20190500 Ver 1_Arbordale PJD Package_20190416

Preliminary ORM Data Entry Fields for New Actions
ACTION ID #: SAW- Begin Date (Date Received):
Prepare file folder ❑ Assign Action ID Number in ORM ❑
1. Project Name [PCN Form A2a]: Arbordale Development
2. Work Type: ❑✓ Private ❑ Institutional ❑ Government ❑ Commercial
3. Project Description / Purpose [PCN Form B3d and B3e]:
The overall purpose of the project is to construct the proposed development and provide additional housing to meet the growing needs
of this area of Gaston County and the greater Charlotte Metropolitan area.
4. Property Owner / Applicant [PCN Form A3 or A4]: Dependable Development, Inc. - Michael Foess
5. Agent / Consultant [PNC Form A5 — or ORM Consultant ID Number]:
Lowrys Environmental & Ecological Services, LLC - S. Paul Petitgout
6. Related Action ID Number(s) [PCN Form B5b]: N/A
7. Project Location— Coordinates, Street Address, and/or Location Description [PCN Form Blb]:
35.339579 N; -81.062973 W; NC Hwy 27 at TwinBrooks Drive
8. Project Location— Tax Parcel ID [PCN Form Bla]: 3588543716; 3588344118; 3588341441; 358824767
9. Project Location — County [PCN Form A2b]: Gaston
10. Project Location — Nearest Municipality or Town [PCN Form A2c]: Stanley, Gaston County, NC
11. Project Information — Nearest Waterbody [PCN Form 132a]: South Stanley Creek
12. Watershed / 8 -Digit Hydrologic Unit Code [PCN Form 132c]: Catawba 03050101
Authorization: Section 10 ❑ Section 404F,/—]
Regulatory Action Type:
❑ Standard Permit
Nationwide Permit #
Regional General Permit #
Jurisdictional Determination Request
Section 10 and 404 ❑
❑ Pre -Application Request
❑ Unauthorized Activity
❑ Compliance
❑ No Permit Required
Revised 20150602

urisdictional Determination Reauest
US Army Corps
of Engineers
Wilmington District
This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (JD) from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
via mail, electronic mail, or facsimile. Requests should be sent to the appropriate project
manager of the county in which the property is located. A current list of project managers by
assigned counties can be found on-line at:
http://www.saw.usace.aM.mil/Missions/Re ug latoryPermitProgram/Contact/CountyLocator.aspx,
by calling 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below. Once your
request is received you will be contacted by a Corps project manager.
ASHEVILLE & CHARLOTTE REGULATORY
FIELD OFFICES
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
INSTRUCTIONS:
WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
General Number: 910-251-4633
Fax Number: [phone]
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E, F and G.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part H.
NOTE ON PART D — PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that
all JD requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to
proceed with the determination, which may include inspection of the property when
necessary. This form must be signed by the current property owner(s) or the owner(s)
authorized agent to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D - NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for
JD requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
projects will be conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD
may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of
1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in
USDA programs, you should also request a certified wetland determination from the local
office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
Version: May 2017 Page 1

Jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: TWinbrooks Drive
City, State:
County:
Stanley, NC
Gaston
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): 3588543716;3588344118; 3588341441;
3588247677
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: S. Paul Petitqout
Mailing Address: 1823 Quinn Road
Chester, SC 29706
Telephone Number: 803-992-0910
Electronic Mail Address: [e-mail]
Select one:
❑ I am the current property owner.
✓❑ I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant'
❑ Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
❑ Other, please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION
Name: Please See All Attached Agent
Mailing Address: Authorization Forms For Appropriate
Owner Information.
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address:
1 Must provide completed Agent Authorization Form/Letter.
2 Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request (copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record).
Version: May 2017 Page 2

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION',4
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on-
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
S. Paul Petitgout
Print Name
Capacity: ❑ Owner ❑✓ Authorized Agents
4-15-19
Date
Pa, -d
Signature
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
process.
❑✓ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
❑ A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
❑ I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
❑ I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
F,7] Other:
For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/ JSACE protocols, skip to Part E.
If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
5 Must provide agent authorization form/letter signed by owner(s).
Version: May 2017 Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD) TYPE (Select One)
7 I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) provides an indication that there may
be "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United States"on a property.
PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all
waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional "waters of
the United States". PJDs cannot be appealed (33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is
"preliminary" in the sense that an approved JD can be requested at any time. PJDs do
not expire.
❑ I am requesting that the Corps provide an approved JD for the property identified herein.
An Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) is a determination that
jurisdictional "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United
States" are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of
waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or
Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved JDs are sufficient as the basis for permit
decisions. AJDs are appealable (33 C.F.R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be
posted on the Corps website. A landowner, permit applicant, or other "affected
party" (33 C.F.R. 331.2) who receives an AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years
(subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter 05-
02).
I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information
to inform my decision.
G. ALL REQUESTS
❑ Map of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the
review area.
✓❑ Size of Property or Review Area 121.4 acres.
❑✓ The property boundary (or review area boundary) is clearly physically marked on the site.
Version: May 2017 Page 4

