310276_Compliance Inspection_20180712

--------- -- ---- -
Facility Number r-� - � O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
Type of Visit: (&Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation U Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: tKRoutlne O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other 0 Denied Access tI
Date of Visit: '7 2 Arrival Time: �--1� Departure Time: ® County: 4' Region:
Farm Name: PGA (J�l �t u Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: S-L'0 T f Oyy (w(, Title:
Onsite Representative: S a-4 Ni^
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to I
Wean to I
,Feederto
Farrow to
Farrow to
Other
Other
Latitude:
Phone:
Integrator: q
Certification Number: 1 I
Certification Number:
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
ayer
Non--
La er
Design Current
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at- ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c, What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? _
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
Longitude:
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
❑ Yes M No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA FINE
[-]Yes
[-]No
❑ Yes]
No
❑ Yes
"n No
❑NA ❑NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑NA ❑NE
Page I of 3 21412015 Continued

il
Facility Number: Date of inspection: 2
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes KNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier: 2-
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):z
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
[ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
' `
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health
or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
[ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
*o
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement9
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
N No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Yes
U
I�Q No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals
(Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge
into
Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application
Outside of Approved Area
II
12. Crop Type(s): bIMX Ot17,
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
1� No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
IN Y No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
I%No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
k No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
V No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
WNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below ❑ Yes DdNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a min gauge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain minbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes NNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 21412015 Continued

Facili Number: Date ofinspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes t No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check []Yes N No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail.provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
XApplication Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other.
32 Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWW?
33 Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
m No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
'4 NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes f No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes M No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question 1): Explain any YES answers• and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary). _
C.�I►bY�� lolls (1�
D - 4, o
A" w i l 1 n Zvi 42
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signatuc
Page 3 of 3
Phone: ---1— 73 g
Date: 2i Iq
21412015