Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.

No preview available

The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About960055_INSPECTIONS_20171231MMMMM MMM RAROLIN '+ N0 Department of Environmental Qua! INSPECTIONS INSPECTIONS INSPECTIONS M Division of Water Resources Division of Soil and Water Conservation Other Agency Facility Number. 960055 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS960055 Denied Access Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive Or Closed Date: Reason for Visit: Routine County: Wayne Region: Washington Date of Visit: 04/17/2018 Entry Time: 09:00 am Exit Time: 10:00 am Incident # Farm Name: Beulahland Farm Owner: Braxton Rouse Mailing Address: 5632 Liddell Rd Physical Address: 186 Daly Chapel Rd Owner Email: Phone: 252-569-1957 Seven Springs NC 28578 Seven Springs NC 28578 Facility Status: Compliant Not Compliant Integrator. Maxwell Foods LLC Location of Farm: Latitude: 35° 11' 06" Located on the south side of NCSR 1751, approx. 0.4 miles from its intersection with NCSR 1739. Question Areas: Dischrge & Stream Impacts Records and Documents Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Other Issues Longitude: 77° 50' 05" Waste Application Certified Operator: Elwood Braxton Rouse Operator Certification Number: 17702 Secondary OIC(s): On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone 24 hour contact name Brent Mitchell Phone : 919-738-3584 On -site representative Brent Mitchell Phone : 919-738-3584 Primary Inspector: Inspector Signature: Secondary Inspector(s): Megan H Stilley Inspection Summary: 7)Erosion on lagoon - add dirt, seed , mulch Waste Analysis 2-9-18 2.36 8-28-17 1.15 2-8-17 1.52 Soil Test due 2018 Freeboard & Rainfall complete & correspond w/ irrigation Sludge Survey 5-17-17 Thick-4.9' LTZ-3.9' Pump intake-3.1' ) 44% Sludge Ratio Calibration complete 2-21-18 w/ 268.1 gpm Crop yield = grazed Phone: Date: page: 1 Permit: AWS960055 Owner - Facility : Braxton Rouse Facility Number: 960055 Inspection Date: 04/17/18 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine Regulated Operations Swine Design Capacity Current promotions Swine - Wean to Feeder 3,200 2,778 Total Design Capacity: 3,200 Total SSLW: 96,000 Waste Structures Disignated Observed Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard Lagoon PRIMARY 05/30/94 19.00 30.00 page: 2 Permit: AWS960055 Owner - Facility : Braxton Rouse Facility Number: 960055 Inspection Date: 04/17/18 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine Discharges & Stream Imoacts Yes No No Ne 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ M ❑ ❑ Discharge originated at: Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other ❑ a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ M ❑ ❑ b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ❑ ❑ c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑M ❑ ❑ 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ M ❑ ❑ 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ State other than from a discharge? Waste Collection. Storage & Treatment Yes No No No 4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard? ❑ 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le] large ❑ � ❑ ❑ trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)? 6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ waste management or closure plan? 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ ❑ ❑ 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ maintenance or improvement? Waste Application Yes No No Ne 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ M ❑ ❑ maintenance or improvement? 11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ If yes, check the appropriate box below. Excessive Ponding? ❑ Hydraulic Overload? ❑ Frozen Ground? ❑ Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑ PAN? ❑ Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.? ❑ Total Phosphorus? ❑ Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? ❑ Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑ Evidence of wind drift? ❑ Application outside of application area? ❑ page: 3 i' Permit: AWS960055 Owner - Facility : Braxton Rouse Facility Number: 960055 Inspection Date: 04/17/18 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine Waste Application Yes No Na Ne Crop Type 1 Small Grain Overseed Crop Type 2 Coastal Bermuda Grass (Pasture) Crop Type 3 Fescue (Pasture) Crop Type 4 Crop Type 5 Crop Type 6 Soil Type 1 Norfolk Soil Type 2 Weston loamy sand Soil Type 3 Soil Type 4 Soil Type 5 Soil Type 6 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ Management Plan(CAWMP)? 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre ❑ E ❑ ❑ determination? 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ E ❑ ❑ Records and Documents Yes No Na Ne 19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available? ❑ E ❑ ❑ 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? ❑ E ❑ ❑ If yes, check the appropriate box below. WUP? ❑ Checklists? ❑ Design? ❑ Maps? ❑ Lease Agreements? ❑ Other? ❑ If Other, please specify 21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ If yes, check the appropriate box below. Waste Application? "" ❑ Weekly Freeboard? ❑ Waste Analysis? ❑ Soil analysis? ❑ Waste Transfers? ❑ Weather code? ❑ Rainfall? ❑ Stocking? ❑ page: 4 Permit: AWS960055 Owner - Facility : Braxton Rouse Facility Number: 960055 Inspection Date: 04/17/18 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine Records and Documents Yes No No No Crop yields? ❑ 120 Minute inspections? ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey ❑ 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment ❑ ❑ E ❑ (NPDES only)? 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ appropriate box(es) below: Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a PDA for sludge levels ❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon ❑ List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ 01113 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ ❑ N ❑ Otherlssues Yes No No Ne 28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document ❑ N ❑ ❑ and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates? 29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, ❑ ❑ ❑ E contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application) 31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? ❑ E ❑ ❑ If yes, check the appropriate box below. Application Field ❑ Lagoon / Storage Pond ❑ Other ❑ If Other, please specify 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or ❑ E ❑ ❑ CAWMP? 33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ 34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ page: 5 a 0 Division of Water Resources ❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency Facility Number: 960055 Facility Status: Active Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine Date of Visit: 04/19/2017 Entry Time: 08:30 am Farm Name: Beulahland Farm Owner: Braxton Rouse Mailing Address: 5632 Liddell Rd Physical Address: 186 Daly Chapel Rd Permit: AWS960055 ❑ Denied Access Inactive Or Closed Date: County: Wayne Region: Washington Exit Time: 9:30 am Incident # Owner Email: Phone: 252-569-1957 Seven Springs NC 28578 Seven Springs NC 28578 Facility Status: 0Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Maxwell Foods LLC Location of Farm: Latitude: 350 11' 06" Located on the south side of NCSR 1751, approx. 0.4 miles from its intersection with NCSR 1739. Question Areas: Dischrge & Stream Impacts Records and Documents Certified Operator: Elwood Braxton Rouse Secondary OIC(s): Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Other Issues On -Site Representative(s): Name 24 hour contact name Brent Mitchell On -site representative Braxton Rouse Primary Inspector: Inspector Signature: Secondary Inspector(s): Megan H Stilley Inspection Summary: Waste Analysis 2-8-17 1.52 7-15-16 1.37 2-22-16 1.69 Soil Test due 2018 Sludge Survey 9-22-16 Thick-4.9' LTZ-4.0' Pump intake-2.9') 43% Sludge Ratio Calibration complete 12-21-16 w/ 233 GPM No crop yield b/c grazed 7)Need to maintain lagoon banks - bare areas - add dirt, seed and mulch Longitude 77° 50' 05" Waste Application Operator Certification Number: 17702 Title Phone Phone: 919-738-3584 Phone: Phone: Date: page 1 Permit: AWS960055 Owner- Facility: Braxton Rouse Facility Number: 960055 Inspection Date: 04/19/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspectit Reason for Visit: Routine Regulated Operations Swine Design Capacity Current promotions Swine - Wean to Feeder 3,200 2,510 Total Design Capacity: 3,200 Total SSLW: 96,000 Waste Structures Disignated Observed Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard Lagoon PRIMARY 05/30/94 19.00 35.00 page 2 Permit: AWS960055 Owner - Facility: Braxton Rouse Facility Number: 960055 Inspection Date: 04/19/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspectii Reason for Visit: Routine Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No Na Ne 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ Discharge originated at: Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other ❑ a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ M ❑ ❑ c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ M ❑ ❑ 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ State other than from a discharge? Waste Collection. Storage & Treatment Yes No Na Ne 4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard? ❑ 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ larc ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)? 6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ M ❑ ❑ waste management or closure plan? 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? M ❑ ❑ ❑ 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ maintenance or improvement? Waste Application Yes No Na No 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ M ❑ ❑ maintenance or improvement? 11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ If yes, check the appropriate box below. Excessive Ponding? ❑ Hydraulic Overload? ❑ Frozen Ground? ❑ Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑ PAN? ❑ Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.? ❑ Total Phosphorus? ❑ Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? ❑ Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑ Evidence of wind drift? ❑ Application outside of application area? ❑ page 3 Permit: AWS960055 Owner - Facility : Braxton Rouse Facility Number: 960055 Inspection Date: 04/19/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspectii Reason for Visit: Routine Waste Application Yes No Na No Crop Type 1 Fescue (Hay) Crop Type 2 Coastal Bermuda Grass (Pasture) Crop Type 3 Small Grain Overseed Crop Type 4 Crop Type 5 Crop Type 6 Soil Type 1 Norfolk Soil Type 2 Weston loamy sand Soil Type 3 Soil Type 4 Soil Type 5 Soil Type 6 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste ❑ ❑ ❑ Management Plan(CAWMP)? 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑0 ❑ ❑ 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre ❑ ❑ ❑ determination? 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ ❑ ❑ 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ Records and Documents Yes No Na Ne 19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available? ❑ E ❑ ❑ 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? ❑ E ❑ ❑ If yes, check the appropriate box below. WUP? ❑ Checklists? ❑ Design? ❑ Maps? ❑ Lease Agreements? ❑ Other? ❑ If Other, please specify 21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ E ❑ ❑ If yes, check the appropriate box below. Waste Application? ❑ Weekly Freeboard? ❑ Waste Analysis? ❑ Soil analysis? ❑ Waste Transfers? ❑ Weather code? ❑ Rainfall? ❑ Stocking? ❑ page 4 Permit: AWS960055 Owner - Facility: Braxton Rouse Facility Number: 960055 Inspection Date: 04/19/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspectit Reason for Visit: Routine Records and Documents Yes No Na No Crop yields? ❑ 120 Minute inspections? ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey ❑ 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ E ❑ ❑ 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipmen ❑ ❑ E ❑ (NPDES only)? 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ E ❑ ❑ 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the ❑ E ❑ ❑ appropriate box(es) below: Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon ❑ List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? 1111011 Other Issues Yes No Na No 28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document ❑ E ❑ ❑ and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates? 29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, ❑ ❑ ❑ contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit% ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application) 31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ If yes, check the appropriate box below. Application Field ❑ Lagoon / Storage Pond ❑ Other ❑ If Other, please specify 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ CAWMP? 33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewfinspection with on -site representative? ❑ N ❑ ❑ 34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ page 5 Division of Water Resources Division of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency Facility Number: 960055 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS960055 ❑ Denied Access Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive Or Closed Date: Reason for Visit: Routine County: Wayne Region: Washington Date of Visit: 04/27/2016 Entry Time: 08:30 am Exk Time: 9:30 am Incident # Farm Name: Beulahland Farm Owner Email: Owner: Braxton Rouse Phone: 252-569-1957 Mailing Address: 5632 Liddell Rd Seven Springs NC 28578 Physical Address: 186 Daly Chapel Rd Seven Springs NC 28578 Facility Status: ECompliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Maxwell Foods LLC Location of Farm: Latitude: 35' 11' 06" Longitude: 77° 50' 05" Located on the south side of NCSR 1751, approx. 0.4 miles from its intersection with NCSR 1739. Question Areas: Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application Records and Documents Other Issues Certified Operator: Elwood Braxton Rouse Operator Certification Number: 17702 Secondary OIC(s): On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone 24 hour contact name Brent Mitchell Phone : 919-738-3584 Primary Inspector: Megan H Stilley Phone: Inspector Signature: Date: Secondary Inspector(s): Inspection Summary: page: 1 FM Permit: AWS960055 Owner - Facility : Braxton Rouse Facility Number: 960055 Inspection Date: 04/27/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine Waste Analysis 2-22-16 1.69 9-21-15 1.55 6-59-15 1.46 4-17-15 2.30 Soil Test 6-10-15 with highest lime 0 tons 15) Continue maintenance on spray fields Freeboard and Rainfall complete and correspond with irrigation Sludge Survey 11-12-15 Thick - 4.7' LTZ - 4.0' Pump Intake - 3.3' 43% SR Calibration due 2016 No crop yield because grazed. page: 2 Permit: AWS960055 Owner - Facility : Braxton Rouse Facility Number: 960055 Inspection Date: 04/27/16 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions Swine Fk—;;;ne - Wean to Feeder 3,200 T 2,984 Total Design Capacity: 3,200 Total SSLW: 96,000 Waste Structures Disignated Observed Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date freeboard Freeboard Lagoon PRIMARY 05/30/94 19.00 29.00 page: 3 Permit: AWS960055 Owner - Facility : Braxton Rouse Facility Number: 960055 Inspection Date: 04/27/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No Na Ne 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ Discharge originated at: Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other ❑ a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ M ❑ ❑ c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ❑ ❑ 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the ❑ M ❑ ❑ State other than from a discharge? Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes No Na Ne 4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard? ❑ 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)? 6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ waste management or closure plan? 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ maintenance or improvement? Waste Application Yes No Na Ne 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ maintenance or improvement? 11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ ❑ ❑ If yes, check the appropriate box below. Excessive Ponding? ❑ Hydraulic Overload? ❑ Frozen Ground? ❑ Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑ PAN? ❑ Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.? ❑ Total Phosphorus? ❑ Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? ❑ Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑ Evidence of wind drift? ❑ Application outside of application area? ❑ page: 4 Permit: AWS960055 Owner - Facility : Braxton Rouse Facility Number: 960055 Inspection Date: 04/27/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine Waste Application Yes No Na No Crop Type 1 Crop Type 2 Crop Type 3 Crop Type 4 Crop Type 5 Crop Type 6 Soil Type 1 Soil Type 2 Soil Type 3 Soil Type 4 Soil Type 5 Soil Type 6 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste ❑ M ❑ ❑ Management Plan(CAWMP)? 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ M ❑ ❑ 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre ❑ M ❑ ❑ determination? 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ M ❑ ❑ 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ ❑ ❑ Records and Documents Yes No No No 19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? ❑ M ❑ ❑ If yes, check the appropriate box below. WUP? ❑ Checklists? ❑ Design? ❑ Maps? ❑ Lease Agreements? ❑ Other ❑ If Other, please specify 21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ M ❑ ❑ If yes, check the appropriate box below. Waste Application? ❑ Weekly Freeboard? ❑ Waste Analysis? ❑ Soil analysis? ❑ Waste Transfers? ❑ Weather code? ❑ Rainfall? ❑ Stocking? ❑ page: 5 Permit: AWS960055 Owner - Facility : Braxton Rouse Facility Number: 960055 Inspection Date: 04/27/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine Records and Documents Yes No Na Ne Crop yields? ❑ 120 Minute inspections? ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey ❑ 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ ❑ ❑ 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment ❑ ❑ M ❑ (NPDES only)? 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the ❑ M ❑ ❑ appropriate box(es) below: Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon ❑ List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ ❑ M ❑ Other Issues Yes No Na Ne 28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates? 29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? ❑ M ❑ ❑ (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application) 31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ If yes, check the appropriate box below. Application Field ❑ Lagoon / Storage Pond ❑ Other ❑ If Other, please specify 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ CAWMP? 33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ M ❑ ❑ ' 34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ page: 6 ■ Division of Water Resources ❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency Facility Number: 960055 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS960055 ❑ Denied Access Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive Or Closed Date: Reason for Visit: Routine County: Wayne Region: Washington Date of Visit: 03/11/2015 Entry Time: 09:30 am Exit Time: 10:30 am Incident # Farm Name: Beulahland Farm Owner Email: Owner: Braxton Rouse Phone: 252-569-1957 Mailing Address: 5632 Liddell Rd Seven Springs NC 28578 Physical Address: 186 Daly Chapel Rd Seven Springs NC 28578 Facility Status: 0Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Maxwell Foods Inc Location of Farm: Latitude: 35' 11' 06" Longitude: 77' 50' 05" Located on the south side of NCSR 1751, approx. 0.4 miles from its intersection with NCSR 1739. Question Areas: Dischrge & Stream Impacts Records and Documents Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application Certified Operator: Elwood Braxton Rouse Operator Certification Number: 17702 Secondary OIC(s): On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone 24 hour contact name Brent Mitchell Phone : 919-738-3584 On -site representative Brent Mitchell Phone : 919-738-3584 Primary Inspector: Inspector Signature: Secondary Inspector(s): Inspection Summary: Justin K Davis Phone: Dale: page: 1 Permit: AWS960055 Owner - Facility : Braxton Rouse Facility Number: 960055 Inspection Date: 03/11/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine 15.) Field 3 Fescue is bare due to overgrazing, no pumping till stand is restablished. Waste Report N 2-16-15 1.89 8-18-14 1.12 5-13-14 1.98 4-16-14 2.22 Lagoon Sludge Survey 9/26/2014 BEF1 Due 2015. Pump Intake= 3.1 Thickness= 4.1 LTZ= 4.6 Soil Test Report -> 4/13/12 Due 2015' Rain Records and Pumping Records -> checked and coincide Irrigation Calibration - 10/2/2014 Due 2016. . page: 2 Permit: AWS960055 Owner - Facility : Braxton Rouse Facility Number: 960055 Inspection Date: 03/11/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine Regulated Operations Swine Design Capacity Current promotions Swine - Wean to Feeder 3,200 Total Design Capacity: 3,200 Total SSLW: 96,000 Waste Structures Disignated Observed Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard Lagoon PRIMARY 05/30/94 19.00 34.00 page: 3 Permit: AWS960055 Owner - Facility : Braxton Rouse Facility Number: 960055 Inspection Date: 03/11/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No No Ne 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ Discharge originated at: Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other ❑ a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ❑ ❑ b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ M ❑ ❑ c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ M ❑ ❑ 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the ❑ M ❑ ❑ State other than from a discharge? Waste Collection. Storage & Treatment Yes No No No 4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard? ❑ 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)? 6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ M ❑ ❑ waste management or closure plan? 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ M ❑ ❑ 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable ❑ M ❑ ❑ to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ maintenance or improvement? Waste Application Yes No No Ne 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ ❑ ❑ maintenance or improvement? 11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ If yes, check the appropriate box below. Excessive Ponding? ❑ Hydraulic Overload? ❑ Frozen Ground? ❑ Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑ PAN? ❑ Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.? ❑ Total Phosphorus? ❑ Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? ❑ Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑ Evidence of wind drift? ❑ Application outside of application area? ❑ page: 4 Permit: AWS960055 Owner - Facility : Braxton Rouse Facility Number: 960055 Inspection Date: 03/11/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine Waste Application Yes No Na No Crop Type 1 Crop Type 2 Crop Type 3 Crop Type 4 Crop Type 5 Crop Type 6 Soil Type 1 Soil Type 2 Soil Type 3 Soil Type 4 Soil Type 5 Soil Type 6 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ Management Plan(CAWMP)? 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre ❑ a ❑ ❑ determination? 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ N ❑ ❑ 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ N ❑ ❑ Records and Documents Yes No Na Ne 19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available? ❑ E ❑ ❑ 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ If yes, check the appropriate box below. WUP? ❑ Checklists? ❑ Design? ❑ Maps? ❑ Lease Agreements? ❑ Other? ❑ If Other, please specify 21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ If yes, check the appropriate box below. Waste Application? ❑ Weekly Freeboard? ❑ Waste Analysis? ❑ Soil analysis? ❑ Waste Transfers? ❑ Weather code? ❑ Rainfall? ❑ Stocking? ❑ page: 5 Permit: AWS960055 Owner - Facility : Braxton Rouse Facility Number: 960055 Inspection Date: 03/11/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine Records and Documents Crop yields? 120 Minute inspections? Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections Sludge Survey 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)? 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate box(es) below: Failure to complete annual sludge survey Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? Yes No Na Ne El El ❑,N ❑ ❑ ❑ ■❑ ❑ ❑ N ❑ ❑ ❑ ■❑ ❑ page: 6 Division of Water Resources Division of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency Facility Number. 960055 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS960055 Denied Access Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive Or Closed Date: Reason for visit: Routine County: Wayne Region: Washington Date of Visit: 04/17/2014 Entry Time: 08:15 am Exit Time: 8:45 am Incident # Farm Name: Beulahland Farm Owner Email: Owner: Braxton Rouse Phone: 252-569-1957 Mailing Address: 5632 Liddell Rd Seven Springs NC 28578 Physical Address: 186 Daly Chapel Rd Seven Springs NC 28578 Facility Status: Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Maxwell Foods Inc Location of Farm: Latitude: 35° 11' 06" Longitude: 77° 50' 05" Located on the south side of NCSR 1751, approx. 0.4 miles from its intersection with NCSR 1739 Question Areas: Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application Records and Documents Other Issues Certified Operator: Elwood Braxton Rouse Operator Certification Number: 17702 Secondary OIC(s): On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone 24 hour contact name Brent Mitchell Phone: 919-738-3584 On -site representative Brent Mitchell Phone: 919-738-3584 Primary Inspector: Ronnie T Smith Phone: Inspector Signature: Date: Secondary Inspector(s): Inspection Summary: page: 1 Permit: AWS960055 Owner - Facility : Braxton Rouse Facility Number: 960055 Inspection Date: 04/17/14 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine Sludge Survey 11/16/13 thickness = 3.8 LTZ = 3.9 pump intake = 3.9 47% "'Sludge Survey due again in 2014— WuP 3/10108 Waste Analysis N 4/8/14 = 2.22 8/20/13 = .95 7/15/13 = 1.27 6/14/13 = 1.70 Soil Test 4/3/12 "'Cu & Zn levels w(n range L=OT "'soil test due again 2015" Irrigation calibration 12/8/12 "'due again 2014"' !Ilfields look great!l! page: 2 Permit: AWS960055 Owner - Facility : Braxton Rouse Facility Number: 960055 Inspection Date: 04/17/14 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine Regulated Operations Swine Design Capacity Current promotions Swine - Wean to Feeder 3,200 1,600 Total Design Capacity: 3,200 Total SSLW: 96,000 Waste Structures Disignated Observed Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard Lagoon PRIMARY 05/30/94 19.00 36.00 page: 3 Permit: AWS960055 Owner - Facility : Braxton Rouse Facility Number: 960055 Inspection Date: 04/17/14 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No Na Ne 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ❑ ❑ Discharge originated at: Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other ❑ a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ M ❑ ❑ b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑M ❑ ❑ c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ❑ ❑ 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ State other than from a discharge? Waste Collection. Storage & Treatment Yes No Na Ne 4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard? ❑ 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large ❑ MEI ❑ trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)? 6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ M ❑ ❑ waste management or closure plan? 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable ❑ M ❑ ❑ to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ maintenance or improvement? Waste Application Yes No Na No 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ maintenance or improvement? 11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ ❑ ❑ If yes, check the appropriate box below. Excessive Ponding? ❑ Hydraulic Overload? ❑ Frozen Ground? ❑ Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑ PAN? ❑ Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.? ❑ Total Phosphorus? ❑ Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? ❑ Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑ Evidence of wind drift? ❑ Application outside of application area? ❑ page: 4 Permit: AWS960055 Owner - Facility: Braxton Rouse Facility Number: 960055 Inspection Date: 04/17/14 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine Waste Application Yes No No Ne Crop Type 1 Fescue (Pasture) Crop Type 2 Coastal Bermuda Grass w/ Rye Overseed Crop Type 3 Crop Type 4 Crop Type 5 Crop Type 6 Soil Type 1 Norfolk loamy sand, 0 to 2% slopes Soil Type 2 Weston loamy sand Soil Type 3 Soil Type 4 Soil Type 5 Soil Type 6 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ Management Plan(CAWMP)? 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ determination? 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ 16. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ ❑ ❑ Records and Documents - Yes No No No 19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available? ❑ M ❑ ❑ 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ If yes, check the appropriate box below. WUP? ❑ Checklists? ❑ Design? ❑ Maps? ❑ Lease Agreements?, ❑ Other? ❑ If Other, please specify 21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ If yes, check the appropriate box below. Waste Application? Cl Weekly Freeboard? ❑ Waste Analysis? ❑ Soil analysis? ❑ Waste Transfers? ❑ Weather code? ❑ Rainfall? ❑ page: 5 Permit: AWS960055 Owner - Facility : Braxton Rouse Facility Number: 960055 Inspection Date: 04/17/14 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine Records and Documents Yes No Na No Stocking? ❑ Crop yields? ❑ 120 Minute inspections? ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey ❑ 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ M ❑ ❑ 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment ❑ ❑ ❑ (NPDES only)? 