HomeMy WebLinkAbout20170785 Ver 2__SAW-2017-01325 XCLT Trail Modification Request-2019-04-09 B2T_20190409K'rmley>>> H�rn
March 28, 2019
Mr. David Shaeffer
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, NC 28801-5006
Mr. Alan Johnson
Division of Water Resources - Water Quality Regional Operations
610 East Center Drive, Suite 301
Mooresville, NC 28115
Re: Pre-Construction Notification (NWP 14 & 27) Modification Request
Cross Charlotte Trail — Brandywine Road to Tyvola Road (B2T)
(SAW-2017-01325 & DWR# 17-0785)
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, NC
Dear Mr. Shaeffer and Mr. Johnson:
On behalf of our client, The City of Charlotte, Engineering and Property Management (City or E&PM),
Kimley-Horn (KH) is requesting a modification to the Pre-Construction Notification application
submitted on June 22, 2017, for the above referenced project. As a result of adding an additional
temporary ford crossing for construction access, 20 linear feet of temporary impacts are requested for
Stream B(Briar Creek). The temporary low water ford crossing will use rip-rap material along the
base, as well as the ramps along the banks. The temporary low water ford crossing will be
constructed in such a manner to allow for aquatic passage over the rip-rap material within the
channel. Temporary impacts have been minimized to the greatest extent practicable in order to meet
the needs of the project. The additional temporary low water ford crossing does not pose adverse
alterations to the existing channel bed. Following completion of the project, all disturbed areas will be
returned to preconstruction conditions. Banks will be stabilized by installing coir fiber matting, as well
as implementing a planting plan which will include the appropriate temporary and permanent seed
mixes, live stakes and bare root plantings.
The following information is included as part of this modification request:
• Project Summary Sheet
• Pre-Construction Notification Form
• Figure 5 — Proposed Conditions
• Revised Construction Plan Sheet
K'rmley>>> H�rn
Page 2
Please feel free to contact me at (704) 409-1802 if you have any questions or if additional information
is necessary.
Sincerely,
KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
��
� `
Chris Tinklenberg, PWS
Environmental Scientist
Attachments
K'rmley�>>Ha�rn
Project Summary Sheet
Project Name: Cross-Charlottc Trail — Brandywine Road to Tyvola Road (B2T�
Applicant Name and Address: City of Charlotte
POC: Erin Shanaber#�er
600 East Fourth Street
Charlotte, NC 28202
Telephone Number: 704-336-3927
Type of Request: � Narionwidc PCN (NWP # 14 & 27)
� Jurisdicrional Dctcrminarion
❑ Individual Pcrmit Applicarion
❑ Othcr:
Included Attachments: � Projcct Plans � USGS Map � NRCS Soil Survcy
� Agent Authorization � Delineation Sketch ❑ Delineation Survey
� Data Forms (Up & Wet) � NCDWR Stream Forms � USACE Stream Forms
❑ NCEEP Confirmation � Aerial Photo � Site Photos
� Agency Correspondence ❑ Other: ❑ Other:
Check if applicable
❑ CAMA Counry ❑ Trout Counry ❑ Isolated Waters
❑ Scction 7, ESA ❑ Scction 106, NHPA ❑ EFH
❑ Mirigarion Proposcd (❑ NC EEP ❑ On-Sitc ❑ Off-Sitc ❑ Othcr)
County: Mccklcn
Waterway: Littic
Crcek
H.U.C.: 03050103
Property Size (acres): �31
Site Coordinates (in decimal degrees): 35.165123 °N
Nearest City/Town: Charlottc
River Basin: Lowcr Catawba
USGS Quad Name: Charlottc East, NC
Approx. Size of Jurisdiction on Site (acres): 3.88ac
-80.846275 °W
Project Location: The project area parallels Little Sugar Creek from Brandywine Road to Twola Road in Charlotte, NC.
Site Description: Existing land usc in thc vicinity of thc projcct includes forestcd riparian arcas that parallcl Littic Sugar
Crccic with adjaccnt commcrcial and residcnrial arcas.
Impact Summary (if applicable): Thc projcct will res�llt in 391 lincar fcct of permancnt-no nct loss impacts to potcnrial
non-wctland watcrs of thc US. Thc projcct will result in permancnt-no nct loss impacts to 460 lf of potcnrial non-wctland
waters of the US from implementine natural channel desi�n techniques to install four rock cross-vanes and associated
constructed rifFles. 4,720 linear feet of temporary stream impacts are requested to conduct construction activities.
Open Water Wetland Stream Channel
NWP (acres) (acres) intermittent and/or Unimportant Perennial and/or Important
# A uatic Function A uatic Function
Tem . Perm. Tem . Perm.
Temp. Perm. Temp. Perm. �f ac lf ac lf ac lf Ac
14 391 0.079
27 460 021
14&27 4720 2.16
Total
Total Permanent — No Net Loss Impact to Waters of the U.S. (lf/acres) $5 ��0.29
Kimley-Horn Contact: Chris Tinklenbere, PWS Direct Number: (704) 409-1802
Email: chris.rinklcnbcrg�a),kimlcy-horn.com
I I
i���i
y�oF wa rF,� p�
� r
�
o ^r
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. A licant Information
1. Processing
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps: � Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 14 & 27 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? � Yes ❑ No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
� 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for DWQ 401 For the record only for Corps Permit:
because written approval is not required? Certification:
❑ Yes � No ❑ Yes � No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation � Yes ❑ No
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu
fee program.
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h ❑ Yes � No
below.
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ❑ Yes � No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: Cross-Charlotte Trail — Brandywine Road to Tyvola Road (62T)
2b. County: Mecklenburg
2c. Nearest municipality / town: Charlotte
2d. Subdivision name: N/A
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state N/A
project no:
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: City of Charlotte and Right of Entry Agreements
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d. Street address:
3e. City, state, zip:
3f. Telephone no.:
3g. Fax no.:
3h. Email address:
Page 1 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: ❑ Agent � Other, specify: Public Agency
4b. Name: Erin Shanaberger, PWS
4c. Business name City of Charlotte, Engineering and Property Management
(if applicable):
4d. Street address: 600 East Fourth Street
4e. City, state, zip: Charlotte, NC 28202
4f. Telephone no.: 704-336-3927
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address: Erin.Shanaberger@charlottenc.gov
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name: Chris Tinklenberg, PWS
5b. Business name Kimley-Horn and Associates
(if applicable):
5c. Street address: 200 South Tryon Street, Suite 200
5d. City, state, zip: Charlotte, NC 28202
5e. Telephone no.: 704-409-1802
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address: Chris.Tinklenberg@kimley-horn.com
Page 2 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): City of Charlotte and Right of Entry Agreements
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 35.165123 Longitude: - 80.846275
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1 c. Property size: 31 acres (Project Boundary)
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to Little Sugar Creek
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: Little Sugar Creek - Class "C"
2c. River basin: Lower Catawba; NCDWR Subbasin 03-08-34; HUC
03050103
Page 3 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
This project area is defined as Little Sugar Creek (LSC) from Brandywine Road to Tyvola Road located in the City of
Charlotte, North Carolina (Figure 1). The Little Sugar Creek watershed currently is a developing urban area. Per the
U.S. Census Bureau, the population of Charlotte has increased from 540,828 people in 2000 to 731,424 people in 2010.
Based on historical aerials (1938, 1948, 1951, 1956, 1965, 1973, 1983, 1996, 2006, and 2008), most of the development
in the watershed occurred between 1973 and 1993. Over the last two decades, this watershed and Little Sugar Creek
have been a focus of the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Stormwater Services who has implement over a dozen projects in the
watershed focused on improving water quality in LSC. The watershed at the downstream end of the project area is
approximately 37 square miles. It is located in a developing watershed and partially drains parts of urban and sub-urban
Charlotte, NC. The North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NC DWR) classifies Little Sugar Creek as a Class C
water. The site is located in the Catawba River Watershed (12-digit Hydrologic Unit 030501030102).
The project area comprises forested riparian areas paralleling Little Sugar Creek with adjacent commercial and residential
areas. Typical on-site vegetation includes sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua), red oak (Quercus rubra), American
sycamore (Platanus occidentalis), Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica), kudzu (Pueraria lobata), green ash
(Fraxinus pennsylvanica), glossy privet (Ligustrum lucidum), Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense), English ivy (Hedera
helix), river cane (Arundinaria gigantea), golden bamboo (Phyllostachys aurea), poison ivy (Toxicodendron radicans),
greenbriar (Smilax rotundifolia), and various grasses (Festuca spp.).
Three jurisdictional stream channels (Streams A-C) located within the project area. On-Site jurisdictional waters drain to
and include Little Sugar Creek. Little Sugar Creek is part of the Lower Catawba River Basin (HUC 03050103) and is
classified as "Class C Waters" by the NCDWR. According to the NCDWR.
No jurisdictional wetlands were identified within the project area.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
Oac
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
The total length of all on-site streams is approximately 8.492 linear feet.
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the project to construct a greenway trail and implement natural channel design techniques in order to
stabilize bed and banks, increase dissolved oxygen, improve habitat diversity and to protect low-water trail crossings.
Page 4 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The Cross-Charlotte Trail (XCLT) is a proposed 26-mile greenway trail proposed to stretch from the North-South Carolina
state line, through the UNC Charlotte Campus and to the Cabarrus County line. Through a partnership between the City
of Charlotte and Mecklenburg County, this trail will connect parks, landmarks, and major employment centers and will
serve both passive and active recreational opportunities for greenway users, while maintaining and preserving the natural
aspects of the corridor.
The B2T segment includes the construction of 1.5 miles of 12-foot wide greenway trail and in-stream enhancements
located along Little Sugar Creek. This segment of trail will tie into the existing Little Sugar Creek Greenway at
Brandywine Road and will extend south to Tyvola Road. In general, the 26-mile corridor will utilize existing and
maintained sanitary sewer easement corridors in order to reduce clearing impacts, however, the B2T section of XCLT is
heavily constrained by a number of factors including topography, access, grade-separation issues, aerial and above-
ground utilities and private commercial/residential properties.
