20130957 Ver 1_Year 4 Monitoring Report_2018_20190131

Mitigation Project Name Tributaries of Wicker Branch Stream Restoration Site County Union USACE Action ID 2013-01680
DMS ID 95022 Date Project Instituted 7/13/2011 NCDWR Permit No 2013-0957
River Basin Yadkin Date Prepared 8/27/2018
Cataloging Unit 03040105
DEBTS (released credits only)
Ratios 1 1.5 2.75242 5 1 3 2 5 1 3 2 5 1 3 2
E
1 - For DMS, no credits are released during the first milestone
2 - For DMS projects, the second credit release milestone occurs automatically when the as -built report (baseline monitoring report) has been made available to the NCIRT by posting it to the DMS (NCEEP) Portal, provided the following criteria
have been met:
1) Approval of the final Mitigation Plan
2) Recordation of the preservation mechanism, as well as a title opinion acceptable to the USACE covering the property
3) Completion of all physical and biological improvements to the mitigation site pursuant to the mitigation plan
4) Reciept of necessary DA permit authorization or written DA approval for porjects where DA permit issuance is not required
3 - A 10% reserve of credits is to be held back until the bankfull event performance standard has been met
1,390.000 426.667 723.000
10.00% 10.00% 10.00%
139.000 42.667 72.300
1,390.000 426.667 723.000
50.00% 50.00% 50.00%
695.000 213.333 361.500
834.000 222.700 361.500
105.6 33.300
Crisco Road industrial Park
Wellington Chase
--
----------------
E
1 - For DMS, no credits are released during the first milestone
2 - For DMS projects, the second credit release milestone occurs automatically when the as -built report (baseline monitoring report) has been made available to the NCIRT by posting it to the DMS (NCEEP) Portal, provided the following criteria
have been met:
1) Approval of the final Mitigation Plan
2) Recordation of the preservation mechanism, as well as a title opinion acceptable to the USACE covering the property
3) Completion of all physical and biological improvements to the mitigation site pursuant to the mitigation plan
4) Reciept of necessary DA permit authorization or written DA approval for porjects where DA permit issuance is not required
3 - A 10% reserve of credits is to be held back until the bankfull event performance standard has been met
1,390.000 426.667 723.000
10.00% 10.00% 10.00%
139.000 42.667 72.300
1,390.000 426.667 723.000
50.00% 50.00% 50.00%
695.000 213.333 361.500
834.000 222.700 361.500
105.6 33.300

YEAR 4 of 5 Monitoring Report
Tributaries of Wicker Branch Stream Restoration
Union County, North Carolina
DMS Project Number: 95022
Contract No: 003982
USACE Action Id No: SAW 2013-01680
Yadkin River
03040105
Prepared for:
NC Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Mitigation Services
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1652
Data Collection Period October 2018
Submitted: January 2019

YEAR 4 of 5 Monitoring Report
Tributaries of Wicker Branch Stream Restoration
Union County, North Carolina
DMS Project Number: 95022
Contract No: 003982
USACE Action Id No: SAW 2013-01680
Yadkin River
03040105
Prepared for:
NC Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Mitigation Services
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1652
Prepared by:
A=COM
701 Corporate Center Drive, Suite 475
Raleigh, NC 27607
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
January 2019

Table of Contents
1.0 PROJECT SUMMARY............................................................................................................1
2.0 METHODOLOGY....................................................................................................................3
2.1 VEGETATION.....................................................................................................................3
2.2 STREAM ASSESSMENT....................................................................................................3
2.3 VISUAL ASSESSMENT......................................................................................................4
2.4 DIGITAL PHOTOS..............................................................................................................4
3.0 REFERENCES.......................................................................................................................4
I
Tributaries to Wickers Branch Stream Restoration Site
Year 4 (2018) Monitoring Report
DMS Project No. 95022

APPENDICIES
Appendix A — Background Tables
Figure 1: Vicinity Map
Figure 2: Stream Assets Map
Table 1: Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Table 2: Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3: Project Contacts
Table 4: Project Baseline Information and Attribute
Appendix B — Visual Assessment Data
Figure 3: Current Condition Plan View
Table 5: Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Table 6: Vegetation Condition Assessment
Photos: Stream Stations
Photos: Vegetation Plots
Appendix C — Vegetation Plot Data
Table 7: Vegetation Plot Counts and Densities
Appendix D — Stream Geomorphology Data
Cross -Sections
Longitudinal Profiles
Pebble Counts
Table 8: Baseline Stream Data Summary
Table 9a: Cross -Section Morphology Data
Table 9b: Stream Reach Morphology Data
Appendix E — Hydrologic Data
Table 10: Verification of Bankfull Events
Tributaries to Wickers Branch Stream Restoration Site
Year 4 (2018) Monitoring Report
DMS Project No. 95022

1.0 PROJECT SUMMARY
The Tributaries of Wicker Branch Stream Restoration Project is located in Union County, North
Carolina in the Yadkin River Basin, (HUC 03040105081010), and within a North Carolina
Department of Environmental Quality, Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) Targeted Local
Watershed (TLW). It is also located within the watershed of Lanes Creek, a 303d -listed stream
and Water Supply Watershed.
The project site consists of four headwater stream channels that flow through agricultural land
and prior to restoration efforts were devoid of riparian vegetation. Past and present agricultural
use of the land had severely impacted and degraded the channels. The project goals address
stressors identified in the TLW and include the following:
• Improved water quality in Wicker Branch.
• Improve aquatic habitat in the tributary channels.
• Provide aesthetic value, wildlife habitat, and bank stability through the creation of a
riparian zone.
• Create a contiguous wildlife corridor, with connection of some isolated adjacent natural
habitats to larger downstream forested tracts.
• Provide shading and biomass input to the stream and mast for wildlife when vegetation
is mature.
These objectives were achieved through restoring, enhancing, and preserving 4020 feet of
perennial and intermittent stream channel. The riparian areas were also planted with native
vegetation to improve habitat and protect water quality. The project reaches consist of Tributary
1A (Priority 1 Restoration), Tributary 1B (Enhancement Level II including invasive species
control), Tributary 2 (Preservation), Tributary 3 (Enhancement Levels I and II), and Tributary 4
(Enhancement Level II)(See Table 1 in Appendix A and Figure 2 in Appendix A).
Tributary 2 was determined to be unsuitable for mitigation credits during a site visit with the
USACE in August, 2011. It was requested by the USACE that a 30 foot buffer and conservation
easement be acquired to provide riparian habitat connectivity between the restored segments of
Tributary 1A and upstream wooded areas.
Project success will be determined by monitoring channel stability and vegetation within the
easement. Success criteria have been outlined in the 2013 Mitigation Plan and include a stable
dimension, pattern, and profile documented through the surveying of cross-sections and
longitudinal profiles. Vegetation monitoring plots will have a minimum of 260 stems per acre
after 5 years.
Project design was completed in December 2013 and the project constructed in September and
October 2014. Planting was complete in March 2015 (See Table 2 in Appendix A).
Herbaceous vegetation is well established though out the easement. The vegetation monitoring
plots show an average density of 430 stems per acre down from baseline planting of 684 stems
per acre but still well above the 320 stems per acre at end of year 3 and 260 stems per acre at
year 5. Two plots do not meet the vegetation success criteria. Plots 6 and 10 are at 202 and 243
stems per acre respectively. A number of volunteer woody stems were observed this year
Tributaries to Wickers Branch Stream Restoration Site
Year 4 (2018) Monitoring Report
DMS Project No. 95022

throughout the easement. Volunteer species included elm, box elder, persimmon, oaks,
sweetgum, pine, willows, elderberry, and redbud.
Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense) is present in the buffer along Tributary 1B. The area was
treated twice in 2018. Scattered privet still remains and spot treating of the floodplain will occur
through 2019. Several areas of dense honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica) have developed in
isolated areas on Tributary 1 and 3. These areas will also be treated in 2019. There are also
scattered chinaberry (Melia azedarach) trees along the edges of Tributary 1 and 3. These trees
will be removed.
The restored stream channels appear to be stable with no areas of bank erosion observed.
During construction in 2014 a headcut at the bottom of Tributary 1 B was stabilized with a log sill
and stone. Floodplain flows during bankfull events has starting to erode the bank around the left
bank side of the sill and will need to be repaired in 2019.
The adjacent fields were planted in soybeans in 2018. Additional signage installed in the spring
of 2016 was augmented in 2017. Only minor encroachment at the crossings of Tributary 1 and 2
is occurring and AECOM will continue to work with the landowner and the current farmer to
address these minor encroachments. The areas of encroachment are shown on Figure 3 in
Appendix B.
Hydrology
AECOM is currently monitoring the stream flow on Tributaries 1 and 3 using Onset HOBO
pressure transducers. Transducers are installed in two separate pools on each of the tributaries
for a total of 4 locations. On Tributary 1A a transducer is located on the downstream end of the
project and a second is located above the confluence with Tributary 2. On Tributary 3 one
transducer is located on the downstream end and a second is located in a pool just below the
wetland at the beginning of the Enhancement I reach. The locations of the transducers are
shown on Figure 3 Current Condition Plan View in Appendix B.
The transducers are suspended in the pool at a set elevation and use pressure to measure the
depth of water over (above) the transducer. The elevation of the transducer is known, as is the
elevation of the head of the riffle and the top of the bank (for bankfull flow). When the elevation
of the water level in the pool above the transducer exceeds the elevation of the head of the
riffle, then it is assumed that flow is occurring. The data for the transducers (which monitor flow)
is presented in graphs that can be found in Appendix E.
Tributary 1 had continuous flow in both the upper and lower reach beginning on January 29,
2018 and continuing through April 8 in the upper section beginning on January 13 and
countinuing until April 24 on the lower reach. Except during storm events the depth of flow at the
head of the riffle is on the order of 0.5 inches or less. Tributary 3 had continuous flow beginning
on January 12, 2018 and continuing through May 6, 2018 in the upper section and in the lower
section flow began on January 9 and continued until May 5. Flow was typically about 1 inch in
depth.
A bankfull event was recorded by the transducers on January 29, 2018 and confirmed through
visual observation of rack lines and debris in the floodplain during a February 6, 2018 site vist.
2
Tributaries to Wickers Branch Stream Restoration Site
Year 4 (2018) Monitoring Report
DMS Project No. 95022

A second bankfull event occurred on April 25 and a third during Hurricane Florence on August
16.
Tributary 3 Stream Mitigation Units
The project as described in the Mitigation Plan is projected to generate 2539.65 SMUs through
a mixture of Restoration, Enhancement I, and Enhancement II. During the Interagency Review
Team (IRT) site visit in April 2017 it was noted that the upper reach located between two
wetland areas was silted in and lacked a distinct channel. This reach is 264 feet in length and
has been proposed as Enhancement II at a Mitigation Ratio of 2.5:1. This length was projected
to generate 105.6 SMUs.
During the October 2018 monitoring it was observed that a channel was starting to reform in this
reach. The channel will continued to be monitored to see if a channel continues to reform and
to what extent (length).
2.0 METHODOLOGY
Vegetation survival, channel stability, and wetland hydrology were monitored on the project site.
Post restoration monitoring will occur for a minimum of five years or until success criteria are
met.
2.1 VEGETATION
Eleven vegetation plots were established and assess for the baseline vegetation monitoring.
The Carolina Vegetative Survey-EEP Protocol Level 2 methodology was used to sample
vegetation on October 14 and 15, 2015 (Lee et al. 2006, http://cvs.bio.unc.edu/methods.htm).
2.2 STREAM ASSESSMENT
Twelve permanent monitoring cross-sections have been established on the site as follows:
• Tributary 1A (1,390 feet) — 4 riffle and 3 pool cross-sections
• Tributary 3 (640 feet) — 2 riffle and 1 pool cross-sections
• Tributary 4 (631 feet) — 2 riffle cross-sections
Wolman pebble counts were conducted on each cross-section. Particle sizes less than 2.0
millimeters (mm) were determined by touch using the following guidelines:
• Silt — Smooth feeling (not gritty)
• Fine sand — Slightly gritty texture
• Coarse sand — Very gritty texture
Multiple parameters were located including top of bank, thalweg, and water surface. Pool and
riffle features were called out to calculate feature slopes and lengths. The survey was performed
with a survey grade GPS (Trimble TCS3 with an R8 Model 3 GNSS receiver).
3
Tributaries to Wickers Branch Stream Restoration Site
Year 4 (2018) Monitoring Report
DMS Project No. 95022

2.3 VISUAL ASSESSMENT
A visual assessment of the stream was performed to assess the bank (lateral stability), bed
(vertical stability), the easement boundary, and site vegetation.
2.4 DIGITAL PHOTOS
Digital photos of each of the vegetation plots and each cross-section were also taken as seen in
Appendix B.
3.0 REFERENCES
Lee, M.T., R.K. Peet, S.D. Roberts, T.R. Wentworth. 2006. CVS-EEP Protocol for
Recording Vegetation Version 4.0.
4
Tributaries to Wickers Branch Stream Restoration Site
Year 4 (2018) Monitoring Report
DMS Project No. 95022

APPENDIX A — General Figures and Tables
Figure 1: Vicinity Map
Figure 2: Stream Assets Map
Table 1: Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Table 2: Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3: Project Contacts
Table 4: Project Baseline Information and Attribute
Tributaries to Wickers Branch Stream Restoration Site
Year 4 (2018) Monitoring Report
DMS Project No. 95022

Monroe
-Wings+'t-e
--- 74
r F
i I
% J-
r -
r-
°'a
�a
V2
3 �a bio.
A
d
0 CO
GO�d o���
01 i
CD a �
c
601 U)
Tributaries of Wicker Branch
Stream Restoration Site a
�e
From the sourtheast of Monroe take US Highway 601 South
6.3 miles to Griffin Cemetery Road. Turn left onto Griffin Cemetery
Road. Follow Griffin Cemetery Road approximately 0.7 miles and
turn right onto gravel drive. Follow gravel drive to farm field and to
the head of Tributary 1A.
Site Boundary
6ABARRup 1. Vicinity Map
STANLY
-.�-�f �__a M BURG, Tributaries of Wicker Branch
�s'f` ' Stream Restoration Site (DMS No. 95022)
Union County, NC
a _
74
i'
0 0.5 1 2
Miles

L
4 Tributary 1A
Tributary 1 B
Legend
Site Boundary
Easement Boundary
Restoration
Enhancement I
Enhancement 11
STANLY
i
Tributary 3
0
t•
Tributary 4
2. Stream Assets Map
Tributaries of Wicker Branch
Stream Restoration Site (DMS No. 95022)
Union County, NC
0 250 500 1,000
Feet

Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Tributaries of Wicker Branch Stream Restoration/ DMS No. 95022
Mitigation Credits
Stream
Riparian Wetland Non-riparian Wetland Buffer
Nitrogen
Offset
phosphorous Offset
Type R
RE
R RE R RE
Totals 2539.67
0
Project Components
Project Component
Stationing/Location Existing Footage Approach Restoration or Restoration Restoration Footage
Equivalent
Mitigation
Ratio
SMUs by
Reach
Tributary 1A
1293 Restoration Restoration
1390
1:1
1390.00
Tributary 1 B
1095 Enhancement II Enhancement II
1095
3:1
365.00
Tributary 2
330 N/A N/A
330
N/A
0.00
Tributary 3
264 Enhancement II Enhancement II
264
2.5:1
105.60
Tributary 3
640 Enhancement I Enhancement 1
640
1.5:1
426.67
Tributary 4
631 Enhancement 11 Enhancement II
631
2.5:1
252.40
Component Summation
Restoration Level
Stream
(linear feet)
Riparian Wetland Non-Riparian Wetland
(acres) (acres)
Buffer
(square feet)
Upland
(acres)
Riverine Non-Riverine
Restoration
1390
Enhancement
Enhancement 1
640
Enhancement II
1990
Creation
Preservation
High Quality Preservation

Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Tributaries of Wicker Branch Stream Restoration/ DMS No. 95022
Activity or Report
Data Collection
Complete
Completion or
Delivery
Restoration Plan
Dec-13
Dec-13
Final Design — Construction Plans
Mar-14
Mar-14
Construction
Nov-14
Nov-14
Permanent seed applied to entire site
Nov-14
Nov-14
Plantings for entire site
Mar-15
Mar-15
Mitigation Plan Year 0 Monitoring — baseline
May-15
Jan-16
Year 1 Monitoring - Vegetation and Stream Channel
Oct-15
Mar-16
Year 2 Monitoring - Vegetation and Stream Channel
Oct-16
Dec-16
Invasives Control
Oct-17
Oct-17
Year 3 Monitoring -Vegetation and Stream Channel
Oct-17
Feb-18
Invasives Control
July/Spt-18
July/Spt-18
Year 4 Monitoring Vegetation and Stream Channel
Oct-18
Jan-19
Invasives Control - proposed
May-19
Year 5 Monitoring -Vegetation and Stream Channel

Table 3. Project Contact Table
Tributaries of Wicker Branch Stream Restoration/ DMS No. 95022
Owner
Harry Tsomides
NCDEQ - Division of Mitigation Services
NCDEQ - Division of Mitigation
5 Ravenscroft Drive, Suite 102
Services
Asheville, NC 28801
[phone]
Designer
Ron Johnson, Project Manager
AECOM of North Carolina, Inc.
701 Corporate Center Drive, Suite 475
Raleigh, NC 27607
919 854-6210
Landowner
3308 Old Pageland Monroe Rd.
Richard Simpson
Monroe, NC 28112
704-506-5184
Riverworks
Construction Contractor
6105 Chapel Hill Road
Raleigh, NC 27607
Efird's Landscaping
Planting Contractor
42759 Greenview Drive
Albemarle, NC 38001
704 985-6559
Seeding Contractor
Riverworks
Invasives Contractor
Habitat Assessment & Restoration Professionals
Charlotte, North Carolina
Monitoring Performer
701 Corporate Center Drive, Suite 475
AECOM of North Carolina, Inc.
Raleigh, NC 27607
919-760-4000

Table 4. Project Baseline Information and Attributes
Tributaries of Wicker Branch Stream Restoration/ DMS No. 95022
Project Information
Project Name
Tributaries of Wicker Branch
Project County
Union
Project Area (acres)
15.49
Project Coordinates (lat/long)
34.8946849, -80.4472082
Project Watershed Summary
Physiographic Province
Carolina Slate Belt - Piedmont
Project River Basin
Yadkin -Pee Dee
USGS HUC for Project
3040105081010
NCDWQ Sub -basin for Project
3/7/2014
Project Drainage Area (acres)
173
Project Drainage Area Percentage of Impervious Area
2% to 3%
CGIA Land Use Classification
Cultivated/Managed Herbaceous Cover
Reach Summary Information (Pre -restoration)
Parameters
Trib 1A
Trib 1B
Trib 2
Trib 3
Trib 4
Length of Reach (feet)
1293
1095
330
1184
631
Valley Classification
Type II
Type II
Type II
Type II
Type II
Drainage area (acres)
71.5
94.5
17.6
32.7
29.8
NCDWQ Stream ID Score
38.5
38.5
27
43
31.5
NCDWQ Water Quality Classification
WS -V
WS -V
WS -V
WS -V
WS -V
Morphological Description
B4c, G4c, F4
C4/1`4
N/A
F/B6c/F6
N/A*
Evolutionary Trend
G-->F4C
N/A
N/A
G-->F4C
N/A
Underlying Mapped Soils
Cid channery silt
loam
Chewacla silt
loam
Cid channery silt
loam, Badin
channery silt
loam
Cid channery silt
loam
Cid channery silt
loam, Goldston-
Badin complex
Drainage Class
Moderately well
drained/
somewhat poorly
drained
Somewhat poorly
drained
Moderately well
drained/
somewhat poorly
drained, well
drained
Moderately well
drained/
somewhat poorly
drained
Somewhat poorly
drained to
excessively
drained
Soil Hydric Status
No
Yes
No
No
No
Slope
1.30%
1.00%
1.70%
1.40%
1.00%
FEMA Classification
Zone X
Zone X
Zone X
Zone X
Zone X
Native Vegetation
None
Mesic Mixed
Hardwoods
None
None
None
Percent Composition of Exotic Invasive Vegetation
0
50 % Understory
0
0
0
Regulatory Considerations
Regulation
Applicable
Resolved
Waters of the US — Section 404
Yes
Yes
Waters of the US — Section 401
Yes
Yes
Endangered Species Act
Yes
Yes
Historic Preservation Act
No
N/A
CZMA/CAMA
No
N/A
FEMA Floodplain Compliance
No
N/A
Essential Fisheries Habitat
No
N/A

APPENDIX B — VISUAL ASSESSMENT DATA
Figure 3: Current Condition Plan View
Table 5: Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Table 6: Vegetation Condition Assessment
Photos: Stream Stations
Photos: Vegetation Plots
Tributaries to Wickers Branch Stream Restoration Site
Year 4 (2018) Monitoring Report
DMS Project No. 95022

Tributary 4
igure 3(
0� -0;� --
Tributary 1A
is
♦ a
At
Aftw
re 3a
Tributary 2
O
c
d O
O O
(6 m
N
Q O
E E
j � N
Cn W
N
o
o U
U
U) E —_
,n O
(n
'a 2 O
C U W
� Id
Tributary IB J
m
m
LL
o C:
L
W
0
Figure 3b
Wicker Branch
o
> U)
c
N
(L a)L)CD
Year 4 Conditions
c �z6,
0 z
f+
` � O U
Photo Locations
mU .�
Invasives
C i C o
0 °
Enchroachment
o
Vegetation Problem Area�/�,
0
V/ L
Vegetation Plots
'x 2
Criteria Met
LV
Criteria Not Met
W
C7
e, GeoEye, EarGhstar Geo•
�

Table 5. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Tributaries of Wicker Branch Stream Restoration/ DMS No. 95022
Reach ID Tributary 1
Assessed Leni Ith 2485
Footage
Number
Number with
with
Adjusted
Major
Stable,
Total
Number of
Amount of
% Stable,
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
for Stabilizing
Channel
Channel
Performing
Number in
Unstable
Unstable
Performing as
Woody
Woody
Woody
Category
Sub-Cateaory
Metric
as Intended
As -built
Segments
Footage
Intended
Vegetation
Vegetation
Vegetation
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
(Riffle and Run units)
1. Aygradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect flow
laterally (not to include point bars)
0
0
100%
2. Degradation - Evidence of downcutting
0
0
100%
2. Riffle Condition
1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate
50 50
100%
3. Meander Pool
Condition
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth > 1.6)
49 49
100%
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of upstream
riffle and head of downstrem riffle)
49 49
100%
4.Thalweg Position
11. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)
50 50
100%
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander (Glide)
50 50
100%
2. Bank
1. Scoured/Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or scour
and erosion
0
0
o
100 /0
0
0
0
100/o
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears likely.
2. Undercut
Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable and are
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, calving, or collapse
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
Totals
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
3. Engineered
Structures
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.
32
33
o
97/o
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill.
33
33
100%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.
33
33
100%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed 15%.
(See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document)
33
33
100%
4. Habitat
Pool forming structures maintaining — Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth
ratio > 1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base -flow.
33
33
100%

Table 5. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Tributaries of Wicker Branch Stream Restoration/ DMS No. 95022
Reach ID Tributary 3
Assessed Leni Ith 904
Footage
Number
Number with
with
Adjusted
Major
Stable,
Total
Number of
Amount of
% Stable,
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
for Stabilizing
Channel
Channel
Performing
Number in
Unstable
Unstable
Performing as
Woody
Woody
Woody
Category
Sub-Cateaory
Metric
as Intended
As -built
Segments
Footage
Intended
Vegetation
Vegetation
Vegetation
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
(Riffle and Run units)
1. Aygradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect flow
laterally (not to include point bars)
0
0
100%
2. Degradation - Evidence of downcutting
0
0
100%
2. Riffle Condition
1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate
12 12
100%
3. Meander Pool
Condition
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth :Mean Bankfull Depth > 1.6)
12 12
100%
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of upstream
riffle and head of downstrem riffle)
12 12
100%
4.Thalweg Position
11. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)
12 12
100%
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander (Glide)
12 1 12
100%
2. Bank
1. Scoured/Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or scour
and erosion
0
0
o
100 /0
0
0
0
100/o
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears likely.
2. Undercut
Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable and are
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, calving, or collapse
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
Totals
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
3. Engineered
Structures
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.
13
13
°
100/o
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill.
13
13
100%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.
13
13
100%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed 15%.
(See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document)
13
13
100%
4. Habitat
Pool forming structures maintaining — Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth
ratio > 1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base -flow.
13
13
100%

Table 5. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Tributaries of Wicker Branch Stream Restoration/ DMS No. 95022
Reach ID Tributary 4
Assessed Leni Ith 630
Footage
Number
Number with
with
Adjusted
Major
Stable,
Total
Number of
Amount of
% Stable,
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
for Stabilizing
Channel
Channel
Performing
Number in
Unstable
Unstable
Performing as
Woody
Woody
Woody
Category
Sub-Cateaory
Metric
as Intended
As -built
Segments
Footage
Intended
Vegetation
Vegetation
Vegetation
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
(Riffle and Run units)
1. Aygradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect flow
laterally (not to include point bars)
0
0
100%
2. Degradation - Evidence of downcutting
0
0
100%
2. Riffle Condition
1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate
4 4
100%
3. Meander Pool
Condition
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth :Mean Bankfull Depth > 1.6)
4 4
100%
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of upstream
riffle and head of downstrem riffle)
4 4
100%
4.Thalweg Position
11. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)
4 4
100%
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander (Glide)
4 4
100%
2. Bank
1. Scoured/Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or scour
and erosion
0
0
o
100 /0
0
0
0
100/o
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears likely.
2. Undercut
Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable and are
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, calving, or collapse
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
Totals
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
3. Engineered
Structures
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.
4
4
°
100/o
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill.
4
4
100%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.
4
4
100%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed 15%.
(See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document)
4
4
100%
4. Habitat
Pool forming structures maintaining — Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth
ratio > 1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base -flow.
4
4
100%

Table 6. Vegetation Condition Assessment
Tributaries of Wicker Branch Stream Restoration/ DMS No. 95022
Planted Acreage 11.57
CCPV
De fiction
Number
of
Polygons
Combined
Acreage
% of
Easement
Acreage
Number
% of
1000 SF
Yellow Hatch
Mapping
CCPV
of
Combined Planted
Vegetation Category
Definitions
Threshold
Depiction
Polygons
Acreage Area
1 0.3%
Beige dot
1. Bare Areas
Very limited cover of both woody and herbaceous material.
0.1 acres
0
0.00 0.0%
pattern
2. Low Stem Density Areas
Woody stem densities clearly below target levels based on MY3, 4, or 5 stem count criteria.
0.1 acres Red Hatch
0
0.00 0.0%
mqqmTotal
0
0. 0.0%
3. Areas of Poor Growth Rates or
Areas with woody stems of a size class that are obviously small given the monitoring year.
0.25 acres N/A
0
0.00 0.0%
Vigor
Cumulative Total
0
0.00 0.0%
Eacament AerPane 15.49
Vegetation Category
Definitions
Mapping
Threshold
CCPV
De fiction
Number
of
Polygons
Combined
Acreage
% of
Easement
Acreage
4. Invasive Areas of Concern
Presence of Chinese privet and honeysuckle
1000 SF
Yellow Hatch
1
0.80
5.2%
5. Easement Encroachment Areas' JAreas or points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale). none I Green Hatch
1 2
1 0.04
1 0.3%
1 = Enter the planted acreage within the easement. This number is calculated as the easement acreage minus any existing mature tree stands that were not subject to supplemental planting of
understory, the channel acreage, crossings or any other elements not directly planted as part of the project effort.
2 = The acreage within the easement boundaries.
3 = Encroachment may occur within or outside of planted areas and will there25fore be calculated against the overall easement acreage. In the event a polygon is cataloged into items 1, 2 or 3 in the to
and is the result of encroachment, the associated acreage should be tallied in the relevant item (i.e., item 1,2 or 3) as well as a parallel tally in item 5.
4 = Invasives may occur in or out of planted areas, but still within the easement and will therefore be calculated against the overall easement acreage. Invasives of concern/interest are listed below. The
of high concern spcies are those with the potential to directly outcompete native, young, woody stems in the short-term (e.g. monitoring period or shortly thereafter) or affect the community structure
existing, more established tree/shrub stands over timeframes that are slightly longer (e.g. 1-2 decades). The low/moderate concern group are those species that generally do not have this capacity over
timeframes discussed and therefore are not expected to be mapped with regularity, but can be mapped, if in the judgement of the observer their coverage, density or distribution is suppressing the viabil
density, or growth of planted woody stems. Decisions as to whether remediation will be needed are based on the integration of risk factors by EEP such as species present, their coverage, distnbut
relative to native biomass, and the practicality of treatment. For example, even modest amounts of Kudzu or Japanese Knotweed early in the projects history will warrant control, but potentially lai
coverages of Microstegium in the herb layer will not likley trigger control because of the limited capacities to impact tree/shrub layers within the timeframes discussed and the potential impacts of treat
extensive amounts of ground cover. Those species with the watch list" designator in gray shade are of interest as well, but have yet to be observed across the state with any frequency. Those in red ita,
are of particular interest given their extreme risk/threat level for mapping as points where isolated specimens are found, particularly ealry in a projects monitoring history. However, areas of discreet, der
patches will of course be mapped as polygons. The symbology scheme below was one tit was found to be helpful for symbolzing invasives polygons, particulalry for situations where the conditon for
area is somewhere between isolated specimens and dense, discreet patches. In any case, the point or polygon/area feature can be symbolized to describe things like high or low concern and species c
be listed as a map inset, in legend items if the number of species are limited or in the narrative section of the executive summary.

® 227°SW (T) G 34°53'42"N, 80°26'55"W ±16.4ft ♦ 588ft
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 1 — 10/9/2017
0 10°N (T) O 34°53'41"N, 80°26'57"W ±16.4ft ♦ 585ft
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 2 — 10/9/2017
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 3 — 10/9/2017
Tributaries to Wickers Branch Stream Restoration Site
Year 4 (2018) Monitoring Report
DMS Project No. 95022
0132°SE (T) OO 34°53'36"N, 80°27'2"W ±16.4ft ♦ 571ft
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 4 — 10/9/2017
0 343°N (T) O 34°53'45"N, 80°26'44"W ±16.4ft • 591ft
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 5 — 10/9/2017
0283'W(T) O 34°53'44"N, 80°26'41"W ±16.4ft ♦ 590ft
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 6 — 10/9/2017

® 24°NE (T) O 34°53'41"N, 80°26'41"W ±16.4ft ♦ 581ft
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 7 — 10/9/2017
w NW NE
300 1
0 4°N (T) O 34°53'39"N, 80°26'39"W ±16.4ft ♦ 577ft
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 8 — 10/9/2017
® 9°N (T) * 34°53'37"N, 80°26'40"W ±16.4ft ♦ 576ft
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 9 — 10/9/2017
Tributaries to Wickers Branch Stream Restoration Site
Year 4 (2018) Monitoring Report
DMS Project No. 95022
034°NE (T) O 34°53'40"N, 80°26'34"W ±16.4ft ♦ 579ft
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 10 — 10/9/2017
®1°N (T) O 34°53'38"N, 80°26'35"W ±16.4ft ♦ 579ft
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 11 — 10/9/2017

fIE78 ♦ IW8r± W" 88'x'08 ,0" OVH8 E * (T) 3°8F 0
Cross Section 1 (looking upstream) — 10/4/17
® 39°NE (T) * 34°53'40"N, 80°26'58"W ±16.4ft ♦ 568ft
Cross Section 2 (looking upstream) — 10/4/17
® 60 -NE (T) OO 34°53'37"N, 80°27TV ±16.4ft ♦ 567ft
Cross Section 3 (looking upstream) — 10/4/17
Tributaries to Wickers Branch Stream Restoration Site
Year 4 (2018) Monitoring Report
DMS Project No. 95022
®1°N (T) OO 34°53'36"N, 80°27'1"W ±16.4ft A 566ft
Cross Section 4 (looking upstream) — 10/4/17
0 36 -NE (T) OO 34°53'35"N, 80°27'3"W ±16.4ft ♦ 563ft
Cross Section 5 (looking upstream) — 10/4/17
® 358°N (T)O 34°53'34"N, 80°27'3"W ±16.4ft ♦ 560ft
Cross Section 6 (looking upstream) — 10/4/17

W 22-N (T) r 34°5334"N, 80°273"W ±16.4ft ♦ 556ft
Cross Section 7 (looking upstream) — 12/13/17
® 346°N (T) * 34°53'41"N, 80°26'40"W ±16.4ft ♦ 577ft
Cross Section 8 (looking upstream) — 10/4/17
® 337°NW (T) OO 34°53'39"N, 80°26'40"W ±16.4ft ♦ 570ft
Cross Section 9 (looking upstream) — 10/4/17
Tributaries to Wickers Branch Stream Restoration Site
Year 4 (2018) Monitoring Report
DMS Project No. 95022
® 346°N (T) OO 34°53'38"N, 80°26'39"W ±16.4ft ♦ 569ft
Cross Section 10 (looking upstream) — 10/4/17
® 347°N (T) OO 34°53'40"N, 80°26'35"W ±16.4ft ♦ 567ft
Cross Section 11 (looking upstream) — 10/4/17
® WN (T) OO 34°53'37"N, 80°26'35"W t16.4ft ♦ 566ft
Cross Section 12 (looking upstream) — 10/4/17

® 208°SW (T) OO 34°53'43"N, 80°26'54"W ±16.4ft ♦ 577ft
Photo Monitoring Point 1 — 10/3/2017
® 345°N (T) * 34°53'36"N, 80°26'39"W ±16.4ft ♦ 572ft
Photo Monitoring Point 3 — 10/3/2017
0 128"SE (T) O 34°53'40"N, 80°26'35"W ±16.4ft ♦ 578ft
Photo Monitoring Point 5 — 10/3/2017
Tributaries to Wickers Branch Stream Restoration Site
Year 4 (2018) Monitoring Report
DMS Project No. 95022
®166°S (T) OO 34°53'42"N, 80°270"W ±16.4ft ♦ 570ft
Photo Monitoring Point 2 — 10/3/2017
®107°E (T)O 34°53'43"N, 80°26'42"W ±16.4ft ♦ 577ft
Photo Monitoring Point 4 — 10/3/2017
0 330°NW (T) * 34°53'39"N, 80°26'57"W ±16.4ft ♦ 586ft
Photo Monitoring Point 6 — 10/3/2017

APPENDIX C: VEGETATION PLOT DATA
Table 7: Vegetation Plot Counts and Densities
Tributaries to Wickers Branch Stream Restoration Site
Year 4 (2018) Monitoring Report
DMS Project No. 95022

Table 7. Vegetation Plot Stem Count Summary
DMS Proiect Code 95022. Proiect Name: Tributaries of Wicker Branch
Current Plot Data (MY4 2018) 1 Annual Means
Scientific Name
Common Name
95022-01-0009
Species Type PnoL$P-all T
95022-01-0010
Pnol-5 P -all T
95022-01-0011
Pnol-5 P -all T
MY4 (2018)
Pnol-5 P -all T
MY3(2017)
PnoLS P -all T
Current Plot Data (MY4 2018)
MY1(2015)
PnoL5 P -all T
MYO(2015)
PnoL5 P -all T
Scientific Name
Common Name
95022-01-0001
Species Type PnoL$ P -all T
95022-01-0002
PnoLS P -all T
95022-01-0003
Pnol-S P -all T
95022-01-0004
PnoLS P -all T
95022-01-0005
PnoLS P -all T
95022-01-0006
PnoLS P -all T
95022-01-0007
PnoLS P -all T
95022-01-0008
PnoLS P -all T
Acernegundo
boxelder
Tree
5
3
Acer negundo var. negunck boxelder
Tree
Acernegundo var. negunck boxelder
Tree
1
1
Acer rubrum
red maple
Tree
Acer rubrum
red maple
Tree
4
8
17
5
Carya
hickory
Tree
2
Carya
hickory
Tree
Celtis laevigata
sugarberry
Tree
1 1
1
3
1
Celtis occidentalis
common hackberry
Tree
sugarberry
Tree
2
1
2
Cercis canadensis
eastern redbud
Tree
1
1
1
2
2
2 3 3
3 4 4
4 2 2
3
3
3
3 1 1 1
Cornus alternifolia
alternateleaf dogwooc Tree
4
1
2
Cornus amomum
silky dogwood
Shrub
4
4
4
2
2 1
1
2 2
2 2 2
2
23
1
1
1
Diospyros virginiana
common persimmon
Tree
1
1
1
26
26
1 1
1
3 3 3
Juniperus virginiana
eastern redcedar
Tree
Cornus amomum
1
Liquidambar styraciflua
sweetgum
Tree
1
2
1 10
10
10
2
4
1
11
11
12
1
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
2 2
2 3 3
3
1
1
1
1
Pinus taeda
loblolly pine
Tree
7
7
1
6
6
6
7
7
1
Juniperus virginiana
eastern redcedar
Tree
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
1
Populus deltoides
eastern cottonwood
Tree
Liquidambar styraciflua
sweetgum
Tree
5
2
17
2
Prunus serotina
black cherry
Tree
13
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
2 2
2
Quercus
oak
Tree
11
11
13
13
13
16
16
18
16
16
16
38
38
Quercus alba
white oak
Tree
3
3
3
3
3
3 2 2
2 1 1
1 5 5
5 3
3
3 6
6
6 4 4 4
Quercus falcata
southern red oak
Tree
4
4
4
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
1 1
1 1
1
1
1 1 1
Rhus copallinum
flameleafsumac
shrub
1
Populus deltoides
Rhus glabra
smooth sumac
shrub
2
1
1
Robinia pseudoacacia
black locust
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 4
4
4
Salix nigra
black willow
Tree
1
1
Quercus
oak
Tree
Sambucus canadensis
Common Elderberry
Shrub
5
5
5
3
3
3 3 3
3
1
1 1 1
Ulmus alata
winged elm
Tree
2
Quercus alba
white oak
Tree
3 3
3 1
1
1 3
3
3 34
34
34
34
Ulmus rubra
slippery elm
Tree
35
36
2
26
26
41
1
4
Quercus falcata
southern red oak
Tree
Unknown
Shrub or Tree
7
7
7
7
7
7
9
9
11
10
10
10
20
20
20
Stem count 20 20
size (ares) 1
size (ACRES) 0.02
Species count 8 8
Stems per ACRE 809.41 809.41
25
11
1012
101
51
101 10 91 91 14
1 1
0.02 0.02
51
404.71 404.71364.21364.21566.61364.21404.71930.81526.11
9 10 23
1
0.02
13 13 18
1
0.02
526.11 728.4
5
5 13
1
0.02
202.3 526.1
15
51
607J
15 1610
1
0.02
51 61
6071 647.5n.71
10 20
1
0.02
51 5 9
404.7 809.4
Current Plot Data (MY4 2018) 1 Annual Means
Scientific Name
Common Name
95022-01-0009
Species Type PnoL$P-all T
95022-01-0010
Pnol-5 P -all T
95022-01-0011
Pnol-5 P -all T
MY4 (2018)
Pnol-5 P -all T
MY3(2017)
PnoLS P -all T
MY2(2016)
PnoLS P -all T
MY1(2015)
PnoL5 P -all T
MYO(2015)
PnoL5 P -all T
Acernegundo
boxelder
Tree
5
3
Acer negundo var. negunck boxelder
Tree
1
Acer rubrum
red maple
Tree
4
17
Carya
hickory
Tree
1
1
1 1
1
3
Celtis laevigata
sugarberry
Tree
1
Celtis occidentalis
common hackberry
Tree
4
1
Cercis canadensis
eastern redbud
Tree
4 4
4 2
2
2 1
1
1 23
23
24
23
23
23
22
22
25
21
21
21
26
26
26
Cornus alternifolia
alternateleaf dogwooc Tree
2
Cornus amomum
silky dogwood
Shrub
1
1
1 10
10
10
10
10
10
11
11
12
18
18
18
21
21
21
Diospyros virginiana
common persimmon
Tree
1
1
2 6
6
7
6
6
6
7
7
10
6
6
6
7
7
7
Juniperus virginiana
eastern redcedar
Tree
1
Liquidambar styraciflua
sweetgum
Tree
5
2
17
13
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
2 2
2
1
1
1 11
11
11
13
13
13
16
16
18
16
16
16
38
38
38
Pinus taeda
loblolly pine
Tree
2
2
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
1
Populus deltoides
eastern cottonwood
Tree
2
1
Prunus serotina
black cherry
Tree
1
1
Quercus
oak
Tree
1
1
1
2
2
2
Quercus alba
white oak
Tree
3 3
3 1
1
1 3
3
3 34
34
34
34
34
34
35
35
36
26
26
26
41
41
41
Quercus falcata
southern red oak
Tree
7
7
7
7
7
7
9
9
11
10
10
10
20
20
20
Rhus copallinum
flameleaf sumac
shrub
I
I
1
Rhus glabra
smooth sumac
shrub
5
6
1
Robinia pseudoacacia
black locust
Tree
1 1
1 1
1
2
3 9
9
13
9
9
9
8
8
14
7
7
7
9
9
9
Salix nigra
black willow
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
4
1
1
1
1
Sambucus canadensis
Common Elderberry
Shrub
2
2
2 2
2
2 16
16
16
16
16
16
18
18
21
15
15
15
21
21
21
Ulmus alata
winged elmTree
2
Ulmus rubra
slippery elm
Tree
1
8
2
Unknown
IShrub or Tree
1
11
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Stem count10 10 19
size (ares) 1
size (ACRES) 0.02
Species count 4 46
Stems per ACRE 404.71404.71 768.9
6
4
6 12
1
0.02
4S
242.81 485.
10
7
10 18
1
0.02
7 11
404.71 728.4
117
9F
118 188
11
0.27
10 22
434.11 691.
119
9
120 129
11
0.27
10 14
441.51 474.
127
9
128 175 121 122 122 186
11 11
0.27 0.27
10 17 10 11 11 10
470.9 643.8 445.2 448.8 448.8 684.31
187
11
0.27
11
6881
187
11
688
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, bu+y less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirimby more than 30%

APPENDIX D: STREAM GEOMORPHOLOGY DATA
Cross -Sections
Longitudinal Profiles
Pebble Counts
Table 8: Baseline Stream Data Summary
Table 9a: Cross -Section Morphology Data
Table 9b: Stream Reach Morphology Data
Tributaries to Wickers Branch Stream Restoration Site
Year 4 (2018) Monitoring Report
DMS Project No. 95022

Cross-section Plot Exhibit
River Basin
Yadkin -Pee Dee
Watershed
Wicker Branch
X -Sec ID
XS -1, Sta. 4+65
Feature
Riffle
Drainage Area (sq mi)
0.15
Date
10/15/2018
Field Crew
IChris Inscore
Station
Elevation
0.00
578.29 LBPIN
0.21
578.36 GR
9.66
577.53 GR
17.68
577.76 GR
17.93
577.70 TOB
18.19
577.51
18.77
577.33 TOE
20.08
577.34 TW
21.31
577.41 TOE
22.14
577.86 TOB
31.80
577.42 GR
39.79
578.07 GR
40.03
578.03 RBPIN
Summary Data
Bankfull Elevation
577.78
Bankfull Width (ft)
4.77
Floodprone Width (ft)
50
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.31
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
0.45
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ftZ
1.51
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
15.39
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
8.03
Low Top of Bank Depth (ft)
0.43
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
0.96
579
578.5
c
.m
578
v
W
577.5
577
0 5 10 15
- - • Bankfull - - • Floodprone Area
0 76°E (T) O 34°63'40"N, 80°26'58"W t16.4ft ■ 573ft
Photo: Cross-section 1 looking upstream
Tributaries of Wicker Branch
Tributary 1, XS -1
20 25 30 35 40 45
Distance (ft)
-Asbuilt Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4

Cross-section Plot Exhibit
River Basin
Yadkin -Pee Dee
Watershed
Wicker Branch
X -Sec ID
XS -2, Sta. 5+05
Feature
Pool
Drainage Area (sq mi)
0.15
Date
10/15/2018
Field Crew
Chris Inscore
Station
Elevation
0.00
577.45 LBPIN
6.20
576.99 GR
12.55
577.14 GR
17.90
577.06 TOB
19.50
575.73 TOE
20.40
575.57 TW
21.19
575.69 TOE
23.15
576.64 TOB
29.50
576.85 GR
34.10
576.87 GR
39.71
577.35 GR
40.06
577.34 RBPIN
Summary Data
Bankfull Elevation
576.77
Bankfull Width (ft)
8.83
Floodprone Width (ft)
50
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.45
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.2
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft)
3.98
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
19.6
Low Top of Bank Depth (ft)
5.6
Low Top of Bank Depth (ft)
1.07
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
0.89
0 39 -NE (T) :# 34°53'40"N, 80°26'58"W _06.4ft i 568ft
Photo: Cross-section 2 looking upstream
Tributaries of Wicker Branch
Tributary 1, XS -2
579
-
578.5
578
-- - -- - - -- --
577.5
w
c
°
577
576.5
576
575.5
575
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Distance (ft)
- - -Bankfull - --FloodproneArea Asbuilt Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4

Cross-section Plot Exhibit
River Basin
Yadkin -Pee Dee
Watershed
Wicker Branch
X -Sec ID
XS -3, Sta. 9+34
Feature
Riffle
Drainage Area (sq mi)
0.15
Date
10/15/2018
Field Crew
IChris Inscore
Station
Elevation
Bankfull Width (ft)
0.00
572.06
LBPIN
0.27
572.08
GR
9.52
570.95
GR
17.27
571.64
TOB
17.84
571.35
0.89
18.49
571.07
18.99
570.98
20.02
570.74
TW
20.85
570.87
TOE
21.72
571.61
TOB
30.52
571.45
GR
39.00
571.82
GR
39.93
571.95
RBPIN
Summary Data
Bankfull Elevation
571.63
Bankfull Width (ft)
11
Floodprone Width (ft)
50
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.28
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
0.89
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft)
3.08
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
39.29
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
4.5
Low Top of Bank Depth (ft)
0.89
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1
573
572.5
572
c
m
571.5
_v
571
570.5
570
0 60*NE (T) 9 34053'37"N, 80°271 "W x16.4ft ♦ 567ft
Photo: Cross-section 3 looking upstream
Tributaries of Wicker Branch
Tributary 1, XS -3
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Distance (ft)
- - • Bankfull - - • Floodprone Area Asbuilt Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4

