400019_INSPECTIONS_20171231

NUH I H LAHULINA
Department of Environmental Qual

r

t
f
Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400019 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS400019
❑ Denied Access
Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for visit: Routine County: Greene Region:
Washington
Date of Visit: 08/17/2017 Entry Time: 08:30 am Exit Time: 9:10 am Incident #
Farm Name: Roy Jones Farm Owner Email:
Owner: Roy S Jones Phone:
252-747-3989
Mailing Address: 7094 Beaman Old Creek Rd Walstonburg NC 27888
Physical Address: 7094 Beaman Old Creek Rd Walstonburg NC 27888
Facility Status: Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35' 32' 07" Longitude:
77° 43' 26"
From Kenansville take NC 903 N to Snow Hill follow NC 903 N until intersection of US 258 N after intersecting US 258 N, turn Lt.
onto NC 91 and an almost immediate Lt. turn onto SR 1247 follow for 4.5 miles until it intersects SR 1222, follow SR 1222
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Ashley Lynn Jones Operator Certification Number.
987241
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Ashley Jones Phone:
On -site representative Vernon Jones Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Waste analysis: soil tested: 412016
7-12-17 = 1.85
4-28-17 = 1.69
10-12-16 = 1.05
IRR records are complete & balanced out.
Reviewed: calibration 2016; sludge survey/due 2019; stocking; crop yield; freeboard/rainfall
Note: severe erosion in lagoon dike (inside) must be fixed - please have a tech specialist look at it.
page: i

i• Permit: AWS400019 Owner - Facility: Roy S Jones Facility Number: 400019
Inspection Date: 08/17/17 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 4,896 4,961
Total Design Capacity: 4,896
Total SSLW: 660.960
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon 1 04/15/91 19.00 31.Q0
page: 2

Y Permit: AW5400019 Owner - Facility : Roy S ,!ones Facility Number: 400019
Inspection Date: 08/17/17 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Dischar es & Stream Impacts
Yes
No Na Ne
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
0 ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0 ❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑
❑
2. is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
M ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
M ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection Storage & Treatment
Yes
No Na Ne
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
E E]
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e.l large
0
❑ ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
0 ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
M ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
0 ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
ED
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na Ne
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

Permit: AWS400019 Owner - Facility : Roy S Jones Facility Number:
Inspection Date: 08/17/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
400019
Routine
Waste Application
Yes
No Na Ne
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
0 ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
■ ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
N 0
[]
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na Ne
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
0 ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
N []
11
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page:
4

Permit: AWS400019 Owner - Facility: Roy S Jones Facility Number: 400019
Inspection Date: 08/17/17 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na Ne
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
E ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
0 ❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
0 ❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
MDEJ
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
N ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
N ❑
[]
Other Issues
Yes
No Na Ne
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
N ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
0 ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
0 ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
0 ❑
❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
[]
[]
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
❑
❑
page: 5

Division of Water Resources
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Other Agency
Facility Number:
400019 Facility Status:
Active Permit: AWS400019
Denied Access
Inppection Type:
Compliance Inspection
Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit:
Routine
County: Greene Region
Washington
Elate of Visit:
09/08/2016 Entry Time: 01:00 pm
Exit Time: 1:40 pm Incident #
Farm Name:
Roy Jones Farm
Owner Email:
Owner:
Roy S Jones
Phone:
252-747-3989
Mailing Address: 7094 Beaman Old Creek Rd Walstonburg NC 27888
Physical Address: 7094 Beaman Old Creek Rd Walstonburg NC 27888
Facility Status: Compliant Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35" 32' 07" Longitude: 77' 43' 26"
From Kenansville lake NC 903 N to Snow Hill follow NC 903 N until intersection of US 258 N after intersecting US 258 N, turn Lt.
onto NC 91 and an almost immediate Lt, turn onto SR 1247 follow for 4.5 miles until it intersects SR 1222, follow SR 1222
Question Areas:
Dischrge & stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Ashley Lynn Jones Operator Certification Number: 987241
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Ashley Jones Phone
On -site representative Vernon Jones Phone
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspectors):
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis: soil tested: 2016
8-19-16 = 1.22
7-1-16 = 1.23
5-4-16 = 1.44
3-10-16 = 1.55
1-12-16 = 1.05
10-22-15 = .90
IRR records are complete & balanced out.
Reviewed: rainfalllfreeboard; stocking; crop yield; sludge survey due 2016
Fb. range: 21" 2-7-16 - 31" 8-28-16
page: 1

kt Permit: AWS400019 Owner - Facility : Roy S Jones Facility Number: 400019
Inspection Date: 09/08/16 1npsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 4,896 1,590
Total Design Capacity: 4,896
Total SSLW: 660,960
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon 1 04/15/91 19,00 33.00
a
page: 2

4 Permit: AWS400019 Owner - Facility : Roy S Jones Facility Number: 400019
Inspection Date: 09/08/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No Na Ne
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
M ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0 ❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
M ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
0 ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No Na Ne
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large
❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
M ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
0 ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
M ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na Ne
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

7 Permit: AWS400019 Owner - Facility : Roy S Jones Facility Number:
400019
Inspection Date: 09/08/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
Waste Application
Yes
No Na Ne
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
E ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
0 ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
0 ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
E ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na Ne
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
0 ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below_
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
[�
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

v
Permit: AWS400019 Owner - Facility: Roy S Jones Facility Number: 400019
Inspection Date: 09/08/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na No
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
E ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
E ❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
0 ❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑01111
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
0 ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes No Na Ne
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
0 ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes.
❑
0 ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
N ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below_
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
N ❑
❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
E []
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
■ ❑
❑
page: 5

0 Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400019 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS400019 ❑ Denied Access
Inpsection Type, Compliance Inspection inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine
County: Greene
Date of Visit: 09/09/2015 EntryTime: 08:53 am Exit Time: 9.20 am Incident #
Farm Name: Roy Jones Farm Owner Email:
Owner: Roy S Jones Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 7094 Beaman Old Creek Rd Walstonburg NC 27888
Physical Address: 7094 Beaman Old Creek Rd Walstonburg NC 27888
Facility Status: ■ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy -Brown LLC
Region: Washington
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35° 32' 07" Longitude: 77' 4T 26"
From Kenansville take NC 903 N to Snow Hill follow NC 903 N until intersection of US 258 N after intersecting US 258 N, turn Lt.
onto NC 91 and an almost immediate Lt, turn onto SR 1247 follow for 4.5 miles until it intersects SR 1222, follow SR 1222
Question Areas: �.
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Slor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Roy S Jones Operator Certification Number: 22394
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
Phone:
Primary Inspector:
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Marlene Sayer
Inspection Summary:
Waste Analysis:
7-16-15= 1,40
4-29-15= 1.73
12-9-14= 1.59
Soil Tested 312015
ERR records are complete and balanced out for BH & SG wl PAN remaining.
Reviewed: New COC; rainfall/freeboard; crop yield; stocking/mortality, sludge survey/calibration in 2014.
Phone:
Date:
page: 1

11
Permit: AWS400019 Owner - Facility : Roy S Jones Facility Number: 400019
Inspection Date: 09/09/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 4,896 4,800
Total Design Capacity: 4,896
Total SSLW: 660,960
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon 1 0411 &91 19.00 26.00
page: 2

Permit: AWS400019 Owner - Facility : Roy S Jones Facility Number: 400019
Inspection Date: 09/09/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes No Na Ne
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
0 ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the Stale? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0 ❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0 ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
M ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No Na Ne
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.eJ large
❑
❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
M ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑0
❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Was A lication
Yes No Na Ne
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

Permit: AWS400019 Owner - Facility : Roy S Jones Facility Number: 400019
Inspection Date: 09/09/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Wasjq Application
Yes No Na No
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
0 ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
0 ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
E ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Records and Documents
rem
Na Ne
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
0 [] ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

\6
Permit: AWS400019 Owner*- Facility: Roy S Jones Facility Number:
400019
Inspection Dale: 09/09/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No Na No
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
0 ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
M ❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
0 ❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
M ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes No Na Ne
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
M ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
0 ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
M ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
MED
❑
CAWM P?
33, Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewfinspection with on -site representative?
❑
0 ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
M ❑
❑
page: 5

Appendix 1. Lagoon Sludge Survey Form Revised August 2008
A. Farm Permit or DWQ Identification Number Roy Jones #1
B. Lagoon Identification 1
C. Person(s) Taking Measurements Eve Honeycutt
D. Date of Measurement 10/1114
E. Methods/Devices Used for Measurement of:
a. Distance from the lagoon liquid surface to the top of the sludge layer
sekkhi disc with attached measurina tape
State University
A&T State University
COOPERATIVE
EXTENSION
- Empowarirrg People - Providing Solutions
b. Distance from the lagoon liquid surface to the bottom (soil) of the lagoon.
PVC pipe with measurements every 1110
c. Thickness of the sludge layer if making a direct measurement with "core sampler'.
nla
F. Lagoon Surface Area (using dimensions at inside top of bank): 2.97 (acres)
(Draw a sketch of the lagoon on a separate sheet, list dimensions, and calculate surface area. The lagoon
may have been built different than designed, so measurements should be made.)
G. Estimate number of sampling points:
a. Less than 1.33 acres: Use 8 points
b. If more than 1.33 ac. acres x 6 = 17 , with maximum of 24.
(Using sketch and dimensions, develop a uniform grid that has the same number of intersections as the
estimated number of sampling points needed. Number the intersection points on the lagoon grid so that data
recorded at each can be easily matched.)
H. Conduct sludge survey and record data on "Sludge Survey Data Sheet" (Appendix 2). Also, at the
location of the pump Intake, take measurements of distance from liquid surface to top of sludge
layer and record It on the Data Sheet (last row); this must be at least 2-5 ft. when irrigating.
I. At the time of the survey, also measure the distance from the Maximum Liquid Level to the Present Liquid
Level (measure at the lagoon gauge pole): 0.8
J. Determine the distance from the top of bank to the Maximum Liquid Level 1.6
(use lagoon management plan or other lagoon records)
K. Determine the distance from the Maximum Liquid to the Minimum Liquid level: 1.8
(use lagoon management plan or other lagoon records)
L. Calculate the distance from the present liquid surface level to the Minimum Liquid Level 1.0
(Item K Minus Item I, assuming the present liquid level is below the Maximum Liquid Level)
M. Record from the Sludge Survey Data Sheet the distance from the present liquid surface level to the
lagoon bottom (average for all the measurement points) 7.9
N. Record from the Sludge Survey Data Sheet the distance from the present liquid surface level to the top
of the sludge layer (average for all the measurement points): 5.1
O. Record from the Sludge Survey Data Sheet the average thickness of the sludge layer: 2.8
P. Calculate the thickness of the existing Liquid Treatment Zone (Item N minus Item L): 4.1
Q. If Item O is greater than Item P, proceed to the Worksheet for Sludge Volume and Treatment Volume.
If Item O Is equal to or less than [tern P, you do not have to determine volumes.
Completed by: Eve H. Honeycutt aS6 A -
Date: c)
Print Name /Signature

r
Appendix 2. Sludge Survey Data Sheet* Revised August 2008
Lagoon Identification
Completed by: Eve H. Honeycutt <b
cwa��
Print Name a re �)
Date:
(A)
{B)
(C)
(C)-(B)
Grid Point
Distance from liquid surface
Distance from liquid surface
Thickness of sludge layer
No.
to top of slud a
to lagoon bottom sail
Ft. & in.
Ft. tenths
Ft. & in.
Ft. tenths
Ft. & in.
Ft. tenths
1
5.6
7.8
2.2
2
4.5
7.6
3A
3
4.6
7.5
2.9
4
5.0
7.9
2.9
5
4.9
7.8
2.9
6
4.6
7.9
3.3
7
4.5
7.5
3.0
8
5.2
7.9
2.7
9
5.0
8.0
3.0
10
4.9
8.0
3.1
11
5.5
8.1
2.6
12
4.9
7.9
3.0
13
6.0
8.3
2.3
14
5.5
8.5
3.0
15
5.2
8.0
2.8
16
5.7
7.8
2.1
17
0.0
18
0.0
19
0.0
0.0
0.0
20
0.0
0.0
0.0
21
0.0
0.0
0.0
22
0.0
0.0
0.0
23
0.0
0.0
0.0
24
0.0
0.0
0.0
Number of points with readings
16.0
X X
16.0
X X
16.0
Average of
X X
t
5.1
X X
7.90625
X X
I
2.80625
points
aF
At pump
5.6
X X X X X X
intake
'All Grid Points and corresponding sludge layer thicknesses must be shown on a sketch attached to this
Sludge Survey Data Sheet.