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ M ❑ ❑ 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the ❑ N ❑ ❑ appropriate box(es) below: Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a PDA for sludge levels ❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon ❑ List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ N ❑ ❑ 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ M ❑ ❑ Otherlssues Yes No Na Ne 28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document ❑ ❑ ❑ and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates? 29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application) 31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ If yes, check the appropriate box below. Application Field ❑ Lagoon / Storage Pond ❑ Other ❑ If Other, please specify 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ CAWMP? 33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ ❑ ❑ 34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ M ❑ ❑ page: 6 0 Division of Water Quality ❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency Facility Number: 960055 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS960055 ❑ Denied Access Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date: Reason for Visit: Routine County: Wayne Region: Washington Date of Visit: 04/11/2013 Entry Time: 10:00 AM Exit Time: 11:00 AM Incident #: Farm Name: Beulahland Farm Owner Email: Owner: Braxton Rouse Phone: 252-569-1957 Mailing Address: 5632 Liddell Rd Seven Sorinas NC 28578 Physical Address: 186 Daly Chapel Rd Seven Sorinas NC 28578 Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Maxwell Foods Inc Location of Farm: Latitude: 35011'06" Longitude: 77050'05" Located on the south side of NCSR 1751, approx. 0.4 miles from its intersection with NCSR 1739 Question Areas: Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application Records and Documents Other Issues Certified Operator: Elwood Braxton Rouse Operator Certification Number: 17702 Secondary OIC(s): On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone 24 hour contact name Brent Mitchell Phone: 919-738-3584 On -site representative Braxton Rouse Phone: Primary Inspector: Megan H Stilley Phone: Inspector Signature: Date: Secondary Inspector(s): Page: 1 Permit: AWS960055 Owner - Facility: Braxton Rouse Facility Number; 960055 Inspection Date: 04/11/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine Inspection Summary: Waste Analysis 2-9-13 2.37 9-19-12 2.1 6-6-12 1.93 4-19-12 2.1 Soil Test 4-3-12 w/ highest lime 0 tons Cu & Zn values Win range Freeboard & Rainfall complete & correspond w/ irrigation Sludge Survey 8-17-12 Thick-2.3' LTZ-6.6' Pump intake-4.7' } 17% Sludge Ratio Calibration due 2014 `Update stocking 'Need to get COC in records Page: 2 Permit: AWS960055 Owner - Facility: Braxton Rouse Inspection Date: 04/11/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Facility Number: 960055 Reason for Visit: Routine Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population Swine ❑ Swine - Wean to Feeder 3,200 Total Design Capacity: 3,200 Total SSLW: 96,000 Waste Structures Designed Observed TVDe Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard lagoon PRIMARY 05/30/94 19.00 33.00 Page: 3 Permit: AWS960055 Owner • Facility: Braxton Rouse Facility Number: 960055 Inspection Date: 04/11/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ Discharge originated at: Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other ❑ a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ from a discharge? Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes No NA NE 4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard? ❑ 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ erosion, seepage, etc.)? 6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ or closure plan? 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ dry stacks and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ improvement? Waste Application Yes No NA NE 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or 000 ❑ improvement? 11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ If yes, check the appropriate box below. Excessive Ponding? ❑ Hydraulic Overload? ❑ Frozen Ground? ❑ Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑ Page: 4 Permit: AWS960055 Owner - Facility: Braxton Rouse Inspection Date: 04/11/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Waste Application PAN? Is PAN > 10%/10 Ibs ? Total Phosphorus? Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? Outside of acceptable crop window? Evidence of wind drift? Application outside of application area? Crop Type 1 Crop Type 2 Facility Number: 960055 Reason for Visit: Routine Crop Type 3 Crop Type 4 Crop Type 5 Crop Type 6 Soil Type 1 Soil Type 2 Soil Type 3 Soil Type 4 Soil Type 5 Soil Type 6 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan(CAWMP)? 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? Records and Documents 19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available? 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check the appropriate box below. WUP? Yes No NA NE ❑ 11 Fescue (Pasture) Coastal Bermuda Grass (Pasture) Small Grain Overseed Weston loamy sand Norfolk ❑■❑❑ ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ Yes No NA NE ■❑❑❑ ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ n Page: 5 Permit: AWS960055 Owner - Facility: Braxton Rouse Facility Number: 960055 Inspection Date: 04/11/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine Records and Documents Yes No NA NE Checklists? ❑ Design? ❑ Maps? ❑ Lease Agreements? ❑ Other? ❑ If Other, please specify 21. Does record keeping need improvement? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ If yes, check the appropriate box below. Waste Application? ❑ Weekly Freeboard? ❑ Waste Analysis? ❑ Soil analysis? ❑ Waste Transfers? ❑ Weather code? ❑ Rainfall? ❑ Stocking? ■ Crop yields? ❑ 120 Minute inspections? ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey ❑ 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ MOO 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ box(es) below: Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon ❑ List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ Page: 6 u Permit: AWS960055 Owner - Facility: Braxton Rouse Facility Number; 960055 Inspection Date: 04/11/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine Records and Documents Yes No NA NE 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ Otherissues Yes No NA NE 28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ mortality rates that exceed normal rates? 29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ freeboard problems, over -application) 31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ If yes, check the appropriate box below. Application Field Lagoon / Storage Pond Other If Other, please specify 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? 33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? 34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? in Page: 7 ` Division of Water Quality ❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency Facility Number: 960055 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS960055 ❑ Denied Access Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date: Reason for Visit: Routine County: Wayne Region: Washington Date of Visit: 07/26/2011 Entry Time:09432 AM Exit Time: 10:15 AM Incident #: Farm Name: Beulahland Farm Owner Email: Owner: Braxton Rouse Phone: 252-569-1957 Mailing Address: 5632 Liddell Rd Seven Springs NC 28578 Physical Address: 186 Daly Chapel Rd Seven Springs NC 28578 Facility Status: E Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Maxwell Foods Inc Location of Farm: Latitude: 35011'06" Longitude: 77050'05" Located on the south side of NCSR 1751, approx. 0.4 miles from its intersection with NCSR 1739 Question Areas: Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application Records and Documents Other Issues Certified Operator: Elwood Braxton Rouse Operator Certification Number: 17702 Secondary OIC(s): On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone 24 hour contact name Brent Mitchell Phone: 919-738-3584 On -site representative Brent Mitchell Phone: 919-738-3584 Primary Inspector: Ronnie T Smith Phone: Inspector Signature: Date: Secondary Inspector(s): Page: 1 Permit: AWS960055 Owner - Facility: Braxton Rouse Facility Number: 960055 Inspection Date: 07/26/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine Inspection Summary: WUP 3/10/08 new Coc in records Waste Analysis N 7/20/11 = 1.2 5/23/11 = 2.2 3/29/11 = 1.2 Soil Test 3/15/11 "due again 2012" Cu & Zn levels w/in range Sludge Survey 5/13/10 'due again in 2011' thickness = 1.6 LTZ = 6.5 irrigation calibration 11/30/10 pump intake = 3.4 "due again 2012" 13% irrigation records correspond to rainfall & lagoon records. lime spread receipt in record 4/28/11 Continue to vegetate inner dike walls; watch for erosion" Crop yield records reviewed. Page: 2 Permit:AWS960055 Owner -Facility: Braxton Rouse Facility Number:960055 Inspection Date: 07/26/2011 Regulated Operations Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Design Capacity Reason for Visit: Routine Current Population Swine Swine - Wean to Feeder 3,200 3,200 Total Design Capacity: 3,200 Total SSLW: 96,000 Waste Structures Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard lagoon PRIMARY 05/30/94 19.00 38.00 Page: 3 Permit: AWS960055 Owner • Facility: Braxton Rouse Facility Number: 960055 Inspection Date: 07/26/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ Discharge originated at: Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other ❑ a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ 000 c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ from a discharge? Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes No NA NE 4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard? ❑ 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ erosion, seepage, etc.)? 6. Are there structures on -site that are not property addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ or closure plan? 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ dry stacks and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ improvement? Waste Application Yes No NA NE 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ improvement? 11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ If yes, check the appropriate box below. Excessive Ponding? ❑ Hydraulic Overload? ❑ Frozen Ground? ❑ Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑ Page: 4 Permit: AWS960055 Owner - Facility: Braxton Rouse Facility Number: 960055 Inspection Date: 07/26/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine Waste Application Yes No NA NE PAN? ❑ Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.? ❑ Total Phosphorus? ❑ Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? ❑ Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑ Evidence of wind drift? ❑ Application outside of application area? ❑ Crop Type 1 Crop Type 2 Crop Type 3 Crop Type 4 Crop Type 5 Crop Type 6 Soil Type 1 Soil Type 2 Soil Type 3 Soil Type 4 Soil Type 5 Soil Type 6 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan(CAWMP)? 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? Records and Documents 19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available? 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check the appropriate box below. WUP? Coastal Bermuda Grass (Hay, Pasture) Small Grain Overseed Fescue (Pasture) Norfolk Weston loamy sand ❑■❑❑ ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ Page: 5 Permit: AWS960055 Owner - Facility: Braxton Rouse Facility Number: 960055 Inspection Date: 07/26/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine Records and Documents Yes No NA NE Checklists? ❑ Design? ❑ Maps? ❑ Lease Agreements? ❑ Other? ❑ If Other, please specify 21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ If yes, check the appropriate box below. Waste Application? ❑ Weekly Freeboard? ❑ Waste Analysis? ❑ Soil analysis? ❑ Waste Transfers? ❑ Weather code? ❑ Rainfall? ❑ Stocking? ❑ Crop yields? ❑ 120 Minute inspections? ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey ❑ 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)? ❑ 0110 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ box(es) below: Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon ❑ List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ Page: 6 Permit: AWS960055 Owner - Facility: Braxton Rouse Inspection Date: 07/26/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Records and Documents Facility Number: 960055 Reason for Visit: Routine 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? 000 ❑ Other Issues Yes No NA NE 28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ mortality rates that exceed normal rates? 29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ freeboard problems, over -application) 31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ If yes, check the appropriate box below. Application Field Lagoon / Storage Pond Other If Other, please specify 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? 33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? 34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? Page: 7 Division of Water Quality 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency Facility Number: 960055 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS960055 ❑ Denied Access Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date: Reason for Visit: Routine County: Wayne Region: Washington Date of Visit: 05/10/2012 Entry Time: 08:30 AM Exit Time: 09:30 AM Incident #: Farm Name: Beulahland Farm Owner Email: Owner: Braxton Rouse Phone: 252-569-1957 Mailing Address: 5632 Liddell Rd Seven Sorinas NC 28578 Physical Address: 186 Daly Chapel Rd Seven Springs NC 28578 Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Maxwell Foods Inc Location of Farm: Latitude: 35011'06" Longitude: 77050'05" Located on the south side of NCSR 1751, approx. 0.4 miles from its intersection with NCSR 1739 Question Areas: Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application Records and Documents Other Issues Certified Operator: Elwood Braxton Rouse Operator Certification Number: 17702 Secondary OIC(s): On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone 24 hour contact name Brent Mitchell Phone: 919-738-3584 On -site representative Braxton Rouse Phone: Primary Inspector: Megan H Stilley Phone: Inspector Signature: Date: Secondary Inspector(s): Page: 1 Permit: AWS960055 Owner - Facility: Braxton Rouse Facility Number: 960055 Inspection Date: 05/10/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine Inspection Summary: `Maintain erosion on inside lagoon bank `Manage weeds in sprayfield Waste Analysis 4-19-12 2.1 2-2-12 2.0 9-14-11 .94 Soil Test 4-3-12 w/ highest lime 0 tons Cu & Zn values Win range Survey Sludge 8-10-11 Thick-1.1' LTZ-6.9' Pump intake-3.8' } 9% Sludge Ratio Calibration due 2012 Freeboard & Rainfall complete & correspond w/ irrigation No crop yields b/c grazing Page: 2 Permit: AWS960055 Owner - Facility: Braxton Rouse Facility Number: 960055 Inspection Date: 05/10/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population Swine O Swine - Wean to Feeder 3,200 3,200 Total Design Capacity: 3,200 Total SSLW: 96,000 Waste Structures Designed Observed Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard lagoon PRIMARY 05/30/94 19.00 35.00 Page: 3 Permit: AWS960055 Owner - Facility: Braxton Rouse Facility Number: 960055 Inspection Date: 05/10/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ Discharge originated at: Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other ❑ a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ D O b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ from a discharge? Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes No NA NE 4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard? ❑ 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Led large trees, severe ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ erosion, seepage, etc.)? 6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■ O ❑ or closure plan? 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ O 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ dry stacks and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or 000 ❑ improvement? Waste Application Yes No NA NE 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ improvement? 11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ If yes, check the appropriate box below. Excessive Ponding? ❑ Hydraulic Overload? Q Frozen Ground? ❑ Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑ Page: 4 Permit: AWS960055 Owner - Facility: Braxton Rouse Inspection Date: 05/10/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Facility Number: 960055 Reason for Visit: Routine Waste Application Yes No NA NE PAN? ❑ Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.? ❑ Total Phosphorus? ❑ Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? ❑ Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑ Evidence of wind drift? ❑ Application outside of application area? ❑ Crop Type 1 Coastal Bermuda Grass (Pasture) Crop Type 2 Small Grain Overseed Crop Type 3 Fescue (Pasture) Crop Type 4 Crop Type 5 Crop Type 6 Soil Type 1 Norfolk Soil Type 2 Weston loamy sand Soil Type 3 Soil Type 4 Soil Type 5 Soil Type 6 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ Plan(CAWMP)? 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ Records and Documents Yes No NA NE 19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ If yes, check the appropriate box below. WUP? ❑ Page: 5 Permit: AWS960055 Owner - Facility: Braxton Rouse Inspection Date: 05/10/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Records and Documents Facility Number: 960055 Reason for Visit: Routine Checklists? ❑ Design? ❑ Maps? ❑ Lease Agreements? ❑ Other? ❑ If Other, please specify 21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ If yes, check the appropriate box below. Waste Application? ❑ Weekly Freeboard? ❑ Waste Analysis? ❑ Soil analysis? ❑ Waste Transfers? ❑ Weather code? ❑ Rainfall? ❑ Stocking? ❑ Crop yields? ❑ 120 Minute inspections? ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey ❑ 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ box(es) below: Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon ❑ List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ Page: 6 Permit: AWS960055 Owner • Facility: Braxton Rouse Facility Number: 960055 Inspection Date: 05/10/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine Records and Documents Yes No NA NE 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ Otherlssues Yes No NA NE 28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ mortality rates that exceed normal rates? 29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ freeboard problems, over -application) 31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ If yes, check the appropriate box below. Application Field ❑ Lagoon / Storage Pond ❑ Other ❑ If Other, please specify 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ 33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ 34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ Page: 7 N Division of Water Quality ❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency Facility Number: 960055 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS960055 ❑ Denied Access Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date: Reason for Visit: Routine County: Wayne Region: Washington Date of Visit: 10/07/2010 Entry Time:09:30 AM Exit Time: Incident #: Farm Name: Beulahland Farm Owner Email: Owner: Braxton Rouse Phone: 252-569-1957 Mailing Address: 5632 Liddell Rd Seven Sprinas NC 28578 Physical Address: 186 Daly Chapel Rd Seven Springs NC 28578 Facility Status: E Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Maxwell Foods Inc Location of Farts: Latitude: 35*11'06" Longitude: 77050'05" Located on the south side of NCSR 1751, approx. 0.4 miles from its intersection with NCSR 1739. Question Areas: Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application Records and Documents Other Issues Certified Operator: Elwood Braxton Rouse Operator Certification Number: 17702 Secondary OIC(s): On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone 24 hour contact name Brent Mitchell Phone: 919-738-3584 On -site representative Braxton Rouse Phone: Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone: Inspector Signature: Date: Secondary Inspector(s): Page: 1 Permit: AWS960055 Owner - Facility: Braxton Rouse Facility Number: 960055 Inspection Date: 10/07/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine Inspection Summary: Waste Analysis: 09/14/10 = 1.1 07/22/10 = 1.4 O6/21/10 = 1.5 03/22/10 = 1.8 Equipment calibration: 2010 Sludge survey: 2010 Freeboard Range: 02/06/10 = 20" - 08/01 /2010 = 42" Soil Tested: 2009 and lime applied Looks Great! Records are complete and balanced out. Page: 2 Permit: AWS960055 Owner - Facility: Braxton Rouse Inspection Date: 10/07/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Regulated Operations Design Capacity Swine Swine - Wean to Feeder 3.200 Waste Structures Facility Number: 960055 Reason for Visit: Routine Current Population Total Design Capacity: 3,200 Total SSLW: 96,000 Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard agoon PRIMARY 05/30/94 19.00 29.00 Page: 3 Permit: AWS960055 Owner - Facility: Braxton Rouse Inspection Date: 10/0712010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Discharges & Stream Impacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Discharge originated at: Structure Application Field Other a. Was conveyance man-made? b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters? d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) Facility Number: 960055 Reason for Visit: Routine 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? 3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a discharge? Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard? Yes No NA NE ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ ❑■❑❑ ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ Yes No NA NE ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le] large trees, severe ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ erosion, seepage, etc.)? 6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ or closure plan? 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or improvement? Waste Application 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or improvement? 11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. Excessive Ponding? Hydraulic Overload? Frozen Ground? Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ 0000 ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ Yes No NA NE ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ Page: 4 Permit: AWS960055 Owner - Facility: Braxton Rouse Inspection Date: 10/07/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Facility Number: 960055 Reason for Visit: Routine Waste Application Yes No NA NE PAN? ❑ Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.? ❑ Total P2O5? ❑ Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? ❑ Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑ Evidence of wind drift? ❑ Application outside of application area? ❑ Crop Type 1 Fescue (Hay) Crop Type 2 Coastal Bermuda Grass (Hay) Crop Type 3 Small Grain Overseed Crop Type 4 Crop Type 5 Crop Type 6 Soil Type 1 Soil Type 2 Soil Type 3 Soil Type 4 Soil Type 5 Soil Type 6 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ Plan(CAWMP)? 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ Records and Documents Yes No NA NE 19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ If yes, check the appropriate box below. WUP? ❑ Page: 5 Permit: AWS960055 Owner - Facility: Braxton Rouse Facility Number: 960055 Inspection Date: 10/07/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine Records and Documents Yes No NA NE Checklists? ❑ Design? ❑ Maps? ❑ Other? ❑ 21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ If yes, check the appropriate box below. Waste Application? ❑ 120 Minute inspections? ❑ Weather code? ❑ Weekly Freeboard? ❑ Transfers? ❑ Rainfall? ❑ Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly? ❑ Waste Analysis? ❑ Annual soil analysis? ❑ Crop yields? ❑ Stocking? ❑ Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)? ❑ 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ 25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ i 26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ Other Issues Yes No NA NE 28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ 29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ Cl ❑ mortality rates that exceed normal rates? 30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ Quality representative immediately. Page: 6 I Permit: AWS960055 Owner - Facility: Braxton Rouse Inspection Date: 10/0712010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection 31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? 32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? 33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? Facility Number: 960055 Reason for Visit: Routine Yes No NA NE ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ Page: 7 L 0 Division of Water Quality ❑. Division of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency Facility Number: 960055 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS960055 ❑ Denied Access Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date: Reason for Visit: Routine County: Wayne Region: Washington Date of Visit: 10/12/2009 Entry Time:09:07 AM Exit Time: Incident #: Farm Name: Beulahland Farm Owner Email: Owner: Braxton Rouse Phone: 252-569-1957 Mailing Address: 5632 Liddell Rd Seven Springs NC 28578 Physical Address: 186 Daly Chapel Rd Seven Springs NC 28578 Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Maxwell Foods Inc Location of Farm: Latitude: 35011'06" Longitude: 77°50'05" Located on the south side of NCSR 1751, approx. 0.4 miles from its intersection with NCSR 1739. Question Areas: Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application Records and Documents Other Issues Certified Operator: Elwood Braxton Rouse Operator Certification Number: 17702 Secondary OIC(s): On -Site Representative(s): 24 hour contact name On -site representative Name Braxton Rouse Brent Mitchell Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Inspector Signature: Secondary Inspector(s): Inspection Summary: Waste analysis: 9-29-09 2.0 8-11-09 1.7 5-28-09 2.3 2-19-09 2.6 soil tested March 2009 Looks Great! Sludge Survey April 2009 Title Phone Phone: Phone: 919-738-3584 Phone: _ Date: Page: 1 Permit: AWS960055 Owner - Facility: Braxton Rouse Inspection Date: 10/12/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Facility Number: 960055 Reason for Visit: Routine Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population Swine Swine - Wean to Feeder 3,200 3,200 Total Design Capacity: 3,200 Total SSLW: 96,000 Waste Structures Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date nasinnad Frnahnard nh<orvad Froohnard agoon PRIMARY 05/30/94 19.00 41.00 Page: 2 Permit: AWS960055 Inspection Date: 10/12/2009 Owner - Facility: Braxton Rouse Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Discharges & Stream Impacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Discharge originated at: Structure Application Field Other a. Was conveyance man-made? b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters? d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) Facility Number: 960055 Reason for Visit: Routine 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? 3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a discharge? Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard? Yes No NA NE ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ Yes No NA NE 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (l.e./ large trees, severe OMOO erosion, seepage, etc.)? 6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ or closure plan? 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or improvement? Waste Application .10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or improvement? 11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. Excessive Ponding? Hydraulic Overload? Frozen Ground? Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ ❑■❑❑ Yes No NA NE ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ Page: 3 Permit: AWS960055 Owner - Facility: Braxton Rouse Facility Number: 960055 Inspection Date: 10/12/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine Waste Application Yes No NA NE PAN? ❑ Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.? Cl Total P205? ❑ Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? ❑ Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑ Evidence of wind drift? ❑ Application outside of application area? ❑ Crop Type 1 Coastal Bermuda Grass (Pasture) Crop Type 2 Fescue (Pasture) Crop Type 3 Small Grain Overseed Crop Type 4 Crop Type 5 Crop Type 6 Soil Type 1 Soil Type 2 Soil Type 3 Soil Type 4 Soil Type 5 Soil Type 6 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ Plan(CAWMP)? 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ Records and Documents Yes No NA NE 19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ If yes, check the appropriate box below. WUP? ❑ Page: 4 Permit: AWS960055 Owner - Facility: Braxton Rouse Facility Number: 960055 Inspection Date: 10/12/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine Records and Documents Yes No NA NE Checklists? ❑ Design? ❑ Maps? ❑ Other? ❑ 21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ IN ❑ ❑ If yes, check the appropriate box below. Waste Application? ❑ 120 Minute inspections? ❑ Weather code? ❑ Weekly Freeboard? ❑ Transfers? ❑ Rainfall? ❑ Inspections after> 1 inch rainfall & monthly? ❑ Waste Analysis? ❑ Annual soil analysis? ❑ Crop yields? ❑ Stocking? ❑ Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)? ❑ 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ 25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ 26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ Otherlssues Yes No NA NE 28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ 29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ONOO mortality rates that exceed normal rates? 30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ Quality representative immediately. Page: 5 Permit: AWS960055 Owner - Facility: Braxton Rouse Facility Number: 960055 Inspection Date: 10/12/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine Other Issues Yes No NA NE 31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? 