WQ0020814_Staff Report_20190422

State of North Carolina
Division of Water Resources
' Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Environmental Staff Report
Quality
April 22, 2019
To: Non-Discharge Unit Application No.: W00020814
Attn: Poonam Girl Facility name: 149 Perfect Moment Dr.SIR
County: Chatham
From: Joan Schneier
Raleigh Regional Office
Note: This form has been adapted from the non-discharge facility staff report to document the review of both non-
discharge and NPDES permit applications and/or renewals. Please complete all sections as they are applicable. .
I. GENERAL AND SITE VISIT INFORMATION
1. Was a site visit conducted? ® Yes or❑No
a. Date of site visit: 02/01/2019
b. Site visit conducted by: J. Schneier
c. Inspection report attached? ❑ Yes or®No
d. Person contacted: Tammy Sanders (AOWA) and their contact information: 252 242 -7693 ext.
e. Driving directions: Are corrrect in BIMS
2. Discharge Point(s):
Latitude: Longitude:
Latitude: Longitude:
3. Receiving stream or affected surface waters:
Classification:
River Basin and Subbasin No.
Describe receiving stream features and pertinent downstream uses:
H. PROPOSED FACILITIES: NEW APPLICATIONS
1. Facility Classification: (Please attach completed rating sheet to be attached to issued permit)
Proposed flow:
Current permitted flow:
2. Are the new treatment facilities adequate for the type of waste and disposal system? ❑Yes or❑ No
If no, explain:
3. Are site conditions (soils, depth to water table, etc)consistent with the submitted reports? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A
If no,please explain:
4. Do'the plans and site map represent the actual site(property lines,wells, etc.)? ❑ Yes ❑No ❑N/A
If no,please explain:
5. Is the proposed residuals management plan adequate? ❑Yes ❑No ❑N/A
If no, please explain:
FORM:WQROSSR 04-14 Page 1 of 5

6. Are the proposed application rates(e.g.,hydraulic,nutrient) acceptable? ❑ Yes ❑No ❑N/A
If no, please explain:
7. Are there any setback conflicts for proposed treatment,storage and disposal sites? ❑ Yes or❑No
If yes, attach a map showing conflict areas.
8. Is the proposed or existing groundwater monitoring program adequate? ❑ Yes ❑No ❑ N/A
If no, explain and recommend any changes to the groundwater monitoring program:
9. For residuals,will seasonal or other restrictions be required? ❑ Yes ❑No ❑N/A
If yes, attach list of sites with restrictions (Certification B)
Describe the residuals handling and utilization scheme:
10. Possible toxic impacts to surface waters:
11. Pretreatment Program(POTWs only):
M.EXISTING FACILITIES: MODIFICATION AND RENEWAL APPLICATIONS
1. Are there appropriately certified Operators in Charge(ORCs) for the facility? ❑ Yes ❑No M N/A
ORC: Certificate#: Backup ORC: Certificate#:
2. Are the design, maintenance and operation of the treatment facilities adequate for the type of waste and disposal
system? M Yes or❑No
If no,please explain:
Description of existing facilities: Roughly: Septic tank,2 Advantex pods,recirc pump and tank,UV,pump
storage tank and pump,high water alarms,rain sensor, 0.37 ac drip field.
Proposed flow:
Current permitted flow: 600 gpd
Explain anything observed during the site visit that needs to be addressed by the permit,or that may be important
for the pemut writer to know (i.e., equipment condition, function, maintenance, a change in facility ownership,
etc.)
3. Are the site conditions (e.g., soils,topography, depth to water table, etc)maintained appropriately and adequately
assimilating the waste? M Yes or❑No
If no,please explain:
4. Has the site changed in any way that may affect the permit (e.g., drainage added,new wells inside the compliance
boundary,new development, etc.)? ❑ Yes or M No
If yes, please explain:
5. Is the residuals management plan adequate? M Yes or❑No
If no,please explain:
6. Are the existing application rates(e.g.,hydraulic,nutrient) still acceptable? M Yes or❑No
If no,please explain:
7. Is the existing groundwater monitoring program adequate? ❑ Yes ❑,No M N/A
If no, explain and recommend any changes to the groundwater monitoring program:
8. Are there any setback conflicts for existing treatment, storage and disposal sites? ❑Yes or M No
If yes, attach a map showing conflict areas.
9. Is the description of the facilities as written in the existing permit correct? ❑ Yes or M No
If no,please explain: See comment 3
10. Were monitoring wells properly constructed and located? ❑ Yes ❑ No M N/A
If no,please explain:
FORM:WQROSSR 04-14 WQ0020814 Page 2 of 5

11. Are the monitoring well coordinates correct in BIMS? ❑Yes ❑No ® N/A
If no,please complete the following ex and table if necessary):
Monitoring Well Latitude Longitude
O , O ,
O , /1 O 1
11
O 1 II O 1
11
O 1 „ O ,
11
12. Has a review of all self-monitoring data been conducted(e.g.,DMR,NDMR,NDAR,GW)? ❑ Yes or❑No
Please summarize any findings resulting from this review: n/a
Provide input to help the permit writer evaluate any requests for reduced monitoring,if applicable.
13. Are there any permit changes needed in order to address ongoing BIMS violations? ❑Yes or®No
If yes,please explain:
14. Check all that apply:
®No compliance issues ❑ Current enforcement action(s) ❑ Currently under JOC
❑Notice(s) of violation ❑ Currently under SOC ❑ Currently under moratorium
Please explain and attach any documents that may help clarify answer/comments(i.e.,NOV,NOD, etc.)
If the facility has had compliance problems during the permit cycle,please explain the status. Has the RO been
working with the Permittee? Is a solution underway or in place?
Have all compliance dates/conditions in the existing permit been satisfied? ❑ Yes ❑No ®N/A
If no,please explain:
15. Are there any issues related to compliance/enforcement that should be resolved before issuing this permit?
❑ Yes®No ❑N/A
If yes,please explain:
16. Possible toxic impacts to surface waters:Not likely
17. Pretreatment Program(POTWs only):,
t
FORM:WQROSSR 04-14 WQ0020814 Page 3 of 5

W. REGIONAL OFFICE RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Do you foresee any problems with issuance/renewal of this permit? ❑ Yes or®No
If yes,please explain:
2. List any items that you would like the NPDES Unit or Non-Discharge Unit Central Office to obtain through an
additional information request:
Item Reason
n/a
3. List specific permit conditions recommended to be removed from the permit when issued:
Condition Reason
n/a
4. List specific special conditions or compliance schedules recommended to be included in the permit when issued:
Condition Reason
n/a
5. Recommendation: ❑Hold,pending receipt and review of additional information by regional office
❑ Hold,pending review of draft permit by regional office
❑ Issue upon receipt of needed additional information
® Issue
❑ Deny(Please state reasons:
6. Signature of report preparers
Signature of regional superviso .
Date:
FORM:WQROSSR 04-14 WQ0020814 Page 4 of 5

V. ADDITIONAL REGIONAL STAFF REVIEW ITEMS
1-The facility lat-long is correct in BIMS.
2-The field lat-long is correct in BIMS but the latitude should be corrected to 35.850256 on the permit.The longitude is
correct.
3-For facility description please add"with pump"to recirc tank and move the'recirc tank and pump to before the UV.
4-FoF table II.4, the soil description should be WhC,White Store-Polkton, 6-10% slopes, from the actual soil survey of
the lot.The NRCS map on the county GIS is more generalized.
5-It is possible the lat-longs reported on the last staff report for the treatment area and irrigation well were wrong but
better data are not available right now.
FORM:WQROSSR 04-14 W00020814 Page 5 of 5

WQ0020814 HaP I &{-3
78189 _ 203
a 80015
19836
n 79799
80016
c
I
I
74088 I 149
J!
79798
I �
80017
i
o
79797
87
ri a Wyse �ya.r�
'f Durham Service Layer Credits: Chatham County,
C'� o " Chatham County GIS
U� �C,°aM.aK{n q�m
c•A°�� N °+ �� o 0.0125 OM5
�rofca°
0 /rryGs°" N
A yn�
Mof115VIIIB / \
Cary C11.91" COUNTY
Date: 4/22/2019
M°rgs8'arkh-� ��
Time:9:37:42 AM `-

VVWUUAUO i•+ Mae a of-3
78'I88 r 3 '°t Y t 9' ,y e y 'z i;4 - s e • `T203 .. - J
{'.
lft.ti
r
3 a wr'¥ A jr3 r
r � FF 19538 j4a x d: �3 e4 e t s F A/ « $ a4 9 ep4'e OF y
je 'A i
,.. • r'^ T. 4 )��+-" ��. f d� ' � 'SP f} of -i�$ J :1E 4m Al
a4 +o- ,
- d 4lri 4?� .er�9. d ,r - r(' F'S t e ��gg a .•
$
ry y 4
7�488 a
lip
�v
1
N 1
Y P
N
r:
.n
v
r K 1 p�
z 4
F
%
I s m ,«e+ ". � "q� � ,� � y_ � Y' ,< s is .
A-
" �K`�Peell elm N ``< Durham Service Layer Credits: NC911, Chatham
C ea ego County, Chatham County GIS
k�� ®Est cfnio'AF rleV
u �«�e.Kr� a� W7 �mggery
kea ce 2'e/r ml
0 0.0125 0.025
1�JK)E2eM
A/"`Narcy Bah Morrisville
.B��o nnV Cf1 umvNI couVCl
s�y9 Cary
3efGBrfi
J Date: 4122/2019 r
T..... 0-Z9-ZZ AAA

wmao814 ben Map
LOT22
N/F NORFOLK AND SOUTHERN
4.537 Acres RAILWAY R/W
NCDOT DB 761, PG 481-483
---- ---- -
----------------- ---08 76t; 6 --fq2 __ = ---=_
--- - -- --- i --,t
140_. ,'r"r l- --= PROP R75` NE-- ._. ---- y----
SErBxm
�z O\ \ \
J J/
`.SOlL,-qo NG�#74
-- `. DISPERSAL AR
i/
----- --SQIL)�QRING 0, 46
160� � � ' \\\\ �_! _I _I�i�� it Garr rrr ,�/•a---- l
0 r0
3 ,SUPPLY/LINT
1/RETURN LINE
03
C�ENERAC LOCgT10N­'-1 -
OF-SEPTIC-SYSTEM
1 1
----APPROXWTE LOCATION I o
\ \\ -__--_AND,S.IZE 0'F HO SE/
\` ` -_-__ SEE GENERAL N07E/ /
` \ ',No. 1 THIS pwrl
\ 1 APAROx. .COCAT10N
' \ \ \ ` ♦ --ice � - �-.-. ! I
PLAN VIEW -
� ` y
SCALE: 1" = 100'FM 9
•, \ �
0 50 100 200 300
ELECTRICAL NOTES:
1, TWO DIFFERENT PANELS SHALL CONTROL EACH SEPTIC SYSTEM. IN THEROSEMONT COMMUNITY
PRETREATMENT, AND ONE SHALL CONTROL FINAL DISPERSAL.