Appendix 3. Worksheet for sludge volume and;treatment volume Revised August 2008
The average thickness of the sludge layer and the thickness of the existing liquid (sludge -free) treatment zone are determined
from the information on the Lagoon Sludge Survey Form ( Items O and P, respectively). In this example, the average sludge
layer thickness is 2.5 feet and the existing liquid treatment zone is 3.5 feet. If the lagoon has a designed sludge storage volume,
see notes at end of the worksheet. The dimensions of the lagoon as measured and the side slope are needed
for calculations of sludge volume and of total treatment volume. If the lagoon is a standard geometric shape, the sludge
volume and the treatment volume in the lagoon can be estimated by using standard equations. For approximate volumes
of rectangular lagoons with constant side slope, calculate length and width at the midpoint of the layer, and multiply by layer
thickness to calculate layer volume, as shown in the example. Far irregular shapes, convert the total surface area to a square
or rectangular shape. For exact volumes for lagoons with constant side slope, the "Prismoidal Equations" may be used.
Example
YourLagoon
1. Average sludge Layer Thickness (T)
2.5
ft.
2.8
ft.
2. Depth of the lagoon from top of bank to bottom soil surface (D)
11
ft.
10.3
ft.
3. Slope = Horizontal/ vertical side slope (S)
3
2.5
4. Length at the top of inside bank (L)
457
ft.
350.0
ft.
5. Width at top inside slope (W)
229
ft.
370.0
ft
6. Length at midpoint of sludge layer Lm= L-2S(D-(T12))
398.5
ft.
305.3
ft.
7. Width at midpoint of sludge layer Wm= W-2S(D-(T12))
170.5
ft.
325.3
ft.
8. Volume of sludge (Vs) Vs=Lm Wm T
169,860
ft3
278,761
ft'
9. Volume in gallons: Vs9 V'7.5 gal./ft.
1,273,950
gal.
2,090,707
gal.
10. Thickness of existing liquid tmt. zone (Y)
3.5
ft
4.1
ft
11. Thickness of total treatment zone (Z) Z= T+Y
6
ft
6.9
ft
12. Length at midpoint of total tmt. zone Lz= L-2(S)(D-(Z12)
409
ft.
315.6
ft.
13. Width at midpoint of total tmt. Zone W. = W-2(S)(D-(Z12)
181
ft.
335.6
ft.
14. Volume of total treatment zone (Vz) Vz = L^ Z
444,174
ft'
730,236
ft3
15. Ratio ( R ) of sludge layer volume to total Treatment Volume
R = VsNz
0.38
0.38
If the ratio R exceeds 0.50, than a sludge Plan of Action may be required. Check with DWQ for information
on filing the Plan of Action.
Note: If the lagoon has a designed sludge storage volume (DSSV), subtract that volume from both the volume
of sludge (Vs) (Item 8) and from the volume of total treatment zone (Vz) (Item 14), and take the ratio.
Then, R = (Vs-DSSV) I (Vz - DSSV)
Example: If DSSV = 85,000 ff, then R = (169,860 - 85,000)1(447,174 - 85,000) = 84,8601362,174 = 024.
16. Design sludge storage volume (DSSV) 85,000
17. Ratio (R) of sludge layer volume to treatment volume adjusted
for designed sludge storage volume 0.24

0
Division of Water Resources
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number.
400019 Facility Status:
tnpsection Type:
Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit:
Routine
Date of Visit:
08/18/2014 Entry Time: 01:00 pm
Farm Name:
Roy Jones Fann
Owner:
Roy S Jones
Mailing Address:
7094 Beaman Old Creek Rd
Active Pennit: AWS400019
Inactive Or Closed Date:
County: Greene Region:
Exit Time: 1:35 pm Incident #
Owner Email:
Phone:
Walstonburg NC 27888
❑ Denied Access
Washington
252-747-3989
Physical Address: 7094 Beaman Old Creek Rd Walstonburg NC 27888
Facility Status: 0Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator. Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35° 32' 07" Longitude: 77" 43' 26"
From Kenansvilie take NC 903 N to Snow Hill follow NC 903 N until intersection of US 258 N after intersecting US 258 N, turn Lt.
onto NC 91 and an almost immediate Lt. turn onto SR 1247 follow for 4.5 miles until it intersects SR 1222, follow SR 1222
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Star, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Ashley Lynn Jones Operator Certification Number: 987241
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Ashley Jones Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Dale:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Soil Tested 2014
Waste Analysis:
4-11-14= 1.60
10-11-13= .98
8-6-14= 1.05
12-18-13= 1.40
IRR records are complete and balenced out.
Remember to do a sludge survey & calibration.
Reviewed: stocking, rainfall, freeboard
12' rainfall June thru August 2014
page: 1

i
Permit: AWS400019 Owner - Facility : Roy S Jones Facility Number: 400019
Inspection Date: 08/18/14 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon 1 04/15/91 19.00
page: 2

Ll
I
Permit: AWS400019
Owner - Facility : Roy S Jones Facility Number: 400019
Inspection Date: 08/18/14 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes No Na Ne
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑ ❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑ ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
❑ ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes No Na No
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large
❑
❑ ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
❑ ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
❑ ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
1111
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na Ne
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 101%o/1D lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

e
Permit: AWS400019 Owner - Facility : Roy S Jones Facility Number: 400019
Inspection Date: 08/18/14 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No Na No
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
❑ ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
110
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
❑ ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na NB
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WU P?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

e
Permit: AWS400019 Owner- Facility: Roy S Jones Facility Number: 400019
Inspection Date: 08/18/14 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No Na No
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
❑ ❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
❑ ❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
2T Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
[]
❑ []
0
Other Issues
Yes
No Na No
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
❑ ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
1111
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
1111
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
t
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
❑ ❑
❑
CAWM P?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
page: 5

Cf
Permit: AWS400019 Owner - Facility: Roy S Jones Facility Number: 400019
Inspection Date: 08/2112013 lnspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 4,896 2,400
Total Design Capacity: 4,896
Total SSLW: 660,960
Waste Structures
Designed Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Fron 1 04/15191 19.00 37.00
Page: 2

r.
(f
Permit: AWS400019 Owner - Facility: Roy S Jones Facility Number: 400019
Inspection Date: 08/21/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes No NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard? ❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or [I ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
11. is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS400019 Owner - Faciility: Roy S Jones
Inspection Date: 08/21/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 400019
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
1100 ❑
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS400019 Owner - Facility: Roy S Jones Facility Number; 400019
Inspection Date: 08121/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Lease Agreements? ❑
Other? ❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
24, Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑
■ ❑ ❑
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
Page: 5

1i
Permit: AWS400019 Owner - Facility: Roy 8 Jones
Inspection Date: 08/21/2013 inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Records and Documents
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Facility Number: 400019
Reason for Visit: Routine
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report ❑ ■ ❑ Cl
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
freeboard problems, over -application) '
31 _ Do subsurface the drains exist at the facility? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field ❑
Lagoon 1 Storage Pond ❑
Other ❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 6

E Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400019 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS400019 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Rome _ County: Greeng4 Region: Washington
Date of Visit- 08/21/2012 Entry Time: 08:00 AM Exit Time: 08:50 AM
Farm Name: Roy Jones Farm
Owner: Roy S Jones
Incident #:
Owner Email:
Mailing Address: 7024 Beaman Qld Creek Rd Walstonbura NC 27888
Physical Address: 7094 Beaman Old Creek Rd Walstonburg NC 27888
Facility Status: ■ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°32'07" Longitude: 77°43'26"
From Kenansville take NC 903 N to Snow Hill follow NC 903 N until intersection of US 258 N after intersecting US 258 N, turn Lt.
onto NC 91 and an almost immediate Lt. turn onto SR 1247 follow for 4.5 miles until it intersects SR 1222, follow SR 1222
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Ashley Lynn Jones Operator Certification Number: 987241
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Vernon Jones Phone:
On -site representative Vernon Jones Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Waste analysis:
3-22-12 = 1.85
1-27-12 = 1.77
5-22-12 = 2.28
soil tested: 10/2011
IRR records on Bermuda last fall & small grain this spring are balanced out.
Need to calibrate reels this year in 2012 - before Dec. 31. Sludge survey due in 2014.
Date:
Page: 1

0
Permit: AWS400019 Owner -Facility; Roy 5 Jones Facility Number: 400019
Inspection Date: 08/21/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 4,896 50
Total Design Capacity- 4,896
Total SSLW: 660,960
Waste Structures
Designed Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
lagoon 1 04/15/91 19A0 1 29 00
Page: 2

Permit: AWS400019 Owner - Facility: Roy S Jones Facility Number. 400019
Inspection Date: 0812112012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3_ Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑ ■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Led large trees, severe
Q ■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑ ■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑ ■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑ ■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑ ■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ■
❑
Cl
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS400019 Owner -Facility: Roy S Jones
Facility Number: 400019
Inspection Date: 08/21/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 Ibs_?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15_ Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
OND Cl
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
ONO ❑
20_ Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS400019 Owner - Facility: Roy S Jones Facility Number: 400019
Inspection Date: 0812112012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Checklists?
Design?
Maps?
Lease Agreements?
Other?
If Other, please specify
Yes No NA NE
❑
❑
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑
■ Q ❑
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a PDA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
Page: 5

Permit: AWS400019 Owner - Facility: Roy S Jones Facility Number: 400019
Inspection Date: 06/21/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concem? If yes, contact a regional 1101111
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
Lagoon / Storage Pond
Other
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/lnspector tail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
■
■
■
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 6

0
E Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number : 400019 _,,,_ Facility Status: Active _ _ Permit: AWS400019 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Colpliance Inspection inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Gr gneRegion: Yyashinaton
Date of Visit: 0810212011, Entry Time: 01:00 PM Exit Time: 01:�0 PM incident #:
Farm Name: BW Jones FaM) Owner Email:
Owner: Roy S Jones Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 7094 Beaman Old Creek Rd Walstonbura NC 27888
Physical Address: 7094 Beaman Old Creek R Walstonburci NG ?78Z}Q_,,,,,
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: 'Murphy -Brown LL
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35"32'07" Longitude: 77°43'26"
From Kenansville take NC 903 N to Snow Hill follow NC 903 N until intersection of US 258 N after intersecting US 258 N, turn Lt.
onto NC 91 and an almost immediate Lt. turn onto SR 1247 follow for 4.5 miles until it intersects SR 1222, follow SR 1222
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Roy S Jones Operator Certification Number: 22394
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Vernon Jones Phone:
On -site representative Vernon Jones Phone:
Primary Inspector: Mariene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Waste analysis: soil tested 3-2010, don't forget to pull samples for 2011
7-14-11 = .80
5-25-11 = 1.80
3-21-11 = .97
1-6-11 = .67
IRR are complete & balanced out. Stocking & mortality are recorded as well as crop yield.
SS done 11-2010 @26%
#24) Calibration #'s were low, hoever TS stated they were within realonalbe limits. 50 120 250
Date:
Page: 1

�f
!s
Permit: AWS400019 Owner - Facility: Roy S Jones Facility Number: 400019
Inspection Date: 0810212011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 4,896 2,340
Total Design Capacity: 4,896
Total SSLW: 660,960
Waste Structures
Designed Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
[agoon 1 04/ 15/91 19.00 32. 00
Page: 2

Is
Permit: AWS400019 Owner - Facility. Roy S Jones Facility Number: 400019
Inspection Date: 08/02/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ 0013
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ 000
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ 000
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than ❑ 000
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes No NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard? ❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
8. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, 0000
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
Q
Page: 3

ti
i
Permit: AWS400019 Owner - Facility: Roy S Jones Facility Number : 400019
Inspection Date: 08/02/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
PAN? ❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.? ❑
Total Phosphorus? ❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? Q
Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑
Evidence of wind drift? ❑
Application outside of application area? ❑
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type i
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Q ❑ Q Q
Plan(CAWMP)?
15_ Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Q Q ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure andlor operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ ❑ Q ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ ❑ Q Q
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available? ❑ ❑ ❑ Q
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP? ❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS400019 Owner - Facility: Roy S Jones Facility Number: 400019
Inspection Date: 08/02/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
Q
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
Q
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Q ❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ❑ ❑ Q
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
Q ❑ ❑ Q
Page: 6

Permit: AWS400019 Owner - Facility: Roy 5 Jones
Facility Number. 400019
Inspection Date: 08/02/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge, ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
Lagoon / Storage Pond
Other
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
M
Page: 6

4
Division of Water Quality
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400019 Facility Status: Actiyg Permit: AWS400019 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Greene Region: Washinaton
Date of Visit: 11/10/2010 Entry Time:¢10¢EM _ . Exit Time:
Farm Name: Roy JRng, Farm
Owner: Roy S Jones
Incident #:
Owner Email:
Phone: -7
Mailing Address: 7094 Beaman Old Creek Rd Walstonbura NC 27888
Physical Address: 7094 Beaman Old Creek Rd AIstonburg NC 27888
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35"32'07" Longitude: 77°43'26"
From Kenansville take NC 903 N to Snow Hill follow NC 903 N until intersection of US 258 N after intersecting US 258 N, turn Lt.
onto NC 91 and an almost immediate Lt. turn onto SR 1247 follow for 4.5 miles until it intersects SR 1222, follow SR 1222
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Records and Documents
Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Other issues
Certified Operator:,Roy S Jones Operator Certification Number: 22394
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name
24 hour contact name Vernon Jones
On -site representative Vernon Jones
Primary Inspector:
Inspector Signature:
Marlene Salyer
Secondary Inspector(s):
Title
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis: soil tested: 2-"9 Make sure you get a sample for 2010
10-11-20 = 1.0
1-20-10 = 1.3
10-23-10 = 1.2
IRR records are complete and balanced out. Rainfall records are on the calendar in the office.
Ss 2010 Calib. 2010
Phone:
Phone:
Phone:
Date:
Phone
Page: 1

Permit: AWS400019 Owner - Facility: Roy S Jones
Inspection Date: 11/10/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 400019
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Q Swine - Feeder to Finish 4,896 1,287
Total Design Capacity: 4,896
Total SSLW: 660,960
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
kgoon 1 04/15/91 19.00 37.00
Page: 2

- ;.�
.: S:;

9
Permit: AWS400019 Owner - Facillty: Roy S Jones Facility Number: 400019
Inspection Date: 11/10/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes No NA
NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ ■ ❑
❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ ■ ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
Cl 01111
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes No NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (LeJ large trees, severe
❑ ■ ❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed andlor managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑ ■ ❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑ ■ ❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑ ■ 0
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS400019 Owner - Facility: Roy S Jones
Facility Number: 400019
Inspection Date: 11 /1012010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑
■
❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
■
❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■
❑
❑
18, Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■
❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
■
❑
❑
20, Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS400019 Owner - Facility: Roy S Jones
Facility Number: 400019
Inspection Date: 11110/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA
NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ ■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ ■
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)? ❑ ■
❑
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ■
❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ ■
❑
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ ■
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ ■
❑
❑
Yan Nn
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

A
Permit: AWS400019 Owner - Facility: Roy S Jones
Inspection Date: 11/10/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Other Issues
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewtinspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Facility Number: 400019
Reason for Visit: Routine
Page: 6

E Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400019 Facility Status: Active Permit: 6M400019 1 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection _ Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Greene Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 10/29/2009 Entry Time: 08 35 AM Exit Time:
Farm Name: Roy Jones Farrn
Owner: Roy S Jones
Incident #:
Owner Email:
Phone: [phone]
T11
11 .. 3Rie7:C�•rlf:I:�
Physical Address: 7094 Beaman Ol¢ Creek Rd Walstonburg NC 27888
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy -Brown, LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35"32'07" Longitude: 77°43'26"
From Kenansville take NC 903 N to Snow Hill follow NC 903 N until intersection of US 258 N after intersecting US 258 N, turn Lt.
onto NC 91 and an almost immediate Lt. turn onto SR 1247 follow for 4,5 miles until it intersects SR 1222, follow SR 1222
Question Areas:
a Discharges & Stream impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
jo Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Roy S Jones Operator Certification Number: 22394
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Re prosentative(s): Name T'itte Phone
24 hour contact name Vernon Jones Phone:
On -site representative Vernon Jones Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone.
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis:
10-23-09 1.2
1-23-09 1.3
soil tested 2008
calibration 2008 sludge survey 2009 (today)
Page: 1

Permit: AWS400019 Owner - Facility: Roy S Jones
Inspection Date: 10/2912009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 400019
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 41896 4,800
Total Design Capacity: 4,896
Total SSLW: 660,960
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon
1
04/15/91
19.00
32.00
Page: 2

Penult: AWS400019 Owner - Facility: Roy 5 Jones Facility Number: 400019
Inspection Date: 10129/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts You No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) 11000
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑ ■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
❑ ■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ ■
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑ ■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑ ■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑ ■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS400019 Owner - Facility: Roy S Jones Facility Number: 400019
Inspection Date: 1012912009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Vlsit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
PAN? ❑
Is PAN } 10%/10 lbs.? ❑
Total P2O5? ❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? ❑
Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑
Evidence of wind drift? ❑
Application outside of application area? ❑
Crop Type 1 Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 2 Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑
■
❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
■
❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
■
❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■
❑ ❑
1 B. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■
❑ ❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
■
❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriale box below.
Wt1P? ❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS400019 Owner - Faculty: Roy S Jones Facility Number: 400019
Inspection Date. 10129/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design?
Maps?
Other?
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after> 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ ■
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑ ■
❑
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ■
❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ ■
❑
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ ■
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ ■
❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑ ■
❑
❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AWS400019 Owner - Facility; Roy S Jones Facility Number: 400019
Inspection Date: 10/2912009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? Q ■ Q O
32. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? Q ■ ❑ 0
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? Q ■ 0 Q
Page: 6

Division of Water Quality
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400019 _ Facility Status: Active _ Permit: AWS400019 t_! Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Greene Region: Washington
Date of Visit: Q8127 0/2 08 - Entry Time:1153 AM _ Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: Roy Jones Fans Owner Email:
Owner: Roy S Jones Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 7094 Beaman OI Creek Walstonburo NC 27888
=, • • - 1 ..gjW*=- 733
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy -Brown. LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°32'OT' Longitude: 77°43'26"
From Kenansville take NC 903 N to Snow Hill follow NC 903 N until intersection of US 258 N after intersecting US 258 N, turn Lt.
onto NC 91 and an almost immediate Lt. turn onto SR 1247 follow for 4.5 miles until it intersects SR 1222, follow SR 1222
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Ashley Lynn Jones Operator Certification Number: 987241
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Vernon Jones Phone:
On -site representative Vernon Jones Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer . Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis:
5-19-08 = 1.9
1-16-08 = 1.5
Page: 1

Permit: AWS400019 Owner - Facility: Roy S Jones
Inspection Date: 08/27/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number:400019
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 4,896 4,700
Total Design Capacity: 4,896
Total SSLW: 660,960
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
kgoon 1 04/15/91 19.00 30.00
Page: 2

Permit: AWS400019 Owner - Facility: Roy S Jones Facility Number: 400019
Inspection Date: 08/27/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■
❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
G
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
001111
improvement?
Waste Application Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS400019 Owner - Facility. Roy S Jones
Inspection Date: 08/27/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number. 400019
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No
NA
NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%1101bs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Coastal
Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain
Overseed
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■
❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■
❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■
❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■
❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■
❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP? D
Page: 4

Permit: AWS400019 Owner - Facility: Roy S Jones Facility Number: 400019
Inspection Date: 08/27/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Other? ❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
■
❑
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■
❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28 Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■
❑
❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AWS400019 Owner - Facility: Roy S Jones
Facility Number : 400019
Inspection Date. 08/27/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
C1fFhnr Icminc Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss reviewiinspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
00110
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 6

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400019 Facility Status: ActivC Permit: AWS400019 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Qomplianoe lasoectionInactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routines County: Greene Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 10/2412007 Entry Time:0_9:10 AM F)dt Time: Incident #.
Farm Name: Roy Jones Farm _ T` Owner Email:
Owner: Roy S Jones Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 7094 Beaman OI Creek Walstonburg NC 27888
Physical Address: 7094 ftamab Old Creek Rd Walstonbura NC 27888
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Faun: Latitude: 35"32'01" Longitude: 77"43'32=
From Kenansville take NC 903 N to Snow Hill follow NC 903 N until intersection of US 258 N after intersecting US 258 N, turn Lt
onto NC 91 and an almost immediate U. turn onto SR 1247 follow for 4.5 miles until it intersects SR 1222, follow SR 1222
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Roy S Jones Operator Certification Number. 22394
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
On -site representative Vernon Jones Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis:
1-17-07 = 1.4
sludge analysis: Lagoon #1 was cleaned out in March 2007
27.2 on 1.3-07
soil test 2007
waste structure cleanout in 2007. Lagoon looks Great!
Page: 1

Permit: AWS400019 Owner - Facility: Roy S Jones
Inspection Date: 10/24/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspecton
Facility Number: 400019
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 4,896 5,000
Total Design Capacity: 4,896
Total SSLW: 660,960
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
lagoon 1 04/15/91 19.00 43.00
Page: 2

3
Permit: AWS400019 Owner - Facillty: Roy S Jones
Facility Number: 400019
Inspection Date: 10/24/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No NA NE
1. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
11000
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
000
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
000
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0 ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a ❑
■ ❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
M ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the pennit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■ ❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■ ❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■ ❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS400019 Owner - Facility: Roy S Jones
Inspection Date: 10/24/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance tnspecton
Facility Number: 400019
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN n 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
1 B. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS400019 Owner - Facility: Roy S Jones
Inspection Date: 10/24/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Records and Documents
Checklists?
Design?
Maps?
Other?
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Facility Number: 400019
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after a 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■ ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
■ ❑
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
0110
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■ ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■ ❑
❑
-14_..
Y..
Nn N3
NF
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern?' If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AWS400019 Owner - Facility: Roy S Jones Facility Number: 400019
Inspection Date: 10/24/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewfinspectlon with on -site representative? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 6

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number : 400019 Facility Status: Active Permit: NCA240019 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Comoliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Elate:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Greene Region:
Date of Visit: 03/16/2006 Entry Time:08:10 AM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: Boy Jones Fans _ .. � _ Owner Email:
Owner: Roy S Jones Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: MBox 39-A Walstonburo NC 27888
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°32'01" Longitude: 77°43'32"
From Kenansville take NC 903 N to Snow Hill; follow NC 903 N until intersection of US 258 N; after intersecting US 258 N, turn Lt.
onto NC 91 and an almost immediate Lt. turn onto SR 1247; follow for 4.5 miles until it intersects SR 1222, follow SR 1222 ror 3.0
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Roy S Jones Operator Certification Number: 22394
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
On -site representative Roy Jones Phone:
24 hour contact name Roy Jones Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
waste analyses: lbs.N11000gal
12-20-05 = 1.4
09-13-05 = 1.1
06-14-05 = 1.7
3-18-05 = 1.9
Soil samples 2005 & 2006
Page: 1

Permit: NCA240019 Owner - Facility: Roy S Jones
Facility Number: 400019
Inspection Date: 03/16/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
O Swine - Feeder to Finish 4,896 43,500
Total Design Capacity: 4,896
Total SSLW: 660,960
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon 1 04/15/91 19.00 25,DO
Page: 2

Permit: NCA240019 Owner - Facility: Roy S Jones Facility Number: 400019
Inspection Date: 03/16/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No
NA
NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
■
❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑
❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■
❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes,'is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Led large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
Cl
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

Permit: NCA240019 Owner - Facility: Roy S Jones Facility Number: 400019
Inspection Date: 03/16/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection. Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
PAN? ❑
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.? ❑
Total P205? ❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? ❑
Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑
Evidence of wind drift? ❑
Application outside of application area? ❑
Crop Type 1 Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay, Pasture)
Crop Type 2 Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■ ❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fall to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of property operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■ 0
Q
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP? ❑
Page: 4

Permit: NCA240019 Owner - Facility: Roy S Jones
Facility Number: 400019
Inspection Date: 03/16/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No NA
NE
Checklists?
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
Q
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ 000
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES
only)? ❑ ■ ❑
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
©■ ❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous lass assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
Yes Nn NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
29_ Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: NCA240019 Owner - Facility: Roy 5 Jones
Facility Number: 400019
Inspection Date: 03/16/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues
Yes No
NA
NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑ ■
❑
❑
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewfiinspection with on -site representative?
❑ 0
❑
❑
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ ■
❑
❑
Page: 6

of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
on for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up Q Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access %
Facility Number 40 1q Date of Visit: 4-2$-2004 Time: 8:3D
O Not Operational O Below Threshold
® Permitted a Certified 0 Conditionally Certified © Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:...................
FarmName: &Y19.11aCaxB]Cn........................................................................................... County: Giesi e............................................... WA►RO.......
OwnerName: Ra..................... :.................... joXtes ............................................................ Phone No, 252.-.7.47:-3989 ..........................................................
MailingAddress: Rjj,.BRX.39zA....................................................................................... W.IibjQ.RbMr N.C................................................. 2. A.&.............
FacilityContact: ....................... :...................................................... Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
Onsite Representative: .S cr-UPA..Joeles............................................................•................. Integrator:lyeurphy.) 8xi11j1'. 8xtM.................
Certified Operator:Roy..S...................................... 1MV1 ................................................. Operator Certification Number:2.239 .............................
Location of Farm:
From Kenansville take NC 903 N to Snow Hill; follow NC 903 N until intersection of US 258 N; after intersecting US 258 N,
turn Lt. onto NC 91 and an almost immediate Lt. turn onto SR 1247; follow for 4.5 miles until it intersects SR 1222, follow �
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 32 s 01 Longitude 77 43 32 °
Design Current
Design
Current
Design Current -
Swine Capacity Population
Poultry Capacity
Population Cattle
Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Layer
❑ Dairy
® Feeder to Finish
4896
4890
JEI Non -Layer
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish
I
I
Total Design Capacity
4,896
❑ Gilts
Total SSLW
660,960
❑ Boars
Number of Lagoons 1
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes N No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gallmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes N No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes N No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes N No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier. .................................................. ..................................... ................................... ......................................................................
Freeboard (inches): 25
12112103 Continued

Facility Number: 4fl-19 Date of Inspection 4-28-2004
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes M No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or ❑ Yes M No
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes M No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes M No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level ❑ Yes M No
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes M No
11, Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes M No
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Hay) Small'Grain Overseed
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes M No
14.
a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
M No
16.
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
M No
Odor Issues
17.
Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
❑ Yes
❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18.
Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
❑ Yes
M No
19.
is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
❑ Yes
M No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? if yes, contact a regional
❑ Yes
M No
Air Quality representative immediately.
Comments (refer to'quesfion'#): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations onany other comments
Copy
.
Use drawings of facdity to better eap1"' situahons (use additions! pages as necessary): ❑ Field Co M Final Notes
Reviewer/Inspector Name Marlene ' D. Salyer
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
12112103 ( Continued

Facility Number: AO-19 Date of inspection 4-28-2004
Required Records & Documents
21. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available? ❑ Yes N No
22. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes N No
23. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes N No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Sampling
24. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
N No
25.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
N No
26.
Fail to notify -regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
N No
27.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
N No
28.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
N No
29.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
N No
NPDES Permitted Facilities
30.
Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35)
® Yes
❑ No
31.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
N No
32.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
N No
33.
Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey?
❑ Yes
N No
34.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
N No
35.
Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
N No
❑ Stocking Form ❑ Crop Yield Form ❑ Rainfall ❑ Inspection After V Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form
©
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
dditional.Com'm' eats an&67r.,Drawings:. k ,
s{
Irrigation equipment callibration on 8-27-03 AL
The freeboard and rain events are recorded weekly.
Waste analysis: 2-9-04 = 2.3; 9-3-03 = 1.3; 6-5-03 = 2.0; 2-28-03 = 2.4; 1-17-03 = 2.7
irrigation records are complete and balanced out.
Is: there was a note from Souther States, Lee Potter; explaining that SS had taken the samples in June 2003 but the NCDA Lab had
them. Another sample was pulled on January 14, 2004 and is back from the loab on 3-3-04.
12112103

Technical Assistance Site Visit Report
• Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Natural Resources Conservation Service
O Soil and Water Conservation District
O Other...
Facility Number 4Q - 19 Date: 10/23/03 Time: 1 1300 Time On Farm: 50 WARO
Farm Name Roy Jones Farm County Greene Phone:
Mailing Address Rt 1 Box 39-A
252-747-3989
Walstonburg NC 27888
Onsite
Representative Vernon Jones Integrator Purphy Brown
Type Of Visit
Compliance Inspection (pilot only)
Technical Assistance
Confirmation for Removal
❑ No Animals -Date Last Operated:
❑ Operating below threshold
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse
Purpose Of Visit
OO Routine
O Response to DWQ/DENR referral
O Response to DSWC/SWCD referral
O Response to complaintllocal ' referral
O Requested by producer/integrator
O Follow-up
O Emergency
O Other...
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Capacity Population
❑ Layer
❑ .
El
Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
4896
3600
❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
GENERAL QUESTIONS:
1. Is waste discharging from any part of the operation aid reaching surface waters or wetlands? ❑ yes ® no
2. Is there evidence of a past waste discharge from any part of the operation that waste reached ❑ yes ® no
surface waters or wetlands?
3. Does any problem pose an immediate threat to the integrity of the waste structure (large trees, ❑ yes ® no
seepage, severe erosion, etc.)?
4. Is there evidence of nitrogen over application, hydraulic overloading or excessive ponding ❑ yes ® no
requiring DWQ notification?
6• Is there evidence of improper dead animal disposal that poses a threat to the environment ❑ yes ® no
and/or public health?
6. Is the waste level within the structural freeboard elevation range for any waste structure? ❑ yes ® no
Structurel Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier
Level (Inches) 34
CROP TYPES 1coastal Bermuda -hay ISmall grain overseed
SPRAYFIELD
SOIL TYPES WaB
7. What type of technical assistance does the onsite representative feel is needed? (list in comment section)
03/10/03

0 Sr
Facility Number 40 - 19 Date:
10/23/03
PARAMETER
O No assistance provided/requested
❑ 8. Waste spill leaving site
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE Needed
Provided
❑ 9. Waste spill contained on site
25• Waste Plan Revision or Amendment
El
El
❑ 10. Level In structural freeboard
26. Waste Plan Conditional Amendment
❑
❑
❑ 11. Level in storm storage
27. Review or Evaluate Waste Plan wlproducer
❑
❑
❑ 12. Waste structure integrity compromised
28. Forms Need (list in comment section)
❑
El
El 13. Waste structure needs maintenance
29. Missing Components (list in comments)
❑
❑
[114. Over application >= 10% & 10 lbs.
❑
❑
❑ 15. Over application < 10% or < 10 lbs.
30. 21-1.0200 re -certification
❑ 16. Hydraulic overloading
31. Five & Thirty day Plans of Action (PoA)
❑
❑
32. Irrigation record keeping assistance
❑
❑
❑ 17. Deficient irrigation records
❑ 18. Late/missing waste analysis
33. Organizelcomputerization of records
❑
❑
❑ 19. Late/missing lagoon level records
34. Sludge Evaluation
❑
❑
❑ 20, Late/missing soils analysis
❑ 21. Crop needs improvement
35. Sludge or Closure Plan
❑
❑
❑ 22. Crop inconsistent with waste plan
36. Sludge removallclosure procedures
❑
❑
37. Waste Structure Evaluation
❑
❑
❑ 23. Irrigation maintenance deficiency
❑ 24. Deficient sprayfield conditions
38. Structure Needs Improvement
❑
❑
39. Operation & Maintenance Improvements
❑
❑
40. Marker checklcalibration
❑
❑
Regulatory Referrals
41.'Site evaluation
❑
❑
❑ Referred to DWQ Date:
42. Irrigation Calibration
❑
❑
❑ Referred to NCDA Date:
43. Irrigation designlinstallation
El
El
Other...
system
Date:
44. Secure Irrigation Information (maps, etc.)
❑
❑
LIST IMPROVEMENTS
45. Operating improvements (pull signs, etc.)
❑
❑
MADE BY OPERATION
46. Wettable Acre Determination
❑
❑
1
47. Evaluate WAD certificationlrechecks
❑
❑
48. Crop evaluationlrecommendations
❑
❑
2.
49. Drainage workievaluation
❑
❑
50. Land shaping, subsoiling, aeration, etc.
51. Runoff control, stormwater diversion, etc.
❑
❑
❑
❑
3
52. Buffer improvements
❑
❑
53. Field measurements(GPS, surveying, etc.)
❑
❑
4.
54. Mortality BMPs
❑
❑
55. Waste operator education (NPDES)
5'
56. Operation & maintenance education
❑
❑
67. Record keeping education
❑
❑
s
58. Croplforage management education
❑
❑
59. Soil and/or waste sampling education
❑
❑
03/10/03

Facility Number 40 - 19 Date: 10/23/03
ICOMMENTS:
;UG datea April 9, 2UU3 ana on site.
nstalled rain break on irrigation pump.
rrigation reel has been calibrated.
flake records available for 5 years.
Zemember to secure annual sludge survey.
feed to complete and return Stop Irrigation Event form to DWQ ASAP.
Haste analysis dated 9/3/03 nitrogen is 1.3 lbs
615103 nitrogen is 2.0 lbs
2/28/03 nitrogen is 2.4 lbs
1/17/03 nitrogen is 2.7 lbs
10/11/02 nitrogen is 1.6 lbs
6/6102 nitrogen is 3.3 lbs
5. Discussed NPDES and transferring information to new forms.
RR2 records are complete and balanced.
),oil test for 2003 have been taken - results lost in mail. Producer to retake samples by Dec 31, 2003.
_agoon level is recorded weekly with drops in lagoon consistent with irrigation events.
:arm is well maintained.
imall grain overseed to be planted in one week.
TECHNICAL SPECIALIST Martin McLawhorn
SIGNATURE
Date Entered: 10/30/03 Entered By: IMartin McLawhorn
3 03/10/03

Michael F, casiey
Governor
William G: Ross J,-, Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
January 2, 2003
Mr. Roy Jones
Roy Jones Farm &
Roy Jones Farm 92
7094 Beaman Old Creek Road
Walstonburg, NC 27888
SUBJECT: Animal Feedlot Operation Compliance Inspection &
Request for Information
Facility No. 40-19 & 40-38
Greene County
Dear Mr. Jones:
On December 18, 2002, 1 conducted Animal Feedlot Operation Compliance Inspections at the referenced facilities. The
Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP) was not readily available for review at these facilities. Therefore, the
records and documents of the CAWMP could not be reviewed during the inspections_
In general, this inspection includes verifying that: (1) the farm has a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP);
(2) the farm is complying with requirements of the State Rules 15 NCAC 2H.0217, Senate Bill 1217, and the Certified Animal
Waste Management Plan; (3) the farm operation's waste management system is being operated property under the
direction of a Certified Operator, (4) the required records are being kept; (5) there are no signs of seepage, erosion, and/or
runoff.
You are requested within 10 days of receipt of this letter to send a copy of the following records for each farm to the DWQ-
Washington Regional Office: last two waste analysis reports, soil analysis reports for 2001 & 2002, freeboard level records
for 2002 and complete copies of your IRRA and IRR-2 forms for the 2001 & 2002 receiving crops. Once this information is
received in the Washington Regional Office, it will be reviewed and the Compliance Inspection completed. If the
Washinaton Reaionai Office -does not receive this information within 10 days, this facility will be in violation of its
General Permit and subject to an aonropriate enforcement action. The requested information should be mailed to the
following address:
Daphne B. Cullom
Division of Water Quality
943 Washington Square Mall
Washington, NC 27889
The recommendations andior comments regarding your inspection can be found in the comment section of the attached
inspection form. It is very important as the owner and Operator in Change that you address any noted concerns, as soon as
possible.
Thank you for your cooperation and assistance. Should you have further questions or comments regarding this
inspection, do not hesitate to call me at (252) 94"481, ext. 321.
Sincerely, 1
Daphne B. Cullom
Environmental Specialist II
cC: WaRO-Animal Compliance
DBC files
943 Washington Square Mall Washington, NC 27889 252-946-6481 (Telephone) 252-946-9215 (Fax)

0
` {r %t.J. .� vi i-•. YY. �' •:u2%m'< .% Joey T.32 i-":K. .:-F• ,s-.-'.S ,Y- v%tiY '''!%ir C'�.._ JM1`: �n
�
Q�Mson Sa7::ad Water Canaer,�sieon'
AL;.
O OQeon WiWewy,� -0 Lagoon Evaluation
type of Visit �? Compliance lnspechon r�
W- �..�- •g L.+ '{�f L-'E'3'.'le •-T_..fi•.' 2.1-.+c.�`�'� r'^. Ci�.wr1.•!-'M--�"� 1�r �y �'.�i.f�j!��Y- •- �yr
Reason fct Vl . +''Ronne ComplWnt: O Fopow Access ups_O Emergency No1>ftcahon O,Other ❑ Denied'
.O
•
+yti�Sy. emu.. -
[,t
�, s [ ;, __.Si • sy. w.-+-: _ V �sy - '�e''e YMt� Of ViS+_ �i J.f✓�OlfrWfir i VYil+..i0�.,.R E' r
O Not 0 rntionalt'O Beldw Threshold
_ ®Fermin & M Certified 1 Condilionaih Ceitifed ©Registered _ ti t� -x
= Date Las Operated o� Ali"aye`�Thfishold:
z - -
Farm Names R[WlQnra SIinrn Carrnrty. -- ------a----- _ AtARQ—_
u•s _.V' -1
wne
? Or Name 8 -�,� a _ n M T Phane
man 1
ng Aiiss21 Ro-
z MZZ
au cldeeDid hkk �x Rd �
n.M1�-'i ;'X .�-•rr'�C _' -.i-v "r- "�'S 'K Y x a.G S[.�-.*G72G�,,,�-i..�
3' FaciltyiContact. 1"rtle.�YA a �PhoneNo-
� s"A` ,- s� cam, Z -�.: .� n--�'�'�'+ � y'v�:'""ys�l'R , u-�•'�+,'�,�� �S 5�"� �G 7«� -.r ..,.K,•; �f--sT�n„s � ��" tY'�•'F'� :-. � � .'.�i - w
fi., "'ri,,��. - c' .r tea` t t �' �.y •x �-„
�*s.,.y� § Z 1� 'f �r .."t .k,.�;.
Onsite Ref esentafi� e_8�:.T41x�' `� :�` ' '; Integrator• M1tg1 I'am�l1Y "'
rtified U rator boy
:Ce pe 5�� ��. ,,, ,,OP�rato._ r�Certdcatton Nnmber4. „...
_ }y _ ram, :"i yl �"t' ;•c-. '." b4 "--...' ,+;_'• i a";.i
xLocation of Farm —
ram Kenans-le take NC 903 N to Snow HID, foRaw NC 903 N until mtersertion''of US 258 N; after intersecting US 258 N. H
�v Lt. onto NC 91 and mediat an almost ime Lt:1 if onto SR_ 1247-'folloiv foe4.5 hula umtrllft interaecta SR 1222 follow SR
' ®Swine ❑ Poultry ❑Cattle ❑Horse Latitude = 35 • 32'' ' Ol `" Longitude = 77 " • 43 ' 32 "^
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
..............:.......
48% Unknown ❑Non -Layer
pother
Discharges & Stream Impacts
i. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Dicharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a_ If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b- If discharge is obsen ed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes. notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaVmin?
d- Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify- DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3- Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment -
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure l Structure 2 Stractue 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: ..
Freeboard (inches): _...--•--2$..__.....__,
- ❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ER No
❑ Yes M No
❑ Yes 0 No
Structure 6
I

Facility Number. 40-19 Date of Inspection 12/18/20D2
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
❑ Yes ® No
�^•�^a 'bi'"c 1�- a°•-x'�. � +�Ya.'x�.��'r"�`, t'Z��ix,�.rt s, -a=4t �'� : ..r•'Ys��^"+:�"��- r•,��:.��.}..-.:. `F�—p—f; �'.t�'-)'..'-.
"properly
'
c.. 1� 6 Are there` on -`site which are not iiW& managed drnongb a waste management or
..
closure plsn7 fT w a ;z - :: w _ . x"
❑ Yes ®No
any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, -and the`shustion poses an
_ ®mediate public hesith or environmentai.threat; notify DWQ) • -
7 Do any of the structox s-h6W �a Erl ap_ W,cment'1
❑ Yes ® No
_
8 Does any of the waste management system other than' waste � require. mamdenancerunpravement?
❑Yes ®No
part
9 Do any. Est ctures lack adegn ga id `markers with iegnhed Twunimn and mimimnm -liquid level
elevation markings? ., <_ = • r" r- -
❑ Yes ®No
Waste Application
=
-77 i-
10, Are there any buffers that need MAW,== /Opra Cni ut?
[IYes No
t 27
P _ H, dranlic Overload Excessive PAN '
-. "on7 ❑ ❑ y
--:11. Is theme evidence of aver licatz - �� -
-YeNo
❑ ❑
_❑ . - -
-
•x 5. 12; Crop-
i t„ �p :5:- r.csi ...;.=Y4's+ J ?• C`� r•. +r � {'+•",. N t
t 13 I)o the receiving crops differ with those designated m fire Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
]] Yes _ ❑ No.
�r
E l4 aj Does Ste facility lack adsgtiate acreage for land appl>ca>7on� _
yes No
❑ ❑
.,.,,F��,•,..;,��,�.�. ``�"'�``-����•��`.�,"r`� ,... -
"` j ' '
Yes No
❑ ❑
b) Does the facility need a wettalle acre won? -
c) This facility is pendecl_for a wettable acre detGrmmation?
❑Yes [] No
l i Does the icoeivmg crap. need mnpr m�i nv
❑Yes ®No
y!e
=
=- . 16Is there a lack of adequate waste- application equipment?
❑ Yes N No
Reg -mired Records & Documents,'
i 47. Fail to have Ces�ofCa rige k General Per_nit or other 1?6m readily naable? -
❑ Yes ❑ No
18, Does the facility fail to have all cornlponents of the Certified Antral Waste Management Plan readily available?
- (ie! WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes ❑ No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie(irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes ❑ No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
[I Yes ® No
t• - -
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes Z No
`• 22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ disc*ge; freeboard problems,_ over application)
[I Yes ❑ No
23. Did Reviewerllnspector fail to discuss reviewrmspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes ® No
' 24. Does facility regnire'a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes 0 No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No
0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit
❑ Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
submit your CAWMP records to the DWQ-WaRO for reviewto complete with Compliance Inspection- if you have and questions,
call 252-946-6481, ext. 321.
Reviewer/Inspector Name
�avasv ar/Ino�►anfn� Cianatra.d�Q f1 Lt n w I -& L � i 11-1 - n.*.. 11 Z 1 o m>

NJ, �,J,
,AYV
1 ry
�eeTO,

Michael t=. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
Division of Water Quality
To: Producer
From: Daphne B. Cullom
Environmental Specialist
Washington Regional Office
Subject: Animal Compliance inspection
Year 2002
Enclosed please find a copy of the Compliance Site Inspection (as viewed in the DWQ database) conducted at the referenced facility
by the Division of Water Quality from the Washington Regional Office. Please read this inspection and keep it with all other
documents pertaining to your animal operation for future inspections.
In general, these inspections included verifying that: (1) the farm has a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP); (2) the
farm is complying with requirements of the State Rules 15 NCAC 2I30217, Senate Bill 1217, and the Certified Animal Waste
Management Plan; (3) the farm operation's waste management system is being operated properly under the direction of a Certified
Operator; (4) the required records are being kept; and (5) there are no signs of seepage, erosion, and/or nutoi£
As a'reminder, please note the following comments, which are conditions of the Certified Aninud Waste Management Plan and the
General Permit; therefore, these items must be implemented:
cp The maximum waste level in lagoons/storage ponds shall not exceed that specified in the CAWMP. At a minimum, maximum waste
level for waste for lagoons/storage ponds must not exceed the level that provides adequate storage to contain 25 year, 24 hour storm
event plus an additional foot of structural freeboard.
(p An analysis of the liquid animal waste from the lagoon shall be conducted as close to the time of application as practical and at least
within 60 days (before or after) of the date of application. This analysis shall include the following parameters: Nitrogen,
Phosphorus, Zinc and Copper.
q) Soil analysis is required annually. Lime is to be applied to each receiving crop as recommended by the soil analysis.
(p The following records are required: off -site solids removal, maintenance, repair, wastelsod analysis and land irrigation records.
"These records should be maintained by the facility owner/manager in chronological and legible form for a minimum of three years.
9 band application rates shall be in accordance with the CAWMP. In no case shall land application rates exceed the Plant Available
Nitrogen (PAN) rate for the receiving crop or result in runoff during any given application.
4 All grassed waterways shall have a stable outlet with adequate capacity to prevent ponding or flooding damages. The outlet can be
another vegetated channel, an earth ditch, stabilization structure, or other suitable outlets.
(p It is su ,gested. not a re4uiremen to keep crop yield information for future use to update your waste management plan. You will
need three years of crop yield data before your plan can be updated -
For your information, any swine facility that has a discharge to surface waters of the State will have to apply for a National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit with the Division of Water Quality, effective January 1, 2001.
Thank you for your assistance and cooperation during the inspection. If you have any questions, please contact me at 252-946-6481, ext.
321 or your Technical Specialist.
Cc: WaRO ✓
DBC Files
943 Washington Square Mall Washington, NC 27889 252-945-6481 (Telephone) 252-946-9215 (Fax)

6
of Visit OO Compliance Inspection O Operation Review Q Lagoon Evaluation
for Visit O• Routine. O Complaint O Follow up Q Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 4p 19 Date of Visit: 12/18/2002 Time: 12:38
Q erationa] Q Below Threshold
M Permitted i Certified E3 Conditionally Certified i] Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ............
Farm Name: ftyl .fA noq..................................................................................... . County: Gxwne............................ .................. WA O.......
Owner Name: t,1t ........ �. ...................... JQttN...... ... .....................
Phone No:
Mailing Address: T B�a�oq,�tu.Qld.Gr aad—._. ............. Wa1�tw h C..... ............... ........................... 27811.............
Facility Contact:.............................................................................. Title:..................................... Phone No
Onsite Representative: Roy..aanea......... ......... ....... ....................... ........... ............... ..... 'Wegratorr Murphy.Fa ift.Y.umm........_..........................
Certified Operator: RQ,y. ..... _.....�.................. d............................................ Operator Certification Number: 22391............................
Location of Farm:
rem Kenansville take NC 903 N to Snow Hill; follow NC 903 N until intersection of US 258 N; after intersecting US 258 N, +
rn Lt. onto NC 91 and an almost immediate Lt. turn onto SR 1247; follow for 4.5 miles until it intersects SR 1222, follow SR
M Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Morse Latitude 35 • 32 t 01 '� Longitude 77 43 632
Discharees & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b_ If discharge is observed, did it reach Rater of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ)' ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, -what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, uotify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes M No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes M No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes M No
Structure i Structure 2 Sinicture 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Stricture 6 '
Identifier: .... ..... ......................... .................................... ................................... ............ ....................... ................. . ................. ....................................
Freeboard(inches): ............... za............ ................................ .... .................. ...................

u.3Vusiul
Facility Number. 40 —19
Date of Inspection 12/18/2002
1, 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/fmprovement?
9. Do any strictures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Hay) Small Grain Overseed
wnanuru
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes N No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(iel WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (iel irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(iel discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/lnspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes to No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ® No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ® No
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit•
❑ Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
submit your CAWMP records to the DWQ-WaRO for review to complete with Compliance Inspection. If you have any questions,
call 252-946-6481, ext. 321.
Reviewed CAWMP records 1/30/2003. D. Cullom. Freeboard levels recorded weekly. Waste analysis 10/11/2002 1.6 Ibs./1000 gals.,
1/17/2003 2.7 lbs./1000 gals., 6/6/2002 3.3 lbs./1000 gals., Soil analysis 4/5/2002, line as recommended; Irrigation records complete with a
nitrogen balance, no overapplication noted.
Reviewer/inspector Name
7?o�riamaniiffa�+anfnr Cinno4ar � �� iiaio•
_4a? 103

of Visit O Compliance Inspection Q Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
IReasonforVisit *Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
FacHity Number 40 19 Date of Visit: 6119l2002 Time: 1130
I '
Q Not O erational 0 Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified © Conditionally Certified d Registered Date East Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name: RWjQ.k1C10R................... Count:.Gl]Re............................................... V1r-All�.�?.......
---............................ ...... ..
Owner Name: Ray ............ - ...-•--••-. ,J<ones............... .... ..... Phone No: 2517.47.3M........ ....................
Mailing Address: Rl_1.BUX.32_A........................................ _............ ................................. Walstez13u=LAC............................................ ..... 178M .............
Facility Contact: .............................................................................. Title: ... Phone No:
Onsite Representative: YenooA. on�.............................................................................. Integrator: Mar�hy -Famykarma ..............................
.......
Certified Operator: Roy..& .................... ............ lxi=..... ..... .................................... Operator Certification Number: 2,4.......
Location of Farm:
rom Kenansville take NC 903 N to Snow Hill; follow NC 903 N until intersection of US 258 N; after intersecting US 258 N, i
urn Lt. onto NC 91 and an almost immediate LL turn onto SR 1247; follow for 4.5 miles until it intersects SR 1222, follow SR r
®Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35OF32 Longitude ude 77 ' 43 32
Des�ga Current '. Design Ctfiwnt Design Current
5wme -:C a Po Watson . `� Ca a ' Po elation Cattle .. -Ca a . Po ulation
P3 P P3 P
❑ Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
4896
1200
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
.......: .... - -- ,
1 �❑ Subsurface Drains Present U❑ Lagoon Area J❑ Spray Field Area
No Liouid Waste
Discharges & Stream impacts
I . Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes ®No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made`.' ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is obsetveil, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) 0 Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, uoti�y DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge From any part of the operation? ❑ Yes N No
3. Were these any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? 0 Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes N No
Structure i Structure 2 Stmeture 3 Stricture 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier ..................................
Freeboard (inches): ...............3.a..................................................

