20130653 Ver 1_Year 5 Monitoring Report_2018_20190201

Mitigation Project Name Muddy Run II Site
DMS ID 95354
River Basin Cape Fear
Cataloging Unit 03030007
County Duplin USACE Action ID 2012-01387
Date Project Instituted 811/2012 NCDWR Permit No 20130653
Date Prepared 5/2212018
Credit Release Milestone
Potential CreditsAs- ation Plan
Potential Credits lASBullSurve
scheduled
Releases
(Stream)
We= Cool
10,485.530
10,738,800
Cold AnMcipated
Release Year
rea
(strum)
Actual
Release Date
/Stream)
Scheduled
Releases
(Forested)
Rivetlm, Rpa
ne
0.920
0.92D
Wetlentl Credits
Ripnea^sNon Non-nda
pan Scheduled
Releases
(Coashl)
Casale] Anticipated
Release Veer
(Wetland)
Actual
Release Date
(Wetlantl)
1(Sita Establishment
WA
9,978.000004.920
WA
WA
WA
NIA
WA
WA
2 ear 0l AvZuilt)
30%
3,221.840
2014
10=014
30%
1.475
WA
2014
10132014
3 earl hankering)
10%
1.073.680
2015
4/232015
10%
0.492
10%
2015
42312015
4 ear 2 Monitoring)
1"..
1.0]3.680
2016
4262016
10%
SAM
15%
2016
428/2016
5 ear 3 Monitoring)
10%
1,073.880
2017
10202017
16%
0.738
20%
2017
1020209
6 ear 4 Monitodn
5%
536.940
2018
4)2521118
5%
0.246
10%
2016
4252018
7 ear 5 Monitoring)
10%
2019
15%
15%
2019
8 Mear 6 Monitorin
5%
1 2020
TA
WA
2020
297.000
earl Monitodn
t0%
2021
1m%
NIA
2021
March New Hanover 104mh
200742785 Plpoline
Ja9 BanRrull6tandaM
1D%
1,0]3.880
2016
4262D15
NIA
NIA
TotalCred"rts Released to Date
149.000
8,054.100
3.444
DEERS (released credits only)
Rados 1 15 25
cfb6/1 kl'
1 - For DMS, no credits are released during Rte first milestone
gASAuiltAmounis
(tea[entl acres)
9,978.000004.920
t00021
As-Suilt Amounts (narration credits)
9,976.00000.4920
Percentage Released
75%SA
70%
Releacad Amounts(feet l cores)
7.482.000250
3Released
Amoun[s(credits)
7.482Ao0100
8.444
NCDWR Permit USACE Acton ID Pmlect Noma
NCDCT TIP R -2405A-1.40
2000.1428 199E-03520 Connector Path. Neal,
71.000
2007-1158 2000.01067 Parson's MITI
297.000
March New Hanover 104mh
200742785 Plpoline
12.000
2008-0815 2008-01284 Caen Famt Project Park
149.000
RM Sedudty Fence
2008-1167 201D-00280 Wilmington AlNon
214.000
GEABachi Global Leser
2008-00188 Endchm"Facllity
158.000
2013.1263 2011-004551LM Rumwy 24 Cdrwl Area
1.059.000
2015-0072 2014-01310 The Raserve on /deed Creek
24.000
Remaining Amounts Reed acres)
5489.0001
531.000
545.250
3.614
Remaining Amounts(arelits)
5.488.0001
350.000
218.100
9.441
cfb6/1 kl'
1 - For DMS, no credits are released during Rte first milestone

MUDDY RUN II STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION
PROJECT
MONITORING REPORT
MONITORING YEAR 5
FINAL
DUPLIN COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
DMS CONTRACT No. 004631— DMS PROJECT No. 95354
SAW -2011-02191
DWR 2013-0653
Prepared for:
Division of Mitigation Services
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1652
February 2019

fires
February 5, 2019
Lindsay Crocker
NC DEQ Division of Mitigation Services
217 West Jones Street
Raleigh, NC 27604
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110
Raleigh, NC 27605
Corporate Headquarters
5020 Montrose Blvd. Suite 650
Houston, TX 77006
Main: 713.520.5400
RE: Muddy Run II Stream and Wetland Restoration Site: MY5 Monitoring Report
(NCDMS ID 95354)
Listed below are comments provided by DMS on January 8, 2019 regarding the Muddy Run II
Stream and Wetland Restoration Site: Year 5 Monitoring Report and RES' responses.
Add the Corps SAW number (SAW -2011-02191) and DWR number (2013-0653) on the cover
page
Done.
Label Wetland assets on CCPV (WA and WB)
Done.
Page 8, 3.1.2, please revise report to read "continuous stage recorder" to describe hobo or
other auto stream flow recorders and/or "crest gauge" to describe static bankfull devices (cork
and stick). DMS has received questions and conflicting interpretations of those monitoring
features and asks that all providers clarify language for consistency. Update this language in
section 5.1.4 also.
Done.
Table 9c. VP 20, MY5: update totals on these cells.
Done.
Need to document that channel was repaired for reach 5b to explain x -sections 52, 54, and 55
in the report. During the site visit, the stream appeared stable and was holding grade after large
storm events in 2018. Please add footnotes to cross-sections as applicable to explain report
discrepancies.
The repair is documented in 5.1.1 Dimension and notes have been added to the Cross Section
Plots in Appendix D.
Table 13. Do you have a table that includes all the bankfull events for the project or can you
generate it? This would be helpful, and you will need it for the final report in MY7.
The bankfull summary table has been added to Appendix E.
res. us

0
Wetland hydrology data: RES needs to be prepared for discussion about malfunctioning gauges
in 2018.
Noted. RES will replace all gauges on site before the start of 2019 growing season.

Muddy Run II Stream and Wetland Restoration • USGS HUC 03030007
Year 5 Monitoring Report • Duplin County, North Carolina • February 2019
Muddy Run II
Duplin County, North Carolina
DMS Project ID 95354
Cape Fear River Basin
HUC 0030007060010
Prepared by:
fires
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110
Raleigh, NC 27605
919-209-1061
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC

Muddy Run II Stream and Wetland Restoration • USGS HUC 03030007
Year 5 Monitoring Report • Duplin County, North Carolina • February 2019
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 PROJECT GOALS, BACKGROUND AND ATTRIBUTES........................................................
1
1.1 Location and Setting................................................................................................................1
1.2 Project Goals and Objectives...................................................................................................1
1.3 Project Structure.....................................................................................................................3
1.3.1 Restoration Type and Approach.....................................................................................3
1.4 Project History, Contacts and Attribute Data.........................................................................6
1.4.1 Project History................................................................................................................6
1.4.2 Project Watersheds.........................................................................................................6
2 SUCCESS CRITERIA...................................................................................................................
7
2.1 Stream Restoration.................................................................................................................7
2.1.1 Bankfull Events..............................................................................................................7
2.1.2 Cross Sections................................................................................................................7
2.1.3 Digital Image Stations....................................................................................................7
2.2 Vegetation..............................................................................................................................8
2.3 Scheduling/Reporting.............................................................................................................8
3 MONITORING PLAN...................................................................................................................
8
3.1 Stream Restoration.................................................................................................................8
3.1.1 As -Built Survey..............................................................................................................8
3.1.2 Bankfull Events..............................................................................................................8
3.1.3 Cross Sections................................................................................................................9
3.1.4 Digital Image Stations....................................................................................................9
3.1.5 Bank Pin Arrays.............................................................................................................9
3.1.6 Visual Assessment Monitoring.......................................................................................9
3.1.7 Surface Flow...................................................................................................................9
3.2 Vegetation..............................................................................................................................10
4 Maintenance and Contingency plan...............................................................................................
10
4.1 Stream.....................................................................................................................................10
4.2 Vegetation..............................................................................................................................10
5 YEAR 4 MONITORING CONDITIONS (MY4)..........................................................................
11
5.1 Year 4 Monitoring Data Collection........................................................................................
11
5.1.1 Vegetation.......................................................................................................................11
5.1.2 Photo Documentation.....................................................................................................12
5.1.3 Hydrology........................................................................................................................12
6 REFERENCES.............................................................................................................................
13
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC ii

Muddy Run II Stream and Wetland Restoration • USGS HUC 03030007
Year 5 Monitoring Report • Duplin County, North Carolina • February 2019
Appendix A. Project Background Data and Maps
Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Table 2. Project Activity and reporting History
Table 3. Project Contacts
Table 4. Project Information and Attributes
Figure 1. Project Vicinity Map
Figure 2. Project USGS Map
Appendix B. Visual Assessment Data
Figure 3. Current Conditions Plan View Map (CCPV)
Table 5. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Table 6. Vegetation Condition Assessment
Table 7. Stream Problem Areas
Table 8. Vegetation Problem Areas
Figure 4. Vegetation Photos
Figure 5. Stream and Vegetation Problem Photos
Appendix C. Vegetation Plot Data
Table 9a. Planted Stem Count Summary
Table 9b. Planted Species Totals
Table 9c. Planted Stem Counts (Species by Plot)
Appendix D. Stream Geomorphology Data
Table 10. Morphological Parameters Summary Data
Table 11. Dimensional Morphology Summary — Cross Sections Data
Table 12. Bank Pin Array Summary Data
Cross Section Plots
Appendix E. Hydrology Data
Table 13. Documentation of Geomorphologically Significant Flow Events
Table 14. Rainfall Summary
Table 15a. Wetland Hydrology Criteria Attainment
Table 15b. MY1-MY5 Wetland Hydrology Gauges Summary
2018 Groundwater Monitoring Gauge Hydrographs
Figure 6. Crest Gauge Verification Photos
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC iii

Muddy Run II Stream and Wetland Restoration • USGS HUC 03030007
Year 5 Monitoring Report • Duplin County, North Carolina • February 2019
1 PROJECT GOALS, BACKGROUND AND ATTRIBUTES
1.1 Location and Setting
The Muddy Run Stream Site ("Site") is located in Duplin County approximately 1.4 miles east of
Chinquapin, NC (Figure 1). The project is in the Cape Fear River Basin (8 -digit USGS HUC 03030007,
14 -digit USGS HUC 03030007060010) (USGS, 1998) and the NCDWQ Cape Fear 03-06-22 sub -basin
(NCDWQ, 2002). To access the Site from the town of Chinquapin, travel east on Highway 50, take the
first left onto Pickett Bay Road (SR 1819), go 1.1 miles, then turn left onto Kenney Crawley Road. This
private road is gravel and will split just past the residential house on the right. Keeping to the left will
take you to the Reaches 3b, 3c, 5b, and 6. Going to the right at the split will take you to Reaches 1, 2,
3a, and 4.
1.2 Project Goals and Objectives
The Muddy Run II stream and wetland mitigation project will provide numerous ecological and water
quality benefits within the Cape Fear River Basin. While many of these benefits are limited to the
project area, others, such as pollutant removal and improved aquatic and terrestrial habitat, have more
far-reaching effects. Expected improvements to water quality, hydrology, and habitat are outlined
below.
Design Goals and Objectives
Benefits Related to Water Quality
Benefit will be achieved through filtering of runoff from adjacent CAFOs through buffer areas, the
Nutrient removal
conversion of active farm fields to forested buffers, improved denitrification and nutrient uptake
through buffer zones, and installation of BMPs at the headwaters of selected reaches and ditch
outlets.
Benefit will be achieved through the stabilization of eroding stream banks and reduction of sediment
Sediment removal
loss from field areas due to lack of vegetative cover. Channel velocities will also be decreased
through a reduction in slope, therefore decreasing erosive forces.
Increase dissolved oxygen
Benefit will be achieved through the construction of instream structures to increase turbulence and
concentration
dissolved oxygen concentrations and riparian canopy restoration to lower water temperature to
increase dissolved oxygen capacity.
Runoff filtration
Benefit will be achieved through the restoration of buffer areas that will receive and filter runoff,
thereby reducing nutrients and sediment concentrations reaching water bodies downstream.
Benefits to Flood Attenuation
Water storage
Benefit will be achieved through the restoration of buffer areas which will infiltrate more water
during precipitation events than under current site conditions.
Improved groundwater
Benefit will be achieved through the increased storage of precipitation in buffer areas, ephemeral
recharge
depressions, and reconnection of existing floodplain. Greater storage of water will lead to improved
infiltration and groundwater recharge.
Improved/restored
Benefit will be achieved by restoring the stream to a natural meandering pattern with an
hydrologic connections
appropriately sized channel, such that the channel's floodplain will be flooded more frequently at
flows greater than the bankfull stage.
Benefits Related to Ecological Processes
Restoration of habitats
Benefit will be achieved by restoring riparian buffer habitat to appropriate bottomland hardwood
ecosystem.
Benefit will be achieved through the construction of instream structures designed to improve
Improved substrate and
bedfonn diversity and to trap detritus. Stream will be designed with the appropriate channel
instream cover
dimension and will prevent aggradation and sedimentation within the channel. Substrate will
become coarser as a result of the stabilization of stream banks and an overall decrease in the amount
fine materials deposited in the stream.
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC

Muddy Run II Stream and Wetland Restoration • USGS HUC 03030007
Year 5 Monitoring Report • Duplin County, North Carolina • February 2019
Addition of large woody
Benefit will be achieved through the addition of wood structures as part of the restoration design.
debris
Such structures may include log vanes, root wads, and log weirs.
Reduced temperature of
water due to shading
Benefit will be achieved through the restoration of canopy tree species to the stream buffer areas.
Restoration of terrestrial
habitat
Benefit will be achieved through the restoration of riparian buffer bottomland hardwood habitats.
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC

Muddy Run II Stream and Wetland Restoration • USGS HUC 03030007
Year 5 Monitoring Report • Duplin County, North Carolina • February 2019
1.3 Project Structure
Following 2016 monitoring the NCIRT requested a review of the differential between the Approved
Mitigation Plan and Baseline Monitoring Report. The table below details the discrepancies by reach.
The primary cause of the 5% increase in baseline SMUs is survey methodology (thalweg vs. centerline).
The Mitigation Plan lengths were based on centerline. Wetland credits are unchanged from Mitigation
Plan to Baseline Monitoring Report.
Table 1. Muddv Run II Proiect Components — Stream Mitigation
Reach
Mitigation Type
ProposedMitigation
WMUs
Proposed
Baseline
1:1
3.60
Length (LF)*
Ratio
SMUs
SMUs
Reach 1
Headwater Valley
401
1:1
401
398
Reach 2
Headwater Valley
504
1:1
504
504
Reach 2
P1 Restoration
1,369
1:1
1,369
1,410
Reach 3a
P1 Restoration
3,440
1:1
3,440
3,586
Reach
P1 Restoration
1,852
1:1
1,852
1,979
3b
Reach 3c
Enhancement I
707
1:1.5
471
472
Reach 4
P1 Restoration
172
1:1
172
173
Reach 5a
P1 Restoration
1,774
1:1
1,774
1,926
Reach
Enhancement II
401
1:2.5
160
164
5b
Reach 6
Enhancement II
317
1:2.5
127
127
Total 11,411 10,270 10,739**
*The proposed lengths represent the total proposed channel length minus the length of the proposed channel associated with crossings
(easement breaks).
**The contracted amount of credits for this Site was 10,375 SMUs.
Table 2. Muddv Run II Proiect Components — Wetland MitiLwation
Wetland Mitigation Type
Mitigation
Area (ac)
Mitigation
Ratio
WMUs
WA Restoration
3.60
1:1
3.60
WB Restoration
1.32
1:1
1.32
Total
4.92
4.92
1.3.1 Restoration Type and Approach
Reach 1
Headwater valley restoration approach was performed along Reach 1. The existing channel/ditch was
backfilled, and flow has been directed from its current position along the tree line back to within the
historic valley location down to the confluence with Reaches 2 and 3a. A 100 foot wide forested buffer
has been planted throughout the reach. The upstream limit of Reach 1 ties into an existing headwater
valley system comprised of intermittent sections of single and multiple channels. This system will be
used as a reference site for incorporating a small baseflow channel into the headwater valley restoration
design.
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC 3

Muddy Run II Stream and Wetland Restoration • USGS HUC 03030007
Year 5 Monitoring Report • Duplin County, North Carolina • February 2019
Reach 2
Similar to Reach 1, headwater valley restoration was performed along the upper section of Reach 2.
The existing channel was backfilled with existing spoil material located along the channel, a result of
previous dredging activities. Areas within the 100 foot buffer that were disturbed or lack riparian
vegetation were planted. Grade control structures were installed along three ditches that enter Reach 2
at the upstream end of the project. These structures raised the upstream channel bed elevations slightly
to tie into existing ditches to the project reach. An existing CMP culvert located along the upstream
section was removed and replaced outside the easement (upstream) to continue to allow the landowner
access to all areas of his property. Priority 1 restoration was performed for the majority of Reach 2.
Restoration activities involved relocating the channel to the north through an existing wooded area
consisting primarily of pines and a few hardwoods. Existing spoil piles located along the channel banks
were removed and used to fill the existing ditch. Diffuse flow structures have been installed along
several ditches that outlet to the reach from both the north and south. The structures will attenuate and
disperse flows as the existing ditches enter the proposed easement.
Reach 3a
Priority Level I restoration was performed on Reach 3a. The restoration approach on this reach included
relocating the channel on either side of its current location to follow the natural valley and removing
the adjacent roadbed to allow continuous access to the floodplain. Two existing 36" CMP culvert
crossings were located along this reach. Each culvert was removed and replaced in-line with the
proposed stream to allow the landowners to access portions of their respective properties to the west of
the project site. Reach 3a now flows in a northwesterly direction until it reaches a property line. At this
point, the existing ditch that continued to flow in a northerly direction was plugged and a diversion
structure was installed. The structure is designed to pass 100 percent of baseflow and small storms
through the project, and divert up to 70 percent of storms larger than the 25 -yr storm to the existing
ditch and offsite. See Section 7.3.1.1 (Stream Hydrologic Analysis) for hydraulic analysis details.
Just downstream of the diversion structure, the channel was relocated south of several turkey houses,
and now flows in a westerly direction as Reach 3b. The network of ditches surrounding the turkey
houses appear to cross a small ridge, directing flow away from the project area. An additional culvert
crossing was constructed where flow will be diverted to the west at the turkey houses. Priority I
restoration is appropriate for this channel because it is the only mitigation approach that addresses bed
and bank instability, establishes a forested riparian buffer, and significantly enhances aquatic habitat.
Diffuse flow structures were constructed where existing agricultural ditches enter the easement area.
The diversion structure was constructed at the downstream end of Reach 3a to alleviate and prevent
flooding caused by rerouting flow and increased drainage areas, to provide continued flow through the
existing ditch for storms larger than bankfull (design) events, and to reduce impacts from proposed
grading activities. Per discussions with Mr. Lanier (owner of parcel northwest of proposed structure),
larger storm events overtop the existing ditch flowing to the north. This flooding may be attributed to
inefficiencies with existing structures and ditch alignments in conjunction with low gradients. The
culvert associated with the gravel access road that leads from Ludie Brown Road to the turkey houses
outlets perpendicular to the receiving ditch that flows to the northeast and under Ludie Brown Road.
This ditch continues to the northeast and crosses Route 111, where it flows to the north into Muddy
Creek. By diverting up to 70 percent of higher flows through the existing ditch and offsite, existing
flooding issues will be reduced adjacent to the turkey houses. This diversion also decreases potential
flooding impacts that would occur if 100 percent of storm events were passed through the proposed
channel, Reach 3b. There are several residential parcels within zero to 200 feet of the proposed
easement along Reach 3b. Because the topography is very flat through this area, the flooding associated
with the majority of storm events greater than bankf ill would negatively impact these parcels.
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC

Muddy Run II Stream and Wetland Restoration • USGS HUC 03030007
Year 5 Monitoring Report • Duplin County, North Carolina • February 2019
Finally, by diverting a percentage of the proposed higher flows, flooding impacts will also be reduced
along Reaches 5a and 5b and at the existing HWY 41 culvert at the downstream end of the project.
Currently, agricultural fields are present along the north side of Reach 5a. By reducing high flows, the
flooding extent and duration will be reduced; thus, preventing adverse impacts to crops. If 100 percent
of higher storm events were allowed to pass through the project, significant grading would be required
to cut floodplain terraces/benches to relieve flooding of the adjacent agricultural fields.
Approximately 1,611 LF of the existing ditch that flows to the north from the Reach 3a/3b diversion
structure will be impacted (dewatered). This length includes the segment of the ditch from the diversion
structure downstream to the Muddy Creek floodplain. The channel impacts resulting from the proposed
channel relocation will be addressed in the ensuing NWP application.
Reach 3b
Priority Level I restoration was performed on Reach 3b. The restoration approach on this reach included
relocating the channel in a westerly direction through an open pasture. The pasture area has been
extensively modified and substantial grading was required. The design then moves the channel to a
historic drainage way as observed on LiDAR and historical aerial photographs. The flow path is now
connected to a small relic channel identified in the forested area west of the pasture. Subsequent
topographic survey confirmed positive drainage along the relic channel which follows a low lying
feature observed on LiDAR. The restoration approach included some minor grading to enlarge the
existing channel and to create a diverse bed habitat by constructing pools. Log grade control structures
were installed at the confluence with Reach 3c and at the connection to the relic channel. Small,
mechanical equipment and hand tools were used to minimize damage to the existing forested buffer. A
livestock protected culvert crossing was constructed near the existing pasture along an existing farm
path to allow the landowner uninterrupted access to his property.
Reach 3c
Enhancement I was performed on Reach 3c as it flows through a forested area downstream from Reach
3b to Reach 3 of the Muddy Run Stream Mitigation Project. A grade control structure was installed at
the upstream end to stabilize the transition from an existing agricultural ditch to the stable channel. A
crossing was constructed along the upper section to allow the landowner access to both sides of his
property. Enhancement activities included removing portions of existing spoil piles located along top
of banks, cutting floodplain benches and laying back banks, and installing woody debris habitat
structures. Diffuse flow structures were also constructed at the downstream limit where existing
agricultural ditches enter the easement area. Invasive species management was performed throughout
the buffer, and any bare or disturbed areas were planted with native riparian vegetation.
Reach 4
Priority 1 restoration was performed on the downstream end of Reach 4 as it flows through a forested
area below a ditch draining an agricultural field. A grade control structure was installed at the upstream
end to transition from the existing ditch to a stable channel. The lower section of the reach was
constructed into an E -type channel before its confluence with Reach 3a. Invasive species management
was performed throughout the buffer, and any bare or disturbed areas were planted with native riparian
vegetation.
Reach 5a
Priority Level I restoration was performed on Reach 5a. The channel was relocated north of its current
location into the adjacent agricultural field. The existing ditch was backfilled and plugged at any
locations that may cross the proposed channel. The upstream end of the reach ties into Reach 1C of the
Muddy Run Stream Mitigation Project. The single -thread channel will flows through proposed wetland
WB beginning approximately 300 feet downstream of the Muddy Run project. A CMP culvert crossing
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC

Muddy Run II Stream and Wetland Restoration • USGS HUC 03030007
Year 5 Monitoring Report • Duplin County, North Carolina • February 2019
was installed in-line with the proposed design near the middle of the reach to allow the landowners
access to the adjacent parcels. Priority I restoration is appropriate for this channel because it is the only
mitigation approach that addresses bed and bank instability, establishes a forested riparian buffer, and
significantly enhances aquatic habitat.
Reach 5b
Enhancement Level II was performed on Reach 5b. Several log grade controls and woody debris
structures were installed along the bed to increase aquatic habitat and bed diversity. The right bank
along the reach was laid back and spoil piles along the tops of banks were removed using small
equipment to minimize impacts to the existing buffer. Additionally, invasive species management was
performed throughout the buffer, and any bare or disturbed areas were planted with native riparian
vegetation.
Reach 6
Enhancement Level I1 was performed on the downstream section of Reach 6 (STA 9+02 to STA
12+19). The right and left banks were laid back, and the channel was backfilled using spoil located
adjacent to the channel such that positive drainage is maintained throughout the reach down to the
confluence with Reach 5a. Invasive species management was performed throughout the buffer where
enhancement took place, and any bare or disturbed areas were planted with native riparian vegetation.
A 50 foot wide buffer was provided along the upper section of Reach 6 (STA 0+00 to STA 9+02);
however, no enhancement activities were performed through this section other than filling portions of
the channel. This additional easement was provided to account for any hydrologic impacts that may
occur as a result of the proposed enhancement activities.
1.4 Project History, Contacts and Attribute Data
1.4.1 Project History
The Site was restored by Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC (EBX) through a full -delivery contract
awarded by NCDMS in 2011. EBX was acquired by Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC (RES)
in 2014 and now oversees the project tasks. Tables 2, 3, and 4 in Appendix A provide a time sequence
and information pertaining to the project activities, history, contacts, and baseline information.
1.4.2 Project Watersheds
The easement totals 37.6 acres and is broken into nine reaches. Reach 1 has a drainage area of 68 acres;
it begins at the start of the restoration project (STA 0+00) and extends west to STA 4+48. Reach 2 has
a drainage area of 114 acres; it begins at STA 0+00 and extends to STA 19+14. Reach 3a (Sta. 0+00 to
37+23) begins at the confluence of Reaches 1 and 2 and has a drainage area of 227 acres. Reach 3b has
a drainage area of 333 acres and flows west into Reach 3c; it begins at STA 37+23 and extends to STA
57+92. Reach 3c has a drainage area of 370 acres extending north to south and flows into Reach 3 of
the Muddy Run project; it begins at STA 57+92 and extends to STA 65+30. Reach 4 has a drainage
area of 46 acres and flows from the east into Reach 3a; it begins at STA 0+44 and extends to STA STA
2+17. Reach 5a begins at the downstream limit of the Muddy Run project, flows into Reach 5b, and
has a drainage area of 774 acres; it begins at STA 0+00 and extends to STA 19+59. Reach 5b has a
drainage area of 908 acres; it starts at STA 19+59 and extends to STA 23+68. Reach 6 has a drainage
area of 318 acres and flows from the south into Reach 5a; it starts at STA 9+02 and extends to STA
12+19 (Figure 2). The land use in the project watershed is approximately 38 percent cultivated, 32
percent evergreen forest, 15 percent shrub/scrub, 6 percent bottomland forest/hardwood swamp, 5
percent mixed forest, 2 percent developed, and 2 percent managed herbaceous cover.
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC

Muddy Run II Stream and Wetland Restoration • USGS HUC 03030007
Year 5 Monitoring Report • Duplin County, North Carolina • February 2019
2 Success Criteria
The success criteria for the Site stream restoration was assembled from the EEP Monitoring
Requirements and Performance Standards Guidance for Stream and -or Wetland Mitigation
(11/07/2011). Specific success criteria components are presented below.
2.1 Stream Restoration
2.1.1 Bankfull Events
Two bankfull flow events must be documented within the seven-year monitoring period. The two
bankfull events must occur in separate years. Otherwise, the stream monitoring will continue until two
bankfull events have been documented in separate years. Bankfull events will be documented using
stage recorders, photographs, and visual assessments for evidence of debris rack lines.
2.1.2 Cross Sections
There should be little change in as -built cross-sections. If changes do take place, they should be
evaluated to determine if they represent a movement toward a less stable condition (for example down -
cutting or erosion), or are minor changes that represent an increase in stability (for example settling,
vegetative changes, deposition along the banks, or decrease in width/depth ratio). Cross-sections are
classified using the Rosgen stream classification method, and all monitored cross-sections should fall
within the quantitative parameters defined for channels of the design stream type.
2.1.3 Digital Image Stations
Digital images are used to subjectively evaluate channel aggradation or degradation, bank erosion,
success of riparian vegetation, and effectiveness of erosion control measures. Longitudinal images
should not indicate the absence of developing bars within the channel or an excessive increase in
channel depth. Lateral images should not indicate excessive erosion or continuing degradation of the
banks over time. A series of images over time should indicate successional maturation of riparian
vegetation.
2.2 Wetland Restoration
The NRCS does not have a current WETS table for Duplin County upon which to base a normal rainfall
amount and average growing season. The closest comparable data was determined to be from Sampson
County. The growing season for Sampson County is 242 days long, extending from March 17 to
November 14, and is based on a daily minimum temperature greater than 28 degrees Fahrenheit
occurring in five of ten years.
Because of the surface roughing and shallow depressions, a range of hydroperiods are expected. The
water balance indicates that the site will have a positive water balance in the early part of the growing
season for four to five weeks, on average. The hydrology success criterion for the site is to restore the
water table at the site so that it will remain continuously within 12 inches of the soil surface for at least
nine percent of the growing season (approximately 22 days) at each groundwater gauge location during
normal rainfall years. Overbank flooding events will provide additional inputs that may extend the
hydroperiod in some years.
Gauge data will be compared to reference wetland well data in growing seasons with less than normal
rainfall. In periods of low rainfall, if a restoration gauge hydroperiod exceeds the reference gauge
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC

Muddy Run II Stream and Wetland Restoration • USGS HUC 03030007
Year 5 Monitoring Report • Duplin County, North Carolina • February 2019
hydroperiod, and both exceed five percent of the growing season, then the gauge will be deemed
successful. If a gauge location fails to meet these success criteria in the seven year monitoring period,
then monitoring may be extended, remedial actions may be undertaken, or the limits of wetland
restoration will be determined.
2.3 Vegetation
Specific and measurable success criteria for plant density within the riparian buffers on the site will
follow NCDMS Guidance. Vegetation monitoring plots are 0.02 acres in size, and cover greater than
two percent of the planted area. Vegetation monitoring will occur annually in the fall of each year. The
interim measures of vegetative success for the site will be the survival of at least 320 three-year-old
trees per acre at the end of Year 3, 260 trees per acre at the end of Year 5, and the final vegetative
success criteria will be 210 trees per acre at the end of Year 7. Invasive species on the site will be
monitored and treated if necessary throughout the required vegetation monitoring period.
2.4 Scheduling/Reporting
The monitoring program will be implemented to document system development and progress toward
achieving the success criteria. The restored stream morphology will be assessed to determine the
success of the mitigation. The monitoring program will be undertaken for seven years or until the final
success criteria are achieved, whichever is longer.
Monitoring reports will be prepared in the fall of each year of monitoring and submitted to NCDMS.
The monitoring reports will include all information, and will be in the format required by NCDMS in
Version 2.0 of the NCDMS Monitoring Report Template.
3 MONITORING PLAN
Annual monitoring data will be reported using the DMS monitoring template. Annual monitoring shall
be conducted for stream, wetland, and vegetation monitoring parameters as noted below.
3.1 Stream Restoration
3.1.1 As -Built Survey
An as -built survey was conducted following construction to document channel size, condition, and
location. The survey will include a complete profile of thalweg, water surface, bankfull, and top of bank
to compare with future geomorphic data. Longitudinal profiles will not be required in annual
monitoring reports unless requested by NCDMS or USACE.
3.1.2 Bankfull Events
Four sets of continuous stage recorders were installed on the site, one along Reach 2, one along Reach
3a, one along Reach 3b, and one along Reach 5a. The stage recorders are made up of an auto logging
flow gauge and a manual crest gauge. Auto logging flow gauges were installed within the channel and
continuously record water level conditions at an hourly interval. Manual crest gauges were installed on
the bank at bankfull elevation and record bankfull height using ground cork. Crest gauges are checked
during each site visit to determine if a bankfull event has occurred since the last site visit. The auto
logging flow gauges are used to record the bankf ill readings that the manual crest gauges miss. Crest
gauge readings and debris rack lines are photographed to document evidence of bankfull events.
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC

Muddy Run II Stream and Wetland Restoration • USGS HUC 03030007
Year 5 Monitoring Report • Duplin County, North Carolina • February 2019
3.1.3 Cross Sections
A total of 59 permanent cross sections were installed to monitor channel dimensions and stability. Four
cross sections were installed along Reach 1 and ten cross sections were installed along Reach 2. There
were 21 cross sections (nine runs, nine pools, and three riffles) installed along Reach 3A and six cross
sections installed along Reach 3B. Four cross sections were installed along Reach 3C and two cross
sections were installed along Reach 4. Reach 5A had eight cross sections installed, while Reach 5B and
6 each had two cross sections installed. Cross sections were typically located at representative shallow
and pool sections along each stream reach. Each cross section was permanently marked with 3/8 rebar
pin to establish a monument location at each end. A marker pole was also installed at both ends of each
cross section to allow ease locating during monitoring activities. Cross section surveys will be
performed in monitoring years 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7 and will include all breaks in slope including top of
bank, bottom of bank, streambed, edge of water, and thalweg.
3.1.4 Digital Image Stations
Digital photographs will be taken at least once a year to visually document stream and vegetation
conditions. This monitoring practice will continue for seven years following construction and planting.
Permanent photo point locations at cross sections and vegetation plots have been established so that the
same directional view and location may be repeated each monitoring year. Monitoring photographs will
also be used to document any stream and vegetation problematic areas such as erosion, stream and bank
instability, easement encroachment and vegetation damage.
3.1.5 Bank Pin Arrays
Twenty bank pin arrays have been installed at cross sections located on meander pools. These bank pin
arrays were installed along the upstream and downstream third of the meander. Bank pins are a
minimum of three feet long, and have been installed just above the water surface and every two feet
above the lowest pin. Bank pin exposure will be recorded at each monitoring event, and the exposed
pin will be driven flush with the bank.
3.1.6 Visual Assessment Monitoring
Visual monitoring of all mitigation areas will be conducted a minimum of twice per monitoring year
by qualified individuals. The visual assessments will include vegetation density, vigor, invasive species,
and easement encroachments. Visual assessments of stream stability will include a complete stream
walk and structure inspection. Digital images will be taken at fixed representative locations to record
each monitoring event as well as any noted problem areas or areas of concern. Results of visual
monitoring will be presented in a plan view exhibit with a brief description of problem areas and digital
images. Photographs will be used to subjectively evaluate channel aggradation or degradation, bank
erosion, success of riparian vegetation, and effectiveness of erosion control measures. Longitudinal
photos should indicate the absence of developing bars within the channel or an excessive increase in
channel depth. Lateral photos should not indicate excessive erosion or continuing degradation of the
banks over time. A series of photos over time should indicate successional maturation of riparian
vegetation.
3.1.7 Surface Flow
Headwater valley restoration areas will be monitored to document intermittent or seasonal surface flow.
This will be accomplished through direct observation, photo documentation of hydrology conditions,
and dye tests if necessary.
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC

Muddy Run II Stream and Wetland Restoration • USGS HUC 03030007
Year 5 Monitoring Report • Duplin County, North Carolina • February 2019
3.2 Vegetation
A total of 28 vegetation plots were randomly established within the planted stream riparian buffer
easement. Each vegetation plot measures 22 feet by 40 feet (0.02 acres) and has all four corners marked
with PVC posts. Planted woody vegetation was assessed within each plot to establish a baseline dataset.
Within each vegetation plot, each planted stem was identified for species, "X" and "Y" origin located,
and measured for height. Reference digital photographs were also captured to document baseline
conditions. Species composition, density, growth patterns, damaged stems, and survival ratios will be
measured and reported on an annual basis. Vegetation plot data will be reported for each plot as well
as an overall site average.
3.3 Wetland Hydrology
Wetland hydrology will be monitored to document hydric conditions in the wetland restoration areas.
Seven automatic recording pressure transducer gauges were installed in representative locations across
the restoration areas and an additional three gauges were installed in reference wetlands. The gauges
will be downloaded quarterly and wetland hydroperiods will be calculated during the growing
season. Gauge installation followed current regulatory and NCDMS guidance. Visual observations of
primary and secondary wetland hydrology indicators will also be recorded during quarterly site visits.
4 MAINTENANCE AND CONTINGENCY PLAN
All identified problematic areas or areas of concern such as stream bank erosion/instability,
aggradation/degradation, lack of targeted vegetation, and invasive/exotic species which prevent the site
from meeting performance success criteria will be evaluated on a case by case basis. These areas will
be documented and remedial actions will be discussed amongst NCDMS staff to determine a plan of
action. If it is determined remedial action is required, a plan will be provided.
4.1 Stream
During the Year 5 monitoring activities, one stream problem area was documented. There is a series of
beaver dams on Reach 5A right where it enters Muddy Run II from Muddy Run. Beaver management
will be performed in 2019. The dislodged structure reported in Year 4 was repaired in June 2018.
Stream issues are described in Appendix B.
4.2 Vegetation
No vegetation problem areas were identified during monitoring Year 5 activities. The encroachment
has stopped near Reach 3a and the bare area associated with the repair of Reach 5a was reseeded in
June 2018.
4.3 Wetlands
No wetland problem areas were noted during the Year 5 monitoring period. Year 5 wetland data only
represents the first 82 days of the growing season. Five of the transducers in the wells failed during
Year 5 including the ambient pressure recorder. Five of the seven wells still managed to record water
continuously within 12 inches of the soil surface for at least nine percent of the growing season. The
two wells that failed to meet the success fell short by one percent. All transducers in the wells will be
replaced in Year 6. If any wetland problem areas are noted in the future, they will be documented and
mapped on the Current Conditions Plan View (CCPV) as part of the annual stream and wetland
monitoring report. Detailed wetland hydrology data is provided in Appendix D.
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC 10

Muddy Run II Stream and Wetland Restoration • USGS HUC 03030007
Year 5 Monitoring Report • Duplin County, North Carolina • February 2019
5 YEAR 5 MONITORING CONDITIONS (MY5)
The Muddy Run II Year 5 Monitoring activities were completed in June and October 2018. All Year
5 monitoring data is presented below and in the appendices. Data presented shows the site has one
stream problem area and no vegetation problem areas; however, the site is on track to meet stream,
wetland and vegetation interim success criteria.
5.1 Year 5 Monitoring Data Collection
5.1.1 Morphological State of the Channel
All morphological stream data for the Year 5 survey and dimensions were collected during the annual
monitoring survey performed during June 2018. Appendix D includes summary data tables,
morphological parameters, cross section plots, and bank pin array tables.
Profile
The baseline (MY -0) profiles closely matches the proposed design profiles. The plotted longitudinal
profiles can be found on the As -Built Drawings. Longitudinal profiles will not be performed in annual
monitoring reports unless requested by NCDMS or USACE. Morphological summary data tables can
be found in Appendix D.
Dimension
The Year 5 cross sectional dimensions closely matches the baseline cross section parameters. Minimal
changes were noticed for most Year 5 cross section surveys resulting from stable bed and bank
conditions. Only one out of 59 cross sections showed noticeable changes from MY3 to MY5. Pool
cross section 54 (Reach 5A) showed evidence of degradation. Cross sections 52, 53, 54, and 55 were
re-established in monitoring Year 3 due to the repair work along Reach 5A. This repair area looks stable
following the large storm events in late 2018. All cross section plots and data tables can be found in
Appendix D.
Sediment Transport
The Year 5 conditions show that shear stress and velocities have been reduced for all six restoration
reaches. Pre -construction conditions documented all six reaches as sand bed channels and remain
classified as sand bed channels post -construction. Visual assessments (Appendix D) show the channels
are transporting sediment as designed and will continue to be monitored for aggradation and
degradation.
Bank Pin Arrays
Ten pool cross section locations with bank pin arrays were observed and measured for bank erosion
located on the outside meander bends. If bank pin exposure was noticeable, it was measured, recorded,
photographed, and then driven flush with the bank at each monitoring location. No bank pin array
locations had measurable readings during annual Year 5 monitoring activities. Bank pin array data
tables can be found in Appendix D.
5.1.2 Vegetation
The Year 5 monitoring vegetation survey was completed in October 2018 and resulted in an average of
627 planted stems per acre, well above the interim survival density of 260 stems per acre at the end of
Year 5 monitoring. The average stems per vegetation plot was 13 planted stems. The minimum planted
stems per plot was 8 stems and the maximum was 20 stems per plot. The average planted stem height
was 8.4 feet. Volunteer tree species were noted throughout the site during MY5 activities. Abundant
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC 11

Muddy Run II Stream and Wetland Restoration • USGS HUC 03030007
Year 5 Monitoring Report • Duplin County, North Carolina • February 2019
herbaceous ground cover may have prevented the observance of these species in previous monitoring
years. Vegetation summary data tables and plot photos can be found in Appendix C.
5.1.3 Photo Documentation
Permanent photo point locations have been established at cross sections, vegetation plots, stream
crossings, and stream structures by RES staff. Any additional problem areas or areas of concern will
also be documented with a digital photograph during monitoring activities. Stream digital photographs
can be found in Appendix B and Appendix C for vegetation photos.
5.1.4 Stream Hydrology
Four sets of continuous stage recorders were installed on the site, one along Reach 2, one along Reach
3a, one along Reach 3b, and one along Reach 5b. All stage recorders documented bankfull events during
the Year 5 monitoring period. Stage Recorder 1, which is located on Reach 2, documented six bankfull
events during MY5 with a highest reading of 2.45 feet. Stage Recorder 2 (Reach 3a) logged ten bankfull
event during MY5 with a reading of 3.5 feet above bankfull elevation. Stage Recorder 3 (Reach 3b)
had one bankfull event reading during MY5 and it was 0.65 feet above bankfull elevation. Stage
Recorder 4 (Reach 5b) documented six bankfull events during MY5 with a highest reading of 3.75 feet.
Stage recorder summary data and photo documentation of the bankfull events can be found in
Appendix D.
5.1.5 Wetland Hydrology
Five of the seven wetland restoration gauges achieved the success criteria by remaining continuously
within 12 inches of the soil surface for at least nine percent of the growing season. The two gauges that
did meet success (AW 1 and AW4) both missed by only one percent. Groundwater gauge data indicate
the hydroperiods being very responsive to rainfall events. Of the three reference wetlands gauges, only
one (RAW3) met success criteria because the other two did not record any data in MY5. Additionally,
wetland data only represents the first 82 days of the growing season. Five of the gauges failed in the
summer including the ambient pressure gauge. All the gauges will be replaced before the MY6 growing
season. Wetland gauge and rainfall data is presented in Appendix D.
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC 12

Muddy Run II Stream and Wetland Restoration • USGS HUC 03030007
Year 5 Monitoring Report • Duplin County, North Carolina • February 2019
6 REFERENCES
Chow, Ven Te. 1959. Open -Channel Hydraulics, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of Wetlands and
Deepwater Habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Office of Biological
Services, FWS/OBS-79/31. U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington, DC.
Environmental Banc & Exchange (2012). Muddy Run Stream Restoration Project Final Mitigation
Plan. North Carolina Ecosystems Enhancement Program, Raleigh, NC.
Horton, J. Wright Jr. and Victor A. Zullo. 1991. The Geology of the Carolinas, Carolina Geological
Society Fiftieth Anniversary Volume. The University of Tennessee Press. Knoxville, TN.
Johnson PA. 2006. Assessing stream channel stability at bridges in physiographic regions. U.S.
Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration. Report Number FHWA-HRT-05-
072.
Krstolic, J.L., and Chaplin, J.J. 2007. Bankfull regional curves for streams in the non -urban, non -tidal
Coastal Plain Physiographic Province, Virginia and Maryland: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific
Investigations Report 2007-5162, 48 p.
LeGrand, H.E., Jr. and S.P. Hall, eds. 1999. Natural Heritage Program List of the Rare Animal
Species of North Carolina. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks and
Recreation, North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources. Raleigh, North
Carolina.
Natural Resources Conservation Service (MRCS). 2007. Stream Restoration Design Handbook (NEH
654), USDA
NCDENR. "Water Quality Stream Classifications for Streams in North Carolina." Water Quality
Section. http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wqhome/html (June 2005).
Radford, A.E., H.E. Ahles and F.R. Bell. 1968. Manual of the Vascular Flora of the Carolinas. The
University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Schafale, M.P. and A.S. Weakley. 1990. Classification of the Natural Communities of North
Carolina, Third Approximation. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks and
Recreation, NCDENR, Raleigh, NC.
Sweet, William V. and Jens W. Geratz. 2003. Bankf ill Hydraulic Geometry Relationships and
Recurrence Intervals for North Carolina's Coastal Plain. J. of the American Water Resources
Association (JAWRA) 39(4):861-871.
Tweedy, K. A Methodology for Predicting Channel Form in Coastal Plain Headwater Systems.
Stream Restoration in the Southeast: Advancing the Science and Practice, November 2008, Asheville,
NC. Unpublished Conference Paper, 2008.
http: //www.bae.ncsu. edu/programs/extension/wqg/srp/2008conference/tweedy_paper.pdf
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC 13

Appendix A
Project Background Data and Maps
Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Table 2. Project Activity and reporting History
Table 3. Project Contacts
Table 4. Project Information and Attributes
Figure 1. Project Vicinity Map
Figure 2. Project USGS Map

Appendix A. General Tables and Figures
Table 1 Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Monitoring Report Year 5
*The upper portion of Reach 6 (893 ft) and the side channel (307 ft) that confluences with it were given a 50 ft buffer and are included in the easement to account for hydrologic
impacts. No credit was generated from these channels.
Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation
Credits
Mitigation Credits
Stream
Riparian Wetland
Non-ripan Wetland
Buffer
Nitrogen
Nutrient Offset
Phosphorous
Nutrient Offset
Type
R
RE R
RE
R=
RE
10,739
4.92
N/A
N/A
I N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Project Components
Project Component -or- Reach ID
As -Built
Stationing/Location LF
Existing
Footage/Acreage
Approach
PI, PII etc.
Restoration -or-
Restoration
Equivalent
Restoratio
n Footage
or Acreage
Mitigation Ratio
Reach 1
0+00-4+48
438
MW
Restoration
398
1 : 1
Reach 2
0+00-5+04
504
MW
Restoration
504
1 : 1
Reach 2
5+04-19+14
1,223
P1
Restoration
1,410
1 : 1
Reach 3A
0+00-37+23
3,301
P1
Restoration
3,586
1 : 1
Reach 3B
37+23 —57+92
NA
P1
Restoration
1,979
1 :1
Reach 3C
57+92 —65+30
737
Enh. I
Rest. Equivalent
708
1: 1.5
Reach 4
0+44-2+17
120
P1
Restoration
173
1 :1
Reach 5A
0+00-19+59
1,602
P1
Restoration
1,926
1 :1
Reach 5B
19+59 —23+68
401
Enh. II
Rest. Equivalent
409
1 : 2.5
Reach 6*
9+02-12+19
317
Enh. II
Rest. Equivalent
318
1 : 2.5
Component Summation
Restoration Level
Stream
(linear feet)
Riparian Wetland Non -riparian Wetland
(acres) (acres)
Buffer
(square feet)
Upland
(acres)
Riverine Non-Riverine
Restoration
9,074
4.92
Headwater Valley
902
Enhancement
Enhancement I
708
Enhancement II
727
Creation
Preservation
High Quality
Preservation
BMP
Element
Location
Purpose/Function
Notes
BMP Elements
BR = Bioretention Cell; SF = Sand Filter; SW = Stormwater Wetland; WDP = Wet Detention Pond; DDP = Dry Detention Pond; FS = Filter Strip; S = Grassed
Swale; LS = Level Spreader; NI = Natural Infiltration Area; FB = Forested Buffer
*The upper portion of Reach 6 (893 ft) and the side channel (307 ft) that confluences with it were given a 50 ft buffer and are included in the easement to account for hydrologic
impacts. No credit was generated from these channels.

Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Project Activity and Reporting History
Muddy Run II Stream and Wetland Restoration / NCDMS Project #95354
Activity or Report
Data Collection
Complete
Completion or
Delivery
Mitigation Plan
NA
January 2014
Final Design — Construction Plans
NA
March 2014
Construction Completed
NA
May 2014
Site Planting Completed
NA
May 2014
Baseline Monitoring Document Year 0 Monitoring — baseline
June 2014
August 2014
Year 1 Monitoring
December 2014
December 2014
Year 2 Monitoring
December 2015
February 2016
Adaptive Management Repair and Supplemental Replanting*
---
Aril 2016
Invasive Species Control
---
October 2016
Year 3 Monitoring
November 2016
February 2017
Year 4 Monitoring
November 2017
February 2018
Structure Repair and Addressing Bare Area/Encroachment
---
June 2018
Year 5 Monitoring
Stream: June 2018
Ve : October 2018
November 2018
*4,400 trees
Table 3. Project Contacts
Project Contacts Table
Muddy Run II Stream and Wetland Restoration /NCDMS Project # 95354
Designer
WK Dickson and Co., Inc.
720 Corporate Center Drive
Raleigh, NC 27607
[phone]
Frasier Mullen, PE
Construction Contractor
GP Jenkins
6566 HWY 55 W
Kinston, NC 28504
[phone]
Gary Jenkins
Planting Contractor
H&J Forestry
Matt Hitch
Seeding Contractor
Rain Services, Inc.
Lupe Cruz
Seed Mix Sources
Green Resource
Nursery Stock Suppliers
Arbogen
Full Delivery Provider
Resource Environmental Solutions
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110
Raleigh, NC 27605
[phone]
ro'ect Manager:
Brad Breslow
Monitoring Performers
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC
302 Jefferson Street. Suite 110
Raleigh, NC 27605
[phone]
[Project Manager:
Ryan Medric

Table 4. Project Information
Project Information
Pro'ectName
Muddy Run II Stream and Wetland Restoration
County
Duplin
Project Area acres
37.6
Project Coordinates latitude and longitude)
34.8308430 N, -77.792838 ° W
Project Watershed Summary Information
Physiographic Province
Coastal Plain
River Basin
Cape Fear
USGS Hydrologic Unit 8-
digit
03030007
USGS Hydrologic
Unit 14 -digit
0303007060010
DWQ Sub -basin
03-06-22
Project Drainage Area acres
908
Project Drainage Area Percentage of Impervious Area
<1%
CGIA Land Use Classification
Reach Summary Information
Parameters Reach 1
Reach 2
Reach 3a Reach 3b Reach 3c Reach 4
Reach 5a Reach 5b Reach 6
Length of Reach (linear feet) 398
1914
3586 1979 708 173
1926 409 318
Valley Classification
Drainage Area (acres) 68
114
227 333 370 46
774 908 77
NCDWQ Stream Identification 24.75
24.75
36.5 NA 40.5 32.0
35.5 37.5 20.75
NCDWQ Water Quality NA
NA
NA NA NA NA
NA NA NA
Morphological Description (stream
Evolutionary Trend
Underlying Mapped Soils Rains
Rains
Goldsboro/ Goldsboro/ Goldsboro/ Goldsboro/ Goldsboro / Goldsboro Goldsboro /
Rains Rains Rains Rains Rains Rains
Drainage Class ---
---
---
Soil Hydric Status Hydric
Hydric
Hydric Hydric Hydric Hydric
Hydric Hydric Hydric
Slope 0.0043
0.0021
0.0016 0.0023 0.0022 0.0034
0.0024 0.0015 0.0024
FEMA Classification Zone X
Zone X
Zone X Zone X Zone X Zone X
Zone X Zone X Zone X
Native Vegetation Community
Coastal Plain Small Stream Swam
Percent Composition of Exotic 0%
0%u 1 0%u 1 0% 1 0% 0%
0% 0 0%
Wetland Summary Information
Parameters
Wetland A
Wetland B
Size of Wetland acres
3.60
1.32
Wetland Type (non -riparian, riparian riverine or riparian
Riparian
Riparian
Mapped Soil Series
Goldsboro
Rains
Drainage class
Moderately Well
Poorly
Soil Hydric Status
Yes
Yes
Source of Hydrology
Runoff/Overbank Flows
Runoff/Overbank Flows
Hydrologic Im airment
Ditched/Incised Channel
Ditched/Incised Channel
Native vegetation community
Cultivated
Cultivated
Percent composition of exotic invasive vegetation
NA
NA
Regulatory Considerations
Regulation
Applicable? Resolved?
Supporting Documentation
Waters of the United States — Section 404
X X
USACE NWP 27
Waters of the United States — Section 401
X X
401 Water Quality Cert.
Endangered Species Act
X X
USFWS (Corr. Letter)
Historic Preservation Act
X X
SHPO (Corr. Letter)
Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA)/ Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) N/A N/A
N/A
FEMA Floodplain Compliance
Essential Fisheries Habitat
N/A N/A
N/A

04
r
Legend
INC Highway
State Roads
— Streams
Muddy Run II Easement
- waterbody
HUC 03030007060010
W's
'..*,
l
imr<w
via
Road
� J t Std to R
od
ate Road
o°
s
ck Pierce Ln
J
Figure 1.
Project Vicinity Map
Muddy Run II Mitigation Site
0 0.75 1.5 3
Miles
1 inch = 1.5 miles
State R �
1715
DUPLIN COUNTY
Scale: NTS

IL
IL
�L k � {f 111 r} •°, +
xf ` + x 41
Drainage Area = 1.4 mi
�",f.Gi• - � f^�� I orf,+ ?}�}, 7 F �'
k? i
tiN.
•y -i •I Is'd" t —'I ys
NJ
a L X3tab
Figure 2. Proposed Streams
USGS/Watershed Map waterbodies
res Muddy Run II Mitigation Site Muddy Run II Easement
0 1,000 2,000 4,000 Muddy Run Easement
Feet
1 inch = 2,000 feet Drainage Area

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Figure 3a -c. Current Conditions Plan View Map (CCPV)
Table 5. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Table 6. Vegetation Condition Assessment
Table 7. Stream Problem Areas
Table 8. Vegetation Problem Areas
Figure 4. Vegetation Photos
Figure 5. Stream and Vegetation Problem Photos

Figure 3a.
Muddy Run II
Mitigation Site
Current Conditions Map
Duplin County, NC
MY5 2018
Ores
Legend
Muddy Run II Easement
® Wetland Restoration Area
Cross Sections
P1 Restoration
HWV Restoration
Enhancement I
Enhancement 11
Channel - No Credit
Muddy Run Easement
® Stage Recorder
o Reach Breaks
Agricultural BMP
Rain Gauge
Well Hydroperiod
® >9%
® 5-8%
® No Data
0 250 500
Feet

Figure 3b.
Muddy Run II
Mitigation Site
Current Conditions Map
Duplin County, NC
MY5 2018
Ores
Legend
Muddy Run II Easement
® Wetland Restoration Area
Vegetation Plot
>260 stems/acre
Cross Sections
P1 Restoration
HWV Restoration
Enhancement I
Enhancement 11
Channel - No Credit
Muddy Run Easement
Agricultural BMP
® Stage Recorder
o Reach Breaks
Well Hydroperiod
® >9%
® 5-8%
® No Data

E4
A
Aft
0 250 500
Feet
` •
:c
j.
AN
ff
A
�A�c4 .
Reach 2
m
� VP5 a 11 L:'�•
vP t 1 r•'Ak
Figure 3c.
Muddy Run II
Mitigation Site
Current Conditions Map
Duplin County, NC
MY5 2018
fires
Legend
I Muddy Run II Easement
® Wetland Restoration Area
Vegetation Plot
>260 stems/acre
P1 Restoration
HWV Restoration
Enhancement I
Enhancement 11
Channel - No Credit
Muddy Run Easement
Cross Sections
Agricultural BMP
® Stage Recorder
o Reach Breaks
Rain Gauge
Well Hydroperiod
® >9%
® 5-8%
® No Data

Table 5a Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Reach ID Reach 1
Assessed Length 398
' Bed - Coastal plain sand bed channels have a mobile bed along their entire length during geomorphically significant flows. Therefore, the number of shallows and pools,
bedform shape, and thalweg position will vary by monitoring event and are not suitable indicators of stability or function.
z Percentage based on visual assessment of channel bed condition.
Footage
Adjusted °%
Number'
Number with
with
for
Major
Stable,
Total t
Number of
Amount of
°% Stable',
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Channel
Channel
Performing
Number in
Unstable
Unstable
Performing
Woody
Woody
Woody
Category
Sub -Category
Metric
as Intended
As -built
Segments
Footage
as Intended
Vegetation
Vegetation
Vegetation
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
1. Aggradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect
0
0
100%
(Riffle and Run units)
flow laterally (not to include point bars)
2. Degradation - Evidence of downcutting
0
0
100%
2. Riffle Condition
1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate
NA
NA
100%
NA
NA
100%
3. Meander Pool
Condition
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth> 1.6)
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
NA
NA
100%
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle)
4.Thalweg Position
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)
NA
NA
100%
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander (Glide)
NA
NA
100%
2. Bank
1. Scoured/Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/orL
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
scour and erosion
Banks undercuUoverhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2. Undercut
likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
sustainable and are providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, calving, or collapse
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
3. Engineered
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.
4
4
o
100/o
Structures
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill.
4
4
100%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.
4
4
100%
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed
3. Bank Protection
15%. (See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance
0
0
1 30%
document)
4. Habitat
Pool forming structures maintaining - Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull
0
0
o
100 /o
Depth ratio > 1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base -flow.
' Bed - Coastal plain sand bed channels have a mobile bed along their entire length during geomorphically significant flows. Therefore, the number of shallows and pools,
bedform shape, and thalweg position will vary by monitoring event and are not suitable indicators of stability or function.
z Percentage based on visual assessment of channel bed condition.

Table 5b Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Reach ID Reach 2
Assessed Length 1914
' Bed - Coastal plain sand bed channels have a mobile bed along their entire length during geomorphically significant flows. Therefore, the number of shallows and pools,
bedform shape, and thalweg position will vary by monitoring event and are not suitable indicators of stability or function.
z Percentage based on visual assessment of channel bed condition.
Adjusted %
Number
Number with
Footage with
for
Major
Stable,
Total
Number of
Amount of
% Stable 2,
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Channel
Channel
Performing
Number in
Unstable
Unstable
Performing
Woody
Woody
Woody
Cate o
Sub-Cateqory
Metric
as Intended
As -built
Segments
Footage
as Intended
Ve etation
Vegetation
Vegetation
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
(Riffle and Run units)
1. Aggradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect
flow laterally (not to include point bars)
0
0
100%
2. Degradation - Evidence of downcutting
0
0
100%
2. Riffle Condition
1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate
NA
NA
100%
3. Meander Pool
Condition
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth> 1.6)
-
NA
NA
100%
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle)
NA
NA
100%
4.Thalweg Position
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)
NA
NA
100%
�2Th,lweg centering at downstream of meander (Glide)
NA
NA
100%
2. Bank
1. Scoured/Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or
scour and erosion
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2. Undercut
likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
and are providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, calving, or collapse
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
Totals
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
3. Engineered
Structures
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.
14
14
°
100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill.
13
13
100%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.
14
14
100%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence doesnot exceed
15%. (See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document)
0
0
100%
4. Habitat
Pool forming structures maintaining - Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull
Depth ratio > 1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base -flow.
1
1
°
100/o
' Bed - Coastal plain sand bed channels have a mobile bed along their entire length during geomorphically significant flows. Therefore, the number of shallows and pools,
bedform shape, and thalweg position will vary by monitoring event and are not suitable indicators of stability or function.
z Percentage based on visual assessment of channel bed condition.

Table 5c Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Reach ID Reach 3A
Assessed Length 3586
' Bed - Coastal plain sand bed channels have a mobile bed along their entire length during geomorphically significant flows. Therefore, the number of shallows and pools,
bedform shape, and thalweg position will vary by monitoring event and are not suitable indicators of stability or function.
z Percentage based on visual assessment of channel bed condition.
Adjusted %
Number
Number with
Footage with
for
Major
Stable,
Total
Number of
Amount of
% Stable 2,
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Channel
Channel
Performing
Number in
Unstable
Unstable
Performing
Woody
Woody
Woody
Cate o
Sub-Cateqory
Metric
as Intended
As -built
Segments
Footage
as Intended
Ve etation
Vegetation
Vegetation
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
(Riffle and Run units)
1. Aggradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect
flow laterally (not to include point bars)
0
0
100%
2. Degradation - Evidence of downcutting
0
0
100%
2. Riffle Condition
1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate
NA
NA
100%
3. Meander Pool
Condition
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth> 1.6)
-
NA
NA
100%
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle)
NA
NA
100%
4.Thalweg Position
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)
NA
NA
100%
�2Th,lweg centering at downstream of meander (Glide)
NA
NA
100%
2. Bank
1. Scoured/Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or
scour and erosion
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2. Undercut
likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
and are providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, calving, or collapse
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
Totals
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
3. Engineered
Structures
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.
21
21
°
100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill.
11
11
100%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.
20
21
95%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence doesnot exceed
15%. (See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document)
1
1
100%
4. Habitat
Pool forming structures maintaining - Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull
Depth ratio > 1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base -flow.
10
10
°
100/o
' Bed - Coastal plain sand bed channels have a mobile bed along their entire length during geomorphically significant flows. Therefore, the number of shallows and pools,
bedform shape, and thalweg position will vary by monitoring event and are not suitable indicators of stability or function.
z Percentage based on visual assessment of channel bed condition.

Table 5d Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Reach ID Reach 3B
Assessed Length 1979
' Bed - Coastal plain sand bed channels have a mobile bed along their entire length during geomorphically significant flows. Therefore, the number of shallows and pools,
bedform shape, and thalweg position will vary by monitoring event and are not suitable indicators of stability or function.
z Percentage based on visual assessment of channel bed condition.
Adjusted %
Number
Number with
Footage with
for
Major
Stable,
Total
Number of
Amount of
% Stable 2,
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Channel
Channel
Performing
Number in
Unstable
Unstable
Performing
Woody
Woody
Woody
Cate o
Sub-Cateqory
Metric
as Intended
As -built
Segments
Footage
as Intended
Ve etation
Vegetation
Vegetation
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
(Riffle and Run units)
1. Aggradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect
flow laterally (not to include point bars)
0
0
100%
2. Degradation - Evidence of downcutting
0
0
100%
2. Riffle Condition
1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate
NA
NA
100%
3. Meander Pool
Condition
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth> 1.6)
-
NA
NA
100%
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle)
NA
NA
100%
4.Thalweg Position
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)
NA
NA
100%
�2Th,lweg centering at downstream of meander (Glide)
NA
NA
100%
2. Bank
1. Scoured/Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or
scour and erosion
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2. Undercut
likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
and are providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, calving, or collapse
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
Totals
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
3. Engineered
Structures
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.
17
17
°
100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill.
9
9
100%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.
17
17
100%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence doesnot exceed
15%. (See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document)
1
1
100%
4. Habitat
Pool forming structures maintaining - Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull
Depth ratio > 1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base -flow.
7
7
°
100/o
' Bed - Coastal plain sand bed channels have a mobile bed along their entire length during geomorphically significant flows. Therefore, the number of shallows and pools,
bedform shape, and thalweg position will vary by monitoring event and are not suitable indicators of stability or function.
z Percentage based on visual assessment of channel bed condition.

Table 5e Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Reach ID Reach 3C
Assessed Length 708
' Bed - Coastal plain sand bed channels have a mobile bed along their entire length during geomorphically significant flows. Therefore, the number of shallows and pools,
bedform shape, and thalweg position will vary by monitoring event and are not suitable indicators of stability or function.
2 Percentage based on visual assessment of channel bed condition.
Adjusted %
Number
Number with
Footage with
for
Major
Stable,
Total
Number of
Amount of
% Stable 2,
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Channel
Channel
Performing
Number in
Unstable
Unstable
Performing
Woody
Woody
Woody
Cate o
Sub-Cateqory
Metric
as Intended
As -built
Segments
Footage
as Intended
Ve etation
Vegetation
Vegetation
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
(Riffle and Run units)
1. Aggradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect
flow laterally (not to include point bars)
0
0
100%
2. Degradation - Evidence of downcutting
0
0
100%
2. Riffle Condition
1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate
NA
NA
100%
3. Meander Pool
Condition
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth> 1.6)
-
NA
NA
100%
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle)
NA
NA
100%
4.Thalweg Position
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)
NA
NA
100%
�2Th,lweg centering at downstream of meander (Glide)
NA
NA
100%
2. Bank
1. Scoured/Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or
scour and erosion
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2. Undercut
likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
and are providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, calving, or collapse
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
Totals
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
3. Engineered
Structures
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.
5
5
°
100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill.
3
3
100%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.
5
5
100%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence doesnot exceed
15%. (See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document)
0
0
100%
4. Habitat
Pool forming structures maintaining - Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull
Depth ratio > 1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base -flow.
2
2
°
100/o
' Bed - Coastal plain sand bed channels have a mobile bed along their entire length during geomorphically significant flows. Therefore, the number of shallows and pools,
bedform shape, and thalweg position will vary by monitoring event and are not suitable indicators of stability or function.
2 Percentage based on visual assessment of channel bed condition.

Table 5f Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Reach ID Reach 4
Assessed Length 173
' Bed - Coastal plain sand bed channels have a mobile bed along their entire length during geomorphically significant flows. Therefore, the number of shallows and pools,
bedform shape, and thalweg position will vary by monitoring event and are not suitable indicators of stability or function.
z Percentage based on visual assessment of channel bed condition.
Adjusted %
Number
Number with
Footage with
for
Major
Stable,
Total
Number of
Amount of
% Stable 2,
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Channel
Channel
Performing
Number in
Unstable
Unstable
Performing
Woody
Woody
Woody
Cate o
Sub-Cateqory
Metric
as Intended
As -built
Segments
Footage
as Intended
Ve etation
Vegetation
Vegetation
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
(Riffle and Run units)
1. Aggradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect
flow laterally (not to include point bars)
0
0
100%
2. Degradation - Evidence of downcutting
0
0
100%
2. Riffle Condition
1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate
NA
NA
100%
3. Meander Pool
Condition
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth> 1.6)
-
NA
NA
100%
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle)
NA
NA
100%
4.Thalweg Position
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)
NA
NA
100%
�2Th,lweg centering at downstream of meander (Glide)
NA
NA
100%
2. Bank
1. Scoured/Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or
scour and erosion
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2. Undercut
likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
and are providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, calving, or collapse
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
Totals
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
3. Engineered
Structures
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.
3
3
°
100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill.
2
2
100%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.
3
3
100%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence doesnot exceed
15%. (See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document)
0
0
100%
4. Habitat
Pool forming structures maintaining - Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull
Depth ratio > 1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base -flow.
1
1
°
100/o
' Bed - Coastal plain sand bed channels have a mobile bed along their entire length during geomorphically significant flows. Therefore, the number of shallows and pools,
bedform shape, and thalweg position will vary by monitoring event and are not suitable indicators of stability or function.
z Percentage based on visual assessment of channel bed condition.

Table 5g Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Reach ID Reach 5A
Assessed Length 1926
' Bed - Coastal plain sand bed channels have a mobile bed along their entire length during geomorphically significant flows. Therefore, the number of shallows and pools,
bedform shape, and thalweg position will vary by monitoring event and are not suitable indicators of stability or function.
z Percentage based on visual assessment of channel bed condition.
Footage
Adjusted °%
Number'
Number with
with
for
Major
Stable,
Total t
Number of
Amount of
°% Stable 2,
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Channel
Channel
Performing
Number in
Unstable
Unstable
Performing
Woody
Woody
Woody
Category
Sub -Category
Metric
as Intended
As -built
Segments
Footage
as Intended
Vegetation
Vegetation
Vegetation
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
1. Aggradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect
0
0
100%
(Riffle and Run units)
flow laterally (not to include point bars)
2. Degradation - Evidence of downcutting
0
0
100%
2. Riffle Condition
1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate
NA
NA
100%
NA
NA
100%
3. Meander Pool
Condition
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth> 1.6)
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
NA
NA
100%
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle)
4.Thalweg Position
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)
NA
NA
100%
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander (Glide)
NA
NA
100%
2. Bank
1. Scoured/Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/orL
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
scour and erosion
Banks undercuUoverhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2. Undercut
likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
sustainable and are providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, calving, or collapse
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
3. Engineered
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.
22
22
o
100/o
Structures
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill.
16
16
100%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.
22
22
100%
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed
3. Bank Protection
15%. (See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance
0
0
1 30%
document)
4. Habitat
Pool forming structures maintaining - Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull
6
6
o
100 /o
Depth ratio > 1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base -flow.
' Bed - Coastal plain sand bed channels have a mobile bed along their entire length during geomorphically significant flows. Therefore, the number of shallows and pools,
bedform shape, and thalweg position will vary by monitoring event and are not suitable indicators of stability or function.
z Percentage based on visual assessment of channel bed condition.

Table 5h Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Reach ID Reach 5B
Assessed Length 409
' Bed - Coastal plain sand bed channels have a mobile bed along their entire length during geomorphically significant flows. Therefore, the number of shallows and pools,
bedform shape, and thalweg position will vary by monitoring event and are not suitable indicators of stability or function.
z Percentage based on visual assessment of channel bed condition.
Adjusted %
Number
Number with
Footage with
for
Major
Stable,
Total
Number of
Amount of
% Stable 2,
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Channel
Channel
Performing
Number in
Unstable
Unstable
Performing
Woody
Woody
Woody
Cate o
Sub-Cateqory
Metric
as Intended
As -built
Segments
Footage
as Intended
Ve etation
Vegetation
Vegetation
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
(Riffle and Run units)
1. Aggradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect
flow laterally (not to include point bars)
0
0
100%
2. Degradation - Evidence of downcutting
0
0
100%
2. Riffle Condition
1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate
NA
NA
100%
3. Meander Pool
Condition
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth> 1.6)
-
NA
NA
100%
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle)
NA
NA
100%
4.Thalweg Position
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)
NA
NA
100%
�2Th,lweg centering at downstream of meander (Glide)
NA
NA
100%
2. Bank
1. Scoured/Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or
scour and erosion
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2. Undercut
likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
and are providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, calving, or collapse
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
Totals
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
3. Engineered
Structures
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.
1
1
°
100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill.
1
1
100%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.
1
1
100%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence doesnot exceed
15%. (See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document)
0
0
100%
4. Habitat
Pool forming structures maintaining - Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull
Depth ratio > 1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base -flow.
0
0
°
100/o
' Bed - Coastal plain sand bed channels have a mobile bed along their entire length during geomorphically significant flows. Therefore, the number of shallows and pools,
bedform shape, and thalweg position will vary by monitoring event and are not suitable indicators of stability or function.
z Percentage based on visual assessment of channel bed condition.

Table 5a Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Reach ID Reach 6
Assessed Length 318
' Bed - Coastal plain sand bed channels have a mobile bed along their entire length during geomorphically significant flows. Therefore, the number of shallows and pools,
bedform shape, and thalweg position will vary by monitoring event and are not suitable indicators of stability or function.
z Percentage based on visual assessment of channel bed condition.
Adjusted %
Number
Number with
Footage with
for
Major
Stable,
Total
Number of
Amount of
% Stable 2,
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Channel
Channel
Performing
Number in
Unstable
Unstable
Performing
Woody
Woody
Woody
Cate o
Sub-Cateqory
Metric
as Intended
As -built
Segments
Footage
as Intended
Ve etation
Vegetation
Vegetation
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
(Riffle and Run units)
1. Aggradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect
flow laterally (not to include point bars)
0
0
100%
2. Degradation - Evidence of downcutting
0
0
100%
2. Riffle Condition
1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate
NA
NA
100%
3. Meander Pool
Condition
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth> 1.6)
-
NA
NA
100%
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle)
NA
NA
100%
4.Thalweg Position
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)
NA
NA
100%
�2Th,lweg centering at downstream of meander (Glide)
NA
NA
100%
2. Bank
1. Scoured/Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or
scour and erosion
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2. Undercut
likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
and are providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, calving, or collapse
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
Totals
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
3. Engineered
Structures
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.
2
2
°
100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill.
2
2
100%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.
2
2
100%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence doesnot exceed
15%. (See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document)
0
0
100%
4. Habitat
Pool forming structures maintaining - Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull
Depth ratio > 1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base -flow.
0
0
°
100/o
' Bed - Coastal plain sand bed channels have a mobile bed along their entire length during geomorphically significant flows. Therefore, the number of shallows and pools,
bedform shape, and thalweg position will vary by monitoring event and are not suitable indicators of stability or function.
z Percentage based on visual assessment of channel bed condition.

Table 6 Vegetation Condition Assessment
Planted Acreage 17
Vegetation Category
Definitions
Mapping
Threshold
CCPV
Depiction
Number of
Polygons
Combined
Acreage
% of Planted
Acreage
1. Bare Areas
Very limited cover of both woody and herbaceous material.
0.1 acres
Red Lines
0
0.00
0.0
2. Low Stem Density Areas
Woody stem densities clearly below target levels based on MY3, 4, or 5 stem count criteria.
0.1 acres
Orange Lines
0
0.00
0.0
4. Invasive Areas of Concern
Areas or points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale).
1000 SF
Total
0
0.00
0.0%
3. Areas of Poor Growth Rates or Vigor
Areas with woody stems of a size class that are obviously small given the monitoring year.
7
0.25 acres
Orange Lines
0
0.00
0.0
5. Easement Encroachment Areas'
Areas or points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale).
'e Total
0
0.00
0.0%
Easement Acreage 37.6
1 = Enter the planted acreage within the easement. This number is calculated as the easement acreage minus any existing mature tree stands that were not subject to supplemental planting of the understory, the channel acreage,
crossings or any other elements not directly planted as part of the project effort.
2 = The acreage within the easement boundaries.
3 = Encroachment may occur within or outside of planted areas and will therefore be calculated against the overall easement acreage. In the event a polygon is cataloged into items 1, 2 or 3 in the table and is the result of encroachment,
the associated acreage should be tallied in the relevant item (i.e., item 1,2 or 3) as well as a parallel tally in item 5.
4 = Invasives may occur in or out of planted areas, but still within the easement and will therefore be calculated against the overall easement acreage. Invasives of concern/interest are listed below. The list of high concern spcies are
those with the potential to directly outcompete native, young, woody stems in the short-term (e.g. monitoring period or shortly thereafter) or affect the community structure for existing, more established tree/shrub stands over timeframes
that are slightly longer (e.g. 1-2 decades). The low/moderate concern group are those species that generally do not have this capacity over the timeframes discussed and therefore are not expected to be mapped with regularity, but can
be mapped, if in the judgement of the observer their coverage, density or distribution is suppressing the viability, density, or growth of planted woody stems. Decisions as to whether remediation will be needed are based on the integration
of risk factors by EEP such as species present, their coverage, distribution relative to native biomass, and the practicality of treatment. For example, even modest amounts of Kudzu or Japanese Knotweed early in the projects history will
warrant control, but potentially large coverages of Microstegium in the herb layer will not Iikley trigger control because of the limited capacities to impact tree/shrub layers within the timeframes discussed and the potential impacts of
treating extensive amounts of ground cover. Those species with the "watch list" designator in gray shade are of interest as well, but have yet to be observed across the state with any frequency. Those in red italics are of particular
interest given their extreme risk/threat level for mapping as points where isolated specimens are found, particularly ealry in a projects monitoring history. However, areas of discreet, dense patches will of course be mapped as polygons.
The symbology scheme below was one that was found to be helpful for symbolzing invasives polygons, particulalry for situations where the conditon for an area is somewhere between isolated specimens and dense, discreet patches. In
any case, the point or polygon/area feature can be symbolized to describe things like high or low concern and species can be listed as a map inset, in legend items if the number of species are limited or in the narrative section of the
executive summary.
of
Mapping
CCPV
Number of
Combined
Easement
Vegetation Category
Definitions
Threshold
De ion
Polygons
Acreage
Acreage
4. Invasive Areas of Concern
Areas or points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale).
1000 SF
Yellow
0
0.00
0.0
Crosshatch
5. Easement Encroachment Areas'
Areas or points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale).
none
Red Lines
0
0.00
0.0
1 = Enter the planted acreage within the easement. This number is calculated as the easement acreage minus any existing mature tree stands that were not subject to supplemental planting of the understory, the channel acreage,
crossings or any other elements not directly planted as part of the project effort.
2 = The acreage within the easement boundaries.
3 = Encroachment may occur within or outside of planted areas and will therefore be calculated against the overall easement acreage. In the event a polygon is cataloged into items 1, 2 or 3 in the table and is the result of encroachment,
the associated acreage should be tallied in the relevant item (i.e., item 1,2 or 3) as well as a parallel tally in item 5.
4 = Invasives may occur in or out of planted areas, but still within the easement and will therefore be calculated against the overall easement acreage. Invasives of concern/interest are listed below. The list of high concern spcies are
those with the potential to directly outcompete native, young, woody stems in the short-term (e.g. monitoring period or shortly thereafter) or affect the community structure for existing, more established tree/shrub stands over timeframes
that are slightly longer (e.g. 1-2 decades). The low/moderate concern group are those species that generally do not have this capacity over the timeframes discussed and therefore are not expected to be mapped with regularity, but can
be mapped, if in the judgement of the observer their coverage, density or distribution is suppressing the viability, density, or growth of planted woody stems. Decisions as to whether remediation will be needed are based on the integration
of risk factors by EEP such as species present, their coverage, distribution relative to native biomass, and the practicality of treatment. For example, even modest amounts of Kudzu or Japanese Knotweed early in the projects history will
warrant control, but potentially large coverages of Microstegium in the herb layer will not Iikley trigger control because of the limited capacities to impact tree/shrub layers within the timeframes discussed and the potential impacts of
treating extensive amounts of ground cover. Those species with the "watch list" designator in gray shade are of interest as well, but have yet to be observed across the state with any frequency. Those in red italics are of particular
interest given their extreme risk/threat level for mapping as points where isolated specimens are found, particularly ealry in a projects monitoring history. However, areas of discreet, dense patches will of course be mapped as polygons.
The symbology scheme below was one that was found to be helpful for symbolzing invasives polygons, particulalry for situations where the conditon for an area is somewhere between isolated specimens and dense, discreet patches. In
any case, the point or polygon/area feature can be symbolized to describe things like high or low concern and species can be listed as a map inset, in legend items if the number of species are limited or in the narrative section of the
executive summary.

Table 7. Stream Problem Areas
Muddy Run II Stream and Wetland Restoration Project - Project # 95354
Feature Issue Station # / Range Suspected Cause; Repair Photo Number
Beaver dams Top of Reach 5A Remove beavers and dams SPA1
Table 8. Vegetation Problem Areas
Muddy Run I1 Stream and Wetland Restoration Project - Project # 95354
Feature Category Station Numbers Suspected Cause; Repair Photo Number
N/A I N/A N/A N/A

kms: �, �la� �� :T�1��., � _ :3 � QTS' -�•
x
s

� ', k

Vegetation Problem Areas Photos
N/A

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data
Table 9a. Planted Stem Count Summary
Table 9b. Planted Species Totals
Table 9c. Planted Stem Counts (Species by Plot)

Table 9a. Monitoring Year 5 Stem Count Summary
Plot Size = 40 X 22 feet = 0.020 Acres
Number Trees/Acres = # of Trees * 50
Table 9b. Planted Species Totals
ecies
Common Name
Baseline
Planted
Year 1
Taxodium distichum
Year 2
1,800
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Green Ash
Year 3
Quercus l rata
Overcup Oak
1,800
Year 4
River birch
1,800
Quercus michauxii
Year 5
2,200
N ssa bi ora
Swamp Tupelo
Planted
Plantanus occidentalis
Planted
2,200
Planted
Laurel Oak
Volunteers
Planted
15,500
Volunteers
Planted
Volunteers
Planted
Volunteers
Vegetation Plot
Stems
Planted
Stems/Acre
Baseline
Stems/Acre
Living Stems Year 1
Living
Stems
Stems/Acre
Year 2
Living
Stems
Total Stems/Acre
Year 2
Living
Stems
Stems/Acre
Year 3
Living Stems
Total Stems/Acre
Year 3
Living
Stems/Acre
Year 3
Total Stems/Acre
Living Stems Year 4
Living
Stems
Stems/Acre
Year 5
Total
Stems/Acre
Living Stems Year 4
1
16
800
16
800
0
0
1
750
13
650
50
3150
13
650
186
9950
13
650
86
4300
2
17
850
14
700
0
0
--
550
11
550
0
550
11
550
43
2700
11
550
1 9
450
3
15
750
13
650
0
0
—
550
11
550
0
550
10
500
53
3150
9
450
6
300
4
14
700
12
600
0
0
400
13
650
5
900
13
650
34
2350
13
650
6
300
5
16
800
12
600
0
0
500
11
550
0
550
13
650
21
1700
13
650
2
100
6
17
850
14
700
0
0
650
13
650
0
650
13
650
7
1000
13
650
0
0
7
15
750
13
650
0
0
600
12
600
0
600
12
600
0
600
12
600
0
0
8
16
800
14
700
0
0
—
600
13
650
0
650
13
650
63
3800
13
650
131
6550
9
17
850
11
550
10
500
—
500
17
850
0
850
13
650
7
1000
12
600
2
100
10
14
700
9
450
0
0
1
350
6
300
1
350
8
400
2
500
8
400
0
0
11
13
650
13
650
0
0
--
550
11
550
0
550
12
600
19
1550
10
500
0
0
12
15
750
9
450
0
0
--
550
13
650
0
650
13
650
1 3
800
13
650
0
0
13
16
800
14
700
0
0
—
650
14
700
0
700
13
650
16
1450
13
650
38
1900
14
14
700
10
500
0
0
--
500
9
450
0
450
9
450
129
6900
9
450
23
1150
15
15
750
13
650
13
650
5
900
19
950
0
950
20
1000
65
3350
20
1000
12
600
16
16
800
15
750
0
0
--
700
12
600
0
600
12
600
71
4150
12
600
73
3650
17
15
750
10
500
11
550
1
600
12
600
0
600
12
600
7
950
12
600
4
200
18
14
700
14
700
13
650
1
700
14
700
0
700
14
700
71
4250
13
650
45
2250
19
9
450
8
400
0
0
--
550
13
650
0
650
9
450
168
8850
9
450
48
2400
20
10
500
7
350
0
0
250
8
400
1
450
8
400
76
4200
8
400
0
0
21
18
900
16
800
15
750
—
750
12
600
0
600
13
650
12
1250
13
650
4
200
22
16
800
13
650
12
600
600
11
550
0
550
11
550
23
1700
11
550
18
900
23 1
13
650
Il
550
12
600
600
14
1 700
35
2450
14
700
60
3.700
15
750
1 66
3300
24
17
850
11
550
8
400
400
8
400
0
400
8
400
33
2050
8
400
39
1950
25
16
800
12
600
11
1 550
550
21
1050
0
1050
21
1050
4
1250
20
1000
0
0
26
11
550
7
350
6
300
—
300
20
1000
34
2700
18
900
64
4100
17
850
3
150
27
19
950
17
850
16
800
800
16
800
0
800
1 16
1 800
12
1400
16
800
7
350
28
17
1 850
1 17
850
15
750
1 --
1 750
14
700
0
1 700
15
750
1 68
4150 1
15
750
0
0
Average
15.0
752
12.3
616
5.1
254
2
577
12.9
645
5
870
12.8
638
47
2957
12.5
627
22
1111
Min
9
450
7
350
0
0
1
250
6
300
0
350
8
400
0
500
8
400
0
0
Max
19
950
17
850
16
800
5
900
21
1050
50
2700
21
r 1050
186
9950
20
1000
131
6550
Calculations include volunteer species
Plot Size = 40 X 22 feet = 0.020 Acres
Number Trees/Acres = # of Trees * 50
Table 9b. Planted Species Totals
ecies
Common Name
Total
Planted
Trees - Bare Root
Taxodium distichum
Bald Cypress
1,800
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Green Ash
1,900
Quercus l rata
Overcup Oak
1,800
Betula nigra
River birch
1,800
Quercus michauxii
Swamp Chestnut Oak
2,200
N ssa bi ora
Swamp Tupelo
2,000
Plantanus occidentalis
American S camore
2,200
Quercus laurifolia
Laurel Oak
1,800
Total
15,500
Live Stakes
Salix nigra Black Willow 3,000
Total 3,000

Table 9c. Planted Stem Counts (Species by Plot)
Vegetation Plot 1
Vegetation Plot 7
Vegetation Plot 2
Vegetation Plot 8
Vegetation Plot 3
Vegetation Plot 9
Vegetation Plot 4
Species
Vegetation Plot 5
MYO
Species
Common Name
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3 MY4
MY5
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3 MY4
MY5
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Taxodium distichum
Bald Cypress
3
3
2
2
2
2
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Green Ash
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
2
2
3
5
5
9
9
9
9
1
1
1
1
1
1
Quercus s.
Unknown Oaks .
1
2
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
Quercus l rata
Quercus l rata
Overcup Oak
1
2
2
2
2
3
8
8
8
8
8
8
4
4
4
4
4
4
3
1
3
8
7
8
6
6
8
Betula nigra
River birch
6
6
5
5
5
5
2
2
2
2
2
1
2
1
1
1
1
10
6
6
6
6
6
3
2
1
1
1
1
1
Quercus michauxii
Swamp Chestnut Oak
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
6
1
1
1
1
1
1
N ssa bi ora
Swamp Tupelo
4
1
2
2
1
1
4
4
1
1
1
1
3
3
2
3
3
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
2
1
1
Plantanus occidentalis
Plantanus occidentalis
American Sycamore
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
2
3
2
2
5
5
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
Quercus laurifolia
Laurel Oak
4
4
3
3
3
3
1
3
2
1
2
3
2
4
4
2
3
2
2
3
2
3
2
3
2
Quercus nigra
uercus nigra
Water Oak
Quercus phellos
Quercus phellos
Willow Oak
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
2
Liriodendron tuli i era
Liriodendron tuli i era
TuRp poplar
Species Count
Species Count
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
3
3
3
3
3
6
6
4
4
4
4
5
4
4
4
4
4
7
6
5
6
7
6
Stem Count
Stem Count
16
16
13
13
13
13
17
14
11
11
11
11
15
13
9
11
10
9
14
12
13
13
13
13
16
12
12
11
13
13
Stems per Acre
Stems per Acrel
800
800
650
650
650
650
850
700
550
550
550
550
750
650
450
550
500
450
700
600
650
650
650
650
800
600
600
550
650
650
Vegetation Plot 6
Vegetation Plot 7
Vegetation Plot 8
Vegetation Plot 9
Vegetation Plot 10
Species
Common Name
MYO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MYO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MYO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Taxodium distichum
Bald Cypress
6
6
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
1
1
1
2
2
3
3
3
3
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Green Ash
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
Quercus s .
Unknown Oaks .
1
1
1
Quercus l rata
Overcup Oak
2
1
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
1
2
3
1
3
2
2
2
2
2
Betula nigra
River birch
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
10
6
6
6
6
6
3
1
1
1
1
1
Quercus michauxii
Swamp Chestnut Oak
5
5
5
5
5
5
7
6
5
5
5
5
6
5
3
2
3
3
N ssa bif7ora
Swarnp Tupelo
4
4
1
2
2
1
1
1
3
3
2
2
2
2
9
6
2
2
2
2
4
2
1
2
1
1
Plantanus occidentalis
American Sycamore
1
1
2
3
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
4
4
4
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
Quercus lauri olia
Laurel Oak
5
3
1
1
1
1
3
2
2
2
3
2
4
4
2
3
2
2
3
3
3
2
3
3
Quercus nigra
Water Oak
Quercus phellos
Willow Oak
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
2
Liriodendron tuli i era
Tuhp poplar
Species Count
5
5
5
5
5
5
6
5
4
4
4
4
6
5
5
5
5
5
4
3
3
5
4
3
5
5
4
4
5
5
Stem Count
17
14
13
14
13
13
15
13
12
12
12
12
16
14
13
13
13
13
17
11
12
17
13
12
14
9
7
6
1 8
8
Stems per Acre
850
700
650
700
650
650
750
650
600
600
600
600
800
700
650
650
650
650
850
550
600
850
650
600
700
450
350
300
1400
400
Vegetation Plot it
Vegetation Plot 12
Vegetation Plot 13
Vegetation Plot 14
Vegetation Plot 15
Species
Common Name
MYO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MYO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MYO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Taxodium distichum
Bald Cypress
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
3
3
3
3
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Green Ash
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
3
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
Quercus s .
Unknown Oaks .
2
1
Quercus 1 rata
Overcup Oak
1
1
2
2
5
5
5
5
Betula nigra
River birch
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
3
3
3
1
1
1
2
2
2
Quercus michauxii
Swamp Chestnut Oak
5
5
5
5
5
5
7
6
5
5
5
5
6
5
3
2
3
3
N ssa bi ora
Swamp Tupelo
4
4
1
2
2
1
4
4
4
4
4
4
9
6
2
2
2
2
3
3
1
2
1
1
Plantanus occidentalis
American Sycamore
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
8
7
8
Quercus lauri olia
Laurel Oak
3
3
1
3
2
1
1
Quercus nigra
Water Oak
Quercus phellos
Willow Oak
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
2
Liriodendron tuli i era
Tuhp poplar
Species Count
6
6
6
6
7
7
6
4
4
4
4
4
6
5
5
5
5
5
4
3
3
4
4
4
8
7
6
7
7
7
Stem Count
13
13R4001
11
12
10
15
9
13
13
13
13
16
14
13
14
13
13
14
10
8
9
9
9
16
14
10
19
18
20
Stems per Acre
650
650550
600
500
750
450
650
650
650
650
800
700
650
700
650
650
700
500
400
450
450
1 450
1 800
7001
5001
9501
900
1000

Table 9c. Planted Stem Counts (Species by Plot) Continued
Vegetation Plot 16
Vegetation Plot 17
Vegetation Plot 18
Species
Vegetation Plot 19
MYO
MYl
Vegetation Plot 20
MY3
Species
Common Name
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Taxodium distichum
Bald Cypress
2
3
3
3
3
8
8
8
8
8
8
2
2
2
3
3
3
1
1
2
1
2
2
4
4
4
4
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Green Ash
6
6
5
4
5
5
Quercus l rata
Overcup Oak
4
4
6
6
7
6
7
7
1
1
4
4
4
4
4
2
2
2
Quercus s .
Unknown Oaks .
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Quercus michauxii
Swamp Chestnut Oak
2
2
3
3
3
3
1
l
1
1
1
1
Quercus l rata
Overcup Oak
3
4
2
3
2
2
3
1
1
l
1
1
3
3
4
4
4
4
1
l
3
1
3
3
Plantanus occidentalis
American Sycamore
1
l
1
l
Betula nigra
River birch
1
1
1
1
1
1
6
4
4
4
4
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
3
3
3
4
3
1
1
1
1
Quercus michauxii
Swamp Chestnut Oak
7
7
6
6
6
6
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
3
2
2
2
2
N ssa bi ora
Swamp Tupelo
8
8
6
6
6
6
4
2
2
2
2
2
4
4
l
3
2
1
3
3
3
3
3
3
6
3
1
0
Plantanus occidentalis
American Sycamore
2
6
300
7
20
1000
9
18
900
9
17
850
5
19
950
4
17
850
3
3
4
4
4
4
5
15
750
5
14
700
5
15
750
1
1
5
5
0
5
2
1
7
8
7
Quercus lauri olia
Laurel Oak
1
1
1
1
5
2
0
2
1
3
2
3
3
6
3
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
Quercus nigra
Water Oak
1
l
Quercus phellos
Willow Oak
2
2
Liriodendron tuli i era
Tulip poplar
Species Count
3
2
2
2
2
2
5
4
5
5
5
5
4
4
4
4
4
4
5
4
5
6
4
4
3
3
2
5
5
5
Stem Count
16
15
12
12
12
12
15
10
12
12
12
12
14
14
13
14
14
13
9
8
9
12
9
9
10
7
3
8
8
8
Stems per Acre
800
750
600
600
600
600
750
500
600
600
600
600
700
700
650
700
700
650
450
400
450
600
450
450
500
350
150
400
400
400
Table 9c. Planted Stem Counts (Species by Plot) Continued
Vegetation Plot 21
Vegetation Plot 22
Vegetation Plot 23
Species
Vegetation Plot 24
MYO
MYl
Vegetation Plot 25
MY3
Species
Common Name
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MYO
MYl
MU
MY3
MY4
MY5
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MYO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Taxodium distichum
Bald Cypress
2
3
3
3
3
8
8
8
8
8
8
2
2
2
3
3
3
1
l
Quercus s .
Unknown Oaks .
4
4
4
4
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Green Ash
6
6
5
4
5
5
Quercus l rata
Overcup Oak
4
4
7
6
2
6
2
2
4
4
4
4
4
1
2
2
Quercus s .
Unknown Oaks .
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Quercus michauxii
Swamp Chestnut Oak
2
2
3
3
3
3
1
l
1
1
1
1
Quercus l rata
Overcup Oak
3
4
2
3
2
2
3
1
l
2
2
2
2
2
l
1
1
l
1
Plantanus occidentalis
American Sycamore
1
1
l
Betula nigra
River birch
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
3
3
3
3
3
Quercus lauri olia
Laurel Oak
1
1
6
3
3
3
3
3
4
3
1
1
1
1
Quercus michauxii
Swamp Chestnut Oak
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
Quercus phellos
Willow Oak
5
4
2
2
1
2
N ssa bi ora
Swamp Tupelo
Liriodendron tuli i era
Tulip Poplar
2
2
3
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
6
5
0
0
Plantanus occidentalis
American Sycamore
2
6
300
7
20
1000
9
18
900
9
17
850
5
19
950
4
17
850
4
16
800
4
16
800
4
15
750
4
16
800
5
17
850
5
17
850
5
15
750
5
14
700
5
15
750
1
1
1
7
8
7
Quercus lauri olia
Laurel Oak
4
1
1
1
5
2
0
2
1
3
2
3
3
6
3
1
1
1
1
1
5
2
2
Quercus nigra
Water Oak
1
Quercus phellos
Willow Oak
1
Liriodendron tuli i era
Tulip poplar
Species Count
6
5
3
4
5
5
3
3
3
2
2
2
5
4
4
5
7
8
5
5
4
4
4
4
4
3
3
7
8
9
Stem Count
18
16
9
12
13
13
16
13
11
11
11
11
13
11
9
14
15
15
17
11
8
8
8
8
16
12
3
21
20
20
Stems per Acre
900
800
450
600
650
650
800
650
550
550
550
550
650
550
450
700
750
750
850
550
400
400
400
400
800
600
150
1050
1000
1000
Vegetation Plot 26
Vegetation Plot 27
Vegetation Plot 28
Species
Common Name
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Taxodium distichum
Bald Cypress
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Green Ash
4
4
4
9
9
9
9
9
9
Quercus s .
Unknown Oaks .
4
Quercus l rata
Overcup Oak
4
4
3
5
4
3
1
4
4
4
4
4
4
Betula nigra
River birch
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Quercus michauxii
Swamp Chestnut Oak
2
2
3
3
3
3
1
l
1
l
1
1
l
1
l
1
1
l
N ssa bi ora
Swamp Tupelo
3
1
Plantanus occidentalis
American Sycamore
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
7
7
6
6
6
6
Quercus lauri olia
Laurel Oak
2
l
1
7
6
5
5
4
5
4
4
3
2
3
3
Quercus nigra
Water Oak
1
1
Quercus phellos
Willow Oak
1
1
Liriodendron tuli i era
Tulip Poplar
2
2
Species Count
Stem Count
Stems per Acrel
5
11
550
3
7
350
2
6
300
7
20
1000
9
18
900
9
17
850
5
19
950
4
17
850
4
16
800
4
16
800
4
15
750
4
16
800
5
17
850
5
17
850
5
15
750
5
14
700
5
15
750
5
15
750

Appendix D
Stream Geomorphology Data
Table 10. Morphological Parameters Summary Data
Table 11. Dimensional Morphology Summary — Cross Sections Data
Table 12. Bank Pin Array Summary Data
Cross Section Plots

Appendix D. Table 10 - Morphological Paramters Summary Data
Project Name/Number: Muddy Run II Mitigation Project/95354
ExWing''Z Desi n As-Built/Baseline
Reference Reach MRii 1 MRii 2 MRii 3A MRii 3R MRii 3C MRii d MRii SA MRii 5R MRii F MRii 2 MRii 3A !ii/Cl MRii 3A !D/Cl MRii 3R I MRH d 1 MRii SA I MRii 1 I MRii 2 1 MRii 3A !ii/Cl I MRii 3A !D/Cl I MRii 3R MRii d 1 MRii SA
Feature
Pool
Run
Shallow
Run
Run
Run
Run
Run
Run
Run
Run
Run
Shallow
Shallow
Shallow
Shallow
Shallow
Shallow
Shallow
Shallow
Shallow
Shallow
Shallow
Shallow
Shallow
Drainage Area ac
286
286
286
68
115
227
NA/313
74/360
45
424/774
583/909
77
115
209
254
333
45
774
68
115
209
254
333
45
774
NC Regional Curve Dischaze cfs
9.3
3
5
8
NA/10
4/11
2
13/18
16/21
4
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
Design/Calculated Discharge cfs
---
---
13
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
7
14
16
10
5
40
5
7
14
16
10
5
40
Dimension
BF Width ft
10.9
8.9
7.0
4.8
8.1
6.9
7.1
8.0
4.2
6.7
9.9
6.9
7.6
9.2
12.4
9
5.6
15
9.7
11.28
10.4
11.9
9.8
8.4
14.7
Floodprone Width ft
100
100
100
8.7
10.2
8.1
>50
12.9
6.1
11.9
11.6
10.0
>40
>30
>30
>30
>30
>40
>30
>50
>50
>50
>50
>40
>50
BF Cross Sectional Area (ft)
11.4
8.4
5.0
2.3
4.1
2.8
2.4
3.9
2.1
6.6
11.1
6.2
5.9
8.7
15.7
8.3
3.3
22.7
3.7
10.2
11.6
16.5
8.0
6.3
23.9
BF Mean Depth ft
1.0
0.9
0.8
0.5
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.5
0.5
1.0
1.1
0.9
0.78
0.9
1.3
0.9
0.6
1.5
0.4
0.9
1.1
1.4
0.9
0.8
1.6
BF Max Depth ft
2.1
1.7
1.3
0.8
0.8
0.6
0.8
0.9
0.7
1.5
1.5
1.3
1.3
1.5
2.0
1.5
0.9
2.4
1.0
1.6
1.8
2.1
1.4
1.5
2.6
Width/Depth Ratio
10.4
9.5
8.8
9.6
16.2
17.3
20.9
16.0
8.4
6.7
9.0
7.7
9.7
9.8
9.8
9.7
9.3
9.9
25.8
12.9
9.4
8.7
13.9
11.1
9.1
Entrenchment Ratio
9.2
11.2
15.1
1.8
1.3
1.2
>2.2
1.6
1.5
1.8
1.2
1.4
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
Wetted Perimeter ft
12.8
9.7
7.4
5.2
8.3
7.1
7.4
8.3
4.6
7.6
11.4
7.8
8.1
9.8
13.2
9.6
6.0
15.9
10.1
11.9
11.2
13.1
10.4
9.1
15.9
Hydraulic Radius ft
0.9
0.9
0.7
0.4
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.5
0.4
0.9
1.0
0.8
0.7
0.9
1.2
0.9
0.5
1.4
0.4
0.8
1.0
1.2
0.9
0.7
1.4
Substrate
Fine Sand
Fine Sand
Fine Sand
Fine Sand
Fine Sand
Fine Sand
Fine Sand
Fine Sand
Fine Sand
Fine Sand
Fine Sand
Fine Sand
Fine Sand
Fine Sand
Fine Sand
Pattern
Min
Max
Med
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
Min Max
Min
Max
Min Max
Min Max
Min
Max
Min Max
Min Max
Min Max
Min Max
Min Max
Min Max
Min
Max
Min Max
Channel Beltwidth ft
13.6
31.8
23.1
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
14 32
17
39
22 53
16 38
10
24
27 64
7 17
14 39
16 52
21 44
18 36
8
24
19 68
Radius of Curvature ft
11.0
27.6
17.6
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
11 28
13
34
18 46
13 33
8
21
22 55
10 31
7 28
15 44
12 29
15 45
13
19
23 38
Radius of Curvature Ratio
1.5
3.7
2.3
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
1.5 3.7
1.5
3.7
1.5 3.7
1.5 3.7
1.5
3.7
1.5 3.7
1.0 3.2
0.6 2.5
1.4 4.2
1.0 2.4
1.6 4.5
1.5
2.3
1.6 2.6
Meander Wavelength ft
34.9
68.3
54.5
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
35 69
43
84
58 113
42 82
26
51
70 137
17 38
13 53
31 81
23 53
33 65
23
33
41 77
Meander Width Ratio
1.8
4.2
3.1
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
1.8 4.2
1.8
4.2
1.8 4.2
1.8 4.2
1.8
4.2
1.8 4.2
0.7 1.8
1.2 3.5
1.5 5.0
1.7 3.7
1.9 3.7
0.9
2.8
1.3 4.6
Profile
Shallow Len ft
3.1
30.7
12.6
---
---
---
--
---
---
---
---
---
3 31
4
38
5 51
4 37
2
23
6 61
8 12
7 22
7 20
5 45
6 25
6
23
6 35
Run Len ft
2.2
33.2
11.3
--
---
---
---
--
---
---
---
---
2 34
3
41
4 55
3 40
2
25
4 66
8 9
5 16
8 25
5 56
5 20
4
15
8 27
Pool Length ft
4.2
9.5
5.8
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
4 10
5
12
7 16
5 11
3
7
8 19
8 10
14 29
10 28
13 30
13 25
12
15
8 23
Pool -to-Pool Spacing ft
17.5
59.8 1
36.3
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
18 60
22
74
29 99
21 72
13
45
35 120
15 42
36 60
18 63
25 100 1
17 56
43
75
15 104
Additional Reach Parameters
Valley Length ft
274
382
1678
3301
908
745
90
1620
383
1172
1682
1524
1648
1693
175
1530
376
1682
1524
1648
1693
175
1530
Channel Length 11
309
382
1678
3301
908
745
90
1620
383
1172
1828
1738
1890
1849
202
1790
398
1914
1796
1790
1979
173
1926
Sinuosity
1.1
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.09
1.14
1.15
1.09
1.15
1.17
1.1
1.14
1.18
1.09
1.17
0.99
1.26
Water Surface Slope ft/ft
0.004
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
Channel Slope ft/ft
0.003
0.0043
0.0021
0.0016
0.0023
0.0022
0.0034
0.0024
0.0015
0.002427
0.0017
0.0026
0.0005
0.0014
0.0049
0.0017
0.0037
0.0022
0.0038
0.001
0.003
0.008
0.0030
Ros en Classification
E5
G5c
F5
F5
C5
F5
G5c
G5c
G5c
G5c
E5
E5
E5
E5
E5
E5
E5
E5
E5
E5
E5
E5
E5
Habitat Index
Bankfull stage was estimated using NC Regional Curve equations and existing conditions data

* Annual measurements for monitoring years MY5 and later are based on fixed baseline cross sectional area. Earlier years annual measurements were based on the baseline bankfull elevation.
Appendix D. Table 11 - Monitoring Data - Dimensional Morphology Summary (Dimensional Parameters - Cross Sections)
Project Name/Number: Muddy Run II Mitigation Project/95354
Cross Section 1 (Riffle)
Cross Section 2 (Pool)
Cross Section 3 (Pool)
Cross Section 4 (Riffle)
Cross Section 5 (Run)
MY5+ based on fixed baseline cross sectional area*
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7
MY+
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7
MY+ Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7
MY+
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+ Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7
MY+
Record elevation (datum) used 53.7
53.7
53.7
53.7
53.9
54.1
54.1
54.1
54.1
54.2
53.3
53.3
53.3
53.3
53.5
53.3
53.3
53.3
53.3
53.4
58.0
58.0
58.0
58.0
58.0
Bankfull Width (ft) 6.3
4.9
5.2
5.1
8.4
6.4
5.6
6.0
6.7
7.8
6.3
6.2
5.7
5.9
17.0
6.9
6.7
6.4
7.3
14.7
14.8
14.5
14.2
14.3
14.4
Floodprone Width (ft) 30.0
30.0
30.0
30.0
31.6
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
36.3
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
46.9
35.0
35.0
35.0
35.0
34.8
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
43.9
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.3
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.7
0.6
0.8
0.6
0.6
0.5
0.3
0.6
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.3
1.1
1.0
1.0
1.1
1.1
Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 0.8
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.9
1.3
1.1
1.2
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.2
1.1
1.0
1.2
1.1
1.1
0.9
0.9
1.0
2.0
1.8
1.9
2.0
1.9
Low Bank Height (ft) -
-
-
-
0.9
-
-
-
-
N/A
-
-
-
-
N/A
-
-
-
-
1.0
-
-
-
-
2.1
Bankf ill Cross Sectional Area (ft) 2.7
2.0
2.1
2.0
2.7
4.7
3.5
3.8
4.5
4.7
5.0
4.0
3.3
3.1
5.0
4.6
4.3
3.2
3.3
4.6
15.6
14.5
14.7
15.4
15.6
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio 14.4
12.2
13.2
13.0
26.0
8.8
8.7
9.4
10.1
12.9
7.9
9.6
9.8
11.2
57.2
10.7
10.4
12.6
16.1
46.8
14.0
13.7
13.8
13.2
13.3
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio >2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>3.8
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
N/A
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
N/A
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.4
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>3.1
Bankf ill Bank Height Ratiol 1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0 1
1.0 1
1
1.0
1 1.0
1.0
1.0
N/A
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
N/A
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0 1
1 1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.1
Cross Section 6 (Run)
Cross Section 7 (Riffle)
Cross Section 8 (Pool)
Cross Section 9 (Riffle)
Cross Section 10 (Pool)
MY5+ based on fixed baseline cross sectional area* =
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7
MY+
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7
MY+ Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7
MY+
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+ Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7
MY+
Record elevation (datum) used 56.6
56.6
56.6
56.6
56.7
55.8
55.8
55.8
55.8
56.0
55.5
55.5
55.5
55.5
55.8
55.3
55.3
55.3
55.3
55.4
54.8
54.8
54.8
54.8
55.0
Bankfull Width (ft) 13.5
13.4
12.7
13.1
14.3
8.4
7.6
7.2
7.5
7.9
9.4
8.8
8.8
8.6
10.6
9.8
9.5
9.2
9.7
14.3
7.0
6.7
6.7
6.7
12.4
Floodprone Width (ft) 50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 0.9
0.9
0.8
0.8
0.9
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.8
1.0
0.9
0.8
0.8
0.9
1.2
1.1
1.0
1.0
0.8
1.1
1.1
0.9
0.9
0.6
Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 1.6
1.5
1.4
1.3
1.5
1.3
1.2
1.1
1.1
1.2
1.6
1.4
1.3
1.3
1.7
1.9
1.8
1.6
1.7
1.8
1.9
1.8
1.7
1.6
1.8
Low Bank Height (ft) -
-
-
-
1.5
-
-
-
-
1.2
-
-
-
-
N/A
-
-
-
-
1.6
-
-
-
-
N/A
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area L
12.7
11.5
10.2
10.3
12.7
6.1
5.6
4.5
4.9
6.1
9.7
7.8
6.7
7.1
9.7
11.3
10.2
9.0
9.5
11.3
8.0
7.1
6.2
5.9
8.0
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio 14.5
15.7
15.7
16.7
16.0
11.5
10.2
11.4
11.7
10.3
9.0
10.0
11.7
10.5
11.7
8.5
8.8
9.5
9.9
18.1
6.1
6.3
7.3
7.7
19.2
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio >2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>3.5
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>6.3
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
N/A
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>3.5
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
N/A
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1 1.0
1.0 1
1.0
1.0
1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0 1
N/A
1.0
1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0
0.9
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
N/A
Cross Section 11 (Riffle)
Cross Section 12 (Pool)
Cross Section 13 (Riffle)
Cross Section 14 (Pool)
Cross Section 15 (Run)
MY5+ based on fixed baseline cross sectional area*
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7
MY+
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7
MY+ Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7
MY+
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+ Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7
MY+
Record elevation (datum) used 53.9
53.9
53.9
53.9
54.0
54.3
54.3
54.3
54.3
54.6
53.3
53.3
53.3
53.3
53.5
52.8
52.8
52.8
52.8
53.0
53.0
53.0
53.0
53.0
53.1
Bankfull Width (ft) 9.0
7.2
7.7
8.0
11.0
11.3
10.2
10.4
10.4
11.8
12.1
10.2
10.2
9.0
27.0
9.0
7.8
10.1
8.5
11.0
11.8
11.9
10.8
11.5
11.8
Floodprone Width (ft) 50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 0.7
0.8
0.6
0.7
0.6
1.4
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.3
0.7
0.8
0.6
0.7
0.3
1.0
0.9
0.7
0.8
0.8
1.2
1.1
1.2
1.1
1.2
Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 1.3
1.2
1.1
1.2
1.3
2.6
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.6
1.5
1.5
1.3
1.2
1.5
2.0
1.8
1.5
1.5
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.7
1.7
1.9
Low Bank Height (ft) -
-
-
-
1.1
-
-
-
-
N/A
-
-
-
-
1.4
-
-
-
-
N/A
-
-
-
-
1.9
Bankf ill Cross Sectional Area (ft) 6.7
5.6
5.0
5.5
6.7
15.5
12.7
12.0
13.0
15.5
8.7
8.2
6.1
6.1
8.7
8.9
7.8
6.8
6.8
8.9
13.7
12.9
12.4
12.4
13.7
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio 12.2
9.4
12.0
11.6
18.1
8.3
8.2
9.0
8.4
9.0
17.0
12.8
17.2
13.2
84.1
9.2
9.9
15.0
10.6
13.6
10.2
10.9
9.3
10.7
10.1
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio >2.2
>2.2
2.2
>2.2
>4.0
>2.2
>2.2>2.2
>2.2
N/A
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>1.8
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
N/A
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>4.3
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.9
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
N/A
1.0
1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0 1
0.9
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0 1
N/A
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Cross Section 16 (Run)
Cross Section 17 (Run)
Cross Section 18 (Pool)
Cross Section 19 (Run)
Cross Section 20 (Riffle)
MY5+ based on fixed baseline cross sectional area*
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7
MY+
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7
MY+ Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7
MY+
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+ Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7
MY+
Record elevation (datum) used 52.3
52.3
52.3
52.3
52.3
50.8
50.8
50.8
50.8
51.1
50.1
50.1
50.1
50.1
50.4
50.5
50.5
50.5
50.5
50.8
50.5
50.5
50.5
50.5
50.4
Bankfull Width (ft) 11.3
11.6
12.2
11.6
13.0
10.5
10.5
10.0
10.1
11.8
10.6
9.9
10.7
9.9
16.1
11.4
11.1
11.3
11.3
14.9
9.3
8.9
11.2
9.0
20.5
Floodprone Width (ft) 50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
40.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 0.9
0.9
0.8
0.9
0.8
1.2
1.2
1.0
1.0
1.1
1.3
1.1
0.9
1.0
0.9
1.3
1.0
0.9
0.9
1.0
1.2
1.2
1.1
1.2
0.5
Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 1.9
1.7
1.6
1.7
1.9
1.8
2.0
1.5
1.7
1.8
2.0
1.8
1.4
1.5
1.8
2.0
1.7
1.6
1.7
1.8
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.3
2.3
Low Bank Height (ft) -
-
-
-
1.5
-
-
-
-
1.7
-
-
-
-
N/A
-
-
-
-
1.8
-
-
-
-
2.3
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area L
9.8
9.9
9.4
9.9
9.8
12.4
12.7
10.0
10.6
12.4
14.2
11.3
9.6
10.0
14.2
14.2
11.1
10.3
10.4
14.2
11.3
10.3
11.2
11.1
11.3
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio 13.0
13.6
15.8
13.6
17.3
8.9
8.6
10.0
9.6
11.2
7.9
8.7
12.1
9.8
18.3
9.1
11.1
12.5
12.2
15.6
7.7
7.7
8.8
7.3
37.4
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio >2.2
1 >2.2
1 >2.2
>2.2
>3.9
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>4.3
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
N/A
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>3.3
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.4
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1.0
1.0
1. 0
1 1. 1
0.8 1
1
1 1.0
1 1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
N/A
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
* Annual measurements for monitoring years MY5 and later are based on fixed baseline cross sectional area. Earlier years annual measurements were based on the baseline bankfull elevation.

