20190555 Ver 1_PCN Form Submission_20190425

DR
02*10n of Water R"Ourc"
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
September 29, 2018 Ver 3
Initial Review
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance into the review process?*
r Yes
r No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
r Yes r No
Change only if needed.
BIMS # Assigned *
Version#*
20190555
1
Is a payment required for this project?*
* No payment required
What amout is owed?*
* Fee received
r $240.00
r Fee needed - send electronic notification
r $570.00
Reviewing Office* Select Project Reviewer*
Mooresville Regional Office - [phone] Alan Johnson:eads\adjohnsonl
Information for Initial Review
1a. Name of project:
881 Derita Industrial
1a. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Sushanth Charabuddi
1b. Primary Contact Email:*
[e-mail]
Date Submitted
4/25/2019
Nearest Body of Water
Rocky River
Basin
Yadkin-PeeDee
Water Classification
Warm Class C
Site Coordinates
Latitude:
35.4017
A. Processing Information
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Cabarrus
Is this project a public transportation project?*
r Yes r No
Longitude:
-80.7136
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
V Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
F Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
1 b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
P Nationwide Permit (NWP)
F- Regional General Permit (RGP)
r- Standard (IP)
1c. Primary Contact Phone:*
[phone]

1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
r' Yes r No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number:
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
P 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
F Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
F Individual Permit
39 - Commercial/Institutional Developments
1e. Is this notification solelyfor the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
F 401 Water Quality Certification - Express
F Riparian Buffer Authorization
1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
r Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r- Yes r No
19. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r• Yes r- No
Acceptance Letter Attachment
1h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
r' Yes r No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
r Yes r No
B. Applicant Information
1d. Who is applying for the permit?
Q Owner r Applicant (other than owner)
1e. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?
C Yes r- No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
Eagle I Property Group, LLC
2b. Deed book and page no.:
13329-0147
2c. Responsible party:
Sushanth Charabuddi
2d. Address
Street Address
One Boston Place
Address Line 2
Suite 2600
city
Boston
Postal / Zip Code
02108
2e. Telephone Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Project Information
State / Province / R icn
MA
Country
USA
2f. Fax Number:
r- Yes r No
r- Yes r No

1b. Subdivision name:
(ff appropriate)
1c. Nearest municipality/town:
Concord
2. Project Identification 1
2a. Property Identification Number:
46809524590000
2c. Project Address
Street Address
881 Derita Road
Address Line 2
Cfty
Concord
Postal / Zip Code
28027
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:*
Rocky River
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:*
Warm Class C
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Yadkin -Pee Dee
3d. Please provide the 12 -digit HUC in which the project is located.
03040105-0106
4. Project Description and History
2b. Property size:
3
State / Ftwince / Pegkm
NC
Country
USA
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application:*
Western 1/3 is developed with one Industrial building and associated parking. Eastern 2/3 is forested. Site is surrounded by industrial development including an Amazon Distribution
Center.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?*
r Yes r No r Unknown
4d. Attach an 8 1/2 X11 excerpt from the most recent version of the USGS topographic map indicating the location of the project site. (for DWR)
ParkstonePlace_USGS. pdf
5.7MB
4e. Attach an 81/2 X11 excerpt from the most recent version of the published County NRCS Soil Survey map depicting the project site. (for DWR)
ParkstonePlace_SOILS.pdf 2.3MB
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0.195
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
122
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:*
Construct a single industrial building with associated parking.
4i. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:*
The site will be cleared of trees, graded using bulldozers, excavators and gradall. Traditional building materials and asphalt parking lot will be installed.
4j. Please upload project drawings for the proposed project.
Site Plan C-2.0.pdf
Site Plan C-3.0.pdf
Site Plan C.4.pdf
2019_04_23 Derita Road Office Wetland Exhibit.pdf
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
r Yes r No
Comments:
Delineated in November 2018 by MMI. No PJD yet.
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?
r Preliminary r Approved r Not Verified r Unknown r WA
359.97KB
401.8KB
527.94KB
432.24KB
r Unknown

Corps AID Number:
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Richard K. Mogensen
Agency/Consultant Company: Mogensen Mitigation, Inc.
Other:
5d1. Jurisdictional determination upload
881 Derita Road Myint Ln Delineation Report.pdf
WetlandDataForm.Up-1 Myint Lane.pdf
WetlandDataForm.W-1 Myint Lane.pdf
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?*
C Yes r No
615.52KB
57.42KB
60.22KB
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?
No
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
W Wetlands F Streams -tributaries F Buffers
F Open Waters F Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
2g. Total Temporary Wetland Impact 2g. Total Permanent Wetland Impact
0.000 0.080
2g. Total Wetland Impact
0.080
2h. Comments:
Block retaining wall utilized to minimize wetland impacts.
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
The lot grading plan was redone several times to avoid the wetlands and intermittent streams on the property. Less than 0.1 ac of wetlands will be
impacted and the stream will NOT be impacted. A block retaining wall will be used to minimize the wetland impacts.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
The undisturbed wetland areas will be marked in the field using orange safety fencing, reinforced silt fence or other obvious marking. All trees in the
undisturbed areas will be left in place.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
r^ Yes r No
2b. If this project DOES NOT require Compensatory Mitigation, explain why:
The impacts are less than the mitigation thresholds for wetlands (0.1 ac) in Cabarrus County, NC.
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan

1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent toprotected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
r Yes r No
If no, explain why:
No buffers in Yadkin-PeeDee HUC
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?*
r Yes r No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
r Yes r No
Comments:
One industrial building on the 3 acre combined lot.
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?*
r Yes r No
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B.0200)?*
r Yes r No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
r Yes r No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
Area is already developed with roads, industrial buildings (Amazon Distribtiuon warehouses) and residences as well as the Concord Regional Airport
already epsts.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
r Yes r Nor N/A
4b. Describe, in detail, the treatment methods and dispositions (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project. If the wastewater will be treated
at a treatment plant, list the capacity available at that plant.
Hookup to City of Concord sewer lines.
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?
r Yes r No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
r Yes r• No
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
r Yes r No r Unknown
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
r Yes r No
5f. Will you cut anytrees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
r Yes r No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
r Yes r No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
r Yes r No
Si. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
r Yes r No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?

USFWS Endangered & Threatened Species List for Cabarrus County, NC. Based on field inspection by R.K. Mogensen, it is our opinion that the site
does not contain suitable habitat for Northern long-eared bat, Carolina heelsplitter, or SchwienitZs sunflower. None of the 3 listed species is reported
on the NC -NHP list for Kannapolis, NC.
Consultation Documentation Upload
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
r Yes 6 No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?*
NOAA Essential Fish Habitat Mapper
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
r Yes F No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
State Historic Preservation Office: https//gis.ncdcr.gov/hpoveb/
7c. Historic or Prehistoric Information Upload
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?*
r Yes F No
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
https://msc.fema.gov/portal/search
Miscellaneous
Comments
Miscellaneous attachments not previously requested.
Myint_DelMap.pdf
915.93KB
FINALSAW JD REQUEST FORM 052017.pdf
196.16KB
881 Derita Completed PCN 4-24-19-FINAL.pdf
472.6KB
PHOTO LOG 881 Derita Road.pdf
1.26MB
ORM JD Request 881 Derita Road.pdf
8.2MB
SWTIC Form Derita Rd Myint Lane.pdf
81.29KB
WetlandDataForm.Up-1 Myint Lane.pdf
57.42KB
WetlandDataForm.W-1 Myint Lane.pdf
60.22KB
Signature
*
P By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
• I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the INC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act');
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act');
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
• I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Richard K. Mogensen
Signature
Date
4/25/2019

ran
MaGENSEN MMGATION, INC
AGENT AUTHORIIZATION FORM
PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
LOT NO. PLAN NO. PARCEL ID:
STREET ADDRESS: it 7 (10 iAl i f o 11�) d' -
PROPERTY OWNER: 'u .fV��� 031
The undersigned, registered property owners of the above noted property, do hereby authorize
�G'rti1'`ti�it a•�^ 3'.i , ofij�t1Y1
(Contractor/ Agent) (Name'of consulting frm)"
to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance and acceptance of
this permit or certification and any and all standard and special conditions attached.
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on-
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Waters Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am the duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein.
PROPERTY OWNERS ADDRESS (if different than property above): VoLrV64nv' e 6 ac,4k)1 U
ov
PROPERTY OWNER CONTACT:
We hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to the
best of our knowledge.
Auth Signature
Date:
Authorized Signature
Date:

: t
r
r . L
ie*.*
v
VIOLIj"
y f*
F*.r , . 4 f
4.
Legend
Project Boundry
- - - Stream
= Wetland
t
W1Stre
2,
Y
Esri, HERE,oGarmin,
Earthstar Geographi
Community
t
III
0 37.5 75 150
Feet
W
z
Q
J
H N
Z
a�-0
Z Lu � ? H
0
O~o
F
U
LU <
Lu Cn
Ft W
W
O
00
00
November 2018
FIGURE 4

MI ap Unit Legend
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Barna Arras In AOI Percent of AOI
Cub Cerfl-Urhan land complm 2 to 1.0 19.5%
B percent slopes
Ena Enon sandy loam, 8 to 15 1:9 37.7%
pe Rnt slopes
lie® Helena sandy town, 2 to 8 22 42.7%
percent slopes
Legend
QProject Boundary
0 37.5 75 150
Feet
NONE
W
2
3
J
c
Ci CD C",
N�
_
MM U
-toZm
n
� o ti �
�mwd,
d 2o
(D
rn U
O
U
�i
z
�W+
C!
R
C
O
L
z U
O
>� o
app z
z C
LU LU 0
� 3
Q W 67
N
J W -
O z U d
S OCO .1X
N U
(n fo N
Y 'n
0
L
M
U
April 2019
FIGURE 4

A,
E 65
0 0
4YO, sch
cc"
Pio, Wood
.2 CO
J ;CU
C,
Z CD
9
C)
A
L)
0 0
.44nab
0
A
0
-A in
Drag
z
7
Ilk z
2
Sewage
Dspol
�2
fa
CoF1
-1K
z
(n
z
697,
X.
4@0
'4r
0
L
4%
> < 0
CO
W 0
SWATCR
V) W 0)
_J
0
vi 0
LU _J
z U
0 00
K 04
L................ (D
to
At
0
fv;,
G 14
0
.4
April 2019
1 kSch
Legend
4�
0 1,000 2,000 4,000
Project Boundary FIGURE 2
Feet
C�

4�34j� �� `t �, 's� 2L �•'i 5 .;�ra�'� g Y- t , � � � �, `Tf,'..
1114 iP'
e 3 < :•� --
s. s �„

�d
s.
.!`
sZ «
Al
Aot
a
�.r
11 1812 01 B ;
Y

PROP. SEGMENTAL
D
BLOCK RETAINING —
WALL (SEE C-4.0) '
3'R
,,—PROP. 1.5'
CURB & GUTTER
(REFER TO DETAIL)
13
STOP BAR, TYP.
3'R
..1.
CURB RAMP
_ (REFER TO
CURB RAMP -DETAIL 848.05)
(REFER TO
DETAIL 848 05)
I
15'R 15'R
EXISTING
TO REMAI
GRAPHIC SCALE
40 0 20 40 80
D
1 INCH = 40 FEET
URBAN
DESIGN
PARTNERS
1318-e6 central ave. P: 704-334-3303
charlotte, nc 28205 e 704-334-3305
WETLAND A
'
EXIST. TOTAL
0
STREAM B
WETLAND AREA
///
122 LF
(0.19 AC)
C.0
V
N
M
4--,
SAFETY RAIL /
(REFER TO DETAIL) I
\
\
\
i 1
co
O
24.0'
'
L
\
- \
4
Q�
52'R
O Q
N
\\3R
\
\
0 OJ
\M
\\\
0 \\
_0
00 w
W
10'R
o
PROP. SEGMENTAL
\
\
Q!,
BLOCK RETAINING
\
WALL (SEE C-4.0)
\
OJ
67'R
\
\
R
/
/ \
\\
""R
/
3'R
3'R
100'R
\
\\
C _
* \\
112'R
15'R 15'R
EXISTING
TO REMAI
GRAPHIC SCALE
40 0 20 40 80
D
1 INCH = 40 FEET
URBAN
DESIGN
PARTNERS
1318-e6 central ave. P: 704-334-3303
charlotte, nc 28205 e 704-334-3305
L0
� d
cb rn
o }
O m m
Z N C) ji
ULu o W
Z
o�una
0Y Q W U
IL 0 0 U)
y� N
0
00
N
W z
z
-0 -2
o
Cu
o
U
Z
Cu
(B
—
00
�
00
0
RIF
0 Lu
w
W
T _
0
(r
C.0
V
N
M
4--,
U)
N
co
O
L
(n N
CD
O Q
N
Co
o
m
_0
00 w
W
D
�' m
L0
� d
cb rn
o }
O m m
Z N C) ji
ULu o W
Z
o�una
0Y Q W U
IL 0 0 U)
y� N
0
00
N
W z
z
-0 -2
o
Cu
o
U
Z
Cu
(B
—
00
�
00
0
RIF
0 Lu
w
W
T _

// /////, "J II
716
714-
---712
14—i712
-708
\\ 06,
10,
708
706—
'704
06-704 --
J
GRAPHIC SCALE\
200 0 100 200 400
1 INCH = 200 FEET
URBAN
DESIGN
PARTNERS
1318-e6 central ave. P: 704-334-3303
charlotte, nc 28205 P: 704-334-3305
L(i
a
0, a
NO
}
z M m
N
Z N 0 II
U a w
z
0E -(Q
w Q w U
N
Cl)
N
N to
z
0w
w
w
N a,

NM
MOGENSEN MITIGATION, INC
881 DERITA ROAD (Myint Lane) STREAM
& WETLAND DELINEATION REPORT
November 23, 2018
PREPARED BY:
MOGENSEN MITIGATION, INC.
PO BOX 690429
CHARLOTTE, NC 28213

Table of Contents
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY...........................................................................................................................................2
METHODOLOGY........................................................................................................................................................2
Vegetation.................................................................................................................................................................3
Soils........................................................................................................................................................................... 3
HydrophyticIndicators.............................................................................................................................................3
STUDYAREA DESCRIPTION...................................................................................................................................4
DELINEATED STREAMS & WETLANDS ON STUDY AREA...............................................................................4
Wetlands...................................................................................................................................................................4
Streams.....................................................................................................................................................................5
CONSIDERATIONS FOR DEVELOPMENT..............................................................................................................5
PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS........................................................................................................................5
REFERENCES..............................................................................................................................................................6
LISTOF GRAPHICS....................................................................................................................................................6
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Mogensen Mitigation, Inc. (MMI) was retained by Eagle I Property Group LLC (Client) to
prepare a jurisdictional stream and wetland delineation on a 3 lots totaling approximately 3 acres
at 881 Derita Road and the two lots immediately to the east on Myint Lane in Concord, Cabarrus
County, NC (Study Area). The Study Area is primarily the 3 lots totaling 3 acres. The purpose of
the stream and wetland delineation report is to identify, flag and survey the jurisdictional streams
and/or wetlands on the parcel in preparation for site development. This report is based on a site
visit and web research, including National Wetland Inventory maps and the USDA Soil Survey
of Cabarrus County (see all attached graphics).
MMI scientists, including Richard Mogensen, PWS, conducted a site evaluation on November
20, 2018. During this evaluation, boundaries between upland and jurisdictional wetlands were
marked with orange flagging tape while the stream is marked with blue flagging tape both
sequentially numbered and surveyed with a GPS unit. A total of one stream (1221f) and one
small wetland area (0.195 ac) were assessed. These areas are shown in bluelines and a cross-
hatch shape polygon, respectively, on Figure 5.
METHODOLOGY
Wetland delineations were made in accordance with the U.S. Armorps of Engineers 1987
Wetland Delineation Manual (1987 Corps Manual) and the State of North Carolina's isolated
wetlands rules. These manuals generally follow a three -parameter approach to making wetland
delineations: hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils and hydrologic indicators. All three parameters
normally must be present for an area to be considered a wetland under Section 404/1 of the
Clean Water Act. Wetlands were classified according to the Cowardin System, as described in
Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States (1979). This is the
2

standard system of wetland classification used by most state and federal agencies. Stream
assessments were conducted in accordance with the NCDEQ Methodology for Identification of
Intermittent and Perennial Streams and Their Origins (version 4.11). Although procedures for
making the determinations are standardized, judgments are sometimes required, depending on
the strength or weakness of any of the defining parameters. In addition, transition areas between
uplands and wetlands often exist, also requiring judgments as to the boundaries. Therefore, some
adjustments to the boundaries may occur during a field review with the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps), NC Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ).
Vegetation
Plant species observed at the Study Area were identified and the wetland indicator status for each
species was determined from the National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands (Region
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain). The indicator status notes the percentage of probability that the
plant would occur in a wetland. The following are the indicator status designations:
OBL — Obligate Wetland (> 99% probability) FACW — Facultative Wetland (>66% probability)
FAC — Facultative (33% to 66% probability)
FACU — Facultative Upland (1% to 3% probability)
Results: The area delineated as wetlands has a predominance of facultative, facultative wet
and/or obligate species according to the USFWS National Wetlands Inventory. For more details
on vegetation data refer to the attached Wetland Data Forms.
Soils
A hydric soil is a soil that is saturated, flooded, or ponded long enough during the growing
season to develop anaerobic conditions that favor hydrophytic vegetation. A hydric soil may
either be drained or undrained, although a drained hydric soil may not continue to support
wetland plants. According to the 1987 Corps Manual, only when a hydric soil supports
hydrophytic vegetation and the area has indicators of wetland hydrology may the soil be referred
to as a wetland soil. During this investigation, soil cores were taken, generally to a depth of 18
inches to determine whether or not wetland soils are present. Soil characteristics that were
checked include composition, texture, color, chroma, value, odor and moisture regime of the soil.
These characteristics are determined in the absence of direct sunlight and with a moistened
sample. The "Munsell Soil Color Chart" is used to determine color and chroma.
Results: The soils mapped on the property are primarily Cecil Sandy Loam (CcB2, CcD2) which
are found on slopes from 2 to 15%. A small pocket of Enon Sandy Loam is mapped along the
east end of Lot 3. In the wetland area we identified the hydric phase of Chewacla soil. For more
details on the soils found onsite refer to the attached Wetland Data Forms.
Hydrophytic Indicators
According to the 1987 Corps Manual, an area must be periodically inundated or have saturated
soils for a significant period of time during the growing season, typically between 5 and 12% of
the growing season. Hydrologic indicators include, but are not limited to, blackened water,
stained leaves, visual inundation, drift lines and hummocks, and wetland drainage patterns.
3