Jurisdictional Determination Request
H. REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS
Project Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude:
Longitude
35.339579
-81.062973
❑� A legible delineation map depicting the aquatic resources and the property/review area.
Delineation maps must be no larger than 11x17 and should contain the following: (Corps
signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been
reviewed and approved).6
■ North Arrow
■ Graphical Scale
■ Boundary of Review Area
■ Date
■ Location of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Form or tributary
assessment reach.
For Approved Jurisdictional Determinations:
■ Jurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404
wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features.
■ Jurisdictional non -wetland features (i.e. tidal/navigable waters, tributaries,
impoundments) should be labeled as Non -Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water, relatively permanent water, pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear
length of each of these features as appropriate.
■ Isolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non -
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non -Jurisdictional. Please
include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non jurisdictional (i.e.
"Isolated", "No Significant Nexus", or "Upland Feature"). Please include the acreage
or linear length of these features as appropriate.
For Preliminary Jurisdictional Determinations:
Wetland and non -wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404,
Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be
identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non -wetland Waters of
the United States, wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and
linear length of these features as appropriate.
P11 Completed Wetland Determination Data Forms for appropriate region
(at least one wetland and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type)
6 Please refer to the guidance document titled "Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations" to ensure that the
supplied map meets the necessary mapping standards. http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Re ug latory-Permit-
Pro,gram/Juri sdiction/
Version: May 2017 Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
aCompleted appropriate Jurisdictional Determination form
• PJDs, please complete a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form' and include the
Aquatic Resource Table
• AJDs, please complete an Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form'
O Vicinity Map
Aerial Photograph
USGS Topographic Map
Soil Survey Map
OOther Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
❑ Landscape Photos (if taken)
❑ NCSAM and/or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets
NC Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms
FOther Assessment Forms
' www.saw.usace.army.mil/Portals/59/docs/re ugulatorregdocs/JD/RGL_08-02_App_ A_ Prelim_ JD_ Form_fillable.pdf
' Please see http://www.saw.usace.arLny.mil/Missions/Re ugulatory-Permit-Program/Jurisdiction/
Principal Purpose: The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine
whether there are any aquatic resources within the project area subject to federal jurisdiction under the regulatory
authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local
government agencies, and the public, and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by federal
law. Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the
approved jurisdictional determination (AJD), which will be made available to the public on the District's website
and on the Headquarters USAGE website.
Disclosure: Submission of requested information is voluntary; however, if information is not provided, the
request for an AJD cannot be evaluated nor can an AJD be issued.
Version: May 2017 Page 6

PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: DATE
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Lowrys Environmental & Ecological Services, LLC, S.
Paul Petitgout, 1823 Quinn Road, Chester, SC 29706
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: Wilmington District, Arbordale Development, FILE
NUMBER
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: NC 27 at Twinbrooks Drive, Stanley,
Gaston County, NC
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County: Gaston City: Stanley
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Latitude: 35.339579 Longitude: -81.062973
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: South Stanley Creek
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES INREVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Estimated amount of
Geographic authority to
Type of aquatic
aquatic resources in
which the aquatic resource
Latitude (decimal
Longitude (decimal
resources (i.e.,
Site Number
review area (acreage
"may be" subject (i.e.,
degrees)
degrees)
wetland vs. non -
and linear feet, if
Section 404 or Section
wetland waters)
applicable
10/404)
Non -wetland
SA
35.337574
-81.054681
+/- 800 If (0.09 -ac)
Section 404
waters
Non -wetland
SB
35.337800
-81.054288
+/- 75 If (0.003 -ac)
Section 404
waters
Non -wetland
Sc
35.337846
-81.054574
+/- 75 If (0.003 -ac)
Section 404
waters
Non -wetland
SD
35.338638
-81.058817
+/- 850 If (0.19 -ac)
Section 404
waters
Non -wetland
SE
35.339516
-81.059362
+/- 550 If (0.04 -ac)
Section 404
waters
Non -wetland
SF
35.337621
-81.059718
+/- 2,750 If (0.63 -ac)
Section 404
waters
Non -wetland
SG
35.337998
-81.060777
+/-100 If (0.02 -ac)
Section 404
waters
Non -wetland
SH
35.337894
-81.061725
+/-100 If (0.02 -ac)
Section 404
waters
Non -wetland
Si
35.339631
-81.061477
+/-1,225 If (0.28 -ac)
Section 404
waters

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review
area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option to request and obtain an
approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an informed decision after having discussed the
various types of JDs and their characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide General
Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre- construction notification" (PCN), or
requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant has
not requested an AJD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit
applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an official
determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the option to request an AJD
before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing a permit
authorization on an AJD could possibly result in less compensatory mitigation being required or
different special conditions; (3) the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than
accepting the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant
can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that
permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5)
undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting an AJD
constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g.,
signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps
permit authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the review area
affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and waives any challenge to such
jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement action, or in any
administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD
or a PJD, the JD will be processed as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual
permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be
administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic jurisdiction exists over
aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional aquatic
resources in the review area, the Corps will provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is
practicable. This PJD finds that there "may be" waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be"
navigable waters of the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the
review area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information:
Non -wetland
SK
-35.340272
-81.061652
+/-175 If (0.01 -ac)
Section 404
waters
Non -wetland
SL
35.341259
-81.064174
+/- 75 If (0.003 -ac)
Section 404
waters
Non -wetland
SM
35.337613
-81.067560
+/- 750 If (0.17 -ac)
Section 404
waters
WA
35.336715
-81.055379
+/- 0.001 -ac
Wetland
Section 404
1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review
area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option to request and obtain an
approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an informed decision after having discussed the
various types of JDs and their characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide General
Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre- construction notification" (PCN), or
requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant has
not requested an AJD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit
applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an official
determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the option to request an AJD
before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing a permit
authorization on an AJD could possibly result in less compensatory mitigation being required or
different special conditions; (3) the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than
accepting the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant
can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that
permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5)
undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting an AJD
constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g.,
signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps
permit authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the review area
affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and waives any challenge to such
jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement action, or in any
administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD
or a PJD, the JD will be processed as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual
permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be
administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic jurisdiction exists over
aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional aquatic
resources in the review area, the Corps will provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is
practicable. This PJD finds that there "may be" waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be"
navigable waters of the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the
review area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources below where
indicated for all checked items:
® Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map: Prelim. JD Map
® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
® U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: 1:24,000 Mount Holly Quad.
® Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: USDA NRCS Web Soil Survey (2019)
National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: USFWS NWI Mapper (Z01 9)
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100 -year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
❑ Photographs: ❑Aerial (Name & Date):
or ❑Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarilv been
verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional determinations.
00
Signature and date of Regulatory
staff member completing PJD Signature and date of person requesting PJD
DATE (REQUIRED, unless obtaining the signature is
impracticable)1
1 Districts may establish timeframes for requester to return signed PJD forms. If the requester does not respond within the
established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is necessary prior to finalizing an
action.

AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
PROJECT NAME, Arbordale Development
PARCEL ID: 3588344118; 3588341441; 3588247677
PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: Twinbrooks Drive, Stanley, Gaston County, NC
PROPERTY OWNER(S): Dependable Development, Inc.
PROPERTY OWNER'S ADDRESS: 2627 Brekonridge Centre Drive
Suite 103
Monroe, NC 28110
PHONE: [phone]
EMAIL: [e-mail]
The undersigned, registered property owner(s) of the above noted property, do hereby authorize
S. Paul Petiteout, of Lowrys Environmental & Ecological Services, LLC,
(Contractor 1 Agent) (Name of consulting firm)
to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance and acceptance of this
Jurisdictional Determination, Permit or Certification and any and all standard and special conditions attached.
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
(Corps) and/or NC Division of Water Resources (NCDWR)- to enter upon the property herein described
(accompanied by the authorized agent) for the purpose of conducting on-site investigations, if necessary, and
issuing a jurisdictional determination and/or permit pursuant to Section 404/401 of the Clean Water Act
and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the undersigned, am a duly authorized owner of
record of the property identified herein.
I hereby certify the above information submitted in this jurisdictional determination/application is true and
accurate to the best of our knowledge
AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE:
DATE: 4/2/19

AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
PROJECT NAME: Arbordgl2peyelopment
PARCEL I Ds: 213418; 21342Q
PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: Charles Raper longs Highway INC 27) Stanley., NC LGa1ton
County)
PROPERTY OWNER(S): Maly 11rooks Sgflab
The undersigned, registered property owner(S) of the above noted property, do hereby authorize
S. P ul P t tuout, of Lomys Environmental & F&gloaiical
(Contractor 1 Agent) (Name of consulting firm)
to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance and acceptance of
this Jurisdictional Determination, Permit or Certification and any and all standard and special
conditions attached.
PROPERTY OWNER'S ADDRESS: PO Box 322 Stanley, NC 28164
TELEPHONE: 9i2 q � a 4 3X�- ;R,
EMAIL: _ - r�
hereby certify the above information submitted in this jurisdictional determination/appllcation is
true and accurate to the best of our knowledge.
AUTHORIZED
S IGNAT
UR
444
DATE:

4/15/2019
Parcel Details for 213418
Property Information
Parcel Number
213418 Mapped Acres
9.5800
Tax Year
2019 - Assessed Value
88,350
Class
1000 - Vacant Tax Rate
0.0000
Tax Code
260 - STANLEY CITY Total Tax
$0.00
Neighborhood
3AO20 - South Charles Raper Jonas
Physical Address
HIGHWAY 27 SOUTH STANLEY NC 28164
No Property Sketches or Photos
Legal Descriptions
Legal Description
Subdivision Name Block Lot
Deed Book Deed Page
MILLER SUBD NLN 14 069 033 00 000
No Exemptions
Related Names as of 1-1-2019
OWNER
DEPENDABLE DEVELOPMENT INC,
Mailing Address
2627 BREKONRIDGE CENTRE DR
MONROE, NC 281105629
Sales History
Year Deed Book & Page
Sale Type Sale Date Sold By
Sold To
Price
2019 5016 0431
Warranty Deed 12/18/2018 SALLAH MARY BROOKS MILLER
DEPENDABLE DEVELOPMENT INC
$171,000
SALLAH MOHAMMED M
2017 4901 1422
3/22/2017 MILLER ELIZABETH D
SALLAH MARY BROOKS MILLER
$0
SALLAH MOHAMMED M
2016 4868 2311
9/19/2016 BROOKS -CHANDLER HOLDING LTD
MILLER ELIZABETH D
$0
2010 4524 1900
7/30/2010
MILLER GENE A
$0
2010 4524 1904
7/30/2010 MILLER GENE A
BROOKS -CHANDLER HOLDING LTD
$77,000
Land Valuation
Property Class Valued Acres Appraised Value
RES UNDEVELOPED 9.5800
88,353
No Structure Information
Market Value
Year
Market Land Market Building
Market Total
2019
88,350
0
88,350
Contact Information
128 W. Main Ave.
PO Box 1578
Gastonia, NC 28053-1578
https:Hgastonnc.devnetwedge.com/parcel/view/213418/201 9?card=true 1/1

4/15/2019
Parcel Details for 213419
Property Information
Parcel Number 213419
Mapped Acres
8.5300
Tax Year 2019 -
Assessed Value
77,220
Class 1000 - Vacant
Tax Rate
0.0000
Tax Code 260 - STANLEY CITY
Total Tax
$0.00
Neighborhood 3AO20 - South Charles Raper Jonas
Physical Address HIGHWAY 27 SOUTH STANLEY NC 28164
No Property Sketches or Photos
Legal Descriptions
Legal Description Subdivision Name
Block Lot
Deed Book
Deed Page
MILLER SUBD NLN 14 069 033 00 000
No Exemptions
Related Names as of 1-1-2019
OWNER DEPENDABLE DEVELOPMENT INC,
Mailing Address 2627 BREKONRIDGE CENTRE DR
MONROE, NC 281105629
Sales History
Year Deed Book & Page Sale Type Sale Date
Sold By
Sold To
Price
2020 5029 0460 Warranty Deed 3/8/2019
STANLEY LAND I LLC DEPENDABLE
DEVELOPMENT INC $250,000
2007 4310 0158 4/9/2007
MILLER ELIZABETH D STANLEY
LAND I LLC
$152,000
Land Valuation
Property Class
Valued Acres
Appraised Value
RES UNDEVELOPED
8.2800
76,445
FLOOD PLAIN
0.2500
775
No Structure Information
Market Value
Year Market Land
Market Building
Market Total
2019 77,220
0
77,220
Contact Information
128 W. Main Ave.
PO Box 1578
Gastonia, NC 28053-1578
https:Hgastonnc.devnetwedge.com/parcel/view/213419/201 9?card=true 1/1

4/15/2019
Parcel Details for 213420
Property Information
Parcel Number
213420 Mapped Acres
8.3400
Tax Year
2019 - Assessed Value
57,520
Class
1000 - Vacant Tax Rate
0.0000
Tax Code
260 - STANLEY CITY Total Tax
$0.00
Neighborhood
3AO20 - South Charles Raper Jonas
Physical Address
HIGHWAY 27 SOUTH STANLEY NC 28164
No Property Sketches or Photos
Legal Descriptions
Legal Description
Subdivision Name Block Lot
Deed Book Deed Page
MILLER SUBD NLN 14 069 033 00 000
No Exemptions
Related Names as of 1-1-2019
OWNER
DEPENDABLE DEVELOPMENT INC,
Mailing Address
2627 BREKONRIDGE CENTRE DR
MONROE, NC 281105629
Sales History
Year Deed Book & Page
Sale Type Sale Date Sold By
Sold To
Price
2019 5016 0431
Warranty Deed 12/18/2018 SALLAH MARY BROOKS MILLER
DEPENDABLE DEVELOPMENT INC
$171,000
SALLAH MOHAMMED M
2017 4901 1422
3/22/2017 MILLER ELIZABETH D
SALLAH MARY BROOKS MILLER
$0
SALLAH MOHAMMED M
2016 4868 2311
9/19/2016 BROOKS -CHANDLER HOLDING LTD
MILLER ELIZABETH D
$0
2010 4524 1900
7/30/2010
MILLER GENE A
$0
2010 4524 1904
7/30/2010 MILLER GENE A
BROOKS -CHANDLER HOLDING LTD
$77,000
Land Valuation
Property Class Valued Acres Appraised Value
RES UNDEVELOPED 6.0500
50,416
FLOOD PLAIN 2.2900
7,099
No Structure Information
Market Value
Year
Market Land Market Building
Market Total
2019
57,520
0
57,520
Contact Information
128 W. Main Ave.
PO Box 1578
Gastonia, NC 28053-1578
https:Hgastonnc.devnetwedge.com/parcel/view/213420/2019?card=true 1/1