* Annual measurements for monitoring years MY5 and later are based on fixed baseline cross sectional area. Earlier years annual measurements were based on the baseline bankfull elevation.
Appendix D. Table 11 - Monitoring Data - Dimensional Morphology Summary (Dimensional Parameters - Cross Sections)
Project Name/Number: Muddy Run II Mitigation Project/95354
Cross Section 21 (Pool)
Cross Section 22 (Pool)
Cross Section 23 (Riffle)
Cross Section 24 (Riffle)
Cross Section 25 (Pool)
MY5+ based on fixed baseline cross sectional area*
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+ Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7
MY+ Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7
MY+
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7
MY+
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used 50.3
50.3
50.3
50.3
50.2
49.0
49.0
49.0
49.0
49.1
49.3
49.3
49.3
49.3
49.4
48.8
48.8
48.8
48.8
49.0
48.7
48.7
48.7
48.7
48.8
Bankfull Width (ft) 11.7
9.1
10.0
9.6
8.3
9.3
9.3
9.9
9.0
9.2
7.8
7.7
7.7
7.3
8.6
11.7
11.8
11.3
11.9
24.6
14.1
13.9
13.8
14.7
15.7
Floodprone Width (ft) 50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 0.7
0.9
0.8
0.8
1.0
1.3
1.6
1.2
1.2
1.3
1.1
1.0
0.9
0.9
1.0
1.5
1.4
1.2
1.2
0.7
1.8
1.7
1.7
1.5
1.6
Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 1.7
1.7
1.9
2.1
2.2
2.2
2.4
2.1
1.8
2.0
1.7
1.8
1.6
1.8
2.1
2.1
2.0
1.8
1.7
2.1
3.1
2.8
2.6
2.7
2.8
Low Bank Height (ft) -
-
-
-
N/A
-
-
-
-
N/A
-
-
-
-
2.2
-
-
-
-
1.9
-
-
-
-
N/A
Bankf ill Cross Sectional Area (ft) 8.6
8.1
7.9
8.1
8.6
12.3
14.5
12.1
10.9
12.3
8.3
7.9
6.9
6.7
8.3
18.0
17.1
13.7
14.6
18.0
25.0
24.3
22.9
22.6
25.0
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio 16.0
10.2
12.8
11.4
8.1
7.0
6.0
8.0
7.4
6.9
7.4
7.5
8.6
8.0
8.9
7.6
8.2
9.3
9.7
33.6
7.9
8.0
8.3
9.6
9.8
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio >2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
N/A
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
N/A
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>5.8
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.0
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
N/A
Bankf ill Bank Height Ratio 1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
N/A
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
N/A
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.1 1
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.9 1
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
N/A
Cross Section 26 (Pool)
Cross Section 27 (Run)
Cross Section 28 (Pool)
Cross Section 29 (Run)
Cross Section 30 (Pool)
MY5+ based on fixed baseline cross sectional area--wBase
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+ Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7
MY+ Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7
MY+
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7
MY+
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used 48.6
48.6
48.6
48.6
48.8
48.8
48.8
48.8
48.8
48.9
48.4
48.4
48.4
48.4
48.5
48.3
48.3
48.3
48.3
48.4
47.4
47.4
47.4
47.4
47.5
Bankfull Width (ft) 14.9
15.7
15.0
15.1
16.0
12.7
12.4
13.7
13.3
16.3
13.4
13.3
14.0
13.9
21.6
13.4
13.7
13.9
13.7
15.6
12.9
13.1
14.0
13.2
17.3
Floodprone Width (ft) 50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 1.7
1.6
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.4
1.4
1.2
1.8
1.7
1.6
1.6
1.1
1.5
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.3
1.4
1.3
1.2
1.2
1.1
Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 3.2
3.1
2.6
2.6
2.9
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.2
2.4
2.9
2.9
2.7
2.5
2.7
2.1
2.3
2.0
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.2
2.0
2.1
2.3
Low Bank Height (ft) -
-
-
-
N/A
-
-
-
-
2.3
-
-
-
-
N/A
-
-
-
-
2.2
-
-
-
-
N/A
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area L
24.9
25.7
23.2
21.9
24.9
19.4
18.9
19.3
19.1
19.4
24.6
23.2
22.2
21.8
24.6
19.8
19.7
18.9
18.7
19.8
18.4
17.4
16.6
16.3
18.4
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio 8.9
9.6
9.7
10.3
10.4
8.3
8.1
9.7
9.2
13.6
7.3
7.6
8.8
8.9
19.1
9.1
9.5
10.3
10.1
12.2
9.1
9.8
11.9
10.7
16.3
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio >2.2
1 >2.2
1 >2.2
1 >2.2 1
N/A
>2.2
1 >2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>3.1
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
N/A
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>3.3
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
N/A
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1.0
1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0 1
N/A
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.9
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
N/A
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
N/A
Cross Section 31 (Run)
Cross Section 32 (Run)
Cross Section 33 (Pool)
Cross Section 34 (Pool)
Cross Section 35 (Run)
MY5+ based on fixed baseline cross sectional area*
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+ Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7
MY+ Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7
MY+
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7
MY+
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used 47.5
47.5
47.5
47.5
47.6
47.7
47.7
47.7
47.7
47.8
47.7
47.7
47.7
47.7
47.9
47.2
47.2
47.2
47.2
47.4
46.9
46.9
46.9
46.9
47.0
Bankfull Width (ft) 13.7
14.2
14.3
14.7
16.6
10.5
10.7
11.3
11.2
11.3
11.5
12.0
13.5
13.0
17.2
10.4
10.5
9.9
10.1
16.2
9.5
8.8
9.0
9.6
10.9
Floodprone Width (ft) 50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 1.2
1.0
1.0
0.9
0.9
1.3
1.3
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.7
1.6
1.3
1.4
1.1
2.1
1.9
1.8
1.8
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.2
1.2
1.1
Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 2.1
1.9
1.7
1.7
1.9
2.2
2.0
2.1
2.0
2.1
3.1
2.9
2.6
2.6
2.8
3.1
3.0
2.8
2.8
3.0
2.0
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
Low Bank Height (ft) -
-
-
-
1.7
-
-
-
-
2.1
-
-
-
-
N/A
-
-
-
-
N/A
-
-
-
-
2.1
Bankf ill Cross Sectional Area (ft) 15.8
14.6
13.8
13.7
15.8
13.8
13.4
13.5
13.4
13.8
19.5
19.0
17.3
17.8
19.5
21.4
20.5
18.2
18.6
21.4
12.1
11.7
11.1
11.4
12.1
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio 11.9
13.8
14.8
15.9
17.5
8.0
8.5
9.5
9.3
9.2
6.8
7.6
10.5
9.5
15.1
5.0
5.4
5.4
5.5
12.3
7.4
6.7
7.4
8.0
9.8
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio >2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>3
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
AA>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
N/A
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
N/A
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>4.6
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.9
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.01
1.0
1.0
N/A
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
N/A
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.1
Cross Section 36 (Pool)
Cross Section 37 (Run)
Cross Section 38 (Pool)
Cross Section 39 (Run)
Cross Section 40 (Pool)
MY5+ based on fixed baseline cross sectional area*
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+ Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7
MY+ Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7
MY+
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7
MY+
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used 45.6
45.6
45.6
45.6
45.8
45.5
45.5
45.5
45.5
45.6
45.4
45.4
45.4
45.4
45.5
45.2
45.2
45.2
45.2
45.2
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.3
Bankfull Width (ft) 9.3
9.0
8.6
8.4
9.7
12.4
11.9
9.7
9.7
12.1
10.0
8.8
9.6
10.2
10.0
8.2
7.2
8.2
8.4
8.9
10.3
10.3
9.7
10.6
24.6
Floodprone Width (ft) 50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
45.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 0.9
0.9
0.8
0.8
0.9
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.3
1.1
1.0
0.9
1.0
0.9
0.9
0.8
0.8
0.9
1.4
1.1
1.0
0.9
0.6
Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 1.7
1.5
1.3
1.5
1.6
1.0
1.1
1.1
1.2
1.2
2.0
1.8
1.8
1.9
1.8
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.6
1.6
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.3
2.1
Low Bank Height (ft) -
-
-
-
N/A
-
-
-
-
1.1
-
-
-
-
N/A
-
-
-
-
1.5
-
-
-
-
N/A
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area L
8.7
8.1
6.7
6.9
8.7
6.1
5.8
4.8
4.6
6.1
12.6
9.2
9.6
9.1
10.5
7.6
6.5
6.9
6.7
7.6
14.3
11.7
9.5
9.3
14.3
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio 9.9
10.1
11.0
10.3
10.9
25.4
24.4
19.4
20.5
24.3
7.9
8.4
9.7
11.4
9.6
8.7
7.9
9.7
10.4
10.5
7.4
9.0
9.9
12.1
42.2
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio >2.2
1 >2.2
1 >2.2
1 >2.2 1
N/A I
I >2.2
1 >2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>4.1
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
N/A
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>5.6
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
N/A
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
N/A
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.9
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
N/A
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.9
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0 1
N/A
* Annual measurements for monitoring years MY5 and later are based on fixed baseline cross sectional area. Earlier years annual measurements were based on the baseline bankfull elevation.

* Annual measurements for monitoring years MY5 and later are based on fixed baseline cross sectional area. Earlier years annual measurements were based on the baseline bankfull elevation.
Appendix D. Table 11 - Monitoring Data - Dimensional Morphology Summary (Dimensional Parameters - Cross Sections)
Project Name/Number: Muddy Run II Mitigation Project/95354
Cross Section 41 (Run)
Cross Section 42 (Run)
Cross Section 43 (Run)
Cross Section 44 (Run)
Cross Section 45 (Run)
MY5+ based on fixed baseline cross sectional area*
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7
MY+
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7
MY+ Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7
MY+
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7 MY+
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used 45.1
45.1
45.1
45.1
45.2
44.0
44.0
44.0
44.0
44.5
41.3
41.3
41.3
41.3
42.2
41.5
41.5
41.5
41.5
41.6
41.4
41.4
41.4
41.4
41.6
Bankfull Width (ft) 8.9
8.5
8.6
9.0
9.9
23.5
24.1
28.1
21.9
34.3
9.4
9.2
10.6
8.3
14.4
13.723
13.5
13.2
13.9
14.2
11.8
11.5
11.2
10.8
12.4
Floodprone Width (ft) 50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
29.0
29.0
15.0
15.0
28.6
22.0
22.0
20.0
20.0
23.0
35.3
35.3
30.0
30.0
37.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 1.1
1.1
1.0
1 0.9 1
1.0
1.7
1.5
1.4
1 1.4 1
1.2
1.4
0.7
0.4
0.3
0.9
1.4
1.3
1.2
1.2 1
1.4
1.2
1.2
1 1.0
1.0
1.2
Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 1.9
1.8
1.8
1.7
1.9
3.8
3.7
3.6
2.9
3.3
2.2
0.9
0.6
0.4
1.3
2.0
2.0
1.7
1.7
2.0
1.9
2.0
1.7
1.4
1.7
Low Bank Height (ft) -
-
-
-
1.9
-
-
-
-
2.7
-
-
-
-
1.5
-
-
-
-
3.4
-
-
-
-
2.5
Bankf ill Cross Sectional Area (ftp) 10.2
9.0
8.8
8.6
10.2
39.7
35.7
38.3
31.0
39.7
13.2
6.5
4.7
2.5
13.2
19.6
18.0
15.2
16.8
19.6
14.6
13.8
11.3
10.4
14.6
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio 7.8
8.0
8.3
9.5
9.5
13.9
16.2
20.6
15.4
29.6
6.7
13.2
23.9
28.0
15.6
9.6
10.1
11.0
11.4
10.3
9.5
9.6
11.1
11.2
10.5
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio >2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>5.1
2.1
2.1
1.8
>2.2
>1.5
>2.2
>2.2
1.4
>2.2
>2
1.6
1.6
1.5
>2.2
>1.6
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>3.0
Bankfill Bank Height Ratio 1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.7
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.8
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.1
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.7
1.0
1.0
1 1.0
1.0
1.5
Cross Section 46 (Run)
Cross Section 47 (Pool)
Cross Section 48 (Riffle)
Cross Section 49 (Pool)
Cross Section 50 (Pool)
MY5+ based on fixed baseline cross sectional area*
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7
MY+
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7
MY+ Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7
MY+
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7 MY+
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used 49.3
49.3
49.3
49.3
49.7
48.2
48.2
48.2
48.2
48.6
41.0
41.0
41.0
41.0
41.1
40.5
40.5
40.5
40.5
40.3
40.0
40.0
40.0
40.0
40.1
Bankfull Width (ft) 8.4
7.2
7.8
6.0
11.6
6.7
6.3
8.6
5.7
16.4
15.1
15.0
15.1
15.3
17.9
16.6
17.0
19.3
17.6
15.4
18.5
17.7
21.6
17.8
21.6
Floodprone Width (ft) 42.5
42.5
42.5
42.5
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
38.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 0.8
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.5
0.9
0.8
0.5
0.5
1.2
1.7
1.7
1.6
1.5
1.4
1.7
1.7
1.4
1.6
1.8
1.8
1.7
1.5
1.7
1.5
Bankfull Maas Depth (ft) 1.5
1.2
1.1
1.1
1.5
1.8
1.5
0.9
0.9
1.2
2.6
2.7
2.6
2.6
2.8
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.3
3.2
3.2
3.1
3.2
3.1
3.2
Low Bank Height (ft) -
-
-
-
1.2
-
-
-
-
N/A
-
-
-
-
2.3
-
-
-
-
N/A
-
-
-
-
N/A
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area L
6.3
5.1
4.7
3.4
6.3
6.0
5.3
4.2
2.9
6.0
25.3
24.8
24.0
23.4
25.3
27.4
28.5
27.3
28.3
27.4
32.9
30.7
31.7
30.2
32.9
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio 11.1
10.2
12.9
10.7
21.1
7.3
7.4
17.7
11.3
44.8
9.0
9.1
9.5
10.0
12.7
10.0
10.2
13.7
11.0
8.6
10.4
10.2
14.7
10.6
14.2
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio >2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>4.3
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
N/A
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.8
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
N/A
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
N/A
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.8
1.0
1.0
1 1.0
1.0 1
N/A
1.0
1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0 1
0.8
1.0
1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0
N/A
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
N/A
Cross Section 51 (Riffle)
Cross Section 52 (Run)
Cross Section 53 (Pool)
Cross Section 54 (Pool)
Cross Section 55 (Riffle)
MY5+ based on fixed baseline cross sectional area*
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7
MY+
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7
MY+ Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7
MY+
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7 MY+
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used 40.0
40.0
40.0
40.0
40.1
39.8
39.8
39.8
37.0
36.8
39.7
39.7
39.7
36.9
36.9
38.8
38.8
38.8
35.9
34.4
38.0
38.0
38.0
35.6
35.7
Bankfull Width (ft) 16.2
16.1
16.3
15.9
22.2
17.7
17.8
19.3
10.6
8.1
17.4
17.9
18.1
8.9
7.7
15.7
16.7
20.3
11.5
7.0
9.7
14.8
20.8
10.2
12.7
Floodprone Width (ft) 50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
45.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
34.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
43.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 1.5
1.4
1.5
1.4
1.1
1.8
2.1
2.7
1.4
1.8
1.9
2.1
2.2
1.5
1.8
1.7
2.0
2.2
1.0
1.7
1.4
2.2
2.1
1.0
0.8
Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 2.4
2.3
2.6
2.7
2.6
3.1
4.5
5.9
2.1
2.3
3.5
3.8
4.1
3.4
3.1
2.9
4.0
4.4
1.7
2.3
2.2
3.0
3.3
1.7
1.8
Low Bank Height (ft) -
-
-
-
2.6
-
-
-
-
2.5
-
-
-
-
N/A
-
-
-
-
N/A
-
-
-
-
1.7
Bankf ill Cross Sectional Area (ft) 24.7
23.2
23.7
22.7
24.7
31.8
36.9
52.3
14.6
14.6
33.8
37.1
39.0
13.6
13.6
26.1
32.7
45.2
11.7
11.7
13.6
33.3
44.4
10.5
10.5
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio 10.6
11.2
11.2
11.1
20.0
9.9
8.6
7.1
7.7
4.5
9.0
8.6
8.4
5.8
4.3
9.5
8.5
9.1
11.3
4.2
7.0
6.6
9.7
9.9
15.4
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio >2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.3
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>6.1
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
N/A
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
N/A
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>3.4
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.1
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
N/A
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
N/A
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.9
Base
MY5+ based on fixed baseline cross sectional area*
Record elevation (datum) used 37.3
Bankfull Width (ft) 17.6
Floodprone Width (ft) 50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 2.6
Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 3.7
Low Bank Height (ft) -
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area L 45.3
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio 6.9
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio >2.2
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1.0
MYl
37.3
17.0
50.0
2.2
3.2
-
38.0
7.6
1 >2.2
1.0
Cross Section 56 (Run)
MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7
37.3 37.3 37.7
17.5 18.4 20.2
50.0 50.0 50.0
2.2 2.1 2.2
3.3 3.4 4.0
- - 3.7
37.9 38.1 45.3
8.0 8.8 9.0
1 >2.2 1 >2.2 1 >2.5 1
1.0 1.0 0.9
MY+
1
Base
35.7
17.0
37.5
1.8
2.6
-
30.7
9.4
2.2
1.0
MYl
35.7
16.8
37.5
1.3
2.1
-
22.4
12.5
1 2.2>2.2
1.0
Cross Section 57 (Run)
MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7
35.7 35.7 36.1
16.0 16.4 20.6
37.5 37.5 50.0
1.4 1.5 1.5
2.1 2.5 3.5
- - 3.1
22.7 24.8 30.7
11.2 10.9 13.9
>2.2 >2.4
1.0 1 1.0 1 0.9 1
MY+ Base
41.0
14.2
50.0
2.4
3.4
-
33.9
6.0
>2.2
1 1 1.0
MYl
41.0
13.7
50.0
2.3
3.3
-
31.7
6.0
>2.2
1 1.0
Cross Section 58 (Run)
MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7
41.0 41.0 41.1
16.9 14.0 15.4
50.0 50.0 50.0
1.9 2.3 2.2
3.3 3.3 3.4
- - 3.2
32.3 32.6 33.9
8.9 6.0 7.0
>2.2 >2.2 >3.2
1 1.0 1 1.0 0.9
MY+
Base
39.5
13.5
50.0
1.1
2.2
-
15.2
11.9
>2.2
1.0
MYl
39.5
12.5
50.0
0.9
1.8
-
11.3
13.8
>2.2
1.0
Cross Section 59 (Run)
MY2 MY3 MY5
39.5 39.5 39.8
11.9 11.9 14.9
50.0 50.0 50.0
0.9 0.8 1.0
1.8 1.6 2.0
- - 2.0
11.1 9.9 15.2
12.7 14.2 14.6
>2.2 >2.2 >3.4
1.0 1.0 1.0
MY7 MY+
* Annual measurements for monitoring years MY5 and later are based on fixed baseline cross sectional area. Earlier years annual measurements were based on the baseline bankfull elevation.

Table 12.Muddy Run II Bank Pin Array Summary
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 5 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 5
Cross Section Location Position Reading Reading Reading Reading Cross Section Location Position Reading Reading Readina Reading
Notes:
US - Upstream from cross section
DS - Downstream from cross section
* Did not replace after Reach 5A repair work in 2016.
XS 30 @ Sta.
US
To
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
XS 2 @ Sta. 1+35
0.0
Bottom
o.0
o.0
0.0
0.0
Reach 1
DS
Top
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Bottom
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
DS
To
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
XS 3 @ Sta. 3+45
XS 36 @ Sta.
Bottom
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Reach 1
DS
Top
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Bottom
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
To
DS
Top
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
XS 8 @ Sta. 8+55
Bottom
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Reach 2DS
0.0
To
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Bottom
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.2
DS
To
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
XS 10 @ Sta. 11+70
To
Bottom
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Reach 2DS
Reach 4
To
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
DS
Bottom 0.0 0.0 0.0
Bottom
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
DS
Top
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
XS 12 @ Sta. 16+40
0.6
Bottom
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Reach 2
DS
Top
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
DS Bottom 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0
Bottom
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
DS
To
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
XS 18 @ Sta. 8+40
0.6 ft
Bottom
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Reach 3A
DS
To
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
XS 54 @ Sta.
Bottom
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Didn't Re lace`
DS
To
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
XS 21 @ Sta. 11+20
Didn't Re lace*
Bottom
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Reach 3A
DS
To
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Bottom
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
DS
To
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
XS 25 @ Sta. 19+80
Bottom
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Reach 3A
DS
To
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Bottom
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
DS
To
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
XS 26 @ Sta. 25+90
Bottom
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Reach 3A
DS
To
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Bottom
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
DS
To
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
XS 28 @ Sta. 31+40
Bottom
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Reach 3A
DS
To
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Bottom
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Notes:
US - Upstream from cross section
DS - Downstream from cross section
* Did not replace after Reach 5A repair work in 2016.
XS 30 @ Sta.
Top
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
DS Bottom 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0
35+60 Reach 3A
Top
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
DS
Bottom 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0
XS 33 @ Sta.
To
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
DS Bottom 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0
40+90 Reach 3B
Top
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
DS
Bottom 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0
XS 36 @ Sta.
Top
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
DS Bottom 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0
48+90 Reach 3B
Top
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
DS
Bottom 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0
XS 38 @ Sta.
To
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
DS Bottom 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0
52+10 Reach 3B
Top
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
DS
Bottom 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0
XS 40 @ Sta.
Top
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
DS Bottom 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0
54+15 Reach 3B
Top
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
DS
Bottom 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0
XS 47 @ Sta. 1+g0
To
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
DS Bottom 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0
Reach 4
Top
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
DS
Bottom 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0
XS 49 @ Sta. 2+40
To
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
DS Bottom 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0
Reach 5A
Top
0.6
0.0
0.0
0.0
DS
Bottom 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0
XS 50 @ Sta. 8+20
Top
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
DS Bottom 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0
Reach 5A
To
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
DS
Bottom 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0
XS 53 @ Sta.
To
0.0
0.6 ft
0.0
0.0
DS Bottom 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0
13+90 Reach 5A
To
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
DS
Bottom 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0
XS 54 @ Sta.
To
0.0
missin
Didn't Re lace*
Didn't Re lace`
DS Bottom 0.0 missin Didn't Re lace*
Didn't Re lace*
17+35 Reach 5A
To
0.0
missin
Didn't Re lace*
Didn't Re lace`
DS
Bottom 1.0 missin Didn't Replace*
Didn't Re lace*

Upstream
Downstream
Muddy Run II Reach 1 Cross Section 1 - Riffle
58
Cross Section 1 Riffle
MY5+based on fixed baseline cross
sectional area"
Base
MYl
57
MY3
MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
53.7
53.7
53.7
53.7
53.9
Bankfull Width ft
56
w
c
° 55
4.9
5.2
5.1
8.4
Floodprone Width ft
30.0
30.0
30.0
30.0
31.6
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.3
Bankfull Max Depth ft
0.8
0.7
_m
LU 54
0.7
0.9
Low Bank Hei ht h
Ode -
0.9
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft)
53
2.0
2.1
2.0
2.7
Bankfull Wid"epth Ratio
14.4
12.2
13.2
13.0
26.0
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
12.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>3.8
Bankfull Bank Heigh- --o
1.0
1.0
52
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Baseline Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 5 - - - - Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area
1 1.0
Cross Section 1 Riffle
MY5+based on fixed baseline cross
sectional area"
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
53.7
53.7
53.7
53.7
53.9
Bankfull Width ft
6.3
4.9
5.2
5.1
8.4
Floodprone Width ft
30.0
30.0
30.0
30.0
31.6
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.3
Bankfull Max Depth ft
0.8
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.9
Low Bank Hei ht h
0.9
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft)
2.7
2.0
2.1
2.0
2.7
Bankfull Wid"epth Ratio
14.4
12.2
13.2
13.0
26.0
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
12.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>3.8
Bankfull Bank Heigh- --o
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1 1.0

Upstream
Downstream
Muddy Run II Reach 1 Cross Section 2 - Pool
57
Cross Section 2 Pool
MY5+based on fixed baseline cross
sectional area* M
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
54.1
56
54.1
54.1
54.2
Bankfull Width (ft)
6.4
5.6
6.0
6.7
7.8
Floodprone Width (ft)
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
36.3
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.7
0.6
55
c
0
m 54
1.3
1.1
12
1.2
1.3
Low Bank Height (ft)
w
Bankfull Cmss Sectional A-(ft2)
4.7
1 3.5
1 3.8
1 4.5
1 4.7
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
8.8
8.7
9.4
53
12.9
Bankfull Fntrenchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
72.2
>2.2
N/A
Bankfull Bank Height Ratiol
1.0
1 1.0
52
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Baseline Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 5 - - - - Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area
1 N/A
Cross Section 2 Pool
MY5+based on fixed baseline cross
sectional area* M
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
54.1
54.1
54.1
54.1
54.2
Bankfull Width (ft)
6.4
5.6
6.0
6.7
7.8
Floodprone Width (ft)
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
36.3
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.7
0.6
Bankfull MaxDe th (ft)
1.3
1.1
12
1.2
1.3
Low Bank Height (ft)
N/A
Bankfull Cmss Sectional A-(ft2)
4.7
1 3.5
1 3.8
1 4.5
1 4.7
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
8.8
8.7
9.4
10.1
12.9
Bankfull Fntrenchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
72.2
>2.2
N/A
Bankfull Bank Height Ratiol
1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0
1
1 N/A

Upstream
Downstream
Muddy Run II Reach 1 Cross Section 3 - Pool
56
Cross Section 3(Pool
MY5+ based on fixed baseline cross
sectional area*
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
55
53.3
53.3
53.3
53.5
Bankfull Width (ft)
6.3
6.2
5.7
5.9
17.0
Floodprone Width (ft)
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
46.9
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
0.8
0.6
0.6
0.5
v 54
c
°
-----
----------------------------------
1.2
1.1
1.0
1.2
Low Bank Height (ft)
53
w
52
N/A
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft2)
5.0
1 4.0
1 3.3
1 3.1 1
5.0
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio7.9
9.6
9.8
11.2
57.2
Bankfull Fntmnchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
N/A
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
51
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Baseline - Year 1 - Year 2 Year 3 Year 5 - - - - Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area
1.0
N/A
Cross Section 3(Pool
MY5+ based on fixed baseline cross
sectional area*
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
53.3
53.3
53.3
53.3
53.5
Bankfull Width (ft)
6.3
6.2
5.7
5.9
17.0
Floodprone Width (ft)
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
46.9
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
0.8
0.6
0.6
0.5
0.3
Bankfull MaxDe th (ft)
1.4
1.2
1.1
1.0
1.2
Low Bank Height (ft)
N/A
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft2)
5.0
1 4.0
1 3.3
1 3.1 1
5.0
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio7.9
9.6
9.8
11.2
57.2
Bankfull Fntmnchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
N/A
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
N/A

Upstream
Downstream
Muddy Run II Reach 1 Cross Section 4 - Riffle
56
Cross Section 4 Riffle
MY5+based on fixed baseline cross
sectional area*
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
55.5
55
Record elevation (datum) used
53.3
53.3
53.3
53.3
53.4
Bankfull Width (ft)
6.9
6.7
6.4
7.3
14.7
Floodprone Width (ft)
35.0
54.5
c
°
35.0
35.0
34.8
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
0.6
0.6
54
0.5
0.3
Bankfull MaxDe th (ft)
1.1
1.1
0.9
w53.5
----- ------ -
---- --------
------------------------
-----
------ ------53
53
52.5
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft2)
4.6
1 4.3
1 3.2
1 3.3
1 4.6
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
10.7
10.4
12.6
16.1
46.8
Bankfull Fntmnchment Ratio
52
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Baseline Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 5 - - - - Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area
7
>22
7
Cross Section 4 Riffle
MY5+based on fixed baseline cross
sectional area*
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
53.3
53.3
53.3
53.3
53.4
Bankfull Width (ft)
6.9
6.7
6.4
7.3
14.7
Floodprone Width (ft)
35.0
35.0
35.0
35.0
34.8
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
0.6
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.3
Bankfull MaxDe th (ft)
1.1
1.1
0.9
0.9
1.0
Low Bank Height (ft)
1.0
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft2)
4.6
1 4.3
1 3.2
1 3.3
1 4.6
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
10.7
10.4
12.6
16.1
46.8
Bankfull Fntmnchment Ratio
>2.2
>22
7
>22
7
Bankfull Bank Height Ratiol
1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0

Upstream
Downstream
Muddy Run II Reach 2 Cross Section 5 - Run
62
61
Cross Section 5
un
MY5+ based on fixed baseline cross
sectional area*
F
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
60
58.0
58.0
58.0
58.0
Bankfull Width (ft)
14.8
14.5
14.2
14.3
14.4
v
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
Downstream
Muddy Run II Reach 2 Cross Section 5 - Run
62
61
Cross Section 5
un
MY5+ based on fixed baseline cross
sectional area*
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
60
58.0
58.0
58.0
58.0
Bankfull Width (ft)
14.8
14.5
14.2
14.3
14.4
v
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
43.9
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1.1
1.0
1.0
1.1
59
c
0
>
--
2.0
1.8
1.9
2.0
1.9
Low Bank Height (ft)
m 58
LU
2.1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Ama (ft2)1
15.6
1 14.5
1 14.7
1 15.4 1
15.6
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
14.0
13.7
57
13.2
13.3
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>3.1
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
56
1 1.0
1 1.0
1.1
55
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Baseline - Year 1 - Year 2 Year 3 Year 5 - - - - Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area
Cross Section 5
un
MY5+ based on fixed baseline cross
sectional area*
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
58.0
58.0
58.0
58.0
58.0
Bankfull Width (ft)
14.8
14.5
14.2
14.3
14.4
Floodprone Width (ft)
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
43.9
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1.1
1.0
1.0
1.1
1.1
Bankfull MaxDe th (ft)
2.0
1.8
1.9
2.0
1.9
Low Bank Height (ft)
2.1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Ama (ft2)1
15.6
1 14.5
1 14.7
1 15.4 1
15.6
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
14.0
13.7
13.8
13.2
13.3
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>3.1
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0
1.1

• >AC� 1 E N �
,k •.� y. 1�r�11a+vC�£y�'i' li'q, v �`�� f✓
14
�y8f
{{ p �
rte.
r -
Upstream
Downstream
Muddy Run II Reach 2 Cross Section 6 - Run
60
Cross Section 6
un
MY5+ bas ed on fixed bas eline eros s
sectional area*
Base
59
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
56.6
56.6
56.6
56.6
56.7
Bankfull Width (ft)
13.5
13.4
12.7
13.1
14.3
Floodprone Width (ft)
50.0
58
w
c
°
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
0.9
0.9
0.8
0.8
0.9
57
_m
w 56
-----------
1.5
1.4
1.3
--- -----
----
------
55
1.5
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft2)
12.7
1 11.5
1 10.2
1 10.3 1
12.7
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
14.5
15.7
16.7
16.0
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>3.5
54
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Baseline Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 5 ---- Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area
1 1.0
1 1.0
1.0
Cross Section 6
un
MY5+ bas ed on fixed bas eline eros s
sectional area*
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
56.6
56.6
56.6
56.6
56.7
Bankfull Width (ft)
13.5
13.4
12.7
13.1
14.3
Floodprone Width (ft)
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
0.9
0.9
0.8
0.8
0.9
Bankfull MaxDe th (ft)
1.6
1.5
1.4
1.3
1.5
Low Bank Height (ft)
1.5
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft2)
12.7
1 11.5
1 10.2
1 10.3 1
12.7
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
14.5
15.7
15.7
16.7
16.0
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>3.5
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1
1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0
1.0
1.0