05103101
Facility Number: 40-19
Date of Inspection 611912tD02
Continued
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/unprovement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require rrraintenance/improvement7
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop" Coastal Bermuda (Hay) Small Grain Overseed
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes N No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15_ Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
Ge/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did ReviewerAnspector fail to discuss review/mspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency9
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
���=1=1
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP.9 ❑ Yes N No
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
❑ Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
iil test dated for 2002 with GPS by Southern States. Lime applied to field #3 coastal Bermuda. Cu and Zn within guidelines.
ante analysis dated 6/6/02 Nitrogen is 3.3 lbs/1000 gallons
2113/02 nitrogen is 3.1 lbs/1000 gallons
10/30/01 nitrogen is 2.5 lbs/1000 gallons
rgoon level is recorded weekly.
xd to rebalance PAN for coastal bermuda hay after 5/21/02 using waste analysis dated 6/6/02. Analysis is 3.3 lbs/1000 gallons. No over
are
Reviewerlinspector Name M
Anvinvrnrlfnannw���• CisanaM ro•

05103101 Continued
Facility Number. 40-19 1 Date of Inspection 611912ti02
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 bours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
24. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ❑ No
n ..entsommor rawtngs� ,�. _
m
*Small amount of trash in lagoon needs to be removed.
*Coastal bermuda fields in eacellant condition.
*farm is well maintained

Type of Visit p Compliance Inspection a Operation Review p Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit a Routine p Complaint p Follow up p Emergency !Notification p Other p Denied Access
Facility Number Date of Visit: 8/1t1121101 Time: 1400
p Not Operationalp Below Threshold
Permitted E Certified p Conditionally Certified p Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:.. ..................•••••
Farm Name: Roy Jones Farm County: Grmne............................................... .WARO.......
Owner Name: Roy
Jones
Phone No: 252-747-3989
Mailing Address: Rt.1..Boat.39-A.......................................................................................WalstonlaurgNc................................................. 2,7888 ..............
FacilityContact: ...............................................................................Title:............................................................... Phone No: ....................................................
Onsite Representative: Vet:non.1Roy..Jones................................................................... Integrator: Murphy..Family.Farms......................................
Certified Operator: Riay.......................................... Jones ................................................. Operator Certification Numher: 22394........................
.....
Location of Farm:
rom Kenansville take NC 903 N to Snow follow NC 903 N until intersection o ; after intersecting
urn Lt. onto NC 91 and an almost immediate Lt. turn onto SR 1247; follow for 4.5 miles until it intersects SR 1222, follow
® Swine p Poultry p Cattle p Horse
�.
esrgn
Swine.. Capacity :Pop
Latitude ©• ©4 ®66 Longitude ©• ®° ©66
i =Poultry
p Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
[3 Farrow to Wean
p Farrow to Feeder
p Farrow to Finish
p Gilts
p Boars
iesrgn Current Design Current =:
opacity Populatton°W Gattle ;� Eapac�ty Population
p Dauy
p on- any
Total Design Capacity 4,896
Total SSLW Po 660,960
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? p Yes N No
Discharge originated at: 0 Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? p Yes p No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) [3 Yes p No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) 13 Yes p No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? p Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? 0 Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? p Spillway p Yes ®No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
......................................................................
Freeboard (inches): ................a4....................................................

k-acility NumWer: 40—t9 Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, E3 Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? p Yes N No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? H Yes p No
S. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? []Yes N No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
p Yes
N No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
p Yes
® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? p Excessive Ponding p PAN p Hydraulic Overload
p Yes
® No
12, Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Hay) Small Grain Overseed
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
p Yes
® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
p Yes
® No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
p Yes
® No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
p Yes
® No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
p Yes
® No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
p Yes
® No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
p Yes
N No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
p Yes
N No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
p Yes
®No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
p Yes
®No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
p Yes
®No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
p Yes
®No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
p Yes
®No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
p Yes
®No
p o violations or aeliciencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about is visit.
C�ommeots:(ref�r_flquestio_n#}:- Ezpiain a©yYES answers ahil7or'anyrecommendat�ons or}any ottier�corments
LTse drawings ofacity'> cr better explain situatronns use a ditip al a es:asPecessa - _ ____
( P g`) p Field Copy p Final Notes
*Lagoon freeboard level being recorded weekly as required by permit.
*Waste analysis dated 7/30/01 nitrogen is 3.4 lbs/1000 gallons
1/24/01 nitrogen is 2.6 lbs/1000 gallons
*Discussed IRR2/waste schedule.
*Need to rebalance PAN for coastal bermuda using waste analysis dated 7/30/01 for irrigation events in June 2001. No over application.
*Soil test dated 4/5/01. Lime requirements were met. Suggest keeping lime receipts.
7. Need to remove trash from lagoon -tornado spring 2001.
t
Reviewer/Inspector Name jMartin
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

05103101 Continued
Facility um er: 40_,19 Date of Inspection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below [3 Yes p No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? p Yes lq No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, p Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? p Yes ®No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) p Yes ® No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? p Yes ® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? p Yes p No

kAkRo
" Kschae_l F+. Easley
Covernor
G. R ilharn ass. Jr.
Depwhytent of Enwonnrerd and Kai18'di
t b i'KeiT T. Steams
ti Ihvision of Water Quality
To: Froduixr
From Daphne B. -Cullom
Environmental Specialist
Washington Regional Office
i Subject Animal. Compliance Inspection
Year2001 _
Enclosed please find a copy of the Compliance Site Inspection (as viewed"in the DWQ database) conducted at the referenced
facility -by the Division of Water Quality from the Washingts:ai Regional Office: Please read this inspection and keep it
with all other documents pertaining to your animal operation for future inspections.
In geaexai, these iiispectians included verifying thai (1)the farm has a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP);
(2) the farm is complying with requirements of the State Rules 15 NCAC 2110217, Senate Bill 1217, and the Certified Animal
Waste Managemern Plan; (3) the farm operation's waste management system is being operated properly under the direction of a
Certified Operator, (4) the required records are being kept; and (5) there are no signs of seepage, erosion, and/or runoff
As a reminder, please note the following comments, which are conditions of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan and
the General Permit; therefore, these items must be implemented:
(p The maximum waste level in lagoons/garage ponds shall not exceed that specified in the CA %W. At a minimum,
maximum waste level for waste for lagoons/storage ponds must not exceed the level that provides adequate storage to
contain 25 year, 24 hour storm event plus an additional foot of structural freeboard.
q) An analysis ofthe liquid animal waste from the lagoon shall be conducted as close to the time of application as practical and
at least within 60 days (before or after) of the date of application_ This analysis shall include the following parameters:
Ttrogen, Phosphorus, Zinc and Copp.
q) Soil analysis is required annually. Lime is to be applied to each receiving crop as recommended by the soil analysis.
(p The following records are required: off -site solids removal, maintenance, repair, waste/soil analysis and land irrigation
records. These records should be maintained by the facility owner/manager in chronological and legible farm for a
minimurm of three years.
q) Land application rates shall be in accordance with the CAWMP. In no case shall land application rates exceed the Plant
Available Nitrogen rate far the receiving crop or result in runoff during an eiven an liration_
q) All grassed waterways shall have a stable outlet with adequate capacity to prevent ponding or flooding damages, The outlet
can be another vegetated channel, an earth ditch, stabilization stricture, or other suitable outlets.
q, it is snggested,_not a regiiirenito keep crop yield information for future use to update your waste management plan.
You will need three years of crop yield data before your plan can be updated.
For your information, any swine fiudi ity that has a discharge to surface waters of the State will have to apply fix• a National
Pollutant urge Elimination System (NPDES) permit with the Division of Water Quality, effective January 1, 2001.
Thank you for your assistance and cooperation during the inspection. if you have any questions, please contact me at 252-946-
6481, ext 321 or your Technical SpeciaiisL
Cc: WaRO
DBC Files
943 Washington Square Mail Washinaton, NC Z7889 252-946-6481 (Telephone) 252-946-9215 (Fax)

- • Divisionof wafGi Quai� y M1 y
Q lfn�ston of Sad and Water Consetvatioa f f
_ Q Other��.� k s h f
� .L�� � s s .-�.v'Y!�- x r �4ay�s � ^$ ;r' r•'•{.�.'.Ji.� �� _ f �
Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation �' J
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
` Dnte(if N isle: S 15-2t101 Timr_ 13:35 am
g Facility Number 40 19
Q Not Operational Q Belon• Threshold
M Permitted ®Certified [3 Conditionally Certified [[ Registered pate Last Operated or Abm'e Threshold : .............
Farm Name: B.cty1f)jnmXAjrm......County: G.tine............................................... 3!4't�Q_.....-
Owner Name: Ray...... Phone No: 7
Mailing Address: Rt1.BnL39-& �. Wa1sti biam-NC....--......_...... 17.I1 ..............
FacilityContact Title: .... . ........... . ............................................. Phone No:...................................................
C)nsite Repm�rntatiz c:'Qrn4►70.,iQ11es.R ,LQnes-.- Inte��: ator: MtttPbi:Famifi:a[as.......................
Certified Operator: Roy .......................................... im............................ ......... ........ Operator Certification Number: 22J9.4.............................
Location of Farm:
From Kenansville take NC 903 N to Snow Hill; follow NC 903 N until intersection of US 258 N; after intersecting US 258 N, j
turn Lt. onto NC 91 and an almost immediate Lt. turn onto SR 1247; follow for 4.5 miles until it intersects SR 1222, follow SR
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ horse Latitude 35 ;' ;' 3; Ol •� L��nOtude. 77 f` I 43 : 32 �•
" -Design: - Current Design . .Carrent ...:;Current
. .
k
f
!
Swine.
Capacity Population
Poultry Capacity Po ulation Cattle Ca achy Po ulatiots
❑ Laver ❑ Dairy
10 Non -Laver J❑ Non -Dais -
❑Other
Total Design Capacity 4.896
Total SSLR' 660,960
❑ Wean to Feeder
I� Feeder to Finish
4896
4$OEl
I❑ Farrow to Wean
J❑ Farrow to Feeder
J❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars j
Number of Lagoons 10 Subsurface. Drains Present ❑ LaRoen ?,rea 113 Sn: rN- Field Ares
Holding Ponds] Solid Traps J❑ No Liquid Waste Management S,%-stem
Dischartes 8 Stream Impacts
1. Is am- discharge observed from am- part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance than -made?
b- If discharge is ob-encd, did it reach Water ofthe State? (If yes- ttotil}, D1X=Q)
c. If di;charize i�; nh;en e what the estitnatcd firnz' in gaihtiin?
d. Doe: dis: haz ne bypass: lagooti wstwitt? (If yes. notifi- DvvQ)
2. Is there e-6dence of past discharge from and° part of the operation?
3- Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
V aste Collection d Treatment
4- Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillwav
Str-ucinre 1 Sta-uctitre , Stn►ctune Stntcture 4 Structure
ltlentifwr:
El Yes fK' No
Yes ❑ No
'❑ Yes ❑ No
Yes n No
ED Yes 9 No
J Yes No
71 Yes No
Stnicturc 6
Fr c;c:a;dGn, hc.i: 32..

