520061_INSPECTIONS_20171231

INSPECTIONS

Facility Number 52 61 Date of Inspection 919/98
Time of inspection 950 24 hr. (hh:mm)
© Registered 0 Certified 0 Applied for Permit [3 Permitted 113 Not Operational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: J3m1a-na.9f.QnULnA.#21 ............................................................. ............... County-: Jam .................................................. W'.ARQ.......
Owner Namc:...................................................tYlRlt'.a.of.ijn. LtG................... Phone No: 210. 29b-tQ(1..........................................................
Facility Contact: dlllblA y..V.iU1,Slt<1.................... .............. Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
MailingAddress: P.Qlox.48..7............................................................................................ Wamaw.Xc ........................................................... 283.98.........._..
Onsite Representative: S,r1=.RAyjx.,5.0M lly.HW....... Integrator:
Certified Operator: Samuel ................................... Hill.. ......... Operator Certification Number: I
Location of Farm:
Latitude °L�` ou Longitude ° & �K
Design _ Current
--Swine: Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
N Feeder to Finish
2000
8000
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
2000
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design - Current _ Design Current
Poultry Capacity Populaiion Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer I I❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer I I- ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
- Total Design Capacity 2,000 -
Total SSLW 270,000
:_ Number of=Lagoons / Holding Ponds" 4 ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
r_ ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes N No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance roan -made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. Ii'discharge is observed. did it reach Surrace Water? (if yes, notifj, DWI ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. ll'discharge is observed, vkhat is the estimated flow in gayinin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes. notif} DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes to No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/75/47
❑ Yes N No

Uonunuea on auc:x
Fac' ' Nun*,er: 52-61 Date of Inspection 919198
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structungs LLaagoons.Holding Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
Structure I Structure 2 Stniclurc 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: k'ijuishet......... ........ NM
I ........... .............. SaW............. ......... XISQ1 tiom.......................................................---.....................
Freeboard(11): ...............6,7......................... .... 27............... .............. 13.............. ............... 4,9............... •••••....-••-•••••.................. ....................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type .......Co 1BQ, tda. )............... cQ a-soykrgm : at..................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Onh•
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
❑ .No.violations or•deftciencies.rvere•iloted;during this -visit. • You.will.receive no further. -. -.
•;•"correspondei�cealioutthis:visit:•;••.•:•;•••;•:•.�:-.•••.-••:•:•:•:•:•::-:•:-:•.•.•;�;�•• :--•-•-:�;
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments refer to uestion. Ex lain any YES answers.andlouany recommendations or'any other_comments - - _
_Use drawuigs of facility to betted explain situations. (use additional pages, as: necessary)c -
* Will contact DWQ to correct compliance page if possible to show 8000 feeder to finish and 2000 farrow to feeder
* Need to pull soil samples by end of year
* Operation certified 5/95 (prior to 9/l /96) - irrigation operating parameters not required by recommended - Mr- Davis said Brown's
working towards securing parameters for operation
* Lagoon 3 (sow) - mower hit air vent of hydrant about a month ago - pipe was fixed - need to fill and shape area where repair was
Coastal fields sprayed for weeds as needed per previous operation review
Reviewer/Inspector Name Pat_Hooper252/916-ba81 _ 1 s -

Facility Number 52 61 Date of Inspection 3/3/98
Time of inspection 0800 24 hr. (hh.mm)
0 Registered ® Certified © Applied for Permit 0 Permitted 10 Not Operational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: Bzxtx��as.nlf Ga cllilts.#F�S�............................................................................ County: J.0nea .................................................. W.R.O.......
OwnerName:............................... .................... ................... Phone No: 91A-296i18Q0...........----.--.........................................
Facility Contact: JAiAmyX1lpglR l............................ Title: spy.mD[AlcWjxl.Mwmgcr........... Phone No: ..............
Mailing Address: PU.Boa48.7....................................... ....................... ..... Wa nw.NC........................... . 2$399.............
.... ..................... ...............................
Onsite Representative:5MMU.g.1AM ............................... ..............
Integrator: Bd(lkltl.'..t)f.GA1ClPli�t,�,.i10.�...........
Certified Operator: Satqua................................... Hill..................................................... Operator Certification Number:.162.45
Location of Farm:
:...............:............................:::::........:.:::::::::.:...:::::::::::......::::::::::::::::::..............::::...........::::......................
Latitude ° �' Longitude
.Design • _-,Current
-Swine _ _ - _ Capacity-PotaUlatioQ
❑ Wean to Feeder
5600
® Feeder to Finish
2000
8000
❑ Farrow to Wean
2000
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
- Design -_-Current Design Current
Poultry -_ Capacity -Population Cattle Capacity .Population
❑ Laver ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Laver ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other .. -
_ Total -Design Capacity 2,000
'Total; SSLW 270,000
Number of Lagoons 1 Holding Ponds �'_ ❑Subsurface Drains Present ©Lagoon Area ❑Spray Field Area
❑ No Liquid Waste Management Svstem
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed. was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes. notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed. what is the estimated [low in galhnin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes. notify' DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
Not Aonlicable
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/75/wi
❑ Yes ® No

