400018_INSPECTIONS_20171231

NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Environmental Qual
II

INSPECTIONS

I
0 Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400018 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS400018
Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Greene Region:
Date of Visit: 09/14/2016 EntryTime: OVOO pm Exit Time: 1:44 pm Incident #
Farm Name: Billy Dail Swine Farm Owner Email:
Owner: Billy Dail Phone:
Mailing Address: 1208 Pridgen Rd Snow Hill NC 285807029
Physical Address: 4717 Hwy 258 S Snow Hill NC 28580
Facility Status: Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35' 22' 33" Longitude: 77' 39' 45"
Farm location: State Road 258 at Browntown 1101 Intersection
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
❑ Denied Access
Washington
252-747-3956
Certified Operator: Steven F Dail Operator Certification Number: 16512
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Billy Dail Phone
On -site representative Kristie, Billy, Steven Dail Phone
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Waste analyis: soil tested:3/2015
8-11-16 = 1.11
3-4-16 = 1.37
11-13-15 = 1.38
IRR records are complete & balanced out.
Reviewed: rainfalltfreeboard, calibration is due in 2016, sludge survey at 49% in 2015, due in 2016.
fb range: 21" 2-27-16 to 45" 7-2-16
page: 1

Permit: AWS400018 Owner - Facility: Billy Dail
Facility Number: 400018
Inspection Date: 09/14/16 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Vsit: Routine
Waste Structures
T Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon 1 03/03/93 19.00 22.00
page: 2

1� Permit: AWS400018 Owner - Facility : Billy Dail
Facility Number: 400018
Inspection Date: 09/14/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No Na Ne
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
M ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
M ❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0 ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
M ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection,_ Storage & Treatment
Yes
No Na Ne
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large
❑
0 ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
0 ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
M ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
0 ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na Ne
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

Permit: AWS400018 Owner - Facility: Billy Dail Facility Number:
Inspection Date: 09/14/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
400018
Routine
Waste Application
Yes
No Na Ne
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
■ ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
El
El
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
E ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
E ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
N ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na Ne
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

4
Permit: AWS400018 Owner - Facility : Billy Dail
Facility Number: 400018
Inspection Date. 09/14/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na No
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fait to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
❑ ❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
❑ ❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
Otherlssues
Yes
No Na Ne
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
❑ ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
❑ ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
❑ ❑
Cl
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon I Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
❑ ❑
❑
CAWM P?
33. Did the-Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
page: 5

Type of visit: 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review O Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: , Departure Time: County: Region:
Farm Name: Owner Email:
Owner Name: �- Phone: 221 =;7e2
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:x L�
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Phone: ?/1I-,—
Integrator:
Certification Number:ri
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Design
Swine Capacity
Wean to Finish
Current
Pop.
FNon-La
Design CurrenE Design Current
Wet Poultry C►apacity Pop. Cattle C>apacity Pop.
La er DairyCow
Wean to Feeder
er
Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish
Dairy Heifer
Design Current Dry Cow
i) , P,oult . C_a aci P,o Non -Dairy
ILayers Beef Stocker
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Non -Layer
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Other
Other
Turke s
Turkey Poults
Other
Discharges and Stream impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes [:]No
[:]Yes ❑ No
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 1 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of Ins ection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
[—]Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 4 Structure 5
Observed Freeboard (in).
S. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes
waste management or closure plan?
Structure 6
V/No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environment threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes VN90 ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes 2 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes /No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window 7[] Evidence of Wind Drift 0 Application Outside of Approved
Area S� �
12. Crop Type(s): G = ms-/Aa5- (J
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes Q o
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes rN
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes d�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes 4No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? [:]Yes E f No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check [:]Yes 2/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WLTP ❑Checklists [:]Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? [:]Yes Vo ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes �(No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facili Number: - f ! 13�M Date of Ins eetion: —
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?r}4/f ❑ Yes Q No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes UNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below. /�d al y • �/ /O
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes TNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? [:]Yes � No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? /i/eW 60'V V51.n
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
❑ Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 54 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes //No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [j3No ❑ NA ❑ NE
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
Vd❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
go ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question ft Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
74
/s- / �.
Reviewer/Inspector Name: 14 /a// &o ap_
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone:
Date: (�
21412015

s
0 Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
El Other Agency
Facility Number.
400018
Facility Status: Active
Permit: AWS400018
❑ Denied Access
lnpsectton Type:
Compliance Inspection
Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit:
Routine
County: I
Greene Region:
Washington
Date of Visit:
09/19/2014 Entry Time: 11:30 am Exit Time: 12:25 pm Incident #
Farm Name:
Billy Dail Swine Farm
Owner Email:
Owner:
Billy Dail
Phone:
252-747-3956
Mailing Address:
1208 Pridgen Rd
Snow Hill NC 285807029
Physical Address:
4717 Hwy 258 S
Snow Hill NC 28580
Facility Status:
Compliant
Not Compliant Integrator:
Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
35' 22' 33" Longitude:
77' 39' 45"
Farm location: State Road 258 at Browntown 1101
Intersection
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts
Waste Col, Stor, & Treat
Waste Application
Records and Documents
Other Issues
Certified Operator: Steven F Dail Operator Certification Number: 16512
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Billy Dail Phone
On -site representative Kristie, Silly, Steven Dail Phone
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Waste analysis:
9-6-14 =.89
3-13-14 = 1.65
8-14-13 = .91
IRR records are complete & balanced out. Soil tested Nov. 2011.
Reviewed: New COG & Permit in Records. Sludge survey completed in 2014 as well as calibration. Rainfall & freeboard
Completed record keeping review on November 3, 2014 due to severe illness of Kristi.
page: 1

r
Permit: AWS400018 Owner - Facility : Billy Dail Facility Number: 400018
Inspection Date: 09/19/14 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 3.672
Total Design Capacity:
Total SSLW:
Waste Structures
Designated Observed
Type identifier Closed Date Start Hate Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon i 03/03/93 19.00
page: 2

r
Permit: AWS400018 Owner- Facility : Billy Dail Facility Number: 400018
Inspection Date: 09/19/14 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges_& Stream Impacts
Yes No Na No
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑0
❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
M ❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
M ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
■ ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes No Na No
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large
❑
M ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
M ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
M ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
0 ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na No
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑0 ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ M ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 1011/6/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

f
r
Permit: AWS400018 Owner - Facility : Billy Dail
Facility Number: 400018
Inspection Date: 09/19/14 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
Waste ARPlication
Yes No No No
Crop Type 1
corn, wheat, soybeans
Crop Type 2
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Pasture)
Crop Type 3
Fescue (Pasture)
Crop Type 4
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑ E ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑ 0 ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ 0 ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ 0 ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No No Ne
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

Permit: AWS400018 Owner - Facility : Billy Dail
Facility Number: 400018
Inspection Date: 09/19/14 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No Na No
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
[]
0 ❑
❑
23, if selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
M ❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
0 ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
M ❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No Na Ne
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
0 ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
0 ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
0 ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
■ ❑
❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewtinspection with on -site representative?
❑
E ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
❑
❑
page: 5

n
0 Division of Water Quality
D Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400018 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS400018 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: QomRliance Inspegtion Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Greener Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 08/30/2013 Entry Time: 10:00 AM Exit Time, 10:50 AM Incident #:
Farm Name: Billy DailOwner Email:
Owner: Billy Dail Phone: 252-747; 3256
Mailing Address: 336_P_ridaen Rd Snow Hill NC 285807029
Physical Address: 4717 Hwy 258 S _ _ _ : Snow Hill NC 28580
Facility Status: E Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35,22'33;_ — Longitude: 77°3945"
Farm location: State Road 258 at Browntown 1101 Intersection
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Steven F Dail Operator Certification Number: 16512
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representatives}: Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Billy Dail Phone:
On -site representative Billy Dail Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Waste Analysis:
8-26-13 = .91 SOIL TESTED:412013
4-16-13 = 1.53
1-24-13 = .99
IRR records are complete & balanced out. Rainfall, freeboard & stocking are recorded.
Looks Good! Sludge survey & caliberation are due in 2014.
Page: 1

i
Permit: AWS400018 Owner - Facility: Billy Dail
Inspection Date: 08/30/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 400018
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Q Swine -Feeder to Finish 4,923 4,896
Total Design Capacity: 4,923
Total SSLW: 664,605
Waste Structures
Designed Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
kgoon 1 03/03/93 19.00 24.00
Page: 2

{
Permit. AWS400018 Owner -Facility: Billy Dail Facility Number; 400018
Inspection Date: 0813012013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit. Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ MOD
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes No NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard? ❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
dry stacks andlorwel stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 3

0
Permit: AWS400018 Owner -Facility: Billy Dail Facility Number: 400018
Inspection Date: 08/30/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
PAN? ❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.? ❑
Total Phosphorus? ❑
Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil? ❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
Evidence of wind drift? ❑
Application outside of application area?
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16, Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Records and Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑■0❑
Page: 4

Ij
Permit: AWS400018 Owner - Facility: Billy Dail Facility Number : 400018
Inspection Date: 08/30/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? Q
Lease Agreements? Q
Other? Q
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
Q
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
Q
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ ■ Q ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
Q ■ ❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 5

K
Permit: AWS400018 Owner • Facility: Billy Dail Facility Number: 400018
Inspection Date: 08130/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ m ❑ ❑
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Air Quality representative immediately_
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
Lagoon / Storage Pond
Other
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
Page: 6

v
n
0 Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400018 Facility Status: active _ T Permit: AWS400018 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Injection _ Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Greene ,_ . Region: Washingtgrt_,,,,
Date of Visit: 0911212012 Entry Time: 08:00 AM Exit Time: 09:15 AM Incident #:
Farm Name. Billy Dail Swine Faan _ Owner Email:
Owner: Billy Dail Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 336 Pridgen Rd Snow Hill NC 285807029
Physical Address: 4717 Hwy 258 S Snow Hill
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy -Brown LLQ
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35"22'33" Longitude: 77°39'45"
Farm location: Slate Road 258 at Browntown 1101 Intersection
Question Areas:
W Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Star, & Treat
Waste Application
jj Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Steven F Dail
Operator Certification Number: 16512
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name
Title Phone
24 hour contact name Billy Dail
Phone:
On -site representative Kristie, Billy, Steven Dail
Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer
Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis: soil tested:11/2011 lime applied
7-26-112 = 1.29
3-28-12 = 3.42
12-08-11 = 1.3
IRR records are complete & balanced out. Rainfall, freeboard & crop yields are recorded.
Calibration due in 2012 SS due 2014
Looks Good!
Page: 1

r
Permit: AWS400018 Owner -Facility: Billy Dail Facility Number: 400018
Inspection Date: 0911212012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine -Feeder to Finish 4,923 4,900
Total Design Capacity: 4,923
Total SSLW: 664,605
Waste Structures
Designed Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
agoon 1 03/03/93 19.00 24 00
Page: 2

0
Permit: AWS400018 Owner - Facility: Billy Dail FacilityNumber : 400018
Inspection Date: 09112/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit. Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NB
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
Application Field
Other
a. Was conveyance man-made?
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ ■
❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ ■
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
ONO
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than
❑ ■
❑
❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
ONO
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e.l large trees, severe
❑ ■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑ ■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS400018 Owner - Facility: Billy Dail Facility Number: 400018
Inspection Date: 0911212012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
PAN? n
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.? ❑
Total Phosphorus? Q
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? Q
Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑
Evidence of wind drift? Q
Application outside of application area? ❑
Crop Type 1 Com, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2 Fescue (Pasture)
Crop Type 3 Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Pasture)
Crop Type 4 Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
Q
■ Q
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
Q
■ Q
❑
16_ Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
Q
■ ❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■ ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■ ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
■ ❑
Q
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP? Q
Page: 4

r
Permit: AWS400018 Owner -Facility: Silly Dail
Inspection Date: 0911212012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Records and Documents
Facility Number: 400018
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly. Free board?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑
■ ❑ ❑
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
Page: 5

Permit: AWS400018 Owner -Facility: Billy Dail
Inspection Date: 09/12/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Records and Documents
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Facility Number: 400018
Reason for Visit: Routine
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 flours andlor document and report ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? - ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
Lagoon ! Storage Pond
Other
If Other, please specify
32..Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Page: 6

0 Division of Water Quality
Q Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 4QQ018 Facility Status: Permit: AWS400018 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Ggg1pliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: RoUtine County: Greene _ _ Region: Washinato
Date of Visit: 07/28/2011 Entry Time:09;OO Abd - Exit Time: 10:00 AM Incident #:
Farm Name: Pally Dail Swine Farm _ _ Owner Email:
Owner: Billy Dail Phone: - -
Mailing Address: 336 Pridoen Rd '? _ _ Snow HW NC 28580i029
Physical Address:
Facility Status: E Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: IMUrohv-Brown LLC
Location of Farm:
Latitude:35°22'33" Longitude: "
Farm location: State Road 258 at 8rowntown 1101 Intersection
Question Areas:
• Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other issues
Certified Operator: Steven F Dail Operator Certification Number: 16512
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Billy Dail Phone:
On -site representative Kristie, Billy, Steven Dail Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Waste analysis: ?Soil tested: 11-2009, PLEASE get soil samples pulled ASAP
4-6-11 = 1.6
12-6-10 = .81
9-24-10 = 1.2
Caliberation due 2012 SS due 2014
irr forms are complete and balanced out.
Page: 1

r
Permit: AWS400018 Owner - Facility: Billy Dail Facility Number: 400018
Inspection Date: 07/28/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 4,923 0
Total Design Capacity: 4,923
Total SSLW: 664,605
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon 1 03/03/93 1 1 19.00 60,00
Page: 2