4/15/2019
Parcel Details for 213457
Property Information
Parcel Number 213457
Mapped Acres
94.9700
Tax Year 2019 F-
Assessed Value
603,938
Class 1001 - Vacant 10 Acres & Up
Tax Rate
0.0000
Tax Code 260 - STANLEY CITY
Total Tax
$0.00
Neighborhood 3A025 - Stanley Lucia Road
Physical Address CHARLES RAPER JONAS HWY MT
HOLLY NC 28120
i0 Property Sketches & Photos
Mobile Video File
ti.
' B
Legal Descriptions
Legal Description Subdivision Name
Block Lot
Deed Book
Deed Page
TWINBROOKS REALTY LLC NLN 14 069 008 00 000
No Exemptions
Related Names as of 1-1-2019
OWNER TWINBROOKS REALTY LLC,
Mailing Address P 0 BOX 160
STANLEY, NC 281640000
Sales History
Year Deed Book & Page Sale Type
Sale Date
Sold By
Sold To Price
2005 4186 489
12/27/2005
$0
Land Valuation
Property Class
Valued Acres
Appraised Value
IND UNDEVELOPED
87.2600
577,724
FLOOD PLAIN
7.7100
26,214
No Structure Information
Market Value
Year Market Land
Market Building
Market Total
2019 603,940
0
603,940
https:Hgastonnc.devnetwedge.com/parcel/view/213457/2019?card=true 1/2

4/15/2019
Parcel Details for 213457
Contact Information
128 W. Main Ave.
PO Box 1578
Gastonia, NC 28053-1578
https:Hgastonnc.devnetwedge.com/parcel/view/213457/2019?card=true 2/2

J,tanley/ — DLD If,MIn
OUhT 1i4LLYRD
t 1
` WBUCKO�KSP (J STANLEY LUCIA RD
t
Q
v
1
31
1"
\�kACLEMMERRd
z
4 � ASD
C
-o 0
S a f
o
LAMPLiLHTER
p
RGDsr f. ip 4�a
WEsrLavo�aP
Arbordale Development - - t
0 1,000 2,000
Feet
1 inch equals 2,000 feet
JRp
Source: USGS Mt. Holly Quad (2016) ��. �c LoPAINo TR
Disclaimer The information depicted on this figure is for
informational purposes only and was not prepared for, and
is not suitable for legal or engineering purposes.
Arbordale Lowrys Environmental &
Gaston County, North Carolina
USGS Topographic Map Ecological Services, LLC
Drawn By: SPP Date: 3-28-19 Rev. 1823 Quinn Road
Chester, South Carolina 29706
Project Mgr. SPP Scale: 1:24,000 Sheet: 1 803-992-0910
\I
Arbordale
A
+121.4 -acres
1
31
1"
\�kACLEMMERRd
z
4 � ASD
C
-o 0
S a f
o
LAMPLiLHTER
p
RGDsr f. ip 4�a
WEsrLavo�aP
Arbordale Development - - t
0 1,000 2,000
Feet
1 inch equals 2,000 feet
JRp
Source: USGS Mt. Holly Quad (2016) ��. �c LoPAINo TR
Disclaimer The information depicted on this figure is for
informational purposes only and was not prepared for, and
is not suitable for legal or engineering purposes.
Arbordale Lowrys Environmental &
Gaston County, North Carolina
USGS Topographic Map Ecological Services, LLC
Drawn By: SPP Date: 3-28-19 Rev. 1823 Quinn Road
Chester, South Carolina 29706
Project Mgr. SPP Scale: 1:24,000 Sheet: 1 803-992-0910

4
Arbordale
iiuk
+
3r,
-Af
ZZ,
CAR
to
V
Arbordale Development

SOILS LEGEND
CeD2 Cecil Sandy Clay Loam 8-15% Slope
Cha Chewacla Loam 0-2% Slope
LdB2 Lloyd Sandy Clay Loam 2-8% Slope
LdD2 Lloyd Sandy Clay Loam 8-15% Slope
WkF Wilkes Loam 15-30% Slope
WnB Winnsboro Loam 2-8% Slope
WnD Winnsboro Loam 8-15% Slope
WoA Worsham Loam 0-2% Slope
Al
Arbordale Development
0 500 1,000
Feet
1 inch equals 1,000 feet
Source: Web Soil Survey (2019)
Disclaimer: The information depicted on this figure is for
informational purposes only and was not prepared for, and
is not suitable for legal or engineering purposes.
Arbordale
±121.4 -acres
Arbordale Lowrys Environmental &
Gaston County, North Carolina
USDA NRCS Soils Map Ecological Services, LLC
Drawn By: SPP Date: 3-28-19 Rev. 1823 Quinn Road
Chester, South Carolina 29706
Project Mgr. SPP Scale: 1:12,000 Sheet: 3 803-992-0910

