400009_INSPECTIONS_20171231

NORTH CAHULINA
Department of Environmental Qual

INSPECTIONS

I
Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400009 Facility Status: Active
Permit: AWS400009
Denied Access
Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection
Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County:
Greene Region:
Washington
Date of Visit: 07/25/2017 Entry Time: 08:30 am Exit Time: 9:20 am Incident #
Farm Name: Shirley Farm
Owner Email:
dgay@wavelengthmail.c
Owner: Michael L Gay
Phone:
252-753-3667
Mailing Address: 930 Meadow Rd
Walstonburg NC 278889340
Physical Address: 340 Evermay Farm Rd
Walstonburg NC 27888
Facility Status: Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm: latitude:
35° 33' 59" Longitude:
77° 42' 20"
Take 91 South out of Walstonburg and go approx. 2.5 miles out of town. Take right fork in the road (off of 91) and the farm is
visible from the road and turn Rt. on the dirt path.
Question Areas;
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat
Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Michael L Gay Operator Certification Number: 16412
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Mike Gay Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Mike Gay Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis: 2 soil tested: 2016
7-7-16 = 1A5 .56
10-7-16 = .89 .52
6-15-17 = 1.33 .73
4-14-17 = 1,59 .81
IRR records are complete & balanced out.
Reviewed: sludge survey#1=40%, #2=36%; rainfall/freeboard; calibration on certer pivot.
page: 1

q
Permit: AWS400009 Owner - Facility : Michael L Gay Facility Number: 400009
Inspection Date: 07/25/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 7,500 800
Total Design Capacity: 7,500
Total SSLW: 1,012,500
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon 1 SH 48.00
Lagoon 2SH 61.00
page: 2

Permit: AWS400009 Owner - Facility : Michael L Gay Facility Number: 400009
Inspection Date: 07/25/17 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes No Na Ne
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other '
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
M ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
M ❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
M ❑
❑
2. is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
M ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
0 ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No Na Ne
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
M ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (LeJ large
❑
M ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
0 ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
M ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
M ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
M ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yee No Na No
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ M ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ M ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
Cl
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

4
Permit: - AWS400009 Owner - Facility : Michael L Gay Facility Number: 400009
Inspection Date: 07/25/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes
No Na Ne
Crop Type 1
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6 _
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
0 ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
0 ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
M ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No Na Ne
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
M ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below-
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
[]
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
M ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
[�
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
[]
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
Cl
page: 4

Y
Permit: AWS400009 Owner - Facility : Michael L Gay Facility Number:
400009
Inspection Date: 07/25/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na No
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
,
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■ ❑
❑
23, If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
Cl
N ❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
N ❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
0 ❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge Levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26, Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
Cl
E ❑
Cl
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
E ❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No Na No
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
0 ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
E ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface the drains exist at the facility?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon 1 Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
M ❑
❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
0 ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
N ❑
❑
page: 5

Farm Name:
Shirley Farm
Owner:
Michael L Gay
Mailing Address:
930 Meadow Rd
M Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400009 Facility Status: Active
Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection
Permit: AWS400009
Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: ROutlne County: "1=11t: Region:
Date of Visit: 07/14/2016 Entry Time: 10:45 am Exit Time: 11:40 am Incident #
Owner Email:
Phone:
Walstonburg NC 278889340
❑ Denied Access
Washington
dgay@wavelengthmail.c
252-753-3667
Physical Address: 340 Evermay Farm Rd Walstonburg NC 27888
Facility Status: Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35' 33' 59" Longitude. 77° 42' 20"
Take 91 South out of Walstonburg and go approx. 2.5 miles out of town. Take right fork in the road (off of 91) and the farm is
visible from the road and turn Rt. on the dirt path.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Cal, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Michael L Gay Operator Certification Number: 16412
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title r I Phone
24 hour contact name Mike Gay Phone : [phone]
On -site representative Mike Gay Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis: soil tested: 2-2015
7-7-16 = 1.45 .60
12-18-15 = .34 .96
9-4-15 = ,42 2,67
IRR records are complete & balanced out.
Reviewed: rainfall/freeboard; stockingimortality; sludge survey at #1=43% & #2=34%
frboard range: 26130" on 2-7-16 to 37155" on 7-10-16
page: 1

Permit: AWS400009 Owner - Facility : Michael.L Gay Facility Number: 400009
Inspection Date: 07/14/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
.agoon 1 SH
.agoon 2SH
page: 2

Permit: AWS400009 Owner - Facility : Michael l_ Gay Facility Number: 400009
Inspection Date: 07/14/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No Na Ne
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑ ❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑ ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
❑ ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No Na No
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e.1 large
❑
❑ ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
B. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
❑ ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
❑ ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
❑ ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na Ne
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN a 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

Permit: AWS400009 Owner - Facility : Michael L Gay Facility Number: 400009
Inspection Date: 07/14/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes
No Na Ne
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
❑ ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
❑ ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
❑ C]
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na No
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fait to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

Permit: AWS400009 Owner - Facility : Michael L Gay Facility Number:
400009
Inspection Date: 07/14/16 Inssection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na No
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
❑ ❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
❑ ❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No Na No
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
❑ ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
❑ ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
❑ ❑
❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
page: 5

r
Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number.
400009 Facility Status:
Active Permit: AWS400009
Inpsection Type:
Compliance Inspection
Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit:
Routine
County: Greene Region:
Date of Visit:
07/30/2015 � EntryTime: 09:15 am
Exit Time: 10:30 am Incident #
Farm Name:
Shirley Farm
Owner Email:
Owner:
Michael L Gay
Phone:
Mailing Address:
930 Meadow Rd
Walstonburg NC 278889340
Physical Address:
340 Evermay Farm Rd
Walstonburg NC 27888
Facility Status: NCompliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy -Brown LLC
❑ Denied Access
Washington
dgay@wavelengthmail. c
252-753-3667
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35° 33' 59" Longitude: 77' 42' 20"
Take 91 South out of Walstonburg and go approx. 2.5 miles out of town. Take right fork in the road (off of 91) and the farm is
visible from the road and turn Rt. on the dirt path.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Michael L Gay Operator Certification Number: 16412
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Mike Gay Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Mike Gay Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Waste analysis: 2 soil tested: 2015
7-3-15 = 1.28 .74
3-11-15 = .69
1-13-15 = .68
IRR Records are complete & balanced out.
Reviewed: freeboard/rainfall; stocking/mortality; sludge survey #1 = 49%, #2=33%, calibration due 2017.
page: 1

Permit: AWS400009 Owner - Facility : Michael L Gay Facility Number: 400009
Inspection Date: 07/30/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 7,500 7,000
Total Design Capacity: 7,500
Total SSLW: 1.012,500
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon 1 SH 48.00
Lagoon 2SH 50.00
page: 2

e"
i
Permit: AWS400009 Owner - Facility : Michael l- Gay Facility Number: 400009
Inspection Date: 07/30/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No Na No
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
❑
[]
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0 ❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
M ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
0 ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes No Na He
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
M ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (LeJ large
❑
MEJ
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
M ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
E ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
■ ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na Ne
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11, Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ MIJEI
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

Is
Permit: AWS400009 Owner -Facility: Michael L Gay Facility Number:
400009
Inspection Date: 07/30/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
Waste Application
Yes No No No
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
E ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
■ ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
0 ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
0 ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Y-u
No Na N0
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
■ ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
E ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

Permit: AWS400009 Owner - Facility : Michael L Gay Facility Number: 400009
Inspection Date: 07/30/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na No
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22, Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
E .❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
E ❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24, Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
0 ❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
0 ❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
0 ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
E ❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes No Na No
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
E ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
0 ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
N ❑
❑
CAWM P?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewfinspection with on -site representative?
❑
0 ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
E ❑
❑
page: 5

I
i
M Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
El Other Agency
Facility Number 400009 Facility Status: Active
Permit: AWS400009
❑ Denied Access
Inpsection Type. Compliance Inspection
Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for visit: Routine County:
Greene Region:
Washington
Date of Visit: 07/10/2014 Entry Time: 09:30 am Exit Time: 110:25 am Incident #
Farm Name: Shirley Farm
Owner Email:
dgay@wavelengthmaii.c
Owner: Michael L Gay
Phone:
252-753-3667
Mailing Address: 930 Meadow Rd
Walstonburg NC 278889340
Physical Address: 340 Evermay Farm Rd
Walstonburg NC 27888
Facility Status: Compliant Not Compliant Integrator.
Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude:
35° 33' 59" Longitude:
77° 42' 20"
Take 91 South out of Walstonburg and go approx. 2.5 miles out of town. Take right fork in the road (off of 91) and the farm is
visible from the road and turn Rt. on the dirt path.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat
Waste Application
Records and Documents Other issues
Certified Operator: Michael L Gay Operator Certification Number: 16412
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Mike Gay Phone : [phone]
On -site representative Mike Gay Phone : [phone]
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Soil tested 2013
Waste Analysis:
1 2
2-12-13= .77
5-9-14= 1.26 .68
2-28-14= 1.47 .51
9-15-13= .67 .42
IRR reports are complete and balanced out.
Reviewed rainfall, freeboard and stocking
Sludge survey 12112113= (#1) .49% (#2) .14% Remember to do a sludge survey by December 2014
Sludge POA - 49%
page: 1

r
I
Permit: AWS400009 Owner -. Facility : Michaet l- Gay Facility Number: 400009
Inspection Date: 07/10/14 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 2.300
Total Design Capacity:
Total SSLW:
Waste Structures Observed
Disignated
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
agoon 1SH
agoon 2SH
page: 2

Permit: AWS400009 Owner - Facility : Michael L Gay Facility Number: 400009
Inspection Date: 07/10/14 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes No Na Ne
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
M ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
mo
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
M ❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑M
❑
❑
2. is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
M ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑0
❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes No No No
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
M ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large
❑
0 ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
00
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
❑
❑
B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
0 ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
M ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No No No
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ M ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

I'
Permit: AWS400009 Owner- Facility : Michael L Gay Facility Number: 400009
Inspection Date: 07/10/14 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No Na Ne
Crop Type 1 Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
0 ❑
11,
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
0 ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
E ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No Na Ne
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
E ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
N ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ E ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

{1P
Permit: AWS400009 Owner - Facility : Michael L Gay Facility Number: 400009
Inspection Date: 07/10/14 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na Re
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
M ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑0
❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑0
❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
S ❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
Cl
0 ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
M ❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes No Na No
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
0 ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection.did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
■ ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
M ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
M ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
0 ❑
❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewfinspection with on -site representative?
❑
0 ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
0 ❑
❑
page: 5

I
Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400009 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS400009 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Ins tin Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: reeve Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 0§(Q7(2Q1_ Entry Time: 09:30 AM Exit Time: 10:10 AM Incident M.
Farm Name: Shirley F Owner Email: daay0wavelenalhmall
Owner: Michael L Gay Phone:2Q?-753-5667
Mailing Address. 930 Meadow Rd Walstonburg NC 278889340
Physical Address: 340 Ev rm R Walstonbura NC 27888
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Murnhv-Brown LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35 33'59" Longitude: 77'42'20"
Take 91 South out of Walstonburg and go approx. 2.5 miles out of town. Take right fork in the road (off of 91) and the farm is visible
from the road and turn Rt. on the dirt path.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Michael L Gay Operator Certification Number: 16412
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Mike Gay Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Mike Gay Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector:
Inspector Signature:
Marlene Salyer
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis: soil tested: 11-2012
2-12-13 = .77
IRR records are complete & balanced out. Rainfall, freeboard, & crop yield are recorded.
Phone:
Date.
Sludge survey 11/29/12 with Front at 19% & back at 90% - POA not complete because wailing on Carl Dunn with S& W to advise.
Calib. done in April 2013.
Page: i

Permit: AWS400009 Owner - Facility: Michael L Gay Facility Number: 400009
Inspection Date: 06/07/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine -Feeder to Finish 71500 4,200
Total Design Capacity: 7,500
Total SSLW: 1,012,500
Waste Structures
Designed Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
agoon 1 SH 43.00
agoon 2SH 37.00
Page: 2

Permit: AWS400009 owner - Facility: Michael L Gay Facility Number: 400009
Inspection Date: 06/07/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ ■
❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ ■
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ ■
❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than
❑ ■
❑
❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage S Treatment Yes No
NA
NE
a. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑ ■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le] large trees, severe
U
■ U
U
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑
■ ❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■ Cl
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■ ❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■ ❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application Yes
No NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■ ❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 3

I
Permit: AWS400009 Owner - Facility: Michael L Gay
Inspection Date: 0610712013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 400009
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA
NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Conn, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■ ❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ ❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ E ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of property operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
1100
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS400009 Owner - Facility: Michael L Gay
Inspection Date: 06/07/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Records and Documents
Checklists?
Design?
Maps?
Lease Agreements?
Other?
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Facility Number. 400009
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
Q
Waste Application?
Q
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
Q
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ 0110
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ■ ❑ Q
25. is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
boxes) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
Q
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
Q ■ Q ❑
Page: 5