Permit: AWS400018 Owner - Facility: Billy Dail Facility Number'. 400018
Inspection Date: 07/28/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■ ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■ ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than
❑
■ ❑
❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
0000
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
M
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS400018 Owner - Facility: Silly Dail
Inspection Date: 07/28/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 400018
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2
Fescue (Pasture)
Crop Type 3
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Pasture)
Crop Type 4
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of property operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS400018 Owner - Facility: Billy Dail Facility Number: 400018
Inspection Date: 07/2812011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Lease Agreements? ❑
Other? ❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
1
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
00013
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑ ■
❑ ❑
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
Page: 5

Permit: AWS400018 Owner -Facility: Billy Dail
Inspection Date: 07/28/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 400018
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA
NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ ■
❑
❑
Other l55ues
Yes No
NA
NE
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report ❑ ■
❑
❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? if yes, contact a regional ❑ ■
❑
❑
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e.,
discharge, ❑ ■
❑
❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑ IN
❑
❑
if yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
if Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑ ■
❑
❑
33. Did the Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ ■
❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
0000
Page: 6

E Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency I --I
Facility Number : 4 Facility Status: Permit: ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Greene Region: Wp§hington
Date of Visit: QQ124/2010_ Entry Time:Q8:30 AM Exit Time:
Farm Name: Billy Dail Swine Farm
Owner: Silly Dail
Incident #:
Owner Email:
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 336 Pridgen Rd Snow Hill NC 2858Q7Q29
Physical Address: 4717 Hwy 258 S Snow Hill NC 28580
Facility Status: N Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: _
Location of Farm: Latitude: 55°22'33" Longitude: 77°39'45"
Farm location: State Road 258 at Browntown 1101 Intersection
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Steven F Dail Operator Certification Number: 16512
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Kristie Dail Phone:
On -site representative Kristie Dail Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

Permit: AWS400018 Owner - Facility: Billy Dail Facility Number: 400018
Inspection Date: 09/2412010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
Waste Analysis: Soil test: 11/2009
1120110 = 1 A
4/6/1 0 = 1.5
7/13/10 = 1 A
Freeboard Range:
1/2/10 = 19' - 7/3/10 = 51"
Sludge Survey extension until 2014.
Equipment calibration due 2010.
C = 105/125, W =100, SB = 112, FP = 160, BP = 205, SG = 50
Note: Place new COC and permit in records.
Looks Great!
Page: 2

Permit: AWS400018 Owner - Facility: Billy Dail
Inspection Date: 09/24/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 400018
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Q Swine - Feeder to Finish 4,923 3,500
Total Design Capacity: 4,923
Total SSLW: 664,605
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
lagoon 1 03/03/93 19.00 5200.
Page: 3

Permit: AWS400018 Owner - Facility: Billy Dail Facility Number : 400018
Inspection Date: 0912412010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
Application Field
Other
a. Was conveyance man-made?
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage S Treatment
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe
❑
■
❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑
■
❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
DED
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application Yes
No
NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑ ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS400018 Owner - Facility: Billy Dail
Inspection Date: 0912412010 Inspection Type. Compliance Inspection
Facility Number : 400018
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN ? 10%110 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Com, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Pasture)
Crop Type 3
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 4
Fescue (Nay, Pasture)
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 5

Permit: AWS400018 Owner -Facility: Billy Dail
Facility Number: 400018
Inspection Date: 09124120W Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES
only)? Q
❑
❑ ■
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑ Q
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑ ❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■
❑ ❑
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■
❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ Q
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 6

Permit: AWS400018 Owner -Facility: Billy Dail Facility Number: 400018
Inspection Date: 09/24/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWo of emergency situations as required by Permit? ❑ ■ ❑ Q
32, Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative? Q ■ Q Q
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 7

a
E Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400018 _ ^, Facility Status: Agliyg Permit: AWS400018 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Greene Region: Washington
Date. of Visit: 09/01/2009 Entry Time:09:00 AM _ Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: Billy Dail Swine Farm Owner Email:
Owner: Billy Dail Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 336 Pridgen Rd Snow Hill NC 285807029
Physical Address: 4717 Hwy 258 5 Snow Hill NC 28580
Facility Status: E Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Mjjrg)hy-ftqwn.
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°22'33" Longitude: 77°39'45"_
Farm location: State Road 258 at Browntown 1101 Intersection
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Steven F Dail Operator Certification Number: 16512
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Billy Dail Phone:
On -site representative Billy Dail Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis:
8-18-09 1.1
5-13-09 1.9
2-19-09 1.9
soil tested 1012008 Lime was applied
Remember to do a sludge survey by Dec. 31, 2009
Looks Good!
Page: 1

Permit: AWS400018 Owner -Facility: Billy Dail Facility Number: 400018
Inspection Date: 09/01/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 4,923 3,600
Total Design Capacity: 4,923
Total SSLW: 664,605
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
sgoon 1 03/03/93 19,00 34.0(
Page: 2

Permit: AWS400018 Owner -Facility: Billy Dail
Facility Number:400018
Inspection Date: 09/01/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other
than from a ❑
■ ❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ Cl
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
11, Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

a,
Permit: AWS400018 Owner - Facility: Billy Dail
Inspection Date: 09/0112009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 400018
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Com, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2,
Fescue (Pasture)
Crop Type 3
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Pasture)
Crop Type 4
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
Q ■ Q Q
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ Q ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■ Q ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■ ❑
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
Q ■ ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WU P?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS400018 Owner - Facility: Billy Dail
Faculty Number: 400018
Inspection Date: 09/01/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for VisIt: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)? ❑ ■
❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
Other Issues
Yes No
NA NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AWS40001 8 Owner -Facility: Billy Dail
Facility Number. 400018
Inspection Date: 09/01/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Clthar ICC116Q Yes No NA NE
31, Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 6