L15; U 3, 61
Facility Number: 40-19
Date of Inspection FT15- 0-0I
Conanuea
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any- of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion.
seepage.- etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not property addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
Or any of questions 46 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notift DWQ)
7. Do any.of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancelimprovement?
9. Do any strictures lack adequate. gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation mai-kings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11 _ Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Pondmg ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Hay) Small Grain Overseed
❑ Yes X, No
❑ Yes . X No
El Yes g No
❑ Yes 0 No
Yes No
❑ Yes ® No
❑Yes Z1No
13. Do the receiving crops differ witb those desimated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? 1E] Yes F No
14- a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes �� No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? E j Yes r No
c) This faciliw is pended for a wettable acre determination? U Yes 0 No
15. Does the recei-ing crop need improvement?
16- Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Docun--tents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readih• available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP_ checklists_ desim maps. etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation_ freeboard waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge_ freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did ItAn iewer/ln pector fail to discuss revie- /inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
E !! Yes No
f!1 Yes No
Yes No
J Yes No
Yes No
I Yes No
i Yes No
J Yes No
D Yes rK No
fD Yes 191 No
25. Were any additional problems noted which came noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ® No
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
tro�ents _(�+ei'er tosq #t�- Ezplaiu�nv YES answers and/or and i�eeomincndatuins ur:aov vt#er eomnzeuts
Use drawengs Mfacalrtf to better expldm�rivatwns.-�useaddrt�al pages as ssar})c
l,� Field Copy ❑ Final Notes , ..:�
*Waste analysis 1-24-2001, 2.6 lbs./l000 gals.
*Soil analysis 4-2001. lime as recommended.
*irrigation records complete with a nitrogen balance.
*Small grain PAN rate is 50 lbs. not 200 lbs./ Correct irrigation records for this winter.
*No overaplication noted.
*If you have any questions and/or need further guidance. please call me at [phone]. ext. 321 or Lyn Hardison at ext. 318.
Reviewer/Inspector Name D
Reviewer/Inspector Sienature:
Date:

05103101 Continued
Facilitf Number. 40-19 Date of Inspection S-i5-21>tll Printed on: 5212001
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement budding to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge atior below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (Le. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt
roads, building structure_ and/or public property)
29.. Is the land application sprat system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters. etc.)
3 L Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes EK No
❑ Yes ® No
0 Yes ® No
AddifionW Comments:'an or- mwmgs:, - r:

of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit *Routine O Complaint O Fallow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: 8/28l2000 Time: 1330
Facility Number 40 19
0 Not Operational Q Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified [3Conditionally Certified 13Registered Bate Last Operated or Above Threshold: ............
Farm Name: R+aylo maFArin............................................................................. ..... CountyGXMjMc ................................................ W..... ARO.......
OwnerName: Rqy.......................................... JoItch ............................................................ Phone No: 2.5Z-14.7,,3982........... ...............................................
Facility- Contact:
Title:
..................... Phone No:
Mailing Address: RI<.j.BQx.j9rA....................................................................................... W. t0nbjult7gC............................... 27.888.............
Onsite Representative. Vernoxiloxtes.............................................................................. Integrator: MVXVbY..FAnitsJFaMb.....................................
Certified Operator: Soy ........................................... jqE ux................................................ Operator Certification Number: 2239.4 .............................
Location of Farm:
From Kenansville take NC 903 N to Snow Hill; follow NC 903 N until intersection of US 258 N; after intersecting US 258 N,
turn Lt. onto NC 91 and an almost immediate Lt. turn onto SR 1247; follow for 4.5 miles until it intersects SR 1222, follow SR v.
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 • 32 < 01 Longitude 77 • 43 32 «
Desi n
. .. .. . ..........:...Ciiinacit
❑ Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
4896
4899
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
1
Subsurface Drains Present 11❑ Lagimn Area [❑ 5pray Field Area
No Liquid Waste
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes ®No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed. -was the conveyance man-made? ❑Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed. did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, uotify DWQ) [j yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed. ghat is the estimated flow in gaUvun?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon ,vslcr ? (If yes. notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Stnucture 5 - Structure 6
Identifier: ......... Pxiia alty. ..................................................................
Freeboard (inches): ................31....................

5100
Facility Number. 40-19 Date of Inspection 8/28/2000
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
I I . Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Hay) Small Grain Oversecd
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
h
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
a No violations; or'd' kk" iericies'were:dot'ed;during thisvisit:: Ytia will:reeeive"no further: •;-
correspondence about this.visit.. - -' -' . . ........ . . .. .
Last waste analysis dated 7/25/00 at 2.2 Ibs/1000 gals.
Previous analysis dated 4/3100 at 2.3 Ibs/1000 gals.
Lagoon level records complete.
Waste plan dated 6/13/96 with an overall PAN deficit of 146.7 lbs.
IRR2 complete and balanced.
Minor mowing needed on inside wall to allow for visual inspection.
Continued on back
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
N No
❑ Yes
N No
❑ Yes
N No
❑ Yes
N No
❑ Yes
N No
❑ Yes
N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ® No
[:]Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
t
Reviewer/Inspector Name

(Type of Visit OO Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation I
Reason for Visit OO Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number
Date of Visit: 5/24/2000 Time: 1:00 PM Printed on: 5/25/2000
40 19
Q Not Operational Q Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified 0 Conditionally Certified 13 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name: fitly. at=.Earm ........................................................................................... County: fixCgjag............................................... 1'4'.A►RQ.......
Owner Name: Roy .......................................... J.QAIU ....................... Phone No: 252.-7.47.-.3989 .................................
Facility Contact: ........... Phone No:........
..............................................................................Title:................................................._...................................---........
Mailing Address:t.1.RKQ:.FA....................................................................................... WA15tAlI�?lUlCg........................--- �.7.8�..............
Onsite Representative: 9y., (}J0.t<S..Y.gX.iI.RIA.J.Qa 5..................................................... Integrator:jy�tl]Cp4._F.a�ully_.FOCI s....................:....
Certified Operator:Roy.......................................... J.Qtkqn ................................................. Operator Certification Number:223.94....... _....................
Location of Farm:
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 • 32 4 OI u Longitude 77 • 43 G 32 u
Design Current
Swine Canacity Ponulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
4896
4000
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Ca acitY Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer 10 Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design'Capacity 4,896
Totah SSLW 660,960
Number of Lagoons JE1 Subsurface -Drains Presen:tJ113 Lagoon Area ID Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharees & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ......................................................................................
Freeboard (inches): 27

Continued on back
Facility Number: 40-19 Date of Inspection 5/24/2000 Printed on: 5/25/2000
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ®No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes ® No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? []-Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ®No
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda Small Grain
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes []No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified A WMP?
N,6-vi6lations:or :deficiencies.wete:note_ d:during• this visit:: Y'ou_ will receive i1q flirtheir : .
corres�oridence about this.visit... . - . . - . . . . . - . . . . . . . . . . . . .... .
analysis 2/16/00; waste analysis 4/3/00 - 2.3 lbs./l000 gals.
3tion records complete with nitrogen balance.
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
Reviewer/Inspector Name baphne B. Cullom Entered by Ann

Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
Facility Number: 40-19 Date of Inspection 5/24/2040 Printed on: 5/25/2000
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ® No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ® No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No

Facility Number 4Q 19 I Date of Inspection 11/22/99
Time of Inspection L 12:20 PM 124 hr. (hh:mm)
® Permitted ® Certified E3 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered [3 Not Operational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: 13d1ylQt>es.1arm ....................... County: G.r.egItC............................................... .. A►RO.......
OwnerName:fty........................................... J.QjUC'5 ............................................................ Phone No: xS2-T4T-39#9...........................................................
Facility Contact:&y.AA.i1m........................................................ Title: .. Phone No:
Mailing Address: Rt.RX,Q-A...............................a�StAlll?�llg.1Y.............................7�..............
........................................................ . ...................
Onsite Representative: RQy..d.Qnles........................................................ .......... ..... Integrator: ifsurphy.Eamllyfarms......................... ..... ......... ............
Certified Operator:RQx.......................................... JjQjjtR ................................................. Operator Certification Number:223.9'1.............................
Location of Farm:
]Fx�ar�.lKen►azlsvill�.la#C�..N�.9Q�.N..#a.S�a�:.>Hi11:.tQ1lA�.lY.G..9Q�..iY..u�a�il.i�l>;�x��trtiaa.Qf..iJ�.�S�.N.;.aftex.i�X�x��e.�ting.[JS..2S.�.N,...
t ra.1G#,. an�ta.�![G. �]..aal�.�n .alrtaQst.xm�lae ia[e.#.X,. t�ur.�a.A tQ.S.I; .#�.4I.;. folLa .fax.9l.S..nnxles. umtal.ix.i�atexsecks. 1K.l Z �.lollaw.....:
Latitude Longitude =0 43 ° 32 u
Design Current Design Current De sign Current
Swine Ca Pam- u elation Poultry C•.a ci l;o elation Cattle Ca acit P,a elation
rGilts
Feeder ❑Layer ❑Dairy
Finish 4896 ❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non-Daio Weano Feeder ❑ Other
o Finish To#al Design►apac1 4-8963l
no-TaISSMI 660,9611
Number of Lagoons 1 ❑ Subsurface Drains Present 11OLagoonArea ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds /Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated Flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ®No
Structure i Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard(inches): ............... ).2............... ....................................................................................................................................................................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on back
Printed an 121201gq

Printed on 12/20/99
Facility Number: 40-19 Date of Inspection 11/22/99
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes ® No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Anplication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Yes ® No
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda Overseed
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ® No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fait to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
�ki•vibtati6ris-.or:deficiiencies•were�noted �du�iag•tti_is visit: 'Y( wrll'receive no ftirtheir
correspondence about this•visit... ..... . ... . . . . . . • .. .. . . ... . ... .
arm did not go in red after hurricane.
Vaste analysis 8/17/99 - 2.0 lbs.
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
z
Reviewer/Inspector Name Carl Dunn Entered by Ann Tyndall
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

0 Division of Soiland Water'Conservahon Operation Rei�ew _ _ �♦
_ _ [j Division of Soilancl`Water Canservahan .Compliance Inspection p =
Division of Water Quality ;Compliance Ii pec4on �'
t- Other -Agency Opeia#oit°Review
- _
® Routine Q Complaint O Follow-up of DWQ inspection Q Follow -tip of DSWC review Q Other
Facility Number c'7 jcj Date of Inspection if-22 qq
Time of Inspection 1 ' 20 24 hr. (hh:mm)
U Permitted [] Certified [3 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered [ Not Operational Date Last Operated:
..........................
...................................Farm NmRoyCounty:........."`...............................................
Owner Name:.................QQ.. _:..-......._......................_..._.-_.. Phone No:.........._............:............................
Edo ......`�...^`y
Facility Contact: .............. ............:............_. .-Title: ......._. Phone No:... ................................................
'failing Address:
r--
Onsite Representative:.......... f.`.'..rY J "`5..............................................................Integrator:...............'":1P.1........................................................
Certified Operator: ...............5-'-5 .-.......... Operator Certification Number:..........................................
7....... ........................................ ........
Location of Farm:
i
.........................................—.............
..-..-...--•--..........-..............
•........--....-.-.--..-
..........................................-.. _..........................................................-.................................................I
Latitude Longitude • �' �'°
Design Current _'::'Design: ' ' Current.= , . = ;:' Design Current _
Swine '-'.: Ca aci Po ulatton `: Pflultry Ca aci Po ulation Cattle Ca aci Population
p ty . p ty=. p- p ty" p
❑ Wean to Feeder
0.Feeder to Finish
'I
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts,
❑ Boars
Number -of Lagoons -]Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
- HoldingMPon& / Solid Traps L_ J ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System _
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes t(No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min'?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes IN No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes M No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes (8 No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard(inches): ......311.21 .......................................................................................................................................—........................................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes XNo
seepage, etc.)
3123/99 Continued on back

Facility Number: y J —101 Data of Inspection +"
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7_ Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes No
Waste ADnliC:ltiOn
10.
Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
J93 No
It.
Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
❑ Yes
No
12.
Crop type �'_.A, cr-lar �eQ�
13.
Do the receiving. crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
No
14.
a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
g) No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
Q No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
21 No
16.
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
O No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
t9_ Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems rioted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
0; Nd •yiblafioris:or &ficiencio? *ere noted- daring this'visit'. • Yoi� Will-t&6*e Rio further
corres�6fidei ' about this .visit. ... .. _ .. .
[:]Yes ' 1' No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes E] No
❑ Yes ® No
[j Yes '] No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes 8 No
:Comments {refer.to. question #): Explatin ariy .YES answers "and/or. any recornmendattons or anp other comments` -
Use;drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages=as necessary)
1 ` __II tt EE .�
Fir, C.ia �n 50 +n ✓eA Gatr hwn'(._4.
V .6�_ X"ty4) `a'V1( 9 9 . 2. 0 lbs
3/23/99

4
y' State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Washington Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
December 11, 1997
Mr. Roy Jones
Roy Jones Farm
Rt. 1, Box 39-A
Walstonburg, NC 27888
SUBJECT: Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
Roy Jones Farm Fac. No. 40-19
Roy Jones Farm #2 Fac. No. 40-38
Greene County
Dear Mr. Jones:
STATE o v F , jL.V
On September 22, 1997,1 conducted an Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection at the Roy Jones Farm
and Roy Jones Farm 92 in Greene County. Overall, the operations were found to be in satisfactory
condition. A copy of the inspection reports is attached for your review.
In general, this inspection includes verifying that: (1) the farm has a Certified Animal Waste Management
Flan (CAWMP); (2) the farm is complying with requirements of the State Rules 15 NCAC 2H.0217,
Senate Bill 1217, and the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan; (3) the farm operation's waste
management system is being operated properly under the direction of a Certified Operator; (4) the required
records are being kept; (5) there are no signs of seepage, erosion, and/or runoff.
The recommendations and/or comments regarding your inspections can be found in the comment section of
the attached inspection forms. It is very important as the owner and Operator in Charge that you address
any noted concerns, as soon as possible. For assistance, please contact your Technical Specialist and/or the
local Soil & Water Conservation District Office.
Thank you for.your cooperation and assistance during the inspections. Should you have further
questions or comments regarding these inspections, do not hesitate to call me at [phone], ext.
321.
Sincerely,
Daphne B. Cullom
Environmental Specialist II
cc: Greene County SWCD Office
Dr. Garth Boyd, Murphy Family Farms
Mr. Tommie Stallings, Murphy Family Farms
,0 RO
943 Washington Square Mall, Washington, North Carolina 27889 Telephone 919-94W81 FAX [phone]
An Equal opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

Facility Number Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection
p Registered a Certified E Applied for Permit p Permitted JU o perationa
Farm Name: County: Greene
24 hr. (hh:mm)
Date Last Operated:
WARO
Owner Name: Ray- Phone No: WzM9.... ._.... _..___ . m........ _ .� .
Facility Contact: _ _ . .___. _ -... _ _ _ _. Title: _ _ _ ___ __ ._.__. __ Phone No:
Mailing Address: 2288H...._.-----
Onsite Representative: Ray..Inwes....._....._.___........»..................................._...... Integrator. Marphy-Family.Esxms.......... ............. ..... .......
Certified Operator:Jones........ ........................................ Operator Certification Number: IRSll3......... ................
Location of Farm:
x�aAa. nsx . a w. �: .n c aa.A er.�atrarxecttng.
L1L.on1a24C.9.1.andAxt.a1mnst 0 media xe.Lt...tuxn ento.SR.1247;.tolloLw-far 4 5. miles_ Wii.it_intersects.SR1222,.foilaw... .
Latitude Longitude
agn urren _ - estgn urren - :. = _ esign. urren
h
actty: `PopuIiition Poultry .s ;Capacity PdWateoa .- :Cattle : Capacity Population
can to ee er
ee er to mts t
arrow to can
13 Farrow to Feeder
13 Farrow to Finish
13 Gilts
Boars
p ayer [ImPon-Vairy
airy
on yer
erg _
To#a1Design 6aOic#y 4,896
s Total SSIMr 660,960
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? p Yes ® No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? p Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: p Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? 13 Yes p No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) 13 Yes p No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes p No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? p Yes ® No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? p Yes N No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require p Yes ® No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not incompliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? p Yes ® No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? p Yes ® No
7/25/97

jr;cwty feumber. 40_19
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
13 Yes
N No
Structures (LapoonsHolding Ponds plush Pits etc.
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
p Yes
N No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure
6
identifier:
Freeboard (ft): 2.5 ft.
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
p Yes
® No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
p Yes
® No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
p Yes
® No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
p Yes
® No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
p Yes
® No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type __foasWBcrmudaGrass—__ _._
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
13 Yes
N No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
p Yes
® No
18. Does the receiving crop need. improvement?
p Yes
® No
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
p Yes
®No
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
p Yes
N No
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
p Yes
® No
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
p Yes
®No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
p Yes
® No
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
p Yes
®No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
p Yes
®No
Q . o-Niotations.or crencies'were.noted raring this visit., You Wffreceive nog further.,
ce espoAde ce aba�i� . . .Y. . .
---------------
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: ► j b on Date: k 0_ t 3 _C1-7

Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of DWQ inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Facility Number 40 I9 Date of Inspection SC16/99
Time of Inspection SIS 24 hr. (hh:mm)
® Permitted ® Certified [3 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered [j Not Operational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: Buy.dop.cUAa•.{71�....................................................... ..... County: �.reemc....-............... .... WA►RQ.......
............................... .......................
Owner Name: iRRX....................ItjJftJ*........................................................... Phone No: 252:-7.47:-3_9A2..........................................
Facility Contact: ............ ................................... ........Title: Phone No
Mailing Address: .t. .QX Q-A ................................... ... W
........... ...................................... .............
Onsite Representative: RQy..jojtcs..Y.gA'Ji.QAI.J.Q]j5..................................................... Integrator:lYjUrPhy..F.a1tKMAlJ'.F&1llalS.....................................
Certified Operator:Roy........................................... jjjftCj ................................................. Operator Certification Number:223.9,4 .............................
Location of Farm:
Latitude 3S - 32 , Ol Longitude = - 43 32
'Design Current ``# xY Design Current De ign Current
Swine Ga acit ulation }Poultry Ca aci P,o Motion Cattle -a acit PLo elation
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
® Feeder to Finish 4896 4720 ❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ OtherA
❑ Farrow to Finish f ' 1 "Total l"esign Capacity 4,89611
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars " Total hau 660,960
JUH'olading�Txaps
1 ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes []No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes . ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes IN No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: #1
Freeboard(inches): ............... 27..................................................................................................................................................................................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (iel trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on back
Printed on 512312non

Printed on 5123/2000
Facility Number: 40-19 1 Date of Inspection 5/26/99
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
❑ Yes
® No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
® No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
®No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
❑ Yes
® No
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Hay) Small Grain Overseed
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
® No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
®No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
® No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
®No
Required Records & Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
® No
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components'of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
®No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
®No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
® No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
®No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
®No
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
®No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
® No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
® No
iio •yiolations:or :def ciencies were'noted :during• this Visit:: Yoti. will ;receive nv fiirtheir
correspondence about this :visit. - ::: :::: :. :: ::::: :..... .
• Recommend signing up for the local Neuse Rule options by 8/1/99 with the Greene Soil & Water Conservation District
Given Integrator Registration card
Last waste sample dated 5/24/99 at 2.1 lbs/1000 gal.
Keeping weekly lagoon levels as required by General Permit
In process of putting farm in GPS for soil analysis and nutrient management - assuming 1998 soil sample report with fertilizer
,ompany - will recheck at next inspection
14. Operation has full irrigation design and map by Crockett Irrigation and not subject to a wettable acre determination. Waste F
will need to be amended to a wettable acre basis - plan has 35.1 acres and irrigation design has 37.02 acres. Mr. Jones is keeping
Reviewer/Inspector Name tPat Hooper 252/946-6481
Reviewer/] uspecto r Signature: Date;

Date of Inspection
Facility Number ®""' Time of Inspection = ad 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Registered 6YCertified [3 Applied for Permit Permitted 13 Not Operational I Date Last Operated:
Farni Name:. ..P........s �p! rs....�� �....................................................... County:... ............ .......................
Owner Name:..... .......................... ...aln..5.............................................. Phone No:��� .��? ����................ra.....
a -
FacilityContact:.... ..................................... .............................. Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
3.1
Mailing Address:...-....15"i..............................................V)-c1,r. .4.� ..-.......-............
Onsite Representative . ...QT......................................................... Integrator:..._.... 6o
c.rn..............
Certified Operator ........ . ... ....... ......................� j,Qa_L 5................. ........ Operator Certification Number, ....� g..��?
Location of Farm:
Latitude =10 =.' " Longitude = • ©' ®"
Design Currrent
Design Current:...
Design Current Y
,
$wine r; -Capacity 'Population
$oultry Capacity Population Cattle
Capacity Population ,.
s
❑ can to Feeder
❑ Layer
❑ DairyEXPeeder
to Finish
❑ Non -Layer
❑Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
r s si n e
Total D g Capacity
1l}f
❑ Gilts
5r� q 6
❑ Boars
Tvtal SSLW
Number oh' Lagoons /Holding Ponds
❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area
❑ Spray Field Area
o- ...__:..
No Liquid Was to Management System
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenancelimprovement? ❑ Yes U✓ No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes l.5No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaUmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes [iNo
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes 2"No
S. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes dNo
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes ((No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes 53N0
7/2S/97
0

Facility Number: —
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (LagoonsMolding Ponds. -Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
❑ Yes LrlNo
❑ Yes No
Structure 5 Structure b
Identifier:
Freeboard (ft): ...........35i.1f1:...........�L s � .........................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes ,l�o
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? El Yes Ur O'
12. Do any of the structures need maintenancelimprovement? ❑ Yes LT<O
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ) ,._!!
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? El Yes Eal o
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type.................................................................................................................................................................... ........ . .........................................................
lb. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? ❑ Yes ❑ No
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
[�I No
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
63 No
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
O lvo
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
l<o
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
<O
22. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
For Certified or Perrnitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ No
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No
0 No.violatioilsor. deficiencies.were,noted-during this :visit.- You:viill receive-ilo-fdrther
c&0r 00]Wke about this;visit..:. ; - :
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: ,1� . l jkV Un O�A� Date: 1 O -_a 3_ - Clp

I* Kounne 0l ompiamt 0 rouow-up of uwt2 inspection 0 rouow-up of uaWU review 0 Vtner I
Facility Number Date of Inspection I�
Time of inspection ® 24 hr. (hh:mm)
p Registered N Certified o Applied for Permit g Permitted In Not Operahona Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: Roy..,hones.Earw........................................................................................... County: Greene WARO
Owner Name: Rc1�t.......................................... .lmgcs........................................................... Phone No: 7.4.7. 3Q89...........------. ...
Facility Contact: ............................................................. .Title: .......... Phone No:
Mailing Address: Rt.1.Box.39.-A....................................................................................... W..als1onitu r4.NC................................................. 2788& ..............
Onsite Representative: stay..Joj s....................................................................................Integrator: Murpuby..Fanuily.EArms....................
..................
Certified Operator: Rays ......................................Inner.................................................. Operator Certification Number: 18503 ............................
Location of Farm:
Latitude ©4 ®u Longitude
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? p Yes N No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: p Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
b. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
p Yes R No
13 Yes p No
p Yes p No
p Yes
p No
p Yes
® No
p Yes
N No
p Yes
N No
p Yes R No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
p Yes ® No

acility Number: 40_19
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
p Yes
N No
Structures (Lagoons,Holding Ponds Flush Pits etc.
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
p Yes
N No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5 Structure
6
Identifier: ................................... . ......................................................................
...................................
......................................................................
Freeboard (ft): 2.0
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
p Yes
H No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
p Yes
M No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
p Yes
® No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
p Yes
H No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
p Yes
M No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ............Coastal.Bermuda....................Small. Cimino.O.uemecd.............................................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
Q .!�oylo4qons.ordenciencies,wer.c.aote string is visit.,. on receive nofurther.,.
+kei9Ces�iojl eue� Wlit x�iis •visa:' .... ........ .. . . .
n Yes M No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes M No
p Yes ®No
n Yes ®No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes n No
ReviewerlI nspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date:

4o- I
Site Requires Immediate Attention:
Facility No.
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATION SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: 7 , 1995
. Time: l /f-3
Farm Name/Owner: o 7h„11E_f
Mailing Address:
County: 6R.6FA/E' _
Integrator: Phone:
On Site Representative: Phone:
Physical Address/Location:
Type of Operation: Swine ✓ Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: +Z9 (o Number of Animals on Site:
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude: 3 5 ' 2' 1S " Longitude: 72 - 43 Elevation: Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches or No Actual Freeboard: —a-Ft. (-') Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes or NRQ_Was any erosion observed? Yes or NQ,
Is adequate land available for spray? (%A or No Is the cover crop adequate? )(j;)or No
Crop(s) being utilized: _ C'r�...�. _ _
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings? or No
100 Feet from Wells? for No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes arm
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes or
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
similar man-made devices? Yes or�- If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes or No
Additional Comments:
Inspector Name Signature
cc: Facility Assessment Unit Use Attachments if Needed.