20041743 Ver 1_Complete File_20041028

?OF WATF,4Q Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
of Environment and Natural Resources
North Carolina
Department
J DW
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
January 5, 2005
(Replaces Approval Issued on December 23, 2004)
DWQ Project # 04-1743
Martin County
Mr. Jack Williford
Martin County
P.O. Box 668
Williamston,NC, 27892-0668
Subject Property: Martin County Airport
Ut Huskanaw Swamp, Class C Sw NSW
Approval of 401 Water Quality Certification and Authorization Certificate per the Tar-Pamlico
River Buffer Protection Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0259) with Additional Conditions
Dear Mr. Williford:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to place fill
within or otherwise impact 0.1 acres of wetlands for the purpose of road crossing construction at the
subject property, as described within your application dated October 26, 2004 and received by the N.C.
Division of Water Quality (DWQ) on October 28, 2004. After reviewing your application, we have
decided that the impacts are covered by General Water Quality Certification Number(s) 3404 (GC3404).
The Certification(s) allows you to use Nationwide Permit(s) 14 when issued by the US Army Corps of
Engineers (USACE). This letter shall also act as your approved Authorization Certificate for impacts to
the protected riparian buffers per 15A NCAC 2B .0259. In addition, you should obtain or otherwise
comply with any other required federal, state or local permits before you go ahead with your project
including (but not limited to) Erosion and Sediment Control, Non-discharge, and other regulations. Also,
this approval to proceed with your proposed impacts or to conduct impacts to waters as depicted in your
application shall expire upon expiration of the 404 or CAMA Permit.
This approval is for the purpose and design that you described in your application. If you change your
project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application. If the property is sold,
the new owner must be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter and is thereby responsible for
complying with all conditions. If total fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre of
wetland or 150 linear feet of stream, compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A
NCAC 2H.0506 (h). This approval requires you to follow the conditions listed in the attached
certification and any additional conditions listed below.
401 Wetlands Certification Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] /FAX [phone] / Internet: htta:/lh2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands
None Carolina
Nturatty
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer- 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
Mr. Jack Williford
Page 2 of 3
January 5, 2005
The Additional Conditions of the Certification are:
1. Impacts Approved
The following impacts are hereby approved as long as all of the other specific and general
conditions of this Certification (or Isolated Wetland Permit) are met. No other impacts are
approved including incidental impacts:
Amount Approved
(Units) Plan Location or Reference
404/CAMA Wetlands 0.1 (acres) Application materials
2. Erosion & Sediment Control Practices
Erosion and sediment control practices must be in full compliance with all specifications
governing the proper design, installation and operation and maintenance of such Best
Management Practices in order to protect surface waters standards:
a. The erosion and sediment control measures for the project must be designed, installed,
operated, and maintained in accordance with the most.recent version of the North Carolina
Sediment and Erosion Control Planning and Design Manual.
b. The design, installation, operation, and maintenance of the sediment and erosion control
measures must be such that they equal, or exceed, the requirements specified in the most
recent version of the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Manual. The devices
shall be maintained on all construction sites, borrow sites, and waste pile (spoil) projects,
including contractor-owned or leased borrow pits associated with the project.
c. For borrow pit sites, the erosion and sediment control measures must be designed, installed,
operated, and maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the North Carolina
Surface Mining Manual.
d. The reclamation measures and implementation must comply with the reclamation in
accordance with the requirements of the Sedimentation Pollution Control Act.
3. No Waste, Spoil, Solids, or Fill of Any Kind
No waste, spoil, solids, or fill of any kind shall occur in wetlands, waters, or riparian areas beyond
the footprint of the impacts depicted in the Pre-Construction Notification. All construction
activities, including the design, installation, operation, and maintenance of sediment and erosion
control Best Management Practices, shall be performed so that no violations of state water quality
standards, statutes, or rules occur.
4. No Sediment & Erosion Control Measures w/n Wetlands or Waters
Sediment and erosion control measures shall not be placed in wetlands or waters to the maximum
extent practicable. If placement of sediment and erosion control devices in wetlands and waters
is unavoidable, they shall be removed and the natural grade restored within six months of the date
that the Division of Land Resources has released the project.
5. Certificate of Completion
Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification or applicable
Buffer Rules, and any subsequent modifications, the applicant is required to return the attached
Mr. Jack Williford
Page 3 of 3
January 5, 2005
certificate of completion to the 401/Wetlands Unit, North Carolina Division of Water Quality,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC, 27699-1650.
Violations of any condition herein set forth may result in revocation of this Certification and may result in
criminal and/or civil penalties. The authorization to proceed with your proposed impacts or to conduct
impacts to waters as depicted in your application and as authorized by this Certification, shall expire upon
expiration of the 404 or CAMA Permit.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this Certification (associated with the approved wetland or
stream impacts), you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act within 60 days of the date that
