20190471 Ver 1_PJD Request_20190412

Dewberry
Preliminary Jurisdictional
Determination Request
Greensboro 44kV Abandonment Project
Guilford County, North Carolina
Duke Energy Carolinas
February 1, 2019
Prepared For:
DUDE
01
E NEm 1o,
Duke Energy Carolinas
A
Prepared By:
Dewberry
551 Piney Forest Road
Danville, Virginia 24540
434-797-4497

t 0 -
Dewberry®
February 1, 2019
United States Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
ATTN: David Bailey
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
Dewberry Engineers Inc. 434.797.4497
551 Piney Forest Road 434.797.4341 fax
Danville, VA 24540 www.dewberry.com
RE: Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Request
Greensboro 44kV Abandonment Project
City of Greensboro / Guilford County, NC
Dear Mr. Bailey:
Between the dates of November 20 and 28, 2018, Dewberry Engineers Inc. (Dewberry)
conducted a wetland and Waters of the U.S. (WOTUS) investigation along the proposed
Greensboro 44kV Abandonment route. Approximately 16,837 linear feet of the overhead
right-of-way (ROW) was investigated for wetlands and WOTUS.
The project site is located in the City of Greensboro, North Carolina. The southern section
of the project begins at the existing substation west of Hill Street (36.084327°N, -
79.8011o6°W), and follows the existing ROW north to the existing substation north of
Electra Drive (36.1214750N, -79.781138°W).
Figure i provides an aerial view of the project route.
DELINEATION FINDINGS
The methods used to identify jurisdictional WOTUS, including wetlands, were those set
forth in the 1987 USACE Wetland Delineation Manual (Y -87-I) and the Regional
Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Eastern Mountains
and Piedmont Region (ERDC/EL TR -12-9). Prior to the site visit, Dewberry conducted
an online investigation of the property reviewing federal and state databases that provide
information regarding the site characteristics of the subject property. During the site
visit, Dewberry traversed the project route identifying wetland and WOTUS. Where
appropriate, field staff collected and recorded soil profiles, observed and recorded the
vegetation and hydrology of each wetland type. WOTUS and wetlands located within
project area were flagged in the field with survey ribbon.
Page 1 of 3

Mr. David Bailey
Greensboro 44kV PJD
February 1, 2019
The USGS Greensboro, NC quadrangle map was initially used to decipher information on
topography and stream channels prior to the site visit and is provided as Figure 2. The
USGS topographic map shows the site as consisting of roadways, greenways, developed
land and residential properties.
The National Wetland Inventory (NWI) map was generated from the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service Wetland Mapper and is provided as Figure 3. The NWI map was used
to help identify mapped wetlands prior to the site visit. The online NWI map illustrated
riverine systems within the project route. The field delineation revealed the presence of
streams and wetlands. The enclosed Preliminary Jurisdictional Request provides a
summary of the WOTUS and wetlands identified within the project route. Wetland
determination forms are provided in Appendix A.
The Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey for Guilford County was
used as a resource to assist with identifying and classifying soil types present at the site
prior to the site visit and is included as Figure 4. The digital Soil Survey Map labels the
soil on-site within the project area as being:
• (CfB) Cecil -Urban land complex, 2-10% slopes
• (ChA) Chewacla loam, 0-2% slopes, frequently flooded
• (EuB) Enon-Urban land complex, 2-10% slopes
• (MuB) Mecklenburg -Urban land complex, 2-10% slopes
• (Ur) Urban land
• (WhA) Wehadkee loam, 0-2% slopes, frequently flooded
Of the above listed soils, (ChA) Chewacla loam and (WhA) Wehadkee loam are considered
hydric soils in Guilford County.
Portions of the project area are located within Special Flood Hazard Areas as illustrated
by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) National Flood Hazard Layer
FIRMette. FEMA flood maps are provided in Appendix B.
The delineated WOTUS boundaries were located with a Trimble GPS and are shown on
the wetland exhibit included as Appendix C of this report. Stream determination forms
are provided in Appendix D.
Dewberry®
Page 2 of 3

Mr. David Bailey
Greensboro 44kV PJD
February 1, 2019
Dewberry requests a USACE preliminary jurisdictional determination of the delineated
area described above. Please contact me at [e-mail] or 434-549-8494 to set
a date and time to meet at the site for confirmation.
Sincerely,
Dewberry Engineers Inc.
Briana L. Bili, PWS, PWD
Senior Environmental Scientist
Troy A. Shelton, PWS, PWD
Environmental Department Manager
Senior Environmental Scientist
BLB\tas\blb
Enclosures
P:\501o8351\Adm\Reports\PJD\2019.2.1Greensboro 44kV Abandonment PJD Request.doex
Dewberry®
Page 3 of 3

urisdictional Determination Reauest
U5 Army Corps
of Engineers.
Wilmington District
This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (JD) from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
via mail, electronic mail, or facsimile. Requests should be sent to the appropriate project
manager of the county in which the property is located. A current list of project managers by
assigned counties can be found on-line at:
http://www.saw.usace.gM.mil/Missions/Re ul�atolyPermitProgram/Contact/CounlyLocator.asj2
by calling 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below. Once your
request is received you will be contacted by a Corps project manager.
ASHEVILLE & CHARLOTTE REGULATORY
FIELD OFFICES
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
INSTRUCTIONS:
WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WILNHNGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
General Number: 910-251-4633
Fax Number: [phone]
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E, F and G.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part H.
NOTE ON PART D — PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that
all JD requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to
proceed with the determination, which may include inspection of the property when
necessary. This form must be signed by the current property owner(s) or the owner(s)
authorized agent to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D - NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for
JD requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
projects will be conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD
may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of
1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in
USDA programs, you should also request a certified wetland determination from the local
office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
Version: May 2017 Page 1

Jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: OHE ROW from Hill St. north to Electra Dr.
City, State:
County:
Greensboro, NC
Guilford
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN):
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: Briana L. Bill. PWS
Mailing Address: 551 Piney Forest Road
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address
Select one:
Danville, VA 24540
434-549-8494
[e-mail]
❑ I am the current property owner.
✓❑ I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant'
Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
Z Other, please explain. Duke Energies Carolinas Greensboro
44kV Abandonment project
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION
Name:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address:
' Must provide completed Agent Authorization Form/Letter.
2 Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request (copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record).
Version: May 2017 Page 2

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION"
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on-
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
Kevin Mason
_
Print Name
Capacity: ❑ Owner
[Z Authorized Agents
2/1/2019
Date
k
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
❑ 1 intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
❑✓ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
process.
I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the pennitting process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
❑A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
❑ I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
❑ Other:
For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOTIUSACE protocols, skip to Part E.
If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
s Must provide agent authorization form/letter signed by owner(s).
Version: May 2017 Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD) TYPE (Select One)
❑✓ I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) provides an indication that there may
be "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United States"on a property.
PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all
waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional "waters of
the United States". PJDs cannot be appealed (33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is
"preliminary" in the sense that an approved JD can be requested at any time. PJDs do
not expire.
❑ I am requesting that the Corps provide an approved JD for the property identified herein.
An Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) is a determination that
jurisdictional "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United
States" are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of
waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or
Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved JDs are sufficient as the basis for permit
decisions. AJDs are appealable (33 C.F.R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be
posted on the Corps website. A landowner, permit applicant, or other "affected
party" (33 C.F.R. 331.2) who receives an AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years
(subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter 05-
02).
❑ I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information
to inform my decision.
G. ALL REQUESTS
Map of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the
review area.
✓� Size of Property or Review Area 63 acres.
❑✓ The property boundary (or review area boundary) is clearly physically marked on the site.
Version: May 2017 Page 4

Jurisdictional Determination Request
H. REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS
Project Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude: 36.095144
Longitude: -79.784141
zA legible delineation map depicting the aquatic resources and the property/review area.
Delineation maps must be no larger than 11x17 and should contain the following: (Corps
signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been
reviewed and approved).6
■ North Arrow
■ Graphical Scale
■ Boundary of Review Area
■ Date
■ Location of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Form or tributary
assessment reach.
For Approved Jurisdictional Determinations:
Jurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404
wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features.
Jurisdictional non -wetland features (i.e. tidal/navigable waters, tributaries,
impoundments) should be labeled as Non -Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water, relatively permanent water, pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear
length of each of these features as appropriate.
Isolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non -
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non -Jurisdictional. Please
include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non jurisdictional (i.e.
"Isolated", "No Significant Nexus", or "Upland Feature"). Please include the acreage
or linear length of these features as appropriate.
For Preliminary Jurisdictional Determinations:
Wetland and non -wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404,
Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be
identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non -wetland Waters of
the United States, wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and
linear length of these features as appropriate.
Completed Wetland Determination Data Forms for appropriate region
(at least one wetland and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type)
6 Please refer to the guidance document titled "Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations" to ensure that the
supplied map meets the necessary mapping standards. http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-
Pro gram/Jurisdiction/
Version: May 2017 Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F4Completed appropriate Jurisdictional Determination form
• PJDs, please complete a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form' and include the
Aquatic Resource Table
• AJDs, please complete an Approved Jurisdictional Determination Forms
W1 Vicinity Map
zAerial Photograph
z USGS Topographic Map
Soil Survey Map
zOther Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
Landscape Photos (if taken)
0 NCSAM and/or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets
❑✓ NC Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms
FJ Other Assessment Forms
' www.saw.usace.aEmy.mil/Portals/59/docs/regulatory/regdocs/JD/RGL_08-02_App A Prelim JD_Form fillable.pdf
s Please see http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-Program/Jurisdiction/
Principal Purpose: The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine
whether there are any aquatic resources within the project area subject to federaljurisdiction under the regulatory
authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local
government agencies, and the public, and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by federal
law. Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the
approved jurisdictional determination (AJD), which will be made available to the public on the District's website
and on the Headquarters USAGE website.
Disclosure: Submission of requested information is voluntary; however, ifinformation is not provided, the
request for an AJD cannot be evaluated nor can an AJD be issued.
Version: May 2017 Page 6

Appendix 2 - PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: February 2, 2019
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Briana L. Bill, 551 Piney Forest Road, Danville, VA 24540
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: Raleigh Field Office
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County/parish/borough: Guilford City: Greensboro
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat.: 36.095144 Long.: -79.784141
Universal Transverse Mercator: 17S 609453mE 3995185mN
Name of nearest waterbody: North Buffalo Creek
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site
number
Latitude
(decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal
degrees)
Estimated amount
of aquatic resource
in review area
(acreage and linear
feet, if applicable)
Type of aquatic
resource (i.e., wetland
vs. non -wetland
waters)
Geographic authority
to which the aquatic
resource "may be"
subject (i.e., Section
404 or Section 10/404)
SA
36.084478
-79.799603
185 LF
non -wetland waters
may be sub. 10/404
SB
36.084510
79.799783
3308 LF
non -wetland waters
may be sub. 10/404
SC
36.088023
-79.795708
74 LF
non -wetland waters
may be sub. 10/404
SD
36.091920
-79.791454
433 LF
non -wetland waters
may be sub. 10/404
SE
36.093292
-79.788453
235 LF
non -wetland waters
may be sub. 10/404
SF
36.094068
-79.786383
62 LF
non -wetland waters
may be sub. 10/404
Table continued...

Appendix 2 - PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAYBE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY JURISDICTION CONTINUED.
Estimated amount
Type of aquatic
Geographic authority
Site
Latitude
Longitude
of aquatic resource
resource (i.e.,
to which the aquatic
Number
(decimal
(decimal
in review area
wetland vs. non -
resource may be„
degrees)
degrees)
(acreage and linear
wetland waters)
subject (i.e., Section
feet, if applicable)
404 or Section 10/404)
Non -wetland
May be sub.
SG
36.094361
-79.785583
11 LF
waters
10/404
Non -wetland
May be sub.
SH
36.097429
-79.783402
1 LF
waters
10/404
Non -wetland
May be sub.
SI
36.111042
-79.781739
703 LF
waters
10/404
Non -wetland
May be sub.
SJ
36.110056
-79.782846
15 LF
waters
10/404
Non -wetland
May be sub.
SK
36.112256
-79.781652
172 LF
waters
10/404
Non -wetland
May be sub.
SL
36.112450
-79.781843
13 LF
waters
10/404
Non -wetland
May be sub.
SM
36.118192
-79.780914
315 LF
waters
10/404
WA
36.088956
-79.795260
0.23 AC
Wetland
May be sub. 404
WB
36.087766
-79.796715
0.02 AC
Wetland
May be sub. 404
WC
36.091920
-79.791454
0.01 AC
Wetland
May be sub. 404
WD
36.092084
-79.791065
0.07 AC
Wetland
May be sub. 404
WE
36.094261
-79.785940
0.01 AC
Wetland
May be sub. 404
WF
36.110411
-79.782551
0.09 AC
Wetland
May be sub. 404
WG
36.110904
-79.781750
0.06 AC
Wetland
May be sub. 404
WH
36.110427
-79.782249
0.01 AC
Wetland
May be sub. 404
WI
36.112690
-79.781830
0.13 AC
Wetland
May be sub. 404

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option
to request and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an
informed decision after having discussed the various types of JDs and their
characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a
Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre -
construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or
other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the
activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has
elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an
official determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the
option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit
authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could possibly result
in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) the
applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can
accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and
conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has
determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject
permit authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance
of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit
authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the
review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and
waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance
or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7)
whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed
as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms
and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively
appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic
jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official
delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will
provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds
that there "may be"waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be" navigable waters of
the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review
area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources
below where indicated for all checked items:
■❑ Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map:Greensboro 44kV Wetland Exhibit
0 Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
■❑ U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: 1:24K, Greensboro NC
❑ Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: MRCS Websoil Survey Guilford Co, IVC
■❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: USFWS NWI Mapper
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100 -year Floodplain Elevation is: .(National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
■❑ Photographs: ■❑ Aerial (Name & Date): Google Earth Imagery Date 7/8/18
or ❑ Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination (s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily
been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional
determinations.
Signature and date of
Regulatory staff member
completing PJD
Signature and date of
person requesting PJD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)'
' Districts may establish timeframes for requestor to return signed PJD forms. If the requestor does not respond
within the established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is
necessary prior to finalizing an action.

