20120747 Ver 1_Year 5 Monitoring Report FINAL_20190318

MONITORING YEAR 5
ANNUAL REPORT
FINAL
DEVIL'S RACETRACK MITIGATION SITE
Johnston County, NC
NCDEQ Contract 003989
DMS Project Number 95021
USACE Action ID Number 2012-00810
NCDWR Project Number 12-0747
Data Collection Period: March - November 2018
Draft Submission Date: January 24, 2019
Final Submission Date: March 18, 2019
PREPARED FOR:
INC Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Mitigation Services
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1652

PREPARED BY:
rwk
WILDLANDS
ENGINEERING
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
312 West Millbrook Road, Suite 225
Raleigh, NC 27609
Jason Lorch
[e-mail]
Phone: [phone]
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 5 Annual Report — FINAL

WILDLANDS
E N G I N E E R I N G
March 18, 2019
Jeff Schaffer
N.C. Division of Mitigation Services
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1652
RE: Monitoring Year 5 Report for Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (95021)
Neuse River Basin — CU# 03020201
Johnston County, North Carolina
Contract No. 003989
Dear Mr. Schaffer,
We have reviewed the comments on the Monitoring Year 5 Report for the above referenced project
dated February 26, 2019 and have revised the report based on these comments. The revised documents
are submitted with this letter. Below are responses to each of your comments. For your convenience,
the comments are reprinted with our response in italics.
1) Section 1.2.6, 3rd paragraph, page 1-5: Report states that six monitoring wells had a hydroperiod
greater than 5% that did not meet success. Since there are a total of 35 wells, with 27 meeting
success and 3 below 5%, DMS believes the count should be 5 wells with a hydroperiod greater than
5% that did not meet success. Please correct.
This section was updated to state that 5 groundwater wells had a hydroperiod greater than 5% that
did not meet success criteria.
2) Appendix 1, Table 1:
a) Given the complexity of the asset history on this project, please provide a table behind table 1
that documents any changes that have occurred since the Mitigation Plan and As -Built phases
with reasons for those changes.
Table 1A was added to document changes in credits that have occurred since the Mitigation Plan
was approved.
b) Please be certain that the stationing, quantities, and assets displayed in the asset table are fully
current and correct in light of all of the asset changes that have occurred and please provide the
GIS features that are accurately segmented and match quantities in the table. The shapefiles
from earlier in the project history do not appear to be correct. An example is the shapefile
called final_alignment_updated.shp.
The asset table has been verified and is current based on all the asset changes that have
occurred. GIS files that match the quantities in Table 1 have been attached.
W Wildlands Engineering, Inc. (P) 919.851.9986 • 312 West Millbrook Road, Suite 225 • Raleigh, NC 27609

WILDLANDS
ENGINEERING
If you have any questions, please contact me by phone [phone], or by email
([e-mail]).
Sincerely,
Jason Lorch, Monitoring Coordinator
WWildlands Engineering, Inc. (P) 919.851.9986 • 312 West Millbrook Road, Suite 225 • Raleigh, NC 27609

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Wildlands Engineering (Wildlands) completed a full -delivery project for the North Carolina Division of
Mitigation Services (DMS) to restore and enhance a total of 18,748 linear feet (LF) of stream and restore
59.70 acres (ac) of wetlands in Johnston County, North Carolina. The project streams consist of five
unnamed tributaries (UTs) to the Neuse River. The largest of these streams, Devil's Racetrack Creek (East
and West), drains directly to the Neuse River. The other four streams are small headwater tributaries to
Devil's Racetrack Creek (Southwest Branch, Middle Branch, Southeast Branch, and North Branch). The
project proposes to provide 18,215 stream mitigation units (SMU's) and 58.50 wetland mitigation units
(WMU's). At the downstream limits of the project, the drainage area is 831 acres (1.30 square miles).
The Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site, hereafter referred to as the Site, is located in eastern Johnston
County along Devil's Racetrack Road just east of its intersection with U.S. Highway 701 and approximately
one mile east of Interstate 95 (Figure 1). The Site is located in the western portion of the Inner Coastal
Plain Physiographic Province (USGS, 1998) within the North Carolina Division of Water Resources
(NCDWR) subbasin 03-04-02 of the Neuse River Basin (United States Geological Survey (USGS) Hydrologic
Unit 03020201140010).
Prior to construction activities, the streams had been relocated and channelized and the surrounding
wetland complex had been drained for agricultural purposes. The primary objectives of the project were
to re-establish wetland hydrology, restore a Coastal Plain Small Stream Swamp wetland community,
restore a Coastal Plain stream system to promote hydrologic connectivity with the floodplains and
wetlands, stabilize stream banks, promote instream habitat and aeration, restore riparian buffers, and
further improve water quality through removing existing agricultural practices. Figure 2 and Table 1
present the restoration and enhancement design for the Site.
The following project goals were established to address the effects listed above from watershed and
project site stressors:
• Restore a large wetland complex to a naturally occurring community to improve riparian
habitat and water quality;
• Restore a network of badly degraded stream channels, including multiple headwater streams,
to create aquatic habitat and further improve water quality to receiving waters; and
• Restore riparian buffers along stream corridors for additional habitat and water quality
benefits.
Stream and wetland restoration and enhancement construction efforts were completed in February 2014.
Baseline as -built monitoring activities (MYO) were completed between January and February 2014. A
conservation easement is in place on 96.065 acres of restored wetland and riparian stream corridors to
protect them in perpetuity.
Monitoring Year 5 (MY5) assessment and site visits were completed between the months of March and
November 2018 to assess the conditions of the project. Overall, the Site has met the required vegetation,
hydrology, and stream success criteria for MY5. The overall MY5 average planted stem density for the
Site is 575 stems per acre, which is greater than the year five interim density requirement of 260 stems
per acre. All restored and enhanced streams are stable and functioning as designed. Southeast Branch,
Southwest Branch, and Middle Branch all had pressure transducers installed to monitor stream flow. All
three stream gages met the hydrologic criteria for MY5. Of the 35 groundwater monitoring wells on the
Site, 27 met the success criteria (water table with 12 inches of the ground surface for 8.5% of the growing
kDevil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 5 Annual Report — FINAL iii

season consecutively), five had a hydroperiod greater than 5% but did not meet the success criteria, and
three had a hydroperiod below 5%. Out of the eight groundwater wells that didn't meet success criteria
for MYS, four were within wetland areas determined to be at risk. During 2019 (MY6) Wildlands will have
a Licensed Soils Scientist look at the soils on site to see which areas demonstrate hydric indicators and
which areas are unlikely to become hydric.
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 5 Annual Report — FINAL iv

DEVIL'S RACETRACK MITIGATION SITE
Monitoring Year 5 Annual Report
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section 1:
PROJECT OVERVIEW.......................................................................................................1-1
Figure 1
1.1
Project Goals and Objectives.....................................................................................................1-1
Project Component/Asset Map
1.2
Monitoring Year 5 Data Assessment..........................................................................................1-2
Table 1A
1.2.1
Vegetative Assessment......................................................................................................1-2
Project Activity and Reporting History
1.2.2
Vegetation Areas of Concern.............................................................................................1-3
Table 4
1.2.3
Stream Assessment............................................................................................................1-3
Visual Assessment Data
1.2.4
Stream Areas of Concern...................................................................................................1-4
Table 5a -f
1.2.5
Hydrology Assessment.......................................................................................................1-4
Vegetation Condition Assessment Table
1.2.6
Wetland Assessment..........................................................................................................1-4
1.2.7
Maintenance Plan..............................................................................................................1-5
Overview Photograph Comparison (Devil's Racetrack East)
1.3
Monitoring Year 5 Summary......................................................................................................1-5
Section2:
METHODOLOGY.............................................................................................................2-1
Section3:
REFERENCES...................................................................................................................3-1
APPENDICES
Appendix 1
General Tables and Figures
Figure 1
Project Vicinity Map
Figure 2a -b
Project Component/Asset Map
Table 1
Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Table 1A
Project Mitigation Credit History
Table 2
Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3
Project Contacts Table
Table 4
Project Information and Attributes
Appendix 2
Visual Assessment Data
Figure 3.0-3.2
Integrated Current Condition Plan View
Table 5a -f
Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Table 6
Vegetation Condition Assessment Table
Stream Photographs
Vegetation Photographs
Overview Photograph Comparison (Devil's Racetrack East)
Appendix 3
Vegetation Plot Data
Table 7
Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment
Table 8
CVS Vegetation Table - Metadata
Table 9
Planted and Total Stem Counts (Species by Plot with Annual Means)
Appendix 4
Morphological Summary Data and Plots
Table 10a -f
Baseline Stream Data Summary
Table 11a -f
Morphology and Hydraulic Summary (Dimensional Parameters — Cross Section)
Table 12a -f
Monitoring Data — Stream Reach Data Summary
Cross Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 5 Annual Report — FINAL v

Appendix 5 Hydrology Summary Data and Plots
Table 13 Verification of Bankfull Events
Table 14 Wetland Gage Attainment Summary
Groundwater Gage Plots
Stream Flow Gage Plots
Monthly Rainfall Data
Pre and Post Construction Groundwater Gage Comparison Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 5 Annual Report — FINAL vi

Section 1: PROJECT OVERVIEW
The Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site, hereafter referred to as the Site, is located in eastern Johnston
County within the Neuse River Basin (USGS Hydrologic Unit 03020201) near the town of Four Oaks, North
Carolina. The Site is located along Devil's Racetrack Road just east of its intersection with U.S. Highway
701 and approximately one mile east of Interstate 95. The Site is in the western portion of the Inner
Coastal Plain Physiographic Province (USGS, 1998). The project watershed consists primarily of
agricultural lands and forest. The only significant development in the watershed is a campground adjacent
to Devil's Racetrack Creek on the western portion of the project site, a middle school in the upper portion
of the watershed, a low-density subdivision with single family homes, and a small section of 1-95. The
drainage area for the project site is 831 acres (1.30 square miles) at the lower end of Devil's Racetrack
Creek (East).
The project stream reaches include Devil's Racetrack Creek (East and West), Southwest Branch, Middle
Branch, Southeast Branch, and North Branch, (stream restoration and/or enhancement level 1/11
approach). Mitigation work within the Site included restoration and enhancement of 18,748 linear feet
(LF) of perennial and intermittent stream channel and restoration of 59.7 acres (ac) of riparian wetlands.
The stream and wetland areas were also planted with native vegetation to improve habitat and protect
water quality. The final mitigation plan was submitted and accepted by the DMS in January of 2013.
Construction activities were completed by Land Mechanic Designs, Inc. (East Side) and Fluvial Solutions
(West Side) in February 2014. Planting and seeding activities were completed by Bruton Natural Systems,
Inc. in February 2014. Baseline monitoring (MYO) was conducted between December 2013 and February
2014. Annual monitoring will be conducted for seven years with the close-out anticipated to commence
in 2021 given the success criteria are met. Appendix 1 provides more detailed project activity, history,
contact information, and watershed/site background information for this project.
A conservation easement has been recorded and is in place along the stream and wetland riparian
corridors to protect them in perpetuity; 96.065 ac (Deed Book 4221, Page 419-433) within two tracts
owned by Nell Howell Revocable Trust. The project provides 18,215 stream mitigation units (SMU's) and
58.50 wetland mitigation units (WMU's). Directions and a map of the Site are provided in Figure 1 and
project components are illustrated in Figures 2a and 2b.
1.1 Project Goals and Objectives
Prior to construction activities, the streams had been relocated and channelized and the surrounding
wetland complex had been drained for agricultural purposes. Stream valleys and other low areas were
filled to raise wet areas and even out the fields. At the same time the streams were straightened, and
riparian vegetation was also removed. The project area west of Devil's Racetrack Road was used for row
crop agriculture and the eastern portion was used for timber production.
The channelization of streams on the Site resulted in severely over -enlarged channels that were extremely
deep in many locations. The alterations of the Site to promote farming practices resulted in complete
elimination of the ecological function of this small stream/wetland complex. Specifically, functional losses
at the Site include degraded aquatic habitat, altered hydrology (related to loss of floodplain connection
and lowered water table), and reduction of quality and amount of riparian wetland habitats and related
water quality benefits. Ongoing bank erosion was also occurring at some locations due to high, overly
steep banks and lack of bank vegetation. Table 4 in Appendix 1 and Tables 10a through 10f in Appendix
4 present the pre -restoration conditions in detail.
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 5 Annual Report — FINAL 1-1

The Site was designed to meet the over -arching goals as described in the mitigation plan (Wildlands,
2013). The project is intended to provide numerous ecological benefits within the Neuse River Basin.
While many of these benefits are limited to the Devil's Racetrack Creek Site project area, others, such as
pollutant removal and improved aquatic and terrestrial habitat, have more far-reaching effects. The
following project specific goals established in the mitigation plan include:
• Restore a large wetland complex to a naturally occurring community to improve riparian
habitat and water quality;
• Restore a network of badly degraded stream channels, including multiple headwaters
streams, to create aquatic habitat and further improve water quality to receiving waters; and
• Restore riparian buffers along stream corridors for additional habitat and water quality
benefits.
Secondary project goals established in the mitigation plan were to restore fish passage from the Neuse
River to Devil's Racetrack Creek. This is a secondary goal because success will not be measured during
monitoring.
The primary project goals were addressed through the following project objectives:
• Promote wetland hydrology by raising channelized stream beds and filling drainage ditches;
• Plant wetland areas with native tree species to restore a Coastal Plain Small Stream Swamp —
Blackwater Subtype community;
• Reconstruct stream channels to have the appropriate slope, planform, and cross-sectional
geometry for the region of the Coastal Plain in which the project is located;
• Size reconstructed stream channels to flood floodplains and wetlands frequently;
• Stabilize stream banks using bioengineering, natural channel design techniques, and grading
to reduce bank angles and bank height;
• Install in -stream structures and woody debris to promote aeration of water, create habitat,
and influence the creation of bed forms commonly found in sand bed channels;
• Restore riparian buffer areas with native tree species to stabilize channels, filter flood flows
and runoff, and supplement wetland plantings; and
• Remove project area from agricultural production further improving water quality.
The design streams and wetlands were restored to the appropriate type based on the surrounding
landscape, climate, and natural vegetation communities but also with strong consideration to existing
watershed conditions and trajectory. The mitigation project was developed to restore a large
stream/wetland complex directly adjacent to the Neuse River to a naturally occurring community to
create riparian and wetland habitat and improve water quality. Other intentions of the design were to
create stable habitats, improve riparian buffers, and restore the natural migration patterns for
anadromous and other fish for spawning.
1.2 Monitoring Year 5 Data Assessment
Annual monitoring and quarterly site visits were conducted during MY5 to assess the condition of the
project. The stream and wetland mitigation success criteria for the Site follow the approved success
criteria presented in the Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Plan (Wildlands, 2013).
1.2.1 Vegetative Assessment
A total of 51 10 -meter by 10 -meter vegetation plots were established within the project easement areas
during baseline monitoring. The final vegetation success criteria is the survival of 210 planted stems per
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 5 Annual Report — FINAL 1-2

acre, within the conservation easement at the end of the seven year monitoring period (MY7). The interim
vegetative success criteria for the Site is the survival of at least 260 stems per acre at the end of the fifth
year of monitoring (MY5). Planted vegetation must average 10 feet in height in each plot at the end of
MY7.
The MY5 vegetative survey was completed in August 2018. The 2018 vegetation monitoring resulted in
an average planted stem density of 575 stems per acre which is greater than the MY 5 interim requirement
of 260 stems per acre, but approximately 18% less than the stem density recorded in MYO. Individual plot
data suggests planted stem density ranges from 324 to 769 stems per acre. When including volunteer
stems, the average number of stems per acre is 744. This is well above the MY5 interim requirement of
260 stems per acre. There was an average of 14 planted stems per plot which is the same as MY4. All 51
of the vegetation plots individually met success criteria for MY5 and are on track to meet the success
criteria required for MY7 (Table 9, Appendix 3). Refer to Appendix 2 for vegetation plot photographs and
the vegetation condition assessment table and Appendix 3 for vegetation data tables.
1.2.2 Vegetation Areas of Concern
The restoration area east of Devil's Racetrack Road received significant treatment to improve the soil
quality and herbaceous cover. Approximately 5 tons/acre of agricultural lime and 0.5 tons of fertilizer/acre
(N, P, and K) with additional micronutrients (Zn, Mg, Cu, etc.) were spread across the area in September
2018. Additionally, the area was seeded with a permanent riparian mix and cool season temporary ground
cover (rye grain). Composted Class A biosolids were also applied to areas. All soil amendments were
mechanically incorporated to a depth of six inches. The temporary ground cover and species from the
permanent seed mix were observed growing vigorously in November. Drone photos in Appendix 2
compare the east side in 2016 and 2018 after the soil amendments and re -seeding were complete.
Wildlands is requesting that the IRT walk the east side of Devil's Racetrack to determine if this area can
be removed from the stream credits at risk category.
During a site walk in the summer of 2018, the IRT expressed concerns about the density of sweetgum
(liquidambar styraciflua) seedlings growing along the west side of Southwest Branch. In October 2018,
this area of sweetgum was treated using the cut stump method to apply triclopyr. In November 2018, a
small patch of mimosa (albizzia julibrissin) was treated on the west side of the project near US Highway
701. Scattered, low densities of Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense) were also treated on the west side of
the project in November 2018. An area containing Chinese privet exists between Devil's Racetrack (West)
and North Branch. This area will be treated during MY6. The Current Condition Plan View in Appendix 2
shows vegetation areas of concern.
Loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) has continued to volunteer across the site. In January of 2019, pines were cut
across the site to keep them from competing with desirable vegetation. Wildlands will continue to
monitor and treat loblolly pine as necessary during subsequent monitoring years.
1.2.3 Stream Assessment
Morphological surveys for MY5 were conducted in April 2018. All streams within the Site are stable and
met success criteria for MY5. In general, cross sections for all streams showed little to no change in
bankfull area, maximum depth ratio, or width -to -depth ratio. Cross section surveys show that the bank
height ratios remain at or very near 1.0. Entrenchment ratios vary slightly from year to year due to minor
changes in bankfull widths. Small adjustments in width occur due to vegetation, sediment deposition, and
many other factors. These minor changes do not indicate channel instability. Surveyed riffle cross sections
fell within the parameters defined for channels of the appropriate Rosgen stream type.
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 5 Annual Report — FINAL 1-3

Cross section 8 on Devil's Racetrack (West) has maintained a consistent bankfull width but has increased
in depth and area. This is due to the location of the cross section within the shallow. The shallow was
built with logs buried at the stream bed elevation, perpendicular to the stream banks, for grade control.
These logs create downstream micro pools within the shallow. Cross section 8 was placed downstream
of one of these logs in a micro pool. These micro pools are expected and the increase in depth and area
of cross section 8 is typical in micro pools. Cross Section 8 is stable and performing as expected, even
though there is an increase in depth and area.
Longitudinal profile surveys are not required on the project unless visual inspection indicates reach wide
vertical stability concerns. Refer to Appendix 2 for the visual stability assessment table, the CCPV map,
and reference photographs. Refer to Appendix 4 for the morphological data and plots.
1.2.4 Stream Areas of Concern
Several beaver dams were observed along Devil's Racetrack (West) in November 2018. Most of the dams
were located between the start of the project at US Highway 701 and the powerline easement on Devil's
Racetrack Creek. Two beaver dams were also located near Devil's Racetrack Road near the confluence of
North Branch (CCPV, Appendix 2). The USDA has been contacted and is in the process of removing beaver
from the Site. The site will be monitored for future beaver activity during subsequent monitoring years.
1.2.5 Hydrology Assessment
At the end of the seven-year monitoring period, two or more bankfull events must have occurred in
separate years within the restoration reaches. Multiple bankfull events were recorded on all the streams
with crest gages and pressure transducers during the MY5 data collection. All streams on the Site had
multiple bankfull events during MY1, MY2, MY3, and MY4. Therefore, the Site has met the required
stream hydrology success criteria.
Flow Gauges were installed on Southwest Branch, Southeast Branch, and Middle Branch to measure
stream flow. These pressure transducers were installed to show that the streams have adequate flow
throughout the year and are not ephemeral ditches. Per discussion with the Interagency Review Team
(IRT), continuous flow must be documented for at least 30 consecutive days under normal circumstances
on these streams. Stream flow must be documented to occur intermittently in all months other than July
through September. Middle Branch showed constant flow throughout MY5. Southwest Branch showed
consistent flow for 106 consecutive days from January 1 through mid-April when the flow gage
malfunctioned. Southeast Branch flow gauge malfunctioned from the beginning of the year until mid-
April but recorded consistent flow for over 30 consecutive days from late October to December. From
mid-April to June and from late July to October Southeast Branch showed intermittent flow. All three
streams have met the flow success criteria for MY5. Refer to Appendix 5 for hydrologic data.
1.2.6 Wetland Assessment
Thirty-four groundwater monitoring gages were established during the baseline monitoring and four
additional gages were added during MY2, all but two (GWB, and GW32) are within the wetland restoration
zones. Groundwater gages 8, and 32 were placed outside of wetland boundaries to capture the extent of
the wetlands and were removed during MY5. All the gages were installed at appropriate locations so that
the data collected will provide an indication of groundwater levels throughout the Site. To provide data
for the determination of the growing season, three soil temperature probes (2 on the west side and 1 on
the east side) have been installed at a depth of twelve inches. A barotroll logger (to measure barometric
pressure used in the calculations of groundwater levels with well transducer data) and a rain gage were
also installed on the Site. All monitoring gages were downloaded and maintained on an as needed basis.
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 5 Annual Report — FINAL 1-4

The success criteria for wetland hydrology is to have a free groundwater surface within 12 inches of the
ground surface for 8.5 percent of the growing season, which is measured in consecutive days under
normal precipitation conditions. During MY1 NRCS WETS Data was used to determine the growing season
for the Site. After discussions with the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), it was agreed to
use on-site soil temperature data to determine the beginning of the growing season and use NRCS WETS
data to determine the end of the growing season. During MY5 the beginning of the growing season was
extended by 20 days from March 21 to March 1 based on soil temperatures staying above 41 degrees
Fahrenheit at 12 inches below the ground surface.
The USACE requested pre -construction groundwater well data be overlaid on hydrographs with the
current monitoring year groundwater well data to see how groundwater levels are recharging after rain
events on the Site. Wildlands overlaid the pre -construction groundwater well data with the closest
monitoring groundwater well data and rain data. These plots suggest that the Site drained more rapidly
and to greater depths prior to restoration. Refer to Appendix 5 for pre and post construction groundwater
gage comparison plots.
Of the 35 groundwater monitoring wells on the Site, 27 met the success criteria (water table with 12
inches of the ground surface for 8.5% of the growing season consecutively), five had a hydroperiod greater
than 5% but did not meet the success criteria, and three had a hydroperiod below 5%. Groundwater wells
8 and 32 were removed during MY5 because they were located outside of the wetland boundaries. Of the
27 wells that met the success criteria, hydroperiods ranged from 13.4% to 29.1%, with one outlier at
42.5%. Four of the eight wells that didn't meet success criteria are located in areas designated as wetland
credits at risk. The other four wells are located in the middle of wetland areas that are surrounded by
wells that easily meet wetland success criteria. Three of these four wells had a hydroperiod range of 5.4%
to 8.4% which is greater than USACE defined minimum wetland hydroperiod but lower than the listed
success criteria. The fourth well had a hydroperiod of 4.6%.
During 2019 (MY6) a Licensed Soil Scientist will observe a series of soil profiles near the groundwater wells
that are not meeting success criteria to see if hydric soil indicators are forming. This data will be included
in the MY6 report. Areas that are not showing evidence of hydric soil formation will be removed from
wetland credit.
1.2.7 Maintenance Plan
Privet will be treated on the Site during MY6, especially in the area along North Branch. Mimosa pines,
and sweetgum will be monitored during subsequent monitoring years and will be treated as necessary.
Beaver activity will be monitored and will dealt with as necessary.
Wildlands will monitor the soil quality of the eastern side of the Site by taking regular soil samples.
Additional amendments will be applied based on the results of these soil tests. This area will also be
monitored for areas with low herbaceous cover and re -seeded if necessary.
1.3 Monitoring Year 5 Summary
The average stem density for the Site is on track to meeting the MY7 success criteria; all individual
vegetation plots meet the MY5 success criteria as noted in the CCPV. All streams within the Site are stable
and functioning as designed. There have been at least two documented bankfull events recorded in
separate years for each stream on the Site. Of the 36 groundwater monitoring wells on the Site, 27 met
the success criteria (water table with 12 inches of the ground surface for 8.5% of the growing season
consecutively), six had a hydroperiod greater than 5% but did not meet the success criteria, and three had
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 5 Annual Report — FINAL 1-5

a hydroperiod below 5%. Privet, mimosa, and sweetgum seedlings will continue to be monitored and
treatments will be applied if necessary. The vegetation on the east side of Devil's Racetrack has improved
drastically. Soil samples will be taken regularly on the east side of the project and additional lime and
fertilizer will be applied based on the results of the soil tests.
Summary information and data related to the success of various project and monitoring elements can be
found in the tables and figures in the report appendices. Narrative background and supporting
information formerly found in these reports can be found in the Mitigation Plan documents available on
DMS's website. All raw data supporting the tables and figures in the appendices are available from DMS
upon request.
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 5 Annual Report — FINAL 1-6

Section 2: METHODOLOGY
Geomorphic data was collected following the standards outlined in The Stream Channel Reference Site:
An Illustrated Guide to Field Techniques (Harrelson et al., 1994) and in the Stream Restoration: A Natural
Channel Design Handbook (Doll et al., 2003). All the Integrated Current Condition Mapping was recorded
using a Trimble handheld GPS with sub -meter accuracy and processed using Pathfinder and ArcGIS. Crest
gages and pressure transducers were installed in surveyed riffle cross sections and monitored quarterly.
Hydrology attainment installation and monitoring methods are in accordance with the USACE (2003)
standards. Vegetation monitoring protocols followed the Carolina Vegetation Survey -DMS Level 2
Protocol (Lee et al., 2008).
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 5 Annual Report — FINAL 2-1

Section 3: REFERENCES
Doll, B.A., Grabow, G.L., Hall, K.A., Halley, J., Harman, W.A., Jennings, G.D., and Wise, D.E. 2003. Stream
Restoration A Natural Channel Design Handbook.
Harrelson, C.C., Rawlins, C.L., Potyondy, J.P. 1994. Stream Channel Reference Sites: An Illustrated Guide
to Field Technique. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM -245. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 61 p.
Lee, M.T., Peet, R.K., S.D., Wentworth, T.R. 2008. CVS -DMS Protocol for Recording Vegetation Version
4.2. Retrieved from http://cvs.bio.unc.edu/protocol/cvs-eep-protocol-v4.2-lev1-5.pdf.
Rosgen, D. L. 1994. A classification of natural rivers. Catena 22:169-199.
Rosgen, D.L. 1996. Applied River Morphology. Pagosa Springs, CO: Wildland Hydrology Books.
Rosgen, D.L. 1997. A Geomorphological Approach to Restoration of Incised Rivers. Proceedings of the
Conference on Management of Landscapes Disturbed by Channel Incision. Center For
Computational Hydroscience and Bioengineering, Oxford Campus, University of Mississippi,
Pages 12-22.
United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). 2003. Stream Mitigation Guidelines. USACE, NCDEQ-
DWR, USEPA, NCWRC.
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). 2002. Natural Resources Conservation Service,
Climate Information for Johnston County, NC (1971-2000). WETS Station: Clayton, NC1820.
United States Geological Survey (USGS). 1998. North Carolina Geology.
http://www.geology.enr.state.nc.us/usgs/carolina.htm
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. 2013. Devil's Racetrack Stream and Wetland Mitigation Plan. DMS, Raleigh,
NC.
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. 2014. Devil's Racetrack Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site Baseline
Monitoring Document and As -Built Baseline Report. DMS, Raleigh, NC.
Winter, Thomas C., Harvey, Judson W., Franke, O. Lehn, Alley, William M. 1998. Ground Water and
Surface Water: A Single Resource.
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 5 Annual Report — FINAL 3-1

APPENDIX 1. General Tables and Figures

4aa,rfer R
a
[IkllY�IY�III it f'�lllkil]
C,yrn SWarnO
o
am
Brcll
:
L+
0 �*4 /
s • +3f��P
n ``
�tlnip�
�CLdi
The subject project site is an environmental restoration site of the
NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) and is
encompassed by a recorded conservation easement, but is
7
Pefi
bordered by land under private ownership. Accessing the site may
�4
require traversing areas near or along the easement boundary and
03020201150020
therefore access by the general public is not permitted. Access by
authorized personnel of state and federal agencies or their
designees/contractors involved in the development, oversight,
Directions:
�Cklf�3 i�r�,
and stewardship of the restoration site is permitted within the terms
From 1-95 exit 90, turn left onto NC -96 N.
Rd
NC -96 N turns slightly left and becomes
03020201130030
Devils Racetrack Rd. Follow Devils
and activites requires prior coordination with DMS.
'%6 S }
GauntryClub
ofJohn;ton
Iv.
County
f?s,
stack G( 12511
Ho Its La ke
:Sr•
C,yrn SWarnO
Four N&66. -O
0 �*4 /
�tlnip�
�
The subject project site is an environmental restoration site of the
NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) and is
encompassed by a recorded conservation easement, but is
7
Pefi
bordered by land under private ownership. Accessing the site may
�4
require traversing areas near or along the easement boundary and
03020201150020
therefore access by the general public is not permitted. Access by
authorized personnel of state and federal agencies or their
designees/contractors involved in the development, oversight,
Directions:
and stewardship of the restoration site is permitted within the terms
From 1-95 exit 90, turn left onto NC -96 N.
and timeframes of their defined roles. Any intended site visitation or
NC -96 N turns slightly left and becomes
activity by any person outside of these previously sanctioned roles
Devils Racetrack Rd. Follow Devils
and activites requires prior coordination with DMS.
Racetrack Road south for 2.1 miles.
WWILDLANDS
ENGINEERING
1
lip
Hydrologic Unit Code (14)
- DMS Targeted Local Watershed
03020201100 Project Location
f!L
03020201140010
rr�rY
49rano4
701'•
03020201150050 *%'m W.
Figure 1. Project Vicinity Map
0 0.5 1 Miles Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
1 I DMS Project No. 95021
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Johnston County, NC

Figure 2a. Project Component/Asset Map
WILDLANDS
0 250 500 Feet Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
ENGINEERINGrkt
I i I DMS Project No. 95021
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Johnston County, NC

in
_ f .i
lot
a
Devils Racetrack (East) ' to I a I a I a
,a I Volo
Is
•^� i 40
4w, 40 so wo
t--��i�� �r"l�G.a�ca _ -a► .-._. a-:_ i�'_=i-aFi =: s� .
;,.
1
Powerline Easement
Conservation Easement
Stream Restoration
Stream Restoration - Partial Credit
Stream Restoration - No Credit
_ S
Enhancement I
Enhancement II
Wetland Restoration
Wetland Restoration - Partial Credit
Figure 2b. Project Component/Asset Map
W I L D L A 1wT D 5 0 250 500 Feet Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
ENGINEERING
I I I t DMS Project No. 95021
rk� Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Johnston County, NC

Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
N/A: not applicable
1. Ratio of 4:1 based on an expected 75% reduction in credits for stream restoration with shrub buffer zone in power line easements
*Stream credit calculations were originally calculated along the as -built thalweg and updated to be calculated along stream centerlines for Monitoring Year 4 after discusions with NC IRT
**Riparian Wetlands (West) credit calculations were updated for Monitoring Year 4 based on the performance of groundwater well 10
Red denotes credits at risk.
Riparian Wetland
Mitigation Credits
Non -Riparian Wetland
Nitrogen
Buffer N utrien t
Phosphorous
Nutrient Offset
Type
R
HL
R
RE
R RE
Offset
Totals 1 16,361
1 0
1 55.53
1 0
1 N/A 1 N/A
1 N/A 1 N/A
N/A
Totals 1,854
0
2.97
0
1 N/A I N/A
N/A I N/A
N/A
Reach ID
As -Built
Stationing/
Location
Existing
Footage/
Acreage
Project Components
Restoration or Restoration
Approach Equivalent
Restoration Footage/
Acreage
Mitigation
Ratio
Credits
(SMU/ WMU)
Streams
Devil's Racetrack Creek
Restoration
(West) (DOT ROW)
0+00-0+20
20 LF
P1
(No Credit)
20
N/A
N/A
Devil's Racetrack Creek
0+20-16+26 &
(West)
17+50-52+05
4,755 LF
PS
Restoration
5,061
1:1
5,061
Devil's Racetrack Creek
(West) (Power Line
16+26-17+50
196 LF
Pi
Restoration
124
4:1t
31
(Partial Credit)
Easement)
Devil's Racetrack Creek
Restoration
52+OS-52+11
5 LF
P3
6
N/A
N/A
(West) (DOT ROW)
(No Credit)
Devil's Racetrack (East) (DOT
Restoration
52+59-52+65
5 LF
P3
6
N/A
N/A
ROW)
(No Credit)
Devil's Racetrack (East)
52+65-70+73
p1/2
Restoration
3,509
1:1
3,509
71+03-88+00
4,778 LF
Devil's Racetrack (East)
88+31-106+85
P1/2
Restoration
1,854
1:1
1,854
Devil's Racetrack (East)
Restoration
70+73-71+03
30 LF
P3/2
30
N/A
N/A
(Easement Break)
(No Credit)
Devil's Racetrack (East)
Restoration
88+00 to 88+31
31 LF
P3/2
31
N/A
N/A
(Easement Break)
(No Credit)
Restoration
Devil's Racetrack (East)
106+85-107+97
0 LF
P3/2
112
N/A
N/A
(No Credit)
Southwest Branch
500+00-501+31
154 LF
Ell
Enhancement
154
2.5:1
61.6
600+00-600+23
Southwest Branch
501+31-502+06
75 LF
EI
Enhancement
75
1.5:1
50
Southwest Branch
502+06-504+85
740 LF
P1/2
Restoration
812
1:1
812
505+99-511+32
Southwest Branch
504+85-505+99
111 LF
P1/2
Restoration
114
4:1'
28.5
(Power Line Easement)
(Partial Credit)
Middle Branch
200+00-204+10
410 LF
Headwater Wetland
410
1:1
410
Middle Branch
204+10-219+06
1,326 LF
P1/2
Restoration
1,496
1:1
1,496
Southeast Branch
300+00-305+03
2 946 LF
Pi
Restoration
2,860
1:1
2,860
305+35-328+92
Southeast Branch (Easement
Restoration
305+03-305+35
30 LF
p1
32
N/A
N/A
Break)
(Partial Credit)
North Branch
403+76-424+18
---
Pi
Restoration
2,042
1:1
2,042
Wetlands
Riparian Wetlands (West)
N/A
0.0 ac
N/A
Restoration
51.70
1:1
51.70
Riparian Wetlands (West)
Restoration
N/A
0.0 ac
N/A
1.53
4:1
0.38
(Power Line Easement)
(Partial Credit)
Riparian Wetlands (East)
N/A
0.0 ac
N/A
Restoration
3.45
1:1
3.45
Riparian Wetlands (West)
N/A
0.0 ac
N/A
Restoration
2.95
1:1
2.95
Riparian Wetlands (West)
Restoration
N/A
0.0 ac
N/A
0.07
4:1
0.02
(Power Line Easement)
(Partial Credit)
Component Summation
Riparian Wetland Non-Riparian;ft
U and
Restoration Le .4��
(acres)
Riverine
(acres
Non-Riverine
Buffer(square
feet)
(acres)
'I
Restoration
16,428
56.68
- -
-
-
Restoration At Risk
1,854
3.02
- -
-
-
Enhancementl
75
Enhancement II
154
Creation
-
- -
Preservation
-
-
I- -
-
N/A: not applicable
1. Ratio of 4:1 based on an expected 75% reduction in credits for stream restoration with shrub buffer zone in power line easements
*Stream credit calculations were originally calculated along the as -built thalweg and updated to be calculated along stream centerlines for Monitoring Year 4 after discusions with NC IRT
**Riparian Wetlands (West) credit calculations were updated for Monitoring Year 4 based on the performance of groundwater well 10
Red denotes credits at risk.

Table IA. Project Mitigation Credit History
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Mitigation Credits
Mit Plan r Credits MY1 Credits MY2 Credits MY3 Credits MY4 Credits MYS Credits
Fr (SMU/WMU)
Streams
Devil's Racetrack Creek (West)
Pi
5,061
5,061
5,122
5,122
5,122
5,061
5,061
2,4
Devil's Racetrack Creek (West)
(Power Line Easement)
PI
31
31
32
32
32
31
31
2,4
Devil's Racetrack Creek (East)
P3/2
5,363
5,461
5,364
5,364
5,364
5,363
3509/1,854
1, 2, 4, 6
Southwest Branch
Ell
62
61.60
62
62
62
61.6
61.6
2,5
Southwest Branch
EI
50
50.67
51
51
51
50
50
2,4
Southwest Branch
P1/2
812
811
829
829
829
812
812
1,2,4
Southwest Branch
(Power Line Easement)
P1/2
29
28.50
29
29
29
28.5
28.5
5
Middle Branch
Headwater
Wetland
410
400
410
410
410
410
410
1,2
Middle Branch
P1/2
1,496
1,506
1,505
1,505
1,505
1,496
1,496
1, 2, 4
Southeast Branch
PI
2,860
2,848
2,919
2,916
2,916
2,860
2,860
1, 2, 3, 4
North Branch
Pi
2,042
2,418
2,050
2,050
2,050
2,042
2,042
1, 2, 4
Total
18,216
18,677
18,373
18,370
18,370
18,215
18,215
Wetlands
Riparian Wetlands (West) N/A 51.4 57.9 57.9 57.9 57.9 54.65 51.70/2.95 5, 7, 8, 9, 10
Riparian Wetlands (West) (Power N/A 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.40 0.38/0.02 5
Line Easement)
Riparian Wetlands (East) N/A 3.4 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.45 3.45 5, 8, 9, 10
Total 55.2 62.1 62.1 62.1 62.1 58.50 58.50
Red denotes credits at risk.
1. As -Built credit calculations were not calculated correctly.
2. During MY1 credits were updated based on as -built thalweg alignments.
3. During MY2 a section of Southeast Branch was removed from credit because it was an easement crossing and not part of the powerline easement.
4. During MY4 credits were updated based on stream centerlines and Mitigation Plan credits after discussions with the IRT.
5. During MY4 DMS requested mitigation credits be calculated to 3 decimal places.
6. Durining MY5 the IRT categorized the lower section of Devil's Racetrack (East) as credits at risk due to the lack of vegetation.
7. Wetland credits were miscalculated in the Mitigation Plan on the west side of the project. The IRT was sent a formal letter describing this and approved it.
8. As -Built wetland credits were based on anticipated wetland boundaries.
9. During MY4 wetland credits were reverted back Mitigation Plan credits after discussions with the IRT, and the area around groundwater well 10 was removed.
10. Durining MY5 the IRT categorized a few areas as credits at risk based on groundwater well performance and soil conditions.

Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
or Repo
IMii
Date Collection
Completion or Scheduled
Raleigh, NC 27609
Complete
September 2011-
Deliveryctivity
Mitigation Plan
Land Mechanic Designs, Inc.
January 2013
Willow Spring, NC 27592
March 2012
Fluvial Solutions
P.O. Box 28749
September 2011-
Raleigh, NC 27611
Final Design - Construction Plans
Bruton Natural Systems, Inc
August 2013
Fremont, NC 27830
March 2012
Bruton Natural Systems, Inc
P.O. Box 1197
December 2013-
Fremont, NC 27830
Construction
Green Resource, LLC
Nursery Stock Suppliers
February 2014
Dykes and Son Nursery and NC Forest Service
February 2014
F
(Claridge Nursery)
Temporary S&E mix applied to entire project area
1
February 2014
February 2014
Permanent seed mix applied to reach/segments
Jason Lorch
February 2014
February 2014
Bare root and live stake plantings for reach/segments
February 2014
February 2014
Baseline Monitoring Document (Year 0)Stream
Survey
February 2014
May 2014
Vegetation Survey
February 2014
Year 1 Monitoring
Stream Survey
July 2014
December 2014
Vegetation Survey
September 2014
Minor Stream Repairs
May 2014
Year2Monitoring
Stream Survey
April 2015
December 2015
Vegetation Survey
June 2015
Minor Stream Repairs & Soil Amendments
April 2015
Year3Monitoring
Stream Survey
Apri12016
December 2016
Vegetation Survey
June 2016
Soil Amendments
June 2016
Beaver Dam Removal
September 2016
Year Monitoring
Stream Survey
May 2017
December 2017
Vegetation Survey
August 2017
Pine Tree Removal
February 2017
Hugel Beds Installed
May 2017
Soil Amendments
November 2017
Year SMonitoring
Stream Survey
April 2018
December 2018
Vegetation Survey
August 2018
Soil Amendments
September 2018
Invasive Treatment
October - November 2018
Beaver Removal
December 2018
Pine Tree Removal
January 2019
Year 6 Monitoring
Stream Survey
2019
December2019
Vegetation Survey
2019
Year 7 Monitoring
Stream Survey
2020
December 2020
Vegetation Survey
2020
'Seed and mulch is added as each section of construction is completed.
Table 3. Project Contact Table
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Designer
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
Jeff Keaton, PE
312 West Millbrook Road, Suite 225
Raleigh, NC 27609
919.851.9986
Construction Contractor (East Side)
Land Mechanic Designs, Inc.
126 Circle G Lane
Willow Spring, NC 27592
Construction Contractor (West Side)
Fluvial Solutions
P.O. Box 28749
Raleigh, NC 27611
Planting Contractor
Bruton Natural Systems, Inc
P.O. Box 1197
Fremont, NC 27830
Seeding Contractor
Bruton Natural Systems, Inc
P.O. Box 1197
Fremont, NC 27830
Seed Mix Sources
Green Resource, LLC
Nursery Stock Suppliers
Dykes and Son Nursery and NC Forest Service
Bare Roots
(Claridge Nursery)
Live Stakes
Bruton Natural Systems, Inc
Monitoring Performers
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
Stream, Vegetation, and Wetland Monitoring, POC
Jason Lorch
919.851.9986, ext. 107

Table 4. Project Information and Attributes
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Project Information
Project Name
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
County
Johnston County
Project Area (acres)
96.065 ac
Project Coordinates (latitude and longitude)
35° 27'01.58" N, 78° 23' 18.08" W
Project Watershed Summary Information
Physiographic Province
Upper Coastal Plain
River Basin
Neuse
USGS Hydrologic Unit 8 -digit
03020201
USGS Hydrologic Unit 14 -digit
03020201140010
DWR Sub -basin
03-04-02
Project Drainage Area (acres)
831 ac
Project Drainage Area Percentage of Impervious Area
<1%
CGIA Land Use Classification
62%forest/wetland, 34% farm land, 4% developed
Reach Summary Information
Southwest Middle loutheast North Devil's Devil's
Parameters Racetrack Creek Racetrack Cre'll
1P Branch Branch. Branch Branch (west) (east)
Length of reach (linear feet) - Post -Restoration
1,155 1,906 2,892 2,042 5,211 5,542
Drainage area (acres)
20.6 10.8 69.9 49.9 493.5 831.4
NCDWR stream identification score
34.5-37 30 29-30.75 32 38 37.5
NCDWR Water Quality Classification
C/NSW
Morphological Desription (stream type)
P
P
P/I
P
P
P
Evolutionary trend (Simon's Model) - Pre- Restoration
---
---
---
---
---
---
Underlying mapped soils
Altavista fine sandy loam, Bibb sandy loam, Cecil loam, Goldsboro sandy loam, Leaf silt
loam, Lynchburg sandy loam, Nason silt loam, Norfolk loamy sand, and Rains sandy loam.
Drainage class
--- --- --- --- --- --
Soil Hydric status
--- --- --
Slope
--- --- ---
FEMA classification
None
Native vegetation community
Coastal Plain bottomland riparian forest
Percent composition exotic invasive vegetation -Post-
Restoration
0%
Regulatory Considerations
Waters of the United States - Section 404
X
X
USACE Nationwide Permit No.27 and DWQ 401 Water
Quality Certification No. 3885.
Waters of the United States - Section 401
X
X
Division of Land Quality (Dam Safety)
N/A
N/A
N/A
Endangered Species Act
X
X
Devils Racetrack Mitigation Plan; Wildlands
determined "no effect" on Johnston County listed
endangered species.
Historic Preservation Act
X
X
No historic resources were found to be impacted
(letter from SHPO dated 7/20/2011).
Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA)/Coastal Area
Management Act (CAMA)
N/A
N/A
N/A
FEMA Floodplain Compliance
N/A
N/A
The project streams do not have an associated
regulatory flooplaing; however the downstream end of
Devil's Racetrack Creek is located within the floodwasy
and flood fringe of the Neuse River (FEMA Zone AE,
FIRM panel 1680).
Essential Fisheries Habitat
I N/A
I N/A
N/A

APPENDIX 2. Visual Assessment Data

Figure 3.0 Integrated Current Condition Plan View
0 500 1,000 Feet (Key)
W I L D L A IST D S I i i i I Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
ENGINEERING
DMS Project No. 95021
rk It Monitoring Year 5 - 2o18
Johnston County, NC

Figure 3.1 Integrated Current Condition Plan View
0 250 500 Feet(Sheet i of 2)
PAIW W I L D L A IST D S I i i i I Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
ENGINEERING rk�
DMS Project No. 95021
Monitoring Year 5 - 2o18
Johnston County, NC

Figure 3.2 Integrated Current Condition Plan View
0 250 500 Feet(Sheet 2 of 2)
W I L D L A IST D S I i i i I Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
E N G I N E E R I N 0 '
DMS Project No. 95021
Monitoring Year 5 - 2o18
Johnston County, NC

Table 5a. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Devil's Racetrack (West) (5,211 LF)
Major Channel
Category
Channel Sub -Category
Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
in As -Built
Number of Amount of %Stable,
Unstable Unstable Perforing as
m
Segments Footage Intended
Number with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footage with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjust% for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
Aggradation
0 0 100%
Degradation
0 0 100%
(Riffle and Run units)
2. Riffle Condition
Texture/Substrate
74
74
100%
3. Meander Pool
Depth Sufficient
74
74
100%
Condition
100%
Length Appropriate
74
74
100%
100%
4. Thalweg Position
Thalweg centering at upstream of
meander bend (Run)
74
74
Thalweg centering at downstream of
meander bend (Glide)
74
74
2. Bank
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting
1. Scoured/Eroded
simply from poor growth and/or scour
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
and erosion
Banks undercut/overhanging to the
extent that mass wasting appears likely.
2. Undercut
Does NOT include undercuts that are
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
modest, appear sustainable and are
providing habitat
3. Mass Wasting
JBank slumping, caving, or collapse
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
Totals
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
3. Engineered
Structures)
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no
dislodged boulders or logs
6
6
100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting
maintenance of grade across the sill
6
6
100%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow
underneath sills or arms.
6
6
100%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures
extent of influence does not exceed 15%
6
6
100%
Pool forming structures maintaining
4. Habitat
—Max Pool Depth : Bankfull Depth>_ 1.6
Rootwads/logs providing some cover at
6
6
100%
baseflow
Excludes constructed riffles since they are evaluated in section 1.

Table 5b. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Devil's Racetrack (East) (5,542 LF)
Major Channel
Category
Channel Sub -Category
Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
in As -Built
Number of Amount of
Unstable Unstable
Segments Footage
%Stable,
Perforing as
m
Inten
Intended
Numberwith
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footagewith
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjust %for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
Aggradation
0 0
100%
Degradation
0 0
100%
(Riffle and Run units)
2. Riffle Condition
Texture/Substrate
85 85
100%
3. Meander Pool
Depth Sufficient
85 85
100%
Condition
Length Appropriate
85 85
100%
4. Thalweg Position
Thalweg centering at upstream of
meander bend (Run)
85 85
100%
Thalweg centering at downstream of
meander bend (Glide)
85 85
100%
2. Bank
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting
1. Scoured/Eroded
simply from poor growth and/or scour
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
and erosion
Banks undercut/overhanging to the
extent that mass wasting appears likely.
2. Undercut
Does NOT include undercuts that are
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
modest, appear sustainable and are
providing habitat
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, caving, or collapse
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
Totals
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
3. Engineered
Structures)
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no
dislodged boulders or logs
17
17
100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting
maintenance of grade across the sill
17
17
100%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow
underneath sills or arms.
17
17
100%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures
extent of influence does not exceed 15%
17
17
100%
Pool forming structures maintaining
4. Habitat
Max Pool Depth : Bankfull Depth >_ 1.6
Rootwads/logs providing some cover at
17
17
100%
baseflow
Excludes constructed riffles since they are evaluated in section 1.

Table 5c. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Southeast Branch (2,892 LF)
Major Channel
Category
Channel Sub -Category
Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
in As -Built
Number of Amount of %Stable,
Unstable Unstable Performing as
Segments Footage Intended
Numberwith
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footagewith
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjust %for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
Aggradation
0 0 100%
Degradation
0 0 100%
(Riffle and Run units)
2. Riffle Condition
Texture/Substrate
121
121
100%
3. Meander Pool
Depth Sufficient
120
120
100%
Condition
100%
Length Appropriate
120
120
100%
100%
4. Thalweg Position
Thalweg centering at upstream of
meander bend (Run)
120
120
Thalweg centering at downstream of
meander bend (Glide)
120
120
2. Bank
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting
1. Scoured/Eroded
simply from poor growth and/or scour
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
and erosion
Banks undercut/overhanging to the
extent that mass wasting appears likely.
2. Undercut
Does NOT include undercuts that are
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
modest, appear sustainable and are
providing habitat
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, caving, or collapse
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
Totals
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
3. Engineered
Structures)
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no
dislodged boulders or logs
67
67
100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting
maintenance of grade across the sill
67
67
100%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow
underneath sills or arms.
67
67
100%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures
extent of influence does not exceed 15%
67
67
100%
Pool forming structures maintaining
4. Habitat
—Max Pool Depth : Bankfull Depth>_ 1.6
Rootwads/logs providing some cover at
67
67
100%
baseflow
Excludes constructed riffles since they are evaluated in section 1.

Table 5d. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Middle Branch (1,906 LF)
Major Channel
Category
Channel Sub -Category
Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
in As -Built
Number of Amount of %StableUnstable Unstable Performing as
Performing
Segments Footage Intended
Number with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footage with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjust% for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
Aggradation
0 0 100%
Degradation
0 0 100%
(Riffle and Run units)
2. Riffle Condition
Texture/Substrate
79
79
100%
3. Meander Pool
Depth Sufficient
78
78
100%
Condition
100%
Length Appropriate
78
78
100%
100%
4. Thalweg Position
Thalweg centering at upstream of
meander bend (Run)
78
78
Thalweg centering at downstream of
meander bend (Glide)
78
78
2. Bank
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting
1. Scoured/Eroded
simply from poor growth and/or scour
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
and erosion
Banks undercut/overhanging to the
extent that mass wasting appears likely.
2. Undercut
Does NOT include undercuts that are
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
modest, appear sustainable and are
providing habitat
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, caving, or collapse
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
Totals
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
3. Engineered
Structures)
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no
dislodged boulders or logs
52
52
100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting
maintenance of grade across the sill
52
52
100%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow
underneath sills or arms.
52
52
100%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures
extent of influence does not exceed 15%
52
52
100%
Pool forming structures maintaining
4. Habitat
—Max Pool Depth : Bankfull Depth>_ 1.6
Rootwads/logs providing some cover at
52
52
100%
baseflow
Excludes constructed riffles since they are evaluated in section 1.

Table 5e. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Southwest Branch (1,155 LF)
Major Channel
Category
Channel Sub -Category
Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
in As -Built
Number of Amount of %Stable,
Unstable Unstable Performing as
Segments Footage Intended
Numberwith
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footagewith
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjust %for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
Aggradation
0 0 100%
Degradation
0 0 100%
(Riffle and Run units)
2. Riffle Condition
Texture/Substrate
48
48
100%
3. Meander Pool
Depth Sufficient
47
47
100%
Condition
100%
Length Appropriate
47
47
100%
100%
4. Thalweg Position
Thalweg centering at upstream of
meander bend (Run)
47
47
Thalweg centering at downstream of
meander bend (Glide)
47
47
2. Bank
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting
1. Scoured/Eroded
simply from poor growth and/or scour
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
and erosion
Banks undercut/overhanging to the
extent that mass wasting appears likely.
2. Undercut
Does NOT include undercuts that are
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
modest, appear sustainable and are
providing habitat
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, caving, or collapse
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
Totals
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
3. Engineered
Structures)
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no
dislodged boulders or logs
28
28
100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting
maintenance of grade across the sill
28
28
100%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow
underneath sills or arms.
28
28
100%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures
extent of influence does not exceed 15%
28
28
100%
Pool forming structures maintaining
4. Habitat
—Max Pool Depth : Bankfull Depth>_ 1.6
Rootwads/logs providing some cover at
28
28
100%
baseflow
)Excludes constructed riffles since they are evaluated in section 1.

Table 5f. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
North Branch (2,042 LF)
Major Channel
Category
Channel Sub -Category
Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
in As -Built
Number of Amount of %Stable,
Unstable Unstable Performing as
Segments Footage Intended
Numberwith
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footagewith
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjust %for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
Aggradation
0 0 100%
Degradation
0 0 100%
(Riffle and Run units)
2. Riffle Condition
Texture/Substrate
35 35
100%
3. Meander Pool
Depth Sufficient
34 34
100%
Condition
100%
Length Appropriate
34 34
100%
100%
4. Thalweg Position
Thalweg centering at upstream of
meander bend (Run)
34 34
Thalweg centering at downstream of
meander bend (Glide)
34 34
2. Bank
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting
1. Scoured/Eroded
simply from poor growth and/or scour
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
and erosion
Banks undercut/overhanging to the
extent that mass wasting appears likely.
2. Undercut
Does NOT include undercuts that are
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
modest, appear sustainable and are
providing habitat
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, caving, or collapse
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
Totals
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
3. Engineered
Structures)
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no
dislodged boulders or logs
10
10
100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting
maintenance of grade across the sill
10
10
100%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow
underneath sills or arms.
10
10
100%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures
extent of influence does not exceed 15%
10
10
100%
Pool forming structures maintaining
4. Habitat
Max Pool Depth : Bankfull Depth >_ 1.6
Rootwads/logs providing some cover at
10
10
100%
baseflow
Excludes constructed riffles since they are evaluated in section 1.

Table 6. Vegetation Condition Assessment Table
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Planted Acreage 96
Easement Acreage 96
Vegetation Category
Definitions
Mapping
Number
Combined
Acreage
% of
Invasive Areas of Concern
Areas of points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale).
1,000
1
Combined
3.5%
Vegetation Category
Definitions
Threshold
of
Easement Encroachment Areas
Planted
none
0
0
0%
Acreage
(Ac)
Polygons
Acreage
Bare Areas
Very limited cover of both woody and herbaceous material.
0.1
0
0.0
0.0%
Woody stem densities clearly below target levels based on MY3, 4, or 5 stem count
Low Stem Density Areas
0.1
0
0.0
0.0%
criteria.
Total
0
0.0
0.0%
Areas with woody stems of a size class that are obviously small given the monitoring
Areas of Poor Growth Rates or Vigor
0.25 Ac
0
0
0%
year.
Cumulative Total
0
0.0
0.0%
Easement Acreage 96
Vegetation Category
Definitions
Mapping
Threshold
(SF)
Number
of
Polygons
Combined
Acreage
% of
Planted
Acreage
Invasive Areas of Concern
Areas of points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale).
1,000
1
3.4
3.5%
Easement Encroachment Areas
Areas of points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale).
none
0
0
0%

STREAM PHOTOGRAPHS
Devil's Racetrack West
Monitoring Year 5
PHOTO POINT 1— looking upstream (04/16/2018)
PHOTO POINT 1— looking downstream (04/16/2018)
PHOTO POINT 2 — looking upstream (04/16/2018)
PHOTO POINT 2 — looking downstream (04/16/2018)
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

PHOTO POINT 3 — looking upstream (04/16/2018) 1 PHOTO POINT 3 — looking downstream (04/16/2018) 1
PHOTO POINT 4—looking upstream (04/16/2018) 1 PHOTO POINT 4—looking downstream (04/16/2018) 1
PHOTO POINT 5 — looking upstream (04/16/2018) 1 PHOTO POINT 5 — looking downstream (04/16/2018)
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

PHOTO POINT 6 — looking upstream (04/16/2018)
PHOTO POINT 6 — looking downstream (04/16/2018)
PHOTO POINT 7 — looking upstream (04/16/2018) 1 PHOTO POINT 7 — looking downstream (04/16/2018) 1
PHOTO POINT 8 —looking upstream (04/16/2018)
PHOTO POINT 8 — looking downstream (04/16/2018)
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

PHOTO POINT 9 — looking upstream (04/16/2018) 1 PHOTO POINT 9 — looking downstream (04/16/2018) 1
PHOTO POINT 10 — looking upstream (04/16/2018) 1 PHOTO POINT 10 — looking downstream (04/16/2018) 1
PHOTO POINT 11— looking upstream (04/16/2018)
PHOTO POINT 11— looking downstream (04/16/2018)
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

PHOTO POINT 12 — looking upstream (04/16/2018) 1 PHOTO POINT 12 — looking downstream (04/16/2018) 1
PHOTO POINT 13 — looking upstream (04/16/2018) 1 PHOTO POINT 13 — looking downstream (04/16/2018) 1
PHOTO POINT 14 — looking upstream (04/16/2018)
PHOTO POINT 14 — looking downstream (04/16/2018)
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

PHOTO POINT 15 — looking upstream (04/16/2018) 1 PHOTO POINT 15 — looking downstream (04/16/2018) 1
PHOTO POINT 16 — looking upstream (04/16/2018)
PHOTO POINT 16 — looking downstream (04/16/2018)
PHOTO POINT 17 — looking upstream (04/16/2018) 1 PHOTO POINT 17 — looking downstream (04/16/2018)
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

PHOTO POINT 18 — looking upstream (04/16/2018) 1 PHOTO POINT 18 — looking downstream (04/16/2018) 1
PHOTO POINT 19 — looking upstream (04/16/2018) 1 PHOTO POINT 19 — looking downstream (04/16/2018) 1
PHOTO POINT 20 — looking upstream (04/16/2018)
PHOTO POINT 20 — looking downstream (04/16/2018)
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

PHOTO POINT 21— looking upstream (04/16/2018) 1 PHOTO POINT 21— looking downstream (04/16/2018) 1
PHOTO POINT 22 — looking upstream (04/16/2018)
PHOTO POINT 22 — looking downstream (04/16/2018)
PHOTO POINT 23 — looking upstream (04/16/2018)
PHOTO POINT 23 — looking downstream (04/16/2018)
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

PHOTO POINT 24 — looking upstream (04/16/2018) 1 PHOTO POINT 24 — looking downstream (04/16/2018) 1
PHOTO POINT 25 — looking upstream (04/16/2018) 1 PHOTO POINT 25 — looking downstream (04/16/2018) 1
PHOTO POINT 26 (04/18/2018)
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

STREAM PHOTOGRAPHS
Devil's Racetrack East
Monitoring Year 5
PHOTO POINT 27 (04/16/2018)
PHOTO POINT 28 — looking upstream (04/16/2018) 1 PHOTO POINT 28 — looking downstream (04/16/2018)
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

PHOTO POINT 29 — looking upstream (04/16/2018)
PHOTO POINT 29 — looking downstream (04/16/2018)
PHOTO POINT 30 — looking upstream (04/16/2018) 1 PHOTO POINT 30 — looking downstream (04/16/2018)
PHOTO POINT 31— looking upstream (04/16/2018) I PHOTO POINT 31— looking downstream (04/16/2018)
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

PHOTO POINT 32 — looking upstream (04/16/2018) 1 PHOTO POINT 32 — looking downstream (04/16/2018)
PHOTO POINT 33 — looking upstream (04/16/2018) 1 PHOTO POINT 33 — looking downstream (04/16/2018)
PHOTO POINT 34 — looking upstream (04/16/2018) I PHOTO POINT 34 — looking downstream (04/16/2018)
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

PHOTO POINT 35 — looking upstream (04/16/2018) 1 PHOTO POINT 35 — looking downstream (04/16/2018)
PHOTO POINT 36 — looking upstream (04/16/2018)
PHOTO POINT 36 — looking downstream (04/16/2018)
PHOTO POINT 37 — looking upstream (04/16/2018) I PHOTO POINT 37 — looking downstream (04/16/2018)
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

PHOTO POINT 38 — looking upstream (04/16/2018) 1 PHOTO POINT 38 — looking downstream (04/16/2018)
PHOTO POINT 39 — looking upstream (04/16/2018) 1 PHOTO POINT 39 — looking downstream (04/16/2018)
PHOTO POINT 40 — looking upstream (04/16/2018)
PHOTO POINT 40 — looking downstream (04/16/2018)
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

PHOTO POINT 41— looking upstream (04/16/2018) 1 PHOTO POINT 41— looking downstream (04/16/2018)
PHOTO POINT 42 — looking upstream (04/16/2018) 1 PHOTO POINT 42 — looking downstream (04/16/2018)
PHOTO POINT 43 — looking upstream (04/16/2018)
PHOTO POINT 43 — looking downstream (04/16/2018)
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

PHOTO POINT 44 — looking upstream (04/18/2018) 1 PHOTO POINT 44 — looking downstream (04/18/2018)
PHOTO POINT 45 — looking upstream (04/18/2018)
PHOTO POINT 45 — looking downstream (04/18/2018)
PHOTO POINT 46 — looking upstream (04/18/2018) I PHOTO POINT 46 — looking downstream (04/18/2018)
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

PHOTO POINT 47 — looking upstream (04/18/2018) 1 PHOTO POINT 47 — looking downstream (04/18/2018)
PHOTO POINT 48 — looking upstream (04/18/2018) 1 PHOTO POINT 48 — looking downstream (04/18/2018)
PHOTO POINT 49 — looking upstream (04/18/2018)
PHOTO POINT 49 — looking downstream (04/18/2018)
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

PHOTO POINT 50 — looking upstream (04/18/2018) 1 PHOTO POINT 50 — looking downstream (04/18/2018)
PHOTO POINT 51— looking upstream (04/18/2018) 1 PHOTO POINT 51— looking downstream (04/18/2018)
PHOTO POINT 52 — looking upstream (04/18/2018)
PHOTO POINT 52 — looking downstream (04/18/2018)
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

PHOTO POINT 53 — looking upstream (06/27/2018)
PHOTO POINT 53 — looking downstream (06/27/2018)
PHOTO POINT 54 — looking upstream (06/27/2018) 1 PHOTO POINT 54 — looking downstream (06/27/2018)
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

STREAM PHOTOGRAPHS
Southwest Branch
Monitoring Year 5
PHOTO POINT 55 — looking upstream (04/16/2018) 1 PHOTO POINT 55 — looking downstream (04/16/2018) 1
PHOTO POINT 56 — looking upstream (04/16/2018)
PHOTO POINT 56 — looking downstream (04/16/2018)
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

PHOTO POINT 57 — looking upstream (04/16/2018) 1 PHOTO POINT 57 — looking downstream (04/16/2018) 1
PHOTO POINT 58 — looking upstream (04/16/2018) 1 PHOTO POINT 58 — looking downstream (04/16/2018) 1
PHOTO POINT 59 — looking upstream (04/16/2018)
PHOTO POINT 59 — looking downstream (04/16/2018)
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data —Stream Photographs

STREAM PHOTOGRAPHS
Middle Branch
Monitoring Year 5
PHOTO POINT 61— looking upstream (04/16/2018) 1 PHOTO POINT 61— looking downstream (04/16/2018) 1
PHOTO POINT 62 — looking upstream (04/16/2018) 1 PHOTO POINT 62 — looking downstream (04/16/2018)
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

1
' rJ
'I_ �, I •rl
\ ' I
J
L
`
�s
0
fv
9
I yr �• 8
I -
I� � � '-��s �� '� - u `� -`i ✓�'R' �� \ fix!
dJ
Ali

PHOTO POINT 66 — looking upstream (04/16/2018) 1 PHOTO POINT 66 — looking downstream (04/16/2018) 1
PHOTO POINT 67 — looking upstream (04/16/2018)
PHOTO POINT 67 — looking downstream (04/16/2018)
PHOTO POINT 68 — looking upstream (04/16/2018)
PHOTO POINT 68 — looking downstream (04/16/2018)
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

STREAM PHOTOGRAPHS
Southeast Branch
Monitoring Year 5
PHOTO POINT 70 — looking upstream (04/16/2018)
PHOTO POINT 70 — looking downstream (04/16/2018)
PHOTO POINT 71— looking upstream (04/16/2018)
PHOTO POINT 71— looking downstream (04/16/2018)
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

PHOTO POINT 72 — looking upstream (04/16/2018) 1 PHOTO POINT 72 — looking downstream (04/16/2018) 1
PHOTO POINT 73 — looking upstream (04/16/2018)
PHOTO POINT 73 — looking downstream (04/16/2018)
PHOTO POINT 74 — looking upstream (04/16/2018) 1 PHOTO POINT 74 — looking downstream (04/16/2018) I
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

PHOTO POINT 78 — looking upstream (04/16/2018) 1 PHOTO POINT 78 — looking downstream (04/16/2018) 1
PHOTO POINT 79 — looking upstream (04/16/2018)
PHOTO POINT 79 — looking downstream (04/16/2018)
PHOTO POINT 80 — looking upstream (04/16/2018)
PHOTO POINT 80 — looking downstream (04/16/2018)
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

PHOTO POINT 81— looking upstream (04/16/2018) 1 PHOTO POINT 81— looking downstream (04/16/2018) 1
PHOTO POINT 82 — looking upstream (04/16/2018)
PHOTO POINT 82 — looking downstream (04/16/2018)
L -
PHOTO POINT 83 — looking upstream (04/16/2018) PHOTO POINT 83 — looking downstream (04/16/2018)
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

STREAM PHOTOGRAPHS
North Branch
Monitoring Year 5
PHOTO POINT 84 — looking upstream (04/16/2018)
PHOTO POINT 84 — looking downstream (04/16/2018)
PHOTO POINT 85 — looking upstream (04/16/2018) PHOTO POINT 85 — looking downstream (04/16/2018) 1
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

PHOTO POINT 86 — looking upstream (04/16/2018) 1 PHOTO POINT 86 — looking downstream (04/16/2018) 1
PHOTO POINT 87 — looking upstream (04/16/2018)
PHOTO POINT 87 — looking downstream (04/16/2018)
PHOTO POINT 88 — looking upstream (04/16/2018)
PHOTO POINT 88 — looking downstream (04/16/2018)
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

PHOTO POINT 89 — looking upstream (04/16/2018)
PHOTO POINT 89 — looking downstream (04/16/2018)
PHOTO POINT 90 — looking upstream (04/16/2018) 1 PHOTO POINT 90 — looking downstream (04/16/2018) 1
PHOTO POINT 91— looking upstream (04/16/2018)
PHOTO POINT 91— looking downstream (04/16/2018)
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

PHOTO POINT 92 — looking upstream (04/16/2018) PHOTO POINT 92 — looking downstream (04/16/2018) 1
PHOTO POINT 93 — looking upstream (04/16/2018) 1 PHOTO POINT 93 — looking downstream (04/16/2018) 1
PHOTO POINT 94 — looking upstream (04/16/2018)
PHOTO POINT 94 — looking downstream (04/16/2018)
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

VEGETATION PHOTOGRAPHS
Devil's Racetrack
Monitoring Year 5
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Vegetation Photographs

f�.IS 4 leia �.
l S. Y
�►Or
i
IE � ,.Vjy•y � <..r
I
4.41%
IF'n' 1
-44
•
� .'��
:cam'
,r

14
Ilk
-
4 r av
-4

VEG PLOT 41(08/08/2018) 1 VEG PLOT 42 (08/08/2018) 1
VEG PLOT 43 (08/08/2018) 1 VEG PLOT 44 (08/08/2018) 1
VEG PLOT 45 (08/08/2018)
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Vegetation Photographs
VEG PLOT 46 (08/08/2018)

VEG PLOT 47 (08/08/2018) 1 VEG PLOT 48 (08/08/2018) 1
� +dE ✓#Y. lid iCs � ._
VEG PLOT 49 (08/08/2018)
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Vegetation Photographs
VEG PLOT 50 (08/08/2018)

OVERVIEW PHOTOGRAPH COMPARISON
Devil's Racetrack East
Monitoring Year 5
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Overview Photograph Comparison

2016 East Side
2018 East Side
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Overview Photograph Comparison

2016 East Side
2018 East Side
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Overview Photograph Comparison

APPENDIX 3. Vegetation Plot Data

Table 7. Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Success Criteria
Plot Met (Y/N)
Tract Mean
1 Y
100%
2 Y
3 Y
4 Y
5 Y
6 Y
7 Y
8 Y
9 Y
10 Y
11 Y
12 Y
13 Y
14 Y
15 Y
16 Y
17 Y
18 Y
19 Y
20 Y
21 Y
22 Y
23 Y
24 Y
25 Y
26 Y
27 Y
28 Y
29 Y
30 Y
31 Y
32 Y
33 Y
34 Y
35 Y
36 Y
37 Y
38 Y
39 Y
40 Y
41 Y
42 Y
43 Y
44 Y
45 Y
46 Y
47 Y
48 Y
49 Y
50 Y
51 Y

Table B. CVS Vegetation Table - Metadata
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Database name
Devils Racetrack MY5 cvs-eep-entrytool-v2.3.1.mdb
Database location
F:\Projects\005-02129 Devil's Racetrack\Monitoring\Monitoring Year 5\Vegetation
Computer name
CAROLYN-PC
File size
62914560
DESCRIPTION OF WORKSHEETS IN THIS DOCUMENT------------
Metadata
Description of database file, the report worksheets, and a summary of project(s) and project data.
Proj, planted
Each project is listed with its PLANTED stems per acre, for each year. This excludes live stakes.
Proj, total stems
Each project is listed with its TOTAL stems per acre, for each year. This includes live stakes, all planted stems, and all natural/volunteer stems.
Plots
List of plots surveyed with location and summary data (live stems, dead stems, missing, etc.).
Vigor
Frequency distribution of vigor classes for stems for all plots.
Vigor by Spp
Frequency distribution of vigor classes listed by species.
Damage
List of most frequent damage classes with number of occurrences and percent of total stems impacted by each.
Damage by Spp
Damage values tallied by type for each species.
Damage by Plot
Damage values tallied by type for each plot.
Planted Stems by Plot and Spp
A matrix of the count of PLANTED living stems of each species for each plot; dead and missing stems are excluded.
ALL Stems by Plot and spp
1A matrix of the count of total living stems of each species (planted and natural volunteers combined) for each plot; dead and missing stems are excluded.
PROJECT SUMMARY -------------------------------------
Project Code
95021
project Name
Devils Racetrack Mitigation Site
Description
Stream and Wetland Mitigation
River Basin
Neuse
Sampled Plots
51

Table 9. Planted and Total Stem Counts
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project Code 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Volunteer species included in total
PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P -all: Number of planted stems including live stakes,
T: Total Stems
Current Plot Data (MY5 2018)
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
95021-01-0001
PnoLS P -all T
95021-01-0002
Pnol-S P -all T
95021-01-0003
PnoLS P -all T
95021-01-0004
PnoLS P -all T
95021-01-0005
PnoLS P -all T
Acer rubrum
red maple
Tree
1
Alnusserrulata
hazel alder
Shrub
Baccharis
baccharis
Shrub
3
7
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
Cephalanthus occidentalis
common buttonbush
Shrub
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
3
3
3
4
4
4
3
3
3
1
1
1
2
2
2
Ligustrumsinense
Chinese privet
Exotic
2
Liquidambarstyraciflua
sweetgum
Tree
5
32
6
27
9
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
Albiziajulibrissin
mimosa
Exotic
1
3
Morelia cerifera
wax myrtle
shrub
Nyssabiflora
swamptupelo
Tree
1
1
1
Nyssasylvatica
blackgum
Tree
3
3
3
1
1
1
2
2
2
Pinus
pine
Tree
1
2
3
3
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
2
2
2
2
2
4
2
2
2
3
3
3
Prunus serotina
black cherry
Tree
1
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
3
3
3
1
1
1
2
2
2
Quercus pagoda
cherrybark oak
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
3
3
3
4
4
4
1
1
1
1
Quercus rubra
northern red oak
Tree
1
Rhus copallinum
flameleaf sumac
shrub
Salix nigra
blackwillow
ITree
2
Salix sericea
Isilky willow
IShrub
Taxodium distichum
Ibald cypress
ITree
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
4
4
Ulmus
Jelm
ITree
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
17
7
688
17
1
0.02
7
688
23
13
931
16
7
647
16
1
0.02
7
647
52
9
2,104
14
6
567
14
1
0.02
6
567
20
8
809
11
6
445
11
1
0.02
6
445
40
11
1,619
11
5
11
1
0.02
5
445
21
9
850
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Volunteer species included in total
PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P -all: Number of planted stems including live stakes,
T: Total Stems

Table 9. Planted and Total Stem Counts
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project Code 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Volunteer species included in total
PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P -all: Number of planted stems including live stakes,
T: Total Stems
Current Plot Data (MY5 2018)
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
95021-01-0006
PnoLSFP-all T
95021-01-0007
PnoLS P -all T
95021-01-0008
PnoLS P -all T
95021-01-0009
PnoLS P -all T
95021-01-0010
PnoLS P -all T
Acer rubrum
red maple
Tree
4
2
Alnusserrulata
hazel alder
Shrub
Baccharis
baccharis
Shrub
1
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
5
5
5
5
5
5
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
Cephalanthus occidentalis
common buttonbush
Shrub
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
2
2
2
1
1
1
4
4
4
1
1
1
3
3
3
Ligustrumsinense
Chinese privet
Exotic
Liquidambarstyraciflua
sweetgum
Tree
9
1
1
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
4
4
4
Albiziajulibrissin
mimosa
Exotic
Morelia cerifera
wax myrtle
shrub
Nyssabiflora
swamptupelo
Tree
1
1
1
1
Nyssasylvatica
blackgum
Tree
Pinus
pine
Tree
1
8
4
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
5
5
5
5
5
7
Prunus serotina
black cherry
Tree
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
Quercus pagoda
cherrybark oak
Tree
1
1
1
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
2
2
2
Quercus rubra
northern red oak
Tree
Rhus copallinum
flameleaf sumac
shrub
Salix nigra
blackwillow
ITree
3
1
Salix sericea
Isilky willow
IShrub
Taxodium distichum
Ibald cypress
ITree
5
5
5
4
4
4
5
5
5
3
3
3
Ulmus
Jelm
ITree
1
1
2
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
15
5
15
1
0.02
5
607
29
10
11,174
12
4
486
12
1
0.02
4
486
13
6
526
13
6
526
13 1
1
0.02
6
526
18
9
728
16
6
647
16
1
0.02
6
647
20
9
809
12
4
486
12
1
0.02
4
486
15
5
607
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Volunteer species included in total
PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P -all: Number of planted stems including live stakes,
T: Total Stems

Table 9. Planted and Total Stem Counts
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project Code 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Volunteer species included in total
PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P -all: Number of planted stems including live stakes,
T: Total Stems
Current Plot Data (MY5 2018)
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
95021-01-0011
PnoLS P -all T
95021-01-0012
Pnol-S P -all T
95021-01-0013
PnoLS P -all T
95021-01-0014
PnoLS P -all T
95021-01-0015
PnoLS P -all T
Acer rubrum
red maple
Tree
8
6
1
Alnusserrulata
hazel alder
Shrub
Baccharis
baccharis
Shrub
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
2
2
2
1
1
1
2
2
2
Cephalanthus occidentalis
common buttonbush
Shrub
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
5
5
5
4
4
4
2
2
2
1
1
1
Ligustrumsinense
Chinese privet
Exotic
Liquidambarstyraciflua
sweetgum
Tree
6
4
8
2
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
Albiziajulibrissin
mimosa
Exotic
Morelia cerifera
wax myrtle
shrub
Nyssabiflora
swamptupelo
Tree
1
1
1
Nyssasylvatica
blackgum
Tree
Pinus
pine
Tree
12
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
2
2
2
5
5
5
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
4
4
Prunus serotina
black cherry
Tree
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
1
1
1
2
2
2
Quercus pagoda
cherrybark oak
Tree
1
1
1
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
4
4
4
4
4
4
Quercus rubra
northern red oak
Tree
Rhus copallinum
flameleaf sumac
shrub
Salix nigra
blackwillow
ITree
5
Salix sericea
Isilky willow
IShrub
Taxodium distichum
Ibald cypress
ITree
2
2
2
2
2
2
5
5
5
10
10
10
7
7
7
Ulmus
Jelm
ITree
6
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
11 1
4 1
11
1
0.02
4
445
31
8
1,255
16
5
647
16
1
0.02
5
647
26
7
1,052
16
6
647
16
1
0.02
6
647
16
6
647
15
3
607
15
1
0.02
3
607
24
5
971
15
5
607
15
1
0.02
5
607
22
7
890
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Volunteer species included in total
PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P -all: Number of planted stems including live stakes,
T: Total Stems

Table 9. Planted and Total Stem Counts
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project Code 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Volunteer species included in total
PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P -all: Number of planted stems including live stakes,
T: Total Stems
Current Plot Data (MY5 2018)
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
95021-01-0016
PnoLS P -all T
95021-01-0017
Pnol-S P -all T
95021-01-0018
PnoLS P -all T
95021-01-0019
PnoLS P -all T
95021-01-0020
PnoLS P -all T
Acer rubrum
red maple
Tree
2
Alnusserrulata
hazel alder
Shrub
Baccharis
baccharis
Shrub
1
4
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
6
6
6
2
2
2
Cephalanthus occidentalis
common buttonbush
Shrub
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
3
3
3
2
2
2
1
1
1
2
2
2
Ligustrumsinense
Chinese privet
Exotic
Liquidambarstyraciflua
sweetgum
Tree
5
3
1
3
3
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
Albiziajulibrissin
mimosa
Exotic
Morelia cerifera
wax myrtle
shrub
Nyssabiflora
swamptupelo
Tree
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
Nyssasylvatica
blackgum
Tree
Pinus
pine
Tree
1
4
5
3
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
4
4
4
Prunus serotina
black cherry
Tree
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
5
5
5
1
1
1
Quercus pagoda
cherrybark oak
Tree
1
1
1
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
1
1
1
4
4
4
1
1
1
Quercus rubra
northern red oak
Tree
1
1
1
Rhus copallinum
flameleaf sumac
shrub
Salix nigra
blackwillow
ITree
Salix sericea
Isilky willow
IShrub
Taxodium distichum
Ibald cypress
ITree
10
10
10
5
5
5
4
4
4
7
7
7
Ulmus
Jelm
ITree
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)0.02
Species count
Stems per ACRE
14
5
14
1
5
567
19
7
769
16
5
647
16 1
1
0.02
5
647
21
8
850
12 1
4
486
12 1
1
0.02
4
486
13
6
526
14 1
5
567
14 1
1
0.02
5
567
17
7
688
15
5
607
15
1
0.02
5
607
18
8
728
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Volunteer species included in total
PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P -all: Number of planted stems including live stakes,
T: Total Stems

Table 9. Planted and Total Stem Counts
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project Code 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Volunteer species included in total
PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P -all: Number of planted stems including live stakes,
T: Total Stems
Current Plot Data (MY5 2018)
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
95021-01-0021
PnoLS P -all T
95021-01-0022
Pnol-S P -all T
95021-01-0023
PnoLS P -all T
95021-01-0024
PnoLS P -all T
95021-01-0025
PnoLS P -all T
Acer rubrum
red maple
Tree
1
Alnusserrulata
hazel alder
Shrub
Baccharis
baccharis
Shrub
1
2
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
Cephalanthus occidentalis
common buttonbush
Shrub
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
5
5
5
3
3
3
6
6
6
3
3
3
Ligustrumsinense
Chinese privet
Exotic
Liquidambarstyraciflua
sweetgum
Tree
2
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
Albiziajulibrissin
mimosa
Exotic
Morelia cerifera
wax myrtle
shrub
Nyssabiflora
swamptupelo
Tree
Nyssasylvatica
blackgum
Tree
Pinus
pine
Tree
19
4
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
1
1
1
7
7
7
4
4
4
4
4
4
Prunus serotina
black cherry
Tree
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
2
2
2
Quercus pagoda
cherrybark oak
Tree
3
3
3
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
2
2
2
2
2
3
1
1
1
Quercus rubra
northern red oak
Tree
Rhus copallinum
flameleaf sumac
shrub
Salix nigra
blackwillow
ITree
2
1
Salix sericea
Isilky willow
IShrub
Taxodium distichum
Ibald cypress
ITree
5
5
5
7
7
7
3
3
3
4
4
4
6
6
6
Ulmus
Jelm
ITree
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
13
3
526
13
1
0.02
3
526 1
13
3
526
16
5
647
16
1
0.02
5
647
16
7
647
14
4
567
14 1
1
0.02
4
567
18
6
728
17
5
688
17
1
0.02
5
688
17
5
688
15
4
607
15
1
0.02
4
607 1
18
8
728
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Volunteer species included in total
PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P -all: Number of planted stems including live stakes,
T: Total Stems

Table 9. Planted and Total Stem Counts
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project Code 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Volunteer species included in total
PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P -all: Number of planted stems including live stakes,
T: Total Stems
Current Plot Data (MY5 2018)
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
95021-01-0026
PnoLS P -all T
95021-01-0027
Pnol-S P -all T
95021-01-0028
PnoLS P -all T
95021-01-0029
PnoLS P -all T
95021-01-0030
PnoLS P -all T
Acer rubrum
red maple
Tree
Alnusserrulata
hazel alder
Shrub
Baccharis
baccharis
Shrub
3
4
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
Cephalanthus occidentalis
common buttonbush
Shrub
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
4
4
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Ligustrumsinense
Chinese privet
Exotic
Liquidambarstyraciflua
sweetgum
Tree
2
3
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
Albiziajulibrissin
mimosa
Exotic
Morelia cerifera
wax myrtle
shrub
3
Nyssabiflora
swamptupelo
Tree
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
Nyssasylvatica
blackgum
Tree
Pinus
pine
Tree
1
2
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
3
3
1
1
1
Prunus serotina
black cherry
Tree
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
4
4
4
1
1
1
Quercus pagoda
cherrybark oak
Tree
8
8
8
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
1
1
1
5
5
5
1
1
1
4
4
4
Quercus rubra
northern red oak
Tree
Rhus copallinum
flameleaf sumac
shrub
Salix nigra
blackwillow
ITree
7
Salix sericea
Isilky willow
IShrub
Taxodium distichum
Ibald cypress
ITree
3
3
3
9
9
9
1
1
1
5
5
5
3
3
3
Ulmus
Jelm
ITree
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count5
Stems per ACRE
11 1
11 1
1
0.02
5
445
11
7
445
16
5
647
16
1
0.02
5
647
21
9
850
14
6
567
14 1
1
0.02
6
567
23
7
931
12
6
486
12
1
0.02
6
486
12
6
486
17
5
688
17
1
0.02
5
688 1
17
5
688
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Volunteer species included in total
PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P -all: Number of planted stems including live stakes,
T: Total Stems

Table 9. Planted and Total Stem Counts
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project Code 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Volunteer species included in total
PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P -all: Number of planted stems including live stakes,
T: Total Stems
Current Plot Data (MY5 2018)
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
95021-01-0031
PnoLS P -all T
95021-01-0032
Pnol-S P -all T
95021-01-0033
PnoLS P -all T
95021-01-0034
PnoLS P -all T
95021-01-0035
PnoLS P -all T
Acer rubrum
red maple
Tree
Alnusserrulata
hazel alder
Shrub
Baccharis
baccharis
Shrub
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
4
4
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
4
4
Cephalanthus occidentalis
common buttonbush
Shrub
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
1
1
1
7
7
8
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
Ligustrumsinense
Chinese privet
Exotic
Liquidambarstyraciflua
sweetgum
Tree
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
Albiziajulibrissin
mimosa
Exotic
Morelia cerifera
wax myrtle
shrub
Nyssabiflora
swamptupelo
Tree
2
2
2
1
1
1
2
2
2
4
4
4
4
4
4
Nyssasylvatica
blackgum
Tree
Pinus
pine
Tree
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
4
4
4
2
2
2
4
4
4
1
1
1
7
7
7
Prunus serotina
black cherry
Tree
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
Quercus pagoda
cherrybark oak
Tree
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
4
4
4
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
1
1
1
2
2
2
Quercus rubra
northern red oak
Tree
Rhus copallinum
flameleaf sumac
shrub
Salix nigra
blackwillow
Tree
Salix sericea
Isilky willow
Shrub
Taxodium distichum
Ibald cypress
Tree
2
2
2
7
7
7
4
4
4
2
2
2
2
2
2
Ulmus
elm
Tree
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
16
7
16
1
0.02
7
647 1
16
7
647
19
5
769
19
1
0.02
5
769
20
5
809
18
7
728
18
1
0.02
7
728
18
7
728
16
6
647
16
1
0.02
6
647 1
16
6
647
19
5
19
1
0.02
5
769
19
5
769
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Volunteer species included in total
PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P -all: Number of planted stems including live stakes,
T: Total Stems

Table 9. Planted and Total Stem Counts
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project Code 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Volunteer species included in total
PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P -all: Number of planted stems including live stakes,
T: Total Stems
Current Plot Data (MY5 2018)
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
95021-01-0036
PnoLS P -all T
95021-01-0037
Pnol-S P -all T
95021-01-0038
PnoLS P -all T
95021-01-0039
PnoLS P -all T
95021-01-0040
PnoLS P -all T
Acer rubrum
red maple
Tree
Alnusserrulata
hazel alder
Shrub
Baccharis
baccharis
Shrub
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
4
4
4
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
Cephalanthus occidentalis
common buttonbush
Shrub
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
Ligustrumsinense
Chinese privet
Exotic
Liquidambarstyraciflua
sweetgum
Tree
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
Albiziajulibrissin
mimosa
Exotic
Morelia cerifera
wax myrtle
shrub
Nyssabiflora
swamptupelo
Tree
1
1
1
2
2
2
Nyssasylvatica
blackgum
Tree
Pinus
pine
Tree
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
2
2
2
2
2
2
6
6
6
5
5
5
Prunus serotina
black cherry
Tree
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
Quercus pagoda
cherrybark oak
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
5
5
5
1
1
1
1
1
1
4
4
4
Quercus rubra
northern red oak
Tree
Rhus copallinum
flameleaf sumac
shrub
Salix nigra
blackwillow
ITree
Salix sericea
Isilky willow
IShrub
Taxodium distichum
Ibald cypress
ITree
3
3
3
3
3
3
5
5
5
4
4
4
5
5
5
Ulmus
Jelm
ITree
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
17
7
688
17
1
0.02
7
688
17
7
688
12
6
486
12
1
0.02
6
486
12
6
486
9
3
364
9
1
0.02
3
364
9
3
364
15
5
607
15
1
0.02
5
607
15Ld
5
607
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Volunteer species included in total
PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P -all: Number of planted stems including live stakes,
T: Total Stems

Table 9. Planted and Total Stem Counts
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project Code 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Volunteer species included in total
PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P -all: Number of planted stems including live stakes,
T: Total Stems
Current Plot Data (MY5 2018)
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
95021-01-0041
PnoLSFP-all T
95021-01-0042
PnoLS P -all T
95021-01-0043
PnoLS P -all T
95021-01-0044
PnoLS P -all T
95021-01-0045
PnoLS P -all T
Acer rubrum
red maple
Tree
Alnusserrulata
hazel alder
Shrub
Baccharis
baccharis
Shrub
1
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
1
1
1
2
2
2
Cephalanthus occidentalis
common buttonbush
Shrub
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
2
2
2
4
4
4
4
4
4
1
1
1
Ligustrumsinense
Chinese privet
Exotic
Liquidambarstyraciflua
sweetgum
Tree
1
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
Albiziajulibrissin
mimosa
Exotic
Morelia cerifera
wax myrtle
shrub
Nyssabiflora
swamptupelo
Tree
1
1
1
6
6
6
2
2
2
8
8
8
Nyssasylvatica
blackgum
Tree
3
Pinus
pine
Tree
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
3
3
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
Prunus serotina
black cherry
Tree
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
1
1
1
Quercus pagoda
cherrybark oak
Tree
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
2
2
2
3
3
3
1
1
1
2
2
2
Quercus rubra
northern red oak
Tree
Rhus copallinum
flameleaf sumac
shrub
Salix nigra
blackwillow
ITree
Salix sericea
Isilky willow
IShrub
Taxodium distichum
Ibald cypress
ITree
6
6
6
1
1
1
4
4
4
6
6
6
Ulmus
Jelm
ITree
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
15
6
607
15
1
0.02
6
607 1
15
6
607
12
5
486
12
1
0.02
5
486
12
6
486
12
4
486
12 1
1
0.02
4
486
13
5
526
15
5
607
15
1
0.02
5
607
15
5
607
12
5
486
12
1
0.02
5
486 1
15
6
607
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Volunteer species included in total
PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P -all: Number of planted stems including live stakes,
T: Total Stems

Table 9. Planted and Total Stem Counts
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project Code 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Volunteer species included in total
PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P -all: Number of planted stems including live stakes,
T: Total Stems
Current Plot Data (MY5 2018)
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
95021-01-0046
PnoLSFP-all T
95021-01-0047
PnoLS P -all T
95021-01-0048
PnoLS P -all T
95021-01-0049
PnoLS P -all T
95021-01-0050
PnoLS P -all T
95021-01-0051
PnoLS P -all T
Acer rubrum
red maple
Tree
Alnusserrulata
hazel alder
Shrub
Baccharis
baccharis
Shrub
1
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
4
4
4
3
3
3
5
5
5
3
3
3
Cephalanthus occidentalis
common buttonbush
Shrub
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
3
3
3
6
6
7
2
2
2
3
3
3
2
2
2
Ligustrumsinense
Chinese privet
Exotic
Liquidambarstyraciflua
sweetgum
Tree
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
1
1
1
2
2
3
3
3
3
2
2
3
Albiziajulibrissin
mimosa
Exotic
Morelia cerifera
wax myrtle
shrub
Nyssabiflora
swamptupelo
Tree
Nyssasylvatica
blackgum
Tree
2
Pinus
pine
Tree
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
1
1
1
3
3
3
5
5
5
Prunus serotina
black cherry
Tree
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
1
1
1
Quercus pagoda
cherrybark oak
Tree
3
3
3
2
2
2
5
5
5
1
1
1
2
2
2
4
4
5
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
2
2
2
3
3
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Quercus rubra
northern red oak
Tree
Rhus copallinum
flameleaf sumac
shrub
Salix nigra
Iblackwillow
Tree
Salix sericea
Isilky willow
IShrub
Taxodium distichum
Ibald cypress
ITree
1
1
1
1
1
1
Ulmus
Jelm
ITree
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
12
6
486
12
1
0.02
6
486
14
7
567
8
3
324
8
1
0.02
3
324
8
4
324
14
4
567
14
1
0.02
4
567
17
5
688
8
5
324
8
1
0.02
5
324
9
6
364
17
6
688
17
1
0.02
6
688
18
7
728
17
6
17
1
0.02
6
688
19
6
769
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Volunteer species included in total
PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P -all: Number of planted stems including live stakes,
T: Total Stems

Table 9. Planted and Total Stem Counts
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project Code 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Volunteer species included in total
PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P -all: Number of planted stems including live stakes,
T: Total Stems
Annual Means
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
MY5 (2018)
PnoLS P -all T
MY4 (2017)
Pnol-S P -all T
M (2016)
PnoLS P -all T
MY2 (2015)
PnoLS P -all T
MY1 (2014)
PnoLS P -all T
MYO (2014)
PnoLS P -all T
Acer rubrum
red maple
Tree
25
8
3
2
Alnusserrulata
hazel alder
Shrub
3
4
Baccharis
baccharis
Shrub
28
32
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
98
98
98
98
98
98
102
102
102
104
104
104
106
106
106
106
106
106
Cephalanthus occidentalis
common buttonbush
Shrub
2
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
116
116
117
117
117
118
119
119
119
123
123
125
124
124
124
126
126
126
Ligustrumsinense
Chinese privet
Exotic
2
Liquidambarstyraciflua
sweetgum
Tree
132
135
184
86
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
12
12
14
13
13
13
13
13
13
14
14
14
25
25
25
20
20
20
Albiziajulibrissin
mimosa
Exotic
4
Morelia cerifera
wax myrtle
shrub
3
Nyssabiflora
swamptupelo
Tree
50
50
51
53
53
54
54
54
54
59
59
59
64
64
64
60
60
60
Nyssasylvatica
blackgum
Tree
6
6
11
7
7
9
8
8
8
8
8
8
9
9
9
10
10
10
Pinus
pine
Tree
73
232
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
116
116
121
117
117
118
123
123
126
128
128
128
124
124
124
124
124
124
Prunus serotina
black cherry
Tree
1
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
25
25
28
57
57
57
60
60
60
77
77
77
91
91
91
108
108
108
Quercus pagoda
cherrybark oak
Tree
44
44
45
12
12
13
12
12
12
12
12
12
14
14
14
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
71
71
73
71
71
79
77
77
79
97
97
97
104
104
104
125
125
125
Quercus rubra
northern red oak
Tree
1
1
2
1
1
4
1
1
7
1
1
3
Rhus copallinum
flameleaf sumac
shrub
2
Salix nigra
blackwillow
Tree
21
38
13
Salix sericea
Isilky willow
IShrub
3
Taxodium distichum
Ibald cypress
ITree
186
186
186
189
189
189
190
190
190
189
189
189
206
206
206
Ulmus
elm
Tree
9
=1167.
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
725
11
725
51
1.26
11
575
937
21
744
11 1
581 1
51
1.26
11
581 1
17
926
758 1
11 1
601 1
758
51
1.26
11
601
1 1005
16
797
813
11
645
813
51
1.26
11
645
910
15
722
850
10 1
674 1
850
51
1.26
10 1
674 1
850
10
674
885
9
702
885
51
1.26
9
702
885
9
702
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Volunteer species included in total
PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P -all: Number of planted stems including live stakes,
T: Total Stems

APPENDIX 4. Morphological Summary Data and Plots

Table 10a. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year S - 2018
Devils Racetrack- West
Parameter
Gage
Pre -Restoration Condition
Devil's Racetrack - West
Scout
West
I
Scout
East
2
Reference Reach Data
Scout West 2
Johanna
Creek
Jarman
Oak
Devil's
Design
r-
r-
As-Built/Baseline
Devil's
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Dimension and Substrate - Shallow
Bankfull Width (ft)
4.8
8.0
2.6
6.3
4.7
6.1
5.6
7.6
9.7
9.3
9.0
11.5
4.7
9.6
7.7
Floodprone Width (ft)
7.8
18.0
>20
>50
>50
>75
>150
100
300
100
300
>200
>200
Bankfull Mean Depth
0.8
1.2
0.3
0.5
1.1
1.3
0.7
1.0
0.8
1.2
0.6
0.8
0.4
0.9
0.5
Bankfull Max Depth
1.3
1.6
0.5
0.7
1.7
1.8
1.2
1.3
1.1
2.3
0.9 1
1.1
1.1
F
1.5
1.1
1.4
0.7
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ftz
N/A
5.7
6.3
1.3
2.0
6.0
6.9
5.3
5.4
7.2
7.8
11.6
5.8
9.5
2.1
8.5
4.0
Width/Depth Ratio
4.0
10.5
5.4
19.4
3.6
5.4
5.7
11.0
10.1
19.7
7.4
14.0
14.5
14.0
10.6
14.8
14.5
Entrenchment Ratio
1.6
2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
8.0
9.6
16.1
26.9
11.1
33.3
8.7
26.1
>20.9
>42.5
>26.1
Bank Height Ratio
1.9
4.5
1.1
1.3
1.0
1.1
1.2
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.1
1.0
1.1
1.0
1.0
D50 (mm)
0.464
N/A
N/A
Profile
Shallow Length (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
3.7
86.8
7.4
54.2
Shallow Slope (ft/ft)
---
0.026
1
0.047
N/A
0.033
1
0.051
N/A
0.0129
0.0036 1
0.0277
0.0023
1
0.0072
0.0013
0.0593
0.0008
0.0195
Pool Length (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
5.5
63.1
18.7
72.9
Pool Max Depth (ft)
N/A
1.2
0.6
N/A
1.7
1.9
1.5
3.1
0.9
2.1
1.1
2.5
1.1
2.9
1.4
1.9
Pool Spacing (ft)
---
27
67
N/A
21
27
16
1
59
32
55
14
63
18
81
9
132
38
104
Pool VolUme ft3
Pattern
_01110111
-
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
---
8.7
14.3
7.2
16.2
9.1
9.8
14.0
20.0
21.0
36.0
12.0
72.0
15.0
92.0
13.0
53.0
16.0
73.0
Radius of Curvature (ft)
---
3.1
9.0
5.5
16.0
5.4
6.8
15.0
27.0
13.7
18.6
14.0
43.0
17.0
55.0
12.0
40.0
17.0
35.0
Rc:Bankfull Width (ft/ft)
N/A
---
0.6
1.6
1.0
3.0
0.8
1.0
1.5
2.8
1.5
2.0
1.5
4.8
1.5
4.8
2.6
4.2
2.2
4.5
Meander Length (ft)
---
39.8
84.8
36.5
63.2
32.5
36.9
50.0
N/A
27
153
35
196
52
133
70
137
Meander Width Ratio
---
1.6
2.6
1.3
3.0
1.4
1.5
1.4
2.1
2.3
2.9
1.3
8.0
1.3
8.0
2.8
5.5
2.1
9.5
Substrate, Bed and Transport Parameters
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be%
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/d100
0.168/0.33/0.464/1.23/2.0/9.6
---
---
---
---
N/A
Shear Stress Com etenc Ib/ftz
N/A
0.18
0.23
---
---
N/A
:=N/AReach
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
I AL
Stream Power (Capacity) W/mz
Additional Reach Parameters
Drainage Area (SM)
0.77
0.06
0.67
0.34
0.90
1.27
0.60
0.70
0.60
0.70
Watershed Impervious Cover Estimate (%)
<1%
---
---
---
---
---
<1%
<1%
<1%
<1%
Rosgen Classification
Gc5
E/C5b
E5
E5
ES/C5
E6
E/C5
E/C5
E/C5
C
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
1.5
1.8
1.3
2.0
2.5
2.9
1.2
1.2
1.8
1.9
0.95
1.7
1.2
1.2
4.8
3.3
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
9.2
10.6
2.6
17.5
6.4
14.0
11.0
10.0
13.0
10.0
13.0
Q-NFF regression
---
Q-USGS extrapolation
N/A
---
Q-Mannings
--
Valley Length ft
---
---
---
--
---
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
4,976
---
---
---
---
---
4,245
966
4,239
962
Sinuosity
1.0
1.1
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.4
1.2
1.6
1.2
1.6
1.2
1.4
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)2
---
---
---
---
---
---
0.0054
0.0015
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)l
0.0041
0.0260
0.0170
0.0040
0.0022
0.0040
0.0025
0.0087
0.0016
F
0.0022
0.0053
1
0.0054
0.0017
1
0.0023
( --- ): Data was not provided
N/A: Not Applicable

Table 10b. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Devils Racetrack- East
( --- ): Data was not provided
N/A: Not Applicable
Gage
Pre -Restoration Condition
Devil's Racetrack - East
Min Max
Scout
Min
West I
Max
Scout
Min
East
I
2
Max
Reference Reach Data
Scout West 2
Min I Max I
Johanna
Min
Creek
I
Max
Jarman
Min
•.
I
Max
Devil's
Min
I
Max
Design
r
Min I Max
r
Min I Max
I Min
F
Max
As-Built/Baseline
.-
Min Max
Devil'sParameter
Min
Max
Dimension and Substrate - Shallow
Bankfull Width (ft)
8.1
10.4
2.6
6.3
4.7
6.1
5.6
7.6
9.7
9.3
13.0
8.0
8.0
12.2
13.7
8.2
Floodprone Width (ft)
14.2
18.6
>20
>50
>50
>75
>150
100
500
100
1
500
100 500
>300
>300
---
Bankfull Mean Depth
1.0
1.8
0.3
0.5
1.1
1.3
0.7
1.0
0.8
1.2
1.0
0.6
---
0.8
1.1
0.7
---
Bankfull Max Depth
2.1
2.8
0.5
0.7
1.7
1.8
1.2
1.3
1.1
2.3
1.4
1.8
0.8
1.0
0.9
1.3
1.7
1.1
---
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ftz
N/A
14.2
19.1
1.3
2.0
6.0
6.9
5.3
5.4
7.2
7.8
11.6
12.8
4.8
---
10.3
13.9
5.7
---
Width/Depth Ratio
5.0
7.8
5.4
19.4
3.6
5.4
5.7
11.0
10.1
19.7
7.4
13.0
13.5
14.0
14.5
---
12.1
14.6
11.9
---
Entrenchment Ratio
1.6
1.8
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
8.0
9.6
16.1
1
26.9
7.7
38.5
12.5
1
62.6
---
>21.9
>24.5
>36.5
---
Bank Height Ratio
2.6
4.3
1.1
1.3
1.0
1.1
1.2
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.1
1.0
1.1
---
1.0
1.0
---
D50 (mm)
0.179
JL
N/A
N/A
Profile
Shallow Length (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
13.0
80.1
20.8
42.4
11.3
25.9
Shallow Slope (ft/ft)
---
7
N/A
0.033
0.051
N/A
0.0129
0.0007
0.0025
0.0377
0.0671
--
0.0004
0.0099
0.0192
0.0318
0.0072
0.0675
Pool Length (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
16.0
77.3
16.5
66.1
13.0
34.2
Pool Max Depth (ft)
N/A
---
[LO.6
N/A
1.7
1.9
1.5
3.1
1.4
3.2
0.8
2.0
1.2
1.9
3.4
1.7
2.7
1.4
2.5
Pool Spacing (ft)
---
N/A
21
27
16
59
32
55
21
91
39
64
---
26
131
43
73
25
70
Pool Volume(ft)
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
---
8.7
14.3
7.2
16.2
9.1
9.8
14.0
20.0
21.0
36.0
17.0
65.0
10.0
40.0
---
15.0
55.0
21
41
1232
Radius of Curvature (ft)
---
3.1
9.0
5.5
16.0
5.4
6.8
15.0
27.0
13.7
18.6
20.0
62.0
12.0
36.0
---
18.0
65.0
12
26
10
35
Rc:Bankfull Width (ft/ft)
N/A
---
0.6
1.6
1.0
3.0
0.8
1.0
1.5
2.8
1.5
2.0
1.5
4.8
1.5
4.5
---
1.5
4.7
1.5
3.2
---
Meander Length (ft)
---
39.8
84.8
36.5
63.2
32.5
36.9
50.0
N/A
39
221
64
136
---
62
203
101
140
52
1 112
Meander Width Ratio
---
1.6
2.6
1.3
3.0
1.4
1.5
1.4
2.1
2.3
2.9
1.3
5.0
1.3
5.0
---
1.2
4.0
2.6
5.0
---
Substrate, Bed and Transport Parameters
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be%
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/d100
-/-/0.179/0.642/1.0/9.6
---
---
---
---
---
N/A
N/A
N/A
Reach Shear Stress Com etenc Ib/
N/A
0.01
N/A
N/A
N/A
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
Stream Power (Capacity)W/mz
Additional Reach Parameters
Drainage Area (SM)
1.30
0.06
0.67
0.34
0.90
1.27
1.14
1.30
---
1.14
1.30
--
Watershed Impervious Cover Estimate (%)
<1%
---
---
---
---
---
<1%
<1%
<1%
<1%
<1%
<1%
Rosgen Classification
Gc5
E/C5b
ES
ES
ES/CS
E6
E/C5
E/C5
E/C5
C
C
---
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
0.3
0.4
1.3
2.0
2.5
2.9
1.2
1.2
1.8
1.9
0.95
1.2
3.5
---
1.2
1.6
3.0
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
8.5
2.6
17.5
6.4
14.0
11.0
16.0
17.0
---
16.0
17.0
---
Q-NFF regression
---
Q-USGS extrapolation
N/A
---
Q-Mannings
---
Valley Length ft
---
---
---
---
--
---
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
4,844
---
---
---
---
---
4,840
313
385
4,833
310
372
Sinuosity
1.0
1.1
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.4
1.1
1.3
1.1
1.2
---
1.1
1.1
1.1
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)2
---
---
---
---0.0007
--
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
0.0003
0.0260
0.0170
0.0040
0.0022
0.0040
0.0004
0.0008
0.0224
0.0251
---0.0007
0.0008
0.0153
0.0166
0.0219
0.0231
( --- ): Data was not provided
N/A: Not Applicable

Table 10c. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Southeast Branch
9000mr-L-
Gage
Pre -Restoration Condition
Southeast Branch
IUL Scout
West
1
Scout
East
2
Reference Reach Data
Scout West 2
Johanna
Creek
Jarman
O.
r
IN Southeast
Branch
Design
Southeast Branch
Southeast
Branch
Southeast
Branch
As-Built/Baseline
Southeast Branch
Southeast
Branch
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Dimension and Substrate - Shallow
Bankfull Width (ft)
2.7
5.7
2.6
6.3
4.7
6.1
5.6
7.6
9.7
9.3
3.0
4.0
5.4
3.0
3.8
5.3
Floodprone Width (ft)
8.6
11.4
>20
>50
>50
>75
>150
25
F
35
50
1
70
100
1 300
>30
>60
>200
Bankfull Mean Depth
0.2
0.4
0.3
0.5
1.1
1.3
0.7
1.0
0.8
1.2
0.5
0.6
1.0
0.3
0.4
0.4
Bankfull Max Depth
0.4
1.4
0.5
0.7
1.7
1.8
1.2
1.3
1.1
2.3
0.4
T
0.6
0.5
1
0.7
0.8
1 1.2
0.5
0.5
0.6
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ft2
N/A
1.1
1.4
1.3
2.0
6.0
6.9
5.3
5.4
7.2
7.8
11.6
1.0
1.5
2.5
0.8
1.3
2.1
Width/Depth Ratio
6.8
24.3
5.4
19.4
3.6
5.4
5.7
11.0
10.1
19.7
7.4
9.0
10.0
10.0
12.0
11.0
12.0
11.4
10.8
13.8
Entrenchment Ratio
1.5
4.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
8.0
9.6
16.1
1
26.9
8.3
11.7
12.5
17.5
18.5
55.6
>9.9
>15.8
>37.5
Bank Height Ratio
2.2
6.0
1.1
1.3
1.01
.1
1.2
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.1
1.0
1.1
1.0
1.2
1.0
1.0
1.0
D50 (mm)
0.409
N/A
N/A
N/A
Profile
Shallow Length (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
2.1
64.4
3.4
144.4
6.0
47.3
Shallow Slope (ft/ft)
---
0.026
0.047
N/A
0.033
1
0.051
N/A
0.0129
0.0162
0.0681
0.0144
1
0.0384
0.0035
0.0285
0.0010
0.0803
0.0021
0.0272
0.0005
0.0168
Pool Length (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
2.1
36.7
3.1
33.6
3.2
61.3
Pool Max Depth (ft)
N/A
0.4
0.6
N/A
1.7
1.9
1.5
3.1
0.5
1.1
0.4
1.2
0.5
1.5
0.7
1.5
0.5
1.0
0.5
1.1
Pool Spacing (ft)
---
27
67
N/A
21
27
16
59
32
55
15
24
20
32
9
38
4
76
8
90
14
52
Pool Volume ft3)
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
---
8.7
14.3
7.2
1
16.2
9.1
9.8
14.0
20.0
21.0
36.0
4.0
9.0
5.0
12.0
7.0
43.0
5.3
11.2
6.8
14.3
12.7
32.8
Radius of Curvature (ft)
---
3.1
9.0
5.5
16.0
5.4
6.8
15.0
27.0
13.7
18.6
5.0
14.0
6.0
18.0
8.0
26.0
5.0
23.5
10.0
25.6
10.4
29.5
Rc:Bankfull Width (ft/ft)
N/A
---
0.6
1.6
1.0
3.0
0.8
1.0
1.5
2.8
1.5
2.0
1.5
4.5
1.5
4.5
1.5
4.8
1.7
7.8
2.6
6.7
2.0
5.6
Meander Length (ft)
---
39.8
84.8
36.5
63.2
32.5
36.9
50.0
N/A
24
51
32
68
16
92
22
63
33
70
32
74
Meander Width Ratio
---
1.6
2.6
1.3
3.0
1.4
1.5
1.4
2.1
2.3
2.9
1.3
3.0
1.3
3.0
1.3
8.0
1.8
3.7
1.8
3.8
2.4
6.2
Substrate, Bed and Transport Parameters
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be%
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/d100
N/A
0.08/0.28/0.41/0.94/1.6/9.6
---
---
---
---
---
N/A
N/A
Reach Shear Stress (Competency) lb/ft'
0.51
--
--
--
N/A
N/A
N/A
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
Stream Power Ca acit W/m2
im
Additional Reach Parameters
Drainage Area (SM)
0.19
0.06
0.67
0.34
0.90
1.27
0.03
0.07
0.10
0.03
0.07
0.10
Watershed Impervious Cover Estimate (%)
<1%
---
---
<1%
<1%
<1%
<1%
<1%
<1%
Rosgen Classification
G/F5
E/CSb
ES
ES
ES/C5
E6
---
---
E/C5
E/C5
E/C5
E/C5
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
2.2
1.3
2.0
2.5
F
2.9
1.2
1.2
1.8
1.9
0.95
1.7
1.4
1.4
1.9
1.5
1.4
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
2.4
2.6
17.5
6.4
14.0
11.0
1.5
2.0
3.0
1.5
2.0
3.0
Q-NFF regression
---
Q-USGS extrapolation
N/A
---
Q-Mannings
---
--Va
ey Length t
Valley
---
---
---
--
---
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
2,976
---
---
---
---
---
1,559
716
617
1,559
713
616
Sinuosity
1.0
1.1
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.4
1.1
1.2
1.1
F
1.2
1.2
1.6
1.6
1
1.1
1.3
Water Surface Slope ft/ft 2
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
0.0221
0.0174
0.0030
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
0.0230
0.0260
0.0170
0.0040
0.0022
0.0040
0.0108
0.0227
0.0096
0.0128
0.0025
0.0089
0.0222
0.0015
0.0119
0.0028
0.0030
( --- ): Data was not provided
N/A: Not Applicable

Table 10d. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Middle Branch
( --- ): Data was not provided
N/A: Not Applicable
Gage
Pre -Restoration Condition
Middle Branchma
Scout West I
an
Scout East 2
Reference Reach Data
Scout West 2
Md A.
Johanna creek
an
Jarman
Oak
AN
Middle Branch
(Reach 1)
Design
Middle Branch
(Reach 2)
Middle Branch
(Reach 1)
As-Built/Baseline
Middle
(Reach
BranchA
2)
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min Max
Min Max Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max Min
Max
Dimension and Substrate - Shallow
Bankfull Width (ft)
1.8
2.3
2.6 6.3
4.7 6.1
5.6 7.6
9.7
9.3
3.0
4.0
2.2
3.4
Floodprone Width (ft)
4.6
6.8
>20
>50
>50
>75
>150
40 1
60
100 F
300
>50
>200
Bankfull Mean Depth
0.2
0.3
0.3 0.5
1.1 1.3
0.7 1.0
0.8
1.2
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
Bankfull Max Depth
0.3
0.6
0.5 0.7
1.7 1.8
1.2 1.3
1.1
2.3
0.4 F
0.5
0.5 1
0.6
0.5
0.5
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ft2
N/A
0.4
0.5
1.3 2.0
6.0 6.9
5.3 5.4 7.2
7.8
11.6
0.9
1.5
0.7
1.1
Width/Depth Ratio
6.9
12.0
5.4 19.4
3.6 5.4
5.7 11.0 10.1
19.7
7.4
10.0
10.5
10.0
12.0
6.7
10.1
Entrenchment Ratio
2.0
3.8
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
8.0
9.6
16.1
26.9
33.3
100.0
22.2
66.7
>22.9
>58.8
Bank Height Ratio
5.3
6.5
1.1 1.3
1.0
1.1 1.2
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.1
1 1.0
1.1
1.0
1.0
D50 (mm)
0.083
N/A
N/A
Profile
Shallow Length (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
2.5
46.6 7.9
16.1
Shallow Slope(ft/ft)
---
0.026 1 0.047
N/A
0.033 1 0.051N/A
0.0129
0.0144 1
0.0489
0.0002 1
0.0074
0.0008
0.0492 0.0059
0.0236
Pool Length (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
2.9
17.3 11.2
19.8
Pool Max Depth (ft)
N/A
---
0.6
N/A
1.7 1.9L16
1.5
3.1
0.4
1.0
0.5
1.0
0.5
1.2 0.6
0.9
Pool Spacing (ft)
---
27 67
N/A
21 27
59
32
55
15
24
5
22
8
56 18
24
Pool Volume ft3
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
I
---
8.7 1 14.3
1 7.2 1 16.2
1 9.1 1 9.8 1 14.0
1
20.0
21.0
36.0
4.0
9.0
6.0
36.0
4.1
9.4 6.7
20.9
Radius of Curvature (ft)
---
3.1 9.0
5.5 16.0
5.4 6.8 15.0
27.0
13.7
18.6
5.0
14.0
7.0
22.0
7.0
23.9 9.2
23.5
Rc:Bankfull Width (ft/ft)
N/A
---
0.6 1.6
1.0 3.0
0.8 1.0 1.5
2.8
1.5
2.0
1.7
4.5
1.5
4.8
3.2
10.9 2.7
6.9
Meander Length (ft)
---
39.8 84.8
36.5 63.2
32.5 36.9
50.0
N/A
24
51
14
77
23
44 32
57
Meander Width Ratio
---
1.6 2.6
1.3 3.0
1.4 1.5 1.4
2.1
2.3
2.9
1.3
3.0
1.3
8.0
2.2
4.3 2.0
6.1
Substrate, Bed and Transport Parameters
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be%'jl
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/d100
N/A
-/-/0.083/0.498/0.9/9.6
---
---
---
---
---
N/A
N/A
Reach Shear Stress (Competency) Ib/ft2
0.24
0.27
N/A
N/A
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
Stream Power Ca acit W/m2
Additional Reach Parameters
Drainage Area (SM)
0.02
0.06
0.67
0.34
0.90
1.27
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
Watershed Impervious Cover Estimate (%)
<1%
---
---
---
---
---
<1%
<1%
<1%
<1%
Rosgen Classification
G5
E/CSb
ES
E5
ES/C5
E6
N/A
E/C5
E/C5
E/C5
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
1.4
1.5
1.3 F 2.0
2.5 1 2.9
1.2 1 1.2 1.8
1
1.9
0.95
1.3
0.8
1.4
0.9
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
0.6
0.7
2.6
17.5
6.4
14.0
11.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Q-NFF regression
---
Q-USGS extrapolation
N/A
---
Q-Mannings
---
--Va
Valley
ey Length t
---
---
---
--
---
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
1,736
---
---
---
---
---
1,060
436
1,058
432
Sinuosity
1.0
1.1
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.4
1.1
1.2
1.2
1.5
1.1
1.2
Water Surface Slope ft/ft 2
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
0.0145
0.0064
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
0.0240
0.0260
0.0170
0.0040
0.0022
0.0040
0.0096
0.0163
0.0024
0.0077
0.0148
0.0024
0.0066
( --- ): Data was not provided
N/A: Not Applicable

Table 10e. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Southwest Branch
( --- ): Data was not provided
N/A: Not Applicable
Gage
Pre -Restoration Condition
Southwest Branch
Scout West
1
Scout East
2
Reference Reach Data
Scout West 2
Johanna Creek
Jarman
Oak
Southwest
Branch
(Reachesl
-3)
Design
Southwest
Branch
(Reach 4)
Southwest
(Reaches
Branch
1-3)
As-Built/Baseline
Southw
(Rea
�Branch
Min
Max
Min
Max Min
Max
Min
Max Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Dimension and Substrate - Shallow
Bankfull Width (ft)
2.8
3.4
2.6
6.3 4.7
6.1
5.6
7.6
9.7
9.3
3.0
3.3
---
2.4
Floodprone Width (ft)
4.9
6.2
>20
>50
>50
>75
>150
40
60
100
300
---
>200
Bankfull Mean Depth
0.2
0.3
0.3
0.5 1.1
1.3
0.7
1.0
0.8
1.2
0.3
0.3
---
0.3
Bankfull Max Depth
0.3
0.9
0.5
0.7 1.7
1.8
1.2
1.3
1.1
2.3
0.5 1
0.6
0.4 F
0.5
---
0.4
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft')
N/A
0.8
0.9
1.3
2.0 6.0
6.9
5.3
5.4 7.2
7.8
11.6
1.0
1.0
---
0.6
Width/Depth Ratio
10.0
14.0
5.4
19.4 3.6
5.4
5.7
11.0 10.1
19.7
7.4
9.0
10.0
10.0
12.0
---
9.7
Entrenchment Ratio
1.5
1.9
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
8.0
9.6
16.1
26.9
13.3
20.0
30.3
90.9
82.3
Bank Height Ratio
10.0
10.7
1.1
1.3
1.0
1.1
1.2
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.1
1.0
1.1
---
1.0
D50 (mm)
0.105
---
N/A
Profile
Shallow Length (ft)
---
---
---
---1L3.1
-
---
---
3.8
51.6
8.3
44.1
Shallow Slope (ft/ft)
---
0.026
0.047
N/A
0.033
0.051
N/A
129
0.0257
0.0648
0.0109
0.0308
0.0015
0.0339
0.0032
0.0228
Pool Length (ft)
---
---
---
----
---
---
1.7
19.9
4.3
23.4
Pool Max Depth (ft)
N/A
---
0.6
N/A
1.7
1.9
1.5
0.5
1.1
0.4
1.0
0.3
1.2
0.6
1.4
PoolSpacing(ft)
---
27
67
N/A
21
27 16
S955
15
24
5
23
8
53
12
51
Pool Volume ft3
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
I
---
8.7 1
14.3 1 7.2
1
16.2
1 9.1 1
9.8 1 14.0
1
20.0
21.0
36.0
4.0
9.0
4.0
26.0
3.9
10.2
5.2
18.9
Radius of Curvature (ft)
---
3.1
9.0 5.5
16.0
5.4
6.8 15.0
27.0
13.7
18.6
5.0
14.0
5.0
16.0
10.0
19.0
7.4
20.3
Rc:Bankfull Width (ft/ft)
N/A
---
0.6
1.6 1.0
3.0
0.8
1.0 1.5
2.8
1.5
2.0
1.7
4.5
1.5
4.8
---
3.1
8.5
Meander Length (ft)
---
39.8
84.8 36.5
63.2
32.5
36.9
50.0
N/A
24
51
10
56
27
50
28
54
Meander Width Ratio
---
1.6
2.6 1.3
3.0
1.4
1.5 1.4
2.1
2.3
2.9
1.3
3.0
1.3
8.0
---
2.2
7.9
Substrate, Bed and Transport Parameters
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%
so
W
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be%
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/d100
N/A
-/0.065/0.105/0.336/0.4/9.6
---
---
---
---
---
N/A
N/A
Reach Shear Stress (Competency) lb/ft'
0.37
0.42
---
---
N/A
N/A
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
Stream Power Ca acit W/m2
Additional Reach Parameters
Drainage Area (SM)
0.03
0.06
0.67
0.34
0.90
1.27
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
Watershed Impervious Cover Estimate (%)
<1%
---
---
---
---
---
<1%
<1%
<1%
<1%
Rosgen Classification
G5
E/CSb
ES
ES
E5/CS
E6
NA
E/CS
N/A
E/C5
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
1.8
1.9
1.3
2.0 2.5
2.9
1.2
1.2 1.8
1.9
0.95
1.7
1.3
N/A
2.5
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
1.6
1.7
2.6
17.5
6.4
14.0
11.0
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
Q-NFF regression
---
Q-USGS extrapolation
N/A
---
Q-Mannings
---
--Va
ey Length t
Valley
---
---
---
--
---
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
1,080
---
---
---
---
---
650
482
646
479
Sinuosity
1.0
1.1
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.4
1.1 1
1.2
1.1
1.5
1.0
1.3
Water Surface Slope ft/ft 2
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
0.0191
0.0090
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
0.0320
0.0260
0.0170
0.0040
0.0022
0.0040
0.0171
0.0216
0.0078
0.0096
0.0186
0.0191
0.0085
0.0088
( --- ): Data was not provided
N/A: Not Applicable

Table 10f. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
North Branch
( --- ): Data was not provided
N/A: Not Applicable
Gage
Pre -Restoration Condition
North Branch
Scout West
I
Scout East
2
Reference Reach Data
Scout West 2
Johanna Creek
Jarman
Oak
Design
North Branch
As-Built/Baseline
North Branch
Min Max
Min
Max Min
Max
Min
Max Min
I
Max
Min
I
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Dimension and Substrate - Shallow
Bankfull Width (ft)
---
2.6
6.3 4.7
6.1
5.6
7.6
9.7
9.3
9.2
8.6
9.3
Floodprone Width (ft)
---
>20
>50
>50
>75
>150
100 F
300
>200
Bankfull Mean Depth
---
0.3
0.5 1.1
1.3
0.7
1.0
0.8
1.2
0.6
0.7
0.7
Bankfull Max Depth
---
0.5
0.7 1.7
1.8
1.2
1.3
1.1
2.3
0.9 1
1.1
1.0
1.2
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft')
N/A
---
1.3
2.0 6.0
6.9
5.3
5.4 7.2
7.8
11.6
5.9
5.7
6.5
Width/Depth Ratio
---
5.4
19.4 3.6
5.4
5.7
11.0 10.1
19.7
7.4
14.0
14.5
13.1
13.2
Entrenchment Ratio
---
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
8.0
9.6
16.1
26.9
10.9
32.6
>21.6
>23.2
Bank Height Ratio
---
1.1
1.3
1.0
1.1
1.2
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.1
1.0
D50 (mm)
---
N/A
Profile
Shallow Length (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
5.3
35.8
Shallow Slope(ft/ft)
---
0.026 1
0.047
N/A
0.033 1
0.051
N/A
0.0129
0.0010
0.0065
0.0013
0.0163
Pool Length (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
8.5
80.8
Pool Max Depth (ft)
N/A
---
0.6
N/A
1.7
1.9
1.5
3.1
0.9
2.1
1.0
3.8
Pool Spacing (ft)
---
27
67
N/A
21
27 16
59
32
55
15
64
17
101
Pool Volume(ft')
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
---
8.7
14.3 7.2
16.2
9.1
9.8 14.0
20.0
21.0
36.0
12.0
74.0
16
72
Radius of Curvature (ft)
---
3.1
9.0 5.5
16.0
5.4
6.8 15.0
27.0
13.7
18.6
14.0
44.0
15
40
Rc:Bankfull Width (ft/ft)
N/A
---
0.6
1.6 1.0
3.00.8
1.0 1.5
2.8
1.5
2.0
1.5
4.8
1.7
4.3
Meander Length (ft)
---
39.8
84.8 36.5
63.2
32.5
36.9
50.0
N/A
28
156
79
129
Meander Width Ratio
---
1.6
2.6 1.3
3.0
1.4
1.5 1.4
F
2.1
2.3
2.9
1.3
8.0
1.9
7.7
Substrate, Bed and Transport Parameters
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be%
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/d100
N/A
---
---
---
---
---
---
N/A
Reach Shear Stress (Competency) lb/ft'
---
---
N/A
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
Stream Power (Capacity) W/m2
Additional Reach Parameters
Drainage Area (SM)
0.08
0.06
0.67
0.34
0.90
1.27
0.19
0.19
Watershed Impervious Cover Estimate (%)
<1%
---
---
---
---
---
<1%
<1%
Rosgen Classification
N/A
E/CSb
ES
ES
ES/C5
E6
E/C5
C5
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
---
1.3
2.0 2.5
2.9
1.2
1.2 1.8
1.9
0.95
0.9
0.8
0.9
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
---
2.6
17.5
6.4
14.0
11.0
5.0
5.0
Q-NFF regression
---
Q-USGS extrapolation
N/A
---
Q-Mannings
---
--Va
Valley
ey Length t
---
---
---
--
---
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
2,418
2,410
Sinuosity
---
1.1
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.4
1.2 F
1.6
1.31
Water Surface Slope ft/ft 2
---
---
---
---
---
---
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
---
0.0260
0.0170
0.0040
0.0022
0.0040
f0.0016
0.0007
0.0020
0.0004
1
0.0020
( --- ): Data was not provided
N/A: Not Applicable

Table 11a. Morphology and Hydraulic Summary (Dimensional Parameters - Cross Section)
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Devil's Racetrack (West)
Dimension and Substrate Base
MY1
Cross
MY2
Section
MY3
1 (Shallow)
MY4
MYS
MY6 MY7 Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MYS
MY6 MY7 Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MYS
MY6 MY7 Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MYS MY6 MY7
Bankfull Elevation (ft)' 135.4
135.4
135.4
135.4
135.4
135.5
135.1
135.1
135.1
135.1
135.1
135.2
131.0
131.0
131.0
131.0
131.0
131.2
130.6
130.6
130.6
130.6
130.6
130.8
Low Bank Elevation (ft) 135.4
135.4
135.4
135.4
135.4
135.4
135.1
135.1
135.1
135.1
135.1
135.1
131.0
131.0
131.0
131.0
131.0
131.0
130.6
130.6
130.6
130.6
130.6
130.6
Bankfull Width (ft) 9.6
7.6
7.7
7.6
7.8
9.0
10.7
10.1
10.2
9.8
9.2
8.1
9.5
10.0
10.0
10.0
9.3
10.0
11.1
11.4
11.4
11.4
11.2
11.8
Floodprone Width (ft) >200
>200
>200
>200
>200
>200
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
>200
>200
>200
>200
>200
>200
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 0.6
0.7
0.8
0.8
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.9
1.0
0.9
0.8
0.8
0.7
0.8
0.8
1.0
0.8
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.9
Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 1.1
1.5
1.5
1.4
1.4
1.3
1.7
1.9
2.0 1
1.9
2.0
1.8
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.5 1
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.6
1.7
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft ) 6.2
5.6
5.8
5.8
5.3
6.2
1 7.8 1
7.6
8.6
8.1
8.1
7.8
8.5
8.1
8.2
7.4
7.1
8.5
10.7
9.4
9.9
8.6
8.0
10.7
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio 14.8
10.4
10.1
10.0
11.5
13.2
14.6
13.4
12.2
12.0
10.6
8.4
10.6
12.3
12.2
13.5
12.1
11.8
11.4
13.9
13.1
15.1
15.6
13.0
Entrenchment Ratio >20.9 >26.2 >26.1 >26.3 >25.7 >22.2
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
>21.1 >20.0 >20.1 >20.0 >21.5 >20.0
N/A
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio' 1.0
4�
Dimension and Substrate Base
1.0
MY3
1.0
Cross
MY2
1.0
Section
MY3
1.0
5 (Pool)
MY4
<1.0
MYS
N/A
1111�
MY6 MY7 Base
N/A
MY1
N/A
Cross
MY2
N/A
Section
MY3
N/A
6 (Shallow)
MY4
N/A
MYS
1.0
MY6 MY7 Base
MYl
Cross
MY2
Section
MY3
7 (Pool)
MY4
MYS
MY6 MY7 Base
MY1
Cross
MY2
Section
MY3
8 (Shallow)
MY4
MYS MY6 MY7
Bankfull Elevation (ft)' 125.3
125.3
125.3
125.3
125.3
125.4
124.7
124.7
124.7
124.7
124.7
124.9
120.8
120.8
120.8
120.8
120.8
120.9
119.9
119.9
119.9
119.9
119.9
119.4
Low Bank Elevation (ft) 125.3
125.3
125.3
125.3
125.3
125.3
124.7
124.7
124.7
124.7
124.7
124.9
120.8
120.8
120.8
120.8
120.8
120.8
119.9
119.9
119.9
119.9
119.9
119.9
Bankfull Width (ft) 8.9
8.6
8.6
8.6
9.3
10.1
8.7
8.2
8.6
8.5
8.0
9.1
9.5
8.0
8.0
8.7
8.7
10.3
4.7
4.8
4.8
4.2
4.2
2.8
Floodprone Width (ft) N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
>200
>200
>200
>200
>200
>200
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
>200
>200
>200
>200
>200
>200
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 0.8
0.8
0.8
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.5
0.7
0.8
0.9
0.9
0.8
0.8
0.7
0.4
0.7
1.2
0.8
1.0
0.8
Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.4
1.4
1.1
1.2
1.2
1.1
1.0
1.2
1.6
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.8
1.8
1.3
1.3
1.7
1.2
1.7
1.0
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft'), 7.5
7.0
6.8 1
6.2 1
6.5
7.5 1
6.0 1
5.3
5.6 1
5.2 1
4.3
6.0
7.6
7.4
7.3 1
7.0 1
7.0 1
7.6
2.1
3.3 1
5.7 1
3.3 1
4.4 1
2.1
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio 10.7
10.6
10.9
11.9
13.4
13.5
12.6
12.6
13.4
14.0
14.7
13.7
11.7
8.7
8.8
10.8
10.8
13.8
10.6
6.9
4.0
5.4
4.0
3.7
Entrenchment Ratio N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
>23.0 >24.4 >23.2 >23.5 >25.1 >22.1
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
>42.5 >42.1 >41.9 1 >47.4 >47.4 >71.9
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio'I N/AN/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
<1.0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1.0
1.0
1.0 1
1.0
1.0 1
2.0
Cross Section 9 (Sh How)
Dimension and Substrate Base MY3 MY2 MY3 MY4 MYS
Bankfull Elevation (ft)' 116.4 116.4 116.4 116.4 116.4 116.31
Low Bank Elevation (ft) 116.4 116.4 116.4 116.4 116.4 116.4
Bankfull Width (ft) 7.7 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.9
Floodprone Width (ft) >200 >200 >200 >200 >200 >200
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 0.5 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.5
Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 0.7 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.0 0.9
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft')l 4.0 1 5.4 1 4.9 4.7 4.6 4.0
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio 14.5 10.4 11.4 12.1 12.4 15.5
Entrenchment Ratio >26.1 >26.7 >26.7 >26.7 >26.7 >25.4
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio' 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1
MY6 MY7 Base
116.1
116.1
6.8 1
N/A
0.6
0.9
4.4
10.6
N/A
N/A
MY3
116.1
116.1
5.9
N/A
0.8
1.0
4.7
7.5
N/A
N/A
MY2
116.11
116.1
5.9
N/A
0.8
1.0
4.6
7.6
N/A
N/A
MY3 I
116.11
116.1
6.2
N/A
0.7
1.0
4.5
8.5
N/A
N/A
MY4 MY5
116.1 116.1
116.1 116.1
6.0 7.9
N/A N/A
0.7 0.6
0.9 0.9
4.0 4.4
9.0 14.0
N/A N/A
N/A I N/A
MY6 MY7
'For MY5 through MY7 bankfull elevation was calculated using the Standard Measurement of the BHR Monitoring Parameter provided by NCIRT and NCDMS.
2Entrenchment Ratio is the flood prone width divided by the bankfull width.
3Bank Height Ratio is the bank height divided by the max depth of the bankfull channel.

Table 11b. Morphology and Hydraulic Summary (Dimensional Parameters - Cross Section)
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Devil's Racetrack (East)
Dimension and Substrate Base
MVl
Cross
MY2
Section
MY3
11 (Po��
MY4
MY5
MV6 Y7
Mase
B
MYl
Cross
MY2
Section
MY3
12 (Shallow)
MY4
MYS
�
MV6 MY7 Base
��oss
MYl
MY2
section
MY3
13 (P��
MY4
MYS
-MY-6F-MY7 Base
�
MYl
Cross
MY2
section
MY3
14 (Shallow)
MY4
MYS MY6 MY7
Bankfull Elevation (ft)' 115.4
115.4
115.4
115.4
115.4
115.5
115.1
115.1
115.1
115.1
115.1
115.3
115.0
115.0
115.0
115.0
115.0
115.3
114.6
114.6
114.6
114.6
114.6
114.9
Low Bank Elevation (ft) 115.4
115.4
115.4
115.4
115.4
115.3
115.1
115.1
115.1
115.1
115.1
115.0
115.0
115.0
115.0
115.0
115.0
115.0
114.6
114.6
114.6
114.6
114.6
114.6
Bankfull Width (ft) 15.0
15.1
15.1
15.1
15.1
14.0
12.2
12.5
12.3
12.2
12.2
12.7
19.8
20.5
20.8
21.1
21.8
22.2
12.7
11.8
12.4
12.2
12.0
12.6
Floodprone Width (ft) N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
>300
>300
>300
>300
>300
>300
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
>300
>300
>300
>300
>300
>300
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 1.2
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.3
0.8
0.7
0.8
0.7
0.7
0.8
1.5
1.2
1.3
1.1
1.1
1.4
1.1
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.9
1.1
Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 2.1
2.0
2.0
2.5
2.0
2.2
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.2
1.3
1.4
2.7
2.5
2.5
2.3
2.5
2.7
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.5
1.6
1.8
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft) 18.8
16.5 1
17.3
16.1
15.9
18.8
10.3
8.9 1
9.3 1
8.0 1
8.4
10.3
30.2
24.6
26.2
23.2
23.2
30.2
13.3
10.4
10.9
10.5 1
10.6
13.3
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio 12.0
13.8 1
13.1
14.2 1
14.3
10.4
1 14.6
17.6
16.1
18.6
17.6
15.7 1
13.0 1
17.1 1
16.6
19.2 1
20.5 1
16.3
12.1
13.4
14.0
14.1
13.7
11.9
Entrenchment Ratio N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
>24.5 >23.9 >24.5 >24.5 >24.6 >23.6
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
>23.7 >25.4 >24.3 >24.6 >24.9 >23.8
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio3 N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
<1.0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
<1.0
Dimension and Substrate Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MYS
MY6 MY7
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MYS
MY6 MY7 Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MYS
MY6 MY7 Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MYS MY6 MY7
Bankfull Elevation (ft)' 114.2
114.2
114.2
114.2
114.2
114.5
114.1
114.1
114.1
114.1
114.1
114.3
113.3
113.3
113.3
113.3
113.3
113.4
112.6
112.6
112.6
112.6
112.6
113.0
Low Bank Elevation (ft) 114.2
114.2
114.2
114.2
114.2
114.1
114.1
114.1
114.1
114.1
114.1
114.4
113.3
113.3
113.3
113.3
113.3
113.3
112.6
112.6
112.6
112.6
112.6
112.5
Bankfull Width (ft) 15.6
12.4
12.4
12.4
12.3
13.2
13.4
12.6
12.7
12.4
12.4
13.8
13.7
12.5
12.7
12.7
13.6
13.5
15.5
15.3
15.3
15.3
15.3
17.1
Floodprone Width (ft) N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
>300
>300
>300
>300
>300
>300
>300
>300 1
>300
>300
>300
>300
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 1.1
1.2
1.2
1.1
1.1
1.3
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.9
0.9
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.6
1.5
1.4
1.2
1.1
1.5
Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 2.1
1.9
1.9
1.8
1.8
2.1
1.7
1.8
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.8
1.7
1.7
1.7
2.1
2.1
2.1
2.8
2.7
2.6
2.1
2.0
2.6
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft) 17.3
14.5
14.3
13.5
13.3
17.3
13.2
12.0
12.3
11.5
11.3
13.2
13.9
12.5
12.7
13.2
13.4
13.9
25.0
22.4
21.0
18.8
16.6
25.0
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio 14.0
10.6
10.7
11.4
11.4
10.1
13.6 1
13.2
13.0
13.4
13.5
14.3
13.4
12.5
12.6
12.2
13.8
13.1
9.5
10.5
11.2�12.4
14.1
11.8
Entrenchment Ratio N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
>22.3 >23.9 >23.6 >24.1 >24.3 >21.8
>21.9 >24.0 >23.6 >23.7 >22.1 >22.2
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio N/A
Dimension and Substrate Base
N/A
MY3
N/A
Cross -Section
MY2
N/A
MY3
N/A
19 (Shallow)
MY4
N/A
MYS
MY6 MY7
1.0
Base
1.0
MYl
1.0
Cross
MY2
1.0
Section
MY3
1.0
r [Shallow��
MY4
1.1
MYS
1.0
MV6 MY7 Base
1.0
MYl
1.0
Cross
MY2
1.0
Section
MY3
1.0
21 (Pool)
MY4
1.0
MY5
N/A
WY -6F MY7
N/A
N/A
Bankfull Elevation (ft)' 112.7 112.7 112.7 112.7 112.7 112.9
109.0 109.0 109.0 109.0 109.0 108.9 108.1 108.1 108.1 108.1 108.1 108.3
Low Bank Elevation (ft) 112.7 112.7 112.7 112.7 112.7 112.8
109.0 109.0 109.0 109.0 109.0 109.2 108.1 108.1 108.1 108.1 108.1 108.2
Bankfull Width (ft) 13.3 14.3 14.2 12.6 14.0 14.1
8.2 7.9 7.9 8.3 8.2 8.1 8.8 8.9 9.1 7.8 7.8 9.0
Floodprone Width (ft) >300 >300 >300 >300 >300 >300
>300 >300 >300 >300 >300 >300 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.9
0.7 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.7 1.2 1.1 1.3 1.2 1.4 1.2
Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.4 1.7
1.1 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 2.0 1.9 2.1 2.1 2.0 2.0
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft'), 12.5 11.2 11.9 1 9.9 1 9.6 1 12.5
5.7 5.9 6.1 6.3 6.3 1 5.7 10.8 9.7 11.5 1 9.4 1 10.6 10.8
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratiol 14.1 1 18.4 1 17.1 1 16.1 1 20.4 1 15.9
11.9 10.6 10.3 10.9 10.6 11.4 7.3 8.1 7.2 6.5 5.7 7.6
Entrenchment Ratio >22.6 >20.9 >21.1 >23.8 >21.5 >21.3
>36.5 >37.8 >37.8 >36.3 >36.6 >37.2 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 <1.0I I
1 1.0 1 1.0 1 1.0 1.0 1 1.0 1 1.2 1 N/A N/A I N/A I N/A I N/A I N/A
1For MY5 through MY7 bankfull elevation was calculated using the Standard Measurement of the BHR Monitoring Parameter provided by NCIRT and NCDMS
2Entrenchment Ratio is the flood prone width divided by the bankfull width.
3Bank Height Ratio is the bank height divided by the max depth of the bankfull channel.

Table 11c. Morphology and Hydraulic Summary (Dimensional Parameters - Cross Section)
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Southeast Branch
Dimension and Substrate Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MYS
MY6 MY7 Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MYS MY6
MY7 Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4 MYS MY6 MY7
Bankfull Elevation(ft)' 137.7
137.7
137.7
137.7
137.7
137.7
137.1
137.1
137.1
137.1
137.1
137.2
122.8
122.8
122.8
122.8
122.8
123.0
Low Bank Elevation (ft) 137.7
137.7
137.7
137.7
137.7
137.8
137.1
137.1
137.1
137.1
137.1
137.2
122.8
122.8
122.8
122.8
122.8
123.0
Bankfull Width (ft) 3.8
3.3
3.3
3.2
3.3
3.6
3.0
2.9
2.6
2.8
2.4
2.6
3.8
4.1
3.5
3.5
3.0
4.1
Floodprone Width (ft) N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
>30
>30
>30
>30
>30
>30
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 0.4
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.4
0.4
0.3
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.2
0.3
Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 0.8
1.2
1.2
1.1
1.1
1.1
0.5
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.4
0.7
0.5
0.4
0.4
0.5
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft) 1.5
1.7
1.6
1.5
1.5
1.5
0.8
1.1
0.8
0.9
0.7
0.8
1.3
1.7
1.1
0.9
0.7
1.3
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio 9.3
6.6
7.1
7.2
7.3
8.8
11.4
7.7
8.3
8.2
7.9
8.6
11.2
9.4
11.7
13.5
12.7
12.9
Entrenchment Ratio' N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
>9.9
>10.4
>11.4
>10.9
>12.5
>11.5
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio' N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.1
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Dimension and Substrate Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MYS
MY6 MY7 Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MYS MY6
MY7 Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MYS MY6 MY7
Bankfull Elevation (ft)' 122.7
122.7
122.7
122.7
122.7
122.9
116.5
116.5
116.5
116.5
116.5
116.8
116.4
116.4
116.4
116.4
116.4
116.7
Low Bank Elevation (ft) 122.7
122.7
122.7
122.7
122.7
122.8
116.5
116.5
116.5
116.5
116.5
116.6
116.4
116.4
116.4
116.4
116.4
116.5
Bankfull Width (ft) 3.8
3.9
3.8
2.7
2.4
3.6
5.3
5.1
3.9
3.5
3.5
8.5
6.3
5.8
5.0
3.6
3.7
4.9
Floodprone Width (ft) >60
>60
>60
>60
>60
>60
>200
>200
>200
>200
>200
>200
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 0.4
0.5
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.2
0.4
0.3
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.5
Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 0.5
0.8
0.5
0.6
0.5
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.4
0.7
0.8
0.6
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.7
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft')l 1.3
2.0
1.3
0.9
0.7
1.3
2.1
1.8
1.2
1.0
0.9
2.1
2.4
1.7
1.8
1.1
0.9
2.4
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio 10.8
7.8
11.2
8.3
7.9
10.0
13.8
14.6
13.0
12.5
13.7
34.4
16.8
19.7
13.7
11.6
14.7
10.0
tio7.9
Entrenchment Ra>15.8 >15.4 >15.8 >22.4 >24.9 >16.7
>37.5 >38.9 >51.3 >5 >56.4 >23.5
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio' 1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
<1.0I
1 1.0
1 1.0
1.0 1
1.0 1
1.0
<1.0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1For MY5 through MY7 bankfull elevation was calculated using the Standard Measurement of the BHR Monitoring Parameter provided by NCIRT and NCDMS
2Entrenchment Ratio is the flood prone width divided by the bankfull width.
;Bank Height Ratio is the bank height divided by the max depth of the bankfull channel.

Table lid. Morphology and Hydraulic Summary (Dimensional Parameters - Cross Section)
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Middle Branch
Dimension and Substrate Base
MYl
Cross
MY2
Section
MY3
24 (Shallow)
MY4
MYS MY6
MY7 Base
MYl
Cross
MY2
Section
MY3
25 (
MY4
ool)
MVS
f MY6
MY7 Base
I MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MYS MY6 MY7
Bankfull Elevation (ft)' 136.4
136.4
136.4
136.4
136.4
136.6
136.4
136.4
136.4
136.4
136.4
136.4
124.7
124.7
124.7
124.7
124.7
124.7
Low Bank Elevation (ft) 136.4
136.4
136.4
136.4
136.4
136.5
136.4
136.4
136.4
136.4
136.4
136.4
124.7
124.7
124.7
124.7
124.7
124.8
Bankfull Width (ft) 2.2
2.3
2.2
1.3
1.2
1.6
3.1
3.1
3.2
3.0
2.7
2.5
4.1
4.8
5.0
5.2
4.4
5.0
Floodprone Width (ft) >50
>50
>50
>50
>50
>50
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.4
0.4
0.5
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.5
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.3
0.2
0.3
Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 0.5 1
0.6 1
0.6
1 0.4
0.5 1
0.6 1 1
1 0.7
1 0.9 1
0.6 1
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.9
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.5
0.6
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft) 0.7
0.8
0.7
0.4
0.4
0.7
1.2
1.6
1.1
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.4
1.0
1.0
1.5
1.0
1.4
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio 6.7
6.8
6.8
4.0
3.5
3.7
8.1
6.0
9.1
7.6
5.8
5.1
11.9
21.9
24.3
17.7
19.7
17.6
Entrenchment Ratio' >22.9 >21.5 >23.2 >38.4 >42.9 >31.3
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio3 1.0
1.0 1
1.0
1.0
1.0
<1.0 I
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1For MY5 through MY7 bankfull elevation was calculated using the Standard Measurement of the BHR Monitoring Parameter provided by NCIRT and NCDMS
2Entrenchment Ratio is the flood prone width divided by the bankfull width.
3Bank Height Ratio is the bank height divided by the max depth of the bankfull channel.

Table 11e. Morphology and Hydraulic Summary (Dimensional Parameters - Cross Section)
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Southwest Branch
Dimension and Substrate Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MYS MY6
MY7 Base
MY7
MY2
MY3
MY4
MYS MY6 MY7
Bankfull Elevation (ft)' 136.4
136.4
136.4
136.4
136.4
136.3
136.4
136.4
136.4
136.4
136.4
136.5
Low Bank Elevation (ft) 136.4
136.4
136.4
136.4
136.4
136.4
136.4
136.4
136.4
136.4
136.4
136.6
Bankfull Width (ft) 4.9
4.8
5.0
4.5
4.2
4.2
2.4
2.9
3.0
2.5
1.8
2.0
Floodprone Width (ft) N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
>200
>200
>200
>200
>200
>200
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 0.4
0.4
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.2
0.3
Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 0.8
1.0
0.9
0.7
0.6
0.7
0.4
0.4
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.4
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft) 1.8
1.9 1
2.1
1 1.5
1 1.3
1.8
0.6
1 0.8
0.9
0.7 1
0.3
1 0.6
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio 13.2
11.9
11.7
13.7
13.2
9.6
9.7
11.2
10.1
8.9
12.0
6.8
Entrenchment Ratio N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
>82.3
>68.6
>67.5
>79.4
>108.7
>98.8
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio' N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.3
1For MYS through MY7 bankfull elevation was calculated using the Standard Measurement of the BHR Monitoring Parameter provided by NCIRT and NCDMS
2Entrenchment Ratio is the flood prone width divided by the bankfull width.
;Bank Height Ratio is the bank height divided by the max depth of the bankfull channel.

Table 11f. Morphology and Hydraulic Summary (Dimensional Parameters - Cross Section)
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
North Branch
Dimension and Substrate Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MYS
MY6 MY7 Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MYS MY6
MY7 Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MYS MY6 MY7
Bankfull Elevation (ft)' 118.6
118.6
118.6
118.6
118.6
118.7
118.73
118.7
118.7
118.7
118.7
118.8
116.8
116.8
116.8
116.8
116.8
116.7
Low Bank Elevation (ft) 118.6
118.6
118.6
118.6
118.6
118.7
118.73 118.7
118.7
118.7
118.7 118.74
116.8
116.8
116.8
116.8
116.8 116.74
Bankfull Width (ft) 9.8
10.0
10.2
9.7
9.5
10.1
8.6
9.2
9.2
9.2
8.9
9.6
9.3
9.0
9.0
9.0
9.0
9.0
Floodprone Width (ft) N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
>200
>200
>200
>200
>200
>200
>200
>200
>200
>200
>200
>200
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 0.8
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.7
0.7
Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 1.3
1.4
1.4
1.3
1.4
1.4
1.0
1.2
1.2
1.1
1.1
1.2
1.2
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.3
1.3
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ftp) 7.5
7.2
7.5
6.7
6.9
7.5
5.7
6.0
6.4
5.4
5.1
5.7
6.5
7.0
6.9
6.9
6.7
6.5
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio 12.8
14.0
13.9
14.0
12.9
13.5
13.1
14.1
13.2
15.6
15.4
16.3
13.2
11.5
11.7
11.8
12.0
12.5
Entrenchment Ratio N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
>23.2
>21.7
>21.7
>21.7
>22.5
>20.8
>21.6
>22.2
>22.2
>22.2
>22.2
>22.2
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio' N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Dimension and Substrate Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MYS
MY6 MY7
Bankfull Elevation (ft)' 116.5
116.5
116.5
116.5
116.5
116.6
Low Bank Elevation (ft) 116.5
116.5
116.5
116.5
116.5
116.6
Bankfull Width (ft) 10.6
11.1
10.7
11.1
11.7
11.6
Floodprone Width (ft) N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 0.9
0.8
0.9
0.8
0.8
0.8
Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 1.4
1.4
1.5
1.4
1.4
1.4
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft')l 9.2 1
9.2
9.2
1 8.9 1
8.9
9.2
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio 12.3
13.4
12.5
13.8
15.4
14.7
Entrenchment Ratio N/A
N/A I
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio' N/A
N/A I
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1For MY5 through MY7 bankfull elevation was calculated using the Standard Measurement of the BHR Monitoring Parameter provided by NCIRT and NCDMS
2Entrenchment Ratio is the flood prone width divided by the bankfull width.
;Bank Height Ratio is the bank height divided by the max depth of the bankfull channel.

Table 12a. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Devil's Racetrack (West)
*Baseline, MYS, and MY2 data was updated during MY3 to include only shallow data.
Min I
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
I Max
Min
Max
Min
Max Min Max Min Max
Dimension and Substrate - Shallow
Bankfull Width (ft)
4.7
9.6
4.8
10.0
4.8
10.0
4.2
10.0
4.2
9.3
2.8
10.0
Floodprone Width (ft)
>200
>200
>200
>200
>200
>200
>200
>200
>200
>200
>200
>200
Bankfull Mean Depth
0.4
0.9
0.7
0.8
0.6
1.2
0.6
0.8
0.5
1.0
0.5
0.8
Bankfull Max Depth
0.7
1.4
1.0
1.5
1.0
1.7
1.1
1.4
1.0
1.7
0.9
1.5
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft)
2.1
8.5
3.3
8.1
4.9
8.2
3.3
7.4
4.3
7.1
2.1
8.5
Width/Depth Ratio
10.6
14.8
6.9
12.6
4.0
13.4
4.7
14.0
4.0
14.7
3.7
15.5
Entrenchment Ratio
>20.9
>42.5
>20
>42.1
>20.1
>41.9
>20.0
>47.4
>21.5
>47.4
>20.0
>71.9
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
<1.0
2.0
D50 (mm)
Profile
Shallow Length (ft)
Shallow Slope (ft/ft)
Pool Length (ft)
Pool Max Depth (ft)
Pool Spacing (ft)
Pool Volume (ft)
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
Radius of Curvature (ft)
Rc:Bankfull Width (ft/ft)
Meander Wave Length (ft)
Meander Width Ratio
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
Sinuosity (ft)
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be%
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/d100
%of Reach with Eroding Banks
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
*Baseline, MYS, and MY2 data was updated during MY3 to include only shallow data.

Table 12b. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Devil's Racetrack (East)
*Baseline, MYS, and MY2 data was updated during MY3 to include only shallow data.
Min I
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
I Max
Min
Max
Min
Max Min Max Min Max
Dimension and Substrate - Shallow
Bankfull Width (ft)
8.2
13.7
7.9
14.3
7.9
14.2
8.3
12.7
8.2
14.0
8.1
14.1
Floodprone Width (ft)
>300
>300
>300
>300
>300
>300
>300
>300
>300
>300
>300
>300
Bankfull Mean Depth
0.7
1.1
0.7
1.0
0.8
1.0
0.7
1.0
0.7
1.0
0.7
1.1
Bankfull Max Depth
1.1
1.7
1.1
1.8
1.2
1.7
1.2
2.1
1.2
2.1
1.2
2.1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft)
5.7
14.1
5.9
12.5
6.1
12.7
6.3
13.2
6.3
13.4
5.7
13.9
Width/Depth Ratio
11.9
14.6
10.6
18.4
10.3
17.1
10.9
18.6
10.6
20.4
11.4
15.9
Entrenchment Ratio
>21.9
>36.5
>20.9
>37.8
>21.1
>37.8
>23.7
>36.3
>21.5
>36.6
>21.3
>37.2
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
<1.0
1.2
D50 (mm)
Profile
Shallow Length (ft)
Shallow Slope (ft/ft)
Pool Length (ft)
Pool Max Depth (ft)
Pool Spacing (ft)
Pool Volume (ft)
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
Radius of Curvature (ft)
Rc:Bankfull Width (ft/ft)
Meander Wave Length (ft)
Meander Width Ratio
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
Sinuosity (ft)
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be%
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/d100
%of Reach with Eroding Banks
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
*Baseline, MYS, and MY2 data was updated during MY3 to include only shallow data.

Table 12c. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Southeast Branch
*Baseline, MYS, and MY2 data was updated during MY3 to include only shallow data.
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max Min Max Min Max
Dimension and Substrate - Shallow
Bankfull Width (ft)
3.0
5.3
2.9
5.1
2.6
3.9
2.7
3.5
2.4
3.5
2.6
8.5
Floodprone Width (ft)
>30
>200
>30
>200
>30
>200
>30
>200
>30
>200
>30
>200
Bankfull Mean Depth
0.3
0.4
0.4
0.5
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.2
0.4
Bankfull Max Depth
0.5
0.6
0.5
0.8
0.5
0.7
0.5
0.7
0.4
0.7
0.7
0.7
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft)
0.8
2.1
1.1
2.0
0.8
1.3
0.9
1.0
0.7
0.9
0.8
2.1
Width/Depth Ratio
10.8
13.8
7.7
14.6
8.3
13.0
8.2
12.5
7.9
13.7
8.6
34.4
Entrenchment Ratio
>9.9
>37.5
>10.4
>38.9
>11.4
>51.3
>10.9
>57.9
>12.5
>56.4
>11.5
>23.5
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
<1.0
1.1
D50 (mm)
Profile
Shallow Length (ft)
Shallow Slope (ft/ft)
Pool Length (ft)
Pool Max Depth (ft)
Pool Spacing (ft)
Pool Volume (ft)
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
Radius of Curvature (ft)
Rc:Bankfull Width (ft/ft)
Meander Wave Length (ft)
Meander Width Ratio
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
Sinuosity (ft)
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be%
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/d100
%of Reach with Eroding Banks
10%
0%
0%
0%
0%
*Baseline, MYS, and MY2 data was updated during MY3 to include only shallow data.

Table 12d. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Middle Branch
*Baseline, MYS, and MY2 data was updated during MY3 to include only shallow data.
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max Min Max Min Max
Dimension and Substrate - Shallow
Bankfull Width (ft)
2.2
3.4
2.3
3.2
2.2
3.1
1.3
3.5
1.2
2.9
1.6
3.3
Floodprone Width (ft)
>50
>200
>50
>200
>50
>200
>50
>200
>50
>200
>50
>200
Bankfull Mean Depth
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.4
Bankfull Max Depth
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.4
0.7
0.5
0.6
0.6
0.6
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
0.7
1.1
0.8
1.0
0.7
1.0
0.4
1.3
0.4
0.9
0.7
1.1
Width/Depth Ratio
6.7
10.1
6.8
10.7
6.8
10.2
4.0
9.5
3.5
8.7
3.7
9.9
Entrenchment Ratio
>22.9
>58.8
>21.5
>62.5
>23.2
>64.3
>38.4
>57.5
>42.9
>69.8
>31.3
>60.6
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
<1.0
<1.0
D50 (mm)
Profile
Shallow Length (ft)
Shallow Slope (ft/ft)
Pool Length (ft)
Pool Max Depth (ft)
Pool Spacing (ft)
Pool Volume (ft)
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
Radius of Curvature (ft)
Rc:Bankfull Width (ft/ft)
Meander Wave Length (ft)
Meander Width Ratio
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
Sinuosity (ft)
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be%
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/d100
%of Reach with Eroding Banks
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
*Baseline, MYS, and MY2 data was updated during MY3 to include only shallow data.

Table 12e. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Southwest Branch
*Baseline, MYS, and MY2 data was updated during MY3 to include only shallow data.
Min I Max
Min Max
Min Max
Min I Max
Min Max
Min Max Min Max Min Max
Dimension and Substrate - Shallow
Bankfull Width (ft)
2.4
2.9
3.0
2.5
1.8
2.0
Floodprone Width (ft)
>200
>200
>200
>200
>200
>200
Bankfull Mean Depth
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.2
0.3
Bankfull Max Depth
0.4
0.4
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.4
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
0.6
0.8
0.9
0.7
0.3
0.6
Width/Depth Ratio
9.7
11.2
10.1
8.9
12.0
6.8
Entrenchment Ratio
>82.3
>68.6
>67.5
>79.4
>108.7
>98.8
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.3
D50 (mm)
Profile
Shallow Length (ft)
Shallow Slope (ft/ft)
Pool Length (ft)
Pool Max Depth (ft)
Pool Spacing (ft)
Pool Volume (ft)
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
Radius of Curvature (ft)
Rc:Bankfull Width (ft/ft)
Meander Wave Length (ft)
Meander Width Ratio
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
Sinuosity (ft)
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be%
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/d100
%of Reach with Eroding Banks
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
*Baseline, MYS, and MY2 data was updated during MY3 to include only shallow data.

Table 12f. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
North Branch
*Baseline, MYS, and MY2 data was updated during MY3 to include only shallow data.
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max Min Max Min Max
Dimension and Substrate - Shallow
Bankfull Width (ft)
8.6
9.3
9.0
9.2
9.0
9.2
9.0
9.2
8.9
9.0
9.0
9.6
Floodprone Width (ft)
>200
>200
>200
>200
>200
>200
>200
>200
>200
>200
>200
>200
Bankfull Mean Depth
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.8
0.7
0.8
0.6
0.8
0.6
0.7
0.6
0.7
Bankfull Max Depth
1.0
1.2
1.2
1.4
1.2
1.4
1.1
1.4
1.1
1.3
1.2
1.3
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft)
5.7
6.5
6.0
7.0
6.4
6.9
5.4
6.9
5.1
6.7
5.7
6.5
Width/Depth Ratio
13.1
13.2
11.5
14.1
11.7
13.2
11.8
15.6
12.0
15.4
12.5
16.3
Entrenchment Ratio
>21.6
>23.2
>21.7
>22.2
>21.7
>22.2
>21.7
>22.2
>22.2
>22.5
>20.8
>22.2
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
D50 (mm)
Profile
Shallow Length (ft)
Shallow Slope (ft/ft)
Pool Length (ft)
Pool Max Depth (ft)
Pool Spacing (ft)
Pool Volume (ft)
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
Radius of Curvature (ft)
Rc:Bankfull Width (ft/ft)
Meander Wave Length (ft)
Meander Width Ratio
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
Sinuosity (ft)
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be%
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/d100
%of Reach with Eroding Banks
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
*Baseline, MYS, and MY2 data was updated during MY3 to include only shallow data.

Cross Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Cross Section 1 -DRC West
9+38 Shallow
138
136
c
O
v 134
w
132
0 10
20
30 40 50
Width (ft)
tMYO (2/2014)
MY1 (7/2014)
--$--MY2 (4/2015) +MY3 (4/2016)
+MY4(5/2017)
+MY5(4/2018)
-Bankfull-FloodproneArea
Bankfull Dimensions
6.2 x -section area (ft.sq.)
9.0 width (ft)
0.7 mean depth (ft)
1.3 max depth (ft)
9.5 wetted parimeter (ft)
0.7 hyd radi (ft)
13.2 width -depth ratio
200.0 W flood prone area (ft)
22.2 entrenchment ratio
1.0 low bank height ratio
Survey Date: 4/2018
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
a
View Downstream

Cross Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Cross Section 2 -DRC West
9+70 Pool
140
138
136
)
�MYO (2/2014) tMYl (7/2014) +MY2 (4/2015) �MY3 (4/2016) tMY4 (5/2017) +MYS (4/2018) —Bankfull
c
O
�
v
134
w
132
130
0 10
20 30
40 50
Width (ft
Bankfull Dimensions
7.8 x -section area (ft.sq.)
8.1 width (ft)
1.0 mean depth (ft)
1.8 max depth (ft)
9.4 wetted parimeter (ft)
0.8 hyd radi (ft)
8.4 width -depth ratio
Survey Date: 4/2018
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream
)
�MYO (2/2014) tMYl (7/2014) +MY2 (4/2015) �MY3 (4/2016) tMY4 (5/2017) +MYS (4/2018) —Bankfull

Cross Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Cross Section 3 -DRC West
18+48 Shallow
134
132
c
O
v
w
130
128
0 10 20 30
40
50 60 70 80
Width (ft)
tMYO (2/2014)
�MY1 (7/2014)
�MY2 (4/2015)
+MY3 (4/2016)
+MY4(5/2017)
+MYS(4/2018)
-Bankfull
-
Bankfull Dimensions
8.5 x -section area (ft.sq.)
��
�•
10.0 width (ft)
0.8 mean depth (ft)
1.5 max depth (ft)
10.5 wetted parimeter (ft)
0.8 hyd radi (ft)
11.8 width -depth ratio
200.0 W flood prone area (ft)
20.0 entrenchment ratio
0.9 low bank height ratio
Survey Date: 4/2018
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream
FloodproneArea

Cross Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Cross Section 4 -DRC West
18+80 Pool
134
c
132
O
v
�MYO (2/2014) tMYl (7/2014) +MY2 (4/2015) �MY3 (4/2016) tMY4 (S/2017) +MYS (4/2018) -Bankfull
w
130 -
Nit
128
0 10 20
30
40
50 60 70 80
Width (ft
Bankfull Dimensions
10.7 x -section area (ft.sq.)
11.8 width (ft)
0.9 mean depth (ft)
1.7 max depth (ft)
12.4 wetted parimeter (ft)
0.9 hyd radi (ft)
13.0 width -depth ratio
Survey Date: 4/2018
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream
)
�MYO (2/2014) tMYl (7/2014) +MY2 (4/2015) �MY3 (4/2016) tMY4 (S/2017) +MYS (4/2018) -Bankfull

Cross Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Cross Section 5 -DRC West
28+73 Pool
128
126
c
O
NW
v
w
124
)
�MYO (2/2014) tMYl (7/2014) +MY2 (4/2015) �MY3 (4/2016) �MY4 (5/2017) +MYS (4/2018) -Bankfull
122
0 10 20 30 40
50 60 70
80 90 100
Width (ft
Bankfull Dimensions
7.5 x -section area (ft.sq.)
10.1 width (ft)
0.7 mean depth (ft)
1.4 max depth (ft)
10.8 wetted parimeter (ft)
0.7 hyd radi (ft)
13.5 width -depth ratio
Survey Date: 4/2018
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream
)
�MYO (2/2014) tMYl (7/2014) +MY2 (4/2015) �MY3 (4/2016) �MY4 (5/2017) +MYS (4/2018) -Bankfull

Cross Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Cross Section 6 -DRC West
29+11 Shallow
128
126
c
O
v 124
w
122
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Width (ft)
tMYO (2/2014) MY1 (7/2014) --$--MY2 (4/2015) +MY3 (4/2016)
+MY4(5/2017) +MY5(4/2018) -Bankfull-FloodproneArea
Bankfull Dimensions
6.0 x -section area (ft.sq.)
9.1 width (ft)
0.7 mean depth (ft)
1.2 max depth (ft)
9.4 wetted parimeter (ft)
0.6 hyd radi (ft)
13.7 width -depth ratio
200.0 W flood prone area (ft)
22.1 entrenchment ratio
1.0 low bank height ratio
Survey Date: 4/2018
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream

Cross Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Cross Section 7 -DRC West
37+04 Pool
124
122
c
O
v
w
120
)
�MYO (2/2014) tMYl (7/2014) +MY2 (4/2015) �MY3 (4/2016) tMY4 (5/2017) +MYS (4/2018) -Bankfull
118
0 10 20 30 40
50 60 70
80 90 100
Width (ft
Bankfull Dimensions
7.6 x -section area (ft.sq.)
10.3 width (ft)
0.7 mean depth (ft)
1.8 max depth (ft)
11.2 wetted parimeter (ft)
0.7 hyd radi (ft)
13.8 width -depth ratio
YF
t
i
`
Survey Date: 4/2018
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
?•
View Downstream
)
�MYO (2/2014) tMYl (7/2014) +MY2 (4/2015) �MY3 (4/2016) tMY4 (5/2017) +MYS (4/2018) -Bankfull

Cross Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Cross Section 8 -DRC West
37+46 Shallow
123
121
c
O
v
w
119
FloodproneArea
117
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Width (ft)
tMYO (2/2014)
�MY1 (7/2014) �MY2 (4/2015)
+MY3 (4/2016)
+MY4(5/2017)
+MYS(4/2018) -Bankfull
-
Bankfull Dimensions
2.1 x -section area (ft.sq.)
2.8 width (ft)
0.8 mean depth (ft)
1.0 max depth (ft)
3.8 wetted parimeter (ft)
0.6 hyd radi (ft)
3.7 width -depth ratio
Y;
200.0 W flood prone area (ft)
71.9 entrenchment ratio
2.0 low bank height ratio
Survey Date: 4/2018
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
�.
v
:
View Downstream
FloodproneArea

Cross Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Cross Section 9 -DRC West
45+77 Shallow
120
118
c
O
bA
v 116
w
114
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Width (ft)
tMYO (2/2014) MY1 (7/2014) --$--MY2 (4/2015) +MY3 (4/2016)
+MY4(5/2017) +MY5(4/2018) -Bankfull-FloodproneArea
Bankfull Dimensions
4.0 x -section area (ft.sq.)
7.9 width (ft)
0.5 mean depth (ft)
0.9 max depth (ft)
8.1 wetted parimeter (ft)
0.5 hyd radi (ft)
15.5 width -depth ratio
200.0 W flood prone area (ft)
25.4 entrenchment ratio
1.1 low bank height ratio
Survey Date: 4/2018
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream

Cross Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Cross Section 10 -DRC West
46+14 Pool
lzo
118
0
v
w
116
)
�MYO (2/2014) tMYl (7/2014) +MY2 (4/2015) �MY3 (4/2016) tMY4 (5/2017) +MYS (4/2018) -Bankfull
114
0 10 20 30
40 50
60 70 80 90 100 110 120
Width (ft
Bankfull Dimensions
4.4 x -section area (ft.sq.)
7.9 width (ft)
0.6 mean depth (ft)
0.9 max depth (ft)
8.2 wetted parimeter (ft)
0.5 hyd radi (ft)
14.0 width -depth ratio
Survey Date: 4/2018
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream
)
�MYO (2/2014) tMYl (7/2014) +MY2 (4/2015) �MY3 (4/2016) tMY4 (5/2017) +MYS (4/2018) -Bankfull

Cross Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Cross Section 11 -DRC East
57+24 Pool
lla
116
c
O
v
w
114
)
�MYO (2/2014) tMYl (7/2014) +MY2 (4/2015) �MY3 (4/2016) tMY4 (5/2017) +MYS (4/2018) -Bankfull
112
0 10 20
30 40 50
60 70
Width (ft
Bankfull Dimensions
18.8 x -section area (ft.sq.)
14.0 width (ft)
fta.
1.3 mean depth (ft)
2.2 max depth (ft)
14.6 wetted parimeter (ft)
1.3 hyd radi (ft)
10.4 width -depth ratio
Survey Date: 4/2018
am
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
s,. Y
.� .��
s.
' •�
a
L anae
View Downstream
)
�MYO (2/2014) tMYl (7/2014) +MY2 (4/2015) �MY3 (4/2016) tMY4 (5/2017) +MYS (4/2018) -Bankfull

Cross Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Cross Section 12 -DRC East
57+74 Shallow
118
FloodproneArea
116
C
O
�
v
w
114
,
112
0 10
20
30 40
50 60
Width (ft)
tMYO (2/2014)
�MY1 (7/2014)
�MY2 (4/2015)
+MY3 (4/2016)
+MY4(5/2017)
+MYS(4/2018)
-Bankfull
-
Bankfull Dimensions
10.3 x -section area (ft.sq.)
.:
12.7 width (ft)
j
0.8 mean depth (ft)
1.4 max depth (ft)
13.1 wetted parimeter (ft)
0.8 hyd radi (ft)
15.7 width -depth ratio
300.0 W flood prone area (ft)
23.6 entrenchment ratio
0.8 low bank height ratio
Survey Date: 4/2018
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream
FloodproneArea

Cross Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Cross Section 13 -DRC East
66+64 Pool
118
116
c
O
v
w
114
112
0 10 20
30 40 50
60
70 80 90
Width (ft
)
Bankfull Dimensions
30.2 x -section area (ft.sq.)
tMYl (7/2014)
+MY2 (4/2015) tMY3 (4/2016)
tMY4 (5/2017)
+MYS (4/2018) -Bankfull
22.2 width (ft)
p
1.4 mean depth (ft)
2.7 max depth (ft)
23.0 wetted parimeter (ft)
1.3 hyd radi (ft)
16.3 width -depth ratio
Survey Date: 4/2018
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream
)
�MYO (2/2014)
tMYl (7/2014)
+MY2 (4/2015) tMY3 (4/2016)
tMY4 (5/2017)
+MYS (4/2018) -Bankfull

Cross Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Cross Section 14 -DRC East
67+02 Shallow
lla
c
116
O
FloodproneArea
v
w
114
112
0 10 20 30
40 50 60 70 80
Width (ft)
tMYO (2/2014)
�MY1 (7/2014)
�MY2 (4/2015)
+MY3 (4/2016)
+MY4(5/2017)
+MYS(4/2018)
-Bankfull
-
Bankfull Dimensions
13.3 x -section area (ft.sq.)
12.6 width (ft)
1.1 mean depth (ft)
1.8 max depth (ft)
13.1 wetted parimeter (ft)
{
1.0 hyd radi (ft)
11.9 width -depth ratio
+
300.0 W flood prone area (ft)i';
y
��•
- -
23.8 entrenchment ratio
i •
-•c
0.8 low bank height ratio
Survey Date: 4/2018
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
s
View Downstream
FloodproneArea

Cross Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Cross Section 15 -DRC East
77+04 Pool
117
115
O
Bankfull Dimensions
17.3 x -section area (ft.sq.)
13.2 width (ft)
1.3 mean depth (ft)
2.1 max depth (ft)
13.7 wetted parimeter (ft) r
1.3 hyd radi (ft) �
10.1 width depth ratio
Survey Date: 4/2018
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream
c
v 113
w
111
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Width (ft
)
�MYO (2/2014)
tMYl (7/2014) +MY2 (4/2015) �MY3 (4/2016) tMY4 (5/2017)
+MYS (4/2018) -Bankfull

Cross Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Cross Section 16 -DRC East
29+11 Shallow
117
115
c
O
v
w
113
111
0 10
20
30 40
50 60
Width (ft)
tMYO (2/2014)
�MY1 (7/2014)
�MY2 (4/2015)
+MY3 (4/2016)
+MY4(5/2017)
+MYS(4/2018)
-Bankfull
-
Bankfull Dimensions
13.2 x -section area (ft.sq.)
13.8 width (ft)
1.0 mean depth (ft)
1.8 max depth (ft)
14.3 wetted parimeter (ft)
0.9 hyd radi (ft)
14.3 width -depth ratio
300.0 W flood prone area (ft)
21.8 entrenchment ratio
1.1 low bank height ratio
Survey Date: 4/2018
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream
FloodproneArea

Cross Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Cross Section 17 -DRC East
86+95 Shallow
116
114
c
O
FloodproneArea
v
w
112
110
0 10
20
30 40
50 60
Width (ft)
tMYO (2/2014)
�MY1 (7/2014)
�MY2 (4/2015)
+MY3 (4/2016)
+MY4(5/2017)
+MYS(4/2018)
-Bankfull
-
Bankfull Dimensions
13.9 x -section area (ft.sq.)
13.5 width (ft)
1.0 mean depth (ft)
2.1 max depth (ft)
14.2 wetted parimeter (ft)
-__
1.0 hyd radi (ft)
13.1 width -depth ratio
300.0 W flood prone area (ft)
22.2 entrenchment ratio
_
1.0 low bank height ratio
Survey Date: 4/2018
�r
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream
FloodproneArea

Cross Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Cross Section 18 -DRC East
91+00 Pool
115
113
c
O
v 111
w
109
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110
Width (ft)
--0.—MYO (2/2014) tMYI (7/2014) +MY2 (4/2015) tMY3 (4/2016) tMY4 (5/2017) +MY5 (4/2018) —Bankfull
Bankfull Dimensions
25.0 x -section area (ft.sq.)
17.1 width (ft)
1.5 mean depth (ft)
2.6 max depth (ft)
18.2 wetted parimeter (ft)
1.4 hyd radi (ft)
11.8 width -depth ratio
Survey Date: 4/2018
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream

Cross Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Cross Section 19 -DRC East
91+48 Shallow
116
c
114
O
v
w
112
FloodproneArea
110
0 10 20 30 40
50 60 70 80 90 100
Width (ft)
tMYO (2/2014)
�MY1 (7/2014)
�MY2 (4/2015)
+MY3 (4/2016)
+MY4(5/2017)
+MYS(4/2018)
-Bankfull
-
Bankfull Dimensions
12.5 x -section area (ft.sq.)
14.1 width (ft)
0.9 mean depth (ft)
1.7 max depth (ft)
14.5 wetted parimeter (ft)
0.9 hyd radi (ft)
15.9 width -depth ratio
300.0 W flood prone area (ft)
21.3 entrenchment ratio
0.9 low bank height ratio
Survey Date: 4/2018
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream
FloodproneArea

Cross Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Cross Section 20 -DRC East
102+92 Shallow
llz
IL
110
0
108
w
106
0 10
20 30 40 50 60
Width (ft)
tMYO (2/2014)
MY1 (7/2014) MY2 (4/2015) +MY3 (4/2016)
+MY4(5/2017)
+MY5(4/2018) —Bankfull—FloodproneArea
Bankfull Dimensions
-
5.7 x -section area (ft.sq.)
8.1 width (ft)
0.7 mean depth (ft)
1.2 max depth (ft)
8.5 wetted parimeter (ft)
0.7 hyd radi (ft)
11.4 width -depth ratio
300.0 W flood prone area (ft)
37.2 entrenchment ratio
1.2 low bank height ratio
Survey Date: 4/2018
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream

Cross Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Cross Section 21 -DRC East
103+37 Pool
111
109
c
O
v
w
107
i
)
�MYO (2/2014) tMYl (7/2014) +MY2 (4/2015) �MY3 (4/2016) tMY4 (5/2017) +MYS (4/2018) —Bankfull
105
0 10 20
30 40 50
60 70
Width (ft
Bankfull Dimensions
10.8 x -section area (ft.sq.)
9.0 width (ft)
1.2 mean depth (ft)
2.0 max depth (ft)
10.7 wetted parimeter (ft)
1.0 hyd radi (ft)
7.6 width -depth ratio
Survey Date: 4/2018
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream
)
�MYO (2/2014) tMYl (7/2014) +MY2 (4/2015) �MY3 (4/2016) tMY4 (5/2017) +MYS (4/2018) —Bankfull

Cross Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Cross Section 22 -Southwest Branch
509+04 Pool
140
138
c
O
a_',
w
136
)
�MYO (2/2014) tMYl (7/2014) +MY2 (4/2015) �MY3 (4/2016) tMY4 (5/2017) +MYS (4/2018) —Bankfull
134
0 10
20
30
40 50
Width (ft
Bankfull Dimensions
1.8 x -section area (ft.sq.)
4.2 width (ft)
0.4 mean depth (ft)
0.7 max depth (ft)
4.6 wetted parimeter (ft)
0.4 hyd radi (ft)
9.6 width -depth ratio
.
Survey Date:
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream
)
�MYO (2/2014) tMYl (7/2014) +MY2 (4/2015) �MY3 (4/2016) tMY4 (5/2017) +MYS (4/2018) —Bankfull

Cross Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Cross Section 23 -Southwest BranchiL-
509+15 Shallow
140
138
c
O
'
FloodproneArea
,
a_
w
136
134
0 10
20
30 40 50
Width (ft)
tMYO (2/2014)
�MY1 (7/2014)
�MY2 (4/2015)
+MY3 (4/2016)
+MY4(5/2017)
+MYS(4/2018)
—Bankfull
—
Bankfull Dimensions
0.6 x -section area (ft.sq.)
2.0 width (ft);
0.3 mean depth (ft)
0.4 max depth (ft)
2.1 wetted parimeter (ft)
0.3 hyd radi (ft)
6.8 width -depth ratio
200.0 W flood prone area (ft)
98.8 entrenchment ratio
1.3 low bank height ratio
Survey Date: 4/2018
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering K�
r
View Downstream
FloodproneArea

Cross Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Cross Section 24 -Middle Branch
207+00 Shallow
140
1387771-
c
O
a_',
w
136
FloodproneArea
134
0 10
20
30
40 50
Width (ft)
tMYO (2/2014)
�MY1 (7/2014)
�MY2 (4/2015)
+MY3 (4/2016)
+MY4(5/2017)
+MYS(4/2018)
—Bankfull
—
Bankfull Dimensions
0.7 x -section area (ft.sq.)
1.6 width (ft)
0.4 mean depth (ft)
0.6 max depth (ft)
2.0 wetted parimeter (ft)
0.3 hyd radi (ft)
3.7 width -depth ratio
50.0 W flood prone area (ft)
31.3 entrenchment ratio
0.8 low bank height ratio
Survey Date: 4/2018
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
,
k
View Downstream
FloodproneArea

Cross Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Cross Section 25 -Middle Branch
207+08 Pool
139
137
c
O
�
v 135
w
133
0 10
20 30
40 50
Width (ft)
�MYO (2/2014) tMYI (7/2014) +MY2 (4/2015) MY3 (4/2016) MY4 (5/2017)
4 MY5 (4/2018) -Bankfull
Bankfull Dimensions
1.2 x -section area (ft.sq.)
2.5 width (ft)
0.5 mean depth (ft)
0.8 max depth (ft)
3.1 wetted parimeter (ft)
•i
0.4 hyd radi (ft)
5.1 width -depth ratio
Survey Date: 4/2018
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
_
View Downstream

Cross Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Cross Section 26 -Middle Branch
216+22 Pool
lza
126
c
O
v
w
124
)
�MYO (2/2014) tMYl (7/2014) +MY2 (4/2015) �MY3 (4/2016) tMY4 (S/2017) +MYS (4/2018) -Bankfull
122
0 10
20 30 40
Width (ft
Bankfull Dimensions
1.4 x -section area (ft.sq.)
5.0 width (ft)
0.3 mean depth (ft)
0.6 max depth (ft)
5.3 wetted parimeter (ft)
0.3 hyd radi (ft)
17.6 width -depth ratio
Survey Date: 4/2018
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream
)
�MYO (2/2014) tMYl (7/2014) +MY2 (4/2015) �MY3 (4/2016) tMY4 (S/2017) +MYS (4/2018) -Bankfull

Cross Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Cross Section 27 -Middle Branch
216+34 Shallow
128
126
c
O
FloodproneArea
v
w
124
122
0 10
20 30 40
Width (ft)
tMYO (2/2014)
�MY1 (7/2014)
�MY2 (4/2015)
+MY3 (4/2016)
+MY4(5/2017)
+MYS(4/2018)
-Bankfull
-
Bankfull Dimensions
1.1 x -section area (ft.sq.)
3.3 width (ft)
0.3 mean depth (ft)
0.6 max depth (ft)
3.5 wetted parimeter (ft)
0.3 hyd radi (ft)
v.
9.9 width -depth ratio
200.0 W flood prone area (ft)
60.6 entrenchment ratio
0.9 low bank height ratio
Survey Date: 4/2018
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream
FloodproneArea

Cross Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Cross Section 28 -Southeast Branch
310+03 Pool
141
139
c
O
Li
v
w
137
)
�MYO (2/2014) tMYl (7/2014) +MY2 (4/2015) �MY3 (4/2016) �MY4 (5/2017) +MYS (4/2018) -Bankfull
135
0 10 20
30
40
50
60 70 80
Width (ft
Bankfull Dimensions
1.5 x -section area (ft.sq.)
;
3.6 width (ft)
0.4 mean depth (ft)
1.1 max depth (ft)
4.8 wetted parimeter (ft)
0.3 hyd radi (ft)
8.8 width -depth ratio
Survey Date: 4/2018
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream
)
�MYO (2/2014) tMYl (7/2014) +MY2 (4/2015) �MY3 (4/2016) �MY4 (5/2017) +MYS (4/2018) -Bankfull

Cross Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Cross Section 29 -Southeast Branch
310+15 Shallow
141
139
c
O
v
w
137
FloodproneArea
135
0 10 20
30
40 50 60 70 80
Width (ft)
tMYO (2/2014)
�MY1 (7/2014)
�MY2 (4/2015)
+MY3 (4/2016)
+MY4(5/2017)
+MYS(4/2018) -Bankfull
-
Bankfull Dimensions
0.8 x -section area (ft.sq.)
2.6 width (ft)
0.3 mean depth (ft)
0.7 max depth (ft)
3.0 wetted parimeter (ft)
0.3 hyd radi (ft)
8.6 width -depth ratio
30.0 W flood prone area (ft)
11.5 entrenchment ratio
1.1 low bank height ratio
Survey Date: 4/2018
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream
FloodproneArea

Cross Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Cross Section 30 -Southeast Branch
318+11 Pool
127
125
c
O
',
a_
w
123
)
�MYO (2/2014) tMYl (7/2014) +MY2 (4/2015) �MY3 (4/2016) tMY4 (5/2017) +MYS (4/2018) —Bankfull
121
0 10
20
30
40
50 60
Width (ft
Bankfull Dimensions
1.3 x -section area (ft.sq.)
4.1 width (ft)
0.3 mean depth (ft)
0.5 max depth (ft)
4.3 wetted parimeter (ft)
0.3 hyd radi (ft)
12.9 width -depth ratio
Survey Date: 4/2018
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream
)
�MYO (2/2014) tMYl (7/2014) +MY2 (4/2015) �MY3 (4/2016) tMY4 (5/2017) +MYS (4/2018) —Bankfull

Cross Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Cross Section 31 -Southeast BranchI
318+27 Shallow
126
124
c
O
T-
A
w
122
FloodproneArea
120
0 10
20
30 40
50 60
Width (ft)
tMYO (2/2014)
�MY1 (7/2014)
�MY2 (4/2015)
+MY3 (4/2016)
+MY4(5/2017)
+MYS(4/2018)
-Bankfull
-
Bankfull Dimensions
1.3 x -section area (ft.sq.)
3.6 width (ft)
0.4 mean depth (ft)
0.7 max depth (ft)
3.9 wetted parimeter (ft)
0.3 hyd radi (ft)
10.0 width -depth ratio
60.0 W flood prone area (ft)
16.7 entrenchment ratio
0.9 low bank height ratio
Survey Date: 4/2018
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream
FloodproneArea

Cross Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Cross Section 32 -Southeast Branch
325+58 Shallow
120
118
c
O
v
w
116
FloodproneArea
114
0 10
20
30 40
50 60
Width (ft)
tMYO (2/2014)
�MY1 (7/2014)
�MY2 (4/2015)
+MY3 (4/2016)
+MY4(5/2017)
+MYS(4/2018)
-Bankfull
-
Bankfull Dimensions
2.1 x -section area (ft.sq.)
8.5 width (ft)
`
0.2 mean depth (ft)
0.7 max depth (ft)
8.7 wetted parimeter (ft)
0.2 hyd radi (ft)
34.4 width -depth ratio
200.0 W flood prone area (ft)
23.5 entrenchment ratio
0.8 low bank height ratio
Survey Date: 4/2018
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
mfr .
View Downstream
FloodproneArea

Cross Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Cross Section 33 -Southeast Branch
325+73 Pool
lzo
118
0
v
w
116
)
�MYO (2/2014) tMYl (7/2014) +MY2 (4/2015) �MY3 (4/2016) tMY4 (5/2017) +MYS (4/2018) -Bankfull
114
0 10
20
30
40
50 60
Width (ft
Bankfull Dimensions
2.4 x -section area (ft.sq.)
4.9 width (ft)
0.5 mean depth (ft)
0.7 max depth (ft)
5.1 wetted parimeter (ft)
0.5 hyd radi (ft)
10.0 width -depth ratio
Survey Date: 4/2018
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream
)
�MYO (2/2014) tMYl (7/2014) +MY2 (4/2015) �MY3 (4/2016) tMY4 (5/2017) +MYS (4/2018) -Bankfull

Cross Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Cross Section 34 -North Branch
407+67 Pool
lzz
lzo
0
v
w
118
)
�MYO (2/2014) tMYl (7/2014) +MY2 (4/2015) �MY3 (4/2016) �MY4 (5/2017) +MYS (4/2018) -Bankfull
116
0 10
20
30 40
50 60
Width (ft
Bankfull Dimensions
7.5 x -section area (ft.sq.)
10.1 width (ft)
0.7 mean depth (ft)
1.4 max depth (ft)
10.6 wetted parimeter (ft)
0.7 hyd radi (ft)
13.5 width -depth ratio
Survey Date: 4/2018
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream
)
�MYO (2/2014) tMYl (7/2014) +MY2 (4/2015) �MY3 (4/2016) �MY4 (5/2017) +MYS (4/2018) -Bankfull

Cross Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Cross Section 35 -North Branch
407+67 Shallow
122
120
0
A> 118
w
LL
116
I I 1 —4
0 10
20 30 40 50 60
Width (ft)
tMYO (2/2014)
MY1 (7/2014) MY2 (4/2015) +MY3 (4/2016)
+MY4(5/2017)
+MY5(4/2018) -Bankfull-FloodproneArea
Bankfull Dimensions
5.7 x -section area (ft.sq.)
9.6 width (ft)
0.6 mean depth (ft)
1.2 max depth (ft)
10.0 wetted parimeter (ft)
0.6 hyd radi (ft)
a
16.3 width -depth ratio
200.0 W flood prone area (ft)
20.8 entrenchment ratio
1.0 low bank height ratio
v
Survey Date: 4/2018
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream

Cross Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Cross Section 36 -North Branch
416+47 Shallow
120
118
c
O
v
w
116
FloodproneArea
114
0 10 20
30 40
50
60 70
Width (ft)
tMYO (2/2014)
�MY1 (7/2014)
�MY2 (4/2015)
+MY3 (4/2016)
+MY4(5/2017)
+MYS(4/2018)
-Bankfull
-
Bankfull Dimensions
r '
6.5 x -section area (ft.sq.)
9.0 width (ft)
0.7 mean depth (ft)
1.3 max depth (ft)
9.4 wetted parimeter (ft)
0.7 hyd radi (ft)
12.5 width -depth ratio
200.0 W flood prone area (ft)
"
22.2 entrenchment ratio
1.0 low bank height ratio
Survey Date: 4/2018
;
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream
FloodproneArea

