510102_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20190320

+r I I -is 'j V) .s l a"I t t
Fatality Number - j Qa O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
AWS 51010 O Other Agency
Type of Visit: t3 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: t$ Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time:Fc f-71 0 0 Departure Time: County: To n$ Region: RPJQ
Farm Name:
De -Anes
❑ NA
�avndr
Owner Name:
[8 No
lit
Ra 11
❑ Yes
� No
❑ NA
Mailing Address:
Owner Email:
Phone:
Physical Address: J A-brao if Low &fo Fur Da k
FacilityContact: ' 1n
t'_n171S KaynO/ _- Title: Q)Yqfl' - Phone:
n
Onsite Representative: nn I-CPav nor Integrator: 040'0.10
I IJ
Certified Operator: bemt
n Q n Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
Other
Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
F�Layer
Non -Layer
Non -La
Pullets
Other
Poults
Design Current
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
.Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
❑ Yes Ej No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
[—]Yes
[8 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
� No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page I of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facili Number: _ j Date of Inspection: 3
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
Waste Collection & Treatment
No
❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure l Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
Identifier: 3 _
❑ Yes
[S No
❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
Spillway?:
❑ No
ONA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3
Designed Freeboard (in): Gi q
2/4/2015 Continued
Observed Freeboard (in): 01 a'T
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health
or environmental
threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
[2] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
[:]Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Auplication
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
[:]Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge
into
Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): C0jdal nplmudaq Gro
13. Soil Type(s):
I4. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
[ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a Iack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
CZ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
[S No
❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
ONA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3
2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: f - Date of Inspection: 3140
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface the drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
2 NE
❑ Yes
� No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes tff No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes JZ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
p Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
'RID -Dennis hili need/.✓ 3 hrs C4l�nvt� eco. bit- is bilacaI, pafarlork 1,6+-ayboe- �y ori
1�e moi ! to 0ddreg OLX fm ,
15- s [ vdye s o - a018 �e rid 0� o P14e. l ook Wo oF'o, s -f& Jea ij_t ,
Lai 1-a, y 9�y y 401°
L a� 3 -gyp a �ao�7 (�vs� [Yew corre� dw'o
1� 3
a�
L�1-a 7 3 3 51�a
�. dy 3 y I "o (sVS)
a4- Collbrd,401
a+o.�ym �aof f- , ndreei
J �e�l I1-0 4P M r a74f-It a
�l-W @W111 lyswoo3a�
q laollry 00 I�So
�a�WOP $DI'd
811,a�s
reii(4.
3101119 WOO 5011
A l l QVC s wire co✓e-� � d wgkP4 y1J
oft e, Nods - 19 in roh fron FfA�,xrr�
Pi -me. p�.aa��►ra� down �J�t�n able
Lcat/ ul ado-. of �f rodca J
�y
1.
Reviewer/Inspector Name: � I n -e ie r
K A
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone: 9IQ= jI_q0q 0%
484 -a,43 -go►.), (C) —
Date:
21412015