Figure 1
Aerial Site Map

'. ��Wcett St
�,
7, Charkcs t• Guest St
5r gond S1 ,
Fields` t ,s 40 Al 14•1 m
° l t C53 c
n L
'
d t �a 'G
O
j
o 0tn_l.
t Regi Buffalo Lake
+� a-4nnix Df. r " 4th St
YA
( 12th St
_ij
f?•
~Nate F St
a
e
t rnw211i +t7 -r V. ��
Greensboro 44kv Aban°durmcnt
OW 4
U
Q a�
.pad P5 o
Project
4 D.f
CoordinatesQ r'/�4, 36.095114
a.+]C ik4i°1, 47-79.784141' (` .d o't Hammel Fide J r�]`� Cj `
.i
'u'ti+ Northwbod 5t ." }
3rd S?,
Perish St 3.. ts[a i rar
dal► � 5 �+� r�c� �
.: .� C7 z, � �� (j ` �,� ■ � fes. �� i
�-CV 27Z�5 2C 18 Goag 16,
- �
a
I

Figure 2
USGS Site Map

Fm -ml�
: MiiUa,
7)pWhp-rrV(k � C-.r'p"P
9
9

Figure 3
NWI Map

Greensboro 44kV North
JJanuar 9, 2019 This map is for general reference only. The US Fish and Wildlife
anuary Service is not responsible for the accuracy or currentness of the
Wetlands base data shown on this map. All wetlands related data should
Freshwater Emergent Wetland 0 Lake be used in accordance with the layer metadata found on the
Wetlands Mapper web site.
Estuarine and Marine Deepwater Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland F]Other
❑ Estuarine and Marine Wetland ❑ Freshwater Pond ❑ Riverine
National Wetlands Inventory (NW)
This page was produced by the NW mapper

Greensboro 44kV Center
JJanuar 9, 2019 This map is for general reference only. The US Fish and Wildlife
anuary Service is not responsible for the accuracy or currentness of the
base data shown on this map. All wetlands related data should
Wetlands
[I Freshwater Emergent Wetland Lake be used in accordance with the layer metadata found on the
Wetlands Mapper web site.
F]Estuarine and Marine Deepwater F1 Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland F1Other
Estuarine and Marine Wetland ® Freshwater Pond ❑ Riverine
National Wetlands Inventory (NUN)
This page was produced by the NW mapper

Greensboro 44kV South
JJanuar 9, 2019 This map is for general reference only. The US Fish and Wildlife
anuary Service is not responsible for the accuracy or currentness of the
base data shown on this map. All wetlands related data should
Wetlands
[I Freshwater Emergent Wetland Lake be used in accordance with the layer metadata found on the
Wetlands Mapper web site.
F]Estuarine and Marine Deepwater F1 Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland F1Other
Estuarine and Marine Wetland ® Freshwater Pond ❑ Riverine
National Wetlands Inventory (NUN)
This page was produced by the NW mapper

Figure 4
NRCS WebSoil Survey

a
607060
36o 731"N
36o 4'49" N
607000 607600 608200 608800 609400
Map Scale: 1:24,300 if printed on A portrait (8.5" x 11") sheet.
Meters
N 0 350 700 1400 2100
Feet
0 1000 2000 4000 6000
Map projection: Web Mercator Coner000rdinates: WGS84 Edge tics: lfrM Zone 17N WGS84
USIA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey
Soil Map—Guilford County, North Carolina
(Greensboro 44kV Abandonment)
607600 608200 608800 609400
610660
610600
36o 73 1" N
I
610660
36o 4'49" N
610600
1/9/2019
Page 1 of 3

Soil Map—Guilford County, North Carolina
(Greensboro 44kV Abandonment)
MAP LEGEND
MAP INFORMATION
Area of Interest (AOI)
Spoil Area
The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at
Area of Interest (AOI)
Stony Spot
1:20,000.
Soils
Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
Soil Map Unit Polygons
Very Stony Spot
measurements.
� r
Soil Map Unit Lines
Wet Spot
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Other
Web Soil Survey URL:
Soil Map Unit Points
Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)
Special Line Features
Special
Point Features
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
Blowout
water Features
projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts
Streams and Canals
distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the
CR
Borrow Pit
Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more
,#
Clay Spot
Transportation
accurate calculations of distance or area are required.
Rails
Closed Depression
This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as
Interstate Highways
of the version date(s) listed below.
Gravel Pit
US Routes
Soil Survey Area: Guilford County, North Carolina
Gravelly Spot
Major Roads
Survey Area Data: Version 16, Sep 10, 2018
Landfill
Local Roads
Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales
1:50,000 or larger.
. -
Lava Flow
Background
Marsh or swamp
Aerial Photography
Date(s)aerial images were photographed: Mar 27, 2015—Oct
1, 017
Mine or Quarry
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
Miscellaneous Water
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor
Perennial Water
shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident.
Rock Outcrop
Saline Spot
Sandy Spot
Severely Eroded Spot
Sinkhole
Slide or Slip
oa
Sodic Spot
usoA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 1/9/2019
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 3

Soil Map—Guilford County, North Carolina
Map Unit Legend
Greensboro 44kV Abandonment
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 1/9/2019
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3
Map Unit Symbol
Map Unit Name
Acres in AOI
Percent of AOI
CfB
Cecil -Urban land complex, 2 to
10 percent slopes
16.6
26.3%
ChA
Chewacla loam, 0 to 2 percent
slopes, frequently flooded
12.4
19.6%
EuB
Enon-Urban land complex, 2 to
10 percent slopes
0.0
0.0%
MuB
Mecklenburg -Urban land
complex, 2 to 10 percent
slopes
23.5
37.1%
Ur
Urban land
8.5
13.4%
WhA
Wehadkee loam, 0 to 2 percent
slopes, frequently flooded
2.3
3.6%
Totals for Area of Interest
63.4
100.0%
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 1/9/2019
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3

Appendix A
Wetland Determination Data Forms

WA
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site:
Greensboro 44kV Abandonment
City/County:
Guilford Date: 11/20/2018
Applicant/Owner:
Duke Energy Carolinas
State: NC
Sampling Point: DPI
Investigator(s):
BLB/K1S- Dewberry
Section, Township,
Range:
X Saturation (A3)
Landform (hillslope, terrace,
etc.):
Swale
Local relief (conc—,
one):
Concave Slope (%): <5
Subregion (LRR or MLRA):
LRRP/MLRA 136
Let: 36.088956
Long: -79.795260 Datum: WGS 1984
Soil Map Unit Name:
Chewacla loam, 0-2% slopes
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
NWI Classification: PEM
Are climate/hydrologic conditions
Are vegetation
Are vegetation
on the site typical for this time of the year?
, soil , or hydrology significantly disturbed?
, soil , or hydrology natrually problematic?
Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks)
Are "Normal Circumstances" present?) Yes X No
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
Summary of Findings - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc
Hydrophytic Vegetation present? Yes X No
Hydric Soil present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Wetland WA, Non -Tidal Freshwater Marsh
Hydrology
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
X Surface Water (Al)
X True Aquatic Plants (1314)
Surface Soil Cracks (136)
X High Water Table (A2)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
X Saturation (A3)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (0)
Drainage Patterns (1310)
Water Marks (131)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Sediment Deposits (132)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
X Drift Deposits (133)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
X Geomorphic Position (D2)
_Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_Microtopographic Relief (D4)
FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No Depth (Inches): 1
Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth (Inches): 1 Wetland Hydrology Present?
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth (Inches): 0-8 Yes X No
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Wetland appears to be a constructed geomorphic depression to accommodate drainage within a maintained city greenway

WA
FEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: DP1
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below.)
Dominance Test Worksheet:
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Number of Dominant Species that Are OBL,
Tree Stratum
(Plot Size: )
% Cover
Species?
Status
FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
1
N
2
N
Total Number of Dominant Species Across
3
N
All Strata: 3 (B)
4
N
5
N
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL,
6
N
FACW, or FAC: 100% (A/B)
7
N
Prevalence Index Worksheet:
0 =Total Cover
Total % Cover of:
Sapling Statum
(Plot Size: )
OBL Species 60 x1= 60
1
N
FACW Species 35 x2= 70
2
N
FAC Species 0 x3= 0
3
N
FACU Species 0 x4= 0
4
N
UPL Species 0 x5= 0
5
N
6
N
Column Totals: 95 (A) 130 (B)
7
N
0
=Total Cover
Prevalence Index = B/A = 1.37
Shrub Stratum
(Plot Size: )
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1
N
X Dominance Testis > 50%
2
N
X Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
3
N
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
4
N
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present,
5
N
unless disturbed or problematic
6
N
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
7 N
0
=Total Cover
Herb Stratum
(Plot Size: 5' )
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft
1 Typha latifolia
30
y
OBL
(6m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6cm) or larger in diameter at
2 Vernonia noveboracensis
25
y
FACW
breast height (DBH).
3 Ludwigia palustris
25
y
OBL
4 Symphyotrichum racemosum
10
N
FACW
5 Solidago gracillima
5
N
OBL
6
N
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20
7
N
ft (6m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6cm) DBH.
8
N
9
N
10
N
11
N
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to
12
N
20 ft (1 to 6m) in height.
95
=Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum
(Plot Size: )
1
N
Herb- All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including herbaceous
2
N
vines, regardless of size. Includes woody plants, except woody
3
N
vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1m) in height.
Hydrophytic yes X No
Vegetation Present?
4 N
5 N
0 =Total Cover
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below.)

SOIL
WA
Sampling Point: DP1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Matrix
Redox Features
Depth (Inches) Color (moist)
% Color (Moist) % Type' LOCI
Texture Remarks
0-8 10YR4/1
95 7.5YR 4/4 5 C M
Clay Loam Faint concentrations, saturated
8-12 7.5YR 5/6
65 10YR 5/3 35 D M
Clay Heavy clay
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains.
I Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Histosol (Al)
Dark Surface (S7)
2 cm Much (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147, 148)
Black Histic (A3)
Thin Dark Surface (S9)(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19) (MLRA 136, 147)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Stratified Layers (AS)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)(LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
Iron -Manganese Masses (1`12) (LRR N, MLRA 136)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Umbric Surface (1`13) (MLRA 136, 122)
' Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology
must be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Redox (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19) (MLRA 148)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed:)
Type:
Hydric Soil
Depth (inches:)
Present? Yes X No
Remarks:

UPL
WA
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site:
Greensboro 44kV Abandonment
City/County:
Guilford Date: 11/20/2018
Applicant/Owner:
Duke Energy Carolinas
State: NC
Sampling Point: DP2
Investigator(s):
BLB/K1S- Dewberry
Section, Township,
Range:
Saturation (A3)
Landform (hillslope, terrace,
etc.):
Floodplain Flat
Local relief (conc—,
one):
Convex Slope (%): <5
Subregion (LRR or MLRA):
LRRP/MLRA 136
Let: 36.088811
Long: -79.795568 Datum: WGS 1984
Soil Map Unit Name:
Chewacla loam, 0-2% slopes
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
NWI Classification: UPL
Are climate/hydrologic conditions
Are vegetation
Are vegetation
on the site typical for this time of the year?
, soil , or hydrology significantly disturbed?
, soil , or hydrology natrually problematic?
Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks)
Are "Normal Circumstances" present?) Yes X No
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
Summary of Findings - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc
Hydrophytic Vegetation present? Yes No X
Hydric Soil present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Upland data point for WA
Hydrology
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Surface Water (Al)
True Aquatic Plants (1314)
Surface Soil Cracks (136)
High Water Table (A2)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
Saturation (A3)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (0)
Drainage Patterns (1310)
Water Marks (131)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Sediment Deposits (132)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Drift Deposits (133)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
_Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_Microtopographic Relief (D4)
FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes_ No X Depth (Inches):
Water Table Present? Yes_ No X Depth (Inches): Wetland Hydrology Present?
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (Inches): Yes No X
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks

✓EGETATION - Use scientific names of plants.
UPL
WA
Sampling Point: DP2
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below.)
Dominance Test Worksheet:
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Number of Dominant Species that Are OBL,
Tree Stratum
(Plot Size: 30' )
% Cover
Species?
Status
FACW, or FAC: 1 (A)
1 Fraxinus pennsylvanica
35
y
FACW
2 Quercus alba
20
y
FACU
Total Number of Dominant Species Across
3 Quercus rubra
5
N
FACU
All Strata: 3 (B)
4 Acer rubrum
5
N
FAC
5 Betula nigra
5
N
FACW
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL,
6
N
FACW, or FAC: 33% (A/B)
7
N
Prevalence Index Worksheet:
70 =Total Cover
Total % Cover of:
Sapling Statum
(Plot Size: )
OBL Species 0 x1= 0
1
N
FACW Species 40 x2= 80
2
N
FAC Species 10 x3= 30
3
N
FACU Species 100 x4= 400
4
N
UPL Species 0 x5= 0
5
N
6
N
Column Totals: 150 (A) 510 (B)
7
N
0
=Total Cover
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.40
Shrub Stratum
(Plot Size: )
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1
N
Dominance Test is > 50%
2
N
Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
3
N
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
4
N
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present,
5
N
unless disturbed or problematic
6
N
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
7 N
0
=Total Cover
Herb Stratum
(Plot Size: 5' )
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft
1 Glechoma hederacea
75
y
FACU
(6m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6cm) or larger in diameter at
2 Allium ascalonicum
5
N
NI
breast height (DBH).
3 Krigia caespitosa
5
N
FAC
4
N
5
N
6
N
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20
7
N
ft (6m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6cm) DBH.
8
N
9
N
10
N
11
N
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to
12
N
20 ft (1 to 6m) in height.
85
=Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum
(Plot Size: )
1
N
Herb- All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including herbaceous
2
N
vines, regardless of size. Includes woody plants, except woody
3
N
vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1m) in height.
Hydrophytic yes No X
Vegetation Present?
4 N
5 N
0 =Total Cover
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below.)