Permit: AWS400009 Owner - Facility: Michael L Gay Facility Number: 400009
Inspection Date: 06/07/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
2T Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
Lagoon / Storage Pond
Other
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewerllnspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
IS
Page: 6

4i
Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400009 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS400009 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: County: Greene -_ Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 07126I2012 _ Entry Time: 10:00 AM _ Exit Time: 11:00 AM Incident #:
Farm Name: Shirley Farm Owner Email: dgavfacr�wavelenathmail
Michael ��l�II�IYi�
Mailing Address: 930 Meadow Rd _ . Walstonburg NG 27888934Q
Physical Address: 340 Evermav Farm Rd _ Wal t2nburg NC 27888
Facility Status: E Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°33'59" Longitude: 77°42'20"
Take 91 South out of Walstonburg and go approx. 2.5 miles out of town. Take right fork in the road (off of 91) and the farm is visible
from the road and turn Rt. on the dirt path.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat jo Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Michael L Gay Operator Certification Number: 16412
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Mike Gay Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Mike Gay Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Date:
Page: 1

Permit: AWS400009 Owner - Facility: Michael L Gay Facility Number: 400009
Inspection Date: 0712612012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
Waste analysis:
7-3-12 = .64
4-23-12 = 1.0
12-8-11 = .58 soil tested: 12/2011
IRR records are complete & balanced out. Rainfall, freeboard & stocking are recorded.
#25) Sludge survey was conducted in August 2010 with Sludge level at 49% in back lagoon, since this lagoon was cleaned out in
2009, Mike wanted Carl Dunn to conduct another sludge survey - Carl did not show up in 2011 as promised - Must get another SS
ASAP.
Everything on the land looks good!
Page: 2

m
Permit: AWW0009 Owner - Facility: Michael L Gay Facility Number: 400009
Inspection Date: 0712612012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 7,500 2,330
Total Design Capacity: 7,500
Total SSLW: 1,012,500
Waste Structures
Designed Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
agoon 1 SH 50.00
agoon 2SH 80.00
Page: 3

0
Permit: AWS400009' Owner- Facility: Michael L Gay Facility Number: 400009
Inspection Date: 07/26/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the Stale other than 0000
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes No NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard? ❑
5_ Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑ ■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑ ■
❑
❑
Improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑ ■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS400009 Owner - Facility: Michael L Gay
Facility Number: 400009
Inspection Date: 07/2612012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Corn (Grain)
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
1& Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Records and Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
Ort■1■1
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ Q ❑
F
Page: 5

Permit: AWS400009 Owner - Facility: Michael L Gay Facility Number: 400009
Inspection Date: 07126/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Lease Agreements? ❑
Other? ❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑■❑❑
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ 01113
25. is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
■ ❑
❑ ❑
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
■
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
2011
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
Page: 6

Permit: AWS400009 Owner - Facility: Michael L Gay
Inspection Date: 07/26/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Records and Documents
Facility Number: 400009
Reason for visit. Routine
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report U ■ U U
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as -required by Permit? (i.e., discharge, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
Lagoon 1 Storage Pond
Other
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
In
Page: 7

4
1
0 Division of Water Quality
0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency II��11
Facility Number: 4400009 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS400009 f_J Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance lnsp2ctiS2n Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine _ County: Greene Region: Washington_
Date of Visit: 07/21/2011 Entry Time: 08:30 AM Exit Time: 0920 AM Incident #:
Farm Name: Shirley Farm _ Owner Email: daay0wavelenothmail
Owner: Michael L Qily Phone: 252-Z52-3667
Mailing Address: 930 Meadow Rd, _ Walstonburg NC 278889340
Physical Address: 340 Evermav Farm Rd Walstonbura NC 27888
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Faun: Latitude: &,ZX52" Longitude: 77°42'20"
Take 91 South out of Walstonburg and go approx. 2.5 miles out of town. Take right fork in the road (off of 91) and the farm is visible
from the road and turn Rt. on the dirt path.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Michael L Gay Operator Certification Number: 16412
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Mike Gay Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Mike Gay Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s)-
Page: 1

r
permit: AWS400009 Owner - Facility: Michael L Gay Facility Number: 400009
Inspection Date: 07/21/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis:
5-31-11 = .98
3-21-11 = .67 sludge 21.8
1-20-11 = .88
IRR records are complete & balanced out. Has a new center pivot.
Sludge S. 8-2010 front = 15% back 49%
Freeboard & rainfall are recorded Crop yields are recorded
Looks Good!
Page: 2

►1
Permit: AWS400009 Owner - Facility: Michael !_ Gay Facility Number. 400009
Inspection Date: 07/21/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 7,500 1,084
Total Design Capacity: 7,500
Total SSLW: 1,012,500
Waste Structures
Designed Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
agoon 1 SH 60.00
agoon 2SH 42.00
Page: 3

Permit. AWS400009 Owner - Facility: Michael L Gay Facility Number: 400009
Inspection Date: 0712112011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? 1111110
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑
❑ ❑
c. What is the estimated volume thal reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑
❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
11000
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than
❑
❑
❑ ❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes
No
NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
❑
❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe U U U U
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6- Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
❑
❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
❑
❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
110130
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
❑
❑ ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
❑
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS400009 Owner - Facility: Michael L Gay
Inspection Date: 07/21/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
facility Number: 400009
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP? ❑
Page: 5

Permit: AWS400009 Owner - Facility: Michael L Gay Facility Number: 400009
Inspection Date: 07121/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Lease Agreements? ❑
Other? ❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
❑ ❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
❑ ❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
❑ ❑ ❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑
❑ ❑ ❑
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon ❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Page: 6

Permit: AWS400009 Owner - Facility: Michael L Gay Facility Number: 400009
Inspection Date: 07/21/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? 111300
Otherissues Yes No NA NE
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge, ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
Lagoon / Storage Pond
Other
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Page: 7

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400009 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS400009 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance In%agglign Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routing County: Greene Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 09/24/2010 Entry Time:10:00 AM Exit Time:
Farm Name: Shidev Farm
Owner: Mllid el L Gay
Incident #:
Owner Email: dgay5jyjayelgriathmail
Mailing Address: 930 Meadow Rd Walstonbura7
Phone.[phone] ^�
Physical Address: 340 Evermay Farm Rd Wal§tgnbura IBC 27888_ _
Facility Status: N Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Murohy-grown LLC _
Location of Farm: Latitude: �5°33'59" Longitude: 77°42'20"
Take 91 South out of Walstonburg and go approx. 2.5 miles out of town. Take right fork in the road (off of 91) and the farm is visible
from the road and turn Rt. on the dirt path.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number:
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Mike Gay Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Mike Gay Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Waste Analysis: S1 / S2 soil test: 2009
7113/10 = 1.1/.63
4/30/10 = 1.1/
11 /20/09 = 1.504
C = 131/135/144, W = 93/106/125, SB= 92/151
Freeboard range: 2115/10 = 23" & 47" - 8/30/10 = 60" & 49"
Date:
Page: 1

Permit: AWS400009 Owner - Facility: Michael L Gay Facility Number : 400009
Inspection Date: 09/24/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
swine - Feeder to Finish 7,500 5,500
Total Design Capacity: 7,500
Total SSLW: 1,012,500
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon 1 S H 50.01
agoon 2SH 46.01
Page: 2

Permit: AW5400009 Owner - Facility: Michael L Gay Facility Number : 400009
Inspection Date: 09/24/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ ■
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ ■
❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑ ■
11
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑ ■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e.l large trees, severe ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■ ❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■ ❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■ ❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS400009 owner - Facility: Michael L Gay
Facility Number: 400009
Inspection Date: 0912412010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
1
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%110 ibs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18, Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Records and Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑■❑❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NE
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS400009 Owner -Facility: Michael L Gay
Facility Number : 400009
Inspection Date. 09/24/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No NA NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
00110
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after ? 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)? ❑
■ ❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
Vo
Wn IJA NF
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? if yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AWs400009 Owner - Facility: Michael L Gay Facility Number. 400009
Inspection Date: 09/24/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
OtherIssues Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Page: 6

X
E Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number : 400009 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS400009 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Gomplitno Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Greene Region: Wi1shinglon
Date of Visit: 08/04/2009 Entry Time: 09700 AM Exit Time: incident #:
Farm Name: 5hirity Farm Owner Email: daav0wavelen, thhmma,il
Owner: Michael L Gay Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 930 Meadow Rd Walstonburg NC 2788893,4O „
Physical Address: 34Q . vermav Farm Rd M-1stonbsna NC 27888
Facility Status: ■ Compiiant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Murr hy-13rown LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°33'59" Longitude: 77°42'20"
Take 91 South out of Walstonburg and go approx. 2.5 miles out of town. Take right fork in the road (off of 91) and the farm is visible
from the road and turn Rt. on the dirt path.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Michael L Gay Operator Certification Number: 16412
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
On -site representative Mike Gay Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector:
Inspector Signature:
Marlene Salyer
Secondary Inspector(s):
Phone:
Date:
Page: 1

Permit: AW5400009 Owner - Facility: Michael L Gay
Facility Number: 400009
Inspection Date: 08/04/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
Waste analysis:
5-11-09 1.3
3-30-09 1.6 sludge .68
1-14-09 1.2 back 1.6
soil tested Fall 2008
Looks Good!
NOTE: Back lagoon had the sludge removed in Spring - records are not yet balanced out - Mr. Tommy Beaman has all information
and will be balancing the records soon. MCDS
I will check back with Mike before leaving Greene County
Page: 2

5
Permit: AWS400009 Owner - Facility: Michael L Gay
Inspection Date: 08/04/2009 inspection Type: Compliance inspection
Facility Number: 400009
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Q Swine - Feeder to Finish 7,500 5,636
Total Design Capacity: 7,500
Total SSL.W: 1,012,500
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoan 1 SH 78.00
agoon 2SH 56.00
Page: 3

u
Permit: AWS400009 Owner - Facility: Michael L Gay Facility Number: 400009
Inspection Date: 0010412009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges S Stream Impacts
Yes No
NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ 0011
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ ■
❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ ■
❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑ ■
❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection Storage S Treatment
Yes No
NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e.1 large trees, severe
Cl ■
❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■
❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑ ■
❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑ ■
❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No
NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑ ■
Cl ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS400009 Owner - Facility: Michael L Gay Facility Number: 400009
Inspection Date: 08/04/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
PAN? ❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.? ❑
Total P205? ❑
Failure to incorporate manureisludge into bare soil? ❑
Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑
Evidence of wind drift? ❑
Application outside of application area? ❑
Crop Type 1 Com, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14, Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑
■ ❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
■ ❑
❑
16, Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
■ ❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■ ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■ ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
■ ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 5

Permit: AWS400009 Owner - Facility: Michael L Gay
Facility Number: 400009
Inspection Date: 08/04/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No NA NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
NOD
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES
only)? ❑
■ ❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
Cl
■ ❑ ❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
27, Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
Other Issues
Yes
No NA NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■ Cl ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those 1101111
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 6

Permit: AWS400009 Owner - Facility: Michael L Gay Facility Number: 400009
Inspection Date: 08/04/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? 0 ■ ❑ 0
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? Q ■ Q Q
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? 00011
Page: 7

Division of Water Quality
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency II ----II
Facility Number : 4Q0009 Facility Status: Actives Permit: &j(j�S400009 t3 Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Greene Region: Washinglon
Date of Visit: 10/14/2008 Entry Time:09A0 AM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: Shirley Farm. _ _ . Owner Email:
Owner: Michael L Gay Phone:
Mailing Address: 930 Meadgw Rd._ Walstonbum NC 278889340
Physical Address: 340 Evermav Farm Rd Walstonburg NC 27888
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Premium Standard Farms Of North Carolina loc
Location of Farm: Latitude: a§*33'59" Longitude: 77°42'20"
Take 91 South out of Walstonburg and go approx. 2.5 miles out of town. Take right fork in the road (off of 91) and the farm is visible
from the road and turn Rt. on the dirt path.
Question Areas: '
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Michael L Gay
Secondary OIC(s):
Operator Certification Number: 16412
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Mike Gay Phone: '
On -site representative Mike Gay Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspectorts):
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis:
9-3-08 = 2.5 1A
5-8-08 = 1.6 1.3
1-23-08 = 1.9 1.4
soil test current
Looks Good!
Date:
Page: 1

or
Permit: AWS400009 Owner -Facility: Michael L Gay Facility Number; 400009
Inspection Date: 10/14/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 7,500 4,700
Total Design Capacity: 7,500
Total SSLW: 1,012,500
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon 1 SH 30.00
agoon 2SH 50.00
Page: 2

Permit: AWS400009 owner - Facility: Michael L Gay
Inspection Date: 10/14/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at:
Structure
Application Field
Other
a. Was conveyance man-made?
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
Facility Number: 400009
Reason for Visit: Routine
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
Yes No NA NE
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑■❑n
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑
11.
B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
1300
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS400009 Owner -Facility: Michael L Gay
Inspection Date: 10/14/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 400009
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑
■
❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per.the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑
■
❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■
❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■
❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
N
❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
E
❑
❑
1f yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS400009 Owner - Facility: Michael L Gay Facility Number: 400009
Inspection Date: 10/14/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Other? ❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application? ❑
120 Minute inspections? ❑
Weather code? ❑
Weekly Freeboard? ❑
Transfers? ❑
Rainfall? ❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly? ❑
Waste Analysis? ❑
Annual soil analysis? ❑
Crop yields? ❑
Stocking? ❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)? ❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? 00011
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■
❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■
❑
❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AWS400009 Owner - Facility: Michael L Gay
Facility Number: 400009
Inspection Date: 10/14/2008 inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
f1thar ICcl1aC Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑■❑❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 6

1
E Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400009 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS400009 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Greene Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 10/0312Q07 Entry Time:08:00 AM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: J&H Milling Co - Shirley FaII]Owner Ema!I:
Owner: Richard S Holloman Jr Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: PO Box 146 Walstonburn NC 27888
Physical Address: 101 W Mill St Walstonbura NC 27888
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°33'59" Longitude: 77°42'20"
Take 91 South out of Walstonburg and go approx. 2.5 miles out of town. Take right fork in the road (off of 91) and the farm is visible
from the road and turn Rt. on the dirt path.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number:
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
On -site representative Mike Gay Phone:
24 hour contact name Mike Gay Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Waste analysis:
6-12-07 = 3.3 .44
Mike Gay bought farm in May 2007
soil test fall 2006
Looks Good!
Date:
Page: 1

Permit: AWS400009 Owner - Facility: Richard S Hoiloman Jr
Inspection Date: 10/03/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number:400009
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Q Swine - Feeder to Finish 7,500 5,690
Total Design Capacity: 7,500
Total SSLW: 1,012,500
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
Lagoon 1SH 84M
agoon 2SH 28.00
Page: 2

Permit: AWS400009 Owner - Facility: Richard S Holloman Jr Facility Number: 400009
Inspection Rate: 10/03/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑ ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■
❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe
❑
WOO
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■
❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑ ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS400009 Owner - Facility: Richard S Holloman Jr Facility Number: 400009
Inspection Date: 10/03/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
PAN? ❑
Is PAN n 10%/10 lbs.? ❑
Total P205? ❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare sail? ❑
Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑
Evidence of wind drift? ❑
Application outside of application area? ❑
Crop Type 1 Com, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crap Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■ ❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■ n
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ 0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS400009 Owner - Facility: Richard S Holloman Jr
Facility Number: 400009
Inspection Date: 10/03/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No NA NE
Checklists?
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
Cl
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)? ❑
■ ❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the pen -nit?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
Other Issues
Yes
No NA NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AWS400009 Owner - Facility: Richard S Holloman Jr
Inspection Date: 1010312007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Other Issues
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss reviewfinspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Facility Number : 400009
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑■❑❑
Page: 6

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400009 Facility Status: Agliye Permit: NCA240009 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: 5,gmpliance lnsoection _ Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Greene Region:
Date of Visit: 02101120Q6 Entry Time:— Exit Time:
Farm Name: J&H Milling Co=Shimmy Farm
Incident #:
Owner Email:
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: PO Box 146 Walstonbura NC 27888
Physical Address:
Facility Status: N Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:35°33'59" Longitude:77°42'20"
Take 91 South out of Walstonburg and go approx. 2.5 miles out of town. Take right fork in the road (off of 91) and the farm is visible
from the road and turn Rt. on the dirt path.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Richard S Holloman Operator Certification Number: 22387
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
On -site representative Russel Vaniford Phone:
24 hour contact name Steve Holloman Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Waste analyses:
1-24-06 = 0.58
7-20-05 = 0.74
4-29-05 = 1.1
3-24-05 = 3.2
Page: 1
1\

Permit: NCA240009 Owner - Facility: Richard S Holloman Facility Number. 400009
Inspection Date: 02/01/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Q Swine - Feeder to Finish 7,500 6,131
Total Design Capacity: 7,500
Total SSLW: 1,012,500
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon 1 SH 37.0(
agoon 2SH 26.0(
Page: 2
V

Permit: NCA240009 Owner - Facility: Richard S Holloman Facility Number: 400009
Inspection Date: 02/01/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑ M ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes No NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 3

Permit: NCA240009 Owner - Facility: Richard S Holloman Facility Number : 400009
Inspection Date: 02/01/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
PAN? ❑
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.? ❑
Total P205? ❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? ❑
Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑
Evidence of wind drift? ❑
Application outside of application area? ❑
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
17, Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Records and Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
Com, Wheat, Soybeans
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
0000
Yes No NA NE
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
C
Page: 4

Permit: NCA240009 owner - Facility: Richard S Holloman
Facility Number: 400009
Inspection Date: 02/01/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
Q
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
Q
Crop yields?
Q
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)? ❑
■
❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑ 0
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑ ❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■
❑ ❑
Other issues
Yes
No
NA NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■
❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: NCA240009 Owner - Facility: Richard S Holloman Facility Number: 400009
Inspection Date: 02/01/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
naa...� �.....�� Yes Nn NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? ❑ ■ © ❑
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewrnspection with on -site representative? 0000
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Page: 6

0/
Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
(Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency (Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 40 q Date of Visit: 2-18-2004 Time: 9:10
Q Not O erational Q Below Threshold
® Permitted N Certified U Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ............
Farm Name: d D lYlxllit n.:..S Arlsry..karat........................................................... County: Gmute .............................................. !' ARO.......
Owner Name: (;bleb:aird.................................. D9AI.Rm a.0................................................... Phone No: xS.2: 753.M.0...........................................................
MailingAddress: F..59.N..1.4.ft............................................................................................ W.4b.tamburgAc ................................................. 1.7.80.8 .............
Facility Contact: R.C.UD.0110M L........................................... Title: ............................................................. _. Phone No: 7.57.-11.7.$Q.D............. ............
Onsite Representative:
Integrator: lPrcmiujn.Ston da rd..l{ ar.In.o f.Nt xib..........•
Certified Operator: Ricka rd.S............................. HQUQINR.J.r .................................. Operator Certification Number:223.8.7 ..............................
Location of Farm:
Take 91 South out of Walstonburg and go approx. 2.5 miles out of town. Take right fork in the road (off of 91) and the farm &
.s visible from the road and turn Rt. on the dirt path.
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 33 + 59 iL Longitude 77 ` 42 G 20 K
Design Current
Design Current
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
Poultry
Capacity Population Cattle
Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Layer
❑ Dairy
N Feeder to Finish
7500
6236
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity
7,500
❑ Gilts
Total SSLW
1,022,500
❑ Boars
Number of Lagoons 2
Anld:n.r.Pnnrlc / Rnli`1 'i'rona'—.
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes N No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. if discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaUmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes N No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes N No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes N No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:......................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard (inches): 24 29
12112103 Continued

Facility Number: 40-9
Date of Inspection 2-18-2004
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (iel trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7_ Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc
12. Crop type Corn, Soybeans, Wheat Cotton
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes N No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes N No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes N No
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge attor below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes N No
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes N No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ Yes N No
Air Quality representative immediately.
Coaiments`(refer to question #):' Explain ariy YES answers:and/or any. recoinmendations :or, any other comments
:._
Use'drawings"of facilityto..better-explain situations. (use additional pages as:,gecessary): ' ❑Field Copy N Final Notes `
Reviewer/Inspector {Name Marlene D. Salyer
Reviewer5uspe—cwi ;��,a.;,.:: '� �_ •� Date:
F.oarrnuea

Facility Number: 40--9 Date of Inspection 2-IS-2004
Required
Records & Documents
21.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
N No
22.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
® No
23.
Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Sampling
24.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
N No
25.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
N No
26.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
'
(iel discharge, freeboard problems, over application) _
C1 Yes
N No
27.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
N No
28.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
N No
29.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
N No
NPDES Permitted Facilities
30.
Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35)
N Yes
❑ No
31.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
® No
32.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
N No
33.
Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey?
❑ Yes
N No
34.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
N No
35.
Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
N No
❑ Stocking Form ❑ Crop Yield Form ❑ Rainfall ❑ Inspection After 1" Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form
[3 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
12112103

Technical Assistance Site Visit Report
1 • Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Natural Resources Conservation Service
O Soil and Water Conservation District
O Other...
Facility Number 4a - Date: 1018103 Time: 1 900 1 Time On Farm: 65 WARO
Farm Name J&H Milling Co - Shirley Farm County Greene
Mailing Address PO Box 146
Onsite
Representative Russell Vandiford
Type Of Visit
® Operation Review.
❑ Compliance Inspection (pilot only)
❑ Technical Assistance
❑ Confirmation for Removal
❑ No Animals -Date Last Operated:
❑ Operating below threshold
IN Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse
Design Current
Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
7500
7500
Phone: [phone]
Walstonburg NC 27888
Integrator Premium Standard Farms
Purpose Of Visit
p Routine
O Response to DWQ/DENR referral
O Response to DSWC/SWCD referral
O Response to complaint/local referral
O Requested by producer/integrator
O Follow-up
O Emergency
O Other...
Design Current
CaMdty Ponulation
❑ Layer
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Dairy
❑ Nan -Dairy
❑ Other
GENERAL QUESTIONS:
1. Is waste discharging from any part of the operation and reaching surface waters or wetlands? ❑ yes ® no
2. Is there evidence of a past waste discharge from any part of the operation that waste reached ❑ yes ® no
surface waters or wetlands?
3. Does any problem pose an immediate threat to the integrity of the waste structure (large trees, ❑ yes ® no
seepage, severe erosion, etc.)?
4. Is there evidence of nitrogen over application, hydraulic overloading or excessive ponding ❑ yes ®no
. requiring DWQ notification?
5. Is there evidence of improper dead animal disposal that poses a threat to the environment ❑ yes ®no
and/or public health?
6. Is the waste level within the structural freeboard elevation range for any waste structure? ❑ yes ®no
Structurel Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier front back
Level (Inches) 49 24
CROP TYPES Corn Soybeans Wheat Cotton
SPRAYFIELD
SOIL TYPES AyB NoA WaB Ra Ly
7. What type of technical assistance does the onsite representative feel is needed? (list in comment section)
1 03/10/03
❑ Dairy
❑ Nan -Dairy
❑ Other
GENERAL QUESTIONS:
1. Is waste discharging from any part of the operation and reaching surface waters or wetlands? ❑ yes ® no
2. Is there evidence of a past waste discharge from any part of the operation that waste reached ❑ yes ® no
surface waters or wetlands?
3. Does any problem pose an immediate threat to the integrity of the waste structure (large trees, ❑ yes ® no
seepage, severe erosion, etc.)?
4. Is there evidence of nitrogen over application, hydraulic overloading or excessive ponding ❑ yes ®no
. requiring DWQ notification?
5. Is there evidence of improper dead animal disposal that poses a threat to the environment ❑ yes ®no
and/or public health?
6. Is the waste level within the structural freeboard elevation range for any waste structure? ❑ yes ®no
Structurel Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier front back
Level (Inches) 49 24
CROP TYPES Corn Soybeans Wheat Cotton
SPRAYFIELD
SOIL TYPES AyB NoA WaB Ra Ly
7. What type of technical assistance does the onsite representative feel is needed? (list in comment section)
1 03/10/03
❑ Other
GENERAL QUESTIONS:
1. Is waste discharging from any part of the operation and reaching surface waters or wetlands? ❑ yes ® no
2. Is there evidence of a past waste discharge from any part of the operation that waste reached ❑ yes ® no
surface waters or wetlands?
3. Does any problem pose an immediate threat to the integrity of the waste structure (large trees, ❑ yes ® no
seepage, severe erosion, etc.)?
4. Is there evidence of nitrogen over application, hydraulic overloading or excessive ponding ❑ yes ®no
. requiring DWQ notification?
5. Is there evidence of improper dead animal disposal that poses a threat to the environment ❑ yes ®no
and/or public health?
6. Is the waste level within the structural freeboard elevation range for any waste structure? ❑ yes ®no
Structurel Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier front back
Level (Inches) 49 24
CROP TYPES Corn Soybeans Wheat Cotton
SPRAYFIELD
SOIL TYPES AyB NoA WaB Ra Ly
7. What type of technical assistance does the onsite representative feel is needed? (list in comment section)
1 03/10/03

Facility Number 40 - 9 Date:
10/8103
PARAMETER
0 No assistance provided/requested
❑ 8. Waste spill leaving site
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE Needed
Provided
❑ 9. Waste spill contained on site
❑ 10. Level in structural freeboard
25. Waste Plan Revision or Amendment
❑
❑
❑ 11. Level in storm storage
26. Waste Plan Conditional Amendment
❑
❑
27. Review or Evaluate Waste Plan wlproducer
❑
❑
❑ 12. Waste structure integrity compromised
❑ 13. Waste structure needs maintenance
28. Forms Need (list in comment section)
❑
El
29. Missing Components (list in comments)
❑
❑
❑ 14. Over application >= 10% & 10 lbs.
❑
❑
❑ 15. Over application < 10% or < 10 lbs.
30.21-1.0200 re -certification
❑ 16. Hydraulic overloading
31. Five & Thirty day Plans of Action (PoA)
❑
❑
32. Irrigation record keeping assistance
❑
❑
❑ 17. Deficient irrigation records
❑ 18. Late/missing waste analysis
33. Organizelcomputerization of records
❑
❑
❑ 19. Late/missing lagoon level records
34. Sludge Evaluation
❑
❑
❑ 20. Late/missing soils analysis
[121. Crop needs improvement
35. Sludge or Closure Plan
❑
❑
❑ 22. Crop inconsistent with waste plan
36. Sludge removal/closure procedures
❑
❑
37. Waste Structure Evaluation
❑
❑
❑ 23. Irrigation maintenance deficiency
[124. Deficient sprayfield conditions
38. Structure Needs Improvement
❑
❑
39.Operation & Maintenance improvements
❑
❑
40. Marker check/calibration
❑
❑
Regulatory Referrals
41. Site evaluation
❑
❑
❑ Referred to DWQ Date:
42. Irrigation Calibration
❑
❑
❑ Referred to NCDA Date:
El
❑
El Other...
43. Irrigation system desigNinstallation
Date:
44. Secure irrigation information (maps, etc.)
❑
❑
LIST IMPROVEMENTS
45.Operating improvements (pull signs, etc.)
❑
❑
MADE BY OPERATION
46. Wettable Acre Determination
❑
❑
1
47. Evaluate WAD certificationlrechecks
❑
❑
48. Crop evaluationlrecommendations
❑
❑
2.
49. Drainage workievaluation
❑
❑
50. Land shaping, subsoiling, aeration, etc.
51. Runoff control, stormwater diversion, etc.
❑
❑
❑
❑
3
52. Buffer improvements
❑
❑
53. Field measurements(GPS, surveying, etc.)
❑
❑
4.
54. Mortality BMPs
❑
❑
55. Waste operator education (NPDES)
❑
❑
5.
56. Operation & maintenance education
❑
❑
57. Record keeping education
❑
❑
6
58. Crop/forage management education
❑
❑
59. Soil and/or waste sampling education
❑
❑
03/10/03

,/
Facility Number 40 - 0 Date: 1 10/8103
COMMENTS:
veg. on iagoon aiKe wails weii estamisnea.
Farm is well maintained.
Wheat crop has been planted.
Flush boxes at end of houses free of leaks.
New waste plan dated 4/15103 Plan developed by Carl Dunn, DSWC, PE. Plan deficit 529,369 gallons.
Installed rain cut off switch.
COC dated April 9, 2003 and on site.
Waste analysis dated 8/19103 nitrogen is SH1=2.5 and SH2=0.49
6119/03 nitrogen is SH 1=3.5 and SH2=0.84
3/27/03 nitrogen is SH1=3.2 and SH2=0.87
12/19/02 nitrogen is SH1=2.9 and SH2=0.83
9/3/02 nitrogen is SH1=2.9 and SH2=0.83
616/02 nitrogen is SH1=3.9 and SH2=1.1
Soil test dated 3/12/03 and 3124/03. Lime applied by GPS Cu, Zn and ph within guidelines.
Window for corn listed in WUP is 2/15/-6/30. Several irrigation events during July 2003. Carl Dunn, DSWC, PE extended
tindow for 2003 corn year. Contact Bob Edwards, agronomist for future extensions.
IRR2 records are complete and balanced.
Lagoon levels are recorded weekly with drops in lagoon consistent with irrigation events.
Records are well organized.
Have records available for 5 years.
Be sure ti record waste being transferred from back lagoon to from lagoon on Trans-1 form
Need to keep crop yield records.
TECHNICAL SPECIALIST Martin McLawhorn
SIGNATURE
Date Entered: 10/13/03 Entered By: IMartin McLawhorn
03/10/03

Type of Visit p Compliance Inspection p Operation Review p Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit p Routine p Complaint p Follow up p Emergency Notification p Other p Denied Access
Facility Number Date of Visit: 21l9I2002 Time: 10:00 am
p Not Operationalp HelowThreshold
Permitted N Certified 13 Conditionally Certified p Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name: d&H Milling Co - Shirley Farm County: Grf-cae............................................... WARD.......
Owner Name: Richard
Holloman
Mailing Address: PO..Box.1.46 ....................................................................
Phone No: 252-753-4240
Walstonhurg.NC................................................. Z7888 ..............
Facility Contact: ...............................................................................Title:........................................... ..... Phone No:
...................................................................
Onsite Representative: Riassell..Y.andiford,.Riclxard..Iiolloanan ......................... Integrator: P.r mium.StandaxdF.arana.of.Horth............
Certified Operator:Richard.&........................... Hallnman.sir...................... ............. - Operator Certification Number:223R7.................. ...........
Location of Farm:
rake 91 Southout of Walstonburg and go approx. 2.5 miles out of town. Take right fork in t he road o o and the farm i
s visible from the road and turn Rt. on the dirt path.
® Swine ❑ Poultry p Cattle p Horse Latitude ©• ©4 ®46 Longitude ©• ®° ®°°
Design: ; .-Current Design ' .:current '.Design : Current;
Swine. Capacity .Poprlation .: I'opltry: Capacity :Popula"tion__ _ Cattte +: Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
[3 Farrow to Wean
p Farrow to Fee er
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
❑
Layer
❑
Non -Layer
I
I
❑
Other
Total. Desigq Capacity
7,500
TotalSSLW
1,012,500
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? p Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon p Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? .❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes p No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge -bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes p No
2. is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? p Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard(inches): ........ ....... 24................ ............... 54............... ................................... .................................... .................................... ....................................

Facility Number: 40-9
Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid.level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? p Excessive Ponding p PAN p Hydraulic Overload
El Yes
® No
p Yes
N No
p Yes
N No
p Yes
N No
p Yes
®No
p Yes
®No
Cl Yes
®No
12. Crop type Bermuda Pasture Wheat Corn, Soybeans, Wheat Cotton
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? p Yes ® No
14, a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes p No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20_ is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
13 Yes N No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ®No
p Yes p No
p Yes ®No
p Yes R No
p Yes ®No
p Yes N No
24: -Does-facility-require-a-foiiow=upvisit-by-same-agency? ----— --- ---—p-Y-es—®No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
p Yes N No
p No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. Y ou will receive no turther correspondence about this visit.
ments ` ri
_Comments {refer to guestionr#} Eiplam any YES answersland/or any recomQ eridations ortany other com41
I,se dravvsrigs.of facility to better explain situatipn�c�(uce addit;onYal pales as necessary,) � '
�a � � �;e�a� f npy 17 Final Notes s
-
Records available for review.
eed to revise the WUP to include overseed crop (50 lbs or 100 lbs PAN) instead of wheat at 144 lbs. There was
so mention of converting Tract 2046 field 6-1 ---> 6-4 back to row crops.
Consult with your Technical Specialist to make these changes.
Waste analysis: 5121/01 = 4.6 lbs & 0.92 lbs; 7/30/01 = 4.6 lbs & 0.70 lbs; 10/26/01 = 3.1 lbs & 0.83 lbs;
i 5102 = 4.7 lbs & 1.3 lbs
Soil analysis up through 2001 - available. (SEE PAGE 3)
Reviewer/inspector Naive Lyn I3 rthson
,
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: , Date:

05103101
Continued
Date of Inspection
Facility Number: 40
Odor Issues
26.
Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
❑ Yes
I] No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27.
Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
p Yes
® No
28.
Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
❑ Yes
® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
.29.
Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
[]Yes
® No
30.
Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
❑ Yes
® No
31.
Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
p Yes
® No
32.
Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Irrigation records are complete and balanced out.
Hadn't irrigated since 12/17/01.
Freeboard levels are recorded weekly as required.
Suggest to install a -gutter -type device on the roof over the dog box located at the end of the houses.
Cover crop is well established.
Continue to practice weed control upon need.
Continue to work on the bare spots on the second lagoon.
If you have any questions, contact your Technical Specialist or us at 252-946-6481.

-- . .`.. WET
� Michael F. Easley
p Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
. _ --f Department of Environment and Natural Resources
QV
Gregory Thorpe, Acting Director
Division of Water Quality
To: Producers
From: Lyn B. Hardison
Environmental Specialist
Washington Regional Office
Date: February 20..2002
, 2002
Subject: Animal Compliance Routine Inspection
Year 2002
Enclosed please find a copy or copies of the Compliance Site Inspection(s) (as viewed in DWQ database) conducted at the
referenced facility by the Division of Water Quality from the Washington Regional Office. Please read this inspection and
keep with all other documents pertaining to your animal operation for future inspections.
In general, these inspections included verifying that: (1) the farm has a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP),
(2) the farm is complying with requirements of the State Rules 15 NCAC 2H.0217, Senate Bill 1217, and the Certified Animal
Waste Management Plan; (3) the farm operation's waste management system is being operated properly under the direction of a
Certified Operator, (4) the required records are being kept; (5) there are no signs of seepage, erosion, and/or runoff.
As a reminder, please note the following which are conditions of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan and the general
permit; therefore, these items must be implemented:
q) The maximum waste level in lagoons/storage ponds shall not exceed that specified in the CAWMP. At a minimum,
maximum waste level for waste for lagoons/storage ponds must not exceed the level that provides adequate storage to
contain 25 year, 24 hour storm event plus an additional foot of structural freeboard
cp An analysis of the liquid animal waste from the lagoon shall be conducted as close to the time of application as practical and
at least within 60 days (before or after) of the date of application. This analysis shall include the following parameters:
Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Zinc and Copper.
ap . Soil analysis is required annually.
T The following records are required: off -site solids removal, maintenance, repair, wastelsod analysis and land irrigation
records. These records should be maintained by the facility owner/manager in chronological and legible form for a
minimum of three years.
(p Land application rates shall be in accordance with the CAWMP- In no case shall land application rates exceed the Plant
Available Nitrogen (PAN) rate for the receiving crop or result in runoff during anv liven application.
q> In accordance with you waste utilization plan, the irrigation application events should not exceed the hydraulic loading as
- - specified per the soil type and in no case should an irrigg ion event exceed one inch per acre:..- _ ...
cp All grassed waterways shall have a stable outlet with adequate capacity to prevent ponding or flooding damages. The outlet
can be another vegetated channel, an earth ditch, stabilization structure, or other suitable outlets.
y it is suggested, not required, to keep crop yield information for future use to update your waste management plan. You will
need three years of crop yield data before your plan can be updated
For your information, any swine facility that has a discharge to surface waters of the Stale will have to apply for a National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit with the Division of Water Quality, effective January 1, 2001.
Thank you for your assistance and cooperation during the inspection. if you have any questions, please contact your Technical
Specialist or meat 252 -946-648 1, ext. 318.
Cc: WaRO
LBH Files (inspection form only)
943 Washington Square Mall Washington, NC 27859 252-946-6481 (Telephone) 252-946-9215 (Fax)

O-Division of Water'Qaalttf-_
-- _ DrvisioWof W'an&Water�Conservation= -- - -
_ Other Agency-.
M .
Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection .O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit OO Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: 7/2012oQ1 Time: 845
Facility Number 40 9
Q Not Operational Q Below Threshold
El Permitted ❑ Certified 0 Conditionally Certified © Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .............
FarmName: ............................................................ County: .S,mue.......... ..................................... WARO.......
OwnerName: Richiarid.................................. Hommaw .................................................. Phone No: =77334290 ..........................................................
MailingAddress: P0.Zax.141i............................................................................................ K'-a,ls#!vt bmrz.NC.--.--..................................---...... Z78BB .............
FacilityContact:.............................................................................. Title:.......................................... ... Phone No:
Onsite Representative: Ruamll.Y.andiford........ ............................................................ Integrator: Caroftalmms------............------........----................
Certified Operator:Rkkud................................. KQIIQMAR........................................ Operator Certification Number:2238.7 ............................
Location of Farm:
rake 91 South out of Walstonburg and go approx. 2.5 miles out of town. Take right fork in the road (off of 91) and the farm is +
risible from the road and turn Rt, on the dirt path.
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 C 33 59 Longitude 77 ® 42 ' 20
Design Current
Swine C_anaeity Pnnulatinn
❑ Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
7500
6271
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer I 1 10 Dairy
❑ Non -Layer I I ID Non -Daily
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 7,5oa
Total SSLW 1,012,500
Number of Lagoons 2 ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagmin Area 10 Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds 1 Solid Traps I0 No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is obsen-ed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (if yes. notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated fogy in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ............. fnnnt............. ............. back ............. ................................... .....................................................
Freeboard (inohcs): .......... ......6.0—..—...... ...............?2.....................

05103101 Continued
Facility Number. 40-9 Date of inspection 7/20/2001
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, 0 Yes ® No
seepage, eta)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an ❑Yes No
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need mamtenauce/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
N No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
® No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
(] Yes
® No
l2. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Hay) Corn, Soybeans, Wheat
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
N No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
N No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ® No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ® No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certifiers Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes ® No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) N Yes ❑ No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes N No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes N No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes N No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewfinspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes N No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes N No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes N No
E3 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit, 1
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES=answers andlor any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations: use additional pages as necessary1 - - --
❑ Field Copy ❑ Final Notes ;
*COC and General Permit on site.
*Waste analysis dated 2/01/01 nitrogen is SHR1=4.416s/1000 gallons
SHR2=1.1 lbs/1000 gallons
5121/01 nitrogen is SHRI=4.6 lbs/1000 gallons
SHR2=0_92 lbs/1000 gallons
*New waste analysis taken on 7/17/01. Results not received.
*Soil test dated 9/26/00. No lime required. Remember to take soil test for this year and follow lime requirements. Suggest keeping lime
Reviewer/InspectorName Martin McLawhorn m
RVVIt: ivEiI'IuJsm.n.-.—I"A : Date-

O5103101 Continued
Facility Number. 40-9 Date of Inspection 7/20/2001
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
*Discussed IRR2/waste schedule.
19. Missing lagoon freeboard levels for the month of June 2001. General permit requires that levels be recorded weekly.
Talked to Mr. Holloman via phone and he stated that lagoon levels were in his truck. Suggest to him that levels be recorded.
J

..1 A-_
' J� - To:
From: Daphne B. Cullom
Y� Fnvironmental Specialist
Washington Regional .Office
- Subject: Animal Compliance Inspection
Year 2001 =
Enclosed please find a copy of the Compliance Site Inspection (as viewed in the DWQ database) conducted at the referenced
facility by the Division of Water Quality from the Washington Regional Office. Please read this inspection and keep it
with all other documents pertaining to your animal operation for future inspections.
In general, these inspections included verifying that: (1) the farm has a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP);
(2) the farm is complying with requirements of the State Rules 15 NCAC 2110217, Senate Bill 1217, and the Certified Animal
Waste Management Plan; (3) the farm operation's waste management system is being operated properly under the direction of a
Certified Operator, (4) the required records are being kept; and (5) there are no signs of seepage, erosion, and/or runoff.
As a reminder, please note the following comments, which are conditions of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan and
the General Permit? therefore, these items must be implem�nte d:-
q) The maximum waste level is lagoons/storage ponds shall not exceed that specified in the CAWMP. At a minimum,
maximum waste level for waste for lagoonslstorage ponds must not exceed the level that provides adequate storage to
contain 25 year, 24 hour stoim event plus an additional foot of structural freeboard
qr An analysis of the liquid animal waste from the lagoon shall be conducted as close to the time of application as practical and
at least within 60 days (before or after) of the date of application This analysis shall include the following parameters:
Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Zinc and Copper.
q> Soil analysis is required annually. Lime is to be applied to each receiving crop as recommended by the soil analysis.
cp The following records are required ofPsite solids removal, maintenance, repair, waste/soil analysis and land irrigation
retards. These records should be maintained by the facility owner/manager m chronological and I egible form for a
min urn of three years.
m Land application rates shall be in accordance with the CAWMP. In no case shall land application rates exceed the Plant
Available NinZen (PAIN rate for the receiving crop or result in runoff_during any given application.
cp All grassed wwmvmys shall have a stable outlet with adequate capacity to prevent ponding or flooding damages. The outlet
can be another vegetated channel, an earth ditch, stabilization struchire, or other suitable outlets. .
cP It is su¢sested not a ragrm+ement, to.keep crop yield infosrn�ioar for fuitae use to update your waste management plan . You will need three years of crop yield data before your plan can be updated.: s. .
For your informaxian, any swine firrm7ity that has a discharge to worth== waters of the State will have to apply fora National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit with the Division of Water Quality, effective January 1, 2001.
Thank you for your assistance and cooperation during the inspection. If you have any questions, please contact me at 252-946-
6481, exL 321 or your Technical Specialist
Cc: WaRO
BC Files
943 Washington Square MaA Washington, NC 27889 252-946-6481 (Telephone) 252-946-9215 (Fax)

,.1 •,. Ll{' W$t ' �1:a wt✓y ., ra°°"�-.a�
}5 �z.rf,wyy/
. . xOdwif
a' r . 'Y' a ..{...�
a rim 4 SW �d W COzle atwn ;�., '•
i�
J1. 00,
.yip
Type of Visit Q Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit OO Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
r
F Facility Number
�Q 9 Date of Visit: 3-ZO-2001 Time: 1:20 pm
O Not Operational O Below Threshold
Permitted M Certified [3 Conditionally Certified © Registered Date Last Operated ur Abov a Threshold: . . ............
Farm Name:Count......
Owner Name: 11khmd ........... Hn�lRbuau� ._.._ . _ .__.._.. - — Phone No: 2552153-429k.....-......... ...... ....... ..... ....................
MailineAddress: PQ.fob..146......... ...... _................... .... .................... .................... W.,abloxibu.ANC......... ......................................... 270.8..............
Facility Contact: ........................................ .......Title:.. ...._................................. .... Phone No:
Onsitc Representative: texc_Hollnman........... ......
................................ Integrator: PX.Ctni�ti.;�#�antla[d.._................... ....... ....
�......
Certified Operator: Ri arA.... .................. ......... Holljomm.................... ................ ..... Operator Certification Number: Z23.8.7 ............................
I-Apeation of Farm:
Take 91 South out of Walstonburg and go approx. 2 5 miles out of town. Take right fork in the road (off of 91) and the farm is I
visible from the road and turn Rt on the dirt path.
® Swine [:].Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse 1-atitude 35 - 33 59 - Long,itude 77 • 42 f: 't 20 j
best fig Current Desi Current: Dest n Gttirrent
: 1;° g
Swtne :: ;;.:Ca acrri Po alatrtin : Poultr ..........Capacity Population_ .... Cattle Capacft, Populaahon
❑ Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
7500
6100
10 Farrow- to wean
J❑ Farrow- to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Cults
❑ Boars
Dischar=es S Stream Impacts
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 9 No
Discharg-c originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. if discharec is ob,en ed_ was the conve--ance roan -made"
b. if discharge is obsen-ed_ did it r: acl: Water of"the State? ('If. -es; notifi. DWQ)
c. If discharge is obfier-.ed. what is the estimated float• in gal/niin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon stertt? (If yes_ notifl- DV'Q)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there an,% adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Yes ❑ No
-71 Yes V No
Yes ❑ No
Yes [K-i No
Yes Z. No

t/l/U1/Ul
Facility Number. 40-4
Date of Inspection 3`20-2001
Confinuer(_
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:r,,xlt... .— . .$A�1►
Freeboard (inches): ....... 47._......... .
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notfy DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/mrprovement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance rimprovement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Hay) Corn, Soybeans, Wheat
Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes X, No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? Li Yes ❑ No
15_ Does the receh ing crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
No
16_ Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
= E Yes
No
17. Are rock otitcxops present'
❑ Yes
U No
18. Is there a waterstippty well within 250 feet of the spraxfeld boundary'? LJ Unknown
❑ Yes
L No
❑ On -site ❑ Oil -site
Renuired Records & Documents
19. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
® No
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
® No
21. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
No
22_ Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
® No
23. Did the facility fail to have a activeh' certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
® No
24. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
No
25. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/mspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
No
26. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
No
27. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
g No
Otto: l.s.ues
28. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
1 Yes
91 No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
29. Are there, 9-jr rip aniTnnlc not di cpn__cp_d of mm�P h7 within IA hnnl '>
- ,—a - -
I- i X7—
u
�s NJ,
41� I . -

01/01/01
i' Facility Number: 40-9 Date of Inspection 3`20-2001
Couiinued
Printed on: 4/32001
30. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure_ and/or public property)
3 L Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
32. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e- broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
33. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
34. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes 91 No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes CK No
❑ Yes 9 No
© No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit -
Comments (refer tb question #�) Fpism any YES anawerddlor any heoommendatmns or any Qiher'Commes. I
Use drawings of facfldy to ii teir a tpla� sitasfiaas {10 ew d ad Pages as necessarf}y i x ,
❑ Field y Final Notes
.... , ...... n......
�P. ❑
...
:.:
Certificate of Coverage & General Permit on site- +
Soil anah*sis 9/25/00 - No lime required.
Waste analysis 2/1/01 #I -4.4 1bs./l000 gals.. #2 - 1.1 lbs./1000 gals.
Freeboard levels recorded weekh per General Permit.
All records of the CAWNT are complete, including the irrigation records with a nitrogen balance for each receiving crop. No
overapplication noted in the review of records.
I
I
f
V
Reviewer/InspectorName DaphneB.Cullum__ -- v-
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: t}— 3 0 1

d L�riruonrrier
---
'� GOMBfTtOr .
ReSotdL+eS : .
� i�*�.�.,: '-�i,5 ..�?F ; �� i �,�r �esi-+� �;v . - -c a .E;�' F��- •, a .. •.:r , _ - �� _ ti . _ _ - �', +.wr.. _ _
i s � _ �,. _ -- s� +car -``. - - :� w--s - .t —1 - er :r�s_1 •°c�i ,'ice Y�`i•r � - *? �� .y `^ � - y ,:
-
T.• n,�ye2001
To: Produuar -
' FM1Daphne B. CuUam _
Envira®mental Specialist . -
Washington Regional Office
Subject t Animal Compliance Inspection
Year 2001
Enclosed please find a copy of the Compliance Site Inspection (as viewed in the DWQ database) conducted at the referenced
facility by the Division of Water Quality from the Washington Regional Office. Please read this inspection and keep it
with all other documents pertaining to your animal operation for future inspections.
In general, these inspections included verifying that: (I) the farm has a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP);
(2) the faun is complying with requirements of the State Rules 15 NCAC 21F.0217, Senate Bill 1217, and the Certified Animal
Waste Management Plan; (3) the farm operation's waste management system is being operated properly under the direction of a
Certified Operator; (4) the required records are being kept; and (5) there are no signs of seepage, erosion, and/or nmoff.
As a reminder, please note the following comments, which are conditions of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan and
the General Permit; therefore, these items must be implemented:
cp The maximum waste level in lagoons/storage ponds shall not exceed that specified in the CAWMP. At a minimum,
maximum wane level for waste for lagoons/storage ponds mast not exceed the level that provides adequate storage to
contain 25 yew, 24 hour storm event plus an additional foot of structural freeboard
cp An analysis of the liquid animal,waste from the lagoon shall be conducted as close to the time of application as practical and
at least within 60 days (before or after) of the date of application. This analysis shall include the following parameters:
Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Tmc and Copper.
cp Soil analysis is required annually. Lime is to be applied to each receiving crop as recommended by the soil analysis.
cp The following records are required: off -site solids removal, maintenance, repair, waste/soil analysis and land irrigation .
records. These records should be maintained by the facility owner/manager in chronological and legible form for a
minimum of three years.
q) Land application rates shall be in accordance with the CAWMP_ In no case shall land ayplication rates exceed the Plant
Available Nitrogen (PAN) rate for the receiving crow or result in runoff during aanv liven armlication.
ip All grassed waterways shall have a stable outlet with adequate rapacity to prevent ponding or flooding damages The outlet
can be ancdber vegetated cha®el, an earth ditch, stabilization structure, or other suitable outlets. .
cp It is suggested, not a requirement, to keep crop yield infasmatiaan far futuuie use to update your waste management plan .
You will need three years of crop yield data before your plan can be updated
For your information, any swine facility that has a discharge to surface waters of the State will have to apply for a National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit with the Division of Water Quality, effective January 1, 2001.
Thank you for your assistance and cooperation during the inspection- If you have any questions, please contact me at 252-946-
6481, ext. 321 or your Technical Specialist.
Cc: ./WaRO
DBC Files
943 Washington Square Mail Washington, NC 27BBS 252-946-6481 (Telephone) 252-946-9215 (Fax)