0 Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400018 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS400018 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliangg 105pection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Greene Region: MEhington _
Date of Visit: 08127/2008 Entry Time:08745 AM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: Billy Dail Swine Farm Owner Email: dailfamilyfa,rms _ aol.c
Owner: Billy Dail Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 201,HuoteM Trace Snow Hill NC 285801§71
Physical Address: 4717 _Hwy 258 S Snow Hill NC 28580
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy Family Farms
Location of Farm:
Farm location: State Road 258 at Browntown 1101 Intersection
Latitude:35"22'22" Longitude:77°39'50"
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Steven F Dail Operator Certification Number: 16512
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Kristie Dail Phone:
On -site representative Billy Dail Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis:
sample pulled last week
2-6-08 = 1.7
10-1B-07 = 1.1
Remember to watch dates for pulling samples more closely
soil sample 12-28-07
Page: 1

Permit: AWS400018 Owner - Facility: Billy Dail Facility Number, 400018
Inspection Date: 08/27/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Q Swine - Feeder to Finish 4,923 4,900
Total Design Capacity: 4,923
Total SSLW: 664,605
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date - Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
k9oon 1 03/03/93 19.00 49.00
Page: 2

Permit: AWS400018 Owner - Facility: Billy Dail Facility Number: 400018
Inspection Date: 08/2712008 inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? 0 ■ 0 0
Discharge originated at
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? 0 ■ 0 0
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) 0 ■ 0 0
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
0 ■
0
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
0 ■
0
0
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑ ■
0
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
0 ■
0
0
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
0
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe
0 ■
0
0
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management 0 ■
0
0
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ ■
0
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
0 ■
110
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑ ■
❑
0
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑ ■
0
0
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ■
0
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Excessive Ponding? 0
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? 0
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? 0
Page: 3

Permit: AWS400018 Owner - Facility: Billy Dail Facility Number. 400018
Inspection Date: 08/27/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes Na NA NE
PAN? ❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.? ❑
Total P205? ❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? ❑
Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑
Evidence of wind drift? ❑
Application outside of application area? ❑
Crop Type 1 Cam, wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2 Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Pasture)
Crop Type 3 Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Sail Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑
■
D ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
■
0 Q
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
■
❑ 11
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■
❑ 0
18, Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
■
❑ Q
20. floes the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■
❑ Q
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS400018 Owner -Facility: Billy Dail
Facility Number: 400018
Inspection Date. 08/27/2008 inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
Q
Other?
Q
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
Q
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
Q
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
26. Did the facility fall to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
..��--•____--
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
ve- U- ue ur
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ Q ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

El
Permit: AWS400018 Owner - Facility: Billy Dail
Facility Number: 400018
Inspection Date. 08/27/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Other issues Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 6

0
i
Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400018 _ Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS400018 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Comoliaom_losoection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 10/11/2007 Entry Time:08:30 AM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: Billy Dail Swine Farm Owner Email: dailfam'lyfarrns6aol.c
Owner. Billy Dail Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 201 Hunters Trace 5now Hill NC 285801871
Physical Address: 4717 Hwy 258 S 5noW Hill NC 28580
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant integrator:
Location of Faun: Latitude: 35°22'22" Longitude. 77"39'50"
Farm location: State Road 258 at Browntown 1101 Intersection
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other issues Technical Assistance
Certified Operator: Steven F Dail Operator Certification Number: 16512
Secondary OIC(s):
OnSite Representattve(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Kristie Dail Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
" Waste Anatysis:
5-25-07= 2.1
2-26-07= 1.8
Soil test 2-23-07
Looks Good!
Page: 1

Permit: AWS400018 Owner - Facility: Billy bail Facility Number: 400018
Inspection Date: 10/11/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine -Feeder to Finish 4,923 3,672
Total Design Capacity: 4,923
Total SSLW: 664,605
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
goon 1 03/03/93 19.00 42.00
Page: 2

Permit: AWS400018 Owner - Facility: Billy Dail Facility Number: 400018
Inspection Date: 1011112007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges S Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
01111
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■ ❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■ ❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
01111
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe (3■ ❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan? ,
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS400018 Owner -Facility. Billy Dail
Inspection Date: 10/11/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 400018
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN ? 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Com, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2
Fescue (Pasture)
Crop Type 3
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Pasture)
Crop Type 4
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6 -
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
18. 1s there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP? ❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS400018 Owner - Facility: Billy Dail ,
Inspection Date: 10/11/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Records and Documents
Checklists?
Design?
Maps?
Other?
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
Facility Number: 400018
Reason for visit: Routine
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
■
❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑ ❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑ ❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■
❑ ❑
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance.of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■
❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AWS400018 Owner - Facility: Billy Dail Facility Number: 400018
Inspection Date: 10/11/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewMspection with on -site representative? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 6

11
Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400018 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS400018 tJ Denied Access
Inspection Type: C m liance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Greene Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 10/1112007 Entry Time:08:30 AM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: Billy Dail Swine Farm _ Owner Email: dailfamil arms@aoLr_
Owner: Billy Dail - Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 201 Hunters Tracge Snow Hill NC 285801871
Physical Address: 4717 Hwy 258 5 __.Snow Hill
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm:
Farm location: State Road 258 at Browntown 1101 Intersection
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Records and Documents
Certified Operator: Steven F Dail
Secondary OIC(s):
Latitude:35"22'22" _. Longitude:77`39'50"
Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Other Issues Technical Assistance
Operator Certification Number: 16512
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Kristie Dail Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
* Waste Analysis:
5-25-07= 2.1
2-26-07= 1.8
* Soil test- 2-23-07
Looks Good!
Page: 1

Permit: AWS400018 Owner - Facility: Billy {fail
Inspection Date: 10/11/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 400018
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 4,923 3,672
Total Design Capacity: 4,923
Total SSLW: 664,605
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
kgoon 1 03/03/93 19.00 42.00
Page: 2

Permit: AWS400018 Owner -Facility: Billy Dail Facility Number: 400018
Inspection Date: 10/11/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ D 0
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■
0
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑
Q
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
0
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
000,11
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS400018 Owner -Facility: Billy Dail
Inspection Date. 10/11/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 400018
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2
Fescue (Pasture)
Crop Type 3
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Pasture)
Crop Type 4
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soii Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑
■
❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
■
❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■
❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■
❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
■
❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have ali components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP? ❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS400018 Owner -Facility: Billy Dail
Facility Number: 400018
Inspection Date: 10/11/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
n
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after n 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
Cl
■
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)? ❑
■
❑
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■
❑
❑
.,��---- --
V..
u.,
ua
uF
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air 00011
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AWS400018 Owner -Facility: Billy Dail
Inspection Date: 10/11/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did ReviewertInspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Facility Number: 400018
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑■❑❑
e
Page: 6

Permit: AWS400018 Owner - Facility: Biliy Dail
Inspection Date: 10/11/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 400018
Reason for Visit: Routine
Technical Assistance
Needed
Provided
34. Waste plan revision or amendment
❑
❑
35. Waste plan conditional amendment
❑
❑
36. Review or evaluate waste plan w/producer
❑
❑
37. Forms need (list in comment section)
❑
❑
38. Missing components (list in comments)
❑
❑
39. 2H.0200 re -certification
❑
❑
40. Five & Thirty day Plans of Action (POA)
❑
❑
41. Irrigation record keeping assistance
❑
❑
42. Organize/computerization of records
❑
❑
43. Sludge evaluation
❑
❑
44. Sludge or Closure plan
❑
❑
45. Sludge removal/closure procedures
❑
❑
46. Waste structure evaluation
❑
❑
47, Structure needs improvement
❑
❑
48. Operation & maintenance improvements
❑
❑
49. Marker check/calibration
❑
❑
50, Site evaluation
❑
❑
51. Irrigation calibration
❑
❑
52. Irrigation system design/installation
❑
❑
53. Secure irrigation information (maps, etc.)
❑
❑
54.Operating improvements (pull signs, etc.)
❑
❑
55. Wettable acre determination
❑
❑
56. Evaluate WAD certification/rechecks
❑
❑
57. Crop evaluationlrecommendations
❑
❑
58. Drainage work/evaluation
❑
❑
59. Land shaping, subsoiling, aeration, etc.
❑
❑
60. Runoff control, stormwater diversion, etc.
❑
❑
61. Buffer improvements
❑
❑
62. Field measurements (GPS, surveying, etc.)
❑
❑
63. Mortality BMPs
❑
❑
64. Waste operator education
❑
❑
65. Operation & maintenance education
❑
❑
66. Record keeping education
❑
❑
67. Crop/forage management education
❑
❑
68. Soil and/or waste sampling education
❑
❑
69. PLAT Assessment
❑
❑
70. Other
❑
❑
Page: 7

Permit: AW5400018 Owner -Facility: Billy Dail Facility Number; 400018
Inspection Date: 10/11/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
List Improvements made by Operation
improvement 1
improvement 2
Improvement 3
Irimprovement 4
Improvement 5
Improvement 6
Page: 8

1�1
0 Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400018 Facility Status: Active Permit: NCA240018 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Greene Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 04/20/2006 Entry Time:08:00 AM� . Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: Billy Dail Swine Farm Owner Email:
Owner: Billy Dail Phone:
Mailing Address: 201 Hunters_Trace Snow Hill NC 285801871
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°2222" Longitude: Z7°39'50"
Farm location: State Road 258 at Browntown 1101 Intersection
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Steven F Dail Operator Certification Number- 16512
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
On -site representative Kristy Dail Phone: [phone]
24 hour contact name Billy Dail Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Soil test 8-30-05 & lime applied in Nov 2005
Waste analyses: IbsN11000gal
1-31-06 = 1.2
8-22-05 = 1.2
4-27-05 = 1.5
1-21-05 = 1.3
Looks Great!
Page: 1

Permit: NCA240018 Owner - Facility: Billy Dail Facility Number: 400018
Inspection Date: 04/20/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Q Swine - Feeder to Finish 4,923 4,800
Total Design Capacity: 4,923
Total SSLW: 664,605
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon 1 03/03/93 19.00 48.00
Page: 2

Permit: NCA240018 Owner - Facility: Billy Dail Facility Number: 400018
Inspection Date: 04/20/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ M ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) 0000
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑ ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■
❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
000
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
❑
■
❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■
❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑ ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 3

Permit: NCA240018 Owner -Facility: Billy Dail Facility Number: 400018
Inspection Date: 04/20/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
PAN? ❑
Is PAN n 10%/10 lbs.? ❑
Total P2O5? ❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? ❑
Outside of acceptable crop window? Q
Evidence of wind drift? ❑
Application outside of application area? Q
Crop Type 1 Com, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2 Bermuda Grass (Hay,
Pasture)
Crop Type 3 Fescue (Pasture)
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3 '
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑
■
❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
1101111
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
■
❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■
❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
E
❑ ❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
■
❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
E
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: NCA240018 Owner - Facility: Billy Dail Facility Number:400018
Inspection Date: 04/20/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design?
Maps?
Other?
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
Yes
No NA NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air Q ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: NCA240018 Owner -Facility. Billy Dail Facility Number: 400018
Inspection Date: 04/20/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewtnspection with on -site representative? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Page: 6

0
0
Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency rr----��
Facility Number: 400018 Facility Status: i Permit: NCA240018 LJ Denied Access
Inspection Type: ComRliancetnsoection _,- Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: County: Greene Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 0910812006 l Entry Time:09:30 AM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: Billy Dail Swine Farm Owner Email:
Owner: Billy Dail Phone: OQQ-747-3956
Mailing Address: 2Q1 Hunters Trace Snow Hill NC 285801871
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Location of Farm:
Farm location: State Road 258 at Browntown 1101 Intersection
Integrator:
Latitude:35°22'22" Longitude:77°39'50"
Question Areas:
W Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Certified Operator: Steven F Dail Operator Certification Number: 16512
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
On -site representative Billy Dail Phone: [phone]
24 hour contact name Kristy Dail Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Date:
Inspection Summary:
#11 Due to irrigation event on 9-7-06 there was ponding in the lower section of the sprayfield. The irrigation occured from 12 to 5 pm
on Thursday the 7th of September 2006. Div. of Water Quality/Aquifer picutures were taken on Friday the 8th around 9:30 AM which
is approximately 16 hours afert the irrrigation stopped.
#15 The fescue had been mowed by "bush hog" about 3 weeks prior to irrigarion event and had not been removed from the field.
Page: 1

Permit: NCA240018 Owner -Facility: Billy Dail Facility Number: 400018
Inspection Date: 09/08/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Emergency
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 4,923 4,800
Total Design Capacity: 4,923
Total SSLW: 664,605
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
lagoon 1 03/03/93 19.00 27.00
Page: 2

k�
Permit: NCA240018 Owner - Facility: Billy Dail Facility Number: 400018
Inspection Date: 09/08/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Emergency
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No
NA
NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
■
❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑
❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■
❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5_ Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le.1 large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not property addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
■
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
■
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

Permit: NCA240018 owner - Facility: Billy Dail Facility Number : 400018
Inspection Date: 09/08/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Emergency
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
PAN? ❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
Total P2O5?
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
Outside of acceptable crop window?
Evidence of wind drift?
Application outside of application area?
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Fescue (Pasture)
Page: 4

Michael P. Easiey
Governor
Wiliam G. Ross Jr_, Secretary
Departmerd of Environment and Natural Resources
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acing Director
Division of Water Quality
To: Producer
From: Daphne B. Cullom
Environmental Specialist
Washington Regional Office
Subject: Animal Compliance Inspection
Year 2002
Enclosed please find a copy of the Compliance Site Inspection (as viewed in the DWQ database) conducted at the referenced facility
by the Division of Water Quality from the Washington Regional Office. Please read this inspection and keep it with aH other
documents pertaining to your animal operation for future hmpetfioas.
In general, these inspections included verifying that: (1) the farm has a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP); (2) the
farm is complying with requirements of the State Rules 15 NCAC 2110217, Senate Bill 1217, and the Certified Animal Waste
Management Plan; (3) the firm operation`s waste management system is being operated properly under the direction of a Certified
Operator, (4) the required records are being kept; and (5) there are no signs of seepage erosion, and/or nmofE
As a reminder, please note the following comments, which are conditions of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan and the
General Permit; therefore, these items must be implemented--
q) The maximum waste level in lagoons/stcrage ponds shall not exceed that specified in the CA AW. At a minimum, maximum waste
level for waste for lagoons/storage pods must not exceed the level that provides adequate storage to contain 25 year, 24 hour storm
event plus an additional foot of structural freeboard.
q) An analysis of the liquid animal waste from the lagoon shall be conducted as close to the time of application as practical and at least
within 60 days (before or after) of the date of application. This analysis shall include the following parameters: Nitrogen,
Phosphorus, Zinc and Copper.
4p Soil analysis is required annually. Lame is to be applied to each receiving crop as recommended by the soil analysis_
q). The following records are required: off -site solids removal, maintenance, repair, waste/soil analysis and land irrigation records.
These records should be maintained by the facility owner/manager in chronological and legible form for a minimums of three years_
cp Land application rates shall be in accordance with the CAWMP. In no case shall land application rates exceed the Plant Available
Nrtro$en (PAN) rate for the receiving crop or result in runoff dialing any given application
q) All grassed waterways shall ^have a stable outlet with adequate capacity to prevent ponding or flooding damages. The outlet can be
another vegetated channel, an earth ditch, stabilization structtM or other suitable outlets.
$ It is sn=ested, flat a requirement, to keep crop yield information for fire use to update your waste management plan. You win
need three years of crop yield data before your plan can be updated.
For your information, any swine facility that has a discharge to surface waters of the State will have to apply for a National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit with the Division of Water Quality, effective January 1, 2001.
Thank you for your assistance and cooperation during the inspection. If you have any questions, please contact meat 252-946-6481, ext
321 or your Technical Specialist.
Cc: a-RO
DBC Files
943 Washington Square MaU Washington, ND 27M 252-946-6481 (Telephone) 252-946-9215 (Fax)

Type of Visit O Compliance inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation I
Reason for Visit O+ Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
ii >Facilit} Number 40 IS Date of Visit.. 1/9RtH12. Time: 12:5D am
O Not Operational O Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified 0 Conditionally Certified Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name: Oif]y..D.A.Sminc.Earm
Owner Name: My........... _...... —
County- G-Mgjac.............................................. l'.4ARO........
----------- Phone No: 2.52.-2.4.7z,3956....................... -..................................
Mailing Address: 3,36.P.tAP,mJWAd......... ....... _............................... ...... ........................ Sa(l7:l.IMN.0............... ......................................... 2SSBO .............
Facility Contact:
Title-
.
....................... Phone No:
Onsite Representative: Bit .3}ZAillSll9YjMD,aH ............................................................. Intenrator: ] urphy. Famil,1.kar=.....................................
Certified Operator: .9teymE,.......... .................... D'ail.................................................... Operator Certification Number:Jj5512 .............................
Location of Farm:
Farm location: State Road 258 at Browntown 1101 Intersection
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 ' 22 6 22 " Longitude 77 • 39 50 w
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at_ ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'
b. If &;charge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes. notif`}T DWQ)
e. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated float° in eallmin?
d_ Does discharge bypass a iagoou systeut? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes 0 No
3_ Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure 1 Stivcture 2 Structu a .i Stntctur•e 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier..................................................................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard(inches) 39.................................................. ....... ............................

_5/03101
Facility Number. 40-18
Date of Inspection 1/9120fl2
Continued
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8.. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any strictures lack adequate, gauged markers r"ith required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there anv buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type Corn, Soybeans, Wheat Coastal Bermuda (pasture) Small Grain Overseed Fescue
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ® No
[-]Yes. N No
❑ Yes N No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? [-]Yes N No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes 0 No
16.
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
N No
Required
Records & Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes.
N No
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
-❑ Yes
N No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
N No
20_
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
N No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
® No
22_
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
N No
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
N No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
N No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes N No
IE3 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
El Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
oil analysis 12/10/01 & 5/21/01; lime as suggested; lime tickets on file.
taste analysis: 12/7/01 - 91 = 1.7 lbs/1000 gals; 42 (Farm #2) = 1.9 lbs/l 000 gals
Taste analysis: 8/14/01 - Al = 1.3 lbs/1000 gals; 42 = 1.3 lbs/1000 gals
Waste analysis: 5/15/01 - 91 = 2.6 Ibs/1000 gals; #2 = 2.6 lbs/1000 gals
reeboard levels recorded weekly.
rigation-records complete with nitrogen balance.
Reviewer/Inspector Name Daphne B:Culloiu r 'entered bs Alin Tyndall
Reviewer/Inspector Siiznatu jS Date:

05103101 Confinued 66
Facility Number. 40-18 Date of inspection 1 1/912002
Odor issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (Le. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30_ Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
rtion omments:an or.B rawfn C ::.:...::.::: : ;

t r O�oF WAr�9pG Michael F. Easley
! ' Governor
co William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
>_ l Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Kerr T. Stevens
Division of Water Quality
May 1, 2001
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Billy Dail
336 Pridgen Road
Snow Hill, North Carolina 28580
SUBJECT: Notice of Deficiency
Animal Feedlot Operation Compliance Inspection
Dail Hog Farm
Facility No. 40-18
Greene County
Dear Mr. Dail:
On April 19, 2001, I conducted an Animal Feedlot Operation Compliance inspection at the Dail Hog Farm in Greene County.
A copy of the inspection report is attached for your review.
In general, this inspection included verifying that: (1) the farm has a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP) and
the General Permit; (2) the farm is complying with requirements of the State Rules 15 NCAC 2H.0217, Senate Bill 1217, the
Certified Animal Waste Management Plan and the General Permit; (3) the farm operation's waste management system is being
operated properly under the direction of a Certified Operator, (4) the required records are being kept; and that (5) there are no
signs of seepage, erosion, and/or runoff. The following deficiencies were observed during the inspection.
➢ Your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan records did not include a soil analysis for 2000. In Section III. Monitoring
and Reporting Requirements, item number 3 of the General Permit it is a requirement that a soil analysis be collected
annually on each application field receiving animal waste. Further, Section Il. Operation and Maintenance Requirements,
item number 3 requires that lime be applied, as needed, to maintain soil pH in the optimum range for crop production. This
information is received from your annual soil analysis.
It is very important as the owner and the Operator in Charge that you resolve these aforementioned deficiencies and any other
problems that may arise, as soon as possible. Nothing in this letter should be taken as absolving this facility of the
responsibility and liability of any violations that have resulted or may result from these deficiencies.
Thank you for your cooperation and assistance during the inspection. Should you have further questions or comments
regarding this inspection, do not hesitate to call at [phone], ext 321.
Sincerely,
B .�
Daphne B. Cullom
Environmental Specialist
CC'. Greene County SWCD Office
DSWC-WaRO
Compliance Group
WaRO — Animal Compliance
V,6BC files
943 Washington Square Mall Washington, NC 27889 252-946-6481 (Telephone) 252-946-9215 (Fax)

Type of Visit OQ Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
(Reason for Visit 4 Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
° Facility Number .fQ 1S Dare of Visit: 3-19 2001 Time: 1:30 pm
l
... O Not Operational O Below Threshold
Permitted ® Certified © Conditionally Certified Q Registered Date Last Operated or Abate Threshold: ---- ..---- __.___ ...
Farm ?Vamc:$.[%-.Aatl.Smame. Fatata....... ,........---•---..-......---._.._..............•---......_.
Count -: .GA'. ............................................... .3.'��?........
OirnerName: M.................... ••---•-•........... DAU..-.:.... -............. .................................... Phone No: 25.2-7.47-325.6.................................... ......................
Mailin-Address: 3.36.PxjdgcEt.RQ&d---.................. ----..... -- --- ..........__ Setun:-Hil+i.NC-............................. .... -.....,.._._.. 285$R............
Facility Contact: ....... .. Tide:....._ ........................................... Phone No:
Onsite Representative: BBLY D-ail_.... g �rpbj.Fatni�.FarMx ............... ..........................................................................._. ntc valor:
Certified Operator: S.Wi u.................................... Dal ._..... ........ ....... .......................... Operator Certification Number: 10M............................
lAication (if Farm:
Farm location: State Road 258 at Browntown 1101 Intersection A�
T
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 22 22 µ I.ungitude 77 0F 39 50 •=
Des�gq : Current
Design
Curreet
Design Cuirent
Swuie.:: ".:Ca act Population
1'oultrt ;...Ca acrti.
"Po elation Cattle
Ca aciri .l?o vlatzon :.
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Lay
❑ Darn
1
IN Feeder to Finish
4923
4$96
I❑ Non -Layer
Non-Dain
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow' to Feeder
❑ Other
..
❑ Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity ;
4,923
❑ Gilts
. :. Total SSLW:
664,605
! Boars
::
Disc�harr2es & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes [K No
Disc hame o6ginaled at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-madel
b. ll'di.,charge is observed.- did it reach eater of the State? (If ves notify" DV 7Q)
c. If discharge is obsen•ed- what is the estimated flmv in gal/min?
d. Doec discharge bypass a lagoon ;.°steal? (If -ye,. notifi- DR1Q)
2- Is there e%idence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there and adh-erse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Yes ❑ No
ED Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes [] No
17, Yes ® No
❑; Yes g No

Ui/Ui/U! Contrnued
Facility Number-. 40-18 Date of Inspection 4-19-2001
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structurt- 4 'Structure 5 Structure 6
Idenlrfer: .._ _...» ——.�...r _ »._ ._...._._,.� ...__ ....... .-- .....�.»....... ......... _. ...—........
Freeboard (inches): ...............
5. Are there anv immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? El Yes ER No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered ties, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenancefunprovement? [I Yes ® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? i,] Yes X No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes JR, No
W agte Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maiutenanre/improvement? ❑ Yes 19 No
I l . Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hvdrauhc Overload ❑ Yes 9, No
12_ Crop type Corn. Sovbeans. Wheat Coastal Bermuda (Graze) Fescue (Graze) Small Grain Overseed
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes 19 No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? 0 Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? �1 Yes i . No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
Z No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
! II Yes
Zi No
17. Are rock: outcrops present?
❑Yes
❑ No
18. Is there a eater stipple well within 250 feet of the sera-,freld boundan°? !] Unknown
-7, Yes
[ No
❑ On -site ❑ off-aitc
Reouired Records & Documents
19. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readih• available?
€j- Yes
JR No
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readih, available?
(ie/ WUP. checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
® No
21. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
.K Yes
❑ No
22. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the; time of design?
❑ Yes
1E No
23. Did the facility fail to have,a activeh, certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
19 No
24. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge. freeboard problems. over application)
rL-1 Yes
F No
25. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss m iew/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
9, No
26. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
R- No
27. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
g No
Odor lscues
28. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
❑) Yes
No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
29. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properh' within 24 hours?
"+ Yes
No

01/01/01
Facility Number. 40-18 Date of In.ipectiou FZ-19--2-001-1
30. Is there any evidence of wind drift during Ind application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
31. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
32. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
33. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
Continued
Printed on: 4124/2001
0 Yes 19 No
[:] Yes Vj No,
0 Yes [K No
0 Yes 0 No
34. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanenthemporaily cover? El Yes 19, No
113 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comments {refer to questron #)- !answen'ancuor. ercom e '❑
W 'reconIftien t n '... Et
. . .............
xj� ..... . Field Copy Final Notes
---- --------------- -------- ---
. ............. . ...... . . '7 ..
*Soil analysis - No analysis for year 2000.
*Waste anahsis 2-26-01, 9-22-00, 5-3 1 -00.
*Irrigation records - Correct ERR-2 forms for fall so,,O),--ans with Sept. waste sample results. No overapplication noted in irrigation records.
Reviewer/Inspector Name
....... .....
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: U s4wa- Date:

Type of Visit Q Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 40 Ig Date of Visit: 5/25/2000 Time: Ii:00 AM Printed on: 5/31/2000
rO Not Operational O Below Threshold
® Permitted ®Certified 0 Conditionally Certified j3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ..................
Farm Name: B1.11y..IL?Aj1.S)yj.Iti.1FArm............................................................................... County:(;.rf:Cjar ............................................... W.aRQ........
OwnerName: Uiily..........................................JDAJII............................................................... Phone No: 252:-.7.47:-395.6 ..........................................................
FacilityContact............................................................................ ... Title: ................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
Mailing Address: Rt..Z,0.Q&.4S1.................................. .. Suaw.M.N.C........................................................ 28.510 .............
Onsite Representative: Il)ll(.�i Il..St�Y.�t1.I?Aal� riStitr Rail ................................ Integrator: Murphy.l.aroily..FA.Cms.....................................
Certified Operator:ftXn.k,......... DIl.................................................... Operator Certification Number:l6512 ................. ............
Location of Farm:
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle [IHorse Latitude 35 OF 22 22 Longitude 77 • 39 ° 50
Discharp_es & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. if discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes IN No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: Primary......--.. .Final ............. ................................... .................................... .................................... ....................................
Freeboard (inches): 39 42

f Continued on bark
Facility Number: 40-18 pate of Inspection 5/25/2000 Printed on: 5/31/2000
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ®No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes ® No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ®No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes IN No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ® No
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (pasture) Small Grain, Matua Corn Fescue
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (iel irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
46•V14tiOds-6rdefClEnC1es-we'te_noted'dufriDg•th_6A lt::You_will:receivenbfurther:
...............................
correspondence about this.vislt. ' .... ............. ...... ...... .. .... .
............. ..... .......-..
Soil analysis 4/20/99; waste analysis 2121/00 - 2.3 lbs.
rrigation records complete with nitrogen balance.
Aaintaining freeboard level records as required by General Permit.
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
Reviewer/Inspector Name iffi
T3 ......... .
B. Cullom Entered by Ann

IZe�iewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
Facility Number: 40 -18 Date of Inspection 5/25/2000 Printed on: 5/31/2000
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27.
Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
❑ Yes
® No
28.
Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
❑ Yes
® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29.
Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
❑ Yes
® No
30.
Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
❑ Yes
® No
31.
Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
❑ Yes
® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No

Je Routine O Complaint O Follow-up of DWQ inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Facility Number 40 18 Date of Inspection 11/22/99
Time of Inspection 1:30 PM 124 hr. (hh:mm)
® Permitted E Certified O Conditionally Certified © Registered JE3 Not Operational I Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: Billx.D.ail.Swims.Farm.......................................................................... ..... County: Gxcgxtfr............................................... W.aRQ........
OwnerName: Billy ..................... .. hall........................ ................... ..................
Facility Contact: .............................................................................. Title:.....
Mailing Address: Rt.2.&&.451...........................
Phone No: 25.2-7T-9S.fi...........................................................
Phone No:
Sl I.QW..k1't11.NC........................................................ 295AQ .............
Onsite Representative: JD.jHy.Qal1....................................................................................... Integrator: i�u��l1lY. aI[IAIY. a[fAIS................. ....................
Certified 0perator:,9jey.Vjl_F ................................ D.Ajl .................................................... Operator Certification Number:1.05.1Z ............................
Location of Farm:
................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Latitude 35 • 22 22 " Longitude 77 • 39 50 "
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. if discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ®No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches): „2Z...................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (iel trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
3123/99 Continued on back
Printed an 1212n/99

Printed on 12120199
Facility Number: 40-18 I Date of Inspection 11/22/99
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
❑ Yes
® No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
®No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
® No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
IN No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
❑ Yes
® No
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda Matua Small Grain Corn
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
® No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
® No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
l5. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
® No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
®No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
vWati6lis'or'deticiencies were'noted'd.'uringthirs vWL'Yoti will"receive Qo further' •'
. -correspondence about this -visit. -
3/16/99 last waste analysis - 2.2 lbs.
WII not be able to deduct 35% for new BMP's due to lack of proper waste sample.
48 inches prior to hurricane - 20 inches post hurricane.
19. Waste sample.
❑ Yes ® No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
z
Reviewer/Inspector Name ,Carl Dunn Entered by Ann Tyndall
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

Facility Number t i J $ Date of Inspection l f-22-2 %
Time of Inspection I3.3 024 hr. (hh:mm)
® Permitted © Certified 0 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered 1 Not O erational I Date Last Operated:
l !
Farm Name: .................•---...---•.9......y........ q'.............f.-............................................. County: .........
�-.............................................
OwnerName: !'.�.t ............ pG`.-.i.................-.............................................. Phone No:..................-....-..................-.........................................
FacilityContact: .............................................................................. Title: ................................................................ Phone No: .....................
Mailing Address:
Onsite Representative:...............�.. I.....D�..�...................... Integrator:........... M"...P.. �......................................................
r
Certified Operator:..... ................. 4........5krc.h 0^1> 1 ............................................................ Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location of Farm:
i
............................................ ............................... ...............................................................................................................................................................................................
. 7
Latitude 0 & Longitude • 4 '°
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
'19 2-3
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts,
❑ Boars
Design Current
_` Poult
rX.-- . Capacity Population Cattle
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer ❑Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
TotM:SSLW
ign .. Current
INumber,of Lagoons, 0 ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
_Holding=Ponds /Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a- If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made`?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/tnin'?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches): .........�' ..................................... I..............
❑ Yes IN No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes 19 No
❑ Yes 19 No
❑ Yes j$J No
Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99
❑ Yes t6 No
Continued on back

Facility Number: 90 — Date of Inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes M No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes tZ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenarice/improvement? ❑ Yes P No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Anolication
I0.
Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
No
11.
Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
❑ Yes
No
12.
Crop type tom, 4Nn 56 C"'
13.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
No
14.
a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
If No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
® No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
El Yes
0 No
16.
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
E] No
Required Records & Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
O No
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
V1No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
® Yes
❑ No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
® No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
R No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
[g No
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
j No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
Qj No
.. �'. . . W14 i 60s:or• defic................ere h6ted• diWitng 4bis:visit; • Yoi� *H1-teeeiye ii6 further
comes• 6fidence: about: tM visit.:: :::::::::::...::::::::: :.:::: :
Comments refer. to question # Ex lain any YES. answers andlor-any recommendations oe-any'other comments:: -
Use drawings of facility";to better,explain-situations .(use addiiin,i pages as _necessary) r m
_ _
lnflj� MOT a� �� 4tJ,+ `3s�/J ire I�Q•✓ r7�+,7 Y� ��[l� 07 a�r
4q 1^tt'S r-"gr 4-
19. VAS-k S u .',la t
Q,$)- L wi+c,--C
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date:
�3/23/99