SOIL
UPL
WA
Sampling Point: DP2
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Matrix
Redox Features
Depth (Inches) Color (moist)
% Color (Moist) % Type' LOCI
Texture Remarks
0-11 7.5YR 4/3
100
Sandy Loam
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains.
I Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Histosol (Al)
Dark Surface (S7)
2 cm Much (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147, 148)
Black Histic (A3)
Thin Dark Surface (S9)(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19) (MLRA 136, 147)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Stratified Layers (AS)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)(LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
Iron -Manganese Masses (1`12) (LRR N, MLRA 136)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Umbric Surface (1`13) (MLRA 136, 122)
' Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology
must be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Redox (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19) (MLRA 148)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed:)
Type:
Hydric Soil
Depth (inches:)
Present? Yes No X
Remarks:

"I,C
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site:
Greensboro 44kV Abandonment
City/County:
Guilford Date: 11/20/2018
Applicant/Owner:
Duke Energy Carolinas
State: NC
Sampling Point: DP3
Investigator(s):
BLB/K1S- Dewberry
Section, Township,
Range:
X Saturation (A3)
Landform (hillslope, terrace,
etc.):
Levee
Local relief (conc—,
one):
Concave Slope (%): <5
Subregion (LRR or MLRA):
LRRP/MLRA 136
Let: 36.087766
Long: -79.796715 Datum: WGS 1984
Soil Map Unit Name:
Chewacla loam, 0-2% slopes
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
NWI Classification: PEM
Are climate/hydrologic conditions
Are vegetation
Are vegetation
on the site typical for this time of the year?
, soil , or hydrology significantly disturbed?
, soil , or hydrology natrually problematic?
Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks)
Are "Normal Circumstances" present?) Yes X No
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
Summary of Findings - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc
Hydrophytic Vegetation present? Yes X No
Hydric Soil present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Wetland WE, Non -Tidal Freshwater Marsh
Hydrology
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
X Surface Water (Al)
X True Aquatic Plants (1314)
Surface Soil Cracks (136)
High Water Table (A2)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
X Saturation (A3)
X Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (0)
Drainage Patterns (1310)
Water Marks (131)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Sediment Deposits (132)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Drift Deposits (133)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
X Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_Aquatic Fauna (1313)
X Microtopographic Relief (D4)
FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No Depth (Inches): 1/2
Water Table Present? Yes_ No X Depth (Inches): Wetland Hydrology Present?
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth (Inches): 1-3 Yes X No
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks

FEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: DP3
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below.)
Assessment area is in highly maintained R/W
Dominance Test Worksheet:
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Number of Dominant Species that Are OBL,
Tree Stratum
(Plot Size: )
% Cover
Species?
Status
FACW, or FAC: 1 (A)
1
N
2
N
Total Number of Dominant Species Across
3
N
All Strata: 2 (B)
4
N
5
N
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL,
6
N
FACW, or FAC: 50% (A/B)
7
N
Prevalence Index Worksheet:
0 =Total Cover
Total % Cover of:
Sapling Statum
(Plot Size: )
OBL Species 50 x1= 50
1
N
FACW Species 0 x2= 0
2
N
FAC Species 0 x3= 0
3
N
FACU Species 30 x4= 120
4
N
UPL Species 0 x5= 0
5
N
6
N
Column Totals: 80 (A) 170 (B)
7
N
0
=Total Cover
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.13
Shrub Stratum
(Plot Size: )
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1
N
Dominance Test is > 50%
2
N
X Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
3
N
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
4
N
' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present,
5
N
unless disturbed or problematic
6
N
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
7 N
0
=Total Cover
Herb Stratum
(Plot Size: 5' )
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft
1 Ludwigia palustris
50
y
OBL
(6m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6cm) or larger in diameter at
2 Glechoma hederacea
30
y
FACU
breast height (DBH).
3
N
4
N
5
N
6
N
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20
7
N
ft (6m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6cm) DBH.
8
N
9
N
10
N
11
N
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to
12
N
20 ft (1 to 6m) in height.
80
=Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum
(Plot Size: )
1
N
Herb- All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including herbaceous
2
N
vines, regardless of size. Includes woody plants, except woody
3
N
vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1m) in height.
Hydrophytic yes X No
Vegetation Present?
4 N
5 N
0 =Total Cover
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below.)
Assessment area is in highly maintained R/W

SOIL
1f
Sampling Point: DP3
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Matrix
Redox Features
Depth (Inches) Color (moist)
% Color (Moist) % Type' LOCI
Texture Remarks
0-9 10YR4/2
90 7.5YR4/6 10 C M
Loam Faint
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains.
2 Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Histosol (Al)
Dark Surface (S7)
2 cm Much (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147, 148)
Black Histic (A3)
Thin Dark Surface (S9)(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19) (MLRA 136, 147)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Stratified Layers (AS)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
Iron -Manganese Masses (1`12) (LRR N, MLRA 136)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Umbric Surface (1`13) (MLRA 136, 122)
' Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology
must be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Redox (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19) (MLRA 148)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed:)
Type:
Hydric Soil
Depth (inches:)
Present? Yes X No
Remarks:

WC
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site:
Greensboro 44kV Abandonment
City/County:
Guilford Date: 11/20/2018
Applicant/Owner:
Duke Energy Carolinas
State: NC
Sampling Point: DP4
Investigator(s):
BLB/K1S- Dewberry
Section, Township,
Range:
Saturation (A3)
Landform (hillslope, terrace,
etc.):
Swale
Local relief (conc—,
one):
Concave Slope (%): <5
Subregion (LRR or MLRA):
LRRP/MLRA 136
Let: 36.091920
Long: -79.791454 Datum: WGS 1984
Soil Map Unit Name:
Chewacla loam, 0-2% slopes
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
NWI Classification: PFO
Are climate/hydrologic conditions
Are vegetation
Are vegetation
on the site typical for this time of the year?
, soil , or hydrology significantly disturbed?
, soil , or hydrology natrually problematic?
Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks)
Are "Normal Circumstances" present?) Yes X No
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
Summary of Findings - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc
Hydrophytic Vegetation present? Yes X No
Hydric Soil present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Wetland WC, Headwater forest
Hydrology
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Surface Water (Al)
True Aquatic Plants (1314)
Surface Soil Cracks (136)
X High Water Table (A2)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
Saturation (A3)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (0)
Drainage Patterns (1310)
Water Marks (131)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Sediment Deposits (132)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
X Drift Deposits (133)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
X Geomorphic Position (D2)
X Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_Microtopographic Relief (D4)
FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes_ No X Depth (Inches):
Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth (Inches): 1/2 Wetland Hydrology Present?
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (Inches): Yes X No
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks

✓EGETATION - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: DP4
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below.)
Dominance Test Worksheet:
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Number of Dominant Species that Are OBL,
Tree Stratum
(Plot Size: 10' )
% Cover
Species?
Status
FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
1 Salix nigra
15
y
FACW
2 Platanus occidentalis
15
y
FACW
Total Number of Dominant Species Across
3 Acersaccharum
5
N
FACU
All Strata: 5 (B)
4
N
5
N
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL,
6
N
FACW, or FAC: 80% (A/B)
7
N
Prevalence Index Worksheet:
35 =Total Cover
Total % Cover of:
Sapling Statum
(Plot Size: 10' )
OBL Species 0 x1= 0
1 Acersaccharum
5
y
FACU
FACW Species 30 x2= 60
2
N
FAC Species 50 x3= 150
3
N
FACU Species 10 x4= 40
4
N
UPL Species 0 x5= 0
5
N
6
N
Column Totals: 90 (A) 250 (B)
7
N
5
=Total Cover
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.78
Shrub Stratum
(Plot Size: )
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1
N
X Dominance Testis > 50%
2
N
X Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
3
N
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
4
N
' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present,
5
N
unless disturbed or problematic
6
N
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
7 N
0
=Total Cover
Herb Stratum
(Plot Size: 5' )
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft
1 Echinochloa crus-galli
30
y
FAC
(6m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6cm) or larger in diameter at
2 Lonicera japonica
15
y
FAC
breast height (DBH).
3 Quercus phellos
5
N
FAC
4
N
5
N
6
N
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20
7
N
ft (6m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6cm) DBH.
8
N
9
N
10
N
11
N
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to
12
N
20 ft (1 to 6m) in height.
50
=Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum
(Plot Size: )
1
N
Herb- All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including herbaceous
2
N
vines, regardless of size. Includes woody plants, except woody
3
N
vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1m) in height.
Hydrophytic yes X No
Vegetation Present?
4 N
5 N
0 =Total Cover
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below.)

SOIL
WC
Sampling Point: DP4
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Matrix
Redox Features
Depth (Inches) Color (moist)
% Color (Moist) % Type' LOCI
Texture Remarks
0-2 10YR3/2
100
Loam Saturated
2-5 10YR4/2
95 10YR4/6 5 C M
Clay Loam Faint mottles
5-9 10YR5/3
80 10YR5/6 20 C M
Clay Loam
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains.
I Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Histosol (Al)
Dark Surface (S7)
2 cm Much (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147, 148)
Black Histic (A3)
Thin Dark Surface (S9)(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19) (MLRA 136, 147)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Stratified Layers (AS)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)(LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
Iron -Manganese Masses (1`12) (LRR N, MLRA 136)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Umbric Surface (1`13) (MLRA 136, 122)
' Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology
must be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Redox (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19) (MLRA 148)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed:)
Type:
Hydric Soil
Depth (inches:)
Present? Yes X No
Remarks:

UPL
WB
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site:
Greensboro 44kV Abandonment
City/County:
Guilford Date: 11/20/2018
Applicant/Owner:
Duke Energy Carolinas
State: NC
Sampling Point: DPS
Investigator(s):
BLB/K1S- Dewberry
Section, Township,
Range:
Saturation (A3)
Landform (hillslope, terrace,
etc.):
Toe of Slope
Local relief (conc—,
one):
Convex Slope (%): <10
Subregion (LRR or MLRA):
LRRP/MLRA 136
Let: 36.092253
Long: -79.790682 Datum: WGS 1984
Soil Map Unit Name:
Chewacla loam, 0-2% slopes
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
NWI Classification: UPL
Are climate/hydrologic conditions
Are vegetation
Are vegetation
on the site typical for this time of the year?
, soil , or hydrology significantly disturbed?
, soil , or hydrology natrually problematic?
Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks)
Are "Normal Circumstances" present?) Yes X No
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
Summary of Findings - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc
Hydrophytic Vegetation present? Yes No X
Hydric Soil present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Upland data point for WB
Hydrology
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Surface Water (Al)
True Aquatic Plants (1314)
Surface Soil Cracks (136)
High Water Table (A2)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
Saturation (A3)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (0)
Drainage Patterns (1310)
Water Marks (131)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Sediment Deposits (132)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Drift Deposits (133)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
_Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_Microtopographic Relief (D4)
FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes_ No X Depth (Inches):
Water Table Present? Yes_ No X Depth (Inches): Wetland Hydrology Present?
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (Inches): Yes No X
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks

FEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants.
UPL
WB
Sampling Point: DP5
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below.)
Dominance Test Worksheet:
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Number of Dominant Species that Are OBL,
Tree Stratum
(Plot Size: )
% Cover
Species?
Status
FACW, or FAC: 1 (A)
1
N
2
N
Total Number of Dominant Species Across
3
N
All Strata: 3 (B)
4
N
5
N
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL,
6
N
FACW, or FAC: 33% (A/B)
7
N
Prevalence Index Worksheet:
0 =Total Cover
Total % Cover of:
Sapling Statum
(Plot Size: )
OBL Species 0 x1= 0
1
N
FACW Species 0 x2= 0
2
N
FAC Species 50 x3= 150
3
N
FACU Species 10 x4= 40
4
N
UPL Species 0 x5= 0
5
N
6
N
Column Totals: 60 (A) 190 (B)
7
N
0
=Total Cover
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.17
Shrub Stratum
(Plot Size: )
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1
N
Dominance Test is > 50%
2
N
Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
3
N
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
4
N
' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present,
5
N
unless disturbed or problematic
6
N
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
7 N
0
=Total Cover
Herb Stratum
(Plot Size: 5' )
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft
1 Rubus argutus
10
y
FACU
(6m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6cm) or larger in diameter at
2
N
breast height (DBH).
3
N
4
N
5
N
6
N
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20
7
N
ft (6m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6cm) DBH.
8
N
9
N
10
N
11
N
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to
12
N
20 ft (1 to 6m) in height.
10
=Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum
(Plot Size: 30' )
1 Bignonia capreolata
40
y
FAC
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including herbaceous
2 Pueraria DC.
20
y
NI
vines, regardless of size. Includes woody plants, except woody
3 Lonicera japonica
10
N
FAC
vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1m) in height.
Hydrophytic yes No X
Vegetation Present?
4 N
5 N
70 =Total Cover
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below.)

SOIL
UPL
WB
Sampling Point: DP5
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Matrix
Redox Features
Depth (Inches) Color (moist)
% Color (Moist) % Type' LOCI
Texture Remarks
0-9 10YR4/4
100
Clay Loam
9-12 10YR5/3
80 10YR5/6 20 C M
Clay Loam
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains.
I Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Histosol (Al)
Dark Surface (S7)
2 cm Much (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147, 148)
Black Histic (A3)
Thin Dark Surface (S9)(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19) (MLRA 136, 147)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Stratified Layers (AS)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)(LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
Iron -Manganese Masses (1`12) (LRR N, MLRA 136)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Umbric Surface (1`13) (MLRA 136, 122)
' Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology
must be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Redox (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19) (MLRA 148)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed:)
Type:
Hydric Soil
Depth (inches:)
Present? Yes No X
Remarks:

�Q
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site:
Greensboro 44kV Abandonment
City/County:
Guilford Date: 11/20/2018
Applicant/Owner:
Duke Energy Carolinas
State: NC
Sampling Point: DP6
Investigator(s):
BLB/K1S- Dewberry
Section, Township,
Range:
Saturation (A3)
Landform (hillslope, terrace,
etc.):
Floodplain Flat
Local relief (conc—,
one):
Concave Slope (%): <5
Subregion (LRR or MLRA):
LRRP/MLRA 136
Let: 36.092084
Long: -79.791065 Datum: WGS 1984
Soil Map Unit Name:
Chewacla loam, 0-2% slopes
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
NWI Classification: PEM
Are climate/hydrologic conditions
Are vegetation
Are vegetation
on the site typical for this time of the year?
, soil , or hydrology significantly disturbed?
, soil , or hydrology natrually problematic?
Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks)
Are "Normal Circumstances" present?) Yes X No
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
Summary of Findings - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc
Hydrophytic Vegetation present? Yes X No
Hydric Soil present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Wetland WD, Non -Tidal Freshwater Marsh located along greenway trail
Hydrology
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
X Surface Water (Al)
X True Aquatic Plants (1314)
Surface Soil Cracks (136)
X High Water Table (A2)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
Saturation (A3)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (0)
Drainage Patterns (1310)
Water Marks (131)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Sediment Deposits (132)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Drift Deposits (133)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
X Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
_Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_Microtopographic Relief (D4)
FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No Depth (Inches): 1/2
Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth (Inches): 1/2 Wetland Hydrology Present?
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (Inches): Yes X No
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:

WD
FEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: DP6
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below.)
Greenway trail maintained and seeded with bermuda grass
Dominance Test Worksheet:
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Number of Dominant Species that Are OBL,
Tree Stratum
(Plot Size: )
% Cover
Species?
Status
FACW, or FAC: 1 (A)
1
N
2
N
Total Number of Dominant Species Across
3
N
All Strata: 2 (B)
4
N
5
N
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL,
6
N
FACW, or FAC: 50% (A/B)
7
N
Prevalence Index Worksheet:
0 =Total Cover
Total % Cover of:
Sapling Statum
(Plot Size: )
OBL Species 30 x1= 30
1
N
FACW Species 15 x2= 30
2
N
FAC Species 0 x3= 0
3
N
FACU Species 55 x4= 220
4
N
UPL Species 0 x5= 0
5
N
6
N
Column Totals: 100 (A) 280 (B)
7
N
0
=Total Cover
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.80
Shrub Stratum
(Plot Size: )
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1
N
Dominance Test is > 50%
2
N
X Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
3
N
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
4
N
' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present,
5
N
unless disturbed or problematic
6
N
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
7 N
0
=Total Cover
Herb Stratum
(Plot Size: 5' )
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft
1 Trifolium repens
40
y
FACU
(6m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6cm) or larger in diameter at
2 Ludwigia palustris
30
y
OBL
breast height (DBH).
3 Cynodon dactylon
15
N
FACU
4 Symphyotrichum lanceolata
10
N
FACW
5 Polygonium pensylvanicum
5
N
FACW
6
N
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20
7
N
ft (6m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6cm) DBH.
8
N
9
N
10
N
11
N
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to
12
N
20 ft (1 to 6m) in height.
100
=Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum
(Plot Size: )
1
N
Herb- All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including herbaceous
2
N
vines, regardless of size. Includes woody plants, except woody
3
N
vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1m) in height.
Hydrophytic yes X No
Vegetation Present?
4 N
5 N
0 =Total Cover
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below.)
Greenway trail maintained and seeded with bermuda grass

SOIL
�Q
Sampling Point: DP6
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Matrix
Redox Features
Depth (Inches) Color (moist)
% Color (Moist) % Type' LOCI
Texture Remarks
0-7 10YR 5/2
75 7.5YR 4/6 25 C PL
Clay Loam
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains.
I Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Histosol (Al)
Dark Surface (S7)
2 cm Much (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147, 148)
Black Histic (A3)
Thin Dark Surface (S9)(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19) (MLRA 136, 147)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Stratified Layers (AS)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
Iron -Manganese Masses (1`12) (LRR N, MLRA 136)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Umbric Surface (1`13) (MLRA 136, 122)
' Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology
must be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Redox (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19) (MLRA 148)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed:)
Type:
Hydric Soil
Depth (inches:)
Present? Yes X No
Remarks:

M-1
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site: Greensboro 44kV Abandonment City/County: Guilford Date: 11/20/2018
Applicant/Owner: Duke Energy Carolinas State: NC Sampling Point: DP7
Section, Township,
Investigator(s): BLB/K1S- Dewberry Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, Local relief (conc—,
Levee coy one): Concave
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRRP/MLRA 136 Let: 36.094261 Long: -79.785940 Datum: WGS 1984
Soil Map Unit Name: Mecklenburg -Urban land complex, 2-10% slopes NWI Classification: PEM
Are climate/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of the year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks)
Are vegetation , soil , or hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present?) Yes X No
Are vegetation , soil , or hydrology natrually problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
Summary of Findings - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc
Hydrophytic Vegetation present? Yes X No
Hydric Soil present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Wetland WE, Non -Tidal Freshwater Marsh
Hydrology
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
X Surface Water (Al)
True Aquatic Plants (1314)
Surface Soil Cracks (136)
X High Water Table (A2)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
X Saturation (A3)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (0)
Drainage Patterns (1310)
Water Marks (131)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Sediment Deposits (132)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Drift Deposits (133)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
X Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_Microtopographic Relief (D4)
FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No Depth (Inches): 1-2
Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth (Inches): 1 Wetland Hydrology Present?
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth (Inches): 1 Yes X No
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks

WE
FEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: DP7
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below.)
Dominance Test Worksheet:
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Number of Dominant Species that Are OBL,
Tree Stratum
(Plot Size: )
% Cover
Species?
Status
FACW, or FAC: 1 (A)
1
N
2
N
Total Number of Dominant Species Across
3
N
All Strata: 2 (B)
4
N
5
N
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL,
6
N
FACW, or FAC: 50% (A/B)
7
N
Prevalence Index Worksheet:
0 =Total Cover
Total % Cover of:
Sapling Statum
(Plot Size: )
OBL Species 55 x1= 55
1
N
FACW Species 0 x2= 0
2
N
FAC Species 0 x3= 0
3
N
FACU Species 20 x4= 80
4
N
UPL Species 0 x5= 0
5
N
6
N
Column Totals: 75 (A) 135 (B)
7
N
0
=Total Cover
Prevalence Index = B/A = 1.80
Shrub Stratum
(Plot Size: )
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1
N
Dominance Test is > 50%
2
N
X Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
3
N
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
4
N
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present,
5
N
unless disturbed or problematic
6
N
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
7 N
0
=Total Cover
Herb Stratum
(Plot Size: 5' )
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft
1 Scirpus atrovirens
35
y
OBL
(6m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6cm) or larger in diameter at
2 Rubus argutus
20
y
FACU
breast height (DBH).
3 Typha latifolia
10
N
OBL
4Alismasubcordatum
10
N
OBL
5
N
6
N
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20
7
N
ft (6m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6cm) DBH.
8
N
9
N
10
N
11
N
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to
12
N
20 ft (1 to 6m) in height.
75
=Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum
(Plot Size: )
1
N
Herb- All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including herbaceous
2
N
vines, regardless of size. Includes woody plants, except woody
3
N
vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1m) in height.
Hydrophytic yes X No
Vegetation Present?
4 N
5 N
0 =Total Cover
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below.)

SOIL
M-1
Sampling Point: DP7
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Matrix
Redox Features
Depth (Inches) Color (moist)
% Color (Moist) % Type' LOCI
Texture Remarks
0-2 5YR3/1
100
Clay Loam Muck, saturated
2-9 10YR4/1
85 7.5YR 5/8 15 C PL
Clay Loam Saturated
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains.
2 Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Histosol (Al)
Dark Surface (S7)
2 cm Much (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147, 148)
Black Histic (A3)
Thin Dark Surface (S9)(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19) (MLRA 136, 147)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Stratified Layers (AS)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)(LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
Iron -Manganese Masses (1`12) (LRR N, MLRA 136)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Umbric Surface (1`13) (MLRA 136, 122)
' Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology
must be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Redox (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19) (MLRA 148)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed:)
Type:
Hydric Soil
Depth (inches:)
Present? Yes X No
Remarks:

WF
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site:
Greensboro 44kV Abandonment
City/County:
Guilford Date: 11/27/2018
Applicant/Owner:
Duke Energy Carolinas
State: NC
Sampling Point: DP8
Investigator(s):
BLB/K1S- Dewberry
Section, Township,
Range:
X Saturation (A3)
Landform (hillslope, terrace,
etc.):
Toe of Slope/Swale
Local relief (conc—,
one):
Concave Slope (%): 5
Subregion (LRR or MLRA):
LRRP/MLRA 136
Let: 36.110411
Long: -79.782551 Datum: WGS 1984
Soil Map Unit Name:
Mecklenburg -Urban land complex, 2-10% slopes
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
NWI Classification: PSS
Are climate/hydrologic conditions
Are vegetation
Are vegetation
on the site typical for this time of the year?
, soil , or hydrology significantly disturbed?
, soil , or hydrology natrually problematic?
Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks)
Are "Normal Circumstances" present?) Yes X No
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
Summary of Findings - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc
Hydrophytic Vegetation present? Yes X No
Hydric Soil present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Wetland WF, Floodplain Pool
Hydrology
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
X Surface Water (Al)
True Aquatic Plants (1314)
Surface Soil Cracks (136)
X High Water Table (A2)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
X Saturation (A3)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (0)
X Drainage Patterns (1310)
Water Marks (131)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Sediment Deposits (132)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Drift Deposits (133)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
X Geomorphic Position (D2)
_Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_Microtopographic Relief (D4)
FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No Depth (Inches): 3
Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth (Inches): 1 Wetland Hydrology Present?
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth (Inches): 2 Yes X No
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks

WF
FEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: DP8
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below.)
Dominance Test Worksheet:
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Number of Dominant Species that Are OBL,
Tree Stratum
(Plot Size: )
% Cover
Species?
Status
FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
1
N
2
N
Total Number of Dominant Species Across
3
N
All Strata: 4 (B)
4
N
5
N
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL,
6
N
FACW, or FAC: 75% (A/B)
7
N
Prevalence Index Worksheet:
0 =Total Cover
Total % Cover of:
Sapling Statum
(Plot Size: )
OBL Species 35 x1= 35
1
N
FACW Species 0 x2= 0
2
N
FAC Species 60 x3= 180
3
N
FACU Species 25 x4= 100
4
N
UPL Species 0 x5= 0
5
N
6
N
Column Totals: 120 (A) 315 (B)
7
N
0
=Total Cover
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.63
Shrub Stratum
(Plot Size: 10' )
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 Alnus serrulata
35
y
OBL
X Dominance Testis > 50%
2
N
X Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
3
N
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
4
N
' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present,
5
N
unless disturbed or problematic
6
N
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
7 N
35
=Total Cover
Herb Stratum
(Plot Size: 5' )
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft
1 Lonicera japonica
35
y
FAC
(6m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6cm) or larger in diameter at
2 Smilax rotundifolia
25
y
FAC
breast height (DBH).
3 Rubus argutus
25
y
FACU
4
N
5
N
6
N
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20
7
N
ft (6m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6cm) DBH.
8
N
9
N
10
N
11
N
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to
12
N
20 ft (1 to 6m) in height.
85
=Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum
(Plot Size: )
1
N
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including herbaceous
2
N
vines, regardless of size. Includes woody plants, except woody
3
N
vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1m) in height.
Hydrophytic yes X No
Vegetation Present?
4 N
5 N
0 =Total Cover
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below.)

SOIL
WF
Sampling Point: DP8
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Matrix
Redox Features
Depth (Inches) Color (moist)
%
Color (Moist) % Type' LOCI
Texture Remarks
0-6 2.5YR 3/1
80
SYR 4/6 20 C M
Clay Loam
6-9 2.5YR 3/1
33
Clay Loam
7.5YR 5/6
33
7.5YR 4/2
33
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains.
I Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Histosol (Al)
Dark Surface (S7)
2 cm Much (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147, 148)
Black Histic (A3)
Thin Dark Surface (S9)(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19) (MLRA 136, 147)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Stratified Layers (AS)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
X
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)(LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
Iron -Manganese Masses (1`12) (LRR N, MLRA 136)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Umbric Surface (1`13) (MLRA 136, 122)
' Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology
must be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Redox (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19) (MLRA 148)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed:)
Type:
Hydric Soil
Depth (inches:)
Present? Yes X No
Remarks:

WG
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site:
Greensboro 44kV Abandonment
City/County:
Guilford Date: 11/27/2018
Applicant/Owner:
Duke Energy Carolinas
State: NC
Sampling Point: DP9
Investigator(s):
BLB/K1S- Dewberry
Section, Township,
Range:
X Saturation (A3)
Landform (hillslope, terrace,
etc.):
Toe of Slope
Local relief (conc—,
one):
Concave Slope (%): <10
Subregion (LRR or MLRA):
LRRP/MLRA 136
Let: 36.110904
Long: -79.781750 Datum: WGS 1984
Soil Map Unit Name:
Wehadkee loam, 0-2% slopes
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
NWI Classification: PEM
Are climate/hydrologic conditions
Are vegetation
Are vegetation
on the site typical for this time of the year?
, soil , or hydrology significantly disturbed?
, soil , or hydrology natrually problematic?
Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks)
Are "Normal Circumstances" present?) Yes X No
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
Summary of Findings - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc
Hydrophytic Vegetation present? Yes X No
Hydric Soil present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Wetland WG, Headwater Forest
Hydrology
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Surface Water (Al)
True Aquatic Plants (1314)
Surface Soil Cracks (136)
X High Water Table (A2)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
X Saturation (A3)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (0)
Drainage Patterns (1310)
Water Marks (131)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Sediment Deposits (132)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Drift Deposits (133)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
_Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_Microtopographic Relief (D4)
FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes_ No X Depth (Inches):
Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth (Inches): 7 Wetland Hydrology Present?
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth (Inches): 1 Yes X No
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks

WG
FEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: DP9
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below.)
Dominance Test Worksheet:
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Number of Dominant Species that Are OBL,
Tree Stratum
(Plot Size: )
% Cover
Species?
Status
FACW, or FAC: 2 (A)
1
N
2
N
Total Number of Dominant Species Across
3
N
All Strata: 4 (B)
4
N
5
N
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL,
6
N
FACW, or FAC: 50% (A/B)
7
N
Prevalence Index Worksheet:
0 =Total Cover
Total % Cover of:
Sapling Statum
(Plot Size: )
OBL Species 15 x1= 15
1
N
FACW Species 50 x2= 100
2
N
FAC Species 35 x3= 105
3
N
FACU Species 20 x4= 80
4
N
UPL Species 0 x5= 0
5
N
6
N
Column Totals: 120 (A) 300 (B)
7
N
0
=Total Cover
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.50
Shrub Stratum
(Plot Size: 10' )
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 Pyrus calleryana
5
y
NI
Dominance Test is > 50%
2
N
X Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
3
N
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
4
N
' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present,
5
N
unless disturbed or problematic
6
N
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
7 N
5
=Total Cover
Herb Stratum
(Plot Size: 5' )
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft
1 Polygonum pensylvanicum
30
y
FACW
(6m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6cm) or larger in diameter at
2 Rubus argutus
20
y
FACU
breast height (DBH).
3 Juncus effusus
15
N
FACW
4 Solidago gracillma
15
N
OBL
5 Lonicera japonica
10
N
FAC
6 Symphyotrichum racemosum
5
N
FACW
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20
7
N
ft (6m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6cm) DBH.
8
N
9
N
10
N
11
N
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to
12
N
20 ft (1 to 6m) in height.
95
=Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum
(Plot Size: 30' )
1 Vitis rotundifolia
25
y
FAC
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including herbaceous
2
N
vines, regardless of size. Includes woody plants, except woody
3
Ns,
less than approximately 3 ft (1m) in height.
Hydrophytic yes X No
Vegetation Present?
r5
4 N
N
25 =Total Cover
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below.)

SOIL
WG
Sampling Point: DP9
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Matrix
Redox Features
Depth (Inches) Color (moist)
% Color (Moist) % Type' LOCI
Texture Remarks
1-14 2.5Y 4/2
80 SYR 5/6 20 C M
Clay Loam 1-8" saturated
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains.
I Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Histosol (Al)
Dark Surface (S7)
2 cm Much (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147, 148)
Black Histic (A3)
Thin Dark Surface (S9)(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19) (MLRA 136, 147)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Stratified Layers (AS)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
Iron -Manganese Masses (1`12) (LRR N, MLRA 136)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Umbric Surface (1`13) (MLRA 136, 122)
' Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology
must be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Redox (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19) (MLRA 148)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed:)
Type:
Hydric Soil
Depth (inches:)
Present? Yes X No
Remarks:

UPL
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site:
Greensboro 44kV Abandonment
City/County:
Guilford Date: 11/27/2018
Applicant/Owner:
Duke Energy Carolinas
State: NC
Sampling Point: DP10
Investigator(s):
BLB/K1S- Dewberry
Section, Township,
Range:
Saturation (A3)
Landform (hillslope, terrace,
etc.):
Side slope
Local relief (conc—,
none):
Both Slope (%): <10
Subregion (LRR or MLRA):
LRRP/MLRA 136
Let: 36.110499
Long: -79.782215 Datum: WGS 1984
Soil Map Unit Name:
Mecklenburg-Urband land complex, 2-10% slopes
NWI Classification: UPL
Are climate/hydrologic conditions
Are vegetation
Are vegetation
on the site typical for this time of the year?
, soil , or hydrology significantly disturbed?
, soil , or hydrology natrually problematic?
Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks)
Are "Normal Circumstances" present?) Yes X No
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
Summary of Findings - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc
Hydrophytic Vegetation present? Yes No X
Hydric Soil present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Upland data for WF, WG, and WH.
Hydrology
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Surface Water (Al)
True Aquatic Plants (1314)
Surface Soil Cracks (136)
High Water Table (A2)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
Saturation (A3)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (0)
Drainage Patterns (1310)
Water Marks (131)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Sediment Deposits (132)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Drift Deposits (133)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
_Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_Microtopographic Relief (D4)
FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes_ No X Depth (Inches):
Water Table Present? Yes_ No X Depth (Inches): Wetland Hydrology Present?
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (Inches): Yes No X
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks

UPL
FEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: DP10
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below.)
Dominance Test Worksheet:
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Number of Dominant Species that Are OBL,
Tree Stratum
(Plot Size: )
% Cover
Species?
Status
FACW, or FAC: 1 (A)
1
N
2
N
Total Number of Dominant Species Across
3
N
All Strata: 3 (B)
4
N
5
N
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL,
6
N
FACW, or FAC: 33% (A/B)
7
N
Prevalence Index Worksheet:
0 =Total Cover
Total % Cover of:
Sapling Statum
(Plot Size: )
OBL Species 5 x1= 5
1
N
FACW Species 20 x2= 40
2
N
FAC Species 10 x3= 30
3
N
FACU Species 35 x4= 140
4
N
UPL Species 0 x5= 0
5
N
6
N
Column Totals: 70 (A) 215 (B)
7
N
0
=Total Cover
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.07
Shrub Stratum
(Plot Size: 10' )
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 Pyrus calleryana
10
y
NI
Dominance Test is > 50%
2
N
Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
3
N
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
4
N
' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present,
5
N
unless disturbed or problematic
6
N
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
7 N
10
=Total Cover
Herb Stratum
(Plot Size: 5' )
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft
1 Symphyotrichum racemosum
20
y
FACW
(6m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6cm) or larger in diameter at
2 Andropogon virginicus
20
y
FACU
breast height (DBH).
3 Festuca rubra L.
15
y
FACU
4 Lonicera japonica
10
N
FAC
5 Solidago gracillima
5
N
OBL
6
N
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20
7
N
ft (6m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6cm) DBH.
8
N
9
N
10
N
11
N
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to
12
N
20 ft (1 to 6m) in height.
70
=Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum
(Plot Size: )
1
N
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including herbaceous
2
N
vines, regardless of size. Includes woody plants, except woody
3
N
vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1m) in height.
Hydrophytic yes No X
Vegetation Present?
4 N
5 N
0 =Total Cover
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below.)

SOIL
UPL
Sampling Point: DP10
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Matrix
Redox Features
Depth (Inches) Color (moist)
%
Color (Moist) % Type' LOCI
Texture Remarks
0-1 2.5Y 4/3
100
-Loam
1-9 10YR4/3
85
10YR5/6 10 C M
Clay Loam
2.5YR 4/4 5 C M
9-13 2.5Y 5/3
28
10YR 3/1 15 C PL
Clay Loam Manganese concentrations
2.5Y 5/2
28
10YR5/6
28
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced
Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains.
I Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Histosol (Al)
Dark Surface (S7)
2 cm Much (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147, 148)
Black Histic (A3)
Thin Dark Surface (S9)(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19) (MLRA 136, 147)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Stratified Layers (AS)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
Iron -Manganese Masses (1`12) (LRR N, MLRA 136)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Umbric Surface (1`13) (MLRA 136, 122)
' Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology
must be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Redox (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19) (MLRA 148)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed:)
Type:
Hydric Soil
Depth (inches:)
Present? Yes No X
Remarks:

WH
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site:
Greensboro 44kV Abandonment
City/County:
Guilford Date: 11/27/2018
Applicant/Owner:
Duke Energy Carolinas
State: NC
Sampling Point: DP11
Investigator(s):
BLB/K1S- Dewberry
Section, Township,
Range:
X Saturation (A3)
Landform (hillslope, terrace,
etc.):
Toe of slope/bowl
Local relief (conc—,
one):
Concave Slope (%): <5
Subregion (LRR or MLRA):
LRRP/MLRA 136
Let: 36.110427
Long: -79.782249 Datum: WGS 1984
Soil Map Unit Name:
Mecklenburg -Urban land complex, 2-10% slopes
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
NWI Classification: PEM
Are climate/hydrologic conditions
Are vegetation
Are vegetation
on the site typical for this time of the year?
, soil , or hydrology significantly disturbed?
, soil , or hydrology natrually problematic?
Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks)
Are "Normal Circumstances" present?) Yes X No
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
Summary of Findings - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc
Hydrophytic Vegetation present? Yes X No
Hydric Soil present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Wetland WH, Non -Tidal Freshwater Marsh
Hydrology
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
X Surface Water (Al)
True Aquatic Plants (1314)
Surface Soil Cracks (136)
X High Water Table (A2)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
X Saturation (A3)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (0)
Drainage Patterns (1310)
Water Marks (131)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Sediment Deposits (132)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Drift Deposits (133)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
_Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_Microtopographic Relief (D4)
FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No Depth (Inches): 1-6
Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth (Inches): <10 Wetland Hydrology Present?
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth (Inches): 0-12 Yes X No
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Wetland appears to be an abandoned or unmaintained stormwater pond that exhibits wetland characteristic

WH
FEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: DP11
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below.)
Dominance Test Worksheet:
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Number of Dominant Species that Are OBL,
Tree Stratum
(Plot Size: )
% Cover
Species?
Status
FACW, or FAC: 2 (A)
1
N
2
N
Total Number of Dominant Species Across
3
N
All Strata: 2 (B)
4
N
5
N
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL,
6
N
FACW, or FAC: 100% (A/B)
7
N
Prevalence Index Worksheet:
0 =Total Cover
Total % Cover of:
Sapling Statum
(Plot Size: )
OBL Species 10 x1= 10
1
N
FACW Species 40 x2= 80
2
N
FAC Species 15 x3= 45
3
N
FACU Species 0 x4= 0
4
N
UPL Species 0 x5= 0
5
N
6
N
Column Totals: 65 (A) 135 (B)
7
N
0
=Total Cover
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.08
Shrub Stratum
(Plot Size: )
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1
N
X Dominance Testis > 50%
2
N
X Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
3
N
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
4
N
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present,
5
N
unless disturbed or problematic
6
N
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
7 N
0
=Total Cover
Herb Stratum
(Plot Size: 5' )
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft
1 Polygonum pensylvanicum
30
y
FACW
(6m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6cm) or larger in diameter at
2 Lonicera japonica
15
y
FAC
breast height (DBH).
3 Scirpus atrovirens
10
N
OBL
4 Scirpus cyperinus
10
N
FACW
5
N
6
N
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20
7
N
ft (6m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6cm) DBH.
8
N
9
N
10
N
11
N
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to
12
N
20 ft (1 to 6m) in height.
65
=Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum
(Plot Size: )
1
N
Herb- All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including herbaceous
2
N
vines, regardless of size. Includes woody plants, except woody
3
N
vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1m) in height.
Hydrophytic yes X No
Vegetation Present?
4 N
5 N
0 =Total Cover
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below.)

SOIL
WH
Sampling Point: DP11
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Matrix
Redox Features
Depth (Inches) Color (moist)
% Color (Moist) % Type' LOCI
Texture Remarks
0-6 2.5Y 5/2
70 10YR 5/8 30 C M
Clay Loam Saturated
6-12 2.5Y 6/2
60
Heavy Clay
5Y 6/2
40
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains.
I Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Histosol (Al)
Dark Surface (S7)
2 cm Much (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147, 148)
Black Histic (A3)
Thin Dark Surface (S9)(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19) (MLRA 136, 147)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Stratified Layers (AS)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)(LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
Iron -Manganese Masses (1`12) (LRR N, MLRA 136)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Umbric Surface (1`13) (MLRA 136, 122)
' Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology
must be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Redox (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19) (MLRA 148)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed:)
Type:
Hydric Soil
Depth (inches:)
Present? Yes X No
Remarks:

WI
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site:
Greensboro 44kV Abandonment
City/County:
Guilford Date: 11/28/2018
Applicant/Owner:
Duke Energy East
State: NC
Sampling Point: DP12
Investigator(s):
BLB/K1S- Dewberry
Section, Township,
Range:
Saturation (A3)
Landform (hillslope, terrace,
etc.):
Toe of Slope/Flat
Local relief (conc—,
one):
Concave Slope (%): <5
Subregion (LRR or MLRA):
LRRP/MLRA 136
Let: 36.112690
Long: -79.781830 Datum: WGS 1984
Soil Map Unit Name:
Wehadkee loam, 0-2% slopes
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
NWI Classification: PFO
Are climate/hydrologic conditions
Are vegetation
Are vegetation
on the site typical for this time of the year?
, soil , or hydrology significantly disturbed?
, soil , or hydrology natrually problematic?
Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks)
Are "Normal Circumstances" present?) Yes X No
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
Summary of Findings - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc
Hydrophytic Vegetation present? Yes X No
Hydric Soil present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Wetland WI, Headwater Forest
Hydrology
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
X Surface Water (Al)
True Aquatic Plants (1314)
Surface Soil Cracks (136)
High Water Table (A2)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
Saturation (A3)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (0)
X Drainage Patterns (1310)
Water Marks (131)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Sediment Deposits (132)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
X Drift Deposits (133)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
_Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_Microtopographic Relief (D4)
FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No Depth (Inches): 1-4
Water Table Present? Yes_ No X Depth (Inches): Wetland Hydrology Present?
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (Inches): Yes X No
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks

WI
✓EGETATION - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: DP12
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below.)
Dominance Test Worksheet:
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Number of Dominant Species that Are OBL,
Tree Stratum
(Plot Size: 30' )
% Cover
Species?
Status
FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
1 Quercus phellos
35
y
FAC
2 Liquidambarstyraciflua
25
y
FAC
Total Number of Dominant Species Across
3 Ulmus americana
10
N
FACW
All Strata: 5 (B)
4
N
5
N
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL,
6
N
FACW, or FAC: 60% (A/B)
7
N
Prevalence Index Worksheet:
70 =Total Cover
Total % Cover of:
Sapling Statum
(Plot Size: )
OBL Species 0 x1= 0
1
N
FACW Species 10 x2= 20
2
N
FAC Species 65 x3= 195
3
N
FACU Species 30 x4= 120
4
N
UPL Species 0 x5= 0
5
N
6
N
Column Totals: 105 (A) 335 (B)
7
N
0
=Total Cover
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.19
Shrub Stratum
(Plot Size: 10' )
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 Ligustrum sinense
15
y
FACU
X Dominance Testis > 50%
2 Elaeagnus angustifolia
10
y
FACU
Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
3 Juniperus virginiana
5
N
FACU
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
4
N
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present,
5
N
unless disturbed or problematic
6
N
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
7 N
30
=Total Cover
Herb Stratum
(Plot Size: 5' )
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft
1 Smilax rotundifolia
5
y
FAC
(6m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6cm) or larger in diameter at
2
N
breast height (DBH).
3
N
4
N
5
N
6
N
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20
7
N
ft (6m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6cm) DBH.
8
N
9
N
10
N
11
N
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to
12
N
20 ft (1 to 6m) in height.
5
=Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum
(Plot Size: )
1
N
Herb- All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including herbaceous
2
N
vines, regardless of size. Includes woody plants, except woody
3
N
vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1m) in height.
Hydrophytic yes X No
Vegetation Present?
4 N
5 N
0 =Total Cover
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below.)