In order to protect users of the trail by eliminating at grade crossings of busy roads, the alignment is proposed to pass
through a culvert located beneath Park Road and East Woodlawn Road. East Woodlawn and Park Roads are very busy
thoroughfares. Moreover, the route is designed to be compliant with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and
Charlotte-Mecklenburg standards for trails and pathways, thus requiring a maximum slope of approximately 5%. For this
slope to be maintained and for the route to pass beneath Brandywine Road, E Woodlawn Road and Park Road, grading
and construction activities associated with the trail installation will impact Little Sugar Creek below the OHWM. These
impacts will also allow for the preservation of mature canopy species along the top of bank of Little Sugar Creek. A total
loss of channel bed and stream function is not proposed by this project — only minor bank/bed impacts on one side, as the
trail runs parallel and below OHWM in a few locations (due to constraints).
The overall project includes the construction of approximately 8,100 linear feet of a 12-foot wide greenway trail.
Streamside impacts below OHWM have been reduced to the maximum extent practicable to minimize impacts to stream
functions already degraded by the urban watershed. One section of greenway will necessitate excavation and fill below
the OHWM resulting in 391 linear feet of permanent — no net loss of WoUS in order to construct the trail running
parallel along the edge of water, including applicable retaining walls, grading, and bank stabilization.
391 If of streamside impacts below OHW M are proposed, however, only 292 If will impact below the existing normal water
surface elevation mainly associated with the section of stream that has over-widened. Most of those impacts occur in an
already heavily degraded section of Little Sugar Creek, where the bank has blown out and resulted in a channel width
twice as wide as sections immediately up and downstream including shear banks that are largely absent of vegetation.
The width of the over-widened section is 35'-40', therefore, the proposed condition seeks to return the normal baseflow
width back to its natural condition while eliminating bank instabilities.
A BEHI/NBS assessment was performed in order to estimate bank erodibility. The results of the stream bank erodibility
assessment demonstrated that in the existing condition, this section of stream bank is producing approximately 17 tons of
sediment per year. In the proposed condition, bank erosion within this section would be prevented, reducing the sediment
input to 0. Additionally, an NCSAM evaluation was conducted and determined that no further degradation of the aquatic
environment would result in the proposed condition; therefore, the project satisfies Regional Condition 3.1 since it will
result in no-net-loss of WoUS including no further degradation of the aquatic environment.
Natural channel design techniques will be implemented to install four rock cross-vanes and associated constructed riffles
at the low-water trail crossing locations. The purpose of the structures will be to stabilize the bed and banks, increase
dissolved oxygen concentrations, improve aquatic habitat diversity, and to protect the low-water crossings from the
hydraulic forces during storm events. 460 linear feet of stream enhancement (permanent — no net loss of WoUS) is
proposed as part of this project.
Due to the highly-constrained project area, it is necessary for a portion of the construction activities to be conducted
within the channel bed of LSC. Due to the size and drainage area of LSC, it is not feasible to utilize measures, i.e.
impervious dikes and pumped diversions, in order to work in dry conditions. 4,720 linear feet of temporary stream
impacts are requested to conduct construction activities including tracked back-hoe access, where greenway
construction from the banks is not feasible. Temporary impacts have been minimized to the greatest extent practicable in
order to meet the needs of the project and do not pose adverse alterations to the existing channel bed. An application to
work in the wet will be submitted to NCDWR, Sediment and Erosion Control, which is typical for these types of projects.
Track hoes and other earth moving equipment is anticipated to be used on this project.
Page 5 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past? ❑ Yes � No ❑ Unknown
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made? ❑ Preliminary ❑ Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company:
Name (if known): Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for � Yes � No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? � Yes ❑ No
6b. If yes, explain.
When complete, the Cross-Charlotte Trail will include 26 miles of trail and connectors. Currently, half of the overall trail is in
design or under construction. Per coordination with USACE and NCDWR, any impacts associated with future phases of the
project require compensatory mitigation, therefore, compensatory mitigation is proposed as part of this project. The City of
Charlotte will continue to address future phases of the project and mitigation requirements associated with those phases with
USACE and NCDWR when necessary.
Page 6 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands � Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
Page 7 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction
number — Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact
Permanent (P) (if known) DWQ — non-404, other) (acres)
or Temporary
T
W� P� T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps
❑ No ❑ DWQ
W❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps
❑ No ❑ DWQ
W� P� T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps
❑ No ❑ DWQ
W� P� T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps
❑ No ❑ DWQ
W❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps
❑ No ❑ DWQ
W� P� T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps
❑ No ❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type ofjurisdiction Average Impact
number - (PER) or (Corps - 404, 10 stream length
Permanent (P) intermittent DWQ — non-404, width (linear
or Temporary (INT)? other) (feet) feet)
(T)
Stream-side area
LSC — Impact 1 impact (below OHWM), LSC � PER � Corps 20 391
� P❑ T construction of ❑ INT � DWQ (0.079ac)
greenway
Stream enhancement;
LSC — Impact 3 installation of LSC � PER � Corps 20 90
� P❑ T constructed riffle and ❑ INT � DWQ
rock-cross vane
Stream enhancement;
LSC — Impact 4 installation of LSC � PER � Corps 20 100
� P❑ T constructed riffle and ❑ INT � DWQ
rock-cross vane
Stream enhancement;
LSC — Impact 5 installation of LSC � PER � Corps 20 140
� P❑ T constructed riffle and ❑ INT � DWQ
rock-cross vane n
Stream enhancement;
LSC — Impact 6 installation of LSC � PER � Corps 20 130
� P❑ T constructed riffle and ❑ INT � DWQ
rock-cross vane
LSC — Impact 7 Temporary impacts � PER � Corps
� P� T necessary to conduct LSC � INT � DWQ 20 4,700
construction activities
SB — Impact 8 Temporary ford � PER � Corps
❑ P� T crossing Briar Creek � INT � DWQ 20 20
Page 8 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 5,180
3i. Comments: One section of greenway will necessitate excavation and fill below the OHWM resulting in 391 linear feet of
permanent — no net loss of WoUS in order to construct the trail running parallel along the edge of water, including applicable
retaining walls, grading, and bank stabilization (Impact 1). Natural channel design techniques will be implemented to install
four rock cross-vanes and associated constructed riffles at the low-water trail crossing locations resulting in 460 linear feet of
permanent — no net loss of WoUS (Impacts 3-6). 4,720 linear feet of temporary construction impacts are necessary to
conduct construction activities including tracked back-hoe access, where greenway construction from the banks is not
feasible. 20 linear feet of additional temporary construction impacts are necessary for a temporary stream crossing for
construction activities and equipment. The project will not result in a linear loss of WoUS, however, 0.079 acres of permanent
stream-side area impacts below the OHWM are necessary to construct the greenway trail.
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of waterbody
impact number (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres)
— Permanent
(P) or
Tem orar T
01 ❑P❑T
02 ❑P❑T
03 ❑P❑T
04 ❑P❑T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If ond or lake construction ro osed, then com lete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
Pond ID Proposed use or purpose of (acres)
number pond
Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded
P1
P2
Sf. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
Page 9 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If an im acts re uire miti ation, then ou MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar-Pamlico ❑ Other:
Project is in which protected basin? � Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer impact
number — Reason Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) for impact Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet)
or Temporary required?
T
B1 ❑P❑T ❑Yes
❑ No
62 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ Yes
❑ No
63 ❑P❑T ❑Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments:
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Avoidance and minimization efforts for the greenway include the avoidance of 555 linear feet of imacts below the
OHW M/stream-side area in two locations. The project will construct approximately 930 feet of elevated boardwalk in order to
avoid additional stream impacts. Moreover, instead of installing culverted crossings within LSC, the project is proposing four
low-water crossings and to install in-stream structures around those crossings in order to protect the infrasture as well as to
provide aquatic uplift. The trail footprint was reduced in the upper section by decreasing the shoulder width on the stream side
from 5-feet down to 2-feet which allowed for the reduction in the overall permanent impacts below OHWM from 966 linear feet
to 391 linear feet (0.079 acre), about a 40% reduction in impact. .
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Temporary impacts have been minimized to the greatest extent practicable in order to meet the needs of the project and do
not pose adverse alterations to the existing channel bed. Erosion control measures implemented during construction of the
greenway will be removed immediatedly following the activity and any disturbance will be returned to preconstruction
conditions. Temporary bridge crossings will be utilized along haul roads in order to avoid additional temporary stream
impacts.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for � Yes ❑ No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ❑ DWQ � Corps
� Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this project? ❑ Payment to in-lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: City of Charlotte Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Stream Quantity 36
Page 10 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
3c. Comments: As part of the pre-application process, the USACE recommended conducting an NC SAM evaluation in order
to qualitatively assess the existing conditions within areas of proposed stream-side impacts. In addition, an assessment of
these areas in the proposed conditions was completed to determine what sub functions might be degraded, if any, as a result
of the greenway construction. Based on the results of the qualitative assessment, the USACE recommended developing a
project specific methodology for interpolating a quantitative value based on the qualitative assessment. The results of the
quantitative assessment were then utilized in determining the appropriate compensatory mitigation requirements for impacts
associated with the project.
Based on the results of the NC SAM evaluation and methodology for calculating compensatory mitigation to offset stream-
side area impacts, 36 stream credits will be purchased from the City of Charlotte's Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank for
offsetting impacts associated with this project.
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires ❑ Yes � No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c. 6d. 6e.
Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation
(square feet) (square feet)
Zone 1 3(2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 11 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified � Yes � No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2. Stormwater Mana ement Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? <5%
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ❑ Yes � No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: B2T is a linear facility and Little Sugar
Creek has been grandfathered, therefore, the project is being treated as one facility and is not subject to the additional
impervious built upon area requirements
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
❑ Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local governmenYs jurisdiction is this project?
❑ Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ❑ NSW
apply (check all that apply): ❑ USMP
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Pro ram Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply � ORW
(check all that apply): ❑ Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached? ❑ Yes ❑ No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ❑ Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 12 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the � Yes ❑ No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ❑ Yes � No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.) ❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ❑ Yes � No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ❑ Yes � No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in � Yes � No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Page 13 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or � Yes � No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act � Yes ❑ No
impacts?
❑ Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
� Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
A review of the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) database on January 14, 2016 did not indicate known
occurences of threatened or endangered species within the project boundary. Additionally, a letter from USW FS dated
February 22, 2016, concurred that no listed species or their habitats are present within the project boundary.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ❑ Yes � No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NCNHP element occurrence database did not indicate the presence of EFH within the project boundary.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation � Yes ❑ No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
A letter from the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) dated February 11, 2016 states that there are
no known archeological sites within the project area, however, the project will occur within the National Register-eligible
Selwyn Village Historic District (MK2113). NCSHPO recommends minimal mature tree removal in order to avoid adverse
affects to the property's view shed. Minimal tree clearing will occur as part of this project and will be predominately
limited to those areas immediately adjacent to LSC where the vegetation is made up of primarily invasive species and
young hardwoods.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? � Yes ❑ No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: A flood impact analysis report, no-rise impact certification, and
individual floodplain development permit will be submitted to Mecklenburg County for review and approval prior to
construction/restoration activities. The results of the flood impact analysis show that there is no net increase in base flood
elevations.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA FIRM No. 3710454100K
Erin Shanaberger, PWS �� �`�''�Q�-
Applicant/Agent's Signature
ApplicanUAgent's Printed Name (Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant Date
is provided.)
Page 14 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
Y.E
F' Legend � Il�;lil� � �I ' �E � � �,grandywine "R,d:�' ,t' , '_ �l
j � i , �`�� �� �
._ 0 Project Area � � �i;�� .� _ -' � ; �:� ` o- m� - �� � -��
r'' � . ,,�' �`.
— Edge of Water '� si �,I�II � ;��'� � t °- ��. � � ` ;► �
�
In-Stream Structures ; f � � f �
, i �, _
, � , /. .� � �•.... . .� _ 4r
, � « ,, ir e��"'( �. �� ► � �r, 7 �
Bridge/Proposed Low Water Crossing � ;' ' � ` %r � 'l� 1 � � '4` �� '� .� "� `
5 y�*
0 Constructed Riffles �� .��' ` � � ,i� � ���`'6S'`"' � ` ' _ .' y �.f j._�� ��. "'3
`� ''i��'-. '��'�'��� Im act 1— Permanent - No Net Loss °� _��"
Proposed Walls ��r�� ����il' , � •- �` p � -
Proposed Greenway ` . , ;; +t, � ` � ���" 6221f, stream-side area impact � ,�!
Survey Contours ' Y i� '�°�,�'"�� ra., �r (below OHWM), construction of greenway �
°� �,�� ,:k�- '°� � »�,.: y , �
r •Or.� � � ' <.- '�''J",�4� ..,�t . � '.' �� '� '. ��.,.. �r'F���f �`� �
�� .� !t �.'� � � �k � ���" ,� .+!.r �, a' �y � �g� '�� .
ktowne Uill ` � i �` _ '� �`� �'" � � '� �,�, � �`�, 4 �� � �,. _�►.� ,
� ,
.
�. �,,
` ag�0'"�` \ \`a � - �,� �'�._�.��, Hassell PI � �
,
� ~ �
�
��. .
,. � � .,. , �
_ � ��,� .a� � �� �� �,;... 3
:�"#�� ► ��'i'E°�� � , 4 �::' � �., ,,, }.,. '�'`�:r"�+�, �t �'
., �
� � �' �_ ��" \ . � -a � . ,
�ia'i� � " �\ I .r°�` ,;�y f � � �.,,� � ' .
��� � �. ��:� •.�.�� �.� `�`> .. i� �+.
� ,t¢. � �'
r► � a \�., r a �-�q �• � � ,
:� �
,� �r,w .� � 'x �
� � � 5 T'� . f %�,\ � . ;V 1� � �. � r9 �J , .... �
� � t a 1ik�� �, `21� q,
.•
� . �", d� f ' 1 � \� ° �a � ♦ �. 7 s � .
�. �3�.� .�� 1�Ci��� � .. . �� ��X ���+}���.��� .�,� _*! ��� �� � � � �, . �,
���'� ��
� � ��� � "�A'^... i � . � �i
=if�y �"�' , *�' ' w ' " _
� �'+ � �l � � � r .' � � +. r .
��'. I+�.^ -`" -. S- ''�� .. +.'�\. �►4'�_�; 3�.-1� �'
. . ��� ,c,.#:� �".� ,' �� '� � �� + �Y" � ;�
a/ ,I 14�� �-I jr� � �,�� f � .�, � ; � °►\�'� `�' � ' � y�_r P� � ����' � `� w ���" � +4^�'�: �'"� r
�'� � � i'� o-_ , �,'� . � j " _ y •ry . . .� � .�'t
7 � .
- '� �,.. "�� 'f• ��}�;,�, �, .,,,, �.• ,� �.: ,,f�� E W�d✓�odlawn`�Rd-g �� �� ' -
� .. �' �,,� �• s� . +C \ '�\. : � � E ,�.,� �,,��� ��+'�J-J,� .;!�;,�,�+., � � - �,;-
- - ��� ` �� � !.
.p . _ '� .'a'�.`v -^ � ;,�1 i `''� �,'^ .+4 1 � � .
,
.
� �
� r�
�
_
'�. � Montford.Dr � �. '`�� _ � � r �, �,� � y � �
,� � � , . �-�.� �"� �
, � �.� �.; :��►� � �Yf � �pR, �+��� ` �' .��;� � � �.� 4�T M
; �#�`'yr.u++�+i"� �� ,, � „; _
. �¢' ,� P� I."� _ _ ����'
1 � � �� � -Y � � �`� � %���� � �'�l'� � � � ' � � -
� : '� � �� � �. y//� P,�' *. , ry �` �'`�`' �''
�'fi � '�a� .r;�`, - � tf i , '���` ,:� � � '� �� , � ��
i� � q� r�' � _��.�'' ° �%. Wakefie�d r � �, v -"�ti `�� �
+�. �!''� ,�l,' � r . J °.� �. � � /// +4. �� D; � � " � ,
� ��� :� � �� i �,,�:. n .- _�
� �, Y �� � . ,
� . � � � - �� ; � „r �� � . � ,.
�F � i � t �;y ,,�,?�f
_ � '�� - .�. „ Impact 2 — Permanent - No Net Loss
. � _�
, ,� � � �� , ��' , ;�,� •Y 3441f, stream-side area impact
�, . _
" ' ��► '� below OHWM construction of reenwa
�� � ��r i� �'. � � /. ��� / ' �.�'-. i ), 9 Y
F '� ��� � , � � % �' :.i - ' _'
�..� � � r,,�X. � .� 3'� "� � .� '�'
� � `�' �, � � � ,�, S
�� y.s< � � _/��/.� .�'4. �+zg � 4, �� �� �` 3� ?r'+*,,' .y.�.'e.
�,'• � i >(i q� ,,(Yl,�.' � ' � ' z '��
�� �, (� !/.,t� �a. � � ,� ° � �� """.
� :���y, r > /,�i%r. �'>� W �����j ,% _ �. L�` . '� ��
. , , . �,,..p,b �l, ,;�e� +f ,,,;K, j;f . ,� � . f ;, �r� ,�,y�,�` �, � �:, �.�`,�.� �, � �
_ . � ''� +��� d "�� iy" �' �' � A - ;
f� ��1�r�. , r 7 �'.� ./ 1�1 "^i., :� r, 'at
� ���� i :� ' � !t , „�' i ','�-�., 1� ,
^ � . �. �': - �' r� 1'Y.�"���� v��, � ~ ` :'�p �� ' :���.�"�
�:f." �. 7� � R �i� � , L / ` . � �� f/ ,, y1 . d +� y,�.' � •• ,,� ^9
� � nP 1� �� ��� / • �.%' .p w ''. ' � . � ' ,a.
�+�� �� '� . � * r'- ,¢` . `� � -
� ,, � � �
p �'� � . }' � � � \� :a� � �' '�� �'�� �. , � �� ��. �.Y
� r•.
. ,
��,.�a.,� _- ���� ' ,�3 ,, �.,� �� �� � � � �� , - �,.� j�
*��/�.i� �!�,y <� , , , , �//�� , � y* '� � -
4, ✓ �� ' S: �..�:
• �" �v��' f� �^',�t�/ �� ��if{��� ,'�t�rl�� e:� 0�� �'.�G'�*� ! a� � � ���
y F� I, �
'f� (� : ���� ' ��� 1` '��I l Y-ryt 1 �� . �1: - �~ .%'iT
� I
� O �� �qP f. I\ f�� �� V11� �"i �111l�'�� •' ' ■ ,g �.+��" � � , y '��
��1. CO ��) ���((��������,p1 ��� ' /BM1I.� �M1� �r ��R. ! �A` �,. ..#_�" vr� f 1 �,.....�'�} "+� 1��`
� A +�. a
� fr � " , �i ��'' i� o: ' ��, ���� ' `��.� +� ''"'�'�=
�t '� � a!� i r �'
a��,�`.,�,��� ��M�,��c„ „�-,��`.<�. �_�!1'1��,.� . � � 0 200 400
. . ,.
� �-- � Feet
,����\��`� � �t; , ,. � w;�, ����:.� • _ ,.
,; r
� �' w'-. �'.'� ��
� Fi ure 5a: Pro osed Conditions
J p
�� Cross-Charlotte Greenway - Brandywine to Tyvola
� ����� '>��-Ivrn Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, NC
{;il:i�il.{lTl'l:. � �
June 2017
F1[l.IIaF6fi1H�; !4 PFOPFRiV
MANO[:FMFM1T
Legend 1��`��,��.'�\\1t1����� /+I,�i�� �`����`� �_ � � '� �' -
� t` �i� ��t� � +��w��+ �,a+,-�c �� =�lNa''"►�y, �? _ '
� ProjectArea ���''��1\���y��t��ll�� , �'����. �,� k�1`� -
, � � �t_ . �� \� �: r � "'��. - "��� .'�,� •. �� �d pr .
�
Edge of Water ���!\���-�-' �-.�;`; �\ ''`����� x. . ��,.
� 'T � r av _„/ >�F' ' +4
In-Stream Structures �y1(i`(�� �"'�° ����r�rrQ, � � `,� � � =� � • '� «,�� �
f� �
, ��ij� � ,���,' �'>> �`�"> =`� �` ��'[ ,r•�.'
Bridge/Proposed Low Water Crossing . --- '�.�" � � �ny�r�,��� � � � �� ���
� .� �,� �.•�
� Constructed Riffle • 1 � � - `�
� ��.�i�I1���1�� ��� �����e "�'°� � � ''`� '�` .��F .
.
_
.
Proposed Walls ��� �J '' , � � � •.
` ` � ����.. � �-�
Proposed Greenway `�," ` ' �' ��I'�� ��\�� � � �" " f ,, � � �"-: � �,. �°`; ;���r��;
� ,wt��� ��� d � � � - ��� "`r�."�, ��"� , � -
Survey Contours �� i' �1 `� P�� '.* � � �� '�f �!-.� ' �`�• �, �� ��
� �
_� i � � *.'T E � � 9�' I �, `� i' �`� ,. f A� � � ¢j."'i• .�, � ' -+/�F? � t'��� ��� �\\����\�i$ ��
� .. � . .. _ ' 1 �'',,. ., _ r �
. } •.. f . _.. '�-`�a� � � � � ' 7 6 k �
� �_ r T .�� f (1 f �r —.� �'~ M � . �/ �
� 7 �� � ' � � � �����1,���a � �' � � � �.�. � ro 1�' �fJ � I
• •- /
'� re �� � gr �, '�,����� �� - �yl�� .. v�
�, . � ,y'
'jr f , � � r'� �/ � `���, r
/ �rx • ; -"` .,.
'�+f - , ..,.. .�a . ��j '� � �r,� �-.
!^�, ` .�,�i �� � ",�" �� � F` , � �. , ., ,
,
. , �,� ,6 ., ;i�, � '��,������r � y ,:/ ,.: �r
, � A;,��._ • '� • s,f � ��i�� �i �� �
� M°�k'n , _ � " ��� ,��I� � "
- , � ,� 9bird Ln �'S�, :�1� - �,I �r � � ',
� �
�� r�.� i ,.�.
;r� � � ': : i � '- , � ,{ i-
�s ,�t���$ _ r ,, �` �j r �� � ' �li
� .� .�� �re.,��:1 �"', j� � �l�,�:t'I�, 3,+ . ; ��r
� „�' • �A t�' ' � F�/ �"��,'��� ��9�[7�, '-iF� � k � /'.,�.�
� e �,�` ' �(P.�i�� . 1"i8'.�!'��� � �p;����'�AAr l�' "r'^ f �i /''',.n ,/� ,_�,�a
► � y�'. � ,�rri✓`i�� 's�% -� � � � , �
�Y
,� 4F �, :� ��i �F ��',� . ��'� "'t`��u�,/s�''71'i�I/ � .1/ ��� �� ,. r
.
.
7� " • _n'� �� /�'� > � �' 1 � _ .? � � '!``�G %' ��� .r
� � �., !' " a„5€�` . > � � / i !�i � /. � d�}` If �
� � � ��� �r' ' „'���� ' '�� ''�����,� � #` ,�� : � hld�lbrq��j/ ,�r..,/' , .� s
;� .�Q � � . �'���� 4�f /,W' '!` '; r � � J 1� � `
� .�,r,•r `+ . . ���;��� �� "�'„,�, ��'��'`�fl';.,..��;"' ;�/:l�' / /��/��ji ��� ✓/��` R r�
.
� T_
�� y �� ���." � ... .. ��O�j .�' ��1�4 ���'Y��, - �'�� r� � �� l �' :.� ��ir/r�� ,i
�,} A p�
�� . �,�r fl �� _- . ��� � �, � � v� �C �"•��� '`�' t�/, ///r � ,, trl� st 1���.�+� ,.
t�� � r� ' s �' �' � � ' '', /l/liP� r r`"�
a d � a� �' ai i �j�,.°` .� /� t cJ '�,� �f�. +'�r y:,
':� � ,�`},'����,`,�} '�, �,¢� �+* %r � �; ✓��' ,� ! ,�'' , i,�, ����.�
• < ,.. -
� � � . ,, .
. � � a , :1� �� �, /� � '� ���,f "� s;°;r , rg''t -
�i r_
r /1/ , r :.:' !/%'�v�'i.� � "1',.
Impact 3 - 901f, stream enhancement; ' � , � '�� � r , ai' (�. J 'r 4r;. �, � rf
r� i
� � installation of constructed riffle and rock-cross vane ��� � � '�� �;; �� , :, '�• "`' ��� ��� ��"
� � - �, �r� , , �'l ��j,P' ��� �
" � � ��ir ..�� t� �s��`� r'1 � rr, r, r `�a���11 �
�� - . . ( '� �I •"/' '���_
s�n0 � - . y''+ ��t k �* �rr �`'• ,�.w.' ..: .' � � fi�� li /r :° / q� .
� � �a pj� ` � �jy+ s r� %.� ,=�� •� � � ,f� � . 'ii t/ i�ill�li��l� ���N ±�'�°�'�� � . � 4.,
v � .�... � �3�''�� %, y! �ul�- � :� + ' �� Fv /�� I � �� � 1J �� R'� ^T f
� �s�. � .�. �,,� �,�, ,��b� �.� ���r r�� , /�rM�r�,��� ��� � � �� � ,��.
� " � , : �G'�- 's� ' ` �` . ;'�1 � '�d � ,+��,. , . �
,
, ,
. ,µ
�` f " Stream C � � ��� �' �f ',� '� ,� '+�+' �,.
� �'.. ��"' •� S�/, 1 ��'�i`�4�' , „ r ,�;;,� � ; n,� ��d �x �,,,�^ :� `�,'��' ,�.
. . �! � --P�,�, .,�.: � ,�.'4e�,��;�lti �� / _,,��. �" �r� ��`'� � �, , 'm` `�
� � %�, , � �- ����<, �, � �' ��j ��., . ��� , ti;: -��r ,
� � ' � � � y'�. � bn �����' 1. �¢` �` �- s ,w - : 1 '� �" ' ' ��� � �' "-.
yy� , , �. , �� ,��" C,\���� ; � �� � , ,�� '� �� �' �`4 " ��,.��.1e �;� *
'�`:�.'7�.., .�, - �, � .. - , � 4 �� �, T. �" ��'�f��' .. A �� �. i- � �. . �.� . , ii
. �r
� � ..����r, . }� � �� �'� �� d" �����l� - { . . #' � / /� �'. a ���+.. � �.��`�t�\: � ti .*i. r ' ' ;�. � . %'+�f
.,, . � -�. � r �
e,
.
. � � �iy+ , w, -. � a��� ��'� '�.n� 9
� ', r
�' , '� + � � ��1�" I: �.,t�y�. ,ii� / r�y�" �p� . .� . .. �,+, i' f'.
� i - ��. l � �� . _ !�/ ��' . . , � ..re� ., '� �{� ��Q� � � .�.c* , : � � � �� �-
�. . � !�� _ ^.0 ,� %�/ r i. �v-_'+ . � y► . (.�'��,�
A , ^ ., � T �// � ��i `. ` s � � y9 !._:'e�� "' � � � � 7e
4iI ♦*i� , tPR 1�. p . �" / �.^Y rv�` w d.a ( � �.
�a �� �F �y�s�if �! �" .d/" `r i� ��;.if � e •��iA'�� . q �" +� � ;� 1r.
,
� � �i[ � � �e � "` ,� - � ysb ,
, e
, �R�", r ' �; � �� � � .� �"�' , ,� 4ry �; � ,� �
,
,�. r
� � e '
. , �
� ��`d`�" � `_�, � ' "'" y`� �: �
a
/
, �, , �
.a
�
�, ,,, � � , � � , ,G�,j b _ Ct �`�"
,
�
; �.
ti , ,
..
, ,_ . ,
. .: �� ._. y � �. .• , ,, ,' - , �
,. �
.-
.,
r -
� . : � ,,, ,�. E� , � .. - . +�,_: r� � � �%"`� '
� 1
. . � ' ' �
,�, r; � r' �� �,` �.. In€r'%�'� �►�� , � �� ,.•�*y� x, .,w ' �. . ,�L �.. y' � �:.�.,
,
�-.,
'"��� ��1� ���� . � ,r da � „/ Mr �.. '• ��� ,i "+�r` i,,.'� �''i , �` �'►";:
� �'_ ;�, �� "� � �,r 1. 9!?�ai-'�`�.r, �`�ir. � �
� �e �i a� �
, � ,�'-��� . ' `'11 �p ' ��,ar�d�cyd � +�m� s'�'� �' 0 200 400.
, . �. . a, .
,
; � . � �
,., � � - �
�'��! -,�'�� '� � � �. 4�� '�� , . ����,� .���� �, � . �r�. ; 'N;� � _� Feet
. � _ , . o W � .__ .,.
� -- t. _ � x �. �h
� Figure 5b: Proposed Conditions
�� Cross-Charlotte Greenway - Brandywine to Tyvola
� ����� '>��-Ivrn Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, NC
{;il:i�il.{lTl'l:. � �
June 2017
F1[l.IIaF6fi1H�; !4 PFOPFRiV
MANO[:FMFM1T
" i �S .. .X� � � . ..�. . - ..
��1 N� �p
� � 1 -: � \lr �
� ta� �
g ;. (�� ., � i � � : � �
Le end � �� .<���' ..� ..v:'�l��� . ,t .�. ' � tW M 4✓G��' ,�
Q Project Area '� � � _,. ' __ ., „,,
— Edge ofi Water � ' �.,�ij���� � . � r� r � , . � ., �. � ��,� , ��`��,�R�a ����
e ��.�g
In-Stream Structures ,h '� '° •� 4 4 � ����� Cd ' ��
� "� ��1 t � �`� re t �� r/ ,
Bridge/Proposed Low Water Crossing � V � ��" �.� �� � , ;�fi �" ,'����t`�,*d�4' ,
. . ,+ - *, � 'v'�+� d Cr �.+n �
�Constructed Riffles � � ' ��. � ��� � -� } � �� � �^
i - �� E - , ,, �� ,�Cu'k �. � �,'5+.� _ ,: ��, �, i.