Cross-section Plot Exhibit
River Basin
Yadkin -Pee Dee
Watershed
Wicker Branch
X -Sec ID
XS -4, Sta. 9+72
Feature
Pool
Drainage Area (sq mi)
0.15
Date
10/15/2018
Field Crew
IChris Inscore
Station
Elevation
0.00
571.94 LBPIN
0.06
571.91 GR
7.23
571.18 GR
13.49
571.03 TOB
14.38
570.42 TOE
15.39
569.72 TW
16.86
570.50 TOE
17.60
570.83
18.77
571.27 TOB
27.32
571.04 GR
39.70
571.43 GR
40.08
571.73 RBPIN
Summary Data
Bankfull Elevation
571.14
Bankfull Width (ft)
9.6
Floodprone Width (ft)
50
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.38
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.42
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ftZ
3.72
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
25.2
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
5.2
Low Top of Bank Depth (ft)
1.31
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
0.92
®1°N (T) B 34°53'36"N, 80°27'1"W +-16.4ft ■ 566ft
Photo: Cross-section 4looking upstream
Tributaries of Wicker Branch
Tributary 1, XSA
573
572.5
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
572
w
= 571.5
0
571
- -- ----
w
570.5
570
569.5
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Distance (ft)
- - • Bankfull - - • Floodprone Area Asbuilt Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4

Cross-section Plot Exhibit
River Basin
Yadkin -Pee Dee
Watershed
Wicker Branch
X -Sec ID
XS -5, Sta. 12+10
Feature
Riffle
Drainage Area (sq mi)
0.15
Date
10/15/2018
Field Crew
IChris Inscore
Station
Elevation
0.00
568.83 LBPIN
0.43
568.68 GR
10.37
567.96 GR
16.77
568.14 TOB
17.06
568.01 TOE
17.52
567.90
17.83
567.80
19.21
567.71 TW
20.60
567.80 TOE
21.24
568.21 TOB
29.21
568.12 GR
39.49
568.76 GR
40.15
568.97 RBPIN
Summary Data
Bankfull Elevation
568.18
Bankfull Width (ft)
4.5
Floodprone Width (ft)
50
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.34
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
0.47
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ftZ
1.54
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
13.24
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
11.11
Low Top of Bank Depth (ft)
0.43
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
0.9
0 36°NE (T) O 3453'35"N, 80°27'3"W -06-4ft ■ 563ft
Photo: Cross-section 5 looking upstream
Tributaries of Wicker Branch
Tributary 1, XS -5
570
569.5
569
c
0
m_
v
_ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _
568.5
W
568
567.5
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Distance (ft)
- - -Bankfull - - •FloodproneArea Asbuilt Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4

Cross-section Plot Exhibit
River Basin
Yadkin -Pee Dee
Watershed
Wicker Branch
X -Sec ID
XS -6, Sta. 12+37
Feature
Riffle
Drainage Area (sq mi)
0.15
Date
10/15/2018
Field Crew
IChris Inscore
Station
Elevation
0.00
568.73 LBPIN
0.74
568.13 GR
12.87
567.82 GR
18.43
567.77 TOB
19.02
567.33 TW/TOE
20.61
567.35
21.51
567.33 TOE
21.96
567.70
22.42
567.84 TOB
30.83
567.75 GR
39.00
569.07 GR
39.89
569.24 RBPIN
Summary Data
Bankfull Elevation
567.83
Bankfull Width (ft)
10.02
Floodprone Width (ft)
50
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.17
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
0.5
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ftZ
1.72
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
58.4
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
4.99
Low Top of Bank Depth (ft)
0.44
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
0.88
570
569.5
569
c
°m 568.5
v
W 568
567.5
567 L
0
0 358-N (T) * 34.53'34"N, 80°27'3"W _06Aft • 56Oft
Photo: Cross-section 6 looking uptream
Tributaries of Wicker Branch
Tributary 1, XS -6
5 10 15
- - -Bankfull - --FloodproneArea
20 25 30
Distance (ft)
-Asbuilt Yl Y2
35 40 45
Y3 Y4

Cross-section Plot Exhibit
River Basin
Yadkin -Pee Dee
Watershed
Wicker Branch
X -Sec ID
XS -7, Sta. 12+72
Feature
Pool
Drainage Area (sq mi)
0.15
Date
10/15/2018
Field Crew
IChris Inscore
Station
Elevation
0.00
567.50 LBPIN
11.68
567.21 GR
23.28
567.44 GR
24.17
567.24
24.42
567.09 TOB
25.61
566.57 TOE
26.80
566.35TW
27.79
566.47 TOE
29.48
567.10 TOB
34.95
567.57
38.93
568.27 GR
39.98
568.62 RBPIN
Summary Data
Bankfull Elevation
567.25
Bankfull Width (ft)
7.1
Floodprone Width (ft)
40
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.45
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
0.9
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ftZ
3.21
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
15.78
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
5.6
Low Top of Bank Depth (ft)
0.74
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
0.82
0 22°N (T) ON 34053'34"N, 80°27'3"W -06.4ft l 556ft
Photo: Cross-section 7 looking upstream
Tributaries of Wicker Branch
Tributary 1, XS -7
569.5
569
568.5
w-
568
- - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - -
0
M
567.5
Uj
567
566.5
566
0 5 10 15 20 Distance (ft) 25 30 35 40 45
- - -Bankfull - --FloodproneArea Asbuilt Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4

Cross-section Plot Exhibit
River Basin
Yadkin -Pee Dee
Watershed
Wicker Branch
X -Sec ID
XS -8, Sta. 1+83
Feature
Riffle
Drainage Area (sq mi)
0.05
Date
10/15/2018
Field Crew
IChris Inscore
Station
Elevation
0.00
575.19 LBPIN
5.00
575.14 GR
11.98
574.39 GR
17.82
574.58 GR
18.86
574.46 JOB
19.45
574.08
20.00
573.66 LTOE
20.41
573.61
21.01
573.47 RTOE/TW
23.30
574.36 RTOB
31.99
574.27 GR
38.75
574.77 GR
39.48
575.01 RBPIN
Summary Data
Bankfull Elevation
574.25
Bankfull Width (ft)
3.8
Floodprone Width (ft)
40
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.44
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
0.77
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ftZ
1.66
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
8.59
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
10.57
Low Top of Bank Depth (ft)
0.89
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.15
576
575.5
575
w
c
574.5
M
7
_v
u' 574
573.5
573
0171°S (T) 0 34053'41"N, 80°26'40"W x16Aft • 572ft
Photo: Cross-section 8 looking downstream
Tributaries of Wicker Branch
Tributary 3, XS -8
777 7 A -99-M-
5 10 15 20Distance(ft) 25 30 35 40 45
- - • Bankfull - - • Floodprone Area Asbuilt Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4

Cross-section Plot Exhibit
River Basin
Yadkin -Pee Dee
Watershed
Wicker Branch
X -Sec ID
XS -9, Sta 3+19
Feature
Riffle
Drainage Area (sq mi)
0.05
Date
10/15/2018
Field Crew
IChris Inscore
Station
Elevation
0.00
574.01 LBPIN
4.42
572.90 GR
11.31
572.66 GR
18.32
572.63 JOB
19.76
572.43
19.83
572.25
20.28
572.13 LTOE
20.75
572.06 TW
21.10
572.13 RTOE
22.65
572.57 RTOB
32.76
572.47 GR
39.32
573.75 GR
40.05
573.95 RBPIN
Summary Data
Bankfull Elevation
572.61
Bankfull Width (ft)
4.17
Floodprone Width (ft)
33
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.27
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
0.55
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ftZ
1.16
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
15.44
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
7.89
Low Top of Bank Depth (ft)
0.51
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
0.93
10337°NW (T) 00 34°53'39"N, 80°26`40"W +16.4ft ■ 570ft
Photo: Cross-section 9 looking upstream
Tributaries of Wicker Branch
Tributary 3, XS -9
575
574.5
574
w
c
573.5
M
>
a
_ _ _ _ _ - - - -
-- --
- - - -
-- --
- - - - - - - - - - - -00
- - - _ _ _
- -
573
-
- - - -
572.5
572
0 5 10 15 20 Distance (ft) 25 30 35 40 45
- - - Bankfull - - • Floodprone Area Asbuilt Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4

Cross-section Plot Exhibit
River Basin
Yadkin -Pee Dee
Watershed
Wicker Branch
X -Sec ID
XS -10, Sta. 4+95
Feature
Pool
Drainage Area (sq mi)
0.05
Date
10/4/2017
Field Crew
IChris Inscore
Station Elevation
0 573.98 LBPIN
0.280323 573.88 GR
9.050526 571.21 GR
13.06106 570.80 GR
15.09038 570.85 GR
15.69159 570.70 GR
15.92276 570.36TOB
16.53906 569.93 LTOE
19.09092 569.45 TW
20.43003 569.96 RTOE
22.07725 570.75 RTOB
29.08425 570.59 GR
40.48548 572.16 GR
40.89072 572.27 RBPIN
Summary Data
Bankfull Elevation
570.91
Bankfull Width (ft)
12.03
Floodprone Width (ft)
35
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.57
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.46
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ftZ
6.98
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
21.1
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
2.96
Low Top of Bank Depth (ft)
1.29
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
0.89
574
573.5
573
572.5
572
c
571.5
m
a 571
W
570.5
570
569.5
569
0 346°N (T) . 34053'38"N, 80°26'39"W » 16.4ft ■ 569ft
Photo: Cross-section 10 looking upstream
Tributaries of Wicker Branch
Tributary 3, XS -10
- - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
5 10 15 20Distance (ft) 25 30 35 40 45
- - -Bankfull - - • Floodprone Area Asbuilt Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4

Cross-section Plot Exhibit
River Basin
Yadkin -Pee Dee
Watershed
Wicker Branch
X -Sec ID
XS -11, Sta. 3+61
Feature
Riffle
Drainage Area (sq mi)
0.05
Date
10/9/2018
Field Crew
IChris Inscore
Station
Elevation
0.00
576.27 LBPIN
0.31
575.96 GR
8.93
575.61 GR
15.17
575.01 GR
17.93
574.53 GR
18.35
574.55 JOB
18.47
574.18 LTOE
19.56
574.06 TW
20.69
574.19 RTOE
21.24
574.64 RTOB
32.23
575.39 GR
39.45
575.75 GR
39.63
575.97 RBPIN
Summary Data
Bankfull Elevation
574.59
Bankfull Width (ft)
3.58
Floodprone Width (ft)
14
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.33
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
0.53
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ftZ
1.21
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
10.85
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
3.97
Low Top of Bank Depth (ft)
0.49
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
0.93
577
576.5
576
575.5
0
Y
575
W
574.5
574
573.5
0347°N (T) * 34053'40"N. 80°26'35"W j-16.4ft ■ 567ft
Photo: Cross-section 11 looking upstream
Tributaries of Wicker Branch
Tributary 4, XS -11
0 5 10 15 20Distance(ft) 25 30 35 40 45
- --Bankfull - --FloodproneArea Asbuilt Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4

Cross-section Plot Exhibit
River Basin
Yadkin -Pee Dee
Watershed
Wicker Branch
X -Sec ID
XS -12, Sta. 6+42
Feature
Riffle
Drainage Area (sq mi)
0.05
Date
10/9/2018
Field Crew
IChris Inscore
Station
Elevation
Bankfull Width (ft)
0.00
572.82
RBPIN
0.08
572.76
GR
7.42
572.68
GR
14.49
572.53
GR
17.62
572.27
GR
17.94
572.23
RTOB
18.46
572.07
18.90
571.87
19.53
571.63
TW/RTOE
20.93
571.76
LTOE
22.71
572.45
JOB
29.98
573.10
GR
39.70
574.06
GR
39.96
574.21
LBPIN
Summary Data
Bankfull Elevation
572.16
Bankfull Width (ft)
3.81
Floodprone Width (ft)
19
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.32
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
0.53
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ftZ
1.23
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
11.91
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
5.1
Low Top of Bank Depth (ft)
0.6
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.1
575
574.5
574
w 573.5
c
573
M
7
w 572.5
572
571.5
571
Q 49hl (T) S 34°53'37"N, 80°26'35"W ±16.4ft i 566ft
Photo: Cross-section 12 looking upstream
Tributaries of Wicker Branch
Tributary 4, XS -12
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Distance (ft)
- - • Bankfull - - • Floodprone Area Asbuilt Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4

Tributaries of Wicker Branch - Tributary 1A Longitudinal Profile
588.00
586.00
584.00
Cross Section 1
582.00
.2 580.00
ca
2 578.00
LU
576.00
574.00
572.00
+ 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 6+00 7+00
Station (ft)
• BKF — — — Asbuilt TW Y1 TW — Y2 TW Y3 TW Y4
Tributaries of Wicker Branch - Tributary 1A Longitudinal Profile
578.00
576.00
574.00
$ 572.00 oft A
c
0
570.00 AL
m
568.00 •
566.00
564.00
7+00 8+00 9+00 10+00 11+00 12+00 13+00 14+00
Station (ft)
BKF — — — Asbuilt TW Y1 TW Y2 TW — Y3 TW Y4 TW
LU
Cross Section 3
•
Section 5 Cross Section
•
Cross
7
•
•
•
•
•
Cross Section 4
• • o n
•
•
Cross Section 6
Section 2
Cross
Tributaries of Wicker Branch - Tributary 1A Longitudinal Profile
578.00
576.00
574.00
$ 572.00 oft A
c
0
570.00 AL
m
568.00 •
566.00
564.00
7+00 8+00 9+00 10+00 11+00 12+00 13+00 14+00
Station (ft)
BKF — — — Asbuilt TW Y1 TW Y2 TW — Y3 TW Y4 TW
LU
Cross Section 3
•
Section 5 Cross Section
•
Cross
7
•
•
Cross Section 4
• • o n
•
Cross Section 6

578
576
574
a 572
w 570
568
566
578
576
F 574
c
0
0 572
w
570
568
Tributaries of Wicker Branch - Tributary 3 Longitudinal Profile
+ 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00
Station (ft)
♦ BKF — — — Asbuilt TW Y1 TW Y2 TW
Y3 TW
Tributaries of Wicker Branch - Tributary 4 Longitudinal Profile
5+00
Y4 TW
6+00
7+00
— — — — ! ♦
now
Cross Section 12
Cross
Section 9
•
o o
Cross Section 10
r
♦
Cross Section 8
+ 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00
Station (ft)
♦ BKF — — — Asbuilt TW Y1 TW Y2 TW
Y3 TW
Tributaries of Wicker Branch - Tributary 4 Longitudinal Profile
5+00
Y4 TW
6+00
7+00
2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00
Station (ft)
BKF — — — Asbuilt TW Y1 TW
6+00
Y2 TW —Y3 TW Y4 TW
7+00
8+00
— — — — ! ♦
now
Cross Section 12
—
Cross Section 11
2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00
Station (ft)
BKF — — — Asbuilt TW Y1 TW
6+00
Y2 TW —Y3 TW Y4 TW
7+00
8+00

