20040026 Ver 2_More Info Received_20070219

KELLER ENVIRONMENTAL
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS
7921 Haymarket Lane, Raleigh, NC
[phone]
Fax [phone]
To: NC Division of Water Quality
401 Oversight and Express Permits Unit
Attn: Staff
2321 Crabtree Boulevard
Suite 250
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604-2260
Re: Cedar Ridge Subdivision PCN Re-Submittal
Wake County, North Carolina

January 31, 2007
On behalf of the applicant, Robert Polanco, please find attached a complete application and
supplemental information requesting written concurrence from the North Carolina Division of Water Quality
(DWQ) that the activities proposed below may proceed under the Neuse River Buffer Rules. We are requesting
to construct three Con-Span Bottomless Stream Culverts across 3 perennial streams for the purpose of building
Virginia Water and Irina Drives. After conversations with DWQ staff and other involved parties, our team
determined that utilizing bottomless stream culverts (as shown on the plans) will completely avoid impacts to
waters of the state. In addition to the attached site plan, we have also included 5 CD's (PDF files) detailing the
lots and stream areas. 117 homesites are also proposed for this subdivision.
PROJECT SUMMARY
Pro'ect Name CEDAR RIDGE
Pro'ect T e SUBDIVISION
Owner / A licant Robert Polanco
Count Wake
Nearest Town Rolesville
Waterbod Name Harris Creek
Basin /Sub-basin Neuse 03-04-02
Index Number 27-26
Class C; NSW
IMPACT Sl1MMARY
Stream Im act acres 0 acres
Neuse River Buffer Im acts acres 0.87 acres ermanent
Wetland Im acts acres 0
Total Im act to Waters of the State acres 0
Total Stream Im act linear feet 0
Please contact me at [phone] (office) or [phone] (cell) or iay a~kellerenvironmental.com if you have any
questions or require any additional information.
Sincerely,
KELLER ENVIRONMENTAL, LLC
~~~
Jay Keller
Principal
Attachments:
Revised Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Application Form
Cedar Ridge Subdivision Site Plan & accompanying CD
Site Plan Information
Signed & Sealed Subsurtace Geotechnical Report
January 19, 2007 Stream Determination Letter
December 22, 2006 Request For More Information Letter
~ LS~~~l~~I.~~
Vt1:TLANq,4 q,~ STOR~WRT~,I t3RA>tl(:ti

Office Use Only: Form Version March OS
USAGE Action ID No. DWQ No. V a o ~ - ~ o a: to
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
I. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
^ Section 404 Permit ® Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
^ Section 10 Permit ^ Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
^ 401 Water Quality Certification ^ Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested:
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here:
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ^
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ^
(~ (~ ~
II. Applicant Information D ~~ ~-`~ ~-"~~ ~~
1. Owner/Applicant Information FEB ~~ ~ `~~~
Name: Robert Polanco .__ ~~~,~~~~:,,,,.~~rr
Mailing Address: 8804 Albright Road; ~+a~-.~o~arrosl'C~Rt~IYt-p~RgR{WCh
Raleigh, NC 27612
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number:
E-mail Address:
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Jay Keller
Company Affiliation: Keller Environmental
Mailing Address: 7921 Haymarket Lane; Raleigh, NC 27615
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: jayCa~kellerenvironmental.com
Page 1 of 10

III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Cedar Ridge Subdivision Phase II
2. T.LP. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only):
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 1768-07-3234
4. Location
County: Wake Nearest Town: Rolesville
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Cedar Ridge
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): Site is located on
Rolesville Road approximately'/4 mile south of downtown Rolesville and US401.
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 35.5474 °N 78.2746 °W
6. Property size (acres):
70.07 Acres
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: Harris Creek
8. River Basin: Neuse
(Note -this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: Site is comprised of an existing subdivision (phase 1)
adjacent to Rolesville Road and a pond on the east side of Phase I. .Harris Creek
was determined to be a perennial stream below the pond on Phase I. No subject
streams were evident above the pond. Remaining Phase II is mostly wooded with
Page 2 of 10

one pond, Harris Creek, and its tributaries. Adjacent land uses include residential,
forested and agricultural areas.
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: Three
road crossings are proposed to access upland areas at the rear of the property and
provide connectivity to the northern parcel. The three crossings will utilize Con-
S~an Bridges. All lots to have county water and sewer. Equipment to be used
includes cranes, trackhoes, bulldozers, and other land grading equipment.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The proposed impacts to the stream buffer
area will be necessary to complete the subdivision, thus sustaining the development
of the proposed residential area. Extending Virginia Water Drive across Harris
Creek and its tributary will also provide connectivity to the adjacent parcels and
existina neiahborhoods.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules. December 6, 2006: Keller Environmental (KE), on behalf of Mr.
Robert Polanco, submitted a PCN application to the US Army Corps of Engineers and
NC Division of Water Quality.
January 16, 2007 Conducted an on-site stream determination with DWQ staff Lia Myott
and Dr. Cynthia Van Der Wiele.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
None.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Page 3 of 10

Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
I. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: No impacts to the streams are
proposed.
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
Wetland Impact Type of Wetland Located within Distance to Area of
Site Number Type of Impact (e.g., forested, marsh, 100-year Nearest Impact
(indicate on map) herbaceous, bog, etc.) Floodplain Stream (acres)
(yes/no) (linear feet)
None

Total Wetland Impact (acres) 0
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 2 Acres
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X width, then divide by 43,560.
Stream Impact
Number
(indicate on map)
Stream Name
Type of Impact Perennial or
Intermittent? Average
Stream Width
Before Impact Impact
Length
(linear feet) Area of
Impact
(acres)
None

Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 0 0
Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Open Water Impact
Name of Waterbody Type of Waterbody Area of
Site Number (if applicable) Type of Impact (lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay, Impact
(indicate on ma) ocean, etc.) (acres)

Total Open Water Impact (acres) 0
Page 4 of 10

6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project:
Stream Impact (acres): p
Wetland Impact (acres): 0
Open Water Impact (acres): 0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 0
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ^ Yes ®No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ^ uplands ^ stream ^ wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond:
Size of watershed draining to pond:
Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts. The proposed Virginia Water
Drive Extension crossings were strategically placed to connect with the subdivision to
the west and the large upland area between it and Phase I. The Irina Drive Extension
will provide access to the upland areas to the area north of Harris Creek. The crossings
were also placed perpendicular in fairly linear stream corridors and Con-Span
bottomless arched culverts (CSBAC) will be utilized to avoid stream impacts.
The Irina Drive CSBAC is 80 linear feet and the 12-foot span will clearly span the entire
4-feet wide stream bed and bank. Also, it was evident during our January 16 2006 site
visit that the crossing area appeared to be a historic stream crossing for agriculture and
silvaculture activities. Our perennial stream determination was conducted within and
immediately upstream of the proposed crossing area. Please refer to Sheet 6 on the
attached CD for details.
Page 5 of 10

The eastern Virginia Water Drive CSBAC is 120 linear feet and the 16-foot span will
clearly span the entire 5-feet wide stream bed and bank. The CSBAC will also include
one slight turn to avoid impacting any stream bank. During our perennial stream
determination, we entered the subject riparian corridor from the existing Virginia Water
Drive end of pavement and walked upstream via the existing sewer line on the west
side to the existing pond and sewer crossing area. It was evident during our analysis
that the stream in the proposed crossing area is slightly incised. Please refer to Sheet 7
on the attached CD for details.
The western Virginia Water Drive CSBAC is 150 linear feet and the 18-foot span will
clearly span the entire 6-feet wide stream bed and bank. The CSBAC will also include