you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition, which conforms to Chapter 150B of
the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center,
Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714. This certification and its conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a
hearing.
Any disputes over determinations regarding this Authorization Certificate (associated with the approved
buffer impacts) shall be referred in writing to the Director for a decision. The Director's decision is
subject to review as provided in Articles 3 and 4 of G.S. 150B.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water
Act and the Tar-Pamlico riparian buffer protection rule as described within 15A NCAC 2B .0259. If you
have any questions, please telephone Cyndi Karoly at [phone].
Sincerely,
,?? I ??
AWK/bz
Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Enclosures: GC 3404
Certificate of Completion
cc: Edward Smail
USACE Washington Regulatory Field Office
DWQ Washington Regional Office
DLR Washington Regional Office
File Copy
Central Files
Filename: 041743Airport(Martin)401+TPBR
OW AT ?RQG
130
55
r*. WG '1
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
December 23, 2004
Mr. Jack Williford
Martin County
P.O. Box 668
Williamston,NC, 27892-0668
Subject Property: Martin County Airport
Ut Huskanaw Swamp, Class C Sw NSW
Alan W. Klimck, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
DWQ Project # 04-1743
Martin County
Approval of 401 Water Quality Certification and Authorization Certificate per the Tar-Panilico
River Buffer Protection Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0259) with Additional Conditions
Dear Mr. Williford:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to place fill
within or otherwise impact 0.1 acres of wetlands for the purpose of road crossing construction at the
subject property, as described within your application dated October 26, 2004 and received by the N.C.
Division of Water Quality (DWQ) on October 28, 2004. After reviewing your application, we have
decided that the impacts are covered by General Water Quality Certification Number(s) 3374 (GC3374).
The Certification(s) allows you to use Nationwide Permit(s) 14 when issued by the US Army Corps of
Engineers (USACE). This letter shall also act as your approved Authorization Certificate for impacts to
the protected riparian buffers per 15A NCAC 213 .0259. In addition, you should obtain or otherwise
comply with any other required federal, state or local permits before you go ahead with your project
including (but not limited to) Erosion and Sediment Control, Non-discharge, and other regulations. Also,
this approval to proceed with your proposed impacts or to conduct impacts to waters as depicted in
your application shall expire upon expiration of the 404 or CAMA Permit.
This approval is for the purpose and design that you described in your application. If you change your
project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application. If the property is sold,
the new owner must be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter and is thereby responsible for
complying with all conditions. If total fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre of
wetland or 150 linear feet of stream, compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A
NCAC 2H.0506 (h). This approval requires you to follow the conditions listed in the attached
certification and any additional conditions listed below.
401 Wetlands Certification Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699.1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] /FAX [phone]/ Internet: http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands
NoraiCarolina
Aaturally
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled/ 10% Post Consumer Paper
Mr. Jack Williford
Page 2 of 3
December 23, 2004
The Additional Conditions of the Certification are:
1. Impacts Approved
The following impacts are hereby approved as long as all of the other specific and general
conditions of this Certification (or Isolated Wetland Permit) are met. No other impacts are
approved including incidental impacts:
Amount Approved
(Units) Plan Location or Reference
404/LAMA Wetlands 0.1 (acres) Application materials
2. Erosion & Sediment Control Practices
Erosion and sediment control practices must be in full compliance with all specifications
governing the proper design, installation and operation and maintenance of such Best
Management Practices in order to protect surface waters standards:
a. The erosion and sediment control measures for the project must be designed,.installed,
operated, and maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the North Carolina
Sediment and Erosion Control Planning and Design Manual.
b. The design, installation, operation, and maintenance of the sediment and erosion control
measures must be such that they equal, or exceed, the requirements specified in the most
recent version of the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Manual. The devices
shall be maintained on all construction sites, borrow sites, and waste pile (spoil) projects,
including contractor-owned or leased borrow pits associated with the project.
c. For borrow pit sites, the erosion and sediment control measures must be designed, installed,
operated, and maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the North Carolina
Surface Mining Manual.
d. The reclamation measures and implementation must comply with the reclamation in
accordance with the requirements of the Sedimentation Pollution Control Act.
3. No Waste, Spoil, Solids, or Fill of Any Kind
No waste, spoil, solids, or fill of any kind shall occur in wetlands, waters, or riparian areas beyond
the footprint of the impacts depicted in the Pre-Construction Notification. All construction
activities, including the design, installation, operation, and maintenance of sediment and erosion
control Best Management Practices, shall be performed so that no violations of state water quality
standards, statutes, or rules occur.
4. No Sediment & Erosion Control Measures w/n Wetlands or Waters
Sediment and erosion control measures shall not be placed in wetlands or waters to the maximum
extent practicable. If placement of sediment and erosion control devices in wetlands and waters
is unavoidable, they shall be removed and the natural grade restored within six months of the date
that the Division of Land Resources has released the project.
5. Certificate of Completion
Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification or applicable
Buffer Rules, and any subsequent modifications, the applicant is required to return the attached
Mr. Jack Williford
Page 3 of 3
December 23, 2004
certificate of completion to the 401/Wetlands Unit, North Carolina Division of Water Quality,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC, 27699-1650.
Violations of any condition herein set forth may result in revocation of this Certification and may result in
criminal and/or civil penalties. The authorization to proceed with your proposed impacts or to conduct
impacts to waters as depicted in your application and as authorized by this Certification, shall expire upon
expiration of the 404 or CAMA Permit.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this Certification (associated with the approved wetland or
stream impacts), you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act within 60 days of the date that
you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition, which conforms to Chapter 150B of
the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center,
Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714. This certification and its conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a
hearing.
Any disputes over determinations regarding this Authorization Certificate (associated with the approved
buffer impacts) shall be referred in writing to the Director for a decision. The Director's decision is
subject to review as provided in Articles 3 and 4 of G.S. 150B.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water
Act and the Tar-Pamlico riparian buffer protection rule as described within 15A NCAC 2B .0259. If you
have any questions, please telephone John Dorney at 919-733-9646 or Bob Zarzecki at 919-733-9726.
Sincerely,
f-15-1 Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
AW Klcbk
Enclosures: GC 3374
Certificate of Completion
cc: Edward Smail
USACE Washington Regulatory Field Office
DWQ Washington Regional Office
DLR Washington Regional Office
File Copy
Central Files
Filename: 041743Airport(Martin)401+TPBR
Office Use Only: Form Version October 2001
7=
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A" rather than
leaving the space blank.
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit
? Section 10 Permit
® 401 Water Quality Certification
? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: Nationwide 14
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (see section VIII - Mitigation), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information V D
1. Owner/Applicant Information OCT 2 8 2004
Name: Mr. Jack Williford, Interim County Manager r ENA wnTERQUALITY
Mailing Address: Martin County WETIANDSANDSTORMYVATERBRRiCH
P.O. Box 668
Williamston. NC 27892-0668
Telephone Number: 252-792-1901 Fax Number: 252-792-7477
E-mail Address:
2. Agent Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter must be
attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Mr. Edward J. Smail
Company Affiliation: THE LPA GROUP of North Carolina, p.a.
Mailing Address: 4904 Professional Court. Suite 201
Raleigh NC 27609
Telephone Number: 919-954-1244 Fax Number: 919-954-1345
E-mail Address: esmail@lpa?roup.com
Page 5 of 13
F
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Martin County Airport Access Road
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): N/A
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): N/A
4. Location
County: Martin County, NC Nearest Town: Everetts. NC
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): N/A
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): The new airport access road will
be located at the intersection of SR 1404 (Airport Road) and SR 1138 (Everetts Road), near
the Wilson Chapel and cemetery. The wetland site is located approximately 400 feet
northwest of the intersection of SR 1404 and SR 1138, and approximately 350 feet southeast
of the Martin County Airport on the east side of the power line right-of-way. (See attached
drawings)
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long):
35.8587°N 77.1767°W
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Describe the existing land use or condition of the site at the time of this application: The
study corridor consists of predominantly uplands with a small area of wetland that bisects the
corridor. These areas have been recently clear-cut and are currently dominated by young
loblolly pine (Pines taeda) water oak (Qnercus nigra), red maple (Ater rubruni), and
sweet,gum (Liquidanrbar styraciflua). There is currently a maintained power line right-of-
way that borders the western limit of the study area. No streams or open water are located
within or adjacent to the study corridor.
Page 6 of 13
7. Property size (acres): 1.55 acres
8. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Small unnamed tributary to
Huskanaw Swami located approximately 0.40 miles south of wetland area. Small unnamed
tributary to Beaverdam Creek located approximately 0.35 miles northeast of the wetland
9. River Basin: Tar-Pamlico
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
10. Describe the purpose of the proposed work: To construct a new access road for Martin
County Airport. This access road will provide main access to the airport, and will also serve
as a route to the airport for emergency vehicles.
11. List the type of equipment to be used to construct the project: Equipment used for the road
construction include: a motorgrader, dump truck, sheep's foot, bull dozer with a box
spreader, and a paver.
12. Describe the land use in the vicinity of this project: Land use in the project vicinity is very
rural and made up mostly of agricultural fields, with scattered residential areas, and the
Martin County Airport.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
There have been no prior permits requested or obtained in conjunction with this project. A
jurisdictional determination request is included with this permit package.
Page 7 of 13
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application:
No future permit requested are anticipated for this project.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Wetland Impacts
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Located within
100-year Floodplain**
(es/no) Distance to
Nearest Stream
(linear feet)
Type of Wetland***
1 Fill 0.1 No 1850 feet Forested Wetland (PFO1)

