20190555 Ver 1_ORM JD Request 881 Derita Road_20190425

Preliminary ORM Data Entry Fields for New Actions
ACTION ID #: SAW -
Prepare file folder ❑
1. Project Name [PCN Form A2a]:
Begin Date (Date Received): 11-28-18
Assign Action ID Number in ORM ❑
2. Work Type: ❑Private ❑ Institutional ❑ Government ❑✓ Commercial
3. Project Description / Purpose [PCN Form B3d and B3e]:
Industrial Site Development
4. Property Owner / Applicant [PCN Form A3 or A4]: Oly Myint (landowner)/Eagle I Property Group
5. Agent / Consultant [PNC Form A5 — or ORM Consultant ID Number]:
Mogensen Mitigation, Inc.
6. Related Action ID Number(s) [PCN Form B5b]:
7. Project Location —Coordinates, Street Address, and/or Location Description [PCN Form Blb]:
881 Derita Rad and 2 adjacent lots along Myint Lane
8. Project Location— Tax Parcel ID [PCN Form Bla]: 46809505240000,46809524360000,4680954434000
9. Project Location — County [PCN Form A2b]: Cabarrus
10. Project Location — Nearest Municipality or Town [PCN Form A2c]: Concord
11. Project Information — Nearest Waterbody [PCN Form 132a]: Rocky River (Yadkin 03040105)
12. Watershed / 8 -Digit Hydrologic Unit Code [PCN Form 132c]: 030400105
Authorization: Section 10 ❑ Section 404 ❑✓
Regulatory Action Type:
❑ Standard Permit
✓ Nationwide Permit #
Regional General Permit #
✓ Jurisdictional Determination Request
Section 10 and 404 ❑
❑ Pre -Application Request
❑ Unauthorized Activity
❑ Compliance
❑ No Permit Required
Revised 20150602

urisdictional Determination Reauest
US Army Corps
of Engineers
Wilmington District
This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (JD) from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
via mail, electronic mail, or facsimile. Requests should be sent to the appropriate project
manager of the county in which the property is located. A current list of project managers by
assigned counties can be found on-line at:
http://www.saw.usace.LM.mil/Missions/Re ug latoiyPennitProgram/Contact/CountyLocator.aspx,
by calling 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below. Once your
request is received you will be contacted by a Corps project manager.
ASHEVILLE & CHARLOTTE REGULATORY
FIELD OFFICES
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
INSTRUCTIONS:
WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
General Number: 910-251-4633
Fax Number: [phone]
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E, F and G.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part H.
NOTE ON PART D — PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that
all JD requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to
proceed with the determination, which may include inspection of the property when
necessary. This form must be signed by the current property owner(s) or the owner(s)
authorized agent to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D - NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for
JD requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
projects will be conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD
may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of
1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in
USDA programs, you should also request a certified wetland determination from the local
office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
Version: May 2017 Page 1

Jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: 881 Derita Road and 2 lots alonq Myint Lane
City, State:
County:
Concord, NC
Cabarrus
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): 46809505240000, 2436, 4434
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: Richard K. Moqensen
Mailing Address: PO BOX 690429
Charlotte, NC 28227
Telephone Number: [phone]
Electronic Mail Address: [e-mail]
Select one:
I am the current property owner.
✓� I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant'
❑ Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
❑ Other, please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION'
Name: Oly Myint
Mailing Address: 612 Childsberg Way
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address:
Hillsborough, NC 27278
[phone]
' Must provide completed Agent Authorization Form/Letter.
2 Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request (copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record).
Version: May 2017 Page 2

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION',4
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on-
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
Richard K Mogensen
Print Name
Capacity: ❑ Owner ❑✓ Authorized Agents
11-27-18
Date
Signature
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
aI intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
✓❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
❑ A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
❑ I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
❑ I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
❑ Other:
For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
s Must provide agent authorization form/letter signed by owner(s).
Version: May 2017 Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD) TYPE (Select One)
❑� I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminarX JD for the property identified herein.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) provides an indication that there may
be "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United States"on a property.
PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all
waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional "waters of
the United States". PJDs cannot be appealed (33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is
"preliminary" in the sense that an approved JD can be requested at any time. PJDs do
not expire.
❑ I am requesting that the Corps provide an approved JD for the property identified herein.
An Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) is a determination that
jurisdictional "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United
States" are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of
waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or
Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved JDs are sufficient as the basis for permit
decisions. AJDs are appealable (33 C.F.R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be
posted on the Corps website. A landowner, permit applicant, or other "affected
party" (33 C.F.R. 331.2) who receives an AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years
(subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter 05-
02).
I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information
to inform my decision.
G. ALL REQUESTS
Map of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the
review area.
✓❑ Size of Property or Review Area 3 acres.
❑✓ The property boundary (or review area boundary) is clearly physically marked on the site.
Version: May 2017 Page 4