Upstream
Downstream
58
Muddy Run II Reach 2 Cross Section 7 - Riffle
Cross Section 7
57.5
MY5+ based on fixed baseline cross
sectional area* MBase
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7 MY+
57
55.8
55.8
55.8
55.8
56.0
Bankfull Width (ft)
8.4
7.6
7.2
7.5
7.9
Floodprone Width (ft)
50.0
50.0
w
c
0
w
56.5
56
55.5Ir
----- ------
- ---
- ----- --- --
-----
------ ------
0.6
0.8
Bankfull MaxDe th (ft)
1.3
1.2
1.1
1.1
1.2
Low Bank Height (ft)
55
54.5
r
Bankfull Cross Sectional Ama(ft)6.1
5.6
4.5
4.9
6.1
Bankfull Width/De th Ratio
11.5
10.2
54
0 5
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
10.3
Baseline -
Year 1 - Year 2 Year 3 Year 5 - - - - Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>6.3
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
Cross Section 7
i1He
MY5+ based on fixed baseline cross
sectional area* MBase
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
55.8
55.8
55.8
55.8
56.0
Bankfull Width (ft)
8.4
7.6
7.2
7.5
7.9
Floodprone Width (ft)
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.8
Bankfull MaxDe th (ft)
1.3
1.2
1.1
1.1
1.2
Low Bank Height (ft)
1.2
Bankfull Cross Sectional Ama(ft)6.1
5.6
4.5
4.9
6.1
Bankfull Width/De th Ratio
11.5
10.2
11.4
11.7
10.3
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>6.3
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0

de
Nisj r,
•,1, iri: At s
3 � tr!►��ti � r ;var .�
,r
e
V c
�O.t}
Upstream
Downstream
Muddy Run II Reach 2 Cross Section 8 - Pool
58
57.5
Cross Section 8(Pool
57
MY5+ bas ed on fixed baseline cross
sectional area* MBase
56.5
MY2
MY3
v 56
c
°
-- - - - - - ----- - - - - -- ----- ------ ------
55.5
55.5
° 55
55.5
55.5
w
54.5
Bankfull Width (ft)
9.4
54
8.8
8.6
10.6
Floodprone Width (ft)
50.0
53.5
50.0
50.0
53
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Baseline - Year 1 - Year 2 Year 3 Year 5 - - - - Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area
1.0
0.9
0.8
Cross Section 8(Pool
MY5+ bas ed on fixed baseline cross
sectional area* MBase
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
55.5
55.5
55.5
55.5
55.8
Bankfull Width (ft)
9.4
8.8
8.8
8.6
10.6
Floodprone Width (ft)
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1.0
0.9
0.8
0.8
0.9
Bankfull MaxDe th (ft)
1.6
1.4
1.3
1.3
1.7
Low Bank Height (ft)
N/A
Bankfull Cross Sectional Ama (ft2)1
9.7
1 7.8
1 6.7
1 7.1 1
9.7
Bankfull Width/Depth n1io
9.0
10.0
11.7
10.5
11.7
Bankfull Fntmnchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
7
7
N/A
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1
1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0
N/A

Upstream
L _
I
Cross Section 9 Riffle
MY5+bas edon fixed baseline cross
sectional area*
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
55.3
55.3
55.3
55.3
55.4
Bankfull Width (ft)
9.8
9.5
9.2
• Y_
4
14.3
Downstream
Cross Section 9 Riffle
MY5+bas edon fixed baseline cross
sectional area*
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
55.3
55.3
55.3
55.3
55.4
Bankfull Width (ft)
9.8
9.5
9.2
9.7
14.3
Floodprone Width (ft)
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1.2
1.1
1.0
1.0
0.8
Bankfull Max De th(ft)
1.9
1_8
1.6
1.7
1.8
Low Bank Height (ft)
1.6
Bankfull Cmss Sectional Area(ft2)
11.3
10.2
9.0
9.5
11.3
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
8.5
8.8
9.5
9.9
18.1
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
12.2
>
>3.5
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.2.20
0.9

Upstream
Downstream
Muddy Run II Reach 2 Cross Section 10 - Pool
58
Cross Section 10 Pool
MY5+based on fixed baseline cross
sectional area*
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
54.8
54.8
57
54.8
55.0
Bankfull Width (ft)
7.0
6.7
6.7
6.7
12.4
Floodprone Width (ft)
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1.1
1.1
0.9
0.9
0.6
Bankfull Max De th(ft)
56
c
° 55
.p
LU 54
1_8
1.7
1.6
1.8
Low Bank Height (ft)
N/A
Bankfull Cmss Sectional Area(ft2)
53
1 7.1
1 6.2
1 5.9
1 8.0
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
6.1
6.3
7.3
7.7
19.2
Bankfull Fntmnchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
N/A
Bankfull Bank Height Ratiol
1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0
1 N/A
52
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Baseline Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 5 - - - - Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area
Cross Section 10 Pool
MY5+based on fixed baseline cross
sectional area*
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
54.8
54.8
54.8
54.8
55.0
Bankfull Width (ft)
7.0
6.7
6.7
6.7
12.4
Floodprone Width (ft)
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1.1
1.1
0.9
0.9
0.6
Bankfull Max De th(ft)
1.9
1_8
1.7
1.6
1.8
Low Bank Height (ft)
N/A
Bankfull Cmss Sectional Area(ft2)
8.0
1 7.1
1 6.2
1 5.9
1 8.0
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
6.1
6.3
7.3
7.7
19.2
Bankfull Fntmnchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
N/A
Bankfull Bank Height Ratiol
1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0
1 N/A

4
Upstream
Downstream
Muddy Run II Reach 2 Cross Section 11 - Riffle
56
Cross Section 11 Riffle
MY5+based on fixed baseline cross
sectional area*
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
53.9
53.9
55
53.9
54.0
Bankfull Width (ft)
9.0
7.2
7.7
8.0
11.0
Floodprone Width (ft)
50.0
50.0
c
° 54
LU
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
0.7
0.8
0.6
0.7
--
-
1.3
1.2
---
53
1.3
Low Bank Height (ft)
1.1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft2)
6.7
1 5.6
1 5.0
52
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Baseline Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 5 - - - - Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
12.2
9.4
Cross Section 11 Riffle
MY5+based on fixed baseline cross
sectional area*
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
53.9
53.9
53.9
53.9
54.0
Bankfull Width (ft)
9.0
7.2
7.7
8.0
11.0
Floodprone Width (ft)
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
0.7
0.8
0.6
0.7
0.6
Bankfull MaxDe th (ft)
1.3
1.2
1.1
1.2
1.3
Low Bank Height (ft)
1.1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft2)
6.7
1 5.6
1 5.0
1 5.5
1 6.7
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
12.2
9.4
12.0
11.6
18.1
Bankfull Fntrenchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
2.2
>2.2
>4.0
Bankfull Bank Height Ratiol
1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0
1 0.9

Upstream
Downstream
Muddy Run II Reach 2 Cross Section 12 - Pool
58
Cross Section 12 Pool
MY5+based on fixed baseline cross
sectional area*
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
54.3
57
56
54.3
54.3
54.6
Bankfull Width (ft)
11.3
10.2
10.4
10.4
11.8
55
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.4
1.2
1.2
1.2
--
Bankfull Max De th (ft)
2.6
---
-----
-----
----
--------------
----
54
54
LU
N/A
Bankfull Cmss Sectional Acca (ft)
15.5
12.7
12.0
13.0
15.5
53
8.3
8.2
9.0
8.4
9.0
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
52
N/A
Bankfull Bank Height Ratiol
1.0
L7
1 1.0
1 1.0
1 N/A
51
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Baseline Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 5 - - - - Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area
Cross Section 12 Pool
MY5+based on fixed baseline cross
sectional area*
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
54.3
54.3
54.3
54.3
54.6
Bankfull Width (ft)
11.3
10.2
10.4
10.4
11.8
Floodprone Width (ft)
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.4
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.3
Bankfull Max De th (ft)
2.6
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.6
Low Bank Height (ft)
N/A
Bankfull Cmss Sectional Acca (ft)
15.5
12.7
12.0
13.0
15.5
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
8.3
8.2
9.0
8.4
9.0
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
N/A
Bankfull Bank Height Ratiol
1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0
1 N/A

Upstream
Downstream
Muddy Run II Reach 2 Cross Section 13 - Riffle
56
55.5
55
Cross Section 13
iffie
MY5+ based on fixed baseline cross
sectional area* MBase
MYl
54.5
MY3
MY5 MY7 MY+
v 54
c
° 53.5
53
53.3
53.3
w
52.5
53.3
53.5
52
12.1
10.2
10.2
9.0
27.0
51.5
50.0
50.0
51
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Baseline - Year 1 - Year 2 Year 3 Year 5 - - - - Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
0.7
Cross Section 13
iffie
MY5+ based on fixed baseline cross
sectional area* MBase
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
53.3
53.3
53.3
53.3
53.5
Bankfull Width (ft)
12.1
10.2
10.2
9.0
27.0
Floodprone Width (ft)
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
0.7
0.8
0.6
0.7
0.3
Bankfull MaxDe th (ft)
1.5
1.5
1.3
1.2
1.5
Low Bank Height (ft)
1.4
Bankfull Cross Sectional Ama(ft�)A-22
8.2
6.1
6.1
8.7
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio12.8
17.2
13.2
84.1
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>1.8
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio1
.0
1.0
1.0
0.9

Upstream
Downstream
Muddy Run II Reach 2 Cross Section 14 - Pool
56
55
Cross Section 14 Pool
MY5+based on fixed baseline cross
sectional area*
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
52.8
52.8
52.8
52.8
53.0
Bankfull Width (ft)
9.0
7.8
10.1
t >�
11.0
Floodprone Width (ft)
50.0
50.0
Upstream
Downstream
Muddy Run II Reach 2 Cross Section 14 - Pool
56
55
Cross Section 14 Pool
MY5+based on fixed baseline cross
sectional area*
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
52.8
52.8
52.8
52.8
53.0
Bankfull Width (ft)
9.0
7.8
10.1
8.5
11.0
Floodprone Width (ft)
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.0
0.9
0.7
0.8
0.8
Bankfull Max De th (ft)
54
c
°
1_8
1.5
1.5
1.8
Low Bank Height (ft)
N/A
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft2)
53
LU 52
7.8
6.8
6.8
8.9
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
9.2
9.9
15.0
10.6
13.6
Bankfull Fntrenchment Ratio
51
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
N/A
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1
1.0
1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0
1 N/A
50
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Baseline Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 5 - - - - Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area
Cross Section 14 Pool
MY5+based on fixed baseline cross
sectional area*
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
52.8
52.8
52.8
52.8
53.0
Bankfull Width (ft)
9.0
7.8
10.1
8.5
11.0
Floodprone Width (ft)
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.0
0.9
0.7
0.8
0.8
Bankfull Max De th (ft)
2.0
1_8
1.5
1.5
1.8
Low Bank Height (ft)
N/A
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft2)
8.9
7.8
6.8
6.8
8.9
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
9.2
9.9
15.0
10.6
13.6
Bankfull Fntrenchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
N/A
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1
1.0
1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0
1 N/A

Upstream
Downstream
Muddy Run II Reach 3A Cross Section 15 - Run
56
Cross Section 15 Run
MY5+based on fixed baseline cross
sectional area* M
Base
55.5
55
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
54.5
53.0
53.0
53.0
53.1
Bankfull Width (ft)
11.8
11.9
10.8
11.5
54
c
°
Floodprone Width (ft)
50.0
50.0
50.0
53.5
w
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1.2
1.1
52.5
1.1
1.2
Bankfull Max De th(ft)
1.8
52
1.7
1.7
1.9
Low Bank Height (ft)
51.5
1.9
51
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Baseline Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 5 - - - - Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area
12.4
12.4
Cross Section 15 Run
MY5+based on fixed baseline cross
sectional area* M
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
53.0
53.0
53.0
53.0
53.1
Bankfull Width (ft)
11.8
11.9
10.8
11.5
11.8
Floodprone Width (ft)
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1.2
1.1
1.2
1.1
1.2
Bankfull Max De th(ft)
1.8
1_8
1.7
1.7
1.9
Low Bank Height (ft)
1.9
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft)A3712.9
12.4
12.4
13.7
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio1099.3
10.7
10.1
Bankfull Fntmnchment Ratio>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>4.3
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0

Upstream
a
o'
Downstream
Muddy Run II Reach 3A Cross Section 16 - Run
55
Cross Section 16 un
54.5
Base
MYI
54
MY3
MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
52.3
52.3
53.5
52.3
52.3
Bankfull Width (ft)
11.3
11.6
v 53
11.6
13.0
c
° 52.5
50.0
50.0
m-----------------------
> 52
- - - --
----- ---- ---- ---------------- - -- ---- ----
50.0
w
0.9
0.9
51.5
0.9
0.8
Bankfull MaxDe th (ft)
1.9
1.7
51
1.7
1.9
Low Bank Height (ft)
1.5
50.5
9.8
9.9
9.4
9.9
9.8
50
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Baseline - Year 1 - Year 2 Year 3 Year 5 - - - - Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area
13.6
17.3
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
Cross Section 16 un
MY5+ bas ed on fixed baseline eros s
sectional area*
Base
MYI
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
52.3
52.3
52.3
52.3
52.3
Bankfull Width (ft)
11.3
11.6
12.2
11.6
13.0
Floodprone Width (ft)
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
0.9
0.9
0.8
0.9
0.8
Bankfull MaxDe th (ft)
1.9
1.7
1.6
1.7
1.9
Low Bank Height (ft)
1.5
Bankfull Cross Sectional Ama(ft)
9.8
9.9
9.4
9.9
9.8
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
13.0
13.6
15.8
13.6
17.3
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
72.2
72.2
73.11
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.8

Upstream
Downstream
Muddy Run II Reach 3A Cross Section 17 - Run
Cross Section 17 un
54
53
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7 MY+
w
c
52
50.8
50.8
50.8
51.1
Bankfull Width (ft)
10.5
10.5
10.0
>
_m
LU
50
Floodprone Width (ft)
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1.2
1.2
1.0
1.0
1.1
Bankfull MaxDe th (ft)
1.8
2.0
1.5
1.7
1.8
Low Bank Height (ft)1.7
49
48
Bankfull Cross Sectional Ama(ft)
12.4
12.7
10.0
10.6
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Bankfull Width/De th Ratio
Baseline
- Year 1 - Year 2 Year 3 Year 5 - - - - Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area
10.0
9.6
11.2
Bankfull Fntmnchment Ratio
>22
Cross Section 17 un
MY5+ based on fixed baseline cross
sectional area* MBase
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
50.8
50.8
50.8
50.8
51.1
Bankfull Width (ft)
10.5
10.5
10.0
10.1
11.8
Floodprone Width (ft)
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1.2
1.2
1.0
1.0
1.1
Bankfull MaxDe th (ft)
1.8
2.0
1.5
1.7
1.8
Low Bank Height (ft)1.7
Bankfull Cross Sectional Ama(ft)
12.4
12.7
10.0
10.6
12.4
Bankfull Width/De th Ratio
8.9
8.6
10.0
9.6
11.2
Bankfull Fntmnchment Ratio
>22
>22
>22
>22
14.3
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0

Upstream
Downstream
Muddy Run II Reach 3A Cross Section 18 - Pool
54
Cross Section 18 Pool
MY5+based on fixed baseline cross
sectional area* M
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
50.1
50.1
53
50.1
50.4
Bankfull Width (ft)
10.6
9.9
10.7
9.9
16.1
Floodprone Width (ft)
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
40.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.3
1.1
0.9
1.0
52
c
°
Bankfull Max De th (ft)
2.0
1.8
1.4
1.5
1.8
Low Bank Height (ft)
51
N/A
Bankfull Cross Sectional Ama(ft2)
142
11.3
9.6
10.0
14.2
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
7.9
8.7
12.1
9.8
18.3
Bankfull Fnnenchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
N/A
Bankfull Bank Height Ratiol
1.0
49
1 1.0
1 1.0
1 N/A
48
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Baseline Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 5 - - - - Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area
Cross Section 18 Pool
MY5+based on fixed baseline cross
sectional area* M
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
50.1
50.1
50.1
50.1
50.4
Bankfull Width (ft)
10.6
9.9
10.7
9.9
16.1
Floodprone Width (ft)
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
40.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.3
1.1
0.9
1.0
0.9
Bankfull Max De th (ft)
2.0
1.8
1.4
1.5
1.8
Low Bank Height (ft)
N/A
Bankfull Cross Sectional Ama(ft2)
142
11.3
9.6
10.0
14.2
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
7.9
8.7
12.1
9.8
18.3
Bankfull Fnnenchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
N/A
Bankfull Bank Height Ratiol
1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0
1 N/A

dun P-
Cross Section 19 un
MY5+ bas ed on fixed baseline cross
sectional area* dd
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
� 1 5Y' ✓'mom,, _
Record elevation (datum) used
50.5
50.5
50.5
50.5
50.8
Upstream Downstream
Muddy Run II Reach 3A Cross Section 19 - Run
54
53
52
w
0 51
M
-------------------I- --- ----- -- ----- -----
--
m
LU 50
49
48
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Baseline - Year 1 - Year 2 Year 3 Year 5 - - - - Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area
Cross Section 19 un
MY5+ bas ed on fixed baseline cross
sectional area* dd
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
50.5
50.5
50.5
50.5
50.8
Bankfull Width (ft)
11.4
11.1
11.3
11.3
14.9
Floodprone Width (ft)
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1.3
1.0
0.9
0.9
1.0
Bankfull MaxDe th (ft)
2.0
1.7
1.6
1.7
1 1.8
Low Bank Height (ft)
1.8
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft2)
142
1 11.1
10.3
10.4
14.2
Bankfull Width/Depth n1io9.1
11.1
12.5
12.2
15.6
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>3.3
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0

Upstream
Downstream
Muddy Run II Reach 3A Cross Section 20 - Riffle
54
53
Cross Section 20
ifIle
MY5+ based on fixed baseline cross
sectional area* MBase
MY]
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
50.5
52
50.5
50.5
50.4
Bankfull Width (ft)
9.3
8.9
11.2
9.0
20.5
Floodprone Width (ft)
w
c
°
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1.2
1.2
1.1
1.2
0.5
51
w 50
-----
-
2.0
2.3
- -
--
---- -
-
---- -----
----
- -
----
- -
49
Bankfull Cmss Sectional Ama (ft2)1
11.3
1 10.3
1 112
1 11.1 1
11.3
Bankfull Width/De th Ratio
7.77.7
8.8
48
37.4
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.4
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1
1.0
1 1.0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Baseline - Year 1 - Year 2 Year 3 Year 5 - - - - Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area
1.0
Cross Section 20
ifIle
MY5+ based on fixed baseline cross
sectional area* MBase
MY]
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
50.5
50.5
50.5
50.5
50.4
Bankfull Width (ft)
9.3
8.9
11.2
9.0
20.5
Floodprone Width (ft)
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1.2
1.2
1.1
1.2
0.5
Bankfulk Max De th (ft)
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.3
2.3
Low Bank Height (ft)
2.3
Bankfull Cmss Sectional Ama (ft2)1
11.3
1 10.3
1 112
1 11.1 1
11.3
Bankfull Width/De th Ratio
7.77.7
8.8
7.3
37.4
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.4
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1
1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0
1.0
1.0

Upstream
Downstream
Cross Section 21 (Pool)
MY5+ based on fixed baseline cross
sectional area*
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
50.3
----------
50.3
50.3
50.2
----------
11.7
9.1
10.0
9.6
8.3
Floodprone Width ft
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
0.7
0.9
0.8
0.8
1.0
Bankfull Max De th ft
1.7
1.7
1.9
2.1
2.2
Y
Y
N/A
1
1 1 1 1 1
8.1
ti
8.1
8.6
Bankfull Width/De thRatio
y 3
10.2
12.8
11.4
8.1
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
12.2
>2.2
Downstream
Cross Section 21 (Pool)
MY5+ based on fixed baseline cross
sectional area*
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
50.3
----------
50.3
50.3
50.2
----------
11.7
9.1
10.0
9.6
8.3
Floodprone Width ft
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
0.7
0.9
0.8
0.8
1.0
Bankfull Max De th ft
1.7
1.7
1.9
2.1
2.2
Low Bank Height ft
N/A
1
1 1 1 1 1
8.1
7.9
8.1
8.6
Bankfull Width/De thRatio
16.0
10.2
12.8
Cross Section 21 (Pool)
MY5+ based on fixed baseline cross
sectional area*
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
50.3
50.3
50.3
50.3
50.2
Bankfull Width ft
11.7
9.1
10.0
9.6
8.3
Floodprone Width ft
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
0.7
0.9
0.8
0.8
1.0
Bankfull Max De th ft
1.7
1.7
1.9
2.1
2.2
Low Bank Height ft
N/A
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ($2)
8.6
8.1
7.9
8.1
8.6
Bankfull Width/De thRatio
16.0
10.2
12.8
11.4
8.1
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
12.2
>2.2
12.2
N/A
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
N/A

Upstream
Downstream
Muddy Run II Reach 3A Cross Section 22 - Pool
52
51
Cross Section 22 Pool
MY5+ bas ed on fixed baseline cross
sectional area*
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
49.0
49.0
49.0
49.0
49.1
Bankfull Width (ft)
9.3
9.3
M z�
50
9.2
Floodprone Width (ft)
50.0
50.0
Downstream
Muddy Run II Reach 3A Cross Section 22 - Pool
52
51
Cross Section 22 Pool
MY5+ bas ed on fixed baseline cross
sectional area*
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
49.0
49.0
49.0
49.0
49.1
Bankfull Width (ft)
9.3
9.3
9.9
50
9.2
Floodprone Width (ft)
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
CL0
-----
-----------------
------
����
��
--------------------�
2.4
2.1
49
m
LU 48
2.0
Low Bank Height (ft)
N/A
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft2)
47
46
14.510.9
12.3
Bankfull Width/De th Ratio
7.0
7.4
6.9
Bankfull Fntrenchment Ratio
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Baseline Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 5 - - - - Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area
>2.2
N/A
Cross Section 22 Pool
MY5+ bas ed on fixed baseline cross
sectional area*
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
49.0
49.0
49.0
49.0
49.1
Bankfull Width (ft)
9.3
9.3
9.9
9.0
9.2
Floodprone Width (ft)
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.3
1.6
1.2
1.2
1.3
Bankfull Max De th (ft)
2.2
2.4
2.1
1.8
2.0
Low Bank Height (ft)
N/A
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft2)
12.3
14.510.9
12.3
Bankfull Width/De th Ratio
7.0
7.4
6.9
Bankfull Fntrenchment Ratio
>2.2
�1200�W
>2.2
N/A
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
N/A

Upstream
Downstream
Muddy Run II Reach 3A Cross Section 23 - Riffle
52
Cross Section 23
ifIle
MY5+ based on fixed baseline cross
sectional area* MBase
51
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
49.3
49.3
49.3
49.3
49.4
Bankfull Width (ft)
7.8
7.7
7.7
7.3
8.6
Floodprone Width (ft)
50.0
50.0
50.0
v 50
c
0
16
49
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1.1
1.0
0.9
0.9
1.0
Bankfull MaxDe th (ft)
1.7
w
48
1.6
1.8
2.1
Low Bank Height (ft)
2.2
47
8.3
1 7.9
1 6.9
1 6.7 1
8.3
Bankfull Width/De th Ratio
7.4
17.5
8.6
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Baseline - Year 1 - Year 2 Year 3 Year 5 - - - - Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
72.2
>2.2
Cross Section 23
ifIle
MY5+ based on fixed baseline cross
sectional area* MBase
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
49.3
49.3
49.3
49.3
49.4
Bankfull Width (ft)
7.8
7.7
7.7
7.3
8.6
Floodprone Width (ft)
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1.1
1.0
0.9
0.9
1.0
Bankfull MaxDe th (ft)
1.7
1.8
1.6
1.8
2.1
Low Bank Height (ft)
2.2
Bankfull Cross Sectional Ama (ft2)1
8.3
1 7.9
1 6.9
1 6.7 1
8.3
Bankfull Width/De th Ratio
7.4
17.5
8.6
8.0
8.9
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
72.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>5.8
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1
1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0 1
1.1

Upstream
Downstream
Muddy Run II Reach 3A Cross Section 24 - Riffle
53
Cross Section 24 Riffle
MY5+based on fixed baseline cross
sectional area*
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
48.8
48.8
48.8
48.8
49.0
Bankfull Width (ft)
11.7
11.8
11.3
11.9
24.6
Floodprone Width (ft)
50.0
50.0
50.0
52
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.5
1.4
1.2
1.2
0.7
Bankfull Max De th (ft)
2.1
2.0
1.8
1.7
2.1
Low Bank Height (ft)
1.9
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft2)
18.0
1 17.1
1 13.7
51
1 18.0
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
7.6
8.2
9.3
9.7
33.6
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.0
Bankfull Bank Height Ratiol
1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0
1 0.9
50
c
0
m 49
LU
48
47
46
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Baseline Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 5 - - - - Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area
Cross Section 24 Riffle
MY5+based on fixed baseline cross
sectional area*
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
48.8
48.8
48.8
48.8
49.0
Bankfull Width (ft)
11.7
11.8
11.3
11.9
24.6
Floodprone Width (ft)
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.5
1.4
1.2
1.2
0.7
Bankfull Max De th (ft)
2.1
2.0
1.8
1.7
2.1
Low Bank Height (ft)
1.9
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft2)
18.0
1 17.1
1 13.7
1 14.6
1 18.0
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
7.6
8.2
9.3
9.7
33.6
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.0
Bankfull Bank Height Ratiol
1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0
1 0.9

Upstream
Downstream
Muddy Run II Reach 3A Cross Section 25 - Pool
53
52
Cross Section 25 Pool
MY5+based on fixed baseline cross
sectional area*
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
48.7
48.7
48.7
51
48.8
Bankfull Width (ft)
14.1
13.9
13.8
50
15.7
Floodprone Width (ft)
50.0
50.0
50.0
c
° 49
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1.8
1.7
1.7
m
w 48
----- -----------------
------ -----
----woo-
---- ------
2.6
47
2.8
Low Bank Height (ft)
46
N/A
Bankfull Cmss Sectional Area(ft2)
25.0
1 24.3
1 22.9
45
1 25.0
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
7.9
8.0
8.3
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Baseline Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 5 - - - - Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area
Bankfull Fntmnchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
Cross Section 25 Pool
MY5+based on fixed baseline cross
sectional area*
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
48.7
48.7
48.7
48.7
48.8
Bankfull Width (ft)
14.1
13.9
13.8
14.7
15.7
Floodprone Width (ft)
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1.8
1.7
1.7
1.5
1.6
Bankfull MaxDe th (ft)
3.1
2.8
2.6
2.7
2.8
Low Bank Height (ft)
N/A
Bankfull Cmss Sectional Area(ft2)
25.0
1 24.3
1 22.9
1 22.6
1 25.0
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
7.9
8.0
8.3
9.6
9.8
Bankfull Fntmnchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
N/A
Bankfull Bank Height Ratiol
1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0
1 N/A

Upstream
Downstream
Muddy Run II Reach 3A Cross Section 26 - Pool
53
52
51
Cross Section 26 (Po 1)
MY5+ based on fixed baseline cross
sectional area* MBase
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
48.6
48.6
48.6
50
48.8
Bankfull Width (ft)
14.9
15.7
15.0
15.1
16.0
Floodprone Width (ft)
50.0
w
c
° 49_
m-----
w 48
50.0
-
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
------ -----
--- -
-- - - - -
------
1.5
47
3.2
3.1
2.6
2.6
2.9
Low Bank Height (ft)N/A
46
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft)
24.9
25.7
23.2
21.9
24.9
Bankfull Width/De th Ratio
8.9
45
9.7
10.3
10.4
Bankfull Fntmnchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
12.2
>2.2
N/A
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Baseline - Year 1 - Year 2 Year 3 Year 5 ---- Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area
1.0
1.0
1.0
Cross Section 26 (Po 1)
MY5+ based on fixed baseline cross
sectional area* MBase
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
48.6
48.6
48.6
48.6
48.8
Bankfull Width (ft)
14.9
15.7
15.0
15.1
16.0
Floodprone Width (ft)
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1.7
1.6
1.5
1.5
1.5
Bankfull MaxDe th (ft)
3.2
3.1
2.6
2.6
2.9
Low Bank Height (ft)N/A
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft)
24.9
25.7
23.2
21.9
24.9
Bankfull Width/De th Ratio
8.9
9.6
9.7
10.3
10.4
Bankfull Fntmnchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
12.2
>2.2
N/A
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
N/A

tai � a v
Z'14 r ._sI
�j •, _ .f rte, � rT , �
Upstream
Downstream
Muddy Run II Reach 3A Cross Section 27 - Run
53
52
Cross Section 27 un
MY5+ bas ed on fixed baseline eros s
sectional area*
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
48.8
48.8
48.8
48.8
48.9
Bankfull Width (ft)
12.7
12.4
13.7
13.3
51
Floodprone Width (ft)
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1.5
1.5
v
1.4
1.2
Bankfull MaxDe th (ft)
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.2
2,4
Low Bank Height (ft)
50
c
0
> 49
m
w
48
-
___
______ __________
2.3
Bankfull Cross Sectional Ama (ft2)1
19.4
1 18.9
19.1
47
Bankfull Width/De th Ratio
8.3
8.1
�12.2
9.2
13.6
Bankfull Fntmnchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
46
>2.2
>3.1
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
I 0.9
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Baseline - Year 1 - Year 2 Year 3 Year 5 - - - - Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area
Cross Section 27 un
MY5+ bas ed on fixed baseline eros s
sectional area*
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
48.8
48.8
48.8
48.8
48.9
Bankfull Width (ft)
12.7
12.4
13.7
13.3
16.3
Floodprone Width (ft)
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1.5
1.5
1.4
1.4
1.2
Bankfull MaxDe th (ft)
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.2
2,4
Low Bank Height (ft)
2.3
Bankfull Cross Sectional Ama (ft2)1
19.4
1 18.9
1
19.1
19.4
Bankfull Width/De th Ratio
8.3
8.1
�12.2
9.2
13.6
Bankfull Fntmnchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>3.1
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
I 0.9

Upstream
Downstream
i v -
Muddy Run II Reach 3A Cross Section 28 - Pool
53
Cross Section 28 (Po 1)
MY5+ based on fixed baseline cross
sectional area* MBase
MYl
52
MY3
MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
48.4
51
48.4
48.4
48.5
Bankfull Width (ft)
50
w
13.3
14.0
13.9
21.6
49
48
-
- -
50.0
50.0
50.0
m
LU 47
1.8
1.7
1.6
1.6
46
Bankfull Max De th (ft)
2.9
2.9
2.7
45
2.7
Low Bank Height (ft)
44
N/A
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)1
24.6
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Baseline - Year 1 - Year 2 Year 3 Year 5 - - - - Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area
1 21.8
1 24.6
Bankfull Width/De th Ratio
Cross Section 28 (Po 1)
MY5+ based on fixed baseline cross
sectional area* MBase
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
48.4
48.4
48.4
48.4
48.5
Bankfull Width (ft)
13.4
13.3
14.0
13.9
21.6
Floodprone Width (ft)
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1.8
1.7
1.6
1.6
1.1
Bankfull Max De th (ft)
2.9
2.9
2.7
2.5
2.7
Low Bank Height (ft)
N/A
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)1
24.6
1 23.2
1 22.2
1 21.8
1 24.6
Bankfull Width/De th Ratio
7.37.6
8.8
8.9
19.1
Bankfull Fntmnchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
N/A
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1
1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0
1.0
N/A

Upstream
Downstream
Muddy Run II Reach 3A Cross Section 29 - Run
52
51
Cross Section 29 un
MY5+ based on fixed baseline cross
sectional area* MBase
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7 MY+
50
48.3
48.3
48.3
48.3
48.4
Bankfull Width (ft)
13.4
13.7
v 49
13.7
15.6
Floodprone Width (ft)
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
c
48
1.5
1.4
_ _
1.3
Bankfull Max De th (ft)
2.3
m
LU
47
2.1
2.2
Low Bank Height (ft)
IL
OF
2.2
46
19.8
1 19.7
1 18.9
1 18.7
1 19.8
Bankfull Width/Depth Rafio
9.1
9.5
45
10.1
12.2
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>3.3
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Baseline - Year 1 - Year 2 Year 3 Year 5 ---- Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area
1 1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0
Cross Section 29 un
MY5+ based on fixed baseline cross
sectional area* MBase
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
48.3
48.3
48.3
48.3
48.4
Bankfull Width (ft)
13.4
13.7
13.9
13.7
15.6
Floodprone Width (ft)
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1.5
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.3
Bankfull Max De th (ft)
2.1
2.3
2.0
2.1
2.2
Low Bank Height (ft)
2.2
Bankfull Cross Sectional Ama (ft2)1
19.8
1 19.7
1 18.9
1 18.7
1 19.8
Bankfull Width/Depth Rafio
9.1
9.5
10.3
10.1
12.2
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>3.3
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1
1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0

Upstream
Downstream
Muddy Run II Reach 3A Cross Section 30 - Pool
52
51
Cross Section 30 Pool
MY5+based on fixed baseline cross
sectional area*
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
50
47.4
47.4
47.4
47.5
Bankfull Width (ft)
12.9
13.1
14.0
49
17.3
Floodprone Width (ft)
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
c
° 48
1.3
1.2
1.2
1.1
Bankfull MaxDe th (ft)
2.3
22
2.0
w
2.3
Low Bank Height (ft)N/A
Bankfull Cmss Sectional Area(ft�)
47
17.4
16.6
16.3
18.4
Bankfukl Width/Depth Ratio
9.1
9.8
11.9
46
45
16.3
Bankfull Fntrenchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
N/A
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
44
1.0
1.0
1.0
N/A
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Baseline Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 5 - - - - Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area
Cross Section 30 Pool
MY5+based on fixed baseline cross
sectional area*
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
47.4
47.4
47.4
47.4
47.5
Bankfull Width (ft)
12.9
13.1
14.0
13.2
17.3
Floodprone Width (ft)
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1.4
1.3
1.2
1.2
1.1
Bankfull MaxDe th (ft)
2.3
22
2.0
2.1
2.3
Low Bank Height (ft)N/A
Bankfull Cmss Sectional Area(ft�)
18.4
17.4
16.6
16.3
18.4
Bankfukl Width/Depth Ratio
9.1
9.8
11.9
10.7
16.3
Bankfull Fntrenchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
N/A
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
N/A

Upstream
Downstream
Muddy Run II Reach 3A Cross Section 31 - Run
52
51
Cross Section 31 un
MY5+ based on fixed baseline cross
sectional area* MBase
MY]
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
50
47.5
47.5
47.5
47.6
Bankfull Width (ft)
13.7
14.2
14.3
14.7
16.6
Floodprone Width (ft)
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1.2
1.0
v 49
0.9
0.9
Bankfull MaxDe th (ft)
2.1
1.9
1.7
1.7
1.9
Low Bank Height (ft)
c
0
M
48
1.7
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)1
15.8
1 14.6
1 13.8
1 13.7
LU
47
-----
-----------------
-----
-----
15.9
17.5
-----
---
>2.2
46
>2.2
>3
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1
1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0
1 0.9
45
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Baseline - Year 1 - Year 2 Year 3 Year 5 - - - - Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area
Cross Section 31 un
MY5+ based on fixed baseline cross
sectional area* MBase
MY]
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
47.5
47.5
47.5
47.5
47.6
Bankfull Width (ft)
13.7
14.2
14.3
14.7
16.6
Floodprone Width (ft)
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1.2
1.0
1.0
0.9
0.9
Bankfull MaxDe th (ft)
2.1
1.9
1.7
1.7
1.9
Low Bank Height (ft)
1.7
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)1
15.8
1 14.6
1 13.8
1 13.7
1 15.8
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
11.9
13.8
14.8
15.9
17.5
Bankfull Fntmnchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>3
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1
1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0
1 0.9

Upstream
Downstream
Muddy Run II Reach 3A Cross Section 32 - Run
52
51
Cross Section 32 Run
MY5+based on fixed baseline cross
sectional area*
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
50
47.7
47.7
47.7
47.8
Bankfull Width (ft)
10.5
10.7
11.3
11.2
11.3
Floodprone Width (ft)
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.3
1.3
49
c
° 48
1.2
1.2
Bankfull Max De th (ft)
2.2
2.0
2.1
2.0
2.1
Low Bank Height (ft)
w 47
2.1
_
- ---- -----
13.8
1 13.4
----- ------
1 13.4
1 13.8
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
8.0
8.5
9.5
9.3
9.2
Bankfull Fntrenchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
46
45
>2.2
>4.4
Bankfull Bank Height Ratiol
1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0
44
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Baseline Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 5 - - - - Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area
Cross Section 32 Run
MY5+based on fixed baseline cross
sectional area*
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
47.7
47.7
47.7
47.7
47.8
Bankfull Width (ft)
10.5
10.7
11.3
11.2
11.3
Floodprone Width (ft)
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.3
1.3
1.2
1.2
1.2
Bankfull Max De th (ft)
2.2
2.0
2.1
2.0
2.1
Low Bank Height (ft)
2.1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Ama(ft2)
13.8
1 13.4
1 13.5
1 13.4
1 13.8
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
8.0
8.5
9.5
9.3
9.2
Bankfull Fntrenchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>4.4
Bankfull Bank Height Ratiol
1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0

Upstream
Downstream
Muddy Run II Reach 3A Cross Section 33 - Pool
52
51
50
Cross Section 33 (Po 1)
MY5+ based on fixed baseline cross
sectional area* MBase
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
47.7
47.7
47.7
49
47.9
Bankfull Width (ft)
11.5
12.0
13.5
13.0
17.2
Floodprone Width (ft)
50.0
w
c
48
50.0
50.0
50.0
--- -----------------
1.7
1.6
--
----47
1.1
47
46
3.1
2.9
2.6
2.6
2.8
Low Bank Height (ft)N/A
45
Bankfull Cross Sectional Ama(ft�)
19.5
19.0
17.3
17.8
19.5
Bankfull Width/De th Ratio
6.8
44
10.5
9.5
15.1
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
N/A
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Baseline - Year 1 - Year 2 Year 3 Year 5 - - - - Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area
1.0
1.0
1.0
Cross Section 33 (Po 1)
MY5+ based on fixed baseline cross
sectional area* MBase
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
47.7
47.7
47.7
47.7
47.9
Bankfull Width (ft)
11.5
12.0
13.5
13.0
17.2
Floodprone Width (ft)
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1.7
1.6
1.3
1.4
1.1
Bankfull MaxDe th (ft)
3.1
2.9
2.6
2.6
2.8
Low Bank Height (ft)N/A
Bankfull Cross Sectional Ama(ft�)
19.5
19.0
17.3
17.8
19.5
Bankfull Width/De th Ratio
6.8
7.6
10.5
9.5
15.1
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
N/A
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
N/A

Upstream
Downstream
Muddy Run II Reach 3A Cross Section 34 - Pool
52
51
Cross Section 34 Pool
MY5+basedon fixedbasefine cross
sectional area*
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
47.2
47.2
47.2
47.2
47.4
Bankfull Width (ft)
10.4
10.5
9.9
50
16.2
Floodprone Width (ft)
50.0
50.0
50.0
49
48
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
2.1
1.9
1.8
0
47
--------- - -- -m
-----------
3.1
3.0
2.8
2.8
3.0
m
LU 46
N/A
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft')A2420.5
18.2
18.6
21.4
45
5.4
5.5
12.3
44
>2.2
>2.2
N/A
43
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Baseline Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 5 - - - - Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area
1.0
1.0
Cross Section 34 Pool
MY5+basedon fixedbasefine cross
sectional area*
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
47.2
47.2
47.2
47.2
47.4
Bankfull Width (ft)
10.4
10.5
9.9
10.1
16.2
Floodprone Width (ft)
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
2.1
1.9
1.8
1.8
1.3
Bankfull MaxDe th (ft)
3.1
3.0
2.8
2.8
3.0
Low Bank Height (ft)
N/A
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft')A2420.5
18.2
18.6
21.4
Bankfull Width/De th Ratio54
5.4
5.5
12.3
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
N/A
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio1.0
1.0
1.0
N/A

Upstream
Downstream
Muddy Run II Reach 3A Cross Section 35 - Run
51
Cross Section 35 un
MY5+ based on fixed baseline cross
sectional area* MBase
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
46.9
50
46.9
46.9
47.0
Bankfull Width (ft)
9.5
8.8
9.0
9.6
10.9
Floodprone Width (ft)
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1.3
1.3
1.2
1.2
1.1
49
2.0
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
Low Bank Height (ft)
2.1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Ama (ft2)1
12.1
1 11.7
1 11.1
1 11.4
1 12.1
Bankfull Width/De th Ratio
7.4
16.7
7.4
v 48
9.8
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
72.2
>2.2
72.2
>2.2
>4.6
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1
1.0
1 1.0
c
0
1 1.0
1 1.1
m 47
LU
46
45
44
-2 3 8 13 18 23 28 33 38 43 48
Distance (ft)
Baseline - Year 1 - Year 2 Year 3 Year 5 - - - - Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area
Cross Section 35 un
MY5+ based on fixed baseline cross
sectional area* MBase
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
46.9
46.9
46.9
46.9
47.0
Bankfull Width (ft)
9.5
8.8
9.0
9.6
10.9
Floodprone Width (ft)
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1.3
1.3
1.2
1.2
1.1
Bankfull MaxDe th (ft)
2.0
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
Low Bank Height (ft)
2.1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Ama (ft2)1
12.1
1 11.7
1 11.1
1 11.4
1 12.1
Bankfull Width/De th Ratio
7.4
16.7
7.4
8.0
9.8
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
72.2
>2.2
72.2
>2.2
>4.6
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1
1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0
1 1.1

Upstream
Downstream
Muddy Run II Reach 313 Cross Section 36 - Pool
50
49
Cross Section 36 Pool
MY5+ based on fixed baseline cross
sectional area* M
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
45.6
45.6
48
45.6
45.8
Bankfull Width (ft)
9.3
9.0
8.6
8.4
9.7
Floodprone Width (ft)
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
0.9
0.9
0.8
0.8
0.9
Bankfull MaxDe th (ft)
47
1.5
1.3
1.5
1.6
Low Bank Height (ft)
N/A
c
0
m
8.7
8.1
6.7
6.9
8.7
Bankfull Width/De thRatio
9.9
10.1
11.0
10.3
46
0)
LU
------------------
>2.2
- -
>2.2
----- - - -
MEMO
- -
- - - -
- - - -
45
44
43
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Baseline Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 5 - - - - Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area
Cross Section 36 Pool
MY5+ based on fixed baseline cross
sectional area* M
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
45.6
45.6
45.6
45.6
45.8
Bankfull Width (ft)
9.3
9.0
8.6
8.4
9.7
Floodprone Width (ft)
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
0.9
0.9
0.8
0.8
0.9
Bankfull MaxDe th (ft)
1.7
1.5
1.3
1.5
1.6
Low Bank Height (ft)
N/A
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft2)
8.7
8.1
6.7
6.9
8.7
Bankfull Width/De thRatio
9.9
10.1
11.0
10.3
10.9
Bankfull Fntmnchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
N/A
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0

Upstream
Downstream
Muddy Run II Reach 3B Cross Section 37 - Run
49
Cross Section 37 un
MY5+ based on fixed baseline cross
sectional area*
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MYS MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
45.5
48
45.5
45.5
45.6
Bankfull Width (ft)
12.4
11.9
9.7
9.7
12.1
Floodprone Width (ft)
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
w 47
1.0
1.1
1.1
1.2
1.2
Low Bank Height (ft)
1.1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Ama (ft2)1
6.1
1 5.8
4.8
4.6
6.1
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
25.4
24.4
19.4
c
0
24.3
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
12.2
>2.2
>4.1
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
46
1.0
0.9
w
45
44
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Baseline - Year 1 - Year 2 Year 3 Year 5 - - - - Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area
Cross Section 37 un
MY5+ based on fixed baseline cross
sectional area*
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MYS MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
45.5
45.5
45.5
45.5
45.6
Bankfull Width (ft)
12.4
11.9
9.7
9.7
12.1
Floodprone Width (ft)
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
Bankfull MaxDe th (ft)
1.0
1.1
1.1
1.2
1.2
Low Bank Height (ft)
1.1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Ama (ft2)1
6.1
1 5.8
4.8
4.6
6.1
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
25.4
24.4
19.4
20.5
24.3
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
12.2
>2.2
>4.1
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.9

Upstream
Downstream
Muddy Run II Reach 313 Cross Section 38 - Pool
49
A
Cross Section 38 (Po 1)
r
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
s
1,�,�
-
45.4
r
45.5
Bankfull Width (ft)
10.0
8.8
Upstream
Downstream
Muddy Run II Reach 313 Cross Section 38 - Pool
49
48
Cross Section 38 (Po 1)
MY5+ based on fixed baseline eros s
sectional area* MBase
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
45.4
45.4
45.4
45.4
45.5
Bankfull Width (ft)
10.0
8.8
9.6
10.2
10.0
47
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1.3
1.1
1.0
v 46
1.0
Bankfull MaxDe th (ft)
2.0
1.8
1.8
1.9
1.8
Low Bank Height (ft)
c
>45
MON
--------
-
-
1 9.2
1 9.6
-
1 10.5
LU
44
7.9
8.4
9.7
11.4
9.6
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
43
711 1
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1
1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0
1 N/A
42
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Baseline - Year 1 - Year 2 Year 3 Year 5 - - - - Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area
Cross Section 38 (Po 1)
MY5+ based on fixed baseline eros s
sectional area* MBase
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
45.4
45.4
45.4
45.4
45.5
Bankfull Width (ft)
10.0
8.8
9.6
10.2
10.0
Floodprone Width (ft)
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1.3
1.1
1.0
0.9
1.0
Bankfull MaxDe th (ft)
2.0
1.8
1.8
1.9
1.8
Low Bank Height (ft)
N/A
Bankfull Cross Sectional Ama (ft2)1
12.6
1 9.2
1 9.6
1 9.1
1 10.5
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
7.9
8.4
9.7
11.4
9.6
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
711 1
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1
1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0
1 N/A

Upstream
Downstream
Muddy Run II Reach 3B Cross Section 39 - Run
48
Cross Section 39 Run
MY5+based on fixed baseline cross
sectional area*
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
45.2
45.2
47
45.2
45.2
Bankfull Width (ft)
8.2
7.2
8.2
8.4
8.9
Floodprone Width (ft)
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
0.9
0.9
0.8
0.8
0.9
Bankfull MaxDe th (ft)
1.5
1.5
46
1.6
1.6
Low Bank Height (ft)
1.5
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft2)
7.6
1 6.5
1 6.9
1 6.7
1 7.6
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
8.7
7.9
9.7
10.4
10.5
Bankfull Fntmnchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
c
0
>2.2
>5.6
Bankfull Bank Height Ratiol
1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0
1 0.9
m 45
w
44
43
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Baseline Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 5 ---- Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area
Cross Section 39 Run
MY5+based on fixed baseline cross
sectional area*
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
45.2
45.2
45.2
45.2
45.2
Bankfull Width (ft)
8.2
7.2
8.2
8.4
8.9
Floodprone Width (ft)
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
0.9
0.9
0.8
0.8
0.9
Bankfull MaxDe th (ft)
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.6
1.6
Low Bank Height (ft)
1.5
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft2)
7.6
1 6.5
1 6.9
1 6.7
1 7.6
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
8.7
7.9
9.7
10.4
10.5
Bankfull Fntmnchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>5.6
Bankfull Bank Height Ratiol
1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0
1 0.9

Upstream
Downstream
Muddy Run II Reach 313 Cross Section 40 - Pool
4s
T
MY5+basedon fixedbasefine cross
sectional area* M
Base
MYl
Downstream
Muddy Run II Reach 313 Cross Section 40 - Pool
4s
Cross Section 40 Pool
MY5+basedon fixedbasefine cross
sectional area* M
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.3
Bankfull Width (ft)
10.3
10.3
9.7
10.6
24.6
47
46
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
45.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.4
1.1
1.0
c
° 45
--
Bankfuff MaxDe th (ft)
2.5
------ ------
--
1.3
2.1
Low Bank Height (ft)
LU 44
N/A
Bankfull Cmss Sectional Ama(ft2)
14.3
11.7
9.5
9.3
14.3
43
9.0
9.9
12.1
42.2
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
42
N/A
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
N/A
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Distance (ft)
Baseline Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 - -Year 5 - - - - Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area
Cross Section 40 Pool
MY5+basedon fixedbasefine cross
sectional area* M
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.3
Bankfull Width (ft)
10.3
10.3
9.7
10.6
24.6
Floodprone Width (ft)
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
45.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.4
1.1
1.0
0.9
0.6
Bankfuff MaxDe th (ft)
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.3
2.1
Low Bank Height (ft)
N/A
Bankfull Cmss Sectional Ama(ft2)
14.3
11.7
9.5
9.3
14.3
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio7.4
9.0
9.9
12.1
42.2
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
N/A
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
N/A

Upstream
Downstream
Muddy Run II Reach 3B Cross Section 41 - Run
48
47 --
46
-- -- -r- -- -
MY5+ based on fixed baseline cross
sectional area*
Base
MYl
MY2
w
0 45
MY5 MY7 MY+
--
------------
45.1
-----
-------------------------
45.2
Bankfull Width ft
8.9
8.5
8.6
ami
LU 44
9.9
Floodprone Width ft
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean De th ft
1.1
Li
1.0
0.9
1.0
Bankfull Max De th ft
1.9
1.8
1.8
1.7
1.9
Low Bank Height ft
43
42
1.9
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (112)1
10.2
1 9.0
1 8.8 1
8.6
1 10.2
BankfullWidth/Depth Ratio
7.8
8.0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Baseline - Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 5 - - - - Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area
9.5
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
Cross Section 41 (Run)
MY5+ based on fixed baseline cross
sectional area*
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
45.1
45.1
45.1
45.1
45.2
Bankfull Width ft
8.9
8.5
8.6
9.0
9.9
Floodprone Width ft
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean De th ft
1.1
Li
1.0
0.9
1.0
Bankfull Max De th ft
1.9
1.8
1.8
1.7
1.9
Low Bank Height ft
1.9
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (112)1
10.2
1 9.0
1 8.8 1
8.6
1 10.2
BankfullWidth/Depth Ratio
7.8
8.0
8.3
9.5
9.5
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>5.1
Bankfull Bank Height Ratiol
1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0 1
1.0
1 0.7

Upstream
Downstream
Muddy Run II Reach 3C Cross Section 42 - Run
49
48
Cross Section 42 un
47
MY]
46
MY3
MY5 MY7 MY+
45
44.0
44.0
v
c
°
----- ------ ------ ----- ------ ----- ----- ----
44.5
44
°
23.5
24.1
43
w
42
21.9
34.3
41
50.0
50.0
40
50.0
50.0
39
1.7
1.5
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Baseline - Year 1 - Year 2 Year 3 Year 5 - - - - Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area
1.2
Bankfull Max De th (ft)
3.8
Cross Section 42 un
MY5+ based on fixed baseline cross
sectional area* MBase
MY]
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
44.0
44.0
44.0
44.0
44.5
Bankfull Width (ft)
23.5
24.1
28.1
21.9
34.3
Floodprone Width (ft)
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1.7
1.5
1.4
1.4
1.2
Bankfull Max De th (ft)
3.8
3.7
3.6
2.9
3.3
Low Bank Height (ft)2.7
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft)
39.7
35.7
38.3
31.0
39.7
Bankfull Width/De th Ratio
13.9
16.2
20.6
15.4
29.6
Bankfull Fntrenchment Ratio
2.1
2.1
1.8
>2.2
>1.5
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.8

Upstream
Downstream
Muddy Run II Reach 3C Cross Section 43 - Run
46
45
Cross Section 43 Run
MY5+based on fixed baseline cross
sectional area*
Base
MYl
MY2
44
MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
41.3
41.3
41.3
41.3
42.2
Bankfull Width (ft)
9.4
9.2
10.6
8.3
14.4
Floodprone Width (ft)
29.0
29.0
15.0
15.0
28.6
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.4
43
°
0.4
- - - --
--- - - -
-
- -
- -
0.6
42
w 41
40
1.3
Low Bank Height (ft)
1.5
Bankfull Cross Sectional Ama(ft2)
13.2
39
4.7
2.5
132
Bankfull Width/De th Ratio
6.7
13.2
23.9
28.0
15.6
Bankfull Fntrenchment Ratio
>2.2
12.2
1.4
>2.2
12
38
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Baseline Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 5 - - - - Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area
10
1.0
1.0
Cross Section 43 Run
MY5+based on fixed baseline cross
sectional area*
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
41.3
41.3
41.3
41.3
42.2
Bankfull Width (ft)
9.4
9.2
10.6
8.3
14.4
Floodprone Width (ft)
29.0
29.0
15.0
15.0
28.6
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.4
0.7
0.4
0.3
0.9
Bankfull Max De th (ft)
2.2
0.9
0.6
0.4
1.3
Low Bank Height (ft)
1.5
Bankfull Cross Sectional Ama(ft2)
13.2
6.5
4.7
2.5
132
Bankfull Width/De th Ratio
6.7
13.2
23.9
28.0
15.6
Bankfull Fntrenchment Ratio
>2.2
12.2
1.4
>2.2
12
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
10
1.0
1.0
1.1

Upstream
Downstream
Muddy Run II Reach 3C Cross Section 44 - Run
48
47
Cross Section 44 un
MY5+ based on fixed baseline cross
sectional area*
Base
46
45
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7 MY+
w
41.5
41.5
41.5
44
41.6
Bankfull Width (ft) 13.723
13.5
c
°
13.9
14.2
Floodprone Width (ft)
43
22.0
20.0
20.0
42
w
41
-----
------ - - - ------- ------ - - ------ ----- ------ ------
1.3
40
1.2
1.4
Bankfull Max De th (ft)
2.0
2.0
1.7
1.7
39
Low Bank Height (ft)
38
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Baseline - Year 1 - Year 2 Year 3 Year 5 - - - - Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area
3.4
Bankfull Cross Sectional Ama(ft)
19.6
Cross Section 44 un
MY5+ based on fixed baseline cross
sectional area*
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
41.5
41.5
41.5
41.5
41.6
Bankfull Width (ft) 13.723
13.5
13.2
13.9
14.2
Floodprone Width (ft)
22.0
22.0
20.0
20.0
23.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1.4
1.3
1.2
1.2
1.4
Bankfull Max De th (ft)
2.0
2.0
1.7
1.7
2.0
Low Bank Height (ft)
3.4
Bankfull Cross Sectional Ama(ft)
19.6
18.0
15.2
16.8
19.6
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
9.6
10.1
11.0
11.4
10.3
Bankfull Fnuenchment Ratio
1.6
1.6
1.5
>2.2
>1.6
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.7

Upstream
�- ,
Downstream
Muddy Run II Reach 3C Cross Section 45 - Run
47
46
Cross Section 45 un
MY5+ based on fixed baseline cross
sectional area*
Base
MY]
45
MY3
MYS MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
41.4
41.4
44
41.4
41.6
Bankfull Width (ft)
11.8
11.5
w
c
10.8
12.4
Floodprone Width (ft)
35.3
35.3
° 43
w 42
30.0
37.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1.2
1.2
41
-----
-------------- -- ------ ----
------ -----
------ ------
2.0
40
1.4
1.7
Low Bank Height (ft)
2.5
Bankfull Cross Sectional Ama (ft2)1
14.6
1 13.8
39
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Baseline - Year 1 - Year 2 Year 3 Year 5 ---- Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area
14.6
Bankfull Width/Depth Rafio9.5
Cross Section 45 un
MY5+ based on fixed baseline cross
sectional area*
Base
MY]
MY2
MY3
MYS MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
41.4
41.4
41.4
41.4
41.6
Bankfull Width (ft)
11.8
11.5
11.2
10.8
12.4
Floodprone Width (ft)
35.3
35.3
30.0
30.0
37.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1.2
1.2
1.0
1.0
1.2
Bankfull MaxDe th (ft)
1.9
2.0
1.7
1.4
1.7
Low Bank Height (ft)
2.5
Bankfull Cross Sectional Ama (ft2)1
14.6
1 13.8
11.3
10.4
14.6
Bankfull Width/Depth Rafio9.5
9.6
11.1
11.2
10.5
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>3.0
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.5

Upstream
Downstream
Muddy Run II Reach 4 Cross Section 46 - Run
53
52
Cross Section 46 un
MY5+ based on fixed baseline cross
sectional area* MBase
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
49.3
49.3
49.3
49.3
49.7
Bankfull Width (ft)
8.4
7.2
7.8
6.0
11.6
Floodprone Width (ft)
42.5
42.5
42.5
42.5
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
0.8
0.7
51
w
c
°
0.6
0.5
Bankfull MaxDe th (ft)
1.5
1.2
1.1
1.1
1.5
Low Bank Height (ft)
50
>
m
w 49
-----
------
----
- - -- -----
-
- - - -
------
------
1 3.4
1 6.3
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
11.1
10.2
12.9
10.7
21.1
Bankfull Fntmnchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
48
47
>2.2
>4.3
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1
1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0
1 0.8
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Baseline - Year 1 - Year 2 Year 3 Year 5 - - - - Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area
Cross Section 46 un
MY5+ based on fixed baseline cross
sectional area* MBase
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
49.3
49.3
49.3
49.3
49.7
Bankfull Width (ft)
8.4
7.2
7.8
6.0
11.6
Floodprone Width (ft)
42.5
42.5
42.5
42.5
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.5
Bankfull MaxDe th (ft)
1.5
1.2
1.1
1.1
1.5
Low Bank Height (ft)
1.2
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)1
6.3
1 5.1
1 4.7
1 3.4
1 6.3
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
11.1
10.2
12.9
10.7
21.1
Bankfull Fntmnchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>4.3
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1
1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0
1 0.8

Upstream
Downstream
Muddy Run II Reach 4 Cross Section 47 - Pool
52
51
Cross Section 47 Pool
MY5+based on fixed baseline cross
sectional area*
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
48.2
48.2
48.2
48.2
48.6
50
6.7
6.3
8.6
5.7
16.4
Floodprone Width (ft)
c
°
50.0
50.0
50.0
38.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
0.9
49
w 48
0.5
0.5
1.2
Bankfull MaxDe th (ft)
1.8
1.5
0.9
0.9
1.2
Low Bank Height (ft)
47
N/A
Bankfull Cross Sectional Ama(ft2)
6.0
1 5.3
1 4.2
1 2.9
46
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Baseline Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 5 - - - - Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area
7.3
7.4
17.7
Cross Section 47 Pool
MY5+based on fixed baseline cross
sectional area*
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
48.2
48.2
48.2
48.2
48.6
Bankfull Width (ft)
6.7
6.3
8.6
5.7
16.4
Floodprone Width (ft)
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
38.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
0.9
0.8
0.5
0.5
1.2
Bankfull MaxDe th (ft)
1.8
1.5
0.9
0.9
1.2
Low Bank Height (ft)
N/A
Bankfull Cross Sectional Ama(ft2)
6.0
1 5.3
1 4.2
1 2.9
1 6.0
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
7.3
7.4
17.7
11.3
44.8
Bankfull Fntrenchment Ratio
>2.2
>211
>2.2
>22
N/A
Bankfull Bank Height Ratiol
1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0
1 N/A

Upstream
M..tl
"*Id- W'j
Downstream
Muddy Run II Reach 5A Cross Section 48 - Riffle
45
Cross Section 48 Riffle
MY5+basedon fixedbasefine cross
sectional area*
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
41.0
41.0
41.0
44
41.1
Bankfull Width (ft)
15.1
15.0
15.1
15.3
17.9
Floodprone Width (ft)
50.0
50.0
50.0
43
42
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.7
1.7
1.6
1.5
1.4
Bankfull Max De th (ft)
2.6
2.7
2.6
c
0
>
2.8
Low Bank Height (ft)
2.3
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft2)
25.3
24.8
24.0
m 41
LU
25.3
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio9.0
A,
9.5
10.0
12.7
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
12.2
>2.2
40
>2.8
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.8
39
38
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Baseline Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 5 - - - - Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area
Cross Section 48 Riffle
MY5+basedon fixedbasefine cross
sectional area*
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
41.0
41.0
41.0
41.0
41.1
Bankfull Width (ft)
15.1
15.0
15.1
15.3
17.9
Floodprone Width (ft)
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.7
1.7
1.6
1.5
1.4
Bankfull Max De th (ft)
2.6
2.7
2.6
2.6
2.8
Low Bank Height (ft)
2.3
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft2)
25.3
24.8
24.0
23.4
25.3
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio9.0
9.1
9.5
10.0
12.7
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
12.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.8
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.8

Upstream
Downstream
Muddy Run II Reach 5A Cross Section 49 - Pool
45
44
Cross Section 49 Pool
MY5+basedon fixed baseline cross
sectional area* M
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
40.5
40.5
40.5
43
40.3
Bankfull Width (ft)
16.6
17.0
19.3
17.6
15.4
Floodprone Width (ft)
50.0
50.0
50.0
42
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1.7
1.7
1.4
41
0
40
1.8
noun
3.1
3.1
3.1
>
m
LU 39
3.2
Low Bank Height (ft)
N/A
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft2)
27.4
1 28.5
1 27.3
38
1 27.4
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
10.0
10.2
13.7
37
8.6
Bankfull Fntrenchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
36
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Baseline Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 5 - - - - Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area
Bankfull Bank Height Ratiol
1.0
1 1.0
Cross Section 49 Pool
MY5+basedon fixed baseline cross
sectional area* M
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
40.5
40.5
40.5
40.5
40.3
Bankfull Width (ft)
16.6
17.0
19.3
17.6
15.4
Floodprone Width (ft)
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1.7
1.7
1.4
1.6
1.8
Bankfull MaxDe th (ft)
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.3
3.2
Low Bank Height (ft)
N/A
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft2)
27.4
1 28.5
1 27.3
1 28.3
1 27.4
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
10.0
10.2
13.7
11.0
8.6
Bankfull Fntrenchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
N/A
Bankfull Bank Height Ratiol
1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0
1 N/A

All
A- i,S6
R
Upstream
Downstream
Muddy Run II Reach 5A Cross Section 50 - Pool
45
Cross Section 50 (Po 1)
MY5+ bas ed on fixed baseline cross
sectional area* MBase
44
MYl
MY2
43
MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
42
40.0
40.0
40.0
40.1
Bankfull Width (ft)
w 41
17.7
21.6
17.8
21.6
Floodprone Width (ft)
c
0 4p
--------- ------ ----- - ----- -
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
39
w
1.7
1.5
1.7
1.5
Bankfull MaxDe th (ft)
38
3.1
3.2
37
3.2
Low Bank Height (ft)
36
N/A
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft)
32.9
30.7
31.7
35
32.9
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
10.4
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Baseline - Year 1 - Year 2 Year 3 Year 5 - - - - Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area
14.2
Bankfull Fntmnchment Ratio
>2.2
Cross Section 50 (Po 1)
MY5+ bas ed on fixed baseline cross
sectional area* MBase
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
40.0
40.0
40.0
40.0
40.1
Bankfull Width (ft)
18.5
17.7
21.6
17.8
21.6
Floodprone Width (ft)
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1.8
1.7
1.5
1.7
1.5
Bankfull MaxDe th (ft)
3.2
3.1
3.2
3.1
3.2
Low Bank Height (ft)
N/A
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft)
32.9
30.7
31.7
30.2
32.9
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
10.4
10.2
14.7
10.6
14.2
Bankfull Fntmnchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
12.2
>2.2
N/A
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
N/A

Upstream
Downstream
Muddy Run II Reach 5A Cross Section 51 - Riffle
45
Cross Section 51
ifIle
MY5+ based on fixed baseline cross
sectional area* MBase
44
MY2
4-
MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
43
40.0
40.0
40.0
40.1
Bankfull Width (ft)
16.2
16.1
16.3
15.9
42
w
Floodprone Width (ft)
50.0
50.0
50.0
41
0
40
----- --
------ ----- ------
1.5
1.4
>
_m
LU 39
1.4
1.1
Bankfull MaxDe th (ft)
2.4
2.3
2.6
2.7
2.6
Low Bank Height (ft)
38
2.6
37
24.7
1 23.2
1 23.7
1 22.7 1
36
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Baseline - Year 1 - Year 2 Year 3 Year 5 - - - - Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area
10.6
11.2
11.2
Cross Section 51
ifIle
MY5+ based on fixed baseline cross
sectional area* MBase
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
40.0
40.0
40.0
40.0
40.1
Bankfull Width (ft)
16.2
16.1
16.3
15.9
22.2
Floodprone Width (ft)
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1.5
1.4
1.5
1.4
1.1
Bankfull MaxDe th (ft)
2.4
2.3
2.6
2.7
2.6
Low Bank Height (ft)
2.6
Bankfull Cross Sectional Ama (ft2)1
24.7
1 23.2
1 23.7
1 22.7 1
24.7
Bankfull Width/Depth Rafio
10.6
11.2
11.2
11.1
20.0
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.3
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1
1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0 1
1.0

Upstream
45
43
Cross Section 52 (Run)
MY5+ based on fixed baseline cross
sectional area*
Base
MYl
MY2
41
MY5 MY7 MY+
•
39.8
39.8
A
37.0
w
c
°
Upstream
Downstream
Muddy Run II Reach 5A Cross Section 52 - Run - Reach Repaired in Year 3
45
43
Cross Section 52 (Run)
MY5+ based on fixed baseline cross
sectional area*
Base
MYl
MY2
41
MY5 MY7 MY+
•
39.8
39.8
39.8
37.0
w
c
°
R
17.7
17.8
19.3
10.6
i
Floodprone Width ft
,
39
_m
LU 37
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1.8
2.1
3-
rr�
- - - --
---- ----
- - -
-------------------------
- -
---- -----
---- ----
- - - -
ai
35
33
2.3
Low Bank HeiahLM
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Baseline - Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 5 - - - - Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area
31.8
36.9
52.3
14.6
14.6
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
9.9
8.6
7.1
7.7
4.5
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>6.1
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0 I
Downstream
Muddy Run II Reach 5A Cross Section 52 - Run - Reach Repaired in Year 3
45
43
Cross Section 52 (Run)
MY5+ based on fixed baseline cross
sectional area*
Base
MYl
MY2
41
MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
39.8
39.8
39.8
37.0
w
c
°
Bankfull Width ft
17.7
17.8
19.3
10.6
8.1
Floodprone Width ft
50.0
39
_m
LU 37
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1.8
2.1
2.7
-----
- - - --
---- ----
- - -
-------------------------
- -
---- -----
---- ----
- - - -
5.9
35
33
2.3
Low Bank HeiahLM
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Baseline - Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 5 - - - - Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area
31.8
36.9
52.3
Cross Section 52 (Run)
MY5+ based on fixed baseline cross
sectional area*
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3*
MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
39.8
39.8
39.8
37.0
36.8
Bankfull Width ft
17.7
17.8
19.3
10.6
8.1
Floodprone Width ft
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1.8
2.1
2.7
1.4
1.8
Bankfull Max De th ft
3.1
4.5
5.9
2.1
2.3
Low Bank HeiahLM
2.5
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ftp
31.8
36.9
52.3
14.6
14.6
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
9.9
8.6
7.1
7.7
4.5
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>6.1
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0 I
1.1

Upstream
Downstream
A . y
Muddy Run II Reach 5A Cross Section 53 - Pool - Reach Repaired in Year 3
44
42
Cross Section 53 Pool
MY5+basedon fixedbasefine cross
sectional area*
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3-
MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
39.7
39.7
39.7
36.9
40
Bankfull Width (ft)
17.4
17.9
18.1
8.9
7.7
Floodprone Width (ft)
50.0
50.0
50.0
c
0
m
45.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1.9
2.1
2.2
1.5
1.8
Bankfull MaxDe th (ft)
3.5
3.8
38
m
LU
36
---
3.1
Low Bank Height (ft)
--
- -
------
-----
------
------
33.8
34
1 39.0
1 13.6 1
13.6
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
9.0
8.6
8.4
5.8
4.3
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
N/A
Bankfull Bank Height Ratiol
1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0 1
N/A
32
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Baseline Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 5 - - - - Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area
Cross Section 53 Pool
MY5+basedon fixedbasefine cross
sectional area*
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3-
MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
39.7
39.7
39.7
36.9
36.9
Bankfull Width (ft)
17.4
17.9
18.1
8.9
7.7
Floodprone Width (ft)
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
45.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1.9
2.1
2.2
1.5
1.8
Bankfull MaxDe th (ft)
3.5
3.8
4.1
3.4
3.1
Low Bank Height (ft)
N/A
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft2)
33.8
1 37.1
1 39.0
1 13.6 1
13.6
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
9.0
8.6
8.4
5.8
4.3
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
N/A
Bankfull Bank Height Ratiol
1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0 1
N/A

Upstream
Downstream
Muddy Run II Reach 5A Cross Section 54 - Pool - Reach Repaired in Year 3
42
40
Cross Section 54 (Po 1)
-
- - -
-
MY2
MY3•
MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
w
c 38
38.8
38.8
35.9
34.4
Bankfull Width (ft)
15.7
0
.6
20.3
11.5
7.0
Floodprone Width (ft)
50.0
50.0
m
w
50.0
34.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1.7
2.0
2.2
36
-----
----------------
- - ------
-----
------ ------
1.7
34
Low Bank Height (ft)
N/A
32
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Baseline - Year 1 - Year 2 Year 3 Year 5 - - - - Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area
1 32.7
1 45.2
1 11.7 1
Cross Section 54 (Po 1)
MY5+ based on fixed baseline cross
sectional area*
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3•
MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
38.8
38.8
38.8
35.9
34.4
Bankfull Width (ft)
15.7
16.7
20.3
11.5
7.0
Floodprone Width (ft)
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
34.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1.7
2.0
2.2
1.0
1.7
Bankfull Max De th (ft)
2.9
4.0
4.4
1.7
2.3
Low Bank Height (ft)
N/A
Bankfull Cross Sectional Ama (ft2)1
26.1
1 32.7
1 45.2
1 11.7 1
11.7
Bankfull Width/Depth Rafio
9.5
8.5
9.1
11.3
4.2
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
N/A
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1
1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0 1
N/A

Upstream
Downstream
Cross Section 55 Riffle
MY5+basedon fixed baseline cross
sectional area*
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3-
MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
38.0
38.0
38.0
35.6
35.7
Bankfull Width (ft)
9.7
14.8
20.8
10.2
12.7
Floodprone Width (ft)
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
43.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.4
2.2
----------
1.0
1
I will
2.2
3.0
3.3
Cross Section 55 Riffle
MY5+basedon fixed baseline cross
sectional area*
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3-
MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
38.0
38.0
38.0
35.6
35.7
Bankfull Width (ft)
9.7
14.8
20.8
10.2
12.7
Floodprone Width (ft)
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
43.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.4
2.2
2.1
1.0
0.8
Bankfull Max De th (ft)
2.2
3.0
3.3
1.7
1.8
Low Bank Height (ft)
1.7
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft2)
13.6
33.3
44.4
10.5
10.5
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
7.0
6.6
9.7
9.9
15.4
Bankfull Fntrenchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>3.4
Bankfull Bank Height Ratiol
1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0 1
0.9

Upstream
Downstream
Muddy Run II Reach 5B Cross Section 56 - Run
43
42
41
40
Cross Section 56 un
w
MYl
39
c
°
MY3
MY5 MY7 MY+
38
m-----
°
_
------ ----- - ------ ----- ------ - ------ ------
37.3
37
w
36
37.3
37.7
35
17.6
17.0
34
18.4
20.2
33
50.0
50.0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Baseline - Year 1 - Year 2 Year 3 Year 5 - - - - Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
2.6
Cross Section 56 un
MY5+ based on fixed baseline cross
sectional area* MBase
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
37.3
37.3
37.3
37.3
37.7
Bankfull Width (ft)
17.6
17.0
17.5
18.4
20.2
Floodprone Width (ft)
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
2.6
2.2
2.2
2.1
2.2
Bankfull MaxDe th (ft)
3.7
3.2
3.3
3.4
4.0
Low Bank Height (ft)3.7
Bankfull Cmss Sectional Ama(ft)
53
453,
38.0
37.9
38.1
45.3
Bankfull Width/De th Ratio
6.9
7.6
8.0
8.8
9.0
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
12.2
>2.2
>2.5
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1 0.9

Upstream
Downstream
Muddy Run II Reach 5B Cross Section 57 - Run
41
Cross Section 57 Run
MY5+based on fixed baseline cross
sectional area* M
Base
40
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
35.7
35.7
35.7
35.7
36.1
39
17.0
16.8
16.0
16.4
38
Floodprone Width (ft)
37.5
37.5
37.5
� 37
0
3g-----
---------------
-
------ ----- ------ ------ ------
1.3
m
LU 35
1.5
1.5
Bankfull Max De th (ft)
2.6
2.1
2.1
2.5
3.5
Low Bank Height (ft)
34
3.1
33
30.7
22.4
22.7
24.8
32
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Baseline Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 5 - - - - Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area
9.4
12.5
11.2
Cross Section 57 Run
MY5+based on fixed baseline cross
sectional area* M
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
35.7
35.7
35.7
35.7
36.1
Bankfull Width (ft)
17.0
16.8
16.0
16.4
20.6
Floodprone Width (ft)
37.5
37.5
37.5
37.5
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.8
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.5
Bankfull Max De th (ft)
2.6
2.1
2.1
2.5
3.5
Low Bank Height (ft)
3.1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Arca(ft2)
30.7
22.4
22.7
24.8
30.7
Bankfull Width/De thEatio
9.4
12.5
11.2
10.9
13.9
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
2.2
2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.4
Bankfull Bank Height Ratiol
1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0
1 0.9

Upstream
Downstream
Muddy Run II Reach 6 Cross Section 58 - Run
46
Cross Section 58 un
45
MYl
44
MY3
MY5 MY7 MY+
43
41.0
41.0
41.0
41.0
41.1
w
14.2
13.7
42
14.0
15.4
c
° 41
--
50.0
40
50.0
50.0
LU
2.4
2.3
39
2.3
2.2
Bankfull MaxDe th (ft)
3.4
3.3
38
3.3
3.4
Low Bank Height (ft)
37
3.2
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft)
33.9
31.7
32.3
32.6
33.9
36
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Baseline - Year 1 - Year 2 Year 3 Year 5 - - - - Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area
6.0
7.0
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
Cross Section 58 un
MY5+ based on fixed baseline cross
sectional area* MBase
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
41.0
41.0
41.0
41.0
41.1
Bankfull Width (ft)
14.2
13.7
16.9
14.0
15.4
Floodprone Width (ft)
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
2.4
2.3
1.9
2.3
2.2
Bankfull MaxDe th (ft)
3.4
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.4
Low Bank Height (ft)
3.2
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft)
33.9
31.7
32.3
32.6
33.9
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
6.0
6.0
8.9
6.0
7.0
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>3.2
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.9

Upstream
Downstream
Muddy Run II Reach 6 Cross Section 59 - Run
44
Cross Section 59 Run
MY5+based on fixed baseline cross
sectional area*
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7 MY+
43
42
39.5
39.5
39.5
39.5
39.8
Bankfull Width (ft)
13.5
12.5
11.9
11.9
14.9
Floodprone Width (ft)
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
41
1.1
0.9
0.9
0.8
1.0
Bankfull Max De th (ft)
2.2
1.8
c
0
m
1.6
2.0
Low Bank Height (ft)
2.0
0) 40
Ej
-----
----
---
- - - - -----
-
-----
---- ----
13.8
39
14.2
14.6
Bankfull Fntrenchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>3.4
38
1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0
37
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Baseline Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 5 - - - - Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area
Cross Section 59 Run
MY5+based on fixed baseline cross
sectional area*
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5 MY7 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
39.5
39.5
39.5
39.5
39.8
Bankfull Width (ft)
13.5
12.5
11.9
11.9
14.9
Floodprone Width (ft)
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.1
0.9
0.9
0.8
1.0
Bankfull Max De th (ft)
2.2
1.8
1.8
1.6
2.0
Low Bank Height (ft)
2.0
Bankfull Cross Sectional Ama(ft2)
15.2
11.3
11.1
9.9
152
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
11.9
13.8
12.7
14.2
14.6
Bankfull Fntrenchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>3.4
Bankfull Bank Height Ratiol
1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0

Appendix E
Hydrology Data
Table 13. Documentation of Geomorphologically Significant Flow Events
Table 14. Rainfall Summary
Table 15a. Wetland Hydrology Criteria Attainment
Table 15b. Wetland Hydrology Gauges Summary
2018 Groundwater Monitoring Gauge Hydrographs
Crest Gauge Verification Photos

Table 13. Documentation of Geomorphically Significant Flow Events
Stage Recorder
Number of Bankf ill
Events
Maximum Bankfull Height (ft.)
Stage Recorder 1 (Reach 2)
On -Site Auto
Rain Gaua e
January
MY1 2014
1
0.40
MY2 2015
1
0.60
MY3 2016
4
1.60
MY4 2017
5
1.10
MY5 2018
6
2.45
Stage Recorder 2 (Reach 3a)
---
A ril
MY1 2014
8
1.50
MY2 2015
19
2.00
MY3 2016
8
2.00
MY4 2017
7
2.00
MY5 2018
10
3.50
Stage Recorder 3 (Reach 3b)
---
July
MY 12014
0
---
MY2 2015
4
0.20
MY3 2016
2
2.18
MY4 2017
0
---
MY5 2018
1
0.65
Stage Recorder 4 (Reach 5b)
27.37
October
MY 1 2014
2
0.45
MY2 2015
l
0.40
MY3 2016
l
3.80
MY4 2017
8
2.80
MY5 2018
6
3.75
Table 14. Rainfall Summary
Month
Average
Normal Limits
30 Percent 70 Percent
Wallace
Station
On -Site Auto
Rain Gaua e
January
4.33
3.32
5.03
5.78
---
February
3.23
2.14
3.87
1.24
---
March
4.50
3.23
5.32
3.57
---
A ril
3.16
1.70
3.85
5.22
---
May
3.68
2.69
4.34
10.56
---
June
4.49
3.11
5.34
5.76
---
July
6.06
4.16
7.22
6.14
10.18
August
5.40
3.12
6.56
1.52
8.16
September
5.00
2.04
6.07
18.88
27.37
October
3.21
1.62
3.92
0.88
0.48
November
2.89
1.83
3.49
---
---
December
3.24
2.14
3.88
---
---
Total
49.19
31.10
58.89
59.55
46.19

Table 15a. Wetland Hydrology Criteria Attainment
2018 Max Hydroperiod (Growing Season 17 -Mar through 14 -Nov, 242 days)
Success Criterion 9%
Gauge
Consecutive
Cumulative
Occurrences
Days
Percent of
growing
Season
Days
Percent of
growing
Season
AW1
19
8
56
23
8
AW2
46
19
70
29
3
AW3
47
19
71
29
3
AW4
20
8
38
16
3
AW5
49
20 d
75
31
3
AW6
1 49
20
75
31
3
AW7
59
24
80
33
3
RAWI
**
**
**
RAW2
**
**
**
**
RAW3
46
19
66
1 27
1 3
* 2018 Data represents March 17, 2018 - June 7, 2018
** Gauge malfunctioned during 2018

Table 15b. Wetland Hydrology Gauge Summary
*MY4-2017 data only represents March 17, 2017 - May 2, 2017
**Gauge data after June 7, 2018 was determined to be unreliable due to inconsitent ambient pressure data
***Gauge malfunctioned in 2018
MY1-2014
MY2-2015
MY3-2016
MY4-2017
MY5-2018**
Consecutive
Consecutive
Consecutive
Consecutive
Consecutive
Gauge
Days
Percent of
growing
Season
Days
Percent of
growing
Season
Days
Percent of
growing
Season
Days
Percent of
growing
Season
Days
Percent of
growing
Season
AW1
22
9
63
26
22
9
49
20
19
8
AW2
22
9
41
17
21
9
26
11
46
19
AW3
13
5
38
16
32
13
52
21
47
19
AW4
67
28
77
32
95
39
69
28
20
8
AW5
7
3
38
16
32
13
55
23
49
20
AW6
43
18
65
27
22
9
55
23
49
20
AW7
5
2
72
30
36
15
59
24
59
24
RAW1*
22
9
49
20
33
13
33
13
***
***
RAW2
10
4
19
8
15
6
6
2
***
***
RAW3
20
8
41
32
13
34
14
46
19
*MY4-2017 data only represents March 17, 2017 - May 2, 2017
**Gauge data after June 7, 2018 was determined to be unreliable due to inconsitent ambient pressure data
***Gauge malfunctioned in 2018

30
20
10
N
W
t
v
0
C
O
cC
_y —10
W
L
—20
c
0
L
0
—30
—40
2018 Muddy Run II Groundwater Gauge AW1
Growing Season
—50
J
F M A M J J A S O N D
Months
Wallace Daily Rainfall -MRII AW1
9.0
put
7.0
N
6.0 t
v
C
5.0 0
.Q
4.0 'v
L-
CL
3.0
2.0
eye,[

2018 Muddy Run II Groundwater Gauge AW2
10
10.0
Growing Season
9.0
5
JI
8.0
0
7.0
rn
-5
6.0 t
O
v
C
5.0 p
d
-10
W----------
m
-----
---
---------
----------- ------
4.0 'v
-15
i
c
a
0
3.0
-20
2.0
-25
1.0
-30
0.0
J F
M A M J J A S O N D
Months
Wallace Daily Rainfall -MRII AW2

10
5
0
rn
d
t
U
-5
C
O
cC
d 10
W
L
-15
C
0
'L^
V
-20
-25
-30
J
2018 Muddy Run II Groundwater Gauge AW3
11 11
F-----
I I 11
'1 Growing Season
11
I I 11
1 1 11
I I 11
1 1 11
I I 11
1 1 11
1 1 11
I I 11
11 11
1 11
11
11
11
1111
11
1 11
1 1 11
I 1
11
1 1
I 1
11
11
1 1
I 1
11
11
1 1
I 1
11
11
1 1
I 1
11
11
1 1
I 1
11
11
I I
11
1 1
I I
11
11
1 1
I 1
11
11
1 1
I 1
11
11
1 1
I 1
11
11
1 1
I 1
11
11
11
11
1
I 1
1 1
II
11
11
- - - - - - - -- - T ---------------------
- - - - - - - - - - -
ZT -------
F M A M J J A S O N D
Months
Wallace Daily Rainfall - MRII AW3
10.0
9.0
8.0
7.0
N
6.0 t
v
O
5.0 0
R
.Q
4.0 'v
Q
L
a
3.0
2.0
1.0
HE

2018 Muddy Run II Groundwater Gauge AW4
10:
10.0
11
11- Growing Season
9.0
0
8.0
=_
-10
_=
7.0
==
W
-20
_=
6.0
O
=_
C
5.0 p
d
-30
==
LU
(D
__
Q
3
_=
4.0 'v
-40
i
a
O
==
3.0
(9
Z Z
-50
_=
ZZ
2.0
-60
ZZ
_=
ZZ
1.0
-70
ZZ
0.0
J
F M A M J J A S O N D
Months
Wallace Daily Rainfall MRII AW4

2018 Muddy Run II Groundwater Gauge AW5
20 10.00
Growing Season
15
9.00
10
8.00
N 5
7.00
t
C
to
0
6.00 t
O
v
c
m
cD -5
5.00 p
W
+r
L
m
yam+
Q
R
4.00
-10
3
a
c
a
O 15
3.00
2.00
-20
-25 - 1.00
-30 0.00
J F M A M J J A S O N D
Months
Wallace Daily Rainfall -MRII AW5 Ground Elevation

"I
30
N 20
d
s
c
0 10
R
d
W
L
W 0
3
c
0
0 -
-20
2018 Muddy Run II Groundwater Gauge AW6
Growing Season
-30
J
F M A M J J A S O N D
Months
Wallace Daily Rainfall MRII AW6 Ground Elevation
10.00
9.00
8.00
7.00
6.00
V
C
5.00 0
4.00 v
a�
L
CL
3.00
2.00
1.00
MIN

20
15
item
-15
2018 Muddy Run II Groundwater Gauge AW7
Growing Season
--------- — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — ----------- ------
-20 111
J
F M A M J J A S O
Months
Wallace Daily Rainfall MRII AW7 Ground Elevation
N D
10.00
9.00
8.00
7.00
rn
6.00 t
V
C
5.00 p
.Q
4.00 v
to
L
CL
3.00
2.00
1.00
0.00

2018 Muddy Run II Groundwater Gauge REFAW3
5 10.0
Growing Season
0
9.0
8.0
-5
t
7.0
-10
V
----------
------
N
6.0
C
-15
d
5.0 p
W
-20
CD
Q
4.0 'U
25
L
d
C
3.0
'L^
V
-30
2.0
-35 1.0
-40ILL 0.0
J F M A M J J A S O N D
Months
Wallace Daily Rainfall -MRII REF AW3

)Y
F�
j
Photo 2. Crest
Gauge
9/15/2018)