20190445 Ver 1_Windsong JD Package_20190407

Preliminary ORM Data Entry Fields for New Actions
ACTION ID #: SAW- Begin Date (Date Received):
Prepare file folder ❑ Assign Action ID Number in ORM ❑
1. Project Name [PCN Form A2a]: Windsong Development
2. Work Type: ❑✓ Private ❑ Institutional ❑ Government ❑ Commercial
3. Project Description / Purpose [PCN Form B3d and B3e]:
The overall purpose of the project is to construct the proposed development and provide additional housing to meet the growing needs
of this area of Union County and the greater Charlotte Metropolitan area.
4. Property Owner / Applicant [PCN Form A3 or A4]: Wellspring Carolina Investments, LLC - Mark Boyce
5. Agent / Consultant [PNC Form A5 — or ORM Consultant ID Number]:
Lowrys Environmental & Ecological Services, LLC - S. Paul Petitgout
6. Related Action ID Number(s) [PCN Form B5b]: N/A
7. Project Location— Coordinates, Street Address, and/or Location Description [PCN Form Blb]:
35.167008 N; -80.587506 W; Seclusive Drive at NC 218
8. Project Location— Tax Parcel ID [PCN Form Bla]: 08279004
9. Project Location — County [PCN Form A2b]: Union
10. Project Location — Nearest Municipality or Town [PCN Form A2c]: Indian Trail, Union County, NC
11. Project Information — Nearest Waterbody [PCN Form 132a]: UT to Duck Creek/Duck Creek
12. Watershed / 8 -Digit Hydrologic Unit Code [PCN Form 132c]: Yadkin -Pee Dee 03040105
Authorization: Section 10 ❑ Section 404F,/—]
Regulatory Action Type:
❑ Standard Permit
Nationwide Permit #
Regional General Permit #
Jurisdictional Determination Request
Section 10 and 404 ❑
❑ Pre -Application Request
❑ Unauthorized Activity
❑ Compliance
❑ No Permit Required
Revised 20150602

urisdictional Determination Reauest
US Army Corps
of Engineers
Wilmington District
This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (JD) from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
via mail, electronic mail, or facsimile. Requests should be sent to the appropriate project
manager of the county in which the property is located. A current list of project managers by
assigned counties can be found on-line at:
http://www.saw.usace.aM.mil/Missions/Re ug latoryPermitProgram/Contact/CountyLocator.aspx,
by calling 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below. Once your
request is received you will be contacted by a Corps project manager.
ASHEVILLE & CHARLOTTE REGULATORY
FIELD OFFICES
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
INSTRUCTIONS:
WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
General Number: 910-251-4633
Fax Number: [phone]
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E, F and G.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part H.
NOTE ON PART D — PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that
all JD requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to
proceed with the determination, which may include inspection of the property when
necessary. This form must be signed by the current property owner(s) or the owner(s)
authorized agent to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D - NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for
JD requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
projects will be conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD
may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of
1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in
USDA programs, you should also request a certified wetland determination from the local
office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
Version: May 2017 Page 1

Jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: Seclusive Drive at NC 218
City, State:
County:
Indian Trail, NC
Union
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): 08279004
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: S. Paul Petitqout - Lowrys Environment
Mailing Address: 1823 Quinn Road
Chester, SC 29706
Telephone Number: 803-992-0910
Electronic Mail Address: [e-mail]
Select one:
❑ I am the current property owner.
✓❑ I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant'
❑ Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
❑ Other, please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION'
Name: Wellspring Carolina Investments, LLC
Mailing Address: 2133 Garden View Lane
Matthews, NC 28104
Telephone Number: 704-936-9624
Electronic Mail Address: [e-mail]
1 Must provide completed Agent Authorization Form/Letter.
2 Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request (copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record).
Version: May 2017 Page 2