Cross Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Cross Section 37 -North Branch
416+85 Pool
120
118
c
O
v
w
116
)
�MYO (2/2014) tMYl (7/2014) +MY2 (4/2015) �MY3 (4/2016) �MY4 (5/2017) +MYS (4/2018) -Bankfull
114
0 10 20
30 40 50 60 70
Width (ft
Bankfull Dimensions
]•
9.2 x -section area (ft.sq.)
11.6 width (ft)
0.8 mean depth (ft)
1.4 max depth (ft)
12.1 wetted parimeter (ft)
0.8 hyd radi (ft)
14.7 width -depth ratio
Survey Date: 4/2018
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream
)
�MYO (2/2014) tMYl (7/2014) +MY2 (4/2015) �MY3 (4/2016) �MY4 (5/2017) +MYS (4/2018) -Bankfull

APPENDIX 5. Hydrology Summary Data and Plots

Table 13. Verification of Bankfull Events
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Reach
Date of Data Date of
Collection Occurrence
Method
Devil's Racetrach (West)
2/22/2018 1/3/2018
Crest Gage/
Pressure
Transducer
2/22/2018 1/29/2018
4/16/2018 3/20/2018
11/27/2018 4/24/2018
11/27/2018 5/29/2018
11/27/2018 8/21/2018
11/27/2018 9/15/2018
11/27/2018 10/11/2018
11/27/2018 11/13/2018
11/27/2018 11/24/2018
Devil's Racetrach (East)
2/22/2018 1/3/2018
2/22/2018 1/29/2018
4/16/2018 3/20/2018
11/27/2018 4/24/2018
11/27/2018 5/29/2018
11/27/2018 8/21/2018
11/27/2018 9/15/2018
11/27/2018 10/11/2018
11/27/2018 11/13/2018
11/27/2018 11/24/2018
Southwest Branch
2/22/2018 1/13/2018
2/22/2018 2/12/2018
11/27/2018 9/15/2018
11/27/2018 11/13/2018
Middle Branch
2/22/2018 1/29/2018
11/27/2018 4/24/2018
11/27/2018 5/29/2018
11/27/2018 9/15/2018
11/27/2018 11/13/2018
Southeast Branch
2/22/2018 1/29/2018
11/27/2018 4/24/2018
11/27/2018 5/29/2018
11/27/2018 9/15/2018
11/27/2018 11/13/2018
North Branch
2/22/2018 1/3/2018
2/22/2018 1/29/2018
4/16/2018 3/20/2018
11/27/2018 5/29/2018
11/27/2018 9/15/2018
11/27/2018 11/13/2018

Table 14. Wetland Gage Attainment Summary
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Summary of Groundwater Gage Results for Monitoring Years 1 through 7
Success Criteria Achieved/Max Consecutive Days During Growing Season (Percentage)
Gage
Year 1(2014)*
Year 2 (2015)
Year 3 (2016)
Year 4 (2017)
Year 5 (2018)
Year 6 (2019)
Year 7 (2020)
No/7.5 Days
No/16 Days
Yes/31 Days
Yes/28 Days
Yes/37 Days
1
(3.1%)
(6.0%)
(11.9%)
(10.8%)
(14.2%)
No/14.5 Days
Yes/ 58 Days
No/21 Days
No/15 Days
Yes/35 Days
2
(6.0%)
(22.3%)
(8.1%)
(5.8%)
(13.4%)
No/2.5 Days
Yes/33 Days
No/9 Days
No/11 Days
Yes/35 Days
3
(1.0%)
(12.8%)
(3.5%)
(4.2%)
(13.4%)
No/13.5 Days
Yes/57 Days
Yes/25 Days
Yes/30 Days
Yes/67 Days
4
(5.6%)
(21.9%)
(9.6%)
(11.5%)
(25.7%)
No/12.5 Days
Yes/34 Days
No/18 Days
No/12 Days
Yes/36 Days
5
(5.2%)
(13.0%)
(6.9%)
(4.6%)
(13.8%)
No/11.0 Days
Yes/53 Days
Yes/23 Days
No/13 Days
No/14 Days
6
(4.6%)
(20.3%)
(8.8%)
(5.0%)
(5.4%)
Yes/21.5 Days
Yes/66 Days
Yes/25 Days
Yes/23 Days
Yes/51 Days
7
(9.0%)
(25.6%)
(9.6%)
(8.8%)
(19.5%)
No/5.0 Days
Yes/31 Days
No/8 Days
No/10 Days
Removed During
8
(2.1%)
(12.0%)
(3.1%)
(3.8%)
MYS
Yes/ 22.0 Days
Yes/80 Days
Yes/ 39.0 Days
Yes/28 Days
Yes/36 Days
9
(9.2%)
(31.0%)
(15.0%)
(10.8%)
(13.8%)
No/ 1.5 Days
No/10 Days
No/ 3 Days
No/3 Days
Removed During
10
(0.6%)
(3.9%)
(1.2%)
(1.2%)
MY4
No/9.0 Days
Yes/65 Days
Yes/23 Days
Yes/31 Days
Yes/52 Days
11
(3.8%)
(25.2%)
(8.8%)
(11.9%)
(19.9%)
No/7.5 Days
Yes/31 Days
No/13 Days
Yes/30 Days
Yes/52 Days
12
(3.1%)
(12.0%)
(5.0%)
(11.5%)
(20.3%)
No/8.0 Days
Yes/34 Days
No/11 Days
No/10 Days
No/14 Days
13
(3.3%)
(13.0%)
(4.2%)
(3.8%)
(5.4%)
No/ 8.5 Days
Yes/32 Days
No/12 Days
No/12 Days
Yes/35 Days
14
(3.5%)
(12.4%)
(4.6%)
(4.6%)
(13.4%)
No/12.5 Days
Yes/33 Days
No/14 Days
Yes/30 Days
Yes/37 Days
15
(5.2%)
(12.8%)
(5.4%)
(11.5%)
(14.2%)
No/12.5 Days
Yes/33 Days
Yes/39 Days
Yes/29 Days
Yes/36 Days
16
(5.2%)
(12.8%)
(15.0%)
(11.2%)
(13.8%)
No/15.0 Days
Yes/34 Days
Yes/23 Days
No/16 Days
Yes/37 Days
17
(6.3%)
(13.2%)
(8.8%)
(6.2%)
(14.2%)
Yes/69.5 Days
Yes/66 Days
Yes/22 Days
No/14 Days
Yes/36 Days
18
(29.0%)
(25.6%)
(8.5%)
(5.4%)
(13.8%)
Yes/31.5 Days
Yes/66 Days
Yes/26 Days
Yes/30 Days
Yes/37 Days
19
(13.1%)
(25.6%)
(10.0%)
(11.5%)
(14.2%)
No/19.5 Days
Yes/35 Days
No/12 Days
No/5 Days
No/13 Days
20
(8.1%)
(13.4%)
(4.6%)
(1.9%)
(5.0%)
Yes/69.5 Days
Yes/79 Days
Yes/38 Days
Yes/31 Days
Yes/37 Days
21
(29.0%)
(30.4%)
(14.6%)
(11.9%)
(14.2%)
Yes/ 31.0 Days
Yes/66 Days
Yes/24 Days
No/16 Days
Yes/37 Days
22
(12.9%)
(25.6%)
(9.2%)
(6.2%)
(14.2%)
No/8.0 Days
Yes/31 Days
No/6 Days
No/5 Days
No/5 Days
23
(3.3%)
(11.8%)
(2.3%)
(1.9%)
(1.9%)
No/13.0 Days
Yes/33 Days
No/ 5 Days
No/9 Days
No/12 Days
24
(5.4%)
(12.8%)
(1.9%)
(3.5%)
(4.6%)
Yes/25.5 Days
Yes/66 Days
Yes/23 Days
No/16 Days
Yes/52 Days
25
(10.6%)
(25.6%)
(8.8%)
(6.2%)
(19.9%)
Yes/39.0 Days
Yes/83 Days
Yes/25 Days
No/14 Days
No/14 Days
26
(16.3%)
(32.2%)
(9.6%)
(5.4%)
(5.4%)
Yes/29.5 Days
Yes/67 Days
Yes/31 Days
Yes/32 Days
Yes/37 Days
27
(12.3%)
(26.0%)
(11.9%)
(12.3%)
(14.2%)
No/19.5 Days
Yes/81 Days
Yes/106 Days
Yes/102 Days
Yes/111 Days
28
(8.1%)
(31.2%)
(40.8%)
(39.2%)
(42.5%)
Yes/70.0 Days
Yes/81 Days
Yes/56 Days
Yes/78 Days
Yes/76 Days
29
(29.2%)
(31.4%)
(21.5%)
(30.0%)
(29.1%)
Yes/52.5 Days
Yes/83 Days
No/11 Days
No/9 Days
No/22 Days
30
(21.9%)
(32.0%)
(4.2%)
(3.5%)
(8.4%)
No/9.0 Days
Yes/77 Days
Yes/40 Days
Yes/32 Days
Yes/66 Days
31
(3.8%)
(29.7%)
(15.4%)
(12.3%)
(25.3%)
No/ 7.0 Days
Yes/78 Days
No/11 Days
No/3 Days
Removed During
32
(2.9%)
(30.2%)
(4.2%)
(1.2%)
MYS
Yes/69.5 Days
Yes/84 Days
Yes/51 Days
Yes/46 Days
Yes/64 Days
33
(29.0%)
(32.4%)
(19.6%)
(17.7%)
(24.5%)
No/2.0 Days
No/16 Days
No/10 Days
No/4 Days
No/9 Days
34
(0.8%)
(6.0%)
(3.8%)
(1.5%)
(3.4%)
Added During
Yes/33 Days
Yes/42 Days
Yes/31 Days
Yes/67 Days
35
MY2
(12.8%)
(16.2%)
(11.9%)
(25.7%)
Added During
Yes/34 Days
Yes/40 Days
Yes/31 Days
Yes/53 Days
36
MY2
(13.0%)
(15.4%)
(11.9%)
(20.3%)
Added During
Yes/33 Days
Yes/22 Days
No/15 Days
Yes/36 Days
37
MY2
(12.8%)
(8.5%)
(5.8%)
(13.8%)
Added During
Yes/33 Days
No/6 Days
No/11 Days
Yes/36 Days
38
MY2
(12.8%)
(2.3%)
(4.2%)
(13.8%)
* NRCS WETS data was used to determine the growing season for monitorg year 1. After discussions with the US Army Corps
of Engineers, on-site soil temperature probe data is being used to determine the beginning of the growing season.

Groundwater Gage Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
20
10
0
-10
a
3 -20
a
Y
-30
-40
-50
-60
C -0 i T C hA Q+-' > U
ti Q � til 0
Q Z
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #1 — — Criteria Level
6.0
5.0
4.0
c
3.0 w
c
2.0
1.0
0.0

Groundwater Gage Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
20
10
0
-10
a
-20
a
Y
f0
-30
-40
-50
-60
C -0 i T C hA Q > U
LiQ m =5�n O O a)
� g Q z
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #2 — — Criteria Level
6.0
5.0
4.0
c
3.0 w
c
m
Oc
2.0
1.0
0.0

Groundwater Gage Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
20
10
0
-10
a
3 -20
a
Y
-30
-40
-50
-60
C -0 i T C OA Q+-' > U
ti Q � til 0
Q Z
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #3 — — Criteria Level
6.0
5.0
4.0
c
3.0 w
c
2.0
1.0
0.0

Groundwater Gage Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
20
10
0
-10
a
-20
a
Y
f0
-30
-40
-50
-60
C -0 i T C hA Q > U
LiQ m =5�n O O a)
� g Q z
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #4 — — Criteria Level
6.0
5.0
4.0
c
3.0 w
c
m
Oc
2.0
1.0
0.0

Groundwater Gage Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
20
10
0
-10
a
3 -20
a
Y
-30
-40
-50
-60
C -0 i T C OA Q+-' > U
ti Q � til 0
Q Z
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #5 — — Criteria Level
6.0
5.0
4.0
c
3.0 w
c
2.0
1.0
0.0

Groundwater Gage Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
20
10
0
-10
a
-20
a
Y
f0
-30
-40
-50
-60
C -0 i T C hA Q > U
LiQ m =5�n O O a)
� g Q z
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #6 — — Criteria Level
6.0
5.0
4.0
c
3.0 w
c
m
Oc
2.0
1.0
0.0

Groundwater Gage Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
20
10
0
-10
a
-20
a
Y
f0
-30
-40
-50
-60
C -0 i T C hA Q > U
LiQ m =5�n O O a)
� g Q z
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #7 — — Criteria Level
6.0
5.0
4.0
c
3.0 w
c
m
Oc
2.0
1.0
0.0

Groundwater Gage Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
20
10
0
-10
a
3 -20
a
Y
-30
-40
-50
-60
C -0 i T C OA Q+-' > U
ti Q � til 0
Q Z
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #9 — — Criteria Level
6.0
5.0
4.0
c
3.0 w
c
2.0
1.0
0.0

Groundwater Gage Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
20
10
0
-10
a
3 -20
a
Y
-30
-40
-50
-60
C -0 i T C to Q+-' > U
�i Q :3 vii O °
� g p
a z
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #11 — — Criteria Level
6.0
5.0
4.0
c
3.0 w
c
2.0
1.0
0.0

Groundwater Gage Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
20
10
0
-10
a
3 -20
a
Y
-30
-40
-50
-60
C -0 i T C hA Q +-' > U
�ivi
Q � i O O p
� g a z
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #12 — — Criteria Level
6.0
5.0
4.0
c
3.0 w
c
2.0
1.0
0.0

Groundwater Gage Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
20
10
0
-10
a
-20
a
Y
f0
-30
-40
-50
-60
C -0 i T C hA Q > U
LiQ m =5�n O O a)
� g Q z
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #13 — — Criteria Level
6.0
5.0
4.0
c
3.0 w
c
m
Oc
2.0
1.0
0.0

Groundwater Gage Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
20
10
0
-10
a
3 -20
a
Y
-30
-40
-50
-60
C -0 i T C hA Q +-' > U
�ivi
Q � i O O p
� g a z
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #14 — — Criteria Level
6.0
5.0
4.0
c
3.0 w
c
2.0
1.0
0.0

Groundwater Gage Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
20
10
0
-10
a
-20
a
Y
f0
-30
-40
-50
-60
C -0 i T C hA Q > U
LiQ m =5�n O O a)
� g Q z
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #15 — — Criteria Level
6.0
5.0
4.0
c
3.0 w
c
m
Oc
2.0
1.0
0.0

Groundwater Gage Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
20
10
0
-10
a
-20
a
Y
f0
-30
-40
-50
-60
C -0 i T C hA Q > U
LiQ m =5�n O O a)
� g Q z
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #16 — — Criteria Level
6.0
5.0
4.0
c
3.0 w
c
m
Oc
2.0
1.0
0.0

Groundwater Gage Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
20
10
0
-10
a
-20
a
Y
f0
-30
-40
-50
-60
C -0 i T C hA Q > U
LiQ m =5�n O O a)
� g Q z
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #17 — — Criteria Level
6.0
5.0
4.0
c
3.0 w
c
m
Oc
2.0
1.0
0.0

Groundwater Gage Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
20
10
0
-10
a
-20
a
Y
f0
-30
-40
-50
-60
C -0 i T C hA Q > U
LiQ m =5�n O O a)
� g Q z
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #18 — — Criteria Level
6.0
5.0
4.0
c
3.0 w
c
m
Oc
2.0
1.0
0.0

Groundwater Gage Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
20
10
0
-10
a
3 -20
a
Y
-30
-40
-50
-60
C -0 i T C to Q+-' > U
�i Q :3 vii O °
� g p
a z
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #19 — — Criteria Level
6.0
5.0
4.0
c
3.0 w
c
2.0
1.0
0.0

Groundwater Gage Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
20
10
0
-10
a
-20
a
Y
f0
-30
-40
-50
-60
C -0 i T C hA Q > U
LiQ m �n O O
� g Q z
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #20 — — Criteria Level
6.0
5.0
4.0
c
3.0 w
c
m
Oc
2.0
1.0
0.0

Groundwater Gage Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
20
10
0
-10
a
3 -20
a
Y
-30
-40
-50
-60
C -0 i T C to Q+-' > U
�i Q :3 vii O °
� g p
a z
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #21 — — Criteria Level
6.0
5.0
4.0
c
3.0 w
c
2.0
1.0
0.0

Groundwater Gage Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
20
10
0
-10
a
-20
a
Y
f0
-30
-40
-50
-60
C -0 i T C hA Q > U
LiQ m =5�n O O a)
� g Q z
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #22 — — Criteria Level
6.0
5.0
4.0
c
3.0 w
c
m
Oc
2.0
1.0
0.0

Groundwater Gage Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
20
10
0
-10
a
-20
a
Y
f0
-30
-40
-50
-60
C -0 i T C hA Q > U
LiQ m =5�n O O a)
� g Q z
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #23 — — Criteria Level
6.0
5.0
4.0
c
3.0 w
c
m
Oc
2.0
1.0
0.0

Groundwater Gage Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
20
10
0
-10
a
3 -20
a
Y
-30
-40
-50
-60
C -0 i T C to Q+-' > U
�i Q :3 vii O °
� g p
a z
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #24 — — Criteria Level
6.0
5.0
4.0
c
3.0 w
c
2.0
1.0
0.0

Groundwater Gage Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
20
10
0
-10
a
3 -20
a
Y
-30
-40
-50
-60
C -0 i T C to Q+-' > U
�i Q :3 vii O °
� g p
a z
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #25 — — Criteria Level
6.0
5.0
4.0
c
3.0 w
c
2.0
1.0
0.0

Groundwater Gage Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
20
10
0
-10
a
3 -20
a
Y
-30
-40
-50
-60
C -0 i T C to Q+-' > U
�i Q :3 vii O °
� g p
a z
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #26 — — Criteria Level
6.0
5.0
4.0
c
3.0 w
c
2.0
1.0
0.0

Groundwater Gage Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
20
10
0
-10
a
-20
a
Y
f0
-30
-40
-50
-60
a to CL
a o z°
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #27 — — Criteria Level
6.0
5.0
4.0
c
3.0 w
c
m
Oc
2.0
1.0
0.0

Groundwater Gage Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
20
10
0
-10
a
-20
a
Y
f0
-30
-40
-50
-60
C -0 i T C hA Q > U
LiQ m =5�n O O a)
� g Q z
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #28 — — Criteria Level
6.0
5.0
4.0
c
3.0 w
c
m
Oc
2.0
1.0
0.0

Groundwater Gage Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
20
10
0
-10
a
-20
a
Y
f0
-30
-40
-50
-60
C -0 i T C hA Q > U
LiQ m =5�n O O a)
� g Q z
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #29 — — Criteria Level
6.0
5.0
4.0
c
3.0 w
c
m
Oc
2.0
1.0
0.0

Groundwater Gage Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
20
10
0
-10
a
-20
a
Y
f0
-30
-40
-50
-60
Q Q n 0 Z
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #30 — — Criteria Level
6.0
5.0
4.0
c
3.0 w
c
m
Oc
2.0
1.0
0.0

Groundwater Gage Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
20
10
0
-10
a
-20
a
Y
f0
-30
-40
-50
-60
Li Li Q Q vii 0 Z
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #31 — — Criteria Level
6.0
5.0
4.0
c
3.0 w
c
m
Oc
2.0
1.0
0.0

Groundwater Gage Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
20
10
0
-10
a
3 -20
a
Y
-30
-40
-50
-60
C -0 i T C to Q+-' > U
�i Q :3 vii O °
� g p
a z
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #33 — — Criteria Level
6.0
5.0
4.0
c
3.0 w
c
2.0
1.0
0.0

Groundwater Gage Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
20
10
0
-10
a
3 -20
a
Y
-30
-40
-50
-60
C -0 i T C hA Q +-' > U
�ivi
Q � i O O p
� g a z
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #34 — — Criteria Level
6.0
5.0
4.0
c
3.0 w
c
2.0
1.0
0.0

Groundwater Gage Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
20
10
0
-10
a
-20
a
Y
f0
-30
-40
-50
-60
C -0 i T C hA Q > U
LiQ m =5�n O O a)
� g Q z
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #35 — — Criteria Level
6.0
5.0
4.0
c
3.0 w
c
m
Oc
2.0
1.0
0.0

Groundwater Gage Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
20
10
0
-10
a
-20
a
Y
f0
-30
-40
-50
-60
C -0 i T C hA Q > U
LiQ m =5�n O O a)
� g Q z
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #36 — — Criteria Level
6.0
5.0
4.0
c
3.0 w
c
m
Oc
2.0
1.0
0.0

Groundwater Gage Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
20
10
0
-10
a
-20
a
Y
f0
-30
-40
-50
-60
y y! Q ; n 0
� � Q Z
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #37 — — Criteria Level
6.0
5.0
4.0
c
3.0 w
c
m
Oc
2.0
1.0
0.0

Groundwater Gage Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
20
10
0
-10
a
3 -20
a
Y
-30
-40
-50
-60
C -0 i T C to Q+-' > U
�i Q :3 vii O °
� g p
a z
Rainfall Reference Gage Depth Gage #38 — — Criteria Level
6.0
5.0
4.0
c
3.0 w
c
2.0
1.0
0.0

In -Stream Flow Gage Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Devil's Racetrack: In -Stream Flow Gage for SW Branch
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Gage stopped recording 4/17/2018.

In -Stream Flow Gage Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
123.00
122.75
w
122.50
`w
A
3
122.25
122.00
Devil's Racetrack: In -Stream Flow Gage for Middle Branch
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
4.0
3.5
3.0
2.5
e
2.0 m
c
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
`m a m ou a +u >
LL a s a z° o
Rainfall — Middle Branch Water Depth — — Thalweg Elevation — • Bankfull

In -Stream Flow Gage Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
123.00
122.75
122.50
122.25
v 122.00
>
v
121.75
3
121.50
121.25
121.00
120.75
Devil's Racetrack: In -Stream Flow Gage for SE Branch
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
> u
LL a s a o z° o
Rainfall —SE Branch Water Depth — — Thalweg Elevation — •Bankfull
4.0
3.5
3.0
2.5
e
2.0 m
C
s
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0

Monthly Rainfall Data
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
Devil's Racetrack 30-70 Percentile Graph for Rainfall in 2018 Smithfield, NC
10.00
9.00
8.00
7.00
c 6.00
C
0
m 5.00
.Q
V
N
4.00
a`
3.00
2.00
1.00
0.00
Jan -18 Feb -18 Mar -18 Apr -18 May -18 Jun -18 Jul -18 Aug -18 Sep -18 Oct -18 Nov -18
Date
2018 Rainfall Data (weather station) 30th Percentile 70th Percentile
1 2018 monthly rainfall collected from USDA weather station 317994 (Smithfield, NC).
2 30th and 70th percentile rainfall data collected from weather station 317994, in Smithfield, NC (USDA, 1970 - 2000).

Pre and Post Construction Groundwater Gage Comparison Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
30
20
10
0
c
Devil's Racetrack Groundwater Gage #1
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
-30
-40
-50
-60
c n > c 75on a > u
�i Q � Un O O p
� � Q Z
Pre -Construction Rainfall Rainfall Pre -Construction Gage Depth Gage #1 — — Criteria Level
5.0
4.5
4.0
3.5
3.0
c
2.5
C
2.0 '
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0

Pre and Post Construction Groundwater Gage Comparison Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
30
20
10
0
c
Devil's Racetrack Groundwater Gage #6
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
-30
-40
-50
-60
C .0 i T C 75CL > u
GJ (a n fv 3 N O UJ
LL Q Q U1 O z o
Pre -Construction Rainfall Rainfall Pre -Construction Gage Depth Gage #6 — — Criteria Level
5.0
4.5
4.0
3.5
3.0
c
2.5
C
2.0 '
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0

Pre and Post Construction Groundwater Gage Comparison Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
30
20
10
0
c
v -10
v
J
v -20
-30
-40
-50
-60
Devil's Racetrack Groundwater Gage #8
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
C .0 i T C7500 Q > V
QJ
Q � Vl 0 O D � Q Z
Pre -Construction Rainfall Rainfall Pre -Construction Gage Depth Gage #8 — — Criteria Level
5.0
4.5
4.0
3.5
3.0
c
2.5
C
2.0 '
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0

Pre and Post Construction Groundwater Gage Comparison Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
30
20
10
0
c
v -10
v
J
v -20
-30
-40
-50
-60
Devil's Racetrack Groundwater Gage #12
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
c n > c 75on a > u
GJ OJ 0 QJ
Pre -Construction Rainfall Rainfall Pre -Construction Gage Depth Gage #12 — — CriteriaLevel
5.0
4.5
4.0
3.5
3.0
c
2.5
C
2.0 '
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0

Pre and Post Construction Groundwater Gage Comparison Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
30
20
10
0
c
Devil's Racetrack Groundwater Gage #19
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
-30
-40
-50
-60
c n > c 75on a > u
GJ � 0 QJ
� a z
Pre -Construction Rainfall Rainfall Pre -Construction Gage Depth Gage #19 — — CriteriaLevel
5.0
4.5
4.0
3.5
3.0
c
2.5
C
2.0 '
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0

Pre and Post Construction Groundwater Gage Comparison Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
30
20
10
0
c
Devil's Racetrack Groundwater Gage #21
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
-30
-40
-50
-60
c n > c 75on a > u
GJ � 0 QJ
� a z
Pre -Construction Rainfall Rainfall Pre -Construction Gage Depth Gage #21 — — CriteriaLevel
5.0
4.5
4.0
3.5
3.0
c
2.5
C
2.0 '
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0

Pre and Post Construction Groundwater Gage Comparison Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
30
20
10
0
c
Devil's Racetrack Groundwater Gage #28
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
-30
-40
-50
-60
�
a 2 a U) o z° o
Pre -Construction Rainfall Rainfall Pre -Construction Gage Depth Gage #28 — — Criteria Level
5.0
4.5
4.0
3.5
3.0
c
2.5 w
C
2.0 z
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0

Pre and Post Construction Groundwater Gage Comparison Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
30
20
10
0
c
v -10
v
J
v -20
-30
-40
-50
-60
Devil's Racetrack Groundwater Gage #36
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
c n > c 75on a > u
Pre -Construction Rainfall Rainfall Pre -Construction Gage Depth Gage #36 — — CriteriaLevel
5.0
4.5
4.0
3.5
3.0
c
2.5
C
2.0 '
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0

Pre and Post Construction Groundwater Gage Comparison Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
30
20
10
0
c
Devil's Racetrack Groundwater Gage #38
Monitoring Year 5 - 2018
-30
-40
-50
-60
c s > c — W a > u
�< g a z
Pre -Construction Rainfall Rainfall Pre -Construction Gage Depth Gage #38 — — Criteria Level
5.0
4.5
4.0
3.5
3.0
c
2.5 w
C
2.0 z
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0