400016_INSPECTIONS_20171231

NUH I H UAHULINA
Department of Environmental Quai

INSPECTIONS

A
Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number:
400016 Facility Status:
Active Permit: AWS400016
❑ Denied Access
Inpsection Type:
Compliance Inspection
Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit:
Routine
County: Greene Region:
Washington
Date of Visit:
09/08/2016 EntryTime: 11:49 am
Exit Time: 12:40 pm Incident #
Farm Name:
Jack & Jerry Cunningham Farms
Owner Email:
Owner:
Jerry M Cunningham
Phone:
252-747-7792
Mailing Address:
7810 Beaman Old Creek Rd
Walstonburg NC 27888
Physical Address: 7800 Beaman Old Creek Rd Walstonburg NC 27888
Facility Status: Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude- 35' 32' 44" Longitude: 77° 43' 40"
Farm location: from Hwy. 58 take State Rd. 1229 4 miles right on 1222 1 mile on rightSR 1222 by Beaman Run. drh.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Cal, Stor, & Treat
Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Jerry M Cunningham
Operator Certification Number: 19496
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name
Title Phone
24 hour contact name Jerry Cunningham
Phone:
On -site representative Jerry Cunningham
Phone :
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer
Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary.
waste analysis: sail tested: 2016
1-28-16 = 1.34
4-29-16 = 1.65
7-1-16 = 1,30
There was 7 irrigation events on "Hay" in March that were not balanced out. All other events on oats & soybeans were balanced
Reviewed: stocking; crop yield; sludge survey T=3.091LTZ=4.25
#7 lagoon needs to be mowed!
page: 1

m
r1 Permit: AWS400016 Owner - Facility : Jerry M Cunningham Facility Number: 400016
Inspection Date: 09/08/16 Inpsec#ion Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 3,840 3,807
Total Design Capacity: 3,840
Total SSLW: 518,400
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon
1.1.1
Lagoon
2JJ
Lagoon
L3
19.50
page: 2

r1 Permit: AWS400016 Owner - Facility : Jerry M Cunningham Facility Number: 400016
Inspection Date: 09/08/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discha es & Stream Impacts
Yes
No Na Ne
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?]
❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
M ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
M ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
M ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No Na Ne
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le] large
❑
M ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
0 ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
M
❑ ❑
❑
B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
0 ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
M ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na Ne
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11 _ Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑ ,
page: 3

Permit: AWS400016 Owner - Facility : Jerry M Cunningham Facility Number:
Inspection Date: 09/08/16 inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
400016
Routine
Waste Application
Yes
No Na Ne
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 3
Soybean, wheat
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
0 ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
0 ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
of -DE]
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
[]
M ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na No
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
M ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
[]
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
[]
Stocking?
❑
page:
4

r Permit: AWS400016 Owner - Facility : Jerry M Cunningham Facility Number: 400016
Inspection Date: 09/08/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na Ne
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
[]
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
E ❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
❑ ❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
0 ❑ -❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
0 ❑ ❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
E ❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
0 ❑ ❑
Other Issues
Yes
No Na No
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
E ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
0 ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the fatality fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
E ❑
❑
(i.e_, discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Feld
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
0 ❑
❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
0 ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
N ❑
❑
page: 5

Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number:
400016 Facility Status: Active
Permit: AWS400016
❑ Denied Access
Inpsection Type:
Compliance Inspection
Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit:
Routine County:
Greene Region:
Washington
Date of Visit:
0711612015 Entry Time: 02,00 pm Exit Time: 2:45
pm Incident #
Farm Name:
Jack & Jerry Cunningham Farms
Owner Email:
Owner:
Jerry M Cunningham
Phone:
252-747-7792
Mailing Address:
7810 Beaman Old Creek Rd
Walstonburg NC 27888
Physical Address:
7800 Beaman Old Creek Rd
Walstonburg NC 27888
Facility Status:
Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm:
Latitude.
35' 32' 44" Longitude:
77" 43' 40"
Farm location: from Hwy. 58 take State Rd. 1229 4 miles right on 1222 1 mile on rightSR
1222 by Beaman Run. drh.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat
M Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Jerry M Cunningham Operator Certification Number: 18496
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Jerry Cunningham Phone :
On -site representative Jerry Cunningham Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Waste ANatysis: soil tested: 612014
7-16-15 = 1.56
3-19-15 = 1.27
12-17-14 = 1.73
IRR records on SIB in June need to be balanced out, there could be operapplication on these! Also irrigation events on CB in May
need to be balanced. IRR events on SG were balanced w PAN remaining.
Reviewed: New COClpermit; crop yield/ sludge survey (LTZ = 4.251ST = 3.09); rainfalllfreeboard; stocking
Note: Lagoon banks have been cleared of all woody vegetation, as requested, it really looks good!
page: 1

Permit AWS400016 Owner - Facility : Jerry M Cunningham Facility Number: 400016
Inspection Date: 07/16/15 tnppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 3,840 1,994
Total Design Capacity: 3,840
Total SSLW: 518,400
Waste Structures
Disignated observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon
1JJ
Lagoon
2JJ
Lagoon
L3
28,00
page: 2

Permit: AWS400016 Owner - Facility : Jerry M Cunningham Facility Number: 400016
Inspection Date: 07/16/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No Na Na
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
F-1
N ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
M ❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
M ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
0 ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No Na No
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large
❑
M ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
0 ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
M ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑M
❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na No
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%I10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

-r
r
Permit: AWS400016
Owner - Facility : Jerry M Cunningham Facility Number: 400016
Inspection Date: 07/16/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Wasto Application
. Yes
No Na NQ
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Soybean,
wheat
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type,3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
0 ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑0
❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
E ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
E ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes NQ Na Ne.
19, Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
0 ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑0
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
N ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

(r
Permit: AWS400016 Owner - Facility : Jerry M Cunningham Facility Number: 400016
Inspection Date: 07/16/15 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No Na Ne
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
0 ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
■ ❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
❑
❑
25, Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑0
❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■ ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Other issues
Yes
No Na Ne
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
M ❑
Cl
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
0 ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
■ ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
M ❑
❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative?
❑
0 ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
E ❑
❑
page: 5

I
M Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number:
400016 Facility Status: Active
Permit: AWS400016
[] Denied Access
Inssection Type:
Compliance Inspection
Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit:
Routine County:
Greene' Region:
Washington
Date of visit:
09125/2014 Entry Time: 10:15 am Exit Time: 11 A5 am Incident #
Farm Name:
Jack & Jerry Cunningham Farms
Owner Email:
Owner:
Jerry M Cunningham
Phone:
252-747-7792
Mailing Address:
7810 Beaman Old Creek Rd
Walstonburg NC 27888
Physical Address:
7800 Beaman Old Creek Rd
Walstonburg NC 27888
Facility Status:
Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator.
Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
35' 32' 44" Longitude:
77° 43- 40"
Farm location: from Hwy. 58 take State Rd. 1229 4 miles right on 1222 1 mile on rightSR
1222 by Beaman Run. drh.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat
Waste Application
Records and Documents
Other Issues
Certified Operator: Jerry M Cunningham Operator Certification Number: 18496
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Jerry Cunningham Phone
On -site representative Jerry Cunningham Phone
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Waste analysis: soil tested: 412012
7,23.13 - 1.26
5.24.13 - 1.40
1,30.14 - 1.47
There are IRR-2 form in the records that are balanced out, but for what year? because the PAN rates do not match with the above
analysis that were available in the records.
Reviewed: stocking, mortality, crop yield for oats, wheat & hay. Sludge survey 412014 LTZ=4.25
#7 Please Mow lagoon bank ASAP & remove the woody vegetation!
#21 Must have current waste analysis & use those for balancing IRR-2 forms!
page: 1

N1
1
Permit: - AWS400016 Owner - Facility : Jerry M Cunningham Facility Number: 400016
Inspection Date: 09/25/14 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 3,784
Total Design Capacity:
Total SSLW:
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon iJJ
Lagoon 2JJ
Lagoon L3
page: 2

N
Permit: AWS400016 Owner - Facility : Jerry M Cunningham Facility Number: 400016
Inspection Date: 09/25/14 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No Na Ne
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
M ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑0
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
M ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
0 ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection Storage & Treatment
Yes
No Na No
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large
❑
0 ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
0 ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
0
❑ ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na No
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ M ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

9
Permit: AWS400016 Owner - Facility : Jerry M Cunningham Facility Number:
400016
Inspection Date: 09/25/14 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
Waste Application
Yes No Na No
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 3
Soybean, Wheat
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
0 ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
0 ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
[]
[]
18. Is there a lack of property operating waste application equipment?
❑
E ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No No Ne
19, Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
E ❑
❑
20, Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WU P?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21, Does record keeping need improvement?
0
❑ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
N
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page:
4

i
Permit: AWS400016 Owner - Facility : Jerry M Cunningham Facility Number:
400016
Inspection Date: 09/25/14 Inpsection Type: Compliance inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No Na No
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
0 ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility tail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
0 ❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24, Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
0 ❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
0 ❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first surrey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
0 ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes No Na No
28, Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
E ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29, At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
0 ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
N ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause'non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
0 ❑
❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
0 ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
E
1111
❑
page: 5
l

E Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency tt---II
Facility Number: 400016 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS400016 Il Denied Access
Inspection Type: Comnliglnce Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Greene Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 08129/2013 Entry Time: 09715 AM Exit Time: 10:12 AM Incident #:
Farm Name: Jack & Jerry Cunningham Farms Owner Email: ierrvc4440hotmail.co
Owner: Jeay M CunninghamPhone:252-714-4141
Mailing Address: 7643 Beaman Old Creek Rd Walstonburg NC 27888
Physical Address: 7800 Beaman Old Creek Rd Walstonburg NC 27888
Facility Status: ■ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm:
Latitude. 35°22'44" Longitude: °4 ' '
Farm location: from Hwy. 58 take State Rd. 1229 4 miles right on 1222 1 mile on rightSR 1222 by Beaman Run. drh.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Jack G Cunningham
Secondary OIC(s):
Operator Certification Number: 19204
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Jerry Cunningham Phone:
On -site representative Jerry Cunningham Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis: soil tested: 4/23/12
7-23-13 = 1.26
5-24-13 = 1.40
3-28-13 = 1.67
1-17-13 = 1.98
IRR records are complete & balanced out. Rainfall, freeboard, stocking & crop yields are recorded.
Sludge survey 5-10-13 & caliberation April 2013
Looks Good!
Page: 1