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION',4
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on-
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
S. Paul Petitgout
Print Name
Capacity: ❑ Owner ❑✓ Authorized Agents
3/27/19
Date
,�7 Pazd
Signature
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
process.
QI intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
❑ A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
❑ I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
❑ I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
F,—(] Other:
For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/ JSACE protocols, skip to Part E.
If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
5 Must provide agent authorization form/letter signed by owner(s).
Version: May 2017 Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD) TYPE (Select One)
7 I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) provides an indication that there may
be "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United States"on a property.
PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all
waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional "waters of
the United States". PJDs cannot be appealed (33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is
"preliminary" in the sense that an approved JD can be requested at any time. PJDs do
not expire.
❑ I am requesting that the Corps provide an approved JD for the property identified herein.
An Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) is a determination that
jurisdictional "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United
States" are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of
waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or
Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved JDs are sufficient as the basis for permit
decisions. AJDs are appealable (33 C.F.R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be
posted on the Corps website. A landowner, permit applicant, or other "affected
party" (33 C.F.R. 331.2) who receives an AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years
(subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter 05-
02).
I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information
to inform my decision.
G. ALL REQUESTS
❑ Map of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the
review area.
✓❑ Size of Property or Review Area 53.79 acres.
❑✓ The property boundary (or review area boundary) is clearly physically marked on the site.
Version: May 2017 Page 4

Jurisdictional Determination Request
H. REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS
Project Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude:
Longitude
35.167008
-80.587506
❑� A legible delineation map depicting the aquatic resources and the property/review area.
Delineation maps must be no larger than 11x17 and should contain the following: (Corps
signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been
reviewed and approved).6
■ North Arrow
■ Graphical Scale
■ Boundary of Review Area
■ Date
■ Location of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Form or tributary
assessment reach.
For Approved Jurisdictional Determinations:
■ Jurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404
wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features.
■ Jurisdictional non -wetland features (i.e. tidal/navigable waters, tributaries,
impoundments) should be labeled as Non -Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water, relatively permanent water, pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear
length of each of these features as appropriate.
■ Isolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non -
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non -Jurisdictional. Please
include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non jurisdictional (i.e.
"Isolated", "No Significant Nexus", or "Upland Feature"). Please include the acreage
or linear length of these features as appropriate.
For Preliminary Jurisdictional Determinations:
Wetland and non -wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404,
Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be
identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non -wetland Waters of
the United States, wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and
linear length of these features as appropriate.
P11 Completed Wetland Determination Data Forms for appropriate region
(at least one wetland and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type)
6 Please refer to the guidance document titled "Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations" to ensure that the
supplied map meets the necessary mapping standards. http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Re ug latory-Permit-
Pro,gram/Juri sdiction/
Version: May 2017 Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
aCompleted appropriate Jurisdictional Determination form
• PJDs, please complete a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form' and include the
Aquatic Resource Table
• AJDs, please complete an Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form'
O Vicinity Map
Aerial Photograph
USGS Topographic Map
Soil Survey Map
OOther Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
❑ Landscape Photos (if taken)
❑ NCSAM and/or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets
NC Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms
FOther Assessment Forms
' www.saw.usace.army.mil/Portals/59/docs/re ugulatorregdocs/JD/RGL_08-02_App_ A_ Prelim_ JD_ Form_fillable.pdf
' Please see http://www.saw.usace.arLny.mil/Missions/Re ugulatory-Permit-Program/Jurisdiction/
Principal Purpose: The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine
whether there are any aquatic resources within the project area subject to federal jurisdiction under the regulatory
authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local
government agencies, and the public, and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by federal
law. Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the
approved jurisdictional determination (AJD), which will be made available to the public on the District's website
and on the Headquarters USAGE website.
Disclosure: Submission of requested information is voluntary; however, if information is not provided, the
request for an AJD cannot be evaluated nor can an AJD be issued.
Version: May 2017 Page 6

PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: DATE
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Lowrys Environmental & Ecological Services, LLC, S.
Paul Petitgout, 1823 Quinn Road, Chester, SC 29706
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: Wilmington District, Windsong Development, FILE
NUMBER
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: PROJECT LOCATION
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County: Union City: Indian Trail
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Latitude: 35.167008 Longitude: -80.587506
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: UT to Duck Creek/Duck Creek
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES INREVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Estimated amount of
Geographic authority to
Type of aquatic
aquatic resources in
which the aquatic resource
Latitude (decimal
Longitude (decimal
resources (i.e.,
Site Number
review area (acreage
"may be" subject (i.e.,
degrees)
degrees)
wetland vs. non -
and linear feet, if
Section 404 or Section
wetland waters)
applicable
10/404)
SA
35.166797
-80.585918
+/- 850 If (0.06 -ac)
Non -wetland
Section 404
waters
SB
35.167341
-80.585060
+/- 350 If (0.04 -ac)
Non -wetland
Section 404
waters
Sc
35.166569
-80.585403
+/-1,500 If (0.54 -ac)
Non -wetland
Section 404
waters
SD
35.165006
-80.586530
+/-1,100 If (0.07 -ac)
Non -wetland
Section 404
waters
WA
35.167464
-80.586530
+/- 0.003 -ac
Wetland
Section 404
WB/WC
35.168797
-80.585575
+/-0.002-ac
Wetland
Section 404

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review
area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option to request and obtain an
approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an informed decision after having discussed the
various types of JDs and their characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide General
Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre- construction notification" (PCN), or
requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant has
not requested an AJD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit
applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an official
determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the option to request an AJD
before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing a permit
authorization on an AJD could possibly result in less compensatory mitigation being required or
different special conditions; (3) the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than
accepting the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant
can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that
permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5)
undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting an AJD
constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g.,
signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps
permit authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the review area
affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and waives any challenge to such
jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement action, or in any
administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD
or a PJD, the JD will be processed as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual
permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be
administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic jurisdiction exists over
aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional aquatic
resources in the review area, the Corps will provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is
practicable. This PJD finds that there "may be" waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be"
navigable waters of the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the
review area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources below where
indicated for all checked items:
® Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map: Prelim JD Map (Sheet 5)
® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
® U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: 1:24,000 Midland NC Quad
® Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: USDA NRCSWeb Soil Survey
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: USFWS NWI Mapper
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100 -year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
❑ Photographs: ❑Aerial (Name & Date):
or ❑Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarilv been
verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional determinations.
Signature and date of Regulatory
staff member completing PJD Signature and date of person requesting PJD
DATE (REQUIRED, unless obtaining the signature is
impracticable)1
1 Districts may establish timeframes for requester to return signed PJD forms. If the requester does not respond within the
established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is necessary prior to finalizing an
action.

AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
PROJECT NAME: Windsong Development
PARCEL ID: 08279004
PROJECT STREET ADDRESS; Seclusive Drive, Union County, NC
PROPERTY OWNER(S): Wellspring Carolina Investments, LLC
PROPERTY OWNER'S ADDRESS; 2133 Garden View Lane
Matthews, NC 2t8�104 �f
PROPERTY OWNER(s) PHONE:
PROPERTY OWNERS EMAIL;. �yi�a�r_� �7�"G��+� �SLe.t`� • c �Yrl
The undersigned, registered property owner(s) of the above noted property, do hereby authorize
S. Paul Petitaout, of Lowrys Environmental & Ecological ,Services, LLC,
(Contractor / Agent) (Name of consulting firm)
to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance and acceptance of this
Jurisdictional Determination, Permit or Certification and any and all standard and special conditions attached.
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S, Army Corps of Engineers
(Corps) and/or NC Division of Water Resources (NCDWR) to enter upon the property herein described
(accompanied by the authorized agent) for the purpose of conducting on-site investigations, if necessary, and
issuing a jurisdictional determination and/or permit pursuant to Section 4041401 of the Clean Water Act
and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the undersigned, am a duly authorized owner of
record of the property identified herein.
I hereby certify the above information submitted in this jurisdictional determination/application is true and
accurate to the best of our knowledge.
AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE; a`
DATE:��/��

Parcel Report
Parcel Number
08279004
Owner _
WELLSPRING
CAROLINA
INVESTMENTS
LLC
Mailing Address IRM
2133 GARDEN VIEW LN
MATTHEWS
NC, 28104
Account Information -qW
1W
Land Value $430,000.00
Subdivision
Building Value $0.00
Description
7207-459
Total Value $430,000.00
Situs Address
W HWY 218
Acreage 53.7940
Property Class
RESIDENTIAL - SINGLE FAMILY
Sales Information
Sale Date Sale Amount
Book & Page
Grantor
07/31/2018 $489,500.00
7207 459
HAGLER LEMUEL S ET AL
10/29/2013 $4,000.00
6123 107
RUSSELL L A JR HEIRS ET
AL
12/31/2010 $0.00
RUSSELL L A JR & B
AUSTIN &
Location Information
Municipal
Union County
12 Mile Service Area
No
Administration
County Zoning Code RA -40
School
School Assignment Information
Zoning Administration Union County
Census Tract Number
202.03
ETJ
FEMA Panel
5522,5521
Fire District Fairview
FEMA Zone
AE
Soils CmB,ChA,BaC,BaB,BdB2
Building Information - View Real Property
Site
Total Living Area
Type of Building
Year Build
Improvement Type
District Voting Assignments (Jurisdictions)
Fairview Elementary
Congressional
Polling Place School
District 4
8
School Gym
District
Senate
Precinct District #32 State House 55
36
District
http://gis-web.co.union.nc.us/... 4.626064623,-8970216.451287266,4187431.2423819844&center=-8970951.572971877,4186589.2513659205[3/28/2019 1:50:03 PM]

