Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
730010_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20190313
r'yw -_j ' 1 C) + W Division df Water Resources Facility Number �1.� � � 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation 0 Other Agency Type of Visit: 9 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance Reason for Visit: 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access Date of Visit: Arrival Time: ri Departure Time: ti', County: 2e r v Region: Farm Name: Tho 4,n o Yckt- m_'5 ?or }C et, p Owner Email: Owner Namc:3 rn w,j, Th o Phone: Mailing Address: Physical Address: Facility Contact: Onsite Representative: Title: Phone: Integrator: Certified Operator: fi ' „ T h c 4n. Certification Number: j LO'i Back-up Operator: Location of Farm: Latitude: Certification Number: Longitude: Other I ITurkeyPoults Other I 10ther Discharees and Stream Impacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Design Current ❑ NA Design Current Design Current Swine Capacity Pop. ' Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop. Wean to Finish ry "Layer ❑ NA ❑ NE c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? Dairy Cow Wean to Feeder Non -La er I ❑ NA ❑ NE Dairy Calf Feeder to Finish Ti V. ❑ NE 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes Dairy Heifer Farrow to Wean of the State other than from a discharge? 'Z'No Design Current I Cow Pr Farrow to Feeder Calpacify Pop. Non -Dairy Farrow to Finish a La ers Beef Stocker Gilts Non -Layers Beef Feeder Boars 1 IPullets; Beef Brood Cow Other I ITurkeyPoults Other I 10ther Discharees and Stream Impacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes g No ❑ NA ❑ NE Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other: a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes [:]No ❑ NA ❑ NE c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE of the State other than from a discharge? 'Z'No Page 1 of 3 21412015 Continued Facill Number: r - C) Date of fns ection: Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes �TNo ❑ NA ❑ NE a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes E3-No ❑ NA ❑ NE Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier: Spillway?: Designed Freeboard (in): Observed Freeboard (in): 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes 1;2"No ❑ NA ❑ NE (i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes J�] No ❑ NA ❑ NE waste management or closure plan? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes PNo ❑ NA ❑ NE 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes fallo ❑ NA ❑ NE (not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks) 2 i. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 9. Does any part of the waste m1anag9megl~syste n other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? ❑ Weather Code ❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? L Waste Anplication No ❑ NA ❑ NE 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? 2/412015 Continued 1 l . Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.) ❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ TotaI Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil ❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area 12. Crop Type(s): 13. Soil Type(s): 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? [:]Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes ❑-No ❑ NA ❑ NE acres determination? 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes [a No ❑ NA ❑ NE 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? D Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE Reguired Records & Documents 19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes [2TNo ❑ NA ❑ NE the appropriate box. ❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other: 2 i. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [,2 No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code ❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE Page 2 of 3 2/412015 Continued Facility Number: jDate of Inspection: 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ YesNo ❑ NA ❑ NE 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE the appropriate box(es) below. ❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑ Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes [/No ❑ NA ❑ NE 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes T� No ❑ NA ❑ NE Other Issues 28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? % 29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ YesNo 0 [:]NA ❑ NE If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes[�No E] NA ❑ NE permit? {i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application) TT 31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other: 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes [� No ❑ NA ❑ NE 33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE 34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes [7 No ❑ NA ❑ NE Comments (refer to question ft Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments. Use drawia s of facility to better a Iain situations (use additional pages as necessary). a ©O %,k� .S s L c S Q.r►,.e w Vj ova" w~c�n b Lk_V'C( '-'-7 11 '') o WOO -7-7q3 .5470 y o96L- o Reviewer. -'Inspector Name: Reviewer.1nspector Signatui Page 3 of 3 v 1,U 6 9190 1.5 6149 1.s3 a v 1 -(U'- CW 3- aa- 114a ► s Co", ytr) 51 gDn) J\ 0 ja� Phone:! I _f — ' I r fl — �o�o Date: 21412015