SOIL
WI
Sampling Point: DP12
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Matrix
Redox Features
Depth (Inches) Color (moist)
% Color (Moist) % Type'
LOCI
Texture Remarks
0-2 10YR 3/2
95 10YR4/6 5 C
M
Clay Loam Faint
2-12 7.5YR 5/1
65 7.5YR 4/6 25 C
PL
7.5YR 3/1 10 D
M
12-14 7.5YR 5/1
55 7.5YR 4/6 25 C
PL
Manganese
7.5YR 3/1 10 C
M
7.5YR 2.5/1 10 C
M
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains.
I Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Histosol (Al)
Dark Surface (S7)
2 cm Much (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147, 148)
Black Histic (A3)
Thin Dark Surface (S9)(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19) (MLRA 136, 147)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Stratified Layers (AS)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)(LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
Iron -Manganese Masses (1`12) (LRR N, MLRA 136)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Umbric Surface (1`13) (MLRA 136, 122)
' Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology
must be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Redox (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19) (MLRA 148)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed:)
Type:
Hydric Soil
Depth (inches:)
Present? Yes X No
Remarks:

WI
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site:
Greensboro 44kV Abandonment
City/County:
Guilford Date: 11/28/2018
Applicant/Owner:
Duke Energy Carolinas
State: NC
Sampling Point: DP13
Investigator(s):
BLB/K1S- Dewberry
Section, Township,
Range:
X Saturation (A3)
Landform (hillslope, terrace,
etc.):
Floodplain Flat/ Toe of Slope
Local relief (conc—,
one):
Concave Slope (%): <5
Subregion (LRR or MLRA):
LRRP/MLRA 136
Let: 36.112626
Long: -79.781722 Datum: WGS 1984
Soil Map Unit Name:
Wehadkee loam, 0-2% slopes
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
NWI Classification: PEM
Are climate/hydrologic conditions
Are vegetation
Are vegetation
on the site typical for this time of the year?
, soil , or hydrology significantly disturbed?
, soil , or hydrology natrually problematic?
Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks)
Are "Normal Circumstances" present?) Yes X No
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
Summary of Findings - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc
Hydrophytic Vegetation present? Yes X No
Hydric Soil present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Wetland WI, Headwater Forest in maintained OHE R/W
Hydrology
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Surface Water (Al)
True Aquatic Plants (1314)
Surface Soil Cracks (136)
X High Water Table (A2)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
X Saturation (A3)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (0)
Drainage Patterns (1310)
Water Marks (131)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Sediment Deposits (132)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Drift Deposits (133)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
_Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_Microtopographic Relief (D4)
FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes_ No X Depth (Inches):
Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth (Inches): 4 Wetland Hydrology Present?
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth (Inches): 1 Yes X No
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks

WI
FEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: DP13
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below.)
Dominance Test Worksheet:
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Number of Dominant Species that Are OBL,
Tree Stratum
(Plot Size: )
% Cover
Species?
Status
FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
1
N
2
N
Total Number of Dominant Species Across
3
N
All Strata: 3 (B)
4
N
5
N
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL,
6
N
FACW, or FAC: 100% (A/B)
7
N
Prevalence Index Worksheet:
0 =Total Cover
Total % Cover of:
Sapling Statum
(Plot Size: )
OBL Species 5 x1= 5
1
N
FACW Species 10 x2= 20
2
N
FAC Species 85 x3= 255
3
N
FACU Species 0 x4= 0
4
N
UPL Species 0 x5= 0
5
N
6
N
Column Totals: 100 (A) 280 (B)
7
N
0
=Total Cover
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.80
Shrub Stratum
(Plot Size: )
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1
N
X Dominance Testis > 50%
2
N
X Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
3
N
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
4
N
' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present,
5
N
unless disturbed or problematic
6
N
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
7 N
0
=Total Cover
Herb Stratum
(Plot Size: 5' )
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft
1 Lonicera japonica
15
y
FAC
(6m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6cm) or larger in diameter at
2 Microstegium vimineum
15
y
FAC
breast height (DBH).
3 Juncus effusus
5
N
FACW
4 Solidago gracillima
5
N
OBL
5 Symphyotrichum racemosum
5
N
FACW
6
N
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20
7
N
ft (6m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6cm) DBH.
8
N
9
N
10
N
11
N
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to
12
N
20 ft (1 to 6m) in height.
45
=Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum
(Plot Size: 30 )
1 Bignonia capreolata
55
y
FAC
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including herbaceous
2
N
vines, regardless of size. Includes woody plants, except woody
3
Ns,
less than approximately 3 ft (1m) in height.
Hydrophytic yes X No
Vegetation Present?
r5
4 N
N
55 =Total Cover
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below.)

SOIL
WI
Sampling Point: DP13
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Matrix
Redox Features
Depth (Inches) Color (moist)
% Color (Moist) % Type' LOCI
Texture Remarks
0-3.5 7.5YR 4/1
90 7.5YR 5/6 10 C M
Loam Wet
3.5-14 SYR 5/6
75 10YR 5/6 15 D M
Clay Loam
7.5YR 3/1 10 C M
Manganese concentrations
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains.
I Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Histosol (Al)
Dark Surface (S7)
2 cm Much (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147, 148)
Black Histic (A3)
Thin Dark Surface (S9)(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19) (MLRA 136, 147)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Stratified Layers (AS)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)(LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
Iron -Manganese Masses (1`12) (LRR N, MLRA 136)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Umbric Surface (1`13) (MLRA 136, 122)
' Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology
must be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Redox (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19) (MLRA 148)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed:)
Type:
Hydric Soil
Depth (inches:)
Present? Yes X No
Remarks:

UPL WI
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site:
Greensboro 44kV Abandonment
City/County:
Guilford Date: 11/28/2018
Applicant/Owner:
Duke Energy Carolinas
State: NC
Sampling Point: DP14
Investigator(s):
BLB/K1S- Dewberry
Section, Township,
Range:
Saturation (A3)
Landform (hillslope, terrace,
etc.):
Drainage Patterns (1310)
Local relief (conc—,
one):
Both Slope (%): <5
Subregion (LRR or MLRA):
LRRP/MLRA 136
Let: 36.112433
Long: -79.781693 Datum: WGS 1984
Soil Map Unit Name:
Wehadkee loam, 0-2% slopes
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
NWI Classification: UPL
Are climate/hydrologic conditions
Are vegetation
Are vegetation
on the site typical for this time of the year?
, soil , or hydrology significantly disturbed?
, soil , or hydrology natrually problematic?
Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks)
Are "Normal Circumstances" present?) Yes X No
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
Summary of Findings - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc
Hydrophytic Vegetation present? Yes X No
Hydric Soil present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Upland data point for WI
Hydrology
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Surface Water (Al)
True Aquatic Plants (1314)
Surface Soil Cracks (136)
High Water Table (A2)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
Saturation (A3)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (0)
Drainage Patterns (1310)
Water Marks (131)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Sediment Deposits (132)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Drift Deposits (133)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
_Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_Microtopographic Relief (D4)
FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes_ No X Depth (Inches):
Water Table Present? Yes_ No X Depth (Inches): Wetland Hydrology Present?
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (Inches): Yes No X
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks

UPL WI
FEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: DP14
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below.)
Dominance Test Worksheet:
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Number of Dominant Species that Are OBL,
Tree Stratum
(Plot Size: )
% Cover
Species?
Status
FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
1
N
2
N
Total Number of Dominant Species Across
3
N
All Strata: 3 (B)
4
N
5
N
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL,
6
N
FACW, or FAC: 100% (A/B)
7
N
Prevalence Index Worksheet:
0 =Total Cover
Total % Cover of:
Sapling Statum
(Plot Size: )
OBL Species 0 x1= 0
1
N
FACW Species 0 x2= 0
2
N
FAC Species 95 x3= 285
3
N
FACU Species 0 x4= 0
4
N
UPL Species 0 x5= 0
5
N
6
N
Column Totals: 95 (A) 285 (B)
7
N
0
=Total Cover
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.00
Shrub Stratum
(Plot Size: )
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1
N
X Dominance Testis > 50%
2
N
Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
3
N
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
4
N
' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present,
5
N
unless disturbed or problematic
6
N
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
7 N
0
=Total Cover
Herb Stratum
(Plot Size: 5' )
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft
1 Microstegium vimineum
10
y
FAC
(6m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6cm) or larger in diameter at
2 Lonicera japonica
5
y
FAC
breast height (DBH).
3
N
4
N
5
N
6
N
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20
7
N
ft (6m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6cm) DBH.
8
N
9
N
10
N
11
N
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to
12
N
20 ft (1 to 6m) in height.
15
=Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum
(Plot Size: 30' )
1 Bignonia capreolata
80
y
FAC
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including herbaceous
2
N
vines, regardless of size. Includes woody plants, except woody
3
Ns,
less than approximately 3 ft (1m) in height.
Hydrophytic yes X No
Vegetation Present?
r5
4 N
N
80 =Total Cover
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below.)

SOIL
UPL WI
Sampling Point: DP14
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Matrix
Redox Features
Depth (Inches) Color (moist)
%
Color (Moist) % Type'
LOCI
Texture Remarks
0-7 10YR4/4
80
10YR4/3 10 D
M
Loam Faint manganese
10YR 5/1 10 D
M
7-9 10YR 5/4
90
10YR 3/1 10 D
M
Clay Loam Manganese
9-14 10YR 5/3
45
10YR 3/1 10 D
M
Clay Loam Stiff clay loam, manganese
10YR 5/6
20
10YR 5/8
15
7.5YR 5/6
10
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced
Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains.
I Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Histosol (Al)
Dark Surface (S7)
2 cm Much (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147, 148)
Black Histic (A3)
Thin Dark Surface (S9)(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19) (MLRA 136, 147)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Stratified Layers (AS)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
Iron -Manganese Masses (1`12) (LRR N, MLRA 136)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Umbric Surface (1`13) (MLRA 136, 122)
' Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology
must be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Redox (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19) (MLRA 148)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed:)
Type:
Hydric Soil
Depth (inches:)
Present? Yes No X
Remarks:

Appendix B
FEMA Flood Maps

National Flood Hazard Layer FI RMette
36°5'18.91 "N
* FEMA
--- ..v,vvv
0 250 500 1,000 1,500 2,000
Legend
SEE FIS REPORT FOR DETAILED LEGEND AND INDEX MAP FOR FIRM PANEL LAYOUT
Without Base Flood Elevation (BFE)
-, Zone A, V, A99
SPECIAL FLOOb With BFE or Depth Zone AE, AO, AH, VE, AR
HAZARD AREAS Regulatory Floodway
0.2% Annual Chance Flood Hazard, Areas
of 1% annual chance flood with average
depth less than one foot or with drainage
areas of less than one square mile zone x
Future Conditions 1% Annual
Chance Flood Hazard zone x
Area with Reduced Flood Risk due to
OTHER AREAS OF Levee. See Notes. zone x
FLOOD HAZARD ®®®I Area with Flood Risk due to Leveezone o
NO SCREEN Area of Minimal Flood Hazard zonex
Q Effective LOMRs
OTHER AREAS Area of Undetermined Flood Hazard zone D
GENERAL - — - - Channel, Culvert, or Storm Sewer
STRUCTURES 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Levee, Dike, or Floodwall
Cross Sections with i% Annual Chance
17.5 Water Surface Elevation
o- - - Coastal Transect
—513— Base Flood Elevation Line (BFE)
Limit of Study
Jurisdiction Boundary
— --- Coastal Transect Baseline
OTHER _ Profile Baseline
FEATURES Hydrographic Feature
Ej Digital Data Available N
11 No Digital Data Available
MAP PANELS ® Unmapped
Q The pin displayed on the map is an approximate
1� point selected by the user and does not represent
an authoritative property location.
This map complies with FEMA's standards for the use of
digital flood maps if it is not void as described below.
The basemap shown complies with FEMA's basemap
accuracy standards
The flood hazard information is derived directly from the
authoritative NFHL web services provided by FEMA. This map
was exported on 11/15/2018 at 9:57:03 AM and does not
reflect changes or amendments subsequent to this date and
time. The NFHL and effective information may change or
a become superseded by new data over time.
J
N This map image is void if the one or more of the following map
elements do not appear: basemap imagery, flood zone labels,
legend, scale bar, map creation date, community identifiers,
FIRM panel number, and FIRM effective date. Map images for
unmapped and unmodernized areas cannot be used for
regulatory purposes.
Approximate Project Route added by f Dewberry'

National Flood Hazard Layer FI RMetteFEMA
�U
36°5'39.07"N
--- ..v,vvv
0 250 500 1,000 1,500 2,000
Legend
SEE FIS REPORT FORD ETA ILED LEGEND AND INDEX MAP FOR FIRM PANEL LAYOUT
Without Base Flood Elevation (BFE)
Zone A, V. A99
SPECIAL FLOOD
With BFE or Depth Zone AE, AD, AH, VE, AR
HAZARD AREAS
Regulatory Floodway
0.2% Annual Chance Flood Hazard, Areas
PF of 1% annual chance flood with average
depth less than one foot or with drainage
areas of less than one square mile zone x
Future Conditions 1% Annual
Chance Flood Hazard zone x
Area with Reduced Flood Risk due to
OTHER AREAS OF Levee. See Notes. zone x
FLOOD HAZARD �&#' 01 Area with Flood Risk due to Leveezone D
NO SCREEN Area of Minimal Flood Hazard ZoneX
Q Effective LOMRs
OTHER AREAS Area of Undetermined Flood Hazard zone D
GENERAL - — - - Channel, Culvert, or Storm Sewer
STRUCTURES 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Levee, Dike, or Floodwall
Cross Sections with i% Annual Chance
17.5 Water Surface Elevation
o- - - Coastal Transect
—513— Base Flood Elevation Line (BFE)
Limit of Study
Jurisdiction Boundary
— --- Coastal Transect Baseline
OTHER _ Profile Baseline
FEATURES Hydrographic Feature
Ej Digital Data Available N
11 No Digital Data Available
MAP PANELS ® Unmapped
Q The pin displayed on the map is an approximate
1� point selected by the user and does not represent
an authoritative property location.
This map complies with FEMA's standards for the use of
digital flood maps if it is not void as described below.
The basemap shown complies with FEMA's basemap
accuracy standards
The flood hazard information is derived directly from the
authoritative NFHL web services provided by FEMA. This map
was exported on 11/15/2018 at 9:53:36 AM and does not
reflect changes or amendments subsequent to this date and
time. The NFHL and effective information may change or
a become superseded by new data over time.
J
This map image is void if the one or more of the following map
elements do not appear: basemap imagery, flood zone labels,
legend, scale bar, map creation date, community identifiers,
FIRM panel number, and FIRM effective date. Map images for
unmapped and unmodernized areas cannot be used for
regulatory purposes.
Approximate Project Route added by ff Dewberry'