a as as f q l N
3 .
t GAO
- 9RIEFRO' � � ,u X _
SILVER MgP,CE Lkl f D
- 71
18 rl
t\a
Windsong Development-
�� _ +53.79 acres m r`` -
r 750 v PERSIMMON -REEK DR
o p f L
SELL
n D
STONEf
RI
4,S4O Af/
J O
a
Q Windsong Development
4 a
0 1,000 2,000
Feet
1 inch equals 2,000 feet 111chel'�s
Source: USGS Midland, NC Quad (2016) Lf f j�- O
X
Disclaimer: The information depicted on this figure is for
informational purposes only and was not prepared for, and
is not suitable for legal or engineering purposes.
Windsong Development Lowrys Environmental &
Union County, North Carolina
USGS Topographic Map Ecological Services, LLC
Drawn By: SPP Date: 11-19-18 Rev. 1823 Quinn Road
Chester, South Carolina 29706
Project Mgr. SPP Scale: 1:24,000 Sheet: 1 803-992-0910

Soils Legend
BaB - Badin Channery Silt Loam, 2-8% Slope
BaC - Badin Channery Silt Loam, 8-15% Slope
BdB2 - Badin Channery Silty Clay Loam, 2-8% Slope
ChA - Chewada Silt Loam, 0-2% Slope
CmB - Cid Channery Silt Loam, 1-5% Slope
Q Windsong Development
0 500 1,000
Feet
1 inch equals 1,000 feet
Source: USDA NRCS Web Soil Survey
(accessed: 11-19-18)
Disclaimer: The information depicted on this figure is for
informational purposes only and was not prepared for, and
is not suitable for legal or engineering purposes.
Windsong Development Lowrys Environmental 8s
Union County, North Carolina
USDA NRcs soils Map Ecological Services, LLC
Drawn By: SPP Date: 11-19-18 Rev. 1823 Quinn Road
Chester, South Carolina 29706
Project Mgr. SPP Scale: 1:12,000 Sheet: 1 803-992-0910

t.
1 !'ww U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
'&�F National Wetlands InventoryWetlan N
Wetlands
0 Estuarine and Marine Deepwater
.
[j Estuarine and Marine Wetland
C3 Windsong Development
Scale: As Shown
Source: USFWS Wetlands Mapper
(accessed: 11/19/18)
Disclaimer: The information depicted on this
figure is for informational purposes only and
was not prepared for, and is not suitable for
legal or engineering purposes.
Windsong Development
Union County, North Carolina
USFWS National Wetlands Inventory Map
Drawn By: SPP
Date: 11-19-18
Rev.
Project Mgr. SPP
Scale: As Shown
Sheet: 4
Freshwater Emergent Wetland Lake
Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland Other
Freshwater Pond E] Riverine
Lowrys Environmental &
Ecological Services, LLC
1823 Quinn Road
Chester, South Carolina 29706
803-992-0910

Windsong Development
±53.79 acres
J
C
rn
VA ZATIT161
Wetland
a
SD Stream
p Windsong Development) I Potential Jurisdictional Areas
• Data Point
0 250 500 Stream SA: ±850 ft. (0.06 -ac.) Intermittent
Stream SB: ±350 ft. (0.04 -ac.) Perennial
FeetStream SC: ±1,500 ft. (±0.52 -ac.) Perennial
1 inch equals 500 feet Stream SD: ±1,100 ft. (±0.07 -ac.) Intermittent
Source: USGS Midland, NC Quad (2016) Wetland WA: ±0.003 -ac.
Disclaimer: The information depicted on this figure is for
informational purposes only and was not prepared for, and Wetland W B/WC: ±0.002 -ac.
is not suitable for legal or engineering purposes.
17
Windsong Development Lowrys Environmental &
Union County, North Carolina
Prelim JD Map (USGS Topographic Map Base) Ecological Services, LLC
Drawn By: SPP Date: 11-19-18 Rev. 1823 Quinn Road
Chester, South Carolina 29706
Project Mgr. SPP Scale: 1'=500' Sheet: 5 803-992-0910

a as as f q l N
3 .
t GAO
- 9RIEFRO' � � ,u X _
SILVER MgP,CE Lkl f D
- 71
18 rl
t\a
Windsong Development-
�� _ +53.79 acres m r`` -
r 750 v PERSIMMON -REEK DR
o p f L
SELL
n D
STONEf
RI
4,S4O Af/
J O
a
Q Windsong Development
4 a
0 1,000 2,000
Feet
1 inch equals 2,000 feet 111chel'�s
Source: USGS Midland, NC Quad (2016) Lf f j�- O
X
Disclaimer: The information depicted on this figure is for
informational purposes only and was not prepared for, and
is not suitable for legal or engineering purposes.
Windsong Development Lowrys Environmental &
Union County, North Carolina
USGS Topographic Map Ecological Services, LLC
Drawn By: SPP Date: 11-19-18 Rev. 1823 Quinn Road
Chester, South Carolina 29706
Project Mgr. SPP Scale: 1:24,000 Sheet: 1 803-992-0910

Windsong Development
Union County, North Carolina
USGS Aerial Man
Drawn By: SPP I Date: 11-19-18 1 Rev.
Project Mgr. SPP I Scale: Not To Scale I Sheet: 2
Lowrys Environmental &
Ecological Services, LLC
1823 Quinn Road
Chester, South Carolina 29706
803-992-0910

Soils Legend
BaB - Badin Channery Silt Loam, 2-8% Slope
BaC - Badin Channery Silt Loam, 8-15% Slope
BdB2 - Badin Channery Silty Clay Loam, 2-8% Slope
ChA - Chewada Silt Loam, 0-2% Slope
CmB - Cid Channery Silt Loam, 1-5% Slope
0 Windsong Development
0 500 1,000
Feet
1 inch equals 1,000 feet
Source: USDA NRCS Web Soil Survey
(accessed: 11-19-18)
Disclaimer: The information depicted on this figure is for
informational purposes only and was not prepared for, and
is not suitable for legal or engineering purposes.
Windsong Development Lowrys Environmental &
Union County, North Carolina
USDA NRCS Soils Map Ecological Services, LLC
Drawn By: SPP Date: 11-19-18 Rev. 1823 Quinn Road
Chester, South Carolina 29706
Project Mgr. SPP Scale: 1:12,000 Sheet: 1 803-992-0910

t.
1 !'ww U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
'&�F National Wetlands InventoryWetlan N
Wetlands
0 Estuarine and Marine Deepwater
.
[j Estuarine and Marine Wetland
C3 Windsong Development
Scale: As Shown
Source: USFWS Wetlands Mapper
(accessed: 11/19/18)
Disclaimer: The information depicted on this
figure is for informational purposes only and
was not prepared for, and is not suitable for
legal or engineering purposes.
Windsong Development
Union County, North Carolina
USFWS National Wetlands Inventory Map
Drawn By: SPP
Date: 11-19-18
Rev.
Project Mgr. SPP
Scale: As Shown
Sheet: 4
Freshwater Emergent Wetland Lake
Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland Other
Freshwater Pond E] Riverine
Lowrys Environmental &
Ecological Services, LLC
1823 Quinn Road
Chester, South Carolina 29706
803-992-0910

Windsong Development
±53.79 acres
Q Windsong Development
" Data Point
0 250 500
Feet
1 inch equals 500 feet
Source: USGS Midland, NC Quad (2016)
Disclaimer: The information depicted on this figure is for
informational purposes only and was not prepared for, and
is not suitable for legal or engineering purposes.
Cz
l
WB/WC
a Wetland
a
SD Stream
Potential Jurisdictional Areas
0
Stream SA: ±850 ft. (0.06 -ac.) Intermittent
Stream SB: ±350 ft. (0.04 -ac.) Perennial
Stream SC: ±1,500 ft. (±0.52 -ac.) Perennial
Stream SD: ±1,100 ft. (±0.07 -ac.) Intermittent
Wetland WA: ±0.003 -ac.
Wetland WB/WC: ±0.002 -ac.
Windsong Development
Union County, North Carolina
Prelim JD Map (USGS Topographic Map Base)
Drawn By: SPP Date: 11-19-18 Rev.
Project Mgr. SPP Scale: 1'=500' Sheet: 5
17
Lowrys Environmental 8s
Ecological Services, LLC
1823 Quinn Road
Chester, South Carolina 29706
803-992-0910

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Russell Heirs City/County: Union Sampling Date: 11-21-17
Applicant/Owner: True Homes State: NC Sampling Point: WB/WC Up
Investigator(s): Petitgout Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Slope Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex Slope (%): 1-3%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.167008 Long: -80.587506 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Cid Channery Silt Loam 0-2% Slope NWI classification: N/A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
—Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (B14)
? Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns (B10)
_Saturation (A3) _Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_Moss Trim Lines (B16)
—Water Marks (B1) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
—Sediment Deposits (B2) —Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
—Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
—Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (B4) —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
—Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont –Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: WB/WC Up
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft )
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1. Pinus taeda
40 Yes
FAC
Number of Dominant Species
2. Liquidambar styraciflua
10 No
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
3. Acer rubrum
5 No
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 4 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
55 =Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
28 20% of total cover:
11
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft
)
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
1. Pinus taeda
20 Yes
FAC
FAC species 85 x 3 = 255
2. Liquidambar styraciflua
5 Yes
FAC
FACU species 0 x 4 = 0
3.
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
4.
Column Totals: 85 (A) 255 (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.00
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is !-3.0'
25 =Total Cover
_
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
13 20% of total cover:
5
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ft )
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2.
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft )
1. Toxicodendron radicans
5 Yes
FAC
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
5 =Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
3 20% of total cover:
1
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: WB/WC Up
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
(inches)
Color (moist)
%
Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-3
10YR 3/2
100
Loamy/Clayey
3-10
7.5YR 5/6
100
Loamy/Clayey
10-20
5YR 5/8
100
Loamy/Clayey
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
This data sheet is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils, Version 8.0, 2016.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Russell Heirs City/County: Uniion Sampling Date: 11-21-17
Applicant/Owner: True Homes, LLC State: NC Sampling Point: wBAVC wet
Investigator(s): Petitgout Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): slope Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 1-3%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.167008 Long: -80.587506 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Cid Channery Silt Loam 0-2% Slope NWI classification: N/A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
_Surface Soil Cracks (136)
—Surface Water (Al) —True
Aquatic Plants (B14)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
X High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns (B10)
X Saturation (A3) _Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_Moss Trim Lines (B16)
—Water Marks (B1) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
—Sediment Deposits (B2) —Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
—Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
—Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (B4) —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
—Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
X FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 10
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 4
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Hydrology present
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont –Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: WB/WC Wet
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1. Pinus taeda
20
Yes
FAC
Number of Dominant Species
2. Liquidambar styraciflua
10
Yes
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6 (A)
3. Acer rubrum
5
No
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
35
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
18 20% of total cover:
7
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft
)
FACW species 5 x 2 = 10
1. Pinus taeda
10
Yes
FAC
FAC species 55 x 3 = 165
2. Liquidambar styraciflua
5
Yes
FAC
FACU species 0 x 4 = 0
3.
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
4.
Column Totals: 60 (A) 175 (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.92
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
X 3 - Prevalence Index is !-3.0'
15
=Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
8 20% of total cover:
3
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ft )
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1. Woodwardia areolata
5
Yes
FACW
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2.
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
5
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
3 20% of total cover:
1
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft )
1. Toxicodendron radicans
5
Yes
FAC
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
5
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
3 20% of total cover:
1
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: WB/WC Wet
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
_ Histosol (Al)
(inches)
Color (moist)
%
Color (moist) % Type' Loc2
Texture Remarks
0-3
10YR 3/2
100
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy/Clayey
3-6
7.5YR 4/2
70
7.5YR 4/6 30 C PL/M
Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
6-20
7.5YR 4/2
60
7.5YR 5/6 40 C PL/M
Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
? Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
X Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
? Redox Depressions (F8)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
This data sheet is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric
Soils, Version 8.0, 2016.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