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at http://www.fema.gov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.)
List the total acreage (estimated) of existing wetlands on the property: 0.17 acres
Total area of wetland impact proposed: 0.1 acres
Page 8 of 13
2. Stream Impacts, including all intermittent and perennial streams
Stream Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Length of
Impact
(linear feet)
Stream Name** Average Width
of Stream
Before Impact Perennial or
Intermittent?
(please secif )
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.usgs.gov. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.topozone.coni,
www.inapquest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: N/A
3. Open Water Impacts, including Lakes, Ponds, Estuaries, Sounds, Atlantic Ocean and any
other Water of the U.S.
Open Water Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres)
Name of Waterbody
(if applicable) Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound,
bay, ocean, etc.)
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: 511, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
4. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): N/A
Page 9 of 13
Size of watershed draining to pond: N/A Expected pond surface area: N/A
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
Design measures taken to avoid wetland impacts include, a shoulder reduction, the use of 2:1 fill
slopes and a shift in alignment.
Short-term impacts to water quality, such as sedimentation and turbidity, may result from
construction-related activities. Temporary construction impacts due to erosion and
sedimentation will be minimized through implementation of a stringent erosion control schedule
and the use of Best Management Practices (BMPs). These measures include the use of dikes,
berms, and other containment measures to control runoff. Measures also include the elimination
of construction staging areas in adjacent wetlands. Disturbed sites will be revegetated with
herbaceous cover after construction to help reduce runoff and lessen sediment loadings.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
Page 10 of 13
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwctlands/strmpide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
Total wetland impacts for the proposed project are 0.1 acres; as per a Nationwide 14 Permit
mitigation is not required.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP) with the NCWRP's written agreement. Check the box indicating that
you would like to pay into the NCWRP. Please note that payment into the NCWRP must be
reviewed and approved before it can be used to satisfy mitigation requirements. Applicants
will be notified early in the review process by the 401/Wetlands Unit if payment into the
NCWRP is available as an option. For additional information regarding the application
process for the NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.tis/wrp/index.htm. If
use of the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide
the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): N/A
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): N/A
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
IX. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Only)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public funds or the use of public (federal/state/local)
land?
Yes ® No ?
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Page 11 of 13
Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (DWQ Only)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 213 .0233
(Neuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
Yes ? No ® If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 N/A 3 N/A
2 N/A 1.5 N/A
Total N/A N/A
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; "Gone Z extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or.0260.
N/A
XI. Stormwater (DWQ Only)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
The existina site is undeveloped; therefore the total impervious surface is 0.0 acres. The
proposed project area is 1.37 acres with an impervious area of 0.65 acres. Therefore the project
will consist of 47.4% impervious surface.
Page 12 of 13
Vegetated ditches will be used to filter stormwater runoff, ditches that flow into wetlands will
have temporary rock ditch checks periodically to slow water and let sediment fall out before it
reaches wetlands Temporary silt fence will be placed at toe of slopes and erosion control
matting will be used until slopes are vegetated.
XII. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Only)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
N/A
XIII. Violations (DWQ Only)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 211.0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
N/A
ant/Agent's Signature v / Wate
's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
O
Page 13 of 13
Biolop,ical Assessment for the Martin County Airport Access Road
Martin County, North Carolina
Pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, a field survey was
conducted within the area of proposed impact. The following list of endangered (E) and
threatened (T) species for Martin County that was obtained from the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (USFWS) website:
ANIMALS
Bald eagle - Haliaeetus leucocephalus - (T)
METHODS
A field survey for potentially suitable habitat for the bald eagle was conducted
within and adjacent to the proposed new road right-of-way (ROW) on December 4,
2002. Prior to performing the field survey, the N.C. Natural Heritage Program (NHP)
database was reviewed to determine if eagles had been previously documented in the
vicinity of the proposed project. The USFWS website and NHP database were reviewed
again on August 30, 2004, to insure that no species had been added to either database,
prior to finalizing this report.
EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS
The study corridor consists of predominantly uplands with a small area of
wetland that bisects the corridor. These areas have been recently clear-cut and are
currently dominated by young loblolly pine (Pines taeda), water oak (Quercus nigra),
red maple (Acer nibnau), and sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua). No streams or
open water are located within or adjacent to the study corridor.
RESULTS
There are no known occurrences of the bald eagle recorded in the coverage area
for the USGS Robersonville East quadrangle in the NHP database. No foraging habitat
or suitable nesting habitat was observed within or adjacent to the study corridor and no
eagles were observed during the field survey. Based on the lack of suitable habitat and
no observations of the listed species during the field survey, the proposed action is not
likely to jeopardize any threatened or endangered species or critical habitats currently
listed by the USFWS.
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Martin County Airport Date: 6/23/04
Applicant/Owner: Martin County Airport Commission County: Martin
Investigator: Edward Small State: NC

Have vegetation, soils, or hydrology been disturbed? Yes ? No El Community ID:U Ip ands
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes ? No El Transect ID:
(If needed, explain on reverse.) Plot ID:
VEGETATION (Note those species observed to have moroholoolcal adaptations to wetlands with a 1.
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Spec es Stratum Indicator
1. Pinus taeda Tree FAC 9. - -
2. Acer rubrum Tree FAC 10. - -
3. Liquidambar styraciflua Tree FAC+ 11. - -
4. Ouercus stellata Tree FACU 12. - -
5. Ligustrum sinense Shrub FAC 13. - -
6. Pteridium aquilinum Herb FACU 14. - -
7. Arundinaria gigantea Herb FACW 15. - -
8. Symplocos tinctoria Herb FAC 16. - -
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC
(except FAC-). Include species noted (•) as showing
Morphological adaptations to wetlands.
75%
Describe Morphological Adaptations:
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
El Recorded Data (Described in Remarks):
? Stream, Lake, or Tide Gage
® Aerial Photograph
® Other (Soil Survey)
? No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:

? Inundated
? Saturated in Upper 12 inches
? Water marks
? Drift Lines
Field Observations: ? Sediment Deposits
Depth of Surface Water: =(in.) ? Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
? Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth to Free Water in Pit: _ (in.) ? Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Saturated Soil: = (in.) ? Local Soil Survey Data
? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: No hydrology Indicators present. The Soil Survey of Martin County, NC and aerial photography were
consulted prior to field observations.
USAE Waterways Experiment Station 12/91
SOILS
Map Unit Name:Woodinctton fine sandy loam

Taxonomy Subgrou :T is Palea uults Drainage Class: Poorly Drained
Field Observations
Confirm Mapped Type? Yes ? No
Profile Descri tion:
Depth
inches
Horizon Matrix Color
Munsell Moist Mottle Colors
Munsell Moist Mottle
Abundance/Contrast Texture, Concretions,
Rhizos heres etc.
0-6 10YR 2/1 Sandy Loam
6-10+ 10YR 2/2 Sandy Loam

Hydric Soil Indicators:
? Histosol
? Histic Epipedon
? Suifidic Odor
? Probable Aquic Moisture Regime
? Reducing Conditions
® Gle ed or Low-Chroma Colors
? Concretions
? High Organic Content in Surface Layer
? Organic Streaking
? Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
? Listed on National Hydric Soils List
? Other (Explain In Remarks
Remarks:Soil had many uncoated grains in the top 6 inches.
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No ?
Hydric Soils Present? Yes ® No ? Is this
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ? No ® Yes
No
Point Within a Wetland?
Remarks:All three wetland criteria are not present.
J ,.
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
ProjecVSite: Martin County Airport Date: 4/15/04
Applicant/Owner. Martin County Airport Commission County: Martin
Investigator: Edward Small and Tracy Wheeler State: NC

Have vegetation, soils, or hydrology been disturbed? Yes ? No ® Community ID:Forested Wetland
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes ? No ® Transect ID:
(If needed, explain on reverse.) Plot ID:Wetland 1
VEGETATION (Note those species observed to have moraholonical adaptations to wetlands with a I.
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Spec es Stratum Indicator
1. Acer rubrum' Tree FAC 9. Vaccinlum corymbosum Herb FACW
2. Pinus taeda Tree FAC 10. Arundinaria gigantea Herb FACW
3. Liquidambar styraciflua Tree FAC+ 11. Smilax laurifolia Vine FACW+
4. Acer rubrum Sapling FAC 12. Gelsemium sempervirens Vine FAC
5. Ilex opaca Shrub FAC- 13. - -
6. Persea borbonia Shrub FACW 14. - -
7. Symplocos tinctoria Herb FAC 15. - -
6. Osmunda cinnamomea Herb FACW+ 16. - -
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC
(except FAC-). Include species noted (') as showing
Morphological adaptations to wetlands.
91.67%
Describe Morphological Adaptations: Acer rubrum exhibited multiple trunks.
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
? Recorded Data (Described in Remarks):
? Stream, Lake, or Tide Gage
® Aerial Photograph
® Other (Soil Survey)
? No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:

? inundated
® Saturated in Upper 12 inches
? Water marks
? Drift Lines
Field Observations: ? Sediment Deposits
Depth of Surface Water: =(in.) ? Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
® Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 inches
Depth to Free Water In Pit: 10 (in.) ? Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Saturated Soil: 6 (In.) ? Local Soil Survey Data
? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:The Soil Survey of Martin County, NC and aerial photography were consulted prior to field observations.
USAE Waterways Experiment Station 12191
l
SOILS
Map Unit Name:Woodington Fine Sandy Loam Drainage Class: Poorly Drained
Field Observations
Taxonomy Sub rou :T is Palea uults Confirm Mapped Type? Yes ? No
Profile Descri tion:
Depth
Inches
Horizon Matrix Color
Munsell Moist Mottle Colors
Munsell Moist Mottle
Abundance/Contrast Texture, Concretions,
Rhizos heres etc.
0-6 10YR 2/1 Sandy Loam
6-10+ 10YR 2/2 Sandy Loam

Hydric Soil Indicators:
? Histosol
? Histic Epipedon
? Sulfidic Odor
? Probable Aquic Moisture Regime
? Reducing Conditions
® Gle ed or Low-Chroma Colors
? Concretions
® High Organic Content in Surface Layer
? Organic Streaking
? Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
? Listed on National Hydric Soils List
? Other (Explain In Remarks
Remarks:Soil meets requirements for Field Indicator of Hydirc Soils S-7.
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No ?
Hydric Soils Present? Yes ® No ? Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland?
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ? Yes ® No ?
Remarks: Positive indicators were observed for all three parameters. Therefore, the area is considered a
wetland according to the COE 1987 Manual.
I L-" -
NOTE: ?I
MRROROaQ FLECTRC AM 0)w4Nf?TKN U,5$
LOCATION Is IaOETONl1UBLF K YEA °
MCERGFAXM Ui1fTES TO BE VAWXD B7 CONTNA[?OA
l ASpNAL'I 1 EI
%
I
I '.
MARTIN COUNTY
AIRPORT I '"'
D.B. G-8 PG. 623 I N ,?
. ?EDCE Of-?N1IT I ?,•
o da
of a ? 'rrs° A"?
AGE rs A$pq,ui
l ASpNAL1 1
q
'y1
Lw?S 1
. 41
h(0 ,
0"
c
1
1
i
Y
G:
Q
J N
U 1?:
J?
Ltj Q a
w w'
a °

Y
D:
Q
J N
U L')n
41 <Q
c7T
J1-.
LL3 LLJ'.
Q o
O
LwoOos1
® FORESTED WETLAND
1PF011
DISTURBED AREA
-1 ACRES)
SILT FENCE
yy FORESTED WETLAND
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 0 50 1 0
HORIZONTAL
ce)
Z
y
1
ASSUMED 30'
UTILITY EASEMENT
1w00os r
DANIEL E. CLARK
ET ALS
D.B. V- 15 G. 3362
\ a ? \?
DANIEL E. CLARK
ET ALS
D.B. V-15 PG. 362
/ QO
o
/ P e
AoA Qp
0
Ma tin Co ty
port
PRSI1C
E I
? .y To
a QW 11110 sto uttGCaT R
y7 R Z p ?,?y1
1 X00 0.D??
0
VICINITY MAP
?4
Fos
o ?icp
9L
J
INSTALL 100 LF
OF 21'RCP ?O
-V
MARTIN COUNTY
AIRPORT
.k
- ? . --=qtr
WILLIAMSTON, NC
THE?D
LPA__ .
GROUP-=
TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS
THE LPA GROUP of North Carolina, p.a.
4904 Professional Court, Suite 201
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
Member of THE LPA GROUP INCORPORATED
ATLANTA GA-BATON ROUGE, LA-CHARLESTON SC
CHARLOTTE, NC-CHICAGO, IL - COLUMBIA S C
GREENSBORO,NC -JACKSONVILLE, FL - KNOXVILLE. TN
MOBILE, AL-ORLANDO, FL - RALEIGH, NC
RICHMOND. VA • ROCK HILL, SC - SARASOTA FL
TALLAHASSEE. FL-TAMPA FL -WEST PALM BEACH, FL
Dug-.
JSJ
J
c? W.
JSD
RR 322010
14.
n
a
REVISIONS
No. o..?v? Dr a
t00 "
9
8 -
r.
e"
t-
iMAIP.P'gtlKr?Er
P.i-Nm
ACCESS ROAD
EROSION CONTROL
PLAN SHEET
AND
VICINITY MAP
AMW Dr-" RMnra
Y:%Roa?xay\PrgedsNjporNnarOn CWOty
Dc lbAy Nnh[
OCTOBER 2004
8-uN E-1
RALEIGH

osa,o d,A. AaaP$
GeoMn
GRADE
POINT
C1
1
Og OD2 0.02 0106
IrDa ?
GRADE TO GRADE TO
THIS LINE THIS LINE
TYPICAL SECTION NO.I
PAVEMENT
SCHEDULE
C1 Prop. Apprm 3' Asphalt Concede Surface
Course, Type S9.50, at an Average Rate of 112
lbs. per sq. Ford in each of two layers.
J1 B' AGGREGATE BASE COURSE
T EARTH MATERIAL

NOTE: ALL PAVEMENT EDGE SLOPES ARE
1:1 UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE.
L
r7• IP -47 r
GRADE
rO42 ODD
aacxu
osKarw
o J 1 T uuuw
GRADE TO GRADE TO
THIS LINE THIS LINE EROSION
fROSbN
MATTING TYPICAL SECTION NO.2 MATMTING
USE TYPICAL SECTION NO, 2
FROM STA. 14+00 TO STA. 15+50
MARTIN COUNTY
AIRPORT
WILLIAMSTON, NC
THE
LPA _
GROUP- R
A=?'
TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS
THE LPA GROUP of North Carolina, p.a.
4904 Professional Court, Suite 201
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
Member of THE LPA GROUP INCORPORATED
N.SC
ATLANTA GA-BATON ROUGE IA - CHAHLESTOSC
CHARLOTTE, NC -CHICAGO, IL - COLUMBIA,
GREENSBORO, NC-JACKSONVILLE, FL-KNOXVILLE, TN
MOBILE. AL- ORLANDO, FL - RALEIGH, NC
RICHMOND, VA- ROCK HILL SC. SARASOTA FL
TALLAHASSEE FL - TAMPA FL-WEST PALM BEACH, FL
D.9-
JSJ
I-
JSJ
craw M
JSD
RR 322010
REVISIONS
Na D...~ Db By
121-
1 .
15 .
B .
8 .
.
7
6 .
5 .
4 .
3 .
2 .
1 .
FAA ALP. Pm-1-
P.j . N-
ACCESS ROAD
Drvo-e Nee=:
TYPICAL SECTIONS
AND
SUMMARY OF QUANTITIES
Abmd Dr." R k-
Y:LRcedwpMroleftWrporr satin =wily
pre D.-V NUree'
OCTOBER 2004
bu*w lbt TS-1
RALEIGH
USE TYPICAL SECTION NO, I
FROM STA. 10+00 TO STA. 14+00
FROM STA. 15+50 TO STA. 21+49,72
9?4'gl; AL??owRa
oecew
ceaw
__ THE LPA GROUP of North Carolina, p.a.
Transportation Consultants
4904 PROFESSIONAL COURT, SUITE 201 v RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27609 v 919-954-1244 v FAX [phone]
October 26, 2004
Mr. John Dorney
Division of Water Quality
401 Wetlands Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Mr. Domey:

D
O C T 2 R 2004
DENR - WATER QUALITY
WETLANDS AND STORMWATER BRANCH
THE LPA GROUP of North Carolina, p.a. has designed a new access road for the Martin
County Airport. This road will provide main access to the Airport from SR1404 and will also
serve as a route to the airport for emergency response vehicles. Enclosed for your approval is
a Nationwide 14 permit application for the proposed Martin County Airport Access Road, in
Martin County, NC.
THE LPA GROUP of North Carolina, p.a. is requesting the approval of the Nationwide
14 permit application. Please find enclosed seven (7) copies of the following for the
permit application: a Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Application Form, a biological
assessment of the study area, and corresponding maps/drawings. A check in the amount
of $200.00 has also been enclosed for the Section 401 processing fee. A copy of the
permit application has also been submitted to the US Army Corps of Engineers, along
with a jurisdictional determination request for wetlands in the study area (delineated on
April 15, 2004 and June 23, 2004). The USACE visited the site on April 15, 2004.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 919-954-1244.
Sincerely,
THE LPA GROUP of North arolina, p.a.
Edward J. Smail
Environmental Scientist
Enclosures
Member of THE LPA GROUP INCORPORATED
ATLANTA ¦ BATON ROUGE a CHARLESTON ¦ CHARLOTTE a COLUMBIA a GREENSBORO o GULFPORT a JACKSONVILLE[
KNOXVILLE a UTTLE ROCK a MOBILE a ORLANDO a RALEIGH o RICHMOND a SARASOTA ¦ TALLAHASSEE a TAMPA ¦ WEST PALM BEACH
MEMORANDUM
TO: John Dorney Regional Contact: tom steffens
Non-Discharge Branch WQ Supervisor: lim Mulligan
Date:
SUBJECT: WETLAND STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Facility Name Martin County Airport County Martin
Project Number 04 1743 County2
Recvd From APP Region Washington
Received Date 10/28/04 Recvd By Region
Project Type access road
Certificates Stream
Permit Wetland Wetland Wetland Stream Class Acres Feet
Type Type Impact Score Index Prim. Supp. Basin Req. Req.
F-14F--PT _O N 1__ 28-103-4-2 F_c_ SwNSNV 30,306. F-F
Mitigation Wetland
MitigationType Type Acres Feet
Is Wetland Rating Sheet Attached? 0 Y 0 N Did you request more info? 0 Y 0 N
Have Project Changes/Conditions Been Discussed With Applicant? 0 Y 0 N
Is Mitigation required? 0 Y 0 N Recommendation: 0 Issue 0 Issue/Cond 0 Deny
Provided by Region: Latitude (ddmmss) Longitude (ddmmss)
Comments:
Issue n/c
cc: Regional Office Page Number I 1
Central Office
Triage Check List
Date: Project Name:
DWQ#: o / `7 `f 3
County: To: ? ARO Kevin Barnett ,5,WaRO Tom Steffens and Kyle Barnes
? FRO Ken Averitte ? WiRO Noelle Lutheran
? MRO Alan Johnson ? WSRO Daryl Lamb
? RRO Mike Horan
.sog3
From: Telephone : (919) ? 3 -
The file attached is being forwarded to\?our for your evaluation.
Please call if you need as?jstance.
? Stream length impacted
? Stream determination
? Wetland determination and distance to blue-line surface waters on USFW topo maps
ZMinimization/avoidance issues
? Buffer Rules (Meuse, Tar-Pamlico, Catawba, Randleman)
? Pond fill
? Mitigation Ratios
? Ditching
? Are the stream and or wetland mitigation sites available and viable?
? Check drawings for accuracy
? Is the application consistent with pre-application meetings?
? Cumulative impact concern
Comments:

COUNTY OF IMAItTIN • POST OFFICE Cox GG3 • VVILLIAMSTON, N.C.27E;12
2 2 2 0
IIVVUII.t UH IC II14VUIUC IVUNlutI{ IIVVUIUC UCJUfSIY I IUIJ IVCI IIVVUII.C HIVIUUIVI t'U Nu. lf(,I I(. f1
F I-1i\ All- FP M f 4(.,CE.'7r..:r -)(_) 6,

O C T 2 8 2004 D
WETLANDS AN STORMWA ER BTM !CH
OF 1:11_JAt..'ly..l.Y