32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? 33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? O■00 ❑■00 Page: 6 E Division of Water Quality ❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency Facility Number: 960055 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS960055 ❑ Denied Access Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date: Reason for Visit: Routine County: Wayne Region: Washington Date of Visit: 06/17/2008 Entry Time:09757 AM Exit Time: Farm Name: Beulahland Farm Owner: Braxton Rouse Incident #: Owner Email: Phone: 252-569-1957 Mailing Address: 5632 Liddell Rd Seven Sprinas NC 28578 Physical Address: Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Goldsboro Hog Farms Inc Location of Farm: Latitude: 35011'06" Longitude: 77050'05" Located on the south side of NCSR 1751, approx. 0.4 miles from its intersection with NCSR 1739. Question Areas: Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application Records and Documents Other Issues Certified Operator: Elwood Braxton Rouse Secondary OIC(s): Operator Certification Number: 17702 On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone 24 hour contact name Brent Mitchell Phone: 919-738-3584 On -site representative Brent Mitchell Phone: 919-738-3584 Primary Inspector: Eric Newsome Inspector Signature: Secondary Inspector(s): Phone: Date: Page: 1 Permit: AWS960055 Owner - Facility: Braxton Rouse Facility Number: 960055 Inspection Date: 06117/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine Inspection Summary: #19 Keep copy of permit (AWG100000) onsite. WUP dated 8/24/2007 (revised and signed). WARs (lbsN/1000gall): 4/8/08-2.8, 1011/07-1.6. 8/10/07-2.3 Soil test results (4/16/08): 0 tons/acre lime required; Znl-909, Cut-233 (sample 2). 2008 IRR1/2 (FP): Fields 1 & 3; (BP): Fields 4-5 2007 IRR1/2 (CBP): Fields 4-5; (SG): Fields 4-5 PAN rates met and balanced. Typical pumping rate 245 gpm. Pumping volumes of irrigation events were consistent with most changes in freeboard levels. Inquired about 3/30/08 lagoon log entry where level decreased by 14" only to increase by 3" on 416/08. There was no pumping record to correspond to this variation and the entry was described as an entry error. Rainfall records were adequate. #15. Continue weed control on the Bermuda Pasture. 2007 sludge survey results (6/7/07): LTZ= 7.41', Thick= 1.31' 2006 calibration requirement results (8/15/07 used): 1.18" ring, 245gpm expected, 243gpm measured. Must have another calibration done before 2008 calendar year ends. No crop yields available (`Note: Permittee is required to keep bale counts if they are made, regardless of whether the crop is typically grazed`). Page: 2 Permit: AWS960055 Owner - Facility: Braxton Rouse Inspection Date: 06/17/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Facility Number: 960055 Reason for Visit: Routine Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population Swine Swine - Wean to Feeder 3,200 1,600 Total Design Capacity: 3,200 Total SSLW: 96,000 Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard lagoon I PRIMARY 05/30/94 1 1 19.00 31.00', Page: 3 a Permit: AWS960055 Owner - Facility: Braxton Rouse Facility Number: 960055 Inspection Date: 06/17/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ Discharge originated at: Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other ❑ a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ Cl b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters? d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? Cl ■ ❑ ❑ 3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ discharge? Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes No NA NE 4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard? ❑ 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ erosion, seepage, etc.)? 6. Are there structures on -site that are not property addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ or closure plan? 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, 11000 dry stacks and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ improvement? Waste Application Yes No NA NE 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or D ■ ❑ ❑ improvement? 11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ - If yes, check the appropriate box below. Excessive Ponding? ❑ Hydraulic Overload? ❑ Frozen Ground? ❑ Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑ Page: 4 Permit: AWS960055 Inspection Date: 06/17/2008 Waste Application PAN? Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.? Total P205? Owner - Facility: Braxton Rouse Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? Outside of acceptable crop window? Evidence of wind drift? Application outside of application area? Crop Type 1 Crop Type 2 Crop Type 3 Crop Type 4 Crop Type 5 Crop Type 6 Soil Type 1 Soil Type 2 Soil Type 3 Soil Type 4 Facility Number: 960055 Reason for Visit: Routine Soil Type 5 Soil Type 6 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan(CAWMP)? 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? Records and Documents 19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available? 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check the appropriate box below. Yes No NA NE n 11 Fescue (Pasture) Coastal Bermuda Grass (Pasture) Small Grain Overseed Norfolk loamy sand, 0 to 2% slopes Weston loamy sand Norfolk loamy sand, 0 to 2% slopes ■n❑❑ ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ n■nn ❑■❑❑ Yes No NA NE ■❑❑❑ ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ Page: 5 a Permit: AWS960055 Owner - Facility: Braxton Rouse Inspection Data: 06/17/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Facility Number: 960055 Reason for Visit: Routine Records and Documents Yes No NA NE WUP? ❑ Checklists? ❑ Design? ❑ Maps? ❑ Other? ❑ 21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ If yes, check the appropriate box below. Waste Application? ❑ 120 Minute inspections? ❑ Weather code? ❑ Weekly Freeboard? ❑ Transfers? ❑ Rainfall? ❑ Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly? ❑ Waste Analysis? ❑ Annual soil analysis? ❑ Crop yields? ❑ Stocking? ❑ Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)? ❑ 122. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ 25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ 26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ ■ ❑ "❑ 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ �.�--'------ V.. Wn rJA IJL 28. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ 29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ mortality rates that exceed normal rates? Page: 6 Permit: AWS960055 Owner -Facility: Braxton Rouse Inspection Date: 06/17/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Facility Number: 960055 Reason for Visit: Routine Otherlssues 30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWO of emergency situations as required by Permit? 32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewfinspection with on -site representative? 33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? Yes No NA NE ❑❑❑■ Page: 7 N Division of Water Quality 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency Facility Number: 960055 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS960055 ❑ Denied Access Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date: Reason for Visit: Routine County: Wayne Region: Washington Date of Visit: 04/04/2007 Entry Time:11700 AM Exit Time: Incident #: Farm Name: Beulahland Farm Owner Email: Owner: Braxton Rouse Phone: 252-569-1957 Mailing Address: 5632 Liddell Rd Seven Springs NC 28578 Physical Address: Facility Status: a Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Location of Farm: Latitude: 35011'06" Longitude: 77°50'05" Located on the south side of NCSR 1751, approx. 0.4 miles from its -intersection with NCSR 1739. Question Areas: Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application Records and Documents Other Issues Certified Operator: Elwood Braxton Rouse Secondary OIC(s): Operator Certification Number: 17702 On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone On -site representative Braxton Rouse Phone: 24 hour contact name Braxton Rouse Phone: Primary Inspector: Megan Hartwell Phone: Inspector Signature: Date: Secondary Inspector(s): Page: 1 Permit: AWS960055 Owner - Facility: Braxton Rouse Facility Number: 960055 Inspection Date: 04/04/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine Inspection Summary: COC and Permit 2009 Waste Analysis 2-13-07 2.2 9-12-06 1.1 7-13-06 2.1 Soil test 3-8-06 with higest lime 0 tons Cu and Zn values within range *2007 soil samples sent off, waiting for return Irrigation records complete - corrected sheet that showed over application but there was not an over application. Freeboard and rainfall records complete Sludge Survey 8-22-06 thick-3.34' LTZ-4.74' Calibrations complete 8-22-06 245 GPM Page: 2 Permit: AWS960055 Owner - Facility: Braxton Rouse Facility Number: 960055 Inspection Date: 04/04/2007 Regulated Operations Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Design Capacity Reason for Visit: Routine Current Population Swine Swine - Wean to Feeder 3,200 3,200 Total Design Capacity: 3,200 Total SSLW: 96,000 Waste Structures Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard agoon PRIMARY 05/30/94 19.00 38.00 Page: 3 Permit: AWS960055 Owner - Facility: Braxton Rouse Facility Number: 960055 Inspection Date: 04/04/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ Discharge originated at: Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other ❑ a. Was conveyance man-made? n ■ ❑ Cl b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters? d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ n n 3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a ❑ ■ o n discharge? Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes No NA NE 4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? ❑ ■ n n If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard? ❑ 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ erosion, seepage, etc.)? 6. Are there structures on -site that are not property addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ or closure plan? 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ n 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ dry stacks and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or n ■ ❑ ❑ improvement? Waste Application Yes No NA NE 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ improvement? 11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? n ■ n n If yes, check the appropriate box below. Excessive Ponding? ❑ Hydraulic Overload? ❑ Frozen Ground? ❑ Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑ Page: 4 Permit: AWS960055 Owner • Facility: Braxton Rouse Inspection Date: 04/04/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Facility Number: 960055 Reason for Visit: Routine Waste Application Yes No NA NE PAN? ❑ Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.? ❑ Total P205? ❑ Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? ❑ Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑ Evidence of wind drift? ❑ Application outside of application area? ❑ Crop Type 1 Fescue (Hay) Crop Type 2 Coastal Bermuda Grass (Pasture) Crop Type 3 Small Grain Overseed Crop Type 4 Crop Type 5 Crop Type 6 Soil Type 1 Norfolk Soil Type 2 Weston loamy sand Soil Type 3 Soil Type 4 Soil Type 5 Soil Type 6 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management 0 ■ ❑ ❑ Plan(CAWMP)? 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ Records and Documents Yes No NA NE 19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ If yes, check the appropriate box below. WUP? ❑ Page: 5 Permit: AWS960055 Owner -Facility: Braxton Rouse Facility Number: 960055 Inspection Date: 04104/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine Records and Documents Yes No NA NE Checklists? ❑ Design? ❑ Maps? n Other? n 21. Does record keeping need improvement? n ■ ❑ n If yes, check the appropriate box below. Waste Application? n 120 Minute inspections? n Weather code? n Weekly Freeboard? ❑ Transfers? ❑ Rainfall? ❑ Inspections after> 1 inch rainfall & monthly? n Waste Analysis? ❑ Annual soil analysis? ❑ Crop yields? n Stocking? n Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)? n 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? n ■ ❑ ❑ 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)? ❑ ■ n n 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ 25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? ❑ m n ❑ 26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? n ■ n n 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? n ❑ ■ n Other Issues Yes No NA NE 28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ ■ n n 29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those n ■ n n mortality rates that exceed normal rates? 30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ Quality representative immediately. Page: 6 Permit: AWS960055 Owner • Facility: Braxton Rouse Facility Number: 960055 Inspection Date: 04/04/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine Otherlssues Yes No NA NE 31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? 32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? 33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ ■ O ❑ Page: 7 G Division of Water Quality n Division of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency Facility Number: 960055 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS960055 ❑ Denied Access Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date: Reason for Visit: Routine County: Wayne Region: Washington Date of Visit: 06/30/2006 Entry Time:11:50 AM Exit Time: Incident #: Farm Name: Beulahland Farm Owner Email: Owner: Braxton Rouse Phone: 252-569-1957 Mailing Address: 5632 Liddell Rd Seven Springs NC 28578 Physical Address: Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Location of Farm: Latitude: 35011'06" Longitude: 77°50'05" Located on the south side of NCSR 1751, approx. 