NC DWO Stream Identification Form Vercinn 4.11
Date: _ T
Project/Site: ?_kI55Qft�_ lk iu
Latitude: ,35, i(01�f-T "d j'l
Evaluator: Pante e
County: UNl4�tA
Longitude: 'rS®.,_6ig
Total Points:
Stream is arleast rnfermitfent
Stream Deter n (circle one}
Other P" I OL4>}�
if a 19 or erenniai if z 30'
Ephemera(ntermitten Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal= i 4fAbsent
2
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1 a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
03
1
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
D
21. Aquatic Mollusks RQJ
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
riIe ool sequence
0
�
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
r2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
26. Wetland plants in streambed
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1'
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11 _ Second or greater order channel
a
No = 0
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal =
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
qL
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
V. DWIUUV (buDiotal = cwt - 1
16. Fibrous roots in streambed 3
2
1
0,
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) IN
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks RQJ
1
2
3
22. Fish 0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0.5 1
1
1.5
24. Amphibians t
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae 0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
Other :.Q
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: SAc 5W_Lrgfnt
Sketch:

NC DWO Stream Identificatinn Farm VArcinn d 11
Date: _ Z � _ 4 - r
Project/Site: ;?cSg t_ 14" p $
Latitude: 3T.
Evaluator: ��- �
County: UNkap
Longitude:•'50,'Ir
Total Points: �A
Stream is at least intermittent
S
Stream Determination (circle one
Other A& t 13 CArFJ�J
if z 19 or perennial if a 30'
Ephemeral Intermittent erennia
e.g. Quad Name,
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = I
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1' Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
Is
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
0.3
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
1
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
1
3
5. Active/relict flood plain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
1.5
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
_
1.5
10. Natural valley
1 0
1 0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
I
0o = 0
Yes = 3
arnrimai ununes are not raiea; see disc ssions in manual
B. Hvdrolocly (Subtotal = l
12. Presence of Baseflow Y
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
4
0.3
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0 .
.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
0
No = 0
1
es ='3
G. Bnogy [Subtotal =
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0.
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 -
`perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: �tvl
Sketch:

NC DWO Stream Identification Form Vercinn 4.11
Date: t f r, _�
Project/Site: ZUS5gW Wtj Q5
Latitude:
35.ceco �*-s
Evaluator: a -
County: UAfiOt(
Longitude -
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittentStream
7
Determination (circle on
Other dNo I L � N,p
if;t 19 or perennial if z 30' T�f
Ephemeral Intermitte erennial
e.g. quad Name:
A. Geomorphology -(Subtotal= YAQ )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1 a' Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
5 1
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
0 5
1
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
V'
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
1.
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
1
1.5
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
1 0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes 7-73
Sketch:
nrmiciai uuums d1v noL iaim; see discussions in manual -
B. Hvdrolociv (Subtotal = 1
12. Presence of Baseflow
0 1
2
3
13_ Iron oxidizing bacteria
0 1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
5 1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0 5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0 .5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
0.5
es = 3
G. 1:31010CIV (Subtotal = [f) .'lam 1 �r
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1 .
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
4
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.
23. Crayfish
0
5
1
24. Amphibians
0
5'
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FA£ = 0.753
OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
"perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

NC DWO Stream Identification Fnrm Vareinn d_71
Date: H ,l ! -7
l
Projectl5ite: OA45 kL-L
Latitude: ) r LqV
Evaluator: s
�'{ (;"�cygZ�,�y
Count Y: (JNt6N
Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream is intermittent
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other ►W t Q LArj_%0
permleast
if _ 19 or erennial if z 3D"
3
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology ( (Subtotal= 16 L2_)
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a* Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
e-2-2.
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
0
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step-pool,0
ripple -pool sequence
16. Organic debris lines or piles
1'
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2.
3
5. Activelrelictflood plain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
rV
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
CQ2
1
3
8. Headcuts
0
Vij
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
-1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
o = 0
Yes= 3
Sketch:
anificial ditches are not rafeu; see a'spus ns in manual
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal = 4 . )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0 1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0 1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5 1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
2
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
0.5
es = 3
G. 131010av (Subtotal = % l
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2 C710
0.
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2 f,
1
0
.20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5 1
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL 1.5
Ot r
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch: