20120748 Ver 1_Year 5 Monitoring Report_2018_20190131

.e m- a.n i

Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
FINAL
Project Name: Junes Branch Stream Restoration
NCDMS Contract No.: 003979
NCDMS Project No.: 95027
USACE Permit Action ID: 2012-01101
DWR Project No.: 20120748
Jackson County, NC
Data Collected: January 2018 - December 2018
Date Submitted: January 2019
Submitted to:
North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services
NCDEQ-DMS, 1652 Mail Service Center Raleigh NC 27699-1652

fires
January 31, 2019
Paul Wiesner
NC DEQ Division of Mitigation Services
5 Ravenscroft Drive, Suite 102
Asheville, NC 28801
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110
Raleigh, NC 27605
Corporate Headquarters
5020 Montrose Blvd. Suite 650
Houston, TX 77006
Main: 713.520.5400
RE: Junes Branch Stream Restoration Site: MY5 Monitoring Report (NCDMS ID
95027)
Listed below are comments provided by DMS on January 17, 2019 regarding the Junes Branch
Stream Restoration Site: Year 5 Monitoring Report and RES' responses.
On January 3, 2019, the Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) received the DRAFT Monitoring
Year 5 report for the Junes Branch Stream Restoration site from Resource Environmental
Solutions, LLC (RES). The report establishes the year 5 monitoring conditions at the site.
Anticipated mitigation on the site includes 3,093 linear feet of stream restoration for a total of
3,093 Stream Mitigation Units (SMUs) (R).
General: Per RFP 16-003573 (Task 11), the final project invoice should be submitted once the
IRT closeout process is complete. The final invoice should reflect the final credits approved by
the IRT at project closeout.
Noted.
General: RES may want to consider adding containerized plants along Doris and Higdon Branch
in the dormant season to accelerate stream shading and channel development along the reaches
prior to project closeout.
RES plans to add containerized trees to both banks of Doris and Higdon Branch before the start
of the growing season in 2019. This has been added to the report.
Table 5 (Doris Branch and Higdon Branch): The table currently indicates that both reaches are
100% stable and performing as intended. The cross sections and longitudinal profiles indicate
aggradation on both reaches over the monitoring term. Please review, confirm the assessment
and update the report if necessary.
The aggradation issue on Doris Branch and Higdon Branch has stabilized in MY5 and has
improved in some areas especially when compared to MY3 and MY4. Despite an increase in bed
elevation, both reaches still maintain riffles and pools. Based on this data, RES proposes credits
be released in full for these two reaches.
Table 13: Please add the 2018 bankfull event noted in the report text (wrack lines) to the table.
Done.
res.us

Prepared by:
res
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110
Raleigh, North Carolina 27605

Contents
1.0
Project Summary...............................................................................................................................
5
1.1.
Goals and Objectives....................................................................................................................
5
1.2.
Success Criteria.............................................................................................................................
5
1.3.
Project Setting and Background....................................................................................................
7
1.4.
Project Approach..........................................................................................................................
7
1.5.
Project Performance......................................................................................................................
7
2.0
Methods.............................................................................................................................................9
3.0
References.......................................................................................................................................10
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 3 RES
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 5 of 5 January 2019

Appendices
Appendix A. General Tables and Figures
Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3. Project Contacts
Table 4. Project Information
Figure 1. Vicinity Map
Appendix B. Visual Assessment Data
Figures 2. Current Conditions Plan View Map
Table 5. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Table 6. Vegetation Condition Assessment
2018 Photo Station Photos
Appendix C. Vegetation Plot Data
Table 7. Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary
Table 8. CVS Vegetation Metadata
Table 9. Total Planted Stem Counts
Vegetation Plot Photos
Appendix D. Stream Geomorphology Data
Table 10a. Dimensional Morphology Summary
Table l Ob. Stream Reach Data Summary
Cross Section Plots
Pebble Count Data
Table 11. Pebble Count Data Summary
Charts 1-6. MY5 Stream Reach Substrate Composition Charts
Appendix E. Hydrology Data
Table 12. Verification of Bankfull Events
Photo Verification of Bankf ill Events
Table 13.2018 Rainfall Summary
Appendix F. Memorandum
Junes Branch IRT Site Visit on 4/18/2017 Meeting Summary
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 4 RES
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 5 of 5 January 2019

1.0 PROJECT SUMMARY
1.1. Goals and Objectives
The project goals address stressors identified in the Targeted Local Watershed (TLW) and include the
following:
• Improve water quality within the restored channel reaches and downstream watercourses through:
o reducing turbidity by stabilizing existing stream banks and altering stream channel
dimension, pattern and profile
o reducing nutrient loads and fecal coliform bacteria from adjacent agricultural fields by
fencing the riparian area to keep livestock out of the stream and restoring a wooded riparian
buffer
• Improve local aquatic and terrestrial habitat and diversity within the restored channels and their
vicinity through:
o reducing water temperatures by planting native vegetation in the riparian zone and creating
shade
o improving habitat complexity by restoring the stream profile to stable riffle/pool and
step/pool complexes
o improving terrestrial habitat by excluding livestock and creating a riparian buffer
comprised of native plant species
o improving aquatic habitat by establishing tree canopy to provide organic material such as
woody debris and leaf packs to stream
o removing invasive exotic species and planting native vegetation in the riparian buffer
Improve flood flow attenuation on-site and downstream through:
o raising the bed or creating bankfull benches to allow for overbank flows every 1-2 years
and improve the connection to the active floodplain.
The project goals will be addressed through the following project objectives:
• Restore stable channel morphology and proper sediment transport capacity.
• Create and improve stream bed form and improve aquatic and benthic macroinvertebrate habitat.
• Reconnect the stream to the historic floodplain or construct a floodplain bench that is accessible at
the proposed bankfull channel elevation.
• Improve channel and stream bank stabilization by integrating in -stream structures and native bank
vegetation.
• Provide riparian buffer restoration by establishing a native forested and herbaceous riparian buffer
plant community with a minimum width of 30 feet from the edge of the restored channels. This
new community will be established in conjunction with the eradication of any existing exotic or
undesirable plant species.
1.2. Success Criteria
The success criteria for the Junes Branch Stream Restoration Site follows accepted and approved success
criteria presented in the USACE Stream Mitigation Guidelines and subsequent NCDMS and agency
guidance. Specific success criteria components are presented below.
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 5 RES
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 5 of 5 January 2019

1.2.1. Morphological Parameters and Channel Stability
Restored and enhanced streams shall be in compliance with the standards set forth in the USACE 2003
Stream Mitigation Guidelines and should demonstrate morphologic stability to be considered successful.
Stability does not equate to an absence of change, but rather to sustainable rates of change or stable patterns
of variation. Restored streams often demonstrate some level of initial adjustment in the several months that
follow construction and some change/variation subsequent to that is also to be expected. However, the
observed change should not be unidirectional such that it represents a robust trend. If some trend is evident,
it should be very modest or indicate migration to a stable form.
Dimension - Cross-section measurements should indicate little change from the as -built cross-sections.
If changes do occur, they will be evaluated to determine whether the adjustments are associated with
increased stability or whether they indicate movement towards an unstable condition.
Pattern and Profile - Measurements and calculated values should indicate stability with little deviation
from as -built conditions and established morphological ranges for the restored stream type. Pool depths
may vary from year to year, but the majority should maintain depths sufficient to be observed as distinct
features in the profile. The pools should maintain their depth with flatter water surface slopes, while the
riffles should remain shallower and steeper. Pattern measurements will not be collected unless
conditions seem to indicate that a detectable change appears to have occurred based on channel profile
and/or cross-section dimension measurements.
Substrate - Calculated D50 and Dsa values should indicate coarser size class distribution of bed materials
in riffles and finer size class distribution in pools. The majority of riffle pebble counts should indicate
maintenance or coarsening of substrate distributions. Generally, it is anticipated that the bed material
will coarsen over time.
Sediment Transport - Depositional features should be consistent with a stable stream that is effectively
managing its sediment load. Point bar and inner berm features, if present, should develop without
excessive encroachment of the channel. Isolated development of robust (i.e. comprised of coarse
material and/or vegetation actively diverting flow) mid -channel or lateral bars will be acceptable.
Likewise, development of a higher number of mid -channel or lateral bars that are minor in terms of their
permanency such that profile measurements do not indicate systemic aggradation will be acceptable, but
trends in the development of robust mid -channel or alternating bar features will be considered a
destabilizing condition and may require intervention or have success implications.
Surface Water Hydrology - Monitoring of stream surface water stages should indicate recurrence of a
bankfull flow on average every 1 to 2 years. At a minimum, throughout the monitoring period, the
surface water stage should achieve bankf ill or greater elevations at least twice. The bankfull events
must occur during separate monitoring years.
1.2.2.Vegetation
Riparian vegetation monitoring shall be conducted for a minimum of five years to ensure that success
criteria are met per USACE (2003) guidelines. Accordingly, success criteria will consist of a minimum
survival of 320 stems per acre by the end of the Year 3 monitoring period and a minimum of 260 stems per
acre at the end of Year 5. If monitoring indicates either that the specified survival rate is not being met or
the development of detrimental conditions (i.e., invasive species, diseased vegetation), appropriate
corrective actions will be developed and implemented.
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 6 RES
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 5 of 5 January 2019

1.3. Project Setting and Background
The Junes Branch Restoration Site (Site) is located in central Jackson County approximately 2 miles east
of Sylva, NC (Figure 1). The site encompasses 5.8 acres of formerly agricultural land and includes portions
of Bumgarner Branch and three unnamed tributaries that, for purposes of the project, are referred to as Junes
Branch, Higdon Branch, and Doris Branch. The Site is located within the Little Tennessee River Basin,
United States Geological Survey (USGS) 14 -digit Hydrologic Unit 06010203020010, and the North
Carolina Division of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ) sub basin 04-04-02. The site watershed is
characteristic of the Blue Ridge region with moderate rainfall with annual precipitation averaging 52.9
inches. Elevation within the site ranges from 2,200 feet at the northwestern extent, to 2,150 feet along
Junes Branch. The drainage area of Bumgarner Branch at the downstream end of the Site is 1.03 square
miles (668 acres). Land use within the watershed is predominately forested (68%) with the remaining land
use composed of low-density residential (21%) and agricultural (11%). Additional information regarding
project setting and background is found in the Final Mitigation Plan (EBX 2013).
Following 2016 monitoring the NCIRT requested a review of the differential between the Approved
Mitigation Plan and Baseline Monitoring Report. The table below details the discrepancies by reach. The
cause of increased baseline SMUs is construction field adjustments and survey methodology (thalweg vs.
centerline). The Mitigation Plan lengths were based on centerline. Credits have reverted to the Approved
Mitigation Plan: 3,093 SMUs.
Proposed Length NEtigation
Reach 1Vfitigation Type* (LF) Ratio ProposedSMUs BaselineSMUs
Bumgarner Branch 1 P1 Restoration 594 1:1 594 631
Bumgarner Branch 2
P1 Restoration
476
1:1 476
501
June's Branch
P1 Restoration
1,319
1:1 1,319
1,374
lEgdon Branch
P1 Restoration
422
1:1 422
376
Doris Branch
P1 Restoration
282
1:1 282
280
Total
3,093
3,093
3,162
*P1=Priority 1
**The contracted amount of credits for this Site is 3,000 SMUs
1.4. Project Approach
Channel restoration involving improved pattern, dimension, and longitudinal profile was completed on all
four stream reaches. A Priority I approach was applied to all four reaches of the project (Rosgen 1996;
NCSRI 2004).
1.5. Project Performance
Monitoring Year 5 (MY5) data was collected from January 2018 to December 2018. Monitoring included
the following activities: visual assessment of all reaches and the surrounding easement, collection of photos
at 14 permanent photo stations, documentation of eight permanent vegetation monitoring plots, surveying
of 3,050 feet of longitudinal profile and 15 cross-sections, and conducting pebble counts at eight riffles.
Generally, visual assessment of the project indicates that the streams are performing as desired and
vegetation is well established throughout the easement. Summary tables and photos taken at the permanent
photo stations associated with the visual assessment are presented in Appendix B. Visual assessment of
the stream was performed to document signs of instability, such as eroding banks, in -stream structural
instability, or excessive sedimentation. Excessive sedimentation was observed on Higdon and Doris Branch
throughout the monitoring period but has improved/stabilized in MY5. This is discussed further in the next
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 7 RES
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 5 of 5 January 2019

paragraph and in Section 1.5.2. Structures are intact and performing as designed. Herbaceous vegetation
has become well established in both the wetland fringes along the stream as well as upland areas. Planted
stems are well established. The small bare area reported in previous years has continued to stabilize with
herbaceous vegetation and is no longer considered a problem area.
In April of 2017, RES and the IRT met to discuss the sediment aggradation noted on Doris Branch and
Higdon Branch. On Higdon Branch, the IRT agreed there was sediment aggradation but a defined channel
was present. No maintenance, remedial actions or credit deductions were requested. On Doris Branch,
however, the sedimentation had diminished the distinct channel features. The IRT requested no specific
maintenance and recommended a final decision on crediting be made after additional monitoring. The IRT
also noticed that overall Junes Branch has a high sediment load but concluded that it appeared to be
maintaining appropriate geomorphology. The meeting summary is documented in Appendix F. The
sediment aggradation was observed again on these reaches at the end of MY4. In July 2018, RES performed
light maintenance on Higdon and Doris Branch by treating the vegetation in the channels with aquatic safe
herbicide and mechanically removing the dead vegetation from the channels. The goal is by removing the
vegetation in the channels, the trapped sediment will be free to move down the system.
Summary information and data related to the occurrence of items such as beaver activity or easement
encroachment and statistics related to performance of various project and monitoring elements can be found
in the tables and figures in the report appendices. Narrative background and supporting information
formerly found in these reports can be found in the Baseline Monitoring Report (formerly the Mitigation
Plan) and in the Mitigation Plan (formerly the Restoration Plan) documents available on NCDMS' website
(http://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/mitigation-services). All raw data supporting the tables and figures in the
appendices is available from NCDMS upon request.
1.5.1.Vegetation
Monitoring of eight permanent vegetation plots was completed during October 2018. Summary tables and
photographs associated with MY5 monitoring can be found in Appendix C. With the exception of Plot 2,
MY5 monitoring data indicates that all vegetation monitoring plots met the MY5 interim success criteria
of 260 planted stems per acre. Low planted stem densities at Plot 2 can be attributed to a large density of
recruited black willows (Salix nigra) outcompeting the planted stems; however, the surviving five trees in
Plot 2 average eight feet tall. While Plot 2 is not meeting interim success criteria for planted stems, with
recruits, the stem density is 18,413 stems/ acre, far exceeding the MY5 interim success criteria of 260 stems
per acre. Six species were documented in the plots as volunteers. Planted stem densities among the plots
ranged from 202 to 850 planted stems per acre with a mean of 531 stems per acre across all plots. When
volunteer stems are included, densities ranged between 567 and 18,413 total stems per acre with a mean of
3,278 stems per acre across all plots. The estimated average stem height was 7.7 feet. No invasive species
were observed in the easement in MY5. An invasive species treatment, however, was conducted in July
2018 along the edge of the easement where invasive species were beginning to grow back towards the
easement area.
1.5.2. Stream Geomorphology
Geomorphic data for MY5 was collected in December 2018. Cross-section plots, longitudinal profiles, and
summary tables related to stream morphology are in Appendix D. The MY5 stream morphology data
indicate that, in general, streams are stable. Cross-section and longitudinal profile data suggests that Higdon
Branch and Doris Branch have aggraded in a few areas but overall have improved or stabilized since MY4.
As for Bumgarner Branch and Junes Branch, several small changes were noted in the cross-section
dimensions and longitudinal profile; however, these are minor and do not exceed expected adjustments in
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 8 RES
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 5 of 5 January 2019

channel form. One area on Junes Branch (about 28 feet) shows aggradation about 6 inches higher than
previous years at Cross Section 6. As discussed at the April 2017 site visit, Junes Branch is a high sediment
load system and RES expects this sediment to continue to move through the system as the issue is at the
top of the reach, close to the unprotected segment of the reach. Starting in MY5, all dimensional parameters
including BHR, were calculated on riffles using the baseline cross sectional area. None of the riffle cross
sections exceeded a 1.2 BHR.
MY5 substrate monitoring was performed in December 2018 (Table 12 & Charts 1-6). The pebble counts
fell into the medium gravel range for Bumgarner I, small cobble for Bumgarner II, and medium gravel for
Junes Branch. Pebble counts remained in the silt/clay range for both the Higdon and Doris Branches.
Overall, shifts in stream morphology between MY4 and MY5 were within the normal range. The project
has met success criteria regarding stable dimension and profile as well as substrate and sediment transport.
As for Higdon and Doris Branch, per MY5 data, the aggradation issue has stabilized and even improved in
some areas especially when compared to MY3 and MY4. Despite an increase in bed elevation both reaches
still maintain riffles and pools. RES will continue to apply the same maintenance as 2018 up until the
closeout site visit and plans on planting containerized trees along the banks of Higdon and Doris Branch in
early 2019. The IRT recommended a final decision on crediting be made after the monitoring period.
1.5.3.Stream Hydrology
Stream hydrology was documented utilizing manual crest gauges to record bankfull events (Table 13). No
manual crest gauge readings were recorded in MY5, but wrack lines were observed throughout the site
during the December 2018 field work. Over the five-year monitoring period Bumgarner II recorded one
crest gauge reading in 2015 and two in 2016; and Junes Branch recorded one reading in 2016 and two in
2017.
2.0 METHODS
Visual assessment of the Junes Branch restoration site was performed during each site visit throughout the
monitoring period. Permanent photo station photos were collected during the initial visual assessment.
Vegetation or stream problem areas occurring outside of the monitoring stations were documented with
additional photographs.
Geomorphic measurements were taken during low flow conditions using a Topcon GTS -312 Total Station.
Three-dimensional coordinates associated with cross-sections and longitudinal profiles were collected in
the field and geo-referenced (NAD83 State Plane feet FIPS 3200). Morphological data was limited to 15
cross-sections, and 3,050 feet of longitudinal profile. Survey data were imported into CAD, ArcGIS®, and
Microsoft Excel® for data processing and analysis. Channel substrate was characterized using a Wolman
Pebble Count outlined in the Harrelson et al (1994) and processed using Microsoft Excel.
Vegetation success is being monitored at eight permanent monitoring plots. Vegetation monitoring follows
the CVS-EEP Level 2 Protocol for Recording Vegetation, Version 4.2 (Lee et al. 2008) and includes
analysis of composition and density of planted species. Data are processed using the CVS data entry tool.
In the field, the four corners of each plot were permanently marked with rebar and photos of each plot are
taken from the origin each monitoring year.
Precipitation data were collected using an Onset® HOBO® Data Logging Rain Gauge. Bankfull events
were documented with crest gauges. During quarterly visits to the site, the height of the corkline was
recorded and cross-referenced with known bankfull elevations at each crest gauge.
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 9 RES
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 5 of 5 January 2019

3.0 REFERENCES
EBX (Environmental Banc and Exchange). 2013. Junes Branch Stream Restoration, Final Mitigation
Plan, Jackson County, North Carolina. NCEEP Project No. 95027.
Harrelson, Cheryl, C. Rawlins and J. Potyondy. 1994. Stream Channel Reference Sites: An Illustrated
Guide to Field Technique. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM -245. Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment
Station. USDA Forest Service. Fort Collins, Colorado
Lee, M.T., R.K. Peet, S.D. Roberts, and T.R. Wentworth. 2008. CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording
Vegetation. Version 4.2. http://cvs.bio.unc.edu/methods.htm.
NCSRI (North Carolina Stream Restoration Institute). 2004. Stream Restoration: A Natural Channel
Design Handbook. North Carolina Stream Restoration Institute and North Carolina Sea Grant.
Raleigh. http://www.bae.ncsu.edu/programs/extension/wqg/srp/guidebook.html
Rosgen, D. 1996. Applied River Morphology. Wildland Hydrology. Pagosa Springs, Colorado.
USACE (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers). 2003. Stream Mitigation Guidelines. U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission,
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources -Division of Water Quality.
Wilmington District.
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 10 RES
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 5 of 5 January 2019

Appendix A
General Tables and Figures
Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3. Project Contacts
Table 4. Project Information
Figure 1. Vicinity Map

'BR= Bioretention Cell; SF= Sand Filter; SW = Stormwater Wetland; WDP =Wet Detention Pond; DDP =Dry Detention Pond; FS= Filter Strip; S= Grassed Swale; LS=
Level Spreader; NI = Natural Infiltration Area; FB = Forested Buffer
Note: Stream credit calculations were originally calculated along the as -built thalweg. Based on the April 3, 2017 IRT Credit Release Meeting, these stream credits have been
reverted back to the amounts in the IRT approved mitigation plan
Table 1. Project Components and NEtigation Credits
Junes Branch / Project Number 95027
Mitigation Credits
Stream
Riparian Wetland
Non -riparian Wetland
Buffer
Nitrogen
Nutrient Offset
Phosphorous Nutrient
Offset
Type
R
RE
R RE
R RE
Totals
3,093
-
-
-
Project Components
Project Component -or-
Reach ID
Stationing/Location
Existing
Footage/Acreage g
a Foota a/Acrea
Approach
(PI, PH etc.)
Restoration -or-
Restoration
Equivalent
Restoration Footage or
Acreage
g
Mitigation Ratio
Bumgarner Branch I
100+37 - 107+27
610
PI
R
594
1:1
Bumgarner Branch II
107+27 - 112+50
550
PI
R
476
June's Branch
200+97 - 215+15
1,311
PI
R
1,319
Higdon Branch
300+46 - 304+08
530
PI
R
422
Doris Branch
400+00 - 402+37
260
PI
R
282
MEL
Component Summation
Stream Riparian Wetland Non -riparian Wetland Buffer
Restoration Level —
(linear feet) (acres) (acres) (square feet)
Upland
(acres)
Riverine Non-Riverine
Restoration 3,093
Enhancement
-
Enhancement I
Enhancement II
Creation
Preservation
High Quality Preservation
BMP Elements
Element
Location Purpose/Function
Notes
FB
Entire Site Protect Stream
'BR= Bioretention Cell; SF= Sand Filter; SW = Stormwater Wetland; WDP =Wet Detention Pond; DDP =Dry Detention Pond; FS= Filter Strip; S= Grassed Swale; LS=
Level Spreader; NI = Natural Infiltration Area; FB = Forested Buffer
Note: Stream credit calculations were originally calculated along the as -built thalweg. Based on the April 3, 2017 IRT Credit Release Meeting, these stream credits have been
reverted back to the amounts in the IRT approved mitigation plan

Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Junes Branch / Project Number 95027
Activity or Report
Data Collection
Complete
Completion
or Delivery
Mitigation Plan
Aug -12
Apr -13
Final Design - Construction Plans
-
Apr -13
Construction
-
Jun -14
Temporary S&E Mix Applied to Entire Project Area
May -14
Permanent Seed Mix Applied
May -14
Containerized and B&B Plantings
May -14
Baseline Monitoring Document (Year 0 Monitoring - Baseline)
Jul -14
Jul -14
Year 1 Invasive Species Treatment
-
Oct -14
Year 1 Monitoring
Jan -15
Feb -15
Year 2 Monitoring
Nov -15
Nov -15
Year 3 Monitoring
Dec -16
Dec -16
Year 4 Monitoring
Vegetation: Oct -17
Stream: Nov -17
Jan -18
Year 5 Invasive Species and Stream Vegetation Treatment
---
Jul -18
Year 5 Monitoring
Vegetation: Oct -18
Stream: Dec -18
Dec -18

Table 3. Project Contacts
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Site — Project # 95027
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC
302 Jefferson St., Suite 110
Prime Contractor
Raleigh, North Carolina 27605
Brian Hockett [phone]
Wolf Creek Engineering
12-1/2 Wall St., Suite C
Designer
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
Grant Ginn [phone] ext 102
Northstate Environmental
2889 Lowery Street
Construction Contractor
Winston Salem, North Carolina 27101
Darrell Westmoreland [phone]
Northstate Environmental
2889 Lowery Street
Planting Contractor
Winston Salem North Carolina 27101
Darrell Westmoreland [phone]
Kee Mapping and Surveying
PO Box 2566
As-built Surveys
Asheville, North Carolina 28802
Phillip B. Key [phone]
Green Resource
5204 Highgreen Court
Seeding Nix Source
Colfax, North Carolina 27235
[phone]
Dykes & Son Nursery
825 Maude Etter Road
Bare Root Seedlings
McMinnville, Tennessee
[phone]
Foggy Mountain Nursery
797 Helton Creek Road
Live Stakes
Lansing, North Carolina 28643
[phone]
Equinox
Monitoring Performers (YO-MY3)
37 Haywood St.
2014-2016
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
Drew Alderman [phone]
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC
Monitoring Performers (Y4-MY5)
302 Jefferson St., Suite 110
2017-2018
Raleigh, North Carolina 27605
Ryan Medric [phone]

Table 4. Project Baseline Information and Attributes
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Site — Project # 95027
Project Information
Project Name
Junes Branch
County
Jackson County
Project Area (acres)
5.8 ac.
Project Coordinates (latitude and longitude)
35.357378'N; 83.191391'W
Project Watershed Summary Information Ony—
Physiographic Province
Blue Ridge
River Basin
Little Tennessee
USGS Hydrologic Unit 8-digit
06010203 USGS Hydrologic Unit 14-digit
6010203020010
DWQ Sub-basin
4/4/2002
Project Drainage Area (acres)
668
Project Drainage Area Percentage of Impervious Area
<5%
CGIA Land Use Classification
2.01.03 Hay and Pasture Land
Reach Summary Information
Parameters
Bumgarner Br. I Bumgarner Br. H Junes Br.
Higdon Br.
Doris Br.
Length of reach (linear feet)
610 550 1,311
530
260
Valley classification (Rosgen)
II II II
II
II
Drainage area
0.93 1.03 0.23
0.08
0.01
NCDWQ stream identification score
40 40 38
38
29.5
NCDWQ Water Quality Classification
C C -
-
-
Morphological Description (stream type) (Rosgen)
E G G
E
G
Evolutionary trend (Rosgen)
C F F
E
G
Underlying mapped soils
CwA, WtB CwA, WtB WtB
CwA
CwA
Drainage class
Somewhat Poorly Somewhat Poorly Somewhat
Drained- Mod. Well Drained- Mod Well Mod Well Drained Poorly
Drained Drained Drained
Somewhat
Poorly
Drained
Soil Hydric status
Non-Hydric Non-Hydric Non-Hydric
Non-Hydric
Non-Hydric
Slope
2.20% 2.20% 2.30%
FEMA classification
N/A N/A N/A
N/A
N/A
Native vegetation community
Agricultural Agricultural Agricultural
Agricultural
Agricultural
Percent composition of exotic invasive vegetation
30% 30% 30%
40%
40%
Wetland Summary Information
Parameters
Wetland 1 Wetland 2
Size of Wetland (acres)
0.03 0.13
Riparian Riparian
Wetland Type (non-riparian, riparian riverine or riparian non-riverine) Non-Riverine Non-Riverine
Mapped Soil Series
CwA CwA
Drainage class
Somewhat Poorly Drained Somewhat Poorly Drained
Soil Hydric Status
Hydric Hydric
Source of Hydrology
Seep Seep
Hydrologic Impairment
None Dredging/Ditching
Native vegetation community
Scrub-Shrub Forested
Percent composition of exotic invasive vegetation
2% 42%
Regulatory Considerations
Regulation
Applicable? Resolved?
Supporting Documentation
Waters of the United States — Section 404
Yes Resolved
Action ID #2012-01101
Waters of the United States — Section 401
Yes Resolved
NCDWR Project # 20120748
Endangered Species Act
No Yes
ERTR
Historic Preservation Act
No Yes
ERTR
Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA)/
Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA)
No N/A
FEMA Floodplain Compliance
N/A N/A
Essential Fisheries Habitat
N/A N/A

rOF,
Nantahall
National
Forest
-lop
.
/ L /
V'.
Webster
23
Scott C ees ,
As
�,, Y -
� f
June's Branch _
Nantahala
National
Forest
�Jfr
i —
116 Uf Tu4asegee VU`eY
1
r i Directions: From Asheville, take I-40 West for approximately 18 miles.
J'� _. Take exit 27 onto US -74 toward US-19/Clyde/US-23/Waynesville.
r 107 Take exit 107 toward Jones Cove Road and merge onto
r US -23 South/US-74 West. After approximately 20 miles, take exit
J 85 toward NC-107/Cullowhee. Keep right at the fork in the ramp
t and continue onto US-23/Asheville Highway. Make a slight left
onto NC-107/East Main Street for approximately 2 miles before
turning left onto Fairview Road (SR 1724).
The subject project site is an environmental restoration site of the
NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) and is
X' encompassed by a recorded conservation easement, but is
bordered by land under private ownership. Accessing the site may
* require traversing areas near or along the easement boundary and
therefore access by the general public is not permitted. Access by
antahala authorized personnel of state and federal agencies or their
designees/contractors involved in the development, oversight and
Forest
stewardship of the restoration site is permitted within the terms and
t Forest r timeframes of their defined roles. Any intended site visitation or
activity by any person outside of these previously sanctioned roles
and activities requires prior coordination with DMS.
Figure 1: Vicinity Map
June's Branch
Project No. 95027
Jackson County, North Carolina
r�t�iY.y►%i�itl��I►�Jy���'Y
Notes: Conservation Easement from Key
Mapping & Survey, P.A.
0 0.5 1 2 3
Miles

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Figures 2. Current Conditions Plan View Maps
Table 5. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Table 6. Vegetation Condition Assessment
2018 Photo Station Photos

40
t.
jog
pis y.
4,i _ - •ry.
� .;�;':. � .s- .: Y� =.. .. .'fir : As .' : � `x . J,-_ °' .�I �w .• +��, ..,ri r r, �J ."f-- :::•
res
05
- , � • _ ��-� :' ' . �.` �' _ : ,.sir,,',
y.
�J
0 75 150
Aggradation Feet
1 inch = 150 feet
6
Figure 2
3\ �� a } 5
?
Bumgarner II :n Junes Branch Stream
--�-' Restoration Project
- � .- ,� MY5 2018
Oil
12 _ - Junes Branch a _ .�� Current Conditions
5 - °r.:.• = Plan View
hi Date: 12/17/2018 Drawn by: RTM
s
13 ' - LEGEND
10 ro -
,;"� ' 11 Conservation Easement
b Doris Branch x 14 �� M Junes Branch
*• T Vegetation Plot
1 • s~ 4 : T y n N" F> 260 stems/acre
s4.A ' < 260 stems/acre
40
Stream Restoration
Higdon Branch E 1 $1;;''�e Cross Section
1 -
A. 1 -. _ 1.- `• ,
Structure
T4.
MY5 SPA
Long Pro Begin/End
3
-r Bumgarner I - • Rain Gauge
7`{ Photo Station
�' •ice`'.: _ ® Crest Gauge
` j� w _ , • �► ...-..
1�- r r� Vegetation Condition Assessment
Target Community
`r�, 1 :•i ,},} d Present Marginal Absent
Ov'1_ t i•' �• p• Absent No Fill
r. >
r >
- _- Pr
�j esent
d 3'• '}f sr. F . � N
Source: 2013 NC OneMap Aerial Imagery x r - -`

Table 5. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Junes Branch / Project No. 95027 - Bumgarner Branch I
Assessed Len th 631 feet
Major Channel
Category
Channel
Sub -Category
Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing
as Intended
Total
Number in
As -built
Number of Amount of
Unstable Unstable
Segments Footage
% Stable,
Performing
as Intended
Number
with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footage
with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjusted %
for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
1. Aggradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect
flow laterally (not to include point bars).
0 0
°
100/o
2 Degradation - Evidence of downcutting.
0 0
100%
(Riffle and Run Units)
2. Riffle Condition
1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate.
13
13
100%
3. Meander Pool
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth: Mean Bankfull Depth>_ 1.6).
13
13
100%
Condition
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstream riffle).
N/A
N/A
N/A
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run).
13
13
100%
4. Thalweg Position
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander bend (Glide).
12
12
100%
2. Bank
1. Scoured /Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or
s
scour and erosion.
IP
0
0
100%
0 0 100°
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2. Undercut
likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable
0
0
100%
N/A N/A N/A
and are providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, calving, or collapse.
0
0
100%
N/A N/A N/A
Totals
0
1 0
100%
N/A N/A N/A
3. Engineered
Structures
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.
14
14
100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill.
14
14
100%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.
14
14
100%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence doesNOT exceed
15%.
14
14
100%
4. Habitat
Pool forming structures maintaining- Max Pool Depth: Mean Bankfull
Depth Ratio > 1.6. Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base -flow.
14
14
r,00

Table 5 cont'd. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Junes Branch / Project No. 95027 - Bumgarner Branch II
Assessed Len th 543 feet
Major Channel
Category
Channel
Sub -Category
Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing
as Intended
Total
Number in
As -built
Number of Amount of
Unstable Unstable
Segments Footage
% Stable,
Performing
as Intended
Number
with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footage
with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjusted %
for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
1. Aggradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect
flow laterally (not to include point bars).
0 0
o
100/o
2 Degradation - Evidence of downcutting.
0 0
100%
(Riffle and Run Units)
2. Riffle Condition
1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate.
7
7
100%
3. Meander Pool
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth: Mean Bankfull Depth>_ 1.6).
8
8
100%
Condition
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstream riffle).
2
2
100%
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run).
8
8
100%
4. Thalweg Position
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander bend (Glide).
8
8
100%
2. Bank
1. Scoured /Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or
scour and erosion.
0
0
100%
0 0 100%
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2. Undercut
likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable
0
0
100%
N/A N/A N/A
and are providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, calving, or collapse.
0
0
100%
N/A N/A N/A
Totals
0
0
100%
N/A N/AN/A
3. Engineered
Structures
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.
7
7
100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill.
7
7
100%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.
7
7
100%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence doesNOT exceed
15%.
7
7
100%
4. Habitat
Pool forming structures maintaining- Max Pool Depth: Mean Bankfull
Depth Ratio >1.6. Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base -flow.
7
7
100%

Table 5 cont'd. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Junes Branch / Project No. 95027 - Junes Branch
Assessed Len th 1,375 feet
Major Channel
Category
Channel
Sub -Category
Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing
as Intended
Total
Number in
As -built
Number of Amount of
Unstable Unstable
Segments Footage
% Stable,
Performing
as Intended
Number
with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footage
with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjusted %
for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
1. Aggradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect
flow laterally (not to include point bars).
1 28
o
90/o
2 Degradation - Evidence of downcutting.
0 0
100%
(Riffle and Run Units)
2. Riffle Condition
1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate.
45
45
100%
3. Meander Pool
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth: Mean Bankfull Depth>_ 1.6).
45
45
100%
Condition
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstream riffle).
N/A
N/A
N/A
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run).
45
45
100%
4. Thalweg Position
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander bend (Glide).
45
45
100%
2. Bank
1. Scoured /Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or
s
scour and erosion.
0
0
100%
0 0 100°
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2. Undercut
likely. DoesNOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable
0
0
100%
N/A N/A N/A
and are providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, calving, or collapse.
0
0
100%
N/A N/A N/A
Totals
0
0
100%
N/A N/A N/A
3. Engineered
Structures
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.
45
45
100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill.
45
45
100%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.
45
45
100%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence doesNOT exceed
15%.
45
45
100%
4. Habitat
Pool forming structures maintaining- Max Pool Depth: Mean Bankfull
Depth Ratio >1.6. Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base -flow.
45
45
100

Table 5 cont'd. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Junes Branch / Project No. 95027 - Higdon Branch
Assessed Len th 376 feet
Major Channel
Category
Channel
Sub -Category
Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing
as Intended
Total
Number in
As -built
Number of Amount of
Unstable Unstable
Segments Footage
% Stable,
Performing
as Intended
Number
with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footage
with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjusted %
for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
1. Aggradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect
flow laterally (not to include point bars).
0 0
°
100/o
2 Degradation - Evidence of downcutting.
0 0
100%
(Riffle and Run Units)
2. Riffle Condition
1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate.
18
18
100%
3. Meander Pool
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth: Mean Bankfull Depth>_ 1.6).
18
18
100%
Condition
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstream riffle).
3
3
100%
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run).
18
18
100%
4. Thalweg Position
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander bend (Glide).
18
18
100%
2. Bank
1. Scoured /Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or
s
scour and erosion.
0
0
100%
0 0 100°
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2. Undercut
likely. DoesNOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable
0
0
100%
N/A N/A N/A
and are providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, calving, or collapse.
0
0
100%
N/A N/A N/A
Totals
0
0
100%
N/A N/A N/A
3. Engineered
Structures
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.
15
15
100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill.
15
15
100%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.
15
15
100%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence doesNOT exceed
15%.
15
15
100%
4. Habitat
Pool forming structures maintaining- Max Pool Depth: Mean Bankfull
Depth Ratio >1.6. Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base -flow.
15
15
100

Table 5 cont'd. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Junes Branch / Project No. 95027 - Doris Branch
Assessed Len th 288 feet
Major Channel
Category
Channel
Sub -Category
Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing
as Intended
Total
Number in
As -built
Number of Amount of
Unstable Unstable
Segments Footage
% Stable,
Performing
as Intended
Number
with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footage
with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjusted %
for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
1. Aggradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect
flow laterally (not to include point bars).
0 0
°
100/o
2 Degradation - Evidence of downcutting.
0 0
100%
(Riffle and Run Units)
2. Riffle Condition
1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate.
23
23
100%
3. Meander Pool
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth: Mean Bankfull Depth>_ 1.6).
23
23
100%
Condition
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstream riffle).
N/A
N/A
N/A
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run).
23
23
100%
4. Thalweg Position
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander bend (Glide).
23
23
100%
2. Bank
1. Scoured /Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or
scour and erosion.
0
0
100%
0 0 100°
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2. Undercut
likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable
0
0
100%
N/A N/A N/A
and are providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, calving, or collapse.
0
0
100%
N/A N/A N/A
Totals
0
0
100%
N/A N/A N/A
3. Engineered
Structures
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.
23
23
100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill.
23
23
100%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.
23
23
100%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence doesNOT exceed
15%.
23
23
100%
4. Habitat
Pool forming structures maintaining- Max Pool Depth: Mean Bankfull
Depth Ratio >1.6. Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base -flow.
23
23
100

N/A - Item does not apply.
Table 6. Vegetation Condition Assessment
Junes Branch / Project No. 95027
Planted Acreage: 5.81
Number of
Combined
/ of
Vegetation Category
Definitions
CCPV Depiction
Planted
Polygons
Acreage
Acreage
1. Bare Areas
Very limited cover of both woody and herbaceous material.
N/A
0
0.00
0
woody stem densities clearly below target levels based on MY3, 4,
2. Low Stem Density Areas
or 5 stem count criteria.
N/A
0
0.00
0
Totals
0
0.00
0%
Areas with woody stems of a size class that are obviously small
3. Areas of Poor Growth Rates or Vigor
given the monitoring year.
N/A
0
0.00
0
Cumulative Totals
1 0
1 0.00
0%
Easement Acreage: 5.81
- of
Number of
Combined
Vegetation Category
Definitions
CCPV Depiction
Easement
Polygons
Acreage
Acreage
4. Invasive Areas of Concern
Areas or points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale).
N/A
0
0.00
0
5. Easement Encroachment Areas
Areas or points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale).
N/A
0
0.00
0%
N/A - Item does not apply.

MY5 2018 Photo Station Photos
Junes Branch — Permanent Photo Station 1
Station 202+60 — Downstream
Junes Branch — Permanent Photo Station 1
Station 202+60 — Upstream

Junes Branch Permanent Photo Station 2
Station 206+30 — Downstream
Junes Branch — Permanent Photo Station 2
Station 206+30 — Upstream

Junes Branch — Permanent Photo Station 3
Looking South/Downstream Junes Branch
Junes Branch — Permanent Photo Station 3
Looking North/Upstream — Upstream

-
w
.v
\ y
i' ll
M�

* Ate. _ . •s
_
4b
-'
-
� 4 _ •?
12-06,2018%

�n � �0}i �
y A�'t�i�� . .P } t fr7 � �y
x
_� fax ✓;� �� �� � "� a ] z�' ,
�< :.t'
c1r�
�"
���-,.
-
f' � �
- _
�3;
�_:
�-
_ �,
S
„ � _
�
_ �
_
f i r . .. � J �
i
� �. _
..
I}
N `� , � Jl
�
� � _.
�
�
"c
��
`
.x � i
� � y
r S ,�, i
�
�
�y
�
' , ,
I�����r//
� �� _
a
y4 ._
� '�{fit
� Yj g� � �.
ji � 9 � f,, + rv� rg' w° °y ti �

Bumgarner Branch I — Permanent Photo Station 9
Station 105+25 — Downstream
f, �T .
h
4 I
A
�y-h
y
wfyia —j
Qw
VU
Bumgarner Branch I Permanent Photo Station 9
Station 105+25 — Upstream

Bumgarner Branch I Permanent Photo Station 10
Looking Upstream from Confluence with Junes Branch
Junes Branch — Permanent Photo Station 10
Looking Upstream from Confluence with Bumgarner Branch

Bumgamer Branch II Permanent Photo Station 11
Looking Upstream from Confluence with Higdon Branch
Higdon Branch — Permanent Photo Station I I
Looking Upstream from Confluence with Bumgarner Branch II

Bumgamer Branch II — Permanent Photo Station 12
Looking Upstream from Confluence with Doris Branch
Doris Branch — Permanent Photo Station 12
Looking Upstream from Confluence with Bumgarner Branch II

Higdon Branch — Permanent Photo Station 13
Station 302+80 — Downstream
Higdon Branch — Permanent Photo Station 13
Station 302+80 — Upstream

.i�5•S
r � r !l
f
1 � 1

Doris Branch — General Conditions
Higdon Branch — General Conditions

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data
Table 7. Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary
Table 8. CVS Vegetation Metadata
Table 9. Total Planted Stem Counts
Vegetation Plot Photos

Table 7. Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment
Plot #
Planted
Stems/Acre
Volunteer
Stems/Acre
Total
Stems/Acre
Success
Criteria
Met?
Average
Stem
Height (ft)
1
607
202
809
Yes
5.0
2
202
18211
18413
No
7.9
3
364
2671
3035
Yes
11.7
4
405
324
728
Yes
5.2
5
324
243
567
Yes
5.5
6
850
121
971
Yes
5.4
7
728
81
809
Yes
10.1
8
769
121
890
Yes
10.2
Project Avg
531
2747
3278
Yes
7.7

Table 8. CVS Vegetation Metadata
Junes Branch Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
Report Prepared By
Ryan Medric
Date Prepared
10/6/20180:00
database name
Junes Branch_MY5_2018.mdb
database location
C:\Users\rmedric\Dropbox (RES)\@RES Projects\North
Carolina\Junes Branch\Monitoring\Monitoring
Data\MY5 2018\Vegetation Data
computer name
D4VOKGH2
file size
61837312
DESCRIPTION OF WORKSHEETS IN THIS DOCUMENT
Metadata
Description of database file, the report worksheets, and a
summary of project(s) and project data.
Proj, planted
Each project is listed with its PLANTED stems per acre, for each
year. This excludes live stakes.
Proj, total stems
Each project is listed with its TOTAL stems per acre, for each
year. This includes live stakes, all planted stems, and all
natural/volunteer stems.
Plots
List of plots surveyed with location and summary data (live
stems, dead stems, missing, etc.).
Vigor
Frequency distribution of vigor classes for stems for all plots.
Vigor by Spp
Frequency distribution of vigor classes listed by species.
Damage
List of most frequent damage classes with number of
occurrences and percent of total stems impacted by each.
Damage by Spp
Damage values tallied by type for each species.
Damage by Plot
Damage values tallied by type for each plot.
Planted Stems by Plot and Spp
A matrix of the count of PLANTED living stems of each species
for each plot; dead and missing stems are excluded.
ALL Stems by Plot and spp
A matrix of the count of total living stems of each species
(planted and natural volunteers combined) for each plot; dead
and missing stems are excluded.
PROJECT SUMMARY
Project Code 95027
project Name Junes Branch
Description
River Basin Little Tennessee
le ngth(ft)
stream -to -edge width (ft)
area (sq m)
Required Plots (calculated)
Sampled Plots 8

Table 9. Total Planted Stem Counts
Junes Branch
Current Plot Data (MY5 2018)
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
95027-01-0001
95027-01-0002 95027-01-0003
95027-01-0004
95027-01-0005
95027-01-0006
95027-01-0007
95027-01-0008
PnoLS P -all T PnoLS P -all T PnoLS P -all T PnoLS P -all T PnoLS P -all T PnoLS P -all T PnoLS P -all T
PnoLS P -all T
Acer rubrum
red maple
Tree
Alnus serrulata
hazel alder
Shrub
8
8
8
4
4
4
1
1
1
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
4
4
4
4
2 2
2
2 2
3
1
1
2
3
3
3
Carpinus caroliniana var.
Coastal American Ho
Tree
Carya ovata
shagbark hickory
Tree
Cornus amomum
silky dogwood
Shrub
Cornus florida
flowering dogwood
Tree
Diospyros virginiana
common persimmon
Tree
1
1
1
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
8
8
8
2 2
2
5 5
7
4 4
6
1
1
1
2
2
2
Hamamelis virginiana var
American witchhazel
Tree
1
1
1
Juglans nigra
blackwalnut
Tree
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
4
Liriodendron tulipifera vz
Tulip -tree, Yellow Pc
Tree
1
4
2 2
2
6
6
6
5
5
6
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
Platanus occidentalis var.
Sycamore, Plane-tre
Tree
1
1
1
5 5 5 7 7
15
2 2
2
2
4
4
6
5
5
6
15
15
15
Prunus cerasus
sour cherry
Exotic
Prunus serotina
black cherry
Tree
Prunus serotina var. serol
black cherry
Tree
Quercus
oak
Tree
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
1
1
1
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
1
1
1
Quercus rubra
northern red oak
Tree
1
1
1
1 1
1
Quercus rubra var. rubra
northern red oak
Tree
Salix nigra
black willow
Tree
4
450
50
2
1
3
Sambucus canadensis
Common Elderberry
Shrub
Unknown
Shrub or Tree
Vitisaestivalis
summergrape
Vine
Vitis rotundifolia
muscadine
Vine
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
15
15
20
5 5 455 9 9
75
10 10
18
8 8
14
21
21
24
18
18
20
19
19
22
1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1
0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
0.02
5 5 7 1 1 2 2
2 5 4
4 6 3 3 5 6 6 6 5 5 5
4 4
5
607 607 809 202 202 18413 364
364 30351405
405 728 324 324 567 850 850 971 728 728 809
769 769
890

Junes Branch
Annual Means
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
MY5 (2018)
MY4 (2017)
MY3 (2016)
MY2 (2015)
MY1(2015)
MYO (2014)
Pnol-S P -all T
PnoLS P -all T
Pnol-S P -all T PnoLS P -all T
PnoLS P -all T
PnoLS P -all T
Acer rubrum
red maple
Tree
5
Alnus serrulata
hazel alder
Shrub
13
13
13
14
14
16
13
13
15
5
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
12
12
18
11
11
19
9
9
13
5
5
20
6
6
6
11
11
11
Carpinus caroliniana var.
Coastal American Ho
Tree
3
3
3
4
4
4
5
5
5
5
5
5
4
4
4
Carya ovata
shagbark hickory
Tree
1
Cornus amomum
silky dogwood
Shrub
20
50
3
Cornus florida
flowering dogwood
Tree
2
2
31
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
Diospyros virginiana
common persimmon
Tree
1
1
1
3
3
3
3
3
6
4
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
22
22
26
23
23
27
25
25
28
20
20
28
20
20
20
21
21
21
Hamamelis virginiana var
American witchhazel
Tree
1
1
1
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
5
5
5
5
5
5
Juglans nigra
black walnut
Tree
1
1
6
1
1
5
1
1
1
1
1
1
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
4
5
Liriodendron tulipifera vz
Tulip -tree, Yellow Pc
Tree
13
13
19
15
15
27
17
17
17
4
4
4
6
6
6
7
7
7
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
24
Platanus occidentalis var.
Sycamore, Plane-tre
Tree
39
39
52
42
42
55
43
43
53
16
16
16
17
17
17
17
17
17
Prunus cerasus
sour cherry
Exotic
3
Prunus serotina
black cherry
Tree
1
Prunus serotina var. serol
black cherry
Tree
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
3
3
3
Quercus
oak
Tree
1
1
1
2
2
2
4
4
4
6
6
6
6
6
6
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
Quercus rubra
northern red oak
Tree
2
2
2
1
1
1
Quercus rubra var. rubra
northern red oak
Tree
1
1
1
3
3
3
6
6
6
5
5
5
Salix nigra
black willow
Tree
510
270
77
53
81
Sambucus canadensis
Common Elderberry
Shrub
3
Unknown
Shrub or Tree
4
4
4
Vitisaestivalis
summergrape
Vine
2
Vitis rotundifolia
muscadine
Vine
2
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
105
1051 648
123
1231 460
1281
1281 285
66
66 196
76
761 157
87
871
87
8
8
8 5
5
5
0.20
0.20
20 0.12
01647d
0.12
0.12
10
10
12
14
14
19
15
11
11
21
11
11
12
12
12
12
531
531
3278
622
622
2327
647
534
534
1586
615
615
1271
704
704
704

- gyro;
�r
h
d,
v g �
w
i
i
l�l,r
h k
- gyro;
3 I
d,
w
i

I WT

Appendix D
Stream Geomorphology Data
Table 11 a. Dimensional Morphology Summary
Table 1 lb. Stream Reach Data Summary
Cross Section Plots
Longitudinal Profile with Annual Overlay
Pebble Count Data
Table 12. Pebble Count Data Summary
Charts 1-11. MY4 Stream Reach Substrate Composition Charts

Table 11 a cont'd. Monitoring Data - Dimensional Morphology Summary (Dimensional Parameters - Cross -Sections)
Junes Branch / Project No. 95027 - Bumgarner II (543 feet)
Table 11a. Monitoring Data - Dimensional Morphology Summary (Dimensional Parameters - Cross -Sections)
Junes Branch / Project No. 95027 - Bumgarner I (631 feet)
Cross -Section 4 Pool
Cross -Section 1 Riffle
Cross -Section 5 Riffle
Dimension
Cross -Section 2 Pool
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
Cross -Section 3 Riffle
Base
MY1
Dimension
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MY1
MY2 MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Record Elevation (datum) Used
2,153.11
2,153.11
2,153.11
2,153.11
2,153.11
2,153.23
2,152.68
2,152.68
2,152.68 2,152.68
2,152.68
2,153.05
2,145.60
2,145.60
2,145.60
2,145.60
2,145.60
2,145.22
Bankfull Width (ft)
13.3
13.4
12.7
12.9
13.2
20.0
13.4
13.1
13.2 12.7
13.4
29.7
15.8
16.8
16.3
18.0
18.3
13.9
Floodprone Width (ft)
>79
>79
>79
>79
>33
>33
>124
>124
>124 124
>39
>38.6
>42
>42
>42
>42
>42
>41.1
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.9
0.8
0.8
0.7
0.7
0.6
1.5
1.1
0.9 0.9
0.9
0.7
0.8
0.9
0.9
0.9
1.0
0.9
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.5
1.3
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.8
2.9
1.9
2.1 2.0
2.3
2.5
1.2
1.7
1.9
2.1
2.2
2.0
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft')
11.7
11.3
10.2
9.6
8.6
11.7
20.6
14.0
12.2 11.3
12.2
20.6
12.2
14.5
14.8
15.8
17.5
12.2
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
15.2
15.8
15.8
17.2
20.2
34.3
8.7
12.3
14.3 14.4
14.6
42.6
20.4
19.4
18.0
20.5
19.1
15.7
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>5.9
>5.9
>6.2
6.1
>2.5
>1.7
>9.3
>9.5
>9.4 >9.7
N/A
N/A
>2.7
>2.5
>2.6
>2.3
>2.3
>3.0
Bankf ill Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.1
1.1
0.9
1.0
1.0
1.0 1.0
N/A
N/A
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.9
1.0
d50 (mm) I
N/A
27
0.67
1.5 1
15
29
N/A
I N/A
N/A N/A I
N/A
N/A
N/A
16
0.68
1 0.24
14
1.6
Table 11 a cont'd. Monitoring Data - Dimensional Morphology Summary (Dimensional Parameters - Cross -Sections)
Junes Branch / Project No. 95027 - Bumgarner II (543 feet)
Cross -Section 4 Pool
Cross -Section 5 Riffle
Dimension
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Record Elevation (datum) Used
2,140.17
2,140.17
2,140.17
2,140.17
2,140.17
2,140.23
2,139.81
2,139.81
2,139.81
2,139.81
2,139.81
2,139.68
Bankfull Width (ft)
16.5
16.1
16.5
15.2
13.8
32.0
16.3
15.7
16.2
16.0
15.1
22.0
Floodprone Width (ft)
>50
>50
>50
>50
>49
>49
>48
>48
>48
>48
>47
>48
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.4
1.2
1.1
1.2
1.2
0.7
0.7
0.9
0.8
0.9
0.6
0.5
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
2.6
2.4
2.5
2.3
2.3
2.6
1.2
1.3
1.3
1.4
1.4
1.5
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft')
23.0
18.9
18.5
17.9
16.6
23.0
11.9
13.4
12.6
13.7
9.4
11.9
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
11.9
13.7
14.8
12.8
11.5
44.6
22.2
18.4
20.8
18.6
24.3
40.8
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>3.0
>3.1
>3.0
>3.3
N/A
N/A
>3.0
>3.1
>3
>3.0
>3.1
>2.2
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
N/A
N/A
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.1
0.8
d50 (mm)
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
25
4.9
4.3
57
67
N/A - Item does not apply.
Note: Starting in MY4, Bankfull Bank Height Ratio was calculated on riffles using the baseline bankfull elevation.
Note: Starting in MY5, all dimesional parameter calculations are based on fixed baseline cross sectional area; therefore, bankfull elevations were adjusted accordingly.

N/A - Item does not apply.
Note: Starting in MY4, Bankfull Bank Height Ratio was calculated on riffles using the baseline bankfull elevation.
Note: Starting in MY5, all dimesional parameter calculations are based on fixed baseline cross sectional area; therefore, bankfull elevations were adjusted accordingly.
Table 11a cont'd. Monitoring Data - Dimensional Morphology Summary (Dimensional Parameters - Cross -Sections)
Junes Branch / Project No. 95027 - Junes (1,375 feet)
Cross -Section 6 Riffle
Cross -Section 10 Pool
Cross -Section 7 Pool
Cross -Section 11 Riffle
Cross -Section 8 Riffle
Dimension
Base
Dimension
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MYl
MY2 MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Record Elevation (datum) Used
2,172.66
2,172.66
2,172.66
2,172.66
2,172.66
2,173.11
2,171.35
2,171.35
2,171.35 2,171.35
2,171.35
2,171.80
2,163.28
2,163.28
2,163.28
2,163.28
2,163.28
2,163.50
Bankfull Width (ft)
8.6
8.8
8.0
6.3
3.9
18.3
8.2
8.8
7.8 8.3
6.8
17.8
9.6
10.8
10.6
10.6
10.1
17.5
Floodprone Width (ft)
>94
>94
>94
>94
>23
>30
>111
>111
>111 >111
>32
>33
>53
>53
>53
>53
>36
>38
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.4
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.2
1.0
0.7
0.6 0.4
0.4
0.5
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.4
0.4
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
0.7
0.9
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.4
2.1
1.6
1.3 1.0
1.3
1.7
1.2
1.1
1.0
1.2
1.1
1.5
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft)
3.7
4.1
3.0
1.7
0.8
3.7
8.6
6.1
4.8 3.7
2.7
8.6
6.4
6.4
5.7
5.6
3.6
6.4
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
19.7
18.9
21.7
23.0
19.4
89.6
7.9
12.7
12.7 18.8
17.0
36.6
14.3
18.2
19.8
20.0
28.3
47.9
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>11.0
>10.7
>11.7
>14.8
>5.8
>1.7
>13.5
>12.6
>14.2 >13.4
N/A
N/A
>5.5
>4.9
>5.0
>5.0
>3.6
>2.2
Bankftxll Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.1
0.9
1.0
1.0
1.0 1.0
N/A
N/A
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.6
d50 (mm) I
N/A
1.4
0.13
0.062
2.8
1.7
N/A
N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
4.7
0.65
0.062
1.9
5.4
N/A - Item does not apply.
Note: Starting in MY4, Bankfull Bank Height Ratio was calculated on riffles using the baseline bankfull elevation.
Note: Starting in MY5, all dimesional parameter calculations are based on fixed baseline cross sectional area; therefore, bankfull elevations were adjusted accordingly.
Table 11a cont'd. Monitoring Data - Dimensional Morphology Summary (Dimensional Parameters - Cross -Sections)
Junes Branch / Project No. 95027 - Junes (1,375 feet)
Cross -Section 9 Pool
Cross -Section 10 Pool
Cross -Section 11 Riffle
Dimension
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MYl MY2 MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Record Elevation (datum) Used
2,162.64
2,162.64
2,162.64
2,162.64
2,162.64
2,163.12
2,144.35
2,144.35 2,144.35 2,144.35
2,144.35
2,144.32
2,143.99
2,143.99
2,143.99
2,143.99
2,143.99
2,143.92
Bankfull Width (ft)
10.5
11.1
10.1
9.8
7.3
26.9
11.0
10.9 11.0 10.3
10.7
17.7
9.8
9.0
8.6
9.2
10
12.9
Floodprone Width (ft)
>56
>56
>56
>56
>36
>42
>39
>39 >39 >39
>39
>39
>38
>38
>38
>38
>38
>37
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.0
0.8
0.7
0.9
0.4
0.4
0.8
0.7 0.7 0.7
0.7
0.5
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.5
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
2.0
1.8
1.6
2.0
0.9
1.5
1.7
1.5 1.5 1.5
1.6
1.7
1.2
1.0
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.4
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft')
10.5
8.4
7.5
8.4
3.3
10.5
9.0
7.9 7.6 7.6
7.9
9
5.8
5.2
5.2
5.7
5.7
5.8
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
10.4
14.7
13.7
11.5
16.3
69.4
13.4
15.0 16.1 14.1
14.3
34.7
16.5
15.9
14.1
14.7
17.6
28.6
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>5.3
>5
>5.5
>5.7
N/A
N/A
>3.5
>3.5 >3.5 >3.8
N/A
N/A
>3.9
>4.2
>4.4
>4.1
>3.8
>2.8
Bankftxll Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
N/A
N/A
1.0
1.0 1.0 1.0
N/A
N/A
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.1
1.0
0.9
d50 (mm) I
N/A
N/A
N/A
I N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A N/A N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
12
0.21
4.3
27
32.0
N/A - Item does not apply.
Note: Starting in MY4, Bankfull Bank Height Ratio was calculated on riffles using the baseline bankfull elevation.
Note: Starting in MY5, all dimesional parameter calculations are based on fixed baseline cross sectional area; therefore, bankfull elevations were adjusted accordingly.

Table 11a. cont'd. Monitoring Data - Dimensional Morphology Summary (Dimensional Parameters - Cross -Sections)
Junes Branch / Project No. 95027 -Higdon Branch (376 feet)
Cross -Section 12 Riffle
Cross -Section 13 Pool
Dimension
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
W1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Record Elevation(datum)Used
2,140.85
2,140.85
2,140.85
2,140.85
2,140.85
2,140.96
2,140.14
2,140.14
2,140.14
2,140.14
2,140.14
2,140.50
Bankfull Width (ft)
6.6
8.1
7.0
7.7
5.4
10.8
8.0
7.2
7.0
7.0
5.6
17.2
Floodprone Width (ft)
>40
>40
>40
>40
>21
>25
>30
>30
>30
>30
>8
>28
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.7
0.6
0.3
0.3
0.1
0.3
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
0.7
0.7
0.9
0.7
0.6
0.7
1.7
1.1
0.5
0.4
0.1
0.8
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft')
2.5
2.6
2.4
2.1
1.2
2.5
5.9
4.0
2.1
1.9
0.5
5.9
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
17.6
24.7
20.6
28.8
23.3
47.1
10.8
13.0
23.9
25.5
62.5
50.2
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>6.0
>4.9
>5.6
>5.2
>3.9
>2.3
>3.7
>4.1
>4.2
>4.3
N/A
N/A
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.1
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.1
N/A
N/A
d50 (mm)
N/A
15
0.13
0.062
0.062
0.062
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A - Item does not apply.
Note: Starting in MY4, Bankfull Bank Height Ratio was calculated on riffles using the baseline bankfull elevation.
Note: Starting in MY5, all dimesional parameter calculations are based on fixed baseline cross sectional area; therefore, bankfull elevations were adjusted accordingly.

Table Ila. cont'd Monitoring Data - Dimensional Morphology Summary (Dimensional Parameters - Cross -Sections)
Junes Branch / Project No. 95027 -Doris Branch (288 feet)
Cross -Section 14 Riffle
Cross -Section 15 Pool
Dimension
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Record Elevation (datum) Used
2,138.93
2,138.93
2,138.93
2,138.93
2,138.93
2,138.93
2,138.74
2,138.74
2,138.74
2,138.74
2,138.74
2,138.91
Bankfull Width (ft)
6.2
6.6
6.9
7.3
3.5
8.5
11.6
11.7
11.9
12.4
9.5
18.4
Floodprone Width (ft)
>23
>23
>23
>23
>20
>21
>21
>21
>21
>21
>21
>21
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.4
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.3
0.5
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.5
0.5
2.3
1.7
1.4
1.2
0.8
1.4
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft')
2.3
2.4
1.9
2.1
0.9
2.3
9.4
8.3
7.4
6.5
2.8
9.4
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
16.7
18.2
25.7
25.9
13.3
31.7
14.3
16.5
19.1
23.6
32.1
36.0
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>3.8
>3.5
>3.4
>3.2
>5.6
.2.5
>1.8
>1.8
>1.8
>1.7
N/A
N/A
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
N/A
N/A
d50 (mm)
N/A
1 0.062
0.062
0.062
0.062
0.062
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A - Item does not apply.
Note: Starting in MY4, Bankfull Bank Height Ratio was calculated on riffles using the baseline bankfull elevation.
Note: Starting in MY5, all dimesional parameter calculations are based on fixed baseline cross sectional area; therefore, bankfull elevations were adjusted accordingly.

N/A - Information does not apply.
Ri = Riffle / Ru = Run / P = Pool / G = Glide / S = Step
SC = Silt -Clay / SA = Sand / G = Gravel / C = Cobble / B = Boulder / Be = Bedrock
Table 11b. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Junes Branch / Project No. 95027 - Bumgarner I 631 feet
Parameter
Baseline
MY -I
MY -2
MY -3
MY -4
MY -5
Dimension & Substrate - Riffle
Min
Mean
Med Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med AW
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med Max
SD
Bankfull Width (ft)
13.3
14.6
14.6 15.8
N/A
2
13.4
15.5
15.5
17.6
3.0
2
12.7
14.5
14.5 16.3
2.5
2
12.9
15.4
15.4 18.0
3.6
2
13.2
15.8
15.8
18.3
3.6
2
13.9
17.0
17.0 20.0
4.32
Floodprone Width (ft)
>42
>61
>61 >79
N/A
2
>42
>61
>61
>79
26.2
2
>42
>61
>61 >79
26.2
2
>42
>60
>60 >79
26.2
2
>33
>37.5
>37.5
>42
6.4
2
>33
>37.1
>37.1 >41.1
5.7
2
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.8
0.9
0.9 0.9
N/A
2
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0
2
0.8
0.9
0.9 0.9
0.1
2
0.7
0.8
0.8 0.9
0.1
2
0.7
0.9
0.9
1.0
0.2
2
0.6
0.8
0.8 0.9
0.2
2
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.2
1.4
1.4 1.5
N/A
2
1.3
1.5
1.5
1.7
0.3
2
1.3
1.6
1.6 1.9
0.4
2
1.4
1.7
1.7 2.1
0.5
2
1.5
1.9
1.9
2.2
0.5
2
1.8
1.9
1.9 2.0
0.1
2
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft)
11.7
12.0
12.0 12.2
N/A
2
11.3
16.4
16.4
21.4
7.1
2
10.2
12.5
12.5 14.8
3.3
2
9.6
12.7
12.7 15.8
4.3
2
8.6
13.1
13.1
17.5
6.3
2
11.7
12.0
12.0 12.2
0.4
2
Width/Depth Ratio
15.2
17.8
17.8 20.4
N/A
2
15.8
18.6
18.6
21.4
4.0
2
15.8
16.9
16.9 18.0
1.6
2
17.2
18.9
18.9 20.5
2.3
2
19.1
19.7
19.7
20.2
0.8
2
15.7
25.0
25.0 34.3
13.2
2
Entrenchment Ratio
>2.7
>4.3
>4.3 >5.9
N/A
2
>2.4
>4.15
>4.15
>5.9
2.5
2
>2.6
>4.4
>4.4 >6.2
2.5
2
>2.3
>4.2
>4.2 >6.1
2.7
2
>2.3
>2.4
>2.4
>2.5
0.1
2
>1.7
>2.4
>2.4 >3.0
0.9
2
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0 1.0
N/A
2
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.0
2
1.0
1.0
1.0 1.0
0.0
2
1.0
1.1
1.0 1.1
0.1
2
0.9
1.0
1.0
1.1
0.1
2
0.9
1.0
1.0 1.0
0.1
2
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
0.5
13.7
14.4 23.0
7.4
14
10.5
17.0
14.5
25.6
5.7
11
11.4
17.5
14.9 26.6
6.1
11
9.4
15.5
12.4 27.3
6.3
11
3.3
15.2
14.2
37.2
8.1
13
5.5
12.5
11.2 25.2
6.2
19
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
0.016
0.061
0.039 0.251
0.063
14
0.019
0.030
0.027
0.055
0.010
11
0.017
0.028
0.025 0.040
0.009
11
0.007
0.022
0.021 0.042
0.012
11
0.001
0.023
0.015
0.061
0.020
13
0.000
0.032
0.025 0.078
0.019
19
Pool Length (ft)
5.2
10.2
9.2 22.5
4.3
12
5.0
7.6
7.3
13.4
2.2
12
5.4
7.7
7.0 12.9
2.1
12
4.9
9.2
8.1 19.1
3.7
12
6.1
12.1
9.6
24.8
5.9
14
5.0
11.5
11.3 18.8
4.2
19
Pool Max Depth (ft)
2.1
2.8
2.8 3.6
0.5
14
1.9
2.5
2.4
3.7
0.5
14
1.9
2.3
2.2 2.7
0.3
14
1.5
1.9
1.9 2.6
0.3
14
2.1
2.6
2.6
3.4
0.3
14
1.9
2.4
2.4 3.0
0.3
19
Pool Spacing (ft)
Pattern
Channel Belt Width (ft)
Radius of Curvature (ft)
Rc: Bankfull Width (ft/ft)
Meander Wavelength (ft)
Meander Width Ratio
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
24.2
24.5
41.6
2.8
69.8
1.9
45.2
25.3
48.3
3.3
81.7
2.0
44.1 60.3
25.3 26.2
41.6 60.1
2.9 4.1
75.9 105.4
2.0 2.1
Be
10.3
N/A
10.3
0.7
16.6
N/A
11
2
3
3
4
2
25.3
41.8
41.1 1
B
59.9
1 11.9
11
28.8
41.4
37.6 57.5
B
10.3
11
23.6
41.3
36.3 1 56.6 1
B
10.9
11
25.9
51.7
45.6
B4c
106.3
24.1
13
15.4
38.8
39.2 88.8
B4
19.7
18
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
728
713
704
703
693
700
Sinuosity (ft)
1.09
1.09
1.07
1.06
1.06
1.09
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
0.0233
0.0243
0.0247
0.0247
0.0253
0.0248
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
0.0235
0.0245
0.0250
0.0254
0.0248
0.0247
Ri% /Ru% /P% /G% /S%
SC% / SA% / G% / C% / B% / Be%*
d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 (mm)
% of Reach with Eroding Banks
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
37%
32%
24% 7%
0%
38%
34%
19%
9%
0%
40%
35%
19% 7%
0%
35%
36%
23% 6%
0%
29%
33%24%
14%
0%
33%
1%
3.0
31%
43%
9.7
30% 6%
43% 14%
15.3 53.5
0%
0%
92.0
0%
N/A - Information does not apply.
Ri = Riffle / Ru = Run / P = Pool / G = Glide / S = Step
SC = Silt -Clay / SA = Sand / G = Gravel / C = Cobble / B = Boulder / Be = Bedrock

N/A - Information does not apply.
Ri = Riffle / Ru = Run / P = Pool / G = Glide / S = Step
SC = Silt -Clay / SA = Sand / G = Gravel / C = Cobble / B = Boulder / Be = Bedrock
Table llb. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Junes Branch / Project No. 95027 - Bumgarner II 543 feet
Parameter
Baseline
MY - 1
MY -2
MY -3
MY -4
MY -5
Dimension & Substrate - Riffle
Min
Mean
Med Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med Max
SD
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
16.3
N/A
1
15.7
N/A
1
16.2
N/A
1
16.0
N/A
1
15.1
N/A
1
22.0
N/A
1
Floodprone Width (fit)
>47
N/A
1
>48
N/A
1
>48
N/A
1
>48
N/A
1
>47
N/A
1
>48
N/A
1
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.7
N/A
1
0.9
N/A
1
0.8
N/A
1
0.9
N/A
1
0.6
N/A
1
0.5
N/A
1
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.2
N/A
1
1.3
N/A
1
1.3
N/A
1
1.4
N/A
1
1.4
N/A
1
1.5
N/A
1
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area(ft)
11.9
N/A
1
13.4
N/A
1
12.6
N/A
1
13.7
N/A
1
9.4
N/A
1
11.9
N/A
1
Width/Depth Ratio
22.2
N/A I
1
18.4
N/A
I 1
20.8
N/A
1
18.6
N/A
1
24.3
N/A
1
40.8
N/A I
1
Entrenchment Ratio
>3
N/A
1
>3.1
N/A
1
>3.0
N/A
1
>3.0
N/A
1
>3.1
N/A
1
>2.2
N/A
1
Bank Height Ratio
Profile JW
1.0
N/A
1
1.0
N/A
1
1.0
N/A
1
1.0
N/A
1
1.1
N/A
1
0.8
N/A
1
Riffle Length (ft)
3.1
29
32.3 38.6
12
7
27.2
34.5
34.5 42.0
5.5
6
26.5
32.9
32.3 42.0
5.9
6
27.9
33.1
30.6 43.2
5.7
6
20.6
27.9
27.7 34.6
4.9
7
26.8
33.2
31.3 44.0
6.7
8
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
0.016
0.026
0.020 0.064
0.017
7
1 0.015
0.017
0.016 0.021
0.002
6
0.013
0.017
0.015 0.024
0.005
6
0.008
0.015
0.016 0.017
0.004
6
-0.001
0.015
0.011 0.037
0.013
7
0.003
0.016
0.017 0.023
0.006
8
Pool Length (ft)
12.1
17.8
19.2 22.4
4
7
9.1
13.9
12.7 25.2
5.6
7
7.9
14.6
14.0 20.1
4.1
7
10.1
17.2
15.9 24.7
5.1
7
9.0
17.3
15.8 27.1
5.9
7
15.4
21.0
19.5 28.7
4.8
7
Pool Max Depth (ft)
2.3
2.9 1
3.1 1 3.4
0.4
7
2.2
2.7
2.7 3.2
0.4
7
2.1
2.6
2.7 3.0
0.3
7
1.9
2.3
2.2 2.6
0.3
7
1.6
2.0
2.0 2.5
0.3
7
2.5
3.0
3.0 3.7
Pool Spacing (ft)
Pattern
Channel Belt Width (ft)
Radius of Curvature (ft)
Rc: Bankfull Width (ft/ft)
Meander Wavelength (ft)
Meander Width Ratio
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
61.5
25.4
39.5
3.1
109.3
2.0
70.2
28.0
54.4
4.3
123.2
2.2
69.9 80.2
26.2 26.2
54.4 69.3
4.3 5.5
65.2 134.6
2.1 2.6
Bc
6
3.8
N/A
N/A
12.8
0.3
6
3
2
2
3
3
60.7
66.7
66.4 74.5
Bc
5.1
6
59.0
67.6
67.7 75.8
Bc
5.7
6
60.3
67.8
68.4 76.6
Bc
6.1
6
14.6
68.0
63.4 129.9
B4c
38.8
6
54.8
69.4
68.3 84.4
Bac
10.9
6
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
543
522
526
536
501
534
Sinuosity (ft)
1.07
1.06
1.07
1.08
1.05
1.07
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
0.0140
0.0151
0.0166
0.0164
0.0158
0.0160
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
0.0152
0.0154
0.0145
0.0154
0.0152
0.0154
Ri% / Ru% /P% / G% /S%
SC% / SA% / G% / C% / B% / Be%*
d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 (mm)
45%
18%
28% 8%
0%
50%
16%
24% 10%
0%
48%
18%
25% 10%
0%
47%
18%
28% 7%
0%
39%
17%
27% 17%
0%
51%
0%
33
6%
0%
54
28% 15%
64% 36%
67 1 110
0%
0%
1 130
0%
% of Reach with Eroding Banks
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
N/A - Information does not apply.
Ri = Riffle / Ru = Run / P = Pool / G = Glide / S = Step
SC = Silt -Clay / SA = Sand / G = Gravel / C = Cobble / B = Boulder / Be = Bedrock

N/A - Information does not apply.
Ri = Riffle / Ru = Run / P = Pool / G = Glide / S = Step
SC = Silt -Clay / SA = Sand / G = Gravel / C = Cobble / B = Boulder / Be = Bedrock
Table llb. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Junes Branch / Project No. 95027 - Junes Branch 1,375 feet
Parameter
Baseline
MY - 1
MY-2
MY-3
MY - 4
MY - 5
Dimension & Substrate - Riffle
Min
Mean
d
SD
n'
an
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Max
SD
n
Min
Med Max
SD
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
8.6
9.3
9.6 9.8
0.6
3
8.8
9.6
9.0
10.8
1.1
3
8.0
9.1
8.6 10.6
1.4
3
6.3
8.7
9.2 10.6
2.17
3
3.9
8.0
10.0 10.1
3.6
3
12.9 16.2
17.5 18.3
2.9
3
Floodprone Width (ft)
>38
>62
>53 >94
29.204
3
>38
>62
>53
>94
29.0
3
>38
>62
>53 >94
29.0
3
>38
>62
>53 >94
29
3
>23
>32.3
>36 >38
8.1
3
>30 >35
>37 >38
4.4
3
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.4
0.6
0.6 0.7
0.2
3
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.6
0.1
3
0.4
0.5
0.5 0.6
0.1
3
0.3
0.5
0.5 0.6
0.2
3
0.2
0.4
0.4 0.6
0.2
3
0.2 0.4
0.4 0.5
0.2
3
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
0.7
1.0
1.2 1.2
0.3
3
0.9
1.0
1.0
1.1
0.1
3
0.7
1.0
1.0 1.2
0.3
3
0.5
1.0
1.2 1.3
0.4
3
0.5
1.0
1.1 1.4
0.5
3
0.4 1.1
1.4 1.5
0.6
3
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area (ft)
3.7
5.3
5.8 6.4
1.4
3
4.1
5.2
5.2
6.4
1.2
3
3.0
4.6
5.2 5.7
1.4
3
1.7
4.4
5.6 5.7
2.3
3
0.8
3.4
3.6 5.7
2.5
3
3.7 5.3
5.8 6.4
1.4
3
Width/Depth Ratio 1
14.3
1 16.8
16.5 19.7
2.7
3
15.9
17.7
18.2
18.9
1 1.6
1 3
14.1 1
18.5
19.8 1 21.7 1
4.0
3
14.7
19.2
20.0 23.0
1 4.2
3
17.6
21.8
19.4 28.3
5.7
3
28.6 55.4
47.9 89.6
31.2
3
Entrenchment Ratio 1
>3.9
1 >6.8
>5.5 >11
3.7
3
>4.2
>6.6
>4.9
>10.7
3.6
3
>4.4
>7.0
>5.0 >11.7
4.1
3
>4.1
>8.0 1
>5.0 >14.8
5.9
3
1 >3.6
>4.4
>3.8 >5.8 1
1.2 1
3
>1.7 >2.2
>2.2 >2.8 1
0.6
3
Bank Height Ratiol
1.0
1 1.0
1.0 1.0
0
3
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.0
3
1.0
1.0
1.0 1.0
0.0
3
1.0
1.0
1.0 1.1
0.1
3
1.0
1.0
1.0 1.1
0.1
3
0.6 0.8
0.9 0.9
0.2
3
Riffle Length (ft)
7.8
14.9
14.4 33.7
4.1
44
1 4.9
13.8
14.1
20.5
3.5
43
5.6
13.6
13.8 20.9
3.4
43
6.2
16.2
16.226.9
5.0
43
3.2
16.0
11.6 39.5
8.8
39
1.7 11.3
8.0 23.4
6.7
47
Riffle Slope (ft ft)
0.007
0.029
0.030 0.052
0.010
44
0.007
0.030
0.032
0.049
0.010
43
0.014
0.034
0.031 0.093
0.014
43
0.004
0.031
0.028 0.081
0.016
43
0.000
0.021
0.021 0.075
0.019
39
0.006 0.026
0.023 0.064
0.018
47
Pool Length (ft)
4.7
10.7
10.4 19.5
3.0
42
1.6
7.8
7.6
14.8
2.9
43
3.7
9.7
9.7 14.5
2.7
43
3.1
8.8
9.0 13.8
2.3
43
4.1
14.0
1 11.0 27.9
6.4
43
1.8 6.8
4.5 15.6
3.0
46
Pool Max Depth (ft)
1.3
1.9
1.9 3.2
0.4
44
1.0
2.1
2.0
1 3.8
1 0.6
1 43
1 0.8 1
2.0
2.0 3.6
0.6
44
0.9
2.0
1.9 3.5
0.6
45
0.6
1.6
1.6 2.8
0.6
43
1 0.3 1.6
1.4 3.5
0.7
46
Pool Spacing (ft)
12.3
30.0
30.5 42.1
6.2
41
19.7
29.8
31.5
38.2
5.4
40
11.9
29.0
30.0 38.6
6.4
41
9.1
1 29.1 1
28.9 40.7
7.4
41
4.1
32.4
26.4 1 94.8 1
13.5 1
42
5.9 30.3
25.7 94.5
12.7
44
Pattern
Channel Belt Width (ft)
18.5
19.7
20.1 21.0
1.5
3
Radius of Curvature (ft)
31.9
35.8
36.7 38.9
3.6
3
Rc: Bankfull Width (ft/ft)
3.3
3.7
3.8 4.0
0.4
3
Meander Wavelength (ft)
53.7
67.1
61.4 88.3
12.5
6
Meander Width Ratio
1.9
2.1
2.1 2.2
0.2
3
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
Be
B
B
B
B4c
B4
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
1,480
1,427
1,414
1,424
1,405
1,415
Sinuosity (ft)
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
0.0231
0.0245
0.0271
0.0261
0.0259
0.0255
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
0.0246
0.0248
0.0272
0.0263
0.0256
0.0259
Ri% / Ru% /P% / G% /S%
50%
0%
34% 9%
7%
47%
0%
26%
18%
9%
46%
0%
33% 13%
8%
55%
0%
30% 8%
7%
44%
0%
43% 10%
3%
38% 25%
22% 15%
0%
SC% / SA% / G% / C% / B% / Be%*
11% 32%
38% 18%
0%
0%
d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 (mm)
0.8 7.3
13 58.8
75.1
% of Reach with Eroding Banks
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
N/A - Information does not apply.
Ri = Riffle / Ru = Run / P = Pool / G = Glide / S = Step
SC = Silt -Clay / SA = Sand / G = Gravel / C = Cobble / B = Boulder / Be = Bedrock

N/A - Information does not apply.
Ri = Riffle / Ru = Run / P = Pool / G = Glide / S = Step
SC = Silt -Clay / SA = Sand / G = Gravel / C = Cobble / B = Boulder / Be = Bedrock
Table llb. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Junes Branch / Project No. 95027 - Higdon Branch 376 feet
Parameter
Baseline
MY - 1
MY -2
MY -3
MY -4
MY -5
Dimension & Substrate - Riffle
Min
Mean'
Med Max
SD
n
Min J&an
I Med Max
I SD
n
Min
Mean
Med Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med Max
IM
Med Max
SD
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
8.0
N/A
1
8.1
N/A
1
7.0
N/A
1
7.7
N/A
1
5.4
N/A 1
10.8
N/A
1
Floodprone Width (fit)
>40
N/A
1
>40
N/A
1
>39
N/A
1
40.0
N/A
1
>21
N/A 1
>25
N/A
1
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.4
N/A
1
0.3
N/A
1
0.3
N/A
1
0.3
N/A
1
0.2
N/A 1
0.2
N/A
1
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
0.7
N/A
1
0.7
N/A
1
0.9
N/A
1
0.7
N/A
1
0.6
N/A 1
0.7
N/A
1
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft)
2.5
N/A
1
2.6
N/A
1
2.4
N/A
1
2.1
N/A
1
1.2
N/A 1
2.5
N/A
1
Width/Depth Ratio
17.6
N/A
1
24.7
N/A
1
20.6
N/A
1
28.8
N/A
1
23.3
N/A 1
47.1
N/A
1
Entrenchment Ratio
>6
N/A
1
>4.9
N/A
1
>5.6
N/A
1
5.2
N/A
1
>3.9
N/A 1
>2.3
N/A
1
Bank Height Ratiol
1 1.0
N/A
1
1.0
N/A
1
1.0
N/A
1
1.1
N/A
1
1.1
N/A 1
1.0
N/A
1
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
2.5
7.7
7.6 15
2.9
13
6.5
9.8
9.1 15.6
2.9
13
4.9
8.9
8.4 14.8
2.8
13
3.4
11.2
10.8 17.6
4.0
13
4.9
12.6
11.5 24.1
6.5 12
3.8
12.3
10.4 28.4
7.5
12
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
0.002
0.021
0.017 0.047
0.012
13
0.007 0.021
0.019 0.040
0.011
13
0.006
0.019
0.016 0.036
0.009
13
0.004
0.021
0.020 0.046
0.011
13
0.004
0.020
0.019 0.037
0.010 1 12
0.003
0.038
0.026 0.102
0.030
12
Pool Length (ft)
4.6
8.1
8.4 11
1.8
14
2.5
6.1
6.3 9.1
1.7
14
2.5
5.6
5.5 8.2
1.8
14
1.6
4.5
3.3 10.6
2.5 1
14
6.2
11.1
11.4 18.6
4.0 11
1 7.2
12.2
11.9 18.0
1 3.6
11
Pool Max Depth (ft)
1.3
1.7
1.7 1 2
0.2 1
13
1 1.2
1.5
1.4 2.0
0.3
12
1 1.2 1
1.4
1.4 1.7
0.2
14
0.6
1.0
1.0 1.5
1 0.2
14
1 0.4
1.3
1.1 2.1
0.5 11
0.4
1 0.8
0.7 1.3
Pool Spacing (ft)
13.1
18.6
17.5 26.6
3.8
13
14.6 20.3
19.0 31.2
4.5
12
12.7
18.8
18.3 25.8 1
3.5 1
13
113.8
18.9
18.7 24.4
3.3
13
18.7
30.1
24.6 53.7
12.3 10
17.7
28.3
22.6 61.6
14.7
10
Pattern
Channel Belt Width (ft)
9.1
10.6
10.6 12.1
2.1
2
Radius of Curvature (ft)
16.2
19.7
20.1 22.9
3.4
3
Rc: Bankfull Width (ft/ft)
2.0
2.5
2.5 2.9
0.4
3
Meander Wavelength (ft)
11.8
31.1
31.5 39.5
9.3
7
Meander Width Ratio
1.1
1.3
1.3 1.5
N/A
2
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
Bc
Bc
Bc
Bc
B6c
B6c
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
382
370
368
369
368
367
Sinuosity (ft)
1.06
1.05
1.06
1.05
1.13
1.14
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
0.020
0.0191
0.0184
0.0162
0.0176
0.0186
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
0.018
0.0156
0.0153
0.0164
0.0204
0.0180
Ri% / Ru% /P% / G% /S%
42%
1%
47% 7%
2%
51%
5%
34% 11%
0%
46%
6%
31% 15%
2%
58%
4%
25% 13%
2%
41%
8%
33% 16%
1%
40%
14%
37% 9%
0%
SC% / SA% / G% / C% / B% / Be%*
78%
22%
0% 0%
0%
0%
d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 (mm)
0.062
0.062
0.062 1.2
1.7
% of Reach with Eroding Banks
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
N/A - Information does not apply.
Ri = Riffle / Ru = Run / P = Pool / G = Glide / S = Step
SC = Silt -Clay / SA = Sand / G = Gravel / C = Cobble / B = Boulder / Be = Bedrock

N/A - Information does not apply.
Ri = Riffle / Ru = Run / P = Pool / G = Glide / S = Step
SC = Silt -Clay / SA = Sand / G = Gravel / C = Cobble / B = Boulder / Be = Bedrock
Table llb. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Junes Branch / Project No. 95027 - Doris Branch 288 feet
Parameter
Baseline
MY - 1
MY -2
MY -3
MY -4
MY -5
Dimension & Substrate - Riffle
Min
Mean'
Med Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med Max
SD
Bankfull Width (ft)
6.2
N/A
1
6.6
N/A
1
6.9
N/A
1
7.3
N/A
1
5.6
N/A
1
8.5
N/A
1
Floodprone Width (fit)
>23
N/A
1
>23
N/A
1
>23
N/A
1
23.0
N/A
1
>8
N/A
1
>21
N/A
1
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.4
N/A
1
0.4
N/A
1
0.3
N/A
1
0.3
N/A
1
0.1
N/A
1
0.3
N/A
1
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
0.7
N/A
1
0.7
N/A
1
0.7
N/A
1
0.7
N/A
1
0.1
N/A
1
0.5
N/A
1
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft)
2.3
N/A
1
2.4
N/A
1
1.9
N/A
1
2.1
N/A
1
0.5
N/A
1
2.3
N/A
1
Width/Depth Ratio
16.7
N/A
1
18.2
N/A
1
25.7
N/A
1
25.9
N/A
1
62.5
N/A
1
31.7
N/A
1
Entrenchment Ratio
>3.8
N/A
1
>3.5
N/A
1
>3.4
N/A
1
3.2
N/A
1
>1.4
N/A
1
.2.5
N/A
1
Bank Height Ratio
Profile
1.0
N/A
1
1.0
N/A
1
1.0
N/A
1
1.0
N/A
1
1.0
N/A
1
1.0
N/A
1
Riffle Length (ft)
2.5
6.1
6.3 11.4
2.5
18
3.7
6.5
6.5 11.3
2.0
18
3.6
6.3
6.1 9.3
1.9
18
3.2
6.3
5.8 11.9
2.4
18
5.2
9.5
8.3 20.4
4.5
11
5.1
9.7
7.7 18.9
4.8
10
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
0.011
0.022
0.013 0.036
0.008
18
1 0.002
0.023
0.020 0.055
0.014
18
0.004
0.026
0.027 0.056
0.014
18
1 0.004
0.022
0.022 0.044
0.013
18
-0.003
0.026
0.020 0.065
0.019
11
0.004
0.038
0.034 0.090
0.026
10
Pool Length (ft)
2.4
3.7
3.5 6.6
1
19
2.5
3.8
3.8 5.3
0.8
19
2.5
3.8
3.6 7.3
1.1 1
1
.
1 3.7
3.4 6.8
1.3
19
4.6
7.2
7.0 9.7
1.6
9
7.0
9.4
8.7 13.3
2.4
10
Pool Max Depth (ft)
1.2
1.6 1
1.6 1 2.3
0.3
18
0.7
1 1.1
1.1 1.5
0.2
1 19
1 0.6 1
1.2 1
1.2 1 1.8 1
0.3
19
0.6
0.9 1
0.9 1 1.3
0.2
19
1 0.4
0.8
1 0.8 1.2
0.3
9
1.5
1.7
1.7 2.2
0.2
9
Pool Spacing (ft)
Pattern
Channel Belt Width (ft)
Radius of Curvature (ft)
Rc: Bankfull Width (ft/ft)
Meander Wavelength (ft)
Meander Width Ratio
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
7.2
9.4
7.9
3.1
16.6
2.0
1 12.4 1
9.9
12.0
4.3
22.6
2.1
12.6 1 19.9
10.0 10.3
12.0 16.1
4.3 5.5
24.5 27.1
2.1 2.2
Bc
2.9
0.5
5.8
N/A
4.5
0.1
18
3
2
2
6
3
7.5
12.4
13.3 18.4
Bc
3.0
18
7.6
12.4
12.9 18.5
Bc
3.0
18
8.6
12.6
12.2 18.8
Bc
1 2.9 1
18
11.5
28.6
21.7 66.8
B6c
18.4 1
8
13.5 1
24.3
21.1 37.7
B6c
8.4
9
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
288
274
274
278
268
271
Sinuosity (ft)
1.06
1.06
1.06
1.08
1.03
1.04
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
0.018
0.019
0.020
0.019
0.024
0.0206
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
0.018
0.020
0.020
0.020
0.023
0.0191
Ri% / Ru% /P% / G% /S%
SC% / SA% / G% / C% / B% / Be%*
d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 (mm)
% of Reach with Eroding Banks
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
48%
8%
31% 12%
1%
51%
6%
32% 11%
0%
49%
7%
31% 11%
2%
49%
13%
31% 7%
1%
41%
19%
24% 15%
1%
360
100%
0.062
12%
0%
0.062
35% 170
0% 0%
0.062 0.062
0%
0%
0.062
0%
N/A - Information does not apply.
Ri = Riffle / Ru = Run / P = Pool / G = Glide / S = Step
SC = Silt -Clay / SA = Sand / G = Gravel / C = Cobble / B = Boulder / Be = Bedrock

Upstream
Downstream
Junes Branch - Bumgarner I - Cross Section 1 - Riffle
2158
2157
2156
2155
2154
c
° 2153 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- -
- _
° 2152 -
LU
2151
2150
2149
2148
0 10 20 30
Distance (ft)
Baseline Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 - - • Approx. Bankfull
Cross Section 1 (Riffle)
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Record elevation (datum) used
2153.1
2153.1
2153.1
2153.1
2153.1
2153.2
Bankfull Width ft
13.3
13.4
12.7
12.9
13.2
20.0
Flood rove Width ft
>79
>79
>79
>79
>33
>33
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
0.9
0.8
0.8
0.7
0.7
0.6
Bankfull Max Depth ft
1.5
1.3
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.8
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft)
11.7
11.3
10.2
9.6
8.6
11.7
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
15.2
15.8
15.8
17.2
20.2
34.3
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>5.9
>5.9
>6.2
6.1
>2.5
>1.7
Bankfull Bank Height Ratiol
1.0
1 1.0
1.0
1.1
1.1
0.9

Upstream
Downstream
Junes Branch - Bumgarner I - Cross Section 2 - Pool
Cross Section 2 (Pool)
2157
2156
2155
2154
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Record elevation (datum) used
2152.7
x
C
°
2153
2152
2152.7
2152.7
2153.1
Bankfull Width (ft)
13.4
13.1
2151
12.7
13.4
29.7
Floodprone Width (ft)
>124
W
>124
124.0
>39
>38.6
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.5
1.1
2150
0.9
0.9
0.7
BankfullMaxDepth (ft)
2.9
1.9
2149
2.0
2.3
2.5
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
20.6
14.0
2148
2147
11.3
12.2
20.6
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
8.7
12.3
0 5
10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Distance (ft)
14.6
Baseline
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 - - -Approx. Bankfull
>9.3 1
>9.5
1 >9.4 1
Cross Section 2 (Pool)
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Record elevation (datum) used
2152.7
2152.7
2152.7
2152.7
2152.7
2153.1
Bankfull Width (ft)
13.4
13.1
13.2
12.7
13.4
29.7
Floodprone Width (ft)
>124
>124
>124
124.0
>39
>38.6
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.5
1.1
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.7
BankfullMaxDepth (ft)
2.9
1.9
2.1
2.0
2.3
2.5
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
20.6
14.0
12.2
11.3
12.2
20.6
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
8.7
12.3
14.3
14.4
14.6
42.6
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>9.3 1
>9.5
1 >9.4 1
>9.7
N/A
N/A
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1
1.0 1
1.0
1 1.0 1
1.0
N/A
N/A

Upstream
Downstream
2150
Junes Branch - Bumgarner I - Cross Section 3 - Riffle
Cross Section 3 Ride
2149
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation
Base
MYl
2148
MY3
MY4
MY5
Record elevation (datum) used
2147
2145.6
2145.6
2145.6
c
°
2146
Bankfull Width (ft)
15.8
16.8
M
2145
2144
18.3
13.9
Floodprone Width (ft)
w
2143
>42
>42
>42
>41.1
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.8
0.9
0.9
0.9
2142
2141
0.9
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.2
1.7
2140
2.1
2.2
2.0
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (fe)
0 5
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Distance (ft)
14.8
Baseline
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 - - -Approx. Bank -full
12.2
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
20.4
Cross Section 3 Ride
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Record elevation (datum) used
2145.6
2145.6
2145.6
2145.6
2145.6
2145.2
Bankfull Width (ft)
15.8
16.8
16.3
18.0
18.3
13.9
Floodprone Width (ft)
>42
>42
>42
>42
>42
>41.1
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.8
0.9
0.9
0.9
1.0
0.9
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.2
1.7
1.9
2.1
2.2
2.0
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (fe)
12.2
14.5
14.8
15.8
17.5
12.2
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
20.4
19.4
18.0
20.5
19.1
15.7
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>2.7 1
>2.5
1 >2.6
>2.3
>2.3
>3.0
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1
1.0 1
1.0
1 1.0
1.0
0.9
1.0

Upstream
Downstream
Junes Branch - Bumgarner II - Cross Section 4 - Pool
2144
2143
2142
2141
Cross Section 4 (Pool)
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4 MY5
Record elevation (datum) used
2140.2
2140
c
° 2139
M
2138
2140.2
- - - - - - -�
2140.2
Bankfull Width ft
16.5
16.1
16.5
15.2
13.8
w
2137
-50
-50
-50
-50
-49
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.4
1.2
1.1
1.2
1.2
2136
2135
2.6
2.4
2.5
2.3
2.3
2134
23.0
18.9
18.5
17.9
16.6
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Baseline - Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 - - -Approx. Bankfull
Cross Section 4 (Pool)
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4 MY5
Record elevation (datum) used
2140.2
2140.2
2140.2
2140.2
2140.2
Bankfull Width ft
16.5
16.1
16.5
15.2
13.8
Floodprone Width ft
-50
-50
-50
-50
-49
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.4
1.2
1.1
1.2
1.2
Bankfull Max Depth ft
2.6
2.4
2.5
2.3
2.3
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ft2
23.0
18.9
18.5
17.9
16.6
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
11.9
13.7
14.8
12.8
11.5
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>3.0
>3.1
>3.0
-3.3
N/A
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
N/A

Upstream Downstream
Junes Branch - Bumgarner II - Cross Section 5 - Riffle
2145
2144
2143
2142
2141
c
° 2140
2139
w
2138
2137
2136
2135
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Baseline Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 - - • Appr Bankfull
Cross Section 5 (Riffle)
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Record elevation (datum) used
2139.8
2139.8
2139.8
2139.8
2139.8
2139.7
Bankfull Width (ft)
16.3
15.7
16.2
16.0
15.1
22.0
Floodprone Width (ft)
>48
>48
>48
>48
>47
>48
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.7
0.9
0.8
0.9
0.6
0.5
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.2
1.3
1.3
1.4
1.4
1.5
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)11.9
13.4
12.6
13.7
9.4
11.9
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
22.2
18.4
20.8
18.6
24.3
40.8
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>3.0
>3.1
>3
>3.0
>3.1
>2.2
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0 1
1.0
1 1.0
1.0
1.1
0.8

Upstream
Downstream
Junes Branch - Junes - Cross Section 6 - Riffle
Cross Section 6 (Rifle)
2178
Based on fixed baseline lrankfull elevation
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
2177
MY5
Record elevation (datum) used
2172.7
2176
-
2172.7
2172.7
2175
Bankfull Width (ft)
8.6
c
2174
6.3
3.9
°2173
___
______ _!DPW ___ _____
>94
>94
>94
>23
>30
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
2172
0.5
0.4
w
0.2
0.2
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
0.7
0.9
2171
0.5
0.5
0.4
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (fe)
3.7
4.1
3.0
1.7
0.8
3.7
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
19.7
18.9
21.7
2170
19.4
89.6
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>11.0
2169
>11.7
>14.8
>5.8
>1.7
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
2168
0.9
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Distance (ft)
Baseline
Year 1 - Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 - - -Approx. Bankfull
Cross Section 6 (Rifle)
Based on fixed baseline lrankfull elevation
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Record elevation (datum) used
2172.7
2172.7
2172.7
2172.7
2172.7
2173.1
Bankfull Width (ft)
8.6
8.8
8.0
6.3
3.9
18.3
Floodprone Width (ft)
>94
>94
>94
>94
>23
>30
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.4
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.2
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
0.7
0.9
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.4
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (fe)
3.7
4.1
3.0
1.7
0.8
3.7
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
19.7
18.9
21.7
23.0
19.4
89.6
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>11.0
>10.7
>11.7
>14.8
>5.8
>1.7
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.1
0.9

Upstream Downstream
Junes Branch - Junes - Cross Section 7 - Pool
2176
2175
2174
2173
2172 _ ____
° 2171
2170
w
2169
2168
2167
2166
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Distance (ft)
Baseline Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 - - • Approx.Bankfull
Cross Section 7 Pool
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Record elevation (datum) used
2171.4
2171.4
2171.4
2171.4
2171.4
2171.8
Bankfull Width (ft)
8.2
8.8
7.8
8.3
6.8
17.8
Floodprone Width (ft)
>111
>111
>111
>111
>32
>33
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.0
0.7
0.6
0.4
0.4
0.5
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
2.1
1.6
1.3
1.0
1.3
1.7
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft)
8.6
6.1
4.8
3.7
2.7
8.6
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
7.9
12.7
12.7
18.8
17.0
36.6
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>13.5
>12.6
>14.2
>13.4
N/A
N/A
Bankfull Bank Height Ratiol
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
N/A
N/A

�• �� r.�sr�e
Upstream Downstream
Junes Branch - Junes - Cross Section 8 - Riffle
2165.5
2165
2164.5
2164
2163.5
0
2163
a�
LU 2162.5
2162
2161.5
2161
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Distance (ft)
Baseline Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 - - • Appr Bankfull
Cross Section 8 Rifle
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Record elevation (datum) used
2163.3
2163.3
2163.3
2163.3
2163.3
2163.5
Bankfull Width (ft)
9.6
10.8
10.6
10.6
10.1
17.5
Floodprone Width (ft)
>53
>53
>53
>53
>36
>38
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.4
0.4
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.2
1.1
1.0
1.2
1.1
1.5
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (fe)
6.4
6.4
5.7
5.6
3.6
6.4
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
14.3
18.2
19.8
20.0
28.3
47.9
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>5.5
>4.9
>5.0
>5.0
>3.6
>2.2
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.6

Upstream Downstream
Junes Branch - Junes - Cross Section 9 - Pool
2167
2166
2165
2164
2163
c
° 2162
2161
w
2160
2159
2158
2157
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Distance (ft)
Baseline Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 - - - Approx. Bankfull
Cross Section 9 (Pool)
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Record elevation (datum) used
2162.6
2162.6
2162.6
2162.6
2162.6
2163.1
Bankfull Width (ft)
10.5
11.1
10.1
9.8
7.3
26.9
Floodprone Width (ft)
>56
>56
>56
>56
>36
>42
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.0
0.8
0.7
0.9
0.4
0.4
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
2.0
1.8
1.6
2.0
0.9
1.5
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
10.5
8.4
7.5
8.4
3.3
10.5
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
10.4
14.7
13.7
11.5
16.3
69.4
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>5.3
>5
>5.5
>5.7
N/A
N/A
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
N/A
N/A

Upstream Downstream
Junes Branch - Junes - Cross Section 10 - Pool
2149
2148
2147
2146
_ 2145
c
° 2144
2143
w
2142
2141
2140
2139
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Distance (ft)
Baseline Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 - - • Approx. Bankfull
Cross Section 10 Pool
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Record elevation (datum) used
2144.4
2144.4
2144.4
2144.4
2144.4
2144.3
Bankfull Width (ft)
11.0
10.9
11.0
10.3
10.7
17.7
Floodprone Width (ft)
>39
>39
>39
>39
>39
>39
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.8
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.5
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.7
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.6
1.7
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
9.0
7.9
7.6
7.6
7.9
9.0
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
13.4
15.0
16.1
14.1
14.3
34.7
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
73.5
>3.5
>3.5
>3.8
N/A
N/A
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
N/A
N/A

Upstream Downstream
Junes Branch - Junes - Cross Section 11 - Riffle
2149
2148
2147
2146
2145
c
°2144 _ _ - - -- -
@
2143
w
2142
2141
2140
2139
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Distance (ft)
Baseline Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 - - • Approx. Bankfull
Cross Section 11 (Rifle)
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Record elevation (datum) used
2144.0
2144.0
2144.0
2144.0
2144.0
2143.9
Bankfull Width (ft)
9.8
9.0
8.6
9.2
10.0
12.9
Floodprone Width (ft)
>38
>38
>38
>38
>38
>37
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.5
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.2
1.0
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.4
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
5.8
5.2
5.2
5.7
5.7
5.8
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
16.5
15.9
14.1
14.7
17.6
28.6
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>3.9
>4.2
>4.4
>4.1
>3.8
>2.8
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.1
1.0
0.9

Upstream
Downstream
Junes Branch - Higdon - Cross Section 12 - Riffle
2146
Cross Section 12 (Riffle)
2145
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
2144
Record elevation (datum) used
2140.9
2140.9 2140.9
2140.9
2140.9
2143
Bankfull Width (ft)
6.6
8.1
2142
c
7.7
5.4
10.8
° 2141
>40
_
- - - - - -
>40
2140
>21
>25
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
w
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.2
2139
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
0.7
0.7
0.9
0.7
0.6
0.7
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft)
2.5
2.6
2.4
2.1
1.2
2.5
2138
17.6
24.7
20.6
28.8
23.3
47.1
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>6.0
>4.9
2137
>5.2
>3.9
>2.3
2136
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0 5 10 15 20 25
Distance (ft)
Baseline Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 - - • Appr Bankfull
Cross Section 12 (Riffle)
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Record elevation (datum) used
2140.9
2140.9 2140.9
2140.9
2140.9
2141.0
Bankfull Width (ft)
6.6
8.1
7.0
7.7
5.4
10.8
Floodprone Width (ft)
>40
>40
>40
>40
>21
>25
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.2
0.2
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
0.7
0.7
0.9
0.7
0.6
0.7
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft)
2.5
2.6
2.4
2.1
1.2
2.5
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
17.6
24.7
20.6
28.8
23.3
47.1
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>6.0
>4.9
>5.6
>5.2
>3.9
>2.3
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.1
1.0

Upstream Downstream
Junes Branch - Higdon - Cross Section 13 - Pool
2145
2144
2143
2142
2141
° 2140
2139
w
2138
2137
2136
2135
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Distance (ft)
Baseline Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 - - - Appr Bankfull
Cross Section 13 Pool
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Record elevation (datum) used
2140.1
2140.1
2140.1
2140.1
2140.1
2140.5
Bankfull Width (ft)
8.0
7.2
7.0
7.0
5.6
17.2
Floodprone Width (ft)
>30
>30
>30
>30
>8
>28
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.7
0.6
0.3
0.3
0.1
0.3
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.7
1.1
0.5
0.4
0.1
0.8
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
5.9
4.0
2.1
1.9
0.5
5.9
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
10.8
13.0
23.9
25.5
62.5
50.2
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
73.7
>4.1
>4.2
>4.3
N/A
N/A
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.1
N/A
N/A

Upstream Downstream
Junes Branch - Doris - Cross Section 14 - Riffle
2144
2143
2142
2141
2140
c
° 2139
2138
w
2137
2136
2135
2134
0 5 10 15 20
Distance (ft)
Baseline Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 - - • Approx. Bankfull
Cross Section 14 Riffie
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Record elevation (datum) used
2138.9
2138.9
2138.9
2138.9
2138.9
2138.9
Bankfull Width (ft)
6.2
6.6
6.9
7.3
3.5
8.5
Floodprone Width (ft)
>23
>23
>23
>23
>20
>21
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.4
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.5
0.5
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
23
2.4
1.9
2.1
0.9
2.3
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
16.7
18.2
25.7
25.9
13.3
31.7
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>3.8
>3.5
>3.4
>3.2
>5.6
.2.5
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0

Upstream
Downstream
Junes Branch - Doris - Cross Section 15 - Pool
2144
Cross Section 15 Pool
2143
Base
MYl
MY2
2142
MY4
MY5
Record elevation (datum) used
2138.7
2141
2138.7
2138.7
2138.7
2138.9
2140
c
11.6
11.7
11.9
° 2139
_____ ___
18.4
Floodprone Width (ft)
2138
>21
>21
>21
w
>21
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.8
2137
0.6
0.5
0.3
0.5
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
2.3
1.7
1.4
1.2
0.8
1.4
2136
9.4
8.3
7.4
6.5
2.8
9.4
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
2135
16.5
19.1
23.6
2134
36.0
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>1.8 1
>1.8
0 5 10 15 20
Distance (ft)
Baseline Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 - - - Approx. Bankfull
N/A
Cross Section 15 Pool
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Record elevation (datum) used
2138.7
2138.7
2138.7
2138.7
2138.7
2138.9
Bankfull Width (ft)
11.6
11.7
11.9
12.4
9.5
18.4
Floodprone Width (ft)
>21
>21
>21
>21
>21
>21
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.3
0.5
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
2.3
1.7
1.4
1.2
0.8
1.4
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
9.4
8.3
7.4
6.5
2.8
9.4
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
14.3
16.5
19.1
23.6
32.1
36.0
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>1.8 1
>1.8
1 >1.8
>1.7
N/A
N/A
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0 1
1.0
1 1.0
1.0
N/A
N/A

2180
2179
2178
2177
2176
2175
2174
2173
2172
2171
2170
a�
2169
° 2168
2167
W
2166
2165
2164
2163
2162
2161
2160
2159
2158
2157
2156
20
Ox
>S
Junes Branch - Sheet 1
Longitudinal Profile
Staioning 200+97 to 215+15
Station (feet)
TW - MYO 5/10/11 TW - MY1 1/15/15 TW - MY2 11/11/15 TW - MY3 12/7/16 TW - MY4 12/12/17 } TW - MY5 12/6/18 ♦ Structure - MYO ♦ BKF ------ WS Linear (BKF)
Average Bankfull Slope
♦
TTT
Station (feet)
TW - MYO 5/10/11 TW - MY1 1/15/15 TW - MY2 11/11/15 TW - MY3 12/7/16 TW - MY4 12/12/17 } TW - MY5 12/6/18 ♦ Structure - MYO ♦ BKF ------ WS Linear (BKF)

W
2160
2159
2158
2157
2156
2155
2154
2153
2152
2151
2150
2149
2148
2147
2146
2145
2144
2143
2142
2141
2140
2139
2138
2137
2136
Junes Branch - Sheet 2
Longitudinal Profile
Staioning 200+97 to 215+15
1a�x2s 2j19X
1jI_x2S 2jIrx2s
Station (feet)
TW - MYO 5/10/11 TW - MY1 1/15/15 TW - MY2 11/11/15 TW - MY3 12/7/16 TW - MY4 12/12/17 t TW - MY5 12/6/18 ♦ Structure - MYO • BKF -----• WS
Average Bankfull Slope
`- XS -11-R
----------- ---- - • •
XS -10-P
1a�x2s 2j19X
1jI_x2S 2jIrx2s
Station (feet)
TW - MYO 5/10/11 TW - MY1 1/15/15 TW - MY2 11/11/15 TW - MY3 12/7/16 TW - MY4 12/12/17 t TW - MY5 12/6/18 ♦ Structure - MYO • BKF -----• WS

2161
2160
2159
2158
2157
2156
2155
2154
2153
2152
y 2151
0 2150
2149
W 2148
2147
2146
2145
2144
2143
2142
2141
2140
2139
Bumgarner Branch I
Longitudinal Profile
Staioning 100+37 to 107+27
x�� 106X
Station (feet)
TW - MYO 5/10/14 TW - MY1 1/15/15 TW - MY2 7/07/15 TW - MY3 8/10/16 TW - MY4 12/14/17 } TW - MY5 12/6/18 ♦ Structure - MYO -----• WS ♦ BKF
WT
--------------------
,
Average Bankfull Slope
,
,
XS -2-P
----�`
•
-
,
,
,
,
Lft
XS -3-R
x�� 106X
Station (feet)
TW - MYO 5/10/14 TW - MY1 1/15/15 TW - MY2 7/07/15 TW - MY3 8/10/16 TW - MY4 12/14/17 } TW - MY5 12/6/18 ♦ Structure - MYO -----• WS ♦ BKF

2145
2144
2143
2142
2141
2140
w 2139
O
2138
W
2137
2136
2135
2134
2133
2132
jO)
x2
S
Bumgarner Branch II
Longitudinal Profile
Staioning 107+27 to 112+35
Station (feet)
TW - MYO 5/10/14 TW- MYl 1/15/15 TW - MY2 10/07/15 TW - MY3 8/31/16 TW - MY412/13/17 } TW - MY512/6/2018 O Structure - MYO ------ WS • BKF
777:�
:77�
____ •
Average Bankfull Slope
-----------
i •
VY---------
------
XS -S -R
XS -4-P
Station (feet)
TW - MYO 5/10/14 TW- MYl 1/15/15 TW - MY2 10/07/15 TW - MY3 8/31/16 TW - MY412/13/17 } TW - MY512/6/2018 O Structure - MYO ------ WS • BKF

2146
2145
2144
2143
2142
c 2141
W 2140
2139
2138
2137
2136
Hidgon Branch
Longitudinal Profile
Staioning 300+46 to 304+22
.?Ojx2s .�"X �o2x�s .���x s .,�0�x2s �D�?x s
Station (feet)
TW - MYO 5/10/11 TW - MY1 1/15/15 TW - MY2 11/10/15 TW - MY3 6/28/16 TW - MY4 12/13/17 } TW - MY5 12/6/2018 ♦ Structure - MYO ------ WS • BKF
Average Bankfull Slope
t
,
,
•
,
XS -12-R
VJ/
IV
.?Ojx2s .�"X �o2x�s .���x s .,�0�x2s �D�?x s
Station (feet)
TW - MYO 5/10/11 TW - MY1 1/15/15 TW - MY2 11/10/15 TW - MY3 6/28/16 TW - MY4 12/13/17 } TW - MY5 12/6/2018 ♦ Structure - MYO ------ WS • BKF

2142
2141
2140
2139
y 2138
0
2137
W
2136
2135
2134
2133
Doris Branch
Longitudinal Profile
Staioning 400+00 to 402+82
F�OXOO s/-09, Q�V, ��VX YD�xOO YD�xSO XOO
IPO
Station (feet)
TW - MYO 5/10/14 — TW - MY1 1/15/15 TW - MY2 11/10/15 TW - MY3 7/21/16 TW - MY412/13/17 } TW - MY5 12/6/18 0 Structure - MYO -----• WS • BKF
'-
-- •
'yam
Average Bankfull Slope
Txs--14-R
F�OXOO s/-09, Q�V, ��VX YD�xOO YD�xSO XOO
IPO
Station (feet)
TW - MYO 5/10/14 — TW - MY1 1/15/15 TW - MY2 11/10/15 TW - MY3 7/21/16 TW - MY412/13/17 } TW - MY5 12/6/18 0 Structure - MYO -----• WS • BKF

Appendix D — Stream Geomorphology Data
Table 12. Pebble Count Data Summary
Table 12. Pebble Count Data Summary
Junes Branch
Stream Reach
MY - 2014
MY2 - 2015
MY3 - 2016
MY4 - 2017
MY5 - 2018
Pebble Count
Pebble Count
Pebble Count
Pebble Count
Pebble Count
D50 (mm) D84 (mm)
D50 (mm) D84 (mm)
D50 (mm)
D84 (mm)
D50 (mm)
D84 (nun)
D50 (mm)
D84 (MM)
Bumgarner I
25 63
0.675 54
0.9
27.0
14.5
75
15.3
53.5
Bumgamer II
27 61
6.4 55
6.1
54
57
81
67
1 110
Junes Branch
6.7 47
0.33 55
2.108
18
10.567
56
13.0333
58.7667
Higdon Branch
15 50
0.13 55
0.062
0.062
0.062
0.062
0.062
0.062
Doris Branch
1 0.062 32
0.062 7.9
0.062
1 0.062
0.062
0.062
0.062
0.062
MY5 Stream Reach Substrate Composition Charts 1-6
Chart 1.
120%
100%
80%
Junes Branch MY5 Substrate Composition
60%
40%
20%
0% —
Sift/Clay Sand Gravel Cobble
NBI 1 B II E Junes Higdon ■ Doris
Boulder Bedrock

Chart 2.
Chart 3.
7(rA
W/6
50°/0
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
7[7°'o
6(PA
SO%
40%
30%
20%
1090
0%
Appendix D — Stream Geomorphology Data
Btungarner I - Substrate Composition
Silt/clay Sand
Gravel
■ MY1 ■ MY2 MY3
I � I
Cobble
- MY4 ■ MY5
Boulder Bedrock
Butngarner IT - Substrate Composition
Silt/Clay Sand Gravel Cobble
a MY1 ■ MY2 MY3 - MY4 ■ MY5
Boulder Bedrock

Chart 4.
Chart 5.
Appendix D — Stream Geomorphology Data
Junes - Substrate Composition
60%
50%
40%
30%
2095
1Q`Ya
0%
Silt/Clay Sand Gravel Cobble Boulder Bedrock
■ MY1 ■ MY2 MY3 - MY4 a MY5
Higdon - Substrate Composition
120%
100%
80°%
60%
40%
i
2T/o
0% - �
Silt/Clay Sand Gravel Cobble Boulder Bedrock
■ MY1 ■ MY2 MY3 MY4 ■ MY5

Chart 6.
Appendix D — Stream Geomorphology Data
Doris - Substrate Composition
3.20%
100%
80%
60%
40°/6
20%
Silt/Clay Sand Gravel Cobble Boulder
■ MY1 ■ MY2 n MY3 z MY4 s MYS
Bedrock

Appendix E
Hydrology Data
Table 13. Verification of Bankfull Events
Photo Verification of Bankfull Events
Table 14. 2018 Rainfall Summary

Table 13. Verification of Bankfull Events
Photo Verification of Bankfull Events
N/A
Table 14. 2018 Rainfall Summary
Junes Branch
Average
Normal Limits
Date of Data Collection
Date of Occurrence
Method
Feet Above Bankfull
Flevation
Photo # (if
available)
5.87
Bumgarner H
February
4.69
7/28/2015
Unknown
Crest Gauge
0.1
MY2
1/11/2016
Unknown
Crest Gauge
0.23
MY3
6/23/2016
Unknown
Crest Gauge
0.23
MY3
12/4/2018
11/13/2018
Wrack Lines
NA
NA
2.73
Junes Branch
5.38
July
6/23/2016
Unknown
Crest Gauge
0.66
MY3
12/12/2017
8/12/2017
Crest Gauge
0.7
MY4
12/12/2017
10/9/2017
Crest Gauge
0.55
MY4
12/4/2018
11/13/2018
Wrack Lines
NA
NA
Photo Verification of Bankfull Events
N/A
Table 14. 2018 Rainfall Summary
Month
Average
Normal Limits
Cullowhee NCRONOS
Station
30 Percent 70 Percent
January
4.92
3.36
5.87
3.14
February
4.69
3.22
5.59
6.99
March
5.43
3.83
6.45
5.70
April
3.91
2.51
4.7
4.98
May
4.86
3.49
5.75
7.50
June
4.34
2.73
5.24
5.38
July
4.27
2.76
5.14
6.68
August
3.91
2.29
4.75
4.92
September
3.57
2.07
4.34
3.18
October
3.20
1.51
3.91
4.16
November
4.28
3.28
4.98
6.90
December
4.33
2.98
5.16
9.07
Total
51.71
34.03
61.88
68.60

Appendix F
Memorandum
Junes Branch IRT Site Visit on 4/18/2017 Meeting Summary

fires
11 1l • : _ \ FDIC 11
To: Paul Wiesner, NCDMS
From: Daniel Ingram, RES
Re: Junes Branch IRT Site Visit on 4/18/2017, DMS project #(95027), FD contract #(003979)
Date: 4/24/2017
Meeting Summary
Date: 4/18/2017, 8:30am to 11:00am
Location: Junes Branch Site, Jackson County
Attendees: Todd Tugwell, Kim Browning, David Brown, and Steve Kichefski (USACE); Mac Haupt
(NCDWR); Paul Wiesner and Matthew Reid (NCDMS), Daniel Ingram and Brian Hockett (RES)
RES and NCDMS requested a site visit at Junes Branch during the 2017 Credit Release IRT
meeting. Specific items to review were two reaches with sediment aggradation (Doris Branch and
Higdon Branch). IRT members also wanted to discuss the monitoring schedule over the previous three
years. Junes Branch is entering into Monitoring Year 4 of 5. The IRT intends to revamp the close-out
process by providing increased review of monitoring reports and providing feedback in advance of close-
out. In light of that approach, the IRT members wanted to walk the entire project area to review all
project components. Their comments are presented below by reach. At the outset of the meeting RES
presented a detailed monitoring schedule to the IRT and DMS staff (see below). IRT feedback on the
schedule was they do not want to see two monitoring events in the same calendar year. RES explained
the reasoning behind the schedule, noted that over six months had elapsed between each monitoring
event, and noted the lack of clear guidance and interpretation of the mitigation guidelines. Paul W.
stated that he approved the compressed monitoring schedule. RES asked what remedy the IRT
proposed and was answered that we just shouldn't do it again on other sites, but no specific remedy or
consequence for Junes Branch was proposed. RES and DMS noted the clear direction from the IRT and
will incorporate these comments into future project activities.
412 N. 4th St. #300 1200 Camellia Blvd. #220 1434 Odenton Rd. 10055 Red Run Blvd. #130 302 Jefferson St. #110 33 Terminal Way #431
Baton Rouge, LA 70802 Lafayette, LA 70508 Odenton, MD 21113 Owings Mills, MD 21117 Raleigh, NC 27605 Pittsburgh, PA 15219
701 E. Bay St. #306 5020 Montrose Blvd. #650 2750 Prosperity Ave. #220 1521 W. Main 2"d Floor 3751 Westerre Pkwy. #A 5367 Telephone Rd. 1371/2 East Main St. #210
Charleston, SC 29403 Houston, TX 77006 Fairfax, VA 22031 Richmond, VA 23233 Richmond, VA 23220 Warrenton, VA 20187 Oak Hill, WV 25901

fires
Activity
Date of Data
Collection
Notes
Earthwork Complete
May 2014
Planting Complete
May 2014
As -Built Veg
June 2014
As -Built Survey
June 2004
Year 1 Veg
Jan 2015
7 months from As -Built
Year 1 Survey
Jan 2015
7 months from As -Built
Year 2 Veg
Sep 2015
8 months from Year 1
Year 2 Survey
Oct -Nov 2015
9 months from Year 1
Year 3 Veg
June 2016
9 months from Year 2
Year 3 Survey
Aug -Dec 2016
10 months from Year 2
Junes Branch
• No specific problem areas or concerns were noted on Junes Branch.
• Overall the system has a high sediment load but appears to be maintaining appropriate
geomorphology.
Bumgarner I and II
• No problems or concerns were noted on Bumgarner I and II.
Higdon Branch
• Sediment accumulation was noted in Higdon Branch, but a defined channel was present.
• No maintenance, remedial actions, or credit deductions were requested by the IRT.
412 N. 4th St. #300 1200 Camellia Blvd. #220 1434 Odenton Rd. 10055 Red Run Blvd. #130 302 Jefferson St. #110 33 Terminal Way #431
Baton Rouge, LA 70802 Lafayette, LA 70508 Odenton, MD 21113 Owings Mills, MD 21117 Raleigh, NC 27605 Pittsburgh, PA 15219
701 E. Bay St. #306 5020 Montrose Blvd. #650 2750 Prosperity Ave. #220 1521 W. Main 2"d Floor 3751 Westerre Pkwy. #A 5367 Telephone Rd. 1371/2 East Main St. #210
Charleston, SC 29403 Houston, TX 77006 Fairfax, VA 22031 Richmond, VA 23233 Richmond, VA 23220 Warrenton, VA 20187 Oak Hill, WV 25901

fires
Doris Branch
• Sediment accumulation was observed in Doris Branch and distinct channel features are absent
along much of the reach.
• No specific maintenance was requested by the IRT.
• Todd T. stated the system appeared to be more of a linear wetland seep.
• Mac H. and David B. both observed that some aquatic function was still provided by the
restoration.
• Mac H. commented that a reduced credit ratio, such as 2:1, may be warranted.
• David B. and Paul W. both stated the pre -construction condition was a shallow ditch/swale
through a disturbed old field with groundwater flow.
• Based on monitoring data the reach appears to have spring fed perennial flow, but limited
watershed size and is lacking channel -forming flow events.
• IRT members did not request any specific remedial actions and recommended a final decision on
crediting be made after additional monitoring.
412 N. 4th St. #300 1200 Camellia Blvd. #220 1434 Odenton Rd. 10055 Red Run Blvd. #130 302 Jefferson St. #110 33 Terminal Way #431
Baton Rouge, LA 70802 Lafayette, LA 70508 Odenton, MD 21113 Owings Mills, MD 21117 Raleigh, NC 27605 Pittsburgh, PA 15219
701 E. Bay St. #306 5020 Montrose Blvd. #650 2750 Prosperity Ave. #220 1521 W. Main 2"d Floor 3751 Westerre Pkwy. #A 5367 Telephone Rd. 1371/2 East Main St. #210
Charleston, SC 29403 Houston, TX 77006 Fairfax, VA 22031 Richmond, VA 23233 Richmond, VA 23220 Warrenton, VA 20187 Oak Hill, WV 25901