V--
ItJYJW:
"Fa U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Wetlands
National Wetlands Inventor N
Wetlands
Q
Freshwater Emergent Wetland
Lake
0 Estuarine and Marine Deepwater
.
Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland
Other
❑ Estuarine and Marine Wetland
Freshwater Pond
®
Riverine
Arbordale Development
Scale: As Shown
Source: USFWS NWI Mapper (2019)
Disclaimer: The information depicted on this figure is for
informational purposes only and was not prepared for, and
is not suitable for legal or engineering purposes.
Arbordale
Gaston County, North Carolina
USFWS National Wetlands Inventory Man
Drawn By: SPP
Project Mgr. SPP
Date: 3-28-19 Rev.
Scale: As Shown Sheet: 4
•+*ASO go
�i►�i�i��Ly��j1�/li*'�� �M`M
Lowrys Environmental &
Ecological Services, LLC
1823 Quinn Road
Chester, South Carolina 29706
803-992-0910

76 1 f
S4 1411b,
ZL}
g N p D p!
6
o 5q CO
y? H 3 cii OiP { f f M1{ 5 Y^�._—�Yq
m cmc �.�i.. �g�5 �� � -U E'
fD�DmCD m mm
u
•` ,fir w5�f 3 Z Z Z Z Z Z
ca= v ? ! I, �,o o ZZ3 0 0 3 Zo ZZO
Q
N Q - o =oo o=oo
ID
m
CD
I+I+ I+ cD
It ^^ OD ^'fn
�1 "-.;_ f ?Y M <j -4 I� N O O- N It C" It W
- O
'F7 X11 s. `f X O U7 N O 0 LrI M O_ UU, LT, O_ 0
cn
45 Cn
ID
d f J J.,+ �,, •i. 2 a .,
77 dt fn
- 1 f
/ { N n � . CD
p
!$�$ 4 h
qq
706 716
r f '
6 92
� T
740 v w S
U) v
a 11 n �w C�
ar
46Q4V
m a' -4
CQ 0
6 moo; S � f
$ f`7.&
U)'
Arbordale Lowrys Environmental 8s
Gaston County, North Carolina
Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Map Ecological Services, LLC
Drawn By: SPP Date: 3-28-19 Rev. 1823 Quinn Road
Chester, South Carolina 29706
Project Mgr. SPP Scale: Not to Scale Sheet: 5 803-992-0910