0.4 miles from its intersection with NCSR 1739 Question Areas: Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application Records and Documents Other Issues Certified Operator: Elwood Braxton Rouse Operator Certification Number: 17702 Secondary OIC(s): On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone On -site representative Braxton Rouse Phone: 24 hour contact name George Pettus Phone: Primary Inspector: Joseph Gyamfi Phone: Inspector Signature: Date: Secondary Inspector(s): Page: 1 Permit: AWS960055 Owner- Facility: Braxton Rouse Facility Number: 960055 Inspection Date: 06/30/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine Inspection Summary: • CoC & Permit available in notebook ` WUP dated 3/31/1999 • Soil test report dated 3/8/06, did not call for lime. Cu & Zn levels ok. ` Waste Analysis: 3/23/06 = 2.4 9/23/05 = 1.5 . Waste Application records are complete and balanced. (21) Need to complete Weather codes and inspection initials. ` Lagoon levels recorded whenever there is rainfall - Changes in levels are consistent with pumping & precipitation events. - Need to records freeboard levels at least once a week as stated in your General Permit • Rainfall recorded with initials . Please secure irrigation calibration & sludge survey by 9/30/2006. ' Need to keep stocking & mortality records on site. #9. Need to practice weed control on Pasture fields Waste applied on Rye overseeded on Coastal Bermuda in October should be charged to the Rye and not the Coastal. Application window for coastal is March through Sept. and that of small grain is Sept - March. Page: 2 Permit: AWS960055 Owner - Facility: Braxton Rouse Facility Number: 960055 Inspection Date: 06/30/2006 Regulated Operations Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Design Capacity Reason for Visit: Routine Current Population Swine Swine - Wean to Feeder 3,200 1,600 Total Design Capacity: 3,200 Total SSLW: 96,000 Waste Structures Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard agoon PRIMARY 05/30/94 19.00 27.00 Page: 3 3 Permit: AWS960055 Owner- Facility: Braxton Rouse Facility Number: 960055 Inspection Date: 06/30/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? n ■ n n Discharge originated at: Structure n Application Field In Other n a. Was conveyance man-made? n ■ n n b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) n ■ n n c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters? d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) n ■ n n 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? n ■ n n 3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a n ■ n n discharge? Waste Collection, Storage& Treatment Yes No NA NE 4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? ❑ ■ n n If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard? n 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe n ■ n n erosion, seepage, etc.)? 6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management n ■ n n or closure plan? 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? n ■ n n 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, n ■ n n dry stacks and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or ■ n n n improvement? Waste Application Yes No NA NE 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or n ■ n n improvement? 11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? n ■ n n If yes, check the appropriate box below. Excessive Ponding? n Hydraulic Overload? n Frozen Ground? n Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? n Page: 4 Permit: AWS960055 Owner - Facility: Braxton Rouse Inspection Date, 06/30/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Facility Number: 960055 Reason for Visit: Routine Waste Application Yes No NA NE PAN? n Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.? n Total P205? n Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? n Outside of acceptable crop window? n Evidence of wind drift? n Application outside of application area? n Crop Type 1 Fescue (Pasture) Crop Type 2 Coastal Bermuda Grass (Pasture) Crop Type 3 Small Grain Overseed Crop Type 4 Crop Type 5 Crop Type 6 Soil Type 1 Norfolk Soil Type 2 Weston Soil Type 3 Soil Type 4 Soil Type 5 Soil Type 6 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management n ■ n n Plan(CAWMP)? 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? n ■ n n 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? n ■ ❑ n 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? n ■ n n 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? n ■ n n Records and Documents Yes No NA NE 19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available? n ■ n n 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? n ■ n n If yes, check the appropriate box below. WUP? ❑ Page: 5 3 Permit: AWS960055 Owner -Facility: Braxton Rouse Facility Number: 960055 Inspection Date: 06/30/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine Records and Documents Yes No NA NE Checklists? n Design? In Maps? n Other? n 21. Does record keeping need improvement? ■ n n n If yes, check the appropriate box below. Waste Application? n 120 Minute inspections? ■ Weather code? ■ Weekly Freeboard? n Transfers? n Rainfall? n Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly? n Waste Analysis? In Annual soil analysis? n Crop yields? n Stocking? n Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)? n 22. Did the facility.fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? n ■ n n 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)? n n ■ n 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? n n n ■ 25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? n n n ■ 26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? n ■ n n 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ n ■ n Other Issues Yes No NA NE 28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? n ■ n n 29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those n ■ n n mortality rates that exceed normal rates? 30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air n ■ n n Quality representative immediately. Page: 6 Permit: AWS960055 Owner - Facility: Braxton Rouse Inspection Date: 06/30/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Otherlssues 31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? 32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? 33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? Facility Number: 960055 Reason for Visit: Routine Yes No NA NE n■nn ❑■0n 0 M 0 n Page: 7 Type of Visit Oi Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O. Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance I for Visit OO Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Referral O Emergency O Other ❑ Denied Access Facility Number 96 5g Date of Visit: 10 14 2004 Time: 1058 0 \ot O erational 0 Below Threshold ® Permitted ®Certified I] Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold• ........� Farm Name: Hcul Wand.F'Arxn........._............. County: Wgy.1.t................ __....... _............ WaR�?_..... OwnerName: Fca7ct9e.................................. Ruse .................................................... _... Phone No:(5?t.569-�7..... ....... ._.......... _......... _..... __...... Mailing Address: 5.631LIddell.R9.4d... :........ ........................................................... __ Seyela-Springs..NC........................ _._......... WE..& .... __.... Facility Contact: Title: Phone No: Onsite Representative: CaJXt.RIA.ItRAtse....................................................................._... Integrator:�itlldsbo�R. o1;E0I1m5__............................ ...... Certified Operator: El)y:Rod.DrAxIoA................ RQ.US.0...... _.................................... _. Operator Certification Number:1%7Q2 Location of Farm: ® Swine [I Poultry [I Cattle [I Horse Latitude 35 11 66 Longitude 77 50 65 Design Current Swine ranarity Pnnnlatinn ® Wean to Feeder 3200 ❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Farrow to Wean ❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Farrow to Finish ❑ Gilts ❑ Boars Number of Lagoons 1 Discharges & Stream Impacts Design Current Design Current Poultry Capacity Population* Cattle Capacity Po uI tion ❑ Layer ❑ Dairy ❑ Non -Layer I JE3 Non -Dairy ❑ Other Total Design Capacity 3,200 Total SSLW 96,000 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 0 No Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notiAl DWQ) El Yes ❑ No c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal%min? d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes. notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No 2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No 3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier:................................... ............... .............. .......... ................. ...... ._............................... Freeboard (inches): 43" 12112103 Continued Facility Number: 96=55 Date of Inspection - 10 142004 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or ❑ Yes N No closure plan? (If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ) 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes N No 8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes N No 9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level El Yes N No elevation markings? Waste Application 10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes N No 11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes N No ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc > IN 12. Crop type Fescue (Graze) Coastal Bermuda (Graze) Small Grain Overseed 13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWNIP)? ❑ Yes N No 14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No 15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes N No 16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes N No Odor Issues 17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation? 18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes N No 19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes N No roads, building structure, and/or public property) 20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ Yes N No Air Quality representative immediately. Comments Use drawer Is available Ito que in #) Eaplam_'any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any othercommenfi4 _ better eaplam s�tuat�ons (use addihonal pages as necessary)::' El Field Copy ❑Final Notes ✓aste Analysis: 9-24-04 = 1.4 lbs 8-9-04 = 1.5 lbs 7-19-04 = 1.51bs 4-28-04 = 2.1 lbs 2-6-04 = 2.2 lbs 10-23-03 = 1.3 lbs oil analysis: 4-16-04 - lime put out in June 2004 Tigation records are complete and balanced out. . grain overseed is emerging reeboard levels are recorded weekly astures are well managed - controlled grazed ows have been fenced out of drainage area. Reviewer/Inspector Name Lyn B. Hatk0s n Reviewer/Inspector Signature: ivrvn3 Date: Facility Number: 96-55 Date of Inspection 10.142004 Required Records & Documents 21. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available? ❑Yes No 22. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? (ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes ® No 23. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Waste Application ❑ Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Sampling 24. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes ® No 25. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ® No 26. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes ® No 27. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes ® No 28. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes ® No 29. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ® No NPDES Permitted Facilities 30. Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35) ❑ Yes ®No 31. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑Yes [I No 32. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ❑ No 33. Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey? ❑ Yes ❑ No 34. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No 35. Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Stocking Form ❑ Crop Yield Form []Rainfall []Inspection After I" Rain ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form 12112103 t, Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access Facility Number 96 55 Date of visit: 12-10.2003 Time: 1255 O Not O erational O Below Threshold ®Permitted ®Certified [3 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ......................... Farm Name: HcAt aWand.farin......................................................................................... County: WAY.Re ............................................... AaRo ........ OwnerName: Hlr&UQj.................................. RRAlse.._.................................................... .... Phone No:(252)L5..69-j95.7......................................................... Mailing Address: 5.6.32.Lid.dill.�ioati.............................................................................. SAiy.VAt.Slatj0gs..NC.............................................. 28.528 ............. Facility Contact: Title: Phone No: Onsite Representative: Rr.a;KtRIA.RRItsG........................................................................... Integrator:Goldshardinfarma ...................................... Certified Operator: HiktRpd..&.H1ra:KtAt1.......... ti.QUe................................................ Operator Certification Number:1,7.7,Q2, ............................ Location of Farm: ® Swine ❑ Poultry [I Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 • 11 06 °° Longitude '77 • 50 05 °' Design Current Swine_ Canacity Pnemiatinn ®Wean to Feeder 3200 3200 ❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Farrow to Wean ❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Farrow to Finish ❑ Gilts ❑ Boars Design Current Design Current Poultry Capacity Po ulation Cattle Capacity Population ❑ Layer [IDairy ❑ Non -Layer I Non -Dairy ❑ Other Total Design Capacity 3,200 Total SSLW 96,000 Number of Lagoons 10 Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area I Holding Ponds / Solid Traps O ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System Discharges & Stream Impacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min? d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No 2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ®No 3. Were. there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ❑ No Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier: ................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Freeboard (inches): 39 ncina/nI / .:.......4 VJ/VJ/Vl Facility Number: 96-55 Date of Inspection 12-10-2003 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or closure plan? (If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ) 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? 8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? 9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level elevation markings? Waste AnDlication l.V/ttN{NCY r ❑ Yes ® No •� ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ®No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ® No 10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No 11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload [ ❑ Yes ® No 12. Crop type Fescue (Graze) Coastal Bermuda (Graze) Small Grain Overseed 13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No 14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No 15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ® No 16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ® No Required Records & Documents 17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ® No 18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? (ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) Yes ®No 19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)- ❑ Yes ® No 20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes ®No 21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ® No 22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit? ❑Yes ®No (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) 23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes ® No 24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes ® No 25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ® No 0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit. ifse(dnavR gsff tyatoti6ettertezplarn stuahons (use addrttonal pages as necessary) 3! Field Copy ® Final Notes C �+ RRecords were available for review Waste analysis: 10-23-03 = 1.3 lbs 9-11-03 = 1.5 lbs 7-9-03 = .76 lbs 2-6-03 = 2.2 lbs 4-23-03 = 2.6 lbs Soil analysis up thru 2003 available and lime was put out in June 2003 _ Reviewer/Inspector Name Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: /a -10--0 3 05103101 Facility Number: 96-55 Date of Inspection 12-10-2003 Continued Odor Issues 26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation? 