National Flood Hazard Layer FI RMetteFEMA
�U
36°5'57.06"N
--- ..v,vvv
0 250 500 1,000 1,500 2,000
Legend
SEE FIS REPORT FORD ETA ILED LEGEND AND INDEX MAP FOR FIRM PANEL LAYOUT
Without Base Flood Elevation (BFE)
Zone A, V. A99
SPECIAL FLOOD
With BFE or Depth Zone AE, AD, AH, VE, AR
HAZARD AREAS
Regulatory Floodway
0.2% Annual Chance Flood Hazard, Areas
of 1% annual chance flood with average
depth less than one foot or with drainage
areas of less than one square mile zone x
Future Conditions 1% Annual
Chance Flood Hazard zone x
�I Area with Reduced Flood Risk due to
OTHER AREAS OF Levee. See Notes. zone x
FLOOD HAZARD Area with Flood Risk due to Leveezone D
NO SCREEN Area of Minimal Flood Hazard ZoneX
Q Effective LOMRs
OTHER AREAS Area of Undetermined Flood Hazard zone D
GENERAL - — - - Channel, Culvert, or Storm Sewer
STRUCTURES 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Levee, Dike, or Floodwall
Cross Sections with i% Annual Chance
17.5 Water Surface Elevation
o- - - Coastal Transect
—513— Base Flood Elevation Line (BFE)
Limit of Study
Jurisdiction Boundary
— --- Coastal Transect Baseline
OTHER _ Profile Baseline
FEATURES Hydrographic Feature
Ej Digital Data Available N
11 No Digital Data Available
MAP PANELS ® Unmapped
Q The pin displayed on the map is an approximate
1� point selected by the user and does not represent
an authoritative property location.
This map complies with FEMA's standards for the use of
digital flood maps if it is not void as described below.
The basemap shown complies with FEMA's basemap
accuracy standards
The flood hazard information is derived directly from the
authoritative NFHL web services provided by FEMA. This map
was exported on 11/14/2018 at 12:05:44 PM and does not
reflect changes or amendments subsequent to this date and
time. The NFHL and effective information may change or
a become superseded by new data over time.
m
a This map image is void if the one or more of the following map
o, elements do not appear: basemap imagery, flood zone labels,
legend, scale bar, map creation date, community identifiers,
FIRM panel number, and FIRM effective date. Map images for
unmapped and unmodernized areas cannot be used for
regulatory purposes.
Approximate Project Route added by f Dewberry'

National Flood Hazard Layer FI RMetteFEMA
�U
36°6'59.80"N
0 250 500 1,000 1,500 2,000
Legend
SEE FIS REPORT FOR DETAILED LEGEND AND INDEX MAP FOR FIRM PANEL LAYOUT
Without Base Flood Elevation (BFE)
-, Zone A, V, A99
rHAZARD
LOOb With BFE or Depth Zone AE, AO, AH, VE, AR
REAS Regulatory Floodway
OTHER AREAS OF
FLOOD HAZARD
0.2% Annual Chance Flood Hazard, Areas
of 1% annual chance flood with average
depth less than one foot or with drainage
areas of less than one square mile zone x
VI Future Conditions 1% Annual
Chance Flood Hazard zone x
Area with Reduced Flood Risk due to
Levee. See Notes. zone x
Area with Flood Risk due to Leveezone D
NO SCREEN Area of Minimal Flood Hazard zonex
Q Effective LOMRs
OTHER AREAS Area of Undetermined Flood Hazard zone D
GENERAL - — - - Channel, Culvert, or Storm Sewer
STRUCTURES 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Levee, Dike, or Floodwall
Cross Sections with i% Annual Chance
17.5 Water Surface Elevation
o- - - Coastal Transect
—513— Base Flood Elevation Line (BFE)
Limit of Study
Jurisdiction Boundary
— --- Coastal Transect Baseline
OTHER _ Profile Baseline
FEATURES Hydrographic Feature
Ej Digital Data Available N
11 No Digital Data Available
MAP PANELS ® Unmapped
Q The pin displayed on the map is an approximate
1� point selected by the user and does not represent
an authoritative property location.
This map complies with FEMA's standards for the use of
digital flood maps if it is not void as described below.
The basemap shown complies with FEMA's basemap
accuracy standards
The flood hazard information is derived directly from the
authoritative NFHL web services provided by FEMA. This map
was exported on 11/15/2018 at 9:41:37 AM and does not
reflect changes or amendments subsequent to this date and
time. The NFHL and effective information may change or
a become superseded by new data over time.
m
a This map image is void if the one or more of the following map
OD
elements do not appear: basemap imagery, flood zone labels,
legend, scale bar, map creation date, community identifiers,
FIRM panel number, and FIRM effective date. Map images for
unmapped and unmodernized areas cannot be used for
regulatory purposes.
Approximate Project Route added by 9 Dewberry'

Appendix C
Wetland/WOTUS Exhibit

.♦ '� ♦ cn O YMOUT PARKMONT DR R�S� G� 2 p 00
W
♦ ♦� HILLS co -0 H �P� FO 5��p
p O
♦ ♦ S CARLISLE R SRL �� �P� -a
♦ ♦ . BRI RCLIFF RD °j gRi RO ❑ �\ rn
•
/pp
ATHAM D NUNA < D U)R�\SEER MARSTON R
fn
Ofi\ ❑ �RPN(P pR Oo m
♦ n:� ♦ ❑ 73 KE FOR w
♦� ♦ < Q O R <
• ♦ �Q� U) z 0 o O SOMM�R�
D
WHARTON ST GRANVILLE N . Q� O 0 03Lu
♦ PCO ❑ o < C/) �Q 6PRG�P
N EU ENE ST w Q . ♦O DALTON RD
O O S
MPSON T �Q ai p ♦ w
P w ❑ ♦ RGINIA �
ALL DALE R U
z ST'
♦ \ OOpQ Y PN�UR� Rp GE
♦ O G�pP MR
CARO NAST
CA AANDO \ NpR
♦ M ��O EW S
N MST ♦ ♦♦ O�� BL KENEY PL
G
G�Q�p HENRY ST
v 0�
MA NOLIA T � � ♦ �v�� RIS PL
U)
Q�
OLIVE T O ♦ ♦ � Of G Z B CH TR
O� O� of ♦ ♦� ROSELAND S w I X co w
z ❑ H J
♦ ♦ co �
w o o ♦ ♦ ♦ w z N w
B LOS G EDEN ATE OR a z
■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ w O
w O w ♦ p ���D T Lu z m
CHESTNUT ST ♦ QV
z
o W ♦ �I♦ PALM ST • • ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ♦ ■
s 9 •• VA■■■■■■.•
PERC ST w w ST■IJD� ■
♦ o
0
�9 O�10 w ♦♦♦ �, I RCHS N ■
000 4W
�
• ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ SIN SPRUCE ST ♦ EEC -TR
W
W O 71 HUBBARD S ♦ ■♦ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■
co CO cn GHUBBAR ST
Q CYPRESS ST O i— ♦♦♦
m CYP ESS ST
S� _
O w MAPLE ST 0
❑ cn
A Z— MAPLE S
MF� R%f gV s�MM/T = j VI EST = 14TH ST CE��LLE S'
O i— YANCEYV LE ST YAN
44kGreensboro
)1000� 1,000 500 0 1,000 Feet Dewberry® V Abandonment
DewbeH 9300H r sCornersParInc.
DUKE WOTUS &Wetland
LS300 Harris Corners Parkway
Suite 220
704-50 -991 26269-2616 t, ENERGY.. Exhibit
1 inch = 1,000 feet www 09dewberryerr
..com Sheet 1 of 12
4
O
COURTNEY LN U Q
J
S
�Q�O
V
ON � A
OL \A
O R
S REGIS RD
OJ�pP CPO�7
o
= s
z Gds
mof
�� 6R00
Q Q
o
p HAZEL LN
=
O� P ID EWO DDR �
U ❑ ��
U
E�FORp LN
a z
m w
�
KgN
♦ Q O
Z> CL URN ST
z
6E
WILLOUGHB BV[if
♦♦ ♦�� wz
z CEE
O
B NEST
.♦ '� ♦ cn O YMOUT PARKMONT DR R�S� G� 2 p 00
W
♦ ♦� HILLS co -0 H �P� FO 5��p
p O
♦ ♦ S CARLISLE R SRL �� �P� -a
♦ ♦ . BRI RCLIFF RD °j gRi RO ❑ �\ rn
•
/pp
ATHAM D NUNA < D U)R�\SEER MARSTON R
fn
Ofi\ ❑ �RPN(P pR Oo m
♦ n:� ♦ ❑ 73 KE FOR w
♦� ♦ < Q O R <
• ♦ �Q� U) z 0 o O SOMM�R�
D
WHARTON ST GRANVILLE N . Q� O 0 03Lu
♦ PCO ❑ o < C/) �Q 6PRG�P
N EU ENE ST w Q . ♦O DALTON RD
O O S
MPSON T �Q ai p ♦ w
P w ❑ ♦ RGINIA �
ALL DALE R U
z ST'
♦ \ OOpQ Y PN�UR� Rp GE
♦ O G�pP MR
CARO NAST
CA AANDO \ NpR
♦ M ��O EW S
N MST ♦ ♦♦ O�� BL KENEY PL
G
G�Q�p HENRY ST
v 0�
MA NOLIA T � � ♦ �v�� RIS PL
U)
Q�
OLIVE T O ♦ ♦ � Of G Z B CH TR
O� O� of ♦ ♦� ROSELAND S w I X co w
z ❑ H J
♦ ♦ co �
w o o ♦ ♦ ♦ w z N w
B LOS G EDEN ATE OR a z
■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ w O
w O w ♦ p ���D T Lu z m
CHESTNUT ST ♦ QV
z
o W ♦ �I♦ PALM ST • • ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ♦ ■
s 9 •• VA■■■■■■.•
PERC ST w w ST■IJD� ■
♦ o
0
�9 O�10 w ♦♦♦ �, I RCHS N ■
000 4W
�
• ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ SIN SPRUCE ST ♦ EEC -TR
W
W O 71 HUBBARD S ♦ ■♦ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■
co CO cn GHUBBAR ST
Q CYPRESS ST O i— ♦♦♦
m CYP ESS ST
S� _
O w MAPLE ST 0
❑ cn
A Z— MAPLE S
MF� R%f gV s�MM/T = j VI EST = 14TH ST CE��LLE S'
O i— YANCEYV LE ST YAN
44kGreensboro
)1000� 1,000 500 0 1,000 Feet Dewberry® V Abandonment
DewbeH 9300H r sCornersParInc.
DUKE WOTUS &Wetland
LS300 Harris Corners Parkway
Suite 220
704-50 -991 26269-2616 t, ENERGY.. Exhibit
1 inch = 1,000 feet www 09dewberryerr
..com Sheet 1 of 12

It
M
IDLEWOOD DR
14
• i
II i
-
7
' ! • • i , -
.J �r
0 op
41
..10.
iv
All
I
A. 401.
`;
100 50 0 100 Feet a::.� Dewberry®
Dewberry Engineers Inc.
9300Harris Corners Parkway
s.ile zlo
Charlotte, NC M.9 -Ml.
1 inch = 100 feet '.4_509-9918
.dewberrrr
y com
T DUKE
ENERGY.
Greensboro
44kV Abandonment
WOTUS & Wetland
Exhibit
Sheet 2 of 12
Legend
Data Points
Investigation Area
Conductor
StrearnR3
Stream R4
WetlandPEM
WetlandPFO
WetlandPSS
II i
-
7
' ! • • i , -
.J �r
0 op
41
..10.
iv
All
I
A. 401.
`;
100 50 0 100 Feet a::.� Dewberry®
Dewberry Engineers Inc.
9300Harris Corners Parkway
s.ile zlo
Charlotte, NC M.9 -Ml.
1 inch = 100 feet '.4_509-9918
.dewberrrr
y com
T DUKE
ENERGY.
Greensboro
44kV Abandonment
WOTUS & Wetland
Exhibit
Sheet 2 of 12

f4�
� -• fir
`
6L7-
Buffalo CreE
Legend
Data Points
Investigation Area
Conductor
StreamR3
Stream R4
WetlandPEM
WetlandPFO
WetlandPSS
14
Stream
CRIDLAND RD44
�''' , •
100 50 0 100 Feet;" Dewberry® TDUKE
' `�/ r
Dewberry Engineers Inc. D V KE
9300 Harris Corners Parkway
C°ile ar'zI0 ENERGY.
Charlotte, NC 28269-2618
1 inch = 100 feet 509-9918
.dewberrrr
y com
Greensboro
44kV Abandonment
WOTUS & Wetiand
Exhibit
Sheet 3 of 12
M

r
_ •fit
IF
1p
tir /
41140A_ r
Nk
s
i r %I 1 `4
Stream SE
ti
dream tor F •
Wetlantl UVE Stream SG
_TANKERSLEY DR
Ak
. X!,
Greensboro
100 50 0 100 Feet; Dewberry® 44kV Abandonment
Dewberry Engineers ParInc,
", DUKE WOTUS & Wetland
9300 Harris Corners Parkway
Suite 220
Cha5otte,09- NC 28269-2618 ENERGY Exhibit
1 inch = 100 feet
704-r,
a
.dewberry com Sheet 5 of 12
ti
Legend
.F
Data Points
y
Investigation Area
Conductor
StreamR3
®
StreamR4
WetlandPEM
WetlandPFO
WetlandPSS
dream tor F •
Wetlantl UVE Stream SG
_TANKERSLEY DR
Ak
. X!,
Greensboro
100 50 0 100 Feet; Dewberry® 44kV Abandonment
Dewberry Engineers ParInc,
", DUKE WOTUS & Wetland
9300 Harris Corners Parkway
Suite 220
Cha5otte,09- NC 28269-2618 ENERGY Exhibit
1 inch = 100 feet
704-r,
a
.dewberry com Sheet 5 of 12

I# , �dip
�
r. t
t Amp. i
40 1
R IN
't •� • 1
A
rtat
f
•
0000
w . ! •
r '
r N
ro
10
R �� �� A ` 1 ' ` ` • '.. ' ice' ,` , , ,'
Op
Legend
Data Points
so
Investigation Area
ST
Conductor
Stream R3
® StrearnR4 ♦ ,�
WetlandPEM . - •
WetlandPFO Greensboro
100 50 0 100 Feet;"
Dewberry
�
44kV Abandonment
Dewberry Engineers WetlandPSS 9300 Harris Parkway DUKE WOTUS &Wetland
Suite220 ENERGY.
NC 28269-2618 ,Exhibit704-509-9918
1 inch = 100 feet www.dewberrycom
Sheet 7 of 12

its ,
lip -W AW
lot
e.
lb A
Ir
40 Ci
dw
1
i ► r00 1001
tiC It
m
`
iv
-
`. I AFT
O
Zj
t Legend 7low ,,�►PO_.
N CHURCH ST
� Data Points A ,. A �/ - �.��
Investigation Area.. •.,�
Conductor
... - ...r �-- - •A.%._
StrearnR3 -'� �� •�`' �' -
_ � r
•
® StrearnR4 • '
WetlandPEM
WetlandPFO Greensboro
100 50 0 100 Feet;" Dewberry® 44kV Abandonment
Dewberry Engineers Inc, DUKE
Wet I a n d P S S 9300 Harris & Wetland
r s Corners Parkway
S
z ite 220
Charone NC 28269-2618 ENERGY.Exhibit
dewwberrberr
1 inch = 100 feet www
.dy com Sheet 8 of 12

BRpOK
•
SYN
�� "� ` J N �'wy►�.�It 111 �
Of
fit
— T
• - - -
Ole
Stream SI$
A,, � � Stream SJ
* t 4; • •• 4
e and WF
• Wetland WH
Legend - 1�
co Data Points �� 1
Investigation Area ,-. 1 • %*
r Conductor _ •' + -
StreamR3
® StreamR4 JU WetlandPEM -
WetlandPFO Greensboro
100 50 0 100 Feet;" Dewberry® 44kV Abandonment
Wet l a n d P S S 9300 Harris
Engineers Par DUKE
9300 Ha Corners Parkway WOTUS &Wetland
z s.i e III
NC 28269-�6,8 ,� ENERGY.Exhibit
1 inch = 100 feet 704W509-99rr
.—dewberrycorn Sheet 9 of 12

and
4L � , "� _
i C
' Stream SL F I y
s
-� Stream
1 +► Z` Wetland WI k ,*'
Mat♦ , FX�cUT/�I.tt Q ,
r
Ab
r
Wetland WG
� � c
Legend ~ '
Data Points •' ' •'' ` t
t
Investigation Area FooyF "
Conductor
Stream R3 Fc°�Fe
® StrearnR4 • 1p
'f
WetlandPEM
Wetland PFOGreensboro
100 50 0 100 Feet Dewberry® � 44kV Abandonment
Wet l a n d P S S 93"0 Harris
Engineers Par DUKE
9300 Ha i Corners Parkway WOTUS &Wetland
Suite 220
s.iteIe NC 28269-2618 ENERGY.Exhibit
1 inch = 100 feet 704W509-99rr
.dewberry com Sheet 10of 12

10 ,
�i
-Alta'
. JVD S,� • � � � � 1
r
GHVRG '� `• .
JWW
•• _ - V
a 1
—
•
• Jpw
Aft"
Legend
Data Points
Investigation Area f ♦
Conductor
Stream R3 `` — 10
® StrearnR4 jmew
E�EDTPJ�DR f �
WetlandPEM1% �►-
WetlandPFO Greensboro
100 50 0 100 Feet;" Dewberry® 44kV Abandonment
z Dewberry Engineers
IncWetlandPSS 9300 Harris Parkway . DUKE
WOTUS &Wetland
o2°
otte, NC 28269-2618
9-9918 ENERGY.
Char' Exhibit1 inch = 100 feet www.dewberrycom
Sheet 11 of 12

',
;'460 _
t 40- , •'
r r .fpr
•• iii
- «ir •- ..
.. Stream
lot
` L
14
3
� Tl- � moi: • ♦ -- `� � _,1, _ ,� _
Legend,-''�:,�
ELECTRA DR
Data Points As'
- `- 1'v
Investigation Area ,� ♦ .'�a• -�! r+�_._�
r
`,mow ♦ + a� 1 �. _�� . ,�•--�� . i
Conductor •.� OW •
j W1
StreamR3 " I
wo
1 : .1 1*
® StreamR4 WO -0
WetlandPEM �r �'�' •�
WetlandPFO Greensboro
100 50 0 100 Feet;" Dewberry® 44kV Abandonment
Wet l a n d P S S Dewberry Engineers Par DUKE
5300 Ha Corners Parkway WOTUS &Wetland
)IIII10- I--/ Suite 220
Ly Char�one,NC 28269-2618 ENERGY.Exhibit
1 inch = 100 feet 7ww.de beer
.dewberry com Sheet 12of 12

Appendix D
Stream Determination Forms

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 "Czz�A I A
Date: 1 4
Project/Site: �Cer130r0
Latitude: 36A M 19
Evaluator: 131 �� _'Wa�c.
County:
Longitude:
0
u�d
14. Leaf litter
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittentEphemeral
3 3 7s
Stream Determination (ci
Intermitte Perennia
Other
e.g. Quad Name: �r10' °� ' Nc
if z 19 or perennial if z 30'
2
zo L k
A. Geomorphology Subtotal
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
18. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
14. Leaf litter
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
1
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
0.5
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
('90
2
3
8. Headcuts
Ln1
25. Algae
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
1.5
10. Natural valley
ACW = 0.75; BL = 1.5 Other = 0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
o = 0
Yes = 3
in
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal = 1\ )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0 1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0 1
2
3-
14. Leaf litter
1.5
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0 .5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes =
3
C. Bioloav (Subtotal= R _TS )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1.5
23. Crayfish
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
ACW = 0.75; BL = 1.5 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:5jim IIUVWOUS
" .nc CffU5i5
in
S#r4tAI*%d
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
s�
Date: «� Zell 0
ProjecVSite:6(et,s66 1 kv
Latitude: 36.(9023
Evaluator: ;,)
County: Q,'r04
Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent rjEphemera
cle one)
Stream Det�Intermlftent
Other
13fee^3 D"°INC
if _> 19 or erennial if >_ 30'
erenniale.g.
Quad Name:
201 to
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =_L15__)
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1.5 1
n2-
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
Yes = 3
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
1.5
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
3
8. Headcuts
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5 *
1
1.5
,11. Second or greater order channel
No= 0
Yes = 3
- artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal = Q,, ,S )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0 1
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
2 3
14. Leaf litter
1.5 1
0. 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0 0.5Cl)
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0 .5 -
1 , 1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
C. Biololav (Subtotal= l0•5 ) -
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3 2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0 1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0'
2
3
22. Fish
0 0.
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
25. Algae
0.5
0.5
1
1
1.5
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.
Other =
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
/
Notes:
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
M
Date:
26 ,
Project/Site: Glufi6ur0 yy kV
Latitude:
1920
Evaluator: ;I-�w��
County: 6'Vpurd
-�
Longitude:
1
0
3
Total Points:
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other
Stream is at least intermittent
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
e.g. Quad Name: C1�eeq�or°. N�
if z 19 or Perennial if z 30'
1
Zo, b
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = )
Absent
Weak
Mode ate-
Strong
18. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
0
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
sequence
0
1
2
3
-ripple-pool
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
0 1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
OA
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
' artificial ditches are not rated; see discsions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = � .? )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0 1 2
3 .
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0 1 2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5 0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0 0.5 1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0 0.5 1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0 r Yes _=
1.5
C. Biology Subtotal = 5,3,5
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3 2 Q1 D
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2 1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1 2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0 1 2
3
22. Fish
0 0.5
1.5
23. Crayfish
0.5
1.5
24. Amphibians
0.5 1
1.5
25. Algae
0 1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75 BL = 1.5 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: 5Wory ee wi ((a.► o �1
,� L'hannc cam n o
&aveor
Sketch:
1
J-)

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 SE 101
Date: I � 20
Project/Site: Gla"Isbor o yy OJ
Latitude: 3(a - O93 29 2.
Evaluator: 11 _
County: G V�' �o r d
Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent 3D
Stream Determination ('
Other
4r`�"s1�" fitG
if z 19 or perennial if z 30*
Ephemeral Intermitten erennia
e.g. Quad Name: Ot tC+
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = 15"
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1 a' Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
1
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
1
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
0.5
1
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
1
3
B. Headcuts
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No =
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discu�ions in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal = °I
12. Presence of Baseflow
0 1
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0 1
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
0.5 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0 1 0.5
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0 0.5
1 1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal =
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
QA
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: ' Q S
Sketch: _
V�vH

NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.1
SF
Date: l_ ZO�
Project/Site: ,,,,,",,I,,,,,,,
,I,,,,ro 44 kJ
Latitude: 3( Ofp$
Evaluator: T1 -Mitt - ,�-�6pt V
County: G�L� 1
Longitude: _� q �g b 3B 3
Total Points:
Stream Dete ' n (circle one)
Other(7i.*4v,,S)CcCo t�jG
Stream is at least intermittent 22
erennial
if z 19 or if i' 30*
Ephemeral termitte t Perennial
e.g. Quad Name: Zpf, b
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
©
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
403
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
C11
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
1.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
Qff
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0)
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloov (Subtotal = Co i
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
0
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
00.
3
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
403
No = 0
1
es = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = -7 l
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
Qff
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
403
0.5
1
1.5
23. CrayfishCO--)0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
Othercol
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
-
Sketch:
P
04
\ c -,
Ilkc h
e

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
S�
I_ 7_ I g
Date:eewr
ProjectlSite: r v
Latitude -
Evaluator:
County: 6I
UA
Longitude: 79, 7855 $3
Total Points:
Stream Det . . n (circle one)
Other NG
Stream is at least intermittent 2-, S
if >_ 19 or eren2lal if a 30'
Ephemera Intermitte Perennial
e.g. Quad Name: Z of i0
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal=
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
0
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
16. Organic debris lines or piles
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
®
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
QD
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
0.5
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
0.5
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
Other 0
3
9. Grade control
0
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
�61
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
o = 0
Yes = 3
Sketch:
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal = 7• S )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0 1
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
1 2
3
14. Leaf litter
1 0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0 .5 1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0 Q.5 1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
s = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = "7 1
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
U0
1
2
3
22. Fish
QO
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
Other 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: L y,,j y
Sketch:
Yoad
r1 t;�.\vest
S�eoccn

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
S+4
Date: + , Z-7-)?'
Project/Site' y
Latitude: 3G_ 09-7 4 2_9
Evaluator: 8 �� 1
County: 6_a.:1NrA
Longitude: -79,1834i32
Total Points:
Stream Determi )
(circle one
Other (sY�¢.-�g►oo,p we,
Stream is at least intermittent % �
if r 19 or ernnnit i if z 30* LhJ
Ephemeral ntermitten erennial
e.g. Quad Name: Zo( p
A. Geomorphology Subtotal =
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
Q0
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
0.5
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
0 0.5S
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1.
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
0
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1.
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No -O
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal = (o,5;
)
12. Presence of Baseflow
0 1
1
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0 1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
T5
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0 0.5S
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
1:5
C. Biologv (Subtotal = ILL-)
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks 0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0.5
1
1:5
24. Amphibians
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae 0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.
Other ___0D
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:
n

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 St-�o
Date: '
Z
Project/Site: 6VeeA3bLn 44W
Latitude: %. )0042
Evaluator: ��\ - eW f/
County:
Longitude: --79-79133q
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent 2�
Stream Deter ' (circle one)
Other a(.�lwro,NC
if? 19 or perennial if � 30' v
Ephemeral nterm�tten erennial
e.g. Quad Name: ?'0110
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = L
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2 '
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
(52
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
26. Wetland plants in streambed
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1.
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
o = 0
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal = I,< )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0 1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
1 '
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5 1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0 0.
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0 0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
1.5
C. Bioloav (Subtotal= In )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians 0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0.5
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL =
5 Other =
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: 1 0+
Sketch: Ir
Seo<-r��►a�.r•��

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 5--.. \ 1 - L)
Date: 1I z�-ItO
Project/Site:G&e-y*Qr0 44 kV
Latitude: 1\005-(o
Evaluator: 15B11 - �l� -'C��C
C�
County: G1AkTV{a.
Longitude:--M,38219(p
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent
cle one)
Stream Dete=1tfttent
Other Gdttns�pr0� �G
if z 19 or erennial if>_ 30*
Ephemeral erennial
e.g. Quad Name: Z4X
n
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = "
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
16. Organic debris lines or piles
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
0 J, 1
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool se uence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositionalbars or benches
0
26. Wetland plants in streambed
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0.5'
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No =
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal =
12. Presence of Baseflow
0 1 3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
1 2 3
14. Leaf litter
1•.5 1 0.5 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
Ka 1 1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0 0.5 1 1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0 es = 3
C. Biology Subtotal = "--�
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3 2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0 J, 1
2
3
22. Fish
4D 0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0 0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0 0.5
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.
Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: tw;
Sketch:
SG1^cioi �ar1�,r IOt'
r C.V�J u
> ` ..i

NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
�Ly
Date:
Project/Site: fle 46CO 44w
Latitude: �& iI2950
Evaluator: '?� 11 �'����r
County: ($U1 o&
Longitude: _ �N43
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent �%�)�j
Stream Deter circle one)
Ephemer ntermitte Perennial
Other
e.g. Quad Name:�����s�rO' N
if 2:19 or perennial if >_ 30" /� fi
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
► ka
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = `6 .5 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1 a Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
0.5
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
Cy
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No =
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloov (Subtotal =
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
1 0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
INo
= 0
25. Algae
es = 3
C. Bioloov (Subtotal = lo
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks 11V
1
2
3
22. Fish 0)
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1
Other =
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
SM '_2
Date: 2
Project/Site:a,-e&'6 o 44 1L-/
Latitude: ? 11%%012-
9 Z
Evaluator:
Evaluator:'S •�" . be
County: . `�a
Longitude: -M,7%09 by
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent
Stream Determination (cir
Other
C.7f�•�T baro, NC
if z 19 or perennial if 2: 30•
Ephemeral Intermittent erennia
e.g. Quad Name: .oI
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = )(0.5)
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
14. Leaf litter
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
0.5
(2p •
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
0.
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1 •
2
3
8. Headcuts
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
CD
1.5
10. Natural valley
0:,
t __ 0.5
1 Mt41.5
11: Second or greater order channel
No = 0 `-
Yes = 3
J ?
J
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = T )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0 1
tt
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0 CD
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0 0.5 ,
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
1
C. Biology (Subtotal = �;,5 )1-_1%-
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
2D
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0)
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
_
ather
.perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: GaAWN lot W oA'eo' m
I a wuyn[10 r iWAncloo,
Sketch:
J ?
J
to f' _