Permit: AWS400016 Owner - Facility: Jerry M Cunningham
Facility Number: 400016
Inspection Date: 0812912013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 3,840 100
Waste Structures
Type
Identifier
Total Design Capacity: 3,840
Total SSLW: 518,400
Designed Observed
Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
agoon
1JJ
agoon
2.1.1
lagoon
U
21.00
Page: 2

Permit: AWS400016 Owner - Facility: Jerry M Cunningham Facility Number : 400016
Inspection Date: 0812912013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ M ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ m ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ 0
❑
Cl
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ ■
❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the Stale other than
❑ ■
❑
❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage S Treatment Yes No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑ ■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not property addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
S. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, 0000
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS400016 owner - Facility: Jerry M Cunningham
Facility Number: 400016
Inspection Date: 08/2912013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1 Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 2 Soybean, Wheat
Crop Type 3 Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP? ❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS400016 Owner - Facility: Jerry M Cunningham Facility Number. 400016
Inspection Date: 05/29/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? , ❑
Lease Agreements? ❑
Other?' ❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
Q
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
23, If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
Cl ■ ❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon ❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 5

1
Permit: AWS400016 Owner - Facility: .ferry M Cunningham Facility Number. 400016
Inspection Date: 0812912013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31 _ Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field ❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond ❑
Other ❑
If Other, please specify
32 Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
33_ Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 6

i
Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400016 Facility Status: Active ^_ Permit: AWS400016 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type, 1;ampliance Inspection inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine _ County: Greene Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 08/21/2012 Entry Time: 10 30AM Exit Time:AM_ Incident #:
Farm Name: Jack & Jeay Cunningham Farms— Owner Email: ieayc444�a hotmail.co
Owner: Jerry M Cunningham Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 7643 Beaman Old Creek Rd Walstonbura NC 27888
Physical Address: 7800 Beaman Old Creek Rd Walstonburg NC 278§8
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy -Brown LL
Location of Farm:
Latitude- 35°32'44" Longitude: 77°4a'40"
Farm location: from Hwy. 58 take State Rd. 1229 4 miles right on 1222 1 mile on rightSR 1222 by Beaman Run. drh.
Question Areas:
© Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Cot, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Jack G Cunningham Operator Certification Number: 19204
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representatives): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Jerry Cunningham Phone:
On -site representative Jerry Cunningham Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis:
7-17-12 = 1.11
5-3-12 = 2.3
1-20-12 = 2.0
12-8-11 = 1_5
soil tested: 4-23-12
IRR records are complete & balanced out. Crop yield, freeboard & rainfall are recorded.
Remember to get a sludge survey in 2012.
Date: -
Page: 1

J
Permit: AWS400M Owner - Facility: Jerry M Cunningham Facility Number: 400016
Inspection Date: 08/21/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Q Swine -Feeder to Finish 3,840 100
Total Design Capacity: 3,840
Total SSLW: 518,400
Waste Structures
Designed Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
agoon 1JJ
Lagoon 2JJ
agoon L3 36.00
Page: 2

Permit: AWS400016 Owner - Facility: Jerry M Cunningham Facility Number : 400016
Inspection Date: 0812112012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? 001111
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes No NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard? ❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet slacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS400016 Owner - Facility: Jerry M Cunningham Facility Number: 400016
Inspection Date: 08/21/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
PAN? ❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 Ibs.?
Total Phosphorus?
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
Outside of acceptable crop window?
Evidence of wind drift?
Application outside of application area?
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
Soybean, Wheal
Bermuda Grass (Hay,
Pasture)
Small Grain Overseed
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Records and Documents Yes No - NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP? ❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS400016 Owner - Facility. Jerry M Cunningham Facility Number: 400016
Inspection Date: 08121 /2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Lease Agreements? ❑
Other? ❑
If Other, please specify
21, Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑ 01111
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? if yes, check the appropriate
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26, Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 5

Permit: AWS400016 Owner - Facility: Jerry M Cunningham Facility Number; 400016
Inspection Date: 08121/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? 1101111
Otherlssues Yes No NA NE
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface the drains exist at the facility? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
Lagoon ! Storage Pond
Other
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewerllnspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Page: 6

0 Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400016 Facility Status: Activg Permit: AWS40QO16 Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliijng2 Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Greene Region: W,15jington
Date of Visit: 0811012011 Entry Time: 11:00 AM Exit Time: 11:40 AM Incident #:
Farm Name: ,Jack, & jgRy Cunningham UrM __ -_ Owner Email: ierrvcA44rg7hotmail.co
Owner: Jay M Cunningham Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 7643 Beaman Old Creek Rd Walstgabura NC 27888 _
Physical Address: 7800 Beaman Old CLeek Waistonburg NC 27888
Facility Status: N Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°32'44" -, Longitude: 77°43'40" _
Farm location: from Hwy_ 58 take State Rd. 1229 4 miles right on 1222 1 mile on rightSR 1222 by Beaman Run_ drh.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other issues
Certified Operator: Jack G Cunningham Operator Certification Number: 19204
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis:
1-6-11 = 1.6 soil tested: 11/2010
3-24-11 = 2.1
6-10-11 = 2.0
IRR records are complete & balanced out. Reviewed rainfall & freeboard & crop yield records.
Caliberabon is due in 2012 Sludge survey due by Dec. 2011
Page: 1

Permit: AWWO016 Owner - Facility: Jerry M Cunningham Facility Number: 400016
inspection Date: O811012011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Structures
Designed Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
agoon 1JJ
goon 211
agoon U 27.00
Page: 2

0
Permit:AWS400016 Owner - Facility: Jerry M Cunningham Facility Number: 400016
Inspection Date: 08110/2D11 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the Stale (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑
❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
❑
❑ ❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than
❑
❑
❑ ❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes
No
NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
❑
❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
U
U U tU
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed andlor managed through a waste management
❑
❑
❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
❑
❑ Cl
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
❑
❑ ❑
dry stacks andlor wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
❑
❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application Yes
No
NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
❑
❑ ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
❑
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

Permit: AW5400016 Owner - Facility: Jerry M Cunningham
Facility Number. 400016
Inspection Date: 08/10/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crap Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14, Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
17, Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18, Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Records and Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
If yes, check the appropriate box below_
WUP?

Permit: AWS400016 Owner - Facility: Jerry M Cunningham Facility Number. 400016
Inspection Date: 08/10/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Lease Agreements? Q
Other? ❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
Q ❑ ❑ ❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑ Q ❑ ❑
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey Q
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon Q
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? Q ❑ ❑ ❑
Page: 5

Permit: AWS400016 Owner - Facility: Jerry M Cunningham Facility Number: 400016
Inspection Date: 08/10/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Vis€t: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ ❑ Q Q
Other Issues Yes
No NA
NE
28. Did the facility fail to property dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report
❑
❑ ❑
❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional
❑
❑ ❑
❑
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge,
❑
❑ ❑
Q
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface Tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below_
Application Field
Lagoon / Storage Pond
Other
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
IS
Page: 6

f
E Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number. 400016 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS40Q016 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance„Inspecti2nInactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Greene Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 12/14/2010 Entry Time:12:57 PM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: Jack & Jerry Cunninaham Farms _ Owner Email: jer[yr44_4@.hotmail. co_
Owner: Jay M Cunningham Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 7643 Beaman Old Creek Rd Walstonbura NC 27888
Physical Address: 7800 Beaman Old Creek Rd Walstonburg N r 27888 _
Facility Status: E Compliant Not Compliant Integrator: Mu h -Br W.n_.L,L
,C ._..
Location of Farm:
Latitude:35°32'44" Longitude:77°43'40"
Farrn location: from Hwy. 58 take State Rd. 1229 4 miles right on 1222 1 mile on rightSR 1222 by Beaman Run. drh.
Question Areas:
Discharges & stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Jack G Cunningham Operator Certification Number: 19204
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representatives): Name Tide Phone
24 hour contact name Jerry Cunningham Phone:
On -site representative Jerry Cunningham Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis:
3-2-10 = 1.3
7-01-10 = 1.6
9-10-10 = .99
soil tested Jan. 2010
IRR records are complete and balanced out.
#25 Sludge survey dated 4-2009 in records, need to do a SS for 2010 if an extension was not granted. Please use new forms.
Page: 1

P-
Permit: AWS400016 Owner - Facility: Jerry M Cunningham
Inspection Date: 12/14/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 400016
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 3,840 2,967
Total Design Capacity: 3,840
Total SSLW: 518,400
Waste Structures
Type Identifier
Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon
1JJ
42.00
agoon
2JJ
46M
agoon
L3
25.00
Page: 2

r
Permit: AWS400016 Owner - Facility: Jerry M Cunningham Facility Number: 400016,
Inspection Date: 12114/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ Cl ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage S Treatment
Yes
No
NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
❑
■
❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■
❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑ ❑
improvement?
11, Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS400016 Owner- Facility: Jerry M Cunningham Facility Number: 400016
Inspection Date: 1211412010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
PAN? ❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.? ❑
Total P205? ❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? ❑
Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑
Evidence of wind drift? ❑
Application outside of application area? ❑
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Records and Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Small Grain Overseed
Soybean, Wheat
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
X
Page: 4

r
Permit: AWS400016 Owner - Facility: Jerry M Cunningham
Facility Number: 400016
Inspection Date: 12114/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22, Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES
only)? ❑ ■
❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ ■
❑ Cl
Other Issues
Yes No
NA NE
26. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AWS400016 Owner - Facility: Jerry M Cunningham
Inspection Date: 12/14/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
34. Are subsurface drains present on this farm?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Spray Field
Lagoon ! Storage Pond
Other
Facility Number: 400016
Reason for Visit: Routine
Page: 6

Division of Water Quality
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400016 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS4QO016❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: RoWtiloe County: Greene Region: Washington _
Date of Visit: Q713012009 Entry Time:01:45 PM Exit Time:
Farm Name: Jack &,ferry Cunningham Farms
Owner: Jerry M Cunningham
Incident #:
Owner Email: ierrvc444fchotmail.co
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 7643 Beaman Old Creek Rd Walstonbura NC 27888
Physical Address: 7800 Beaman Qd Creek Rd Walstonburg NC 27§88,_,
Facility Status: E Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: MuEphy-Brown, LL
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35-°,2'44"__ Longitude: 77°45'40"
Farm location: from Hwy. 58 take State Rd. 1229 4 miles right on 1222 1 mile on rightSR 1222 by Beaman Run. drh
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Jack G Cunningham Operator Certification Number: 19204
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Jerry Cunningham Phone:
On -site representative Jerry Cunningham Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis:
5-13-09 2.0
1-23-09 1.6
soil tested Nov 2008 remember to test this fall
Looks good!
Page: 1

Permit: AWS400016 Owner - Facility: Jerry M Cunningham
Facility Number: 400016
Inspection Date: 07/30/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon
iJJ
agoon
2JJ
agoon
L3
39.00
Page: 2

Permit: AWS400016 Owner - Facility: Jerry M Cunningham Facility Number: 400016
Inspection Date: 07/30/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No
NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
Cl
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
■
❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑ ❑
Z Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑ ❑,
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■
❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe
❑
■
❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■
❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA NE
1i0. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑ ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS400016 Owner - Facility: Jerry M Cunningham
Inspection Date: 07/30/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 400016
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
Q
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.?
Q
Total P2O5?
Q
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
Q
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
Q
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 3
Soybean, Wheat
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Sail Type 5
Soil Type 6
14, Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■ ❑ Q
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? Q ■ Q Q
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Q ■ Q Q
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
Q ■ Q ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
Q ■ Q Q
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
Q
Page: 4

0
Permit: AWS400016 Owner - Facility: Jerry M Cunningham Facility Number: 400016
Inspection Date: 07/30/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
Other Issues
Yes No
NA NE
26. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those
❑ ■
❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air
❑ ■
Cl ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

U
Permit: AWS400016 Owner - Facility: Jerry M Cunningham
Inspection Date: 07/30/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Other Issues
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWO of emergency situations as required by Pen -nit?
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewfinspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Facility Number: 400016
Reason For Visit: Routine
Page: 6

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400016 Facility Status: Actives - Permit: AWS400016 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Greene Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 10/09/2008 Entry Time: 01:50 PM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: Jack & Jerry Cunningham Fames Owner Email:
Phone: [phone] , T
Mailing Address: 7643 Beaman Qld CreekWalstonbura NC 27888
Physical Address: 7800 Bean OldQreek Rd Walstonburg NC 27888
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Location of Farm:
Integrator: Premium Standard Farms Of North Carolina Inc
Latitude:35'32'44" Longitude:77°43'40"
Farm location: from Hwy. 58 take State Rd, 1229 4 miles right on 1222 1 mile on righlSR 1222 by Beaman Run. drh.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Records and Documents
Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Other Issues
Certified Operator: Jack G Cunningham Operator Certification Number: 19204
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representatives): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Jerry Cunningham Phone:
On -site representative Jerry Cunningham Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis:
1-16-08 = 2.1
3-25-08 = 2.2
5-19-08 = 1.7
8-12-08 = 1.4
soil test Nov. 2007
Page: 1

l
Permit: AWS400016 Owner - Facility: Jerry M Cunningham Facility Number: 400016
Inspection Date: 10/09/2608 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 3,840 3,800
Total Design Capacity: 3,840
Total SSLW: 518,400
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon
1JJ
agoon
2JJ
agoon
L3
30.50
Page: 2
11

Permit: AWS400016 Owner - Facility: Jerry M Cunningham Facility Number: 400016
Inspection Date: 1010912008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at
Structure ❑
Application Field Q
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? Q ■ Q D
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence Of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes No
NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le] large trees, severe
❑ ■
❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■
❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
Q ■
❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
Q ■
❑ Q
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No
NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑ ■
❑ ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
Q ■
Q ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
Q
Page: 3

Permit: AWS400016 Owner - Facility: Jerry M Cunningham Facility Number: 400016
Inspection Date: 10/09/2008 Inspection Type: Complianoe Inspection Reason for VisIt: Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
PAN? ❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.? ❑
Total P205? ❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? ❑
Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑
Evidence of wind drift? ❑
Application outside of application area? ❑
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
1& Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Records and Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WU P?
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(May)
Soybean, Wheat
Small Grain Overseed
OMOO
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
A
Page: 4

Permit: AWS400016 Owner - Facility: Jerry M Cunningham
Facility Number:
400016
Inspection Date: 10109l2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA
NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
Q
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ ■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
Q
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
Q
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
Q
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
Q 0011
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)? ❑ ■
❑
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ■
❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ ■
❑
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ ■
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Q ■
Q
Q
Yon Nn
NA
NF
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours andfor document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air 110011
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AWS400016 Owner - Faciffty: Jerry M Cunningham
Facility Number: 400016
Inspection Date: 10/09/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? ❑ ■
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ ■ Q 11
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ ■
Page: 6

0 Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400016 _ Facility Status: Active Permit: NCA240016 Q Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routing County: Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 09/18/2007 _ Entry Time:09:30 AM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: Jack & Jerry Cunningham Farms Owner Email:
Owner: Jerry M Cunningham Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 7643 Beaman Old Creek Rd yWalstonburg NQ 27888
Physical Address: 7800 Beaman Old Creek Rd WalstonLijLg UC 27888
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: A5"32'44" _ Longitude: 77°43'40
Farm location: from Hwy. 58 take State Rd. 1229 4 miles right on 1222 1 mile on rightSR 1222 by Beaman Run. drh.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Jack G Cunningham Operator Certification Number: 19204
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
On -site representative Phone:
24 hour contact name Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Date:
Page: 1

Permit: NCA240016 Owner - Facility: Jerry M Cunningham
Facility Number : 400016
Inspection Date: 09/18/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis:
8-20-07 = 1.3
6-5-07 = 1.2
3-28-07 = 1.7
soil test 2006
When farm was visited - New NPDES forms were not being used - we discussed this fact; daily freeboard & water lines will be
switched immediately. Jerry is going to call SWCD office for guidance on Phosporus balance on IRR2. He is also contacting Raleigh
with the possibility of going to state permit!
Note on old lagoon re: sludge: there is practically on water in lagoon with a nice grassy bottom, freeboard marker showing 50+
inches, so there is no need for a sludge survey as this lagoon was never really used for animal waste.
Page: 2

Permit: NCA240016 Owner - Facility: Jerry M Cunningham
Facility Number: 400016
Inspection Date: 09/18/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Q Swine -Feeder to Finish 3,840 3,800
Total Design Capacity: 3,840
Total SSLW: 518,400
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon
111
48.00
agoon
2JJ
48.00
agoon
L3
55.00
Page: 3

Permit: NCA240016 Owner - Facility: Jerry M Cunningham Facility Number : 400016
Inspection Date: 09/18/2007 Inspectlon Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes No
NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑ ■
Cl ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ ■
❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ ■
❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑ ■
❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes No
NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
❑ ■
❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■
❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑ ■
❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑ ■
❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No
NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑ ■
❑ ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 4

Permit: NCA240016 Owner - Facility: Jerry M Cunningham
Inspection Date: 09/1812007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number : 400016
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Day)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 3
Soybeans
Crop Type 4
Winter Annual
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
18. is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 5

Permit: NCA2400116 Owner - Facility: Jerry M Cunningham Facility Number: 400016
Inspection Date: 0911812007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for VisIt: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA NE
Checklists?
Cl
Design?
Cl
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > i inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
Other issues
Yes No
NA NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
29, Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those
❑ ■
❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30, At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air
❑ ■
❑ 0
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 6

Permit: NCA240016 Owner - Facility: Jerry M Cunningham
Facility Number: 400016
Inspection Date: 09/18/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss reviewrnspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 7

E Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: Facility Status: Active Permit: NCA240016 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Rou(ine County: Greene Region: yjWashinan
Date of Visit: 02/02/2006 Entry Time:09:30 AM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: Jack & Jerry Qunniagharn Farms Owner Email:
Owner: Jack G CugniQgham Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 7810 Beaman Old Creek Rd Walstonburg NC 27888
Physical Address:
Facility Status: Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:35"32'44" Longitude:77°43'40"
Farm location: from Hwy. 58 take State Rd. 1229 4 miles right on 1222 1 mile on rightSR 1222 by Beaman Run. drh.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Jack G Cunningham Operator Certification Number: 19204
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
On -site representative Jerry Cunningham Phone: [phone]
24 hour contact name Jerry Cunningham Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Waste analyses:
4-29-05 =2.4
4-7-05 = 1.5
8-31-05 = 1.4
12-5-05 = 0.82
2-25-05 = 2.1
Soil sample in Dec. 2005
Irr balanced out.
Page: 1

Permit: NCA240016 Owner - Facility: Jack G Cunningham Facility Number: 400016
Inspection Date: 02/02/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon
1JJ
agoon
2JJ
agoon
L3
29.00
Page: 2

Permit: NCA240016 Owner - Facility: Jack G Cunningham Facility Number: 400016
Inspection Date: 02/02/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection . Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes No
NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ ■
❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass 'the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ 000
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑ 0110
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes No
NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.eJ large trees, severe
❑ ■
❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■
❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑ ■
❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑ ■
❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No
NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑ ■
❑ ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

Permit: NCA240016 Owner - Facility: Jack G Cunningham
Facility Number: 400016
Inspection Date: 02/02/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1 Bermuda Grass (Hay,
Pasture)
Crop Type 2 Soybean, Wheat
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1 Johns
Soil Type 2 Wagram
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ ❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ ❑ ❑
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP? ❑
Page: 4

Permit: NCA240016 Owner - Facility: Jack G Cunningham
Facility Number: 400016
Inspection Date: 02/02/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES
only)? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Other Issues
Yes No NA NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: NCA240016 Owner - Facility: Jack G Cunningham
Inspection Date: 02/02/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Otherlssues
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss reviewfinspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by saute agency?
Facility Number : 400016
Reason for Visit: Routine
Page: 6

Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit 0 Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notifrcation O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 4l1 16 Date of Visit: 2-23-Z�o4 Time: 11:00
E_ .� Not O erational 0 Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified E3 Conditionally Certified 13 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: Jack. icsleixy. 1111g111gUAfl. ax711s.................................................... County: Grccjac ............................................... WARO .„.....
Owner Name:,1,ACk......................................... CUnxtjngbAM ............................................ Phone No: 2S .-7.47:1729ur. 3.36..---•-•--...............................
Mailing Address: 7..643..B.t,gm;itL.Qlil.CrcgJk.Rd........................................................ W.Rj$.t.QAhjftrg.N.0 ................................................. 2.7.83.8 .............
Facility Contact: dlGrry..AtAltAA1711Ait1......................„.............Title:................................................................ Phone No: 7.47.-$.19.5................................
Onsite Representative: Jcrxy............................................................................................... Integrator: P.re�nxu�m �Staztdars� axm�S.Q iQ�rth...........
Certified Operator: J.gg G................... ......... QUIRRip2ham ............................. Operator Certification Number: j9ZQ4,
Location of Farm:
Farm location: from Hwy. 58 take State Rd. 1229 4 miles right on 1222 1 mile on right
3R 1222 by Beaman Run. drh.
® Swine [I Poultry [I Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 • 32 r ®u Longitude 77 • 43 40 49
Design Current
Design Current
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
Poultry
Capacity population Cattle
Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Layer
1
1[:] Dairy
® Feeder to Finish
3840
3600
❑ Non -Layer
I
JE] Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity
3,840
❑ Gilts
Total SSLW
518,400
❑ Boars
. Number of Lagoons 2
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: El Lagoon [I Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ SpilIway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:...................................................................... .................................... ................................... ...........................
Freeboard (inches): 24
12112103
Continued

Facility Number: 40-16 Date of Inspection 2-23-2004
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or ❑ Yes ® No
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level ❑ Yes ® No
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ® No
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc
12. Crop type Soybeans
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ® No
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge attor below . ❑ Yes M No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ Yes ® No
Air Quality representative immediately.
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YE&answers and/or any,recommendations of any other comments -
Use drawings, of facility to 6etter'eaplain situations (use additional pages as necessary): " ❑Field Copy ®Final Notes
c x
The COC was on site. +
Reviewer/inspector Name Marlene D. Salyer
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: 11yj1110__Z -
Date: 3 i — p[/
Continued
1l/11M.1

r
'Facility Number: 40-16 Date of Inspection 2-23-2t104
Required Records & Documents
2I . Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
22. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(iel WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
23. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Waste Application ❑ Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Sampling
24. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
25. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
26. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(iel discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
27. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
28. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
29. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
NPDES Permitted Facilities
30. Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35)
31. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
32. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
33. Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey?
34. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment?
35. Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Stocking Form ❑ Crop Yield Norm []Rainfall ❑ Inspection After V Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes OR No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ® No
12112103

Technical Assistance Site Visit Report
" Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Natural Resources Conservation Service
Q Soil and Water Conservation District
Q Other...
Facility Number 40 - 1 fi Date: 9123103 Time: 1 1130 Time On Farm: 60 WaRO
Farm Name Jack & Jerry Cunningham Farms County Greene
Mailing Address Rt 1 Box 46-A
Phone: [phone] or
Walstonburg NC 27888
Onsite
Representative Jer Cunningham/Matt Barefoot integrator 1premium Standard Farms
Type Of Visit Purpose Of Visit
Operation Review
Compliance Inspection (pilot only)
Technical Assistance
Confirmation for Removal
I ❑ No Animals -Date Last Operated:
❑ Operating below threshold
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse
Design Current
Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
3840
3840
O Routine
O Response to DWQ/DENR referral
O Response to DSWC/SWCD referral
O Response to complaint/local referral
O Requested by produce rfi ntegrato r
O Follow-up
O Emergency
O Other...
Design Current
Capacity Population
❑ Layer
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
GENERAL QUESTIONS:
1. Is waste discharging from any part of the operation and reaching surface waters or wetlands? ❑ yes ® no
2. Is there evidence of a past waste discharge from any part of the operation that waste reached ❑ yes ® no
surface waters or wetlands?
3. Does any problem pose an immediate threat to the integrity of the waste structure (large trees, ❑ yes ®no
seepage, severe erosion, etc.)?
4. Is there evidence of nitrogen over application, hydraulic overloading or excessive ponding ❑ yes ®no
requiring DWQ notification?
5. Is there evidence of improper dead animal disposal that poses a threat to the environment ❑ yes ®no
and/or public health?
6. Is the waste level within the structural freeboard elevation range for any waste structure? ❑ yes ® no
Structure1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier
Level (Inches) 1 27
CROP TYPES 1coastal Bermuda -hay I Small grain overseed IlSoybeans heat
SPRAYFIELD
SOIL TYPES WaS Jo
7. What type of technical assistance does the onsite representative feel is needed? (list in comment section)
03/10/03
❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
GENERAL QUESTIONS:
1. Is waste discharging from any part of the operation and reaching surface waters or wetlands? ❑ yes ® no
2. Is there evidence of a past waste discharge from any part of the operation that waste reached ❑ yes ® no
surface waters or wetlands?
3. Does any problem pose an immediate threat to the integrity of the waste structure (large trees, ❑ yes ®no
seepage, severe erosion, etc.)?
4. Is there evidence of nitrogen over application, hydraulic overloading or excessive ponding ❑ yes ®no
requiring DWQ notification?
5. Is there evidence of improper dead animal disposal that poses a threat to the environment ❑ yes ®no
and/or public health?
6. Is the waste level within the structural freeboard elevation range for any waste structure? ❑ yes ® no
Structure1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier
Level (Inches) 1 27
CROP TYPES 1coastal Bermuda -hay I Small grain overseed IlSoybeans heat
SPRAYFIELD
SOIL TYPES WaS Jo
7. What type of technical assistance does the onsite representative feel is needed? (list in comment section)
03/10/03

Facility Number 40 - 16 Date:
9/23/03
PARAMETER
Q No assistance provided/requested
❑ 8. Waste spill leaving site
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE Needed
Provided
❑ 9. Waste spill contained on site
❑ 10. Level in structural freeboard
25. Waste Plan Revision or Amendment
El
❑
❑ 11. Level in storm storage
26. Waste Plan Conditional Amendment
❑
❑
27. Review or Evaluate Waste Plan wlproducer
❑
❑
❑ 12. Waste structure integrity compromised
28. Forms Need (list in comment section)
❑
❑
❑ 13. Waste structure needs maintenance
29. Missing Components (list in comments)
❑
❑
[114. Over application >= 10% & 10 lbs.
El
❑
❑ 15. Over application < 10% or < 10 lbs.
30.2H.0200 re -certification
[116. Hydraulic overloading
31. Five & Thirty day Plans of Action (PoA)
❑
❑
32. Irrigation record keeping assistance
❑
❑
❑ 17. Deficient irrigation records
❑ 18_ Late/missing waste analysis
33. Organizelcomputerization of records
❑
❑
[119. Latelmissing lagoon level records
34. Sludge Evaluation
❑
❑
❑ 20_ Late/missing soils analysis
❑ 21. Crop needs improvement
35. Sludge or Closure Plan
❑
❑
❑ 22. Crop inconsistent with waste plan
36. Sludge removallclosure procedures
❑
❑
37. Waste Structure Evaluation
❑
❑
❑ 23. Irrigation maintenance deficiency
❑ 24. Deficient sprayfield conditions
38. Structure Needs Improvement
❑
❑
39. Operation & Maintenance Improvements
❑
❑
40. Marker checklcalibration
❑
❑
Reaulatory Referrals
41. Site evaluation
❑
❑
❑ Referred to DWO Date:
42. Irrigation Calibration
❑
❑
❑ Referred to NCDA Date:
43. Irrigation
El
❑
❑ Other...
system design/installation
Date:
44. Secure irrigation Information (maps, etc.)
❑
❑
LIST IMPROVEMENTS
45. Operating improvements (pull signs, etc.)
❑
❑
MADE BY OPERATION
46. Wettable Acre Determination
❑
❑
1
47. Evaluate WAD certificationlrechecks
❑
❑
48. Crop evaluationfrecommendations
❑
❑
Z.
49. Drainage workievaluation -
❑
❑
50. land shaping, subsoiling, aeration, etc.
51. Runoff control, stormwater diversion, etc.
❑
❑
❑
El3
52. Buffer improvements
❑
❑
53. Field measurements(GPS, surveying, etc.)
❑
❑
4.
54. Mortality BMPs
❑
❑
55. Waste operator education (NPDES)
5.
56. Operation & maintenance education
❑
❑
67. Record keeping education
❑
❑
s
58. Croplforage management education
❑
❑
59. Soil and/or waste sampling education
❑
❑
03/10/03

Facility Number 40 - 16 Date: 9/23/03
COMMENTS:
. Discussed NPDES and transferring information to new forms. Need to use new IRR1 forms to transfer information t{
w IRR2. Presently, new IRR2 forms are being used.
oil test dated 1/15103 this is for 2002 crop year. Cu, Zn and ph within guidelines. Remember to take soil test for 2003.
taste analysis dated 8/19/03 nitrogen is 2.1 Ibs11000 gallons
5/19/03 nitrogen is 1.8 Ibs/1000 gallons
3/27/03 nitrogen is 2.0 Ibs/1000 gallons
1/15103 nitrogen is 1.5 Ibs/1000 gallons
10/11/02 nitrogen is 1.8 Ibs/1000 gallons
7/18/02 nitrogen is 1.8 Ibs/1000 gallons
OC need to be on site.
eed to use new IRR1 forms when transferring information to IRR2.
agoon level is recorded weekly with drops in lagoon consistent with irrigation events.
ave records available for five years.
eceiving crops in good condition.
eed to lower lagoon as soil and weather conditions permit. Follow guidance from waste plan
TECHNICAL SPECIALIST Martin McLawhorn
SIGNATURE
Date Entered: 9/25/03 Entered By: Imartin McLawhorn
3 03/10/03

