF Max Depth (ft)
2.2
1.8
2.6
1.8
Low Bank Height
2.2
1.8
2.6
1.8
BF Cross Sectional Area (ft)
15.5
1 14.2
18.6
14.5
Wid"epth Ratio
NA
22.1
NA
14.7
Entrenchment Ratio
NA
5.6
NA
6.8
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
d50 mm
18.8
18.8
Table 8d. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Mud Lick Creek Mitigation Project - NCDMS Project Number 93482
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle Only
BF Max Depth (ft)
BF Cross Sectional Area (ft)
Entrenchment Raft.
Bank Height Ratio
------
------
------ ------ ------ ------
------
------
------ ------ ------ ------
Channel Beltw�
Radvas of Curvature (ft)
------
------
------ ------ ------ ------
Meander Wavelength (ft)
------
------
------ ------ ------ ------
Additional Reach Parameters
BF slope
d . 1 d8 d'
------------------------------------
Eroding

Table 8e. Monitoring Data - Dimensional Morphology Summary (Dimensional Parameters - Cross Sections)
Mud Lick Creek Mitis ation Proiect - NCDMS Protect Number 93482
Table 8b. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Mud Lick Creek Mitigation Project - NCDMS Project Number 93482
Cross Section 7 East Branch
Cross Section 8 East Branch Cross Section 9 East Branch)
Parameter
Riffle
Pool Riffle
JL—
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle Only
Dimension
MYO
MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY5+ MYO
MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY5+ MYO MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY5+
BF Width ft
8.9
7.6
16.6
Floodprone Width (ft) (approx)
100.0
NA
100.0
BF Mean Depth (ft)
0.8
1.4
0.6
BF Max Depth (ft)
1.2
2.4
1.5
Low Bank Height
1.2
2.4
1.5
BF Cross Sectional Area (ft)
6.7
1 10.5
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10.6
Width/Depth Ratio
11.8
NA
26.0
Entrenchment Ratio
11.2
NA
6.0
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
d50 mm
14.3
14.3
Table 8b. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Mud Lick Creek Mitigation Project - NCDMS Project Number 93482
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle Only
BF Max Depth (ft)
BF Cross Sectional Area (ft)
Erit,enchinerit Ran.
Bank Height Ratio
------
------
------ ------
------
------
------
------
------ ------
------
------
------
------
------ ------ ------
------
- -
------
------
------ ------ ------
------
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
C
' '-. o�

Appendix E.
As -built Plan Sheets
Asbuilt Baseline Monitoring Report (Final) Appendices
Mud Lick Creek Mitigation Site (DMS Project # 93482)

CERTIFICATE OF ACCURACY OF MAPPING
I, DAVID K. ALLEY, CERTIFY THAT THIS PROJECT WAS COMPLETED
UNDER MY DIRECT AND RESPONSIBLE CHARGE FROM AN ACTUAL
SURVEY MADE UNDER MY SUPERVISION; THAT THIS TOPOGRAPHIC
SURVEY WAS PERFORMED AT THE 95 PERCENT CONFIDENCE LEVEL
TO MEET THE FEDERAL GEOGRAPHIC DATA COMMITTEE STANDARDS;
THAT THIS SURVEY WAS PERFORMED TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS
FOR A TOPOGRAPHIC/PLANIMETRIC SURVEY TO THE ACCURACY OF
CLASS AA AND VERTICAL ACCURACY WHEN APPLICABLE TO THE CLASS
A STANDARD, AND THAT THE ORIGINAL DATA WAS OBTAINED ON
FEBRUARY 19 2015; THAT THE SURVEY WAS COMPLETED ON
FEBRUARY 20, 2015; AND ALL COORDIANTES ARE BASED ON NCGS
VRS-NETWORK NAD83-(2011) AND ALL ELEVATIONS AREA BASED ON
NCGS VRS-NETWORK NAVD 88 AND THAT THIS MAP WAS PREPARED
IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE STANDARDS AND PRACTICE FOR LAND
SURVEYING AS OUTLINED BY THE NC ADMINISTRATION CODE TITLE
21, CHAPTER 56.
WITNESS MY HAND D OFFIC SEALTHI 10 DAY OF AUGUST
2017. Wcsrci #�
VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE L -44x2 CAW
;�
LICENSE NO. -- PROFES ONAL D YOR s •.'�y
•� �y►• 'T
:'C SEAL r:
�.•9s
49
NOTES:t�/It����
1. RAW ERROR OF CLOSURE 1:10,000+, MISCLOSURE WAS
DISTRIBUTED BY COMPASS RULE.
2. AREA DETERMINED BY COORDINATE COMPUTATIONS.
3. DISTANCES SHOWN ARE HORIZONTAL GROUND DISTANCES
UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.
4. CONTOUR INTERVAL = 1 FOOT
5. THE HORIZONTAL (NAD 83/2011) AND VERTICAL (NAVD 88) DATUM WAS ESTABLISHED
BY OTHERS. SEE REFERENCE'S SHOWN HEREON.
6. THIS SURVEY IS SUBJECT TO ANY AND ALL FACTS THAT MY
BE DISCLOSED BY A FULL TITLE SEARCH, WHICH HAS NOT
BEEN FURNISHED TO SURVEYOR AS OF THIS DATE.
7. THE EXISTING CONTOURS SHOWN HEREON IN COLOR WERE PROVIDED BY OTHERS
AND ARE SUBJECT TO THE ACCURACY THEREOF.
8. THE FIELD WORK WAS PERFORMED FROM JULY 17-18, 2017.
REFERENCES: PROJECT CONTROL
1. PLAT ENTITLED "FINAL PLAT MUDLICK CREEK (EEP 939485, SPO 19 -BD) ADDITIONAL CP #4 (NAD83/NAVD 88)
ACREAGE TO NCDOT PROJECT U-2524WM, PROPERTY OF GRAYSON C. THOMAS HEIRS" NORTHING-751,377.7236
FASTING-1,870,842.0187
RECORDED NOVEMBER 13, 2015 IN PLAT SLIDE 2015-265 & 266, CHATHAM COUNTY
REGISTRY. ELEVATION -587.54'
2. PLAT ENTITLED "CONSERVATION PROJECT U-2524WM THOMAS TRACT" RECORDED
DECEMBER 2, 2004 IN PLAT SLIDE 2004-393 & 394, CHATHAM COUNTY REGISTRY.
3. ALL DEEDS AND MAPS SHOWN HEREON.
PROJECT CONTROL
NCDOT "THOMAS 1- (NAD83/NAVD 88)
NORTHING -751,100.7723'
EASTING-1,869,878.4481'
ELEVATION -610.85'
VAN
AA T11I F
LEGEND
EXISTING IRON PIN O EIP -
EXISTING REBAR O EIR
NO POINT SET • NPS
IRON REBAR SET • IRS
CABLE PEDESTAL nc
TELEPHONE MANHOLE CT)
TELEPHONE PEDESTAL T
FLOOD LIGHT
GUY WIRE m
LIGHT POLE
ELECTRIC MANHOLE QE \\
ELECTRIC METER Q \
ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER ® \
UTILITY POLE 1� \
BOLLARD o �,\d'y
GAS METER
GAS VALVE ®GV y���a��
SEWER CLEAN OUT O \
SEWER MANHOLE QS
WOMEN rmL�,
SIGN
CATCH BASIN ❑ CBS---�€
CURB INLET MCI \
DROP \ YARD INLET Q DI / YI
FLARED END SECTION 31e.00
...... . \.
STORM MANHOLE
HANDICAP 3Il¢ (`� 3».? °Q °
MUD LICK CREEK Ate» ,� 00
FIRE HYDRANT
WATER MANHOLE ® o \ ✓ +p' , -
WATER METER ��__=` {•
WATER VALVE ® WV
0
WELL US -V
MANHOLE Q MH $. 0,0 °I
PRESSURE INDICATOR VALVE ® PIV � �F
TREE,
RIGHT-OF-WAY R/W \4&
PROPERTY LINE P/L
PARCEL IDENTIFICATION NO. P.I.N.
CONCRETE MONUMENT CM
CHORD CH
SIGHT EASEMENT SE SHf� j',1 j,L'j 7T 2
DEED BOOK DB
PLAT BOOK PB
CURB AND GUTTER C&G
REINFORCED CONC PIPE RCP
CORRUGATED METAL PIPE CMP
CORRUGATED PLASTIC PIPE CPP
BOUNDARY LINE
RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE - --
UNSURVEYED PROPERTY LINE
CONSERVATION EASEMENT — CE CE AA
FENCE (WIRE) LINE x —x —x
F
aAraax J¢�mainfele
TAx Pw Q7AP 1',1�41{.OW
—SHEET 5
i SHEET 4—
� E� E
v, r
ENCE (WOOD) LINE
x— x— x
_71— SHEET 6-- ---
SHEET S
BANKFULL
..... ..... —
'THOMAS 2-
NCDOT THOMAS 2*(NAD83/NAVD 88)
cT
v _
NORTHING -750,346.4685 -
� y�
$ 17111x'
EASTING-1,870,442.8109'
yr
EP
ELEVATION -600.80'
EDGE OF PAVEMENT
r
c
\%
GRADING LIMITS
---------------
%
CRUTCHMID
CROSSROADS
—❑NU—aHU ------- DW—
CH
TIE LINE
„yam 109+00cc
M• /
Cz
OHARUE COOPER pD
N c sm R
MINOR CONTOUR LINE
._...... .. .......
YamIM RDD h 4'� ` 2\ s i
�mm\ C
° 1
WETLAND ZONE LINE
ORADY SLER
CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
LOG VANE
9000aft
os
a
qr
CERTIFICATE OF ACCURACY OF MAPPING
I, DAVID K. ALLEY, CERTIFY THAT THIS PROJECT WAS COMPLETED
UNDER MY DIRECT AND RESPONSIBLE CHARGE FROM AN ACTUAL
SURVEY MADE UNDER MY SUPERVISION; THAT THIS TOPOGRAPHIC
SURVEY WAS PERFORMED AT THE 95 PERCENT CONFIDENCE LEVEL
TO MEET THE FEDERAL GEOGRAPHIC DATA COMMITTEE STANDARDS;
THAT THIS SURVEY WAS PERFORMED TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS
FOR A TOPOGRAPHIC/PLANIMETRIC SURVEY TO THE ACCURACY OF
CLASS AA AND VERTICAL ACCURACY WHEN APPLICABLE TO THE CLASS
A STANDARD, AND THAT THE ORIGINAL DATA WAS OBTAINED ON
FEBRUARY 19 2015; THAT THE SURVEY WAS COMPLETED ON
FEBRUARY 20, 2015; AND ALL COORDIANTES ARE BASED ON NCGS
VRS-NETWORK NAD83-(2011) AND ALL ELEVATIONS AREA BASED ON
NCGS VRS-NETWORK NAVD 88 AND THAT THIS MAP WAS PREPARED
IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE STANDARDS AND PRACTICE FOR LAND
SURVEYING AS OUTLINED BY THE NC ADMINISTRATION CODE TITLE
21, CHAPTER 56.
WITNESS MY HAND D OFFIC SEALTHI 10 DAY OF AUGUST
2017. Wcsrci #�
VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE L -44x2 CAW
;�
LICENSE NO. -- PROFES ONAL D YOR s •.'�y
•� �y►• 'T
:'C SEAL r:
�.•9s
49
NOTES:t�/It����
1. RAW ERROR OF CLOSURE 1:10,000+, MISCLOSURE WAS
DISTRIBUTED BY COMPASS RULE.
2. AREA DETERMINED BY COORDINATE COMPUTATIONS.
3. DISTANCES SHOWN ARE HORIZONTAL GROUND DISTANCES
UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.
4. CONTOUR INTERVAL = 1 FOOT
5. THE HORIZONTAL (NAD 83/2011) AND VERTICAL (NAVD 88) DATUM WAS ESTABLISHED
BY OTHERS. SEE REFERENCE'S SHOWN HEREON.
6. THIS SURVEY IS SUBJECT TO ANY AND ALL FACTS THAT MY
BE DISCLOSED BY A FULL TITLE SEARCH, WHICH HAS NOT
BEEN FURNISHED TO SURVEYOR AS OF THIS DATE.
7. THE EXISTING CONTOURS SHOWN HEREON IN COLOR WERE PROVIDED BY OTHERS
AND ARE SUBJECT TO THE ACCURACY THEREOF.
8. THE FIELD WORK WAS PERFORMED FROM JULY 17-18, 2017.
REFERENCES: PROJECT CONTROL
1. PLAT ENTITLED "FINAL PLAT MUDLICK CREEK (EEP 939485, SPO 19 -BD) ADDITIONAL CP #4 (NAD83/NAVD 88)
ACREAGE TO NCDOT PROJECT U-2524WM, PROPERTY OF GRAYSON C. THOMAS HEIRS" NORTHING-751,377.7236
FASTING-1,870,842.0187
RECORDED NOVEMBER 13, 2015 IN PLAT SLIDE 2015-265 & 266, CHATHAM COUNTY
REGISTRY. ELEVATION -587.54'
2. PLAT ENTITLED "CONSERVATION PROJECT U-2524WM THOMAS TRACT" RECORDED
DECEMBER 2, 2004 IN PLAT SLIDE 2004-393 & 394, CHATHAM COUNTY REGISTRY.
3. ALL DEEDS AND MAPS SHOWN HEREON.
PROJECT CONTROL
NCDOT "THOMAS 1- (NAD83/NAVD 88)
NORTHING -751,100.7723'
EASTING-1,869,878.4481'
ELEVATION -610.85'
VAN
AA T11I F
LEGEND
EXISTING IRON PIN O EIP -
EXISTING REBAR O EIR
NO POINT SET • NPS
IRON REBAR SET • IRS
CABLE PEDESTAL nc
TELEPHONE MANHOLE CT)
TELEPHONE PEDESTAL T
FLOOD LIGHT
GUY WIRE m
LIGHT POLE
ELECTRIC MANHOLE QE \\
ELECTRIC METER Q \
ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER ® \
UTILITY POLE 1� \
BOLLARD o �,\d'y
GAS METER
GAS VALVE ®GV y���a��
SEWER CLEAN OUT O \
SEWER MANHOLE QS
WOMEN rmL�,
SIGN
CATCH BASIN ❑ CBS---�€
CURB INLET MCI \
DROP \ YARD INLET Q DI / YI
FLARED END SECTION 31e.00
...... . \.
STORM MANHOLE
HANDICAP 3Il¢ (`� 3».? °Q °
MUD LICK CREEK Ate» ,� 00
FIRE HYDRANT
WATER MANHOLE ® o \ ✓ +p' , -
WATER METER ��__=` {•
WATER VALVE ® WV
0
WELL US -V
MANHOLE Q MH $. 0,0 °I
PRESSURE INDICATOR VALVE ® PIV � �F
TREE,
RIGHT-OF-WAY R/W \4&
PROPERTY LINE P/L
PARCEL IDENTIFICATION NO. P.I.N.
CONCRETE MONUMENT CM
CHORD CH
SIGHT EASEMENT SE SHf� j',1 j,L'j 7T 2
DEED BOOK DB
PLAT BOOK PB
CURB AND GUTTER C&G
REINFORCED CONC PIPE RCP
CORRUGATED METAL PIPE CMP
CORRUGATED PLASTIC PIPE CPP
BOUNDARY LINE
RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE - --
UNSURVEYED PROPERTY LINE
CONSERVATION EASEMENT — CE CE AA
FENCE (WIRE) LINE x —x —x
F
aAraax J¢�mainfele
TAx Pw Q7AP 1',1�41{.OW
—SHEET 5
i SHEET 4—
� E� E
v, r
ENCE (WOOD) LINE
x— x— x
_71— SHEET 6-- ---
SHEET S
BANKFULL
..... ..... —
'THOMAS 2-
NCDOT THOMAS 2*(NAD83/NAVD 88)
THALWEG
v _
NORTHING -750,346.4685 -
EDGE OF GRAVEL
EG
EASTING-1,870,442.8109'
EP
ELEVATION -600.80'
EDGE OF PAVEMENT
r
c
\%
GRADING LIMITS
---------------
%
OVERHEAD UTILITY
—❑NU—aHU ------- DW—
CH
TIE LINE
„yam 109+00cc
M• /
Cz
MAJOR CONTOUR LINE
MINOR CONTOUR LINE
._...... .. .......
YamIM RDD h 4'� ` 2\ s i
�mm\ C
WATER LINE
WETLAND ZONE LINE
CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
LOG VANE
9000aft
BRUSH TOE
PDF processed with CutePDF evaluation edition www.CutePDF.com
e�sep°�s
SHEET I OF 7
AS BUILT SURVEY
FOR: NORTH STATE
ENVIRONMENTAL, INC
OF. MUD LICK CREEK
STREAM RESTORATION"
OWNER:
GRAYSON C. THOMAS, HEIRS
319 AUGUSTA DRIVE
STATESVILLE, NC 28625
TAX PIN: 8775-12-3214.000
DEED BOOK JS, PAGE 143
TAX PIN: 8775-01-6345.000
DEED BOOK 411, PAGE 846
IA ACRES +/- (TOTAL)
Allied Associates, P.A.
4720 KESTER MILL ROAD PHONE [phone]
WINSTON—SALEM, N.C. 27103
GRAPHIC SCALE www.alliedapa.com NC LICENSE #C-2198
0 50 100 200 400
SCALE TOWNSHIP COUNTY STATE DATE
1 " = 100' ALBRIGHT CHATHAM NORTH CAROLINA 08/01/17
( IN FEET ) SURVEYED: MAPPED: JOB NO. MAP NO. TDS
ft.
1 inch = 100 PJ TR DA PA170611 MLC.dw9 MLC
© AlUed Assoc., P.A. 2017
a� — —--
_71— SHEET 6-- ---
SHEET S
----
PROJECT CONTROL
CP #6 (NAD83/NAVD 88)
} /
NORTHING -751,064.1633
--�,
MOL
GSHEET
CATE
r
c
\%
m
0
V�p
%
iia 10 r. �;_ EASTD
CH
„yam 109+00cc
M• /
Cz
U){,-1
m '
.. �
Gm
YamIM RDD h 4'� ` 2\ s i
�mm\ C
�^^
MEL
GAN
/ /
/
aura a mous leis
TAX Pik pl7�L-0-�OIS000
a
SHEET I OF 7
AS BUILT SURVEY
FOR: NORTH STATE
ENVIRONMENTAL, INC
OF. MUD LICK CREEK
STREAM RESTORATION"
OWNER:
GRAYSON C. THOMAS, HEIRS
319 AUGUSTA DRIVE
STATESVILLE, NC 28625
TAX PIN: 8775-12-3214.000
DEED BOOK JS, PAGE 143
TAX PIN: 8775-01-6345.000
DEED BOOK 411, PAGE 846
IA ACRES +/- (TOTAL)
Allied Associates, P.A.
4720 KESTER MILL ROAD PHONE [phone]
WINSTON—SALEM, N.C. 27103
GRAPHIC SCALE www.alliedapa.com NC LICENSE #C-2198
0 50 100 200 400
SCALE TOWNSHIP COUNTY STATE DATE
1 " = 100' ALBRIGHT CHATHAM NORTH CAROLINA 08/01/17
( IN FEET ) SURVEYED: MAPPED: JOB NO. MAP NO. TDS
ft.
1 inch = 100 PJ TR DA PA170611 MLC.dw9 MLC
© AlUed Assoc., P.A. 2017
1 /
�
PROJECT CONTROL
CP #6 (NAD83/NAVD 88)
} /
NORTHING -751,064.1633
/
EASTING-1,871,667.0262'
ELEVATION -602.61'
I�
100
SHEET I OF 7
AS BUILT SURVEY
FOR: NORTH STATE
ENVIRONMENTAL, INC
OF. MUD LICK CREEK
STREAM RESTORATION"
OWNER:
GRAYSON C. THOMAS, HEIRS
319 AUGUSTA DRIVE
STATESVILLE, NC 28625
TAX PIN: 8775-12-3214.000
DEED BOOK JS, PAGE 143
TAX PIN: 8775-01-6345.000
DEED BOOK 411, PAGE 846
IA ACRES +/- (TOTAL)
Allied Associates, P.A.
4720 KESTER MILL ROAD PHONE [phone]
WINSTON—SALEM, N.C. 27103
GRAPHIC SCALE www.alliedapa.com NC LICENSE #C-2198
0 50 100 200 400
SCALE TOWNSHIP COUNTY STATE DATE
1 " = 100' ALBRIGHT CHATHAM NORTH CAROLINA 08/01/17
( IN FEET ) SURVEYED: MAPPED: JOB NO. MAP NO. TDS
ft.
1 inch = 100 PJ TR DA PA170611 MLC.dw9 MLC
© AlUed Assoc., P.A. 2017

VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE
STEEL
GATE
T AS PER E=6E=C �o��
ERVATION EASEMEN E 394 CE = CE XX�E XCE
CONSLAT SLIDE 2004, PA_ E �E ---A — C�- ; ,n
P � CE X CE CE — ♦ �� �\\
5 STRAND BARB x CE = — CE
�� C
WIRE FENCE — X X CE — CE
CE — CE
�
X CE X CE011,
CE X CE X CE CE ♦ �I
CE
X — X C CE CE ,
X XCE
E — CE
CE CE � _%
GG� 316+00 �7
, zc�� z
318+0041 1
♦ _�
40
04 40
< y _ _ _ •.
00
ICK CRE
MUD LIC ; _--- \\ '�� x / - x585.8' \ .
, - �\
l� � ► ` '•\� \ \ � � i // / 1 ' //� � � � _-'- 585.7'
\ --
.' 585.9'-'' ♦ •�•�•
— 4* ♦ ••.
LEGEND
EXISTING IRON PINO EIP 4* 4#
EXISTING REBAR O EIR
NO POINT SET • NPs C1� �� 585.7'
IRON REBAR SET • IRS ���� _r
CABLE PEDESTAL © `�� __ 584.7`'
O ` — \
TELEPHONE MANHOLE T -� � x x,�------------_- ,, , —�
TELEPHONE PEDESTAL ❑T
ao-
FLOOD LIGHT � 584.3' ��� 585.4' i
E A`SE
GUY WIRE m �� �— 3� 3�— �C ��`�_j
85.4 ��, -30 R ��101 0♦�
LIGHT POLE � X _3_3_—x33 �
ELECTRIC MANHOLE T �� 3 �C �� SE 20
ELECTRIC METER ❑E / ��3 � 3C � % 3C SL
3� � CO LAT IDE
ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER ® t� \ �rD x� 3� 3 % 33 P
UTILITY POLE a V � � �C �_ % -•�
�ASLME ER © F,�, 15p/ STRAND BARB C =�--�— ���'
GAS VALVE ®GV \ �'<� WIRE FENCE �'--���-3��3C�X
SEWER CLEAN OUT O
S 10\
EWER MANHOLE
WETLAND ZONE LINE
°,0 \
<O
�\ J \
\ O \
CE CE —
x x x \
x x x \
Hu OHu oHu
CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
LOG VANE
BRUSH TOE
SHEE T 2 OF 7
AS BUILT SURVEY
FOR: NOR TH S TA TE
ENVIRONMENTAL, INC
OF: "MUD LICK CREEK
STREAM RES T ORA TION"
OWNER:
GRAYSON C. THOMAS, HEIRS
319 AUGUSTA DRIVE
STATESVILLE, INC 28625
TAX PIN: 8775-12-3214.000
DEED BOOK JS, PAGE 143
TAX PIN: 8775-01-6345.000
DEED BOOK 411. PAGE 846
VA ACRES +/- (TOTAL)
Allied Associates, P.A.
SCALE
4720 KESTER MILL ROAD PHONE [phone]
WINSTON—SALEMFAX 760-8
GRAPHIC SCAILE www.allledapacomN.C. 27103NC LICENSE #C82198
20 0 10 20 40 80
SCALE TOWNSHIP COUNTY STATE DATE
" = 20' ALBRIGHT CHATHAM NORTH CAROLINA 08/01/17
( IN FEET ) SURVEYED: MAPPED: JOB NO. MAP NO. TDS
1 inch = 20 ft. PJ TR DA PA170611 MLC.dwg MLC
© AWed Assoc., P A 2017
SIGN
-�
CATCH BASIN
❑ CB
CURB INLET
D CI
DROP \ YARD INLET
❑Q DI / YI
FLARED END SECTION
STORM MANHOLE
QD
HANDICAP
FIRE HYDRANT
WATER MANHOLE
QW
WATER METER
❑w
WATER VALVE
® WV
WELL
WO
MANHOLE
(DMH
PRESSURE INDICATOR VALVE
® PIV
TREE
O
RIGHT-OF-WAY
R/W
PROPERTY LINE
P/L
PARCEL IDENTIFICATION NO.
P.I.N.
CONCRETE MONUMENT
CM
CHORD
CH
SIGHT EASEMENT
SE
DEED BOOK
DB
PLAT BOOK
PB
CURB AND GUTTER
C&G
REINFORCED CONC PIPE
RCP
CORRUGATED METAL PIPE
CMP
CORRUGATED PLASTIC PIPE
CPP
BOUNDARY LINE
RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE
UNSURVEYED PROPERTY LINE
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
—
FENCE (WIRE) LINE
FENCE (WOOD) LINE
BANKFULL
—
THALWEG
—
EDGE OF GRAVEL
E
EDGE OF PAVEMENT
F
GRADING LIMITS
---
OVERHEAD UTILITY
u
TIE LINE
MAJOR CONTOUR LINE
MINOR CONTOUR LINE
WATER LINE
WETLAND ZONE LINE
°,0 \
<O
�\ J \
\ O \
CE CE —
x x x \
x x x \
Hu OHu oHu
CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
LOG VANE
BRUSH TOE
SHEE T 2 OF 7
AS BUILT SURVEY
FOR: NOR TH S TA TE
ENVIRONMENTAL, INC
OF: "MUD LICK CREEK
STREAM RES T ORA TION"
OWNER:
GRAYSON C. THOMAS, HEIRS
319 AUGUSTA DRIVE
STATESVILLE, INC 28625
TAX PIN: 8775-12-3214.000
DEED BOOK JS, PAGE 143
TAX PIN: 8775-01-6345.000
DEED BOOK 411. PAGE 846
VA ACRES +/- (TOTAL)
Allied Associates, P.A.
SCALE
4720 KESTER MILL ROAD PHONE [phone]
WINSTON—SALEMFAX 760-8
GRAPHIC SCAILE www.allledapacomN.C. 27103NC LICENSE #C82198
20 0 10 20 40 80
SCALE TOWNSHIP COUNTY STATE DATE
" = 20' ALBRIGHT CHATHAM NORTH CAROLINA 08/01/17
( IN FEET ) SURVEYED: MAPPED: JOB NO. MAP NO. TDS
1 inch = 20 ft. PJ TR DA PA170611 MLC.dwg MLC
© AWed Assoc., P A 2017

LEGEND
TREE
RIGHT—OF—WAY R/W I \ \`l� \\ ♦ I J# j '
PROPERTY LINE P/L ����r•�----,� m ♦♦;�\ \/ ♦� n ; J# 41
PARCEL IDENTIFICATION NO. P.I.N. e. SHEET m ,CONCRETE MONUMENT CM e. % '� �♦
CHORD CH 7������e•e.e.�e.� ♦\ \ /1 \ ��♦ i
�MfM I ♦ \� 585.3 J*
SIGHT EASEMENT SE e■ ♦� \ \ / \ %% , ,
DEED BOOK DB 4UPLAT BOOK PBcG �V SHEET �-----_--������e.���------ ♦,;\\\\\\\ / �X m 'i ,�
CURB AND GUTTER 3 �� ��`� ,
REINFORCED CONC PIPE RCP
CORRUGATED METAL PIPE CMP ,\
CPP \ �O
CORRUGATED PLASTIC PIPE /, tV n \ ♦,\ 0 \ \ 1 e. --
BOUNDARY LINE Q kU m ♦,\ \\ ����� ���----- i j
/
RIGHT—OF—WAY LINE — — — — _ _ I ♦,\ \ \ \ op J*
UNSURVEYED PROPERTY LINE — IT t \ 586.6, , 1
— /
CONSERVATION EASEMENT CE CE �G / \\ / X
FENCE (WIRE) LINE x x x
FENCE (WOOD) LINE x x x `V / / ♦ m
I I
BANKFULL = — — —
THALWEG
EDGE OF GRAVEL EP /
EDGE OF PAVEMENT / m
/
GRADING LIMITS -
--———— —— — — — — —-
/ _30./f
OVERHEAD UTILITY
TIE LINE / -30 OO / 587.6)
MAJOR CONTOUR LINE -30 (�X i,// /// X #
� ' 1 1
MINOR CONTOUR LINE JO /-/�// �/ ,,
� 1 1
WATER LINE — — — — ——
--_,-� /�
WETLAND ZONE LINE 0 / / -'
CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
OLOG VANE
I I
BRUSH TOE
4
144,
i
4
1 1
! —5g5 '
//C 0__
-
QQj
P � 5 PES i GE / ' oQ-
`►� GE ��
SEMEN �E 3g
0*
/�
STEEL
o
GATE
/ ��j 4 t4
J* /4f�
;' Co
�/ ♦ / Q'
U 0 �If ♦
O
40P
41
�, / •
CE X �XCE O 41
O
�E w
1
�, M ;
��
1
< w / / STAGING
��`� �` 7�91, AREA/'4#40,
Ic 4o
J
41
,♦ ` `w----- I
1---------'--
I �� '
t
�7 ♦ w ,
U
� XO �
0 %
,'�� i
x SHEE T 3 OF 7
, ! , .�_ _
'~ ` \ `♦ AS BUILT SURVEY
1 . 1
JJ, ��� I _ 4'♦ GRAYSON C. THOMAS, HEIRS %% ,,-'' FOR: NORTH STATE
DB 411, PG. 846 �-'
585.9X r , ENVIRONMENTAL, INC
TAX PIN: 8775-01-6345.000
OF. MUD LICK CREEK
------� ; X585.8' N�-...... �STREAM RESTORATION
/ I 588.0
\ I J* OWNER:
GRAYSON C. THOMAS, HEIRS
X
\� I 319 AUGUSTA DRIVE
%585.4 ----.'--~♦,, STATESVILLE, NO 28625
--
------`-. -4 ---- �� 4# TAX PIN: 8775-12-3214.000
585.7' -o 586.4x �, 586.4X � DEED BOOK JS, PAGE 143
--- TAX PIN: 8775-01-6345.000
-- ♦♦ I ,-/ DEED BOOK 41 1, PAGE 846
—K ♦ 0 NILA ACRES +/— (TOTAL)
♦,
3��X 5 PER -- Allied Associates, P.A.
�— •CEMENT �' 3g q STEEL WINSTON—SALEM, N.C. 27103
4720 KESTER MILL ROAD PHONE [phone]
PAGE GATE GRAPHIC SCALE
www.alliedapa.com NO LICENSE #C-2198
2-0(%,
O 0 /I_' 20 0 10 20 40 80
'LJ �L, SCALE TOWNSHIP COUNTY STATE DATE
1 " = 20' ALBRIGHT CHATHAM NORTH CAROLINA 08/01/17
( IN FEET SURVEYED: MAPPED: JOB NO. MAP NO. TDS
1 inch = 20 ft. PJ TR DA PAI 70611 MLC.dwg MLC
© Allied Assoc, P.A. 2017
EXISTING IRON PIN
O EIP
EXISTING REBAR
O EIR
Srm
NO POINT SET
• NPS
IRON REBAR SET
• IRS
R
CABLE PEDESTAL
`R"'C"F'gD
ortossnoaus
TELEPHONE MANHOLE
Q
�
TELEPHONE PEDESTAL
❑T
FLOOD LIGHT
RD 4"0� " CUUWRS. RD 41
GUY WIRE
m
RLE COMER
LIGHT POLE
ELECTRIC MANHOLE
Q
ELECTRIC METER
❑E
Gwy 511SR RD a
ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER
UTILITY POLE
a
�S
BOLLARD
o
GAS METER
AYf2i
GAS VALVE
®GV
SEWER CLEAN OUT
O
SEWER MANHOLE
Q
SIGN
—�
CATCH BASIN
❑ CB
CURB INLET
CI
DROP \YARD INLET
❑Q DI / YI
VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE
FLARED END SECTION
STORM MANHOLE
QD
HANDICAP
FIRE HYDRANT
WATER MANHOLE
QW
WATER METER
Q
WATER VALVE
® WV
WELL
WO
MANHOLE
QMH
PRESSURE INDICATOR VALVE
® PIV
TREE
RIGHT—OF—WAY R/W I \ \`l� \\ ♦ I J# j '
PROPERTY LINE P/L ����r•�----,� m ♦♦;�\ \/ ♦� n ; J# 41
PARCEL IDENTIFICATION NO. P.I.N. e. SHEET m ,CONCRETE MONUMENT CM e. % '� �♦
CHORD CH 7������e•e.e.�e.� ♦\ \ /1 \ ��♦ i
�MfM I ♦ \� 585.3 J*
SIGHT EASEMENT SE e■ ♦� \ \ / \ %% , ,
DEED BOOK DB 4UPLAT BOOK PBcG �V SHEET �-----_--������e.���------ ♦,;\\\\\\\ / �X m 'i ,�
CURB AND GUTTER 3 �� ��`� ,
REINFORCED CONC PIPE RCP
CORRUGATED METAL PIPE CMP ,\
CPP \ �O
CORRUGATED PLASTIC PIPE /, tV n \ ♦,\ 0 \ \ 1 e. --
BOUNDARY LINE Q kU m ♦,\ \\ ����� ���----- i j
/
RIGHT—OF—WAY LINE — — — — _ _ I ♦,\ \ \ \ op J*
UNSURVEYED PROPERTY LINE — IT t \ 586.6, , 1
— /
CONSERVATION EASEMENT CE CE �G / \\ / X
FENCE (WIRE) LINE x x x
FENCE (WOOD) LINE x x x `V / / ♦ m
I I
BANKFULL = — — —
THALWEG
EDGE OF GRAVEL EP /
EDGE OF PAVEMENT / m
/
GRADING LIMITS -
--———— —— — — — — —-
/ _30./f
OVERHEAD UTILITY
TIE LINE / -30 OO / 587.6)
MAJOR CONTOUR LINE -30 (�X i,// /// X #
� ' 1 1
MINOR CONTOUR LINE JO /-/�// �/ ,,
� 1 1
WATER LINE — — — — ——
--_,-� /�
WETLAND ZONE LINE 0 / / -'
CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
OLOG VANE
I I
BRUSH TOE
4
144,
i
4
1 1
! —5g5 '
//C 0__
-
QQj
P � 5 PES i GE / ' oQ-
`►� GE ��
SEMEN �E 3g
0*
/�
STEEL
o
GATE
/ ��j 4 t4
J* /4f�
;' Co
�/ ♦ / Q'
U 0 �If ♦
O
40P
41
�, / •
CE X �XCE O 41
O
�E w
1
�, M ;
��
1
< w / / STAGING
��`� �` 7�91, AREA/'4#40,
Ic 4o
J
41
,♦ ` `w----- I
1---------'--
I �� '
t
�7 ♦ w ,
U
� XO �
0 %
,'�� i
x SHEE T 3 OF 7
, ! , .�_ _
'~ ` \ `♦ AS BUILT SURVEY
1 . 1
JJ, ��� I _ 4'♦ GRAYSON C. THOMAS, HEIRS %% ,,-'' FOR: NORTH STATE
DB 411, PG. 846 �-'
585.9X r , ENVIRONMENTAL, INC
TAX PIN: 8775-01-6345.000
OF. MUD LICK CREEK
------� ; X585.8' N�-...... �STREAM RESTORATION
/ I 588.0
\ I J* OWNER:
GRAYSON C. THOMAS, HEIRS
X
\� I 319 AUGUSTA DRIVE
%585.4 ----.'--~♦,, STATESVILLE, NO 28625
--
------`-. -4 ---- �� 4# TAX PIN: 8775-12-3214.000
585.7' -o 586.4x �, 586.4X � DEED BOOK JS, PAGE 143
--- TAX PIN: 8775-01-6345.000
-- ♦♦ I ,-/ DEED BOOK 41 1, PAGE 846
—K ♦ 0 NILA ACRES +/— (TOTAL)
♦,
3��X 5 PER -- Allied Associates, P.A.
�— •CEMENT �' 3g q STEEL WINSTON—SALEM, N.C. 27103
4720 KESTER MILL ROAD PHONE [phone]
PAGE GATE GRAPHIC SCALE
www.alliedapa.com NO LICENSE #C-2198
2-0(%,
O 0 /I_' 20 0 10 20 40 80
'LJ �L, SCALE TOWNSHIP COUNTY STATE DATE
1 " = 20' ALBRIGHT CHATHAM NORTH CAROLINA 08/01/17
( IN FEET SURVEYED: MAPPED: JOB NO. MAP NO. TDS
1 inch = 20 ft. PJ TR DA PAI 70611 MLC.dwg MLC
© Allied Assoc, P.A. 2017

VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE
LEGEND
EXISTING IRON PIN
O EIP
EXISTING REBAR
O EIR
NO POINT SET
• NPS
IRON REBAR SET
• IRS
CABLE PEDESTAL
nc
TELEPHONE MANHOLE
0
TELEPHONE PEDESTAL
❑T
FLOOD LIGHT
MLC
GUY WIRE
m
LIGHT POLE
ELECTRIC MANHOLE
0
ELECTRIC METER
❑E
ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER
UTILITY POLEBOL
171
GASLMETER
nG
GAS VALVE
®GV
SEWER CLEAN OUT
O
SEWER MANHOLE
SIGN
-o-
CATCH BASIN
❑ CB
CURB INLET
CI
DROP \ YARD INLET
❑o DI / Y
FLARED END SECTION
STORM MANHOLE
DQ
HANDICAP
FIRE HYDRANT
WATER MANHOLE
OW
WATER METER
❑W
WATER VALVE
® WV
WELL
OW
MANHOLE
Q MH
PRESSURE INDICATOR VALVE ® PIV
TREE
a
RIGHT-OF-WAY
R/W
PROPERTY LINE
P/L
PARCEL IDENTIFICATION NO.
P.I.N.
CONCRETE MONUMENT
CM
CHORD
CH
SIGHT EASEMENT
SE
DEED BOOK
DB
PLAT BOOK
PB
CURB AND GUTTER
C&G
REINFORCED CONC PIPE
RCP
CORRUGATED METAL PIPE CMP
CORRUGATED PLASTIC PIPE CPP
BOUNDARY LINE -
RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE -- --
UNSURVEYED PROPERTY LINE
CONSERVATION EASEMENT CE CE —
FENCE (WIRE) LINE x x x
FENCE (WOOD) LINE x x x
BANKFULL —. • • • —. • • • —
THALWEG — — — — —
EDGE OF GRAVEL EG
EDGE OF PAVEMENT Ep
GRADING LIMITS
OVERHEAD UTILITY
TIE LINE
MAJOR CONTOUR LINE
MINOR CONTOUR LINE
WATER LINE
WETLAND ZONE LINE
OHU OHU OHU
CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
LOG VANE
CE X CE X CE C E CE X CE X CE X CE X CE X CE X CE XCE T E 6E STEEL
GATE GRAPHIC SCALE
- �,
yr'
�'� 20 0 10 20 40 80
\\ 588.2' r _
_ \
�. IN FEET )
+ ► 1 inch = 20 ft.
0 ;
(Y) I I i ! 582.1
\ `
"m
k2O
\ \m
\%� N,�_583.2'•
00
.
588.0'
J \ I
O \
\ GRAYSON C. THOMAS, HEIRS
DB JS, PG. 143
U \
TAX PIN: 8775-11-3214.000
--__--- STEEL
m GATE
�------------------
-.-.-----SHEET T
z, %
/. /%%
</D/ % C SHEET
a
ir , /' /� /,yIoo \ 0 B Pig ---
I•r 4f
►I I:� I IIS
\ � � I: I � �• i k cc �X � -- 588.2
� � f I • � cF c� 0
'/ �') I� 44+00 588.2' m
.�� X \G
Z �� ♦ / / /-,-'' 587.7'
C11
��� j = �� ,��� ., \ \ X 5 8 7.3' .1 4' I \ I
_– _ . x0 \ _ 585
\ / X 587.6 o ��
y`------------------------�
\� \• X 586.8 °
V_r NV–
un
C
1'�'`
0 585.44
s
-o CF
� k I i .•'/� / / sem/ /'• ♦
\ //0 3, I — 585
TN I I _ r
Do .1e
U CFNINN i ��00
\ 4 � ► / / X 586.5 . .-
U m / /j
Al
0
oC0
co
W �
wQ
C:)
U�
INS= c
585.35 z0•
109+00
�\48�` NV=
\ em
/
t) ,
SHEE T 4 OF 7
AS BUILT SURVEY
/'' --'' FOR: NORTH STATE
v m / ,� I� - - - SOX X
m _ _ _ _ ENVIRONMENTAL, INC
/ � /// X 587.2'-- �
;/ STEL
U m �l1011!-;;''O' S S�R �� CE GAT OF: "MUD LICK CREEK
OMAS HEIRS IW
G. 846 � m STREAM RESTORATION
♦ ' ►► m —
01-6345.000 m
m ^X //1:� 1 ► m1k
X 1587.2'
L) ♦ / ►
STEEL / ,�/��� • /I i �, m<
GATE
♦ � I
_ S \ . m
H EE T \ N SCALE
\� 585.3 1" _ 20'
SHEE
T
�
_ % %\ \ \ \ %
m \X SURVEYED:
BRUSH TOE
CHATHAM
NORTH CAROLINA
�_ � - ��� � � �PJ TR
MAPPED:
JOB NO.
MAP NO.
TDS
OWNER:
GRAYSON C. THOMAS, HEIRS
319 AUGUSTA DRIVE
STATESVILLE, NC 28625
TAX PIN: 8775-12-3214.000
DEED BOOK JS, PAGE 143
TAX PIN: 8775-01 -6345.000
DEED BOOK 411, PAGE 846
ACRES +/- (TOTAL)
Allied Associates, P.A.
4720 KESTER MILL ROAD PHONE [phone]
WINSTON—SALEM, N.C. 27103
www.alliedapa.com NC LICENSE #C-2198
TOWNSHIP
COUNTY
STATE
DATE
ALBRIGHT
CHATHAM
NORTH CAROLINA
08/01/17
MAPPED:
JOB NO.
MAP NO.
TDS
DA
PA170611
MLC.dwg
MLC
© Allied Assoc„ P,A, 2017

v` ,
t x ♦,'' x 591.8' � ,
7Z/7SHEET\ , - o 6
/ �� 1� -"�
Q ♦
a e SITE
ryP
C
RD co 47-
-OEHEET 5
le 1. +00 590.2'
/
x
CRUX FALO
CROSSROADS Ile
6/ 0
CHARLIE COOPER RD'o NRENN CULyERSDN RD G ;If
4f 4fIf
E9 0C
,0? RD GRADY SRER RD / . _
a
4S Nib I ��Z
40,
VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE 4*
4#
x
4#589.4 I ,�
-' / 1000,00 40 40
O / \
��- \ 1 f I
����• 588.7'
Ll% \7-
A-
590.2'x \� \ \\\ ``�
o . i/� 205+00 589.5'X 4,oa \ \ \\ I I
zL f x 588.6' 20 \ \ \\ `� %
x 588.6' %% \ I
588.5
\ \ _
100,
/ \ _ I _
22
N \. \ \ 592.6' �. �� 1 "
35 �k ; EAST BRANCH _ , `\ \ o �o
I 585. 20 � `,, c
109+00 i 590.3X \ \ I \ \ f I
i \ 593.6' ,, El -<
�. ��"/ `,/ • �// / 591.5'.--- ��•/` �, \ \\ \�\ \\ \ x x C
000,
0 \\\ \\ \\ 594.2 i \V,
C) _ - �!� I x88.5 �. O \ \\ C I I
\ f
/ v I I G7 I—
�\ _ � k _ m
LEGEND // � ♦♦� �o�
EXISTING IRON PIN O EIP , ♦� . (� , - \ ->1
EXISTING REBAR O EIR / � �♦ � V� O� `,, •� � \� • . \ `% n� I
NO POINT SET • NPS /// ; �♦ / `\` _ ._ \ `� I `
IRON REBAR SET •IRS �, � � � \ ,, • \ \ �
CABLE PEDESTAL © .� r♦♦ /� '9 \\ �\ \ `%
TELEPHONE MANHOLE T D // ♦�
TELEPHONE PEDESTAL
FLOOD LIGHT 2\' 591.
GUY WIRE 00 X
LIGHT POLE eo
_
n
0 \ o
ELECTRIC MANHOLE 0♦ / O O 'Q \ \ 1 I C) C
❑
ELECTRIC METER �,' C'F (�� S \ Q vp \
ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER
UTILITY POLEGJ �.9 �� �� �'� %,
BOLLARD o R
GAS METER © \N�\� (1 r// \ -�/ "% ,`� \\ \\ \ �' I I `` C� Lj
_
GAS VALVE ®GV , l O \ ♦ \ \ \ I c /v
SEWER CLEAN OUT O I C� \ \ ;I
SEWS MANHOLE SO r ��� \ �S `,� \\\ \ STEEL 0 I 20 0 0 GRAPHIC SCALE
'9 �9 -o `, \ \ \ \ I I GATE
\ \ \ 1.
SIGN H BASIN oCB GRAYSON C. THOMAS HEIRS
DROP INLET INLET =1 CI YI • D B JS P G. 143 �� s�'� `� ��
FLARED END SECTION EEL TAX PIN: 8775-11-3214.000 �j �\ \ \ \
STORM MANHOLE o ATE � �Q ``� \ � \\ \\ \� •\ \ \\�`; E\��
HANDICAP Li
FIRE HYDRANT( -n
' \J
WATER MANHOLE Q
WATER METER ;
❑ \ F `� \ \ \\ \
WATER VALVE ® WV \, �S9
Cn ,,
WELL OW �\
MANHOLE QMH --n%� C� `` \ \ \ ` �\\ c -70
1 '
20 40
( IN FEET )
1 inch = 20 ft.
SHEE T 5 OF 7
PRESSURE INDICATOR VALVE ® PIV
`, \ \ \ \ 7X
TREE
RIGHT-OF-WAY R/W % C' %, \ \ \ \ \ \\• ,`• p o �1
PROPERTY LINE P/L /�- F , \ \ \ \ 1,p =
PARCEL CONCRETE MONUMENT Cm
N0. P. ;T "///� `,,,\ \\ \\ 1\:N, '\\\\ ,* `,, c AS
CHORD CH \ \ \ \ ` \ \\ PP
S -9\ ♦ \ \ \
SIGHT EASEMENT E x, /1 � \ \ \ \ \�
BUILT SURVEY
0
W
PLATT BOOK PB - q '�`� `\ \\ `� ��\; �'� �' I FOR: NOR TH STA TE
\ �\ �� 598.3'
CURB AND GUTTER C&G '— � �\� --
ENVIR ENVIRONMENTAL, INC
REINFORCED
EIN ORACEDDGONG PIP PE CMP '9� �,� ���,,, \\ \\ ��� r�:- = 1
CORRUGATED PLASTIC PIPE CPP • `��, \\ \�` \`� ; , ;
BOUNDARY LINE
RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE -- -- ; C� `� ; ��\ = �� »
UNSURVEYED PROPERTY LINE — — — .�, _ ---J I Op I OF. MUD LICK CREEK
CONSERVATION EASEMENT CE CE '
\ \ `�"- _ 592.5' 1 I »
FENCE (WIRE) LINE X x X � /�1\ 1
FENCE (WOOD) LINE X_ X_ X ��� _ �� STREAM RESTORATION
BANKFULL —. -.
THALWEG — - - - — / \ OWNER:
592.2 , GRAYSON C. THOMAS, HEIRS
EDGE OF GRAVEL �
EG ; C �� ' STAT SVILLE,319 NCDRIVE625
`
EDGE OF PAVEMENT EP , c ' 1
GRADING LIMITS - - - - - - - - - - - - - --
\ �� TAX PIN: 8775-12-3214.000
DEED BOOK JS, PAGE 143
TIELINE
OVERHEAD UTILITY °"° °"" °"° • GRAYSON C. THOMAS, HEIRS o _1 _
MAJOR CONTOUR LINE DB 411, PG. 846 C 597.3 J DEEDPIN: 8775BOOK 4110PAG E846°
MINOR CONTOUR LINE TAX PIN: 8775-01 -6345.000 \\ ST EL N/A ACRES +/_ (TOTAL)
WATER LINE '
WETLAND ZONE LINE
CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE �����------- ; --------------
OLOG VANE _
ME
ggmalE�rj BRUSH TOE
GA E
C
c X
0
C
SCALE
1 " = 20'
SURVEYED:
PJ TR
Allied Associates, P.A.
4720 KESTER MILL ROAD PHONE [phone]
WINSTON-SALEM, N.C. 27103
www.alliedapa.com NO LICENSE #C-2198
80
TOWNSHIP
COUNTY
STATE
DATE
ALBRIGHT
CHATHAM
NORTH CAROLINA
08/01/17
MAPPED:
JOB NO.
MAP NO.
TDS
DA
PA170611
MLC.dwg
MLC
© AU led Assoc, P A. 2017

VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE
I F(,FNn
EXISTING IRON PIN O EIP
EXISTING REBAR O EIR
NO POINT SET • NPS
IRON REBAR SET • IRS
N� 8 ARB
El
Ge
F �
o
1596.9'
STEEL
GATE ,4f,
1001
'` o
0
I /X
1 Q
-F
V
r
m
♦
CABLE PEDESTAL © ����'� 95_8- -�
TELEPHONE MANHOLE Q
TELEPHONE PEDESTAL D ��� / ^ � � / \� � • ♦♦ �
FLOOD LIGHT \�\ \ ♦♦ c
GUY WIRE m ���
LIGHT POLEC ���' 592.4' N ♦♦♦ (n
ELECTRIC MANHOLE QE �� / / / / / / / X 1 ♦ O
ELECTRIC METER ❑E
ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER
UTILITY POLE )a , I � / / / // / / � I Q �
BOLLARD 0 Q (,7 r
GAS METER ©/// '
GAS VALVE ®GV-, ni
SEWER CLEAN OUT O / ; / / / , 01 % / // 1 Q o 0
SEWER MANHOLE/ Ji/ /
SIGN v / / / / / / / / C: 0
i
CATCH BASIN ❑ CB , / / / / // / / / i j /
CURB INLET = CI / / / / / /
DROP \ YARD INLET ❑o DI / YI / / / I / 'o" 0 G o
FLARED END SECTION
J ' •. ' L
STORM MANHOLE QD / J / �j c
/ ,
HANDICAP / / / / • '
FIRE HYDRANT -6-GRAYSON C. THOMAS, HEIRS / //'`/ �-' n
WATER MANHOLE �W p / // / o `
WATER METER ❑W DB JS, PG. 143 �/ �/ //�/� ,,''
WATER VALVE ® WV
WELL w TAX PIN: 8775-11-3214.000
MANHOLE Q MH / / / ���� ♦ 0
PRESSURE INDICATOR VALVE PIV i
® / n
TREE a
RIGHT-OF-WAY R/W
PROPERTY
LINE P/L / �
PARCEL IDENTIFICATION NO. P. 1. `�
�
CONCRETE MONUMENT HORD CH Q � � ,�� I � I � ;� o Cf)
SIGHT EASEMENT SE C/) 0) I \ 1 \,
DEEBOOK DD
PLATT BOOK PB I \
CURB AND GUTTER C&G \ ,�
REINFORCED CONC PIPE RCP
�%
CMP,
CORRUGATED METAL PIPE \ o
CORRUGATED PLASTIC PIPE CPP
,,
Q
BOUNDARY LINE `�� ;I I \ \\ \ \%
RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE -- -- (^
UNSURVEYED PROPERTY LINE
CONSERVATION EASEMENT CE CE — O �
I\ \\
FENCE (WIRE) LINE XXXXXX (�/ � \ \ I \ \ � �\® � �
\ \ ♦
FENCE (WOOD) LINE O�/. I � � I I I 1 \ \ \ \ \ ♦♦
BANKFULL —• -• � ; I I \ \ �\ ♦♦
THALWEG-..-..-..-..- Q I I 1 \\ \ ♦ o
EG
EDGE OF GRAVEL 2, \
EDGE OF PAVEMENT EP I I I \
GRADING LIMITS
OVERHEAD UTILITY
TIE LINE
MAJOR CONTOUR LINE
MINOR CONTOUR LINE
WATER LINE
WETLAND ZONE LINE
UHU -11HU -11HU
0
MJ �� / 591.91,
1 / X
//' / / I I. o
♦ / / / i
CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE / ,�/ /' , // // // I f
�/ • / / / 591.9
1-1
11, Li
•J /' /'' /'
LOG VANE ' ' I ♦ c
// / /
// Z 100, / //
i
101 C
BRUSH TOE /
'/ ' '
II STEEL
GATE
/Q / o
590.!'
n c
P� G�41
/ / / , / /'Q
/00,
/ , / / e /
AA41
\\�O �
40'
olo
'/��J 590.3' / I c
x 4f
/ '
i/ I
/ 41 I c
41 loo,
/ mloo,J / /
/' ' �
C 591.4i�/
loo, Q5
i
41 e
41 loo,
414* / // _590, / / C) 590.5X �' �
1"o16
/ X C / Q- n� o
o� ,. _*1
/�, / 590.1 �� 1 �� ; ,
, . <v
Cj
/
4#
04' x 591.8' i� C) c
\ I / i a �,
o) / / O
_____ �_________ I �� �� SHEET
6
SHEET 5
20
0
�CO
00
w(2)
SHEE T 6 OF 7
AS BUILT SURVEY
FOR: NOR TH STA TE
ENVIRONMENTAL, INC
OF: "MUD LICK CREEK
STREAM RESTORATION ))
OWNER:
GRAYSON C. THOMAS, HEIRS
319 AUGUSTA DRIVE
STATESVILLE, NC 28625
TAX PIN: 8775-12-3214.000
DEED BOOK JS, PAGE 143
TAX PIN: 8775-01 -6345.000
DEED BOOK 411, PAGE 846
NLA ACRES +/- (TOTAL)
Allied Associates, P.A.
4720 KESTER MILL ROAD PHONE [phone]
WINSTON—SALEM, N.C. 27103
www.alliedapa.com NC LICENSE #C-2198
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 10 20 ao 80 SCALE TOWNSHIP COUNTY STATE DATE
1 " = 20' ALBRIGHT CHATHAM NORTH CAROLINA 08/01/17
SURVEYED: MAPPED: JOB NO. MAP NO. TDS
( IN FEET ) PJ TR DA PA170611 MLC.dwg MLC
1 inch = 20 ft. © Allied Assoc„ P.A. 2017

590
585
580
57E
DATUM ELEV
570.00
C
6'
L('
101+00 101+50 102+00 102+50 103+00 103+50 104+00 104+50 105+00 105+50 106+00 106+50 107+00 107+50 108+00 108+50 109+00 109+50 110+00
590
585
580
DATUM ELEV
Ci
a
a
NORTH BRANCH
��
�►
_�
ELEV:
585.86'
ELEV: 585.44'
00
a)
00
Ln
u�
0)
00
Ln
0
0)
L0
N
0�
00
LC)
00
cy;
00
L0
O
0�
00
Ln
CO
G;
00
Ln
r`
00
00
Ln
O
cy;
00
Ln
r`
oo
00
Ln
r-
r;
00
Lf)
r
00
Ln
C
00
L0
00
00
Ln
O
r
00
Ln
r
00
LC)
00
L6
00
Ln
07
co
00
Ln
00
co
00
Ln
C6
00
Ln
O
O
m co
u7 0
r`
00
0
O�
0)
co
a")
m
00
n
Qo
0)
00
a")
CO
co
00
n
07
00
Lf)
r7
00
00
07
ca
00
00
LO
m
0
00
Ln
N
00
Ln
(0
00
00
Ln
00
00
c0
Ln
r`
r`
00
Ln
r`
00
00
Ln
(0
r`
00
Ln
00
00
LO
N
r`
00
Ln
00
00
LO
N
r`
00
Ln
M
00
Ln
0)
r`
00
LO
co
r`
co
Ln
Ln
c0
00
Ln
co
r`
00
Ln
N
r`
00
Ln
Ln
u�
00
Ln
N
r`
00
Ln
Ln
c0
00
Ln
r`
L6
00
Ln
c0
C6
00
u�
00
Ln
m
4
00
Ln
00
L6
00
Ln
r`
L6
co
Ln
N
0i
0o
Ln
N
4
co
Ln
00
U-)
r`
r6
00
Ln
CO
4
00
r0
4
co
Ln
r6
00
LO
r6
co
Ki
00
101+00 101+50 102+00 102+50 103+00 103+50 104+00 104+50 105+00 105+50 106+00 106+50 107+00 107+50 108+00 108+50 109+00 109+50 110+00
590
585
580
DATUM ELEV
Ci
a
a
NORTH BRANCH
201+00 201+50 202+00 202+50 203+00 203+50 204+00 204+50 205+00 205+50
EAST BRANCH
GRAPHIC SCALE
40 0 20 40 80
( IN FEET )
1 inch = 40 ft.
110+50 111+00
SHEE T 7 OF 7
AS BUILT SURVFY
FOR: NOR TH S TA TE
ENVIRONMENTAL, INC
OF: "MUD LICK CREEK
STREAM RESTORATION
OWNER:
GRAYSON C. THOMAS, HEIRS
319 AUGUSTA DRIVE
STATESVILLE, NC 28625
TAX PIN: 8775-12-3214.000
DEED BOOK JS, PAGE 143
TAX PIN: 8775-01-6345.000
DEED BOOK 411, PAGE 846
VA ACRES +/— (TOTAL)
Allied Associates, P.A.
4720 KESTER MILL ROAD PHONE [phone]
WINSTON—SALEM, N.C. 27103 FAX [phone]
www.alliedapa.com NC LICENSE #C-2198
160
SCALE TOWNSHIP COUNTY STATE DATE
1 " = 40' ALBRIGHT CHATHAM NORTH CAROLINA 08/01/17
SURVEYED: MAPPED: JOB NO. MAP NO. TDS
PJ TR DA PA170611 MLC.dwg MLC
© Allied Assoc„ P. A. 2017
00
a)
00
Ln
u�
0)
00
Ln
0
0)
L0
N
0�
00
LC)
00
cy;
00
L0
O
0�
00
Ln
CO
G;
00
Ln
r`
00
00
Ln
O
cy;
00
Ln
r`
oo
00
Ln
r-
r;
00
Lf)
r
00
Ln
C
00
L0
00
00
Ln
O
r
00
Ln
r
00
LC)
00
L6
00
Ln
07
co
00
Ln
00
co
00
Ln
C6
00
Ln
201+00 201+50 202+00 202+50 203+00 203+50 204+00 204+50 205+00 205+50
EAST BRANCH
GRAPHIC SCALE
40 0 20 40 80
( IN FEET )
1 inch = 40 ft.
110+50 111+00
SHEE T 7 OF 7
AS BUILT SURVFY
FOR: NOR TH S TA TE
ENVIRONMENTAL, INC
OF: "MUD LICK CREEK
STREAM RESTORATION
OWNER:
GRAYSON C. THOMAS, HEIRS
319 AUGUSTA DRIVE
STATESVILLE, NC 28625
TAX PIN: 8775-12-3214.000
DEED BOOK JS, PAGE 143
TAX PIN: 8775-01-6345.000
DEED BOOK 411, PAGE 846
VA ACRES +/— (TOTAL)
Allied Associates, P.A.
4720 KESTER MILL ROAD PHONE [phone]
WINSTON—SALEM, N.C. 27103 FAX [phone]
www.alliedapa.com NC LICENSE #C-2198
160
SCALE TOWNSHIP COUNTY STATE DATE
1 " = 40' ALBRIGHT CHATHAM NORTH CAROLINA 08/01/17
SURVEYED: MAPPED: JOB NO. MAP NO. TDS
PJ TR DA PA170611 MLC.dwg MLC
© Allied Assoc„ P. A. 2017

Mui Li'ckCTCck Mitigation Site
Cape Fear River Basin 03030003
Chatham County, North Carolina
for
NCDEQ Divisions ®f
0 A8 360 720 100 1440
N
PrajeflLocalion � 1
l
� fig n
cs
Vicinity lylap
No( to scale
Mitigation Services Sheet Index
FINAL. RECORD DRAWINGS
Issued June 2018
Revised 06.12.2018
Stream Origins
Stream Latitude Longitude
North Branch N 35° 48'53,73" W 79° 25' 56.95"
East Branch N 35" 48' 46,31" AV 79" 25'56.17"
Mud Lick Creell N35' 48'50.97" -VV 790 26' OAK
Title Sheet
0 1
Legelad
0.2
Stream Overlay Overview
0.3
Stream Overlay Plans
1.11.10
Planting Plan
2.1
Fencing Plan
3,1
P7°oject Direat+oxy
Surveying:
Owner;
Turner Land Surveying, PLLC
NCDEQ Division of
P.O, Box 41023
Mitigation Services
Raleigh, NC 27629
1652 Mail Service Center
David S. Turner, PLS
Raleigh, NC 27699-1652
919--8751373
Jcff Schaffe3-
919-707-8976
Engineering:
DEQ Contract No. D14D01i
Wildlands Engineering, Inc
DMS XD No. 93482
License No. F-0831
312 tiVest Millbi-mk Road, Suite 225
SCO No. 1209857-01
Raleigh, NC 27609
Angela N. Allen, PE
919-851-9986
I
a
AL
M280 =
muura`
�rZ-rfr
is

(Existing ]E eatures
PL Pr — Pi -- Existing Property Boundary
17. Existing Wellands
NOTE: FEATURES IN RED INDICATE DEVIATION FROM FINAL CONSTRUCTION PLANS
Propos,
ed Features
10+00
As -Built Fencing
- -
- Proposed Stream Alignment
- - - -
Proposed 8ankfull
-------52p-------
Proposed 5' Major Gonteur
10+00
Proposed 1' Minor Contour
KNAM
Proposed Constructed Riffle
VNProposed
Angled Log Step Pool
Proposed Angled Log Drop
As -Built Features
ce Ce
Conservation Easement
x r:
As -Built Fencing
As -Built Slraam Thalweg
10+00
- —j— -
As -Built Slrearn Centerline - Restoration
10+00
V
_ I -
- As -Built Stream Centerline - Enhancement II
10+00
As -Built Stream Centerline- Not For Credit
...._ ...._ ...._ ...._
As -Built Bankfull
- ��—
As-Buill 5' Major Contour
As -Built 1' Minor Contour
As -Built Constructed Riffle
Proposed Log Vane
- ` r As -Built Angled Log Step Pool
Proposed Permanent Ford Crossing
As -Built Angled Log Drop
r�
Proposed Brush Toe
r � As-8ui0. Lag Vane
As -Built Permanent Ford Crossing
4 - -- -- - I Proposed Permanent Culvert Crossing
I As -Built Brush Too
As -Built Permanent Culvert Crossing
Z v,om
�1 ozrn
az ozWv
Az �.vm
au�rE
H
m
S AL
0OM
a
T+ s
V
O
E
t i -I
e
o

p�anzanny 14
s
a
S y+'
EAL
040280
FNc 1 NEF'� �`,,`•
•..y�e{a rs neo•.
m

AL
040280
O
595
SBfi
$00
_
r
_
AS-bUIT
PROFILE
PROP
ED PROFILE
585
585
581
581
10C+00 100+50 101+00 101+54 102+00 102+50
103+00 103+50
104+00 104i50 104+60
NOTES:
1. FOR ENHANCEMENT REACHES, THE EXISTING CONDITIONS
THALWEG WAS USED TO DEVELOP PROPOSED MITIGATION
CREDITS AS OUTLINED IN THE MITIGATION PLAN BECAUSE
THE ALIGNMENTS OF ENHANCEMENT REACHES WERE NOT
ALTERED DURING CONSTRUCTION, AS -BUILT ALIGNMENTS
ARE ALSO BASED ON THE EXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEY.
2 AS -BUILT BANKFULL LINES FOR ENHANCEMENT REACHES
ARE BASED ON EXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEY.
7� +p0 %/ i .•10f+00• . r,
I
',� \
1D4+0p �f• -590 `� L[1 -
V,
�
/ \ NORTH BRANCH j, T
\\ '\ ......... ._ ..1pyt00r ..._ •
5,95
'
�•
0' 20' 40' 60'
inkuc.rny
U
QJ
AL
040280
O

1
590
585
m
PROPOSED PROFILE
AS -BUILT PRIOR -
590
585
580
579 579
104,90105+00 105+50 100+00 108+59 107+00 107+50 100+00 108-x50 108+80
--_- _ _ 590
\'\ -------
------- 1
rte,.'_. Lr•—�__-_ --�
o0i
NpRTH BRANCH � ,a� xoo - ..
\ � -'---- .•` :^..�•��� ^moo �` \`1 I J
— / /
NOTE! FROM NORTH BRANCH STA. 107+55 TO STA. 107+86, PROPOSED STREAM
ALIGNMENT REALIGNED IN ORDER TO AVOID EXISTING BEDROCK,
590 �
� 1
� II!
i
0' 2' 4' 6'
u �vFJitr4.l
60'
picA¢cntrey
1-4
CN
9

565
m
576
108480 109+00
109+50
PROPOSED PROFILE
AS -BUILT PROFILE
110+00
i10+50
V_
5@0
565
586
576
111+50
}
co
p
LL]`
z
�}
II
U}
r.
NOTES: }
1. FROM NORTH BRANCH STA. 108+82 TO STA. 110+03,
PROPOSED STREAM ALIGNMENT AND CULVERT REALIGNED I
IN ORDER TO AVOID EXISTING BEDROCK.
2. FOR ENHANCEMENT REACHES, THE EXISTING CONDITIONS }
THALWEG WAS USED TO DEVELOP PROPOSED MITIGATION `
CREDITS AS OUTLINED IN THE MITIGATION PLAN. BECAUSE �}
THE ALIGNMENTS OF ENHANCEMENT REACHES WERE NOT
ALTERED DURING CONSTRUCTION, AS -BUILT ALIGNMENTS `
ARE ALSO BASED ON THE EXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEY. }
3. AS -BUILT BANKFULL LINES FOR ENHANCEMENT Il REACHES `
ARE BASED ON EXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEY.
OR rH BSN
�i .
y'.
u AL -
- 040280 "
I NEf¢'ti2'•.•
eCA N P,,, •,,
7 ch
�I4-4
O
d
0' 20' 40'
60'
E
N�
7 ch

IM
390
585
581
7.00+00
201+00
l
A8-BUI4-TPROFILE
PROPOSED PROFILE
201♦50
202+00
202+50
203+00
595
590
585
581
203+50 203+80
X�C}
Lk
201+00 } -
;T 201+oor \ /J
0111.,
\ lok /
\�OxB
NOTES: F�� ��� '�x �� _ ���❑•'
1. FOR ENHANCEMENT REACHES, THE EXISTING Y�
CONDITIONS THALWEG WAS USED TO�� ,1`
DEVELOP PROPOSED MITIGATION CREDITS AS \ ��a O� \\ , - —--______
OUTLINED IN THE MITIGATION PLAN BECAUSE
THE ALIGNMENTS OF ENHANCEMENT REACHES
WERE NOT ALTERED DURING CONSTRUCTION,
AS -BUILT ALIGNMENTS ARE ALSO BASED ON x
THE EXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEY.
2. AS -BUILT BANKFULL LINES FOR ENHANCEMENT +
REACHES ARE BASED ON EXISTING \�\
CONDITIONS SURVEY. ,.,
0' 20' 40' 60'
n�rnvairui
r` o+ � ti y`•,
EAL
040280
�M-iN6��

590
585
5B0
579
203+80 20q+00
it
A UI LT PROFILE PROPOSED PROFILE
204+50
205+00
590
585
580
$79
205+50 245+77
cr
I � 1
�O � •264+00 �_•�-� � ______ ___
�
r 1r� i '-=-�'L r—rte''''-._Jy •!' �'�
�i !, \
r'
tos,.g2
700
�nrrwil
0' 20' 40' 80'
(ita,rzoil,M1! I
U)
A "
m
Zz
z o
oz h
'az 2¢I"€
m
• p 9�L
= 0 0280
Y)

�— N CcF-L7L.E�
t �t
P
,_ ld
_ TJ — ld _ld_l
}
d 3/�-old ��d� �/ •�, '` j I
3 Qo ti ld 7d mot) Li
oo.� . ' • ., � ii •'., , . Ck C
z '
u \\; ---------
46-
NOTES: -
NOTES:
1. FOR ENHANCEMENT REACHES, THE EXISTING, CONDITIONS
THALWEG WAS USED TO DEVELOP PROPOSED MITIGATION
CREDITS AS OUTLINED IN THE MITIGATION PLAN. BECAUSE
THE ALIGNMENTS OF ENHANCEMENT REACHES WERE NOT
ALTERED DURING CONSTRUCTION, AS-BUILTALIGNMENTS
ARE ALSO BASED ON THE EXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEY.
2. AS -BUILT BANKFULL LINES FOR ENHANCEMENT REACHES
ARE BASEO ON EXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEY.
40' 60'
r�
R.
w

1 `
I
1
1
1
1
1
I
k1
.
f,
R
i
i
1 ,
1 I
I 1
y �
11
,1
1
II
11
FA
NOTES:
I FOR ENHANCEMENT REACHES, THE EXISTING CONDITIONS
THALWEG WAS USED TO DEVELOP PROPOSED MITIGATION
CREDITS AS OUTLINED IN THE MITIGATION PLAN, BECAUSE
THE ALIGNMENTS OF ENHANCEMENT REACHES WERE NOT
ALTERED DURING CONSTRUCTION, AS -BUILT ALIGNMENTS
ARE ALSO BASE❑ ON THE EXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEY.
2. AS -BUILT BANKFULL LINES FOR ENHANCEMENT REACHES
ARE BASED ON EXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEY.
y
3 ,
a' 2•
a, 20' 40• so,
wwzavre!�
3
S AL
040280
b!J
�
O
ERo6

��� <<\ � •. Vis- � „�" E`
wr\\ MUD LICK CREEK + /�
1 /
r ,
r �*
NOTES:
1. FOR ENHANCEMENT REACHES, THE EXISTING CONDITIONS
THALWEG WAS USED TO DEVELOP PROPOSED MITIGATION 1
CREDITS AS OUTLINED IN THE MITIGATION PLAN. BECAUSE
THE ALIGNMENTS OF ENHANCEMENT REACHES WERE NOT
ALTERED DURING CONSTRUCTION, AS -BUILT ALIGNMENTS
ARE ALSO BASED ON THE EXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEY.
2 AS -BUILT BANKFULL LINES FOR ENHANCEMENT REACHES
ARE BASED ON EXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEY.
CIC
1
0
2 S L r -
04
'YCF�A N P �.
c�
ft
b10
A
x
C SCC
�
t % G �%
�, I
x
g^
/
n' z' a' s'
i�
I
I
r
e
Cr�TIGiI
1
I
1
O
0 20' ao' 60' (�
—
��� <<\ � •. Vis- � „�" E`
wr\\ MUD LICK CREEK + /�
1 /
r ,
r �*
NOTES:
1. FOR ENHANCEMENT REACHES, THE EXISTING CONDITIONS
THALWEG WAS USED TO DEVELOP PROPOSED MITIGATION 1
CREDITS AS OUTLINED IN THE MITIGATION PLAN. BECAUSE
THE ALIGNMENTS OF ENHANCEMENT REACHES WERE NOT
ALTERED DURING CONSTRUCTION, AS -BUILT ALIGNMENTS
ARE ALSO BASED ON THE EXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEY.
2 AS -BUILT BANKFULL LINES FOR ENHANCEMENT REACHES
ARE BASED ON EXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEY.
CIC
1
0
2 S L r -
04
'YCF�A N P �.
c�
ft
b10
A
Q
g^
n' z' a' s'
e
Cr�TIGiI
O
0 20' ao' 60' (�
—

SII �-- -- y00
s _ - - l •� � _ ....� ..._ .._ .,_�,� _ ..... Ire
•�+d3f� .�' � '� 316 � i' I1
1 I
I
I I
1
NOTES:
1. FOR ENHANCEMENT REACHES, THE EXISTING CONDITIONS
THALWI=G WAS USED TO DEVELOP PROPOSED MITIGATION
CREDITS AS OUTLINED IN THE MITIGATION PLAN. BECAUSE
THE ALIGNMENTS OF ENHANCEMENT REACHES WERE NOT
ALTERED DURING CONSTRUCTION, AS -BUILT ALIGNMENTS
ARE ALSO BASED ON THE EXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEY,
2 AS -BUILT BANKFULL LINES FOR ENHANCEMENT REACHES
ARE BASED ON EXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEY.
o' 2' 4' 6'
o' 20' 40' oo'
luno
a� s"�Z
Zo
Z�
Qp .a Looma
aZ �aFE
� 3
M
cd
0

NOTES:
t FOR ENHANCEMENT REACHES, THE EXISTING CONDITIONS
THALWEG WAS USED TO DEVELOP PROPOSED MITIGATION
CREDITS AS OUTLINED IN THE MITIGATION PLAN. BECAUSE
THE ALIGNMENTS OF ENHANCEMENT REACHES WERE NOT
ALTERED DURING CONSTRUCTION, AS -BUILT ALIGNMENTS
ARE ALSO BASED ON THE EXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEY,
2. AS -BUILT BANKFULL LINES FOR ENHANCEMENT REACHES
ARE BASED ON EXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEY.
CD
x
0
-o
vi
IT,
in
X
O
q
D
SEAL'"
oaazao
VAq, SLA tJ P � ••`,
0
uj
ll
Ur"
©
p
PPte\\
bq
-
p
8
0' 2' 4' W
��
IVER•�3 �i
OS
0' 20' 40 Cn' U
�
d —
F
,�j
i
Mrrc�nRU

\'Area for bare root planting= 9.6 acres
5lrcarubnnlc 1'l:w ling 2ouc
l.ivu 3rrrkes+uu! N.rbuecqur }Yngr
51:C[ICS Cnlllnlnn l\11111L' na
sparing
111 LM
111!11. 51eL Shaluln rF nr SlelmS
rurmu Silks ❑uessuud It n
2-x n.
pi'--t.i•'r,l .ehmh
Spen'irl
Cnnlnsun Nnmc
AU,
Spacing
1
SI
h'rm0ha
f,r'rarwhY111rrn
Grceu Ash
121L
(,
phdmnrs'S-
orridennAir
vramarr
1211
G
Ccrcisrmxrrhvnrr
Redb.r
f'apnh,s,lel Al.
C4i[unnoad
12R
6
1h•011nnf9rn
Rirrr RW,
12 p.
6
Cr HA urrirf •rNnrir
Hac4bzrry•
12 n,
6
Nl ss'n.1}Jrnlirn
Hluak Glm,
17 4
fr
Uffi—mmtr ,61m
Aulrrican film
121L
r,
011,11 9giulmrn
P.Ww
Hophomh.nnl
121E
Srnnhnrar SNp,
l:Ide,krry
12R-
6
ltubrnrn
prrxdnrrrtrrin
Rhck Loctut
fIR.
G
L'ar++us lommrrurl
SHIN ❑ugt—d
11 It,
6-
Flmnnrlu-F.r
,vrgorr
Witch h—I
12 n.
6-
Ccpknlm IT'l.
orrideuln7rs
RUuanUu511
1211.
6-
L1f�1lpvv.r
1vrAi,riro,n
Parinunne
121E
6-
CuR+herr
e-nrnlirrinrrn
tlnmrllod
l2 R-
C-
Ar—L7Jluru
Sn.Inlp Tupelo
12R
6-
S,—p Chuhm
OIL
12 rL
6-
Orvrrr+n "h rrr
Nolte O,"Is
12 f1,
f,
l.lrinrlemlran
rrrlYl'rrr
Tl;%p Poplar
121L
6-
\'Area for bare root planting= 9.6 acres
5lrcarubnnlc 1'l:w ling 2ouc
l.ivu 3rrrkes+uu! N.rbuecqur }Yngr
51:C[ICS Cnlllnlnn l\11111L' na
sparing
Indre.
spacing
111!11. 51eL Shaluln rF nr SlelmS
rurmu Silks ❑uessuud It n
2-x n.
pi'--t.i•'r,l .ehmh
Sirearnbank Pkanitng Zone d
8p'- lea, 240,
SEAL �
040280
N

0' aois0zdn'
iyoaea-,iai
PROPERTY BOUNDARY FOR
REPRESENTATIVE PURPOSES
ONLY. NOT FINAL SURVEY.
\ �d
a
)a,
q\)
o-
�d
111
ro-
nF I
m�
Q
4-4 6
0
r4 u
�1 E