640074_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20190218

"011� t t
iyl,c ui vis": !0 [;ompliance Inspec
Reason for Visit: Q Routine O Co
w .L & ty oc t
abutm d'sou"door eaweiWliow.
Utha -Auoriav
O Referral
Evaluation
0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: h': Region:
Form Name: + $ V 7Z Owner Email: '
r
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
1 I-_
Onsite Representative: �(1 .11 / 4y-) 1'r , 5 4 W
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
oars
Phone:
Title:
Phone:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Latitude: Longitude:
Design! :Cuxra4t sign Clzrxaut
(-jAPjxe#y Pap. et y a "tapaaity Bap.
Laver
ate_,
Non -La er
Nan -L
Pullets
Other
Poults
Nstp, uvrt~euir
PQ
roesigu .Cllr i3
Catili 61ap.aaity Pup;
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
—.Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker j
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Discharges and Stream Impacts
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation'?
Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure Application Field ❑ Other:
I'fl 1 26,151
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Dyes ❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
es ❑ No
[:INA
❑ NE
11
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?� � b
1 �/� 2 1
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
:. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
f 'Yes ❑ No
[DNA
❑ NE
Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
�es [] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page 1 of .I
2/412015 Continued

FacilityNumber: Ley- '� [ Date of Inspection: —/
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA 4n <NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? E] Yes E] No ❑ NA NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ]Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an Immediate public health or environmental threat, notifyDWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA � N
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA Pi
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA E
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ AppIication Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): ell L3 e /" a
I3. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Ye ON ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? Yes ���000
NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes [ <""o NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? Y3Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
No
[DNA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP []Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑ Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ MonthIy and I" Rainfall Inspections
❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: 74 Date of Inspection: ! l 1
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? Yes ZNo NA NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check Yes 0 No C] NA [] NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
Failure to complete annual sludge survey Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
El Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? Yes N NA NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Oth Yes No NA NE I
er ssues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than
E] Yes No NA NE
normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
Yes No NA NE
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
Yes No NA NE
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Yes E] No NA NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
Yes No C] NA NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative?
Yes No (] NA C3 NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?El
Yes [] No NA NE
' t�fues�o�l�j:,Ifi�pla�any"YE9 as s�cirs.an$ru�.a�,�j�alneaommendns organ �r
110AMMriVA-AfifxrMt-..,-PR A'.4fa, __T_r_r�z..�.r-- ..._ .,...._ 4 I3 �' IR 9►
4pp t! s Gq uh S l�fGj / (� l �i'� /j,
pr (3 e c_ z e r=, ria/ Sasas�
1) 61s4&r,4ot4e110 ncderlr,,jov
C11 I' a rq4" ok j tk'C
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
519rloi� —7-017
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone: f % 7t'j (y ZOO
Date: �- — I /f
2141201S