Proposed Walls s "`� *� � ' - �I�1 ,�,� r : � �'Y yM � �� .
.'� 1� 4 , � � ' . 4 "l�yj � �.; �ly�j��.
Proposed Greenway ., � "� `' ���`��»�" �" '� ,��� ,'.� �. *�
` , �
Survey Contours �� . "��?�����. :_. : I � �/�j .��� '.
r ' `
f ,� �, � r � + � �, �� ., . � � � � � � „ : , _ �� ,
tt'� � ' � ' �� F � ' � i r _ � 4. i y�; �'1� � ,'�
. � ..`
. P
;. Kr .- •- . ._ -�rie� yF"` � > .:, � . �`': � . �:� � g /�"; �, /r ''r _
�
��. � t .+�... �v '!/�1�� �� � �e,,� /d ��� � / �����
Cort�a `�,,"`_,. , Rd =- � �%�)� :� �� � �!'���'�`' %'; �'��`, ! ":�i
�4�J(%� y o�� �1Ca�. * �i/ �� � �r v?r °�I ^+,
a . G a � � a Ot , � " ,, /r' � � ., � � �`
��, . � .` .• � • +� eCmos .y � a, ° yfr-�-f- f ��,� �'.
'`" � � - �►��\\a�H � "� �� � �t�.�,/�j}' � �9yr . �^�>
.. .--'�`<Ci/ - i� `. ', i��.^�. .. ` I��� �___. . J / «, . ,r /�S �'e'��/��l � ��b,�l�` d ,J p� : '� - - •�'�
! � a -- •t � i �y� . � � �d: � y l��i���l�� ' tl '��^'��' Y�s
• . �
� � � � . �'� R �r I R.. ��� +%� �,�r�,"���� ti�''�
'� .���a ��� _ '�,. ��, � �, �;�,��,i�' � ,� . ,1 � ,� � j�� � ; i�� � ��� � . _ -
f � � �a'� � �,� �d. �
�t�m � �� ' r� ��wy c'° ° "e , t�+.�.'�Jl, d�`n►' 1 �I Ill�lf �� ( / � „(I �`���\r� y�`�; � eJ `y �
r:- G
G � - �`y �1�''� �' � _. � � � \ ��. � , r ���hj 4t '� , �* r.
� � '' � � � � ,
�� �� , � � • ���,1 � .�` 7 ( t �i L�I+' �' i �,;y J' T� ..
,� �\�, `�� �� � i �� p�� r� 1 � vpR ' *a - yr ;� � '��''�
.� � ��,�}'r� �yS. � � �'� '� � -` 1' � '' � �� ��w /'7�� � �'`� � ���r3.��/ . .. _ �� �� °a . `� �
� ,
� '�` , ti� _� �_I AR� , (� ' ,.� � i � � .,� ��� � � � Il� � `. . �� ' s / � �f ,� .���,/ .
� �' ' �! � 4 � \ '�� -0 �v,, �'/� w � 1 �� . b7` r, �' ` i�• � �..
�s� �� y r C ����}�.:�� �� s . 'm �, �� � � �, ���� ti�� I�r�,���r,�A��� i.�, ����
�,_ �"A ." ���"? . '"L �'� � +t, � \i1 �� al � � � �i :.� , 11�^ �'��� � ,�,. '� � ic:•',�S .,�f,
t��«�#r ' (' � _� �. Y � ^ . . . � � ��� 0. � � rr�. � � �.1�,'� ' � �y _
� +
' � /F '. !G 1' L . � 1rA/ �+ ! 3��.
� � 3 . �`��`F` Impact 5 — Permanent - No Net Loss � ��+� �. �' '� + �
' �'� �, � 1401f, stream enhancement; installation of � � ��•� y�� k"'i� ,�a� �`'t �� ' ' '�
��`� constructed riffie and rock-cross vane � � '��'�r r'"�� ��t '�' � �� � }
�, ,�
� ` � ,ay � , ,�„r • � "� "� �
� "'��
� �IR�'��tJ � �' .. y , vy,..,, ` �_. y 8�;`Irl t^ � � � Y '��f � �
�' � � � I ^ _ �., ( y . % _ � 'j"v_'
r �, � : � I ��,,,.�'�1 -i +1�.# f .. � )1� ! . ./ �f s� ..� '�`�� � � � ,
� q
_ V r� 1�' �..� � � � � qp �� :� ��� ��a% r��C`��1��, �� ��'�,+��'�� ,� ��� � � ..
- �4 ` � � ;, `: �+� � �w ��� ¢ r, � . ,. �
r ` �� � "�yp I i r ��� .� j '4 ��
e i ,�� . � I'Y }*` R'., � I . .t � �` .. F f �M., �� :� I� '� ��'
„ � � r
� ,.� . ��. . � . � �; . .
` - � � '�i! N '' i ' �'�,�
, . . � -.
� �.,�, '• ,�y
. ,.
,
� . -� � 4 , � ^ �l '�� o�`�' � A`I�k � `•, �. '� �
`,�;, ' � F , _ .. O.l ( " �*-'' `.y .' F- �' � ' e» ���'�:^t'�"w�� �s��'ia r �..l;� s . ��• •- `i.
,� � ' . i .R� �, � irp , .. � .
, „ : �i �� . %
, , ., _
m � � � TM o. � . b: 1�.. 8 ��a �,la /'Irw � "t� ���. . M : � � 1�.`e�'�
i �'' r �R / ,�}
R�C� -. . . ... '� �� Y/ _ ; � . i n � � �'"��'` �� ' %� �/�J , ,, ` ���� . � -
� � A � f �+R� � �� �:.
�,� _ .�.e�.. � �irU�''fai f� ��� � � `�� •� , � _ �* C ' �.
�� - ��-��� f ��, - : -�,� � �` � • , �. �F` �I1I�`�'. �Ili� . - �'�`�, , �n,., � - .
"�'. '�r
�� v� • ;j 1 � � � � � �� ��I�,�ItII����� ,�� :��. •.� ti.. .?R'� '}. �l' �
.. , A� � "� � n',!�II �Ir � .� .
^ . •' ,.
a;. •
;>� � � �.f . �, � � ��n � �ti �"'rt `��ii . � � .
. , �, � .��: ��, l� � j�',.
-, �
. ,�y�r
� � �' :� � �'y'� ,1 .�� ��,!�, � �'y . �,,,4e�-" � ' ; .�
, , ,
� � A'-��� � ;/'. �,.
� '� �r y .
'`�� � '�li� � �� �� ��
s .
. _
�r ,
• • � r-
�,� _ _ � �t
� ", , , ��,r . _ - - ., - a • r�s �,„, t *' + �'"�'�' s .; .eM�
� .
, ,,
,
��
— --- t.*•�� ; - ; ` '� s .� �- " � ' , r:. �,+ .
/� ,� e;/�__ - � . -
, _ 'r �,, ��. = _ ,_. � , . 3�K' ,� ���� _�.� � :�$4.- � �: r: �
. ,.
1'�l �y4, y j�. �j� i— .. �-, F k '� f � ' (; r c._ wd�Y' / / e � � � '
. � �. � � Y ,� • F V�.
�. c r .��
� � �'�� ;;-� ��;,�`'�,�� Impact 4— Permanent - No Net Loss
� ' �� � �Y a, `' �� � " � `"� .' 1001f, stream enhancement; installation of
�' �y _
� 1 � i � �� ���
�i� �;�i .� � constructed nffle and rock-cross vane
�,,.�,- �,�; " � rn� �t , , 's.
� '' ' ,. ��: .� ;� "�, �
�- � ��'� ' � , '�,r ��. �e 1� � � . . ��c ��
,.
r..
.
�y�` � „- ��.;r Y ,- :: �,: ge��yr P �',`�° ,, { >, w;' �', '; �'
k �i � �.�'�,�� x ��i -" „� ;.� � 4 � ti,
i � �' � _ �•� � � _ ' � �� `
.. � � s � � t. .A, � ,�k'_�"4n �'�y, , �� �,�-�
�i ill�i r ; � , * � �
� " `ti' ,� � ; � ,ya
��.,: ,i f �k. .� � c�� ' i �' � � A,�� �.,, � v���.,
�`Id � u ,fR � r �'x,� � l�s, ��� : �� `� �► �. '� � �` � `, � �, ^r'� ^�
'� i , �.,- 9 a +�.�
����Ity'�,�.11��� "4 � � . � ��� �i. - �► �T►�;.i��,' ��,
' / ° 0 200 400
< -- �+ �4� ,J,�r-.
I��I�rO' i � ' ��.•� ;r ���� ���rF' �8' a '� .-�v.�' � ��z� Feet
C 3'�t{ � I �- ��4�.'�. � ��L` w '}�•t �� � �•�.�t y)„ ,A �,�. :�"� �'w
� Figure 5c: Propsed Conditions
�� Cross-Charlotte Greenway - Brandywine to Tyvola
� ����� '>��-Ivrn Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, SC
{;il:i�il.{lTl'l:. � �
June 2017
F1[l.IIaF6fi1H�; !4 PFOPFRiV
MANO[:FMFM1T
� _` v`, p�•,4.`��% ��✓,/� �^��� '
g ` � �/� J fi � / . � - � v,. . � �
Le end � � "'a. l �� :3-�`��*'",��-, N
�k � �"���J����� �� _ �� _ � f F "t F �" �"����� �
0 ProjectArea ' ��: � ��� " � � � .
— Edge of Water ,'' �"� ��� � r� _ :, �` � =�,,,�,�•=-'� � .�
. ��'�� %%/�l � �
/� .,:�r ; � f: r"'.�•.�.�' ' i
— In-Stream Structures :«�_ ��. �'`
a� � - � ��i�
�-
Bridge/Proposed Low Water Crossing ����((I� �� ,;� � � � �.� .� ��
•� � � � _ � , a�:. r = �� r�
0 Constructed Riffles 1 •� ,� � t�T =� �b,
� � .`
= Proposed Walls `i�� p� �,` �-s' ���" � ;�I�`�" " � � ��� �
�b//� � � � � 'i�'� , ,� • �,►�� Y
Proposed Greenway , r� ��� , )��I _,��� � �� � �� � ���
__= Pro osed Construction Access � ����� � _ �� �'� � � "� �' ��� �:�� �
p . ,'�'" � lui � � �
� -
�
� � � -t � � � _ ,;� k. ^,r � �. �. � � �. ��
Surve Contours �J � r �`1 * 1�,y"�' ,�e' ;- ���rr�. ��'�
r y �/1r�� � , t !T!/i;l� ! �_ { 9s�►S ��„�,�, . _ �� .. � 4 '► ,
a;��r� ` �� 4. + ,� .. " -'�� •,�r�� �l K`� jo\/r �(� ��� � '� r� I �'"�'° ��� t��e t � � ..:�?»=
l
+ .a. Y .��.� .F ,� �. � �' � d � . 'J ��% ��� p r� ��`'� *`, j � R� q&_ Ta}�-; _�" ,,
- . - "- .. � � � ."�'1fc- . ,�..�.
.��� ��_ ` \ � ��I�I .. �� - �; � � � y..�� -.� .. -,� t,.
.4 � � ,* � ' � / i �"r�" � "�
l _,,�at,♦.� �; .�' _ . .,:;.1�� ,�.�1�1� ./� 4��'� Ct����y'y�r 4 j7��Q � �� � b
� / �4 Ea� 4 ` �-��-'������i
,'�� k�'� . � +� `'. ' . ` ". .. -;4 S . `A, d' �� �� � P'i'��, ya� '-`� �.. \ �.�^ �x�s.�„�.--��, f -r��� ��
,� ;,,,� "�� '�;�,,,, � .� :��;�,+�`f' <,' j�; ;,� ; ;�•� a1 � : — �. ,� �� �!
.
„
� � r � �. j�
' � �� "� ,►''��� '' ,' ,II �, ' ��- ' :�
��, +c�. )vA . "4 �r�: � r's 4 < ��"f'F�� I/> �'I �, ! �r '� ��� �'• � ,,,��� � '�` � ,. . � � i� �i�
� . ,t��� ��. ,t`. �i��`�� 't.a � a � i / � � ;�► ,30' �'�^�{+1►<'u �'' c. /_
� r'`.� � 'a j� �� ' � '• �� � "a� ,'� � �' � , .
,. 1 Impact 6 - Permanent - No Net Loss °�%/r ` �°, � ��,` r _� ` `. ,,� � `t'���s��;�' �� I,
�' �,�r ; �, � ,� �: �r
�'�i �,'�� 1301f, stream enhancement; installation of (�% ��'� ' �-�, �� �- � ,v{ �''�w`� '' ; �--';,r�;'
�� � � �, r � �� �� '� ' � _ ;. � �__� ,��p ����,� �r�.. ��I
•���` w<� constructed riffle and rock-cross vane ,�,`�`'��t� x'�4�� ��� 4� `�w..� 7� m��°� � ��
ti 4,� �,� �; �.� � � � � . ' � � : �? %!?��ti: '�'y� : �`� �� �'-`' �� a.
, . , s �,.� �
� �'.�4 ��"4�,��'; a� �',�a�,'�` �'�' 1�' r� a v/+�� ��„�, '� .��,• ��� � ,� w 4��� /
�'�r
,
� . _ � � �� /� ,
�
� �S d ` � � �'���` y � -+ / -�
�P, d+, _ � �' �y � � /'_- �, -A � ' � � x. � . '
5; � y � �w +i �{ , "l� .� .Y�� . l � � � i� i` � / / � � C J3`� "��� � - ,�� t*'� .���
: rt
�� `�['�, w, �,ky,�, � �f „"�' �,� c �� �� *� � a � �,��p.t �, r�i / �� , '� �r s ,j�' �+ �F��� II
�� z
v�`�..�... �. � ,a1' � �, ; �'���.�q�y�\ ? ` +� y'�[�` 1�� � '�h . �. �* �� � � . .4 �t ��:;,.
� .�+ .. �` �-'�, � �` �, : t� ��. � � ',�� �. bg `��14 ' ' �1 � . ; 4 � r ,
'� � � � � �, �` �a �1; , �`-� ,, �� �A�Ji� Y _�, � +,y�,.� �'��.'� �,,�,.j, ',�,�;_ . _�
� ���`�'�`� � �' � �+�, �, s � �`�r1 � ,;'' �� Y �� �� i�`�° ���'� � �,��.✓,� K = , , �: � �i►. � "'� g. �.
, ..
e • �. � ��. . :# ,9 ,�t ,y,� � ..�a r r'' .�,� �
�r, • � ,', � `�� '� � �. �� Jrt � � ��;��,..= � ,�a: ' `�a,�. � �� Impact8-Temporary 1�`,
,;� '� � ��,�� `��� �,-'"- ,, � !� ;�i� sk;' '�� .�q���,'�t s^' 201f, temporaryford crossing �,�'
� ' �. `.._� n Y' �t. �1,�8 \: : � f i w ,�,,�f -� , �{
''� � \ ����� � . �. a'i��` d'�? GI :�'�� �- '1� y, � �'�� �� ,,� '� t �'��� ��
, , w .•,
�.�. q y� � � �1 0 9 � p:�.
�it+ ��,��, .,`'' - � �� �,� � i�'� - � � � 4 ��e� �.� . , r._ �4 _. � �
� i .. '"a ,�'�r✓p . sl�, ` , a
�� L , 'Go i
��� r � =iw �,� t !� �t �'Pr � �� ������� .Stl"@alll B �BI"IaY �'.Y@@%� 1 �'"�'� _
r-`�� �*�..� ��-� � . � '}' � �;� I� �� .,r,; - - - � r"w - �: '..
9M� � ••�_+ a �,'4.,�,� � � � �� � �-^,
�' ',� w . .a - '�'u`� `... 'ti!��_ � �i) F� - - '� '1� '� , �iT��� .'' . . :; #
� // � _ <�ne �.: � � � � �
� -- , 7�''� `� �:�.,( , � � � /'�� ��,, j �':pF. `{ , ��i�-.�" �� �{,�.. r ',R�"�` '�'
, � � .
� •;-��. �•� �� � ��� ���i „� � �. -„ `' �i- �E �� �"'k f � �� �F 4
• ,,� � �,,�",' � (� _ � ' . . s •'!,�, � i 'Y"�:` S `�, � r.< �' � .
, -- `' � �* \� � � �'� A � .,... ` �ti i r � 1�. � �: r� � ~.
� `!� '�� ��,. ♦ � —, �� :r"• .• • ,� � � �a..�[s,��'� @,,_ s� ,� _�(,
. . _ ' , Yi�,;��,' . �,.�=+� V � �rC�� __w . . 'A' � � � - , � � �
r �� '�"F* �
� . ��. .:+7� ~ ' �\ ,. ` ` �.,.,:'� ,..i � 1 �M�"-' � �s,,;a�_� _ *.=--
���'; . :'�' �r�%�� ii \�\ � I h . ` � � _ .,,:�� . '� � T• `- �"�*�.
. .
.. � -.-_� � � - � � . �
._, .. - .. . . _ _ .
\ r � }' �`w .� � ,. +c _ �%� , � '� `. �. ^ �� : � '��`� � ` � . � �`t' ' �.
� •
, ��
��'�� ^$' '��; � 4 /i' @, r�; �< " +�-� �+.�i, -��, 4. ' '. , � .' _ - " '`
i� ., "r
� �t`',��?2"L�� �.�� �`�-- - :�� �. . �,,� ��v�-��f �� �T ` _ . .,���
` 3� ., �,�y� ' ` ' � � � .r a ► , , .
� � " �,� � . �, �r t J �,�I y;;:. a"'� �'"` r" �, �, �'. I, � � , _.t�.�k :�k'� , � s�
4�, � :i.. �;,� .„ �i �. � 4 . ,+I�t ., r � }� � ' �
� � t a e. -t.; . � 1� . ` � . . �,^ „r .
� Y � � � • Impact 7 - Temporary - Throughout Project Area ,� � ''� � -
�� ��" "� 4,7201f, necessary to conduct construction activities sg � �
�
'� :� a . � _ - .. . . . � �, . - - .
� ,� j'{ ., ' ,.. ._„� 7 � _�. - _
�; �� - - * 6� C h�4� ;'� Y ..4� ��, �� � '��.� ""� w
Sx� � F . . . �� -
a,� ` , ''� ��, .. -� r .��-,t��'
�, �,� �k�,: ., _� ,�' -,: �,�,� Oy 200 400
< '�� ♦ �, - x'� �L ,
� - �' � � . �\,,� �;,_,,�; 'i ,� �_ �- Feet
. � * , � _ �"�� ' S v+�5 : �' � - — -
v: '" ! + � w '�.� ) ��"
• Figure 5d: Proposed Conditions
�,% Cross-Charlotte Greenway - Brandywine to Tyvola
� ����Qy ��� �Qr�j Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, SC
{;iR:tF�I.(Yf"rl�:. March 2019
EHGIkEERING & 9R6PFi17Y
NAHaGL1iENT
CONSTRUC�ON SEO�ENCE
5' MAX. STREAM CHANNEL t. coNsrRucr �MaoRARr oivERSioN oR sEr-uP
,I BANK HEIGHT PUMP AROUND PER THE �ETAIL ON.
IRI � IVI� �I Itrl'iIi / �I 2. EXCAVATE APPROACH SEC�ONS.
IV� 3. BEGIN E%CAVATION OF THE CHANNEL TO
__ -, � i6 �. , � �I��Y I " � ,.I, SURFACE FLOW
� -� ` � � / IV4II�II i, ��y DIVERSION INSiALL THE FILTER FABFIG AND STONE BASE.
��_� \ � /� �li�i �" � 4. REPLACE ANV STABILIZING MATERIAL THAT IS
� "�' � �, WASHED OUT DURING STORM FLOWS.
� Illr � ` _ 0 6 � _ _ _ � � _ 19��I
� iul� oo � op� �o - -� -
� �� �Ird�.�� � �i �S�l��� -.:�_� � o
� � i!I �� i�i — a
� y,y STONE APPROACH SECTION � Ilil
5:1 MAX. SLOPE ON ROAD
STONE OVER
- FILTER FABRIC
i
i�
�
<
m
N
� fr
E
N �
� V
w F
a�
� -s
�z
z.
� "s
z
�
0
a �
w 8
M
o g
I �
W b
o �
� x
o g
V =
5
O f
o �
w ,$
I y
M p
/
N `g
2 p
� S
a� `
% �
a 5
a �
UI
E
9a
� $
a `
N a
J �
U
x �
�0E
2
� .c
o $
U Y
�
oB
SURFACE FLO
DNERSI ON
ORIGINAL STREAMBANK�`
'-\\ // �
GRADATION OF 2"-6" RIP ���
RAP WITH 1" OF //57 STONE ` - - - _ _ _ - - - - - - -��TYPE 1 (4oz) FILTER FABRIC
AS TOP LAYER TO FILL VOIDS
iN Ria Rna SECTION
TEMPORARY STREAM CROSSING/FORD
NOT TO SC/i.0
STREAM CHANNEL BRIDGE MAT
N��i ii��� �i � ili��i� � � � V�li
, , ��, �
—_�- — I I�'�dn""�� ' 1� /u/IiI� � �I � SURFACE FLOW
�` \ IIIiII IIiIi .. ' DIVERSION
�� � IVi�I
I�{ �11� li�� �' - _ � � �
�' � I �� j �r� I . I I \ _ .. � �
V
� i.il �'� I4` _ _ �
�� �� —
� f II �y uuli
� � � IWi
.. . .O . . O. .
NOTES:
1. CONSTRUCT STREAM CROSSING WHEN FLOW IS AT NORMAL
BASEFLOW.
2. MINIMIZE CLEARING AN� EXCAVATION OF STREAMBANKS. 00
NOT EXCAVATE CHANNEL BOTTOM.
3. INSTALL STREAM CROSSING PERPENDICULAR TO THE FLOW.
4. MAINTAIN CROSSING 50 THAT RUNOFF IN THE CONSlRl1CTI0N
ROAD DOES NOT ENTER EXISTING CHANNEL.
5. STABILIZE AN ACCE55 RAMP OF CLA55 B STONE TO THE
EDGE OF THE MUD MAT.
6. CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE AN APPROPRIATE RAMP
ANGLE ACCORDING TO THE EQUIPMENT UTILIZED.
TEMPORARY STREAM CROSSING - MUD MAT ON SIDE CHANNELS
NOT TO SCA�E
�
m e
o �
0
� � NOTES:
�8
a� � 1. CONSIRUCT STREAM CROSSING WHEN FLOW IS AT NORMAL
BASEFLOW.
U� 2. MINIMIZE CLEARING AND EXCAVAPON OF STREAMBANKS. DO
NOT E%CAVATE CHANNEL BOTTOM.
�.`�� 3. INSTALL STREAM CROSSING PERPEN�ICULAR TO THE FLOW.
Y 4. MAINTAIN CROSSING SO THAT RUNOFF IN hIE CONSTRUCTION
� ROAD DOES NOT ENTER EXISTING CHANNEL.
E�, 5. STABILIZE AN ACCESS RAMP OF CLASS B STONE TO THE
EDGE OF THE MUD MAT.
6. CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE AN APPROPRIATE RAMP
� E ANGLE ACCORDING TO THE EQUIPMENT UTILIZED.
°$ TEMPORARY DEEP STREAM CROSSING - MUD MAT ON LITTLE SUGAR
� € NOT TO SCALF
SOIL STABILIZATION TIMEFRAMES
SITE DESCRIPTION STABILIZATION TIME TIMEFRAME EXCEP IIONS
PERIMLTEI� DIKES, SWALES, DITCHES AND SLOPLS 7 DAYS NONE
HIGH QUALITY WATER (HQW) ZONES 7 DAYS NONE
SLOPES STEEPER THAN 3:1 7 DAYS IF SLOPES ARE 10' OR LESS IN LENGTH AND ARE
NOT STEEPER THAN 2:1, 14 DAYS ARE ALLOWED.
SLOPES 3:1 OR FLATTER 14 DAYS 7 DAYS FOR SLOPES GREATER THAN 50'IN
LENGTH.
ALL OTHER AREAS WITH SLOPES FLATTER THAN 4:1 14 DAYS NONE, EXCEPT FOR PERIMETERS AND HQW ZONES-
PERMANENT SEEDING - RIPARIAN SEED MIX
(USE UNDER COIR MATTING)
COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME PERCENTAGE
RE9TOP PANIC GRASS (NC ECOTYPE) P' um rigidulum 2a
CAMPER LITiLE BLUE SiEM S h' ochyrium xoporium ZQ
LANCE-LEAVED COREOPSIS (NC ECOTVPE) Goreopsis londceoloto I 10
BLACK-EYED SUSAN (NC ECOTWE) R�dbeckia hirta ��
PARTRIDGE PEA Ghamaecr'sta (oxicu/ota I 5
BEAKED PANIGGRA55 (MD EGOiYPE) Panicum onceps I 5
41VER OATS (WV ECO�YPF) Chosmanthium IoHfolum 3
DEER TONGUE Oichanthelium clandestinum I 3
VIRGINIA WILD RYE £lymus hginicus 3
COMMON SNEEZEWEED (VA EGOttPE) Helenium outumnole I 3
SWAMP SUNFLOWER (NC ECOttP€) Helionfhus ongust�folius I 3
WIL� OUININE (VA ECOTYPE) Porthenium integrifol�um 3
APPALACHIAN BEARDTONGUE (SC ECOTWE) Pensteman laevigatus 3
PURPLE TOP ('SUTHER', NC ECOTWE) iidans )lows 3
SPOTTED BEEBALM (SC ECOTIPE) Monordo punctota p
IRONWEED ('SUTHER', NC ECOiYPE) �emonia noveboro 2
UPLAND BENTGRASS Agrostis perennans �
TICKSEED SUNFLOWER (NC ECOTWE) Bidens oristoso 1
"APPLICATION R4TE 15 LBS/ACRE
APPLY SOIL AMENDMENTS ACCORDING 70 iT+E FOLLOWWG TABLE AT 1000 LBS�ACRE�
N z ,o
P z05 io
K �0 �o
APPLY LIME AT 3000 LB�ACRE.
MULCH
APPLY 4,000 LB�ACRE STRAW. ANCHOR STRAW BY A MULCH ANCHORING TOOL A
DISK WITH BLADES SET NEARLY STRAIGHT CAN BE USED AS A MULCH ANCHORING
TOOL.
MAINTENANCE
REFERTILIZE IF GROWTH IS NOT FULLY ADEQUATE- RESEED, REFERTILIZE AND MULCH
IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING EROSION OR OTHER DAMAGE PER SECTION 6.10 OF NCDENR
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DESIGN MANUAL.
GENERALNOTES
1. IN ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHOULD BE RAKED/ROUGHENED (A MINIMUM OF 5"),
AMENDED WITH FERTILIZER, SEEDED (PERMANENT AND TEMPORARY), STRAWED, AND
THEN COVERED WITH EROSION CONTROL MATTING (IF APPLICABLE) PER THE
MANUFACTORERS RECOMMENDATIONS. ONCE THE MATTWG IS DOWN INSTALL THE
LIVE STAKES AND TUBELWGS THROUGH THE MATTWG.
2. O.C. = ON-CENTER
3- TEMPORARv SEEDiNG S4ALL BF APPUED IN ALL DIS�URBcD AREAS.
WOODY VEGETATION — 6' O.C.
COMMON BOTANICAL PERCENTAGE NUMBER ROW TYPE
NAME NAME OF ROWS SPACING
SILKY D06WOOD Comus am 3a Z 3' LIVE STAKE
SILKY WILLOW Solix Sericea 30 2 3' LIVE STAKE
ELDERBERRY Sambucus canaaensis 30 2 3' LIVE STAKE
TAG ALDER A/nus serrulata �0 3 2' BAR[ ROOT
'RANDOM SPACING TO MIMIC NATURAL CONDITIONS
VEGETATION SPECIES FOR BUFFER AREAS (TUBELINGS)
COMMOM NAME BOTANICAL NAME TREE/SHRU�
SOUTHERN ARROWWOOD VIBURNUM DENTATUM SHRUB
HAZEL ALDER ALNUS SERRULATA TREE
RIVER BIRCH BETULA NIGRA TREE
EASTERN REDBUD CERCIS CANADENSIS TREE/SHRUB
SILKY DOGWOOD CORNUS AMOMUM SHRUB
INKBERRY lLEX CLABRA SHRUB
YELLOW POPLAR LIRIODENDRON TUI,IPIFERA TREE
WILLOW OAK QUERCUS PHELLOS I TREE
BUTTON BUSH CEPHALANTHUS OCCIDENTALIS SHRUB
RED CHOKEBERRY PHOTINIA PYRIFOGIA � SI-IRUB
CHOSEN SPEGES SHALL BE COMPR6ED OF 70% TREES AND 30% SHRUBS OR iREE�SHRUB SPECIES
AND PLANTED AT 200 STEMS�ACRE.
SENSITIVE
DO NOT DUPLICATE
�
, o
Know whaYs below.
Cal I before you tlig.
� I
LO o �
O �o
o��
.. � � _
[�,`�'
�' d '�°.
9 � p L
j� W�U
� �' t
w �z°,
q �] yFZ
o„ = ,a s .°�'
� `
Z � `n
�
U
i
:�o�S� ESSRp�'� �
i '
_ �'e S ° ,�
i
�' 9� �a..: �E�P� �e :
• � O ,,,,
EF CLA�;,.�`•
Q �
� �
o �
z
a �
O
N i
0
_ ��
� 'o
M
f �
Z y � �
W
F
E-
O
�a
Q Q
UF
�
�
O�/
W
U
M
j O
= U
r. W
�
a
F
w
a
a
CC
F
z
0
V
z
�
�
�
�
w
�
C �
d
0
�
F
��
a�
N �
m �
N
� �
�
N =Z
� 's
a g
o �
�
a �
U �
O u
N �
w �
� E
N
U S
w,
�
a
v a
N g
� 6
U
I a
x
�0 2
� .c
o $
U Y
I
`o B
� bg
U §
m �
o ��
E
I I
TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTIOfJ
ENTRANCE(TVP�.CONTRACTORTO
COORDINATE WITH RESPECTIVE
UTILITY COMPANIES FOR ANY
POTENTIAL IMPACTS OR
RELOCATIONS REQUIRED FOR THIS
TEMP.CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
," ,� � ,� � � �� - ; __ ; :
' ' � � � , ' ,, ,,— ,,�' ���' ------------ � i' •
PRIVPTEI � � / � � �� � �� � ,,�� ,�� /
RDDRNEI � � �� � � � i ,� ,�� i
GRANF� � ��� i ���� ,,, --------------------- ___- / / ���� �l��N
� �
� � � �
� � � � � �
� . "� � � / � � � _
, _ � � � � , �
% � > � � � / i �� �� ��
� � , � �
i � � �
/ � i ,' ,' ,—' _-------- -- � L� o
� � � � � , ,-- ----- ___--- � � ,,
N�
� � ,— — --
� � � � --- -- � ,,
/ i i — — N �
�� . / � � � � --- / � ��i - INFE „ ���
— �_��� � � / �� �� �� �� � � - GRAPHIC SCALE ET o � A
�`� � / i �� �� �� , i , 0 10 20 40 �, �_
\ �� i�// /�� —���� ��--- i� i� 9 O�V
i � i
i � i i
` . i � � _ — _ �� �� y
� � �
i � / w �
` � / a m �..
� � �
� � �
� .. � ' _ - ' / � . . . . . . - . __ _ � ] U c.
� � ._ _ _ ' \�/ L
� � � -- __ _ -_-�- Z
- � _ ._ _ ----- q
� -__- ____ _ --- . � 0. ..z ti
� .a .- �
_ � i
� ��L � ,- -- _ ,_- ,-�- - Z� �
� �� � -'� _ _ _ ��=7i� _ -"- � �,, � �_
_ , , � �� , , � �
, � � � -- --- � � •
O U � / '\ ' � - - � � LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE (TYP ��� ��` ` _ � � � \ �
C i � / � - _ - / � � �
p� ;�� / � � � � ..�-�� ���� � �� �� —"
Qz `, ,� ; _ � , ��r� � �. � �� ��
a � � II' � r_, � ` � `
w � jl�l�luj�ii� � �� ��� '1/� \ � �
iiii�iii��<<�" �'�� ��1�� � _ , --____
�� � �,, ���, > 1 �_� /lL _ � ; ' ' — —_ —
� � � --
, �,�����,��,� ��� i --,-
, �, � ���, ,
� L �/�i� � � � � -�' � ,��,-' ,--,
_
,, ,,��,�,i, � � c � � -
� II I / �� � ���� I � / . � / _
� — �
'� ��� �� �'ll���'��"�' ♦ IL � � _- __,
� -
�� � �' � � � .. .
I� � � I �' � ll�l� � I/ /" ` �/�/� `
/\\�� �lI �I '��1����/I��/ � __ � ...� .' -... `
� ����� I � - � / � • , `
_ � ��� � � � � TEMPORARY DETAIL SNEETEC03
� � LOW WATER FORD. SEE `
� V/r� l /�I��I I � I I / / _ — . . .. ___ .� � _..._ . / ��-- �
`
� �� ���1/ll������� / � ����� ��,�I �
---�
�---- ----- �
. I � � I���III� I� �_ _ � ' - --
� I ��I�III����/��� � � / � ��, i� ����� � ��i%��� __ -_ �
� �� �I lll � ��l �� � I / � l J �/ �� ��/ii� � � � � � � .
` ` � - _ �
I �� ( Illl�l��l�/ / / I /� SILTFENCE�TVP -� > // �r//�� r� �// � . — �- _ - _
I �� � I�llll��l�l � i i / � �/ i � l i/i � � � - -- ___ - __
J / / _
� � � � � � ���� /���I / / � � / / / /�/ - - — ^�� _
� � A � l ��� � � � � � �-7 /� �/ � I /�/ � .. ` -_ _ . � -
� �II I��lllll�I��I� 1���� I i MECPW#B7R4COZNTY \ __ //// �//� � ` - _
i � I�� �� / /// � I �I� I D814587PG609 � / � i / � / ��� � /��/,%� � � � �
iii � �iliii����i� i��� i � ` _ � /� i � ��� � j � �� ��
� i i � i � , ` _ , — / i � �� ii� �� ♦
i ii i iii � i i i ,
�li � �i�iiij� i i i �il i � ��� / i� i' ���� ���i;�- � � —
iu � .�i�iiii i �i��i � j � i �`— - ` �� / \ � � ` � �� � % � � ��
,�� �II � il /ll� � l,/ / � i � ,� � � =__� � ��� i �� � �i� � %���. __ � . . —_.—
�� �
.. . �-. _ ` � --,\ �, —_'— - . ' _ -_
� l _—_ �� � / ��_ ��' ;%���i% � �j�
� � � � �� � � '� �i ��j � �
_ _
�
� � � _ � � � i� �� r � j �� ���� �%��� ��� �-- �i�
� " J
-- i � � � �� G i,, _' _ ♦
, i � ,, i r% Q- � � �
- � � i ���/ P � ,
PROPOSED EROSION CONTROL INFO ' �Q` � �--_,
�
� , — �� � �%� i
- � i iii � � �
''- � � �� � � � ,i -
> > TEMPORARY DIVERSION DITCH ���� �
ii% � �
�/�i/� � /J l� �/ � � � �\
� � � � � � � � DISTURBED AREA �� ������ �� / ��
;�'� � � �i�� � LAYDOWNAREA#6 �
CONSTRUCTION OF THE TRAIL, WALLS, BOARDWALKS, AND STREAM � /
644 PROPOSED CONTOURS RcSTORA710N ITEMS MAY REQUIRE THAT THE CONTRACTOR Tp � ---� ' ���, �,
EXISTING CONTOURS
PF TREE PROTECTION FENCE
—�� �� SILT FENCE
� SPECIAL SEDIMENT CONTROL FENCE
CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
` t r-. ; �:I
RIP RAP APRON
FILTER BAG WLET PROTECTION
CLDSM 30.�5
cZOCK INLET SEDIMENT TRAP
—>-� >�� — ROCK CHECK DAM, TYPE A
> �>� ROCK CHECK DAM, TYPE B
- COIR FIBER MATTING
STRAW MATTMG
SEE SHEEic EC-04 THRU EC-04 FOR NOTES AND DETAILS
TEMPORARILY WORK IN THE WET- THIS WORK MAY CAUSE A
TEMPORARY INCREASE IN TURBIDITY�, HOWEVER THE CONTRACTOR
WILL MAKE ATTEMPTS TO LIMIT THE DISTURBANCE AS MUCH AS
PRACTICAL. BECAUSE OF THE URBAN NATURE OF THE CORRIDOR AND
BACKWATER EFFECT OF ROCK SILT CHECKS, NONE IS PROPOSED FOR
IN STREAM DURING ANY OF THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.
TEMPORARY LOW WATER FORD CROSSINGS PER DETAIL 6JOA OF THE
NCDNR MANUAL MAY BE IMPLEMENTED FOR THESE CROSSINGS.
CONiRACTOR TO INSTALL
iMPERVi0U5 DIKES ALONG THE
STREAM AS NEEDED AND UTILIZE
SPECIAL STILLWG BASWS FOR
DEWATERING.
STABILIZE ALL SLOPES 3-1 AND GREATER
WITH MULCH AND SEED AS NOTED IN
PROPOSED CONTOURS SHOWN AS EROSION CONTROL DEIAILS
APPROXIMATE ONLY TO ILWSTRATE STABILIZE AS SHOWN (UNLESS OTHERWISE
G�NERAL FLOW PATHS. SEE CROSS
SECTIONS FOR ACTUAL ELEVATIONS NOTED) ON THIS PLAN WITHIN 14 DAYS OF
COMPLETION PER EROSION CONTROL NOTES
DO NOT INSTALL FILTER BAG INLET
PROJECTION UNTIL GRADING [3CGINS ACREAGE SUMMARY
THAT WILL REQUIRE TNE PROJECT DISTURBED AREA
PROTECTION ±14.39 ACRES
:�o�S� ESSRp�'� �
" �¢e S j _
..t rti;
' �9'� t�a• :�EeP,+�•�`
..�
QC�'+f,EF CLA�N��.�`��.
t
��
o �
z
a �
�
� � w
M
. � � � MECKLENBURG COUNTY ' �
i � �i � PIN# 171-18139 . I �
� / �� D811020PG318 � � �
� � � � i�� MB4PG345 _--- - �_ � _ � _ � �
p � i �
� � � N �
. � �//��/ � , ,- o
�I / i�/ j � .
�
V^ �� -
. _1 � \�-� / / i�/� ' �
-_ � �i� � � /� /� � ��
���-'� % -� 1 � � / �/ /�/ � � i �/ -
_ � i
i i ,��r--���I /��/ /���i �/ [�]
i—�-�'� --�I)1���1// i ��i � � E V1
�� _ � � 111 � � I � � � I �' i�/���" � � � .
i /
� �� �/ I // � I � I I / / � / n
_ �
� n w E-! a
--- '� `i���i�� � i i i i i�i i i �� � � � t� �. 0 w
� � 1 I I ( � 1� � I I � � � �
�i�i� � iii���� i \ �� ��` �
1
_ �� � �i�i��iii � � ��� �V�� � �
-- � � / �/� I ��l ,. �
I �/ I I ����/ l/� I �' 7� \�
� � l �1 �1 � 1 � I � /I � � ! JGL I LLC �
/ / � PIN# 171-181-44 �
� �� \ � � / ���/ / �/ , D870193PG110 '
� � � � \ \/ � /// / � DB 9904 PG 325 �
,����� �� /����/
� �� � � � \ �� / � �// �� � � , ��
�� � � � i � i i � i � � ��
��
Qy� Q Q Z
y� v � o
� �
� O�/ �
W O
, ° V W
SENSITIVE o
DO NOT DUPLICATE KnowwhaYs below. w ri �
Cal I before you tlig. r W °