400002_INSPECTIONS_20171231

NUH I H UAHULINA
Department of Environmental Qua

INSPECTIONS.
INSPECTIONS

V
141 Koutme p t ompiaint p rouow-up of uwy inspection p rc
Facility Number
M Registered p Certified p Applied for Permit p Permitted
C•]
Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
In Not Operationa Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: Seymour.Farms..................................................................... .......•...... County: Greene WARO
OwnerName: Frank........ ............................. S.eymnu.r..................................................... Phone No: 919-58Q-7805..........................................................
Facility Contact: ................................................... .Title: ... Phone No:
MailingAddress: f? .Bye..808.......................................................................................... Saox.HUAC ....................................................... 2BS8JQ ..............
Onsite Representative: SEE.CODIMMI SEC:T.IE.ON............................................. Integrator: ........................................................................
Certified Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude • ° �u
Operator Certification Number:
Longitude • 6 Du
estgn urren - __ esigu m Current'.- , . —., . estgn- _ -Current;
Swine . Capacity- Population Poultry_ Capacity Population-=Cat#le _ ._Capacity Population
L
r
13 Wean to Feeder
13 Feeder to Finish
13 Farrow to Wean
p Farrow to Feeder
p Farrow to Finis
p Gilts
p Boars
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: p Lagoon p Spray Field 13 Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
0 Yes p No
p Yes p No
p Yes Q No

ae i Number: 40_2
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
p Yes
p No
Structures fLnoons,Holding Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
p Yes
p No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure
6
Identifier:
Freeboard (ft):
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
p Yes
p No
11. is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
p Yes
p No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
p Yes
p No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
p Yes
p No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
p Yes
p No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type............................................................................................................................................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
p Yes
p No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
p Yes
p No
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
p Yes
p No
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
p Yes
p No
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
p Yes
p No
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
p Yes
13 No
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
p Yes
p No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
p Yes
p No
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
p Yes
p No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
p Yes
p No
o'vio tions. or crencies'were -no e . uring is visit; . om receive nor u er . :
• � . Ce1`Kes�op�eae� about �t�iis •v�s�t: • . • .....:.:. • ......:.... .. .:......... ,
Comments (refer to question'#)._ Explain anyYESanswers. and/or any.recommenrlations or any other comments. -
Usedraw iafttacili to metier ex h�rri situations rraddttioaal e es,as ttecessa'.
h' p ( ryJ
• � .a , � . ���_ _ �• �-vim_ ____ : w _�_ � �•- a W _.��_ �. �s p;; �.. . �._.. ,a.�a��� _ �_a_ __
Iwner states he has a dry litter turkey operation�and will submit a letter"reguesting removal. (See compliance section for this
!formation.) The local SWCD will confirm removal. Since this operation is a dry litter turkey operation, the site is not subject to
H .0217 or. .a,site insspection from the Division 6f Water Quality.