Cross - Section Pebble Count
Project Name : Tributaries of Wickers Branch
Cross Section: 1
Feature: Riffle
Description
Particle
Millimeter
Total #
Item %
Cum %
S/C
Silt/Clay
<0.062
6
10%
10%
S
Very Fine
.062-125 .125
0
0%
10%
A
Fine
.125-.25
0
0%
10%
N
Medium
.25-.50
0
0%
10%
D
Coarse
.50-1.0
1
2%
12%
S
Very Coarse
1.0-2.0
2
3%
15%
Very Fine
2.0-4.0
4
7%
22%
G
Fine
4.0-5.7
2
3%
25%
R
Fine
5.7-8.0
1
2%
27%
A
Medium
8.0-11.3
3
5%
32%
V
Medium
11.3-16.0
8
13%
45%
E
Coarse
16.0-22.6
8
13%
58%
L
Coarse
22.6-32.0
9
15%
73%
S
Very Coarse
32.0-45.0
11
18%
92%
Very Coarse
45.0-64.0
2
3%
95%
C
Small
64-90
3
5%
100%
O
Small
90-128
0
0%
100%
B
Large
128-180
0
0%
100%
L
Large
180-256
0
0%
100%
B
Small
256-362 1
0
0% 1
100%
L
Small
362-512
0
0%
100%
D
Medium
512-1024
0
0%
100%
R
Lrg- Very Lrg
1024-2048
0
0%
100%
BDRK
Bedrock
0
0%
100%
Totals
60
100%
Summary Data
D50 21.77
D84 44
D95 64
XSec 1
Particle Size Distribution
Tributary 1 - Tributaries of Wicker Branch - Union County, NC
100%
90%
80%
70%
w 60%
m
3 50%
a0%
L)
30%
20%
10%
o%
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Size (mm)
--11--Asbuilt —Y1 —Y2 �Y3 • y4
X -Sec 1
Particle Size Distribution
Tributary 1 - Tributaries of Wicker Branch - Union County, NC
100%
90%
80%
u
a 70%
m 60%
U
50%
a
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
0.01 0.125 0.25 0.5 1 2 4 6 8 11 16 22 32 45 64 90 128 180 256 362 512 1024 2048
Particle Size (mm)
■Asbuilt ■Y1 ■Y2 ■Y3 ■Y4 ■Y5

Cross - Section Pebble Count
Project Name : Tributaries of Wickers Branch
Cross Section: 2
Feature: Pool
Description
Particle
Millimeter
Total #
Item %
Cum %
S/C
Silt/Clay
<0.062
10
14%
14%
S
Very Fine
.062-125 .125
3
4%
19%
A
Fine
.125-.25
0
0%
19%
N
Medium
.25-.50
0
0%
19%
D
Coarse
.50-1.0
3
4%
23%
S
Very Coarse
1.0-2.0
3
4%
27%
Very Fine
2.0-4.0
8
11%
39%
G
Fine
4.0-5.7
3
4%
43%
R
Fine
5.7-8.0
11
16%
59%
A
Medium
8.0-11.3
7
10%
69%
V
Medium
11.3-16.0
14
20%
89%
E
Coarse
16.0-22.6
0
0%
89%
L
Coarse
22.6-32.0
1
1%
90%
S
Very Coarse
32.0-45.0
7
10%
100%
Very Coarse
45.0-64.0
0
0%
100%
C
Small
64-90
0
0%
100%
O
Small
90-128
0
0%
100%
B
Large
128-180
0
0%
100%
L
Large
180-256
0
0%
100%
B
Small
256-362
0
0%
100%
L
Small
362-512
0
0%
100%
D
Medium
512-1024
0
0%
100%
R
Lrg- Very Lrg
1024-2048
0
0%
100%
BDRK
Bedrock
0
0%
100%
Totals
70
100%
Summary Data
D50 6.75
D84 15
D95 39
XSec 2
Particle Size Distribution
Tributary 1 - Tributaries of Wicker Branch - Union County, NC
100%
90%
80%
70%
m
60%
50%
3
v 40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Size (mm)
--11--Asbuilt —Y1 —m—Y2 Y3 Y4
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
X -Sec 2
Particle Size Distribution
Tributary 1 - Tributaries of Wicker Branch - Union County, NC
0.01 0.125 0.25 0.5 1 2 4 6 8 11 16 22 32 45 64 90 128 180 256 362 512 1024 2048
Particle Size (mm)
■Asbuilt ■Y1 ■Y2 ■Y3 ■Y4 ■Y5

Cross - Section Pebble Count
Project Name : Tributaries of Wickers Branch
Cross Section: 3
Feature: Riffle
Description
Particle
Millimeter
Total #
Item %
Cum %
S/C
Silt/Clay
<0.062
3
5%
5%
S
Very Fine
.062-125 .125
0
0%
5%
A
Fine
.125-.25
0
0%
5%
N
Medium
.25-.50
0
0%
5%
D
Coarse
.50-1.0
0
0%
5%
S
Very Coarse
1.0-2.0
1
2%
7%
Very Fine
2.0-4.0
1
2%
8%
G
Fine
4.0-5.7
1
2%
10%
R
Fine
5.7-8.0
0
0%
10%
A
Medium
8.0-11.3
1
2%
11%
V
Medium
11.3-16.0
7
11%
23%
E
Coarse
16.0-22.6
1
2%
25%
L
Coarse
22.6-32.0
2
3%
28%
S
Very Coarse
32.0-45.0
3
5%
33%
Very Coarse
45.0-64.0
10
16%
49%
C
Small
64-90
11
18%
67%
O
Small
90-128
10
16%
84%
B
Large
128-180
9
15%
98%
L
Large
180-256
1
2%
100%
B
Small
256-362
0
0%
100%
L
Small
362-512
0
0%
100%
D
Medium
512-1024
0
0%
100%
R
Lrg- Very Lrg
1024-2048
0
0%
100%
BDRK
Bedrock
0
0%
100%
Totals
61
100%
Summary Data
D50 65
D84 129
D95 168
X -Sec 3
Particle Size Distribution
Tributary 1 - Tributaries of Wicker Branch - Union County, NC
100%
90%
60%
u
a 70%
" 60%
U
50%
a
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
0.01 0.125 0.25 0.5 1 2 4 6 8 11 16 22 32 45 64 90 128 180 256 362 512 1024 2048
Particle Size (mm)
■Asbuilt ■Y1 ■Y2 ■Y3 ■Y4 ■Y5

Cross - Section Pebble Count
Project Name : Tributaries of Wickets Branch
Cross Section: 4
Feature: Pool
Description
Particle
Millimeter
Total #
Item %
Cum %
S/C
Silt/Clay
<0.062
30
50%
50%
S
Very Fine
.062-125 .125
0
0%
50%
A
Fine
.125-.25
2
3%
53%
N
Medium
.25-.50
0
0%
53%
D
Coarse
.50-1.0
0
0%
53%
S
Very Coarse
1.0-2.0
5
8%
62%
Very Fine
2.0-4.0
7
12%
73%
G
Fine
4.0-5.7
2
3%
77%
R
Fine
5.7-8.0
1
2%
78%
A
Medium
8.0-11.3
2
3%
82%
V
Medium
11.3-16.0
0
0%
82%
E
Coarse
16.0-22.6
1
2%
83%
L.
Coarse
22.6-32.0
2
3%
87%
S
Very Coarse
32.0-45.0
2
3%
90%
Very Coarse
45.0-64.0
2
3%
93%
C
Small
64-90
3
5%
98%
O
Small
90-128
0
0%
98%
B
Large
128-180
1
2%
100%
L.
Large
180-256
0
0%
100%
B
Small
256-362
0
0%
100%
L.
Small
362-512
0
0%
100%
D
Medium
512-1024
0
0%
100%
R
Lrg- Very Lrg
1024-2048
0
0%
100%
BDRK
Bedrock
0
0%
100%
Totals
60
100%
Summary Data
D50 0.06
D84 25
D95 73
X -Sec 4
Particle Size Distribution
Tributary 1 - Tributaries of Wicker Branch - Union County, NC
100%
90% IM -
80%
70%
w so%
m
- 50%
40%
v
se 30%
20%
10%
0%
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Size (mm)
--m—Asbuilt —Y1 —Y2 —Y3 —e—Y4
X -Sec 4
Particle Size Distribution
Tributary 1 -Tributaries of Wicker Branch - Union County, NC
100%
90%
80%
u
a 70%
e 60%
U
50%
a
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
0.01 0.125 0.25 0.5 1 2 4 6 8 11 16 22 32 45 64 90 128 180 256 362 512 1024 2048
Particle Size (mm)
■Asbuilt ■Y1 ■Y2 ■Y3 ■Y4 ■Y5

Cross - Section Pebble Count
Project Name : Tributaries of Wickers Branch
Cross Section: 5
Feature: Riffle
Description
Particle
Millimeter
Total #
Item %
Cum %
S/C
Silt/Clay
<0.062
9
15%
15%
S
Very Fine
.062-125 .125
0
0%
15%
A
Fine
.125-.25
0
0%
15%
N
Medium
.25-.50
0
0%
15%
D
Coarse
.50-1.0
0
0%
15%
S
Very Coarse
1.0-2.0
7
12%
27%
Very Fine
2.0-4.0
6
10%
37%
G
Fine
4.0-5.7
4
7%
43%
R
Fine
5.7-8.0
2
3%
47%
A
Medium
8.0-11.3
2
3%
50%
V
Medium
11.3-16.0
6
10%
60%
E
Coarse
16.0-22.6
4
7%
67%
L
Coarse
22.6-32.0 1
2
3%
70%
S
Very Coarse
32.0-45.0
9
15%
85%
Very Coarse
45.0-64.0
6
10%
95%
C
Small
64-90
3
5%
100%
O
Small
90-128
0
0%
100%
B
Large
128-180
0
0%
100%
L
Large
180-256
0
0%
100%
B
Small
256-362
0
0%
100%
L
Small
362-512
0
0%
100%
D
Medium
512-1024
0
0%
100%
R
Lrg- Very Lrg
1024-2048
0
0%
100%
BDRK
Bedrock
0
0%
100%
Totals
60
100%
Summary Data
D50 30.6
D84 60
D95 90
XSec 5
Particle Size Distribution
Tributary 1 - Tributaries of Wicker Branch - Union County, NC
100
90%
80%
70%
w 60%
m
3 50%
a0%
L)
30%
20%
10%
o%
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Size (mm)
--m—Asbuilt —Y1 —Y2 —Y3 Y4
X -Sec 5
Particle Size Distribution
Tributary 1 - Tributaries of Wicker Branch - Union County, NC
100%
90%
60%
u
a 70%
" 60%
U
50%
a
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
1"
0.01 0.125 0.25 0.5 1 2 4 6 8 11 16 22 32 45 64 90 128 180 256 362 512 1024 2048
Particle Size (mm)
■Asbuilt ■Y1 ■Y2 ■Y3 ■Y4 ■Y5

Cross - Section Pebble Count
Project Name : Tributaries of Wickers Branch
Cross Section: 6
Feature: Riffle
Description
Particle
Millimeter
Total #
Item %
Cum %
S/C
Silt/Clay
<0.062
15
25%
25%
S
Very Fine
.062-125 .125
0
0%
25%
A
Fine
.125-.25
3
5%
30%
N
Medium
.25-.50
2
3%
33%
D
Coarse
.50-1.0
3
5%
38%
S
Very Coarse
1.0-2.0
0
0%
38%
Very Fine
2.0-4.0
2
3%
42%
G
Fine
4.0-5.7
1
2%
43%
R
Fine
5.7-8.0
2
3%
47%
A
Medium
8.0-11.3
3
5%
52%
V
Medium
11.3-16.0
0
0%
52%
E
Coarse
16.0-22.6
0
0%
52%
L
Coarse
22.6-32.0 1
2
3%
55%
S
Very Coarse
32.0-45.0
8
13%
68%
Very Coarse
45.0-64.0
11
18%
87%
C
Small
64-90
7
12%
98%
O
Small
90-128
1
2%
100%
B
Large
128-180
0
0%
100%
L
Large
180-256
0
0%
100%
B
Small
256-362
0
0%
100%
L
Small
362-512
0
0%
100%
D
Medium
512-1024
0
0%
100%
R
Lrg- Very Lrg
1024-2048
0
0%
100%
BDRK
Bedrock
0
0%
100%
Totals
60
100%
Summary Data
D50 10
D84 61
D95 82
XSec 6
Particle Size Distribution
Tributary 1 - Tributaries of Wicker Branch - Union County, NC
100
90%
80%
70%
w 60%
m
50%
3
40%
L)
30%
20%
10% —
0%
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Size (mm)
--m—Asbuilt —Y1 —Y2 Y3 Y4
X -Sec 6
Particle Size Distribution
Tributary 1 - Tributaries of Wicker Branch - Union County, NC
100%
90%
60%
u
a 70%
m 60%
U
50%
a
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
0.01 0.125 0.25 0.5 1 2 4 6 8 11 16 22 32 45 64 90 128 180 256 362 512 1024 2048
Particle Size (mm)
■Asbuilt ■Y1 ■Y2 ■Y3 ■Y4 ■Y5

Cross - Section Pebble Count
Project Name : Tributaries of Wickers Branch
Cross Section: 7
Feature: Pool
Description
Particle
Millimeter
Total #
Item %
Cum %
S/C
Silt/Clay
<0.062
20
33%
33%
S
Very Fine
.062-125 .125
0
0%
33%
A
Fine
.125-.25
3
5%
38%
N
Medium
.25-.50
2
3%
42%
D
Coarse
.50-1.0
0
0%
42%
S
Very Coarse
1.0-2.0
1
2%
43%
Very Fine
2.0-4.0
5
8%
52%
G
Fine
4.0-5.7
1
2%
53%
R
Fine
5.7-8.0
9
15%
68%
A
Medium
8.0-11.3
7
12%
80%
V
Medium
11.3-16.0
8
13%
93%
E
Coarse
16.0-22.6
3
5%
98%
L
Coarse
22.6-32.0
0
0%
98%
S
Very Coarse
32.0-45.0
0
0%
98%
Very Coarse
45.0-64.0
1
2%
100%
C
Small
64-90
0
0%
100%
O
Small
90-128
0
0%
100%
B
Large
128-180
0
0%
100%
L
Large
180-256
0
0%
100%
B
Small
256-362
0
0%
100%
L
Small
362-512
0
0%
100%
D
Medium
512-1024
0
0%
100%
R
Lrg- Very Lrg
1024-2048
0
0%
100%
BDRK
Bedrock
0
0%
100%
Totals
60
100%
Summary Data
D50 3.6
D84 13
D95 18
XSec 7
Particle Size Distribution
Tributary 1 - Tributaries of Wicker Branch - Union County, NC
100
90%
80%
70%
w 60%
m
50%
3
40%
v
30%
20%
10%
0%
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Size (mm)
--m—Asbuilt —Y1 —Y2 Y3 Y4
X -Sec 7
Particle Size Distribution
Tributary 1 - Tributaries of Wicker Branch - Union County, NC
100%
90%
80%
u
a 70%
" 60%
U
50%
a
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
0.01 0.125 0.25 0.5 1 2 4 6 8 11 16 22 32 45 64 90 128 180 256 362 512 1024 2048
Particle Size (mm)
■Asbuilt ■Y1 ■Y2 ■Y3 ■Y4 ■Y5

Cross - Section Pebble Count
Project Name : Tributaries of Wickers Branch
Cross Section: 8
Feature: Riffle
Description
Particle
Millimeter
Total #
Item %
Cum %
S/C
Silt/Clay
<0.062
25
42%
42%
S
Very Fine
.062-125 .125
0
0%
42%
A
Fine
.125-.25
0
0%
42%
N
Medium
.25-.50
0
0%
42%
D
Coarse
.50-1.0
1
2%
43%
S
Very Coarse
1.0-2.0
1
2%
45%
Very Fine
2.0-4.0
3
5%
50%
G
Fine
4.0-5.7
5
8%
58%
R
Fine
5.7-8.0
1
2%
60%
A
Medium
8.0-11.3
5
8%
68%
V
Medium
11.3-16.0
7
12%
80%
E
Coarse
16.0-22.6
6
10%
90%
L
Coarse
22.6-32.0
3
5%
95%
S
Very Coarse
32.0-45.0
2
3%
98%
Very Coarse
45.0-64.0
1
2%
100%
C
Small
64-90
0
0%
100%
O
Small
90-128
0
0%
100%
B
Large
128-180
0
0%
100%
L
Large
180-256
0
0%
100%
B
Small
256-362
0
0%
100%
L
Small
362-512
0
0%
100%
D
Medium
512-1024
0
0%
100%
R
Lrg- Very Lrg
1024-2048
0
0%
100%
BDRK
Bedrock
0
0%
100%
Totals
60
100%
Summary Data
D50 4
D84 19
D95 64
XSec 8
Particle Size Distribution
Tributary 3 - Tributaries of Wicker Branch - Union County, NC
100%
90%
80%
70%
w 60%
m
50%
3
40%
L)
30%
20% 11
10%
0%
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Size (mm)
�Asbuilt —Y1 —Y2 Y3 Y4
X -Sec 8
Particle Size Distribution
Tributary 3 - Tributaries of Wicker Branch - Union County, NC
100%
90%
80%
u
a 70%
" 60%
U
50%
a
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
0.01 0.125 0.25 0.5 1 2 4 6 8 11 16 22 32 45 64 90 128 180 256 362 512 1024 2048
Particle Size (mm)
■Asbuilt ■Y1 ■Y2 ■Y3 ■Y4 ■Y5

Cross - Section Pebble Count
Project Name : Tributaries of Wickers Branch
Cross Section: 9
Feature: Riffle
Description
Particle
Millimeter
Total #
Item %
Cum %
S/C
Silt/Clay
<0.062
45
75%
75%
S
Very Fine
.062-125 .125
0
0%
75%
A
Fine
.125-.25
0
0%
75%
N
Medium
.25-.50
0
0%
75%
D
Coarse
.50-1.0
2
3%
78%
S
Very Coarse
1.0-2.0
1
2%
80%
Very Fine
2.0-4.0
0
0%
80%
G
Fine
4.0-5.7
0
0%
80%
R
Fine
5.7-8.0
0
0%
80%
A
Medium
8.0-11.3
0
0%
80%
V
Medium
11.3-16.0
1
2%
82%
E
Coarse
16.0-22.6
1
2%
83%
L
Coarse
22.6-32.0
1
2%
85%
S
Very Coarse
32.0-45.0
3
5%
90%
Very Coarse
45.0-64.0
5
8%
98%
C
Small
64-90
1
2%
100%
O
Small
90-128
0
0%
100%
B
Large
128-180
0
0%
100%
L
Large
180-256
0
0%
100%
B
Small
256-362
0
0%
100%
L
Small
362-512
0
0%
100%
D
Medium
512-1024
0
0%
100%
R
Lrg- Very Lrg
1024-2048
0
0%
100%
BDRK
Bedrock
0
0%
100%
Totals
60
100%
Summary Data
D50 0.04
D84 26
D95 56
XSec 9
Particle Size Distribution
Tributary 3 - Tributaries of Wicker Branch - Union County, NC
100
90%
80%
70%
w 60%
m
3 50%
40%
L)
30%
20%
10%
o%
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Size (mm)
�Asbuilt —Y1 —Y2 —Y3 Y4
X -Sec 9
Particle Size Distribution
Tributary3 - Tributaries of Wicker Branch - Union County, NC
100%
90%
80%
u
a 70%
" 60%
U
50%
a
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
0.01 0.125 0.25 0.5 1 2 4 6 8 11 16 22 32 45 64 90 128 180 256 362 512 1024 2048
Particle Size (mm)
■Asbuilt ■Y1 ■Y2 ■Y3 ■Y4 ■Y5

Cross - Section Pebble Count
Project Name : Tributaries of Wickers Branch
Cross Section: 10
Feature: Pool
Description
Particle
Millimeter
Total #
Item %
Cum %
S/C
Silt/Clay
<0.062
50
83%
83%
S
Very Fine
.062-125 .125
0
0%
83%
A
Fine
.125-.25
0
0%
83%
N
Medium
.25-.50
0
0%
83%
D
Coarse
.50-1.0
2
3%
87%
S
Very Coarse
1.0-2.0
2
3%
90%
Very Fine
2.0-4.0
3
5%
95%
G
Fine
4.0-5.7
2
3%
98%
R
Fine
5.7-8.0
1
2%
100%
A
Medium
8.0-11.3
0
0%
100%
V
Medium
11.3-16.0
0
0%
100%
E
Coarse
16.0-22.6
0
0%
100%
L
Coarse
22.6-32.0
0
0%
100%
S
Very Coarse
32.0-45.0
0
0%
100%
Very Coarse
45.0-64.0
0
0%
100%
C
Small
64-90
0
0%
100%
O
Small
90-128
0
0%
100%
B
Large
128-180
0
0%
100%
L
Large
180-256
0
0%
100%
B
Small
256-362
0
0%
100%
L
Small
362-512
0
0%
100%
D
Medium
512-1024
0
0%
100%
R
Lrg- Very Lrg
1024-2048
0
0%
100%
BDRK
Bedrock
0
0%
100%
Totals
60
100%
Summary Data
D50 0.03
D84 0.04
D95 0.06
XSec 10
Particle Size Distribution
Tributary 3 - Tributaries of Wicker Branch - Union County, NC
100%
90% MO
80%
70%
w 60%
m
50%
3
a0%
v
30%
20%
10%
0%
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Size (mm)
--11--Asbuilt —Y1 —Y2 Y3 Y4
X -Sec 10
Particle Size Distribution
Tributary 3 - Tributaries of Wicker Branch - Union County, NC
100%
90%
80%
u
a 70%
" 60% -
U
50% -
.5
v 40%
c
30%
20%
10%
0%
0.01 0.125 0.25 0.5 1 2 4 6 8 11 16 22 32 45 64 90 128 180 256 362 512 1024 2048
Particle Size (mm)
■Asbuilt ■Y1 ■Y2 ■Y3 ■Y4 ■Y5

Cross - Section Pebble Count
Project Name : Tributaries of Wickers Branch
Cross Section: 11
Feature: Riffle
Description
Particle
Millimeter
Total #
Item %
Cum %
S/C
Silt/Clay
<0.062
60
100%
100%
S
Very Fine
.062-125 .125
0
0%
100%
A
Fine
.125-.25
0
0%
100%
N
Medium
.25-.50
0
0%
100%
D
Coarse
.50-1.0
0
0%
100%
S
Very Coarse
1.0-2.0
0
0%
100%
Very Fine
2.0-4.0
0
0%
100%
G
Fine
4.0-5.7
0
0%
100%
R
Fine
5.7-8.0
0
0%
100%
A
Medium
8.0-11.3
0
0%
10070
V
Medium
11.3-16.0
0
0%
100%
E
Coarse
16.0-22.6
0
0%
100%
L
Coarse
22.6-32.0
0
0%
100%
S
Very Coarse
32.0-45.0
0
0%
100%
Very Coarse
45.0-64.0
0
0%
100%
C
Small
64-90
0
0%
100%
O
Small
90-128
0
0%
100%
B
Large
128-180
0
0%
100%
L
Large
180-256
0
0%
100%
B
Small
256-362
0
0%
100%
L
Small
362-512
0
0%
100%
D
Medium
512-1024
0
0%
100%
R
Lrg- Very Lrg
1024-2048
0
0%
100%
BDRK
Bedrock
0
0%
100%
Totals
60
100%
Summary Data
D50 0.03
D84 0.05
D95 0.06
XSec 11
Particle Size Distribution
Tributary 4 - Tributaries of Wicker Branch - Union County, NC
100
90%
80%
70%
w 60%
m
50%
3
40%
L)
30%
20%
10%
0%
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Size (mm)
�Asbuilt —Y1 —Y2 Y3 Y4
X -Sec 11
Particle Size Distribution
Tributary 4 - Tributaries of Wicker Branch - Union County, NC
100%
90%
80%
u
a 70%
" 60% -
U
50% -
a
N
v 40%
c
30%
20%
10%
0%
0.01 0.125 0.25 0.5 1 2 4 6 8 11 16 22 32 45 64 90 128 180 256 362 512 1024 2048
Particle Size (mm)
■Asbuilt ■Y1 ■Y2 ■Y3 ■Y4 ■Y5

Cross - Section Pebble Count
Project Name : Tributaries of Wickers Branch
Cross Section: 12
Feature: Riffle
Description
Particle
Millimeter
Total #
Item %
Cum %
S/C
Silt/Clay
<0.062
46
77%
77%
S
Very Fine
.062-125 .125
0
0%
77%
A
Fine
.125-.25
0
0%
77%
N
Medium
.25-.50
0
0%
77%
D
Coarse
.50-1.0
1
2%
78%
S
Very Coarse
1.0-2.0
2
3%
82%
Very Fine
2.0-4.0
2
3%
85%
G
Fine
4.0-5.7
3
5%
90%
R
Fine
5.7-8.0
2
3%
93%
A
Medium
8.0-11.3
1
2%
95%
V
Medium
11.3-16.0
1
2%
97%
E
Coarse
16.0-22.6
1
2%
98%
L
Coarse
22.6-32.0
1
2%
100%
S
Very Coarse
32.0-45.0
0
0%
100%
Very Coarse
45.0-64.0
0
0%
100%
C
Small
64-90
0
0%
100%
O
Small
90-128
0
0%
100%
B
Large
128-180
0
0%
100%
L
Large
180-256
0
0%
100%
B
Small
256-362
0
0%
100%
L
Small
362-512
0
0%
100%
D
Medium
512-1024
0
0%
100%
R
Lrg- Very Lrg
1024-2048
0
0%
100%
BDRK
Bedrock
0
0%
100%
Totals
60
100%
Summary Data
D50 0.03
D84 0.04
D95 3.4
XSec 12
Particle Size Distribution
Tributary 4 - Tributaries of Wicker Branch - Union County, NC
100
90%
80%
70%
w 60%
m
50%
3
40%
L)
30%
20%
10%
0%
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Size (mm)
--m—Asbuilt �Seriesl —Y2 —Y3 Y4
X -Sec 12
Particle Size Distribution
Tributary 4 - Tributaries of Wicker Branch - Union County, NC
100%
90%
80%
u
a 70%
" 60%
U
50%
a
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
0.01 0.125 0.25 0.5 1 2 4 6 8 11 16 22 32 45 64 90 128 180 256 362 512 1024 2048
Particle Size (mm)
■Asbuilt ■Y1 ■Y2 ■Y3 ■Y4 ■Y5

Runs and Glides are too short to obtain meaningful measurements
Table 8. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Tributaries of Wicker Branch Stream Restoration/ DMS No. 95022
Parameter
Existing Trib 1A to Wickers
Branch
Reference
Reach.
Creek
Spencer
Reference Reach
Rockwell Pastures
UT4
Proposed
Trib 1 to Wickers
Branch
As-built Baseline
(Tributary 1A)
Stream Type
Drainage Area (sq mi)
G4/B4c
0.14
C4
0.5
C4
0.11
E4
0.1
Dimension
Min
Max
Avg
Min
Max
Avg
Min
Max
Avg
Min
Max
Avg
Min
Max
Avg
BF Width (ft)
3.27
3.90
3.58
12.30
7.30
4.00
3.93
4.93
4.43
4
BF Cress Sectional Area (ft)
1.52
1.99
1.74
10.80
4.20
1.50
1.62
2.80
1.94
4
BF Mean Depth (ft)
0.43
0.61
0.50
0.88
0.60
0.38
0.30
0.61
0.41
4
BF Max Depth (ft)
0.54
1.10
0.76
1.80
1.10
0.50
0.42
0.69
0.53
4
Width/Depth Ratio
5.36
8.48
7.37
13.98
12.60
10.52
7.49
14.94
11.56
4
Entrenchment Ratio
1.54
1.88
1.70
>2.20
2.70
>2.20
7.16
10.18
8.63
4
Wetted Perimeter (ft)
3.94
4.31
4.17
14.13
5.77
4.76
4.31
5.09
4.73
4
Hydraulic radius (ft)
0.39
0.47
0.43
0.76
0.76
0.32
0.29
0.55
0.38
4
Bank Height Ratio
2.21
2.41
2.32
1.10
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
4
Pool Area/Riffle Area
N/A
1.17
1.00
5.70
1.98
Max riffle depth/mean riffle depth
1.08
1.22
1.52
2.05
1.90
1.32
1.29
Max pool depth/mean riffle depth
1.22
2.3
1.76
2.38
2.5
6.50
2.76
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
7
10
9
24
52
38
3.20
5.70
4.40
15
30
23
18
25
22
Radius of Curvature (ft)
6
8
7
5
22
13
5
13
9
5
30
18
6
20
12
Meander Wavelength
27
497
181
54
196
125
10.00
17.00
13.60
30
110
70
34
106
50
Meander Width ratio
1.98
2.79
2.39
1.95
4.23
3.09
0.40
0.80
0.60
1.80
4.50
3.15
5.0
Meander Length ratio
7.64
138.78
50.53
4.39
15.93
10.16
1.40
2.30
1.90
7.50
27.50
17.50
11.20
Radius of Curvature/Riffle Width (ft)
1.68
2.23
1.96
0.44
4.23
1.05
0.70
1.70
1.20
1.00
4.20
2.60
1.35
4.06
2.71
Pool Length/Riffle Width
3.91
7.65
5.53
0.76
1.94
1.45
N/A
1.05
3.75
2.40
2.50
Pool to Pool Spacing/ Riffle Width
5.50
26.26
13.08
1.06
3.78
1.97
2.40
3.30
2.90
3.50
14.75
9.13
2.93
13.77
6.00
Riffle Length/Riffle Width
1.90
20.75
8.13
0.30
1.84
1.07
N/A
2.45
11.00
6.73
1.85
10.61
3.54
Profile
Pool length (ft)
14.0
27.4
19.8
9.3
23.9
17.8
N/A
4.2
15.0
9.8
4.9
17.8
11.3
49
Pool spacing (ft)
19.7
94.0
46.8
13.0
46.5
24.2
17.6
24.1
20.8
14.0
59.0
26.5
13.0
61.0
26.6
48
Riffle length (ft)
6.8
74.3
29.1
3.7
22.6
13.1
N/A
9.8
44.0
26.9
8.2
47.0
15.7
50
Riffle slope (ft/ft)
0.014
0.027
0.02
0.020
0.036
0.026
0.006
0.049
0.028
0.018
0.029
0.02
0.01
0.48
0.03
50
Pool slope (Wft)
0.006
0.017
0.012
0.000
0.005
0.003
0.008
0.014
0.010
0.018
0.029
0.024
0.010
0.001
0.005
48
Run slope (f /ft)
0.009
0.025
0.018
0.028
0.059
0.041
N/A
NIA*
N/A*
Glide slope (ft/ft)
0.006
0.016
0.01
0.000
0.012
0.003
N/A
N/A*
NIA*
Riffle Slope/Avg. Water Surface Slope
1.09
2.11
1.56
1.52
2.73
1.97
0.40
3.20
1.80
1.29
2.09
1.69
2.36
Run slope/Avg. Water Surface Slope
0.73
1.95
1.41
2.12
4.47
3.11
N/A
NIA*
NIA'
Pool Slope/Avg. Water Surface Slope
0.47
1.33
0.94
0.00
0.38
0.23
0.50
0.90
0.60
1.29
2.09
1.69
0.39
Glide Slope/Avg.Water Surface Slope
0.50
1.25
0.78
0.00
0.91
0.23
N/A
N/A*
N/A*
Substrate
d50 (mm)
2.5
23.32
10.09
8.6
12.70
13.8
35.5
25.6
4
d84 (mm)
10.38
44.3
25.7
77.00
38.00
123
37
88
65.3
4
Additional Reach Parameters
Valley Length (ft)
1285
235
N/A
1284
1285
Channel Length (ft)
1293
266
N/A
1395
1390
Valley Slope (ft/ft)
0.0113
0.0138
0.0132
0.0139
0.0173
0.0132
0.0129
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)
0.0080
0.0177
0.0128
0.0132
0.0156
0.0139
0.0127
Sinuosity
1
1.1
1.05
1.1
1.1
Runs and Glides are too short to obtain meaningful measurements

• Tributary 3 and 4 - The Pattern of the channel was not altered. Tributary 4 only minimal work consisting of altering dimension was performed.
•• Tributary modified/channelized in past so application of classification of natural channels may not be applicable
-Note on Tributaries 3 and 4 Pattern Data. These two tributaries are relatively straight channels. Beltwidth, radius of curvature, and other measurements are not applicable.
•••• Runs and glides are too short to obtain meaningfull measurements
Table 8. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Tributaries of Wicker Branch Stream Restoration/ DMS No. 95022
Parameter
Existing Trib 3 to Wickers
Branch
Existing Trib 4 to Wickers
Branch
Reference
Reach- Spencer
Creek
Reference Reach
Rockwell Pastures
UT4
Proposed Trib 3 & 4 to
Wickers Branch*
As -built Baseline
(Tributary 3)
As -built Baseline
(Tributary 4)
Stream Type
B6c
E6**
C4
C4
C4
Drainage Area (sq mi)
0.05
0.05
0.5
0.11
0.05
Dimension
Min
I Max
Avg
Min
Max
Avg
Min
Max
Avg
Min
Max
Avg
Min
Max
Avg
Min
Max
Avg
n
Min
Max
Avg
n
BF Width (ft)
2.55
2.66
2.61
2.90
3.66
3.28
12.30
7.30
3.60
3.58
6.74
4.70
3
3.53
4.29
3.91
2
BF Cress Sectional Area (ft)
0.40
0.63
0.52
0.83
1.13
0.98
10.80
4.20
1.08
1.16
6.98
3.2
3
1.21
1.23
1.22
2
BF Mean Depth (ft)
0.15
0.25
0.20
0.23
0.39
0.31
0.88
0.60
0.30
0.32
1.04
0.59
3
0.29
0.34
0.32
2
BF Max Depth (ft)
0.38
0.45
0.42
0.38
0.65
0.52
1.80
1.10
0.60
0.49
1.53
0.89
3
0.43
0.69
0.56
2
Width/Depth Ratio
10.20
17.73
13.97
7.44
15.91
11.68
13.98
12.60
12.00
6.48
11.19
9.15
3
10.38
14.79
12.59
2
Entrenchment Ratio
1.36
1.88
1.62
2.46
4.84
3.65
>2.20
2.70
>2.20
5.12
8.60
7.20
3
4.26
5.50
4.88
2
Wetted Perimeter (ft)
2.83
2.84
2.84
3.26
3.77
3.52
14.13
5.77
4.20
3.59
6.80
5.20
2
3.81
4.42
4.12
2
Hydraulic radius (ft)
0.14
0.22
0.18
0.22
0.35
0.29
0.76
0.76
0.26
0.24
0.72
0.48
2
0.28
0.32
0.3
2
Bank Height Ratio
2.24
3.32
2.78
1.00
1.60
1.30
1.10
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
Pool Area/Riffle Area
NIA
N/A
1.17
1.00
8.00
0.52
N/A
Max riffle depth/mean riffle depth
1.9
2.25
2.08
1.68
2.05
1.90
2.00
1.51
1.78
Max pool depth/mean riffle depth
2.15
3.4
2.78
1.13
1.97
1.55
2.38
2.5
8.30
2.64
N/A
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
5
9
7
NIA
24
52
38
3.20
5.70
4.40
NIA*
N/A***
N/A*••
Radius of Curvature (ft)
2
8
5
N/A
5
22
13
5
13
9
NIA*
NIA***
NIA***
Meander Wavelength
109
312
189
N/A
54
196
125
10.00
17.00
13.60
NIA*
NIA•••
N/A*••
Meander Width ratio
2.00
3.31
2.65
N/A
1.95
4.23
3.09
0.40
0.80
0.60
NIA*
N/A***
NIA***
Meander Length ratio
41.68
119.38
72.24
NIA
4.39
15.93
10.16
1.40
2.30
1.90
NIA*
NIA•••
N/A•••
Radius of Curvature/Riffle Width (ft)
0.69
3.07
1.88
N/A
0.44
4.23
1.05
0.70
1.70
1.20
NIA*
N/A***
N/A***
Pool Length/Riffle Width
6.79
14.39
9.13
3.60
10.09
6.22
0.76
1.94
1.45
NIA
1.11
1.67
NIA*
2.19
2.38
Pool to Pool Spacing/ Riffle Width
14.80
34.66
24.86
5.46
15.70
9.91
1.06
3.78
1.97
2.40
3.30
2.90
5.56
16.11
10.83
11
37
Riffle Length/Riffle Width
2.72
8.58
5.40
5.46
11.16
8.45
0.30
1.84
1.07
NIA
4.44
14.44
9.44
8.64
35.29
Profile
Pool length (ft)
17.7
37.6
23.8
11.8
33.1
20.4
9.3
23.9
17.8
N/A
4.0
6.0
5.0
7.7
17.7
10.3
11
7.6
11.2
9.3
4
Pool spacing (ft)
38.6
90.5
64.9
17.9
51.5
32.5
13.0
46.5
24.2
17.6
24.1
20.8
20.0
58.0
45.3
34.7
88
52
10
140
150
145
4
Riffle length (ft)
7.1
22.4
14.1
17.9
36.62
27.7
3.7
22.6
13.1
N/A
16.0
52.0
34.0
22.2
74.9
40.6
10
133
145
138
3
Riffle slope (ft/ft)
0.011
0.027
0.019
0.008
0.014
0.0095
0.020
0.036
0.026
0.006
0.049
0.028
0.018
0.029
0.02
0.0048
0.0179
0.0115
10
0.007
0.014
0.009
3
Pool slope (ft/ft)
0.012
0.013
0.011
0.008
0.009
0.0085
0.000
0.005
0.003
0.008
0.014
0.010
0.018
0.029
0.024
0.0001
0.0048
0.0025
10
0.0001
0.0012
0.0007
4
Run slope (f/ft)
0.013
0.034
0.023
0.008
0.030
0.0125
0.028
0.059
0.041
N/A
N/A
N/A****
NIA****
Glide slope (ft/ft)
0.008
0.020
0.012
0.0050
0.0460
0.015
0.000
0.012
0.003
NIA
N/A
N/A-
N/A*•••
Riffle Slope/Avg. Water Surface Slope
0.79
1.93
1.36
0.89
1.56
1.06
1.52
2.73
1.97
0.40
3.20
1.80
1.29
2.09
1.690.97
0.95
Run slope/Avg. Water Surface Slope
0.93
2.43
1.64
0.87
3.33
1.39
2.12
4.47
3.11
N/A
NIA
N/A•••*
N/A•***
Pool Slope/Avg. Water Surface Slope
0.86
0.93
0.79
0.89
0.97
0.94
0.00
0.38
0.23
0.50
0.90
0.60
1.29
2.09
1.69
0.21
0.07
Glide Slope/Avg.Water Surface Slope
0.57
1.43
0.86
0.56
5.11
1.67
0.00
0.91
0.23
N/A
NIA
N/A'***
N/A•***
Substrate
d50 (mm)
0.04
0.04
8.6
12.70
0.06
16
7.1
3
0.03
4.7
2.4
2
d84 (mm)
0.06
6.16
77.00
38.00
108
5
29
17
3
0.05
14
7
2
Additional Reach Parameters
Valley Length (ft)
1184
629
235
NIA
1284
1184
629
Channel Length(ft)
1184
631
266
N/A
1395
1184
631
Valley Slope (ft/ft)
0.0116
0.0164
0.0135
0.0087
0.0122
0.0095
0.0139
0.0173
0.0132
0.0119
0.0097
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)
0.0100
0.0176
0.0140
0.0090
0.0090
0.0090
0.0132
0.0156
0.0139
0.0119
0.0095
Sinuosity
1
1
1.1
1.05
1.1
1.0
1.0
• Tributary 3 and 4 - The Pattern of the channel was not altered. Tributary 4 only minimal work consisting of altering dimension was performed.
•• Tributary modified/channelized in past so application of classification of natural channels may not be applicable
-Note on Tributaries 3 and 4 Pattern Data. These two tributaries are relatively straight channels. Beltwidth, radius of curvature, and other measurements are not applicable.
•••• Runs and glides are too short to obtain meaningfull measurements

Note: Bankfull elevation for MY 1 - 3 based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation. Bankfull elevation for MY 4 and 5 based on Bankfull Cross-sectional area per USACE guidance.
Table 9a. Morphology and Hydraulic Monitoring Summary (Dimensional Parameters - Cross Sections)
Tributaries of Wicker Branch Stream Restoration/ DMS No. 95022
Cross Section 1 (Riffle)
Cross Section 2 (Pool)
Cross Section 3 (Riffle)
Cross Section 4 (Pool)
Cross Section 5 (Riffle)
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4 MY5
MY+ Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4 MY5
MY+ Base
MY1
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4 MY5
MY+ Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4 MY5 MY+
Bankfull Width (ft)
3.97
3.93
3.07
3.26
4.77
5.13
6.09
5.85
4.81
8.83
4.51
4.57
5.08 4.25 11
5.14
5.31
6.2
9.9
9.6
4.76
4.27
3.8
3.9
4.5
Floodprone Width (ft)
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50 50 50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.38
0.41
0.42
0.28
0.31
0.78
0.7
0.69
0.82
0.45
0.68
0.61
0.8 0.6 0.28
0.72
0.68
0.83
0.41
0.38
0.32
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.34
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
0.53
0.51
0.5
0.37
0.45
1.19
1.21
1.38
1.21
1.2
1
0.69
1.22 0.9 0.89
1.33
1.26
1.5
1.28
1.42
0.79
0.42
0.45
0.42
0.47
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft)
1.51
1.62
1.28
0.92
1.51
3.98
4.27
4.03
3.96
3.98
3.08
2.8
4.06 2.36 3.08
3.72
3.59
5.17
4.1
3.72
1.54
1.7
1.3
1.1
1.54
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
10.45
9.59
7.31
11.64
15.39
6.58
8.7
8.5
4.81
19.6
6.63
7.49
6.4 7.59 39.29
7.14
7.81
7.4
24.1
25.2
14.87
14.23
11.5
13.6
13.24
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
10.06
10.18
16.29
15.34
8.03
7.79
6.57
8.5
10.4
5.6
11.1
8.72
9.8 11.8 4.5
9.7
7.49
8.1
5
5.2
10.5
8.44
13.2
12.6
11.11
Low Top of Bank Depth (ft)
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.43
NA
NA
NA
NA
1.07
0.89
1.31
0.43
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1
1
1
1
0.96
1
1
1
1
0.89
1
1
0.9 0.9 1
1
1
1
1
0.92
1
1
1
1
0.9
Based on current/developing bankfull feature
Bankfull Width (ft)
Floodprone Width (ft)
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft)
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
Cross Sectional Area between end pins (ft)
d50 (mm)
35.5
32.9
31.2
14.5
21.8
7.7
6.9
0.8
13.6
6.8
25.7
32
73 64 65
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.06
27.3
42.4
45
11.3
30.6
Cross Section 6 (Riffle)
Cross Section 7 (Pool)
Cross Section
Cross Section
Cross Section
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4 MY5
MY+ Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4 MY5
MY+ Base
MY1
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4 MY5
MY+ Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4 MY5 MY+
Bankfull Width (ft)
4.39
4.93
4.37
3.98
10.02
6.59
6.21
9.94
10.5
7.1
Floodprone Width (ft)
50
50
50
50
50
40
40
40
40
40
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.39
0.33
0.4
0.34
0.17
0.49
0.59
0.4
0.4
0.45
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
0.58
0.5
0.5
0.43
0.5
0.85
0.92
0.97
0.87
0.9
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft)
1.72
1.64
1.73
1.35
1.72
3.21
3.69
3.98
3.92
3.21
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
11.26
14.94
10.97
11.7
58.4
13.45
10.53 24.8
28.5
15.78
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
11.4
7.16
11.4
11.4
4.99
6.1
6.37
4.02
3.8
5.6
Low Top of Bank Depth (ft)
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.44
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.74
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1
1
1
1
0.88
1
1
1
1
0.82
Based on current/developing current/developingbankfull feature
Bankfull Width (ft)
Floodprone Width (ft)
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft)
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
Cross Sectional Area between end pins (ft)
d50 (mm)
13.8
12.9
41
5.2
10
11.2
6.3
0.8
3
3.6
Note: Bankfull elevation for MY 1 - 3 based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation. Bankfull elevation for MY 4 and 5 based on Bankfull Cross-sectional area per USACE guidance.

Table 9a. Morphology and Hydraulic Monitoring Summary (Dimensional Parameters - Cross Sections)
Tributaries of Wicker Branch Stream Restoration/ DMS No. 95022
Cross Section 8 (Pool)
Cross Section 9 (Riffle)
Cross Section 10 (Riffle)
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4 MY5
MY+ Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4 MY5 MY+
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4 MY5 MY+
Bankfull Width (ft)
4
4.3
4.2
4.9
3.8
3.58
3.48
3.3
3.2
4.17
6.74
6.19
6.61
6.39
12.03
Floodprone Width (ft)
32
32
40
40
40
31
31
32
33
33
35
35
33
32
35
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.41
0.38
0.33
0.25
0.44
0.32
0.24
0.31
0.32
0.27
1.04
0.79
0.84
0.8
0.57
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
0.65
0.71
0.6
0.6
0.77
0.49
0.38
0.49
0.54
0.55
1.53
1.29
1.22
1.2
1.46
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft)
1.66
1.65
1.38
1.25
1.66
1.16
0.85
1.01
1.03
1.16
6.98
4.87
5.53
5.09
6.98
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
9.78
11.32
12.8
19.9
8.59
11.19
14.5
10.6
10
15.44
6.48
7.84
7.87
7.99
21.1
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
7.9
9.31
9.48
8
10.57
8.6
6.89
9.77
10.35
7.89
5.12
5.1
4.96
5.02
2.96
Low Top of Bank Depth (ft)
0.89
0.51
1.29
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1
1
1
1
1.15
1
1
1
1
0.93
1
1
1
1
0.89
Based on current/developing bankfull feature
Bankfull Width (ft)
Floodprone Width (ft)
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft)
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
Cross Sectional Area between end pins (fig)
d50 (mm)
5.42
0.04
0.03
4
4
16
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.04
0.06
0.04
0.03
0.03
0.03
Cross Section 11 (Riffle)
Cross Section 12 (Riffle)
Cross Section
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4 MY5
MY+ Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4 MY5 MY+
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4 MY5 MY+
Bankfull Width (ft)
3.53
2.98
3.22
3.54
3.58
4.29
4.17
4.18
3.15
3.81
Floodprone Width (ft)
19.5
19.5
18
14
14
18.3
18.3
24
11
19
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.34
0.41
0.35
0.36
0.33
0.29
0.25
0.28
0.3
0.32
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
0.69
0.69
0.62
1 0.53
0.53 1
0.43
0.44
1 0.5
0.48 1
0.53
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft)
1.21
1.22
1.12
1.27
1.21
1.23
1.05
1.19
0.94
1.23
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
10.38
7.27
9.2
9.83
10.85
14.79
16.68
14.93
10.5
11.91
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
5.5
6.39
5.42
3.94
3.97
4.26
5.4
5.83
3.5
5.1
Low Top of Bank Depth (ft)
0.49
0.6
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1
1
1
1
0.93
1
1
1
1.1
1.1
Based on current/developing bankfull feature
Bankfull Width (ft)
Floodprone Width (ft)
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft)
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
Cross Sectional Area between end pins (fig)
d50 (mm)l
0.03 1
0.03
1 0.03
1 0.03
1 0.03 1
4.7 1
0.03
1 0.03
1 0.03 1
0.03
Note: Bankfull elevation for MY 1 - 3 based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation. Bankfull elevation for MY 4 and 5 based on Bankfull Cross-sectional area per USACE guidance.

Table 9b. Stream Reach Data Summary
Tributaries of Wicker Branch Stream Restoration/ DMS No. 95022
Parameter
MY 0
Trib 1A
MY 1
Trib 1A
MY 2
Trib 1A
MY 3
Trib 1A
MY 4
Trib 1A
MY 5
Trib 1A
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle
Min
Max
Avg
Min
Max
Avg
Min
Max
Avg
Min
Max
Avg
Min
Max
Avg Min Max Avg
Bankfull Width (ft)
3.97
4.76
4.41
3.93
4.93
4.43
3.07 5.08
4.08
3.26
4.25
3.84
4.50
11.00
7.57
Floodprone Width (ft)
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.32
0.68
0.44
0.30
0.61
0.41
0.30 0.80
0.48
0.28
0.6
0.38
0.17
0.34
0.28
'Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
0.53
1.00
0.73
0.42
0.69
0.53
0.45 1.22
0.67
0.37
0.9
0.53
0.45
0.89
0.58
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft)
1.51
3.08
1.96
1.62
2.80
1.94
1.28 4.06
2.09
0.92
2.36
1.43
1.51
3.08
1.96
Width/Depth Ratio
6.63
14.87
10.80
7.49
14.94
11.56
6.40 11.50
9.05
7.59
13.6
11.13
13.24
58.40
31.58
Entrenchment Ratio
10.1
11.4
10.8
7.16
10.18
8.63
9.80 16.29
12.67
11.4
15.34
12.79
4.50
11.11
7.16
Low Top of Bank Depth (ft)
0.43
0.89
0.55
'Bank Height Ratio
1
1
1
1
0.88
1
0.94
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
8.2
47
15.7
6.3
46
14.4
10
47
16
6.7
48
16.5
8
48
16.5
Riffle Slope (ft/ft) 0.0125
0.475
0.0253
0.007
0.047
0.024
0.006 0.047
0.022
0.011
0.048
0.025
0.012
0.047
0.025
Pool Length (ft)
4.9
17.8
11.3
7.8
17.9
13.1
7.9
18
12.9
5.2
17.3
10.4
7.6
17.5
10.3
Pool Max depth (ft)
1.27
1.78
1.53
1.15
1.92
1.49
1.14
1.8
1.47
1.2
1.6
1.4
1.2
1.58
1.42
Pool Spacing (ft)
13
61
26.6
13.8
60
26.9
12.7
60
27.6
14
60
27.1
13
60
27.5
P
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
18
25
22
18
25
22
18
25
22
18
25
22
18
25
22
Radius of Curvature (ft)
6
20
12
6
20
12
6
20
12
6
20
12
6
20
12
Re/Bankfull width (ft/ft)
1.36
4.54
2.72
1.35
4.51
2.71
1.47
4.90
2.94
1.56
5.21
3.13
0.79
2.64
1.58
Meander Wavelength (ft)
34
106
50
34
106
50
34
106
50
34
106
50
34
106
50
Meander Width Ratio
5.0
5.0
5.4
5.7
2.9
Transport parameters
ir
Reach Shear Stress (competency) Ib/f2
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
Stream Power (transport capacity) W/mZ
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
C4
C4
C4
C4
C4
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
Valley length (ft)
1285
1285
1285
1285
1285
Channel Thalweg length (ft)
1390
1390
1390
1390
1390
Sinuosity (ft)
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
0.0127
0.0127
0.0127
0.0127
0.0127
BF slope (ft/ft)
0.0129
0.0129
0.0129
0.0129
0.0129
3Bankfull Floodplain Area (acres)
4Proportion over wide (%)
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other

*Note on Tributary 3 Pattern Data. This tributary is a relatively straight channel. Beltwidth, radius of curvature, and other pattern measurements
does not provide meaningfull information
Table 9b. Stream Reach Data Summary
Tributaries of Wicker Branch Stream Restoration/ DMS No. 95022
Parameter
MY 0
Trib 3
MY 1
Trib 3
MY 2
Trib 3
MY 3
Trib 3
MY 4
Trib 3
MY 5
Trib 3
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle
Min
Max
Avg
Min Max
Avg
Min
Max
Avg
Min
Max
Avg
Min
Max
Avg Min Max Avg
Bankfull Width (ft)
3.58
6.74
4.77
3.48 6.19
4.66
3.30
6.61
4.70
3.2
6.39
4.83
3.80
12.03
6.67
Floodprone Width (ft)
31.00
35.00
32.67
31 35
32.70
32
40
35
32
40
35.00
33
40
36
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.32
1.04
0.59
0.24 0.79
0.47
0.31
0.84
0.49
0.25
0.8
0.46
0.27
0.57
0.43
'Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
0.49
1.53
0.89
0.38 1.29
0.79
0.49
1.22
0.77
0.54
1.2
0.78
0.55
1.46
0.93
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft)
1.16
6.98
3.27
0.85 4.87
2.45
1.01
5.53
2.64
1.03
5.09
2.46
1.16
6.98
3.27
Width/Depth Ratio
6.48
11.19
9.15
7.84 14.5
11.22
7.87
12.80
10.42
7.99
19.9
12.63
8.59
21.10
15.04
Entrenchment Ratio
5.12
8.60
7.21
5.1 9.31
7.10
4.96
9.77
8.07
5.02
10.35
7.79
2.96
10.57
7.14
Low Top of Bank Depth (ft)
0.51
1.29
0.90
'Bank Height Ratio
Profile
1
1
1
1
0.89
1.15
0.99 Ig
Riffle Length (ft)
22.2
74.9
40.6
22.2 74.9
40.6
24
73
43
25
76
43
23
73
43
Riffle Slope (ft/ft) 0.0048 0.0179 0.0115 0.0048 0.019
0.013
0.0048 0.0179 0.0115
0.003
0.019
0.012
0.0048
0.0179
0.013
Pool Length (ft)
7.7
17.7
10.3
7.6 17.8
10.4
6
12
9.4
6
9
7.6
6
12
10
Pool Max depth (ft)
1.01
1.97
1.56
1 1.95
1.52
0.9
1.7
1.3
0.9
1.6
1.2
0.9
1.7
1.2
Pool Spacing (ft)
34.7
88
52
34.8 88.1
52
31
84
52
31
83
50
32
83
52
P
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A* N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
Radius of Curvature (ft)
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A* N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
Re/Bankfull width (ft/ft)
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A* N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
Meander Wavelength (ft)
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A* N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
Meander Width Ratio
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A* N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
Transport parameters
Reach Shear Stress (competency) Ib/f2
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
Stream Power (transport capacity) W/mZ
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
C4
C4
C4
C4
C4
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
Valley length (ft)
1184
1184
1184
1184
1184
Channel Thalweg length (ft)
1184
1184
1184
1184
1184
Sinuosity (ft)
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
0.0119
0.0119
0.0119
0.0119
0.0119
BF slope (ft/ft)
0.0119
0.0119
0.0119
0.0119
0.0119
3Bankfull Floodplain Area (acres)
4Proportion over wide (%)
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other,
*Note on Tributary 3 Pattern Data. This tributary is a relatively straight channel. Beltwidth, radius of curvature, and other pattern measurements
does not provide meaningfull information

*Note on Tributary 4 Pattern Data. This tributary is a relatively straight channel. Beltwidth, radius of curvature, and other pattern measurements
does not provide meaningfull information
Table 9b. Stream Reach Data Summary
Tributaries of Wicker Branch Stream Restoration/ DMS No. 95022
Parameter
MY 0
Trib 4
MY 1
Trib 4
MY 2
Trib 4
MY 3
Trib 4
MY 4
Trib 4
MY 5
Trib 4
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle
Min
Max
Avg
Min
Max
Avg
Min
Max
Avg
Min
Max
Avg
Min
Max
Avg Min Max Avg
Bankfull Width (ft)
3.53
4.29
3.91
2.98
4.17
3.57
3.57
4.17
2.98
3.15
3.54
3.34
3.58
3.81
3.70
Floodprone Width (ft)
18.30
19.50
18.90
18.3
19.5
18.9
18.9
19.5
18.3
11
14
12.50
14.00
19.00
16.50
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.29
0.34
0.32
0.25
0.41
0.33
0.33
0.41
0.25
0.3
0.36
0.33
0.32
0.33
0.33
'Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
0.43
0.69
0.56
0.44
0.69
0.56
0.56
0.69
0.44
0.48
0.53
0.51
0.53
0.53
0.53
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft)
1.21
1.23
1.22
1.05
1.22
1.13
1.13
1.22
1.05
0.94
1.27
1.11
1.21
1.23
1.22
Width/Depth Ratio
10.38
14.79
12.59
7.27
16.68
11.97
11.97
16.68
7.27
9.83
10.5
10.17
10.85
11.91
11.38
Entrenchment Ratio
4.26
5.50
4.88
5.4
6.39
5.89
5.89
6.39
5.40
3.5
3.94
3.72
3.97
5.10
4.54
Low Top of Bank Depth (ft)
0.49
0.60
0.55
'Bank Height Ratio
1
1
1
0.93
1.10
1.02
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
133
145
138
130
145
136
140
160
148
134
146
139
134
160
148
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
0.007
0.014
0.009
0.006
0.014
0.009
0.006
0.014
0.009
0.007
0.014
0.01
0.006
0.014
0.009
Pool Length (ft)
7.6
11.2
9.3
7.4
11.1
9.2
7.1
13
10.6
5
9
7
7.4
13
10.6
Pool Max depth (ft)
1.39
2.35
1.78
1.37
2.35
1.77
1.18
1.79
1.46
1
1.53
1.22
1.39
1.79
1.46
Pool Spacing (ft)
140
150
145
140
150
145
140
150
145
140
150
145
140
150
145
P
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
Radius of Curvature (ft)
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
Re/Bankfull width (ft/ft)
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
Meander Wavelength (ft)
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
Meander Width Ratio
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
Transport parameters
Reach Shear Stress (competency) Ib/f2
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
Stream Power (transport capacity) W/mZ
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
Valley length (ft)
631
631
631
631
631
Channel Thalweg length (ft)
631
631
631
631
631
Sinuosity (ft)
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
0.00972
0.00972
0.00972
0.00972
0.00972
BF slope (ft/ft)
0.0095
0.0095
0.0095
0.0095
0.0095
3Bankfull Floodplain Area (acres)
4Proportion over wide (%)
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
*Note on Tributary 4 Pattern Data. This tributary is a relatively straight channel. Beltwidth, radius of curvature, and other pattern measurements
does not provide meaningfull information

APPENDIX E: HYDROLOGIC DATA
Table 10 —Verification of Bankfull Events
Tributaries to Wickers Branch Stream Restoration Site
Year 4 (2018) Monitoring Report
DMS Project No. 95022

Table 10. Documentation of Geomorphologically Significant Flow Events
Tributaries of Wicker Branch Stream Restoration/ DMS No. 95022
Greater Than
Greater
Date of
Date of
Qgs=Q2*0.66
than Qbkf
Observation
occurrence
Method
Stage
Stage?
Notes
Photo on -
12/3/2014
11/23/2014
site wrack
Yes
See photo below
line
See photos below. Most
likely occurred on
4/17/2017
Apr -17
Crest Gauge
Yes
1/2/2017 or 1/3/2017
when site received a
total of 1.5 inches of rain
Photo, crest
2/6/2018
1/29/2018
gauge, and
Yes
See photos and
transducer
transducer graphs
data
9/16/2016
9/16/2018
Transducer
Yes
See transducer graphs
data
Photo of wrack lines from 11/23/2014 bankfull event
® 258°W (T) OO 34°53'36"N, 80°26'40"W ±32.8ft ♦ 573ft
® 300 -NW (T) O34'53'34"N, 80°27'3"W �16.4ft ♦ 580ft
Tributary 1 Crest Gauge 4/17/2017
Tributaries to Wickers Branch Stream Restoration Site
Year 4 (2018) Monitoring Report
DMS Project No. 95022
Tributary 3 Crest Gauge 4/17/2017

0 98°E (T) C00- 34°5336"N, 80°26'39"W ±16.4ft ♦ 574ft
0 204°5W (T) 4, 34°53'34"N, 80°27'3"W ±16.4ft ♦ 539ft
Tributary 1 wrack lines 2/6/2018 Tributary 3 wrack lines 2/6/2018
Tributaries to Wickers Branch Stream Restoration Site
Year 4 (2018) Monitoring Report
DMS Project No. 95022

16.00
14.00
12.00
v
10.00
d
8.00
r 6.00
6
v
O
4.00
2.00
0.00
Tributary 1 -Upper Transducer
Date
IaaIERainfall -Water Depth in Pool -Bankfull -Depth at Which Flow Occurs
6
5
4
L
C
3
A
S
I
C
2
1
0
Tributaries to Wickers Branch Stream Restoration Site
Year 4 (2018) Monitoring Report
DMS Project No. 95022
Tributary 1
- Lower Transducer
11100
6
16.00
5
14.00
r 12.00
c
4
m
10.00
L
c
m
- 3
�0.
R
00
A-
C
.A
t
0,6
6.00
0
-
i 2
4.00
1
2.OD
0.00
0
rl
rl 'i N N
rn rn a a
N N N iL L
L f` n r. OO D] C5
Q1
r,.
Date
aaa� Rainfall
-Water Depth in Pool
-Bankfull
-Depth at Which Flow Occurs
Tributaries to Wickers Branch Stream Restoration Site
Year 4 (2018) Monitoring Report
DMS Project No. 95022

Tributary 3 -Upper Transducer
18.00 6
16.00
5
14.00
i 12.00 4
c
w r
10.00
3 e
8.00
L R
m 6.00 2
O
4.00
1
2.00
0.00 p u..-.i1k, I� ...d.l L�' -ham r..l I L 0
00 OD cc 00 COCO
.moi ti_ -i ,5 O N N N �_ _-� � � tib+ O O O O O OObi T �_ "a �
0�0
V zt N N N 10 tp ip h n h W CO C} M H
Date
Rainfall Water Depth in Pool Bankfull -Depth at Which Flow Occurs
Tributaries to Wickers Branch Stream Restoration Site
Year 4 (2018) Monitoring Report
DMS Project No. 95022
Tributary 3
- Lower Transducer
1&00
6
14.00
5
12.00
d
4
10.00
C
e
3 8.00
—
3
m
r 6.00
�
C6
Z
0
4.00
1
2.00
0.00
0
Date
Rainfall
-W ate r Depth in Pool
Bankfull
Depth at Which Flow Occurs
Tributaries to Wickers Branch Stream Restoration Site
Year 4 (2018) Monitoring Report
DMS Project No. 95022