J . ';� 6
L
Visit p Compliance Inspection p Operation Review p Lagoon Evaluation
for Visit p Routine p Complaint p Follow up p Emergency notification p Other p Denied Access
Facility Number Date of Visit: z/6/z(102 Time: 13:25
p Not Operational p e ow Threshold
0 Permitted X Certified p Conditionally Certified p Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name: Jack & Jerry Cunningham Farms County: 1Gr .- .................W.a.RQ........
............................
Owner Name: Jack Cunningham Phone No: 252-747-7729 or 5386
Mailing Address:.7.5.43..Hcatmon.QId..Creck.road...................................................... Wa lstontturp N C................................................. 22,88R..----........
FacilityContact: ..............Title:............................................................... Phone No: ....................................................
Onsite Representative: ,Ie.ry..Cunminghaan................................................................. Integrator: Prnuzuum.Stmdard.F,armi.oLNorkh...........
Certified Operator:Jack.G................................... CUxWWghaxn .................................. Operator Certification Number: 19.2,Q4.............................
Location of Farm:
+arm location: from Rwy. 58 take State Rd. 1229 4 miles right on 1222 1 mile on right A
iR 1222 by Beaman Run. drh.
® Swine 13 Poultry p Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude ©• ©' ®� Longitude ©• ®®�
Design Curreat DesignFCarrent 1 �k " Design ' Current
Swine Capacity
;Populat�onL`Poulfry
�t -Capacity Populstton Cattle }Capacity Population
�.
r
_ -. aw-- --�...:C"-.
. sSa,,.is� ^�u..s;:'r:•'�`T=-a.a "-z'"e`n--e'z '` .._ri..s=',¢..,, - ra - F. r i �k,:i
x
p Other
�3. ToEal Desjgn Capac�t}+, _ 3,840
!
otal SSLW 518,400
�i
_,r
" *r Number ofLagoons
ace rams resent p Lagoon Area p pray ie rea
❑ MUM
F Holding Ponds /Solid Traps _ � o iqui Waste Management System r
p can to Feeder
® Feeder to un�s
p arrow to can
p Farrow to Feeder
p Farrow to Finish
p Gilts
p ayer
p airy
p on- ayer
p Non- airy
Discharses & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? p Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: 0 Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? p Yes ONO
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) Yes ® No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min? na
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes ®No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? [3 Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? 13 Yes N No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? 13 Spillway p Yes ®Na
Structure l Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ............ Back ------ ...Abandon........ ...............................................................................................................................
Freeboard(inches): ...............2.5...............................5.Q.................................. ........

act umber: 40-16
Date of Inspection 1.770902
i.L
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
Closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? p Excessive Ponding p PAN p Hydraulic Overload
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes N No
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Hay) Small Grain Overseed Wheat, Soybeans
I3. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAW1vIP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? p Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
I8. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(iel discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes N No
p Yes N No
p Yes to No
p Yes ® No
p o violations or deficiencies were noted uring this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about tills visit.
io"no�q rExplam'any,YES answers sud(or anyrecprimendations o'r=anyKtitler�commentsal 1tz ti.h
Mi Y.&:�`a�'�S3ia �`?-F�.'.2i-->'#'..`t�'�"'f1. .- •. '.3_.
Use#drawings°to'better a }�la�n sEtuattoits (use additional,pages a9:becessary)
-dacihty j_ � - b Field Co p Final Notes
,.RONNIE
Records available for review.
Waste analysis - 11/21/01 = 1.71bs.; 8/14/01 = 2.4 lbs.
Soil analysis - for 2001 available.
Waste plan dated 4/7/01
Irrigation records are complete and balanced out. Very little overapplication - not significant.
Make sure to pull soil samples for this year.
Continue to remove trash from the lagoon. (SEE PAGE 3)
Reviewer/Inspector Name Lya >a rdison' - Ny =entered Y,, nn Tyndall
Reviewer/inspector Signature: Date:

J . 'ii)
05103101
Facility i Number; 40 _16
Date of Inspection
Continued
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below [3 Yes 13 No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? [3 Yes ® No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, E3 Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? p Yes ® No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) p Yes ® No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? p Yes ® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? [3 Yes p No

A
©� Michael F. Easley
Governor
7 William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
> Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Gregory Thorpe, Acting Director
Division of Water Quality
To: Producers
From: Lyn B. Hardison
Environmental Specialist
Washington Regional Office
Date: February 20, 2002
Subject: Animal Compliance Routine Inspection
Year 2002
Enclosed please find a copy or copies of the Compliance Site Inspection(s) (as viewed in DWQ database) conducted at the
referenced facility by the Division of Water Quality from the Washington Regional Office. Please read this inspection and
keep with all other documents pertaining to your animal operation for future inspections.
In general, these inspections included verifying that: (1) the farm has a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP);
(2) the farm is complying with requirements of the State Rules 15 NCAC 2H_0217, Senate Bill 1217, and the Certified Animal
Waste Management Plan; (3) the farm operation's waste management system is being operated properly under the direction of a
Certified Operator, (4) the required records are being kept; (5) there are no signs of seepage, erosion, and/or runoff.
As a reminder, please note the following which are conditions of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan and the general
pen -nit. therefore, these items must be implemented:
cp The maximurn waste level in lagoons/storage ponds shall not exceed that specified in the CAWIviP. At a minimum,
maximum waste level for waste for lagoons/storage ponds must not exceed the level that provides adequate storage to
contain 25 year, 24 hour storm event plus an additional foot of structural freeboard.
cp An analysis of the liquid animal waste from the lagoon shall be conducted as close to the time of application as practical and
at least within 60 days (before or after) of the date of application. This analysis shall include the following parameters:
Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Zinc and Copper.
cp Soil analysis is required annually.
cp The following records are required: off -site solids removal,- maintenance, repair, waste/soil analysis and land Irrigation
records. These records should be maintained by the facility:owner/manager in chronological and -legible form for a -
minimum of three years.
(p Land application rates shall be in accordance with the CAWMP. In no case shall land application rates exceed the Plant
Available Nitrogen (PAN) rate for the receiving crop or result in runoff during M given application
cp In accordance with you waste utilization plan, the irrigation application events should not exceed the hydraulic loading as
specified per the soil type and in no case should an irrigation event exceed one inch per acre.
n 11 e.i . .,ro...,.,..� �y 1 1�`.'e L.lo n..�l et, �.; Y}•ndr+r,.,�ta Wm� h,, to ..mz,en� r+n�+Ai.+rt,nr {7�neiino ri�martPc 'T7�p n��11 Pt _�._ _-a-:.ii gr"uaa.... ••ua�.a r, Jo_Sl�ei-�aiay.v ... u.+....l..a.w L"' _ +Y Y """b •, `-"'b �-•"'-b" .
can be another vegetated channel, an earth ditch, stabilization structure, or other suitable outlets.
cp It is suggested not required to keep crop yield information for future use to update your waste management plan. You will
need three years of crop yield data before your plan can be updated
For your information, any swine facility that has a discharge to surface waters of the State will have to apply for a National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit with the Division of Water Quality, effective January 1, 2001.
Thank you for your assistance and cooperation during the inspection. If you have any questions, please contact your Technical
Specialist or pre at 252-946-6481, ext. 319.
Cc: WaRO
LBH Files (inspection form only)
943 Washington Square Mall Washington, NC 27889 252-946-6451 (Telephone) 252-946-9215 (Fax)

' - -,— 0 Diva n-of Water Qualih -
-
_ --9 firision_af Sdifaad Water Conservation T
- _ 06th4 Agency -
Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection OO Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation I
Reason for Visit OO Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 40 16 Date of Visit: 8/2/2001 Time: tltltl
Not Operational g Below Threshold
Permitted 93 Certified 0 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name: JackA.Jc rry-.Cut vb9hAna.Ew=a..................... County: G.r"jag .............................. WARO.--.....
Owner Name: Jack ......................................... CuRaiuigbAR........................................... Phone No: 252.-741=.29 fir.53.86................-..-_..-.................
Mailing Address: 1D.3..Bux46-A......................... .. ----- Wa1aglitz-NC................................................. 17. .............
FacilityContact: .............................................................................. Title:................ ........................ Phone No:
Onsite Representative: ,terry-.Cunningham.................................................................. Integrator: C, rDIitia.Pawls..............-.............------------.............
Certified Operator: ,jak....................................... Cm =....... ... Operator Certification Number: 192M....................... ...................... ......
Location of Farm:
Farm location: from Hwy. 58 take State Rd.1229 4 miles right on 1222 1 mile on right +
SR 1222 by Beaman Run. drh.
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ horse Latitude 35 ° 32 ' A " Longitude 77 ° 43 40 K
Design Current
Design Current
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
Poultry
Capacity Population Cattle
Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
10 Layer
JE1 Dairy
® Feeder to Finish
3840
3600
10 Non -Layer
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity
3,840
❑ Gilts
Total SSLW
518,400
❑ Boars
Number of Lagoons 2 10 Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lanrmrt Area 10 Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream impacts
1. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is obsen?cd, did it reach Water of die State? (If yes. notif}, DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gallmiu?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ONO
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Stnicture 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: hack ............. ..abandon .......................................... ... ................ ................. ......................... _.......... ....................................
Freeboard (inches): ............... 26_............ ............... ?0.-.............

