20190323 Ver 1_More Info Received_20190412

Homewood, Sue
From: Josselyn Lucas <[e-mail]>
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2019 3:56 PM
To: 'Fuemmeler, Amanda J CIV (US)'; Homewood, Sue
Cc: 'Adam Williams'
Subject: [External] Updates for PCNs : North Fork New River, and Call Creek (Wilson and
Gentry)
Attachments: Gentry Impact Map_Update.pdf, Gentry-Call Creek Impact Updated PCN.pdf;
Wilson_North Fork New River-Impact Updated PCN.pdf
......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Hi Amanda and Sue,
We updated the PCN pages (impacts pages)for the North Fork New River and Call Creek Projects (Wilson and Gentry).
I've attached those for your review. I've also included the updated wetland map with PJD reaches on it.
Please let me know if this is clear and if you require anything else!
Thanks,
Josselyn
��Iroject ` Ila&Ilia&ger, wpeda&hst
51116hy °irk O111SLultJ11ig, 'IliiC.
10565 I°Wy 421 SOU lh, !rode, !Id
Offiiced 423 727 447
C IIII° 828...406...9508
BFEC.org
"Study I111,1tL ire, 14.1ve I111,l Lfl-e, stay dose to I111,1tLVII"tl'. It M never Ilr&IIII YOLC' rank I...l yd WirIght
Lt
....,.
1

6. Future Project Plans
6a.Is this a phased project?*
r Yes r No
Are any other NWP(s),regional general permit(s),or individual permits(s)used,or intended to be used,to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?This
includes other separate and distant crossing for linear projects that require Department of the Army authorization but don't require pre-construction notification.
No
FD. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
la.Where are the impacts associated with your project?(check all that apply):
W Wetlands W Streams-tributaries r Buffers
r- Open Waters r Pond Construction
2.Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site,then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
"W."will be used in the table below to represent the word"wetland".
2a1 Reason*(?) 2b.Impact type*M 2c.Type of W.* 2d.W.name* 2e.Forested* 2f.Type of Impact
Jurisdicition (?) ]2g.
area*
1 CONSTRUCTION T Non-Tidal Freshwater Marsh W1 No Both 0.004
ACCESS (acres)
2g.Total Temporary Wetland Impact
0.004
2g.Total Permanent Wetland Impact
0.000
2g.Total Wetland Impact
0.004
2h.Comments:
Many of the wetlands on-site are technically agricultural drainage ditches Mich have been colonized by wetland plant species(see photos in
Wetlands Submittal of miscellaneous attachments).The project site is an active agricultural and cattle farm.
3.Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts(including temporary impacts)proposed on the site,then complete this question for all stream sites impacted.
"S"will be used in the table below to represent the word"stream".
F
3a.Reason for impact*(?) 3b.lmpact type* 3c.Type of impact* 3d.S.name* ��3ImpactI
e.Stream Type* 3f.Type of 3g S width* 3h.
(?) Jurisdiction* length*
1 S1
Stabilization Project Tem orar Bank Stabilization North Fork New River Perennial Both 30 2,312 P Y
Average(feet) (liriearfeet)
1 S2
Stabilization Project Tem ora Bank Stabilization Brush Fork Perennial Both 10 805 P rY
Average(feet) (linearfeet)
All Perennial or Intermittent streams must be verified by DWR or delegated local government.
3i.Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
0
3i.Total permanent stream impacts:
0
3i.Total temporary stream impacts:
3,117
3i.Total stream and ditch impacts:
807
3j.Comments:
3i above(807)is auto-calculated and does not match our calculations(BFEC does not knowwhere this number is derived from).The project total
stream impacts are 3117 LF(with 2312 LF on North Fork New River and 805 LF on Brush Fork).
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1.Avoidance and Minimization