one slight turn to avoid impacting any stream bank. This crossing area is also being
utilized for utilities (i.e. sewer, etc.) to avoid additional impacts. Similar to the
aforementioned CSBAC's and evident on the Overall Site Plan, this stream crossing is
being placed in a fairly linear stream section. It will provide connectivity to the existing
Virginia Water Drive and the Village of Rolesville (Phase II) Subdivision on the west
side. Please refer to Sheet 9 on the attached CD for details.
The wide spans will be placed by using a crane and bridge footings will be placed
outside of the stream banks. Since all of the proposed crossing areas have direct road
access, temporary impacts to the streams will also be avoided.
This proposed Phase (II) of Cedar Ridge will also use an existing sewer line that
parallels Harris Creek and the two ponds. During initial construction of Phase II a
sanitary sewer line will be installed near and parallel to the southern property line. As
mentioned in the previous paragraph, this new sewer line will utilize the Virginia Water
Drive CSBAC area to pain access to the existing sewer line on the west side of Harris
Creek.
Also evident on the Site Plan, there will be minimal grading conducted on the residential
lots throughout this phase. This should maximize nutrient removal through the rag ssed
and landscaped areas.
15.78 Acres will be permanently preserved along Harris Creek and its tributaries. This
includes the large pond at the rear of lots 72-88. Moreover, areas adjacent to the
stream crossings will be in the dedicated open space area. This will prevent homes
from encroaching into the riparian buffer areas. Examples include areas west of Lots
103 & 118.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
Page 6 of 10

USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o. enr.state.nc. us/ncwetl ands/strmgide.html.
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
The proposed project should not be reauired to provide mitigation for the proposed
impacts. This is due the efforts of the developer's team to avoid jurisdictional areas
to the maximum extent possible. As shown in the attached Engineering Plans, the
properties adjacent to the stream will not encroach into the vegetated buffers to
rop tect_open waters along Harris Creek and its tributaries. Moreover, areas adjacent
to the stream crossings will be in the dedicated open space area. This will prevent
homes from encroaching into the riparian buffer areas. Examples include areas
west of Lots 103 & 118. 15.78 Acres will be permanently preserved along Harris
Creek and its tributaries. This includes the large pond at the rear of lots 72-88.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): n/a
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): n/a
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): n/a
Page 7 of 10

Amount ofNon-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): n/a
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): n/a
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ^ No
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether aNEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ^ No ^
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ^ No ^
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ® No ^
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
* Impact Required
Zone ~~,,,,,,ro f o,~ Multiplier ,~,~,+;, ,,,,,,~
1 22,800 3 (2 for Catawba) 68,400
2 15,200 1.5 22,800
Total I 38,000 I 91,200
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration /Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260. Riparian buffer mitigation is not required.
Page 8 of 10

XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss stormwater
controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from the property. If
percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations demonstrating total proposed
impervious level.
Quantity Area Area Proposed
square feet (acres) Impervious

Roadways 230,622 5.29
Lots * 117 3,500 9.40
Sidewalk 39'995 0
92
(7,999 x 5) .
Total 117
680 15
61 22'23%
Im envious Area , . 15.61 / 70.07
Open Space 16.00
Total Tract Area 70.07
* Lot SF based on 2200 SF Footprint, 1300 SF in Deck, Drive, & Sidewalk
Please refer to "Site Plan Information" for details and the Table on Overall Site Gradin
and Drainage Plan. While under construction, temporary custom sedimentation basins
will be installed outside of the wetlands and streams to protect them against
sedimentation along with other appropriate sedimentation and erosion control measures
in compliance with the DWQ and Wake County Sedimentation and Erosion Control
requirements. Fourteen Level Spreaders will be utilized to provide diffuse flow. Utilizing
fourteen level spreaders that average 55-feet and are no longer than 95-feet will
maximize stormwater distribution. As seen on the Site Grading and Drainage Plan site
grading will be _minimal. This will maximize the penetration of surface water into the
rg ound.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
To City of Raleigh Walnut Creek Waste Water Treatment Plant.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ^ No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ^ No
Page 9 of 10

XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ^ No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description: Since
the proposed Cedar Ridge Subdivision~roposes using bottomless culverts to avoid
impacts to waters of the state, a 401 Water Quality Certification or an Isolated Wetland
Permit is not applicable. Therefore, a cumulative impact provisions are not necessar rL.
This is per the "DRAFT Internal Policy; Cumulative impacts and the 401 Water Quality
Certification and Isolated Wetland Programs; NC Division of Water Quality; October 3,
2002; Version 1.6" posted on the above website.
Furthermore, it is unlikely that the proposed project should result in cumulative stream
impacts and degrade downstream stream quality.
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
.~~-~
January 30, 2007
Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 10 of 10

0:\sdskdsgn\proj\CEDAR\2-construciton\CEDARBASE-construr.tion.dwg Thu Jan 25 11:37:57 2007
SITE PLAN INFORMATION
OWNER OF RECORD: CEDAR RIDGE LAND DEVELOPMENT LLC
ADDRESS: 8804 ALBRIGHT RO
RALEIGH, NC 27612-7445
DEVELOPER: CEDAR RIDGE LAND DEVELOPMENT LLC
8804 ALBRIGHT RD
RALEIGH, NC 27612-7445
WAKE COUNTY P.I.N.: 1768-07-3234
ZONING: _
CURRENT USE: VACANT
INSIDE CITY LIMITS? YES, ROLESVILLE
INSIDE FLOOD HAZARD AREA? NO
IN NEUSE RIVER BASIN? YES
TOTAL TRACT AREA: 70.07 AC
PROPOSED USE: SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
TOTAL TRACT AREA: 70.07 AC
NET TRACT AREA AFTER R/W DEDICATION = 61.20 AC
PROPOSED UNITS & DENSITY•
TOTAL TRACT AREA = 70.07 AC
MAXIMUM ALLOWED DENSITY: 1.45 DU /AC (CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT)
MAXIMUM ALLOWED LOTS: 1.45 X 70.07 AC= 101.6 LOTS
PROPOSED DWELLING UNITS: 117 LOTS
PROPOSED DENSITY = 117 DU/70.07 AC
= 1.67 DU/AC
MINIMUM LOT SIZE: 15,000 SF
AVERAGE LOT SIZE: 16,500f SF (0.38 AC)
IMPERVIOUS AREA:
PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS SURFACE
-ROADWAYS: 230,622 (5.29 AC)
-LOTS': 117 x 13500 SF/ LOT= 409,500 SF (9.40 AC)
-SIDEWALK: 7999 LF x 5 = 39,995 SF (0.92 AC)
TOTAL PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS SURFACE: 680,117 SF (15.61 AC)
PROPOSED ~ IMPERVIOUS: 15.69 AC / 70.07 AC= 22.23
' LOT SF BASED ON 2200 SF FOOTPRINT, 1300 SF IN DECK, DRIVE AND SIDEWALK.
OPEN SPACE REQUIRED•
PASSIVE OPEN SPACE PROVIDED: 16.00 AC
PERSON TO CONTACT REGARDING STAFF COMMENTS OR
QUESTIONS ABOUT THE PLANS: ---~
NAME(S): AIKEN & YELLE AS50CIATES ( HAROLD A. YELLE, II ) Dt
ADDRESS: 3755 BENSON DR., RALEIGH, NC, 27609
TELEPHONE: [phone] FAX: [phone]
E-MAIL ADDRESS: AYESC~BELLSOUTH.NET
V a. O~ - O~ a--~
r ~_
FEB l 9 2007
Uti=N{Y vYAT1:S~ G1UALiTY
~:`ETi.I~FdO:~ r'~!D ST4RPAWATFR BRA?J(:ii

FROM FAX N0. :9198779979 Feb. 19 2007 01:46PM P2
CTl Englneering, Inc.
4122 Bennetl Memorial Road, Suite 301, Durham, North Cerollna 27705
Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]A3
e•malt• ctlncd(~clleng.com AN EMPLOYEE OWNED COMPANY
Consulting Engineers ~ Testlnq • Inspection Services • Analytical Laboratories
!-'ebnr~rry 2, 2007
Ai.kcn & Yx.lle Assaciatl.irn, PA
:1755 Benson L)rive
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
Attention: Mr, Andrew Klinksiek
kefcrcncc: Ccilar Ridgt Phase 2
Ktilcxville, NC-Wake Cizuuty
CTL Project. No: U7US0003T)UK
Dear Mr. Klinksick:
Establt6h¢d 1827
C'I'L ~,ugineeriug, Inc has completed the Geot.eehttieal investigation at the above ref~`rL`raeed site. As
rcqucstcd, C"C1..Enginccrins drilled four (4) borings to determine bedrock depth. Lnclnsed is a copy of the
rrrim.
Thank you for the upporl.unity to he of service to you on this projc:c;t, tf yuu have; arty question pl.ea.~c
contact our office.
fl\CS i~ictfully suhta~t*t.~,Cl=,~.n•n^•~i'r. ~•'"^. ,~, .
cz'r rNCrNFr~v.'~Nt~ : ~,~
G. ~~ `~,~
~" ~^, ~~~
C.K. Satyapriya, 1?r ~,.~°-~~;,,,, .,- ^''- ~ ~.
Project Engineer ,~d`, ~ " , G ~;r~'.
Air;rlll,4~~'~'
~~~
Officos: Ohio, Indiana, Norlh Carolina. West Virginia

FROM FAX N0. :9198779979 Feb. 19 2007 01:46PM P3
CTL Englneering, Inc.
4122 Bennett Memorial Road, Sulte 3Ut, Durham, North Carolina 27705
Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
e-mail: otlncd(~cfleng.eom dN EMPLOYEE OWNED COMPANY
r nnculfinn Fnolneers • Tesflnn • Inspection Services • Analytlcel Laboratories
1'R.UJ1rCT i.OCATION A.Nll llCSCR1PTION
c~
Esfab//sAed 1927
'the pt~jua site is located south of Rolesvillc Road and rasl of South Mail Street in Rolesville, North
C'amlina., 'the project involves th.e construction of single fanuly llomts. Current condition of the site is
hilly, with creeks and visible bedrock at the Sw~face. Accurding to the plan providc;d to us, it is assutttt~l
that the proposed buildings will have o-te or two stories and will be constnlcted as slab on grade
structures. Also there will be a new ruad connecting Virginia Water Drive.
As per your verbal recortunc-ndaticln, you welted this report to only address the depth to rock in the
burings luca.led by you. No other rccunvnendations ur analysis was authorized or required.
SUiiSURI'ACF INVESTiGA1'lON
Four (4) soil test borings were dri ll.c;c1 to augor refusal. All hclrings were r~ffset up to I S feet away from the
creek to accommodate drilling. Boring A-2 was drilled on either sictc of the stream for clarification since
bedn~ck was encounlt7ed at shallow depth. The table below Shows boring location and the depth to which
bedrock was erleount.ered.
Boring Location Depth to Bodrock Offset Depth from Boring Surface
B-1 12 Feet North of the creek 14.5 Feet 5.5 Feet above center line of the creek
B-2 10 Feet East of the creek 3.5 Feet 1.5 Feet above center line of the creek
B-2b 10 Feet West of the creek 3.5 Feet_ 2.5 Feet above center Ilne of the creek
g3 15 Feet west of the creek 7 Feet 8.0 Feet above center line of the creek
CLOSURE
C'T'L Engineering, Inc has prepared this report according to your specific requests.
'1.'h.is report dues not address soil testing or Geot~chnical recommendations.
Respectfully Sublllittecl
'
r
Harry atuu, T~.I
Slaff )/I1gInCCr ~•,,

,
~ .. n .,

n
f..1 ~ ~ r ,
`
~
V
~ , r
a~
~•
.,
~;y.
P
~
P /' her
i
~'
C.K. Sa.tyapriya, . ~, ~ ?,~ai
,
. ~r,,l
~
~ '
:
'
'
'
:
Project F,ngineer ~+} ,
~•!
~" `
~ -
~
~ :
;, •r _

r'~,
., ~< ..
~ ~ .:
;
;
,.
.
~~ ~
n .
n1
~ nn ;p1~ .
Offices: Ohio, Indiana, Norlh Caroline, West Virginia

FRO"1 : FAX N0. :9198779979 Feb. 05 2007 04:48PM P5
02/05/2007 SON 15;15 FAX CTL ENGINERRING X004/008
TEST BORING RECORa
CLIENT AACen B Ydls Aseocioteo PA BORIN©NO,; B-1
PROJECT CAdar Rldgp Phase 2 SFdEET 1 OF 1
LOCATION ; 3yksvlAs, NC DATE STARTED o1-a0.07
PROJECT NO.: 4r0600000Ute DATE COMPLETED ; 01-30•U7
9oRIN0 ELEVATION : BORING METHOD ; H9A hIAMMER
9TATIpN RIO TYPE DRILLER :William _
OFF»Et ; 12' N. or S'Iream CA91NQ DIA. 5.26" TEMPERATURE ;
DEPTH 14,5 Feel CORE 817.E WEATHER (ilaaf
t3ROUNDWAT6R: Y Enocunbared eK ,g,~ ~ At complotlen ~ Q Delayed ReadlnD ~ $ Cuvod fn et 6_ti
d ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ AT1'~M B6RG
~ ~ p
W~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~++ SOIUMATERIAL DESCRIPTION 25 v~ z ~ o m ~ ~ ~ ~ F ~ ~ c~ lL PL PI
TQPSOIL
1.0
~ ~ 1
`
~
~ as-, ~ z 100
oar t3a_TY tu-r MAG1 Fine sand ~ 1

~ 3.5
.~ ~' 2
~• . ~ . ss-x 1 z 100
5 ©r~y Fin®SIl1Y sANQ ~ ~ 1
.
.
'
.- ~
~~' O.D
~. `~~ 1
• ~~ . 883 1 a 100
OIHy and While Fina (;ANDY 61LT `
~ p
\\
'
~
. ~
'~` 89
•~
:::
ss-a 1
a
5
~ o0
10 „~ 3
~~~
Tan end Whito SILT wnh Flns Send ~~~
~~~
~\~
~~~
~~
~~~ 13b
~Y entl White, Pa~u„ny WEwT»ER~D SSA yea-4'~ ?2
Rt)CI((TiilA66iC) ~ 1.5
~ 16 d~~FUSAL

G
i I30TTOM OF BORW6
i

i
~0
2860 Fl~hbr Road I~awt~c rNET~ 1ou sAMpuNG MET>•tOD aeeREVtAnoNa
(:olumbus~ OhlO 43204 MeA • hlollnw am ar S - , p111 8paon 6ample -Hand Penetrometer
SFA - 8olld FIIgMt AUp9r 87 -Shelby Tuba tlsmple LL - Llquln Limit
Telephone: (G14) 278-8123 RC - Rorx CaAwg CR -Rode Core t9omplo PL • Plaetle LfmA
~~ Fax: [phone] Ml) -Mud Odlnng B9 - 4ap Sample PI - Plasticity Index
WD -Wash Drllnnp ePT • Standard
1
_ Email: ctl~tatten .com HA -Nand II, ar Penetration Ten

'FROP1 FAX N0. :9198779979 Feb. 05 2007 04:48PM P6
02/05/2009 NON 15;15 FAg CTL ENGINEERING f~005/008
TEST BO(tING RECORD
GHENT Alkran 8 Yello Associata4, PA ®OR1N4 NO.' B-2
PROJECT Cedar Ridoa Phase 2 SHEET 1 OF 1
LOCATIGN RobevNla, NC PATE STARTED 01-30-07
PROJECT Np, ; 07060003DUR DATE COMPLETED ; 01-0D-07
BORING ELEVATION ~ ,~ 9CRIN0 METHOD : HBA HAMMER __ _
STATION Rfp TYPE DRILLER : Wllllam
OFFSET 10' E, of Stream CASING DIA. :3.25' TEMPERATURE : _
DEPTH 3.5 Feet CORE SIZE WEATHER Clear
GROUNDWATER: Encountered at ~ At completbn Qyr $~ Delayed Reading ~ ~ Cevatl in et?„Q'
z4

~

~

~
~

~

~
AT'TERBERG
F a~
~ ~ am Ntr
~ ~ j
~`~`~`z''' F. i LIMITS
g ~
° ~ ~ ~ R ~ ~ ~ ~
~
SOIUMATERIAL D6BCRIPTION
~ z
v, a
m 4 ~
.
~ v
LL
PL
PI
rOPSdL
1.0
" "'" 98"1 100.2 10D
. ~.

Clary Fina tv Coarse SILTY>lANO ~.~.
'~ ~
~' .
..~
~~'. 3.5
®R
617TTpM or aoRlN~
s
to
s
a~
3
1S

U

s
0
2880 Fisher Road @ OAINA MET?40D 6AMPWNA2 METHOD ABBREYIAT10N3
~
r cnlumbuC
ohlo a32oa IiSA - HoAow Stem Auger 38 - 3pAt Spoon Semple - Fiend Penetromela
,
s SFA • 6oG0 FBgM Auger 5T .Shelby Tube Sample LL - Liquid Llmlt
~ Telephone: [phone]
~ RC - Rtx~t coring CR • Rodt core semWe PL -Plastic Limit
~= Fax: (®14) 278377 MD -Mud DrfAing B8 -Beg Sample PI - Plaetldry Indax
WD - Wesh DAlling &PT - Slondord
Email: ctl ctleng.com H .rlane er ~„-,-,,,,_„_,-~ _,~?enetrauonTost

'FRAM ~ FAX N0. :9198779979 Feb. 05 2007 04:49PM P7
02/05/2001 SON 15;15 FAX CTL ENGINEERING X006/008
TEST BORING RECORD
CLIENT Alkc„ & Yelle AssooirAte6, PA BORING P-O.: H~~
PRQJECT : Cedar Ridgy Phar-o Z 3H6ET 1 Of: 1
LOCATION Rolesville, NC l7ATt; BTARTEC- : pt-30-Oi
PRQJECT N0. ' Oi030003DUR DATE COMPLETED : 01-80.07
BORING ELEVATION ~ BORING METHOD : HAA
~ HAMMER
BTATIC+N RIO TYPE t]RIILER William
OFFSET t0' W, of Stream CA91Nt3 DIA. : x_25' TEMPERATURE ;
DEPTH : .6 F t CORE SIZE WEATHER : Cloar
GROUNDWATER: 6noountored st D~(r , At oompledan ~ ~ Daloyid Rarading 1`5' ~. Caved 1n at 2~0'
y f-
Z a ATTERBERG
~ ~ 7C Je UMITe~
~
J
j
~
W N
~d
~=
u.~ ~ o.m ~ a}r. y
~~ Q~
~
Z
DO p }~jj
~~ No r~w ~~ a ` ~
SOILJAAAT>rRIAL DESCRIPTION v, o a, z h ~ m ~, i'e ~ U -- ~ ~ ~ LL PL PI
TOPSOIL
1.0
~ ~ 3
~
~ S$-1 4 10
Gray end Brown, Sandy 3tlTY CLAY ~ 6

~ 3.6
tT(1'fTOM OF BORING
5
10
~
15
0
ro
J

x
3
K
ZO
D _ _ _
2890 Fltih~r RpBd... _. - E
ORIN
G MET
HOD
B
AMPIJ
NQ, MI
E7IIW
A$d
kt':VIA
l'I[>N
S
m
Hdlow Sc
HSA Au
r SS li
S t S
oon le - an enetrOntAter
~`.OIUmbUS, OI110 4~~ ri
•
8~A • 8o1{tl PIIgl11 ge
Auger t3T p
-
- she p
iby Tul» SA p
rriple I.t. - Llqultl Umlt
Telephone: (614) 27t~8123 RC -Rods Cering CR - Roo -c Garo t3~m pl~ F~L - Plsdle Umlt
~A~,aN~x Fax: [phone] MD -Mud Drpllnp 88 - ®09 Sempta PI • PINIIdQr Indsx
WD • W4rih Drlllln q 8f'T • $londtard
Email: ctl®dleng.com HA - Hand Au ar Panstrrtlan Test

FROP'1 FAX N0. :9198779979
02/05/2007 SON 15;16 FAQ CTL ENGINEERING
Feb. 05 2007 04:49PM P6
~j00~/008
TEST BORING RECORD
IXJENT alk0d & Yelle Assodatea, PA BORING NO.: ~-$
PROJECT C®darRldprr Plfa6a 2 SHEET 1 _ OF 1
LOCATION : ROIOiy1Be, NC _ _ D11TE STARTED 01-30.87
PROJECT NO.: 07050003DUR DATE COMPLETEp ; 01.90.07
90RIN0 ELEVATION 60RING METHOD : WSA FtNMMER -
STATION RIG TYPE DRILLER ;William
OFFSET 15 W. oP Qfroem CASING DUl :3,26' TEMPERATURE
DEPTH : 7.0 Feet CORE 511E WEATHER : Glear

GROUNDWATER: F1,oountered at ply At urrnplelion ~ Dolayod Randing O~ ~ Caged In of ~¢:
~ w ~ ~ ATTERBERG
r4
~ ~_ ~ w
~ rnZ >
8 ~~
Z
~~ ~ LIMITS
j
r/+ w ~~ SOILIPAATERIAL DESCRIPTION ~ ~ r°n °a
~ m n
~ ` ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 3
LL
PL
PI
TOPSOIL
~.o

\ z
~~ 99-1 3 7 B7
t3rown BANpY giLT ~
~ 4
\~
~.~
'~~' 3.9
30
SS-2 40 43 44
tS Tan and (~nywn ParifeNyr tNEATHlAlLrD RDCK 3
(TtiIASSIC)
SS-3 50-0'
7.0
BO
auc~R r>:~wu~u.
to
~ 15
i
J
~y
9
a
Z~
~ _....
28x0 Fltaher Road BORING METI~IOD enMl~l.IN~ MErFaD ABtaREVwnais
~ Columbus, Ohlo 43204 HsA - HoAow Stcm agar SS - Sprit Spoon Sample -Hand Peltetrdnet0l
5FA • SofM Flight ALgar ST -Shelby Tvbe Semple 1.1 - Ligvid Limit
T®lephone: {914) 279.123 RC • Rock Corlnp CR - kodc Core Sampl® PL - Pladic Llmlt
~~ Fex: [phone] MD .Mud Dru11nA 88 -Bag 3wRtµle PI . Ple®Octry Indaz
WD • Wash Oripinq SPT -Standard
~ Etltail; cU~ctlang.com HA - Held Au er Penetr.~tiCn Tost

FROM : FAX N0. :9198779979 Feb. 05 2007 04:49PM P9
02/05/Z00~ SON 15:16 F~( CTL ENGINEERING 008/008
• ..
`,~,~~ ,,, y q,.t.a, ,~
~ ., ~ 11 - -
~.
'~ `' l r `'
s r _ ~ ;•
1r' y
s '
1 d.' ~I ~' ' C ~ r
'Y \ ~. ~ /
;. j , •,, ~ O ~,
~~
~ t...
~~.

Jay Keller
From: Ian McMillan [[e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2007 2:55 PM
To: [e-mail]
Subject: Bottomless Culvert
Page 1 of 1
Requesting submittal of a signed and sealed (by a Professional Engineer) geotechnical investigation of subsurface soils
is authorized per the DIVISION OFHIGHWAYS -GUIDELINES FOR DRAINAGE STUDIESAND HYDRAULIC
DESIGN, PREPARED BYA. L. HANKINS, JR., P.E.
STATE HYDRAULICS ENGINEER -1999, which states, "When a shallow (3-5 foot max. depth) non-erosive rock
foundation is found throughout the proposed site, the structure can be built on footings without a bottom allowing
retention of the natural channel bed. The Geotechnical Unit must confirm the foundation acceptability prior to final
selection of the "bottomless" culvert."
2/19/2007

~~F WAT F90
~0 ~
~ r_
~_ y
O 'C
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Cazolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
January 19, 2007
Mr. Harold Yelle
3755 Benson Drive
Raleigh, NC 27609
Subject Property:
Cedar Ridge Site
Alan W, Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
DWQ EXP# 07-0081
Wake County
On-Site Determination for Applicability to the Neuse Riparian Area Protection Rules (15A NCAC 2B
.0233)-EXPRESS REVIEW PROGRAM
On January 16, 2007, at the request of Mr. Jay Keller, an on-site determination was conducted to review two
stream features located on the subject property for applicability to the Neuse Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0233).
The features are labeled as "1" and " 2" on the attached map, initialed by Lia Myott and Cynthia Van Der Wiele
on January 1.9, 2007. The Division of Water Quality (DWQ) has determined that the following:
• Feature "1" is subject to the Neuse Buffer Rule at the pond outlet (Pond 1), but is not subject upstream of
the pond. Stream 1 is a perennial stream and rated a score of 36 on the DWQ Stream Identification Form.
Pond 1 is also subject to the Neuse Buffer Rule.
• Feature " 2" is subject to the Neuse Buffer Rule on• the property and rated a score of 35.75 on the DWQ
Stream Identification Form.
This on-site determination shall expire five (5) years from the date of this letter.
Landowners or affected parties that dispute a determination made by the DWQ that a surface water exists and that
it is subject to the buffer rule may request a determination by the Director. A request for a determination by the
Director shall be referred to the Director in writing c/o Cyndi Karoly, DWQ 401 OversightlExpress Review
Permitting Unit, 2321 Crabtree Blud., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260. You must act within 60 days of the date that you
receive this letter. Applicants are hereby notified that the 60-day statutory appeal time does not start until the
affected party (including downstream and adjacent landowners) is notified of this decision. This determination is
final and binding unless you ask for a hearing within 60 days.
This letter only addresses the applicability to the buffer rules of the stream features listed above and does not
approve any activity within the buffers or address features that were not observed during the site visit. Nor does
this letter approve any activity within Waters of the United States or Waters of the State. If you have any
questions, please contact Lia Myott at 919.733.9502.
Sincerely,
J~Alan W. K imek, P.E.
AWK/cbk/lem UJ
Attachments: NRCS Soil Survey Map, USGS Topo Quad Map
cc: Jay Keller, 7921 Haymarket Lane, Raleigh, NC 27615
File Copy
Central Files
401 Oversight /Express Review Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] /FAX [phone] / Internet: httn://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands
Nom` Carolina
~tura!!y
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer- 50%Recycled/10%Post Consumer Paper

~_

' /

~ i
Y N
~
_ ~_ }P __ l t ~N
nl ~:r Jk mac, ~
.
V < ~
~ ~ i ~1 ~
A _/(/j'
~.~~ / ~ ~~ •
~
` l r (~
~
~ ~ 1
~y ~.
. / rr
vl
_ p
k~ l
- ,-~ ?~;•t ~ it r < r
A \ ~-\•'
•, ~` I f n r '~ s - ~ f I l
'~'~~ '
` ,, ~•.~ .~. - ..
; ;,;'ice---' - ._ ~,
ff ~~ v- rte. ~ ~ ~ ~
~ -- 6 ~ ~
p a n ,'R' - ~ ~
a~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ -
/ .__
~
` ' ~

_ d

~ ~

~ ~
!
t
+~r ~~~.,~~~`vr~~--~`
t ~ ;awes 4~~~~
ffi
~ /9
~ , i ~u ~` / e/
'
~\,• J1

~_
~. _\l. tl I
%P~if{e t -
.R 1 ~
4?2 \
11
~~ ~ .. N
i
> ay ~ p . t ., ._--_---`~ "~-'a rl' 1 ~ ~ j` .. ~ i O ..~ / a o~ J V 1~3 J°', \
~ ~ : •
Iii ~ ~''•~ / . M~,~ ;` il.} 1 /f fi 1 1 ~- a 3 4~ a ~}'~ ~ b ~." ~. 1 ~ x'~~'~
.
~
~ JJ
~ f /
• ~1~
~
-~\~--~
~ J ~ ~ ~
v, 1 ~.
•'
a a
`
~
~- it `
\
.~'
:~^'
.
try- -Uf ~
1~ ~
.,
"' ~
r ~
~
!/
1 ! /~ ~ ,
f
. ~ I S
~
S a /
/,:1
~ gyl -\• NI r
In`,._~JBlN,
/
N ""i°

n
;~~ ~ ;._.~-~) .
.
bp`v /""~ /.'~' \ ~ r{ r YV>(tB(!Tifl'1 _a ~ t ii',~ /~ -..~.~ , ~~._\ _^ ~HN. i l ~,.

. _.

N

a

•. 0~ ~
'~
-v.'
t -
In

18M.1d2 ~

r :'
.

' , ,~
~

1' ~
_

`

A
`~~~' r / ;\~~
~~ ~-~~elt{r Tk`/`h4 ~x_
~
\
'
~~ ~_ ~T;e - ; /
`
l,.
.
{ y~o..
__'
'7 ~•{- _7 ~
J _{~ 1/~ r~.~_~~
/ /y//'~~~~ } 1
1'
~ I -- ~\ ~`1~~~j
1 )
~~~
./ . /
\~
-
`
•~ `
d
~
4 «t
~
f
~~
,` .
TL
`

\ 1 i /
rC

~_
1
T
f p i ~t !'
l ~r,~

j
\ J r)\I

\

!

`
_
u r
~ ~
~ ,r^ ! ,Gates ~, -
°
~ ~ 4/
~

.._ >~ '-
/
~
-
~ ! 4
~~ ~
J
S~_ as r
/~,J( ~
:(~l
l ~ ~!' } 9f.~1, r ~
~
~ ~~
1} ~./p 1.:;~1
f
~~ ,-
e t l' b
`a
~t.._._~
' ~~ z
•
_ ~
o ~ ..

`
W ills aad.
R
- ' rt/', , ~; 306 ~~

i' i n
~ ~
~ r ` i !il ~
I
, ~'

~ ~~ i
`!
j
~
~ ;_
, ~/
U,
).~1 !' ~1ri ~
^~
~ 11 `
.. ,
f
~\, `f: r ~ Gem R ,`
r
id .~\~ ~ i
~
y -
.~ _--\~ ` 1 '
~ ~ ~ no'` l:{ ~ry

' '
,
8`_"{a ...
J• l~ J\``~~l'y~ ./
~f 0 C 1.=/ " ~//~~ `~ i ,~ ~ x~~ ~~T~ ~i , ''~t \.,.~ ~ ;: '~l
~` ("~t.GC~Ci
1
f f ._ ~~i
' i, 1 1 f }~'.r~ (~ c ~ (n ~~
f
~`
4 li i t a i' >-~'.r`~' r
9
1
~ ~ 4
`` '
~c.ul..r I.
f r' `~ `_C~ t
`\`~~~'
~ (~~ ;t\~~--,~
~
'
~ r
~1
t
, ( ~
C' i yf a tMi 4tt<' `'' '
'~x"~1,~,~i' ~' ~ ~,J' i,
~` 1 /~ ~ , ~ ~
~~ ' l' ~` .cam ~
~ ~
~ ,
` ' ` `
j
~
~
J ~
~ ~Si1 ~-
y`" ~ ¢~,
= 1~
, ~<.
\~_ tf
~' r(~ ~~,
~4 _
w) "'
)(
.v ~_ .f. i ~ iii l )t ~~ ' ~
f~;! ~ /
_ ~ ~/
~ ! ~
s ~ 7 ~s~
4~
r~ t, _-'' ~ ;S
~ li
-„
-
'

~

~

_

~,'
~-
,l' '~ ~•~ ;artt, ~~
ri ~Z ~ 1~, ~. /
L .
__ -
~
' / ~
'
•( ~/` i
°~ ~\ C~/
~ ~~ ~ .~j~l :'~i r ~a~` ~\.
(((( i~~//((// ~ ,,,
17~1~~~. ~~~~ '~\~~~
r
'''. ~~rf'1 lam. ~ , \.~
r°!, ~~ ~f~ ~~ ~ _
t~f ~ ~(! Irt~ .,
,
`
1
• ~ ~ ~~~~
~~'?
~ (- ~' ~~~•.3
l ~ ~( ~
~
- f
*
7 / \
Cry i~ U s ~
-\~~3 3~ ~n
~'
-
~ ~
~
.~ 1
M1r~•~,,
I
~
~`_' 1/ _~~
41
~~
a..J'/'!

~Z r ~ !
t~ `
f( r
1//
^
i '~~~ ~ ~ . .~ ~~ ~~ !
L}~ .:
;
)I
; i t ~
I~
1, t ~`.i/ J~1 ~ '.'mot
~

f~/ < < ~ < <I c/ ~ j J
1
~
'til-~ ~ ~ ~/
•
<Z. -
• ~-
t ~v 23aa . p
~/

~~

I ~ .~ ii r ~ _ f
-
~_~
,
~ ,
_
3D TopoQuads Capyrlght 01999 DeLorme Ysimouth, ME 04096 SwrFe D¢ta BLS ",,}---~-~-~Q R Scale: l :24,000 Ddail:13-1 Dates: WGS84
~::> e

~,; 11 .
.. u:;ll
~>~~?r=~ ~ ~~ ~y~~~~er ~.~ W iaie

~.--
_, - . ~ m
s ~ ~~ _
,
~
~ ~
~
~ ~ ~ ~Y :'y s',
' 3 f~_ r

r
ti
'~'~pti .S ..- .~;
'S
_ ~ '
is $ ~ {;,M,
~ .,
~ y ~ r
4IV
~„ ~ t, 'f
~
~
'1 .~
.~ ,t~ r ~ c ~
' o

~1
a' y N ~~
f<: ~ { ':
% i 4 ~i.

. 1~
({
~~~ 4 .,
Y ~~'~
r
~.
.
i s

~ ~ d
'^v F}~ 4-
mo
f
~
~ y
-
~
w. ~. } .
,m~
~
_ Y ~ ~

-'~'~' .
6~, ~

~
~G
`~ ~ ~
. ,. f~
_
.

.rah... ...

~,
~ ~M xy4 t,.. .._ i

~+ ~ ~ ~ !~ l [
r
°
~
~'f~i
i i~~ h ~ ;

~.
.
~ }i y i
i. z
a,~ ~ a
y
• ~ .
,.+~ . _

F ,h~1p^+ 4,3~ roc ~.~'=s+l F, ° a~,~

.,
North Carolina Division of Water Quality -Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1
Date: ~ ~ Project: C ~ Latitude:
Evaluator: ~ Cv~ Site: Longitude:
Total Points: ~~ Other
Stream is at least intermittent County: e.g. Quad Name
if Z 19 or erennial if z 30
A'. Geomo bolo Subtotal = ~ '~~ fi+lleal~ ~ tstiai<'~
1a. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2
2. Sinuosity 0 1 2
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 0 1 2 3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 0 1 3
5. Active/relic floodplain 0 1
6. Depositional bars or benches. 0 1 2 3
7. Braided channel : 0 1 2 3
8. Recent alluvial deposits 1 3
9a Natural levees 1 2 3
10. Readouts 1 2 3
11. Grade controls 0 0.5 1 1.5
12. Natural valley or tirainageway 0 0.5 1 1.5
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence.
No ~
Yes = 3
Man-made ditches are not rated; seeQdiscussions in manual
R Nvrlrnlnnv lSuhtntal = 1 1
14. Groundwater flow/discharge 0 1 3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or
Water in channel -- d or rowin season 0 1 2
16. Leaflitter 1.5 1 ~ 0.5 0
17. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5
18.Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) 0 0.5 1 1.5
19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present? No = 0 Yes 1.5
C_ 6ioloav (Subtotal = ~ l
20 . Fibrous roots in channel 3 1 0
21 . Rooted plants in channel 2 1 0
22. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5
23. Bivalves 1 2 3
24. Fish 0.5 1 1.5
25. Amphibians 0.5 1 1.5
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0.5 1 1.5
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 0 1 3
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus. 0 0.5 1.5
29 . Wetland plants in streambed FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other = 0
"Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, Item 28 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wenana pianos.
Sketch:
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.)

,.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality -Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1
Date: p-~ Project: ~~ Latitude:
Evaluator: ~ ~,~,e,J Site: Longitude:
Total Points: ~ / Other
Stream is at least intermittent ~ County: ~a r, „ e.g. Quad Name:
if t 19 or er:nnial if Z 30 v` KJ~

A". Geomor holo (Subtotal = ` 1.5) Absent Weak 'Moderate Str.~ftg
1a. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2
2. Sinuosity 0 1 3
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 0 1
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 0 1 2 3
5. Active/relic floodplain 0 1 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
7. Braided channel 0 2 3
8. Recent alluvial deposits 0 2 3
9 a Naturai levees 2 3
10. Headcuts 0 2 3
11. Grade controls 0 0.5 1 1.5
12. Natural valley or drainageway 0 0.5 1 1.5
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence.
No~
Yes = 3 _
° Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal = ~. ~) ~
14. Groundwater flow/discharge 0 1 2
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or
Water in channel -- d or rowin season 0 1 2
16. Leaflitter: 1.5 1 0.5 0
17. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1.5
18.Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) 0 0.5 1.5
19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present? No = 0 Yes 1.5
C. Biology (Subtotal = (• 6 / ) `I
20 . Fibrous roots in channel 3 2 1 0
21 . Rooted plants in channel 3 1 0
22 Crayfish 0 0. 1 1.5
23. Bivalves 1 2 3
24. Fish 0.5 1 1.5
25. Amphibians 0 1 1.5
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 1 1.5
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 0 1 3
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus. 0 .5
29 . Wetland plants in streambed FAC = 0.5; FACW 0.75, BL = 1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other = 0
"Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the pre3~ce of aquatic or wetland plants.
Sketch:
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.)
~.~ d. ~ 2
q N~~

Q~ W ~ T~'~ Michael F. Easley, Ciuvernor
~()~ ~G William Ci, Rnss 1r., Secretmry
f/j ~ North Carolina 17epartment of Environment And Na[ural fiesnurces
~ ,~ Alan W. Ktitnck, .P.F:. Director
~ivisian of Wa[es Qualiry
DeCentbet' 22, 2006
l?WQ Project ~ 04-0026, Ver. ~
.'Wake Cauraty
CERTI1~IElD MAIIf: RETURN >Ei.EGEIPT REQU:ESTEI)
Mr, Robert Polanco
8804 Albright Raad
Raleigh, NC 2761.2
Subject Property; Cedar ~.idge Subdivision
Harris Creek {030402, 27-26, Ct, NSW]
REQUEST FOR MORE ;kNFORMATiON
Dear Mr. Polanco:
Q7tt November Deceznber'7, 2006, th.e Division cif Water Quality (~7WQ) received your application dated .
December 6, 2006 to impact 90 linear feet of ptrrennial stream., and 5,044 square feet of 7.one l pratected
Meuse River basin riparian-buffers, and 2,`708 square feet of7one '2 pratected Meuse River basin riparian
buffers to construct the prap~sed residential 'subdivi.sian. On December 14, 2006, the DWQ received
additional infcrtnation from yi~ia, however, the DWC} has determined that your application remains
incomplete and/cir provided inaccurate information as discussed below. The DWQ will require additiona!
information in order to process your application to impact protected wetlands andlor streams an the
subject property. Therefore, unkess we receive the additional information requested below, we wilt have
to move. toward denial of your: application as rege~ireri by l SA NCA.C 2I-I.0506 and will place this. project
on hold as incomplete until we receive this additional infcirtn.ation. Please provide the following
~.. information so that we may corlfinuo to review your project.
Additional Information Requested: "
] . Please contact the DWQ to schedule intermittent perennial stream determinations at the site.
2.. Please cotitplete SGCttan XIV - Csenxealative Impacts (ra:clu.i>e~*cl iay .D'VVQ~ ref yc~lar Pre-Con,structian
Natiftcatian {PCN7 application.
3. Please clearly intiioate Lane l anal Zane 2 buffer. impacts nn the site plan with shading or
hatching,
4. Please pro~!ide a signed and soaked subsurface geotechniaal report for your proposed. bottomless
culvert.
5. Please provide Dross section details showing the provisions far aquatic life passage.
6. .Please locate and clearly label any planned sewer lines all t:he situ plan.
401 OeersighUl~xpress Review I'em~itting unit
160 Nail Service C:cnter, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suiie 250, Raleigh, North Carolina ?760A
Phnnc: 914-733-178b (i•AX 919.733.6893 !Internet: kitty:/~%b~~:t;nr~~tate,,,,~,nc~ucj~ u~c I n"
NU°` hC:aroLina
An Eyitat t7pportunity/Aft"smtative Action Entplnyer - 50% Recycled/1.0% Post Consumer Paper

Mr. Rot~ert Pol.anco
Page 2 oft
December 22, 2t~06
7. Please provide an inventory of all itnperviou.s su.rfa.ces (building tioat~arints, roads, drivewAys,
decks, stivimming pools, sidewalks, gravel-covered areas, etc..
S. Please provide building envelopes on the plan sheet.
9. Please submit CAS files showing streairt le~agth impacts and culverts at all stream crossings.
The stream length appears to be longer than the culvert on the site plan.
10. Tl}e 160 linear feet of pereruaial stream itxtpacts axe nat temporary. Cornpensatary tnitigatlan
will be required for the ] 60 feet ofperennial stream itnpa.ct and far the 1401inear feet of
perennial stream impact. '1'herefare, 264 linear feet of stream. mitigation will. be required far tk~is
project. Please submit a canipensatory mitigation plan. The plan must confartn fa the
regttiretn.ents in 1 S !~ NCAC 211.540 and trust be appropriate to the type of impacts prapased.
Please contact the I~W~ witl-in three weeks afthe date of this [eater to verify that you have received-this
letter and that y~au remain interested in continuing to purst:e permitting of your project. and will be
providing the DW4 the requested infortnatian at a later date. Please canta.rt the in writing and iviike
Moran of the D'WQ Raleigh Regional Office. If we do not hear franc you within three weeks, we will
assume that you tea longer want to pursue this project and. we will consider the project as witlxdrawn.
This .lett:er only addresses the application. review and. does not au.tl~orize any impacts to wetlands, waters
or protected buffe;;s: Please be aware that airy impacts requested within. yattr application are not
authorized (at this.tune) by the I?WQ. :Please call Ms. Cynd.i Karoly or Mr. Iar.31V1cMill:~in at .919-733-
1786 if you have any questions rel;ardin.g ar would like to set up a meeting to discuss ti~is matter.
Sincerel},, r f'~
F
'~~ ~~
/`~ ~~Cyndi I{aroly, Sulaervisar
' ~ .t 441. Oversi ht/P;xnress IZ.uview Perirtittin Unit
g !~
C'BKl~m
t.c.......:M.i~~,HQran, D..W..Q Ratoa.gh:Rc.giranal_O.ffice.._. _ .... _.. ._...._ . ...:........ _... ...._._......._ _........._ . __.
USAGE Raleigh Regulatory kfield Office
f il.e Copy
Central Files
Jay .l{eller, Kehler Environmental, 792 f l-laymarkei I.,ane, lZ.a.legh, NC' 27G 15
E'iltuame: f14i~426i'cr2CedartdidgeSD(`aVxke)On_tiald