20070235 Ver 1_More Info Received_20070214

Agri WasteTechnology, Inc.
5400 Etta Burke Court
Raleigh, North Carolina 27606
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
www. agriwaste. com
Email: [e-mail]
0~1 - o a3S
Fi4i'r;!''~!V ~
RECEIVED
2/12/2007
Dear Ms. Karoly,
Please accept these additional application sets that are to be included with Kent Wiles
PCN application. Please excuse the oversight. If you have any questions, please do not
hesitate to contact me at 919-859-0669.
Best Regards,
% 9
t1~-' ~,~ l ~ ~,
i Julie Peele

,, ,;

~~~ :~~ t
off- ~a3s
Agri-WasteTechnology, inc. Pi +Y~~~ ~.NT
5400 Etta Burke Court REGEfUED
Raleigh, North Carolina 2760b
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]/2007
www.agriwaste.com
Email: [e-mail]
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
United States Army Corps Engineers
6508 Falls of Neuse Road
Suite 120
Raleigh NC 27615
Division of Water Quality
401/Wetland Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh NC, 27699-1650
Dear Regulatory Agency,
Jeff Vaughan, Senior Soil Scientist and Julie Peele, Environmental Technician of Agri-
waste Technology Inc. are submitting this PCN on behalf of Kent Wiles. Mr. Wiles has
purchased a 60 feet easement in hopes to use it to construct an access road to a land
locked piece of property in Orange County, NC. This access road will lead to a planned
subdivision containing four lots. The subdivision cannot be constructed until the access
road is built.
This proposed access road will cross approximately .12 acres of a riverine wetland
associated with Price Creek. In addition to the .12 acres of wetland impacted,
approximately 60 feet of Price Creek will be affected.
Included in this application are applicable maps, wetland delineation datasheets, and an
acceptance letter from the Ecosystem Enhancement Program. If you have any questions
concerning this application please contact Julie Peele or Jeff Vaughan at 919-859-0669.
Sincere ,
Julie Peele
s`. t, ,.,
't'~ _.
-:. ai.- 1

Office Use Only: Form Version March OS
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No. D `~ - O oL3 5
(lf any particular item is not applicable to this projeck, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
I. Processing
f'`.,~~ ~~i,.w
1 (~i {+ia_1'i
R~rCI~`ED
Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ^ Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
^ Section 10 Permit ^ Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
^x 401 Water Quality CertiEca#ion ^ Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: xatiorn~iae 39
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ^
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here:
S. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern {see the top of page 2 for further details), check herd; ^ ', ~ ' rt
II. Applicant Information
Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Went Wiles

Mailing Address: Sole Butler Gies Drive
Cdapel Hill, Nt: 27516
Telephone Number: 919-370-7980 Fax Number: 9i9-338-1515
E-mail Address: brovhillvilesine(~vahoo_coe
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.}
Name: Ji}71 P Pal P
Company Affiliation: Agri~aste Ter.1u-ology, inc.
Mailing Address: 540o Etta Burxe court.
Raleigh, ~ 27606
Telephone Number: 919-859-OG69 FaX Number: 919-233-1970
E-mail Address: jpeele@agri~raste.oon

Page 5 of 12

III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: na,s,as~•~ ch,,.-~•h it~~
2. T.LP. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only):
3. Property Identification Number (Tax P1N): 9~~~13szo4
4. Location
County: Orange Nearest Town: Chapel Hill
Subdivision name {include phase/lot number):
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): ~atr_e 1*,Sg-i;yp_~~ ~~ •rh~
level Rd. sake a right onto S~ithlevel Rd_ rake-right tMt,[tlk3na5s.7LS Ctmrrmh Rd_
Proiect area is ,~ aile on left neat to ~5) ] I~d14c7st't1q {-~~~r~rjd,,+ Cha~rnl - Ri 7 7 ~ ~N'
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 3s.s~4s~ ~N -~9.os5~7~ oW
6. Property size (acres): Total Acres 9.37
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: trice creek
8. River Basin: cape Fear raver Basin
(Note -this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.usradmii>/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: This area is a smar), Annulated urban- area with a riverine
xetland located daxnslope.
Page 6 of 12

I0. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Please see attachaent 1.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: To bufla acxess road to a Planned neighborhood
of 3-2 acre lots and 1-3 acre lot. This neighborhood is land locked raithout access.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules. xiA JiorPoPr, nSaCpg, c-ann to the SiY~~A Ik~CPat1Pr 2$, ?DO6 tri.
incTVx•t thr+ vt~t7anA r7atar~inatinn wwAra t~ AiiT - cw att~rh~ant Q_
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
zone
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: •i2 acres viii be impacted due to
the constrution of an access road_ There rill be culverts placed every 100' in order to not
iapede the sheet floc of Price Creek. ?here rill be secbanical clearing, grading: of fill
dirt to build this road.
Page 7 of 12

Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact Type of Wetland
{e.g., forested, marsh,
herbaceous, bog, etc.) Located within
100-year
Floodplain
( es/no) Distance to
Nearest
Stream
(linear feet) Area of
Impact
(acres)
1 Adding Fill Dirt Riverine Yes 0 .12
2 Hiec2ianical Gradin River Yes -
3 Grading Rfverine Yes 0 _12

Total Wetland Impact (acres) .lz
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: •47
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.}, excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
,,,,~~r he;nch,ded To calculate acreage. multiply len>;th X width, then divide by 43,560.
Stream Impact
Number
indicate on ma
Stream Name
Type of Impact Perennial or
Intermittent? Average
Stream Width
Before Im act Impact
Length
linear feet) Area of
Impact
{acres) j
2,. 3, and 4 Price Ceelc Fill Dirt, 2[ech. P 4' 60' .001

Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 60'
S. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill PYCavat;nn dredQ-in~_ floodine. drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Open Water Impact

Site Number
(indicate on ma
Name of Waterbody
(if applicable}

Type of Impact Type of Waterbody

{lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay,
ocean, etc.) Area of

Impact
(acres)

Total Open Water Impact (acres) PF/A
Page 8 of 12

6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project:
Stream Impact (acres : -~1 ~-
Wetland Impact (acres): _lz ac.
O en Water Im act (acres : x/A
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) x/A
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): so'
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ^ Yes ®No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ^ uplands ^ stream ^ wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): x/A
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): x/A
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond:
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts. ~- impact development practices
Mill be used_ For eza~le, wall footprint for planned hones. Just enough trees will be
cieared for the haves, septic systeo_s, and access road. Culverts rill be added under the road.
_Rain Gardens Mill be iwplemented on the sides of the access road. These wall depressions
Mill slots doMn the funoff from the inpezvious road as t]~e vegetation Mithin these gardens will
VIII. Miti ation ~O~' the rtmoff. lnitiallp, the plan called for 9' ditches on either side of the
g road, hoMever, the road. Mfll be elevated and as a result no ditches Mill be needed.
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
Page 9 of 12

USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide. for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
httn:iih2o.enr.state.nc.us/nc«~etlands!strm~ide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location {attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation}, a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
liitig~tion is not planned for this project, haMever, an acceptance letter frog the F•EP
is included in the application_ Iir. Fifes gill be piping into the In-Lieu Fee Program
for mitigation.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Frogram (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
{919) 7 i 5-0476 to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this fornn. For
additional inforrrzation regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.ushvrp/index.h.tm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): x/A
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): N~a
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): .lz ac
Amount ofNon-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): x/A
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): x/A
Page 10 of 12

IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Daes the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ^ No
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environtneutal documentation.
Yes ^ No ^
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ^ No ^
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by D'~'VQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. Ail buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identif ed within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 {Catawba) I SA NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ^ No
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
Zone* Impact Multiplier I Required
!square feet) Mitigation
1 3 (2 for Catawba)
2 1.5
Total
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 fee[ from the edgc of Zone 1.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration 1 Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund}. Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260. N/A
Page 11 of 12

XI. Storrnwater (requlred by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level. s~ atrA^,~,t 2.
X1I. Sewage Disposal {required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
~i mak -° -_`.rtitiuiftn a i a121P., l:Q~' a S7QII~"'}tonal asw+tic~ _~; rw ..ith i>ti. mcceot~~
fn F}v ~aYarn,~~Lion ~tJ tQee aitt fttDia~_a.*'^*a i4 svitafi]r foi em h1Lg~*TM~~
tivc slsta.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (ISA NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ^ No z^
Ys this anafter-the-fact pem]it applicatian? Yes ^ No
XI V. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ^ NU Q
if yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
httn:/lh2o.enr.state.ne.uslttc~vetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description:
Once the development is completed, there are no additional impacts anticipated_
XV. Other Cfrci~mstanees (Optioaal):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules fox lakes, dales associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control}.
ApplicantlAgent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 12 of 12

Attachment 1.
Project Information
Question 10.

Attachment 1
III. Project Information
10. Mr. Wiles is proposing to use an easement in order to build an access road to a land
locked piece of property in Orange County NC. This easement includes a 20,SOOsq ft.
(.47ac} wetland area and 60 feet of Price Creek. The access road will lead to a planned
subdivision containing 4 lots. The subdivision will not be constructed until the access
road is built.
The proposed road is planned to be18 feet wide. As a result, approximately .12 ac of the
wetlands will be used to construct the road. Culverts will be installed every 100 feet as to
trot impede the sheet flow of Price Creek. Building the road will entail the use of a light
utility bulldozer for clearing, grading, and a dump truck to bring in fill material. A
sedimentation fence will be put up along the border of the wetland as protection from
sedimentation loading.
The planned subdivision will begin approximately 600 feet upslope from the wetland.
Building the subdivision will entail the use of concrete trucks, boom trucks, light utility
bulldozer, and a dumpster. This will be a low impact development, in that extra
precautions will be taken to ensure the smallest footprint possible for these homes.

Attachment 2
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)

Attachment 2
XI.
Currently this area is completely pervious accounting for a total of 9.07 acres. The
proposed access road will consist of .12 impervious acres and the proposed subdivision
will have approximately .9 impervious acres.
Storm water controls proposed for this project are as follows:
1. Gutter curbs will not be used so that runoff will be absorbed by pervious surfaces
instead of making a concentrated stream towards the wetland.
2. There will be one driveway for all four homes. This low impact development
practice will decrease the amount of impervious area.
Rain gardens will be installed on the side of the access road. These small divots
with vegetation planted inside them will absorb runoff from the road. This
practice will decrease the amount of runoff that could impact the wetlands.

Attachment 3
1. Vicinity Map
2. Site Map
3. Quad Map
4. Map of Wetland Up Close
5 . Cross-Section of the Road
6. Grading Plan

0
0
0
0
ai
m
U
N
r
t ' .:~ -~
'4
L ~,
® ° °~N~r~ N ~ N V ~ ~ 1 ~ L~ll~ ~ ~ ~
~. U a o
~~ U ~n ''~ m Q- fA m y
HmZrn~3 z ,~ ~ ~ ~ mj3a cov
w m m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~AFE~ QuALiTI' ~ .s ~ °'
m o °-' r X 3 ~ fC Q ~ .,r'R ~ST~~t.a~. +!n~:~FF RFzAC~(:7f o w~~ 0 0
a~ ~0~

0)
c 04
L L
® rn0 Em O V
" °' N U
� z 1, m Cl.
°
�mL� m 7 s o C)0
O N O O
mrn m ^
Nw LL L
O L m 'O M O
N d LL 3 a) E W c LL C
o
_ U
��� U)Q v�iU-1 vii
O
O
O
M
N
m
U
U)

0
0
M
r
_~
ca
U
N
LL
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
® ~ _ d
__ ~ ~~~,~ ~ W a~ ~ _.~ 1 ~ 2011 -~ ~ J ~m
~m2mm.3 z n O ~ ~ ~ ~n °o ° m33a N
~ w m rn m m ~ ~ ~ . ~/E1;~,7~ t2 QU0.1.1'i'Y N o ~ ~ -> m ui
_ ,n _ o
a ~ ~ ~ LL

t
c U
Is - L m
T 7 0
� O 0 0 0 U
oU� U U e. i
NmZ��3 rn Usk?
C..
.�
CD m. 3
*�,a n
�© � o a- 3 N FCD 1* Z0lJ7 J
�� LL >�
a > a
DENR - WATER QUALITY
4-
N
N
LL
O
LO
r
O
O
T-
0
C
O
LO

'T`~1~1GRL
2cs ~~ .. ~'~Y

~r _ ~
110
~4
I
t
~Q5
x
IG a
~t/~T~"5 ~ f~ Pl2aP. CkOSS-S~C7ipN /S N~ BQSED O~v S~fRi~Ff'Eb 77~Po,
z) ~'uAT/ONS A~DVE MEAN .SEA LE AEG ~~~ ,455'UMfA.
:~~ CRO55 - SECTi sn/ W/ c:c. ~ kA~V G ~ /F s~v'A C ES ARC"' PR~s~v7-'
~~ F~'~ I1 nn akcr~~,.l W ~ tI bc. ~ ~ ~i-e.. ~~ tl t:~rti1~~~ ~;~~ec!
L~Sw+~ak,~~,,~ Q,~:,.+,h~. ~-; me c~.i~ke.rna-'~~vC,. meAs~res w,t~
b~ -~.

EX. GRADE
~o~r~ovrac /y=/o'

Q,, 111^ ~ ~\ t 4 4 f _1~ / ~.
3 ~ i
z ~ ~ ' ~ 1'
a[ ~ `? ~1 W Ott s ~~ , `` ` ~
~. ] ~ ~ '
~_ ~ ~ ~ ~ `~
~ ~, ~, ~,
S ' ' . `~ ! t. s ` ,~t
!~ it
`7 - ~ d i lZl IS ~ r ,~ l ~ ~ y
~ ~ t~1n }Q 4 ~ ~
Z ~ to ~ Z, ~: '~ ~'~ ``ti,. ~'~`''`t'\
.1 , p p~p~~ f ~ y'~ ~
e~
.. r+r
3 ~.
J,. '. '
. ~ ..
:~
_. _ _ ~ ~ .
. . -.. ~~, .r~ ~ i +
;l
.... ` •t
` ~f - s
~~ ,.
~ '~ I
.. ~
11
a
a
_ s
U i
~bo ue°~ TAO ~ ~ ." .. ., ..
0~~~~3 ~ ~'~U
~ `rte ..

s
is
-c
a ,.
~ ~. ~
a ~.
.,- _ :..
.
U
~~~~.
0
d
a m v ,~
~o~ °n
m~ ~a
~~-°a> mrv
c~~~r
Ow¢->oo

Attachment 4
Wetland Delineation Datasheets

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
('l987 COE Weflands Determination Manual)
~ ~
C ~.
~ P
~~ G~.
Project 1 Site: SGti-S Date: ~~7~Y-- o(o
Applicant /Owner: -~
Investigator: 6,~t: .. -°t- ~f ' County: rD~9~_
State: Ncr

Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes ~ No
Is the siEe significantly disturbed .{Atypical situation)? Yes No~~
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes Now
(explain on reverse if needed) Community ID:
Transecf ID:
Plot ID:
VEGETATION
Dominant Plank Saecles Stratum indicator Dominanf Plant Soecles Stratum Indicator
1._ c`3 t,~? 2~ V"u rYl ~r.c',~Iva ~j (. 0. G-E 9.
2. I~orV~ bear/t • C+~-Qu~r,~us~ulvs t ae 10.
3. rY1"i Cn35}Pc~ , v ~^ - EvlAl ~ a 30°lo c +
~
~ 11.
V;m-~.~ta
°
4. 12..
5. 13.
6. 14..
7. 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are A13L, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-)._~-"~s '~~~
Remarks: Wetland Vegetation Present Based Upon Greater than 50% of the Plant Species arelare not
Classified as FAC-OBL in the National List of Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands. Sample plot was taken....
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data {Descrit~e In Remarks); Wetland Hydrology Indicators
/ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
,~ Aerial Photographs Prima Indicators:
T Other ~ Inundated
Saturated in Upper 12"
Ho Recorded Data Available Water Marks
._-_y~ Drift Lines
FIeId Observations•
' /Sediment Deposits

~ _..y~ Drainage Patterns !n Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water:
(in.)
Secondary Indicators:

Depth to Free Water in PiE: ~ (in.) Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
_ Water~Sta(ned Leaves
_ Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: ~_(in.) _FAC-Neutral Test
t3ther(Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:

IVVI~.
sons
Map Unit Name
~
l
{Series and phase):
i ~
..vitbv oam Drainage Ctass:_ ~n1e,U ~;+n-c.c~
Cla~t kaolin ~'1"i e.r ers ,e ~ P,d Elr,~aiuc(v!'fS
Taxonom
(S
b
~
~
y
u
group):
r
-(nam ~i~ miYt~r~~ Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
v +~ ~. - ! i r --"
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors
nches Horizon 1Munsell Moist) Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(Mun
se
ll
Moist} AbundancelContrast Structure
ete.
~_ ~` ~ blac,lr. t
~
„
~y
10-~-~! - m Q ~'~,~ (,rung
,~ A
~ G'z..t
l Q ~ Q. ~'
I~ , w~ 1~ ~-td~-t~. iii-r•-
r
`~ ~ Q.. LI i ~J---~
Hydric Soil Indicators:
.~ Histosol. Concretions
Hlstlc Eplpedon
~Sulfidic Od ~Hlgh Organic Content In Surtace Layer in Sandy Solis
or
~ Organic Streaking In Sandy Soils
Aqulc Moisture Regime
Reducing Conditions Listed On Local Hydric Sotls Lfst
Listed on National Hydric Soils Llst
~Gteyed or Low-Chroma Colors .-Other (Explain In Remarks)
Remarks:
~.( „v r1w~ l,+ ~
G h e wG c.l cam..
S~ wl-L ~ ~,,,-L~ clti-~. ~l
vvn t t_HIVU Lt 1 rKMINA l I VN
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes / No is the Sampling Point
Wetland. Hydrology present? Yes ? No ~ Within a Wetland? Yes / No
.Hydric Soils Present? Yes / No .~ ~ `
Remarks: Location (describe) is/is not classified as a wetland based upon the criteria set forth in the 1987
Army 1y Corps of Engineers. Wetlands Delineation Manual
_.d'KC. .tee a-- /Lq~ VB,a.a h-e. ~Mu~~
~ .ii1~w G,..~~~-. a.~ n-~-~`: ~ ~ ,uw ~b2~G~z.!/~d.., ire- ~~.
L~xI.JV ~~~ ~L,w.-u {Ya r-~-c~ rrn ~ ~ L •.z- Sri. ,~.p ~-. „r. -ri_ , r_
v ~. 4 Y. .., - Q- -~-~,

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATEON
(1987 COE Weflands Determination ManuaE)
Project l Site: 3 Date: 12-Z4~ ' a ~
Applicant /Owner: w ~
Investigator: ~~- ~ ~ County:
State: (JL

Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes 'f No
Is the site significantly disturbed .(Atypical situation)? Yes Na / Community (D:
Transact !D:
is the area a potential problem area? Yes No / PIoE 1D:
(explain on reverse (f needed)
VEGETATION
Dominant Alant Species ratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. at. l '~ X IJ ~ t~_ _~ fl g L s.

3. t r ; fuG,, ~n~-f 19.
0
4.
12..
S. 13.
6. 14.
7. 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAt:-). lf~
Remarks: Wetland Vegetation Present Based Upan Greater than 50% of the Plant Speci ar are not
Classified as FAC-OBL in the National List of Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands. Samp plot was taken....
HYDROLOGY
/ Recor ed Data (Describe. In Remarks); Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
A Aeria! Photographs Primary Indicators:
/"
._
,
Other inundated
_
_ / Saturated in Upper 12"
No Recorded Data AvaHable ., water Marks
-` Drift Lines
Sediment Deposits
~
Field Observations: _
_/ Drainage Patterns In Wetlands
~
Depth of Surtace Water.
(ia~) Secondary Indicators:

Depth to Free Water in Pit: g fin.) 4Xidized Roots Channels 3n Upper 12"
Water-Stained Leaves

~ _ Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil:
(in.) ,_ FAC-Neutral Test
`Other (Explain in Remarksy
Remarks:

~c,'~
SOILS
Map Unit Name ~i' ¢ ~,~.sb~rr~ 5 tvu,.,,
c~~c Kaoi~nr~tc- 'Yhx/m~c fYp:v Nc~lvdalla
'
(Series and Phase):~sv~sc'-
lva.••7 rn; z~l ~E-I~erm:~ R~ph-c Drainage Class: ~~,1
11_ pid,;~
,
V 14-~ c Py 5'I-YvGG, rc,f-I'S
Taxonomy {Subgroup): Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Profile bescrlptfon:
Depth Matrix Colors
inches Ho
r
izon IMunsefl Moistl Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretlons,
{Mu
n
sei! Moist) Abundance/Con vast Structure
atc
(
~ ,
`
1
+~
~
g.. ~
-

~ -- ~ o z 1~
Hydrlc Soil Indicators:
Histosol
Hfstic Epipedon Concretlons
~Hlgh Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Suifidic Odar
~! Aquic Moisture Regime -Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
`..,Listed On Local Hydrlc Sali.s List
/ Reducing Cond[ttons ~Ltsted on National. Hydrlc Soils List
/ Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors -Other {Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:

cL.
.. ~ -^-~ ~ 6~- ~i- Gt~~- i
+-+~~L.r11~V VGIGR1YiI1VH1lV.1V
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ,~ No _,_._ is the Sampling Point
Wetland. Hydrolog}~ Present? Yes ~ No __._ Within a WeElandl Yes / No
Hydrlc Soils Present? Yes ~ No .__~_ ~` `^"
Remarks: Location (describe is not classifsed as a wetland based upon the criteria set forth in the 1487
Army Corps of Engineers. Wetlands elineativn Manual.
ve r- ~ i,Je,-~--1~-~.

Attachment 5
Acceptance Letter From the' Ecosystem Enhancement Program

`~,,,,
o~stem . .
PROGRAM
January 23, 2007
Kent Wiles
3018 Butler Glen Drive
Chapel Hill, NC 27516
Project: Damascus Church Road County: Orange
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the North Cazolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is willing to
accept payment for impacts associated with the above referenced project. Please note that this decision does not assure that
the payment wilt be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts. It is the responsibility of the
applicant to contact these agencies to determine if payment to the NCEEP will be approved.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter. I£we have not received a copy of the issued 404
Permit/401 CertiftcaHon/CAMA permit within this time frame, this acceptance will expire. It is the applicant's
responsibility to send copies of the permits to NCEEP. Once NCEEP receives a copy of the permit(s) an invoice will be
issued based on the required mitigation in that pernut and payment must be made prior to conducting the authorized work.
The amount of the In Lieu Fee to be paid to NCEEP by an applicant is calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and policies
listed at www.nceep.net.
Based on the information supplied by you the impacts that may require compensatory mitigation are summarized in the
following table,
Cape Fear
03030002 Stream (feet) Wetlands (acres) Buffer I
(Sq. Ft.) Buffer II
(Sq. Ft.)
Cold Cool Wazm Ri arian Non-Ri arian Coastal Marsh
Impacts 0 0 65 0.17 0 0 0 0
Credits 0 0 130 0.34 0 0 0 0
Upon receipt of payment, EEP will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. If the regulatory agencies
require mitigation credits greater than indicated above, and the applicant wants NCEEP to be responsible for the additional
mitigation, the applicant will need to submit a mitigation request to NCEEP for approval prior to permit issuance. The
mitigation will be performed in accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding between the N. C. Department of
Environment and Natural Resources and the U. S, Army Corps of Engineers dated November 4, 1998.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Kelly Williams at [phone].
Sincerely,
Wil ' D. Gilmore, PE
Director
ce: Cyndi Karoty, Wetlands/401 Unit
John Thomas, USAGE-Raleigh
Ian McMillan, DWQ-Raleigh
Julie Peele, agent (email}
File
R,P~SZ`DYl,Gl9... ~ti~?.G{,GI,I.GK~... PYDtt?G~l.K~ OGLY .f~~P~
A~,1~
~CDE~tR
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program, 1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1652 / 919-715-0476 ! www.nceep.net