Jurisdictional Determination Request
H. REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS
Project Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude:
Longitude
35 24 06.18
80 42 49.07
A legible delineation map depicting the aquatic resources and the property/review area.
Delineation maps must be no larger than 11x17 and should contain the following: (Corps
signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been
reviewed and approved).6
■ North Arrow
■ Graphical Scale
■ Boundary of Review Area
■ Date
■ Location of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Form or tributary
assessment reach.
For Approved Jurisdictional Determinations:
■ Jurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404
wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features.
■ Jurisdictional non -wetland features (i.e. tidal/navigable waters, tributaries,
impoundments) should be labeled as Non -Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water, relatively permanent water, pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear
length of each of these features as appropriate.
■ Isolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non -
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non -Jurisdictional. Please
include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non jurisdictional (i.e.
"Isolated", "No Significant Nexus", or "Upland Feature"). Please include the acreage
or linear length of these features as appropriate.
For Preliminary Jurisdictional Determinations:
■ Wetland and non -wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404,
Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be
identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non -wetland Waters of
the United States, wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and
linear length of these features as appropriate.
aCompleted Wetland Determination Data Forms for appropriate region
(at least one wetland and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type)
6 Please refer to the guidance document titled "Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations" to ensure that the
supplied map meets the necessary mapping standards. http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Re ulatory-Permit-
Pro gram/Jurisdiction/
Version: May 2017 Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
aCompleted appropriate Jurisdictional Determination form
• PJDs, please complete a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form' and include the
Aquatic Resource Table
• AJDs, please complete an Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form'
Vicinity Map
Aerial Photograph
USGS Topographic Map
Soil Survey Map
Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
❑� Landscape Photos (if taken)
❑ NCSAM and/or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets
NC Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms
FOther Assessment Forms
' www.saw.usace.gM.mil/Portals/59/docs/re ug latorregdocs/JD/RGL 08-02_ App _ A_ Prelim_ JD_ Form_fillable.pdf
' Please see http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Re ug latory-Permit-Proaram/Jurisdiction/
Principal Purpose: The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine
whether there are any aquatic resources within the project area subject to federal jurisdiction under the regulatory
authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local
government agencies, and the public, and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by federal
law. Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the
approved jurisdictional determination (AJD), which will be made available to the public on the District's website
and on the Headquarters USAGE website.
Disclosure: Submission of requested information is voluntary; however, if information is not provided, the
request for an AJD cannot be evaluated nor can an AJD be issued.
Version: May 2017 Page 6

Appendix 2 - PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: 11-27-18
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Richard K. Mogensen PO Box 690429, Charlotte, NC 28227
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: Charlotte Regulatory Field Office
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County/parish/borough: CabarruS City: Concord
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat.: 35 24 06.18 N Long.: 80 42 49.07 W
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: Rocky River (Yadkin 030401205)
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site
number
Latitude
(decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal
degrees)
Estimated amount
of aquatic resource
in review area
(acreage and linear
feet, if applicable)
Type of aquatic
resource (i.e., wetland
vs. non -wetland
waters)
Geographic authority
to which the aquatic
resource "may be"
subject (i.e., Section
404 or Section 10/404)
W-1
35 24 06.18
80 42 49.07
0.195 ac
Wetland
404/1
St. 1
35 24 04.95
80 42 47.01
122 If
Stream
404/1

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option
to request and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an
informed decision after having discussed the various types of JDs and their
characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a
Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre -
construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or
other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the
activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has
elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an
official determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the
option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit
authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could possibly result
in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) the
applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can
accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and
conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has
determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject
permit authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance
of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit
authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the
review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and
waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance
or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7)
whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed
as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms
and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively
appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic
jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official
delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will
provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds
that there "may be" waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be" navigable waters of
the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review
area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources
below where indicated for all checked items:
❑■ Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map:
❑■ Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
❑■ U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:
1:24,000 Kannapolis
❑m Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation:
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100 -year Floodplain Elevation is:
❑■ Photographs: ❑ Aerial (Name & Date):
(National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
or 0 Other (Name & Date): Photo Log pictures taken RKM 11-20-18
❑ Previous determination (s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily
been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional
determinations.
Signature and date of
Regulatory staff member
completing PJD
ensen Digitally signed by Richard K. M°9ensen
Richard K. Mo
g Dale: 2018.1128104717-05'00'
Signature and date of
person requesting PJD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)'
' Districts may establish timeframes for requestor to return signed PJD forms. If the requestor does not respond
within the established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is
necessary prior to finalizing an action.

rtim
MOGENaSENi MMGA'nON. INC
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 4L80 q 50 5z4-0ggo
LOT NO. PLAN NO. PARCEL M: 4 8 Z 33 gCho
STREET ADDRESS
aTb6a*Z(
PROPERTY OWNER: the Estate of Maung Shwe Mylnt
The undersigned, registered property owners of the above noted property, do hereby authorize
�f d C.
(Contractor j Agent) {Nam f consulting firm)
to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance and acceptance of
this permit or certification and any and all standard and special conditions attached.
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on-
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Waters Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am the duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein.
PROPERTY OWNERS ADDRESS (if different than property above):
612 Childsberg 'VVay, Hillsborough, NC 27278
PROPERTY OWNER CONTACT. 919609-1557
We hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to the
best of our knowledge,
Authorized Signature Authorized Signa ure
Cate: 11/19/2018 bate: 11-2i - i

y
flk
— �i YsPG��h� '� ,v� p�rg' r� l '�� �y�4• a y� �'`.
- '_71
`'
s�
i 1 t
x
� . .•. yam' j,y"s-., ; � � _._ _ ,.r

Table of Contents
EXECUTIVESUMMARY...........................................................................................................................................2
METHODOLOGY........................................................................................................................................................2
Vegetation.................................................................................................................................................................3
Soils...........................................................................................................................................................................3
HydrophyticIndicators.............................................................................................................................................3
STUDYAREA DESCRIPTION...................................................................................................................................4
DELINEATED STREAMS & WETLANDS ON STUDY AREA...............................................................................4
Wetlands...................................................................................................................................................................4
Streams.....................................................................................................................................................................5
CONSIDERATIONS FOR DEVELOPMENT..............................................................................................................5
PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS........................................................................................................................5
REFERENCES..............................................................................................................................................................6
LISTOF GRAPHICS....................................................................................................................................................6
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Mogensen Mitigation, Inc. (MMI) was retained by Eagle I Property Group LLC (Client) to
prepare a jurisdictional stream and wetland delineation on a 3 lots totaling approximately 3 acres
at 881 Derita Road and the two lots immediately to the east on Myint Lane in Concord, Cabarrus
County, NC (Study Area). The Study Area is primarily the 3 lots totaling 3 acres. The purpose of
the stream and wetland delineation report is to identify, flag and survey the jurisdictional streams
and/or wetlands on the parcel in preparation for site development. This report is based on a site
visit and web research, including National Wetland Inventory maps and the USDA Soil Survey
of Cabarrus County (see all attached graphics).
MMI scientists, including Richard Mogensen, PWS, conducted a site evaluation on November
20, 2018. During this evaluation, boundaries between upland and jurisdictional wetlands were
marked with orange flagging tape while the stream is marked with blue flagging tape both
sequentially numbered and surveyed with a GPS unit. A total of one stream (1221f) and one
small wetland area (0.195 ac) were assessed. These areas are shown in bluelines and a cross-
hatch shape polygon, respectively, on Figure 5.
METHODOLOGY
Wetland delineations were made in accordance with the U.S. Armorps of Engineers 1987
Wetland Delineation Manual (1987 Corps Manual) and the State of North Carolina's isolated
wetlands rules. These manuals generally follow a three -parameter approach to making wetland
delineations: hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils and hydrologic indicators. All three parameters
normally must be present for an area to be considered a wetland under Section 404/1 of the
Clean Water Act. Wetlands were classified according to the Cowardin System, as described in
Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States (1979). This is the
2

standard system of wetland classification used by most state and federal agencies. Stream
assessments were conducted in accordance with the NCDEQ Methodology for Identification of
Intermittent and Perennial Streams and Their Origins (version 4.11). Although procedures for
making the determinations are standardized, judgments are sometimes required, depending on
the strength or weakness of any of the defining parameters. In addition, transition areas between
uplands and wetlands often exist, also requiring judgments as to the boundaries. Therefore, some
adjustments to the boundaries may occur during a field review with the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps), NC Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ).
Vegetation
Plant species observed at the Study Area were identified and the wetland indicator status for each
species was determined from the National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands (Region
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain). The indicator status notes the percentage of probability that the
plant would occur in a wetland. The following are the indicator status designations:
OBL — Obligate Wetland (> 99% probability) FACW — Facultative Wetland (>66% probability)
FAC — Facultative (33% to 66% probability)
FACU — Facultative Upland (1% to 3% probability)
Results: The area delineated as wetlands has a predominance of facultative, facultative wet
and/or obligate species according to the USFWS National Wetlands Inventory. For more details
on vegetation data refer to the attached Wetland Data Forms.
Soils
A hydric soil is a soil that is saturated, flooded, or ponded long enough during the growing
season to develop anaerobic conditions that favor hydrophytic vegetation. A hydric soil may
either be drained or undrained, although a drained hydric soil may not continue to support
wetland plants. According to the 1987 Corps Manual, only when a hydric soil supports
hydrophytic vegetation and the area has indicators of wetland hydrology may the soil be referred
to as a wetland soil. During this investigation, soil cores were taken, generally to a depth of 18
inches to determine whether or not wetland soils are present. Soil characteristics that were
checked include composition, texture, color, chroma, value, odor and moisture regime of the soil.
These characteristics are determined in the absence of direct sunlight and with a moistened
sample. The "Munsell Soil Color Chart" is used to determine color and chroma.
Results: The soils mapped on the property are primarily Cecil Sandy Loam (CcB2, CcD2) which
are found on slopes from 2 to 15%. A small pocket of Enon Sandy Loam is mapped along the
east end of Lot 3. In the wetland area we identified the hydric phase of Chewacla soil. For more
details on the soils found onsite refer to the attached Wetland Data Forms.
Hydrophytic Indicators
According to the 1987 Corps Manual, an area must be periodically inundated or have saturated
soils for a significant period of time during the growing season, typically between 5 and 12% of
the growing season. Hydrologic indicators include, but are not limited to, blackened water,
stained leaves, visual inundation, drift lines and hummocks, and wetland drainage patterns.
3

Hydrological characteristics observed on the Study Area were noted during the field
investigation and are listed on the attached Wetland Data Forms.
Results: Standing water was observed in the upper end of this headwater forested wetland. A
high water table (within 3") was noted in other parts of the wetland area. For more details on the
existing hydrologic indicators refer to the attached Wetland Data Forms.
STUDY AREA DESCRIPTION
The project Study Area is located at 881 Derita Road and two adjacent lots along Myint Lane,
Concord, NC, Cabarrus County, North Carolina; latitude is 35' 24" 06.18 N, longitude is 80' 42"
49.07 W (Figure 1). The Study Area is bounded by Derita Road on the west, Myint Lane to the
south, forest with one single-family house to the north and east. The Study Area is in a primarily
industrial area surrounded by warehouses, small factories, scattered houses and open forest. The
site contains one house facing Derita Road and the associated grassed lot with a few demolished
buildings along the treeline. Two junk cars sit in the grassed lot. The adjacent two lots along
Myint Lane are forested with some mature oaks and hickories as well as tulip poplar and
dogwood. A small headwater wetland is located at the back of "Lot 2" and runs into "Lot 3"
where a small intermittent stream begins and the wetland ends. The stream flows ultimately to
the Rocky River which is in the Yadkin River Basin (HUC 03040105). Soils on the Study Area
predominantly consist of well drained, sandy loams (Cecil & Enon) in the upland slopes with
some areas of poorly drained, frequently flooded silty loam (Chewacla) along the bottomland
(Figure 4). The topography on the Study Area moderately rises from 700 to 800 ft. (Figure 2). A
majority of the surrounding area is characterized primarily by industrial, residential,
developments, roads and some forest pockets.
The uplands within the Study Area are dominated by mature forest including sweet gum,
hickory, red oak, tulip poplar and flowering dogwood. The upland areas are steeply sloped and
well drained while the lower areas are gently sloping and drain to a small stream which runs off
site and flows into a perennial stream under Myint Lane.
DELINEATED STREAMS & WETLANDS ON STUDY AREA
Wetlands
One forested headwater wetland was delineated on the Study Area located on the northeastern
corner of Lots 2 & 3 and runs into Stream #1 which flows off the property at Lot 3. It is located
mostly on the northeastern corner of the 3 -lot complex and is depicted on the attached
delineation map (Figure 4).
4

Wetland #1 is a relatively small headwater forested wetland feature that is located above Stream
#1 in a natural low flat topographic position. This wetland seems to stop when the surface flow
becomes channelized at ST #1 and flows downslope. Hydrology concentrates at the upper end of
the wetland. This wetland is a small (0.195 acre) low-lying flat feature which ponds water long
enough in the winter and spring to develop hydric soil characteristics. It is dominated by native,
bottomland, hardwood trees and has seasonal herbaceous wetland vegetation in the spring and
summer. The Study Area is classified as PFO IA (forested) using the Cowardin Classification
system. The wetland area is dominated by paw paw, red maple, green ash, and sweet gum with
some tulip poplar.
Streams
The Study Area contains the one small intermittent stream which drains to the Rocky River and
ultimately the Yadkin River (HUC 03040105) noted here as ST #1 on the attached delineation
map (Figure 5).
ST #1 is an intermittent stream located on the Lot 3 (eastern -most lot) and begins at the
downslope end of Wetland #1. High groundwater drainage appears to collect up slope in
Wetland #1, a relatively flat bottomland area then concentrates into a channel with an Ordinary
High Water Mark (OHWM) at Stream #1. The stream is approximately 122 linear feet long
before it leaves the property. This stream scores out as 25.5 on the DEQ SWTIC Form which is
intermittent (typically jurisdictional) along most of its extent on the Study Area. The DEQ-
DWR and the Corps have not verified the jurisdictional determination and may require seeing
the Study Area to confirm MMI's opinion.
CONSIDERATIONS FOR DEVELOPMENT
To verify this delineation, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the NC DEQ-DWR will need
to visit the site. Once this report is approved by the Client, we will complete the Pre -JD request
forms, DEQ stream forms & wetland data forms and submit to the agencies and request a site
visit to verify the stream and wetland boundaries. This all can be done now or at the permitting
stage of the project development referenced below.
If fill will be placed in any of the wetland or stream areas, a US Army Corps of Engineers
Section 404 Clean Water Act permit and NCDEQ Section 401 Water Quality Certification
and/or state wetlands permit authorization may be required. Adherence to state and local water
quality standards and procedures are also required as part of the permit process. Other local
water quality and/or stormwater authorizations may be required due to the Study Area's location.
If the project's impacts exceed North Carolina thresholds (0.10 acre for wetlands and 150 linear
feet for streams), compensatory mitigation may be required.
MMI can assist with any necessary Clean Water Act or Endangered Species Act permits and
authorizations.
PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS
PRIMARY AUTHOR: Richard Mogensen, PWS holds degrees in Biology from the
University of Connecticut (1977) and Geology from the University of Colorado at Denver
5

(1984). He is certified as a Professional Wetland Scientist (PWS) by the Society of Wetland
Scientists and is also provisionally certified as a Wetland Delineator by the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers, Baltimore District. Mr. Mogensen has attended and taught at numerous wetland
training classes and programs. He has over 25 years of experience in wetland consulting and
mitigation.
QA/QC: Daniel Kuefler, PhD holds a BSc in Conservation Biology from the University of
Alberta (1999), an MSc in Ecology from North Carolina State University (2005), and a PhD in
Integrative Biology from the University of Guelph (2013). He is certified in jurisdictional stream
assessment (SWITC) and qualitative stream assessment (NCSAM). Dr. Kuefler has over 15
years of experience in environmental research, assessment, and reporting.
MAPPING: Heath Caldwell holds a BS in Environmental Science from Miami of Ohio and
Master's from Ohio State University has extensive experience with ARC GIS mapping tools and
other related graphics programs.
REFERENCES
Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. Laroe. December 1979.
Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States. U.S. Department
of the Interior, Fish & Wildlife Service. Office of Biological Services. Washington, D.C.
47pp
Environmental laboratory 1987. "Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation
Manual," Technical report Y-87-1, US Army Engineer Waterways Station, Vicksburg, MS.
Reed, P.B. Jr. March 1988. National List of Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands:
Southeast (Region 2). U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Biol. Report 88(26.1)
U.S Department of Agriculture, National Resources Conservation Service. December
1987. Hydric Soils of the United States. National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils.
Washington, D.C. Web Soil Survey of Cabarrus County, NC.
US Department of the Interior Fish & Wildlife Service, Field Guide to Non -tidal Wetland
Identification & NWI Maps
LIST OF GRAPHICS
Figure 1 — Vicinity Map
Figure 2 — USGS Topo Map
Figure 3 — Soil Map
Figure 4 - Delineation Enlargement
Figure 5 — Overview of Study Area
PHOTO LOG
0

9-a
Ra
°n Rd
i
1
c, \
o�
9 f
r`
e
�1
cy
\ c�
1 ?+
1d
7 1 ✓ �a
c
l tarka Creek G 1 v
/ T
Skybrook
Golf C lub j
! Site Location
L a stf ie Id
Regional \
Park
l a
Highland \
Creek p
Golf Club
\
\ cone or
aMn�B
9
Concord ,
$• \ \vlills Mall
fvfallard R° \
Creek
High Mallard
C reek
Regional Park
Legend Sro y cress
�a
Project Parcels
Cor
Reg
Air
0
'J
f
°
C
G
9
t.
Coddle
Creek
Reservoir 4A
se via
C �
o�
s'rm Blvd
Poplar Tull I i� a
cc,'.
\ o
\ a.
� 5
Q
\ ` °c Charlotte
Speed., 0 0.5 1 2
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, USGS
° Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Es Miles
contributors, and the GIS User Commu
v
c
n
C°1 Nr
C e4 N r
N r
�wzw
x
O .O N
O
L
0
c
C; CD
dat
ar U
0
u
x
F
2
m
i
i
W
Z
Q
J
H
azz
Q}o
ZW
aFn0
U
0 0 Z
W
Q
y W
W
00
00
November 2018
FIGURE 1
O
-/
� Cs°',C
o�
cord
a
`;J
C:
9-a
Ra
°n Rd
i
1
c, \
o�
9 f
r`
e
�1
cy
\ c�
1 ?+
1d
7 1 ✓ �a
c
l tarka Creek G 1 v
/ T
Skybrook
Golf C lub j
! Site Location
L a stf ie Id
Regional \
Park
l a
Highland \
Creek p
Golf Club
\
\ cone or
aMn�B
9
Concord ,
$• \ \vlills Mall
fvfallard R° \
Creek
High Mallard
C reek
Regional Park
Legend Sro y cress
�a
Project Parcels
Cor
Reg
Air
0
'J
f
°
C
G
9
t.
Coddle
Creek
Reservoir 4A
se via
C �
o�
s'rm Blvd
Poplar Tull I i� a
cc,'.
\ o
\ a.
� 5
Q
\ ` °c Charlotte
Speed., 0 0.5 1 2
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, USGS
° Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Es Miles
contributors, and the GIS User Commu
v
c
n
C°1 Nr
C e4 N r
N r
�wzw
x
O .O N
O
L
0
c
C; CD
dat
ar U
0
u
x
F
2
m
i
i
W
Z
Q
J
H
azz
Q}o
ZW
aFn0
U
0 0 Z
W
Q
y W
W
00
00
November 2018
FIGURE 1

W E
G / P
50
/ �.• �+ �� 700 %� `r� is O CC -04 7
U7
LO
CO
• O n 0 � ��� � 700 =
750
fnone LOca
ua
CL
LLJ 21-1,- 0 z
Cn
DOz o
�.. � � / • y Q N y
Lu
LLI
Oft 00
1 V �� �Y C�� • �f�• � R
6 41 00�.a 1\� ��� \ • C�.�:� November 2018
Legend J�
1 0 1,000 2,000 4,000
FIGURE 2
Project Parcels
�, 0 � 1 �:• Feet ��;
c.

W E
two
i+�• Odor
c
w }}d
*�/.l .j-.'� ` `� r1 -�., e• 4 ala U v
1 .t O
t
Nal
�4 � •1
I1 A
s
•1
� � t
Legend
Project Boundry
Stream r
Wetland Esri, HERE,iGarmin, ©OpenStreeUMap con 0 37.5 75 150
EarthstarG�eoaraphics,,NES/Airbus DS, U Feet
Community
W
Z
Q
J
H N
Z
a -0
ZL'i� ? H
0
0 ~—
U U
W Q (D
W ~
W
W
O
00
00
November 2018
FIGURE 4

�T
Legend
Project Parcels
MyMt �n
\how...-
w
Esri, HERE?,#Garmin,
Earthstar Geographi
Community
r
0 37.5 75 150
Feet
F� ,Mu
W
z
Q
J
H N
Z z
!- p
aEp:
�LLIz
aFn0
W O z
ay
H X
W
W
O
00
00
November 2018
FIGURE 5

4�34j� �� `t �, 's� 2L �•'i 5 .;�ra�'� g Y- t , � � � �, `Tf,'..
1114 iP'
e 3 < :•� --
s. s �„

�d
s.
.!`
sZ «
Al
Aot
a
�.r
11 1812 01 B ;
Y

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Derita Road/Myint Lane City/County: Concord/Cabarrus Sampling Date: 11-20-18
Applicant/Owner: Estate of Maung Shwe Myint State: NC Sampling Point: Up -1
Investigator(s): R. Mogensen Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Sloping Upland Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%): 30
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 137 Lat: 35 24 06.18 N Long: 80 42 49.07 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Cecil Sandy Loam CcB2 NWI classification: PFO 1A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes x No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes x No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No x Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No x within a Wetland? Yes No x
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No x
Remarks:
Steep upland slope adjacent to bottomland wetland
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
x Surface Water (Al) _Aquatic
Fauna (B13)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
x High Water Table (A2) _
Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
—Drainage Patterns (B10)
x Saturation (A3) _
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Moss Trim Lines (B16)
—Water Marks (B1) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
—Sediment Deposits (B2) _
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
—Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (63) _
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
—Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
—Algal Mat or Crust (B4) —Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
—Iron Deposits (65) —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
x Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
Sphagnum Moss (D8) (LRR T,U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes x No
Depth (inches): 1
Water Table Present? Yes x No
Depth (inches): 3
Saturation Present? Yes x No
Depth (inches): 3
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No x
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
no signs of surface hydrolgy on steep slope
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region – Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30'x 30' )
1. Liriodendron tulipifera
2. Acer saccharum
3. Quercus falcata
4. Carya ovata
5.
6.
50% of total cover: 35
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 15'x 15' )
1. Acer saccharum
2. Quercus falcata
3. Acernegundo
4.
5.
6.
50% of total cover: 45
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15'x 15' )
1. Cornus florida
2. Acer saccharum
3. Crataegus X simulata
4.
5.
6.
50% of total cover: 30
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5'x 5' )
1. Hexastylis arifolia
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
Absolute
Dominant
Indicatc
% Cover
Species?
Status
20
Yes
FACU
20
Yes
FACU
20
Yes
FACU
10
No
FACU
70 =Total Cover
40 =Total Cover
20 20% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
14
50 Yes
FACU
30 Yes
FACU
10 No
FAC
Sampling Point: Up -1
Dominance Test worksheet:
40 =Total Cover
20 20% of total cover:
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Number of Dominant Species
18
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
3
(A)
Total Number of Dominant
FACU
_
- Prevalence Index is :53.01
Species Across All Strata:
11
(B)
Percent of Dominant Species
UPL
3. Smilax rotundifolia
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
27.3%
(A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
5.
OBL species 0 x 1 =
0
FACW species 0 x 2 =
0
FAC species 100 x 3 =
300
100 =Total Cover
FACU species 250 x 4 =
1000
50% of total cover:
UPL species 10 x 5 =
50
Present? Yes No x
Column Totals: 360 (A)
1350
(B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
3.75
90 =Total Cover
40 =Total Cover
20 20% of total cover:
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
20% of total cover:
18
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
)
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
25 Yes
FACU
_
- Prevalence Index is :53.01
25 Yes
FACU
-3
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
10 No
UPL
3. Smilax rotundifolia
60 =Total Cover
20% of total cover: 12
40 Yes FAC
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody Plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody Vine - All woody vines, regardless of height
50% of total cover:
40 =Total Cover
20 20% of total cover:
8
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30'x 30'
)
1. Lonicera japonica
50 Yes
FACU
2. Toxicodendron radicans
30 Yes
FAC
3. Smilax rotundifolia
20 Yes
FAC
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
100 =Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
50 20% of total cover:
20
Present? Yes No x
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: Up -1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Types Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-3 7.5YR 3/4 100 Loamy/Clayey
3-18 7.5YR 4/4 100 Loamy/Clayey
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol (Al) —Thin
Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2) —Barrier
Islands 1 cm Muck (S12)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
—Black Histic (A3)
(MLRA 153B, 153D)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
(outside MLRA 150A)
_ Stratified Layers (A5) _
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Reduced Vertic (F18)
—Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR, P, T, U) _
Depleted Matrix (F3)
(outside MLRA 150A, 150B)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) _
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, T)
_ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) _
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_Anomalous Bright Floodplain Soils (F20)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) _
Redox Depressions (F8)
(MLRA 1538)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) —Marl
(F10) (LRR U)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2) _
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) _
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
(outside MLRA 138, 152A in FL, 154)
x Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S) _
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
—Barrier Islands Low Chroma Matrix (TS7)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) —Delta
Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
(MLRA 153B, 153D)
_Sandy Redox (S5)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 1506)
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
—Stripped Matrix (S6) _
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
_ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U) —Anomalous
Bright Floodplain Soils (F20)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)
(MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
(LRR S, T, U) —Very
Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
wetland hydrology must be present,
(MLRA 138,152A in FL, 154)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches): I Hydric Soil Present? Yes No x
Remarks:
Soil mapped as Cecil Sandy loam and that soil type was confirmed in the field.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region – Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Derita Road/Myint Lane City/County: Concord/Cabarrus Sampling Date: 11-20-18
Applicant/Owner: Estate of Maung Shwe Myint State: NC Sampling Point: W--1
Investigator(s): R. Mogensen Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Sloping Bottomland Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%): 1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 137 Lat: 35 24 06.18 N Long: 80 42 49.07 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: ChA Chewacla NWI classification: PFO 1A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes x No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes x No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes x No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes x No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes x No
Remarks:
Small forested headwater wetland with some pockets of standing water
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
x Surface Water (Al) _Aquatic
Fauna (B13)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
x High Water Table (A2) _
Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
—Drainage Patterns (B10)
x Saturation (A3) _
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Moss Trim Lines (B16)
—Water Marks (B1) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
—Sediment Deposits (B2) _
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
—Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (63) _
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
—Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
—Algal Mat or Crust (B4) —Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
—Iron Deposits (65) —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
x Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
Sphagnum Moss (D8) (LRR T,U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes x No
Depth (inches): 1
Water Table Present? Yes x No
Depth (inches): 3
Saturation Present? Yes x No
Depth (inches): 3
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
some standing water in small pockets. High water table throughout.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region – Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30'x 30' )
1. Asimina triloba
2. Fraxinus pennsylvanica
3. Acer rubrum
4. Liquidambar styraciflua
5. Liriodendron tulipifera
6.
50% of total cover: 50
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 15'x 15' )
1. Asimina triloba
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Absolute
Dominant
Indicato
% Cover
Species?
Status
40
Yes
FAC
25
Yes
FACW
20
Yes
FAC
10
No
FAC
5
No
FACU
100 =Total Cover
20% of total cover: 20
60 Yes FAC
Sampling Point: W--1
Dominance Test worksheet:
60 =Total Cover
Number of Dominant Species
50% of total cover:
30 20% of total cover:
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
5
(A)
Total Number of Dominant
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
Species Across All Strata:
6
(B)
Percent of Dominant Species
2.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
83.3%
(A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 0 x 1 =
0
5•
FACW species 25 x 2 =
50
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
FAC species 160 x 3 =
480
FACU species 55 x 4 =
220
=Total Cover
UPL species 0 x 5 =
0
50% of total cover:
Column Totals: 240 (A)
750
(B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
3.13
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0
60 =Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
50% of total cover:
30 20% of total cover:
12
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15'x 15' )
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
1.
3 - Prevalence Index is :53.01
2.
_
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
3.
4.
5•
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
6.
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
=Total Cover
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5'x 5' )
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
1. Carex spp
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
2•
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
3.
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
4
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
5.
Shrub - Woody Plants, excluding woody vines,
6
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
7•
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
8.
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
9
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
10.
11.
Woody Vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15'x 15'
)
1. Lonicera japonica
50 Yes
FACU
2. Toxicodendron radicans
30 Yes
FAC
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
80 =Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
40 20% of total cover:
16
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: W--1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Types Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-3 10YR 3/3 100 Sandy Saturated at 3 inches
3-18 7.5YR 4/2 85 7.5YR 5/6 15 Sandy Saturated with faint mottles
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol (Al) —Thin
Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2) —Barrier
Islands 1 cm Muck (S12)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
—Black Histic (A3)
(MLRA 153B, 153D)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
(outside MLRA 150A)
_ Stratified Layers (A5) _
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Reduced Vertic (F18)
—Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR, P, T, U) _
Depleted Matrix (F3)
(outside MLRA 150A, 150B)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) _
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, T)
_ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) _
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_Anomalous Bright Floodplain Soils (F20)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) _
Redox Depressions (F8)
(MLRA 1538)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) —Marl
(F10) (LRR U)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2) _
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)—
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
(outside MLRA 138, 152A in FL, 154)
x Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S) _
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
—Barrier Islands Low Chroma Matrix (TS7)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) —Delta
Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
(MLRA 153B, 153D)
_Sandy Redox (S5)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 1506)
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
—Stripped Matrix (S6) _
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
_ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U) —Anomalous
Bright Floodplain Soils (F20)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)
(MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
(LRR S, T, U) —Very
Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
wetland hydrology must be present,
(MLRA 138,152A in FL, 154)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches): I Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Soil mapped as Cecil Sandy Loam but the field indicators show the hydric phase of Chewacla soil. Low chrioma with mottling.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region – Version 2.0

Stream Reach Evaluation Form
Date:
11/20/18
Evaluator:
R. Mogensen
Easting:
8042
49.07
Project:
881 Derita Road (Myint Lane)
Northing:
35 24 06.18
Total Points:
3
Stream is at least intermittent if > 19 or perennial if > 30*
25.5
(right -click the purple number and left -click Update Field to summarize points
0
A.
Geomorphology
Absent Weak
Moderate
Strong
SCORE
1a.
Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2
2.
Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3
3.
In -channel structure: riffle- / step- pool sequence
0
1
2
3
1
4.
Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
1
5.
Active/relic floodplain
0
1
2
3
2
6.
Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
1
7.
Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
1
8.
Headcuts
0
1
2
3
2
9.
Grade controls
0
0.5
1
1.5
1
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
1.5
11.
Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes
= 3
0
Geomorphology
Subtotal
a Man-made ditches are not rated: see discussion in NCDWQ Manual
B. Hydrology
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2 3
2
13. Iron Oxidizing Bacteria
0
1
2 3
0
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5 0
0.5
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1 1.5
0.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines)
0
0.5
1 1.5
0
17. Soil -based Evidence of high water table?
No =
0
Yes = 3
3
0
0.5
1
Hydrology Subtotal
0
C. Biology
18.
Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
1
19.
Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
3
20.
Macrobenthos note diversity and abundance
0
1
2
3
0
21.
Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
0
22.
Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
23.
Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
24.
Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
25.
Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
26.
Wetland plants in streambed
FACW= 0.75, OBL=
1.5, Other=
0
0
Biology Subtotal
4
perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See page 35 of NCDWQ manual.
Notes:
Intermittent stream with no obvious macrobenthos, amphibians or crawish
I certify that this evaluation conforms to the latest version of
the NCDWQ document entitled Methodology for Identification
Richard K. Mogensen
of Intermittent and Perennial Streams and their Origins.
Signature of Certified Evaluator
(version 4.11)
Form #PC039