27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No 28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No roads, building structure, and/or public property) 29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ®No 30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ® No 31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ® No 32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? irrigation records are complete and balanced out levels are recorded weekly. are well established. on dike wall is well established. records are organized. farm is well managed. have any questions, contact your T. specialist or me at 252-946-6481. ❑ Yes ❑ No +1 J of Visit OO Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation for Visit@ Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access Faeelst} Number96 y55J Date of Visit: 4/9/2002 Time: 808 Not O 3eeat:ona➢ O ) O Below Threshold Permitted :0 Certified Conditionally Certified Registered Dage Last �slterated or A1)ove Threshold : ......................... FarmName: lirulahtla WYArm......................................................................................... Count=y: W..AY.IIQ ............................................. WaRQ........ Owner Name: BlrzWon.................................. Rause ........................................................... Phone No:(252).569A952.........-.-...-............................-.-.....--.. 11ai➢ing Address: 5632.LiddtR.Road............................................................................... SeyM.SRrin=..NC............................ .................. 21i5.7.$....-......... Facility Contact: Title: Phone No: Onsite Representative: Braxtotlt.house,.GGorge-Pgtjus........................................... Integrator: Goldshoro.Hog.F.artins--....---.............................. Certit?ed Operator: Ed7a'..QQd.B.r Xt.QjL................ RRuse......................................... p> ....... Operator ............................. Location of Farm: -- i r T ® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latfitude a 35 Ii 11 i>L 06 Lowvitude 1 77 ° i 50 1 0- Swine Design Capacity Current Population Design Current Design Current Poultry Capacity Population Cattle_ Capacity Po suI tion 10 Dairy ❑Non -Laver ❑ Non -Dairy Other i Total Design Capacity 31200 Total SSLW . 96,000 s ® Wean to Feeder 3200 3200 h Feeder to Finish r. !-- ❑ Farrow to Wean •. ❑ Farrow to Feeder r ❑ Farrow to Finish !❑Gilts ? ❑Boars Number of Lagoons 0 ❑ Subsurface Drains Present =0 Lagmn Area ❑ Spray Field Area Holding Ponds / Solid Traps I_i No Liquid Waste Management System i ➢•. 3sar:a€s: strc:icr inmiwct, 1 Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?; Yes 0 No Discharge originated ai: ❑i Lagoon U Spray Field ❑ Other a. If discharge is observed_ was tLe conveyance man-made? r' Yes ❑ No h. If discharge is obsen' ;d- did it reach Wam of the State" (If ;�e _ notify DWQ) )� Yes ❑ No c. If discharge Is obsen'Cd- i\hat is the cslirnaled tloVi M gai/mmn? d. Does discharge b%pass a lagoon Nvstenl? (IL ves. iloiil\ DWQ) 2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? F 1 Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes I� No 3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? Gi Yes C9 No Co%-;'2'E:;3 Cr 4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? C Spillway 0 Yes Z No Structure I Structure 2 Su i.Allrc 3 Siruciurc 4 Stricture -5 Structure 6 Identilicr:..................................................... Frceboard (,inches,): ...... ......... A............... VJ/V✓/VA Facility Number: 96-55 Date of Inspection 4/9/2002 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or closure plan? (If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ) 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? 8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? 9. Do any strictures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level elevation markings? Paz to .Application 10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? 11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload c.ommuea _)J _ . J i❑ Yes ® No © Yes ® No Ej- Yes Eg No ® Yes k1 No ❑ Yes 54 No ❑ Yes N No © Yes 0 No 12. Crop type Fescue C grazed Bermuda C grazed Small Grain Overseed 13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? © Yes Q No 14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? 15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? 16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? hequired 11Ctonis & 11!tii'6iii en LY 17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available? 18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? (ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) 19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) 20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? 21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? 22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) 23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? 24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes ❑ No E]Yes ❑ No [j Yes ❑ No Q Yes 9 No ❑ Yes 9 No M Yes ® No L.1 Yes ® No El Yes N No ❑ Yes ® No Cj Yes 1I`i No F-1 Yes AF No fM{ Yes 0, No Yes g No 25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? Cj Yes N No ® No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit. Comments (refer to question {I): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments. I Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary): 0 Field Copy ❑ Final Notes -,cords available for review. 'aste analysis 1/9/02 - 1.8 lbs.; 10/25/01 - 1.61bs.; 7/9/01 - 1.6 lbs. )il analysis up to 2001 available. Make sure to pull samples for this year. rigation records are complete and balanced out. •eeboard levels are recorded weekly as required. egetation on dike wall is well established. )rayfields are in good shape except in the field next to the first house. Need to clean up ..... (SEE PAGE 3) Reviewer/Inspector Name Lyn B. Hardison entered by Ann Tyndall Reviewer/Inspector Sienature: l% Date: , _? 05103101 Continued Facility Number: 96-55 hate of Inspection 4/9/2002 DJo, Issues 26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation? 27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? 28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt roads, building structure, and/or public property) 29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? 30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) 31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? 32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? El Yes r0 No C Yes ® No ❑ Yes E�] No [j Yes i'p No 01 Yes 9 No ❑ Yes 9 No [I Yes [:] No 1AL PeA Facility Number 96 55 Date of visit: 4/18/2001 Time: 1310 Printed on: 6/19/2001 rO Not Operational O Below Threshold 13Permitted A Certified 13Conditionally Certified 13Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ........ _.............. FarmName: Bul,aWaI d..F,aclul........__._....._._................................._........_........._.._.... County: Vl'AY.ne............................................... \l'aAS?........ Owner Name: ]E ra t911............... _................. Rouse. .............................. ............ _...... ...... .Phone No:(2SZ1.5.69A-95.7......................................................... Mailing Address: 5632.Lid.dell.RQas1........... ................................................ _......_........ S.eren.SR>iRgs..NC.................... .......................... 28.5.7.8 ............. FacilityContact: ..............................................................................Title:......................................--........................ Phone No: -- Onsite Representative:$rAXtRIu.RRAlsg..ireRlge.P�tt1uS.......................-.................. Integrator: G-Q1dsbolR..UQg..kalCdns...................................... Certified Operator: $r.ajKLOIX. ....................:....... R,QU.e................................................ Operator Certification Number:1.77Q2............................. Location of Farm: ® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 • 11 06 Longitude 77 • 50 OS Design Current �Wzjlc Ua act ® Wean to Feeder 3200 ❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Farrow to Wean ❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Farrow to Finish ❑ Gilts ❑ Boars Design Current Design Current Poultry Ca acit Po ulation Cattle Capacity Population ❑ Layer ❑ Dairy ❑ Non -Layer 10 Non -Dairy ❑ Other Total Design Capacity 3,200 Total SSLW 96,000 Number of Lagoons10 Subsurface Drains Present 110 Lagoon Area 10 Spray Field Area rxx : Holding Ponds 1 Solid.Traps; ❑ No Liquid Waste Management Svstem s=; Discharges & Stream Impacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) c. if discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in <,al/min? d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) a ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes to No ❑ Yes ® No n/a ❑ Yes ® No 2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No 3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier: ....................- - Freeboard (inches): 42 0.5/03/01 rnnlinuPd OSIO3101 Facility Number: 96-55 Date of Inspection 4/18/2001 �g Continued Printed on: 6/19/2001 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or closure plan? (If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ) 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? 8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? 9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level elevation markings? Waste Application 10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? 11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ®No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ®No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ❑ No 12. Crop type Fescue (grazed) Coastal Bermuda (Graze) Small Grain Overseed 13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CA WMP)? ❑ Yes ® No 14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? 15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? 16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? Required Records & Documents 17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available? 18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? (ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) 19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) 20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? 21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? 22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) 23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? 24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ®No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ®No ❑ Yes ®No 25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ® No 0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit. ❑ Field Copy ❑ Final Notes Ards available for review. to analysis: 10/18/00 = 1.6 lbs; 2/14/01 = 2.1 lbs; 3/28/01 = 2.7 lbs; 4/6/01 = 2.0 lbs. analysis up through 2000 available. Awaiting this year's results. Lime put out last year. ition records are complete and balanced out. board levels are recorded as required. Inds are well kept. station on dike wall is well established. SEE PAGE 3 IV Reviewer/Inspector Name Lyn B._IWdison r entered by Ann Tyndall�'� Reviewer/InspectorSignature: Date: /k,�/ Y O5103101 Facility Number. 96-55 Date of Inspection 4/18l2001 Continued Printed on: 6/19/2001 Odor Issues 26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation? 27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No 28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ®No roads, building structure, and/or public property) 29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ® No 30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ® No 31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ® No 32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No xayfields are in good shape. you have any questions, contact your Technical Specialist or me at 252-946-6481, ext. 318. .&I of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access Facility Number 96 55 Date of Visit: 6l22/2000 Time: 10:32AM Printed on: 6/23/2000 �Not erational 0 Below Threshold Permitted a Certified 0 Conditionally Certified E3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ._...... __. FarmName: l�ulal.1md.fAirut..__................ _........... ............................................... _.... County: 1'�'.ayn.0................. ..................... __ W. RO........ Owner Name: 111A11.tAA........ ............... ..... Raw ........ _............................................. Phone No:(��Zi.S(e9-145.7.._..........._._....__......__.............. FacilityContact: .._ .......... _............... .......................... ........... Title: .................... _..... .................................. Phone No:..... Mailing Address: 56 2.I.iddell.J3Qad........................ _..................................... ......... 5g.yC11.,SAfiftgS.. G............. _............. ...... _........ 2$ 7.8_._..__._ Onsite Representative: CdXLQa.I3R1AS�.saeRlgk. ettllS......_........._....................... Integrator:G.Qjd:jhQrR. l9.g.1!.al[05....... ............ _................ Certified Operator: Bx..a&Qa.E............................. R9.09................................................. Operator Certification Number:a-7..7.Q . ......... _............... Location of Farm: ......................................................... ............................. ....................................::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::....... .............................. .......... ............... 0 Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 11 06 Longitude 77 50 OS .Design Current 5wme Cauacitv Po ulation ® Wean to Feeder 3200 0 ❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Farrow to Wean ❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Farrow to Finish ❑ Gilts ❑ Boars Design Current Design Current Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population ❑ Layer ❑ Dairy ❑ Non -Layer 10 Non -Dairy ❑ Other Total Design Capacity 3,200 Total SSLW ' 96,000 Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present 110 Lagoon Area 10 Spray Field Area Holding Ponds,/ Solid Traps �_ ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System Discharges &Stream Impacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes 0 No b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ® No c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min? d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If ves, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ®No 2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ®No 3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No Waste Collection S Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier: .................................... .... _.......... _.... _........ _... ................................... .................................... ..... .............................. ........................ _.......... Freeboard (inches): 36 Continued on back Facility Number: 96-55 Date of Inspection 6/22/2000 Printed on: 6/23/2000 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or closure plan? ❑ Yes ® No (If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ) 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No 8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No 9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level elevation markings? ❑ Yes ®No Waste Application 10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No 11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes IN No 12. Crop type Fescue, C. grazed Bermuda C. grazed Small Grain Overseed 13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ®No 14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ® No b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No 15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes El NoLV( 16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ® No Required Records & Documents 17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ No 18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? (ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes ® No 19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) ❑ Yes ® No 20. is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes ®No 21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ® No 22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes ® No 23. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes ® No 24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes ® No 25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified A WMP? ❑ Yes ® No �Io voatousor d. ... ewee::n.o.te.d:d:u:r:in:g :t:D.s .v.si:t:::I..in.: ll.:r.ec. comes ondenceaboutthis:visit. Records available for review. Waste samples 3/29/00 = 1.8 lbs; ?/?/99 = 1.0 lbs.; 8/25/99 = 2.1 lbs.; 6/4/99 = 2.1 lbs. Samples pulled quarterly. Soil analysis: 1998, 1999 and 2000 available. Irrigation records are complete and balanced out. - Freeboard levels are recorded weekly. During last year's hurricane season, this farm was very well operated. Overall, the farm is very well managed. SEE PAGE 3 Reviewer/Inspector Name :Lyn !!I@ on . "/ .v Entered by Ann e'vieWer/Inspector Signature: Date: ' Facility Number: 96-55 Date of Inspection 6/22/2000 Printed on: 6/23/2000 Odor Issues 26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ® No liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation? 27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No 28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No roads, building structure, and/or public property) 29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ® No 30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ® No 31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ® No 32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ® No ie sprayfields are well established. ie vegetation on dike wall is in good shape. ie grounds are very well kept. aep up the good work. you have any questions, contact me at 252-946-6481, extension 318. it State of North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Water Quality James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor Wayne McDevitt, Secretary Kerr T. Stevens, Director July 12, 1999 Mr. Braxton Rouse Beulahland Farm 5632 Liddell Road Seven Springs, NC 28578 NCDENR NORTH C.4ROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND N/.ruRAL RESOURCES SUBJECT: Animal Feedlot Operation Compliance Inspection Beulahland Farm Facility No. 96 -55 Wayne County Dear W. Rouse: On June 9, 1999, I conducted an Animal Feedlot Operation Compliance Inspection at the referenced facility. Overall, the operation was found to be in satisfactory condition. A copy of the inspection report is attached for your review. In general, this inspection includes verifying that: (1) the farm has a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP); (2) the farm is complying with requirements of the State Rules 15 NCAC 2110217, Senate Bill 1217, and the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan; (3) the farm operation's waste management_ _ system is being operated properly under the direction of a Certified Operator, (4) the required records are _ being kept; (5) there are no signs of seepage, erosion, and/or runoff The recommendations and/or comments regarding your inspection can be found in the comment section of the attached inspection form. It is very important as the owner and Operator in Charge that you address any noted concerns, as soon as possible. Thank you for your cooperation and assistance during the inspection. Should you have further questions or comments regarding this inspection, do not hesitate to call me at (252) 946-6481, exL 321. Sincerely, Daphne B. Cullom Environmental Specialist II cc: George Pettus, Goldsboro Hog Farms 'Wayne County SWCD Office /WaRO 943 Washington Square Mail, Washington, North Carolina 27889 Telephone 252/946-Wl FAX 252/946-9215 An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer I* rcounne p t-ompiamt p ronow-up of uvvy inspection p ronow-up of u�jvvL. review p tuner Facility Number Date o1' Inspection Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm) p Permitted i Certified p Conditionally Certified p Registered O Not 0perationa Date Last Operated: Farm Name: Beulahland.Eartn......................................................................................... County: Wayne WaRO OwnerName: Braxton ................................. Ramw .......................................................... Phone No:(252).569-195.7........................................................ FacilityContact: ...............................................................................Title:.........----...........----................................... Phone No:.................................................... Mailing Address: 5632.L'uidell.Road.............................................................................. Sexen.Springs... C.......................... .................... 2857R .............. Onsite Representative: Braxion..Etnusp,.Gearge.P.ettus.......................................... Integrator: Gtildsbnrn.Hog.Farms....................................... Certified Operator: Etwond.Braxtan............... Rause ................................................. Operator Certification Number: 1.7.M............................. Location of Farm: Latitude ©•©' ®• Longitude ©• ® �• I = Design-. -Currt win Se Capacity Popula ® Wean to keeder ❑ ee er to P mis ❑ Farrow to Wean ❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Farrow to Finish ❑ Gilts ❑ Boars mbed:of Lagoons, _ Impacts Design Current = Design urgent Poultry ': Capacity -Population :: Cattle _Capacity Population ❑ ayer ❑ Dairy ❑ Non -Layer I" ❑ Non -Dairy ❑Other _ Total Design Capacity ,; 3,200 -- Total SSLW 96;000 �, ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area 113 Spray Field Area 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min? d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No 2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No 3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier: Freeboard (inches): ...............43................ 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, 3/23/99 seepage, etc.) ❑ Yes ® No Continued on back r ace sty umb ber: 96-55 ate of Inspection �y. 6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or closure plan? (If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ) 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? 8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? 9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level elevation markings? Waste Application 10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? 11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN 12. Crop type Fescue (Graze) Coastal Bermuda (Graze) Small Grain 13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? 14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? 15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? 16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? Required Records & Documents 17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available? 18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? (ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) 19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) 20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? 21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator -in charge? 22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) 23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? 24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes N No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes N No ❑ Yes ®No ❑ Yes ®No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ®No -❑ Yes ®No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ®No ❑ Yes ®No 25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ® No _ 3/23/99 Date of Inspection ace rty Number: 96_55 Odor Issues 26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below p Yes ® No liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation? 27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? p Yes ® No 28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, p Yes ® No roads, building structure, and/or public property) 29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? p Yes ® No 30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) p Yes ® No 31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? p Yes ®No 32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? p Yes ® No .I 0i»WU Animal Feedlot Operation Review p DWQ Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection O L.omptamt O Facility Number Farm Status: 13 Registered p Applied for Permit 0 Certified p Permitted p Not Ope Date Last Operated: Farm Name: Tommy Sanderson Farm O Date of Inspection Time of Inspection Owner Name:.T.ommy................................... SAnderson ................................................. O 24 hr. (hh:mm) County:..W..ayne................................................ k4'.aRO........ Phone No: 919,%9-1S0.j.......................................................... Facility Contact: Rita.Sanderson..............................................Title: Earm..Manager .............................. Phone No: 919:Sb9.-1S0 ..................... Mailing Address: LRb.Da1y_Chapel Rd.........................................................................: Sexen.Springs...N.C.............................................. 2,8519 ............ Onsite Representative: Rita.Sandersan......................................................................... Integrator: GoldsUmMog.Farms....................................... Certified Operator: DuirmonA.M......................... Sanderson ...................................... Operator Certification Numberj9b.8.7.............................. Location of Farm: a ULILuuc 1 „ '61 6 �R Longitude ©9 ®' FU-9-1a 1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? p Yes N No 2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? p Yes ® No Discharge originated at: p Lagoon 13 Spray Field p Other a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? p Yes p No b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes p No c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min? d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes p No 3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? p Yes ®No 4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? p Yes ®No 5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require r3 Yes N No 4/30/97 maintenance/improvement? Facility Number: 96_55 6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? 7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? 8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? Structures (Lagoons and/or Holdine Ponds) 9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? Freeboard (11): Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 ............... 2.92............... ...................................... ...................................... ....................................... 10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? 11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? p Yes ® No p Yes ®No _ --- p Yes ® No p Yes ® No --- Structure 5 - - _- . - Structure 6 12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? (If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ) 13. -Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? _ Waste Application 14. Is there physical evidence of over application? (If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ) 15. Crop type -...... Ckiastal.Bermuda.Gxass............................ F.escjue.:..............................................Bya._......................... 16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? 17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? 18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? --19.- Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?-- 20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? 21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? For Certified Facilities Only 22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? 23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified A WMP? p Yes ® No - - p Yes ® No - pYes ® No - p Yes ® No p Yes H No - N Yes p No p Yes N No ® Yes p No p Yes ®_No p Yes N No p Yes H No p Yes ® No ❑ Yes ® No 24. Does record keeping need improvement? p Yes ® No . . - Site Requires Immediate Attention: Facility No. 16 - scs— two DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD Date: -'Z 1995 // Time: j�e c... 4 Farm Name/Owner: Mailing Address: County: Integrator: On Site Represent No. of Animals on Site: 1,�EM Certification No.: ACE DEM Certification No.: 0-NEW Latitude: - __U- Longitude: ')7 60 _.(2,�:_Elevation: Ft Circle Yes or No Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Ft + 25 year 24 hour storm event? (approximately 1 Ft + 7 in) (J59 or No Actual Freeboard: G Ft A Inches Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes orcgi> Was any erosion observed? Yes or Is adequate land available for spray? es or No' AeR Is the cover crop adequate? Mesr No HCOz� �Cewr,i_ ea�N2 / ^Crop(s) being utilized: j3,� A�UR,��(�. /IP:QAt�4 � f-exa:A Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Ft from Dwellings? for No 100 Ft from Wells?-- or No Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Ft of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes oro;�' Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Ft of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes or 3> Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state blAan-made ditch, flushing system, or other similar man-made devices? Yes o If Yes, please explain: Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of m ure, land applied, spray irrigated on specific eage with co a crop)? r No 1-Fd" Inspector Name ` Si ture Cc: Facility Assessment Unit Comments & Sketch on Back of Sheet 6 vw sK2(!, DEM SITE VISITATION RECORD Page Two Co=ents: I. R e,Z Sketch: