20120102 Ver 1_Year 5 Monitoring Report_2018_20181218

k
MONITORING YEAR 5 of 5
ANNUAL REPORT
12101rim
BYRDS CREEK MITIGATION SITE
Person County, NC
NCDEQ Contract 003987
DMS Project Number 95020
USACE Action ID Number 2012-00230
NCDWR Project Number 2012-0102
Data Collection Period: January 2018 - October 2018
Draft Submission Date: November 29, 2018
Final Submission Date: December 18, 2018
PREPARED FOR:
NC Department of Environment Quality
Division of Mitigation Services
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1652

PREPARED BY:
ryk
WILDLANDS
ENGINEERING
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
312 West Millbrook Road, Suite 225
Raleigh, NC 27609
Jason Lorch
[e-mail]
Phone: [phone]

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Wildlands Engineering (Wildlands) completed a full delivery project for the North Carolina Division of
Mitigation Services (DMS) to restore and enhance a total of 7,328 linear feet of stream in Person County,
North Carolina. The project streams consist of Byrds Creek, a third order stream, as well as three
unnamed first and second order tributaries to Byrds Creek (South Branch, Southeast Branch, and West
Branch). The project provides 5,371 stream mitigation units (SMU's). At the downstream limits of the
project, the drainage area is 2,957 acres (4.62 square miles).
The Byrds Creek Mitigation Site, hereafter referred to as the Site, is approximately 1.8 miles south of
Hurdle Mills, NC off of Wolfe Road in southwestern Person County (Figure 1). The Site is located in the
Carolina Slate Belt of the Piedmont Physiographic Province (USGS, 1998). The Site is within the South
Flat River watershed, North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NCDWR) Subbasin 03-04-01 of the
Neuse River Basin, and United States Geological Survey (USGS) Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC)
03020201010020. Land use within the watershed is rural and is dominated by forestry, agriculture, and
livestock operations, with approximately 60% of the watershed used for agriculture and 40% forested.
The Site is located in an active agricultural field surrounded by wooded lots, small agricultural
operations, and rural residential areas. Prior to construction activities, the streams on the Site were
heavily impacted by cattle, which led to stream bank erosion and instability.
The following project goals were established to address the effects from watershed and project site
stressors:
• Reduce nutrient loads within the watershed and to downstream waters;
• Stabilize eroding stream banks greatly reducing sediment loads;
• Restore riffle/pool sequencing resulting in decreased water temperatures and increased
dissolved oxygen concentrations;
• Establish in -stream structures to improve habitat diversity and trap detritus;
• Restore native vegetation and riparian buffers; and
• Protect the restored land in perpetuity through a conservation easement.
These goals were achieved by restoring 3,096 LF of perennial and intermittent stream channel and
enhancing 4,232 LF of perennial stream channel. Restoration and enhancement construction was
completed in September 2013 and planting efforts were completed in December 2013. A conservation
easement is in place on 24.4 acres of riparian corridor and stream resources to protect them in
perpetuity.
Monitoring Year 5 (MY -5) monitoring and site visits were completed between the months of January and
October 2018 to assess the conditions of the Site. The Site's overall average planted stem density of 503
stems per acre is greater than the success criteria of 260 stems per acre required for MY -5. All streams
within the Site are stable and functioning as designed. There are three areas of bank erosion on Byrds
Creek reach 3 that will be repaired during the winter of 2018/2019. Two sections of stream had some
minor erosion as a result of Hurricanes Florence and Michael, and a small section of stream erosion has
resulted from a beaver dam. Overall, these isolated sections total approximately 90 liner feet.
Hydrologic monitoring gages documented multiple bankfull events during subsequent years for all
streams on the Site and have met the MY -5 hydrology success criteria.
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 5 Annual Report — FINAL

BYRDS CREEK MITIGATION SITE
Monitoring Year 5 Annual Report
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section 1:
PROJECT OVERVIEW.......................................................................................................1-1
Figure 1
1.1
Project Goals and Objectives.....................................................................................................1-1
Project Component/Asset Map
1.2
Monitoring Year 5 Data Assessment..........................................................................................1-2
Table 2
1.2.1
Vegetative Assessment......................................................................................................1-2
Project Contact Table
1.2.2
Vegetation Areas of Concern.............................................................................................1-3
Table 12a -f
1.2.3
Stream Assessment............................................................................................................1-3
Longitudinal Profile Plots
1.2.4
Stream Areas of Concern...................................................................................................1-3
1.2.5
Hydrology Assessment.......................................................................................................1-3
Hydrology Summary Data
1.2.6
Maintenance Plan..............................................................................................................1-4
1.3
Monitoring Year 5 Summary......................................................................................................1-4
Section 2:
METHODOLOGY.............................................................................................................2-1
Section 3:
REFERENCES...................................................................................................................3-1
I'_11141,11L7101*i
Appendix 1
General Tables and Figures
Figure 1
Project Vicinity Map
Figure 2
Project Component/Asset Map
Table 1
Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Table 2
Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3
Project Contact Table
Table 4
Project Information and Attributes
Appendix 2
Visual Assessment Data
Figure 3
Integrated Current Condition Plan View
Table 5a -i
Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Table 6
Vegetation Condition Assessment Table
Appendix 4
Stream Photographs
Table 10a -c
Vegetation Photographs
Appendix 3
Vegetation Plot Data
Table 7
Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment
Table 8
CVS Vegetation Table — Metadata
Table 9
Planted and Total Stem Counts
Appendix 4
Morphological Summary Data and Plots
Table 10a -c
Baseline Stream Data Summary
Table 11
Morphology and Hydraulic Summary (Dimensional Parameters — Cross Section)
Table 12a -f
Monitoring Data — Stream Reach Data Summary
Longitudinal Profile Plots
Cross Section Plots
Reachwide and Cross Section Pebble Count Plots
Appendix 5
Hydrology Summary Data
Table 13
Verification of Bankfull Events
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 5 Annual Report — FINAL ii

Section 1: PROJECT OVERVIEW
The Byrds Creek Mitigation Site, hereafter referred to as the Site, is located in southwestern Person
County within the Neuse River Basin (USGS Hydrologic Unit 03020201). The project site is located south
of Hurdle Mills off of Wolfe Road and is in the Carolina Slate Belt of the Piedmont Physiographic
Province (USGS, 1998). The Multi -Resolution Land Characteristics Consortium (MRLC, 2001) classified
approximately 57% of the land in the project watershed as managed herbaceous cover or agricultural,
42% is classified as forested/scrubland, and the remaining 1% as open water. The drainage area for the
Byrds Creek Site is 2,957 acres (4.62 square miles).
The project stream reaches consist of Byrds Creek reach 2 (BC2), Byrds Creek reach 3 (130), South
branch (S131), Southeast branch reach 1 (SEI), and Southeast branch reach 2 (SE2) which are stream
restoration and/or enhancement level I approach. The project also consists of Byrds Creek reach 1 (BC1),
Byrds Creek reach 4 (BC4), and West branch (W131) which are enhancement level 11 approach. Mitigation
work within the Site included restoring and enhancing 7,328 linear feet of perennial and intermittent
stream channel. The stream areas were also planted with native vegetation to improve habitat and
protect water quality. The project provides 5,371 stream mitigation units (SMU's). The final mitigation
plan was submitted and accepted by DMS in January 2013. Construction activities were completed by
North State Environmental in September 2013 and planting and seeding activities were completed by
Bruton Natural Systems, Inc. in December 2013. Baseline monitoring (MY -0) was conducted between
September 2013 and January 2014. Annual monitoring has been conducted for five years with the close-
out anticipated to commence in 2019 given the success criteria are met. Appendix 1 provides more
detailed project activity, history, contact information, and watershed/site background information for
this project. Three separate conservation easements have been recorded and are in place along the
riparian corridors and stream resources to protect them in perpetuity. Directions and a map of the Site
are provided in Figure 1 and project components are illustrated for the Site in Figure 2.
1.1 Project Goals and Objectives
Prior to construction activities, the streams on the Byrds Creek Site were heavily impacted by cattle,
which led to stream bank erosion and instability. Related degradation included declining aquatic habitat,
loss of forest, degraded riparian buffers, and water quality problems related to increased sediment and
nutrient loadings. Tables 10a -c in Appendix 4 present the pre -restoration conditions in detail.
The Site was designed to meet the over -arching goals as described in the mitigation plan (Wildlands,
2013). The project is intended to provide numerous ecological benefits within the Neuse River Basin.
While many of these benefits are limited to the Site, others, such as pollutant removal and improved
aquatic and terrestrial habitat, have farther -reaching effects. The following project specific goals
established in the mitigation plan included:
• Reduce nutrient loads within the watershed and to downstream waters;
• Stabilize eroding stream banks greatly reducing sediment loads;
• Restore riffle/pool sequencing resulting in decreased water temperatures and increased
dissolved oxygen concentrations;
• Establish in -stream structures to improve habitat diversity and trap detritus;
• Restore native vegetation and riparian buffers; and
• Protect the restored land in perpetuity through a conservation easement.
The design features of this project were developed to achieve multiple project objectives. The stream
restoration reaches were designed to frequently flood the reconnected floodplain. This design approach
provides more frequent dissipation of energy from higher flows (bankfull and above) to improve channel
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
41100 Monitoring Year 5 Annual Report — FINAL 1-1

stability; provide water quality treatment through detention, settling, and biological removal of
pollutants; and restore a more natural hydrologic regime. The project objectives defined in the
mitigation plan (Wildlands, 2013) are as follows:
• On-site nutrient inputs will be decreased by removing cattle from streams and filtering on-site
runoff through buffer zones. Off-site nutrient input will be absorbed on-site by filtering flood
flows through restored floodplain areas, where flood flow will spread through native vegetation.
Vegetation is expected to uptake excess nutrients.
• Stream bank erosion which contributes sediment load to the creek will be greatly reduced in the
project area. Eroding stream banks will be stabilized using bioengineering, natural channel
design techniques, and grading to reduce bank angles and bank height. Storm flow containing
sediment will be filtered through restored floodplain areas, where flow will spread through
native vegetation. Spreading flood flows will also reduce velocity and allow sediment to settle
out. Sediment transport capacity of restored reaches will be improved so that capacity balances
more closely to load. Sediment load reduction will be monitored through assessing bank stability
with cross section and profile surveys and visual assessment through photo documentation
which serves as an accepted surrogate for direct turbidity measurements.
• Restored riffle/pool sequences will promote aeration of water and create deep water zones,
helping to lower water temperature. Establishment and maintenance of riparian buffers will
create long-term shading of the channel flow to minimize thermal heating. Lower water
temperatures will help maintain dissolved oxygen concentrations.
• In -stream structures will be constructed to improve habitat diversity and trap detritus. Wood
habitat structures will be included in the stream as part of the restoration design. Such
structures may include log drops and rock structures that incorporate woody debris.
• Adjacent buffer and riparian habitats will be restored with native vegetation as part of the
project. Native vegetation will provide cover and food for terrestrial creatures. Native plant
species will be planted and invasive species will be treated. Eroding and unstable areas will also
be stabilized with vegetation as part of this project.
• The restored land will be protected in perpetuity through a conservation easement.
The design streams were restored to the appropriate type based on the surrounding landscape, climate,
and natural vegetation communities but also with strong consideration to existing watershed conditions
and trajectory. The designs were developed to correct incision and lack of pattern caused by
channelization, bank instability caused by erosion and livestock access, lack of vegetation in riparian
zones, and lack of riparian and aquatic habitat.
1.2 Monitoring Year 5 Data Assessment
Annual monitoring and site visits were conducted during MY -5 to assess the condition of the project.
The stream success criteria for the Site follows the approved success criteria presented in the Byrds
Creek Mitigation Plan (Wildlands, 2013).
1.2.1 Vegetative Assessment
A total of 14 vegetation plots were established within the project easement area during the baseline
monitoring. Thirteen of the plots were established as standard 10 meter by 10 meter plots with one plot
established as a 5 meter by 20 meter plot. The final vegetative success criteria is the survival of 260
planted stems per acre in the riparian corridor along restored and enhanced reaches at the end of MY -5.
The MY -5 vegetative survey was completed in August 2018. The 2018 annual vegetation monitoring
resulted in an average planted stem density of 503 planted stems per acre, which is greater than the
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 5 Annual Report — FINAL 1-2

requirement of 260 planted stems per acre. All 14 vegetation plots met success criteria during MY -5
with a range of 324 to 728 planted stems per acre. The MY -5 planted stem density is approximately 31%
less than the baseline density recorded (734 stems per acre) in January 2014 and there is an average of
12 stems per plot. Refer to Appendix 2 for vegetation plot photographs and the vegetation condition
assessment table and Appendix 3 for vegetation data tables.
1.2.2 Vegetation Areas of Concern
During MY -4 an area of easement encroachment was discovered along a portion of Byrds Creek reach 4
This area was replanted during the winter of 2017/2018 with trees of a similar age and size to the ones
that were mowed. Refer to the CCPV Map in Appendix 2 for the area that was replanted.
1.2.3 Stream Assessment
Morphological surveys for MY -5 were conducted in June 2018. All streams within the Site are stable with
the exception of a few isolated areas of bank erosion. Refer to Appendix 2 for the visual assessment
table, integrated current condition plan view (CCPV) map (Figure 3), and reference photographs. Refer
to Appendix 4 for the morphological data and plots.
While there have been some minor post -construction adjustments within the restored channels; the
cross sections show little to no change in the bankfull area, maximum depth ratio, or width -to -depth
ratio. Surveyed riffle cross sections fell within the parameters defined for channels of the appropriate
Rosgen stream type. The surveyed longitudinal profile data for BC2, BC3, S131, SE1, SE2a and SE2b
illustrates that the bedform features are maintaining lateral and vertical stability. The riffles are
remaining steeper and shallower than the pools, while the pools are remaining deeper than the riffles
and maintaining flat water surface slopes. The longitudinal profiles show that the bank height ratios
remain at or very near to 1.0 for the restoration reaches. Entrenchment ratios vary slightly from year to
year due to minor changes in bankfull widths. Small adjustments in width occur due to vegetation,
sediment deposition, and many other factors. These minor changes do not indicate channel instability.
The Site was walked after Hurricane Florence and minimum damage was found. A debris jam was
blocking the culvert on BC2 and was removed immediately.
Two beaver dams were observed along Byrds Creek reach 3 in November 2018 (MY -5) and the USDA
was contracted to trap beaver and breach the dams. Trapping and dam removal have been initiated at
the Site and beaver activity will continued to be monitored and controlled as necessary. Minor bank
erosion was observed as a result of the dams. Also, after Hurricanes Florence and Michael two isolated
areas of bank scour along Byrds Creek reach 3 were observed. Land Mechanics Designs, Inc. has been
contracted to repair these areas. Stream banks will be graded, seeded, matted, and planted with live
stakes as needed to stabilize any damaged areas and replace vegetation removed by beaver activity.
Repair work is anticipated to be completed by the middle of December 2018.
1.2.4 Stream Areas of Concern
Beaver activity has not been observed on the Site since the removal of two beaver in early November
2018. Beaver presence and the repair areas discussed in section 1.2.3 above will continue to be
monitored.
1.2.5 Hydrology Assessment
At the end of the five-year monitoring period, two or more bankfull events must have occurred in
separate years within the restoration reaches. Bankfull events were recorded on all restoration reaches
during MY -5. Byrds Creek and South Branch have each had bankfull events during MY -1, MY -2, MY -3,
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 5 Annual Report — FINAL 1-3

and MY -4. Therefore, they have met the hydrology success criteria for the Site. Southeast Branch
recorded bankfull events during MY -2, MY -3, and MY -4 meeting hydrology success criteria as well. Refer
to Appendix 5 for hydrologic data.
1.2.6 Maintenance Plan
As described in section 1.2.3 above, stream repair work will be performed during the winter of 2018.
1.3 Monitoring Year 5 Summary
All individual vegetation plots met the MY -5 success criteria and the average planted stem density for
the Site is 503 stems per acre. All streams within the Site are stable and functioning as designed. A few
small areas of stream bank erosion will be repaired during the winter of 2018. Bankfull events were
recorded on all three restoration reaches during MY -5. The terminal stream hydrology success criteria
has been met on Byrds Creek, South Branch, and Southeast Branch. Beaver activity was observed during
MY -5 and were removed from the Site in November 2018.
Summary information and data related to the performance of the project and monitoring elements can
be found in the tables and figures in the report appendices. Narrative background and supporting
information formerly found in these reports can be found in the Mitigation Plan documents available on
DMS's website. All raw data supporting the tables and figures in the appendices are available from DMS
upon request.
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 5 Annual Report — FINAL 1-4

Section 2: METHODOLOGY
Geomorphic data was collected following the standards outlined in The Stream Channel Reference Site:
An Illustrated Guide to Field Techniques (Harrelson et al., 1994) and in the Stream Restoration: A Natural
Channel Design Handbook (Doll et al., 2003). Longitudinal and cross-sectional data was collected using a
total station and were georeferenced. All CCPV mapping was recorded using a Trimble handheld GPS
with sub -meter accuracy and processed using Pathfinder and ArcView. Crest gages were installed in
surveyed riffle cross sections and monitored quarterly. Hydrology attainment installation and
monitoring methods are in accordance with the USACE (2003) standards. Vegetation monitoring
protocols followed the Carolina Vegetation Survey -DMS Level 2 Protocol (Lee et al., 2008). Reporting
follows the DMS Monitoring Report Template and Guidance Version 1.3 (DMS, 2010).
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 5 Annual Report — FINAL 2-1

Section 3: REFERENCES
Doll, B.A., Grabow, G.L., Hall, K.A., Halley, J., Harman, W.A., Jennings, G.D., and Wise, D.E. 2003. Stream
Restoration A Natural Channel Design Handbook.
Harrelson, C.C., Rawlins, C.L., Potyondy, J.P. 1994. Stream Channel Reference Sites: An Illustrated Guide
to Field Technique. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM -245. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest
Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 61 p.
Lee, M.T., Peet, R.K., S.D., Wentworth, T.R. 2008. CVS -DMS Protocol for Recording Vegetation Version
4.2. Retrieved from http://cvs.bio.unc.edu/protocol/cvs-eep-protocol-v4.2-lev1-5.pdf.
North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services (DMS). 2010. Monitoring Report Template and Guidance.
Version 1.3. Raleigh, NC.
Rosgen, D. L. 1994. A classification of natural rivers. Catena 22:169-199.
Rosgen, D.L. 1996. Applied River Morphology. Pagosa Springs, CO: Wildland Hydrology Books.
Rosgen, D.L. 1997. A Geomorphological Approach to Restoration of Incised Rivers. Proceedings of the
Conference on Management of Landscapes Disturbed by Channel Incision. Center For
Computational Hydroscience and Bioengineering, Oxford Campus, University of Mississippi, Pages
12-22.
United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). 2003. Stream Mitigation Guidelines. USACE, NCDEQ-
DWR, USEPA, NCWRC.
United States Geological Survey (USGS). 1998. North Carolina Geology.
http://www.geology.enr.state.nc.us/usgs/carolina.htm.
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. 2013. Byrds Creek Mitigation Site Mitigation Plan. DMS, Raleigh, NC.
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. 2014. Byrds Creek Mitigation Site Baseline Monitoring Document and As -
Built Baseline Report. DMS, Raleigh, NC.
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 5 Annual Report — FINAL 3-1

APPENDIX 1. General Tables and Figures

Hydrologic Unit Code (14)
- DMS Targeted Local Watershed
�
•z'
Lu 0
jot
�. a
E
dr'° G
I QP,4.
I
500 !! sn�A
� n
� n
i s or
0301 '104061030
f
i m
03010104062020 Gee°� Opp
oxboro �,A�0104061060
—=- Leasbusg R41 . ' f +�� e'� O261010406107
Dee
'e
p,�reek
0 03020201010040
!
030 201010010
�
NXa
Flvt
r3 ape
V
M 0101
01-
a�
15.11.11 �
'p'i'er
Directions:
The Site is located in southwestern Person County,
southwest of Roxboro. From Roxboro take
Route 157 south 9.8 miles. Turn right on Charlie
Monk Road. Travel 1.0 miles and turn left on Wolfe
Road. Travel 0.4 miles to the end of Wolfe Road.
The project site is located south and east of the end of
Wolfe Road and is bound by Route 157 to the west
and Walnut Grove Church Road to the east.
The site is within the Neuse River Basin
(HUC 03020201).
WILDLANDS
ENGlNEE32lNG
rka,
Timbe rh ke
010020
A03020
010030
.t
The subject project site is an environmental restoration site of the
NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) and is
encompassed by a recorded conservation easement,
but is bordered by land under private ownership. Accessing the
site may require traversing areas near or along the easement
boundary and therefore access by the general public is not 46
permitted. Access by authorized personnel of state and
federal agencies or their designees/contractors involved in
the development, oversight,and stewardship of the restoration
site is permitted within the terms and time frames of their defined
roles. Any intended site visitation or activity by any person
outside of these previously sanctioned roles and activites
requires prior coordination with DMS.
0
Figure 1 Project Vicinity Map
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
0 1 2 Miles DMS Project No. 95020
1 1 1 1 I Monitoring Year 5- 2018
Person County, NC

Easement Area
Stream Restoration
Stream Enhancement I
Stream Enhancement II
� '-max ' :j_ - F t•,.+�„" ;�%�;��:L + ti
4 '1
i
Culverted Stream Crossing P, z, +�
Z04
. � ■ ���� ''',,moi ��♦ r•'3#�� __.�, i
� � �, ice`- • .
, er,
Culverted Stream Crong
+�♦ ■
■ ■ '' Culverted Stream Crossing
�4 ♦�• • ■
- %44ft, oil*
♦ 1
• r
Figure 2 Project Component/Asset Map
W I L D L A IST D S Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
E N G I N E E R I N G 0 250 500 Feet DMS Project No. 95020
I I I I I Monitoring Year 5- 2018
ML Person County, NC

Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Mitigation
Credits
Nitrogen
Phosphorous
Stream
Riparian Wetland
Non -Riparian Wetland
Buffer
Nutrient Offset
Nutrient Offset
Type R
RE
R
RE
R RE
Totals 5,371
0
N/A
N/A
Project
N/A N/A
Components
N/A N/A
N/A
As -Built
Existing Footage (LF) /
Restoration or Restoration
Restoration Footage (LF) /
Mitigation
Credits
ReachlD
Stationing/
Approach
Acreage (Ac)
Equivalent
Acreage (Ac)
Ratio
(SMU / WMU)
Location (LF)
Streams
BC1
10+00-16+43
643
N/A
Enhancement Level 11
643
2.5:1
257
BC2
16+43-32+89
1,630
N/A
Enhancement Level
1,646
1.5:1
1,097
32+89-34+05
BC3
1,368
Priority 1
Restoration
1,407
1:1
1,407
34+64-47+55
BC4
47+55-55+51
796
N/A
Enhancement Level 11
796
2.5:1
318
60+00-66+48
SB1
976
Priority 1
Restoration
1,009
1:1
1,009
67+08-70+69
SE1
80+00-84+85
916
Priority 1
Restoration
485
1:1
485
SE2a
85+88-91+24
524
N/A
Enhancement Level
536
1.5:1
357
SE2b
91+24-93+19
50
Priority 1
Restoration
195
1:1
195
WB1
100+00-106+11
611
N/A
Enhancement Level 11
Summation
611
2.5:1
244
Stream
Component
Riparian Wetland Non -Riparian Wetland Buffer
Upland
Restoration Level
(linear feet)
(acres)
(acres) (square feet)
(acres)
Riverine
Non-Riverine
Restoration
3,096
-
-
- -
-
Enhancement
-
Enhancement l
2,182
Enhancement 11
2,050
Creation
Preservation
High Quality Preservation

Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Activity or Report
Date Collection
Complete
Completion
or Scheduled Delivery
Mitigation Plan
312 West Millbrook Road, Suite 225
January 2013
January 2013
Final Design - Construction Plans
June 2013
June 2013
Construction
September 2013
September 2013
Temporary S&E mix applied to entire project area'
2889 Lowery Street
September 2013
September 2013
Permanent seed mix applied to reach/segments
September 2013
September 2013
Bare root and live stake plantings for reach/segments
December 2013
December 2013
Baseline Monitoring Document (Year 0)
Stream Survey
Vegetation Survey
September 2013
January 2014
January 2014
Year 1 Monitoring
Stream Survey
Vegetation Survey
March 2014
September 2014
December 2014
Tree of Heaven Treatment
Winston Salem, NC 27101
August 2014
Additional Live Stake Planting
Green Resource, LLC
February 2015
Year 2 Monitoring
Stream Survev
Vegetation Survey
March 2015
June 2015
December 2015
Tree of Heaven Treatment
Live Stakes
Foggy Mountain Nursery
July 2015
Stream Repair Work
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
Stream and Vegetation Monitoring, POC
January 2016
Year 3 Monitoring
Stream Survey
Vegetation Survey
March 2016
June 2016
December 2016
Stream Repair Work
March 2017
Year 4 Monitoring
Stream Survey
Vegetation Survey
May 2017
August 2017
December 2017
Replanting of Easement Encroachment Area
January 2018
Strain Repair Work
Winter 2018
Year 5 Monitoring
Stream Survey
Vegetation Survey
June 2018
August 2018
December 2018
'Seed and mulch is added as each section of construction is completed.
*Byrds Creek Mitigation Site is a 5 year credit release project.
Table 3. Project Contact Table
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
Designer
312 West Millbrook Road, Suite 225
Jeff Keaton, PE
Raleigh, NC 27609
919.851.9986
North State Environmental
Construction Contractor
2889 Lowery Street
Winston Salem, NC 27101
Bruton Natural Systems, Inc
Planting Contractor
P.O. Box 1197
Fremont, NC 27830
North State Environmental
Seeding Contractor
2889 Lowery Street
Winston Salem, NC 27101
Seed Mix Sources
Green Resource, LLC
Nursery Stock Suppliers
Bare Roots
ArborGlen, Inc
Live Stakes
Foggy Mountain Nursery
Monitoring Performers
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
Stream and Vegetation Monitoring, POC
Jason Lorch
919.851.9986, ext. 107

Table 4. Project Information and Attributes
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Project Name
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
County
Person County
Project Area (acres)
24.4
Project Coordinates (latitude and longitude)
36. 14.744' N, 79. 79. 2.636'W
Physiographic Province
Carolina Slate Belt of the Piedmont Physiographic Province
River Basin
Neuse
USGS Hydrologic Unit 8 -digit
03020201
USGS Hydrologic Unit 14 -digit
03020201010020
DWQ Sub -basin
03-04-01
Project Drainiage Area (acres)
2,957 ac
Project Drainage Area Percentage of Impervious Area
<1%
CGIA Land Use Classification
57% managed herbaceous cover/agricultural, 42%forested/scrubland, 1% open water
Reach Summary Information
Parameters
BC1
BC2
BC3 BC4 SBI SEI
SE2a
SE2b
WBI
Length of reach (linear feet) - Post -Restoration
643
1,646
1,407 796 1,009 485
536
195
611
Drainage area (acres)
2,635
2,637
2,703 2,957 164 56
62
1 62
255
NCDWQ stream identification score
51.75 25.75
46.25
46.75
NCDWQ Water Quality Classification
WS -III, NSW
Morphological Desription (stream type)
P
P
P
P
I
P
P
P
P
Evolutionary trend (Simon's Model) - Pre- Restoration
IVN
IV
IV/\(
IV
III
IV/V
III/IV
III/IV
IV/V
Underlying mapped soils
Chewacla / Georgeville Loam
Drainage class
--- ---
--- ------ ---
---
---
---
Soil Hydric status
--- ---
--- ------ ---
---
---
---
--
---
FEMA classification
--- ---
--- --- ---
Native vegetation community
Piedmont bottomland forest
Percent composition exotic invasive vegetation -Post-
Restoration
JL
alim
0.8%
Regulatory Considerations
Regulation
Applicable? Resolved?
Supporting Documentation
Waters of the United States - Section 404
Waters of the United States - Section 401
X X
X X
USACE Nationwide Permit No.27 and DWQ401 Water Quality Certification No. 3885
Division of Land Quality (Dam Safety)
N/A N/A
N/A
Endangered Species Act
X X
Byrds Creek Mitigation Plan; no critical habitat for listed species exists within the project area (Pedestrian Survey)
Historic Preservation Act
X X
No historic resources were found to be impacted (letter from SHPO)
Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA)/Coastal Area
Management Act (CAMA)
N/A N/A
N/A
FEMA Floodplain Compliance
N/A N/A
N/A
Essential Fisheries Habitat
N/A N/A
N/A

APPENDIX 2. Visual Assessment Data

. y • dry.
1
♦
r �•rr � Ir j
es
.11
•� ♦•♦♦•�• PP #35 PP #36
1�. / q, 00/11,/
I
•�•�XS4 XS5 ♦PP
1 r� 1 � f♦♦ r r \\ ♦•♦.; ;,Q do / / % 1
I ` e
� ♦1.,�CS6 ♦.�'� . �� � SE Branch Reach 2b
\ 0 ♦ XS7 \ e PP #10 1 - 1•
j 1 `♦�j PP #11 `. rF S `•�•�•� `Branch each
2.
1N '♦•♦rPP #26•� ♦•♦ . IPP #29 SE Branch Reach 1
1 ! �•�.�• XS15 P------.—.—.—.—.
1 ♦. PP #251 ........ i^ XS13 XS12 7
�;• ,% PP #28,—, j
j ® % 1�•�`�•�• PP #27. X14
XS31 r•. `•�•�•.t
•�.�•`•XS1 N'
�•�. XS2 01
`• .: P P 1-�- r S 1 1
1 W•
�•1 1 °' 1 1 1
I• 1 a i..'.1. � �
:: •�.I m PPV20
PP #1
1�
,�
.,.y;
.; y�.. .• -
•rte � .�.
- �'
r.
kA,
.
�,!�- •�� i � �� �
�
T Y�
-,� �IP-icy-
tom'
2017 Aerial Photography

Table 5a. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Byrds Creek Reach 1 (643 LF)
Major Channel
Category
Channel Sub -Category
Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
in As -Built
Number of Amount of %Stable,
Unstable Unstable Performing as
Segments Footage Intended
Numberwith
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footagewith
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjust %for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
1. Vertical Stability
Aggradation
0 0 100%
Degradation
0 0 100%
(Riffle and Run units)
2. Riffle Condition
Texture/Substrate
n/a
n/a
n/a
3. Meander Pool
Depth Sufficient
n/a
n/a
n/a
1. Bed
Condition
n/a
Length Appropriate
n/a
n/a
4. Thalweg Position
Thalweg centering at upstream of
meander bend (Run)
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Thalweg centering at downstream of
meander bend (Glide)
n/a
n/a
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting
1. Scoured/Eroded
simply from poor growth and/or scour
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
and erosion
Banks undercut/overhanging to the
2. Bank
extent that mass wasting appears likely.
2. Undercut
Does NOT include undercuts that are
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
modest, appear sustainable and are
providing habitat
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, caving, or collapse
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
TOTALS
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no
dislodged boulders or logs
n/a
n/a
n/a
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting
maintenance of grade across the sill
n/a
n/a
n/a
3. Engineered
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow
underneath sills or arms
n/a
n/a
n/a
Structures
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures
extent of influence does not exceed 15%
n/a
n/a
n/a
Pool forming structures maintaining
4. Habitat
Max Pool Depth : Bankfull Depth>_ 1.6
Rootwads/logs providing some cover at
n/a
n/a
n/a
baseflow

Table 5b. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Byrds Creek Reach 2 (1,646 LF)
Major Channel
Category
Channel Sub -Category
Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
in As -Built
Number of Amount of %Stable,
Unstable Unstable Performing as
Segments Footage Intended
Numberwith
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footagewith
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjust %for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
1. Vertical Stability
Aggradation
0 0 100%
Degradation
0 0 100%
(Riffle and Run units)
2. Riffle Condition
Texture/Substrate
10
10
100%
3. Meander Pool
Depth Sufficient
9
9
100%
1. Bed
Condition
100%
Length Appropriate
9
9
100%
100%
4. Thalweg Position
Thalweg centering at upstream of
meander bend (Run)
9
9
Thalweg centering at downstream of
meander bend (Glide)
9
9
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting
1. Scoured/Eroded
simply from poor growth and/or scour
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
and erosion
Banks undercut/overhanging to the
2. Bank
extent that mass wasting appears likely.
2. Undercut
Does NOT include undercuts that are
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
modest, appear sustainable and are
providing habitat
10
3. Mass Wasting
JBank slumping, caving, or collapse
1 0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
TOTALS
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no
dislodged boulders or logs
2
2
100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting
maintenance of grade across the sill
1
1
100%
3. Engineered
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow
underneath sills or arms
1
1
100%
Structures
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures
extent of influence does not exceed 15%
2
2
100%
Pool forming structures maintaining
4. Habitat
Max Pool Depth : Bankfull Depth >_ 1.6
Rootwads/logs providing some cover at
1
1
100%
baseflow

Table 5c. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Byrds Creek Reach 3 (1,407 LF)
Major Channel
Category
Channel Sub -Category
Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
in As -Built
Number of Amount of %Stable,
Unstable Unstable Performing as
Segments Footage Intended
Numberwith
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footagewith
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjust %for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
1. Vertical Stability
Aggradation
0 0 100%
Degradation
0 0 100%
(Riffle and Run units)
2. Riffle Condition
Texture/Substrate
11
11
100%
3. Meander Pool
Depth Sufficient
11
11
100%
1. Bed
Condition
100%
Length Appropriate
11
11
100%
100%
4. Thalweg Position
Thalweg centering at upstream of
meander bend (Run)
11
11
Thalweg centering at downstream of
meander bend (Glide)
11
11
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting
1. Scoured/Eroded
simply from poor growth and/or scour
3
90
94%
n/a
n/a
n/a
and erosion
Banks undercut/overhanging to the
2. Bank
extent that mass wasting appears likely.
2. Undercut
Does NOT include undercuts that are
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
modest, appear sustainable and are
providing habitat
3. Mass Wasting
JBank slumping, caving, or collapse
0
1 0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
TOTALS
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no
dislodged boulders or logs
5
5
100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting
maintenance of grade across the sill
3
3
100%
3. Engineered
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow
underneath sills or arms
3
3
100%
Structures
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures
extent of influence does not exceed 15%
3
3
100%
Pool forming structures maintaining
4. Habitat
Max Pool Depth : Bankfull Depth >_ 1.6
Rootwads/logs providing some cover at
1
1
100%
baseflow

Table Sd. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Byrds Creek Reach 4 (796 LF)
Major Channel
Category
Channel Sub -Category
Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
in As -Built
Number of Amount of %Stable,
Unstable Unstable Performing as
Segments Footage Intended
Numberwith
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footagewith
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjust %for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
1. Vertical Stability
Aggradation
0 0 100%
Degradation
0 0 100%
(Riffle and Run units)
2. Riffle Condition
Texture/Substrate
n/a
n/a
n/a
3. Meander Pool
Depth Sufficient
n/a
n/a
n/a
1. Bed
Condition
n/a
Length Appropriate
n/a
n/a
4. Thalweg Position
Thalweg centering at upstream of
meander bend (Run)
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Thalweg centering at downstream of
meander bend (Glide)
n/a
n/a
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting
1. Scoured/Eroded
simply from poor growth and/or scour
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
and erosion
Banks undercut/overhanging to the
2. Bank
extent that mass wasting appears likely.
2. Undercut
Does NOT include undercuts that are
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
modest, appear sustainable and are
providing habitat
10
3. Mass Wasting
JBank slumping, caving, or collapse
1 0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
TOTALS
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no
dislodged boulders or logs
n/a
n/a
n/a
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting
maintenance of grade across the sill
n/a
n/a
n/a
3. Engineered
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow
underneath sills or arms
n/a
n/a
n/a
Structures
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures
extent of influence does not exceed 15%
n/a
n/a
n/a
Pool forming structures maintaining
4. Habitat
Max Pool Depth : Bankfull Depth>_ 1.6
Rootwads/logs providing some cover at
n/a
n/a
n/a
baseflow

Table 5e. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
South Branch Reach 1 (1,009 LF)
Major Channel
Category
Channel Sub -Category
Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
in As -Built
Number of Amount of
Unstable Unstable
Segments Footage
%Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Numberwith
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footagewith
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjust %for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
1. Vertical Stability
Aggradation
0 0
100%
Degradation
0 0
100%
(Riffle and Run units)
2. Riffle Condition
Texture/Substrate
17 17
100%
3. Meander Pool
Depth Sufficient
14 14
100%
1. Bed
Condition
Length Appropriate
14 14
100%
4. Thalweg Position
Thalweg centering at upstream of
meander bend (Run)
14 14
100%
lweg centering at downstream of
Fmeanderbend(Glide)
14 14
100%
1
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting
1. Scoured/Eroded
simply from poor growth and/or scour
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
and erosion
Banks undercut/overhanging to the
2. Bank
extent that mass wasting appears likely.
2. Undercut
Does NOT include undercuts that are
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
modest, appear sustainable and are
providing habitat
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, caving, or collapse
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
TOTALS
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no
dislodged boulders or logs
n/a
n/a
n/a
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting
maintenance of grade across the sill
n/a
n/a
n/a
3. Engineered
Za. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow
underneath sills or arms
n/a
n/a
n/a
Structures
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures
extent of influence does not exceed 15%
n/a
n/a
n/a
Pool forming structures maintaining
4. Habitat
Max Pool Depth : Bankfull Depth >_ 1.6
Rootwads/logs providing some cover at
n/a
n/a
n/a
baseflow

Table 5f. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Southeast Reach 1 (485 LF)
Major Channel
Category
Channel Sub -Category
Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
in As -Built
Number of Amount of %StableUnstable Unstable Performing as
Performing
Segments Footage Intended
Numberwith
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footagewith
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjust %for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
1. Vertical Stability
Aggradation
0 0 100%
Degradation
0 0 100%
(Riffle and Run units)
2. Riffle Condition
Texture/Substrate
12
12
100%
3. Meander Pool
Depth Sufficient
7
7
100%
1. Bed
Condition
100%
Length Appropriate
7
7
100%
100%
4. Thalweg Position
Thalweg centering at upstream of
meander bend (Run)
7
7
Thalweg centering at downstream of
meander bend (Glide)
7
7
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting
1. Scoured/Eroded
simply from poor growth and/or scour
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
and erosion
Banks undercut/overhanging to the
2. Bank
extent that mass wasting appears likely.
2. Undercut
Does NOT include undercuts that are
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
modest, appear sustainable and are
providing habitat
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, caving, or collapse
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
TOTALS
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no
dislodged boulders or logs
11
11
100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting
maintenance of grade across the sill
11
11
100%
3. Engineered
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow
underneath sills or arms
11
11
100%
Structures
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures
extent of influence does not exceed 15%
11
11
100%
Pool forming structures maintaining
4. Habitat
Max Pool Depth : Bankfull Depth >_ 1.6
Rootwads/logs providing some cover at
n/a
n/a
n/a
baseflow

Table 5g. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Southeast Reach 2a (536 LF)
Major Channel
Category
Channel Sub -Category
Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
in As -Built
Number of Amount of %Stable,
Unstable Unstable Performing as
Segments Footage Intended
Numberwith
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footagewith
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjust %for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
1. Vertical Stability
Aggradation
0 0 100%
Degradation
0 0 100%
(Riffle and Run units)
2. Riffle Condition
Texture/Substrate
12
12
100%
3. Meander Pool
Depth Sufficient
8
8
100%
1. Bed
Condition
100%
Length Appropriate
8
8
100%
100%
4. Thalweg Position
Thalweg centering at upstream of
meander bend (Run)
8
8
Thalweg centering at downstream of
meander bend (Glide)
8
8
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting
1. Scoured/Eroded
simply from poor growth and/or scour
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
and erosion
Banks undercut/overhanging to the
2. Bank
extent that mass wasting appears likely.
2. Undercut
Does NOT include undercuts that are
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
modest, appear sustainable and are
providing habitat
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, caving, or collapse
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
TOTALS
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no
dislodged boulders or logs
9
9
100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting
maintenance of grade across the sill
6
6
100%
3. Engineered
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow
underneath sills or arms
6
6
100%
Structures
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures
extent of influence does not exceed 15%
9
9
100%
Pool forming structures maintaining
4. Habitat
Max Pool Depth : Bankfull Depth >_ 1.6
Rootwads/logs providing some cover at
3
3
100%
baseflow

Table 5h. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Southeast Reach 2b (195 LF)
Major Channel
Category
Channel Sub -Category
Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
in As -Built
Number of Amount of %Stable,
Unstable Unstable Performing as
Segments Footage Intended
Numberwith
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footagewith
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjust %for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
1. Vertical Stability
Aggradation
0 0 100%
Degradation
0 0 100%
(Riffle and Run units)
2. Riffle Condition
Texture/Substrate
4
4
100%
3. Meander Pool
Depth Sufficient
3
3
100%
1. Bed
Condition
100%
Length Appropriate
3
3
100%
100%
4. Thalweg Position
Thalweg centering at upstream of
meander bend (Run)
3
3
Thalweg centering at downstream of
meander bend (Glide)
3
3
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting
1. Scoured/Eroded
simply from poor growth and/or scour
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
and erosion
Banks undercut/overhanging to the
2. Bank
extent that mass wasting appears likely.
2. Undercut
Does NOT include undercuts that are
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
modest, appear sustainable and are
providing habitat
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, caving, or collapse
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
TOTALS
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no
dislodged boulders or logs
3
3
100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting
maintenance of grade across the sill
3
3
100%
3. Engineered
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow
underneath sills or arms
3
3
100%
Structures
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures
extent of influence does not exceed 15%
3
3
100%
Pool forming structures maintaining
4. Habitat
Max Pool Depth : Bankfull Depth>_ 1.6
Rootwads/logs providing some cover at
n/a
n/a
n/a
baseflow

Table 5i. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
West Branch Reach 1 (611 LF)
Major Channel
Category
Channel Sub -Category
Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
in As -Built
Number of Amount of %Stable,
Unstable Unstable Performing as
Segments Footage Intended
Numberwith
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footagewith
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjust %for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
1. Vertical Stability
Aggradation
0 0 100%
Degradation
0 0 100%
(Riffle and Run units)
2. Riffle Condition
Texture/Substrate
n/a
n/a
n/a
3. Meander Pool
Depth Sufficient
n/a
n/a
n/a
1. Bed
Condition
n/a
Length Appropriate
n/a
n/a
4. Thalweg Position
Thalweg centering at upstream of
meander bend (Run)
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Thalweg centering at downstream of
meander bend (Glide)
n/a
n/a
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting
1. Scoured/Eroded
simply from poor growth and/or scour
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
and erosion
Banks undercut/overhanging to the
2. Bank
extent that mass wasting appears likely.
2. Undercut
Does NOT include undercuts that are
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
modest, appear sustainable and are
providing habitat
10
3. Mass Wasting
JBank slumping, caving, or collapse
1 0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
TOTALS
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no
dislodged boulders or logs
n/a
n/a
n/a
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting
maintenance of grade across the sill
n/a
n/a
n/a
3. Engineered
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow
underneath sills or arms
n/a
n/a
n/a
Structures
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures
extent of influence does not exceed 15%
n/a
n/a
n/a
Pool forming structures maintaining
4. Habitat
Max Pool Depth : Bankfull Depth>_ 1.6
Rootwads/logs providing some cover at
n/a
n/a
n/a
baseflow

Table 6. Vegetation Condition Assessment Table
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Planted Acreage 15.5
Easement Acreage 24.4
Vegetation Category
Definitions
Mapping
Number
Areas of points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale).
%of
Easement Encroachment Areas
Areas of points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale).
none 0 0 0.0%
Combined
Vegetation Category
Definitions
Threshold
of
Planted
Acreage
(Ac)
Polygons
Acreage
Bare Areas
Very limited cover of both woody and herbaceous material
0.1
0
0
0.0%
Woody stem densities clearly below target levels based on MY3, 4, or 5 stem count
Low Stem Density Areas
0.1
0
0.0
0.0%
criteria.
Total
0
0.0
0.0%
Areas with woody stems of a size class that are obviously small given the monitoring
Areas of Poor Growth Rates or Vigor
0.25 Ac
0
0
0.0%
year.
Cumulative Total
0
0.0
0.0%
Easement Acreage 24.4
Vegetation Category
Definitions
Mapping Number Combined %of
Threshold of Planted
Acreage
(SF) Polygons Acreage
Invasive Areas of Concern
Areas of points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale).
1,000 0 0 0.0%
Easement Encroachment Areas
Areas of points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale).
none 0 0 0.0%

Stream Photographs

PHOTO POINT 4 —looking upstream (10/18/2018)
�� Y♦ _ 1 fi
PHOTO POINT 4 — looking downstream (5/17/2018)
PHOTO POINT 5 — looking upstream (5/17/2018) 1 PHOTO POINT 5 — looking downstream (5/17/2018)
PHOTO POINT 6 — looking upstream (5/17/2018)
PHOTO POINT 6 — looking downstream (5/17/2018)

PHOTO POINT 7 — looking upstream (5/17/2018) 1 PHOTO POINT 7 — looking downstream (5/17/2018)
PHOTO POINT 8 — looking upstream (10/18/2018) PHOTO POINT 8 — looking downstream (5/17/2018)
PHOTO POINT 9 — looking upstream (10/18/2018) 1 PHOTO POINT 9 — looking downstream (5/17/2018)

PHOTO POINT 10 — looking upstream (5/17/2018) PHOTO POINT 10 — looking downstream (5/17/2018)
PHOTO POINT 11— looking upstream (5/17/2018) 1 PHOTO POINT 11— looking downstream (5/17/2018)
PHOTO POINT 12 — looking upstream (5/17/2018)
PHOTO POINT 12 — looking downstream (5/17/2018)

PHOTO POINT 13 — looking upstream (5/17/2018) PHOTO POINT 13 — looking downstream (5/17/2018)
PHOTO POINT 14 — looking upstream (5/17/2018) 1 PHOTO POINT 14 — looking downstream (5/17/2018)
PHOTO POINT 15 — looking upstream (5/17/2018)
PHOTO POINT 15 — looking downstream (5/17/2018)

PHOTO POINT 16 — looking upstream (10/18/2018) 1 PHOTO POINT 16 — looking downstream (10/18/2018)
PHOTO POINT 19 — looking upstream (5/17/2018) I PHOTO POINT 19 — looking downstream (5/17/2018)
PHOTO POINT 20 — looking upstream (10/18/2018) PHOTO POINT 20 — looking downstream (10/18/2018)

PHOTO POINT 24 — looking upstream (5/17/2018) 1 PHOTO POINT 24 — looking downstream (5/17/2018)
PHOTO POINT 25 — looking upstream (5/17/2018)
PHOTO POINT 25 — looking downstream (5/17/2018)

PHOTO POINT 27 — looking upstream (5/17/2018) 1 PHOTO POINT 27 — looking downstream (5/17/2018)
PHOTO POINT 28 — looking upstream (5/17/2018) 1 PHOTO POINT 28 — looking downstream (5/17/2018)
PHOTO POINT 29 — looking upstream (5/17/2018)
PHOTO POINT 29 — looking downstream (5/17/2018)

PHOTO POINT 33 — looking upstream (5/17/2018) PHOTO POINT 33 — looking downstream (5/17/2018)
PHOTO POINT 34 — looking upstream (5/17/2018)
PHOTO POINT 34 — looking downstream (5/17/2018)
PHOTO POINT 35 — looking upstream (10/18/2018)
PHOTO POINT 35 — looking downstream (5/17/2018)

Vegetation Photographs

h
T �, r yU ��, � ", N
, I- I �
�A
a�
At• I: I • I: I
�� F �s rF•��� � Ff ;.`.1 �� int, �� � r�� (�"'�`- � '•
Y �
5
0 F
• 1: I • 1 I: I I
� d Y
'S'1`
r„'

o
..
its
'

APPENDIX 3. Vegetation Plot Data

Table 7. Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Plot
Success Criteria
Met (Y/N)
Tract Mean
1
Y
100
2
Y
3
Y
4
Y
5
Y
6
Y
7
y
8
Y
9
Y
10
Y
11
Y
12
Y
13
Y
14
Y

Table 8. CVS Vegetation Table - Metadata
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Database name
Byrds Creek MY4 cvs-eep-entrytool-v2.3.1.mdb
Database location
F:\Projects\005-02128 Byrds Creek\Monitoring\Year 5\Vegetation
Computer name
CAROLYN-PC
File size
55648256
DESCRIPTION OF WORKSHEETS IN THIS DOCUMENT
Metadata
Description of database file, the report worksheets, and a summary of project(s) and project data.
Proj, planted
Each project is listed with its PLANTED stems per acre, for each year. This excludes live stakes.
Proj, total stems
Each project is listed with its TOTAL stems per acre, for each year. This includes live stakes, all planted stems, and all natural/volunteer stems.
Plots
List of plots surveyed with location and summary data (live stems, dead stems, missing, etc.).
Vigor
Frequency distribution of vigor classes for stems for all plots.
Vigor by Spp
Frequency distribution of vigor classes listed by species.
Damage
List of most frequent damage classes with number of occurrences and percent of total stems impacted by each.
Damage by Spp
Damage values tallied by type for each species.
Damage by Plot
Damage values tallied by type for each plot.
Planted Stems by Plot and Spp
A matrix of the count of PLANTED living stems of each species for each plot; dead and missing stems are excluded.
ALL Stems by Plot and spp
1A matrix of the count of total living stems of each species (planted and natural volunteers combined) for each plot; dead and missing stems are excluded.
PROJECT SUMMARY
Project Code
95020
project Name
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
Description
Stream Mitigation Site
River Basin
Neuse
Sampled Plots
14

Table 9. Planted and Total Stem Counts
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Color Coding for Table
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Failc rn macer raniiiramanrc h-- �-'---'^"'
Volunteer species included in total
* Volunteer species not included in total
PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P -all: Number of planted stems including live stakes,
T: Total Stems
Current Plot Data (MY5 2018)
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
95020-01-0001
Pnol-S P -all T
95020-01-0002
Pnol-S P -all T
95020-01-0003
Pnol-S P -all T
95020-01-0004
Pnol-S P -all T
95020-01-0005
Pnol-S P -all T
cernegundo
boxelder
Tree
cerrubrum
red maple
Tree
3
Baccharishalimifolia*
eastern baccharis
Shrub
1
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
1
1
9
1
1
1
Corpinuscaroliniano
American hornbeam
Tree
Carya
hickory
Tree
2
Cephalanthus occidentalis
common buttonbush
Shrub
Cercis canodensis
eastern redbud
Tree
Cornus amomum
silky dogwood
Shrub
Diospyros virginiana
common persimmon
Tree
Fogus grandifolia
American beech
Tree
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
3
3
3
8
8
8
6
6
6
13
13
13
1
1
1
Gleditsia triacanthos
honeylocust
Tree
1
uglans nigra
black walnut
Tree
uniperus virginiana
eastern redcedar
Tree
Liquidambarstyrociflua
sweetgum
Tree
5
1
40
37
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
2
2
4
4
4
27
3
3
4
Pinus taedo
loblolly pine
Tree
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
2
6
6
24
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
1
1
1
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
Quercus rubra
northern red oak
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
Rhus copallinum
Iflameleaf sumac
Ishrub
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
10
6
405
10
1
0.02
6
405
19
8
769
18
7
18
1
0.02
7
728
50
8
2,023
8
3
324
8
1
0.02
3
324 1
9
3
364
14
2
14
1
0.02
2
567
58
5
12,3471
12
5
486
12
1
0.02
5
486
69
7
2,792
Color Coding for Table
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Failc rn macer raniiiramanrc h-- �-'---'^"'
Volunteer species included in total
* Volunteer species not included in total
PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P -all: Number of planted stems including live stakes,
T: Total Stems

Table 9. Planted and Total Stem Counts
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Color Coding for Table
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Failc rn macer raniiiramanrc h-- �-'---'^"'
Volunteer species included in total
* Volunteer species not included in total
PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P -all: Number of planted stems including live stakes,
T: Total Stems
Current Plot Data (MY5 2018)
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
95020-01-0006
Pnol-S P -all T
95020-01-0007
Pnol-S P -all T
95020-01-0008
Pnol-S P -all T
95020-01-0009
Pnol-S P -all T
95020-01-0010
PnoLS P -all T
cernegundo
boxelder
Tree
cerrubrum
red maple
Tree
Baccharishalimifolia*
eastern baccharis
Shrub
3
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
2
2
2
3
3
3
2
2
2
1
1
1
2
2
2
Corpinuscaroliniano
American hornbeam
Tree
Carya
hickory
Tree
Cephalanthus occidentalis
common buttonbush
Shrub
Cercis canodensis
eastern redbud
Tree
1
1
1
2
2
2
Cornus amomum
silky dogwood
Shrub
Diospyros virginiana
common persimmon
Tree
2
Fogus grandifolia
American beech
Tree
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
4
4
4
1
1
1
5
5
5
11
11
11
Gleditsia triacanthos
honeylocust
Tree
2
uglans nigra
black walnut
Tree
uniperus virginiana
eastern redcedar
Tree
1
Liquidambarstyrociflua
sweetgum
Tree
14
30
85
30
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
1
1
2
2
2
2
1
1
6
3
3
5
1
1
1
Pinus taedo
loblolly pine
Tree
5
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
4
4
4
2
2
2
3
3
3
1
1
1
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
2
2
2
2
2
2
Quercus rubra
northern red oak
ITree
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Rhus copallinum
Iflameleaf sumac
Ishrub
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
13
6
526
13
1
0.02
6
526
34
10
1,376
9
5
9
1
0.02
5
364 1
9
5
364
11
7
1 445 1
11
1
0.02
7
445
48
9
11,942
13
5
13
1
0.02
5
526
102
7
4,128
15
4
15
1
0.02
4
607
45
5
1,821
Color Coding for Table
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Failc rn macer raniiiramanrc h-- �-'---'^"'
Volunteer species included in total
* Volunteer species not included in total
PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P -all: Number of planted stems including live stakes,
T: Total Stems

Table 9. Planted and Total Stem Counts
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Color Coding for Table
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Failc rn macer raniiiramanrc h-- �-'---'^"'
Volunteer species included in total
* Volunteer species not included in total
PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P -all: Number of planted stems including live stakes,
T: Total Stems
Current Plot Data (MY5 2018)
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
95020-01-0011
Pnol-S P -all T
95020-01-0012
Pnol-S P -all T
95020-01-0013
Pnol-S P -all T
95020-01-0014
Pnol-S P -all T
cernegundo
boxelder
Tree
cerrubrum
red maple
Tree
4
2
Baccharishalimifolia*
eastern baccharis
Shrub
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
2
2
2
1
1
1
4
4
4
2
2
2
Corpinuscaroliniano
American hornbeam
Tree
Carya
hickory
Tree
Cephalanthus occidentalis
common buttonbush
Shrub
Cercis canodensis
eastern redbud
Tree
1
1
1
Cornus amomum
silky dogwood
Shrub
Diospyros virginiana
common persimmon
Tree
Fogus grandifolia
American beech
Tree
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
5
5
5
2
2
3
4
4
4
6
6
6
Gleditsia triacanthos
honeylocust
Tree
uglans nigra
black walnut
Tree
uniperus virginiana
eastern redcedar
Tree
1
Liquidambarstyrociflua
sweetgum
Tree
50
50
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
1
1
10
2
3
3
23
Pinus taedo
loblolly pine
Tree
2
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
4
4
6
4
4
5
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
Quercus rubra
northern red oak
Tree
1
1
1
Rhus copallinum
Iflameleaf sumac
Ishrub
2
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
11 1
5 1
445
11
1
0.02
5
445
21
6k486
850486
12
12
1
0.02
7
69
10
2,792
15
5
15
1
0.02
5
607
72
8
2,914
13
5
526 1
13
1
0.02
5
526
35
6
11,416
Color Coding for Table
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Failc rn macer raniiiramanrc h-- �-'---'^"'
Volunteer species included in total
* Volunteer species not included in total
PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P -all: Number of planted stems including live stakes,
T: Total Stems

Table 9. Planted and Total Stem Counts
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Color Coding for Table
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Failc rn macer raniiiramanrc h-- �-'---'^"'
Volunteer species included in total
* Volunteer species not included in total
PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P -all: Number of planted stems including live stakes,
T: Total Stems
Annual Means
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
MYS (2018)
Pnol-S P -all T
M (2017)
Pnol-S P -all T
MY3 (2016)
Pnol-S P -all T
MY2 (2015)
Pnol-S P -all T
MY1 (2014)
PnoLS P -all T
MYO (2014)
Pnol-S P -all T
cernegundo
boxelder
Tree
1
cerrubrum
red maple
Tree
9
8
4
Baccharishalimifolia*
eastern baccharis
Shrub
4
5
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
21
21
29
19
19
26
18
18
18
24
24
24
29
29
29
41
41
41
Corpinuscaroliniano
American hornbeam
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
3
3
12
12
12
Carya
hickory
Tree
2
1
Cephalanthus occidentalis
common buttonbush
Shrub
2
11
Cercis canodensis
eastern redbud
Tree
4
4
4
5
5
5
7
7
7
8
8
8
8
8
8
Cornus amomum
silky dogwood
Shrub
1
Diospyros virginiana
common persimmon
Tree
2
Fogus grandifolia
American beech
Tree
5
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
69
69
70
71
71
80
69
69
73
75
75
83
73
73
73
72
72
72
Gleditsia triacanthos
honeylocust
Tree
3
uglans nigra
black walnut
Tree
3
uniperus virginiana
eastern redcedar
Tree
2
2
Liquidambarstyrociflua
sweetgum
Tree
342
114
32
102
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
21
21
86
23
23
124
23
23
63
25
25
81
40
40
40
49
49
49
Pinus taedo
loblolly pine
Tree
7
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
28
28
50
27
27
51
27
27
27
30
30
70
31
31
31
32
32
32
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
9
9
9
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
13
13
13
19
19
19
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
16
16
17
17
17
21
17
17
17
22
22
26
20
20
20
13
13
13
Quercus rubra
northern red oak
ITree
6
6
6
6
6
7
7
7
7
8
8
14
9
9
9
16
16
16
Rhus copallinum
Iflameleaf sumac
Ishrub
2
2
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
174
8
503
174
14
0.350.35
8
503
640
17
1,850
180
9
180
14
9
520
470
20
1,359
180
9
520 1
180
14
0.35
9
520
260
11
1 752
204
9
204
14
0.35
9
590
431
11
1,246
226
9
226
14
0.35
9
653
226
9
653
254
8
734 J
254
14
0.35
8
734
254
8
734
Color Coding for Table
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Failc rn macer raniiiramanrc h-- �-'---'^"'
Volunteer species included in total
* Volunteer species not included in total
PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P -all: Number of planted stems including live stakes,
T: Total Stems

APPENDIX 4. Morphological Summary Data and Plots

Table 10a. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Bvrds Creek
( --- ): Data was not provided
N/A: Not Applicable
'UT Cane Creek reference reach data only utilized for pattern and a reference point in the project specific regional curve.
'Data only utilized as a reference point on the the project -specific drainage area -discharge curve.
'Existing condition sinuosity based on valley length/channel length given no flow and therefore no water sureface shots at time of survey.
'Entrenchment Ratio is the flood prone width divided by the bankfull width.
'Bank Height Ratio is the bank height divided by the max depth ofthe bankfull channel.
Parameter
Gage
Byrds Creek
Reach 2
Byrds Creek
Reach 3
Spencer Creek1
Downstream
UT Cane Creek
UT Richland Creek
UpstreamZ
Z
UT Rocky Branch
Byrds Creek
Reach 2
Byrds Creek
Reach 3
Byrds Creek
Reach 2
Byrds Creek
Reach 3
Min Max
Min Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min Max
Min Max
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle
Bankfull Width (ft)
N/A
19.0 26.1
27.4 35.9
10.7
11.2
11.5
12.3
8.8
10.4
12.2
33.2
38.3
25.0
28.9 42.7
20.4 36.9
Floodprone Width (ft)
145 231 116 124 60.0 114+ 31.0 27.6 31.4 72.0 156 160 95 350 150+ 150+
150+ 150+
Bankfull Mean Depth
2.2 3.4 1.9 2.3 1.6 1.8 0.8 1.0 0.8 0.9 1.3 1.6 1.9 1.8 1.6 2.1
1.0 1.4
Bankfull Max Depth
3.8 4.4 2.6 3.4 2.1 2.6 1.2 1.6 1.1 1.3 1.8 2.8 3.2 2.8 2.9 3.4
2.1 3.0
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ftz
58.4 64.5 62.5 66.7 17.8 19.7 8.9 12.2 7.8 8.5 16.3 59.8 61.5 45.3 56.2 88.7
28.8 37.4
Width/Depth Ratio
5.6 11.7 9.3 19.3 5.8 7.1 12.3 14.4 10.0 12.8 9.1 18.0 24.5 13.8 14.8 22.2
14.5 36.5
Entrenchment Ratl04
5.5 12.1 3.2 5.5 5.5 10.2 >2.5 2.5 4.0 6.0 4.1 4.8 3.8 14.0 3.5+ 5.2+
4.7+ 7.4+
Bank Height Ratios
1.0 1.0 1.0 1.3 1 1.0 1.4 2.1 1.001.0 1.0 1.0
1.0 1.0
D50 (mm)
0.41 22.6 --- --- - 12.5 2604
29.3 45.0
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
---
---
--
---
13 59
12 57
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
0.0074 0.0075
0.0043 0.0133
0.0130
0.0188
0.0704
0.0210
0.0450
0.0606 0.0892
0.0029
0.0052
0.0076 0.0134
0.0036 0.0097
0.0022 0.0190
Pool Length (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
34 179
46 129
Pool Max Depth (ft)
N/A
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
1.21 2.58
0.97 2.43
Pool Spacing (ft)
54
103
70
124
71
27
73
N/A
26 1 81
102
211
60
141
84 278
73 129
Pool Volume (ft)
---
---
-
---
--
---
---
---
---
---
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
N/A
N/A
N/A
38
41
102
N/A
N/A
52
116
26 57
31 62
Radius of Curvature (ft)
N/A N/A 11 15 23 38 N/A N/A 50 80 19 79
44 84
Rc:Bankfull Width (ft/ft)
--- --- 1.0 1.3 2.0 3.1 N/A N/A --- 2.0 3.2 0.7 1.9
2.2 2.3
Meander Length (ft)
N/A N/A 46 48 45 81 N/A N/A 177 263 279 603
190 255
Meander Width Ratio
3.6 3.7 3.9 6.6 N/A N/A 2.1 4.6 0.9 1.3
1.5 1.7
Substrate, Bed and Transport Parameters
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%
N/A
-
-
-
-
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be%
--- --- --- --- --- --
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/d100
SC/0.19/0.41/116/ SC/0.41/22.6/ SC/SC/SC/55/
232/>2048 143.4/2048/>2048 --- --- --- --- --- --- 128/362
SC/SC/sC/107.3/
362/>2048
Reach Shear Stress (Competency) Ib/ft
--- --- --- --- --- --- 69 1.71 N/A
-- 0.
0.23 0.31
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
--- -- --- - - - -- --
---
Stream Power (Capacity) W m
--- --- ----- --- -
---
Additional Reach Parameters
Drainage Area (SM)
N/A
4.12
4.22
0.96
0.29
0.28
1.10
4.12
4.22
4.12
4.22
Watershed Impervious Cover Estimate (%)
1% <1% --- --- --- --- 1% <1% 1%
<1%
Rosgen Classification
C5/ES C4/E4 E4 C4/E4 C4/E4 E4b C4 C4 C4
C4
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
2.7 3.0 2.5 2.5 4.9 5.4 3.8 3.5 4.1 5.5 3.0 3.3 4.6 3.6
7.3
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
97 40 29.1 3z.o 85.0 200 210 200
210
Q-NFF regression
--- --- --
Q-USGS extrapolation
--- --- --- ----- --- --- --- ---
Q-Mannings
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
---
Valley Length (ft)
--- --- ----- ---
---
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
1,630 1,368 --- --- --- --- 1,630 1,402 1,646
1,407
Sinuosity
1.18 1.01 1.30 1.40 1.00 1.10 1.11 1.18
1.06
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)2
--- --- --- --- --- -- 0.0039 0.0016
0.0043
Bankfull Slope (ftft)
--- --- --- --- --- --- 0.0046 0.0013
0.0042
( --- ): Data was not provided
N/A: Not Applicable
'UT Cane Creek reference reach data only utilized for pattern and a reference point in the project specific regional curve.
'Data only utilized as a reference point on the the project -specific drainage area -discharge curve.
'Existing condition sinuosity based on valley length/channel length given no flow and therefore no water sureface shots at time of survey.
'Entrenchment Ratio is the flood prone width divided by the bankfull width.
'Bank Height Ratio is the bank height divided by the max depth ofthe bankfull channel.

Table 10b. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
South Branch and Southeast Branch
16
94
Parameter
Gage
South Branch
Reach 1
Southeast Branch
Reach 1
Spencer Creek
Upstream
UT Richland Creek
Downstream
1
UT Cane Creek
UT Richland Creek
UpstreaM2
UT Rocky Branch 2
South Branch
Reach 1
Southeast Branch
Reach 1
South Branch
Reach 1
Southeast Branch
Reach 1
Min Max
Min Max
Min Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min I Max
Min Max
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle
Bankfull Width (ft)
N/A
7.4 7.9
7.7
8.7
13.3
15.2
11.5
12.3
8.8
10.4
12.2
10.0
8.0
9.3
19.0
Floodprone Width (ft)
96.0 98.0 9.5 229.0 >50 31.0 27.6 31.4 72.0 70.0 375.0 30 100 >100
>75
Bankfull Mean Depth
1.0 1.2 0.8 1.2 1.1 1.3 0.8 1.0 0.8 0.9 1.3 1.0 0.7 0.7
0.5
Bankfull Max Depth
2.3 2.4 1.0 1.9 1.8 2.1 1.2 1.6 1.1 1.3 1.8 1.3 1.0 1.4
1.5
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ftz
8.0 8.7 6.2 10.6 16.5 17.5 8.9 12.2 7.8 8.5 16.3 9.6 5.7 6.5
9.6
Width/Depth Ratio
6.2 7.8 9.6 7.3 10.1 13.9 12.3 14.4 10.0 12.8 9.1 10.4 11.2 13.4
37.7
Entrenchment Ratio'
12.4 13.1 1.2 26.3 >2.5 >2.5 2.5 4.0 6.0 7.0 37.5 3.8 12.5 >2.2
>2.2
Bank Height Ratios
1.0 3.7 1.0 1.4 2.1 --- 1.4 2.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
1.0
D50 (mm)
1.0 0.09 56.1
28.5
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
8 46
10 28
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
0.0176 0.0349
0.0247 0.049
0.0188 0.0704
0.0183
0.0355
0.0188
0.0704
0.0210
0.0450
0.0606 0.0892
0.0052 0.0199
0.0220 0.0410
0.0021 0.0178
0.0023 0.0527
Pool Length (ft)
-
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
20 64
7 45
Pool Max Depth (ft)
N/A
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
0.4 2.2
0.9 2.3
Pool Spacing (ft)
30
62
35
1 90
13 47
33
93
27
73
N/A
26 1 81
34
85
21
53
36 116
26 58
Pool Volume (ft)
---
---
---
---
--
---
---
---
---
---
---
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
N/A
N/A
N/A
24 52
NA
102
N/A
N/A
25
48
16
39
14 35
10 27
Radius of Curvature (ft)
N/A N/A 5.4 22.1 NA 23 38 N/A N/A 20 35 18 26 17 32
14 30
Rc:Bankfull Width (ft/ft)
0.6 2.5 NA 2.0 3.1 N/A N/A 2.0 3.5 2.3 3.3 1.8 3.4
1.3 2.9
Meander Length (ft)
N/A N/A 54 196 NA 45 81 N/A N/A 76 120 47 93 78 127
65 74
Meander Width Ratio
2.8 6 NA 3.9 6.6 N/A N/A 7.6 12.0 S.9 11.6 8.4 13.6
6.3 7.1
Substrate, Bed and Transport Parameters
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%
-
-
-
-
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be%
---
---
---
---
---
--
---
---
---
---
---
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/d100
N/A
sC/sC/1.0/45/
107.33/180
SC/sC/0.09/26.23
/50.61/180
___
___
___
___
___
___
___
SC/sC/sC/103.6/
256/362
SC/SC/SC/68.1/
180/362
Reach Shear Stress (Competency) Ib/ft2
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
0.28
0.98
0.94
1.34
0.23
0.43
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
---
---
-
-
-
-
---
-
---
--
Stream Power (Capacity) W/M21
I---
---
--
--
---
---
---
Additional Reach Parameters
Drainage Area (SM)
N/A
0.25
0.09
o.so
0.97
0.29
0.28
1.10
0.25
0.09
0.25
0.09
Watershed Impervious Cover Estimate %
<i% 1% -- --- --- --- --- <1% 1% <1%
1%
Rosgen Classification
E5 E6/G6 E4 C4/E4 C4/E4 C4/E4 E4b E4 E4 C3
C4
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
3.7 2.8 4.2
F 4.5 3.8 3.5 4.1 5.5 3.1 3.5 4.6
2.1
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
68.9
1 78.6 40 29.1 1 32.0 85.0 30 20 30
20
Q-NFF regression
-- --
Q-USGS extrapolation
--- --- --- ----- --- --- --- --- ---
---
Q-Mannings
--- -- -
Valley Length (ft)
--- --- ----- --- --- --- --- --- ---
---
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
976 916 -- -- -- -- -- 971 792 1,009
485
Sinuosity
1.03 1.31 1.40 1.10 1.40 1.00 1.10 --- 1.13 1.06
1.18
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)2
--- --- --- --- --- -- 0.0068 0.0161 0.0070
0.0138
Bankfull Slope (ftft)
--- - - -- -- 0.0075 0.0182 0.0068
0.0136
( --- ): Data was not provided
N/A: Not Applicable
'UT Cane Creek reference reach data only utilized for pattern and a reference point in the project specific regional curve.
'Data only utilized as a reference point on the the project -specific drainage area -discharge curve.
'Existing condition sinuosity based on valley length/channel length given no flow and therefore no water sureface shots at time of survey.
'Entrenchment Ratio is the flood prone width divided by the bankfull width.
'Bank Height Ratio is the bank height divided by the max depth ofthe bankfull channel.

Table 10c. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Southeast Branch
�Ellll
Pre -Restoration
Condition
Reference
Reach Data
sign
Built/Baseline
Parameter
Gage
Southeast Branch
Reach 2
Spencer Creek
Upstream
UT Richland Creek 1
Downstream UT Cane Creek
UT Richland Creek
Upstreamz
UT Rocky Branch Z
Southeast Branch
Reach 2a
Southeast Branch
Reach 2b
Southeast Branch
Reach 2a
Southeast Branch
Reach 2b
Min Max
Min Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min Max
Min
Max
Min Max
Min Max
Min Max
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle
Bankfull Width (ft)
N/A
7.2 7.4
8.7
13.3
15.2
11.5
1
12.3
8.8
10.4
12.2
11.7
15.0
9.0
10.6
Floodprone Width (ft)
8.0 9.8 229.0 >50 31.0 27.6 31.4 72.0 114.7 120.1 lao.o 310.0 >100
Bankfull Mean Depth
1.3 1.4 1.2 1.1 1.3 0.8 1.0 0.8 0.9 1.3 0.7 0.9 0.7 0.6
Bankfull Max Depth
1.6 1.9 1.9 1.8 2.1 1.2 1.6 1.1 1.3 1.8 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.2
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ftZ
8.9 9.4 10.6 16.5 17.5 8.9 12.2 7.5 8.5 16.3 10.2 10.5 6.5 6.8
Width/Depth Ratio
5.8 7.3 7.3 10.1 13.9 12.3 14.4 10.0 12.8 9.1 13.5 21.3 12.5 16.5
Entrenchment Rdtl04
1.6 6.2 26.3 >2.5 >2.5 2.5 4.0 6.0 7.7 10.3 15.6 34.4 >2.2
Bank Height Ratios
1.5 2.1 1.0 1.4 2.1 1.4 2.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
D50 (mm)
0.04 - 37.2
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
4 20
11 36
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
0.0047 1 0.0147
O.O1S8 0.0704
0.0183
0.0355
0.0188
0.0704
0.0210
0.0450
0.0606 0.0892
0.0122
0.0367
0.0202
0.0145 0.0454
0.0119 0.0606
Pool Length (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
21 53
27 45
Pool Max Depth (ft)
N/A
---
---
---
---
---
---
--
---
---
1.3 2.6
0.89 2.23
Pool Spacing (ft)
17
122
13 1 47
33
93
27
73
N/A
26 1 81
27
55
43 49
25 S4
34 73
Pool Volume (ft)
---
---
---
--
---
---
---
---
---
---
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
N/A
24 52
NA
102
N/A
N/A
N/A
27
3 22
12
22
Radius of Curvature (ft)
N/A
5.4 22.1
NA
23
38
N/A
N/A
N/A
22
30
7 58
21
1 25
Rc:Bankfull Width (ft/ft)
N/A
0.6 2.5
NA
2.0
3.1
N/A
N/A
N/A
2.4
3.3
0.7 5.5
N/A
Meander Length (ft)
N/A
54 196
NA
45
81
N/A
N/A
N/A
82.0
43 80
88 1 88
Meander Width Ratio
2.8 6
NA
3.9
6.6
N/A
N/A
N/A
3.0
4.1 7.5
N/A
Substrate, Bed and Transport Parameters
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%
---
---
---
---
---
--
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be%
---
--
-
--
---
--
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/d100
N/A
SC/0.02/0.04/0.05/33.2
/79.6
SC/SC/SC/70.9/
256/362
SC/SC/SC/70.9/
256/362
Reach Shear Stress (Competency) Ib/ftZ
---
-
-
-
-
--
0.93
1.14
0.93 1.14
0.47
N/A
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
---
---
---
---
--
---
---
---
---
---
Stream Power (Capacity) W/mZ
Additional Reach Parameters
Drainage Area (SM)
N/A
0.09
0.50
0.97
0.29
0.28
1.10
0.09
0.10
0.09
0.10
Watershed Impervious Cover Estimate (%)
1% --- --- --- --- --- 1% 1% 1%
1%
Rosgen Classification
E6/G6 E4 C4/E4 C4/E4 C4/E4 E4b C4 C4 C4
C4
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
2.9 T 3.4 4.2
4.5 3.8 3.5
4.1 5.5 3.0 3.3 3.1 4.4
N/A
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
- 6s.9
78.6 40 29.1
32.0 85.0 30 20 30
N/A
Q-NFF regression
--- --- ----- --- --- --- --- ---
---
Q-USGS extrapolation
--- - - --
Q-Mannings
--- --- ----- --- --- --- --- ---
---
Valley Length
--- - - ----- ---
---
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
524 --- --- --- 533 180 536
195
Sinuosity
1.17 1.40 1.10 1.40 1.00 1.10 --- 1.21 1.11
1.23
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)Z
--- --- --- --- --- -- --- 0.0101 0.0144
0.0160
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
i i i i i i i i 0.0122 0.0146
0.01sa
( --- ): Data was not provided
N/A: Not Applicable
'UT Cane Creek reference reach data only utilized for pattern and a reference point in the project specific regional curve.
'Data only utilized as a reference point on the the project -specific drainage area -discharge curve.
'Existing condition sinuosity based on valley length/channel length given no flow and therefore no water sureface shots at time of survey.
`Entrenchment Ratio is the flood prone width divided by the bankfull width.
'Bank Height Ratio is the bank height divided by the max depth ofthe bankfull channel.

Table 11. Morphology and Hydraulic Summary (Dimensional Parameters - Cross Section;
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
N/A: Not Applicable
1For MY5 bankfull elevation was calculated using the Standard Measurement of the BHR Monitoring Parameter provided by NCIRT and NCDMS
Entrenchment Ratio is the flood prone width divided by the bankfull width.
;Bank Height Ratio is the bank height divided by the max depth of the bankfull channel.
* Data for cross sections 6, 8, & 12 were updated during MY2 for previous monitoring years. Cross sections 6 and 12 had an error in the spreadsheet that was corrected. The spreadsheet was
not calculating bankfull width correctly which affected cross-sectional area, and width to depth ratio. Bankfull elevation was corrected on cross section 8 after careful evaluation. It was
determined that during the baseline survey, bankfull was called at a higher elevation than it should have been.
Byrds Creek - Reach 2
Dimension and Substrate
Base
MY3
MY2
MY3
MY4
MYS
Base
MY3
MY2
MY
MY4
MYS
Base
MY3
MY2
MY3
MY4
MYS
Base
MY3
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Bankfull Elevation (ft)l
574.4
574.4
574.4
574.4
574.4
574.5
574.6
574.6
574.6
574.6
574.6
574.6
574.2
574.2
574.2
574.2
574.2
574.4
572.6
572.6
572.6
572.6
572.6
572.8
Low Bank Elevation (ft) 574.4
574.4
574.4
574.4
574.4
574.2
574.6
574.6
574.6
574.6
574.6
574.6
574.2
574.2
574.2
574.2
574.2
574.2
572.6
572.6
572.6
572.6
572.6
572.7
Bankfull Width (ft)
36.4
36.6
35.3
35.6
35.9
37.9
42.2
42.1
42.6
40.3
40.3
41.0
28.9
24.7
22.9
22.1
20.8
27.3
42.7
36.0
36.9
32.8
33.6
39.8
Floodprone Width (ft)
>150
>150
>150
>150
>150
>150
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
>150
>150
>150
>150
>150
>150
>150
>150
>150
>150
>150
>150
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.6
1.4
1.4 1
1.4
1.5
1.6 1
1.9
1.9
1.9 1
2.0
2.0
2.0
1.9
2.1
2.0
2.1
2.2
2.1
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.2
2.3
2.2
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
2.9
2.7
2.7
2.7
3.1 1
3.1
4.6
4.5
4.3
4.3
4.4
4.4
3.4
3.2
3.2 1
3.1
3.2
3.7
3.2
3.2
3.3
3.1
3.2
3.6
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ftZ)
59.3
51.1
50.6
50.6
53.4
59.3
80.3
79.9
79.6
79.3
80.8
80.3 1
56.2
51.6
46.5
45.9
45.7
56.2
1 88.7
1 78.3 1
83.9
73.4
76.7
88.7
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
22.2
26.2
24.6
25.0
24.1
24.3
22.1
22.2
22.8
20.5
20.1
20.9
14.8
11.8
11.3
10.6
9.5
13.3
20.6
16.6
16.2
14.6
14.7
17.9
Entrenchment RatioZ
4.5+
4.1+
4.2+
4.2+
4.2+
4.0+
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
5.2+
6.1+
6.6+
6.8+
7.2+
5.5+
3.4+
4.2+
4.1+
4.6+
4.5+
3.8+
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio'
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
<1.0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
<1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
<1.0
d50 (mm)
12.5
28.7
18.0
19.0
24.2
16.6
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
26.4
42.9
28.1
37.9
25.0
22.6
22.6
32.0
36.4
29.8
49.1
64.5
Byrds Creek - Reach 2
Byrds Creek
- Reach 3
Dimension and Substrate
Base
Cross
MY1
Section
MY2
5 (Pool)
MY3
MY4
MYS
Base
Cross
MY3
Section
MY2
6 (Poo4
MY3
MY4
MYS
Base
Cross
MY3
Section
MY2
7 (Riffle)
MY3
MY4
MYS
Base
Cross
MY3
Section
MY2
8 (Riffle)
MY3
MY4
MY5
Bankfull Elevation (ft)'
572.0
572.0
572.0
572.0
572.0
572.3
569.0
569.0
569.0
569.0
569.0
569.1
568.7
568.7
568.7
568.7
568.7
568.6
565.0
565.0
565.0
565.0
565.0
564.6
Low Bank Elevation (ft) 572.0
572.0
572.0
572.0
572.0
573.1
569.0
569.0
569.0
569.0
569.0
569.0
568.7
568.7
568.7
568.7
568.7
568.6
565.0
565.0
565.0
565.0
565.0
564.9
Bankfull Width (ft)
34.8
34.3
35.3
32.2
32.4
36.5
26.2
25.4
25.9
29.6
25.9
30.4
20.4
22.6
23.4
21.2
22.5
24.2
17.6
17.6
18.3
19.5
20.2
18.1
Floodprone Width (ft)
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
>150
>150
>150
>150
>150
>150
>150
>150
>150
>150
>150
>150
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
2.4
2.3
2.5
2.2
2.3
2.3
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.4
1.7
1.6
1.4
1.4
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.2
1.3
1.1
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
3.7
4.3
4.5
4.1
4.0
4.5
3.2
3.0
3.1
2.9
3.0
3.1
2.1
2.2
2.4
2.1
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.1
2.2
2.1
2.3
2.1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ftZ)
84.3
80.2
86.7
71.4
73.2
84.3
47.5
45.8
47.8
40.3
43.6
47.5
28.8
31.0
31.0
26.6
29.2
31.0
20.5
23.4
24.9
23.2
25.8
20.5
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
14.3
14.7
14.4
14.5
14.4
15.8
14.4
14.1
14.1
21.7
15.4
19.5
14.4
16.5
17.7
16.8
17.3
18.8
15.1
13.3
13.4
16.3
15.8
16.0
Entrenchment RatioZ
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
7.4+
6.6+
6.4+
7.1+
6.7+
6.2+
8.5+
8.5+
8.2+
7.7+
7.4+
8.3+
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio'
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.1
d50 (mm)
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
29.3
41.3
37.2
52.1
16.0
15.3
45.0
49.1
66.2
70.2
11.6
18.4
Byrds Creek - Reach 3
Cross Section 9 (Pool)
Cross
Sectionrn
South Branch - Reach 1
11 (Pool)
Southeast Branch - Reach 1
Cross Section 12 (Riffle)
Dimension and Substrate
Base
MY3
MY2
MY3
MY4
MYS
Base
MY3
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
FMY1
FMY2
MY3
MY4
MYS
Base
MY3
MY2
MY3
MY4
MYS
Bankfull Elevation (ft)' 565.5
565.5
565.5
565.5
565.5
565.4
571.4
571.4
571.4
571.4
571.4
571.4
571.3
571.3
571.3
571.3
571.3
571.6
580.3
580.3
580.3
580.3
580.3
580.2
Low Bank Elevation (ft) 565.5
565.5
565.5
565.5
565.5
566.5
571.4
571.4
571.4
571.4
571.4
571.5
571.3
571.3
571.3
571.3
571.3
571.4
580.3
580.3
580.3
580.3
580.3
580.3
Bankfull Width (ft)
34.2
33.6
33.7
32.6
33.9
35.6
9.3
8.8
9.0
9.0
7.8
10.5
10.2
9.7
9.2
8.8
8.9
9.5
10.4
9.1
8.2
8.5
8.6
8.1
Floodprone Width (ft)
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
>100
>100
>100
>100
>100
>100
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
>75
>75
>75
>75
>75
>75
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
2.0
2.0
2.1
2.0
2.1
2.0
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.7
0.6
1.1
1.0
1.0
1.1
1.1
1.2
0.6
0.5
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.8
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
3.9
3.8
3.7
3.7
3.8
3.7
1.4
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.7
1.6
2.0
1.9
1.8
1.9
2.0
2.2
1.5
0.9
1.3
1.3
1.5
1.4
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ftZ)
69.6
66.5
69.3
66.5
69.6
69.6
6.5
6.4
5.5
5.5
5.4
6.5
11.6 1
10.1 1
9.1
9.3
9.5
11.6
6.7
4.7
5.6
6.0 1
5.7
1 .7
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
16.8
17.0
16.3
16.0
16.5
18.2
13.4
12.2
14.8
14.8
11.3
17.1
8.9
9.2
9.4
8.3
8.4
7.8
16.3
17.6
12.0
12.0
12.9
9.8
Entrenchment RatioZ
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
10.7+
11.4+
11.1+
11.1+
12.9+
9.5+
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
7.2+
8.3+
9.1+
8.8+
8.0+
9.2+
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio'
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.1
d50 (mm)
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
56.1
9.4
30.9
29.3
9.5
18.0
N/A
N/A I
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
28.5
37.0
68.0
52.3
51.4
9.2
Dimension and Substrate Base
Bankfull Elevation (ft)' 579.5
Low Bank Elevation (ft) 579.5
Bankfull Width (ft) 12.5
Floodprone Width (ft) N/A
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 1.2
Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 2.5
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ftZ) 15.3
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio 10.1
Entrenchment RatioZ N/A
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio' N/A
d50(mm) N/A
Southeast Branch - Reach 1
Cross Section 13 (Pool) JLL__
MY3 MY2 MY3 MY4
579.5 579.5 579.5 579.5
579.5 579.5 579.5 579.5
8.6 8.7 9.5 8.5
N/A N/A N/A N/A
1.1 1.1 1.1 1.0
2.3 1 2.0 2.0 1 2.1 1
9.4 9.5 10.3 8.9
7.9 8.0 8.8 8.1
N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A
MYS
579.9
579.7
10.1
N/A
1.5
2.9
15.3
6.6
N/A
N/A
N/A
Base
572.7
572.7
16.7
N/A
1.7
3.5 1
28.0
10.0
N/A
N/A
N/A
MY1
572.7
572.7
14.8
N/A
1.5
3.2 1
22.0
10.0
N/A
N/A
N/A
��Ool)
MY2
572.7
572.7
13.0
N/A
1.8
3.1
23.1
7.3
N/A
N/A
N/A
MY3
572.7
572.7
12.2
N/A
1.7
3.0 1
20.5
7.2
N/A
N/A
N/A
Southeast Branch - Reach 2
Cross
MY4 MYS Base MY1
572.7 573.1 572.6 572.6
572.7 572.9 572.6 572.6
13.2 18.7 10.6 9.7
N/A N/A >100 >100
1.6 1.5 0.6 0.6
3.0 1 3.0 1.2 1 1.0
21.2 28.0 6.8 5.8
8.3 12.4 16.5 16.4
N/A N/A 9.4+ 10.3+
N/A N/A 1.0 1.0
N/A N/A 37.2 13.5
Section
MY2
572.6
572.6
9.3
>100
0.5
1.0 1
4.9
17.6
10.8+
1.0
45.0
15 (Riffle)
MY3
572.6
572.6
9.0
>100
0.7
1.3
5.9
13.8
11.1+
1.0
43.8
MY4
572.6
572.6
9.1
>100
0.8
1 1.3
7.7
10.8
11.0+
1.0
30.8
MY5
572.6
572.7
8.9
>100
0.8
1.4
6.8
11.6
11.3+
1.1
25.2
N/A: Not Applicable
1For MY5 bankfull elevation was calculated using the Standard Measurement of the BHR Monitoring Parameter provided by NCIRT and NCDMS
Entrenchment Ratio is the flood prone width divided by the bankfull width.
;Bank Height Ratio is the bank height divided by the max depth of the bankfull channel.
* Data for cross sections 6, 8, & 12 were updated during MY2 for previous monitoring years. Cross sections 6 and 12 had an error in the spreadsheet that was corrected. The spreadsheet was
not calculating bankfull width correctly which affected cross-sectional area, and width to depth ratio. Bankfull elevation was corrected on cross section 8 after careful evaluation. It was
determined that during the baseline survey, bankfull was called at a higher elevation than it should have been.

Table 12a. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Bvrds Creek - Reach 2
'Entrenchment Ratio is the flood prone width divided by the bankfull width.
2Bank Height Ratio is the bank height divided by the max depth of the bankfull channel.
As-Built/Baseline
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
r
Min
Max
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle
Bankfull Width (ft)
28.9
42.7
24.7
36.6
22.9
36.9
22.1
35.6
20.8
35.9
27.3
39.8
Floodprone Width (ft)
>150
>150
>150
>150
>150
>150
>150
>150
>150
>150
>150
>150
Bankfull Mean Depth
1.6
2.1
1.4
2.2
1.4
2.3
1.4
2.2
1.5
2.3
1.6
2.2
Bankfull Max Depth
2.9
3.4
2.7
3.2
2.7
3.3
2.7
3.1
3.1
3.2
3.1
3.7
Bankfull Cross-sectional Area (fe)
56.2
88.7
51.1
78.3
46.5
83.9
45.9
73.4
45.7
76.7
56.2
88.7
Width/Depth Ratio
14.8
22.2
11.8
26.2
11.3
24.6
10.6
25.0
9.5
24.1
13.3
24.3
Entrenchment Ratio'
3.4+
5.2+
4.1+
6.1+
4.1+
6.6+
4.2+
6.8+
4.2+
7.2+
3.8+
5.5+
Bank Height Ration
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
<1.0
<1.0
D50 (mm)
12.5
26.4
28.7
1
42.9
18.0
36.4
19.0
37.9
24.2
49.1
16.6
1
64.5
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
13
59
12
59
18
59
12
59
14
59
11
61
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
0.0036
0.0097
0.0019
0.0147
0.0003
0.0110
0.0009
0.0138
0.0025
0.0147
0.0008
0.0153
Pool Length (ft)
34
179
34
182
59
183
70
185
30
165
33
185
Pool Max Depth (ft)
3.7
4.6
4.3
4.5
4.2
5.8
3.6
4.8
3.1
5.0
1.2
2.5
Pool Spacing (ft)
Pool volume (fe)
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
Radius of Curvature (ft)
Rc:Bankfull Width (ft/ft)
Meander Wave Length (ft)
Meander Width Ratio
Additional Reach Parameters
84
26
19
0.7
279
0.9
278
57
79
1.9
603
1.3
80
214
81
225
85
211
107
219
72
231
Rosgen Classification
C4
71.2
C4
C4
C4
C4
C4
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
1,646
1,6467
1,646
1,646
1,646
1,646
Sinuosity (ft)
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)l
0.0016
1
0.0018
0.0019
1
0.0017
0.0017
0.0014
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be%
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/d100
0.0013
0.2/0.6/5.6/55/128/362
0.0018
0.3/1.2/2.9/75.9/122.5/256
0.0020
0.21/1.0/3.7/80.3/168.1/362
0.0016
0.34/1.24/2.4/85.0/163.3/362.0
0.0017
0.55/0.99/4.0/92.1/175.7/512.0
0.0019
0.86/2.27/49.8/123.3/165.3/256.0
%of Reach with Eroding Banks
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
'Entrenchment Ratio is the flood prone width divided by the bankfull width.
2Bank Height Ratio is the bank height divided by the max depth of the bankfull channel.

Table 12b. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
gyros �reex - meacn a
'Entrenchment Ratio is the flood prone width divided by the bankfull width.
2Bank Height Ratio is the bank height divided by the max depth of the bankfull channel.
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle
Bankfull Width (ft)
17.6
20.4
17.6
22.6
18.3
23.4
19.5
21.2
20.2
22.5
18.1
24.2
Floodprone Width (ft)
>150
>150
>150
>150
>150
>150
>150
>150
>150
>150
>150
>150
Bankfull Mean Depth
1.2
1.4
1.3
1.4
1.3
1.4
1.2
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.1
1.3
Bankfull Max Depth
2.1
2.3
2.1
2.2
2.2
2.4
2.1
2.1
2.3
2.3
2.1
2.3
Bankfull Cross-sectional Area (ft2)
20.5
28.8
23.4
31.0
24.9
31.0
23.2
26.6
25.8
29.2
20.5
31.0
Width/Depth Ratio
14.4
15.1
13.3
16.5
13.4
17.7
16.3
16.8
15.8
17.3
16.0
18.8
Entrenchment Ratio'
7.4+
8.5+
6.6+
8.5+
6.4+
8.2+
7.1+
7.7+
6.7+
7.4+
6.2+
8.3+
Bank Height Rati02
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.1
D50 (mm)
29.3
45.0
41.3
49.1
37.2
66.2
52.1
70.2
42.7
68.3
15.3
18.4
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
12
57
26
43
18
44
28
44
24
45
27
45
Riffle Slope(ft/ft)
0.0022
0.0190
0.0065
0.0311
0.0018
0.0304
0.0054
0.0304
0.0067
0.0263
0.0115
0.0204
Pool Length (ft)
46
129
33
134
32
132
31
134
31
128
33
132
Pool Max Depth (ft)
3.2
3.9
3.0
3.8
2.9
4.3
3.4
4.6
3.1
4.7
0.7
3.2
Pool Spacing (ft)
73
129
82
190
92
199
60
180
60
189
72
177
Pool Volume (ft)
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
31
62
Radius of Curvature (ft)
44
84
Rc:Bankfull Width (ft/ft)
2.2
2.3
Meander Wave Length (ft)
190
255
Meander Width Ratio
1.5
1.7
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
C4
C4
C4
C4
C4
C4
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
1,407
1,407
1,407
1,407
1,407
1,407
Sinuosity (ft)
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
Water Surface Slope(ft/ft)
0.0043
0.0045
0.0052
0.0047
0.0046
0.0044
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
0.0042
0.0047
0.0047
0.0044
0.0047
0.0042
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%
SC%/Sa°!o/G%/C%/B%/Be%
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/d100
0.1/0.6/16/107.3/362/>2048
0.2/9.1/29/82.6/180/362
0.2/1.68/32.0/112.6/430.5/2048
0.5/4.73/23.4/105.6/256.0/2048
0.34/1.47/5.8/54.6/89.8/180.0
0.91/1.81/13.3/57.9/101.2/256.0
%of Reach with Eroding Banks
0%
20%
4%
0%
6%
'Entrenchment Ratio is the flood prone width divided by the bankfull width.
2Bank Height Ratio is the bank height divided by the max depth of the bankfull channel.

Table 12c. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
South Branch - Reach 1
'Entrenchment Ratio is the flood prone width divided by the bankfull width.
2Bank Height Ratio is the bank height divided by the max depth of the bankfull channel.
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
r
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle
Bankfull Width (ft)
9.3
8.8
9.0
9.0
7.8
10.5
Floodprone Width (ft)
>100
>100
>100
>100
>100
>100
Bankfull Mean Depth
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.7
0.6
Bankfull Max Depth
1.4
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.7
1.6
Bankfull Cross-sectional Area (ft)
6.5
6.4
5.5
5.5
5.4
6.5
Width/Depth Ratio
13.4
12.2
14.8
14.8
11.3
17.1
Entrenchment Ratio'
10.7+
11.4+
11.1+
11.1+
12.9+
9.5+
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
D50 (mm)
56.1
9.4
30.9
29.3
9.5
18.0
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
8
46
10
39
13
37
10
38
12
38
11
39
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
0.0021
0.0178
0.0022
0.0431
0.0029
0.0298
0.0023
0.0409
0.0030
0.0573
0.0089
0.0349
Pool Length (ft)
20
64
22
65
21
67 1
21
69
20
62
22
66
Pool Max Depth (ft)
2.0
1.9
2.8
2.5
3.2
1.8
Pool Spacing (ft)
Pool Volume (fe)
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
Radius of Curvature (ft)
Rc:Bankfull Width (ft/ft)
Meander Wave Length (ft)
Meander Width Ratio
Additional Reach Parameters
36
14
17
1.8
78
8.4
116
35
32
3.4
127
13.6
22
87
32
117
35
133
38
118
43
81
Rosgen Classification
C3
C3
C3
C3
C3
C3
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
1,009
1,009
1,009
1,009
1,009
1,009
Sinuosity (ft)
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)
0.0070
0.0065
0.0078
0.0092
0.0079
0.0078
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
0.0068
0.0062
0.0070
0.0072
0.0061
0.0072
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be%
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/d100
SC/SC/SC/103.6/256/362
SC/0.2/5.3/71.7/141.1/180
SC/0.09/0.3/75.9/143.4/256
SC/SC/0.6/99.5/180/512
0.27/2.0/4.8/37.9/180.0/362.0
0.15/4.0/8.7/55.0/107.3/180.0
%of Reach with Eroding Banks
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
'Entrenchment Ratio is the flood prone width divided by the bankfull width.
2Bank Height Ratio is the bank height divided by the max depth of the bankfull channel.

Table 12d. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Southeast Branch - Reach 1
'Entrenchment Ratio is the flood prone width divided by the bankfull width.
2Bank Height Ratio is the bank height divided by the max depth of the bankfull channel.
As-Built/Baseline
Min
Max
��Y-Ir
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle
Bankfull Width (ft)
10.4
9.1
8.2
8.5
8.6
8.1
Floodprone Width (ft)
>75
>75
>75
>75
>75
>75
Bankfull Mean Depth
0.6
0.5
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.8
Bankfull Max Depth
1.5
0.9
1.3
1.3
1.5
1.4
Bankfull Cross-sectional Area (ft)
6.7
4.7
5.6
6.0
5.7
6.7
Width/Depth Ratio
16.3
17.6
12.0
12.0
12.9
9.8
Entrenchment Ratio'
7.2+
8.3+
9.1+
8,8+
8.0+
9.2+
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.1
D50 (mm)
28.5
37.0
68.0
52.3
51.4
9.2
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
10
28
10
28
11
29
12
32
9
28
6
28
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
0.0023
0.0527
0.0100
0.0390
0.0039
1
0.0630
0.0035
1
0.0612
0.0019
0.0290
0.0038
1
0.0708
Pool Length (ft)
7
45
10
54
1 19
48
19
47
18
41
18
47
Pool Max Depth (ft)
2.5
2.3
2.6
2.8
2.6
2.0
Pool Spacing (ft)
Pool Volume (fe)
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
Radius of Curvature (ft)
Rc:Bankfull Width (ft/ft)
Meander Wave Length (ft)
Meander Width Ratio
Additional Reach Parameters
26
10
14
1.3
65
6.3
58
27
30
2.9
74
7.1
18
78
22
56
21
72
24
64
32
68
Rosgen Classification
C4
C4
C4
C4
C4
C4
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
485
485
485
485
485
485
Sinuosity (ft)
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)
0.0138
0.0140
0.0133
0.0143
0.0141
0.0134
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
0.0136
0.0141
0.0126
0.0161
0.0171
0.0121
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be%
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/d100
SC/0.2/8/68.1/180/362
SC/0.1/4/67.2/151.8/362
SC/SC/0.3/86.7/180.0/512.0
SC/SC/4/101.2/170.1/256
SC/SC/0.3/84.6/151.8/256.0
SC/10.43/20.7/67.2/87.8/256.0
%of Reach with Eroding Banks
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
'Entrenchment Ratio is the flood prone width divided by the bankfull width.
2Bank Height Ratio is the bank height divided by the max depth of the bankfull channel.

Table 12e. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Southeast Branch - Reach 2a
'Entrenchment Ratio is the flood prone width divided by the bankfull width.
2Bank Height Ratio is the bank height divided by the max depth of the bankfull channel.
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle
Bankfull Width (ft)
10.6
9.7
9.3
9.0
9.1
8.9
Floodprone Width (ft)
>100
>100
>100
>100
>100
>100
Bankfull Mean Depth
0.6
0.6
0.5
0.7
0.8
0.8
Bankfull Max Depth
1.2
1.0
1.0
1.3
1.3
1.4
Bankfull Cross-sectional Area (ft)
6.8
5.8
4.9
5.9
7.7
6.8
Width/Depth Ratio
16.5
16.4
17.6
13.8
10.8
11.6
Entrenchment Ratio'
9.4+
10.3+
10.8+
11.1+
11.0+
11.3+
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.1
D50 (mm)
37.2
13.5
45.0
43.8
30.8
25.2
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
4
20
4
26
3
28
4
27
3
28
7
45
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
0.0145
0.0454
0.0017
0.0845
0.0026
0.0750
0.0010
0.0834
0.0049
0.0758
0.0039
1
0.0351
Pool Length (ft)
21
53
9
1
44
16
1
49
10
48
12
47
12
35
Pool Max Depth (ft)
3.5
3.2
3.4
2.9
3.1
2.4
Pool Spacing (ft)
25
54
16
88
21
66
17
55
16
67
22
72
Pool Volume (fe)
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
3
22
Radius of Curvature (ft)
7
58
Rc:Bankfull Width (ft/ft)
0.7
5.5
Meander Wave Length (ft)
43
80
Meander Width Ratio
4.1
7.5
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
C4
C4
C4
C4
C4
C4
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
536
536
536
536
536
536
Sinuosity (ft)
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)
0.0144
0.0134
0.0137
0.0137
0.0125
1
0.0134
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
0.0146
0.0135
0.0148
0.0122
0.0136
0.0121
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%
IMIii
III MENZIES 23
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be%
1111
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/d100
SC'0.1/17.1/70.9/256/362
SC/0.1/18/78.1/143.4/362
SC/0.13/24.7/128.0/214.7/256
SC/0.16/6.3/82.6/180/512
SC/3.82/15.0/98.37/192.5/362.0
SC/8.90/18.8/43.8/107.3/256.0
%of Reach with Eroding Banks
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
'Entrenchment Ratio is the flood prone width divided by the bankfull width.
2Bank Height Ratio is the bank height divided by the max depth of the bankfull channel.

Table 12f. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Southeast Branch - Reach 2b
'Entrenchment Ratio is the flood prone width divided by the bankfull width.
2Bank Height Ratio is the bank height divided by the max depth of the bankfull channel.
As-Built/Baseline
Min
Max
��Y-ir
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle
Bankfull Width (ft)
10.6
9.7
9.3
9.0
9.1
8.9
Floodprone Width (ft)
>100
>100
>100
>100
>100
>100
Bankfull Mean Depth
0.6
0.6
0.5
0.7
0.8
0.8
Bankfull Max Depth
1.2
1.0
1.0
1.3
1.3
1.4
Bankfull Cross-sectional Area (ft)
6.8
5.8
4.9
5.9
7.7
6.8
Width/Depth Ratio
16.5
16.4
17.6
13.8
10.8
11.6
Entrenchment Ratio'
9.4+
10.3+
10.8+
11.1+
11.0+
11.3+
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.1
D50 (mm)
37.2
13.5
45.0
43.8
30.8
25.2
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
11
36
14
36
12
31
12
41
13
37
15
34
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
0.0119
0.0606
0.0017
1
0.0520
0.0073
1
0.0580
0.0021
1
0.0494
0.0164
0.0866
0.0054
1
0.0626
Pool Length (ft)
27
45
27
1
44
28
45
28
46
30
55 1
27
43
Pool Max Depth (ft)
3.5
3.2
2.7
2.7
3.1
1.9
Pool Spacing (ft)
Pool Volume (ft3)
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
Radius of Curvature (ft)
Rc:Bankfull Width (ft/ft)
Meander Wave Length (ft)
Meander Width Ratio
Additional Reach Parameters
34
12
21
88
N/A
1
N/A
73
22
25
88
33
60
29
55
43
58
41
57
46
60
Rosgen Classification
C4
C4
C4
C4
C4
C4
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
195
195
195
195
195
195
Sinuosity (ft)
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)
0.0160
0.0085
0.0092
0.0124
0.0086
0.0224
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
0.0168
0.0092
0.0081
0.0122
0.0055
0.0111
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be%
d16/c135/cI5O/cI84/d95/d100
SC/0.1/17.1/70.9/256/362
SC/0.1/18/78.1/143.4/362
SC/0.13/24.7/128.0/214.7/256
SC/0.16/6.3/82.6/180/512
SC/3.82/15.0/98.37/192.5/362.0
SC/8.90/18.8/43.8/107.3/256.0
%of Reach with Eroding Banks
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
'Entrenchment Ratio is the flood prone width divided by the bankfull width.
2Bank Height Ratio is the bank height divided by the max depth of the bankfull channel.

Longitudinal Profile Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Byrds Creek Reach 2
580
578
576
574
572
v 570
c
O
j 568
w
566
564
562
560
1600 1700 1800
1900 2000 2100
2200 2300
2400 2500 2600
♦ ♦
--------------------------------------------------------
------------------------
_________
N
X X X
�
� TW (MVO -9/2013)
X X
t TW (MV2-3/2015)
TW (MV3-3/2016) t 7W (MV4-5/2017)
1900 2000 2100
2200 2300
2400 2500 2600
2700 2800 2900 3000 3100 3200 3300
Station (feet)
� TW (MVO -9/2013)
t TW (MVI -4/2014)
t TW (MV2-3/2015)
TW (MV3-3/2016) t 7W (MV4-5/2017)
� TW (MV5-6/2018)
------- WS (MV5-6/2018)
• BKF(MV5-6/2018)
0 STRUCTURES (MVS -6/2018)

Longitudinal Profile Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Byrds Creek Reach 3
576
574
572
570
568
v
a, 566
c
0
w 564
562
560
558
556
3250
3350 3450 3550 3650 3750 3850 3950 4050 4150 4250 4350 4450 4550 4650 4750
Station (feet)
TW (MYO 9/2013) - TW (MY1 4/2014) � TW (MY2-3/2015) TW (MY3-3/2016) TW (MY4-5/2017)
TW (MY56/2018)-------WS(MY5-6/2018) ♦ BKF(MY5-6/2018) • STRUMRBS(MY5-6/2018)
` -------------
X
v
310tlllif:� ------- --------- -
--------
X p
---------
X
X
3350 3450 3550 3650 3750 3850 3950 4050 4150 4250 4350 4450 4550 4650 4750
Station (feet)
TW (MYO 9/2013) - TW (MY1 4/2014) � TW (MY2-3/2015) TW (MY3-3/2016) TW (MY4-5/2017)
TW (MY56/2018)-------WS(MY5-6/2018) ♦ BKF(MY5-6/2018) • STRUMRBS(MY5-6/2018)

Longitudinal Profile Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
South Branch Reach 1
580
578
576
574
572
d
570
C
O
568
566
564
562
560
6000
6100 6200 6300 6400 6500 6600 6700 6800 6900 7000 7100
Station (feet)
t TW (MYO-9/2013) TW (MY1-4/2014) t TW (MY2-3/2015) t TW (MY3-3/2016)
t TW (MY4-5/2017) TW (MY5-6/2018)------- WS(MY5-6/2018) ♦ BKF/TOB (MY5-6/2018)
-----
--
♦ ♦ ♦
_ ♦ ♦ ♦
♦
AL
O
X
�
X
6100 6200 6300 6400 6500 6600 6700 6800 6900 7000 7100
Station (feet)
t TW (MYO-9/2013) TW (MY1-4/2014) t TW (MY2-3/2015) t TW (MY3-3/2016)
t TW (MY4-5/2017) TW (MY5-6/2018)------- WS(MY5-6/2018) ♦ BKF/TOB (MY5-6/2018)

Longitudinal Profile Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Southeast Reach 1
590
588
586
584
582
v
c 580
0
w 578
576
574
572
570
8000
8050 8100 8150 8200 8250 8300 8350 8400 8450 8500
Station (feet)
TW (MYO-9/2013) - TW (MYl-4/2014) � TW (MY2-3/2015) TW (MY3-3/2016) TW (MY4-5/2017)
TW (MYS-6/2018)------- WS (MY5-6/2018) • BKF(MYS-6/2018) 0 STRUCTURES(MY5-6/2018)
--"------
N
ti
n
x
- -
m
ti
x
X
"- -
-
8050 8100 8150 8200 8250 8300 8350 8400 8450 8500
Station (feet)
TW (MYO-9/2013) - TW (MYl-4/2014) � TW (MY2-3/2015) TW (MY3-3/2016) TW (MY4-5/2017)
TW (MYS-6/2018)------- WS (MY5-6/2018) • BKF(MYS-6/2018) 0 STRUCTURES(MY5-6/2018)

Longitudinal Profile Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Southeast Reach 2a
580
578
576
574
w 572
v
c
570
'w
w 568
566
564
562
560
8550
8600 8650 8700 8750 8800 8850 8900 8950 9000 9050 9100 9150
Station (feet)
TW (MYO-9/2013) t TW (MY3-4/2014) t TW (MY2-3/2015) t TW (MY3-3/2016) t TW (MY4-5/2017)
TW(MYS-6/2018)------- WS(MYS-6/2018) • BKF(MYS-6/2018) • STRUCTURES(MY5-6/2018)
------
4V
A
V"!!" --A
v.n
ti ti
x
x x
8600 8650 8700 8750 8800 8850 8900 8950 9000 9050 9100 9150
Station (feet)
TW (MYO-9/2013) t TW (MY3-4/2014) t TW (MY2-3/2015) t TW (MY3-3/2016) t TW (MY4-5/2017)
TW(MYS-6/2018)------- WS(MYS-6/2018) • BKF(MYS-6/2018) • STRUCTURES(MY5-6/2018)

Longitudinal Profile Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Southeast Reach 2b
572
570
568
------------------- -
v-- -----------------
w
c
566
p �
v
w
564
562
560
558
9100 9150 9200 9250 9300 9350
Station (feet)
- TW (MYO-9/2013) TW (MYI-4/2014) TW (MY2-3/2015) - TW (MY3-3/2016) - TW (MY4-5/2017)
TW (MYS-6/2018)------- WS (MYS-6/2018) • BKF/TOB (MY5-6/2018) 0 STRUCTURES (MYS-6/2018)

Cross Section Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Cross Section 1- Byrds Creek Reach 2
16+62 Riffle
578
576
574
c
0
572
v
w
570
568
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Width (ft)
tMYO (9/2013) +MY1 (3/2014) +MY2 (3/2015) +MY3 (3/2016)
�MY4(5/2017) +MY5(6/2018) —Bankfull—FloodproneArea
Bankfull Dimensions
59.3
x -section area (ft.sq.)
37.9
width (ft)
1.6
mean depth (ft)
3.1
max depth (ft)
39.1
wetted parimeter(ft)
1.5
hyd radi (ft)
24.3
width -depth ratio
150.0
W flood prone area (ft)
4.0
entrenchment ratio
0.9
low bank height ratio
Survey Date: 6/2018
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream

Cross Section Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Cross Section 2 - Byrds Creek Reach 2
19+69 Pool
578
576
574
0
v
w 572
570
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Width (ft)
tMYO (9/2013) tMY1 (3/2014) +MY2 (3/2015) +MY3 (3/2016) tMY4 (5/2017) tMY5 (6/2018) —Bankfull
Bankfull Dimensions
80.3
x -section area (ft.sq.)
41.0
width (ft)
2.0
mean depth (ft)
4.4
max depth (ft)
43.0
wetted parimeter(ft)
1.9
hyd radi (ft)
20.9
width -depth ratio
Survey Date: 6/2018
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream

Cross Section Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Cross Section 3 - Byrds Creek Reach 2
20+85 Riffle
578
576
c
4 574
v
572
570
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Width (ft)
tMYO (9/2013) 4 MY1 (3/2014) +MY2 (3/2015) +MY3 (3/2016)
�MY4(5/2017) +MY5(6/2018) —Bankfull—FloodproneArea
Bankfull Dimensions
56.2
x -section area (ft.sq.)
27.3
width (ft)
2.1
mean depth (ft)
3.7
max depth (ft)
29.3
wetted parimeter(ft)
1.9
hyd radi (ft)
13.3
width -depth ratio
150.0
W flood prone area (ft)
5.5
entrenchment ratio
0.9
low bank height ratio
Survey Date: 6/2018
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream

Cross Section Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Cross Section 4 - Byrds Creek Reach 2
Bankfull Dimensions
88.7
x -section area (ft.sq.)
39.8
width (ft)
2.2
mean depth (ft)
3.6
max depth (ft)
50.8
wetted parimeter(ft)
1.7
hyd radi (ft)
17.9
width -depth ratio
150.0
W flood prone area (ft)
3.8
entrenchment ratio
0.9
low bank height ratio
Survey Date: 6/2018
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream

Cross Section Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Cross Section 5 - Byrds Creek Reach 2
III MINE I
Bankfull Dimensions
84.3
x -section area (ft.sq.)
36.5
width (ft)
2.3
mean depth (ft)
4.5
max depth (ft)
39.0
wetted parimeter(ft)
2.2
hyd radi (ft)
15.8
width -depth ratio
Survey Date: 6/2018
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream

Cross Section Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Cross Section 6 - Byrds Creek Reach 3
I.w�lll��_101
Bankfull Dimensions
47.5
x -section area (ft.sq.)
30.4
width (ft)
1.6
mean depth (ft)
3.1
max depth (ft)
32.1
wetted parimeter(ft)
1.5
hyd radi (ft)
19.5
width -depth ratio
Survey Date:
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream

Cross Section Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Cross Section 7 - Byrds Creek Reach 3
-------------- iiiil
YYlll�llv��lll ����IlYllllll
Bankfull Dimensions
31.0
x -section area (ft.sq.)
24.2
width (ft)
1.3
mean depth (ft)
2.3
max depth (ft)
25.1
wetted parimeter(ft)
1.2
hyd radi (ft)
18.8
width -depth ratio
150.0
W flood prone area (ft)
6.2
entrenchment ratio
1.0
low bank height ratio
Survey Date: 6/2018
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream

Cross Section Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Cross Section 8 - Byrds Creek Reach 3
46+25 Riffle
568
566
c
0
w 564
562
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Width (ft)
tMYO (9/2013) 4 MY1 (3/2014) +MY2 (3/2015) tMY3 (3/2016)
�MY4(5/2017) +MY5(6/2018) —Bankfull—FloodproneArea
Bankfull Dimensions
20.5
x -section area (ft.sq.)
18.1
width (ft)
1.1
mean depth (ft)
2.1
max depth (ft)
18.8
wetted parimeter(ft)
1.1
hyd radi (ft)
16.0
width -depth ratio
150.0
W flood prone area (ft)
8.3
entrenchment ratio
1.1
low bank height ratio
Survey Date: 6/2018
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream

Cross Section Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Cross Section 9 - Byrds Creek Reach 3
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Width (ft)
tMYO (9/2013) +MY1 (3/2014) 1 MY2 (3/2015) +MY3 (3/2016) tMY4 (5/2017) tMY5 (6/2018) -Bankfull
Bankfull Dimensions
69.6
x -section area (ft.sq.)
35.6
width (ft)
2.0
mean depth (ft)
3.7
max depth (ft)
37.2
wetted parimeter(ft)
1.9
hyd radi (ft)
18.2
width -depth ratio
Survey Date: 6/2018
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream

Cross Section Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Cross Section 10 - South Branch Reach 1
65+41 Riffle
574
572
F mob"
0
w 570
568
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Width (ft)
+MYO (9/2013) 4 MY1 (4/2014) +MY2 (3/2015) +MY3 (3/2016)
�MY4(5/2017) tMY5(6/2018) —Bankfull—FloodproneArea
Bankfull Dimensions
6.5
x -section area (ft.sq.)
10.5
width (ft)
0.6
mean depth (ft)
1.6
max depth (ft)
11.6
wetted parimeter(ft)
0.6
hyd radi (ft)
17.1
width -depth ratio
100.0
W flood prone area (ft)
9.5
entrenchment ratio
1.0
low bank height ratio
Survey Date: 6/2018
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream

Cross Section Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Cross Section 11- South Branch Reach 1
65+54 Pool
574
572
c
0
w 570
568
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Width (ft)
tMYO (9/2013) tMY1 (4/2014) 1 MY2 (3/2015) +MY3 (3/2016) tMY4 (5/2017) tMY5 (6/2018) -Bankfull
Bankfull Dimensions
11.6
x -section area (ft.sq.)
9.5
width (ft)
1.2
mean depth (ft)
2.2
max depth (ft)
11.0
wetted parimeter(ft)
1.1
hyd radi (ft)
7.8
width -depth ratio
Survey Date: 6/2018
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream

Cross Section Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Cross Section 12 - Southeast Reach 1
82+39 Riffle
582
not
580
0
v
578
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Width (ft)
+MYO (9/2013) 4 MY1 (4/2014) 4 MY2 (3/2015) +MY3 (3/2016)
�MY4(5/2017) tMY5(6/2018) —Bankfull—FloodproneArea
Bankfull Dimensions
6.7
x -section area (ft.sq.)
8.1
width (ft)
0.8
mean depth (ft)
1.4
max depth (ft)
8.7
wetted parimeter(ft)
0.8
hyd radi (ft)
9.8
width -depth ratio
75.0
W flood prone area (ft)
9.2
entrenchment ratio
1.1
low bank height ratio
Survey Date: 6/2018
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream

Cross Section Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Cross Section 13 - Southeast Reach 1
82+54 Pool
584
582
ME mpg on W=
0
s8a
v
w 578 77
576
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Width (ft)
tMYO (9/2013) $ MY1 (4/2014) +MY2 (3/2015) tMY3 (3/2016) tMY4 (5/2017) tMY5 (6/2018) —Bankfull
Bankfull Dimensions
15.3
x -section area (ft.sq.)
10.1
width (ft)
1.5
mean depth (ft)
2.9
max depth (ft)
11.8
wetted parimeter(ft)
1.3
hyd radi (ft)
6.6
width -depth ratio
Survey Date: 6/2018
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream

Cross Section Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Cross Section 14 - Southeast Reach 2
88+10 Pool
578
576
574
c
0
572
v
w
570
568
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Width (ft)
+MYO (9/2013) tMY1 (4/2014) 1 MY2 (3/2015) +MY3 (3/2016) tMY4 (5/2017) tMY5 (6/2018) -Bankfull
Bankfull Dimensions
28.0
x -section area (ft.sq.)
18.7
width (ft)
1.5
mean depth (ft)
3.0
max depth (ft)
20.5
wetted parimeter(ft)
1.4
hyd radi (ft)
12.4
width -depth ratio
Survey Date: 6/2018
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream

Cross Section Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Cross Section 15 - Southeast Reach 2
88+35 Riffle
576
574
c
0
w 572 7
570 1 ' I I I i
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Width (ft)
+MYO (9/2013) 4 MY1 (4/2014) +MY2 (3/2015) +MY3 (3/2016)
�MY4(5/2017) tMY5(6/2018) —Bankfull—FloodproneArea
Bankfull Dimensions
6.8
x -section area (ft.sq.)
8.9
width (ft)
0.8
mean depth (ft)
1.4
max depth (ft)
9.8
wetted parimeter(ft)
0.7
hyd radi (ft)
11.6
width -depth ratio
100.0
W flood prone area (ft)
11.3
entrenchment ratio
1.1
low bank height ratio
Survey Date: 6/2018
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream

Reachwide and Cross Section Pebble Count Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Project
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Byrds Creek R2, Reachwide
Particle Class
Diameter (mm)
min max
Particle Count
Riffle Pool Total
each Summary
Class Percent
Percentage Cumulative
0.86
Silt/Clay
0.000
0.062
49.8
2
2
2
2
D300 =
Very fine
Fine
Medium
Coarse
Very Coarse
0.062
0.125
0.25
0.5
1.0
0.125
0.250
0.50
1.0
2.0
2
6
1
6
7
8
1
6
9
14
1
6
9
14
2
3
9
18
32
Very Fine
2.0
2.8
1
7
8
8
40
Very Fine
2.8
4.0
1
1
1
41
70
Fine
4.0
5.6
w
3 50
41
L-
w
Fine
5.6
8.0
a
E
41
Medium
8.0
11.0
1
1
1
42
Medium
11.0
16.0
1
1
1
43
Coarse
16.0
22.6
3
1
4
4
47
Coarse
22.6
32
20
10
0011,
47
Very Coarse
32
45
1
1
1
48
Very Coarse
45
64
4
3
7
7
55
Particle Class Size (mm)
Small
64
90
7
5
12
12
67
Small
90
128
15
4
19
19
86
Large
128
180
8
4
12
12
98
Large
180
256
2
2
2
100
Small
256
362
100
Small
362
512
100
€
Medium
512
1024
100
e
Large/Very Large
1024
2048
100
Bedrock
2048
>2048
100
Total
50
50
100
100
100
Byrds Creek R2, Reachwide
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
Reachwide
Channel materials (mm)
D16 =
0.86
D35 =
2.27
D50 =
49.8
Ds4 =
123.3
D95 =
165.3
D300 =
256.0
Byrds Creek R2, Reachwide
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
100
90
Silt/Clay a avel
Individual Class Percent
100
ble
er
gp
90
a ro
0 70
60
70
w
3 50
L-
w
60
a
E
N
50
U= 40
u
40
w 30
Ta
3
30
aw 20
a
20
10
0011,
E
10
0
Oe4ry It, o ih Oy
0
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Class Size (mm)
Byrds Creek 112, Reachwide
Individual Class Percent
100
90
80
70
w
L-
w
60
a
N
50
u
40
Ta
3
30
a
20
E
10
0
Oe4ry It, o ih Oy
S It, ,y� b 5� 0 1ti tid �,L�o ,5'L ph rod` �� yyw ye0 ,yy6 "V yyti 1e tie"$ e6
Particle Class Size (mm)

Reachwide and Cross Section Pebble Count Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Project
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Byrds Creek R2, Cross Section 1
Particle Class
Diameter (mm)
min max
Riffle 100-
Count
Summary
Class Percent
Percentage Cumulative
5.89
Silt/Clay
Very fine
Fine
Medium
Coarse
Very Coarse
0.000
0.062
0.125
0.25
0.5
1.0
0.062
0.125
0.250
0.50
1.0
2.0
1
1
1
5
1
1
1
5
1
1
2
3
8
8
D95 =
Very Fine
2.0
2.8
1
1
9
Very Fine
2.8
4.0
3
3
12
80
Fine
4.0
5.6
3
3
15
Fine
5.6
8.0
7
7
22
C
Medium
8.0
11.0
11
11
33
Medium
11.0
16.0
16
16
49
Coarse
16.0
22.6
9
9
58
50
Coarse
22.6
32
8
8
66
Very Coarse
32
45
8
8
74
Very Coarse
45
64
11
11
85
Small
64
90
9
9
94
Small
90
128
5
5
99
Large
128
180
1
1
100
.Mroa2/-
Large
180
256
100
Small
256
362
100
ii iii
Small
362
512
100
- --- ----_�
Medium
512
1024
100
Large/Very Large
1024
2048
100
Bedrock
2048
>2048
100
Totall
100
1 100
1 100
100
90
80
70
a 60
-23 50
E
�? 40
d
30
U
a 20
10
Byrds Creek R2, Cross Section 1
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Class Size (mm)
Mrouv�o.3 � Mrs-0a2o24 � Mn-03no25 � Mr3u3no.e � Mr4-0sao.� � Mrs-0,ao..
Cross Section 1
Channel materials (mm)
D1fi=
5.89
Di5 =
11.53
D50 =
16.6
D84 =
62.0
D95 =
96.6
D100 =
180.0
100
90
80
70
a 60
-23 50
E
�? 40
d
30
U
a 20
10
Byrds Creek R2, Cross Section 1
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Class Size (mm)
Mrouv�o.3 � Mrs-0a2o24 � Mn-03no25 � Mr3u3no.e � Mr4-0sao.� � Mrs-0,ao..
Byrds Creek R2, Cross Section 1
Individual Class Percent
100
90
80
C
70
a
u
iu
60
a
vI
50
m
u
40
m
3
30
v
20
10
' -
0
00ti ytih by Oh
'r 'L ,L� P yrO 0 yti y0 ,yt� ,,,'L by 6b 0o titi0 4' y0 ,yA a0 90
ti ti 3 e do yo �o
.Mroa2/-
Particle Class Size (mm)
.M-4/2014 .-3no1s .MY3o312016 -6/2- .Mrs -07r2-

Reachwide and Cross Section Pebble Count Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Project
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Byrds Creek R2, Cross Section 3
Particle Class
Diameter (mm)
min max
Riffle 100-
Count
Summary
Class Percent
Percentage Cumulative
6.01
Silt/Clay
Very fine
Fine
Medium
Coarse
Very Coarse
0.000
0.062
0.125
0.25
0.5
1.0
0.062
0.125
0.250
0.50
1.0
2.0
2
5
2
5
0
0
0
2
7
7
D95 =
Very Fine
2.0
2.8
3
3
10
Very Fine
2.8
4.0
10
80
Fine
4.0
5.6
5
5
15
Fine
5.6
8.0
5
5
20
C
Medium
8.0
11.0
12
12
32
Medium
11.0
16.0
12
12
44
Coarse
16.0
22.6
6
6
50
50
Coarse
22.6
32
9
9
59
Very Coarse
32
45
12
12
71
Very Coarse
45
64
14
14
85
Small
64
90
7
7
92
Small
90
128
6
6
98
Large
128
180
2
2
100
.Mroa2/2 3
La rge
180
256
100
Small
256
362
100
ii iii
Small
362
512
100
- --- ----_�
Medium
512
1024
100
Large/Very Large
1024
2048
100
Bedrock
2048
>2048
100
Totall
100
1 100
1 100
100
90
80
70
a 60
-23 50
E
�? 40
d
30
U
a 20
10
Byrds Creek R2, Cross Section 3
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
0 i I I,
-arm-�f F-�-"'r
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Class Size (mm)
Mro-0u2o.3 � Mrs-0a3o24 � Mrz-03no25 � Mr3u3no.e � Mr4-0sao.� � Mrs-0,ao..
Cross Section 3
Channel materials (mm)
D1fi=
6.01
Di5 =
12.08
D50 =
22.6
D84 =
62.4
D95 =
107.3
D100 =
180.0
100
90
80
70
a 60
-23 50
E
�? 40
d
30
U
a 20
10
Byrds Creek R2, Cross Section 3
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
0 i I I,
-arm-�f F-�-"'r
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Class Size (mm)
Mro-0u2o.3 � Mrs-0a3o24 � Mrz-03no25 � Mr3u3no.e � Mr4-0sao.� � Mrs-0,ao..
Byrds Creek R2, Cross Section 3
Individual Class Percent
100
90
80
C
70
a
u
iu
60
a
vI
50
M
u
40
m
3
30
v
20
10
0
-.Lj.iL,I11.L1MWMEuLA
00ti ytih by Oh
'u.
r 6b 0o ti ti ti p 0o y0 ,yA a0 90
3 e 10 ,yo �o
.Mroa2/2 3
Particle Class Size (mm)
.M-4/2014 .-3no1s .MY3o312016 -6/2- .Mrs -03r2-

Reachwide and Cross Section Pebble Count Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Project
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Byrds Creek R2, Cross Section 4
Particle Class
Diameter (mm)
min max
Riffle 100-
Count
Summary
Class Percent
Percentage Cumulative
1.51
Silt/Clay
Very fine
Fine
Medium
Coarse
Very Coarse
0.000
0.062
0.125
0.25
0.5
1.0
0.062
0.125
0.250
0.50
1.0
2.0
2
1
3
17
2
1
3
17
2
2
2
3
6
23
D95 =
Very Fine
2.0
2.8
2
2
25
Very Fine
2.8
4.0
1
1
26
80
Fine
4.0
5.6
4
4
30
Fine
5.6
8.0
3
3
33
C
Medium
8.0
11.0
2
2
35
Medium
11.0
16.0
60
35
a 60
Coarse
16.0
22.6
35
50
Coarse
22.6
32
1
1
36
Very Coarse
32
45
2
2
38
Very Coarse
45
64
12
12
50
Small
64
90
22
22
71
Small
90
128
13
13
84
Large
128
180
10
10
94
La rge
180
256
5
5
99
0
Small
256
362
�O ti$ 0 0n' y'ti ,tiA a0 90
'r 'ti ,tib P yrO yti y0 ro ,,,'L by 6b CO y
ti ti ti 3 e do ,tio �o
99
Particle Class Size (mm)
.M-4/2014 .-3no1s .MY3o312016 -6/2- .Mrs-07r2-
Small
362
512
1
1
100
- --- ----_�
Medium
512
1024
100
Large/Very Large
1024
2048
100
Bedrock
2048
>2048
100
Totall
101
1 100
1 100
Byrds Creek R2, Cross Section 4
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
Cross Section 4
Channel materials (mm)
D1fi=
1.51
Di5 =
25.53
D50 =
64.5
D84 =
127.4
D95 =
192.5
D100 =
512.0
Byrds Creek R2, Cross Section 4
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
100
90
SIIVCIay
Individual Class Percent
avel
100
90
le
er
80
80
a ro
C
70
a
u
iu
60
a 60
a
vI
50
M
50
u
40
E
30
v
20
�? 40
10
cwd 30
U
0
Doti ytih by Oh
�O ti$ 0 0n' y'ti ,tiA a0 90
'r 'ti ,tib P yrO yti y0 ro ,,,'L by 6b CO y
ti ti ti 3 e do ,tio �o
.Mroa2/-
Particle Class Size (mm)
.M-4/2014 .-3no1s .MY3o312016 -6/2- .Mrs-07r2-
aw 20
10
0
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Class Size (mm)
Mro-02ao.3 � Mrs-0a2o24 � Mn-03no25 � Mr3u3no.e � Mr4-0sao.� � Mrs-0,ao..
Byrds Creek R2, Cross Section 4
Individual Class Percent
100
90
80
C
70
a
u
iu
60
a
vI
50
M
u
40
m
3
30
v
20
10
0
Doti ytih by Oh
�O ti$ 0 0n' y'ti ,tiA a0 90
'r 'ti ,tib P yrO yti y0 ro ,,,'L by 6b CO y
ti ti ti 3 e do ,tio �o
.Mroa2/-
Particle Class Size (mm)
.M-4/2014 .-3no1s .MY3o312016 -6/2- .Mrs-07r2-

Reachwide and Cross Section Pebble Count Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Project
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Byrds Creek R3, Reachwide
Particle Class
Diameter (mm)
min max
Particle Count
Riffle Pool Total
each Summary
Class Percent
Percentage Cumulative
0.91
Silt/Clay
0.000
0.062
1
6
7
7
7
D300 =
Very fine
Fine
Medium
Coarse
Very Coarse
0.062
0.125
0.25
0.5
1.0
0.125
0.250
0.50
1.0
2.0
1
1
7
1
7
14
1
2
7
21
1
2
7
21
7
8
10
17
38
Very Fine
2.0
2.8
0 70
38
Very Fine
2.8
4.0
60
38
70
Fine
4.0
5.6
w
u
3 50
38
w
Fine
5.6
8.0
1
2
3
3
41
Medium
8.0
11.0
4
1
5
5
46
Medium
11.0
16.0
5
3
8
8
54
Coarse
16.0
22.6
3
3
6
6
60
Coarse
j 22.6 j
32 j
3
j 3
6
6
66
H
Very Coarse
32
45
5
3
8
8
74
0
Very Coarse
45
64
11
3
14
14
88
Small
64
90
4
2
6
6
94
Small
90
128
2
1
3
3
97
Large
128
180
1
1
2
2
99
Large
180
256
1
1
1
100
--I„
Small
256
362
100
Small
362
512
100
€
Medium
512
1024
100
e
Large/Very Large
1024
2048
100
Bedrock
2048
>2048
100
Total
50
50
100
100
100
Byrds Creek R3, Reachwide
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
Reachwide
Channel materials (mm)
D16 =
0.91
D35 =
1.81
D50 =
13.3
Da4 =
57.9
D95 =
101.2
D300 =
256.0
Byrds Creek R3, Reachwide
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
100
90
Silt/clay
Sand avel
Individual Class Percent
100
ble
r
80
90
a ro
0 70
60
C
70
w
u
3 50
w
60
a
E
N
50
U= 40
we
u
40
w30
Ta
3
30
aw 20
a
20
101E
H
10
0
ooe'Lotily otih oy
ti ti ti$ a e� titi tie �ti� �ti ah bo �o tiyw tiwo tiy� "ti ytiti yoyo ti��$ deo
0
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Class Size (mm)
mroo�nm3 � rm.unao.a � rm�u3ao.s � mr3u3no.e � m.aow�on � m,�umma
Byrds Creek 113, Reachwide
Individual Class Percent
100
90
80
C
70
w
u
w
60
a
N
50
u
40
Ta
3
30
a
20
10
0
ooe'Lotily otih oy
ti ti ti$ a e� titi tie �ti� �ti ah bo �o tiyw tiwo tiy� "ti ytiti yoyo ti��$ deo
Particle Class Size (mm)

Reachwide and Cross Section Pebble Count Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Project
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Byrds Creek R3, Cross Section 7
Particle Class
Diameter (mm)
min max
Riffle 100-
Count
Summary
Class Percent
Percentage Cumulative
0.59
Silt/Clay
Very fine
Fine
Medium
Coarse
Very Coarse
0.000
0.062
0.125
0.25
0.5
1.0
0.062
0.125
0.250
0.50
1.0
2.0
5
3
6
8
1
5
3
6
8
1
5
5
8
14
22
23
D95 =
Very Fine
2.0
2.8
1
1
24
Very Fine
2.8
4.0
2
2
26
80
Fine
4.0
5.6
2
2
28
Fine
5.6
8.0
6
6
34
C
Medium
8.0
11.0
8
8
42
Medium
11.0
16.0
9
9
51
Coarse
16.0
22.6
7
7
58
AO
Coarse
22.6
32
4
4
62
�? 40
Very Coarse
32
45
6
6
68
Very Coarse
45
64
8
8
76
Small
64
90
16
16
92
Small
90
128
7
7
99
Large
128
180
1
1
100
La rge
180
256
00ti ytih by oy
o, o, o
00 y
'r 'L ,L� 11 yrO 0 yti 10 ,yt� 'I, by 6b 0o ti$ 0 0n' y'L ,yA a0 90
ti ti ti ti 3 e do ,yo �o
100
.Mroa2/-
Small
256
362
100
Small
362
512
100
- --- ----_�I I
Medium
512
1024
100
ii
Large/Very Large
1024
2048
100
Bedrock
2048
>2048
100
Totall
100
1 100
1 100
Byrds Creek 113, Cross Section 7
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
Cross Section 7
Channel materials (mm)
D1fi=
0.59
Di5 =
8.32
D50 =
15.3
D84 =
75.9
D95 =
104.7
D100 =
180.0
Byrds Creek 113, Cross Section 7
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
100
90
SIIUCIay
avel
100
80
90
er
a ro
70
80
60
C
70
a
u
50
iu
60
a
E
vI
AO
M
�? 40
u
40
d 30
U
m
3
30
v
at 20
20
10
0
00ti ytih by oy
o, o, o
00 y
'r 'L ,L� 11 yrO 0 yti 10 ,yt� 'I, by 6b 0o ti$ 0 0n' y'L ,yA a0 90
ti ti ti ti 3 e do ,yo �o
.Mroa2/-
Particle Class Size (mm)
.M-4/2014 .-3no1s .MY3o312016 -6/2- .Mrs-07r2-
Ht
0 -
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Class Size (mm)
Mro-02ao.3 � Mrs-0a2o24 � Mn-03no25 � Mr3u3no.e � Mr4-0sao.� � Mrs-0,ao..
Byrds Creek 1113, Cross Section 7
Individual Class Percent
100
90
80
C
70
a
u
iu
60
a
vI
50
M
u
40
m
3
30
v
20
10
0
00ti ytih by oy
o, o, o
00 y
'r 'L ,L� 11 yrO 0 yti 10 ,yt� 'I, by 6b 0o ti$ 0 0n' y'L ,yA a0 90
ti ti ti ti 3 e do ,yo �o
.Mroa2/-
Particle Class Size (mm)
.M-4/2014 .-3no1s .MY3o312016 -6/2- .Mrs-07r2-

Reachwide and Cross Section Pebble Count Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Project
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Byrds Creek R3, Cross Section 8
Particle Class
Diameter (mm)
min max
Riffle 100-
Count
Summary
Class Percent
Percentage Cumulative
8.66
Silt/Clay
Very fine
Fine
Medium
Coarse
Very Coarse
0.000
0.062
0.125
0.25
0.5
1.0
0.062
0.125
0.250
0.50
1.0
2.0
5
5
0
0
0
0
0
5
D95 =
Very Fine
2.0
2.8
90
5
Very Fine
2.8
4.0
1
1
6
80
Fine
4.0
5.6
2
2
8
Fine
5.6
8.0
5
5
13
C
Medium
8.0
11.0
12
12
25
Medium
11.0
16.0
18
18
43
Coarse
16.0
22.6
17
17
60
50
Coarse
22.6
32
13
13
73
Very Coarse
32
45
7
7
80
Very Coarse
45
64
6
6
86
Small
64
90
5
5
91
Small
90
128
7
7
98
Large
128
180
2
2
100
La rge
180
256
0
100
Small
256
362
.Mroa2/-
Particle Class Size (mm)
.MY -4/2014 .W-3no1s .MY3o312016 -6/2- .Mrs -07r2-
100
Small
362
512
100
--- ----_�
US i
Medium
512
1024
100
Large/Very Large
1024
2048
100
Bedrock
2048
>2048
100
Totall
100
1 100
1 100
100
90
80
70
60
50
E
�? 40
d
30
U
a 20
10
Byrds Creek R3, Cross Section 8
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Class Size (mm)
Mro-0u2o.3 � Mrs-0a2o24 � Mn-03no25 � Mr3u3no.e � Mr4-0sao.� � Mrs-0,ao..
Cross Section 8
Channel materials (mm)
D1fi=
8.66
Das =
13.55
D50 =
18.4
D84 =
56.9
D95 =
110.1
D100 =
180.0
100
90
80
70
60
50
E
�? 40
d
30
U
a 20
10
Byrds Creek R3, Cross Section 8
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Class Size (mm)
Mro-0u2o.3 � Mrs-0a2o24 � Mn-03no25 � Mr3u3no.e � Mr4-0sao.� � Mrs-0,ao..
Byrds Creek R3, Cross Section 8
Individual Class Percent
100
90
80
C
70
a
u
iu
60
a
vI
50
M
u
40
m
3
30
v
20
11 Ll I-
10
0
00ti ytih by Oh
'Y ti ti� P yrO 0 yti y0 ,tiro ,,,'L by 6b 00 ti0 00 0n' y'ti ,tiA
ti ti ti y0 a0 90
3 e 10 ,tio to
.Mroa2/-
Particle Class Size (mm)
.MY -4/2014 .W-3no1s .MY3o312016 -6/2- .Mrs -07r2-

Reachwide and Cross Section Pebble Count Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Project
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
South Branch, Reachwide
Particle Class
Diameter (mm)
min max
Particle Count
Riffle Pool Total
each Summary
Class Percent
Percentage Cumulative
0.15
Silt/Clay
0.000
0.062
8.7
11
11
11
11
D300 =
Very fine
Fine
Medium
Coarse
Very Coarse
0.062
0.125
0.25
0.5
1.0
0.125
0.250
0.50
1.0
2.0
2
3
4
4
2
5
2
4
4
2
7
5
4
4
2
7
5
15
19
21
28
33
Very Fine
2.0
2.8
a ro
33
0 70
Very Fine
2.8
4.0
2
2
2
35
70
Fine
4.0
5.6
2
1
3
3
38
w
Fine
5.6
8.0
4
5
9
9
47
Medium
8.0
11.0
6
5
11
11
58
Medium
11.0
16.0
2
2
4
4
62
Coarse
16.0
22.6
4
1
5
5
67
Coarse
22.6
32
6
20
6
6
73
Very Coarse
32
45
5
2
7
7
80
0
Very Coarse
45
64
7
7
7
87
Small
64
90
5
5
5
92
0
Small
90
128
2
4
6
6
98
Large
128
180
2
2
2
100
Large
180
256
100
-- - -_ - '„Small
256
362
100
Small
362
512
100
€
Medium
512
1024
100
e
Large/Very Large
1024
2048
100
Bedrock
2048
>2048
100
Total
50
50
100
100
100
South Branch, Reachwide
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
Reachwide
Channel materials (mm)
D16 =
0.15
D35 =
4.00
D50 =
8.7
Da4 =
55.0
D95 =
107.3
D300 =
180.0
South Branch, Reachwide
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
100
90
Silt/clay
Sandavel
Individual Class Percent
100
bble
r
90
80
80
a ro
0 70
70
60
w
u
w
60
3 50
a
N
50
E
u
40
U 40
Ta
3
30
w 30
-43
a
20
aw 20
10
10
0
004ry It, o ih oy
ti It, ti$ 11 yti tie �ti� �ti ah 6C` 00 ,''L' y00 ,LyO 30ti ytiti y�'Lb ti0�$ �0'
Particle Class Size (mm)
0
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Class Size (mm)
mroonm3 � rm.unao.a � rmu3ao.s � mr3u3no.e � m.aowon � m,�umma
South Branch, Reachwide
Individual Class Percent
100
90
80
70
w
u
w
60
a
N
50
u
40
Ta
3
30
a
20
10
0
004ry It, o ih oy
ti It, ti$ 11 yti tie �ti� �ti ah 6C` 00 ,''L' y00 ,LyO 30ti ytiti y�'Lb ti0�$ �0'
Particle Class Size (mm)

Reachwide and Cross Section Pebble Count Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Project
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
South Branch, Cross Section 10
Particle Class
Diameter (mm)
min max
Riffle 100-
Count
Summary
Class Percent
Percentage Cumulative
4.42
Silt/Clay
0.000
0.062
5
5
5
D95 =
Very fine
Fine
Medium
Coarse
Very Coarse
0.062
0.125
0.25
0.5
1.0
0.125
0.250
0.50
1.0
2.0
2
2
4
2
2
4
5
7
9
13
13
Very Fine
2.0
2.8
gp
13
80
Very Fine
2.8
4.0
13
Fine
4.0
5.6
10
10
23
C
Fine
5.6
8.0
12
12
35
Medium
8.0
11.0
8
8
43
Medium
11.0
16.0
5
5
48
50
Coarse
16.0
22.6
6
6
54
E
Coarse
22.6
32
14
14
68
Very Coarse
32
45
8
8
76
Very Coarse
45
64
6
6
82
Small
64
90
4
4
86
Small
90
128
10
10
96
.Mroa2/-
Large
128
180
4
4
100
La rge
180
256
100
Small
256
362
100
Small
362
512
100
- --- ----_�
Medium
512
1024
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Class Size (mm)
Mro-02ao.3 � Mrs-0a2o24 � Mn-03no25 � Mr3u3no.e � Mr4-0sao.� � Mrs-0,ao..
100
Large/Very Large
1024
2048
100
Bedrock
2048
>2048
100
Totall
100
1 100
1 100
South Branch, Cross Section 10
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
Cross Section 10
Channel materials (mm)
D16 =
4.42
Di5 =
8.00
D50 =
18.0
D84 =
75.9
D95 =
123.6
D100 =
180.0
South Branch, Cross Section 10
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
100
90
SIIVCIay
avel
100
90
le
er
gp
80
a ro
70
C
70
a
u
60
iu
60
a
50
vI
50
M
E
u
40
�? 40
m
3
30
Xp
MI
d 30
U
20
10
0
o0ti ytih by Oh
a 20
.Mroa2/-
Particle Class Size (mm)
.M-4/2014 .-3no1s .MY3o312016 -6/2- .Mrs-07r2-
10
0
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Class Size (mm)
Mro-02ao.3 � Mrs-0a2o24 � Mn-03no25 � Mr3u3no.e � Mr4-0sao.� � Mrs-0,ao..
South Branch, Cross Section 10
Individual Class Percent
100
90
80
C
70
a
u
iu
60
a
vI
50
M
u
40
m
3
30
MI
.'
20
10
0
o0ti ytih by Oh
00 ti0 0 0n' y'ti ,tiA a0 90
'r 'ti ,tib P yrO 0 yti y0 ,tiro ,,,'L by 6b 0o y
ti ti ti 3 e do ,tio �o
.Mroa2/-
Particle Class Size (mm)
.M-4/2014 .-3no1s .MY3o312016 -6/2- .Mrs-07r2-

Reachwide and Cross Section Pebble Count Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Project
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Southeast R1, Reachwide
Particle Class
Diameter (mm)
min max
Particle Count
Riffle Pool Total
each Summary
Class Percent
Percentage Cumulative
Silt/Clay
Silt/Clay
0.000
0.062
2
15
17
17
17
D300 =
Very fine
Fine
Medium
Coarse
Very Coarse
0.062
0.125
0.25
0.5
1.0
0.125
0.250
0.50
1.0
2.0
Silt/clay
1
1
3
1
1
3
1
1
3
17
17
18
19
22
Very Fine
2.0
2.8
1
1
1
23
Very Fine
2.8
4.0
2
2
2
25
80
Fine
4.0
5.6
1
1
1
26
a ro
Fine
5.6
8.0
4
4
4
30
Medium
8.0
11.0
1
5
6
6
36
Medium
11.0
16.0
3
5
8
8
44
3 50
Coarse
16.0
22.6
4
4
8
8
52
Coarse
22.6
32
6
3
9
9
61
Very Coarse
32
45
10
1
11
11
72
0
Very Coarse
45
64
8
2
10
10
82
w 30
Small
64
90
13
1
14
14
96
Small
90
128
2
1
3
3
99
Large
128
180
99
Large
180
256
1
1
1
100
10
Small
256
362
100
ii.Small
362
512
100
€
Medium
512
1024
0
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
100
il�e
Large/Very Large
1024
2048
100
Bedrock
2048
>2048
100
Total
50
50
100
100
100
Reachwide
Channel materials (mm)
D16 =
Silt/Clay
D35 =
10.43
D50 =
20.7
Ds4 =
67.2
D95 =
87.8
D300 =
256.0
Southeast R1, Reachwide
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
100
Individual Class Percent
100
90
Silt/clay
Sand
avel
90
80
bble
r
C
80
w
u
a ro
60
0 70
a
N
50
60
u
40
3 50
Ta
3
30
M
E
20
C
�? 40
0
ooe'Lotily otih oy
ti v ti$ a e� � titi tie �ti� �ti ah bo` �o tiyw tiwo tiy� 3�ti ytitiyoyo<�o�ro deo
Particle Class Size (mm)
w 30
IL 20
10
0
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Class Size (mm)
mroo�nm3 � rm.unao.a � rm�u3ao.s � mr3u3no.e � m.aow�on � m,�umma
Southeast R1, Reachwide
Individual Class Percent
100
90
80
C
70
w
u
w
60
a
N
50
u
40
Ta
3
30
M
20
C
10
0
ooe'Lotily otih oy
ti v ti$ a e� � titi tie �ti� �ti ah bo` �o tiyw tiwo tiy� 3�ti ytitiyoyo<�o�ro deo
Particle Class Size (mm)

Reachwide and Cross Section Pebble Count Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Project
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Southeast 111, Cross Section 12
Particle Class
Diameter (mm)
min max
Riffle 100-
Count
Summary
Class Percent
Percentage Cumulative
1.26
Silt/Clay
Very fine
Fine
Medium
Coarse
Very Coarse
0.000
0.062
0.125
0.25
0.5
1.0
0.062
0.125
0.250
0.50
1.0
2.0
8
3
1
1
9
8
3
1
1
9
8
8
11
12
13
22
D95 =
Very Fine
2.0
2.8
1
1
23
Very Fine
2.8
4.0
4
4
27
er
Fine
4.0
5.6
11
11
38
Fine
5.6
8.0
8
8
46
C
Medium
8.0
11.0
9
9
55
Medium
11.0
16.0
7
7
62
Coarse
1 16.0
22.6
4
4
66
50
Coarse
22.6
32
5
5
71
Very Coarse
32
45
4
4
75
Very Coarse
45
64
7
7
82
Small
64
90
5
5
87
Small
90
128
9
9
96
Large
128
180
2
2
98
10
La rge
180
256
2
2
100
Small
256
362
d 30
U
100
Small
362
512
.Mroa2/-
Particle Class Size (mm)
.M-4/2014 .-3no1s .MY3o312016 -6/2- .Mrs-07r2-
100
- --- ----_�
Medium
512
1024
aw 20
100
Large/Very Large
1024
2048
100
Bedrock
2048
>2048
10
100
Totall
100
1 100
1 100
Southeast R1, Cross Section 12
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
Cross Section 12
Channel materials (mm)
D16 =
1.26
Di5 =
5.11
D50 =
9.2
D84 =
73.4
D95 =
123.1
D100 =
256.0
Southeast R1, Cross Section 12
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
100
90
SIIUCIaySandavel
Individual Class Percent
100
90
le
er
gp
C
a ro
70
a
u
iu
60
a
60
vI
50
m
u
40
50
m
3
30
M
E
.'
20
�? 40
10
0
d 30
U
00ti ytih by Oh
'r 'L ,L� P yrO 0 yti y0 ,yt� ,,,'L by 00 y6b 0o ti0 0 0n' y'L ,yA a0 90
ti ti ti 3 e do ,yo �o
.Mroa2/-
Particle Class Size (mm)
.M-4/2014 .-3no1s .MY3o312016 -6/2- .Mrs-07r2-
aw 20
10
0
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Class Size (mm)
Mro-02ao.3 � Mrs-0a2o24 � Mn-03no25 � Mr3u3no.e � Mr4-0sao.� � Mrs-0,ao..
Southeast Rl, Cross Section 12
Individual Class Percent
100
90
80
C
70
a
u
iu
60
a
vI
50
m
u
40
m
3
30
M
.'
20
10
0
00ti ytih by Oh
'r 'L ,L� P yrO 0 yti y0 ,yt� ,,,'L by 00 y6b 0o ti0 0 0n' y'L ,yA a0 90
ti ti ti 3 e do ,yo �o
.Mroa2/-
Particle Class Size (mm)
.M-4/2014 .-3no1s .MY3o312016 -6/2- .Mrs-07r2-

Reachwide and Cross Section Pebble Count Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Project
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Southeast R2&3, Reachwide
Particle Class
Diameter (mm)
min max
Particle Count
Riffle Pool Total
each Summary
Class Percent
Percentage Cumulative
Silt/Clay
Silt/Clay
0.000
0.062
4
14
18
18
18
D300 =
Very fine
Fine
Medium
Coarse
Very Coarse
0.062
0.125
0.25
0.5
1.0
0.125
0.250
0.50
1.0
2.0
1
1
2
1
3
2
5
2
3
3
7
2
3
3
7
18
20
23
26
33
Very Fine
2.0
2.8
le
33
Very Fine
2.8
4.0
33
70
Fine
4.0
5.6
0 70
33
L-
w
Fine
5.6
8.0
1
1
1
34
Medium
8.0
11.0
2
1
3
3
37
Medium
11.0
16.0
3
2
5
5
42
Coarse
16.0
22.6
10
7
17
17
59
Coarse
22.6
32
8
5
13
13
72
w 30
Very Coarse
32
45
9
4
13
13
85
Very Coarse
45
64
6
6
6
91
Small
64
90
1
1
1
92
Small
90
128
2
4
6
6
98
Large
128
180
1
1
1
99
Large
180
256
1
0
1
1
100
--I„
Small
256
362
100
Small
362
512
100
€
Medium
512
1024
100
e
Large/Very Large
1024
2048
100
Bedrock
2048
>2048
100
Total
50
50
100
100
100
Reachwide
Channel materials (mm)
D16 =
Silt/Clay
D35 =
8.90
D50 =
18.8
Da4 =
43.8
D95 =
107.3
D300 =
256.0
Southeast R2&3, Reachwide
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
100
Individual Class Percent
100
90
Silt/clay
Sandavel
90
80
le
r
80
C
70
a ro
0 70
L-
w
60
60
N
50
3 50
u
40
E
Ta
3
30
U= 40
20
w 30
10
aw 20
0
ooe' It, otih oy
ti It, ti$ a e� titi tie �ti� �ti ah bo Co tiyw tiwo tiy� 3�ti ytiti yoyo �o"I deo
Particle Class Size (mm)
10
0
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Class Size (mm)
—1/1 3 rm /2— --1/2— --1/1 a --1/1— m,�umma
Southeast R2&3, Reachwide
Individual Class Percent
100
90
80
C
70
w
L-
w
60
a
N
50
u
40
Ta
3
30
a
20
10
0
ooe' It, otih oy
ti It, ti$ a e� titi tie �ti� �ti ah bo Co tiyw tiwo tiy� 3�ti ytiti yoyo �o"I deo
Particle Class Size (mm)

Reachwide and Cross Section Pebble Count Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Project
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Southeast R2&3, Cross Section 15
Particle Class
Diameter (mm)
min max
Riffle 100-
Count
Summary
Class Percent
Percentage Cumulative
4.73
Silt/Clay
Very fine
Fine
Medium
Coarse
Very Coarse
0.000
0.062
0.125
0.25
0.5
1.0
0.062
0.125
0.250
0.50
1.0
2.0
10
2
1
10
2
1
10
10
12
12
13
13
D95 =
Very Fine
2.0
2.8
90
13
Very Fine
2.8
4.0
2
2
15
80
Fine
4.0
5.6
2
2
17
Fine
5.6
8.0
7
7
24
C
Medium
8.0
11.0
7
7
31
Medium
11.0
16.0
5
5
36
Coarse
16.0
22.6
10
10
46
50
Coarse
22.6
32
13
13
59
Very Coarse
32
45
15
15
74
Very Coarse
45
64
9
9
83
Small
64
90
13
13
96
Small
90
128
4
4
100
Large
128
180
100
10
La rge
180
256
100
'r 'L ,L� P 5� 0 yti y0 ,tit0 ,'L by o, 00 ,14b 00 y0 0n' y'L ,yA a0 90
ti ti ti ti 3 e 10 ,yo to
Small
256
362
100
Small
362
512
100
--- ----_�
US i
Medium
512
1024
100
Large/Very Large
1024
2048
100
Bedrock
2048
>2048
100
Totall
100
1 100
1 100
100
90
80
70
a 60
-23 50
E
�? 40
d
30
U
a 20
10
Southeast R2&3, Cross Section 15
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
0 i I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I I
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Class Size (mm)
Mro-0u2o.3 M.2-0a2o24 --1/125 --1/2 a -Mr In- -Mrs-0,n-
Cross Section 15
Channel materials (mm)
D16 =
4.73
Di5 =
14.84
D50 =
25.2
D84 =
65.7
D95 =
87.7
D100 =
128.0
100
90
80
70
a 60
-23 50
E
�? 40
d
30
U
a 20
10
Southeast R2&3, Cross Section 15
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
0 i I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I I
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Class Size (mm)
Mro-0u2o.3 M.2-0a2o24 --1/125 --1/2 a -Mr In- -Mrs-0,n-
Southeast R2&3, Cross Section 15
Individual Class Percent
100
90
80
C
70
a
u
iu
60
a
vI
50
M
u
40
m
3
30
MI
.'
20
10
0
00ti ytih by Oh
'r 'L ,L� P 5� 0 yti y0 ,tit0 ,'L by o, 00 ,14b 00 y0 0n' y'L ,yA a0 90
ti ti ti ti 3 e 10 ,yo to
.M.oa2/2 3
Particle Class Size (mm)
.M-4/2014 .-3no1: .MY3o312016 -6/2- .Mrs -07r2-

APPENDIX 5. Hydrology Summary Data and Plots

Table 13. Verification of Bankfull Events
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Reach
Date of Data Date of
Collection Occurrence
Method
Byrds Creek
5/16/2018 4/16/2018
Crest Gage/
Pressure
Transducer
11/20/2018 5/17/2018
11/20/2018 8/2/2018
11/20/2018 9/17/2018*
11/20/2018 11/13/2018
South Branch
11/20/2018 9/17/2018*
11/20/2018 11/13/2018
Southeast Branch
11/20/2018 9/17/2018*
11/20/2018 11/13/2018
*Bankfull flow attributed to Hurricane Florence