� Dr�smn of Sol! and Water Cc►nser�att<on , .� yy y =
,Y-a 0�:f.
Type of Visit OO Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up ()Emergency Notification O Other Denied Access
;Dar! of ti'isir: 3-20-2001 Time: 1:20 pm
i Facility Number 40 9 p
4 0 Not O crxtional 0 Belo-w Threshold
Permitted S Certified [3Conditionally- Certded Q Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .._........
Farm Name: J.MjWAXCv.-,Shide.y_Fa=............... - ................ - County.:.�rxrj=..........-.-..........-------............----..�:tfAR0......
O%vner Name: Ekbmd............. ............. _.- HQUOMAR.... ._... ........... ............ .............. Phone No: 25215-422Q---------•-....--------•---...
Mailing Address: P B.ojj.46r•-------------------------•-...- -- — -----—.......... -Wabloxtbu=NC........ ..-... -.... -........ ......... .......... 2728.8 ..............
Facility Contact: Titic: .... Phone No:
onsite Representati►'i•: StC.j-X.H[klllnln,atn.......................... .._-...._... Integral P ................................. .- nte�g._ LC,t1R1><l[t1t.!iXRIldJC1d................................ - ......
,..
Certified Operator: RichtalrA................................,HSlllmaxt................ .-..................... Operator Certification Number: 223.82
bovation of'Farm:
;Take 91 South out o` Walstonburg and ro approx. M miles out of town. Take right iorl: in the road (off of 91) and the farm is i '
visible from the road and turn Rt. on the dirt path.
® Swine ©Eoultry ©Cattle ❑ Horse f-atituelc 1 35 ;` 33 i u E ungitude 77 s = 42 �20 i�
Design Current. " :. :. Design" ...Cterrent :Design Current
Sinine .. �Ca ackv Population Poultr+ Ca acity-'Po ulation Cattle .:: :Ca acihPo` ulaimn .:.
IE1 Wean to Feeder
j
jg Feeder to Finish
j 7500
6100
10 Farrow to Wean
IQ Farrow to Feeder
I] Farrow to Finish
I
I
❑ Gilt
10 Boars
'10 Laver Dain°
ID Non -Layer j❑ Non -Dairy
ilOther I {
Total Design Capacity. 7.500
Total.SSLW:' I,Q) 2,500
Number of Lagoons 2 `e] Subsurface. Drains Present ❑ La�rron Area
Holding Ponds -Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Dkehar,es & Stream Impacts
1. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Dischat'gz orlglnaicd at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field I II Other
a. 1f ai; itm ne is oh;erz,—;4 was the con%-C�-ance matt -made",
h. j'di:s:€;g. i� ctlt:; Lied. dial i; r�a;;lt t�!`atcr oltl€e Stat? (If v::;. natif�z?��� )i
jf dis-zhart!e i� obget%'ed- what it the estimated tlo-w in nal/milt?
d. Direr discharge bypass a lawon systemM"Ye,. notify DWQ)
2. Is there e«dence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any ad%rerse impacts or potential adirerse impacts to the Mlaters of the State other than front a discharge?
r• Field Area :
I] Yes 0 No
i] Yes r� No
Yes `t No
Yes ! t3 No
Yes No
L Yes No

Ul/Uf/Ul
Facility Number. 40-9
Date of Imcpection 3-20-2001
Continued,
Waste Collection & 'Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Stnicture 3 Stricture 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier Il l .....»._.. ............ RVI ._..........
Freeboard (iuclics): ............ 4:I..... z4.
5_ Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(if any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notM, DWQ)
7_ Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Wa-te Aro lication
I0. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Hay) Corn_ Soybeans, Wheat
Yes ® No
❑ Yes IRI No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes X, No
❑ Yes ® No
Yes [Kc No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes 2 No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑! Yes C No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? --,Yes Lt No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
S, No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
E] Yes
Z No
IT Are roclft- outcrops present?
❑ Yes
Li No
18. Is there a grater s, upph: well within 250 feet of the sprayfield boundan? ❑ I)rtl:riown
Yes
❑ No
❑ On -site 3 11 Off -site
Rectuired Records & Documents;
I9. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readih• available?
❑ Yes
9 No
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readih, available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
® No
21. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
X No
22_ Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback- criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
® No
23. Did the facility fail to have a activeh• certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
0 No
24. Fail to notifV regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(iel discharge. freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
. No
25. Did Re-v iewer/lnspector fail to discuss reviewhnspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
& No
26. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
No
27. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
[$ No
OJor Is ue-
29. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge atior below
❑ Yes
S No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
10 A�rw fl .m - it .ad arnimalc tint rlicnn zed of nmcrh- within 24 hours?
-E] Yes
No

01/01/01
Facilih Number. 40-9 Date of Inspection 3-24-2001
30. Is there am evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
31. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
32- Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e- broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shatters, eta.)
33. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
Consinued
Printed on: 4132001
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes 19, No
Yes N No
❑ Yes [91 No
34. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes JK No
113 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit
❑ Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
Certificate of Coverage & General Permit on site.
Soil analysis 9125/00 - No lime required. -
Waste analysis 2/1/01 41 - 4.4 lbs./1000 gals._ 42 - 1.1 lbs./1000 gals.
Freeboard levels recorded weekly per General Permit.
All records of the CAWMP are complete. including the irrigation records with a nitrogen balance for each receiving crop. No
overapplication noted in the review- of records-
n.
Re,vzewerfInspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date- 0 i

»L • :.;.�..�a-;:^.` -. -
�w•„� �-—•---.�,-Q-Other Agency
v.�
F
peof Visit O Compliance Inspection ©Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
ason for Visit OO Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
;tcility Number
of Visit: 8l24/20[IO Time: 11011 Printed on: 3/9/2001
F40 9
.�.,,.....a. M.... �,, ,..�.®�.,.,��. .�. Q NOt Grier&tiQ tat Q Belo"Threshold
Permitted ® Certified 0 Conditionally Certified ❑ Registered Date Last Cfl►cratect orf3.:.tc. Tlircel:olcl: .........................
Farm Name: .......................... Ce,e ldy ... WARO.......
0%vnerNanne: Riekgr.d .................................. jJQllot M.----.-----.---.---..------..----------.......---.. Phone Nit: 25Z-.7.5j-47.9Q.........................................
FacilityContart: ........ Tith:................................................................ ph,t w No....................................................
llailit;g Addie Pt?.Ban.]4lCe..................... ........................................................................ -.aktwxburgAC..-----.......................................... 17.8.8 .............
Onsite Rcpve ..idafi. - Ril�baid-Hollomau.................................................................... Tsste�ratur: CaroMnaL.F.ajaw ....................................................
Certilicu Operator: $1!C)axd................................. HQI.IQjM1=-....... ............................... Operator Certiflcatitm Number: 22397..................I...........
iAratinn of Farm: -
Take 91 South out of Walstonburg and go approx. 2.5 miles out of town. Take right fork in the road (off of 91) and the farm is ♦ 3
- -t
visible from the road and turn Rt. on the dirt path.
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Ir't:tudt 35 ° 33 59 L mgitudx F 77 ° 42 2fl
Design Current
-
- ------------ -- -----
Design Current = .
---- - -
Design Current
Swine .
Pot-
CatlCaacty Population
Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Layer
❑ Dairy
® Feeder to Finish
7500
5200
10 Non -Layer
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
-
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity
7,500
'❑ Gilts
Total SSLW .
1,012,500
❑ Boars
Number of. Lagoons 2 ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds:/.Solid: Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Disc.harg,es & Stream impacts
1- is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. lidiseharge i, ob,er►cxl.+a, the Cnnvevance mao-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observ4 did it reach Water of the State? (if ves, notify- DWQ) El Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed7 what is the estimated flow in gallmin?
d. Docs discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes 91 No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
;r:sclssre I 4fi,ia;Euse2 `?tsts;4sss'e = Cirss�is:sea
l et;iii �r. .............back............. ............ fmial............. -.
❑ Yes ® No
I=rccboard (inchesr............... 24................ ..........48::V1us .......... .....................

5/00 Continued on back
Facility Number. 40-9 Date of Inspection 8/24/2000 Printed on: 3/9/2001
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, [l Yes % No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? Yes No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7_ Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes C9 No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes 59 No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? [I Yes Z No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes 0 No
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Hay) Corn, Soybeans, Wheat
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? L Yes Z No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
No
b) Does the facility aced a wettable acre determination?
r' Yes
No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
No
15_ Does the receiving crop need improvement?
['j Yes
No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Yes
No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
Yes
No
I & Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in erect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
® No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
19 No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
N No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
Zi No
-No' violations,or.ddkiencies-Weee:noted:during this-Vi WL: You'Will.reeeive'no ftirth& j
L ..correspondence about this visit.' _ . . _ - .: ...... ... , .. ...]
Coinmenti (refer to question #) Explain any'YES answers and/6r any-recominenilatibns or any oth_er'comments. -
Use drawings of,facilityto better explain situations. (use:addition_ al,pages as necessary): -
*Lagoon levels being recorded weekly as required by permit.
*Waste analysis dated 8/3/00. Nitrogen in SHR 1 is 3.7 lbs/1000 gallons and SI-IR 2 is 0.47 lbs/1000 gallons.
*Soil test dated 12123/99. Lime required was < one ton per acre.
*New soil test dated 2f7/00.
*Records are well organized.
Reviewertinspector Name _ 3 _

Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit 0• Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 4p g Date of Visit 5/11/20110 Printed on: 5/16/2000
Not Operational Q Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified 13 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ..................
Farm Name: �I l�it>g o..-5)ai�l�y.. ��1�........................................................... County: Grimac .............................................. 1'4'.PRD.......
Owner ]Name: EUrhlaJf[1..................................Allenu�al.................................................. Phone No: .429.Q ..........................................................
Facility Contact: ................................................................... ... Title Phone No:
............................................................................................................................
Mailing Address: F..B.9&.>1.40................................ --. Wa,Sts.rlbMrg.NC................................................. 2.7.08 .............
Onsite Representative: ateyip.Uolloigala......................................................................... Integrator: CarpliMA.)EpC11Aa....................................................
Certified Operator:Ri.cbard. jiQjuglupi.................. Operator Certification Number:223.&,7.
.................. ............................
Location of Farm:
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 • 33 ` 59 Longitude 77 • 42 20 u
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ®No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ®No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ®No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ............ Rom........................ B ack...........................................:...................................................................--------.....................................
Freeboard (inches): 39 24

Continued on back
[Facility Number: 40-9 I Date of Inspection 5/11/Z000 Printed on: 6/16/2000
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes ® No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
.8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ®No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Yes ®No
12. Crop type Corn, Soybeans, Wheat Coastal Bermuda
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes []No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
.22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/]nspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
0 fl yioTatiotis:or defc. . . .es we ... .e. :duripg tliis visit:: - - -will "receive no further
correspondence about this visit.
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes M No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ®No
II records of the CAWMP are complete including irrigation records with a nitrogen balance, waste
nalysis, soil analysis and freeboard records.
Adequate freeboard levels.
Reviewer/Inspector Name 3Daphne B. Cullom Entered by Ann Tyndall n..........-�rr..........a.... C:..�..a.... 8 . Nam- i►..a... '—o —1 I-7
C>0

Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
Facility Number: 40-9 Date of Inspection 5/11/2000 Printed on: 5/16/2000
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ®No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ® No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes I& No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
FA'd"d_RKnaentsTan_ orlDrawmgs:

Facility Number 40 09 Date of Inspection 4/1199
Time of Inspection 1410 124 hr. (hb:mm)
® Permitted ® Certified E3 Conditionally Certified 13 Registered 113 Not O erational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: ,I [l!'�illatl� A.:.SX4i ley..far.[t........................................................... County: Cixegiag............................................... 1'4'.PRO .......
Owner Name: lieb:arA................................. Hallom ut................................................... Phone No: 252.-751.4220..........................................................
FacilityContact:.............................................................................. Title:........................................................... Phone NO:
MailingAddress: EI.Q.H.QN,.1.46..............................................................................I............. W..alwstQ.Rb rg.NC................................................ 2.78R& .............
Onsite Representative: lt�X�. fl1lATIARIp............................................................ .......... Integrator: AIC9I1dIRl.Hai'.i"........--•--.......................................
Certified Operator:)R,iSGtArd................................. HQjjQjUja ........................................ Operator Certification Number:2238a.......... ..................
Location of Farm:
'�a1sc.91.�Qultlx.Q�t.A.f.l3!alstQ.n�a�g.analt.ga.�IRAxQa�,.�,S..nail��.Aut.ai:.tax�at�..T�I��.xitgttfr.fQxic.in..ttfe.r.Qasi.{a�.af.�l�.al�.�.tlte.t'arnu. �'
iu�.x>i�ikl . ann.thy.xQmd.��al1.lu�ra t,.a>x.1!►e.tli�t. atf ,............................................................................................................................... w
Latitude 3S a 33 1 59 ilk Longitude =10
=1 DO
D sign
.: Current De is gn
Current
Design Current
Swine
Ca aci
1'o ulation Poultry Ca aci
no ulation Cattle
Ca aci Po ulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑Layer
❑ Dairy
® Feeder to Finish
7500
6500
❑Non -Layer
IF1 Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
-
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑Other
❑ Farrow to Finish
Total Design CAnacity
7 500
❑ Gilts
Total SSI��V
1,012,500
❑ soars
Number of Lagoons
2 ❑ Subsurface Drains Present Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds /Solid TrapsIff
❑ No Liquid Waste
Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ®No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4, is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: Primary Secondary
Freeboard (inches): ............... Zl................ ................ 2................ .................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
3/23199 Continued on bank
Printed nn 5/912000

Printed on 5/9/2000
Facility Number: 40-09 1 Date of Inspection 4/l/99
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? -
❑ Yes
® No
(if any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
®No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
® No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
11, Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
❑ Yes
® No
12. Crop type Oats Coastal Bermuda grass Corn, Soybeans, Wheat
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
® No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
® No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
® No
Required Records & Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
® No
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
® No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
® No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
® No
2l.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
® No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
® No
23.
Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
® No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
® No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
®No
IO V10�at10QS,OT i�ef C_I�DCIC$ WCi C.nBte[� ,dUi'illg ttlt5 V151t:. YQu. . . .rECe . . . . . . . . .
correspondence about this.visit. • . . . . . . . . ....... . ......................... . . .... .
----.. ---...
*Recommend signing up for Neuse Rule options by 8/l/99 with Greene Soil and Water.
*Given Int. Reg. card.
*Operation has full irrigation design and parameters by Sam Jarvis, P.E. Not subject to wettable acre determination.
*Waste utilization plan amended to include overall farm PAN balance (operation has 4 individual Waste Utilization Plans)
and pulls 6-1 through 64 have been corrected to coastal bermuda / cam split.
*Lagoon's critical elevations recorded on design map.
*Soil sample report dated 10/22/98.
*Waste analysis dated 3/16/99 with nitrogen at 3.8 lbs./1000 gallons. (Primary)
1W
Reviewerllnspector Name :Pat Hooper 252/946-6481 Martin McLawhorn
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

Printed on 5/9/2000
Facility Number; 40--09 Date of Inspection F 4/1/99
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ❑ No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ❑ No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ❑ No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ❑ No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes [_-]No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
lAMitio, nali!omments ancl/or]D 1 .. —gs:
*Keeping weekly lagoon Ievels as required.
AL
7. Need to eradicate rodents and repair tunneling damage as needed.
*Need to repair split discharge pipe in lagoon #! 1. (Dike wall is not eroding at this time)
Printed on 5/9/2000

Facility Number 40 9 Date of Inspection 1219199
Time of Inspection 10:30 AM 24 hr. (hh:mm)
® Permitted 0 Certified [3 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered 10 Not O erational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: dA.ti..11 1111 z.Co.n5hirley..IFArm ........................................................... County:(;.r.CCjtC .............................................. !?lrAR0 .......
Owner Name: tip haird.................................. 11WIUmtatt.................... ........................... Phone No: 252:151AM ......................
Facility Contact: ..Title: ................................ ............ Phone No:..................................................
MailingAddress: P.Q.09i.1.46............................................................................................ W-81S.t.Q.0bjRr9.N.0 ................................................. VMS
Onsite Representative: �X..!?1lAtAa�l......................... .. Integrator:CArgjUqall.F#X.Ma............................. .............................................. .......................
Certified Operator:Ridard................................. U9110t]laEl........................................ Operator Certification Number:22.3.8.7 .............................
Location of Farm:
.ga.��P.t:a�z,.2..�.rrAites.Qut.a[.tag:n,�..:��l��.xi�tt.taxtC.alp.xhe.cirad.Lt?i1.Q�f�l�.�nd..t�e..fa�rua. +
Latitude 35 • 334 F_5_9_- Longitude 77 • 42 f 20 64
Discharp_es & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes []No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway. ❑ Yes ® No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: primary secondary
Freeboard(inches) ............... ................ ................4.5................ ................................... .......................... .......... .................................... ....................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on hack
Printed on 12/17199

Printed on 12/17/99
Facility Number: 40-9 J Date of Inspection 12/9/99
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
❑ Yes
® No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
® Yes
❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
® No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
IL Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
❑ Yes
® No
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda Wheat Corn
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
®No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
®No
Re uired Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
® No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
® No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
® No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
®No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
® No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
❑ No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
®No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
® No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
® No
No•violati6us o'r defciencies•wetre'noted duirftthis visit: 'Yati will reeeive no further
correspondence about this •visit. -
rricane Floyd caused some flood waters to come up on back side of primary lagoon. A wash has developed on the
ht side of the lagoon. The wash must be corrected back to original state or better.
3ste analysis 10/19/99 = .67 lbs.
commend signing up for Emergency BMP's.
IV
Reviewer/inspector Name Carl Dunn Entered by Ann Tyndall
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

Facility Number of
Inspection. t2-
Time of Inspection l 0 3f7 24 hr. (hh:mm)
® Permitted (] Certified [3 Conditionally Certified 13 Registered © Not Operational I Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: J -6 0O1 � r � — S � t �..f F"« I County :................. ............-...............................
.................................... -- .............-_.........................._.----
Owner Name: ................Ric� O� li a'^ `t^ Phone No:.. .......................... ........... .......................
FacilityContact: ....................................... .............................. .......... Title ......................................... I ............ ........... Phone No: ..... ........... ....................
........--...,
FlailingAddress: .......................................................................................................................................................................................................... ..........................
Onsite Representative:......s......... ..........J.}.......................................................... Integrator:..........�01r'........Fcv.,5....................................
Certified Operator:................................................................................................................ Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location of Farm:
A,
Latitude Longitude �• �� ���
Design Current _.
g Point Design Current. Cattle Design Current
Swine Capacity Population ry Capacity Po ulation tle Capacity Population ,
❑ Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
—75oo
{91 0 3
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts,
❑ Boars
❑ Layer I Dairy
❑ Non -Layer ❑Non -Dairy
❑ Other
T otal Design`Gapacity
Total SSL W
Number of:Lagoons - ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area 10Spray Field Area -
'Holding.Ponds tSolid Traps w ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ElLagoon [3Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min'?
& Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 -Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches): ..........i............... ........................... 45............................................................................... ...................:......... 5. Are there any immediate threats to'the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99
❑ Yes ZNo
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Cl Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes JE No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Structure 6
...................................
❑ Yes VfNo
Continued on back

Facility Number: yO Date of Inspection j�-mil 9
6. Are there structures on -sire which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes 0 No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? Oyes ❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes [�No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes E'J No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes dl No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Yes ErNo
12. Crop type �V_f.-4 S6 C.v i �#-
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
' �vioi.. . .s :or iie#.... i.. were .. dui iEng �his:vis.. Moir ..... eeeiye pit? #'urther
curies orideRce. abouA this visit: _ ... .
oriwtnents (referto= uesteon #) -Explain any -YES answers and/or apy•recommendations or any other -con menti.
IUC
se,dra�viugs of facili to better -ex lain situations use additional:'page's as necessary
_
t3'.:. p ,( m,- .. _ ry)
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ff No
❑ Yes JE] No
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes 21 No
❑ Yes ,I No
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes 21 No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes I�j No
❑ Yes In No
❑ Yes JZ No
co.,d c,�
�va4,ui 1„
A►
e, �sq A- (A i� h f O 1C o I hC V,-,Lt k te C-rie
k -6 ct., �i'n,1 5 ��le �r iie • 4ff,
pp
��� ���t7. 1i "1'► S�
Reviewer/Inspector Name _
x
� :.•`
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date: �9
3/23/99

99
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and
Natural Resources
'Washington Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr_, Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
• •
ENR
NOFRTH CA.FiOLFNA pEF-ARTMEWT av
ENVIRONFr1FrIJT ANp NA-ruRAL RF-SOt_jRCF=S
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
January 29, 1999
Mr. Richard Holloman
J & H Milling Co. - Shirley Farm
P.O. Box 146
Waistonburg, North Carolina 27888
SUBJECT: Notice of Deficiency
Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
J & H Milling Co. - Shirley Farm
Facility No. 40-9
Greene County
Dear Mr. Holloman:
On April 30, 1998, I conducted an Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection at
the J & H Milling Co. - Shirley Farm in Greene County. A copy of the inspection
report is attached for your review.
In general, this inspection included verifying that: (1) the farm has a Certified
Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP) and the Genera! Permit; (2) the farm
is complying with requirements of the State Rules 15 NCAC 2H.0217, Senate Bill
1217, the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan and the General Permit; (3)
the farm operation's waste management system is being operated properly under
the direction of a Certified Operator; (4) the required records are being kept; (5)
there are no signs of seepage, erosion, and/or runoff. The following deficiencies
were observed during the inspection.
➢ The current waste utilization plan for your facility does not contain all of the
receiving crops and/or land that are being utilized for waste management. All
receiving crops and/or land being utilized for waste management are required
943 Washington Square Mall, Washington, North Carolina 27889
Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

Page Two ,
J & H Milling Co. - Shirley Farm
Facility No. 40-9
January 29, 1999
to be included in the waste utilization plan. Please refer to the attached
inspection form for further comments.
It is very important as the owner and the Operator in Charge that you resolve
these aforementioned deficiencies and any other.problems that may arise, as
soon as possible. For additional assistance, please contact your Technical
Specialist. Nothing in this letter should be taken as absolving this facility of the
responsibility and liability of any violations that have resulted or may result from
these deficiencies.
Thank you for your cooperation and assistance during the inspection. Should
you have further questions or comments regarding this inspection, do not
hesitate to call at [phone], ext. 321.
Sincerely,
Daphne B_ Cullom
Environmental Specialist
cc: David Moore, Carolina Farms
Greene County SWCD Office
Greene County NCCES Office
DSWC-WaRO
Compliance Group
WaRO

Facility Number Date of Inspection
Time of Illsl,eciioil 14:00 24 hr. (hh:mm)
p Registered p Certified Ig Applied for Permit 13 Permitted 10 Not Operationa Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: ........................................................... County: Greene WARO
O.,-ner Name: Rirltard................................. Rolloman .................................................. Phone No: 9.19-.7.51.42 0...------------...........................................
Facility Contact:.................................::................... ..Title: .. Phone No:
Mailing Address: P...0,,.11m.14.6...... ..................................................................................... .Walslont rg.NC................................................ 27R88 ..............
Onsite Representative: S.tr.ve.Nolloman. ........................................................................ Integrator:Carolina.Farms...........------.------..--....--.----..............
Certified Operator: Richard ................................. linllautan................................... ...... Operator Certification Number:22397.............................
Location of Farm:
Latitude �• ©° Longitude
L esignCurrent esign- urren
Swtite .Capacity -Population P-oulfry '� a _ Capacity Population Cats
- ri aver =w >n i3
p can to ee er
® Feeder to rots
63
❑ Farrow to can
❑ Farrow to Feeder
E3 Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
p Boars
r x vesign -
- j❑�on-Layer I 1 1-.?#3 Nonce- airy
Other
'T6ta1 Desi<gapactfy7,509
Total SSLI =1,012,500 y
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/.improvement? 13 Yes ® No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? t3 Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed. was the conveyance man-made? p Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed. did it reach Surface Water? (If ves, notify DWQ) p Yes p No
c. If discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in ;al/n-iin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes. notify DWQ) ❑Yes p No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ®No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes N No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoonsiholding ponds) require 0 Yes ® No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes ® No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? E3 Yes ® No
7/25/97

act tty Number: 40_9 . Dale of Incpectioll
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (La2oons.Holding Ponds. Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes H No
Structure 5 Structure 6
identifier:
Freeboard (ft): 1.9 ft. (23 in.) 2 ft.
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? p Yes H No
11, Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ® No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? p Yes H No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Application
14. is there physical evidence of over application? p Yes IS No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
P type .Oats ........................ ......Coasta1 Bermuda Gm ............... Cain4Silat. e&,.Gxaia)
._..... 15. Crop e. .......................�'V.kteat................_..._..........--------------�-
.
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? N Yes ❑ No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Onlv
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
:: �eir>�espo�lerie� abQdt t�i�s-v�s��:: - : - : - • • :.:..n.g t..rs. visit: -. : o.u. will ...re... rtrQ.No-violations. or rr-renzies'were.nate uneev
.
: ...... • .
p Yes ® No
C7 Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
H Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ®No
® Yes p No
p Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
p Yes p No
Reviewer/Insnector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: k.-_. Q ' Q-XI cO\ Date:

[] D'vision of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency
Wii [vision of Water Quality
lGrRoutine O Comilaint ' O Follow-up of DWO inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other I
Date of inspection
Facility Number
Time of Inspection a:OCs Illy 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Il-fa-
� Registered Certrifeed l pplied for Permit 13Permitted ❑ Not O erational _ Date Last Operated:.....
Farm Name:. .: A....lY.l i l�l.l!1.�cz....— 6L, � �vev_l .......... County:..- .....----•..-- •.......
f. ............... �.....--....
Owner name::-. Phone 10 - ....................
�., .......�:............. ... ......... Qk�,,rx an.................................... . :..... 1!a.- s. ......�+
FacilityContact:.....................Q........................................................ Title: ............... .... ........ ....... .............. .''...ii.......__.tt..-- Phone No:.........----.........................------.......
Mailing Address:...'{ .:o..:.. Q?� 14�...6.. ... ..... pit 4'n't?.l1>t w ............... ... ` t.. �—
Onsite Representative: ... s...�'_.'1'S>r?1.L�s�CtLlt.l....................................... Integrator :.......�,�11�5�1 �141.....'0.!�tCJ< �...................
Certified Operator;.... ....................... _.Itti-to vux. ............................... Operator Certification Number:....... 19.qca .............
Location of Farm:
..........................�..5_77............................................ ........... ...................... ............................................................... -
Latitude Longitude
❑ an to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
--1 pp
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Ue:
Poultry Cap
U Layer
❑ Non -I
❑Oh'.
Current. ..Design Current
'Population 'Cattle Capacity '_Papuiahon
6tal Design ;Copal
,Total SSI
y -7 SC)C)
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes U� //10
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes Ex o
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance inan-trade? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes B No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes (J'f,3o
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes 2"No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes [RNo
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes C-No
7/25/97 Continued on back

Facility Number: Q0 --
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed'?
❑ Yes o
Structures (Lagoons,lfolding Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.) '
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate. ❑ Yes MK.
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 `S uc u e r ut-e 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
................................ ............. .................... .......... .......................... ... ............. I—- ...... .......
Freeboard ft + y
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed'?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers'?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of W }MP, or runoff entering waters of the State. notify DWQ)
15. Crop type.VIf L:.....y................................................�.0..... t...... ..
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit'?
0 No.violations or deficiencies. were, n ote'& during this visit. You.will receive no further
correspondence ahout this:visit: :
❑ Yes &KO
❑ Yes Ey No
U
❑ Yes [No
3
❑ Yes 191<0
❑ Yes P<
CCQ ✓) ...............'.
Rr5es ❑ No
S
o
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
G?<Cs
❑ Yes
�es
❑ Yes
Ql e.S
❑ Yes
,9 s
G�1Go � dJ
❑``To �N Q.
`o ! t
❑ No S
7
El No
❑ No t l
Comments•(refer to ques#ion #): UpUin,any Y`ES atnwers and/or.anv reeommendattons:or any tither connnents,,' j z
Use'iltrawin s of�fa1 � to better ex lain' situations use additional a es as:necme ��
Y P ( Fla �} .
ti
`�"tA�o K&MI LU60tcv also 1, kk- -b
c�o; l
, � a -2a - a --7
��1 cis g - qr f, r -1
Mast¢_
s t o13o q-f — . o •all y8 •7 .5
9 qS - 4,1 7/25/97
E
Reviewer/InspectorName ' :. NF; w T„
. .
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date: 4— 30- q&

16 tcoutme p Lompiamt p rollow-up of uwy inspection p Pc
Facility Number
p Registered ■ Certified ■ Applied for Permit p Permitted
Farm Name: ,1&H.].1'IiUing.Ca.-.Shiriey..Farm......................................
ow -up of USwc review O Vtner
Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection ® 24 hr. (hh:mm)
In Not 0perationa Date Last Operated:
............... County: Greene WARO
Owner Name: Air,hard................................. Hoflo=n .................................................. Phone No: 9.19-153-4290 ....................
Facility Contact: Steyk.Hoffnman.............................................Title: owtier ................................................. Phone No: 9,191.753-A290 .......................
MailingAddress: P.Q.Hoar.]Af............................................................................................w.alsionhurgNC ................................................. 27888 ..............
Onsite Representative: S.teve.Hattoman,.Russt11..]aiWilfard ............................... Integrator:.......................................................................................
Certified Operator: EUch:and.S............................. Hallam= ........................................ Operator Certification Number: 194.0.............................
Location of Farm:
Latitude Longitude Mm«
L
esign urren t Design urren ry _ Design -
Swine _= . Capactfy.f9pulation PoulEry. K Capacity Population`.Cattle Capacity
❑ Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to mis
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finis
p Gilts
p Boars
s- Total Desi
rren
nation -
;n Capacity l7,500W-
ofaUSSLW_'- 1 1,012,300
Number of:Lagoons 1 Holding Ponds
IE3 Subsur ace rams Present
p agaon Area
113 Spray ie
rea
- - -
❑ No Squid Waste Management System
='
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
p Yes
® No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
p Yes
®No
Discharge originated at: p Lagoon ❑ Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
N No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
®No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
p Yes
®No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
®No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes
®No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
❑ Yes
N No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
p Yes
®No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
❑ Yes
® No
7/25/97

IT aciljty Number: 40_9
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
p Yes
a No
Structures (Lagoons,Holding Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
p Yes
a No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5 Structure
6
Identifier: ........#.1..(back).......................#2......................................................................................
......................................................................
Freeboard (ft): 1.7 3.0
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
p Yes
a No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
H No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
N Yes
p No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
p Yes
a No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
p Yes
a No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type......CaasW.Bm=da.(haYl.............Small..Cumin.O.uczseed ....... ........................ Con ................................................Whmt.......................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? p Yes a No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
Q ...o vior ttons.or jr-iencies*were noted . uring
tYs visit:. -You, will .re.rx.ive no further
.7 . .
... ::....:..ceKeo6nOiO abuw:.:.•. •. •....:I............
p Yes a No
p Yes a No
p Yes a No
p Yes a No
p Yes ® No
R Yes 13 No
p Yes a No
p Yes a No
p Yes p No
Reviewer/Inspector Name'at Hooper
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

p Division of Soil and Water Conservation p Other Agency
lawn Division of Water Quality
N icoutine p Uompiamt p rottow-up of DWQ inspection p rotlow-up of D'Wl: review p caner
Date of Inspection
Facility Number
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
p Registered .0 Certified 0 Applied for Permit p Permitted Not perattona Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: J&H,b=ing.C.n.:.Shirley.Farm........................................................... County: Greene WARO
Owner Name: Richm d................................. H,olloman...............--.......--.......---.............. Phone No: 919.153-424II-.------...------.........................................
Facility Contact:
Title:
Phone No:
MailingAddress: PO.Box.1.4G............................................................................................ Walstonlaurg..NC ................................................. 27988 ..............
Onsite Representative: Steve.11alloman........................................................................ Integrator: Car u".Earms.....................................................
Certified Operator: RicWAS....................... ..... Hnfitumaa............... .......................... Operator Certification Number: 19.4111 .............................
Location of Farm:
a e... Gaut a ... tam Faa.annr,ax. ottt.o .tatixn.... in.tke.rnaA4j3H.nf9JL1znd.L_M.Ea rm .
Latitude ©+©4 ®u Longitude ©+®° ®-
Swine Capacity Population
13 Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
pLayer JE3 Dairy
03 Non -Layer Non - airy
er
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW 1,012,500
Number of Lagoons / Holding Ponds u su ace rains Present 0 Lagoon rea 13 Spray Field Area
la o Liquid Waste Management SysteE=
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? p Yes ® No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? p Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: p Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? p Yes p No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes p No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) 17 Yes p No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? p Yes ® No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? p Yes ® No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require p Yes ® No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? p Yes ® No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? p Yes ® No
7/25/97

acr. um er: 40_9
8. - Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
p Yes ®No
Structures (Lagoons,Holding Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure 1
Identifier: ._..�------------------
Structure 2 Structure 3
Freeboard (ft): 1.8 ft. 4.2 ft.
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
p Yes ® No
Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenancelimprovement?
(If any of questions 9-I2 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?M (If in excess of WP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
13 Yes N No.
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes N No
15. Crop type ....... Com.(Silage.&..Grain)........ Small.Grain��4,)&ptt a .BUky......CoastalBermu,da.Gmss.................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in AnIll Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? p Yes H No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities. Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
o-via ions.or �crencies,were.no a ring this vise oa wi .rereive no further .
t:ejq<eSodja t EiO a�ri}1�1 lthi51'i$t�:. .. .
p Yes ® No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
n Yes ® No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes p No
s
an trripatlon event.
flAnalysis S-A-Mjones Farm 5-15-97 -
-r
fied`i@a9,'waste management plan needs -lagoon design and operation & maintenance plan.
"ems ;,,�: ;xn
aste onllan_ Deeds to be amended t_o show appropriate wetted acres that are in the irrigation recoids..A new map
spry fields*ould be.h61pful.
The following items are con"ons=of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan and the general permit, therefore these items
must be IMP lemented:
yKeep'lagoonsJstorage ponds -free of=foreigti'de>iis'tnchtdmg, but not limited.to tires; bottles, plastic products, light bulbs,
Reviewer/Inspector Name Daphne B.'Cttllotn =
r_
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
'�
Date:

p f a }=z+ 43 p1'+f yyyF�yyyt'I°, I i .ter.•
Al
t t ••1 M i ;� i�
i wi :_ .}` 3 '' r E�,.t� � k,{ F , . •� . . "1 r • O C tx a ti`� r�. + ta:'.�
11Ty.� 4[��ttF�L� �,,j A 4. ..
j *i'ip Y rl,,� 11 +i r:€€r PS`� F •.1 r
�i+ i�IF!'.", . f • ' „ . t .'i r +'`ray ii �.T'
u�?��t�r°,�frri
i � r t-{� � �-` -� I ' <i III' .c . n�1 t � . Q � i � ". �c •`�' � t ( rS
o.1r
y ?S+{+i.r� I. r f' O t,; * H ' 1
� r � rtf' ttA = ,y' {;�,,jy�Fti i14 't�' r �: r ; � ^ t � �-� ��� it � ,, . '
ryJ
}i'!`�y��q,��
tT' t ` �,+1) - 1t.j i i }�1' r�, �ef1) '�r' •I °+'.i
ti ,.�. - i' - , 1' i �+ i 2 r e
,d. i S+'FtA� 'I S.f f� �: �.' r i• - y7 1 • .y '�,!'r`r.��: - hid 1 �' Clr /si Ll h i r +'�,
,7 I i° �• r i. ;if
r ; Ir�tl , <I r .. }� t i' s f Es•s i�a Zti?'S d 3Y }i,.
.�'�' =r 1 Y�F. h .tiIf7i�ir O r,,i5 `:pit, ,� r, l'...r �r>ir ,�.'•R �1 ,� •' E, ,{f f�'.f.} r�.t lr 4��+i}�'<i.�1 �C i�,i1 g5'Elx+� �
.% �� ',�+•' I. 7 • ��`i���;. , • p1�rr rr . e +.i�r;',k r, 1 r �,� i ref rf i {:: .1 ,i'. fi.s''q'"��� lti;��yy� {'
't r 7'�• 1.•' �y 7 r � A . 1-�['i ti _ �'. 'a 1�i. :,i r j�; yl
ir•a{;ffiir' '{I_ ri4`Ft0'�i
1• ,r 5e �.. Et p'f i �,;,� �+i r :-i $r' .r. ;_ k • ' - i- -, +::''i O: py.` W { O i 'yA'
,t +. >•, AgR,'P��.1
r n { 1��'r r�`` r " u' � r '�, � • .. i �.rin- K °r <r ��y.� t 0 ,,r.
��' li Yf+ f , I .Y.. �+�' r'f •�, J IIr F,•+ �-t,
is t ``F'+^ i {i'�,. � t}ti hl, ; i i � �9 xt'� ;�{'��i;o A, ,3�' ' •,�,
I 7iT r�'=� � t rt .� '.i' •+`e''+� • i 1+ , Vl ', ' :I- ,i� �;Q• 'il" �i�l�.
I r�. r. 7 4 ;z{;; i r: { r c, '. 7 + � C7 ` � � • �AT�� a � � ',F•}
r'� i p�, I F - i - l i. A , t +• r ,4. 'r.�. A r j� '� r e�•r,
T + , f.� 'I. i i" iFr i'..•• - ,r},� ' ` ! n1 Vl '�1�4� ' 5����
�i :'' v•ff�I •7 }, 4 , kr y + , pp µr wsfl�n an,yt
h i F if, 's�',f +i ter�{ � q. :� �� t�;?'�?.�"- .tt+. •t
rr {j 'S!� �til r 7:r t 'r'ii'� i t R�!!t1•.S' i - r '�ilz� t^, ,� � ! p�'j Fi1i t :I,,� iS
, � i sift ;q� I+ � I I '�{ } }�w f � t •.z. , �, L r • Iir{ rt�ylr; t ,�.,. ' ' �p + Y "� � { .. ` y `. I � _ ..��71� `?�i r + .
Af I ���.�; �''i: .♦• + ',r t�'t .r± '• t:�y ci �' + y+"•(� low,
o
•�7! �r AINI11
� r . 'r� �•i r'� �I 11 j I PPP � j �,p tyy{•{.
ti}i{
�k t �� il' i'I '�ri' `v raft.{q+�r' K I� p �. `q, '� �`�iCl � `{p7:{;�•'�
•f, {. •",; - i i E. r r i r r+ oiy
`+' +• }mar �. ? '4 -��1Opp ' d"�':'�i � li F}ti, +`rW:�e
J,J* i{ `I �`�r �I ,, � ,� � a �•fA tr `r
•� ,r ��_- � t�j! 1��'_ :._ ar G.Ca
prrar+l £ `�r;r„ � C`,�' •
$ a �
}