400017_INSPECTIONS_20171231

NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Environmental Quai
II

INSPECTIONS
INSPECTION9

Division of Water Resources
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Other Agency
Facility Number: 400017 Facility Status: ""1fe Permit: AWS400017 0 Denied Access
Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Greene
Date of Visit: 09/05/2017 Entry Time: 03:30 pm Exit Time: 4:15 pm
Farm Name: Everette Murphrey Farm
Region:
Incident #
Owner Email:
Washington
Owner: Everette Murphrey Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 6930 US Hwy 258 N Farmville NC 27828
Physical Address: 5842 Willow Green Rd Farmville NC 27828
Facility Status: Compliant El Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35' 31' 60" Longitude: 77' 33' 43"
On west side of SR 1245 approx. 0.5 miles north of SR 1228. Sandy Run.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: William E Murphrey Operator Certification Number: 16630
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Everette Murphrey Phone :
On -site representative Everette Murphrey Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis: soil tested: 2016
6-23-17 = 3.26
9-20-16 = .94
7-7-16 = 1.75
IRRs are complete & balanced out on corn.
Reviewed: rainfalllfreeboard; sludge survey 1-8-16 @46%; calibration due 2017
page: 1

i , Permit: AWS400017 Owner- Facility: Everette Murphrey Facility Number: 400017
Inspection Date: 09/05/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon 1 03/14/94 19,00 23.00
page: 2

• 'Permit: AWS400017 Owner- Facility : Everette Murphrey Facility Number: 400017
Inspection Date: 09/05/17 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No Na Ne
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑0
❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0 ❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0.1111
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
M ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
a ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection Storage & Treatment
Yes
No Na Ne
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large
❑
■ ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
M ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
all
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na Ne
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ M ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ M ❑ []
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 tbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

'Permit: AWS400017 Owner - Facility : Everette Murphrey Facility Number: 400017
Inspection Date: 09/05/17 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No Na Ne
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
0 ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
M ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na No
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
M ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

�,,;:
r .

'Permit: AWS400017 Owner - Facility : Everette Murphrey Facility Number: 400017
Inspection Date: 09/05/17 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na No
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
0 ❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
0 ❑ ❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
0 ❑ ❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
0 ❑ ❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
[]
❑ 0
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
0 ❑ ❑
Other Issues
Yes
No Na No
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
N ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
0 ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
0 ❑
❑
(i_e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
■ ❑
❑
CAWM P?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewfinspection with on -site representative?
❑
N ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
E ❑
❑
page: 5

-
0
Division of Water Resources
❑
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑
Other Agency
Facility Number:
400017
Facility Status: Active Permit:
AWS400017
Denied Access
Inpsection Type:
Compliance Inspection
Inactive Or
Closed Date:
Reason for Visit:
Routine
County; Greene
Region:
Washington
Date of Visit:
09/27/2016 Entry Time:
08:30 am Exit Time: 9:20 am
Incident #
Farm Name:
Everette Murphrey Farm
Owner Email:
Owner:
Everette Murphrey
Phone:
252-753-2733
Mailing Address: 6930 US Hwy 258 N Farmville NC 27828
Physical Address: 5842 Willow Green Rd Farmville NC 27828
Facility Status: 0Compliant El Not Compliant Integrator. Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm:
On west side of SR 1245 approx. 0.5 miles north of SR 1228. Sandy Run.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts
Records and Documents
Latitude: 35° 31' 60"
Waste Col, Stor, & Treat
Otherlssues
Longitude: 77' 33' 43"
Waste Application
Certified Operator: William E Murphrey Operator Certiftcation Number: 16630
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Titte Phone
24 hour contact name Everette Murphrey Phone:
On -site representative Everette Murphrey Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis: soil tested: 1012015 & 2016
9-1-16 = .94
7-7-16 = 1.75
2-22-16 = 2.01
8-25-15 = .96
IRR records are complete & balanced out.
Reviewed: rainfall/freeboard; sludge survey 1212014 at 44%, 11/29/15 at 46%
fb range: 16" 2-8-16 to 37" on 6-22-16
page: 1

Permit: AWS400017 Owner- Facility: Everette Murphrey Facility Number: 400017
Inspection Date: 09/27/16 Inppection Type: Compliance inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
swine - Wean to Finish 5,869 5,500
Total Design Capacity: 5,869
Total SSLW: 674,935
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon i 03/14/94 19.00 35.00
page: 2

. Permit: AWS400017 Owner - Facility : Everette Murphrey Facility Number: 400017
Inspection Date: 09/27/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges &_Stream Impacts
Yes
No Na Me
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
M ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a- Was conveyance man-made?
❑
❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■ ❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
0
■ []
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
M ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No Na No
4- Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
N ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
El
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.ed large
❑
M ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
0 []
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
M ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
0 ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na Ne
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. is there evidence of incorrect application?
[]] []
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

Permit: AWS400017 Owner - Facility : Everette Murphrey Facility Number:
400017
Inspection Date: 09/27/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
Waste Application
Yes
No Na Ne
Crop Type 1
Com, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
E ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
0 ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
0 ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
[]
N ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na Ne
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
E ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
N ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.,
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
[]
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
E ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

Permit: AWS400017 Owner - Facility : Everette Murphrey Facility Number: 400017
Inspection Date: 09/27/16 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na Ne
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
E ❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
0 ❑ ❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑E
❑ ❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
■ ❑ ❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
0 ❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
E ❑ ❑
Other Issues
Yes
No Na No
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
E ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes.
❑
N ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
0 ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑N
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
0 ❑
❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection. with on -site representative?
❑
❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
0 ❑
❑
page: 5

Division of Water Resources
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Other Agency
Facility Number.
400017 Facility Status:
Active Permit: AWS400017
Denied Access
Inppection Type:
Compliance Inspection
Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit:
Routine
County: Greene Region:
Washington
Date of Visit:
08/19/2015 Entry Time: 09:45 am
Exit Time: 10:40 am Incident #
Farm Name:
Everette Murphrey Farm
Owner Email:
Owner:
Everette Murphrey
Phone:
252-753-2733
Mailing Address:
6930 US Hwy 268 N
Farmville NC 27828
Physical Address:
5842 Willow Green Rd
Farmville NC 27828
Facility Status:
E C 1' N t C 1' t
1 Murphy -Brown LLC
omp cant o amp ian ntegrator.
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35° 31' 60" Longitude: 77° 33' 43"
On west side of SR 1245 approx. 0.5 miles north of SR 1228. Sandy Run.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: William E Murphrey Operator Certification Number: 16630
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Everette Murphrey Phone:
On -site representative Everette Murphrey Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Waste analysis: soil tested: 2014
7-15-14 = 1.20
6-9-15 = 3.01
IRR records on corn & wheat are complete & balanced out.
Reviewed: new COC; sludge surrey @ 44%; rainfall/freeboard; crop yield; new center pivot
page: 1

i
Permit: AWS400017 Owner - Facility : Everette Murphrey Facility Number: 400017
Inspection Date: 08/19/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
Swine - Wean to Finish 5,869 5,725
Total Design Capacity: 5.869
Total SSLW: 674,935
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon 1 03/14/94 19.00 36.00
page: 2

w
Permit: AWS400017 Owner - Facility : Everette Murphrey Facility Number: 400017
Inspection Date: 08/19/15 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Im pacts
Yes No Na Na
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0 ❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0 ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
■ ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection. Storage & Treatment
Yes
No Na No
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
M ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large
❑
❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
M ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
❑
❑
& Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
M ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
M ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na Ne
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manurelsiudge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

Permit: AWS400017 Owner - Facility : Everette Murphrey Facility Number:
400017
Inspection Date: 08/19/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
Waste Application
Yes
No Na No
Crop Type 1
Com, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
0 ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
0 ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No No me
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
C]
0 ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
E ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
[]
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

Permit: AWS400017 Owner - Facility : Everette Murphrey Facility Number:
400017
Inspection Date: 08/19/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na Ne
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List struclure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
M ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
01111
Other Issues
Yes
No Na No
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
M ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? if yes,
❑
M ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
0 ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
M ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon I Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
M ❑
❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewfinspection with on -site representative?
❑
0 ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
0 ❑
❑
page: 5

M Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number.
400017 Facility Status:
Active Permit: AWS400017
❑ Denied Access
Inppection Type:
Compliance Inspection
Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for visit:
Routine
County: Greece Region:
Washington
Date of Visit:
07/17/2014 Entry Time: 08:30 am
Exit Time: 9:05 am incident #
Farm Name:
Everette Murphrey Farm
Owner Email:
Owner:
Everette Murphrey
Phone:
252-753-2733
Mailing Address:
6930 US Hwy 258 N
Farmville NC 27828
Physical Address:
5842 Willow Green Rd
Farmville NC 27828
Facility Status:
ECompliant ❑ Not Compliant
Integrator. Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm:
Latitude: 35° 31' 60" Longitude:
77° 33' 43"
On west side of SR 1245 approx. 0.5 miles north of SR 1228. Sandy Run.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat
Records and Documents Other Issues
Waste Application
Certified Operator: William E Murphrey Operator Certification Number: 16630
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
On -site representative Everette Murphrey Phone :
Primary Inspector:
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Marlene Salyer
Inspection Summary:
Soil tested 2013
Waste Analysis:
7-5-14= 1.20
6-9-14= 3.00
8-8-13= 2.47
IRR records are complete and balanced out.
Reviewed crop yield, rainfall and freeboard.
#25-IMPORTANT_ last year could only find Sludge Survey for 2011 1012.013 at 44%
WUP- June 2014
Don't forget to do a Sludge Survey this year- 2014.
paperwork changing design type to wean to finish is in RAleighl
Phone:
Date:
page: 1

Permit: AWS400017 Owner - Facility : Everette Murphrey Facility Number: 400017
Inspection Date: 07/17/14 Inpsection Type: , Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 5,000
Total Design Capacity:
Total SSLW:
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon 1 03/14/94 19,00
page: 2

c
Permit: AWS400017 Owner - Facility : Everette Murphrey Facility Number: 400017
Inspection Date: 07/17/14 Inssection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No No No
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0 ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection Storage & Treatment
Yes No No Na
4, is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
M ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
[]
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large
❑
❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
M ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
MEI
❑
B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
0 ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
0 ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No No Na
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑01111
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3
rd

Permit: AWS400017 Owner - Facility : Everette Murphrey Facility Number: 400017
Inspection Date: 07/17/14 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste ARplication Yes No Na Ne
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
0 ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
N ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
0 ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
0 ❑
❑
1 B. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
N ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No Na He
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
E ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
N ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

Permit: AWS400017 Owner - Facility : Everette Murphrey Facility Number: 400017
Inspection Date: 07/17/14 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na No
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
0 ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
0 ❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
N ❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
0 ❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26, Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
N ❑
❑
27, Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous toss assessment (PLAT) certification? -
❑
0 ❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes No Na Ne
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
E ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
0 ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
N ❑
❑
CAWMP?
33, Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative?
❑
0 ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
0 ❑
❑
page: 5

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400017 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS 00017 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Roujine County: Gre�gne� Region: WasbLrtgton
Date of Visit: 09/18/2013 Entry Time: 01:55 PM Exit Time: 02720 PM Incident #:
Farm Name: Everette Murohrev Farm Owner Email:
Owner: EvgreUp,MLIERhrgy Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 6930 US Hwy 258 N -� Farmville NC 27828
Physical Address: 5842 Willow Green Rd Farmville NC 27828
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°31'60" Longitude: 77°3343"
On west side of SR 1245 approx. 0.5 miles north of SR 1228. Sandy Run.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: William E Murphrey
Secondary OIC(s):
Operator Certification Number. 16630
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Everette Murphrey Phone:
On -site representative Everette Murphrey Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Phone:
Date:
Inspection Summary:
Waste analysis:
8-8-13 = 2.47
8-21-12 = 1,80 Note: one sample taken in April - no record at Lab
rainfall, freeboard, mortality & crop yields are recorded.
Note: no sludge survey in records for 2012, but perhaps Carl Dunn (DSWC) did one, please get a copy in records ASAP.
Looks Good.
Page: 1

Permit: AWS400017 Owner -Facility: Everette Murphrey Facility Number., 400017
Inspection Date: 0911812013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 5,000 5,100
Total Design Capacity: 5,000
Total SSLW: 675,000
Waste Structures
Designed Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
kgoon 1 03/14/94 19.00 38.00
Page: 2

Permit: AW5400017 Owner - Facility: Everette Murphrey Facility Number: 400017
Inspection Date: 09118/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ M ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ M. Cl ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes No NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard? ❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the pennit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS400017 Owner - Facility: Everette Murphrey
Inspection Date: 09/18/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 400017
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
PAN?
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
Total Phosphorus?
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
Outside of acceptable crop window?
Evidence of wind drift?
Application outside of application area?
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
1 B. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Records and Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
If yes, check the appropriate box below_
WUP?
Yes No NA NE
❑
❑
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
ONOO
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NE
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS400017 Owner - Facility: Everette Murphrey
Inspection Date: 09118/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 400017
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
Q
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
Q
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22, Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES
only)? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 5

