20190451 Ver 1_PCN Form Submission_20190410

DWR
Urtslpu of W.-10"Revourc"
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
September 29, 2018 Ver 3
Initial Review
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance into the review process?*
r Yes
r No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
r Yes r No
GwW only if needed.
BIMS # Assigned *
Version#*
20190451
1
Is a payment required for this project?*
* No payment required
What amout is owed?*
* Fee received
r $240.00
r Fee needed - send electronic notification
r $570.00
Reviewing Office* Select Project Reviewer*
Asheville Regional Office - [phone] Amy Annino:eads\amannino
Information for Initial Review
1a. Name of project:
Limekiln Creek Restoration, North Cove Elementary School
1a. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Greg Jennings
1 b. Primary Contact Email:*
[e-mail]
Date Submitted
4/10/2019
Nearest Body of Water
Limekiln Creek
Basin
Catawba
Water Classification
c
Site Coordinates
Latitude:
35.788820
Longitude:
-82.033304
1c. Primary Contact Phone:*
[phone]
A. Processing Information -
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
McDowell
Is this project a public transportation project?*
r Yes r No
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
V Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
F Section 10 Permit (navigable ureters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
1 b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
rJ Nationwide Permit (NWP)
F- Regional General Permit (RGP)
r- Standard (IP)

1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
r- Yes r No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number:
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
P 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
r Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
Individual Permit
27 - Restoration
1e. Is this notification solelyfor the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
F 401 Water Quality Certification - Express
r Riparian Buffer Authorization
1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
f Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r Yes r No
19. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r- Yes r No
Acceptance Letter Attachment
1h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
r Yes r No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
O Yes r No
B. Applicant Information
1d. Who is applying for the permit?
Q Owner r Applicant (other than owner)
1e. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?
O Yes r No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
McDowell County
2b. Deed book and page no.:
2c. Responsible party:
Neil Brackett, McDowell County
2d. Address
Street Address
25 S. Garden Street
Address Line 2
City
State / Rmince / fbgicn
Marion
NC
Postal / Zip Code
Country
28752
USA
O Yes r No
O Yes r No
v
2e. Telephone Number: 2f. Fax Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Project Information

1b. Subdivision name:
(d appropriate)
1c. Nearest municipality/ town:
North Cove, NC
2. Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number:
2c. Project Address
Street Address
401 American Thread Road
Address Line 2
City
Marion
R�stal / Zip Cade
28752
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:*
Limekiln Creek
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:*
c
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Catawba
3d. Please provide the 12 -digit HUC in which the project is located.
030501010202
4. Project Description and History
2b. Property size:
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application:*
Limekiln Creek on the property of North Cove Elementary School is incised and eroding with poor water quality and habitat conditions. The watershed drainage area at this location is
2.8 square miles with mostly forested land use in the headwaters and some commercial and residential development along US 221 and American Thread Trail immediately upstream of
the project reach. The North Cove Elementary School property includes approximately 1,000 linear feet of Limekiln Creek proposed for restoration to improve ecological conditions and
support educational programs at the public school. The school property includes buildings, parking lots, playgrounds, open fields, and a riparian forest buffer along Limekiln Creek.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?*
r Yes r No r Unknown
4d. Attach an 8 1/2 X11 excerpt from the most recent version of the USGS topographic map indicating the location of the project site. (for DWR)
USGS_Quad_1.pdf
2.41 MB
4e. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the published County NRCS Soil Survey map depicting the project site. (for DWR)
NRCS_Soil Map_ LIMEKILN CREEK - NORTH COVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL.pdf 881.34KB
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
1,000
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:*
Limekiln Creek will be restored using natural channel design techniques to improve ecological conditions and support educational programs at the public school. The project will serve
as a demonstration of sustainable stream protection for the community.
41. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:*
Limekiln Creek will be restored by realigning the channel and connecting to a floodplain for hydraulic energy dissipation. In -stream log and rock vanes will be used to enhance bedform
diversity and protect streambanks. Native riparian vegetation will be established to support long-term stream health. The project will have a positive impact on the downstream
watershed by reducing sediment loading. Equipment will include trackhoe excavators and track trucks for grading and structure installation.
4j. Please upload project drawings for the proposed project.
LIMEKILN_CREEK_DESIGN_04072019.pdf 1.72MB
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
r Yes r No r Unknown
Comments:
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?*

r Preliminary r Approved r Not Verified r Unknown r N/A
Corps AID Number:
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company:
Other:
5d1. Jurisdictional determination upload
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?*
r Yes r No
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed projector related activity?
No
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
r- Wetlands R Streams -tributaries r- Buffers
r- Open Waters r- Pond Construction
3. Stream Impacts
—0--A —
3a. Reason for impact (?) 3b.lmpact type * 3c. Type of impact* �me*d. S. na3e. Stream Type * L31.. Type of 3g. S. width * 3h. Impact
(?) risdiction* length*
Restoration Tem orar Bank Stabilization :T;�
Perennial Both 25 1,000
fl
P Y Average (feet) (linearfeet)
31. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
0
3i. Total permanent stream impacts: 3i. Total temporary stream impacts:
0 1,000
3i. Total stream and ditch impacts:
1
3j. Comments:
Impacts are temporary during construction, which is a)pected to be completed within 45 days.
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
Stream restoration is needed to achieve ecological objectives. Impacts will be minimized by protecting epsting healthy stream channel and riparian
buffer as much as possible.
Ib. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
Construction will take place during dry weather and low flow conditions. Stream flowwill be pumped around active construction areas. Streambanks
and other disturbed areas will be stabilized as soon as possible using grass seeds, straw mulch, and biodegradable erosion control matting.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
r Yes r No
2b. If this project DOES NOT require Compensatory Mitigation, explain why:
No loss of stream channel will occur as a result of this project.
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)

1. Diffuse Flow Plan
la. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
r Yes r No
If no, explain why:
Tributary to Catawba River not included in buffer rules.
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?*
r Yes r No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
r Yes r No
Comments:
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federallstate/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?*
r Yes r' No
1b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State (North Carolina)
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? *
r Yes r No
Comments:
Project does not require environmental documents.
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B.0200)?*
r Yes r No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
r Yes r No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
No future development will occur on this property based on its use as a public school.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
rYes r Nor N/A
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
r Yes r No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
r- Yes r No
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
r' Yes r No r Unknown
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
r^ Yes r No
5f. Will you cut anytrees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
r Yes r No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
r Yes r No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
r Yes r No
5i. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?

r Yes r No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
https: //ecos.fws. g ov/ecpO/re ports/species-listed-by-state-report? state=NC&statu s=listed
Consultation Documentation Upload
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
r Yes r No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?*
https://vow.habitat.noaa.gov/protection/efb/efhmapper/
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
r Yes r No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
http://gis.ncdcr.gov/hpoweb/
7c. Historic or Prehistoric Information Upload
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
Be. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?*
r Yes r No
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
https://msc.fema.gov/portal/search#searchresultsanchor
Miscellaneous
Comments
This project is funded by a grant to the McDowell County Soil & Water Conservation District.
Miscellaneous attachments not previously requested.
Signature
*
P By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
• I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act');
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act');
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
• I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Greg Jennings
Signature
1,
Date
4/10/2019

AGENT AUTHORIZATION rORM
Property: 401 American Thread Road, Marion, NC 28752
North Cove Elementary School
Coordinates: 35. 788702, -82.033322
Property Owner(s). McDowell County
Neil Brackett
25 S. Garden Street, Marion, NC 28752
[phone] ext. 374
[e-mail]
The undersigned, registered property owners) of the above noted property, do hereby
authorize the following Agent.
Grey Jennings of
Agent
Jennings Environmental PLLC
Business Name
to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance, and acceptance
of this permit or certification and any and all standard and special conditions attached.
We hereby certify that the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate
to the best of our knowledge.
thorized S gnatu e(s)

3 Soil Map—McDowell County, North Carolina
G (LIMEKILN CREEK - NORTH COVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL)
(V
N
W
405200 405400 405600 405800 4060W 406200 406400 4066W 406800
35° 47' 44" N
g
5IIS
rS
g
c�
c�
K
35° 46'53" N
405200 405400 405600 405800 406000 406200 406400
3
N Map Scale: 1:11,100 if printed on A landscape (11" x 8.5") sheet.
N Meters
0 150 300 600 900
Feet
0 500 1000 2000 3000
Map projection: Web Mercator Comer coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: LFFM Zone 17N WGS84
UsDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey
407000 407200 407400
N
N
407600
35° 4744" N
g
dS
c'S
58
ri
g
406600 406800 407007 407200 4074W
35° 46'53" N
3
4/7/2019
Page 1 of 3

Soil Map—McDowell County, North Carolina
(LIMEKILN CREEK - NORTH COVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL)
MAP LEGEND
Area of Interest (AOI)
Soils
..,
Soil Map Unit Lines
Soil Map Unit Points
Special
Point Features
V,
Blowout
Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause
Borrow Pit
Clay Spot
Water Features
Closed Depression
line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of
Gravel Pit
Gravelly Spot
Landfill
scale.
Lava Flow
Marsh or swamp
Fi-r Rails
Mine or Quarry
Interstate Highways
Miscellaneous Water
_ US Routes
Perennial Water
Rock Outcrop
Major Roads
Saline Spot
Local Roads
Sandy Spot
4-_.
Severely Eroded Spot
Sinkhole
. Aerial Photography
Slide or Slip
oa
Sodic Spot
Spoil Area
Stony Spot
MAP INFORMATION
Very Stony Spot
The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at
1:24,000.
Wet Spot
Other
Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
.� Special Line Features
Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause
misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil
Water Features
line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of
Streams and Canals
contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed
scale.
Transportation
Fi-r Rails
Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
Interstate Highways
measurements.
_ US Routes
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey URL:
Major Roads
Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)
Local Roads
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
Background
projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts
distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the
. Aerial Photography
Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more
accurate calculations of distance or area are required.
This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as
of the version date(s) listed below.
Soil Survey Area: McDowell County, North Carolina
Survey Area Data: Version 19, Sep 10, 2018
Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales
1:50,000 or larger.
Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Dec 2, 2010—Nov 9,
2017
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor
shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident.
usDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 4/7/2019
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 3

Soil Map -McDowell County, North Carolina
Map Unit Legend
LIMEKILN CREEK - NORTH COVE
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
u}SDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 4/7/2019
i Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3
Map Unit Symbol
Map Unit Name
Acres in AOI
Percent of AOI
BrB2
Braddock clay loam, 2 to 6
14.5
2.9%
percent slopes, eroded
Braddock clay loam, 6 to 15
BrC2
62.6
12.7%
percent slopes, eroded
CaF
Chestnut-Ashe complex, 25 to
6.1
1.2%
80 percent slopes, stony
DdB
Dillard loam, 1 to 4 percent
56.9
11.5%
slopes, rarely flooded
EcD
Edneyville-Chestnut complex,
1.9
0.4%
10 to 25 percent slopes,
stony
EcF
Edneyville-Chestnut complex,
15.2
3.1%
25 to 80 percent slopes,
stony
EsB
Elsinboro loam, 1 to 4 percent
46.5
9.4%
slopes, rarely flooded
EvD
Evard loam, 10 to 25 percent
1.2
0.2%
slopes
EwE
Evard-Cowee complex, 25 to
27.2
5.5%
60 percent slopes
HcC2
Hayesville clay loam, 6 to 15
16.6
3.4%
percent slopes, eroded
HeD
Hayesville-Evard complex, 15
26.3
5.3%
to 25 percent slopes
IoA
lotla sandy loam, 0 to 2
63.3
12.8%
percent slopes, occasionally
flooded
RaD
Rabun loam, 6 to 25 percent
49.4
10.0%
slopes
RaE
Rabun loam, 25 to 50 percent
72.8
14.7%
slopes
RoA
Rosman loam, 0 to 3 percent
6.0
1.2%
slopes, occasionally flooded
Uf
Udifluvents, sandy, frequently
0.2
0.0%
flooded
Uo
Udorthents, loamy
10.8
2.2%
Ur
Urban land
16.8
3.4%
Totals for Area of Interest
494.3
100.0%
u}SDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 4/7/2019
i Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3

`U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR The National Map
U S G S
U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY US Topo
science for a changing world ' ` J s4i
82°07'30" LV MV 5' 2'30"
35°52'30" 399000-E 400 1 401 402 403 404 405
3970000-n
50'
396(
396£
396-
396[
3964
39K
39619
47'30"
3961
396(
750 000
FEET
395E
407
40
LITTLE SWITZERLAND QUADRANGLE
NORTH CAROLINA
7.5 -MINUTE SERIES
82°00'
3 1 110 000 FEET 1 35°52'30"
FIRE OWER RD
Pine
�,�P�
Bi- ix
�V� T� A �py
�
��� JOL•T.INAGON'TRL
��,����
� 1 � _
Tunnel ���
M Laured Rich
// 3s00 ��
Knob
RD
U
1
bo Knob
\o �) 9�F
o `'P
H')
�
I l 1
Upper Pine
1
Tunnel Bird Ridge \
� � Urn
Serono Rocky
Tunnel
I (t ��
CARVERS_KNOB
o Fork
ss✓ Py
=t
SWAFFORD RD/1
II
Lowers 1 n
Colhs Cem 0 ?
OC'HOWELL
o �'��
RO 2a
`or n D01
a Red fck
o
Br i
$Wa rrford
/ l 11;
Tunnel
N
c4
C llisn Gap
190NG BRANCH TRL / \ urnett
Grass S
scree �ag5?� � 1 \ rpSsy Cr
- -
all
4
'J
'Po) oo� �
Z
( /
UPPer Bridle
O n
�T�el
Do
L1_�\
�tLO Cy �
/�� _ —� ,Q�I � ' •,\
� p�
� � � /�
Lower�Br'dle
Tunnel/%
�
o
/
Switzerland alj
`.� \� � � a ;,; ✓ _ /S Stony
!
d
� � � , � _
tt Br ���
�t e " ` �F M UE RIDGE Gr s�
PARKWAYAll\ ri /i ,-
o o
aP
a G�N9.
Tunnel�!J�
�a �� , /
M _ -� 1 Kno = ..
11\ //ice- - �^ \ \ ✓ — '—//-�I" °/ , �'"
Blue
��ti8"
_ Sand y Alt _ ��
R d" e y 7qU �,i� j%1 �.i –� 3000
RE�'< v �Ga zz6 �/
�ap� -_- J�...� /P
_ �n226A
Gi.e
\ Ib
�1N N
�/ Tunne
ashtiwrn
2 i'�
shb'urn
O
Zoo° \
(SPS/
I,-Strawerry- = /
3ioo
Snipes
Tunnel
g
�� ckner
,/ n�Tennessee,l!olley Dlvlde
� s- � �ticA°
g
T61
hird`Wash burn
Tunnel
z 0
°o
IOD
-OS
-Osb�orne�JLo�
v
n 1600
Cem
z1
GooCflj 7-_ ,j f
� Gap ,�-
/
ZApo
M
p0
rtm%Br
-
l
'
/CI Wild\ res Tunnel
//4; \
Hol field
Cem
O
Che ,
nRld�
o / 3z� ��
'��� ,
e
_
Nortill,
Crossing
L1L G p'/,,'
�-
J�De�--�-7
18oD .�
L0�7�o�
N
Cem burn
�-
O X600
w _
Pups
Rid�
�tiJo°
vsnow�Hill-Cem
zt-
S
1600
`
n
o
O
NI �V
Sevier
'
�Go
��
2200
21
�
= r RJ
s:tron9 G
Arm _ v
g
x�
INitne
�s
��� � EKILN�v6
a
�
�-
Rock R'dge
4
C o
CJ
u rkey
CT
v
Rough ,x
\�l
Timber 22o Rutge
Styr
�fi
ti
�b
ti
t
0
�
tial adge-
a�J) 9
�
2600
/4�'
Woodlawn
PROJECT
226
�
9
8
N
0�
o
�Qhh
AREA
4
w ��
✓0
is 00
Mouritain
P�JP�O�
em _
Cry
8
Cr
Hensley
4
0 150
Bald Mtn �60
m�
.� scald
e
L
—
O
1800
^
1
g
1 1
>6pp
�O
's
2600
3957
35°45' 399 400
82°07'30" LV MV
Produced by the United States Geological Survey
North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83)
World Geodetic System of 1984 (WGS84). Projection and
1 000 -meter grid: Universal Transverse Mercator, Zone 175
10 000 -foot ticks: North Carolina Coordinate System of 1983
This map is not a legal document. Boundaries may be
generalized for this map scale. Private lands within government
reservations may not be shown. Obtain permission before
entering private lands.
Imagery ..................................................NAIP, June 2014
Roads ................................ U.S. Census Bureau, 2015 - 2016
Roads within US Forest Service Lands.............FSTopo Data
with limited Forest Service updates, 2012 - 2016
Names...............................................................GNIS, 2016
Hydrography ....................National Hydrography Dataset, 2014
Contours............................National Elevation Dataset, 2008
Boundaries ............ Multiple sources; see metadata file 1972 - 2016
Wetlands ......... FWS National Wetlands Inventory 1977 - 2014
1 1 080 000 FEET 401
N.
6° 55"
123MILS
0° 31-
"'S
UTM GRID AND 2016 MAGNETIC NORTH
DECLINATION AT CENTER OF SHEET
U.S. National Grid
100,000-m Square ID
'loo
LV MV
Grid Zone Designation
17S
5' 403 1 404 405 2,30„ 406
SCALE 1:24 000
1 0.5 0 KILOMETERS 1 2
1000 500 0 METERS 1000 2000
1 0.5 0 1
MILES
1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000
FEET
CONTOUR INTERVAL 40 FEET
NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988
This map was produced to conform with the
National Geospatial Program US Topo Product Standard, 2011.
A metadata file associated with this product is draft version 0.6.19
1 407
■ NORTH
CAROLIN
QUADRANGLE LOCATION
1 Micaville
1 2 3 2 Spruce Pine
3 Linville Falls
4 5 4 Celo
5 Ashford
6 Old Fort
6 7 8 7 Marion West
8 Marion East
ADJOINING QUADRANGLES
3970
3969
780 000
FEET
3968
3967
50'
3965
3964
3963
3962
I:fAIC111
3961
3960
3959
3958
3957000- N
35°45'
408 409000-E
82°00'
ROAD CLASSIFICATION
Expressway Local Connector
Secondary Hwy Local Road
Ramp 4WD
If Interstate Route 0 US Route O State Route
FS Primary Route O FS Passenger 0 FS High
Route Clearance Route
Check with local Forest Service unit
for current travel conditions and restrictions.
LITTLE SWITZERLAND, NC
2016
of 00
N M
0
rn(0
W (V
M �
N
�X
00
co
v
m O
LL
LU
Z Q
rn C9
-ZZ