Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
310235_Compliance Inspection_20181016
(tl'Division of Water Resources Facility Number ©- '� f O Division of Soil and Water Conservation ' O Other Agency Vi Type of Visit: C�om/pHance Inspection Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance Reason for Visit: ({3Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access Date of Visit: p-l6•( Arrival Time: (oG Departure Time: Coo County: Region: Farm Name: Owner Email: Owner Name: Phone: Mailing Address: Physical Address: Facility Contact: Title: Onsite Representative: 26ftog L, 4rn1b Integrator: Certified Operator: Back-up Operator: Location of Farm: Swine to I to I ,to to Other Other Latitude: Phone: Certification Number: Certification Number: Design Current Design Current Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. IN Non-- La er Design Current Dry Poultry Canacitv Poo. Layers Non -Layers Pullets Turkeys Turkey Poults Other Discharges and Stream Impacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other. a. Was the conveyance man-made? b. Did the discharge mach waters of the State? (If yes, notify D WR) c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? Longitude: Design Current Cattle Capacity Pop. Dairy Cow Dairy Calf Dairy Heifer Dry Cow Non -Dairy Beef Stocker Beef Feeder Beef Brood Cow ❑ Yes I No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE [—]Yes [:]No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes M/ No [E� ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE Page I of 3 2/4/2015 Condnaed Facie Number: 21 - 2 Date of Inspection: 0 'i Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes Z No ❑ NA ❑ NE a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier: Spillway?: Designed Freeboard (in): Observed Freeboard (in): 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes Z1 No ❑ NA ❑ NE (i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 77 6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes jl� No ❑ NA ❑ NE waste management or closure plan? JP If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [l'No ❑ NA ❑ NE (not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes [�[ No ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? Waste Application 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No No ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? 11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.) ❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil ❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area 12. Crop Type(s): 13. Soil Type(s): 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes [�j No ❑ NA ❑ NE 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes [,q No ❑ NA ❑ NE 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE acres determination? r 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes [P No ❑ NA ❑ NE 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes [Q No ❑ NA ❑ NE Required Records & Documents 19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE the appropriate box. ❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other: 21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes P No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code ❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes W No ❑ NA ❑ NE 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA [�j NE Page 2 of 21412015 Continued Facility Number: 3 j� Date of Inspection: 10 (6 ' 24. Did t}i$ facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [)j No ❑ NA ❑ NE 25' Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes [�j No ❑ NA ❑ NE the appropriate box(es) below. ❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes [;U No ❑ NA ❑ NE 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No [* NA ❑ NE Other Issues 28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? 29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes [] No ❑ NA ❑ NE If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes [;g No ❑ NA ❑ NE permit? (i e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application) 31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ;U NE ❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other. 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes [)2 No ❑ NA ❑ NE 33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes V§ No ❑ NA ❑ NE Reviewer/Inspector Name: / ' I (66" % %���Ty Phone: Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: /0-/6, l Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015