/0Vol
Facility Number. 40716
Date of Inspection 1 8/2/2001
Continued
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4fi was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste AVUlication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes, ® No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes N No
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Hay) Small Grain Overseed soybeans wheat
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes N No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management flan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(iel discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes N No
❑Yes NNo
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
N Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes to No
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comments (refer to question € ). Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary): [ Field Copy_❑ Final Notes
*Soil test dated 4/10/01. Applied one ton lime in fall of 2000. Need to follow lime requirements for 2001 soil sample. Some fields require
ore than one ton lime. Suggest keeping lime receipts -
*Waste analysis dated 6/08/01. Nitrogen sample JJ21=2.4 Ibs/1000 gallons
sample 3000=3.0 lbs/1000 gallons
*Discussed IRR2/waste schedule.
*Time to secure new waste analysis.
*Lagoon freeboard level is recorded weekly on wall calendar. Need to record these levels on lagoon report where report can be kept in
record book.
ReviewerllnspectorName Martin Mciawhorn
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

05fi3101 Continued
Facility Number: 40-16 Date of Inspection 8/2/2001
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge atlor below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29_ Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ® No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ® No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanenthemporwy cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Additional Comments and/or rawings:
*Wetted Acre Certification dated 4/12/01 signed by tech. spec.
*Waste plan dated 4/07/01 based on wetted acres with PAN deficit -98 lbs.
*VAW changes field # 2=491 acres
#3=4.17 acres
Additional fields added to Plan (fields 5, 6, 7)
19. IRR2 records for small grain overseed not in record book.
o

Agr6vision of Water Quality
Q Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Q Other Agency
Type of Visit C�liance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number Date of Visit: -ZD-Q 'rime: is Printed on: 7/2112000
Q Not Operational Q Below Threshold
Permitted Certified [3 Conditionally Certified 13 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold
Farm Name: .. (�,1 .. {........,N....... Count': ..........................1.....................
�-� l.)L.3x-�su
Owner Name: i),4 .. .r...... ...�Ju. Phone No:
.. .........
FacilityContact:.............................................................................. Ti1tlle:..........�....................................................... Phone No:...................................................
flailing Address: .... �A Y1lll1(1. .� ._ 1QJi.tL�..K.id1............. ....1.tF,fib.�L�.Y7A_t.l�1C.,................... ..........................
On -site Representative:....... y,�y(1� . Integrator:..p��,..;. .
Certified Operator........... P�.. .. �M „�'.. Operator Certification Numbers .... k G1. Z�.Lk
Location of Farm:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 0 C '4 Longitude ' ° C�Li
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Po ulation Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wan to Feeder ❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
eeder to Finish ❑ Non -Layer I JE1 Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑Other
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ID Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds 1 Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impactti
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes [�Vo
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. li' discharge is observed; was the conveyance man-made"? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑ No
c. II' discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in galhnin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 090
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes GWo
Waste Collection & "Treatment ��,,�
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? El Spillway El Yes ld't�o
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure
__ ; Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ....._.... �.lr............. ..... _ .. t!'..""....1ViV\.....S�*x?.-................................................. ....................................
Freeboard (inches):
5100 Continued on back

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection ., . Printed ()n. 7/21/2000
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed'? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
❑Yes
[ �0
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
�
closure plan?
❑ Yes
VIN/0
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
GKO
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
04o
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
540
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
2<0
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes
❑ No
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those signated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan ( AWMP)?
❑ Yes
[fo
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination'?
❑ Yes
❑
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement'?
❑ Yes
/No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
7No
Required Records & Documents
�10
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
WIN o
19. Does record keeping need improvement'? (ic/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
[Rfo
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
E(No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
R No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes 0 0
23, Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes [Ko
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency'? ❑ Yes Rl"No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes �;To
0: o yiiolatigns;oi defcienc�es were no#ed cluringtis;visit: Yoir will receive 1io fuithtr ;
;corres ondenee: about: this visit. ::::.::::::::::::::: ..... - . - . .. • : • : ' : • : • : • : • :
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility toobbettterexplain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
%-S , o K-bAa-& I vL e jvi out E e_C_A- -nq0 &1kA_ c"I t.U►j �
WM bt_ V-GVtiaveL a 5 v►2-;
s a o l 1 1 bs J�ooO
�, z� . 6 z�IPQ� d V
Reviewer/Inspector Name (3 , 1
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: 0,VV-1 Date: '3-7,0- 01 5100

Facility Number: ()— Date of Inspection 3-ZO-0 Printed on: 7/21/2000
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge At/or below ❑ Yes [1I0
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes Qo
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes [JXo
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes [�'1�To
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes Qi6
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes [�.1tfO
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? El Yes o
Additional Comments and/orDrawings:
' e 1
L � Otj�C�C �-C 4 e �bs�N� COL D�6ti bLA
�`
4o �5 w a- - Y%r� 01 - a�t 'tVA�2-Sj
v -
4Z� C -�C-7r� "1— (114 C-Al 1,4
D. cJ u P Z e. U
7 1, Y n'V O(k- 1
5100

Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection* Operation Review Q Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit *Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 40 1G Date of Visit: 8/28/2000 Time: 1510 Printed on: 3/9/2001
Q Not operational 0 Below Thresholr!
® Permitted M Certified ❑ Conditionally Certified j] Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name: dusk.&.eriry.Gt>ululAtP,ham.aua>xr................................ C�tuf�co:r�ene.
.............................................. W..ai�Q........
...................... .
0" n r Name:JAck......................................... cunjili gham........................................_.. Phone No: 2iX:74.7.-7.I72 0j:53.Sb.....----....................----.
FacilityContact:....♦..............................................................................'Title:............................................................7........ Phone No: .....................
.................
.............
stl$il►r:g Address: JU..J.JI�Q.46.A................................................................................... aWmLb rZ-XC................................................. Z71MR.............
Onsitr Re .esentativu: lac.Cxagtan...................................................................I3tegrator
• Camlina-Farm ....................................................
%ertiird Operator. JN.CAS..G.. .................................. Cznnllnghaul....... .......................... Operatx:r CertificationNumber:1920.4 .............................
Ur-.ation of Farm -
Farm location: from Hwv. 58 take State Rd. 1229 4 miles right on 1222 1 mile on right
SR 1222 by Beaman Run. drh. J
® Swine []Poultry []Cattle ❑Horse L:itituilc 35 ° 32 = ® 'U►ngitrrdc: 77 ° 43 40
- Design Y- Ceirr+enf _
wtine— Ca acity - Po -ulat
❑ Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish 3840 2880
m ❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Discharges & Stream Impacts
! . Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at_ ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field 0 Other
r►. If disc barge is observe d. was the conveyance: man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed. did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) El Yes ❑ No
Q. ' if discharge is observed. -what is the estiruatud flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes. notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes No
I 1 Yes No
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
2 Stroi .::1:re 3 l:'i:e l;.Ey ti
Tilt::t:I ici : .......... 'XJrtla]Cjl ......... .........ka�tll(.......................................................................................................................................................
Frs cboard (inches)! ................ 3R................ ............... A(i............... ................................... .................................... .................................... ....................................

5100
Facility Number: ' 40— tfi Date of Insncetion 8/28/2000 Printed on:
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Annlication
Continued on back
3/9/2001
Yes
- No
❑ Yes
N No
N Yes
❑ No
El Yes
N No
0 Yes
N; No
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? Yes N No
I I . Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes 0 No
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Graze) Small Grain Overseed Soybeans/Wheat
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes N No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
-No violations, or:deficiencies-were t oted:during this visit:: You will:receive'no further:
correspondence about this'visit.' .
L; Yes u No
J Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
N Yes ❑ No
ID Yes N' No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
Yes N No
Yes N No
Comments (refer to gaestioo`#): Explain an f YES -answers and/or any recomtnentlatlons or -any other comments
Use drawings_of facility.to better explain situations.{use additional pages as_nccess_ary) - —
3/19/00 waste analysis report with L1 at 0.83 Ibs/1000 gal.
4/3100 waste analysis report with L1 at 0.21 Ibs/1000 gal.
t Amended Certificate of Coverage on site dated 2/17/00 for 3840 finishers.
r New waste plan dated 12/6/99 with an overall PAN deficit of 773 lbs.
Send Excel IRR2 disk. -
19. cNoTsoitsireport�availablOdr_1.999r2000�samples-have-been-pul__ led -Need to transfer I R R 1
nformation to IRR2 and balance. SEE PAGE 3
I ICI
Reviewer/Inspector Name—
.._

Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 5/00
Facility Number: 4tl 16 Date of inspection 8/28I2000 Printed on: 3/9/2001
Odor Issues
26_ Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below 0 Yes 0 No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? 0 Yes CK No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt. O Yes 0 No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes iK No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ® No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? [I Yes 19 No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes C3 No
Additional Comments and/orMrawings:-
* Lagoon level records complete.
7_ Planning to log area adjacent to lagoon by end of year; at that time woody vegetation will be removed
from outside wall; in process of mowing lagoon.

Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit OO Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility {Number 40 16 Date of Visit 51111Z1100 Printed on: 5/16/2000
Q Not Operational Q Below Threshold
® Permitted ■ Certified i❑ Conditionally Certified [3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ....................
Farm Name: Nf: 01ybx GurttaiingilQM.JFArw..................... ... County: GTQCJatr............................................... FARO........
Owner Name: N?aoIyaQ.................................... clat i ulgham............................................ Phone No: 252-747-..7.7.29..Ru.53.86..........................................
FacilityContact: ..............................................................................Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
MailingAddress:A .......................................................................................W.Qb.t.Q.UbMr9.N.0 ........................................... I .--........
Onsite Representative: ....................................................... Integrator: CAr ...................................................g.jjjgqL.F>IJCME......................................_.............
Certified Operator: J.a G,,....................... Gelti ism................................. Operator Certification Number:192,Q4,,,,,,
Location of Farm:
IN Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 • 32 f 44 Lf Longitude 77 • 43 4 40
Number of Lagoons 2 I❑ Subsurface Drains Present 10 Lagoon Area I❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds /Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ®No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier: ..........P.ritnary........................ OM..............................................................................
Freeboard (inches): 26 31
❑ Yes ® No
Structure 5 Structure 6

Continued on back
Facility Number: 411-16 Date of Inspection 5/11/2000 Printed on: 5/16/2000
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes ® No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Yes ®No
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda Small Grain (Rye)
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
® No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
® No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ic/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
® No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
® No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
® No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
® No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) .
❑ Yes
® No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
® No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
® No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
® No
0 10 violations:o:r deficiencies•vvere:noted:during•th' fs wisit::Xou_rvill:receive nb further
.. correspondence about this.visit. -
9 7., New Certificate of Coverage issued 2/2000. Fully stocked with animals. All records of the
W CAMP are current and up to date.
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Oanhne B. Cullom Entered by Ann Tyndall 1
qV

�Reviewer/inspector Signature_ Date:
�w
Facility Number: 40-16 Date of Inspection r 5/11/2000 Printed on: 5/16/2000
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ® No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ® No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No

10 Routine Q Complaint 0 Follow-up of DW2 inspection Q Follow-up of DSWC review Q Other
Facility Number 40 ]6 Date of Inspection 12/9/99
Time of Inspection 2:00 PM 24 hr. (hh:mm)
® Permitted ® Certified © Conditionally Certified © Registered JE3 Not O ratronal Date Last Operated.
Farm Name: ............ County: 1reg=......... ............ .......... _.......... .. W&W........
Owner Name: Melxill.. _._.. -. _ ...�... Clltugi m ._ _ ...­.w_.... Phone No: ?5 :74.7 ..7299. Qr . W......_..._ .....� ...
FacilityContact: ............................................................................ Title:................................................................ Phone No:.................................................
Mailing Address: Rt.7.JW 4Gr.A..................... ......... .................._....... _....... — ----------- V�Aktonbarg.Nc...................................... _.. 278SR.............
Onsite Representative: 1ac.� am....-..�..---•...................................................Integrator: uraby amib .ara.._.....--------....................
Certified Operator: ,leek fir,, , �._...... _ � p A blkm� ._.........�.�.... Operator Certification Number: 192Q9 .
Location of Farm:
Latitude 35 • 32 1 44 K Longitude 77 • 436 F-4-0
Design Current
awrne Capacity Po ula'
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
® Farrow to Feeder 1000 100
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
Non Layer 1 1[:] Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 1,000
Total SSLW 522,000
Number of Lagoons 2 I 10 Subsurface Drains Present JILI Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps 10 No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Imuacts
1. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. Kdischarge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: ._... ._. kl .._. �..... ... ...-... jam._ ...... - _ .................. .. ............._ ._........_..... .. _.._..._._.
Freeboard(inches): ................ A............... ...........16.........------... -.............................. .................................... ....... ............................. .
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (iel trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes []No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
Structure 6
❑ Yes
® No
Continued on hack

Facility Number: 40-16 Date of Inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
l I . Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
Printed on 12/17/99
12/9/99
❑ Yes
® No
® Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
®No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda Small Grain
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
_No �olatioiis:or:defineitcies'ivere:doted'd' u' H lg ails-vi§it:k' e' a n'Q 4rt6ei•: :
c2E!!!pondence about this -visit- -'
t0i.'
Use:drawings of facility tobetter;explam`srtuatiuns. (use additional pages as necessary)
0.82 Ibs/1000 -waste analysis on 11/3/99
7. Need to continue to work on vegetation on dike wall. Excessive growth. Old lagoon has some severe erosion. This
should be addressed.
15. Oversee was eaten by cows. Need to work on overseed.
19. Missed 2 months of freeboard records but otherwise, very good.
Farm is in process of converting from sow farm to topping. New houses will be built. Plan is being done with Greene
County NRCS.
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ®No
Reviewer/Inspector Name ;Carl Dunn Entered by Ann Tyndall - I
Rs-vifwprf1ncnortnr Civnstus"a n2ta-

Division of Sail andWaEer Consei-vahon _ Operatiao:Reviery
__.IlDivision of Soil and Vtrater.Conservatton xCampliance Inspection
. Division of Water,Qiialcty Compliance Inspection
_.M
[3 Uther Agency Operation Review;. =�
[e Routine O Complaint O Fol]ow-uE of DWQ inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Facility Number io Date of Inspection 2 �q
Time of Inspection I4,'vJ 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Permitted © Certified © Conditionally Certified 0 Registered 10 Not Operational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: ..�Gc� b......:t�...`N..""!^�.k.'... Cuunty:............�r`R2..2-"
......................... .... .......
Owner Name: k��� 4 f" Phone No:
........ ..............................................................................
Facility Contact:.............................................................................. Title:......
MailingAddress:..................................................................................................................... ..
Onsite Representative: .............4..........".-^?..`"`'.L........................................
Certified Operator:..... I[ ..
CMIw'� nY'�
Location of Farm:
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Latitude ' 4 •4 Longitude • 6 46
Design Current Design, Current Design Current
Swine,. --_ -Point -
Capacity Po ulation _.,,1').., Capacity .Population . -Cable Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Jovv
joa
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts,
❑ Boars
Number of Lagoons; 2. ❑ Subsurface Drains Present I ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
�-
Holding;Poiids /Solid Traps �m ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in gal min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: (Iev DN
Freeboard (inches): 3...................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
No
Cl Yes
,fNo
❑ Yes XNo
Structure.6
❑ Yes ZNo
Continued on back
3/23/99

Facility Number: tf0
Date of Inspection
T_cF4'
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
❑ Yes
�PfNo
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
XYes
❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenarice/improvement?
❑ Yes
ZNo
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
ZNo
Waste Application
10, Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
O No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
❑ Yes
ZNo
12. Crop type �X_t,.ne n SG
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
Wj No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
[] No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
Yes
❑ No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
No
Reouired Records & Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
ZNo
18,
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
O No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
Yes
❑ No
20_
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
O No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
O No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
❑ No
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
j No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes]
No
0:.io yiolafigns or .... eu... vt� .. pried d#riitg phis:visit: Yoi� will -receive fi© further -
corres�ondeitce. ah,rnti this visit_ . . .
Jsi:.drawings of facility
#)m Explain
oil
tional,pages as necessary) _
1L1, LV111111G1l il.:.' ;^
ptej `[d
CFJrL��H�
+v
1/0,- v, ve5e,%t'a.. ,,
�i�� �-o� f ,
��� �wy gow(
S:eV2/e_ graV47A, 45
} +-�►-�(i, rF�cess�ae
(5-
OVzT ' +�-+cs e�
t,Y
co..g. j�Ped f o 6,p,k
oA ov45 .
M� ss�l
2 �,o-l�
�d,,,d ref., cd) ► +
Ele_ aer-� ��c►.
Few 1's ix
prsuss 04
-(._ -k,
-4.rA _s, �►e. ka s �,I{ c 1fi
Ply,,
rs
A"- -,,.AI^
6, t✓P-CS.
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
3/23/99

Facility Number 40 16 Date of Inspection 5/17/99
Time of Inspection 1200 24 hr. (hh:mm)
® Permitted M Certified © Conditionally Certified 0 Registered [3 Not Operational I Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: rAfKlylix.C.Umning11,ana.farm.................................................... ................. County: G.rmag .............................................. WA�0........
Owner Name: lY.><rjyjut.................................... Qn jugfkam............................................ Phone No: 7S.Z-247-.77.29.RX.5386.........................................
Facility Contact: ............Title:.....................Phone No:
..................................................................Phone No:................................................... ...................................................
Mailing Address: Litj.UaX.4ft.A ......................•------.. ... WaktolhurgAC................................................. 2.78.48 .............
Onsite Representative:,]89k>AI1II]lAag1lA[10..................... Integratar:u�F! ���lidiY.iFOC[1�5.....-------....................................................... .........
Certified Opera tor:,jark,.G................................... C.UltujughAm ................................. Operator Certification Number:19Z04 .............................
Location of Farm:
Latitude 35 • 32 44 GL Longitude 77 • 43 40 u
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ® Yes ❑ No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field IN Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ® No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ® No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min? <lgallon
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ® No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ®No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ®No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure G
Identifier: Inactive Primary
Freeboard (inches):... 3.5................ „3.Q
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on back
Printed an 5/912000

Printed on 519/2000
[Facility Number: 40-16 Date of Inspection 5/17/99
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
❑ Yes
N No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
N Yes
❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
N No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
® No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
❑ Yes
® No
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Graze) Small Grain Overseed Corn, Soybeans, Wheat
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
(:1 Yes
® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
N No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
® No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
N Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
N No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
N No
Required
Records & Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
N No
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
Yes
N No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
N No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
N No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
N No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
N No
23.
Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
N No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
N No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
N No
0" Rio violations -or deficie-ncies•were:noted "duHhg" th6 *bit: _Y6u: Will:r&eive no iurthe_r : " : "
correspondence about this.visit. " . .. "
*Recommend signing up for local Neuse Rule options by 811199 with Greene Soil & Water Conservation District.
*Given Integrator Registration Card.
*Currently has 1075 farrow to wean with SSLW of 465,475. Temporarily running as farrow to wean but plans to change operation
tope. Will need to recertify operation & make request to DWQ to have certificate of coverage amended prior to change.
*Basic calculations for operation change (preliminary only) -
1000 farrow to feeder has steady state live weight = 522,000 lbs
1000 farrow to feeder has PAN rate = 6500 lbs PAN
17,400 wean to feeder has steady state live weight = 522,000 lbs
..
Reviewer/]nspector Name .Pat Hooper 252/946-6481 Entered by Kathy Ford
Reviewer/]nspector Signature: Date:

Printed on 519/2000
Facility Number: 40-16 1 Date of Inspection 5/17199
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ❑ No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ❑ No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ❑ No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ❑ No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
FAMitionall •omments an :o'7MYRings:
1. Breeding barn has flush tank leaking through crack however waste contained on site. Will repair within 24 hours and ensure no
waste leaves site.
7. Continue efforts to remove trees and heavy vegetation to allow for visual inspection. Mr. Cunningham has removed some trees
from back wall and sprigged Coastal Bermuda which is establishing.
14c. Operation pended for a wettable acre determination. Both spray fields utilizing 82% of total acres. However Mr. Cunningham
in process of having waste plan revised by Greene Soil and Waste to include additional acreage and wettable acres.
*Last waste sample dated 3110\99 at 1.4 per 1000 gal (101 OM - 1.3 lbs per 1000 gal)
*Last soils report dated 3\18\99 with lime applied last fall.
*Keeping lagoon level records as required by General Permit.
Printed on 5/9/2000

-Division of Soil and Water Conservation [3 Other Agency
vision of Water Quality
10"Routine O Complaint O Follow-up of DWQ inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Date of Inspection 10-13-
F_ Facility Number
��� Time of Inspection l� : � 24 hr. (hh:nzm)
13 Registered Q'Certified 13 Applied for Permit Permitted JE3 Not Operational I Date Last Operated:. .............„•...
sA�. C��s'.Y1?.nant.ctC y �s �nQ ...:.............:............
Farm Namc:...... _�}' (�c ('.................... Count
Owner Name:........_.:TA.!!�....................... .L1�?r�aiX!rl........................ Phone No:....s `�7. .....�.4.�..:.. 7 `^j
..r..
Facility Contact: .... 11-hL .....W. ?4.)� ............................ �a(.!�:l�i(L.. .............. Title: ......... ... ........... .t.... Phone No:
Mailing Address* .... — ':..�... ox...... =[........................................................ ..... cb ►:4t�!.f:�.t.N..c ...................... ..
OnsiteRepresentative: ... -aAO< ,�v%_nA' A �?:-�^ . ....... Integrator...•. k
...
/ (�
Certified Operator:...s � . l`q'................1.�t �s✓t C� t l.................. Operator Certification Number:.... G.� d`t ...............
Location of Farm: Q
---•---•,,�•-- yy�� nn ..................................................................................•--.................................................................................----........-------•---•---------....--
. -X6.iL....1.. .................. .. ....... .............................................................................................. ..
Latitude E=•=` ®" Longitude ©• 01 =11
:. Design ' Current
Design ' Current Design ' Cu[eht
`u.lation
=ffswine Capacity Population Poultry
Capacity CattleCapacity hPo .Iation.
r
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer
❑ Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Non -Layer
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ F.affow to Wean I OLJA
w ❑ Other
arrow to Feeder (556
❑ Farrow to Finish
:.x u
Y` Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts
❑soars
Total SSLW S 0 4Q
Numberof L oohs / Holdt Pands `
❑ Subsurface
Drains Present
ID Lagoon Area
❑Spray Field Area
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenanedimprovement?
❑ Yes
[.�
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
,..,,'N��
L3<o
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes. notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated'flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑Yes
(10
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes
EI No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
❑ Yes
G1,&o
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
El Yes
,'No
E40
7/25/97

Facility Number: cto —
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes [-}'No`
Structures (Lag9ons.Holding Ponds Flush -Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: C.II![�,'.,r�. .�a.......................................................................................................................................
Freeboard (ft): ..........�..�+�....... ......o� 1. rt (�
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? [ 'Yes ❑❑ No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes M o
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ld'No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ) /
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? ❑ Yes 9<0
Waste A lication
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes 0<0
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ) (�
15. Crop type }.4e5..............................................�...i�d.�P.�s............................---......---.
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? ❑ Yes 0No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
[� No.vitilations�nr. deficiencies:we're-noted- during this:visit. You.vfill receiv',n6 tirthe_r :
:�:•corresp�iadegcealiouflFhis:visa:•: ; :�::•.�:.:.•:'.::-:�..�: •:':..•::.•,•.:•. ;. _ ::�
ill6 �15 ,
�� e �tre .
5 C�s
❑ Yes lKo
❑ Yes L !<o
❑ Yes Q*f4o
❑ Yes Ea<o
❑ Yes Q o
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes L 1Y1V o
❑ Yes�es to fv o
9-es ❑ No
AA-
4,,1�,{�
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date: 10 - 33 —9 8

pot mwt, review p
Facility Number Date of Inspection i 7�
Time of Inspection ® 24 hr. (hh:mm)
p Registered 0 Certified E Applied for Permit p Permitted 0 Not 0perationa Date Last Operated:
Farm Name:JarkAJcrry..Cunniugham.Farm........................................................ County: Greene WaRO
Owner Name: .lack........................................ Cunningham ........................................... Phone No: 9191.7.41.7.729..........................................................
Facility Contact: .larkkCunningb= ........ ...........Title: o.�x.................................................. Phone No: 9.1917.4.7=7729 ........................
Mailing Address: RU.Boas.4bA....................................................................................... .Walstonhuxg.NC................................................. 27R8R ..............
Onsite Representative: ,lack.Q=ingham................................................................... Integrator: l.!'11uxptby.FanxUy.FA pins.....................................
Certified Operator:Jack.G................................... Cumniagham .................................. Operator Certification Number: 19.2114.............................
Location of Farm:
arm. orattnaL M. ................................................................................
1 ?, ii :h,�t:B�eaar�an Ru u.h.........................................................................................................
Latitude Longitude © •
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? p Yes N No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? p Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: p Lagoon p Spray Field 13 Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? p Yes ® No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (if yes, notify DWQ) p Yes ® No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes ® No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? p Yes N No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? p Yes N No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require p Yes ® No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? p Yes ® No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? p Yes N No
7/25/97

ace i Number: 40_16�
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
❑ Yes
® No
Structures (Lagoons,Holdine Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
p Yes
N No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5 Structure
6
Identifier: A.&Y.e........... InactiYa.........
Freeboard (ft): 2.9 2.2
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
p Yes
® No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
p Yes
N No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenancelimprovement?
N Yes
p No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
p Yes
® No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
p Yes
N No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type Umtal.Besmt,tdaAay.).............Small Hrain.C.rerseed.........................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
Q . o!v ar ons.or �cancies-were.no a ut-og 1s visit. as w1 .reeeive nor further . .
- . CerrespoAftijc' �boO X IS YtSi�:
iReviewer/Inspector Name
p Yes ® No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes N No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
® Yes p No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes p No
IReviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

❑ DSWC Animal Feedlot Operation Review
M11UQ Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
10 Routine Q Complaint Q Follow-up of DWO inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Facility Number
Date of Inspection
d
// Time of Inspection: 30Ann 24 hr. (hh:mm).
--
M Registered I�Certified [3 Applied for Permit 13 Permitted 10 Not Operational I Date Last Operated
Farm Name: ......[Y>
�..tJ..tl.k1.�........ "........
l N\................. County:....
Owner Name:.......7i o.... x.�..... ... I'honc \o: �.`lekx. ............
........................
Facility Contact: ......— W�v+�Title• Phc}neNo:..�.-..���.-.�.7�-�
...............n.......................... r ....................................t..
r-
...................................... AA 11
Mailing Address:. �.o�0......�..............` ......u. ..I�.G....a Bg8
€_. .........
Onsite Representative -..... G 0-Cl . &v�.h. ` t✓j .................... vV��
me rotor :................ tJ
Certified Operator ........ .J..!.....-�......................�,...- •- - ..�b t
Location of Farm: Opetator Certification Number....�J
.......... ......... ....................................................................................................... .................. ............................................ . ............................................
................................................................................................................................. ...... ..............................
............._
A
Latitude
NMI
Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ F3paw to Wean
EiTarrow to Feeder
10 50
1000
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Longitude ©• 4 41
Design Current Design Current,
PoultryCapacity Population . Cattle Capacity. Population
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer 10 Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity pc`,. p :3
Total SSL W
Number of Lagoons / Holding Ponds f I0 Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area 10 Spray Field Area
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
General -�sl io ni�n.� t�k S �kl$_ i ctA4V't.['e�—�
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes o
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notif-y DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charLe?
❑ Yes P4°
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes To
❑ Yes g
❑ Yes
K�No
❑ Yes
U40
❑ Yes
Q' 0
7/25/97
Continued on back

Facility Number: Lip — I
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? 2-fes ❑ No
Structures (Lagoons,11olding Ponds Flush Pits etc.'
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes G Imo
Structure 1 `��� Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: a.1.1\ ..........Tntiki �� ..-
Creeboard (ft):........I...........................
..... G.........................................................................................................................
.4-..VQin. `I'-1C1 irk �!
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes I�tvo
If. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? Cl Yes
12- Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement.7 -_k-t.. tQS es El No
GA,C - 0
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses (� � ��%�ey� n
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ) � � , �� 4 otVQ&,�` ve`1e�'tm.tti
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? 4-1a fT42 S-"it -, L ❑ Yes f o
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes 10
(If in excess ofWMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
QQ
15. Crop type ...... k.1.4,Jum.Jf �........................................................................................................... ...............-----------..................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ wittha�se designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? El Yes fo
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes E�No
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes No
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment? ❑Yes ,P40
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes L1d<0
21, Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes E'<0
22. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ Yes ll 1<10
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ❑ Yes UKO
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit? lLJ`k ❑ Yes ❑ No
0 No.vioiations or. deficiencies. were noted during this.. visit. You will receive no further.
correspondence about this: visit.
�N 3- S- ct 7 - (SLI me_xA 0-00-6-�sLl t
ove)Ls ee_
l stt�, s l - 3 -9 7 l n�+- .L s L� eo �; t .so i{s
�n� as J-t� i wt5 p2c.'� i s cti .
`OC=
..r4-4zA qDC
8V16.w P (�
(Z' wD .wr�Tt a S tl _ 7125197
Reviewer/Inspector Name v
Vl b vti L .7gg
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: q 1-7-
1'

! Site Requires Immediate Attention:
Facility No.
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT.
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: _ 7 - l.S , 1995
Time: // /S
Farm Name/Owner. ..l A t2, Fasaac P1 .J Cu.�.l:vl u .r
Mailing Address: __t2 %__ Ao ---�-6 !( �fte �A 5 A/C,
County: C A Eenl c
Integrator: Phone:
On Site Representative: Si4cY_ C_J ,VM ^le WJ*V^1 Phone: 747 - S-1 B 4
Physical Address/Location:
Type of Operation: Swine Poultry Cattle
�ZbO lost sows
Design Capacity: Number of Animals on Site: 4ono w)s yysx-,s
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude: J S _° 2 ' 12Z" Longitude: 77 22a
Circle Yes or No
Elevation: Feet
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) Q"L"ej�or No Actual Freeboard: 3 Ft. a Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes or l-&Was any erosion observed? Yes or 19
Is adequate land available for spray? � No Is the cover crop adequate? d £No
Crop(s) being utilized: Z tAA,. u,#& j7 a,s_•ds-
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings? 'r No
100 Feet from Wells? �r No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes or/
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? (&6 No
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
similar man-made devices? Yes 0(91 If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes or No
Additional Comments:
1�.
Inspector Name
Signature
cc: Facility Assessment Unit Use Attachments if Needed.

U�
�'© �9I�� �Sl

1 Site Requires Immediate Attention:
Facility No.
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT. 44D
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: IdItl - 1995
Time: O7
Farm Na
Mailing
County:
Integratc
On Site Representative: Phone:[ V ti )' I �j- ! -. ]1(o
Physical Address/Location:
Type of Operation: Swine ✓ Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: 1a60 5mws Number of Animals on Site: 3YM
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude: '� 0 Longitude: 77 ' 4' ? 7 Elevation: Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) Yes or No Actual Freeboard: _,5>—Ft- Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes or No Was any erosion observed? Yes or No
Is adequate land available for spray? Ye or No . Is the cover crop adequate?%or No
Crop(s) being utilized: CcrcI
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings? (jAor No
100 Feet from Wells?(74,or No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes or a
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line?
Yes or(i�
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
similar man-made devices? Yes 61(9� If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes 4(��)
Additional Comments:
Inspector Name 9c
cc: Facility Assessment Unit Use Attachments if Needed.