20190274 Ver 1_More Info Received_20190411

Strickland, Bev
From: Adam Carter <[e-mail]>
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2019 9:32 AM
To: [e-mail]; Homewood, Sue; Josh Johnson; Jesse Wilson; Jason
DeBoer
Subject: [External] Eastbrooke Apartments NW Requested information
Attachments: Eastbrooke Apartment Complex DMS Acceptance revised conditional.pdf; 4_10_2019
_Morningside Dr -PCN form.pdf, Burlington Impact Update_20190406.pdf;
EASTBROOK-SITE-WETLAND-W2(1 R)-TO-A-CARTER.pdf, Eastbrooke Apt Seep NC
WAM Rating Calculator v5.0 .xIsm
gumxterna I email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to
m nc. ov
David _Sue _Josh
It is looking pretty awesome outside today. I hope you all are well? Please find the updated site plan and additional
information requested below for the Eastbrooke Apt project. Let me know if anyone needs any additional
information? Thank you all for your time.
Regards,
Adam Carter
Owner
Wetland Solutions, LLC
P.O. Box 244
Bunnlevel, NC 28323
[phone]
Adam&WetlandNC.com
www.WetlandNC.com
www.linkedin.com/in/adam-carter-wetland

a`'oF wArE�Q�
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
❑X Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1 b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: NW29 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑X Yes ❑ No
1 d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑X 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
NX Yes ❑ No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑X Yes ❑ No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
❑X Yes ❑ No
1 g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes ❑X No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Eastbrook Apartments
2b.
County:
Alamance
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Burlington
2d.
Subdivision name:
Eastbrook Apt
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
EASTBROOK APARTMENTS LLC
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
3431/0431
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
DEBOER & GABRIEL PROPERTIES INC
3d.
Street address:
2304 Churchill Drive
3e.
City, state, zip:
Burlington, NC 27215
3f.
Telephone no.:
[phone]
3g.
Fax no.:
3h.
Email address:
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a.
Applicant is:
❑X Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b.
Name:
4c.
Business name
(if applicable):
4d.
Street address:
4e.
City, state, zip:
4f.
Telephone no.:
4g.
Fax no.:
4h.
Email address:
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name:
Adam Carter
5b.
Business name
(if applicable):
Wetland Soutions, LLC
5c.
Street address:
816 Merry Street
5d.
City, state, zip:
Dunn, NC 28334
5e.
Telephone no.:
(910)890-27789
5f.
Fax no.:
5g.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 10

B.
Project Information and Prior Project History
1.
Property Identification
1a.
Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
8885160959
1 b.
Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 36.103744 Longitude: -79.401783
1 c.
Property size:
6.36 acres
2.
Surface Waters
2a.
Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
Service Creek to Haw River to Jordan Lake
2b.
Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
WS-V;NSW
2c.
River basin:
Upper Cape Fear
3.
Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The existing conditions on site consist of open field and mature native forest within an active and growing residential development. Residential
development surrounds 360 degrees of the project area.
3b.
List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.55
3c.
List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 438
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the proposed project is to construct an apartment building to assist with shortage of apartments in the Burlington area.
3e.
The
Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
project will consist with constructing a sediment basin outside of the wetlands and grading the project site in preparation of the construction.
4.
Jurisdictional Determinations
4a.
Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (includingall prior phases in the past?
❑X Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Comments: 1/2o1s
4b.
If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
❑ Preliminary ❑X Final
4c.
If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Adam carter
Agency/Consultant Company: Wetland Solutions, LLC
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
JD will be issued with NW permit request.
5.
Project History
5a.
Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑ Yes ❑X No ❑ Unknown
5b.
If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6.
Future Project Plans
6a.
Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ❑X No
6b.
If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands ❑ Streams — tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
2b.
Type of impact
2c.
Type of wetland
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other)
2f.
Area of
impact
(acres)
W1 P
Fill
Headwater Wetland
Yes
Corps
0.24
W2 P
Fill
Seep
No
Corps
0.07
W3 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W4 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W5 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W6 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
0.31
2h. Comments:
All residual wetlands will be monitored throughout the process of construction and 2 yrs after construction activity for no additional loss of wetlands.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
Stream impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
3b.
Type of impact
3c.
Stream name
3d.
Perennial (PER) or
intermittent (INT)?
3e.
Type of
jurisdiction
3f.
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g.
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
S1 -
Choose one
S2 -
Choose one
S3 -
Choose one
-
S4 -
Choose one
-
S5 -
Choose one
-
S6 -
Choose one
-
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
3i. Comments:
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then indivi ually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01
Choose one
Choose
O2 -
Choose one
Choose
03 -
Choose one
Choose
04
Choose one
Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other:Jordan Lake
6b.
Buffer Impact
number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet)
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet
B1 T
Apt Building and Stormwatr
UT to Service Creek
No
3,351.31
B2 -
Yes/No
B3 -
Yes/No
B4 -
Yes/No
B5 -
Yes/No
B6 -
Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
3,351.31
6i. Comments:
Page 5 of 10

D.
Impact Justification and Mitigation
1.
Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
We have altered the layout of the apt building to not impact eh stream. We have minimized the impacts to the wetlands to just zone 2 of the stream
buffer. Measures have been taken to move the temporary retention pond out of the wetlands to further lesson the wetland impact.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
We will utilize silt fence, Wattles, clean gravel/rip-rap, to helps slow down surface water so that no sediment or silt will be transproted off site during the
time of construction. We will maintain BMPs through out the construction cycle and beyond through maintaining a inspection regiment after each rain
fall event.
2.
Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a.
Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑X Yes ❑ No
2b.
If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
X❑ DWQ ❑X Corps
2c.
If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
❑X Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3.
Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a.
Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b.
Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
3c.
Comments:
4.
Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a.
Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑X Yes
4b.
Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c.
If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
Choose one
4d.
Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
3,351.31 square feet
4e.
Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
0.48 acres
4f.
Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
0.07 acres
4g.
Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h.
Comments:
5.
Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
We are using the in -lieu fee program to mitigate for wetland impacts for the lack of there being a private mitigation bank in the HUC of the impact.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
❑X Yes ❑ No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c.
6d.
6e.
Zone
Reason for impact
Total impact
Multiplier
Required mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
Stormwater/APT Construction
3,351.31
1.5
3,351.31
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments: Waiting on Burlington to decide on mitigation decision
Page 7 of 10

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑X Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
All
surface water will be directed into a retention pond and then slow released back into the down hill
into the
❑X Yes ❑ No
slope
and wetlands
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
11.49%
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑X Yes ❑X No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
More than and acre of disturbance
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative
description of the plan:
All storm -water BMPs will be utiliezed in order to manage low engery flow across
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
City of Burlington
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which localgovernment's jurisdiction is thisproject?
City of Burllington
❑ Phase II
❑ NSW
3b.
Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑X Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑X No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑Coastal counties
❑X HQW
4a.
Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ORW
(check all that apply):
❑Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑X No
attached?
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑X Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑X No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes X❑ No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ❑X No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes ❑X No
letter.)
Comments:
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
E] Yes ❑X No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b.
Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
El Yes ❑X No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑Yes ❑X No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a.
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
All
waste water will be discharged into city of Brlington sewer treatment system.
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ❑X No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ❑X No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
-
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ❑X No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
https://www.habitat.noaa.gov/protection/efh/efhmapper/
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ❑X No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
http://gis.ncdcr.gov/hpoweb/
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes ❑X No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
https://hazards-fema.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/
Samuel Adam Carter
` 604.—
4/10/2019
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Applicant/Agent's Signature
Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant is provided.
Page 10 of 10

•
,P
------------
EM
nr
AY 4
v ■+■!■■ 1. f. PAP
17 4 c a
��� wll IfI�IIF ,.;I y'4 2ao
Ar
IN
MAIN,,
� Y 1
h Y
I 9 SM.
II li If
• � 111 I ill,�d' g.gw��! •
•
Burlington_Parcel -- 3.6 acres
Delineation Flags
WOUS -- 438' length x 10' wide
O
Al -A28
WOUS Area — 2,555 sq. ft.
O
131-1310
Wetlands -- 0.45 acre
O
J1 -J7 (Uplands)
O
S1 -S16
O
W1 -W19
O
Reference Flags
0 50 100 150 200 250 Feet
I I I I I
Project Name: Eastbrooke Apartments, LLC N Figure. 2
Location: Burlington, Alamance County, NC w E
` SO'UTIONS LLO PIN: 161870 1 inch = 63.94 feet
GPIN: 8885161870 s
P.O. Box 244 13 Feb 2019
Bunnlevel, NC 28323

ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Se—etary
TIM BAUMGARTNER
DUlecmr
Jason DeBoer
DeBoer and Gabriel Builders
2304 Church Drive
Burlington, NC 27215
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental QoaW
April 8, 2019
Expiration of Acceptance: 10/8/2019
Project: Eastbrooke Apartment Complex County: Alamance
This letter revises and replaces one issued February 20, 2019.
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) is willing to
accept payment for compensatory mitigation for impacts associated with the above referenced project as
indicated in the table below. Please note that this decision does not assure that participation in the DMS in -
lieu fee mitigation program will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts.
It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact permitting agencies to determine if payment to the DMS will
be approved. You must also comply with all other state, federal or local government permits, regulations or
authorizations associated with the proposed activity including G.S. § 143-214.11.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. If we have not
received a copy of the issued 404 Permit/401 Certification within this time frame, this acceptance will
expire. It is the applicant's responsibility to send copies of the permits to DMS. Once DMS receives a copy
of the permit(s) an invoice will be issued based on the required mitigation in that permit and payment must
be made prior to conducting the authorized work. The amount of the in -lieu fee to be paid by an applicant is
calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and policies listed on the DMS website.
Based on the information supplied by you in your request to use the DMS, the impacts for which you are
requesting compensatory mitigation credit are summarized in the following table. The amount of mitigation
required and assigned to DMS for this impact is determined by permitting agencies and may exceed the
impact amounts shown below.
River Basin Impact Location Impact Type Impact Quantity
(8 -digit NUC)
Cape Fear 03030002
Cape Fear
03030002
Riparian Wetland
Zone 2
Cape Fear 03030002 I Non -Riparian Wetland*
0.48
3,358
0.07
*DMS does not have non -riparian wetland credit available in this service area. In accordance with the
directive from the February 8, 2011 IRT meeting, non -riparian wetland impacts located in the mountains and
piedmont areas of North Carolina can be accepted as requested, but mitigated utilizing riparian wetland
mitigation credits. Upon receipt of payment, DMS will take responsibility for providing the compensatory
mitigation. The mitigation will be performed in accordance with the In -Lieu Fee Program instrument dated
July 28, 2010 and 15A NCAC 02B .0295 as applicable. Thank you for your interest in the DMS in -lieu fee
mitigation program. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Kelly Williams
at [phone].
cc: Adam Carter, agent"'
Sincerely,
Ja es. Stanfill
Ass management Supervisor
DEQQ
North Carolina Department of Envimnnrntal (�itality I Division of Mitlgadon Services
217 W.Jones Strzet 11652 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1652
919.707.8976

SITE AREA
DESCRIPTION
STABILIZATION
TIME
FRAME
STABILIZATION TIME
FRAME EXCEPTIONS
• Perimeter dikes,
��'� 77
•
swales, ditches
1�
\ \
E
C TEMPORARY DIVERSION DITCH
TOP SLOPE DIVERSION (TYP.)
SKIMMER BASIN/F
3
3
TORY BRICK I
SQ. FT. FOOTPRINT I �
�,
�
6 6 & SEDIMENT FENCE TO
SB -2. ESTABLISH GROUND
M SLOPE DRAIN
MAINTAIN AS FILL SLOPE RISES
BAFFLES (TYP) 6
RI MH
RIM 545.27
ITS I �
� �,
�_\\
d An
COVER WITHIN 7 DAYS
TO FINISHED GRADE
SEDIMENT BASIN 2
INV. OUT - 535.37
I - - - -�
-
_
� � - _
\/�"/\�\'
V /Nn
GS/DE
7 -Days For Slopes Greater
BOTTOM EELL 5434
-
• All Other Areas
_�/�IVE--
TEMP. SLOPE H
RAIN TO SB -1 6
14 Days
And HQW Zones)
Flatter Than 4:1
* "Extensions of time may be approved by the permitting authority
based on weather or other site-specific conditions that make
compliance impracticable." (Section II.B(2)(b)) EC Manual
W
<
C
0
0
I DISTURBED
N
-
FIOOTPRINT
I I
_
M TS
CL
I 54 0 SQ. FT.
v�
2.10 ACRLI
ES
o
Z
w
LL
a
=
C
K K
o
Z
M
o
aLL
g
LL
U
Z
Y
a
o
o
a2
W
a
o
f
c0i
O
Z
a
w
GO
I I
I I
0
a
o
z
J
W
w
0
GO
W
I D CLOTH & GRAVEL
I
a
--- -
! 30
-- _FENCE H
•- 6 INLET PROTECTION
I I
a
-
I �
ET \
I -
SITE AREA
DESCRIPTION
STABILIZATION
TIME
FRAME
STABILIZATION TIME
FRAME EXCEPTIONS
• Perimeter dikes,
��'� 77
•
swales, ditches
7 Days
None
and slopes
C -2° N
3
• High Quality
3
3
Water (HQW)
7 Days
None
Zones
If Slopes Are 10' Or Less In
• Slopes Steeper
7 Days
Length And Are Not Steeper
Than 3:1
Than 2:1, 14 Days Are Allowed
• Slopes 3:1 or
Flatter
14 Days
7 -Days For Slopes Greater
Than 50 -Feet In Length
• All Other Areas
None (Except For Perimeters
With Slopes
14 Days
And HQW Zones)
Flatter Than 4:1
* "Extensions of time may be approved by the permitting authority
based on weather or other site-specific conditions that make
compliance impracticable." (Section II.B(2)(b)) EC Manual
I STONE OUTLET 6
(TYPICAL ALL STORM TOP SLOPE DIVERSION (TYP) - I� - / / S (n ; GROUND STABILIZATION A
DRAINS) I TO SLOPE DRAIN I+ - _ / / I SEDIMENT FENCE E
I AINTAIN AS FILL SLOPE RISS - I I TI / SMALL AREA 6 REQUIREMENTS
- TO FINISHED GRADE WETLAND MITIGATION -^ /
AREA -3,045.98
07 AC. __/ I I IS LESS THAN 0.10 ACRES
I 1 - -_ - - --"-• - - % - x•.\. (.0) i
771,
R, M MH - - - '-•._.. l - - �'• �(� -545L_ -1 �� - LLc). I __ GENERAL GRADING & EROSION CONTROL NOTES
I I I I INV OVT 552.123' I --- �� - T `l► i I z. i I
I I I I TI
544/73' l I I I - - -L - •.� i \\ - I \ 1 ► ;, = ►� / Q�
1 I l I # 1 I �- ) `' \ ► ► ► ► m / m m - - -I- 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE ALL REASONABLE PRECAUTIONS TO AVOID THE SILTING OF
36 PARKING SP I I l I I I 1 I I l 5 �•' �'� ► N ' 0 D STREAMS, LAKES OR OTHER WATER COURSES DUE TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT.
ACES / ► i I z �W I ` i ` I 2. EFFECTIVE EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE INITIATED PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF
\\ 1 / I/ I I I I I I �\ _ -L\� 1 Y' \ - �\ \• i I i i /1z oo n. i _�I 1 I CLEARING, GRADING, EXCAVATION, OR OTHER OPERATIONS THAT WILL DISTURB THE NATURAL
L =-, ► I , /� n U) OI I` +I i I i PROTECTION.
_ - ► i I I I 3. THE EROSION CONTROL DETAILS SHOWN HEREIN ARE FOR THE CONTRACTOR'S REFERENCE. THE
39 PARKING - // a �_ •' \ \ 1,L 3.
�� - y y �� ` M z+ y y p ` i j DETERMINATION OF WHICH DETAIL IS APPLICABLE AS THE WORK PROGRESSES SHALL BE AS SHOWN
I 1 I J 2i ./ 4 1 0
SPACES / /� - _ ,-' - \ ���� I - - �.�GA1'Ep) - - - - - I 04N ALL EDTCHES HALLDBEBSTABILIZED ENGINEER.
SESOON AS IS PRACTICABLE TO MINIMIZE EROSION.
1 I co 1 I, - - _ _ - �� - \ `I - - + - - - / -► I cn I EXCELSIOR MATTING SHALL BE PLACED IN DITCHES AND OTHER AREAS THAT EXHIBIT MULCH
'' DISPLACEMENT FROM VELOCITY SCOUR.
I I I l l WETLAND MITIGATION AREA i Q - - - _ -� - ° S2� $� I \ - . �- 5. THE ANGLE FOR GRADED SLOPES AND FILLS SHALL BE NO GREATER THAN THE ANGLE THAT CAN
I I I I Ill 9903.53 SF 0.23 AC. o f `'�'� \ , - -_ - _ W I 20 00/I m BE RETAINED BY VEGETATIVE COVER OR OTHER ADEQUATE EROSION -CONTROL DEVICES OR
i / _ \ �( - _ F� .I�_ _ I _ I C/) I D STRUCTURES. IN ANY EVENT, SLOPES LEFT EXPOSED WILL WITHIN 14 CALENDAR DAYS OF
o Q \ \ _ 1 - / I COMPLETION OF ANY PHASE OF GRADING BE PLANTED OR OTHERWISE PROVIDED WITH TEMPORARY
/ ' _ \\\ rn ` �� I D CD OR PERMANENT GROUND COVER, DEVICES, OR STRUCTURES SUFFICIENT TO RESTRAIN EROSION.
- I S - x• I i
tORM H I I I _ / + I z 6. PROVISIONS FOR PERMANENT GROUND COVER SUFFICIENT TO RESTRAIN EROSION MUST BE
- I (SIM 5� I _ ACCOMPLISHED FOR ALL DISTURBED AREAS WITHIN 14 WORKING DAYS OR 90 CALENDAR DAYS
IN1j/"'
552 I I ' I I � ( ' � S � ��-\ �� � - \ % \� _ IL I - j D I I (WHICHEVER IS SHORTER) FOLLOWING COMPLETIONS OF CONSTRUCTION OR DEVELOPMENT.
OU1j: 54 / z 7. GROUNDCOVER MUST BE PROVIDED WITHIN 14 DAYS OF COMPLETION OF ANY PHASE OF GRADING.
\ + WL --� 47= I b m� ? I 1 8. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN ALL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES IN A GOOD, WORKING STATE
\ I I A EMI. CONS RUCTI N I a, 363 ss� S� I I I I SSMH I OF REPAIR UNTIL THEIR USE IS NO LONGER WARRANTED. AT THAT TIME, AND WITH THE APPROVAL
12" HDPE --1 _ I 6 NTRA CE 1 ' I I `' a / I \\ \ \ I I I •�,I RIM 544.44 1 OF THE ENGINEER / EROSION CONTROL ADMINISTRATOR, THE EROSION CONTROL DEVICES SHALL BE
INV.555.0 / / NI 6 XISTIN o� \ 45 I ` 306\ I I I INV. OUT 537.441 REMOVED AND DISPOSED OF SO AS TO CAUSE NO STREAM SILTATION.
�y I r-�'--,• - : 1 I RANSMI W r�4. \ 5 I\ i 9. WHERE CULVERT PIPES ARE TO BE INSTALLED UNDER ROADWAY, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL
I I I `� • ' - -I I ' / I SSIO \ I \ / THE CULVERTS AS RAPIDLY AS IS PRACTICAL, BACK FILL IMMEDIATELY AND RIP RAP THE UPSTREAM
C TEMP. DIVERSION I W 554 \ I I / I \ I AND DOWNSTREAM SIDES OF THE STREAM CHANNEL. PERMANENT OUTLET PROTECTION SHALL BE
• 9 ( \ I I I AT ANY CULVERT THAT IF IS
I I I - - - _ '�-'�_,_�'. I \ 5 5 �n c,4. / 6 ` \ / J I \ I \ I POROAIDL DISTURBED ROAD DITCHESTO ER % WILL BEORLINEDRWITHTHGH VELOCITYREXCELSIORURBED.
I 1 I I 6 DITCH TO SB 3 � _ _ •�, \ LL
I I , ESTABLISH GROUND COVER " "� " " " " " " " I s I ) ) I ) \ \ \ \ �• ---� _ MATTING AND PERMANENT SEEDING UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
I w 1� l \ s \ 0-----___ 11. SEE EROSION CONTROL DETAIL SHEET FOR TEMPORARY SEDIMENT TRAP SIZING AND CULVERT
I X IMMEDIATELY z . . . . . . . . - / °� I s - / / ,�� I I \ yy3• \ \ \ \ - OUTLET STABILIZATION.
I I x I m „m - - - - - S SA _ _ ss �J / h. _ I I \ \ \ lf� I I. 12. ALL TEMPORARY DIVERSION DITCHES SHALL HAVE GROUND COVER ESTABLISHED WITHIN SEVEN
I F SKIMMER BASIN W I I o Y 650' - � °° I \ - ���' 15" - I I \ \ - I` \ I (7) DAYS OF BEING CONSTRUCTED PER NCG01SECTION IIB (2).
I I I < - - - - \ - - / I I I-II y6�' - RCp \ I \ I I 13. ALL CLEAN WATER DIVERSIONS SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY LINED WITH EXCELSIOR MATTING AND
I 6 BAFFLES (TYPICAL) I Q \ I III " / \ I1=1 \ - - �- ' / - _ I �`� \
I SEDIMENT BASIN 3: '� - -� - - =� " - / I ►� � I - -ISI- \ I- _� / -�� � h��l \ - 11= I � \ �� I I IMMEDIATELY SEEDED TO ESTABLISH GROUNDCOVER.
14. ALL SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL DEVICES SHALL BE INSPECTED AT LEAST ONCE EVERY
b co LiI I SURFACE EL. 551 I - - - - - \ I I / g ° 0 / \ II �r /�� I \ I SEVEN 7 CALENDAR DAYS AND AFTER ANY STORM EVENT GREATER THAN 0.5 INCHES OF
1 I BOTTOM EL. 550 \� . . - Z ~- )/ i i I i I yo X5G'�0 0y� I 3 I - / ,-I ��II \\ \ \ o \ \ �� \ ( )
� I PRECIPITATION DURING ANY 24-HOUR PERIOD, AND THE INSPECTION SHALL BE DOCUMENTED IN
I (SEE SEDIMENT B, IN / - - - Q - - - j I X553 0 =III x ss / 7 5 h \ \\ I• WRITING. DAMAGED OR INEFFECTIVE DEVICES SHALL BE REPAIRED OR REPLACED, AS NECESSARY.
NOTES THIS SH-ET). \ F- F- j I I I I I 4 ° \ / '� I I 15. A SELF -INSPECTION MUST BE MADE OF THE PROJECT AFTER EACH PHASE OF THE PROJECT,
I I )
Lu ► i I I �__ I 5 `'0 5�'`' S5 / / \ AND THE INSPECTION SHALL BE DOCUMENTED IN WRITING. THIS SELF -INSPECTION WILL BE
xX I _ _� �_ \ _ 1 I'- ► I I _i_ - f \ 65' / / 5 4.33 q \� I I. PERFORMED IN ADDITION TO THE NPDES SELF-MONITORING REPORT REQUIRED BY THE GENERAL
`r I I / �� - /- \- - - �- I I I 1 1'-'r L L- 1 + 59 6f 54.3340
\ \ \ �� I PERMIT DESCRIBED ABOVE.
# V . . . \ _ \. 1 1 1 I'm----- -, I , / 54 • 17. \ � \
I ' / - - \ s - 11 1 I I °9- 1 I 1 ► h / \ 55 5 ? \ \ I �I 16. ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES WILL BE INSTALLED AS FIELD CONDITIONS DICTATE OR
Al
if 1 I ► \ / 554.67 / `'�O \ M� \ I AS DIRECTED BY THE EROSION CONTROL INSPECTOR.
j E DOUBLE ROW SEDIM HJT /` - - - - - _ - - _ _ _ I i i 1 1 i 1 I 1 ► / 'O \ \`
, \ I 1 If I If ► \ \ I 17. ANY BORROW MATERIAL MUST COME FROM A PERMITTED SITE OR WASTE MATERIAL MUST GO TO
} 6 FENCE ALONG 30 . . . . - _ \_ F- _ _ ? _ 11-► x I I / \ \ \ 5 �2� A PERMITTED SITE. IF NOT IT WILL BE AN EXTENSION OF THIS SITE AND SUBJECT TO PERMITTED
STREAM BANK BUFFER r� - - .\/ - - _ _ _ \\ z ' ; ; ; ��5 ° / H TEMP. SLOPE ` \ \ \ SITE REQUIREMENTS.
LLJ I w m ►'J !1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 IX► / 6 DRAIN TO SB -1 _ \ \ W \ FROM THE CITY ORDINANCE: "IF THE SAME PERSON CONDUCTS THE
i I I I I . . . . . _ _ _ _ _ a _ � 2 _ 1 1 1 1 I ► i 6 \ \ LAND -DISTURBING ACTIVITY AND ANY RELATED BORROW OR WASTE ACTIVITY, THE RELATED BORROW
I Y_ - O \ / 1 x SIJ ► \ \ \ OR WASTE ACTIVITY SHALL CONSTITUTE PART OF THE LAND -DISTURBING ACTIVITY UNLESS THE
u� 1 I 1 1 1 ► \ i� tk 1\ \ \ BORROW OR WASTE ACTIVITY IS REGULATED BY THE DIVISION OF WASTE MANAGEMENT. IF THE
-Q - - - - - ,✓ - O O -L'' - -, q z l- / 1 1 i f 1 1 i / I j ► \\, �`J \ \. LAND -DISTURBING ACTIVITY AND ANY RELATED BORROW OR WASTE ACTIVITY ARE NOT CONDUCTED BY
I II II I I� z _ .550 _ Q� \ ; I I r THE SAME PERSON, THEY SHALL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATE LAND -DISTURBING ACTIVITIES AND MUST
- W W Q �'-�/ I �� o I �/ I ► ,�\�` y BE PERMITTED EITHER THRU THE SEDIMENTATION POLLUTION CONTROL ACT AS A ONE -USE BORROW
Q W J >- I 1 ► ► 46 \ \ SITE OR THROUGH THE MINING ACT."
IOW Ix _ . . . . m -m 625 �.►_ r�►�/ �! 1 1 �n 1 I ► - o
/ J' j W " "! ,� `�' i II i i;
i I N(rj -►� I I I IO m I 1 I ry W / I , i, \
0 i - - - - - cv I / - z I ► �,� \ \ \�\ \ l� \ EXCELSIOR MATTING B
-�roo oW moo, of I "' `�' I1�1 i '' ���
/ / / ►- ` °'-' �- rb r=- 1 1 I 1 1 1 ► I= a I , i \ \ `� `� \ \ \ ON FILL SLOPES 6
_ _ _ _w .�.�.� .-. ._-.-.-. ,�, III 011
x VIII i III 1=1 5��° I v, "' / l �,#; )>>��✓ (TYPICAL)
j - I I I I I I I I I 1=-- - I I Z - o I C,Lj_'�,� )� „I o
DO . . . 4U .-.- -._--- I I1 1 iii 11' Y = - OO I a '/ / ' i 'f/' '+i ►' �,� l l
1 LL I I f� x III I III g -I I o o / ' ; ��� / / TEMPORARY DIVERSION DITCH C
U- J� Ji4 1 1 I I -ty 1 I Q - _ i i i
#- 1
if 1 1 1 1 a /\ -1 III I- �'�► /
- - - - - _ m I III fit I 0 \ - LLI LrJ (lj d z # / i if i i i : l f l ( )
- - - - - - / I I I 1 1 1 I -� i c� I I m m "? 111111 III / \i� /,,, i l / TO SB -1. ESTABLISH GROUND
/ & SEDIMENT FENCE AS SHOWN 6
M - z 1 1 1 I I I IXy i'"� I (r' - III- / tVL
- - / \ /
_ _ _ _ .Q I �- x 1 1 >t r; ► N' r\ o z - °o ;�,rc ► COVER WITHIN 7 DAYS
`° - - - /' i II ii Ili► I N I �� �u� -II X5°/I'�44
III I I I I°► - �o o'er I I I L �� �rL---------1-
j 552 / If
III °'"'",� '►I k �; -L- / - --
/ - >' . I i Co ; iLP
C TEMP. DIVERSION\. -� / 1 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _- - _ - _ _ - 554 \ I o I 4 '► ► _J� \ \
6
DITCH/ TO SB -3) %_ � _ _ _ � -- �� _ ---_---------- \ \ � \ I I I
ESTABLISH/GROUND CQVER 5 I - - - -- _ _ - _ - - - -
IMMEDIATELY /` _ _ : '_ _ l ` '/ / 1'i �� - _ - _ - \\ �S I -"-•--- - SEDIMENT BASIN NOTES
-' 556 I / 1/ ► 5 l \ SRS \ �I I \ - 1. SEDIMENT BASIN 1: TO REMAIN IN PLACE AND CONVERTED TO A
I I / / - - _ _ _ - - - _ - - - \ \ \ \\ \\ I m I 0I I moo, I \. \OA PREFORMED SCOUR HOLE ONLY AFTER ALL DISTURBED DRAINAGE
\ I w ` \ s \ \ AREAS ARE STABILIZED. RESULTING DISCHARGE BERM SHALL BE
_ s cn \ \�'A \ \ LEVEL AND THE ENTIRE SCOUR HOLE SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AS
560- \ \ \
/ ' " -� - - " / I '� / 1 ► ' / _ _ - _ _ - _ ` - SHOWN IN THE PREFORMED SCOUR HOLE DETAIL (E ON SHEET 4).
O
- _\ \ I INI \
III �I ► / / / / , - 55.4 - _ \ \ \ \ ' \ \�G ` \ S 2. TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN 3: TO BE CONSTRUCTED DURING
i -I -I- /� f / / / / / / / ° CLEARING AND GRUBBING OPERATIONS. SEDIMENT BASIN 3 TO
I L --- = f / / 5y \ \ \ F \ F
�/- /! - L / // , // 5 \ \ \ \ \ l I .\ \� \9� REMAIN IN PLACE UNTIL ALL CONTIBUTING DISTURBED DRAINAGE
/ - - _ �, ` 55 \ \ \ I cv\ �2 AREAS ARE STABILIZED. SEE BUILDING PAD / SB -3 CONSTRUCTION
L'' '' ' '' - L
SETBACK SEQUENCE ON SHEET 3. CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE THE ENTIRE
/ _ - -� \ \ \\ X55° I I - - \>G \ TEMPORARY BASIN IS LOCATED WITHIN THE BUILDINGS STRUCTURAL
•\ FILL ZONE.
DISTURBED LIMITS
2.10 ACRES DISTURBED LIMITS \ SEDIMENT BASIN F PREFORMED SCOUR E
, / � � - � � � �� \
WETLAND MITIGATION AREA
20 0 20 40 60
ON ON ON
NN NN
Scale 1 " = 20' Each Block Measures 20'
/
3
TEMPORARY CLEAN WATER C /
DIVERSION DITCH 5
ESTABLISH GROUND COVER 3
WITHIN 7 DAYS
EXCELSIOR MATTING LINED DITCH B EXCELSIOR B
AS SHOWN 6 MATTING ON 6
OFFSITE DRAINAGE AREA TO 2:1 CUT SLOPE
DIVERSION = 1.12 AC.
ASA"M-0
,Q►I��1`�1`���� ���♦ �. I ! �/ • ACRES
.w�.�I����Iw•A�A� 1.��►A �.h1,�.♦����,���� . �Q► �_�Z��►� v I�.� s�
�i�Is���I - . �i��`�i1F .1�►���i���.����!��� ��IA �`� �Z�iaiyw�!���w��� � ` .•
•��vi•i�i!I',jA��C�ASi'�1j��1�i�I"��Aw!.4
Aj����j1���
��ft
%�1�Lv`fa+�`��%�.
�0�
�� •
�jffi
L4qQ TOP SLOPE DIVERSION
�'
1 Oi ••
• •
RISES-
TONGRADE
A3
TEMPORARY- �C
DIVERSION DITCH©TEMPORARY DIVERSION DITCH /CN/E
GROUND
GROUNDESTABLISH • - COVER WITHIN 7 DAYS
WITHIN 7 DAYS
EXCELSIOR 0 EXCELSIOR 0
SHOWNAS v v
OFFSITE .-..... TO
DIVERSIONAC.
WITH BAFFLES 5
SEDIMENT BASIN 1
SURFACE EL. 544
BOTTOM EL. 541
(SEE SEDIMENT BASIN
NOTES THIS SHEET).
HOLE DETAIL5
(SEE SEDIMENT BAST
NOTES THIS SHEET).
I
61
��'� 77
•
_j
y
0�
�_ �' 4V N
0 ........
C -2° N
W
LiJ �
LO
0 Cfl
Z U O�
Oz co
W
U) O
= LL_I
LL- (O
O
U)
0
0
a
d
3
3
3
3
3
3
Q
0°
W
<
C
0
0
0
N
M
CL
m
O
-
d
_
�
U
Wo
C)
o
Z
w
LL
a
=
C
K K
o
Z
M
o
aLL
g
LL
U
Z
Y
a
o
o
a2
W
a
o
f
c0i
O
Z
a
w
GO
Z
W
Z
W
V
W
W
=
a
B
w
12U
z LL
�
w
CL
O
4,
F-
o
0
a
o
z
J
W
w
0
GO
W
W
a
a
a
d
N
",
'I-
u7
1-0
Ld
0 COca
U)~ 0
M Z WHZ
Z j hoz
0aa cc 0
J M ac��
m J w azz
moa aoIxIx
Z Omm
ad O � W 0
V 0 my�
Z Hai
�00
LLI
a a�
Wa
0
PROJECT NUMBER
DESIGNED BY
JWW
DRAWN BY
JWW
CHECKED BY
JWW
SCALE
AS NOTED
DATE
10-01-18
2 OF 6
1

NC WAM WETLAND ASSESSMENT FORM
Accompanies User Manual Version 5
USACE AID#: NCDWR #:
Project Name Eastbrook Apt Date of Evaluation 1/18/2019
Applicant/Owner Name Jason DeBour Wetland Site Name Eastbrook Apt
Wetland Type Headwater Forest Assessor Name/Organization Adam Carter
Level III Ecoregion Piedmont Nearest Named Water Body Service Creek
River Basin Cape Fear USGS 8 -Digit Catalogue Unit 03030002
County Alamance NCDWR Region Raleigh
Yes No Precipitation within 48 hrs? Latitude/Longitude (deci-degrees) 36.103732 -79.401783
Evidence of stressors affecting the assessment area (may not be within the assessment area)
Please circle and/or make note on last page if evidence of stressors is apparent. Consider departure from reference, if
appropriate, in recent past (for instance, approximately within 10 years). Noteworthy stressors include, but are not limited
to the following.
• Hydrological modifications (examples: ditches, dams, beaver dams, dikes, berms, ponds, etc.)
• Surface and sub -surface discharges into the wetland (examples: discharges containing obvious pollutants, presence of nearby
septic tanks, underground storage tanks (USTs), hog lagoons, etc.)
• Signs of vegetation stress (examples: vegetation mortality, insect damage, disease, storm damage, salt intrusion, etc.)
• Habitat/plant community alteration (examples: mowing, clear -cutting, exotics, etc.)
Is the assessment area intensively managed? Yes * No
Regulatory Considerations - Were regulatory considerations evaluated? * Yes No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
F Anadromous fish
F Federally protected species or State endangered or threatened species
F NCDWR riparian buffer rule in effect
F Abuts a Primary Nursery Area (PNA)
F Publicly owned property
F N.C. Division of Coastal Management Area of Environmental Concern (AEC) (including buffer)
R Abuts a stream with a NCDWQ classification of SA or supplemental classifications of HQW, ORW, or Trout
F Designated NCNHP reference community
F Abuts a 303(d) -listed stream or a tributary to a 303(d) -listed stream
What type of natural stream is associated with the wetland, if any? (check all that apply)
r Blackwater
r Brownwater
Tidal (if tidal, check one of the following boxes) Lunar Wind Both
Is the assessment area on a coastal island? Yes * No
Is the assessment area's surface water storage capacity or duration substantially altered by beaver? Yes * No
Does the assessment area experience overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions? Yes * No
1. Ground Surface Condition/Vegetation Condition — assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider alteration to the ground surface (GS) in the assessment area and vegetation structure
(VS) in the assessment area. Compare to reference wetland if applicable (see User Manual). If a reference is not applicable,
then rate the assessment area based on evidence of an effect.
GS VS
� " A A Not severely altered
r' B * B Severely altered over a majority of the assessment area (ground surface alteration examples: vehicle tracks, excessive
sedimentation, fire -plow lanes, skidder tracks, bedding, fill, soil compaction, obvious pollutants) (vegetation structure
alteration examples: mechanical disturbance, herbicides, salt intrusion [where appropriate], exotic species, grazing,
less diversity [if appropriate], hydrologic alteration)
2. Surface and Sub -Surface Storage Capacity and Duration — assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface storage capacity and duration (Surf) and sub -surface storage capacity and
duration (Sub). Consider both increase and decrease in hydrology. A ditch <_ 1 foot deep is considered to affect surface water only,
while a ditch > 1 foot deep is expected to affect both surface and sub -surface water. Consider tidal flooding regime, if applicable.
Surf Sub
� A A Water storage capacity and duration are not altered.
r B C B Water storage capacity or duration are altered, but not substantially (typically, not sufficient to change vegetation).
r' C t'*� C Water storage capacity or duration are substantially altered (typically, alteration sufficient to result in vegetation
change) (examples: draining, flooding, soil compaction, filling, excessive sedimentation, underground utility lines).
3. Water Storage/Surface Relief — assessment area/wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
Check a box in each column for each group below. Select the appropriate storage for the assessment area (AA) and the wetland
type (WT).
AA WT
3a. C A r A Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water > 1 foot deep
B r B Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 6 inches to 1 foot deep
C ( C Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
D (* D Depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
3b. A Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is greater than 2 feet

B Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is between 1 and 2 feet
* C Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is less than 1 foot

4. Soil Texture/Structure — assessment area condition metric (skip for all marshes)
Check a box from each of the three soil property groups below. Dig soil profile in the dominant assessment area landscape
feature. Make soil observations within the 12 inches. Use most recent National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils guidance for
regional indicators.
4a. { A Sandy soil
" B Loamy or clayey soils exhibiting redoximorphic features (concentrations, depletions, or rhizospheres)
Ce" C Loamy or clayey soils not exhibiting redoximorphic features
C" D Loamy or clayey gleyed soil
r E Histosol or histic epipedon
4b. A Soil ribbon < 1 inch
" B Soil ribbon >_ 1 inch
4c. * A No peat or muck presence
B A peat or muck presence
5. Discharge into Wetland — opportunity metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface pollutants or discharges (Surf) and sub -surface pollutants or discharges (Sub).
Examples of sub -surface discharges include presence of nearby septic tank, underground storage tank (UST), etc.
Surf Sub
� A C A Little or no evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the assessment area
r' B r' B Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the wetland and stressing, but not overwhelming the
treatment capacity of the assessment area
C t' C Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges (pathogen, particulate, or soluble) entering the assessment area and
potentially overwhelming the treatment capacity of the wetland (water discoloration, dead vegetation, excessive
sedimentation, odor)
6. Land Use — opportunity metric (skip for non -riparian wetlands)
Check all that apply (at least one box in each column). Evaluation involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. Consider sources
draining to assessment area within entire upstream watershed (WS), within 5 miles and within the watershed draining to the
assessment area (5M), and within 2 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment area (2M). Effective riparian buffers
are considered to be 50 feet wide in the Coastal Plain and Piedmont ecoregions and 30 feet wide in the Blue Ridge Mountains ecoregion.
WS 5M 2M
C A F A A >_ 10% impervious surfaces
F B F B B Confined animal operations (or other local, concentrated source of pollutants)
F C F C C >_ 20% coverage of pasture
F D F D D >_ 20% coverage of agricultural land (regularly plowed land)
F E f E E >_ 20% coverage of maintained grass/herb
F F F F F >_ 20% coverage of clear-cut land
F G F G G Little or no opportunity to improve water quality. Lack of opportunity may result from little or no disturbance in
the watershed or hydrologic alterations that prevent dainage and/or overbank flow from affectio the
assessment area.
7. Wetland Acting as Vegetated Buffer — assessment area/wetland complex condition metric (skip for non -riparian wetlands)
7a. Is assessment area within 50 feet of a tributary or other open water?
Yes * No If Yes, continue to 7b. If No, skip to Metric 8.
7b. How much of the first 50 feet from the bank is weltand? (Wetland buffer need only be present on one side of the water body. Make
buffer judgment based on the average width of wetland. Record a note if a portion of the buffer has been removed or disturbed.)
C A >_ 50 feet
P-'- B From 30 to < 50 feet
C' C From 15 to < 30 feet
r D From 5 to < 15 feet
r E < 5 feet or buffer bypassed by ditches
7c. Tributary width. If the tributary is anastomosed, combine widths of channels/braids for a total width.
<_ 15 -feet wide > 15 -feet wide Other open water (no tributary present)
7d. Do roots of assessment area vegetation extend into the bank of the tributary/open water?
Yes No
7e. Is tributary or other open water sheltered or exposed?
Sheltered — adjacent open water with width < 2500 feet and no regular boat traffic.
Exposed — adjacent open water with width >_ 2500 feet or regular boat traffic.
8. Wetland Width at the Assessment Area — wetland type/wetland complex condition metric (evaluate WT for all marshes
and Estuarine Woody Wetland only; evaluate WC for Bottomland Hardwood Forest, Headwater Forest, and Riverine Swamp
Forest only)
Check a box in each column. Select the average width for the wetland type at the assessment area (WT) and the wetland complex at the
assessment area (WC). See User Manual for WT and WC boundaries.
WT WC
C A
C A
>_ 100 feet
r B
C B
From 80 to < 100 feet
r C
C C
From 50 to < 80 feet
r D
C D
From 40 to < 50 feet
r E
C E
From 30 to < 40 feet
r F
C F
From 15 to < 30 feet
r G
C G
From 5 to < 15 feet
r H
C H
< 5 feet

9. Inundation Duration - assessment area condition metric (skip for non -riparian wetlands)
Answer for assessment area dominant landform.
( A Evidence of short -duration inundation (< 7 consecutive days)
r' B Evidence of saturation, without evidence of inundation
(' C Evidence of long -duration inundation or very long -duration inundation (7 to 30 consecutive days or more)
10. Indicators of Deposition - assessment area condition metric (skip for non -riparian wetlands and all marshes)
Consider recent deposition only (no plant growth since deposition).
(- A Sediment deposition is not excessive, but at approximately natural levels.
r B Sediment deposition is excessive, but not overwhelming the wetland.
r' C Sediment deposition is excessive and is overwhelming the wetland.
11. Wetland Size - wetland type/wetland complex condition metric
Check a box in each column. Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric evaluates three aspects of the wetland area: the
size of the wetland type (WT), the size of the wetland complex (WC), and the size of the forested wetland (FW) (if applicable, see User
Manual). See the User Manual for boundaries of these evaluation areas. If assessment area is clear-cut, select "K" for the FW column.
WT WC FW (if applicable)
r A (- A c A >_ 500 acres
r B C B B From 100 to < 500 acres
r C r C C From 50 to < 100 acres
r D r D r D From 25 to < 50 acres
r E C E r E From 10 to < 25 acres
r F C F r F From 5 to < 10 acres
r G C G - G From 1 to < 5 acres
r H r H H From 0.5 to < 1 acre
r' I '* 1 * 1 From 0.1 to < 0.5 acre
r r J From 0.01 to<0.1 acre
r K r K K < 0.01 acre or assessment area is clear-cut
12. Wetland Intactness - wetland type condition metric (evaluate for Pocosins only)
A Pocosin is the full extent (>_ 90%) of its natural landscape size.
B Pocosin is < 90% of the full extent of its natural landscape size.
13. Connectivity to Other Natural Areas - landscape condition metric
13a. Check appropriate box(es) (a box may be checked in each column). Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This
evaluates whether the wetland is well connected (Well) and/or loosely connected (Loosely) to the landscape patch, the contiguous
metric naturally vegetated area and open water (if appropriate). Boundaries are formed by four -lane roads, regularly maintained utility
line corridors the width of a four -lane road or wider, urban landscapes, fields (pasture open and agriculture), or water > 300 feet wide.
Well Loosely
(�'- A ( A >_ 500 acres
r B C" B From 100 to < 500 acres
r C C C From 50 to < 100 acres
r D D From 10 to < 50 acres
r E r E < 10 acres
-* F ('* F Wetland type has a poor or no connection to other natural habitats
13b. Evaluate for marshes only.
Yes No Wetland type has a surface hydrology connection to open waters/stream or tidal wetlands.
14. Edge Effect - wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes and Estuarine Woody Wetland)
May involve a GIS effort with field adjustment. Estimate distance from wetland type boundary to artificial edges. Artificial edges include
non -forested areas >_ 40 feet wide such as fields, development, roads, regularly maintained utility line corridors and clear -cuts. Consider
the eight main points of the compass. Artificial edge occurs within 150 feet in how many directiions? If the assessment area is clear-cut,
select option "C."
C A 0
r B 1 to 4
re C 5to8
15. Vegetative Composition - assessment area condition metric (skip for all marshes and Pine Flat)
A Vegetation is close to reference condition in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of appropriate
species, with exotic plants absent or sparse within the assessment area.
B Vegetation is different from reference condition in species diversity or proportions, but still largely composed of native species
characteristic of the wetland type. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clearcutting or
clearing. It also includes communities with exotics present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata.
* C Vegetation severely altered from reference in composition, or expected species are unnaturally absent (planted stands of non -
characteristic species or at least one stratum inappropriately composed of a single species), or exotic species are dominant in
at least one stratum.
16. Vegetative Diversity - assessment area condition metric (evaluate for Non -tidal Freshwater Marsh only)
(' A Vegetation diversity is high and is composed primarily of native species (<10% cover of exotics).
r' B Vegetation diversity is low or has > 10% to 50% cover of exotics.
(' C Vegetation is dominated by exotic species (>50% cover of exotics).

17. Vegetative Structure — assessment area/wetland type condition metric
17a. Is vegetation present?
* Yes No If Yes, continue to 17b. If No, skip to Metric 18.
17b. Evaluate percent coverage of assessment area vegetation for all marshes only. Skip to 17c for non -marsh wetlands.
A >_ 25% coverage of vegetation
B < 25% coverage of vegetation
17c. Check a box in each column for each stratum. Evaluate this portion of the metric for non -marsh wetlands. Consider structure
in airspace above the assessment area (AA) and the wetland type (WT) separately.
AA WT
oA A Canopy closed, or nearly closed, with natural gaps associated with natural processes
C: r B B Canopy present, but opened more than natural gaps
cz
U r C C Canopy sparse or absent
o A'' A Dense mid-story/sapling layer
C B r B Moderate density mid-story/sapling layer
* C C Mid-story/sapling layer sparse or absent
r A r A Dense shrub layer
r B C B Moderate density shrub layer
C * C Shrub layer sparse or absent
A r A Dense herb layer
a� C B B Moderate density herb layer
_ r C C Herb layer sparse or absent
18. Snags — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
C- A Large snags (more than one) are visible (> 12 -inches DBH, or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
r' B Not A
19. Diameter Class Distribution — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
r A Majority of canopy trees have stems > 6 inches in diameter at breast height (DBH); many large trees (> 12 inches DBH) are
present.
r B Majority of canopy trees have stems between 6 and 12 inches DBH, few are > 12 -inch DBH.
r' C Majority of canopy trees are < 6 inches DBH or no trees.
20. Large Woody Debris — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
Include both natural debris and man -placed natural debris.
C A Large logs (more than one) are visible (> 12 inches in diameter, or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
r' B Not A
21. Vegetation/Open Water Dispersion — wetland type/open water condition metric (evaluate for Non -Tidal Freshwater
Marsh only)
Select the figure that best describes the amount of interspersion between vegetation and open water in the growing season. Patterned
areas indicate vegetated areas, while solid white areas indicate open water.
A B C D
-
�5
22. Hydrologic Connectivity — assessment area condition metric (evaluate for riparian wetlands and Salt/Brackish Marsh only)
Examples of activities that may severely alter hydrologic connectivity include intensive ditching, fill, sedimentation, channelization,
diversion, man-made berms, beaver dams, and stream incision. Documentation required if evaluated as B, C, or D.
(" A Overbank and overland flow are not severely altered in the assessment area.
r B Overbank flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
r C Overland flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
r D Both overbank and overland flow are severely altered in the assessment area.
Notes

NC WAM Wetland Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 5.0
Wetland Site Name Eastbrook Apt Date
1/18/2019
Wetland Type Headwater Forest Assessor Name/Organization
Adam Carter
Notes on Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
NO
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
YES
Wetland is intensively managed (Y/N)
Function Rating Summary
Assessment area is located within 50 feet of a natural tributary or other open water (Y/N)
NO
Assessment area is substantially altered by beaver (Y/N)
NO
Assessment area experiences overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions (Y/N)
NO
Assessment area is on a coastal island (Y/N)
NO
Sub -function Rating Summary
Condition/Opportunity
Function Sub -function Metrics
Rating
Hydrology Surface Storage and Retention
Condition
LOW
Sub -Surface Storage and Retention
Condition
LOW
Water Quality Pathogen Change
Condition
LOW
Function Rating Summary
Condition/Opportunity
Function
Metrics/Notes
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
Hydrology
Particulate Change
Condition
Water Quality
Condition
Condition/Opportunity
NA
Condition/Opportunity
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
NA
Soluble Change
Condition
Habitat
Condition
Condition/Opportunity
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
Physical Change
Condition
Condition/Opportunity
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
Pollution Change
Condition
NA
Condition/Opportunity
NA
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
NA
Habitat
Physical Structure Condition
LOW
Landscape Patch Structure Condition
LOW
Vegetation Composition Condition
LOW
Function Rating Summary
Function
Metrics/Notes
Rating
Hydrology
Condition
Water Quality
Condition
Condition/Opportunity
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
Habitat
Condition
LOW
Overall Wetland Rating