Hydrological characteristics observed on the Study Area were noted during the field
investigation and are listed on the attached Wetland Data Forms.
Results: Standing water was observed in the upper end of this headwater forested wetland. A
high water table (within 3") was noted in other parts of the wetland area. For more details on the
existing hydrologic indicators refer to the attached Wetland Data Forms.
STUDY AREA DESCRIPTION
The project Study Area is located at 881 Derita Road and two adjacent lots along Myint Lane,
Concord, NC, Cabarrus County, North Carolina; latitude is 35' 24" 06.18 N, longitude is 80' 42"
49.07 W (Figure 1). The Study Area is bounded by Derita Road on the west, Myint Lane to the
south, forest with one single-family house to the north and east. The Study Area is in a primarily
industrial area surrounded by warehouses, small factories, scattered houses and open forest. The
site contains one house facing Derita Road and the associated grassed lot with a few demolished
buildings along the treeline. Two junk cars sit in the grassed lot. The adjacent two lots along
Myint Lane are forested with some mature oaks and hickories as well as tulip poplar and
dogwood. A small headwater wetland is located at the back of "Lot 2" and runs into "Lot 3"
where a small intermittent stream begins and the wetland ends. The stream flows ultimately to
the Rocky River which is in the Yadkin River Basin (HUC 03040105). Soils on the Study Area
predominantly consist of well drained, sandy loams (Cecil & Enon) in the upland slopes with
some areas of poorly drained, frequently flooded silty loam (Chewacla) along the bottomland
(Figure 4). The topography on the Study Area moderately rises from 700 to 800 ft. (Figure 2). A
majority of the surrounding area is characterized primarily by industrial, residential,
developments, roads and some forest pockets.
The uplands within the Study Area are dominated by mature forest including sweet gum,
hickory, red oak, tulip poplar and flowering dogwood. The upland areas are steeply sloped and
well drained while the lower areas are gently sloping and drain to a small stream which runs off
site and flows into a perennial stream under Myint Lane.
DELINEATED STREAMS & WETLANDS ON STUDY AREA
Wetlands
One forested headwater wetland was delineated on the Study Area located on the northeastern
corner of Lots 2 & 3 and runs into Stream #1 which flows off the property at Lot 3. It is located
mostly on the northeastern corner of the 3 -lot complex and is depicted on the attached
delineation map (Figure 4).
4

Wetland #1 is a relatively small headwater forested wetland feature that is located above Stream
#1 in a natural low flat topographic position. This wetland seems to stop when the surface flow
becomes channelized at ST #1 and flows downslope. Hydrology concentrates at the upper end of
the wetland. This wetland is a small (0.195 acre) low-lying flat feature which ponds water long
enough in the winter and spring to develop hydric soil characteristics. It is dominated by native,
bottomland, hardwood trees and has seasonal herbaceous wetland vegetation in the spring and
summer. The Study Area is classified as PFO IA (forested) using the Cowardin Classification
system. The wetland area is dominated by paw paw, red maple, green ash, and sweet gum with
some tulip poplar.
Streams
The Study Area contains the one small intermittent stream which drains to the Rocky River and
ultimately the Yadkin River (HUC 03040105) noted here as ST 41 on the attached delineation
map (Figure 5).
ST #1 is an intermittent stream located on the Lot 3 (eastern -most lot) and begins at the
downslope end of Wetland #1. High groundwater drainage appears to collect up slope in
Wetland #1, a relatively flat bottomland area then concentrates into a channel with an Ordinary
High Water Mark (OHWM) at Stream #1. The stream is approximately 122 linear feet long
before it leaves the property. This stream scores out as 25.5 on the DEQ SWTIC Form which is
intermittent (typically jurisdictional) along most of its extent on the Study Area. The DEQ-
DWR and the Corps have not verified the jurisdictional determination and may require seeing
the Study Area to confirm MMI's opinion.
CONSIDERATIONS FOR DEVELOPMENT
To verify this delineation, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the NC DEQ-DWR will need
to visit the site. Once this report is approved by the Client, we will complete the Pre -JD request
forms, DEQ stream forms & wetland data forms and submit to the agencies and request a site
visit to verify the stream and wetland boundaries. This all can be done now or at the permitting
stage of the project development referenced below.
If fill will be placed in any of the wetland or stream areas, a US Army Corps of Engineers
Section 404 Clean Water Act permit and NCDEQ Section 401 Water Quality Certification
and/or state wetlands permit authorization may be required. Adherence to state and local water
quality standards and procedures are also required as part of the permit process. Other local
water quality and/or stormwater authorizations may be required due to the Study Area's location.
If the project's impacts exceed North Carolina thresholds (0.10 acre for wetlands and 150 linear
feet for streams), compensatory mitigation may be required.
MMI can assist with any necessary Clean Water Act or Endangered Species Act permits and
authorizations.
PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS
PRIMARY AUTHOR: Richard Mogensen, PWS holds degrees in Biology from the
University of Connecticut (1977) and Geology from the University of Colorado at Denver
5

(1984). He is certified as a Professional Wetland Scientist (PWS) by the Society of Wetland
Scientists and is also provisionally certified as a Wetland Delineator by the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers, Baltimore District. Mr. Mogensen has attended and taught at numerous wetland
training classes and programs. He has over 25 years of experience in wetland consulting and
mitigation.
QA/QC: Daniel Kuefler, PhD holds a BSc in Conservation Biology from the University of
Alberta (1999), an MSc in Ecology from North Carolina State University (2005), and a PhD in
Integrative Biology from the University of Guelph (2013). He is certified in jurisdictional stream
assessment (SWITC) and qualitative stream assessment (NCSAM). Dr. Kuefler has over 15
years of experience in environmental research, assessment, and reporting.
MAPPING: Heath Caldwell holds a BS in Environmental Science from Miami of Ohio and
Master's from Ohio State University has extensive experience with ARC GIS mapping tools and
other related graphics programs.
REFERENCES
Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. Laroe. December 1979.
Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States. U.S. Department
of the Interior, Fish & Wildlife Service. Office of Biological Services. Washington, D.C.
47pp
Environmental laboratory 1987. "Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation
Manual," Technical report Y-87-1, US Army Engineer Waterways Station, Vicksburg, MS.
Reed, P.B. Jr. March 1988. National List of Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands:
Southeast (Region 2). U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Biol. Report 88(26.1)
U.S Department of Agriculture, National Resources Conservation Service. December
1987. Hydric Soils of the United States. National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils.
Washington, D.C. Web Soil Survey of Cabarrus Count.y, NC.
US Department of the Interior Fish & Wildlife Service, Field Guide to Non -tidal Wetland
Identification & NWI Maps
LIST OF GRAPHICS
Figure 1 — Vicinity Map
Figure 2 — USGS Topo Map
Figure 3 — Soil Map
Figure 4 - Delineation Enlargement
Figure 5 — Overview of Study Area
PHOTO LOG
0

urisdictional Determination Reauest
US Army Corps
of Engineers
N16mmgtcn District
This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (JD) from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
via mail, electronic mail, or facsimile. Requests should be sent to the appropriate project
manager of the county in which the property is located. A current list of project managers by
assigned counties can be found on-line at:
http://www.saw.usace.aM.mil/Missions/Re ulatoiyPermitProizram/Contact/CountyLocator.aspx,
by calling 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below. Once your
request is received you will be contacted by a Corps project manager.
ASHEVILLE & CHARLOTTE REGULATORY
FIELD OFFICES
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
INSTRUCTIONS:
WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
General Number: 910-251-4633
Fax Number: [phone]
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E, F and G.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part H.
NOTE ON PART D — PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that
all JD requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to
proceed with the determination, which may include inspection of the property when
necessary. This form must be signed by the current property owner(s) or the owner(s)
authorized agent to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D - NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for
JD requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
projects will be conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD
may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of
1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in
USDA programs, you should also request a certified wetland determination from the local
office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
Version: May 2017 Page 1

Jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: 881 Derita Road and 2 lots alonq Myint Lane
City, State:
County:
Concord, NC
Cabarrus
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): 46809505240000, 2436, 4434
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: Richard K. Moqensen
Mailing Address: PO Box 690429
Charlotte, NC 28227
Telephone Number: [phone]
Electronic Mail Address: [e-mail]
Select one:
I am the current property owner.
✓❑ I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant'
❑ Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
❑ Other, please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION'
Name: Oly Myint
Mailing Address: 612 Childsberg Way
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address:
Hillsborough, NC 27278
[phone]
1 Must provide completed Agent Authorization Form/Letter.
2 Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request (copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record).
Version: May 2017 Page 2

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION',4
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on-
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
Richard K Mogensen
Print Name
Capacity: ❑ Owner ❑✓ Authorized Agents
11-27-18
Date
Signature
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
aI intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
❑✓ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
❑ A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
❑ I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
❑ I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
❑ Other:
For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
5 Must provide agent authorization form/letter signed by owner(s).
Version: May 2017 Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD) TYPE (Select One)
7 I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) provides an indication that there may
be "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United States"on a property.
PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all
waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional "waters of
the United States". PJDs cannot be appealed (33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is
"preliminary" in the sense that an approved JD can be requested at any time. PJDs do
not expire.
OI am requesting that the Corps provide an approved JD for the property identified herein.
An Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) is a determination that
jurisdictional "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United
States" are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of
waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or
Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved JDs are sufficient as the basis for permit
decisions. AJDs are appealable (33 C.F.R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be
posted on the Corps website. A landowner, permit applicant, or other "affected
party" (33 C.F.R. 331.2) who receives an AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years
(subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter 05-
02).
I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information
to inform my decision.
G. ALL REQUESTS
W1Map of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the
review area.
aSize of Property or Review Area 3 acres.
The property boundary (or review area boundary) is clearly physically marked on the site.
Version: May 2017 Page 4

Jurisdictional Determination Request
H. REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS
Project Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude:
Longitude
35 24 06.18
80 42 49.07
❑� A legible delineation map depicting the aquatic resources and the property/review area.
Delineation maps must be no larger than 11x17 and should contain the following: (Corps
signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been
reviewed and approved).6
■ North Arrow
■ Graphical Scale
■ Boundary of Review Area
■ Date
■ Location of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Form or tributary
assessment reach.
For Approved Jurisdictional Determinations:
■ Jurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404
wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features.
■ Jurisdictional non -wetland features (i.e. tidal/navigable waters, tributaries,
impoundments) should be labeled as Non -Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water, relatively permanent water, pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear
length of each of these features as appropriate.
■ Isolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non -
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non -Jurisdictional. Please
include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non jurisdictional (i.e.
"Isolated", "No Significant Nexus", or "Upland Feature"). Please include the acreage
or linear length of these features as appropriate.
For Preliminary Jurisdictional Determinations:
Wetland and non -wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404,
Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be
identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non -wetland Waters of
the United States, wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and
linear length of these features as appropriate.
Completed Wetland Determination Data Forms for appropriate region
(at least one wetland and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type)
6 Please refer to the guidance document titled "Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations" to ensure that the
supplied map meets the necessary mapping standards. http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Re ug latory-Permit-
Pro gram/Jurisdiction/
Version: May 2017 Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
aCompleted appropriate Jurisdictional Determination form
• PJDs, please complete a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form' and include the
Aquatic Resource Table
• AJDs, please complete an Approved Jurisdictional Determination Forms
Vicinity Map
Aerial Photograph
a USGS Topographic Map
Soil Survey Map
Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
Wfl Landscape Photos (if taken)
F] NCSAM and/or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets
F71 NC Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms
Other Assessment Forms
' www.saw.usace.army.mil/Portals/59/docs/re ug lator /y regdocs/JD/RGL_08-02_App_ A_ Prelim_ JD_ Form_fillable.pdf
s Please see http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-Program/Jurisdiction/
Principal Purpose: The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine
whether there are any aquatic resources within the project area subject to federal jurisdiction under the regulatory
authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local
government agencies, and the public, and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by federal
law. Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the
approved jurisdictional determination (AJD), which will be made available to the public on the District's website
and on the Headquarters USAGE website.
Disclosure: Submission of requested information is voluntary; however, if information is not provided, the
request for an AJD cannot be evaluated nor can an AJD be issued.
Version: May 2017 Page 6

Stream Reach Evaluation Form
Date:
11/20/18 1 Evaluator: I R. Mo ensen
Easting:
35.4017
Project:
881 Derita Road M int Lane
Northing:
-80.7136
Total Points:
0
Stream is at least intermittent if > 19 or perennial if > 30*
25.5
(right -click the purple number and left -click Update Field to summarizepoints)
2
A.
Geomorphology
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
SCORE
1a.
Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2
2.
Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3
3.
In -channel structure: riffle- / step- pool sequence
0
1
2
3
1
4.
Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
1
5.
Active/relic floodplain
0
1
2
3
2
6.
Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
1
7.
Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
1
8.
Headcuts
0
1
2
3
2
9.
Grade controls
0
0.5
1
1.5
1
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
0
Geomorphology
Subtotal
15.5
a Man-made ditches are not rated: see discussion in NCDWQ Manual
B. Hydrology
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
2
13. Iron Oxidizing Bacteria
0
1
2
3
0
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
0.5
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
0.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines)
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
17. Soil -based Evidence of high water table?
0.5
No = 0
Yes =
3
3
Crayfish
0
0.5
Hydrology
Subtotal
0
C. Biology
18.
Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
1
19.
Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
3
20.
Macrobenthos note diversity and abundance
0
1
2
3
0
21.
Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
0
22.
Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
23.
Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
24.
Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
25.
Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
26.
Wetland plants in streambed
FACW=
0.75, OBL= 1.5, Other= 0
0
Biology Subtotal
4.0
" perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See page 35 of NCDWQ manual.
Notes:
Intermittent stream with no obvious macrobenthos, amphibians or crawish
I certify that this evaluation conforms to the latest version of
the NCDWQ document entitled Methodology for Identification
Richard K. Mogensen
of Intermittent and Perennial Streams and their Origins.
Signature of Certified Evaluator
(version 4.11)
Form #PC039

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Derita Road/Myint Lane City/County: Concord/Cabarrus Sampling Date: 11-20-18
Applicant/Owner: Estate of Maung Shwe Myint State: NC Sampling Point: Up -1
Investigator(s): R. Mogensen Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Sloping Upland Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%): 30
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 137 Lat: 35.4017 Long: -80.7136 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Cecil Sandy Loam CcB2 NWI classification: PFO 1A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes x No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes x No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No x Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No x within a Wetland? Yes No x
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No x
Remarks:
Steep upland slope adjacent to bottomland wetland
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (66)
x Surface Water (Al) —Aquatic
Fauna (B13)
—Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
x High Water Table (A2) —Marl
Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
—Drainage Patterns (B10)
x Saturation (A3) _
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
—Moss Trim Lines (B16)
—Water Marks (B1) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
—Sediment Deposits (B2) _
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
—Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (B3) _
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
—Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
—Algal Mat or Crust (B4) —Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
—Iron Deposits (65) —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
_ FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
x Water -Stained Leaves (69)
Sphagnum Moss (D8) (LRR T,U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes x No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No x
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
no signs of surface hydrolgy on steep slope
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region – Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: Up -1
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
Liriodendron tulipifera
20
Yes
FACU
Number of Dominant Species
2.
Acer saccharum
20
Yes
FACU
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
3.
Quercus falcata
20
Yes
FACU
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Carya ovata
10
No
FACU
Species Across All Strata: 11 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 27.3% (A/B)
70
=Total Cover
Prevalence Index worksheet:
50% of total cover:
35
20% of total cover:
14
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 15' )
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
1.
Acer saccharum
50
Yes
FACU
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
2.
Quercus falcata
30
Yes
FACU
FAC species 100 x 3 = 300
3.
Acer negundo
10
No
FAC
FACU species 250 x 4 = 1000
4.
UPL species 10 x 5 = 50
5.
Column Totals: 360 (A) 1350 (B)
6.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.75
90
=Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
50% of total cover:
45
20% of total cover:
18
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' )
Dominance Test is >50%
1.
Cornus florida
25
Yes
FACU
-2
3 Prevalence Index is :53.01
2.
Acer saccharum
25
Yes
FACU
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
3.
Crataegus X simulata
10
No
UPL
4.
5.
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
6.
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
60 =Total Cover
50% of total cover:
30
20% of total cover:
12
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' )
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
1.
Hexastylis arifolia
40
Yes
FAC
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
2
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
3•
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
4
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
5.
Shrub - Woody Plants, excluding woody vines,
6
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
7•
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
8.
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
9
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
10.
11.
Woody Vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
40
=Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20 20% of total cover: 8
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30'
)
1.
Lonicera japonica
50
Yes
FACU
2.
Toxicodendron radicans
30
Yes
FAC
3.
Smilax rotundifolia
20
Yes
FAC
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
100
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
50
20% of total cover:
20
Present? Yes No x
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: Up -1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
(inches) Color (moist)
Redox Features
Color (moist) % Type' LocZ Texture
0-3 7.5YR 3/4 100 Loamy/Clayey
3-18 7.5YR 4/4 100 Loamy/Clayey
C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
_ Histosol (Al) _Thin
Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2) —Barrier
Islands 1 cm Muck (S12)
_ Black Histic (A3)
(MLRA 153B, 153D)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
—Stratified Layers (A5) _
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR, P, T, U) _
Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) _
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) _
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) _
Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All 1) _
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
_Thick Dark Surface (All 2) _Depleted
Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (All 6) (MLRA 150A)_
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
x Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S) _
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) —Delta
Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
_Sandy Redox (S5)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
—Stripped Matrix (S6) —Piedmont
Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
_ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U) —Anomalous
Bright Floodplain Soils (F20)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)
(MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
(LRR S, T, U) —Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
(MLRA 138,152A in FL, 154)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Soil mapped as Cecil Sandy loam and that soil type was confirmed in the field.
Remarks
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
2 cm Muck (All 0) (LRR S)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(outside MLRA 150A)
—Reduced Vertic (F18)
(outside MLRA 150A, 1506)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, T)
_Anomalous Bright Floodplain Soils (F20)
(MLRA 1536)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
(outside MLRA 138,152A in FL, 154)
Barrier Islands Low Chroma Matrix (TS7)
(MLRA 1536, 153D)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No x
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region – Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Derita Road/Myint Lane City/County: Concord/Cabarrus Sampling Date: 11-20-18
Applicant/Owner: Estate of Maung Shwe Myint State: NC Sampling Point: W--1
Investigator(s): R. Mogensen Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Sloping Bottomland Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%): 1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 137 Lat: 35.4017 Long: -80.7136 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: ChA Chewacla NWI classification: PFO 1A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes x No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes x No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes x No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes x No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes x No
Remarks:
Small forested headwater wetland with some pockets of standing water
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (66)
x Surface Water (Al) _Aquatic
Fauna (B13)
? Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
x High Water Table (A2) —Marl
Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
—Drainage Patterns (B10)
x Saturation (A3) _
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
—Moss Trim Lines (B16)
—Water Marks (B1) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
—Sediment Deposits (B2) _
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
—Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (B3) _
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
—Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
—Algal Mat or Crust (B4) —Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
—Iron Deposits (65) —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
_ FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
x Water -Stained Leaves (69)
Sphagnum Moss (D8) (LRR T,U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes x No
Depth (inches): 1
Water Table Present? Yes x No
Depth (inches): 3
Saturation Present? Yes x No
Depth (inches): 3
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
some standing water in small pockets. High water table throughout.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region – Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: W--1
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0
Absolute Uominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1. Asimina triloba
40 Yes
FAC
Number of Dominant Species
2. Fraxinus pennsylvanica
25 Yes
FACW
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A)
3. Acer rubrum
20 Yes
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
4. Liquidambar styraciflua
10 No
FAC
Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
5. Liriodendron tulipifera
5 No
FACU
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 83.3% (A/B)
100 =Total Cover
Prevalence Index worksheet:
50% of total cover:
50 20% of total cover:
20
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 15' )
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
1. Asimina triloba
60 Yes
FAC
FACW species 25 x 2 = 50
2.
FAC species 160 x 3 = 480
3.
FACU species 55 x 4 = 220
4.
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
5.
Column Totals: 240 (A) 750 (B)
6.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.13
60 =Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
50% of total cover:
30 20% of total cover:
12
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' )
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
1.
3 - Prevalence Index is :53.01
2.
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
3.
4.
5•
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
6.
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' )
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
1. Carex spp
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
2•
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
3.
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
4
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
5.
Shrub - Woody Plants, excluding woody vines,
6
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
7•
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
8.
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
g
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
10.
11.
Woody Vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
=Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30'
)
1. Lonicera japonica
50 Yes
FACU
2. Toxicodendron radicans
30 Yes
FAC
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
80 =Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
40 20% of total cover:
16
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: W--1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Types LoC2 Texture Remarks
0-3 10YR 3/3 100 Sandy Saturated at 3 inches
3-18 7.5YR 4/2 85 7.5YR 5/6 15 Sandy Saturated with faint mottles
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol (Al) —Thin
Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2) —Barrier
Islands 1 cm Muck (S12)
_2 cm Muck (All 0) (LRR S)
_ Black Histic (A3)
(MLRA 153B, 153D)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
(outside MLRA 150A)
Stratified Layers (A5) _
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Reduced Vertic (F18)
? Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR, P, T, U) _
Depleted Matrix (F3)
(outside MLRA 150A, 1506)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) _
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, T)
_ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) _
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_Anomalous Bright Floodplain Soils (F20)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) _
Redox Depressions (F8)
(MLRA 1536)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All 1) _
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
_Thick Dark Surface (All 2) _
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (All 6) (MLRA 150A)_
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
(outside MLRA 138,152A in FL, 154)
x Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S) _
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
—Barrier Islands Low Chroma Matrix (TS7)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) —Delta
Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
(MLRA 1536, 153D)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
? Stripped Matrix (S6)
Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
—Piedmont
_ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U) —Anomalous
Bright Floodplain Soils (F20)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)
(MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
(LRR S, T, U) —Very
Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
wetland hydrology must be present,
(MLRA 138,152A in FL, 154)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches): I Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Soil mapped as Cecil Sandy Loam but the field indicators show the hydric phase of Chewacla soil. Low chrioma with mottling.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region – Version 2.0

GAS
'IPEL/NE
DARKER
EXISTING CONDITIONS NOTES:
EXISTING INFORMATION ON THIS PLAN WAS PROVIDED BY:
CAROLINA SURVEYORS, INC.
P.O. BOX 267
PINEVILLE, NC 28134
[phone]
R
-NOW OR FORMERLY- 10' DRAINAGE (Fp (FOUND)
DYNAMIS HOLDINGS EASEMENT --
LLC (PB 20/7)
DB 73100/36
_ S83°3703 Ems_ 92 32 \
690 -
7 �►� - _ —\
PND) _ \
(FO /� /^ T \\ --�
690
58 �/ / / _ / � 1�
220.--- _
0,01
TEES SHED V
S O ND) WELL - 693 / / / / - -�-� '
685
// !� EASEMENT J \ \ 5' DRAINAGE
\___ EASEMENT
5' DRAINAGE \ _ _ (PB 20/7)
° 583 24'39 E 198��\���o A \ \ ( - _ j \ / / / / (PB 20/7)
l \
1 I I I I
I FOUN)
FEE SIMPLE R/W
CONVEYED, NOT NOW OR FORMERLY
YNCLUDED IN o ', \ \ P \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ - \\ - _ - - _ _ �- \ I/ - - _ - - d BRIAN & CAND211ACE WATSON
TOTAL AREA \ \ \ \ \ \ \ - `� \ _ _ - _ _ - - - - - - DB 12542/793
° \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ / \ --- I 1 LOT 2, PB 20/7
WOODLINE \ V A V \ �\ V A V A V \ �� V - A \ _� V v680—
/K
80— _o
o
A-
C:) I BENCHMARK I I /, \ \ �� -v \ V A \ I v j / -705-
Ln SSMH .•/� \ \ \ _ _ �y -
� I RIM: 71736111 I '' a m ' �\ \\ \V \_N6 W
T OR FORMERLY-,
-4 INV IN. 763.96 p _ _
(� INV OUT 763.66 \ - - \ \ _ \ - \ \ \ \& CHR/ST/NE S. MYINT
OC I I I IGW '''' _ ' — _ _
I POOL � �� \ \ \ \ � \ '� - \ \ � \ \ DB 619 270
U) m I I I I 'SPP ' POOL I EQUIPMENT
/ A � -NOW OR FbAMERLY� - � � � v v V A LOT 1, MB 20/7
FILLED - - / U S 101 MYINT - - _ \ \ \ \
d W I /'Z M / DECK WITH DIRT I I O - - - \ CHRISTINE S MYINT _ PID 46809544340000 \ \ \
W � ' ' \ - w _ D9 616/467 V 1.074 AC.
A V es
J O �1$ V �z w''%,' �' I � �_ _ / \ P10 809 4.160000
Q CO W I I iD Z/;%,',,,, s1 v - 1. . NET _— v v v v v v \ A V A \\\\ \ \ V v v
i STORY BR/CK HOUSELu RIW
\ 1 \ \ \\ \ \
> U I I I ''i;'!' /\� 2 _----
--- - - —
'oISC o x X
\ _
I
I
(FOUND)11
BARN \ \ \ \
SNOW OR FORMERLY%r \ \ \ \ \ \ \ y\ \ > ✓ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ SLr [),WG \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 68O \
U SHNEE MINT
I \ — \ 'I \ � \ \ s re cK �Zw)�
°vI & CHRIS77NE S MYINT - - - - - \ \ > / \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
/ _
z I I A l 1 LESs�De is s %�s� —-_/ \ V A \\ y fV
/ PID 46809505240000 / WOODLINE - / \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ POINT OF
0.793 AC. NET BEGINNING
R
TEMPORARY \ \ WELL \ \ \ \ I \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ s \ \ \ EBAR (FOUND)
II h\ �� II\I \\ \ \\ \\ \\ \\ vvvvv vv NG. .P C.
(ED
\ / \ \ \ \ I \ \ \ \ \ \ \
E 1,489,522.19
� � � � � TELE CF. 0�999846�1
FF
MPLE R/ I I II �',Z� / (DB 123 9 7/1 9 7) \ I / \ \ V V A \ I V A V A \ V A
ON EYED, N01I I I \ \ \ \ \ \ ��E, T \ \ \ \
I DED I 6 �sr; �/ / / \ \ SEM V v \
\ \ \ \ \ I 11 \ \ \ \ AINAGE \ \
TAL ARE I I 'u �� I / \ I I \ \ \ \ \ \ I \ I M I I I I I \ �\ 10 D� (PB\\ 20A) \ \ \ \ \ \ e
Q
(DB 12397/19 W z PERMANENT
\ I IIII DRAINAGE \ \ EL I \I I I \ \ I I I \\SVA\�,W 192.31 \\ \\\
EASEMENT \ SrE GRA I I \U REB R 2 '53'27 t ss-
/ PP P / '(DB � 397/197) I \ \ \ \ \ (FOUND) II I % % I I II II II pM I (FOUND) I �— \ \ \\ \ j C\ Wit\ INV IN:
INV OU
�- PVC R/W I \ N72 51'58"W 258.86 s V A
SSMH o ° TUB N73°3T11'W 158.62 - -
F DISC - \ / - - CO I I I - - - = - - -
RIM: 715.06 H FUND - - - - -
INV /N. 708.16
�— /
INV OUT. -708.06 �I}I _I _t-- I = -ss--- _ �n<--
SMB- yes 47� - - Ss t _ - _ _� S - /
o I -t_---T�s�-=}=_--t - _-t- t�-- t ----t-- = - - -tom ==s �_ =�-ss- c}= -ss= --_S.— SSMH \ \ / _ jam/
4- ----- - - - - - - - - - - - - �- ----- ss-- _ss--- --ss-- =--ss-- = sem-- s= _ _� _
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -> - - - - 1 - o \ rn ,RIM: 703.01 \ ) r —
0.441 AC. WITHIN PUBLIC R/W \ I 0.366 AC WITHIN PUBLIC R/W \ V /N: 69731 I -
3 ° (NO RECORD OF SSMH \ I (NO RECORD OF I o /AV OU T- 697.11
RIM: 713.91 0 1 -t-
� CONVEYANCE/DED/CATION FOUND, INV /N: 706.91 SDMH � CONVEYANCE DED/CATION FOUND, �
orz i �0 1�1 I i NOT INCLUDED IN TOTAL AREA) INV OUT 706.31 RIM: 713.07 ^^� ry' NOT INCLUDED IN TOTAL AREA)
/ + - „,_ --=moi - - - - _- - - - - -- - - - - - - _ ---i---- - w --`-- = -_;=_ - -t=- v-
- — - - - _
rt— —t WT= —�-- _ =="—tom —}— W' \� _
! � / W'V v v V
SDMH MB L_ A �H
GW ° D 5' CONCRETE SIDEWALK / �R/M: 713.09 ROW - FH - - 5' CONCRETE S/DEWAL - - - - - -
\ / E- P -oher� ---ohe----ohe----ohe----ohe----ohe----o e�--- - _ -- _ --- - _ - _ _ _ _ - -
P 0 _ __ _
P ohe ohe a �� ohe ah
C P SDMH CP CO
�WV I DISC RIM: 714.52 RAMP
V" (FOUND) RAMP Rllv1 09.67
IDMH
PP MYINT LANE
60' PUBLIC R/W
(MB 20/7)
CITY MAINTAINED
BEFORE YOU DIGI
CALL 811 OR 1-800-632-4949
N.C. ONE—CALL CENTER
IT'S THE LAWI
URBAN
DESIGN
PARTNERS
1318-e6 central ave. P 704.334.3303
charlotte, nc 28205 F 704.334.3305
u rbandesig n partners. com
nc firm no: P-0418
sc coa no: C-03044
FOR
REFERENCE
ONLY
Q_
0
N
C7
>
L
O
0
Q
O
a)
O
T
70
y
jV^J
N
>
0
^_
W
C
N
CZ
70
O
O
W
Z)
00
r
m
O
66
z
O
U)
Lu
rr
O
z
X LO
W oo
Project No: 18-155
Date: 04.12.2019
Designed by: UDP
Drawn By: UDP
Sheet No:
GRAPHIC SCALE
30 0 15 30 60
1 INCH = 30 FEET C-200