l.UnunuerW an VUVA
Facility Number: 5T61 Date of Inspection 313/98
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
❑ Yes
® No
Structures (Lanoons,14olding Ponds, Flush Pits. etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
® Yes
❑ No
Structure l Stricture 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier: $AN:.......................I�uu'sia..................�.its.�h a&................). ad.. A.....................................
............. ......
...................................
Freeboard(fi):.............. L47.............. .............. ,Q2............................ 1.10............................ 4,J3...............
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes
® No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
® No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
® Yes
❑ No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes
® No
Waste AApplication
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
® No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type.......QaaL4Silagc.&..(kaW..........................
S%brKaus....................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes
® No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
® No
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
® Yes
❑ No
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
® No
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
® No
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
® No
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
® Yes
❑ No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
N No
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
®No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
❑ Yes
❑ No
0 No. violations or-deficiencies.were-noted_duririg this�visit.-You will.ieceive no further:.-
.cotrrk*)fidence A out this:visit:
Comments (refer to_questton#) .Explamvany YES answers and/or anv"reeommendations or any other comments -_
Use;drawings of facility.to better explain situations. (ase additional pages as necessary)._ ,_ _ _ _ _ _
5. Recommend consulting your technical specialist or the Jones County Soil & Water Office regarding installation of grassed waterways
in spray fields to help divert storm water.
9. Finishing lagoon has less than adequate storage. Need to spray at rates listed in plan as soon as weather permits.
12. Bare areas along dike walls to be seeded as soon as weather permits. No threat to dike wall integrity.
13. Recommend replacing markers with one that has incremental measurements - to make record keeping more accurate. Markers
should be set according to each lagoon's design storage levels.
18. Coastal to be sprayed for weeds as soon as weather permits - before coastal emergence (if possible).
wr
Reviewer/Inspector Name Scott Junes

LReviewer,,'Inspector Signature: Date:
Facility Number: 52-61 Date of Inspection 313198
Additional Comments "and/or Drawings.: - -
22. Need to update irrigation map and hydrant locations. The following items are to be obtained and maintained with on -site records:
design storage calculations for waste structures; lagoon operation and maintenance plan; and irrigation system operating parameters.
The above referenced information to be in place no later than June 3, 1998.
OTE: Operation Review is for farms 52-61, 52-67, and 52-70. Farms combined under 52-61 since lagoons are tied together and all
Pray fields are shared. Operating numbers for farm are 5600 wean to feeder; 8000 feeder to finish; and 2000 sow farrow to wean
lualing 2,1 I4,000 lbs. SSLW. Waste utilization plan for 8000 feeder to finish and 2000 sow farrow to feeder equaling 2,124,000 lbs.
SLW.
313198

I* rcoutme p Lompiamt p ronow-up of uwlt inspection p romw-up of uawL review p utner
Date of Inspection
Facility Number Time of Inspection ��.-1 I� 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Farm Status: 0 Registered p Applied for Permit
Certified p Permitted
in Not Operational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: Browns of Carolina #25
County: Jones ............... .............. . ................. .WA)`iQ.......
Owner Name: . . .... . ........................ . ... . ......... Brnwn'SLof.! :arDUna.iM.......-----..... Phone No: 911 29t1-184Q...................._.....................................
Facility Contact:.iintmy.Yimsnn _........... _�. W. _.......Title: Enykoaxnrxtal.Manages... ....... Phone No: 9.1A-24G-18011.......................
MailingAddress: W..Baz.487I.........................._............................... .................. . W.suave.NV......................... .. .............. ................ 2M8.............
Onsite Representative: M& Senya.lohnson................................................................. Integrator:.......................................................................................
Certified Operator: So Operator Certification Number:16245 .............................
Location of Farm:
Latitude ®a Fgg--� ®« Longitude
ape of Operation Design ..Current.;! - :_Design - Current , - : Design - Current
Swine _ Capacity Population ~ ' Poultry Capacity Population Cattle' ;Capacity Population
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Fin,s
mown
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
p Other
Number of Lagoons / Holding Ponds ` E3Subsurface'rams resen p agoonArea p SPrH rea
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? 13 Yes ® No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? p Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: p Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? p Yes ® No
b, If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes ® No
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes ® No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? p Yes ® No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? p Yes ® No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require p Yes ® No
4/30197 maintenance/improvement?

Facility Number: 52_ f
6.' is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? p Yes ® No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? p Yes ® No
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? p Yes ® No
Structures (Lagoons and/or Holding Ponds)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? p Yes ® No
Freeboard (ft): Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
..##2.Nursery-15.B.. A3.1inishing.3..ft.... Load.Dut:.S.fL.... ..... -...... .......... ............. ................... I.,.................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type Sj age.&.Gzain).......--------
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
For Certified Facilities On!
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
24. Does record keeping need improvement?
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
N Yes p No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes M No
p Yes N No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ® No
® Yes p No
p Yes ® No
All records of the CAWMP are kept at the Complex 23.Shop located on NCSR 1156. This farm is included in a permit application I&
omitted to the DWWon-of Water -Quality, which includes Facility Nos. 52-61, 51G7, and 52-70; design capacity of 8000 feeder to
finish & 200q,fariow to feeder: *Me current population of animals could not be provided. Please note the following comments:
12-'Vegatation needs to -be established on the -bare spots of lagoon #3.
rite Analysis - 4/28/97, 7/18197
e animal waste management plan certification. form and permit application for Farm #25 does not appear -to include a load out
house and truck washing pad with one.holding.pond. -This needs to be verified along with the design information being submitted
Leigh to'be included in the permit applicatioif"Jnfoi7 iation'for Farm-#25.
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date:

I* Kouime p 4omp:alni p rouow-up of owy mspecinon p ronow-up of u�wt_- review p viner l
Date of Inspection
Facility Number
Timc of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Farm Status: 0 Registered 0 Applied for Permit -
■ Certified p Permitted��-
_._. T.
In Not Operational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: Farm #25 Finishing County:Joites........ _............. .......................... .WARQ.......
Owner BrQwa.'s,.of.liaraWta.Inr. ................. Phone No: 9AR-29AA8QI1... ............................ ......... ........ .........
Facility Contact. jimm Vjjj&0jL..............................................Title: .......... Phone No: 9111-2QFr..18011.......................
MailingAddress: W.Hox.48I........ ........... ...... ....... ........... .......................... .......... ... W..,m3aw-NC..... ..... ................................... ........... IM98 ..............
Onsite Representative: Ms..Son a.Johnsan................................................................. Integrator: ... ............... ....... ....... _...................................................
Certified Operator: ...................................... Operator Certification Number:].6245-...........................
Location of Farm:
Latitude ` ®µ Longitude ©0 ©& ®u
pe of Operation -Design Current _ -Design : `Current Design Current
Swine Capacity ;Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity .Population
13 Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finishmown
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to ee er
Farrow to FlUs
p Other
Ayer
Non.Layer
`Total Design Cap$city ,
Total SSLW ,
-_Number of Lagoons / Holding Ponds u sur ace rains Present jPFUF5-5—nXrea 113 Spray rea
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: p Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
4/30/97 maintenance/improvement?
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
13 Yes ® No
p Yes ® No

Vacility Number: 52_70
6. 'Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? p Yes ® No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? p Yes ® No
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? p Yes ® No
Structures (Lagoons and/or Holding Ponds)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? p Yes B No
Freeboard (ft): Structure l Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
#2_Xurscry. 2.5_fL..A3.Finishing-3..ft_....Load.1,dui:-.5.2..... ...... ..._.......... ................ .......................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type .W....CoastalBarmuda iF3ajr...............Cara.(S.i12ge,&.Gcain)..................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
For Certified Facilities Only
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
24. Does record keeping need improvement?
s anaror.;aayrecommenaauon.
13 Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
N Yes p No
p Yes N No
p Yes ® No
13 Yes ® No
(3 Yes N No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes M No
® Yes p No
p Yes ® No
11 records of the C:A WM1' are Kept at the Complex 923 Shop located on NUNK 1156. i'his farm is mcluaea in a permit application a
omitted to the Division of Water Quality, which includes Facility Nos. 52-61, 52-67,•and 52-70; design capacity of 8000 feeder to
finish & 2000. farrow to feeder. The current -population. of animals could not be provided. -Please note the following comments:
12 - Vegetation needs to be established -on the bare:spots of lagoon #3. _
Waste Analysis - 4R8/97, 7/18/97
e animal waste management plan certification form and permit application for Farm #25 does not appear -to include a load out
house and truck washing pad with -one holding pond.• This needs to be verified along with the design informationteing submitted
eigh to be included in the peririit application -information for Farm #25.. _ - -

19 Routine p omp aint p Follow-up of DWQ inspection p Follow-up of DSWC review p Other
Facility Number
Farm Status: 13 Registered p Applied for Permit
■ Certified p Permitted
in Not Operational I Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: Farm ##25 Nurseries
Owner Name:
Brnwn's of.CarDUwJu _...............
County: Jones ........... ................................... .WARO.......
Phone No: 911k29"8011 .........................................................
Facility Contact: dimmYinson........ ... EnYironmrtral.Alanager........... Phone No: 91124b-18411 .......................
Mailing Address: PQ.Sax.487 .. ____. ___ . _... _ .. ._ ...__... )Nat ssaHt..lYC.......................................... 188..............
Onsite Representative: Ms..Stonya.Johnsots...................... _................ ....... Integrator: Hm.wj's.nf.C,arralin:a,Jac .............................
Certified Operator:Samuel................ Hill..................................................... Operator Certification Number:16245 ....... ................... ...
Location of Farm:
Latitude Longitude
Type of Operation =:Design <Current ' Design Current Design Current
Swine , •. Capacity ` Population , :Poultry -Capacity Population 'Cattle Capacity Population
Wean to Feeder 5600 Unknown p Myer Dairy
Feeder to Finish Non -Layer p Non - airy
Farrow to can
13 Farrow to ee er `_Total Design •Capacity 5,6
Farrow to Finish
- ` Total'SSLW 169,0
p Other
:Number of Lagoons /Holdi ftP©ndsSubsurface rains Present p agoon e rea rea 3 pray i
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? p Yes ® No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? p Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: p Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? p Yes ® No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes ® No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes ® No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? p Yes ® No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? p Yes ® No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require p Yes ® No
4/30/97 maintenance/improvement?

Facility Number: 52_67
6. `Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? p Yes ®No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? 13 Yes ®No
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? p Yes ®No
Structures (Lagoons and/or Holding Ponds)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? p Yes ®No
Freeboard (ft): Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
._A1.Saw.:.2.fL_.. #2.Nur aw::2.5A. .t3.Finishin&.a.ft_....Load.IItu.-.5.5..... .. _.......-_.... ......
10, Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ........ Coasta1B=uxl Hay...._...._.Cmu.(Silage.&..Grain)... _.............................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss.review/inspection with on -site representative?
For Certified Facilities On1y
22- Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
24. Does record keeping need improvement?
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
® Yes p No
p Yes N No
p Yes B No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ® No
® Yes p No
p Yes ® No
11 records of the CAWMP are kept at the Complex #23. Shop located on NCSR 1156. This farm is included in a permit application
submitted to the Division of Water Quality, which includes Facility Nos. 52-61, 52-67, and 52-70; design capacity of 8000 feeder to
finish & 2000 farrow to €eeder. The current population of animals could not be provided. Please note the following comments:
12 - Vegatation needs to be established on the bare spots of lagoon #3.
Waste Analysis - 4R8/97,'7/18/97
e animal waste management plan certification form and permit application for Farm #25 does not appear to include a load out
Ouse and truck washing pad with one holding pond. This needs to be verified along with the design information being submitted
Leigh to be included in the permit application information for Farm #25. _
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: V_r�,)Ll:t.u`Q _ (I Date: Date:

Site Requires Immediate Attention: r'
Facility No.
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD 5 Z ��
Date: (y$ - 1d , -1995
Time: a;ypWN
Farm Name/Owner: ts"W
Mailing Address:
County:
Integrator: 'g
On Site Representative:
Physical Address/Location:
as
Phone: eQZy-031-�,
Type of Operation: Swine Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: ';;000 Sews No. of Animals on Site: _
DEM Certification No.: ACE DEM Certification No.: ACNEW
Latitude: 3 41 X9 J4�_ Longitude: - Elevation: Ft
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient eboard of 1 Ft + 25 year 24 hour
storm event? (approximately 1 Ft + 7 in) Yes or No
Actual Freeboard: - Ft nches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes or
Was any erosion observed? Yes or6;)
Is adequate land available for spray? Yes r No
Is the cover crop adequate? Yes or No
Crop(s) being utilized:
Does the facility meet SCS setback criteria?
200 Ft from Dwellings? Yes or No 100 Ft from Wells? es or No
Is th mal waste stockpiled within 100 Ft of USGS Blue Line Stream?
Yes o No
Is animal waste/�'� nd applied or spray irrigated within 25 Ft of a USGS Map Blue
Line? Yes oro
�S j,,4 � pia
Is animal waste discharged into awaters of the state b man-made ditch, flushing
g Y g
system, or other similar man-made devices? Yes or No
If Yes, please explain:
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management re rds (volumes of manure,
land applied; spray irrigated on specific acreage c r crop)? Yes or No
nsl' pector 'r atur
Cc: Facility Assessment Unit
Comments & sketch on Hack of Sheet

DEM
SITE VISITATION RECORD
Page Two
Comments: AA inn r►n ti.
;I! [ #5rawvt'
Ste° Alla,
vF IV � ]
�„ vvv
Y
L
N
?-