Permit: AW5400017 Owner - Facility: Everette Murphrey
Inspection Date: 09/18/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Records and documents
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Facility Number: 400017
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field ❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond ❑
Other ❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
33. Did the Reviewerlinspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 6

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400017 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS400017 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine _ County: Greene Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 08/28/2012 Entry Time: 08:00 AM Exit Time: 08:45 AM Incident #:
Farm Name: Everette Murphrey Farm Owner Email:
Owner: Everette Murphrey Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 6930 US Hwy_258_N Farmville NC 27828
Physical Address: 5842 Willow Green Rd Farmville NC 27828
Facility Status: E Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35"31'60" Longitude: 7° '
On west side of SR 1245 approx. 0.5 miles north of SR 1228. Sandy Run.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat
J1 Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: William E Murphrey
Operator Certification Number: 16630
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name
Title Phone
24 hour contact name Everette Murphrey
Phone:
On -site representative Everette Murphrey
Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer
Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Waste analysis: soil tested: Oct 2011
8-17-12 = 1.8
4-19-12 = 1.86
8-10-12 = 1.3
IRR records are complete & balanced out. Rainfall & freeboard are recorded. Remember to do a sludge survey in 2012.
New houses look Greats
Page: 1

Permit: AWS400017 Owner - Facility: Everette Murphrey
Inspection Date: 08/28/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number : 400017
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine -Feeder to Finish 5,000 5,000
Total Design Capacity: 5,000
Total SSLW: 675,000
Waste Structures
Designed Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
kgoon 1 03/14/94 19.00 27.00
Page: 2

Permit: AWS400017 Owner -Facility: Everette Murphrey Facility Number : 400017
Inspection Date: 08/28/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? 00011
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑ ■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
❑ ■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed andlor managed through a waste management
❑ ■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
. ■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS400017 Owner - Facility: Everette Murphrey
Facility Number :
400017
Inspection Date: 0812812012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for visit:
Routine
Waste Application
Yes No
NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Com, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■
❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
16, Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■
❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
1100
Cl
18, Is there a lack of property operating waste application equipment?
OND
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
ONO
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS400017 Owner - Facility: Everette Murphrey Facility Number: 400017
Inspection Date: 08/28/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design? Q
Maps? ❑
Lease Agreements? ❑
Other? ❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ MOO
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
Q ■ ❑ ❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑ ■ ❑ Q
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon ❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ ■ Cl ❑
Page: 5

Permit: AWS400017 Owner -Facility: Everette Murphrey Facility Number: 400017
Inspection Date: 08/28/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Other issues Yes No NA NE
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? 1101111
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field ❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond ❑
Other ❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 6

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400017 Facility Status: Actiye Permit: AWS40QQ Z ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance InsDeglion Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Greene Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 07/27/2011 Entry Time:0&00 6M _ Exit Time: 0§_40 AM Incident #:
Farts Name: Everette Murph,[Y,Fa[M
Owner: Everette Murahrev
Owner Email:
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 6930 US Hwy 258 N Farmville NC 27828
Physical Address: 5842 Willow Green Rd _ _ Farmville NC 27828
Facility Status: E Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°31'60" Longitude: 77°33'43"
On west side of SR 1245 approx. 0.5 miles north of SR 1228. Sandy Run.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: William E Murphrey Operator Certification Number: 16630
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Everette Murphrey Phone:
On -site representative Everette Murphrey Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis: soil tested: 2010 & lime was applied
5-7-10 = 2.9
sample pulled now
Irrigation occurred in June on corn - waiting on analysis to balance IRR's.
Calib. done in 2010 due 2012. SS done jan. 2010 due 2011.
Farm looks good.
Page: 1

Permit: AWS400017 Owner- Facility: Everette Murphrey Facility Number: 400017
Inspection Date: 0712712011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
�agoon 1 03/14/94 19,00
Page: 2

Permit: AWS400017 Owner - Facility: Everette Murphrey Facility Number, 400017
Inspection Date: 07/27/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field Q
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ M ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? 1101111
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes No NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard? ❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ ■ Q Cl
S. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
0 ■ Q ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks) '
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
improvement? '
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
Q
Frozen Ground?
❑ .
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS400017 owner -Facility. Everette Murphrey
Facility Number: 400017
Inspection Date: 07/27/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection,
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
17, Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Records and Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NE
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
C
Page: 4

Permit: AWS400017 Owner - Facility: Everette Murphrey Facility Number: 400017
Inspection late: 0712712011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No NA
NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
if Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
.❑ ■ ❑
❑
24, Did the facility fail to calibratewaste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑ ■ ❑
❑
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26, Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
Page: 5

Permit: AWS400017 Owner - Facility: Everette Murphrey
Inspection Date: 07/27/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 400017
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes ,No
NA
NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ ■
❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes No
NA
NE
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report
❑ ■
❑
❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional
❑ ■
❑
❑
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge,
❑ ■
❑
❑
freeboard problems, aver -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑ ■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
Lagoon / Storage Pond
Other
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or GAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
In
Page: 6

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400017 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS400017 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Insl2ection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Greene Region: Washington _
Date of Visit: 10/25/2010 Entry Time:08:05 AM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: Everette Murnhrey_Earm Owner Email:
Owner: Fvt<r€ttl;„-!durohrevL Phone: [phone]Z53
Mailing Address: 6930 US Hvw 258 N _ _ F r�nr ville NC 27828
Physical Address: 5842 Willow Green Rd Farmville NC 27828
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator. Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 3§'31'60" Longitude: 77°33'43"
On west side of SR 1245 approx. 0.5 miles north of SR 1228. Sandy Run.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: William E Murphrey Operator Certification Number: 16630
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Everette Murphrey Phone:
On -site representative Everette Murphrey Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer ' Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis:
5-7-10 = 2.9
1-29-10 = 2.5
5-26-10 = 3.7
soil tested 2009 SS 2010 Calib. 2008 & due 2010
IRR records are complete and balanced out. Looks GREAT!
Page: 1

Permit: AWS400017 Owner - Facility: Everette Murphrey Facility Number: 400017
Inspection Date: 10/2512010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Q Swine - Feeder to Finish 5,000 L 4,750
Total Design Capacity: 5,000
Total SSLW: 675,000
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed freeboard Observed Freeboard
kgoon 1 03/14/94 19.00 38.00
Page: 2

I
Permit: AW5400017 Owner - Facility: Everette Murphrey Facility Number : 400017
Inspection Date: 1012512010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑ ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
Cl
■
❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
S. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or ❑ 111111111 ❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS400017 Owner - Facility: Everette Murphrey Facility Number: 400017
Inspection Date: 10/25/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
PAN? ❑
Is PAN n 10%/10 lbs.? ❑
Total P205? ❑
Failure to incorporate manure/siudge into bare soil? ❑
Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑
Evidence of wind drift? ❑
Application outside of application area? ❑
Crop Type 1 Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
16. Did the Facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ ❑ El
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WU P? ❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS400017 Owner - Facility: Everette Murphrey
Facility Number: 400017
Inspection Date: 10/2512010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after> 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)? ❑ ■
❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ ■
❑ Cl
Other Issues
Yes No
NA NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AWS400017 Owner - Facility: Everette Murphrey Facility Number: 400017
Inspection Date: 10/25/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? Q ■ ❑ ❑
32. Did Reviewerlinspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? 110011
Page: 6

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 40QQ17 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS400017 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Greene Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 08/31/2009 Entry Time: 08:00 Alm Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: Everette Murphrey Farm Owner Email:
Owner: Everette Mumhrev Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 6930 US Hwy 258 N Farmville NC 27828
Physical Address: 5842 Willow Green 13d Farmville NC 27828
Facility Status: E Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Murohv-Brown. LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35`31'60" Longitude: 77°33'43"
On west side of SR 1245 approx. 0.5 miles north of SR 1228. Sandy Run.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other issues
Certified Operator: William E Murphrey Operator Certification Number: 16630
Secondary OICjsj:
On -Site Representatives): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Everette Murphrey Phone:
On -site representative Everette Murphrey Phone:
Primary inspector: Martene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis:
5-26-09 3.7
7-10-08 2.7
2-13-08 4.4
soil tested 2008
Looks Good!
Page: 1

Permit: AWS400017 Owner - Facility: Everette Murphrey
Inspection Date: 08/31/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number:400017
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 51000 5,325
Total Design Capacity: 5,000
Total SSLW: 675,000
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Desioned Freeboard Observed Freeboard
lagoon i 03/14/94 19.0036. 00
Page: 2

Permit. AWS400017 Owner - Facility: Everette Murphrey Facility Number: 400017
Inspection Date: 08/31/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? 110011
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) 0000
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any pars of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
1101111
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe
❑
■ ❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■ ❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■ ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■ ❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■ ❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■ ❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS400017 Owner - Facility: Everette Murphrey
Inspection Date: 08/31/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 400017
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA
NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Com, Wheat,
Soybeans
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14, Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■ ❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ ❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS400017 Owner - Facility: Everette Murphrey
Facility Number: 400017
Inspection Date: 08/31/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No NA
NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
110011
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■ ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES
only)? ❑
■ ❑
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■ ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■ ❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■ ❑
❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AWS400017 Owner - Facility: Everette Murphrey Facility Number : 400017
Inspection Date: 08/31/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? Q ■ ❑ ❑
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative? Q ■ O ❑
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? Q ■ ❑ Q
Page: 6

E Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400017 Facility Status: Active Permit: M5400017 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Com Ig_iance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Greene Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 10/29/2008 Entry Time:08:23 AM__ Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: Everette Mumhrey Farm Owner Email:
Owner: Everettg MUrpbrev Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 6930 US_tjun y 258 N Farmville NC 27828
Physical Address: 5842 Willow Greg Rd Farmville NC 27828
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: premium Standard Farms Of North Carolina Inc
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35'31'60" _ Longitude: 77°33'43"
On west side of SR 1245 approx. 0.5 miles north of SR 1228. Sandy Run
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: William E Murphrey Operator Certification Number: 16630
Secondary OIC[s):
On -Site Representativels): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Everette Murphrey Phone:
On -site representative Everette Murphrey Phone:
Primary inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspectors}:
Inspection Summary:
Waste analysis:
7-10-08 = 2.7
2-13-08 = 4.4
soil test fall 2007
Looks Great!
Page: 1

Permit: AWS400017 Owner - Facility: Everette Murphrey Facility Number. 400017
Inspection Date: 10/29/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Q Swine - Feeder to Finish 5,000 5,000
Total Design Capacity: 5,000
Total SSLW: 675,000
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon 1 03/14/94 19.00 45.01
Page: 2

Permit: AWS400017 Owner - Facility: Everette Murphrey Facility Number: 400017
Inspection Date: 10/29/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
❑
■ ❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not property addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■ ❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■ ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■ ❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■ ❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■ ❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS400017 Owner - Facility: Everette Murphrey Facility Number: 400017
Inspection Date: 10/29/2008 inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for VisIt: Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
PAN? ❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.? ❑
Total P2O5? ❑
Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil? ❑
Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑
Evidence of wind drift? ❑
Application outside of application area? ❑
Crop Type 1 Corn (Grain)
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑
■ ❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
■ ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
■ ❑
Cl
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■ ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■ ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
■ ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS400017 Owner - Facility: Everette Murphrey Facility Number: 400017
Inspection Date: 10/29/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Other? ❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDFS only)?
Q
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■ ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDFS only)?
❑
■ ❑
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge surrey as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■ ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■ ❑
❑
Other issues
Yes
No NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■ Cl
❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

F-
Permit: AWS400017 Owner - Facility: Everette Murphrey
Inspection Date. 10129/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Other Issues
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Facility Number : 400017
Reason for Visit: Routine
Page: 6

/"
Type of Visit 0 Compliance Inspection O Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of visit: Arrival Time: : Q Departure Time: County: Region:LZ
Farm Name:
Owner Name: -Z
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative��:,, ll
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Owner Email:
PhoneNo:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number: Q
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: =O = { = Longitude:
0
Design C►urrent
Swine C•ap ity Population
Design Curreniiiiiiit Design Current
Wet Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Finish
Layer
❑ DairyCow
❑ Wean to Feeder
er
❑ DairyCalf
Feeder to Finish
�Q
oNn-La
❑ DairyHeifer
Poultr❑ D Cow
❑ Non-Dairs
❑ Beef Stocker
La Non -Layers
❑ Pullets ❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Co
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
ED Gilts
Boars
❑ Turkeys
Other
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Number of Structures:
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes [W/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ o [3 NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
El Yes
No [3NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
7No ❑ NA
❑ NE
Page 1 of 3
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: Yo — 9
Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
through a waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes 2 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
El Yes [1/No El NA [I NE
❑ Yes <]d No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmentalth
Eleat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes d No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes El No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes WNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes WNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes o El NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? El Yes �o El NA El NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination',[] Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
IT Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes VNo
NA [INE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
�t)46fe ahfl�jrs%S
9- Io- o g a. 7
3 - /3 - OF = Af. y
i
Reviewer/Inspector Name '; ' ` Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: r
12a8/04 Continued

R
_ Facility Number: �1 —I Date of Inspection©
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20, Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design El Maps El Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I " Rain Inspectionzlwo
Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? El Yes ❑NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ElYes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes Yub ❑ NA ElNE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? ElYes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? ElYes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
�o
❑ NA
❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
Zo
El NA
ElNE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
and
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
El YesYN'
o
El NA
El NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
3 I. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
El Yes
o
❑ NA
El NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
El Yeso
❑ NA
El NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
El Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
Addfho6al'C6M`n1e6ts and/or Di awings: ' s&
I2128104

Type of Visit a Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit • Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: g.' 3 Departure Time: County: Region: a4,f4i
Farm Name: Owner Email:
Owner Name: , y _%.c[-cii� Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone No:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: Lf/ Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Operator:
Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: = o = f 0 H Longitude: = ° [= 6 0
64
Design Current
Design Current
Design Current
Swine Capacity Populatiop
Wet Poultry Capacity Population
Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ La er
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Non -La er
❑ Dairy Calf
® Feeder to Finish dQ
❑ Dai Heifer
❑ Farrow to Wean
Dry Poultry
❑ pry Cow
❑ Farrow to Feeder
Non-Daity
El Farrow to Finish
❑ Layers
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Gilts
❑ Non -La ers
❑Beef Feeder
[--]Boars__
El Pullets
ix
❑ Beef Brood CoAl
❑ Turke s
Other
❑ Other
❑'Turke Points
❑Other
Number of Structures:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes 0No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
dNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
f1 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page 1 of 3 12128104 Continued

f
' Facility Number:
Date of Inspection D
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
❑ Yes ' No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Structure 5
❑ NA ❑ NE
El NA El NE
Structure 6
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes V o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental) threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes
BhrNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes
[/No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ YeS
{} f(No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes
5 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes
40
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or l0 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop types) . -. �, �=� j �•
13. Soil type(s)
,
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
BNo
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes
LI No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?❑ Yes
WN o
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes
YIN.,o
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
ReviewerlInspector Name � �^ 1 Phone: 3
ReviewerlInspector Signature: Date:
. 15

Facility Number: O — Date of Inspection
Reguired Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes -N ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? if yes, check ❑ Yes N ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box. ❑ WDp ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑Maps El Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes J; No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rain Inspections❑Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? El Yes M' o ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes Rl� ❑ NA ❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes L� o0 ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? ❑ YesZo
❑ NA ❑ NE
26. Did the facilityfail to have an active/ certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
y p g '
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes [0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes [A No ❑ NA ❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
91 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
El Yes
,_,(
E No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
,_,(
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
El Yes
9 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
�'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
dNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
Page 3 of 3 12128104

W Division of Water. Quality
Facility Number .O Division of Soil and Water Conservation ,
--jOther Agency
Type of Visit 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit • Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: �1f0 Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: Region: UjIf�
Farm Name: 1 �J-.Cl�(ibt�/ Owner Email:
Owner Name: i7�.I Phone: 4 5-9 — %6-"tea/ 9-3-3�
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: Cam.
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Title:
p Phone No:
Integrator: 4 Z / J
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: = c =, = " Longitude: = ° ❑ ` E__1 "
_ . Design =Current Design Current-`I)esigru:. , t
Wet Poul .. Swore Capacity :Population: try Capacity Population , Cattle ,Capacity Population
] Wean to Finish p•, ❑ Layer
] Wean to Feeder 10 Non -Layer
�Feeder toFinish QQd
] Farrow to Wean °
Dry P6611:ry
] Farrow to Feeder
] Farrow to Finish
] Gilts
] Boars
7777,
her,
Other
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Co
- - --
Number of : Struct&&
- .F
❑ Layers
❑ Non -La ers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ urkey Poults
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
ElYes
210
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
� No ❑ NA
❑ NE
Page I of 3 12128104 Continued

r
- Facility Number: ' O— Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes F No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [ON. ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Annlication
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes EWINo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 2(No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drifi ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) —
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
o
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?❑ Yes
:No
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
4�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
[ /No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question ft Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
Reviewer/Inspector Name r Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: — O
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: — Date of inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑Maps El Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes O No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 6No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes LI No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ElYes LI No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes dbi ❑ NA ❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
No
Cl Yes
Ed
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
�
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
7X0
El NA
❑ NE
El Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document ElYes 71,40 ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
LYJ No ❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
K� ❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
El Yes
!CJ No ❑ NA
❑ NE
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
12128104

Division of Water Quality
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400017 Facility Status: Active Permit: AW1400017 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Gre ne Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 08116I2007 Entry Time:09:00 AM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: Everette Murl2hrev Farm Owner Email:
Owner: Everette Mu[phreyPhone:252-753-2733
Mailing Address: 69930 US Hwy 258 N _ rmville NC 27828
Physical Address: 5842 Willow Green Rd rm
FacilityStatus: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:35°31'60" Longitude:77°33'43"
On west side of SR 1245 approx. 0.5 miles north of SR 1228, Sandy Run.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number:
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
On -site representative Everette Murphrey Phone:
24 hour contact name Everette Murphrey Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Hate:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
waste analyses:
7-19-07 = 3.2
1-24-07 = 2.5
Soil test March 2007
Looks good.
Page: 1

Permit: AWI400017 Owner -Facility: Everette Murphrey
Inspection Date: 08/16/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number : 400017
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Q Swine - Feeder to Finish 5,000 4,996
Total Design Capacity: 5,000
Total SSLW: 675,000
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
�reatment System RECOVERY SYSTEMS INC 40.00
Page: 2

Permit: AW1400017 Owner - Facility: Everette Murphrey
Facility Number: 400017
Inspection Date: 08/16/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No
NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
■
❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑ ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other
than from a ❑
■
❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe ❑ ■ Cl ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ ■ Cl ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑ ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 3

J
Permit: AW1400017 Owner - Facility: Everette Murphrey Facility Number:4000W
Inspection Date: 0811612007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
PAN? ❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.? ❑
Total P205? ❑
Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil? ❑
Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑
Evidence of wind drift?
Application outside of application area? ❑
Crop Type 1 Com, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑
■
❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
■
❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
■
❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■
❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■
❑ ❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA NE
19, Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
■
❑ ❑
20, Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AW1400017 Owner - Facility: Everette Murphrey
Facility Number: 400017
Inspection Date: 08/16/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No NA NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
Cl
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES
only)? ❑
■ ❑ ❑
24, Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
Other Issues
Yes
No NA NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately,
Page: 5

Permit: AW1400017 owner - Facility: Everette Murphrey
Inspection Date: Oa11612007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewrnspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Facility Number:400017
Reason for Visit: Routine
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 6

t
Type of Visit 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit 49 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arriva[ Time: Departure Time: County: Region: / C�
Farm Name: Owner Email:
Owner Name: —� Phone:10,
✓r
Mailing Address: 7�d�1Y1��___,
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone No:
Onsite Representative: Integrator: _T _
Certified Operator: ] z'J Z��,.�� Operator Certification Number: J �irw 7U
Back-up Operator: Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: = o = I = « Longitude: [= ° = 4
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
❑ Other
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ Laver
❑ Non -Layer
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ DaijX Heifer
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Co
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
Number of Structures:
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
[R/No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
[l o
❑ NA
❑ NE
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: W6=
Date of inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
❑ Yes UNo
❑ Yes ❑ No
Structure 5
El NA El NE
❑NA ❑NE
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ElNE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ElYes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental th at, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ;7No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes VINo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes V/N(❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ElYesVNo❑NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs [:]Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type —
s) l � Il< 7 S /!��• �� Jd% � .�� `�/ n �-
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination ? ❑ Yes
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
V El NA ❑ NE
El NA El NE
[o❑ NA NE
�46" ❑NA El NE
L>d o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question # ): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or;any other comments
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary)-
� 3�
7-1--0 s- 33 0
a-l&-05— 3. a
Reviewer/Inspector Name I Phone: 9fT_3Z36(s
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: gaza—�B
Pnoa � of 3 r2/2RinQ !'nniinund

F
Facility Number: Date of Inspection -i-a-D
Required Records_& Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes P N ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes 0No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box. ❑ wup ❑ Checklists ❑ Design [I Maps ❑Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ RainfalI ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ElYes 2 N El NA [I NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? El Yes V ❑ NA ❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
El NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
L✓, N ❑ NA
❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
/ El NA
❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
146 ElNA
ElNE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
ElYes
�I N El NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
El Yes
No ❑ NA
El NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
ElNA
ElNE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
7tiu
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
ElYes
El NA
❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
El Yes
rNo ❑ NA
❑ NE
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
Page 3 of 3 12129104

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection -�-a-0
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes V N ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fait to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes 1 . ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box. ❑ WT Tp ❑ Checklists ❑ Desi n ❑ Mn s ❑ Other
g p
21.
Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1"
Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
facility
❑
22.
Did the fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
Yes
IJ N
❑ NA
❑ NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
El
,
❑ NA
❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
El Yes7Nv
❑ NA
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
El NA
El NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
El Yes
NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
Na
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
ElNA
❑ NE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
ElYes
U/ N
El NA
El NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
El Yes
No
[I NA
El NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
,(❑
,71310
NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
El NA
El NE
33.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
Zo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
Page 3 of 3 12128104

i
M Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency II ----II
Facility Number: Facility Status: Active Permit: NCA240017 I_I Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Greene Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 02/22/2006 Entry Time:11:30 AM Exit Time:
Incident M
Farm Name: Everette Murohrev Farm Owner Email:
Owner: Everette Murohrey
------ rCftT1•�[�Xi�l�lya ,� _ u , $'•FE:'�1•
Physical Address:
Q99�r %"x =
Facility Status: M Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35031'60" Longitude: 77°33'43"
On west side of SR 1245 approx. 0.5 miles north of SR 1228. Sandy Run.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: William E Murphrey Operator Certification Number: 16630
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
On -site representative Phone:
24 hour contact name Everette Murphrey Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Waste analyses:
10-10-05 = 3.1
7-1-06 = 3.0
2-1 fi-05 =3.0
Sail test Oct. 2005
Date:
Page: 1

4
Permit: NCA240017 - Owner -Facility: Everette Nlurphrey Facility Number: 400017
Inspection Date: 02/2212006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 5.000 4,975
Total Design Capacity: 5,000
Total SSLW: 675,000
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
lagoon 1 03/14/94 19.00 :26-:00]
Page: 2

0
Permit: NCA240017 Owner - Facility: Everette Murphrey Facility Number: 400017
Inspection Date: 02/22/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?,
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ ■ ❑ ❑ ,
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes No NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑ -■ 130
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

Permit: NCA240017 Owner - Facility: Everette Murphrey Facility Number: 400017
Inspection Date: 02/22/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
PAN? ❑
Is PAN > 100/o/10 lbs.? ❑
Total P205? ❑
Failure to incorporate manureisludge into bare soil? . ❑
Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑
Evidence of wind drift? ❑
Application outside of application area? ❑
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
'Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Records and Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
If yes, check the appropriate box below,
WUP?
Com, Wheat, Soybeans
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
n
Page: 4

Permit: NCA240017 Owner - Facility: Everette Murphrey
Facility Number: 400017
Inspection Date: 02t2212006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Beason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
0000.
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
110
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)? ❑
■
❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑ ❑
25. Did the facility fail to -conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑ ❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■
❑ ❑
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■
❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: NCA240017 Owner -Facility: Everette Murphrey
Facility Number: 400017
Inspection date: 02/22/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Other issues
Yes
No
NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWO of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
M
❑ ❑
32. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss reviewrinspection with on -site representative?
❑
N
❑ ❑
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
- ❑
■
❑ ❑
Page: 6

Type of Visit OQ Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 40 I7 Date of Visit: 3-5-2004 Time: S:SO
rO Not Operational O Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified [a Conditionally Certified [3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold :...................
Farm Name: Exerettti.MiLrnbrut.F.airin......................... County: Grcuat..... ......................................... W.aRO?........
Owner Name: Exeretke................................. 1! iarphr.tax.......................... Phone No: 25.2.7.53-173.3....... ..................................................
Mailing Address: 6,9.3.0-175..fIgh i'-ay..,Z5B.N.Q1Cth................................ ........................ �axar>.vitae...N�.............................. ,....................... Z.7.82.8 ...............
Facility Contact: Exerefte.l►.'tlJua barmy ....................................Title:................... Phone Not
Onsite Representative: Fygrettg........................................................................................ Integrator:... ......................................... .........................
Certified Operator%W.jllAam..E............................. 1Y.1,uXilhrgy................................. ..... Operator Certification Number%t6.6 Q.............................
Location of Farm:
On west side of SR 1245 approx. 0.5 miles north of SR 1228. Sandy Run.
® Swine [I Poultry [I Cattle [I Horse Latitude 35 • 31 6fl u Longitude 77 • 33 43 «
Design Current
Design Current
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
Poultry
Capacity Population Cattle
Capacitv Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
I[] Layer
❑ Dairy
I
I
® Feeder to Finish
5000
I
1700
❑ Non -layer
❑ Non -Dairy
__d
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity
5,000
❑ Gilts
Total. SSLW
675,000
❑Boars
Number of Lagoons 1 Subsurface Drains Present
Holdirify Prinds . S611*d : '. Tr2nsE I -T
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
Structure 6
Identifier: ....................
Freeboard (inches): 25
1211210.3
Continued

Facility Number: 40-17 Date of Inspection 3-5-2004
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or ❑ Yes ® No
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level ❑ Yes ® No
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ® No
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc
12. Crop type Corn, Soybeans, Wheat
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes OR No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ®No
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ Yes ® No
Air Quality representative immediately.
Comments (re[er-.to questioii #) Explain any,YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments
Use: drawings;of facilityto Ibetter.eiplam situations (use `add itionsl-pages as _necessary):. z; ❑Field Copy ®Final Notes
Reviewerfluspector Name ,Marlene D. Salyer
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 5 —
17/17/113 rnrdln,.nd

Facility Number: 40-17 3-5-2004
Date of Inspection
Required Records_& Documents
21.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
® No;
22.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
® No
23.
Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Sampling
24.
is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
® No
25.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
® No
26.
FaiI to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
®No
27.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
® No
28.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Ye's
® No
29.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
® No
NPDES Permitted Facilities
30.
Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35)
® Yes
❑ No
31.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
®No
32.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
® No
33.
Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey?
❑ Yes
® No
34.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
®No
35.
Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Stocking Form ❑ Crop Yield Form ❑ Rainfall ❑ Inspection After 1" Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form
12112103

�• Technical Assistance Site Visit Report
• Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Natural Resources Conservation Service
O Soil and Water Conservation District
O Other...
Facility Number 40 - 17 Date: 9124/03 Time: 1 915 Time On Farm: 50 WaRO
Farm Name Everette Murphrey Farm County Greene
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address 6930 US Highway 258 North Farmville NC 27828
Onsite
Representative Everette Murphrey/ Michele Christensen Integrator jPremium Standard Farms
Type Of Visit Purpose Of Visit
Operation Review
Compliance Inspection (pilot only)
Technical Assistance
Confirmation for Removal
❑ No Animals -Date Last Operated:
❑ Operating below threshold
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse
Design Current
Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to -Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
soon
5000
•O Routine
O Response to DWQ/DENR referral
Q Response to DSWC/SWCD referral
O Response to complaintllocal referral
O Requested by producer/integrator
O Follow-up
Q Emergency
O Other...
Design Current
Capacity Population
❑ Layer
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
GENERAL QUESTIONS:
1. Is waste discharging from any part of the operation and reaching surface waters or wetlands? ❑ yes ® no
2. Is there evidence of a past waste discharge from any part of the operation that waste reached ❑ yes ® no
surface waters or wetlands?
3. Does any problem pose an immediate threat to the integrity of the waste structure (large trees, ❑ yes ®no
seepage, severe erosion, etc.)?
4. Is there evidence of nitrogen over application, hydraulic overloading or excessive ponding ❑ yes ® no
requiring DWQ notification?
5. Is there evidence of improper dead animal disposal that poses a threat to the environment ❑ yes ® no
and/or public health?
6. Is the waste level within the structural freeboard elevation range for any waste structure? ❑ yes ®no
Structure1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier
Level (Inches) 1 32
CROP TYPES lCorn Soybeans Wheat
SPRAYFIELD
SOIL TYPES NoA Ly GoA
7. What type of technical assistance does the onsite representative feel is needed? (list in comment section)
03/10/03
❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
GENERAL QUESTIONS:
1. Is waste discharging from any part of the operation and reaching surface waters or wetlands? ❑ yes ® no
2. Is there evidence of a past waste discharge from any part of the operation that waste reached ❑ yes ® no
surface waters or wetlands?
3. Does any problem pose an immediate threat to the integrity of the waste structure (large trees, ❑ yes ®no
seepage, severe erosion, etc.)?
4. Is there evidence of nitrogen over application, hydraulic overloading or excessive ponding ❑ yes ® no
requiring DWQ notification?
5. Is there evidence of improper dead animal disposal that poses a threat to the environment ❑ yes ® no
and/or public health?
6. Is the waste level within the structural freeboard elevation range for any waste structure? ❑ yes ®no
Structure1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier
Level (Inches) 1 32
CROP TYPES lCorn Soybeans Wheat
SPRAYFIELD
SOIL TYPES NoA Ly GoA
7. What type of technical assistance does the onsite representative feel is needed? (list in comment section)
03/10/03
❑ Other
GENERAL QUESTIONS:
1. Is waste discharging from any part of the operation and reaching surface waters or wetlands? ❑ yes ® no
2. Is there evidence of a past waste discharge from any part of the operation that waste reached ❑ yes ® no
surface waters or wetlands?
3. Does any problem pose an immediate threat to the integrity of the waste structure (large trees, ❑ yes ®no
seepage, severe erosion, etc.)?
4. Is there evidence of nitrogen over application, hydraulic overloading or excessive ponding ❑ yes ® no
requiring DWQ notification?
5. Is there evidence of improper dead animal disposal that poses a threat to the environment ❑ yes ® no
and/or public health?
6. Is the waste level within the structural freeboard elevation range for any waste structure? ❑ yes ®no
Structure1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier
Level (Inches) 1 32
CROP TYPES lCorn Soybeans Wheat
SPRAYFIELD
SOIL TYPES NoA Ly GoA
7. What type of technical assistance does the onsite representative feel is needed? (list in comment section)
03/10/03

Facility Number 40 - 17 Date:
9/24/03
PARAMETER
Q No assistance provided/requested
❑ 8. Waste spill leaving site
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE Needed
Provided
❑ 9. Waste spill contained on site
❑ 10. Level in structural freeboard
25. Waste Plan Revision or Amendment
❑
❑
[111. Level in storm storage
26. Waste Plan Conditional Amendment
❑
❑
27. Review or Evaluate Waste Plan wlproducer
❑
❑
❑ 12. Waste structure integrity compromised
❑ 13. Waste structure needs maintenance
28. Forms Need (list in comment section)
❑
El
29. Missing Components (list in comments)
❑
❑
❑ 14. Over application >= 10% & 10 lbs.
❑
❑
❑ 15. Over application < 10% or < 10 lbs.
30. 2H.0200 re -certification
❑ 16. Hydraulic overloading
31. Five & Thirty day Plans of Action (PoA)
❑
❑
32. Irrigation record keeping assistance
❑
❑
[117. Deficient irrigation records
❑ 18. Late/missing waste analysis
33.Organizelcomputerization of records
El
El
El 19. Late/missing lagoon level records
34. Sludge Evaluation
❑
❑
❑ 20. Late/missing soils analysis
❑ 21. Crop needs improvement
35. Sludge or Closure Plan
❑
❑
❑ 22. Crop inconsistent with waste plan
36. Sludge removal/closure procedures
❑
❑
37. Waste Structure Evaluation
❑
❑
❑ 23. Irrigation maintenance deficiency
❑ 24. Deficient sprayfield conditions
38. Structure Needs Improvement
❑
❑
39. Operation & Maintenance Improvements
❑
❑
40. Marker check/calibration
❑
❑
Regulatory Referrals
41. Site evaluation
❑
❑
❑ Referred to DWQ ' Date:
42. Irrigation Calibration
❑
❑
❑ Referred to NCDA Date:
43. Irrigation designlinstailation
El
El
El Other...
system
Date:
44. Secure irrigation information (maps, etc.)
❑
❑
LIST IMPROVEMENTS
45. Operating improvements (pull signs, etc.)
❑
❑
MADE BY OPERATION
46. Wettable Acre Determination
❑
❑
1
47. Evaluate WAD certificationlrechecks
❑
❑
48. Crop evaluation/recommendations
❑
❑
2.
49. Drainage worklevaluation
❑
❑
50. Land shaping, subsoiling, aeration, etc.
51. Runoff control, stonnwater diversion, etc.
❑
❑
❑
❑
3
52. Huffer improvements
❑
❑
53. Field measurements(GPS, surveying, etc.)
❑
❑
4.
54. Mortality BMPs
❑
❑
55. Waste operator education (NPDES)
5.
56.Operation & maintenance education
❑
❑
57. Record keeping education
❑
❑
6
58. Croplforage management education
❑
❑
59. Soil and/or waste sampling education
❑
❑
03/10/03

1.
Facility Number 40 - 17 Date: r 9/24/03
COMMENTS:
55. Reviewed NPDES and transferring information to new forms with producer.
*Farm is well maintained.
COC dated April 9, 2003 and on site.
*Waste plan dated 8/19/03 nitrogen is 1.5 Ibs/1000 gallons
6/5103 nitrogen is 3.1 Ibs11000 gallons
3/28/03 nitrogen is 2.3 Ibs/1000 gallons
1213/02 nitrogen is 2.8 Ibs/1000 gallons
6/6/02 nitrogen is 3.3 Ibs11000 gallons
Soil test dated 1017/02 and 4/9103 Cu, Zn and ph within guidelines.
*Make records available for 5 years.
Irrigation reel calibrated 8/20/03.
IRR2 records are complete and balanced.
Rain stop installed on irrigation pump.
Lagoon level has been transferred to new forms including rainfall. Drops in lagoon are consistent with irrigation events.
*Receiving crops in good condition.
TECHNICAL SPECIALIST Martin McLawhorn
SIGNATURE
Date Entered: 9/24/03
Entered By: IMartin McLawhorn
03/10/03

of Visit 0 Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit *Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 40 17 Date of Visit: 12-18-2002 Time:E: 1205
Q Not Operational Q Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified [3 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above 'Threshold : .................
Farm Name: Exeretfe.Mttrphroy..Faint........... ..............................I............ County: Gxmne-............................................. . .I .A........
OwnerName: Ev.=Ke................................. MjRrp jVy................................................. Phone No: 7.5Z-.733-2733....... -..................................................
Facility Contact:
Title:................................................................ Phone No:
Mailing Address: 693Il.U5jMXtLWa.1'.2M..N0X&........................................................ Fa�myuk.xC.......... ............................................. 2.782 .............
Onsite Representative: )dye=tle.Mlulrpj=y..............."............._.................................... Integrator: Pmmiu=.S1autdat>:dJFaxta [t1;Nur1h...........
Certified Operator: 1N.i111amF............................. Hur4jh=y ....................................... Operator Certification Number: .16630.............................
Location of Farm:
Dn west side of SR 1245 approx. 0.5 miles north of SR 1228. Sandy Run. " A,
I® Swine [I Poultry El Cattle [3 Norse Latitude 35 • 31 60 u Longitude 77 • F 43 fi
Swtge
Design_ Current-
Caoackv-Ponuiation
❑ Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
5000
?
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current = , - Design « Current
Poultry ._ Ca acit Population __ Cattle Capacity Pa elation
LLayer _ ❑ Dairy
Non -Layer I Non -Dairy
❑ Other t =
Total Design Capacity 5,000
Total SSLW 675,000
-Number of Lagoons INSubsurface Drains Present 0 Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Tietd Area
Belding Ponds] So idTraps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed. was the conversance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If ves, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. II' discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d_ Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes. notify DWQ) [--]Yes ❑ No
2_ Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus slorm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure l Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ...................................
Freeboard(inches) : .............. 2z.................. .................................... ...... ............................. .................................... .................................... .............
.......................

5100 Continued on back
Facility Number: 40-17 Date of Inspection 12-18-2ti02 Printed on: 12130/2002
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ic/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes N No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes N No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? [:]Yes N No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes N No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes N No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenancelimprovement? ❑ Yes N No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ❑ No
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ❑ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
N No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
❑ No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
❑ No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
❑ No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
❑ No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
� •No violations or:deficiencies were:noted:during thiswisit:: You will'receive'no further' :
correspondence about this -visit.• :: . : ::::.:.:::::::::::::::::::::::
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any.YES answers=and/or any recommendations or any other comments. - -
Use drawings of facility to Better explain situations. use additional pages as necessary):...
nannounced inspection. Records were no on site.
Requested the following records to be sent to the WaRO office. Send to 943 Washington Square Mall, Washington NC
27889: Current waste utilization plan, Irrigation records from October 2001 to present date, Waste analysis from
October 2001 to present date, Soil analysis for October 2001 to present date and freeboard levels from October 2001 to
resent date.
Everette began pumping in the front field - wheat crop
ReviewerlInspector NameA4-
-ram

IReviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 5/00 1
Facility Number: 40-17 Date of Inspection 12-18-2002 Printed on: 12/30/2002
Odor Issues
26_ Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
28_ Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt_ ❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ® No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ® No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No

,Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O. Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
(Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ denied Access
Facility Number 40 I7 Date of visit: 6/13f2t102 Time: t338
O Not Operational O Below Threshold
® Permitted MICertified 13Conditionally Certified © Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ............
Farm Name: Ey.crcM._Mu hrry...F......I................... I ............... .............................. County: Gmin ............................................... WARO ........
OwnerName: EyemUt................................. Mulrp hay...............................................--- Phone No: 2.5Z77532713-------------------.----------------....... ..........................................................
Mailing Address: fi`,3.0.C1.S.Higtrw.ay25$.Nnrkit.......................................•................. FatmxaDe..NC....................................................... 22.829 .............
FacilityContact: .............................................................................. Title:
... Phone No: ...................................................
Onsite Representative: JEycmtfc.Marpbzcy/..Michele.ChrJ9ten&DA................... Integrator: PremiumSxat dartl.Fax=&.9 NQrj R...........
Certified Operator: WflUmE............................ Mi x.............. . Operator Certification Nurnber:,16.63.0 ............................
Location of farm:
3n west side of SR 1245 approa. US miles north of SR 1228. Sandy Run.
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude Longitude 77 • 33 43
Design : Curren# .::..: :: Deli Current _ Des` o:: Current .:
Swine :: .-Poultry Cattle:C :Capacity -PuattuiCapacity - Populati6n
❑ Wean to Feeder
N Feeder to Finish
5000
5000
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Subsurface Drains Present II❑ Lagoon Area I❑ Spray Field Area
No Liquid Waste
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Di-scbarge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Qiber
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b_ If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes_ notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If ves, uotifz- DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
St uatire l Structure 2 Stricture 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identilieu-:
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
[j Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
Structure 6
Freeboard (inches):...............3.0...............

05103101
Facility Number: 40- 17
Date of Inspection 6/1312d02
Continued
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
& Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
1 1. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type Com, Soybeans, Wheat
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
I4. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Re aired Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ic/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
25_ Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ® No
113 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
❑ Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
*Waste plan dated 8108/01.
*Soil test dated 10/1/01 lime requirements are less than one ton per acre. Cu and Zn within guidelines. Remember to take soil test for 2002
and follow time requirements.
*Waste analysis dated 6/6/02 unitrogen is 3.3 lbs/1000 gallons
2/2/02 nitrogen is 3.1 lbs/1000 gallons
7/30/01 nitrogen is 2.81bs/1000 gallons
*Lagoon level is recorded weekly as required by permit.
Reviewer/Inspector Name
�a�;oa,o..rr..ana...,.. c;....ar.,..o. ngfa•

O5103101 Condnued
Facility Number: 4l}-17 Bate of Inspection 6/I3/2002
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge atlor below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i_e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i_e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes R No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
19. There is not a current waste analysis to cover irrigation events on 2001 wheat crop dates 9130/01 thru 11/13/01. Unable to answer
11. Remember to take waste analysis 60 days before /60 days after irrigation events.
*Small amount of trash needs to be removed from lagoon.
*Weeds have been sprayed on inside dike walls.
*Farm is well maintained - crops free of weeds.

O�o� W AT �9QG
—1
To: Producers
From: Lyn B. Hardison
Environmental Specialist
Washington Regional Office !
Date: May 18, 2001
Subject: Animal Compliance Routine Inspection
Year 2001
Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G- Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Kerr T. Stevens
Division of Water Quality
Enclosed please find a copy or copies of the Compliance Site Inspection(s) (as viewed in DWQ database) conducted at the
referenced facility by the Division of Water Quality from the Washington Regional Office. Please read this inspection and
keep with all other documents pertaining to your animal operation for future inspections.
In general, these inspections included verifying that: (1) the farm has a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP);
(2) the farm is complying with requirements of the State Rules 15 NCAC 2H.0217, Senate Bill 1217, and the Certified Animal
Waste Management Plan; (3) the farm operation's waste management system is being operated properly under the direction of a
Certified Operator; (4) the required records are being kept; (5) there are no signs of seepage, erosion, and/or runoff.
As a reminder, please note the following which are conditions of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan and the general
permit; therefore, these items must be implemented:
cp The maximum waste level in ]agoons/storage ponds shall not exceed that specified in the CAWMP. At a minimum,
maximum waste level for waste for lagoons/storage ponds must not exceed the level that provides adequate siorage to
contain 25 year, 24 hour storm event plus an additional foot of structural freeboard.
cp An analysis of the liquid animal waste from the lagoon shall be conducted as close to the time of application as practical and
at least within 60 days (before or after) of the date of application. This analysis shall include the following parameters:
Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Zinc and Copper.
cp Soil analysis is required annually.
tp The following records are required: off -site solids removal, maintenance, repair, waste/soil analysis and land irrigation
records. These records should be maintained by the facility ownedmanager in chronological and legible form for a
minimum of three years.
tp Land application rates shall be in accordance with the CAWMP. In no case shall land application rates exceed the Plant
Available Nitrogen (PAN) rate for the receivine croD or result in runoff durinc anv given application.
cp All grassed waterways shall have a stable outlet with adequate capacity to prevent ponding or flooding damages. The outlet
can be another vegetated channel, an earth ditch, stabilization structure, or other suitable outlets.
9 It is suggested, not required, to keep crop yield information for future use to update your waste management plan. You will
need three -years of crop yield data before your plan can be updated.
For your information, any swine facility that has a discharge to surface waters of the State will have to apply for a National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit with the Division of Water Quality, effective January 1, 2001,
Thank you for your assistance and cooperation during the inspection. If you have any questions, please contact your Technical
Specialist or me at 252-946-6481, ext. 318.
Cc: ;�aRO
LBH Files (inspection form only)
943 Washington Square Mall Washington, NC 27889 252-946-6481 (Telephone) 252-946-9215 (Fax)

of Visit O Compliance inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Fallow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Deni2d Access
Facility Number 40 17.. late of v'ihl: 3-26-2U01 Time: 1358
O Not O rational O Below Threshold
■ Permitted ■ Certified [3 Conditionally Certified ❑ Registered Date Vast Operated or Above Threshold- _
Farm Name- EY=#tom _. County:
Owner Name: EYtx,ritt4� M Phone No:
Mailing Address: 693QN-
Facility Contact:
Title:
Phone No:
Onsite Representative: tg��tt� ]ltz�h 3'_ ._—_.._._.___.._�---..••-. Integrator: L.L.Murpkur x-Co.................................
Certified Operator: j? 51114M........._...._-----_-Operator Certification Number: {f _AQ•-__ .....................
Location of Farm:
On west side of SR 1245 approx. 0-5 miles north of SR 122& Sandy Run. A.
® Swine ❑ ?sultry ❑Cattle ❑horse Latitude 35 • 31 60 Longitude 77 " 33 43
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
J❑ Wean to Feeder
('$! Feeder to Finish 5000 I 4800
JE) Fa, -row to Wean
ji-D Farrow to Feeder
iJ Farrow to Finish
j❑ Gilts I
1❑ Boars
Design Current : Desiga` ` _ CinTenY
Poultry CapacityC-1pacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
10 Laver { JED Dairy
JEJ Non -Layer ] J❑ Non -Dairy
lu Outer I I
Total Design Capacity ,000
Total SSLW 1 675.000
Number of Lagoons I9, Subsurface Drains Present 10 Lagoon Area Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps 1❑ No Liquid Nt1'aste Management System _ _ _ _ ` = ° _
e r _
Discharg t- Stream lmnac
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Feld ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed. was the convevance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed. did it reach Water of the State? (If yes. notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in ual/min?
d. Does discharge bvpass a lannon system? (If ves_ notify DI11Q)
?- Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
n/a
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
1t'aste Collection d Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus sto-,m storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes 0 No
Structure 1 Structure ? Structure : Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure G
ldentif ter....................................................................... ............. _......... __....... ................................... .......
Freeboard finches):30
05103101 Continued

Facility Number: 40-27 _ Date of Inspection 3-Z6-7A01
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which arc not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public stealth or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance./improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctums lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum -and minimum }squid level
elevation markings?
Ml ficafim
10. Arc there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type Corn, Soybeans, Wheat
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
®No
❑ Yes
®No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
®No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
IN No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records &Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
I9. Does record loping need improvement? (iel irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. 1s facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) .
23_ Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit -by same agency?
❑ Yes Z No
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes ®No
0 Yes 19 No
❑ Yes Z No
0 Yes ®No
€Ji Yes gj No
0 Yes ® No
L7 Yes gj No
❑ Yes ® No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes 0 No
0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit You will t ecelve no further correspondence about this visit
Records available for review.
Soil analysis up thru 2000 available. Lime has been applied.
Hadn't irrigated since 10/00 - therefore, no irrigation records to review.
Waste analysis - 8/00 = 2.4 lbs.
Time to pull another sample'.
Vesetation on dike wall is well established.
Practice weed control upon need.
❑ Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
Reviewer/lrtspector Name Lyn B. Uardison r, -
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
05103101 v
i
Date: -�

Facility Number. 4—17 Date of 1avection- F3-26-2001
Printed on: 5/18/2001
26.• Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the starabere pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (ie. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29.- Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?.
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? .(i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
Suggest to calibrate irrigation system every 3 years.
Suggest to check the accuracy of the lagoon marker to the lagoon design.
'If you have any questions contact your Technical Specialist or me @ 252-946-6481 est- 318.
.s
r
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
OSIO3101
J

Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 40 I7 Date of Visit: 6/8/2000 Time: 1:35 PM Printed on: 6/16/2000
O Not O erational O Below Threshold
® Permitted ®Certified E3 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ................ . .
FarmName: .................................................. ..................... County: Gnuc .............................................. W.BR.?........
Owner Name: EyCrt~Xkti................................. MlLep rgy................................................. Phone No: 252:151-173.3 ..........................................................
Facility Contact: ................................................................... ... Title: .. Phone No
Mailing Address: �it.�. a� � X: r�................................................................................. karanyilk..NC....................................................... a.7.8Z8 .............
Onsite Representative: EyeJCCkte..il urph rCy.................................................................. Integrator: L.L.UItmb1Ca..C&...............................
...............
Certified Opera to r:.Wjark8M„ Ey.trf jtC.............. K91Cjth<]Cgy........................................ Operator Certification Number:X,6¢ Q,
............................
Location of Farm:
IN Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 • 31 G 60 Longitude 77 • 33 ° 43
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
❑ Yes ® No
Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ........................................................................
Freeboard (inches): 35
!'.....�:.-.....J .. -. L.... 1.

Continued on back
+- haeility Number: 40-17 Date of Inspection 6/$12p00 Printed on: 6/16/2000
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes ® No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ®No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ®No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ❑ No
12. Crop type Corn, Soybeans, Wheat
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
0 �o •vt6fatiogs:or def eiencies-We re :noted :dii _ring• ttiis visit:: Y'OW will :receive nb further
. ' corresnondence about thI Asit.
uate freeboard level.
,w records Tuesday/June 13, 2000.
6113/00 (11:45 AM)
Irrigating corn during site visit. Unable to review records.
Contact me at 252-946-6481, extension 321 if you have any questions.
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Reviewer/Inspector Name
B. Cullom Entered by Ann

Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
r Facility Number: 4o--17 Date of Inspection b18/2000 Printed on: 6/16/2000
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ® No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ®No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanenthemporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
iAUditionalCGomments an_ o3Drawings:

,- �- State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
July 6,1999
Everette Murphrey
Rt l Box 221-AC
Farmville NC 27828
A IT 0 0
44
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Subject: Compliance Inspection
Everette Murphrey Farm
Facility Number 40 - 17
Greene County
Dear Everette Murphrey,
On 6/16/99, Carl Dunn from the Washington Regional Office of the Division of Water Quality
conducted an inspection of your animal operation. Please review the enclosed inspection form. This
inspection form should be maintained as part of the records for your facility. Please note any items that
may be marked with a yes answer and make every effort to correct these deficiencies. You are advised
that you must maintain a freeboard of at least one foot in your lagoon(s) plus a storage volume sufficient
to accommodate the rainfall and subsequent runoff from a 25 year 24 hour storm event to remain in
compliance. You should consult your lagoon design for the exact freeboard requirement. Please
remember that you must follow your waste management plan at all times.
Thank you for your cooperation in this inspection. If you have any further questions in regard to this
matter or if I may be of any assistance, I can be contacted at [phone] ext. 208.
Sincerely,
Carl Dunn
Environmental Engineer
cc: WaRO
L L Murphrey Co.
943 Washington Square Mall, Washington, NC 27889 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Facility Number Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection c7(% 24'hr. (hh:mm)
10 Permitted [3 Certified Q Conditionally Certified © Registered JE3 Not O erational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: P.
Fe er <JJ ti� F" I .- I County:......... . ..............................
................................................7..................--................................................ .
Owner Name: ...............E✓�.f1 4C .................�..`......`..� j!......................--................ Phone No:..............................
FacilityContact: ..............................................................................Title:...............................
MailingAddress: .................................................................................................................
Onsite Representative: Q r e '� �..
n l 1 *�... .'............................f .....................................
Certified Operator: ��
Location of Farm: /
f...
...................... Phone No:
...................................................
....................................... ..................................... I...... ..........................
Integrator; ..........`..... n.......p......Q..yy ............................................
Operator Certification Number: ..........................................
A
......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Latitude 0 r Longitude • 4 &_
Design Current ;_ Design Current, Design Current
Capacity Ponutatron Pogltry Capacity Ponulation Cattle
Canacity Population
❑ We to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
500 p
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts,
❑ Boars
�14umber4f Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area 0 Spray Feld Area
--
HotdingaPondsJ Solid Traps -' ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharge- & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min!
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If ves, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge -from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches): ...... ..�..I....
Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes 5d No
❑ Yes 19 No
❑ Yes Q No
Structure 6
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99
❑ Yes 9[ No
Continued on back

Facility` -Number: L40 — [ Date of Inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes 2i4o
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes [9 No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes N No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes P,No
Waste it
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Yes 2�No
12. Crop type C_,r.-, hc.L'5
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?❑ Yes [&No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
12 No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
® No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
q No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
[ANo
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (iel irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
® No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
❑ No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
® No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
No
yii>lafigns :or de#icien... were . . . . during phis. visj t. - Y;ou :will •reeeiye id further - : - : •
6 res• oriden' ce: Aa' U : this v:isit- : - : - : • : :
Commenis-(refeiio question #) - iplain`any YES answers agd/or any recornm-'endations,or any other cominents'
_ _:. —
_ __
g ty. x
Use drawin s of facili to better explain situations .(use additional pages as.necessary)
w
Reviewer/Inspector Name=utr*� :.%�'ti n�
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: ` 1 G-
3/23/99

Facilirj Number: Date of lnspection
•Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below 10 Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes VNo
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes 5rNo
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. is the land application. spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ER No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged Till pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? Yes ❑ No
3/23/99

O Rzo
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and
Natural Resources
Washington Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Mr. Everette Murphrey
Everette Murphrey Farm
RL 1, Box 221-AC
Farmville, NC 27828
o0F1.4V*W,A
ww-""" r00044*%6�
NCDENR
Nc>m,r" CARdLINA r7EPAmTMENT Off'
ENVIRONMENT ANr> N acru t ,L F2ESOUFtGES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALM
January 21, 1999
SUBJECT: Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
Everette Murphrey Farm
Fac. No. 40-17
Greene County
Dear Mr. Murphrey:
On June 24, 1998, I conducted an Animal Feedlot Operation Site 'Inspection at the referenced facility.
Overall, the operation was found to be in satisfactory condition. A copy of the inspection report is attached.
for your review.
In general, this inspection includes verifying that (1) the farm has a Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan (CAWMP); (2) the farm is complying with requirements of the State Rules 15 NCAC 2H.0217, Senate
Bill 1217, and the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan; (3) the farm operation's waste management
system is being operated properly under the direction of a Certified Operator, (4) the required records are
being kept; (5) there are no signs of seepage, erosion, and/or nmoff.
The recommendations and/or comments regarding your inspection can be found in the comment section of the
attached inspection form. It is very important as the owner and Operator in Charge that ym-address any noted
concerns, as soon as possible. For assistance, please contact your Technical Specialist and/or the local Soil &
Water Conservation District Office.
Thank you for your cooperation and assistance during the inspection. Should you have further questions or
comments regarding this inspection, do not hesitate to call me at [phone], ext. 321.
Sincerely,
Daphne B. Cullom
Environmental Specialist Il
M. Greene County SWCD Office
Jake Bartow, L.L. Murphrey Company
O
943 Washington Square Mall, Washington, North Carolina 27889
Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

Facility Number Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection r. 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Q Registered i Certified 0 Applied for Permit Permitted 113 Not Operational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: Exeratte..Murphrey:F.arm............................... ............... ......................... County: Greene WaRO
Owner Name: ExexxUr. ................................ hlurphrry ................................................. Phone No:.75.1-2733........................................................•..•••••••.
Facility Contact: ...................................................................... .Title: ....... Phone No:
Mailing Address: Rt.L.Rox.221 AC...•••••••••••••••••••............•••••••.•••.................................... Farmxalle-NC.............................••••••••••••-••••••••...... 2782R ..............
Onsite Representative: Exarette.3kllurpfuey_.......... ...••••••-.......................................... Integrator: L.L.Murpitrey..CampanY.................................
Certified Operator: W. ! Liam.I...••••••••••••............• Murp rey....................................... Operator Certification Number- 1663Q•............................
Location of Farm:
Latitude ©•©° ®� Longitude ©a ©®K
13 Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
17 Farrow to Wean
p Farrow to Feeder
13 Farrow to Fmish
Gilts
p Boars
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? p Yes ® No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? p Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: p Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? p Yes p No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes p No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) 0 Yes p No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? p Yes ® No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? p Yes .® No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoonsiholding ponds) require p Yes ® No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? , © Yes ® No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? p Yes N No
7/25/97

I&"
acl i Number: 40_17 Date of Inspection ® '%%
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? p Yes ® No
Structures (Laeoons,Holding Ponds, _Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) Iess than adequate? p Yes ® No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ...................... _._............................... ........................... ......... ................................ ...................................
Freeboard (ft 2.3 ft.
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? p Yes ® No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? p Yes ® No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? p Yes ® No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? 0 Yes ® No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? p Yes ® No
(If in excess of WNW, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ....................... ....................... meat.......... ........................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities On]
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25- Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
p Yes ® No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
13 Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes N No
3 '
p Yes ® No
R . �a t�ons.or pT!La ies-were.note ring is visit:. om wi .rereive nay er .
e' es onde�ie� about x#is v s�i:: .
p Yes ® No
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: �_�4_.qA

a�1
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Washington Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
December 19, 1997
Mr. Everette Murphrey
Everette Murphrey Farm
Rt, 1, Box 221-AC
Farmville, NC 27828
SUBJECT: Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
Everette Murphrey Farm
Facility No. 40-17
Greene County
Dear Mr. Murphrey:
On October 1, 1997, 1 conducted an animal feedlot operation site inspection at the referenced facility. Overall, the
operation was found to be in satisfactory condition. A copy of the inspection report is attached for your review.
In general, this inspection includes verifying that: (1) the farm has a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan
(CAWMP); (2) the farm is complying with requirements of the State Rules 15 NCAC 2H.0217, Senate Bill 1217, and
the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan; (3) the farm operation's waste management system is being operated
properly under the direction of a Certified Operator;. (4) the required records are being kept; (5) there are no signs of
seepage, erosion, and/or runoff.
The recommendations and/or comments regarding your inspection can be found in the comment section of the attached
inspection form. It is very important as the owner and Operator in Charge that you address any noted concerns, as soon
as possible. For assistance, please contact your Technical Specialist and/or the local Soil & Water Conservation District
Office.
Thank you for your cooperation and assistance during the inspection. Should you have further questions or
comments regarding this inspection, do not hesitate to call me at [phone], ext. 321.
Sincerely,
Qj" (3-
Daphne B. Cullom
Environmental Specialist II
cc: Greene County SWCD Office
Mike Regans, Greene County NCCES
Jake Barrow, L.L. Murphrey Hog Company
waRO�
943 Washington Square Mall, Washington, NC 27889 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

U
1* Routine a Complaint a Follow-up of DWQ inspection a Follow-up of DSWC review a Other -"-A
Date of Inspection
Facility Number �--���
Time of Inspection 124 dr. (bh:mm)
a Registered 0 Certified a Applied for Permit ■ Permitted in Not Operational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: Exec',ette.Murprhrey.Yar-m................ _..-_--_-.................._......................... County: Greene WaRO
Owner Name: EYer ette..._ ._ .. ..__.-. b�ur�itreyW.. _- . --- Phone No: 75.V2733...... ...__.....-_.................
Facility Contact Title:..... ..-. _ ...,- _ . Phone No: . . . . ... . .......... . . . .... . . .............
Mailing Address: RLI.Box.221.-AG....... ........ ............ ...... ........................... ._... Earm.ville.AC................................... ................... 2782R ..............
Onsite Representative:EyxrcM.Mut:plUr4..... ............... ............... ...... __.. _..... ... Integrator:LL.Murphrty.Hog.Company:....... ...............
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number: 11i630..._ _ .._ .........
Location of Farm:
Latitude ©• ©i ®� Longitude ©• ©i ®K
Swine
_ esign urren esegn urren esign urren
Y , : ;. f
"Capacity"°Population poultry' * . =Capacity Population_ Cattle" Capacity Population
can to Feeder
® Feeder to Fini
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
arrow to finis
p Gilts
13 Boars
'Number of Lagoons / Holding Ponds +� u sur ace rams resent goon Area 13 pray fie rea
p o iqui as a aoagement system
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? 13 Yes N No
2. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? 13 Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: p Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? p Yes p No
- b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes 13 No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gallmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) 0 Yes p No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? p Yes ®No
4- Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? p Yes ®No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require p Yes ®No
maintenance/improvement?
6. is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? [3 Yes ®No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? p Yes ®No
7/25/97

racility Number, 40_17
r'
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? p Yes ® No
Structures (La2oons,HoldinQ Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? p Yes ® No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard (ft): 3.7 ft.
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? p Yes M No
IL Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? p Yes ® No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? p Yes ® No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? p Yes N No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? p Yes ® No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type Carn.(Silage.&..Hirain)... ..................... 1-Sgybrans.................... .......................eat...............................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
o-violation s.or erencies-wer.e.nos grlgg. is visit. Nou Will .recerve vcr Further.7
p Yes ® No
t3 Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes N No
p Yes ® No
p Yes N No
.Use `drawrugs of facilityto be#ter eiplam'situatiot►s. {use addibanal pages as necessary) r� 1 = s -
aste Analysis 6-11-97 ,_ - _ 1 •�•
k oil Analysrs-12/96; Planning to take sample this Fall 1997 ' - -
Cirtified'ainijimial'WaSte: management plan needs.lagoon design and operation &maintenance plane
degdite freeboard. _
^e following items are editions of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan and the general-pertiiit;_therefore these items
must be implemented:. -
'Keep'.lagoons/su rage ponds.free-of .foreign -debris including; but not iimited to tires, bottles; -plastic products,' light bulbs -gloves,
ges:or. any other solids waste: i _ ; - - ' 7/25197
,.
Reviewer/Inspector Name �ll'aphne- B: Curllom" ��"';
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date: (1-1 _.9 -7

a
kr�
O
6I
R
d
`
ff;;el
.i 4s • .. kp
�
, ���� � ;IJ I}i �' t 1 3i •. � h
L.F+f .l '
:.
�y
NI
r (; � .p O
�i J. t d', w
1 :t , • 1-.. � , . o,l 1y;.
pI` § Il'
[ •'� �' f f f 4.1'�y
d; p ,).••.
'� d
�'`4}h
•
.m ,�
0 I, -3 �S � a°%.. .wri �
i�
7'r(a5 t 1117 �'t{it
J.l r -� . , . _;•, lit^` rl Nt`. t�r� r �•iazr,cfj}i:r� }+��-L ••J
'
..N,
f
_
p',F •� �O',.I
w
; -z •<' ,
,.l
7� :=A� t ,i�tt� , ,jm {{,�,=3.J[?
,}
_ a F;G t,�f ;'_ yy r ��F 1 s �,R; �� �F1 {µ7�'i
f�i'�f
3°4C' i (� •; {;{ ..I I «�i
C+:j'Y
'id ski rl, ,t _•! " �fF'" �1Y t!`� s.r
f! ; t -
-'
i�,�
atl.
i�L,!
!i+•,`�,},i� ;ttl;l'�!, -'1; �,
�}i:.r�Lpltty �:{;.a>.�.c �•„d
.T [�„ fj a? .iVI p
+ 1111 p'iir f�
�
E}tQ,
't5 I ;� t !, .r •'f, irk{-. "'7+� Lr 'irr l- (. I�71"�L..f .�.. 'r:x 4-lyjrrfY
G.' „`�"•1, ;,.� ,,�+ ., �Iry,,�„ 4 ,,{,r,s1 !' '`� i��', ;� },��� [{�li�� ,2F i},�'`.° '�I ••r
- 1. 1, .,4• 511 'L +1.4Yr' 1 .• r%r
1ri 1 S ��3' i' T.p R t ld„r. a4 �j
�{k
�'t
�'t�, �il�.
.l`A .a•
,1 s1:
.�
r'145
VF:.1 � 'LS O?Il .�'• y!
�dll, ;'„'�,rF��l
n��S,x
1 l:'p jj ��y1
r, �[Er G; L , •, LL,�, :Lip�{,'�'!`! 'I} .-�� , 51 k Z;- "'I;$ � H . ;V' .s Y:� .7 ikj{: d,
.I ' r:5h _t. a C l N••ri.'-.�1 !' ai 3, za dl,JjA,�vit ! 1, 1, �I'1 tY ' 7.
'{,1F1
.,i✓,rj i,4
1.
°.{
LL
r '.t.l� ,yy� f
Sa ' r f. r'+oq'i� + 1'
•r ''I� } <ii; !y:,t :L �.t?:.
'��
.i�i-v,7
'+'l ' ! ; • 1' S E-'.tA'.� 1' j P _ _? J'.+.
'Cr�i;�r' 1 L't'''r' f 4".i n }r•Cf r7 �'ir� k.. •. r,' T E}
(�" f r• Y• ^r },£r t pi, '' iti'�•r r
't i. S• sLr t r �" �� ,i, s, �i- ( �. w i ,•a,. ,�i ,N
!{ � �•
�'i; % ii 1 `�
'z+'
'�: '•,yt•,k
.i
t '1 �.yi. ..
i;y
"'-li
[<.
}
rYi(a!'..
,,,
.'qg � � O
Q :':Y•33`+•t�.iFf�,l �yl..� y, f 3
� � d O SS"" ; • /4� • 3'a.'•. ^`'
m' �,. A;'_ ,W •( Or
'., �,.r •� R O 1 • -' , . t3
•1.� ! .4r ,j,,.�� 0 •�,t:}
'i,; 'r �,'O r ,. �
rr�,
,'Y'. I
s.::ta � a +, h '� �. + f_:, �'
-r• r ..M _ _ s "� 4• r _ ti�J, er• 1' '� S ]'•. � tali 1 F '.1"} r,:k
{4 ; �' `, •.i ;, GG � 3i1•� P't'(.: r , �'r••� � ,� 'k �� ,� fff 4•v^ -4 , ]fh� r , r I
F ' ! 1' 1 7a,'. �. tl i ',J S ,Ir �� !I L,jr' {, a� j L' �p-If•[•,
"' 7 i 1; ' ('}-'t ; Y.+'.r t , , ::f: K•7� :� ')r^ !'°- t,• i tr h' Lc�C-k• . r� �t-
- '`3:� •r 1-a,.'f�t,k"+'•° �. , 6 I � r:, •r�f �
Y; •i:� 'L5 '`,i , 1 ' ", > r ff r} q
�.i
L, :Y. � }`..
it � �:
i� .11
. tt•-} 1
.Y
I
;� :1
Ih EI
j!�I
i, ,� O
A . , 4r , T, �.�
,y 'f n� -! 1-'.d , it U♦
p 11 I I �Y
8•.. f-i, ;t rr.
� NCh {r ,n! }q ��� n
a z. � - I 1' r 5 �; ' : 5 e-� P, rr i+• 1 i - �' e: j ',Y'i!''i k� i'! k,',
� r N `f;ar4 . �• • f' S s # ' �, 1fi � l �' L i i +
A - .iri �.{- F.:1 � l jf'`' i L' ,Y :, r'T, " S Nl�i,t i •�NI t �r 1 A •l I tF, i k
¢ �F.Y7 -,y �! f..i 1- E: • �[i 1 R� �.. �p{3 t�,l i�r.. t'.� ��1.- �`�- I� P' YfjLr
+•".4 5, .1..� - r .� {., r+," `.r '�, ' ''•
r'•r.�>r.=+''
`:1. f.�� ;.�,;{:' y-_-�, �:+'.'
}}�+ �!
s
'f f' ('l'
L.
C,Ail;i
:!'
°"l..r 33
pt ',,�i
t
JJ
,Lyk:k•'r,�'
44 )1 Ir;{
',! :.i F.,
c . d i N r
_ '� 3•i 9i :,fl,
1• � w �p
{. L'* ,i` ., L�(��4ypy!rI•i:
� r1
txeY. ,t S.iij }tk.i •,'r,r
t �`,Si.. tr 'i,-
. :`•:,I ]• l--, 'Y • fr>•_:':
�.{ -' 0 .. !` i {i.( ) ':1� ` I! l Y I 1,.,3 !t !•r '1. .F 0. F�,., v
' �: r r'y' •''' i�, r ; Ek i" LI'r I,.r ysr. ' A , 1 - 1 ''B� '. �'''.
,�;'�'-3� i .'i �6yi ''• t' "� -y, rS't '-L �F' -Y 7 ^ i!. . ''Silo r 1 ti. r,� r,t :l` y.+i_:., t .f�•1 .iN., ,,4{ I.
'i .� Er, r a j L �.,` ';x s,, I rd is r F .gig rt `
t- 'FfF rly(L
�N4 ',rf e1#i' '6
Q,;4i( �t.. '.! 11!I
�.f''
Y`
't#i?(
9B7# �
.i yy
+y.:
r �U�.(1 F+ QQ
`�- i.j 'Fb� v� :I
O a.',, rI� ;5 � >-4 ..�I�r
. �•�: f7! f f; }*�i I,..;`,3�; ' �%
+,a Y- s' ` � o: ei; . � 1 '(i1
„ r O '•�:,t �'j'
l"ri• .,, .(- q' :14.. lf'r � _� 0,l t', tl�i 'i .1 't P,�, 1,j�, 5d: 5�-,4 / ,'�rd r!,^ ,'ir• 'V„ h�
F
,•Z I( l - �''
; I ! {'C i. �t '!' I i '.�•' I. ; �;7F. �,it `{'
, .� nf. �? d a � �}• , f, I ;;b.•i,',-r ,it ' , K ;il. F 1 ,�,: r,5 y , .. � ;,a i .F,��•' ,:5t6 - . + rrl. *,+::N t.
d � 1'i � t i�f,i f,a � . 1 �a r ;�'� � .'I., tt;<•r.Ir �i ' �i' •' '!iu r •��„ t5 S t f 1 r� � "w
;!i���. ,I r ,I r . 3� -.i {'��.� • ..:�;' � � ' �+I �La'. � r; ,.ir1. r'. �a - n y,N s �Y'�,(F�' �N, ,,�', • f r i'- •,i�} _
s. F N Y$ r• r '•i ?., {.y';,.' •I s{�' "
3��"• "< v:`� r'fi-, '.' + �:�:i,�r. 'a �
i'F
r a(>-.
� ?a .� r.,�(�'t'
'` x�` s .
I-,
Vff �,
Ij?
,:`t
a'
r'r:=�U•a�"'�Vi r
, ,l 1}�, 1
t'..,_iti-�'ir,.r !r�r
•"� cr,f1l•y:',Ir�lO
s5�.a"`t 'k.6' r-ti ;.�.fj.;' j ,�f`3�`-i ,t'Y'P'' :t>r;'�w:r ,fir
-"�`t. �r5,f_Ja 'r r ty'1.. i�'�, •rr r• 4 1 L, ,, .j. F., �_� �':� �, n,
t'' r, r ,i :I
1, ,.,.i{,• �! ,+y�i (.4 r41 'Y4 ...i::'r`1' y 1e "2i•,. 1 i ! .. Vrl ^tFfi'.: r'}:.% a +lL-, w1•r.ty rr 1'X',q it r1=r.�lRvSf ,
k �Yi�'6Cdr�
' °I{R17 _ .'i3'. ik , P+1 ti Z'f'
�'` i1' iEf ��i- �-c, is : �h 'la,.:Ya�,�,Lr':ii' „Je ll' !
f�',' �, ..yi�•-'
rur':rIttF.•�rlr;'7
-1
7
r,i4��.re#�'.-
•iiryp,Ify.�
m:.piI�1',�'. Ot
k'1' '(., `� '>i'k;`at' ,� ;i
• 'fi�J
:#,S13.'t . •'
ff �r- .�.rL,] s ,. t,Q S, , a j 1. I xr�.:'•- s -F'Nr4
✓''`-
I.
'f,:
q {k"'
,(� �...rr+'
, ' '15Cto err:}��y Mr% 1• ar_ ,F=31.... :r :k �'.
{„�. i }�'7i i 1 • tr,r, p^.{r-
rf•, �•, N' i
•_P..• 'r,,}fir`•
i. r %Y.'• -
't-
'4i
i7�•'
r! •r'; ..ir ::rii ,; '.'� :
F ,RkO • 4, T 6�
r �., ' W (� ,�,} .0
r{'S. ��
7' t'.: �' • {� ., i � r1 e
;�`'ff ':r�x< ' •' '7�'
_ i' ..Ir tl',� rf,.l yew '{ ..4 i=' �• S•!,5 .. j• ,i •1 : ,r f 4i1W},SfP �,�.�.-S.'.'1. 'R .I'
�Lr!•[ yy� 3 +i,
,i VI!- �, ,.FI1 'f 'F.'V ry'�'. -'•i s • Yr i'... •;• S t 'lr S . V,v '!(}r
;., +_} '� ,.( ? III t .# L7 k'%,1 - rr^�^i `"^ .�rf' l;, c at '," •',t ft:r7 !', S { FFFNNN,1. .,4-
,wS , r r4 cS,'i 1 ( � '�^� j 7 Y Y y.q a"r`` r •• ,r .-$ 'ili} , r� l `y% r r' i' � � .i� ' �I'9 (� � � j�., l ,t�k�•
{. 'r,' 'r ``I; :- 1'� i��i, b. �.'"{t• 'i."i't i+��'+r; •('� I',.. �; 1`�'r.�t; {' {-e'k ..7,{.'?I,�,�1
•is•
�• Q+ t(
!t
�'
�'�,rr:Sy,��`re
,sf
,.,, Al d' s"'r 1
.rA�7•. ., [ 'Sit fr'�. �rrr,
'�y'' q �! tlr l'M,'`I'f'.:•.(.
N
�+'.'
_( {.i.}}
,
eraFc.'S[� {
;,. ` ,� ,{-;,7 _< ` I'�' J Fl: r} ,i.,j �a, i. T k:; r{.,9•rf}, , `.�
['+,j "
f'':{aIf �x+1'i.�,.t
1 r
•ri.l�'.', 1�',1
'ti `,4�{�i -� Ir•..,`
ir,
!
1 ":�.'�
rr;.
1-
:N •!
q npi-. N.. Y'{.
it S��" y-! O
(a•j" �!; r�..±, ""y "S-
•ni l.1' S 4J Q • ;
}' - '' i 1}�{ ,'
�:, rl I r',r-, . f !t'', �
$a.
'T :.`I-iJ. V��'�I Sr}i:l i- V',. :,'l�l .1,!jr,fi , L;,i -# l i} {• r(Y
#r dI! r fir' t :� T �„•:i: {. �"i' a �. •;ki• } k . i w-. I �.'7 � u ' k -
•4.7 .e. ?j1',':If �., l.1dt, ,,; I,, I
•i t ,� r (-4�,> /,. 1;4]:Y r ,1k � k • L Y. '.J �'�',, If' I„ . _ ,S r' 7"f�_ gfr` ' Jr !! L I�+' L �:.
,'f •rl� •_E' :'1' e.,- /' 'J'�s •,�{, F `•l,i1'f, � sue'€f>.s�,4 .1, '� I.•a I „i�,t
�',rwt ) !.I' 47 Pj t, r Id F. L (,r rir. � , � : -r I ,Y :! x f. 'a�" N :irlki! ' �' I F
'�4t
,i:*
t „r.
•.t' ' �•I-
�: 7
r:a'-�.',"t
�
�y,.Y
I ft
�
IKIi
d ,; .�7�•.`rt,
E .�: gip,-�• cl Gq
.t; n ,� �,. tb "t ,• 7�LO,
*, •r r"
c N � 4.';" ,_,,
,7 �d3 +5 U« ^.
Isf'
.-j,r .Gkr 2 ? 7.• 4' rr Y' � i.. ,''. 'r9.✓°ad Rn, '�. S :i rr �i,��_: rA� , r
,:i{:; ..f e'I �f :, r{ I,'�. � '�., i ;�I, IrW .; :� ,,��l;:�� '�°.'' �Ga ,,j •> ¢;,��:
{Y � {r'r i�.t 1,,. y.. ; s �',.a 1t�. 1^ ..L � ,y.'
.YN 3y'i,= # rk' r k„, I h e , 1 i} i' _1, J +�r•Ir, n -F ;? .>r i
: 'rn i' 4 'Jk :I.'4 ! 1\il J -t. -fh M,,j, �, � � I• �jL .,
r `.i ,•�,, I 'h'ii. � -I. ,:��r.• , r '�s ,.ri r ,.y r .
,11r �-t,xfr% iro l [?11�1` �•'-.L=.- ?' a� f 'ii��ff �,f i }r � -f• { �' �6
�,:
,�.
�� �_�,;N '�
t`+
�: i.:
�I�4r !
M
Y;e r
4;i,
;•.Sr•
,.} .tr,,.�..� _ ,1,[�•,1„L!y 4'�.�tt`5 .l��sj.'^+' :{!,-k
'• � _� k � r: ��r rr d"�, +� r � •� �1 1F1
f' r � �'.: ati: r�s' >••"a f �L '4 ,i{ �'''r � � I, k
�'
"�.., r •r�' '. ,r �.'�M'"P,+`'� -��r j, �''k tl• i `�,�TY f_ � �Frr stir �. fl' d►. -1'� i a k. N- .N is :-j-.5
.'; ,'�r' �• -'u . �a i',l ntt.,; 'i a '�ag,.,k� �,r a.,' s at r a� ;:t
.5yy.. _�ly �..,'.,..r �� j' ,�y= 1r. .4: .1: •>R`'-- .4. Ir A.• ', ei 1, �C N. �%Ii' ,Fi,?.� "' r„_. t •�i]1� '.3 a' 'ly lrr.� )
O .O i��] .,r a` e +r�, + uA r4 LA• 'a� •�; '? i n, e t r• - a
rpp�.;.r; #}•' jr�-i.W Y',.$�i ,Si' a '�.�+ iN.;f" I S 't i,,(r t IF} 't-'�' �- i•b rL 75� -,{ !: f'iiy t. i is •�t li-:L•..-
,1 1'f :� J,,, C#, { I, ''r� i :�} it r
'fi�•'i�.r-_ ^ v ! �iir It{kr•I of f`��, . fiS r •, 1 �.+ I.k(
.v°i
-FL' i
•��
7-F�I.
'�'
.! .ar .�• 'i, ,'1 v1:
Q rJ' ', �{n Of �rr�..H .iJ- O:
' , OJ : w y h ;••
S '1�`iu'��. .a7.:.4'LI:i�'if-y'?,.
~kO ��F�py
'.�I'
.',�..�, ,Fr ,fit i i, f,r py ,�'• .y. L'f'rFf
{r k,� f M ( .{.� i. i �r k. v¢•
r � 'i, ', _� - n . : { , �' �•[. 'e.1� ,� ' '.i�ai_'P i •. n .' 'i. Z
:5.r�l: ri��,r } it ,l�r ''! � �,'.. /'.i" li; �':: S`s y(ri,f•�{ ��L !'�}F ryA-,Q�'g11 L{'L/ , r'' N.?�r•' 4j Ja..e,
�:i I •' Y' (A/ L-:r I ,'.• • t^' , r jj [}'',�s t�+ ,11�j.�ti! -] 'k i iFy i' } { ,
,r'yr1e{: +.�.•IIY'�It '�• Sj5}µ. l l p r^7�1.5• t ll �5r�!j1:i�.4f, i I 1 . I,i_",`j
,wh i'.. '., f_:{�{',' tft
�- �.�,{�
�R.
,.=i .
•� _
i4 +Nh
+'
401,
W
~1•G
oLL
KY p i;• "+ %\.,rr r1t,
FL. ,
i�r•W,'�• -
N'�+{� •,�.
(}= �,( ,t ^� �.: '�I ,t ""t,'
9 •' d
:rs4 `g<<"t ��� '•�
{°j _ "'1. ' ,r. r• S'
L,i• `�' • I-i
W I;.-. IBC..
:ii5„�, C+
� t i`�iF'r;; ,Y•%rL=� y ;.S .i:t $� �k, .� -}C r' �I.y''
�,I "{ { a,,ti,r i!:lli' •I ?j•'n 1� %� 'iY� "9.: r'�-1 lk� `f
r, ' '• 3.. � . fi �� { R �
E- �i_,r'-+r� •�M ii (,s t. 1 �, �t(d1't' r i1' i� -:'" lW, i•- i' :.r `` y � a ( I �'•d•.. s,;'
��w1 �� ��, �.-� w
: I z� r�;t' 1 t 5 ,,; rNjN7,1;�.f,' N ,h F ..I.Y .���.�,5511``YYPP Ir e! ��(llFi•• � 1�tL /''� r]
-�i.}•. ,. ....5yi,i - '�Lir 1 -r�l Tr'4r.1. ��1, _,,I.�11 ,T, �+- • '�N' # /•
.�... r, ti. .iNf ' 7., L i 1- I,,f,, ••:14i� , �. I f 0. - f,
_ ,r� ` � �`1ir �;�� � 'pia `,fry � �'•;� � i,•��:, ', r �.r•��,r.-��, �1�C,. _ t,
j'1 i•
'fc'zl iRt,- n' �'�. �, 3t h _+�„ �'r'1'> �;�e l;. { ,�i. �^i � �' �'� � - tit t
'., 11 r � tl �:I ir �
�
�
,'qk•r �+S
r
.,�r��i.^ ,:1
}, i.��,:1 .; y�:
{ »1
�,;� ��t `�
't� 'i �r`T
y
'C ii
�,
� ; �k,, t, r ,I�.;, r
4y� ,+. .,t '� ` ,j ? ` r',i �- i!'•�}�.j�t.l +L .LI i 4�,. M1. rat 'M.ki i :''S1' 1 i r �t ' L �'e � i' I �'i ' -: y� ir'• t.
..,� y
,°.�l�u' "�,la, i'y YY!! ,;' pE .� } ..1 � ?( w7r i 7•'j{.I .;4. in-�; ..ter i i'r i�r'j.�. -+,� Yjrry jb..4 �L; rt' F`'4r(rt ixk p ' r7` ��yl •, f
t iM ,�-.jr•. ,FLU .W. 1 k,'. �7J - iyE, `J1r:It ,r '.t. ,:.r '{:: n N1� ii a! -Yri'. rid".', "F `r. "1 ii. 3�__"'177pq.,�;'��, ..i I'+`. 9.1, `rf,y `_;- _r, -r i.. ii
� �i' �• S ! �•y �.
'�t�Yr.
W
-
'rr r: �'4b'FI :�O O, 1
..,. '4-r
AL�5(,ri:
S. f s i1 ! a•-I'r :$..* g'1!T"11�''i r,7, ik �G''�7,, 5f:'� .-"d'„ .!f t i#!.t lq7 rx r :t f-1Y
.l 'i •:x li f I i w ,'ry"'-r .>Yi r, •l.A,,-1 4, Lr rLr -r.l
Y t `' iS ': j �' 1 :: ', [ r. L ,, .:•i j f,r,r 'r
,.r..a. '4`„��1�{i {�,
'tit
�
•:si �,' r
t'5 y':
s
{�r;,
IQ
�'ya
_
u;[.'�'•zG:i4r -. Q'ir i:. ,
;I3�''"-• n
�fK,.fa1,1f}`;.
',
l..'a:,{'}`y7�
h.-.
:�ir
'TqQ}(jL�w'q�`/].Y{r
N0, ay,.FY'.'
",...'��.QqOf6i�:,r�17i
:1f ,,> $wL'��Lk''• t ..'{;'•IIw� 4'..
5 "l; x'xr'F e'i. `� '''�', rr: i''*'-�k' t* G t. �,� ,�',,.rZ f. Er
(
Z, 't•
rt� �- '{ri , i
',' b', '�
� /7
fEj�°•. ,
' r
jr`kt
M
.r..7`5•s
- -r�
i'�"',R1�
tt, yt'J
.,sa4VI
,
yy'{i11+,,'I.
' 7'1jtt>
ii�'
tti'i,t.fd
•:.r,
,�1zr'',
'`';.y,
M1` '.�I13�e''`,1{Mtl
rsk`
'tlsi.r`
1jfr.,f!
.i-'-
,{�S
._'k�.T+�.�4
.,.,[C.^!:'r
' _i.,a
:'.:4+
'•`
7"r.
j�5k�ff't
l?
.rr•l•'
,7L5I
.,r-i'r
qr11
1�_��i
«�'9-3S1
rr:taN-'ri}.!�
'r-?'L',.
!i
t`r
�f r
'
tltS.i
•'�'gy }q.�„'�i,s%,q•si�;ty ti;;,, xn�
U�'-�a�q�O'Y '�L.a�L,`YS
..
.
'
xija.fs''1l.i`
.�yrooW_.
'
rxr1
��:.•t!k,, i`q '.
}�RP'jr
. +11;''p`..r, .•n •
.\rr�'Iy
}jr`h {�'q�1ii
tEtiY.tt :, Al �h.Ai.>. i,
r�+'1�F,?1,r��)11y7j!T'.44
' .tti: '1w.'
.Tb,�rt r
r _
J5r:i
.'Pg-f{1
,:�F
' .t
;YLsr"'$I4-t
.:{;.`
y{,,''',-
r�..
�¢A1lIvd
I�!.s. ��i�
{.
'•
_ 'i
`":'3'`
.�.
m,
q�Zav']lq �
�kI-r.'It'-s.
+e�'(r4iO�a��
.�i�$
O,ys
1�1,'�
`r
Lr',i
=!
'�u<•t!
r'.Li?
a!I,LF1
ti
15iffri'',ir�}`
44 r ;OHM d
f a?
f
•.. ei} {�tI�{:
- y.l11
(!}N ,
- •S3.{pf - 'I
.s! i}
jiar',
.>k
-
tj;l
_5.5Yk•`f.�
.
to ��5i
rN
•5j`aV�+t'_
rk.,
7l,.�,r.
:�t!L
t„
}�7i:.':i
'°
t--i3
Y-T<Ffs_5�h.
-.
S �iy',;,f�-'.s4"''
� w1�
tit �
1 • I ,`1 r
N�l.,t-i,;r
r
rp
..4f .:' �H�.. , , r . i t' r. .•'rl! i ;t,
i1 if, , r',r f= ;. .. .ri a �T . .I-'r :,�„ :' .,r;'••;irz r 'k,• I
'.y rf-=} ,Irtil, - •, �n
'{-;
Jr�
rP., n.l `J•
'd
.[y•�
°.p O
r7 ,�rf = w I'�.
y�r.' :. .��jr. �Li "„i _'�,r +
�J e;
�[Ij�.i
-.•

Site Requires Immediate Attention: A. D
Facility No. 4D
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
Date: 18 - ZQ 1995
Time: q30
Farm Name/Owner : G o c 4c'-77bAvAp
Mailing Address: A-r J 9 0-e fix] tie-.__ _isi e,-o& . w 2.7 02X
County: E, t
Integrator: J_ L MgMwgy Phone:
On Site Representative: Phone: 7 3
Physical Address/Location:
Type of Operation: Swine Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: 010 Q No. of Animals on Site:
DEM Certification No.: ACE DEM Certification No.: ACNEW
Latitude: Longitude: Elevation: Ft
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficien eeboard of 1 Ft + 25 year 24 hour
storm event? (approximately 1 Ft + 7 ii Wep or No
Actual Freeboard: + Ft 10 nches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes or 1p_
Was any erosion observed? Yes or
Is adequate land available for spray? I or No So 0940&-
Is the•cover crop adequate? _%jP or No
Crop(s) being utilized: Kamer T+se.s /'wce. } C'o,,,,n-« ,:r4) .r,o,tp^g,
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria?
200 Ft from Dwellings? (259 or No 100 Ft from Wells? Y_J5:)or No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Ft of USGS Blue Line Stream?
Yes or/Op
`
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Ft of a USGS Map Blue
Line? Yes or
Hp -
Is animal•waste discharged into waters of the state b man-made ditch, flushing
system, or other similar man-made devices? Yes or
If Yes, please explain:
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records, (volumes of manure,
land applied, spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes or No
4 A011 ztl
Inspector Name S igrpture
cc: Facility Assessment Unit
Comments & Sketch.on Back of Sheet

DEM
SITE VISITATION RECORD
Page Two
Comments:
Sketch:
41
13N
H
rJ
�lj
L:�:D D
Li:3