NUf30
IF ANY DISCREPANCY IN ELEVATION, AS NOTED ON THE
GRADING PLAN, OCCURS ON SITE DURING CONSTRUCTION THE
GENERAL CONTRACTOR IS TO CONTACT THE LANDSCAPE
ARCHITECT AND CIVIL ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY.
-NOW OR FORMERLY- 10" DRAINAGE
DYNAMIS HOLDINGS EASEMENT
LLC (PB 20/7)
DB 13100/36
$8337'=
SNEo
/ y
-685 5' DRAINAGE
/ \ \ EASEMENT
- = (PB 20/7)
-
moll
_�n _ _ 1
-
FEE PIMPLE R/W - I h r \ 'o \ \ \ �Q \ \ ` \_ \\ \\ - \ I \ \ _ \ \ 1'
CO VEYED, NOT I L \ I \ St \ \ _ - - - - �- _ - _ _ BRIAN
NCLUDED IN I \ _ _ _ \ \ - - I \ - - v SNOW U r U
° \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ - \ \ - ` _ - - I \ _ v DB 1252% 93A
TOTAL AREA v X777 a \ _ - - - - \\ ��\ I r
r \ r \ / - \ - - 1 \ 1 \ LOT 2, PB 20/7
(DB 1239
I\
8_-003
rn\
O o eB NCHMARK 704
�LO SSMH -
RIM: 71736
705
�l!
oO
UINV IN: 763.96 N
h0 \ \ -_ __
INV OUT 763.66 ` J .o
�' \ - � � \ \ _� \ \\ \ \ \ \
tp vv
cr_ Lo'T I I II I jW�° 4P
cn m
N
65 �4 -
T_ w
LL
rrcc
wQO� I �_
o > I ----
z-
\
II I I QRW
U I D C � -
°' (FO ND)
I I ILd
m I ! i ✓ \ \ �\ \ �'� �`i \ \ X66,\ \
L_`2-�I'IL FFE: 720
SII I BFE: 708_J
,v\\\��� \ v v vv vvvvv
I ( II I o� \ \ \\ \ 70 \ < s \ \ \ \
II 1 wVI I \ \ \ \ \ \ \ .- \ \
J
LJ
FE MPLE R/l� I 1 I I Z� \ �j. \ \ \ 1 I \ \ \ \ / \ \ \ TELE
/ ON YED, I _ \ \
-r-��_
l CLUDED l o_
TAL ARE
DB 12397/19
( \
o t
GW �
C 19
IPP /
PP I \ -* \fir\ -
c
SSMH I ti s1 'w as
RIM: 715.06
INV IN: 708.16 -
INV OUT 708.06 �� �� I - - - - - - - - - � »<
Fo �I Ursa-- -t---- ---- -- -- --- - ---_----t- \ ----- - `-�- \-�- -� - - - - - - -05 SSMH
- - - - - - - - - - - - = - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - - - n 0 R1M: 703.01 \ l r /
I ° 0.441 AC. WITHIN PUBLIC R W \ I 0.366 AC. WITH/N PUBLIC R/W _
/ / \ �V 1N: 697.31
I / ° (NO RECORD OF SSMH \ I (NO RECORD OF o I o I 1 OUT: 697.11-
¢o RIM: 713.91 0 �J
I CCONVEYANCE/DEDICATION FOUND, SDMH CONVEYANCE/DEDICATION FOUND, N I /
0o �� I�1 I NOT INCLUDED IN TOTAL AREA) - - - - INV OUT77�31 - - - RIM: 713.07^ ��� - �- - \ - - - -L -J j \\1�/
INV IN: NOT INCLUDED IN TOTAL AREA) /
_ _ _ _ _ _ _
-�--- m
t=s-1\\T�� t- f -try
° 5' CONCRETE SIDEWALK - - -'
SDMH _ROW L 5' CONC ETE SIDEWAL -
/
i \
Rohe - - - - ohm - ohe - - � ohe - ohe � o e - - - - o e� - - - - - - -ohe - ohe - - - - e - -_ - _ \ - -ohe \ \ = eh P
I RIW SDMH CO
RAMP
RIM: 714.52
WV DISC RAMP SDMH
PP
(FOUND) MYI NT LANE RIM: 709.67
60' PUBLIC R/W
(MB 20/7)
CITY MAINTAINED
GRADING AND STORM DRAINAGE NOTES:
1. ON-SITE BURIAL PITS REQUIRE A PERMIT.
2. ANY GRADING DONE BEYOND THE DENUDED LIMITS INDICATED ON THE
CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS IS A VIOLATION AND IS SUBJECT TO A FINE.
3. GRADING MORE THAN ONE ACRE WITHOUT AN APPROVED EROSION CONTROL PLAN
IS A VIOLATION AND IS SUBJECT TO A FINE.
4. ALL FINAL CURB AND STREET GRADES AT INTERSECTIONS SHALL BE COORDINATED
WITH INSPECTOR.
5. SIGHT TRIANGLES INDICATED ARE THE MINIMUM REQUIRED.
6. APPROVAL OF CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS IS NOT AN AUTHORIZATION TO GRADE
ADJACENT PROPERTIES. WHEN FIELD CONDITIONS WARRANT OFF-SITE GRADING,
PERMISSION SHALL BE OBTAINED BY CONTRACTOR FROM THE AFFECTED PROPERTY
OWNERS.
7. IN ORDER TO ENSURE PROPER DRAINAGE, CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN A
MINIMUM OF 0.5% SLOPE ON THE CURB.
8. SUBSURFACE DRAINAGE FACILITIES MAY BE REQUIRED IN THE STREET RIGHT OF
WAY IF DEEMED NECESSARY BY THE INSPECTOR.
9. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN EACH STREAM, CREEK OR BACKWASH
CHANNEL IN AN UNOBSTRUCTED CONDITION AND SHALL REMOVE FROM THESE AREAS
ALL DEBRIS, LOGS, TIMBER, TRASH, JUNK AND OTHER ACCUMULATIONS.
10. ANY CONSTRUCTION OR USE WITHIN THE AREAS DELINEATED AS FLOODWAY
DISTRICT FRINGE BOUNDARY LINE OR FLOODWAY DISTRICT ENCROACHMENT BOUNDARY
LINE IS SUBJECT TO THE RESTRICTIONS IMPOSED BY THE FLOODWAY REGULATIONS.
11. THE LOCAL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT HAS NOT REVIEW AND DOES NOT ASSUME
RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE STRUCTURAL STABILITY OF ANY EXISTING OR PROPOSED
RETAINING WALLS ON THE SITE.
12. NON-STANDARD ITEMS (I.E.: PAVERS, IRRIGATION SYSTEMS, ETC.) IN THE RIGHT
OF WAY REQUIRE A LOCAL OR STATE ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT PRIOR TO
INSTALLATION.
13. ALL "CLDSM" NUMBERS REFER TO THE CHARLOTTE LAND DEVELOPMENT
STANDARDS MANUAL.
14. ALL SIDEWALKS, STOOPS, TERRACES AND OTHER PAVED AREAS SHALL SLOPE
AWAY FROM BUILDING(S) AT A MINIMUM OF 2%.
15. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT INSPECTOR 48 HOURS BEFORE CONSTRUCTION.
16. STABILIZE ALL SLOPES GREATER THAN 3:1 WITH JUTE MESH.
17. ALL ELEVATIONS ARE IN REFERENCE TO THE BENCHMARK WHICH MUST BE
VERIFIED BY THE CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO STARTING CONSTRUCTION.
18. ALL CONTOURS AND SPOT ELEVATIONS REFLECT FINISHED GRADES. REFER TO
PAVEMENT CROSS-SECTION DATA TO ESTABLISH CORRECT SUB -BASE, AGGREGATE
BASE COURSE ELEVATIONS TO BE COMPLETED UNDER THIS CONTRACT.
19. CONTRACTOR SHALL BLEND NEW EARTHWORK SMOOTHLY WITH EXISTING
CONTOURS.
IMPERVIOUS SUMMARY
SITE AREA: 3.07 AC
EXISTING IMPERVIOUS:
BUILDING: 2,300 SF
DRIVES/BARN: 3,651 SF
TOTAL IMPERVIOUS: 5,951 SF
0.14 AC
EXISTING BUILT -UPON AREA: 4%
PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS:
BUILDING: 21,026 SF
ROAD/SIDEWALK: 55,237 SF
TOTAL IMPERVIOUS: 76,263 SF
1.75 AC
PROPOSED BUILT -UPON -AREA: 57%
GRADING LEGEND:
A
TOP OF CURB
TC
BOTTOM OF CURB
BC
TOP OF WALL
TW
BOTTOM OF WALL
BW
TOP OF STAIRS
TS
BOTTOM OF STAIRS
BS
BREAK POINT
BP
HIGH POINT
HP
LOW POINT
LP
YARD INLET
Yl
EXISTING ELEVATION
EX
Q
N
(.0
tnL
T
>
0
2i
Cz
o
Lu
00
00
CO
LJ
FE MPLE R/l� I 1 I I Z� \ �j. \ \ \ 1 I \ \ \ \ / \ \ \ TELE
/ ON YED, I _ \ \
-r-��_
l CLUDED l o_
TAL ARE
DB 12397/19
( \
o t
GW �
C 19
IPP /
PP I \ -* \fir\ -
c
SSMH I ti s1 'w as
RIM: 715.06
INV IN: 708.16 -
INV OUT 708.06 �� �� I - - - - - - - - - � »<
Fo �I Ursa-- -t---- ---- -- -- --- - ---_----t- \ ----- - `-�- \-�- -� - - - - - - -05 SSMH
- - - - - - - - - - - - = - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - - - n 0 R1M: 703.01 \ l r /
I ° 0.441 AC. WITHIN PUBLIC R W \ I 0.366 AC. WITH/N PUBLIC R/W _
/ / \ �V 1N: 697.31
I / ° (NO RECORD OF SSMH \ I (NO RECORD OF o I o I 1 OUT: 697.11-
¢o RIM: 713.91 0 �J
I CCONVEYANCE/DEDICATION FOUND, SDMH CONVEYANCE/DEDICATION FOUND, N I /
0o �� I�1 I NOT INCLUDED IN TOTAL AREA) - - - - INV OUT77�31 - - - RIM: 713.07^ ��� - �- - \ - - - -L -J j \\1�/
INV IN: NOT INCLUDED IN TOTAL AREA) /
_ _ _ _ _ _ _
-�--- m
t=s-1\\T�� t- f -try
° 5' CONCRETE SIDEWALK - - -'
SDMH _ROW L 5' CONC ETE SIDEWAL -
/
i \
Rohe - - - - ohm - ohe - - � ohe - ohe � o e - - - - o e� - - - - - - -ohe - ohe - - - - e - -_ - _ \ - -ohe \ \ = eh P
I RIW SDMH CO
RAMP
RIM: 714.52
WV DISC RAMP SDMH
PP
(FOUND) MYI NT LANE RIM: 709.67
60' PUBLIC R/W
(MB 20/7)
CITY MAINTAINED
GRADING AND STORM DRAINAGE NOTES:
1. ON-SITE BURIAL PITS REQUIRE A PERMIT.
2. ANY GRADING DONE BEYOND THE DENUDED LIMITS INDICATED ON THE
CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS IS A VIOLATION AND IS SUBJECT TO A FINE.
3. GRADING MORE THAN ONE ACRE WITHOUT AN APPROVED EROSION CONTROL PLAN
IS A VIOLATION AND IS SUBJECT TO A FINE.
4. ALL FINAL CURB AND STREET GRADES AT INTERSECTIONS SHALL BE COORDINATED
WITH INSPECTOR.
5. SIGHT TRIANGLES INDICATED ARE THE MINIMUM REQUIRED.
6. APPROVAL OF CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS IS NOT AN AUTHORIZATION TO GRADE
ADJACENT PROPERTIES. WHEN FIELD CONDITIONS WARRANT OFF-SITE GRADING,
PERMISSION SHALL BE OBTAINED BY CONTRACTOR FROM THE AFFECTED PROPERTY
OWNERS.
7. IN ORDER TO ENSURE PROPER DRAINAGE, CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN A
MINIMUM OF 0.5% SLOPE ON THE CURB.
8. SUBSURFACE DRAINAGE FACILITIES MAY BE REQUIRED IN THE STREET RIGHT OF
WAY IF DEEMED NECESSARY BY THE INSPECTOR.
9. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN EACH STREAM, CREEK OR BACKWASH
CHANNEL IN AN UNOBSTRUCTED CONDITION AND SHALL REMOVE FROM THESE AREAS
ALL DEBRIS, LOGS, TIMBER, TRASH, JUNK AND OTHER ACCUMULATIONS.
10. ANY CONSTRUCTION OR USE WITHIN THE AREAS DELINEATED AS FLOODWAY
DISTRICT FRINGE BOUNDARY LINE OR FLOODWAY DISTRICT ENCROACHMENT BOUNDARY
LINE IS SUBJECT TO THE RESTRICTIONS IMPOSED BY THE FLOODWAY REGULATIONS.
11. THE LOCAL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT HAS NOT REVIEW AND DOES NOT ASSUME
RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE STRUCTURAL STABILITY OF ANY EXISTING OR PROPOSED
RETAINING WALLS ON THE SITE.
12. NON-STANDARD ITEMS (I.E.: PAVERS, IRRIGATION SYSTEMS, ETC.) IN THE RIGHT
OF WAY REQUIRE A LOCAL OR STATE ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT PRIOR TO
INSTALLATION.
13. ALL "CLDSM" NUMBERS REFER TO THE CHARLOTTE LAND DEVELOPMENT
STANDARDS MANUAL.
14. ALL SIDEWALKS, STOOPS, TERRACES AND OTHER PAVED AREAS SHALL SLOPE
AWAY FROM BUILDING(S) AT A MINIMUM OF 2%.
15. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT INSPECTOR 48 HOURS BEFORE CONSTRUCTION.
16. STABILIZE ALL SLOPES GREATER THAN 3:1 WITH JUTE MESH.
17. ALL ELEVATIONS ARE IN REFERENCE TO THE BENCHMARK WHICH MUST BE
VERIFIED BY THE CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO STARTING CONSTRUCTION.
18. ALL CONTOURS AND SPOT ELEVATIONS REFLECT FINISHED GRADES. REFER TO
PAVEMENT CROSS-SECTION DATA TO ESTABLISH CORRECT SUB -BASE, AGGREGATE
BASE COURSE ELEVATIONS TO BE COMPLETED UNDER THIS CONTRACT.
19. CONTRACTOR SHALL BLEND NEW EARTHWORK SMOOTHLY WITH EXISTING
CONTOURS.
IMPERVIOUS SUMMARY
SITE AREA: 3.07 AC
EXISTING IMPERVIOUS:
BUILDING: 2,300 SF
DRIVES/BARN: 3,651 SF
TOTAL IMPERVIOUS: 5,951 SF
0.14 AC
EXISTING BUILT -UPON AREA: 4%
PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS:
BUILDING: 21,026 SF
ROAD/SIDEWALK: 55,237 SF
TOTAL IMPERVIOUS: 76,263 SF
1.75 AC
PROPOSED BUILT -UPON -AREA: 57%
GRADING LEGEND:
A
TOP OF CURB
TC
BOTTOM OF CURB
BC
TOP OF WALL
TW
BOTTOM OF WALL
BW
TOP OF STAIRS
TS
BOTTOM OF STAIRS
BS
BREAK POINT
BP
HIGH POINT
HP
LOW POINT
LP
YARD INLET
Yl
EXISTING ELEVATION
EX
U R B
A
N
DESIGN
Q
PARTNERS
1318-e6 central ave.
P 704.334.3303
charlotte, nc 28205
F 704.334.3305
urbandesignpartners.
com
nc firm no: P-0418
co
a)
sc coa no: C-03044
Lu
m
�a� o
O� O
Z
BEFORE YOU DICT
CALL 811 OR 1-800-632-4949
N.C. ONE -CALL CENTER
IT'S THE LAWI
GRAPHIC SCALE
30 0 15 30 60
INCH = 30 FEET
Project No: 18-155
Date: 04.12.2019
Designed by: UDP
Drawn By: UDP
Sheet No:
ti
N
O
00
N
IN
0
CID
M U
L.� z
.J
C
rL _�
V O
00
C-4.0
4/12/19
Q
0
CV
co
a)
Z3
U)
Q
N
(.0
tnL
T
>
0
2i
Cz
o
Lu
00
00
CO
Lu
m
�a� o
O� O
Z
BEFORE YOU DICT
CALL 811 OR 1-800-632-4949
N.C. ONE -CALL CENTER
IT'S THE LAWI
GRAPHIC SCALE
30 0 15 30 60
INCH = 30 FEET
Project No: 18-155
Date: 04.12.2019
Designed by: UDP
Drawn By: UDP
Sheet No:
ti
N
O
00
N
IN
0
CID
M U
L.� z
.J
C
rL _�
V O
00
C-4.0

REFER TO ARCH.
(SEE NOTE 8)
15' TYPE B BUFFER —
SNE
EXISTING TREES WE��
TO REMAIN
_— 50'R
I
I II I
I II A
°
co Ir
LoEL° -
m 2
oc�oLo
a-w�
LL Lu
_J X
wUJ
I II }
a_
o>0
z I I I r7
m N
L W.
oU
I I I a,
ZI I PROP. 3 STORY BUILDING
Iv I 51,576 SF
0
I I I \
I I I 4
0
C _
IPP I o
o
o°
T I
8' CLASS 3 STREET
11 YARD BUFFER
i
o
\ � GWv
L F— P —ohe----ohe----ohe---_
PP
BEFORE YOU DIGI
CALL 811 OR 1-800-632-4949
N.C. ONE -CALL CENTER
IT'S THE LAWI
29
3'R
REFER TO ARCH.
(SEE NOTE 8)
12' CATEGORY 3
3,R BUILDING YARD BUFFER
12
—NOW OR FORMERLY
DYNAMIS HOLDINGS
LLC
DB 13100/36
PROP. 1.5'
CURB & GUTTER
(REFER TO DETAIL) =
1
26.0' 3'R
N
41
o , 9.0' ,
ME
M
N
o � STOP BAR, TYP
3' 3'R
911
24.0'
58"W
' I PROP, 5'° SIDEWALK °
15'R 15'R
PROP. 2.5'
CURB & GUTTER
(REFER TO DETAIL)
---------
MYI NT LANE
60' PUBLIC R/W
(MB 20/7)
CITY MAINTAINED
_ ,n
PROP. SEGMENTAL
BLOCK RETAINING 1
WALL (SEE C-4.0)
— DISTURBED
WETLAND AREA -
3,345 SF
1
1
SAFETY RAIL I \ \ \ 1
3'R (REFER TO DETAIL) \ \ I —NOW OR FORMERLY—
BRIAN
ORMERLYBRIAN & CANDACE WATSON
DB 125421193
\ LOT 2, PB 20/7
24.0'
5 52'R
3'R / \
\3'R �
PROP. 1.5' `� O
CURB & GUTTER �� 9 0 PROP. SEGMENTAL
(REFER TO DETAIL) t\ 10'R o' BLOCK RETAINING
WALL (SEE C-4.0)
13
o
J67 R
\SiR j /> 1
3'R 3'R EXISTING TREES
TO REMAIN
100'R \� 2� 1 1 —
1 12' R
-(REFER TO - — —
DETAIL 848.05)
CURB RAMP PROF ° 5' SIDEWAUK
_ (REFER TO 5 z!�`
DETAIL 848.05)--- _
15'R 15' R ,
°o o _ PROP. 2.5'
o _ CURB & GUTTER
(REFER TO DETAIL)
WA \°5
__0 e — — —
WM 0 D
DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY
TAX PARCEL ID #:
4680-95-0524-0000
PROPOSED:
4680-95-2436-0000
EXTERIOR:
4680-95-4434-0000
TOTAL SITE AREA:
2.99 AC
EXISTING ZONING:
C-2 (REZONING RECORD NUMBER
P 704.334.3303
CN-RZZ-2018-00013)
FLOOR AREA RATIO:
0.4
SETBACKS:
GROSS LEASABLE AREA)
FRONT:
10'
SIDE:
N/A
REAR:
N/A
MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT:
72'
PROPOSED USE:
OFFICE
VEHICULAR PARKING:
REQUIRED:
172 SPACES (1 SP/300 SF)
PROPOSED:
175 SPACES
EXTERIOR:
150 SPACES
INTERIOR:
25 SPACES (6 ACCESSIBLE/ 1 VAN.
PINEVILLE, NC 28134
REF. ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR
P 704.334.3303
LOCATIONS)
REQUIRED LOADING SPACES:
1 SPACE (1 SP/50,000 SQFT OF
PREPARED BY:
GROSS LEASABLE AREA)
OPEN SPACE:
N/A
U R B
A
N
DESIGN
Q
PARTNERS
PINEVILLE, NC 28134
1318-e6 central ave.
P 704.334.3303
charlotte, nc 28205
F 704.334.3305
urbandesignpartners.com
PREPARED BY:
nc firm no: P-0418
(.0
N
sc coa no: C-03044
>
�`o00000000 oO O0o0
�0oo°�iD3cq' �005p
S -Fjp o
� 00 191113
=, `f
Noa
` °00000
M.
NOTES:
4/12/19
Q
P.O. BOX 267
PINEVILLE, NC 28134
■
[phone]
0
PREPARED BY:
i
(.0
N
>
co
N
i
3
Q
0
(D
i
4. TRASH SERVICE FOR THE SITE WILL BE CONTRACTED THROUGH A
PRIVATE COLLECTION COMPANY. COORDINATION FOR SERVICE IS
O
THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE APPLICANT.
U)
r
o
^—
>
O
6. LOCATIONS OF SITE LIGHTING ARE APPROXIMATE. THE FINAL
NUMBER AND LOCATIONS OF LIGHTS SHALL BE DETERMINED BY THE
0
C�0
W
::)
00 rn
r
o
m
NOTES:
1. BOUNDARY AND TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION PROVIDED BY:
CAROLINA SURVEYORS, INC.
P.O. BOX 267
PINEVILLE, NC 28134
■
[phone]
2. SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR BUILDING FOOTPRINT DIMENSIONS
PREPARED BY:
OSTERLUND ARCHITECTS, PLLC
5W HARGETT STREET 502
RALEIGH, NC 27601
[phone]
3. CONTACT THE UTILITY COMPANY TO RELOCATE ANY EXISTING UTILITY
POLES. ALL EXISTING FACILITIES WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE
IMPROVEMENTS UNDER THE SCOPE OF THIS PROJECT MUST BE
RELOCATED AT THE EXPENSE OF THE APPLICANT.
4. TRASH SERVICE FOR THE SITE WILL BE CONTRACTED THROUGH A
PRIVATE COLLECTION COMPANY. COORDINATION FOR SERVICE IS
O
THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE APPLICANT.
5. DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO THE FACE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE
NOTED. CURB RADII SHALL MEASURE 5' AT FACE OF CURB UNLESS
OTHERWISE NOTED.
6. LOCATIONS OF SITE LIGHTING ARE APPROXIMATE. THE FINAL
NUMBER AND LOCATIONS OF LIGHTS SHALL BE DETERMINED BY THE
OWNER AND DUKE ENERGY.
7. ALL UTILITIES WILL BE UNDERGROUND.
■
8. REFERENCE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR LAYOUT, MATERIALS,
HANDRAILS, TOP AND BOTTOM OF RAMP/ STAIRS DIRECTLY
ASSOCIATED WITH THE BUILDING. a)
PROJECT SCHEDULE:
PROJECT COMMENCEMENT: SEPTEMBER 2019
PROJECT COMPLETION: DECEMBER 2020
GRAPHIC SCALE
30 0 15 30 60
1 INCH = 30 FEET
&i
z
0
CO
w
m
m
w
a
0
0
z
ti
N
O
00
N
z
i
O
C
O
.i,
u
Project No: 18-155
Date: 04.12.2019
Designed by: UDP
Drawn By: UDP
Sheet No:
C-300