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 11/8/18
Project/Site: Arbordale
Latitude: 35.337574
Evaluator: Petitgout
County: Gaston
Longitude: -81.054681
Total Points:
Stream Determination (c
Other Mount Holly, NC
Stream is at least intermittent 30
Ephemeral Intermitten Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30*
2
3
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =___20__j
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a' Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1O2
1
es =
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
0
1
C 1 73
C"275
2
3
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
�0
1
2)
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
9. Grade control
0 1
0
C 1 D
0.5
2
C 1
3
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
C 1 D
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No =
0
Ce7s =
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 9 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0 1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0 U.b
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
0 0.5
No = 0
1
es =
1.5
C. Biology Subtotal = 3
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
C 1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
3
0
2
1
1
2
0
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
CO
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; 0 B =
1.5 ther0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: SA Stream
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 11/8/18
Project/Site: Arbordale
Latitude: 35.337800
Evaluator: Petitgout
County: Gaston
Longitude: -81.054288
Total Points:
Stream Dete circle one)
Other Mount Holly, NC
Stream is at least intermittent 22
Ephemera Intermitten Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30*
2
I
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 13 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1aContinuity of channel bed and bank
0
IL 1 2
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
C -1-D
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
O
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
C 1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
C 1 D
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
9. Grade control
0
0
C 1 D
0.5
2
1 1
3
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
eir--i
Yes = 3
Sketch:
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloqv (Subtotal = 7 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0 <Z>
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
es =
1
C. Biology (Subtotal =
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
3
0
2
1
C 1
2
0
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
CO
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; 0 B =
1.5 ther0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: SB Stream
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 11/8/18
Project/Site: Arbordale
Latitude: 35.337846
Evaluator: Petitgout
County: Gaston
Longitude: -81.054574
Total Points:
Stream Dete circle one)
Other Mount Holly, NC
Stream is at least intermittent 20
Ephemera Intermitten Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30*
2
I
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =__j 1 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1aContinuity of channel bed and bank
0
IL 1 2
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
C -1-D
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
O
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
C 1 D
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
9. Grade control
0
0
C -T -D
0.5
2
1
3
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
eir--i
Yes = 3
Sketch:
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloqv (Subtotal = 7 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0 <Z>
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
es =
1
C. Biology (Subtotal =
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
3
0
2
1
C 1
2
0
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
CO
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; 0 B =
1.5 ther0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: SC Stream
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 11/8/18
Project/Site: Arbordale
Latitude: 35.338638
Evaluator: Petitgout
County: Gaston
Longitude: -81.058817
Total Points:
Stream Determination (c
Other Mount Holly, NC
Stream is at least intermittent 33
Ephemeral Intermitten Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30*
0 U.b
3
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =___21 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1aContinuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
0 U.b
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
O
4. Particle size of stream substrate
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
0
1
C 1 73
C"275
2
3
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
9. Grade control
0 1
0
C 1 D
0.5
2
C 1
3
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
C 1 D
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No =
0
Ce7s =
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloqv (Subtotal = 9 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0 1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0 U.b
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
0 0.5
No = 0
1
es =
1.5
C. Biology (Subtotal =
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
3
0
2
1
1
2
0
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
CO
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; 0 B =
1.5 ther0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: SD Stream
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 11/8/18
Project/Site: Arbordale
Latitude: 35.339516
Evaluator: Petitgout
County: Gaston
Longitude: -81.059362
Total Points:
Stream Dete circle one)
Other Mount Holly, NC
Stream is at least intermittent 22
Ephemera Intermitten Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30*
2
I
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 13 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1aContinuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
(Z>
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1 73
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
C72
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1 2
2
3
8. Headcuts
9. Grade control
0 1
0 1
C-1 D
0.5
2
1
3
1.5
10. Natural valley
0 1
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
eir--i
Yes = 3
Sketch:
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloqv (Subtotal = 7 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0 <Z>
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
es =
1
C. Biology (Subtotal =
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
3
0
2
1
C 1
2
0
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
CO
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; 0 B =
1.5 ther0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: SE Stream
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 11/8/18
Project/Site: Arbordale
Latitude: 35.337621
Evaluator: Petitgout
County: Gaston
Longitude: -81.059718
Total Points:
Stream Deter circle one)
Other Mount Holly, NC
rpereleast infer30enf 36.5
Ephemeral ntermitten Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
ifre19
if >_ 79 or perennial if >_ 30*
0 0.5
3
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =___23__j
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1aContinuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
0 0.5
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
O
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
1.5
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
1.5
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3 -73
8. Headcuts
9. Grade control
fl
0
1
0.5
2
1
3
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No =
0
C773_
Sketch:
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 10.5 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0 1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0 0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
0 0.5
No = 0
C 1
tap
1.5
C. Biology Subtotal = 3
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
3
0
2
1
1
2
0
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
CO
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; 0 B =
1.5 ther0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: SF Stream
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 11/8/18
Project/Site: Arbordale
Latitude: 35.337998
Evaluator: Petitgout
County: Gaston
Longitude: -81.060777
Total Points:
Stream Determination(c
Other Mount Holly, NC
Stream isatleast intermittent 32
Ephemeral Intermitten Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30*
2
3
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =___21 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a' Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1O2
1
es =
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
0
1
1
C"275
2
3
C 3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
C2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
C 2
3
8. Headcuts
0 1
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1 D
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No =
0
es =
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloqv (Subtotal = 9 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0 1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0 U.b
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
0 0.5
No = 0
1
es =
1.5
C. Biology (Subtotal =
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
C7
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
C-1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; 0 B =
1.5 er =
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: SG Stream
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 11/8/18
Project/Site: Arbordale
Latitude: 35.337894
Evaluator: Petitgout
County: Gaston
Longitude: -81.061725
Total Points:
Stream Determination ircle one
Other Mount Holly, NC
Stream is at least intermittent 33
Ephemeral Interm itte eren
e.g. Quad Name:
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30*
2
3
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =___21 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a' Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1O2
1
es =
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
0
1
1
C"275
2
3
C 3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
C2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
C 2
3
8. Headcuts
0 1
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1 D
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No =
0
es =
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloqv (Subtotal = 9 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0 1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0 U.b
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
0 0.5
No = 0
1
es =
1.5
C. Biology (Subtotal =
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; 0 B =
1.5 er =
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: SH Stream
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 11/8/18
Project/Site: Arbordale
Latitude: 35.339631
Evaluator: Petitgout
County: Gaston
Longitude: -81.061447
Total Points:
Stream Determination(c
Other Mount Holly, NC
Stream is at least intermittent 33
Ephemeral Intermitten Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30*
2
3
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =___21 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a' Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1O2
1
es =
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
0
1
1
C"275
2
3
C 3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
C2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
C 2
3
8. Headcuts
0 1
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1 D
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No =
0
es =
Sketch:
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloqv (Subtotal = 9 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0 1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0 U.b
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
0 0.5
No = 0
1
es =
1.5
C. Biology (Subtotal =
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
C7
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
C-1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
22. Fish
C, 0
1
QLD
2
1
3
1.5
23. Crayfish
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5)
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; 0 B =
1.5 er =
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: SJ Stream
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 11/8/18
Project/Site: Arbordale
Latitude: 35.340272
Evaluator: Petitgout
County: Gaston
Longitude: -81.061652
Total Points:
Stream Dete circle one)
Other Mount Holly, NC
Stream is at least intermittent 23
Ephemera Intermitten Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30*
2
I
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 14 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1aContinuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
O
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
C 1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
C 1 D
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
9. Grade control
0
0
1
0.5
2
1
3
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
-
Yes = 3
Sketch:
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloqv (Subtotal = 7 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0 <Z>
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
es =
1
C. Biology (Subtotal =
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
3
0
2
1
C 1
2
0
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
CO
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; 0 B =
1.5 ther0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: SK Stream
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 11/8/18
Project/Site: Arbordale
Latitude: 35.341259
Evaluator: Petitgout
County: Gaston
Longitude: -81.064174
Total Points:
Stream Dete circle one)
Other Mount Holly, NC
Stream is at least intermittent 21
Ephemera Intermitten Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30*
2
I
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 12 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1aContinuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
(Z>
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
C 1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
C 1 D
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1 2
2
3
8. Headcuts
9. Grade control
0
0
1 D
0.5
2
1
3
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
eir--i
Yes = 3
Sketch:
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloqv (Subtotal = 7 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0 <Z>
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
es =
1
C. Biology (Subtotal =
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
3
0
2
1
C 1
2
0
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
CO
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; 0 B =
1.5 ther0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: SL Stream
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 11/8/18
Project/Site: Arbordale
Latitude: 35.336715
Evaluator: Petitgout
County: Gaston
Longitude: -81.055379
Total Points:
Stream Determination (c
Other Mount Holly, NC
Stream is at least intermittent 33.5
Ephemeral Intermitten Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30*
2
3
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =___21 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a' Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1O2
C 1
tap
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
0
1
1
C"275
2
3
C 3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
C2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
C 2
3
8. Headcuts
0 1
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1 D
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No =
0
es =
Sketch:
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloqv (Subtotal = 9.5 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0 1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0 0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
0 0.5
No = 0
C 1
tap
1.5
C. Biology (Subtotal =
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
C7
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
C 1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
22. Fish
0
1
QLD
2
1
3
1.5
23. Crayfish
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5)
1
1.5
25. Algae
0775 1
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; 0 B =
1.5 er =
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: SM Stream
Sketch:

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Abordale City/County: Gaston Sampling Date: 11-8-18
Applicant/Owner: Dependable Development, Inc. State: NC Sampling Point: WA up
Investigator(s): Petitgout Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): hillside Local relief (concave, convex, none): convex Slope (%): 1-2%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.336715 Long: -81.055379 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Cecil Sandy Clay Loam; 8-15% slope NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
The wetland area associated with this upland plot is too snall to sample. No trees were present in the plot. The recognizable vegetation consisted of
Juncus effusus, Ligustrum sinense, ect, Soils were hydric and saturated. The area will qualify as a wetland. However, a data form was not created
for the area due to size of the wetland area (<0.001 -ac).
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
—Surface Water (Al) —True
Aquatic Plants (614)
? Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
_ High Water Table (A2) _
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns (B10)
_ Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Moss Trim Lines (616)
—Water Marks (131) _
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
—Sediment Deposits (62) _
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
—Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
—Algal Mat or Crust (64) —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (613)
FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
No Hydrology Indicators Present
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata;- Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: WA up
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
Pinus taeda
20
Yes
FAC
Number of Dominant Species
2.
Acer rubrum
10
Yes
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6 (A)
3.
Liquidambarstyraciflua
5
No
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Quercus alba
5
No
FACU
Species Across All Strata: 8 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 75.0% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
40
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
20
20% of total cover:
8
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft
)
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
1.
Pinus taeda
10
Yes
FAC
FAC species 65 x 3 = 195
2.
Acer rubrum
5
Yes
FAC
FACU species 15 x 4 = 60
3.
Liquidambarstyraciflua
10
Yes
FAC
UPL species 2 x 5 = 10
4.
Column Totals: 82 (A) 265 (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.23
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is :53.01
25
=Total Cover
_
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
13
20% of total cover:
5
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ft )
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Chimaphila umbellata
2
No
UPL
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
2.
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
4•
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5,
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7•
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8,
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
2
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
1
20% of total cover:
1
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft )
1.
Lonicera japonica
5
Yes
FACU
2.
Parthenocissus quinquefolia
5
Yes
FACU
3.
Toxicodendron radicans
5
Yes
FAC
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
15
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
8
20% of total cover:
3
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: WA up
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Loc Texture Remarks
0-5 10YR 4/3 100 Loamy/Clayey
5-20 10YR 4/6 100 Loamy/Clayey
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (A1)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
This data sheet is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils, Version 8.0, 2016.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0