960051_INSPECTIONS_20171231

2'
NUH I H UAHULINA
Department of Environmental Qual

INSPECTIONS
INSPECTIONS
INSPECTIONS

ft
Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number:
960051
Facility Status: Active
Permit: AWS960051
❑ Denied Access
Inppection Type:
Compliance Inspection
Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit:
Routine
County:
Wayne Region:
Washington
Date of Visit:
08/29/2017 Entry Time: 08:05 am Exit Time: 9:45
am Incident #
Farm Name:
Daw & Son Farm
Owner Email:
Owner:
Daw Farms Inc
Phone:
919-734-6410
Mailing Address:
653 Hare Rd
Goldsboro NC 27534
Physical Address:
1041 Mt Cannel Church Rd
Pikeville NC 27863
Facility Status:
Compliant ❑
Not Compliant Integrator:
Maxwell Foods LLC
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
35` 28' 25" Longitude:
77' 56' 36"
SR 1545, 2 miles north
of SR 1523, west side of road.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat
Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Paul Lewt Daw
Operator Certification Number: 26042
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name
Title Phone
24 hour contact name Brent Mitchell
Phone : [phone]
Primary Inspector: Justin K Davis
Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary
page: 1

r �+
Permit: AWS960051 Owner - Facility : Daw Farms Inc Facility Number: 960051
Inspection Date: 08/29/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Report N
6-22-17 1.24
4-7-17 0.94
10-20-2016 0.99
Soil Report 12-28-2016
Zn<600
Cu<300
Calibration due 2017
2015
Lagoon Sludge Survey 11-27-2016
LTZ 3.3
T 3.8
PI 3.2
45%
page: 2

.. y
Permit: AWS960051 Owner - Facility : Daw Farms Inc Facility Number: 960051
Inspection Date: 08/29/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
Sw ne - Wean to Feeder 3,200 2,559
Total Design Capacity: 3,200
Total SSLW: 96,000
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon PRIMARY 06/01/92 19.00 43.00
page: 3

► ""
Permit: AWS960051 Owner -Facility: Daw Farms Inc Facility Number: 960051
Inspection Date: 08/29/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No Na Ne
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
M ❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
M ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes No Na Ne
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large
❑
M ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
0 ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
M ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
M ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na Ne
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ M ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 4

ae .
Permit: AWS960051 Owner - Facility : Daw Farms Inc Facility Number: 960051
Inspection Date: 08/29/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No Na No
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
0 ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
0 ❑
❑
determination?
17_ Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
0 ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
E ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na Ne
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
0 ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 5

i � d
Permit: AWS960051 Owner -Facility: Daw Farrns Inc Facility Number: 960051
Inspection Date: 08/29/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No Na Ne
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
0 ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
MEJ
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
M ❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
0 ❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
0 ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No Na Ne
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
0 ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
0 ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
M ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
M ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
0 ❑
❑
CAWMP?
33, Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
0 ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
E ❑
❑
page: 6

0
Division of Water Resources
❑
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑
Other Agency
Facility Number: 960051 Facility Status: Active
Permit: AWS960051
❑ Denied Access
Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection
Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County:
Wayne Region:
Washington
Date of Visit: 08/24/2016 Entry Time: 07:30 am Exit Time: 8:35 am Incident #
Farm Name: Daw & Son Farm
Owner Email:
Owner: Daw Farms Inc
Phone:
919-734-6410
Mailing Address: 653 Hare Rd
Goldsboro NC 27534
Physical Address: 1041 Mt Carmel Church Rd
Pikeville NC 27863
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Maxwell Foods LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude:
35° 28' 25" Longitude:
77' 56' 36"
SR 1545, 2 miles north of SR 1523, west side of road.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat
Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Paul Lewt Daw
Operator Certification Number:
26042
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Brent Mitchell
Phone : [phone]
Primary Inspector: Justin K Davis
Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
page: 1

Permit: AWS960051 Owner - Facility : Daw Farms Inc Facility Number: 960051
Inspection Date: 08/24/16 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Report N
1
7-6-2016
1.29
3-15-2016
1.81
12-3-2015
1.24
7-29-2015
0.84
Soil Report 12/4/2015
Due 2018
Zn<407
Cu<299
Calibration 2013. Due 2017.
Lagoon Sludge Survey 11-1-2016
1
LTZ= 3.3
Thickness= 3.7
Pump Intake= 3.2
off= 44
Freeboard and Rainfall records recorded on calendars. 2015 and 2016 calendars checked.
page: 2

N
Permit. AWS960051 Owner - Facility : Daw Farms Inc Facility Number: 960051
Inspection Date: 08/24/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
Swine - Wean to Feeder 3,200 3,050
Total Design Capacity: 3,200
Total SSLW: 96,000
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon PRIMARY 06/01/92 19.00 29.00
page: 3

r
Permit: AWS960051 Owner - Facility : Daw Farms Inc Facility Number: 960051
Inspection Date: 08/24/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes No Na No
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
M ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
0 ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
M ❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0 ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
0 ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No Na Ne
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
M ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large
❑
0 ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
0 ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
0 ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
0 ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na No
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ M ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ M ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 4

• •.
Permit: AWS960051 Owner -Facility: Daw Fanns Inc Facility Number: 960051
Inspection Date: 08/24/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No Na Ne
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
0 ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
MEI
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
MEI
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na Ne
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ M ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 5

Permit: AWS960051
Owner - Facility : Daw Farms Inc Facility Number: 960051
Inspection Date: 08/24/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No Na Ne
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
0 ❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
N ❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
0 ❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
0 ❑
❑
2?. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
N ❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes No Na Ne
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
0 ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
0 ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
0 ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
E ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
E ❑
❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
0 ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
E ❑
❑
page: 6

0 Division of Water Resources
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
El Other Agency
Facility Number: 960051 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS960051 ❑ Denied Access
Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit:
Routine
Dale of Visit:
09/17/2015 Entry Time: 08:40 am
Farm Name:
Daw & Son Farm
Owner:
Daw Farms Inc
Mailing Address:
653 Hare Rd
Physical Address:
1041 Mt Carmel Church Rd
Facility Status:
® Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Location of Farm:
SR 1545, 2 miles north
of SR 1523, west side of road.
Question Areas:
K] Dischrge & Stream Impacts
10 Records and Documents
Inactive Or Closed Date:
County: Wayne Region:
Washington
Exit Time: 9:50 am Incident #
Owner Email:
Phone:
919-734-6410
Goldsboro NC 27534
Pikeville NC 27863
Integrator: Maxwell Foods Inc
Latitude: 35' 28' 25" Longitude:
77' 56' 36"
Waste Col, Stor, & Treat
Other Issues
Waste Application
Certified Operator: Paul Lewt Daw Operator Certification Number: 26042
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Brent Mitchell Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector:
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Justin K Davis
Phone:
Date:
page: 1

Permit: AWS960051 Owner - Facility : Daw Farms Inc Facility Number: 960051
Inspection Date: 09/17/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Report
N
7-29-15
0.84
4-21-15
1.46
2-4-15
1.18
12-3-14
1.86
8-1-14
1.29
Soil Report
Zn<420
Cu<280
Lagoon Sludge Survey 5-16-14
LTZ-3.9
Thickness-3.3
Pump Intake-3.9
37%
Calibration due 2015.
Crop yield, pumping records, rainfall and freeboard coincide.
page: 2

Permit: AWS960051 Owner - Facility : Daw Farms Inc Facility Number: 960051
Inspection Date: 09/17/15 Inpsection Type. Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
El Swine - Wean to Feeder 3,200 I 3,418
Total Design Capacity: 3,200
Total SSLW: 96,000
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon PRIMARY 06/01/92 19.00 38.00
page: 3

Permit: AWS960051 Owner - Facility : Daw Farms Inc Facility Number: 960051
Inspection Date: 09/17/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No Na Ne
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
®❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
®❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
M ❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
®❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
®❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
®❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No Na No
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
®❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large
❑
®❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
®❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
®❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
®❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
®❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na Ne
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ ®❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ®❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 4

Permit: AWS960051 Owner - Facility : Daw Farms Inc Facility Number: 960051
Inspection Date: 09/17/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No Na Ne
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
®❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
®❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
. ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
®❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
®❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na No
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
®❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
W ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ N ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 5

Permit: AWS960051 Owner - Facility : Daw Farms Inc Facility Number: 960051
Inspection Date: 09/17/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na Ne
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
®❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
©❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
®❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
®❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
®❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
®❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No Na Ne
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
❑ ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
❑ ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
❑ ❑
❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
page: 6

0 Division of Water Quality
El Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 960051 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS960051 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Comoliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Wayne Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 05/07/2014 Entry Time: 07:11 AM Exit Time: 07:45 AM Incident #:
Farm Name: Daw & Son Farm Owner Email:
Owner: Daw Farms Inc Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 653 Hare Rd Goldsboro NC 27534
Physical Address: 1041 Mt Carmel Church Rd Pikeville NC 27863
Facility Status: E Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Maxwell Foods Inc
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35028'25" Longitude: 77056'36"
SR 1545, 2 miles north of SR 1523, west side of road.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Paul Lewt Daw
Secondary OIC(s):
Operator Certification Number: 26042
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Brent Mitchell Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Brent Mitchell Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: Ronnie T Smith Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

Permit: AWS960051 Owner - Facility: Daw Farms Inc
Facility Number: 960051
Inspection Date: 05/07/2014 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
CoC in records
WUP 7111/02
OIC card in records
Waste Analysis N
1 /23114 = 1.66
7/14/13 = .94
4/15/13 = 2.35
2/21/13 = 1.69
Soil Test 11/29/12
Cu & Zn levels w/in range
L=OT
"`due again in 2015"'
crop yield reviewed
"'irrgiation calibration due again 2015"`
irrigation reocrds correspond to rainfall and lagoon records
"Sludge Survey due again 2014"'
Page: 2

Permit: AWS960051 Owner - Facility: Daw Farms Inc Facility Number: 960051
Inspection Date: 05/07/2014
Regulated Operations
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Wean to Feeder 3,200 0
Waste Structures
Type
Identifier
Total Design Capacity: 3,200
Total SSLW: 96,000
Designed Observed
Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
agoon PRIMARY 06/01/92 19.00 39.00
Page: 3

0
Permit: AWS960051 Owner - Facility: Daw Farms Inc
Facility Number: 960051
Inspection Date: 05/07/2014 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes No NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
OSO
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS960051 Owner - Facility: Daw Fars Inc
Inspection Date: 05/07/2014 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 960051
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Craven sandy loam, 2
to 6% slopes, erode
Soil Type 2
Norfolk loamy sand, 0
to 2% slopes
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑
■
❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
■
❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■
❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■
❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
■
❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Page: 5

Permit: AWS960051 Owner - Facility: Daw Farms Inc
Inspection Date: 05/07/2014 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Records and Documents
Facility Number: 960051
Reason for Visit: Routine
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement? OMOO
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑ ■
❑ ❑
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
Page: 6

u
Permit: AWS960051 Owner - Facility: Daw Farms Inc
Inspection Date: 05/07/2014 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 960051
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes
No
NA
NE
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
ONO
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■
❑
❑
Other Issues Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report
❑
■
❑
❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional
❑
■
❑
❑
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge,
❑
■
❑
❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
Lagoon / Storage Pond
Other
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
IS
Page: 7

F%
J
Division of Water Quality
j� Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 960051 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS960051 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Wayne Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 08/06/2013 Entry Time: 12:30 PM Exit Time: 01:10 PM Incident #:
Farm Name: Daw & Son Farm Owner Email:
Owner: Daw Farms Inc Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 653 Hare Rd Goldsboro NC 27534
Physical Address: 1041 Mt Carmel Church Rd Pikeville NC 27863
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Maxwell Foods Inc
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°28'25" Longitude: 77056'36"
SR 1545, 2 miles north of SR 1523, west side of road
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat
Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Paul Lewt Daw
Operator Certification Number: 26042
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name
Title Phone
24 hour contact name Brent Mitchell
Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Brent Mitchell
Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: Ronnie T Smith
Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

Permit: AWS960051 Owner - Facility: Daw Farms Inc Facility Number: 960051
Inspection Date: 08/0612013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
WuP 7111112
OIC in records
Waste Analysis N
7/14/13 = .94
4/15/13 = 2.35
2/21/13 = 1.69
10/15/12 = 1.11
crop yield records reviewed
Soil Test 11/29/12
L = O.OT
Cu & Zn levels
"due again 2013"
sludge Survey 10/23/12
thickness = 1.9
LTZ = 5.4
pump intake = 3.4
19%
Irrigation calibration due again 2013"
irrigation records correspond to rainfall and lagoon records
Page: 2

Permit: AWS960051 Owner - Facility: Dew Farms Inc
Facility Number: 960051
Inspection Date: 08/06/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity
Current Population
Swine
Q Swine - Wean to Feeder 3,200 2,870
Waste Structures
Type
Identifier
Total Design Capacity: 3,200
Total SSLW: 96,000
Designed Observed
Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
lagoon PRIMARY 06/01/92 19.00 38.00
Page: 3

Permit: AWS960051 Owner - Facility: Daw Farms Inc Facility Number: 960051
Inspection Date: 08/06/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
■
❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than
❑
■
❑
❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS960051 Owner • Facility: Daw Farms Inc
Inspection Date: 08/06/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number : 960051
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Craven sandy loam, 2
to 6% slopes, erode
Soil Type 2
Norfolk loamy sand, 0
to 2% slopes
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑
■
❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
000
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
■
❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■
❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
ONO
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
■
❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Page: 5

Permit: AWS960051 Owner - Facility: Daw Farms Inc Facility Number; 960051
Inspection Date: 0810612013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
WUP? ❑
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Lease Agreements? ❑
Other? ❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑
■ ❑ ❑
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a PDA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
Page: 6

Permit: AWS960051 Owner - Facility: Daw Farms Inc
Inspection Date: 08/06/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 960051
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No
NA
NE
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ ■
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ ■
❑
❑
Other Issues Yes No
NA
NE
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report
❑ ■
❑
❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional
❑ ■
❑
❑
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge,
❑ ■
❑
❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑ ■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
Lagoon / Storage Pond
Other
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Page: 7

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 960051 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS960051 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Comoliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Wayne Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 05/22/2012 Entry Time: 08:57 AM Exit Time: 09:30 AM Incident #:
Farm Name: Daw & Son Farm Owner Email:
Owner: paw Farms Inc Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 653 Hare Rd Goldsboro NC 27534
Physical Address: 1041 Mt Carmel Church Rd Pikeville NC 27863
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Maxwell Foods Inc
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35028'25" Longitude: 77956'36"
SR 1545, 2 miles north of SR 1523, west side of road
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat
Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Paul Lewt Daw
Operator Certification Number: 26042
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name
Title Phone
24 hour contact name Brent Mitchell
Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Brent Mitchell
Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: Ronnie T Smith
Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

Permit: AWS960051 Owner - Facility: Daw Farms Inc Facility Number: 960051
Inspection Date: 05/22/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
New CoC in records
WUP 7/11/02
OIC card in records
Sludge Survey 8/10/11
"due again 2012"
thickness = 1.1
LTZ = 5.7
pump intake = 3.8
12%
Waste Analysis N
3/8/12 = 2.4
12/1111 = 1.4
7/13/11 = 2.2
Soil Test 12/1/2011
"due again 2012"
Cu & Zn levels Min range
L=OT
irrigation records correspond to rainfall & lagoon records
irrigation calibration 9/19/11
"due again 2013"
crop yield records reveiwed
Page: 2

Permit: AWS960051 Owner - Facility: Daw Farms Inc
Inspection Date: 05/22/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 960051
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Wean to Feeder 3,200 2,374
Total Design Capacity: 3,200
Total SSLW: 96,000
Waste Structures
Designed Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
agoon PRIMARY O6/01/92 19.00 37.00
Page: 3

Permit: AWS960051 Owner - Facility: Daw Farms Inc
Facility Number: 960051
Inspection Date: 05/22/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes
No
NA
NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
■
❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
I Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than
❑
■
❑
❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑
■
❑
Cl
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
Cl
improvement?
Waste Application Yes No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS960051 Owner • Facility: Daw Farms Inc
Inspection Date: 05122/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 960051
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Craven sandy loam, 2
to 6% slopes, erode
Soil Type 2
Craven
Soil Type 3
Norfolk loamy sand, 0
to 2% slopes
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑
■
❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
■
❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
ONO
❑
16. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■
❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
■
❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Page: 5

Permit: AWS960051 Owner - Facility: Daw Farms Inc Facility Number: 960051
Inspection Date: 05/22/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
WUP? ❑
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Lease Agreements? ❑
Other? ❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑ ■
❑ ❑
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
Page: 6

Permit: AWS960051 Owner - Facility: Daw Farms Inc
Facility Number: 960051
Inspection Date: 05/22/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ ■
❑
❑
Otherlssues Yes No
NA
NE
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report
❑ ■
❑
❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional
❑ ■
❑
❑
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge,
❑ ■
❑
❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field ❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond ❑
Other ❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 7

Division of Water Quality
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 960051 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS960051 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Wayne Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 07/11/2011 Entry Time:09:30 AM Exit Time: 10:15 AM Incident #:
Farm Name: Daw & Son Farm Owner Email:
Owner: Daw Farms Inc Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 653 Hare Rd Goldsboro NC 27534
Physical Address: 1041 Mt Cannel Church Rd Pikeville NC 27863
Facility Status: E Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Maxwell Foods Inc
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35028'25" Longitude: 77°56'36"
SR 1545, 2 miles north of SR 1523, west side of road.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Paul Lewt Daw
Secondary OIC(s):
Operator Certification Number: 26042
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Brent Mitchell Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Brent Mitchell Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: Ronnie T Smith Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page:1

Permit: AWS960051 Owner - Facility: Daw Farms Inc Facility Number: 960051
Inspection Date: 07/11/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
WUP 7/11/02
Soil Test 11/8/10
CoC in records
"due again in 2011"
OIC in records
Field #2 & Field #4 Zn levels around 1,000
keep eye on, Cu w/in range.
Waste Analysis N
3/30/11 = 3.1
Sludge Survey
11/12/10 = 1.6
"due again 2011"
8/17/10 = 1.8
thickness = .8
2/15/10 = 1.6
LTZ = 4.0
pump intake = 3.8
lagoon records correspond to irrigation 13%
& rainfall records.
"'irrigation calibration bue again
2011 *"
crop yield records reviewed
Page: 2

Permit: AWS960051 Owner • Facility: Daw Farms Inc Facility Number: 960051
Inspection Date: 07/11/2011
Regulated Operations
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Design Capacity
Swine
❑ Swine - Wean to Feeder 3,200
Waste Structures
Reason for Visit: Routine
Current Population
Total Design Capacity: 3,200
Total SSLW: 96,000
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon PRIMARY 66/01/92 1 19.00 31.00
Page: 3

Permit: AWS960051 Owner - Facility: Daw Farms Inc
Inspection Date: 07/11/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Discharges $ Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at:
Structure
Application Field
Other
a. Was conveyance man-made?
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
Facility Number : 960051
Reason for Visit: Routine
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes No NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard? ❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS960051 Owner - Facility: Daw Farms Inc
Inspection Date: 07/1112011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number : 960051
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No
NA
NE
PAN?
❑ -
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Com, Wheat,
Soybeans
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Craven
Soil Type 2
Norfolk
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■
❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■
❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
Cl ■
❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■
Cl
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■
❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 5

u
Permit: AWS960051 Owner • Facility: Daw Farms Inc
Inspection Date: 07/11/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Records and Documents
Facility Number : 960051
Reason for Visit: Routine
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑
■ ❑ ❑
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■ Cl ❑
Page: 6

Permit: AWS960051 Owner - Facility: Daw Farms Inc
Facility Number: 960051
Inspection Date: 07/11/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field ❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond ❑
Other ❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewfinspection with on -site representative? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 7

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 960051 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS960051 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Comoliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Wayne Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 09/23/2010 Entry Time:09,10 AM Exit Time:
Farm Name: Daw & Son Farm
Owner: paw Farms Inc
Incident #:
Owner Email:
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 653 Hare Rd Goldsboro NC 27534
Physical Address: 1041 Mt Carmel Church Rd Pikeville NC 27863
Facility Status: E Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Maxwell Foods Inc
Location of Farm:
SR 1545, 2 miles north of SR 1523, west side of road.
Latitude:35°28'25" Longitude:77°56'36"
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Paul Lewt Daw
Secondary OIC(s):
Operator Certification Number: 26042
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Brent Mitchell Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Brent Mitchell Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: Megan H Stilley
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Phone:
Date:
Page: 1

Permit: AWS960051 Owner - Facility: Daw Farms Inc Facility Number : 960051
Inspection Date: 09/23/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
New COC and Permit in records
Waste Analysis 8-17-10 1.8
2-15-10 1.6
11-19-09 1.2
Soil test 11-20-09 with highest lime 0 tons
Cu and Zn values within range
'Sludge removed March 2010 with sludge analysis 1-28-10 13.7
-Soil test 3-8-10 with highest lime .3 tons - Cu and Zn values within range
Sludge Survey 6-14-10 Thick-.8'
LTZ4.0'
Pump intake-3.8' 113% Sludge Ratio
Calibration due 2011 } 213 GPM 6-29-09
Freeboard and Rainfall complete & correspond with irrigation
Page: 2

' Permit: AWS960051 Owner - Facility: Daw Farms Inc
Inspection Date: 09/23/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 960051
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
O Swine - Wean to Feeder 3,200 2,898
Total Design Capacity: 3,200
Total SSLW: 96,000
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon PRIMARY 06/01/92 19.00 40.00
Page: 3

Permit: AWS960051 Owner - Facility: Daw Farms Inc
Facility Number:960051
Inspection Date: 09/23/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No
NA
NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
■
❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑
❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■
❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■ ❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■ ❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■ ❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS960051 Owner - Facility: Dew Farms Inc
Inspection Date: 09/23/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 960051
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No
NA
NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Com, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Craven
Soil Type 2
Norfolk
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■
❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■
❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■
❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■
❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■
❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 5

Permit: AWS960051 Owner - Facility: Daw Farms Inc
Inspection Date: 09/23/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 960051
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)? ❑
❑
■
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑
❑
27: Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑
■
❑
Vas
Nn
NA
NF
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ❑ ❑ ■
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 6

Permit: AWS960051 Owner - Facility: Daw Farms Inc Facility Number: 960051
Inspection Date: 09/23/2010
Otherlssues
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page:7

E Division of Water Quality
El Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 960051 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS960051 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Wayne Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 10/07/2009 Entry Time:08730 AM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: Daw & Son Farm Owner Email:
Owner: Daw Farms Inc Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 653 Hare Rd Goldsboro NC 27534
Physical Address: 1041 Mt Cannel Church Rd Pikeville NC 27863
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Maxwell Foods Inc
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°28'25" Longitude: 77056'36"
SR 1545, 2 miles north of SR 1523, west side of road
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment
Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Paul Lewt Daw
Operator Certification Number: 26042
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name
Title Phone
24 hour contact name Brent Mitchell
Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Paul Daw
Phone:
Primary Inspector: Megan H Stilley
Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

Permit: AWS960051 Owner - Facility: Daw Farms Inc Facility Number: 960051
Inspection Date: 10/07/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
COC and Permit in records 2014
Waste Analysis 8-12-09 .88
2-4-09 1.6
11-17-08 1.6
7)Leak at pump by lagoon - maintain - looks like past leak
Soil test 12-19-08 with highest lime 0 tons
-Zinc levels elevated on field 2&3 (levels in the 1000 range)
Freeboard and Rainfall complete and correspond with irrigation
Calibration 6-29-09 with 213 GPM ) Next one due 2011
Sludge Survey 2-23-09 Thick-3.2'
LTZ-3.4'
Pump intake-2.6') Sludge Ratio 40%
Crop yield complete
Page:2

Permit: AWS960051 Owner - Facility: Daw Farms Inc Facility Number: 960051
Inspection Date: 10/07/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
O swine - Wean to Feeder 3,200 2,791
Total Design Capacity: 3,200
Total SSLW: 96,000
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon PRIMARY 06/01/92 19.00 30.00
Page: 3

Permit: AWS960051 Owner - Facility: Daw Farms Inc Facility Number: 960051
Inspection Date: 10/07/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
■
❑
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lads adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS960051 Owner - Facility: Daw Farms Inc
Inspection Date: 10/07/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 960051
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No
NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Com (Grain)
Crop Type 2
Soybean,
Wheat
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Craven
Soil Type 2
Norfolk
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■
❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■
❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page:5

e
Permit: AWS960051 Owner- Facility: Daw Farms Inc
Inspection Date: 10/07/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 960051
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
❑
■ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑ ❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑ ❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑
■ ❑
Otherissues
Yes
No
NA NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■
❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ❑ ❑ ■
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 6

• Permit: AWS960051
Inspection Date: 10/07/2009
Otherlssues
Owner - Facility: Daw Farms Inc
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWO of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Facility Number: 960051
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
Cl ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 7

0 Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 960051 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS960051 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Wayne Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 06/11/2008 Entry Time:08:25 AM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: Daw & Son Farm Owner Email:
Owner: Delanor Daw Son Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 653 Hare Rd Goldsboro NC 27534
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Goldsboro Hog Farms Inc
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35028'25" Longitude: 77056'36"
SR 1545, 2 miles north of SR 1523, west side of road.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Paul Lewt Daw Operator Certification Number: 26042
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Brent Mitchell Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Brent Mitchell Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: Eric Newsome Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

Permit: AWS960051 Owner - Facility: Delanor Daw Son Facility Number: 960051
Inspection Date: 06/11/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
Saw CoC and Permit.
WUP dated 1/2/2003. Land listed as Tract 4907 (F1, 2, 3, 4A, 413, 5, 6, 7).
WARS (lbsN/1000gall): 4/7/08-1.5, 10/19/07-1.1, 5/24/07-1.8
Soil test results (117/08), Rept#17301: 0 tons/acre lime required (sample 5); Znl-540, Cut-326 (sample 5).
20081RR1/2 (corn): pull 2; (wheat): pull 4
20071RR1/2 (corn): pull 4; (SB): pull 3
PAN rates met and balanced. Typical pumping rate 210 gpm.
Pumping volumes of irrigation events (6" drop vs 84,000 gallons and 7" drop vs 52,000 gallons) were consistent with changes in
freeboard levels. Rainfall records were adequate.
#7. Need to mow the vegetation that has grown on the northeast toe of the lagoon.
2007 sludge survey results (9/21/07): LTZ= 4.3', Thick= 3.1'
2007 calibration results (6/10/07): 55 psi @gun. 210gpm expected, 209gpm measured.
Crop yields seen (126 bu of SB 1215/07; 486 bu of corn 10/11/07).
Page: 2

Permit: AWS960051 Owner - Facility: Delanor Daw Son
Facility Number: 960051
Inspection Date: 06/11/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity
Current Population
Swine
Swine - Wean to Feeder 3,200 2,872
Total Design Capacity: 3,200
Total SSLW: 96,000
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon PRIMARY 06/01/92 19.00 31.00
Page: 3

Permit: AWS960051 Owner - Facility: Delanor Daw Son
Facility Number : 960051
Inspection Date: 06/11/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at:
Structure
Application Field
Other
a. Was conveyance man-made?
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Led large trees, severe
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
n■DD
00011
0000
❑■❑❑
Yes No NA NE
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
Hydraulic Overload?
Frozen Ground?
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
■❑❑❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NE
n■nn
Dann
n
11
Page: 4

Permit: AWS960051 Owner - Facility: Delanor Daw Son
Inspection Date: 06/11/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number : 960051
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
n
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Com, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Craven sandy loam, 2
to 6% slopes, erode
Soil Type 2
Norfolk loamy sand, 0
to 2% slopes
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑
■
❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
■
❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■
❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■
❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
■
❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■
0
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Page: 5

Permit: AWS960051 Owner - Facility: Delanor Daw Son
Facility Number :
960051
Inspection Date: 06/11/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA
NE
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
Cl
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ ■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after> 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ ■
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)? ❑ ❑
■
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ■
❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ ■
❑
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ ■
0
0
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ ❑
m
❑
Other Issues
Yes No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑ ■
❑
❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
Page: 6

Permit: AWS960051 Owner - Facility: Delanor Daw Son
Facility Number: 960051
Inspection Date: 06/11/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air
Quality representative immediately.
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Page: 7

E Division of Water Quality
n Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 960051 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS960051 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Wayne Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 06/30/2006 Entry Time:09:25 AM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: Daw & Son Farm
Owner: Delanor Daw Son
Owner Email:
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 653 Hare Rd Goldsboro NC 27534
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Location of Farm:
SR 1545, 2 miles north of SR 1523, west side of road.
Integrator:
Latitude:35°28'25" Longitude:77°56'36"
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Paul Lewt Daw
Secondary OIC(s):
Operator Certification Number: 26042
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
On -site representative Paul Daw Phone: [phone]
24 hour contact name George Pettus Phone:
Primary Inspector: Joseph Gyamfi
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Phone:
Date:
Page: 1

Permit: AWS960051 Owner - Facility: Delanor Daw Son Facility Number: 960051
Inspection Date: 06/30/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
` #19. Permit available in notebook, but missing CoC. Will mail copy to Paul Daw @ 330 Daw Pate Rd, Goldsboro, NC 27534
` WUP dated 7/11/2002
Waste Analysis:
5/19/06 = 2.3
12/21 /05 = 2.1
9/21 /05 = 1.5
` Soil test report dated 1/17/05, Lime applied on 3/18/06. Cu & Zn levels elevated, Need to be monitored, look at sampling techniques
and tools.
• Reviewed waste application records, complete and balanced. Weather codes and inspection initials completed.
• Lagoon levels recorded twice a week. Changes in levels are consistent with pumping and precipitation events
• Rainfall amounts recorded with initials
' Reviewed crop yield, stocking and mortality records
` Lagoon sludge survey report dated 4/16/05, sludge thickness = 1.8', LTZ = 5.5'
- May apply for sludge survey exempt
` Irrigation calibration available, 4/5/05, 215GPM
' PLAT completed 2116/06, low ratings for all fields
(7) Please mow the vegetation around lagoon to toe to allow effective inspection of lagoon dike for rodent activity, leakage or seepage.
Farm & records well managed
Page: 2

Permit: AWS960051 Owner - Facility: Delanor Daw Son Facility Number: 960051
Inspection Date: 06/30/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Q swine - Wean to Feeder 3,200 3,207
Total Design Capacity: 3,200
Total SSLW: 96,000
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon PRIMARY 06/01/92 19.00 32.00
Page: 3

Permit: AWS960051 Owner - Facility: Delanor Daw Son
Facility Number: 960051
Inspection Date: 06/30/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No
NA
NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
■
n
n
Discharge originated at:
Structure
n
Application Field
n
Other
n
a. Was conveyance man-made?
n
■
n
n
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
n
■
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
n
■
n
n
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
o
■
u
In
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
n
■
n
n
discharge?
Waste Collection Stora e & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
n
■
n
n
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
n
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
n
■
n
n
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
n
■
n
n
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
■
n
n
n
S. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
n
n
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
n
■
n
n
improvement?
Waste Applicatiq9 Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
n
■
n
n
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
n
■
00
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? n
Hydraulic Overload? n
Frozen Ground? n
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? n
Page: 4

Permit: AWS960051 Owner - Facility: Delanor Daw Son
Inspection Date: 06/30/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 960051
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
- -
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
n
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
n
Total P205?
n
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
n
Outside of acceptable crop window?
n
Evidence of wind drift?
n
Application outside of application area?
n
Crop Type 1
Com, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Craven
Soil Type 2
Norfolk
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
n
■
n
n
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
n
■
n
n
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
n
■
n
n
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
n
■
n
n
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
n
■
n
n
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
■
n
n
n
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
n
■
n
n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
n
Page: 5

Permit: AWS960051 Owner - Facility: Delanor Daw Son Facility Number: 960051
Inspection Date: 06/30/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? n
Design? n
Maps?
Other? n
21. Does record keeping need improvement? n ■ n n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
n
120 Minute inspections?
n
Weather code?
n
Weekly Freeboard?
n
Transfers?
n
Rainfall?
n
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
n
Waste Analysis?
n
Annual soil analysis?
n
Crop yields?
n
Stocking?
n
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
n
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
n
■ n n
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
n
n ■ n
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
In
■ n n
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
n
■ n n
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
n
■ n n
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
n
n ■ n
Otherlssues
Yes
No NA NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
n
■ n n
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those
n
■ n n
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air
n
■ n n
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 6

Permit: AWS960051 Owner - Facility: Delanor Daw Son
Facility Number: 960051
Inspection Date: 06/30/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Otherlssues Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
n■nn
n■on
n■nn
Page: 7

0 Division of Water Quality
(� Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency --------------- ___ _
Facility Number: 960051 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS960051 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Wayne Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 04/04/2007 Entry Time:08:00 AM Exit Time:
Farm Name: Daw & Son Farm
Owner: Delanor Daw Son
Incident #:
Owner Email:
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 653 Hare Rd Goldsboro NC 27534
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Location of Farm:
SR 1545, 2 miles north of SR 1523, west side of road.
Question Areas:
W Discharges & Stream Impacts
jj Records and Documents
Certified Operator: Paul Lewt Daw
Secondary OIC(s):
Integrator:
Latitude:35°28'25" Longitude:77°56'36"
d Waste Collection & Treatment
® Other issues
On -Site Representative(s): Name
On -site representative Paul Daw
24 hour contact name Paul Daw
W Waste Application
Operator Certification Number: 26042
Title
Phone:
Phone:
Primary Inspector: Megan Hartwell Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Phone
Page: 1

Permit: AWS960051 Owner - Facility: Delanor Daw Son
Facility Number: 960051
Inspection Date: 0d/04/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
COC and Permit 2009
Waste Analysis 1-19-07 1.6
11-21-06 1.8
8-9-06 1.5
Soil test 11-29-06 highest lime 0 tons
Cu and Zn values within range
Rainfall and freeboard complete and correspond with irrigation
Irrigation records complete
'send copy of crop yield records and rainfall and freeboard records reporting form and new IRR-2 form
Sludge survey complete 4-16-05 thick-1.8' LTZ-55} Complete next survey in 2007
Calibrations complete 4-5-05 with 215 GPM
Page: 2

Permit: AlNS960051 Owner - Facility: Delanor Daw Son Facility Number: 960051
Inspection Date: 04/04/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Wean to Feeder 3,200 2,757
Total Design Capacity: 3,200
Total SSLW: 96,000
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon PRIMARY 06/01/92 19.00 32.00
Page: 3

Permit: AWS960051 Owner - Facility: Delanor Daw Son Facility Number: 960051
Inspection Date: 04/04/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? D ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
n
Application Field
n
Other
n
a. Was conveyance man-made?
n
■
n
n
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑
❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
n
■
n
n
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
n
■
❑
n
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
n
■
n
n
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
n
■
n
n
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
n
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there Structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑
!!
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
n
s
n
n
S. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
D
to
n
n
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
n
■
n
n
improvement?
Waste Application Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
D
p
❑
n
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
D
®
n
n
If yes, check the apprcpriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? D
Heavy metals (Cu. Zn, etc)? rl
Page: 4

Permit: AWS960051 Owner - Facility: Delanor Daw Son
Inspection Date: 04/04/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 960051
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
n
Is PAN > 10%/10 ibs.?
n
Total P205?
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
n
Outside of acceptable crop window?
n
Evidence of wind drift?
n
Application outside of application area?
rl
Crop Type 1
Soybean, Wheat
Crop Type 2
Cotton
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Norfolk
Soil Type 2
Craven
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
n
0
n
n
Plan(CAWh,1P)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
n
■
n
n
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
n
■
Q
O
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
n
■
0
C1
18. Is :here a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
n
■
n
n
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
n
©n
n
20. Dori the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
fl
13
❑
fl
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Wtip?
n
Page: 5

Permit: AAIS960051 Owner - Facility: Delanor Daw Son Facility Number: 960051
Inspection Date: 04/04/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Checklists?
Design?
Maps?
Other?
21. Does record :seeping need improvement?
Yes
No
NA
NE
n
n
n
n
n■nn
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
120 Minute inspections?
Weather code?
n
Weekly Freeboard?
n
Transfers?
n
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
n
Waste Analysis?
n
Annual soil analysis?
Crop yields?
Stocking?
n
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
n
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
n
■
n
n
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
n
■
n
n
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■
n
Cl
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
n
■
n
n
26. Did :he facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
n
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
D
n
■
n
Other ISSUCS
Yes
No
NA
NE
201. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■
n
n
29. Did the facility fail fo properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those
n
■
n
n
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air
00
n
IN
Quality rronresen'.ntive immediately.
Page: 6

Permit: AWS960051 Owner - Facility: Delanor Daw Son
Inspection Date: 04/04/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Otherlssues
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Revie .,er/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Facility Number: 960051
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes
No
NA
NE
n■nn
n■n❑
n■nn
Page: 7

(Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
FacilityNumber
51 Date of Visit: 7/5/2000 Time: 8:04 AM Printed on: 7/72000
96
Not O erational Q Below Threshold
0 Permitted N Certified E3 Conditionally Certified E3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ......... _..........
,
FarmName:!'ajr.tiaexx.''.P.igs........__...._._......_.........__........................................... County: WAVIC ............................................... !l'aRS�........
.Owner Name: CuKdelix... _.................... _. Sasser..... ........ _......................................... Phone No: 9]9-I34 D-9L9]9-I3frQ4.7.9.............................
Facility Contact:
Title:
Phone No:
MailingAddress: 36SQ.A!IG.11l.tl..._................_...._._.__.-........................._................. PACY.01C.Ac ......................................................... 2.7.8.6.3..............
Onsite Representative: Mr....&.TICS.. iAtSSCr. Geaxge Pettlxs.................................. Integrator: G.RldsbQr.Q.R.og.1.8r=.......................................
Certified Operator:.or.deA1..F................................ 5.455rC......................................... _..... Operator Certification Number:1fi5 ..
.......
Location of Farm:
......................::::::....................................:........................:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::...............................................
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 28 25 u Longitude 77 56 36
Design Current
Swine
N Wean to Feeder
3200
3200
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Number of Lagotins- ; C
Design . Current' Design`Current"
Poultry Capicity. Po ulation Cattle
Cjj6acijy. Po ulatiOW
❑ Layer
JE3 Dairy
❑ Non -Layer
JE3 Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
3,200
Total SSLW
96,000
= r ❑ Subsurface Drains Present JID Lagoon Area 10 Spray Field Area
I notamg ronas i Solia Traps, I I .�LJ No Liquid Waste Management System 4M d
_. �s xs r
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes N No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed. was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes N No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If ves, notify DWQ) ❑yes N No
c. If discharge is observed- what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If ves, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes N No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes N No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes N No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑Yes N No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
......................................................._....-...............................................................................................................-.....................
Freeboard (inches): 30

Continued on back
Facility Number: 96-51 Date of Inspection 7/5/2000
0 Printed on: 7/7/2000
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes I@ No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes ® No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ® No
12. Crop type Corn, Soybeans, Wheat
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ® No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
0 Nii-Viotatiotis:ordeftciencies-were-noted;during-this°visit::You_willreeeivenofurther
. • . - correspondence about this.visit... .. ... ...
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
:ecords available for review.
lew waste utilization plan dated 7/3/00; meets the wetted acre requirement. Written on 67% of total
cres.
Naste samples are collected quarterly.
foil analysis for 2000 - available.
rrigation records are complete and balanced out.
,rounds are well managed.
Fhe lagoon levels were maintained within permit i
Well organized.
uirements......... SEE PAGE 3
Reviewer/Inspector Name Ll
Entered by Ann Tyndall

1 A
Reviewer/inspector Signature: Date:
Facility Number: 96-51 Date of Inspection 7/5/2000 Printed on: 7/7/2000
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes S No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes S No
28. is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes S No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes S No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes S No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes S No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
....throughout and after the 1999 hurricane season.
Overall, the farm is well operated.
If you have any questions, contact me at 252-946-6481, extension 318.
GPS = L070512A

Type of Visit (9) Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Eval. O Tech. Assistance O Conf. for Removal
Reason for Visit *Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Referral O Emergency O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 96 51 Date of Visit. 10-14-2004 Time: 758
0 Not Operational 0 Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified. 13 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold
Farm Name: DawA.Son.k',arm........................ _........................... _._............................... County: !l.ay e....._........._....._.......___........ \'!ARQ...._..
Owner Name: Relanor. )AW.&Son............................. Phone No: (9191.I3S>333.'.............. _._.-..... .._................... __
Mailing Address: kS.3.Dare.iioad................................................................_................... Ciddsb rv..NG...._........__.................__.....2.7.53.4......... ...
Facilin• Contact: Paul.Daw.........................................................Title:
Phone No: 9].9:73fr_.4.424.................. __
Onsite Representative: Paul.AatY.............................................................................. Integrator:G.RldsbntQ.Doa�arms-._..................................
Certified Operator:Pall.1.Lewt ............................. DAW ................................................... Operator Certification Number:2.kQ4 .............................
Location of Farm:
SR 1545, 2 miles north of SR 1523, west side of road.
0 Swine [I Poultry ❑ Cattle [I Horse Latitude 35 28 25 Longitude 77 56 36
Design Current
Design Current
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
Poultry
Capacity Population Cattle
Capacity Population
Fx Wean to Feeder
3200
❑Layer
❑ Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑Other
❑ Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity
3200
❑ Gilts
Total SSLW
96,000
❑ Boars
Number of Lagoons 1
Holding Ponds / Solid Trans
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 0 No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field []Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notiA, DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. R-ere there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes 0 No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeb and (inches):
12,72/03 Continued

Facility Number: 96-51 Date of Inspection 10 142004
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
❑ Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
or
closure plan? `
[I Yes ®No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes ® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes ®No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes ®No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes ® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc > 30(
12. Crop type Com, Soybeans, Wheat
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWNIP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ®No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ® No
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ElYes ® No
Air Quality representative immediately. `
Comments (refer -to question #) Explain any YES,ansa ers and/or any recommendations or any other comments:
Use drawings otfactlityo_better eiplam srtusttons (use additional pages as necessary): 0 Field Copy ❑Final Notes _
Records available for review
Waste Analysis: 8-13-04 = 1.9 lbs
6-23-04 = 3.1 lbs
5-11-04 = 2.41bs
3-17-04 = 2.1 lbs
12-08-03 = 2.9lbs
Soil analysis 6-11-03 & 6-24-02
Irrigation records are complete and balanced out.
Freeboard levels are recorded weekly
Continue to practice weed control.
Need to shrub the down slopes of the dike wall
If you have any questions contact your Technical Specialist or us @ 252-946-6481..
Re-,iewer/Inspector Name 'Lyn B. . rdison %
Re-,iewer/Inspector Signature• �, . , �� �/
�_.� - �- .n. Date:
12n21n? U
t, onrrnuea

Facility Number: 96-51 Date of Inspection 10-14-2004
Required
Records & Documents
21.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
N No
22.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
N No
23.
Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
N No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Sampling
24.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
N No
25.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
N No
26.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
N No
27.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
N No
28.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
N No
29.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
N No
NPDES Permitted Facilities
30.
Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35)
❑ Yes
N No
31.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
32.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
33.
Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey?
❑ Yes
❑ No
34.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
35.
Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If }'es, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Stocking Form ❑ Crop Yield Form ❑ Rainfall ❑ Inspection After 1" Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form
113
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
(Additional Comments and/or Drawings'
Questions 31-31 -NA
12112103

(Type of Visit 0° Compliance Inspection O Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation I
Reason for Visit 0° Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 96 51 Date of Visit: 12-10-2003 Time: 1045
FO Not Operational O Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified E3 Conditionally Certified E3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:._ ......................
FarmName: DA v..&.So10X0rM........................................................................................ County: W.Ayixc ............................................... 1'l'ARO........
Owner Name: ................................................... RdamRi.AawA.SOA............................. Phone No: (91S�.IDS-� 32........................................................
Mailing Address: 651Hart:.22.oad.....................................................................:............... 'CJ..Rldsk9x.R.AC...................................................... Z.7.53.4 ..............
Facility Contact:
Title:
Phone No:
Onsite Representative: F,&W.1?a....................................................................................... Integrator: G.Q1dsbox.o.HRg.k:AICdGIS.......................................
Certified Operator:)Qa17d.UWA ............................. I2aY.t'.................................................... Operator Certification Number: Z69..42.............................
Location of Farm:
R 1545, 2 miles north of SR 1523, west side of road.
O Swine []Poultry []Cattle []Horse Latitude 35 ° 28 25 Longitude 77 • 56 36 °°
Design Current
Swine. Canacitv Ponulation
® Wean to Feeder
3200
3200
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
-
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer 1 ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 3,200
Total SSLW 96,000
I Number of Lagoons 1� ❑ Subsurface Drains Present JE1 Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area I
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ Liquid No Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ......................................................................
Freeboard (inches): 35"

VJ/VJ/Vl
Facility Number: 96-51 Date of Inspection 12-10.2003
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload [
12. Crop type Corn, Soybeans, Wheat
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes IN No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
E3 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
pla
'Commeritsr(refer to uestion�#) Eainsany YES answerssand/or any recommendations or an {other=comments+,„
"�,.y '�.`,s `.4rq'°�'rxr.X ���`� re.3 P.. a,E y•, :,. _ %'�' xrk .,..� '-s"xr4x _....�.._k�atr,Z.t,�.�:.Sa'+v&4=.b`...-'�.aic. a '��'ya
'
,-i
Ei3se+drawings�ofafaclity�4oibetter�eaplamrsituaiions'(use addihonalopages as necessary) i,.� 4,
3 � � r -� ❑Field COPY ®Final Notes t a
��r�.�- �s . � � �x ,. -� � � I �^ r *� a'; � � Y ,,�
�. �:.�',•,'i �. rt� �.2 ��'e. t�;�.:� .4. 4... �: ...> � �w S I�•�:a 4I' �.7 �4..?e r a'I•..:.. q;" :t-v+avr.-.Y.zk.-S`P-:.:;'�:".t�r"r*i .'
.k.�
Records were available
ast analysis 12-8-03 2.9 lbs
10-10-03 2.4 lbs
8-8-03 1.7 lbs
5-23-03 2.4lbs
3-6-03 3.0lbs
1-6-03 2.2 lbs
10-24-03 1.6 lbs
Reviewer/Inspector Name Lyn r Bison
_B:RH
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: c 1 U- D 3
v

O5103101 Continued
Facility Number: 96-51 Date of Inspection 12-10-2003
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ® No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ® No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
u ?.- :-zs.,'C, a
�i�ddltKgnA1 rie_nts1an_ .6WD_ravnngs 7;'„ w' r. .'r d -r .l _ z - rr. a .
Soil analysis - up thru 2003 available
Irrigation records are complete and balanced out.
Freeboard levels are recorded weekly.
Continue to manage the vegetation along the dike wall especially along the downslope of dike wall.
Farm is well managed.
If you have any questions, contact your Technical Specialist or me at 252-946-6481.

Facility Number Date of Visit: 3/27/2002 Time: 1448
p Not Operational p ffmow res o
N Permitted N Certified p Conditionally Certified p Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name: Daw & Son Farm County:.W..ayne................................................ .WaRG........
Owner Name: Delanor Daw & Son Phone No: [phone]
Mailing Address: 653.Haxe.Road..................................................................................... Goldsbara..NC.............. ........................................ 27534 ..............
FacilityContact: ...............................................................................Title:............................................................... Phone No:....................................................
Onsite Representative: D,elanar,Paul:&.txeorgaP.ettus........................................ Integrator: Goldsboro.Hog.Farms.......................................
Certified Operator:P.aul.Lewt ............................ Da-ty...................... ............................... Operator Certification Number: 26042.............................
Location of Farm:
0 Swine 0 Poultry 0 Cattle 0 Horse Latitude ©• ®' ©" Longitude ©• �' ®"
Swine
Design, Current Design „ .,Current, Design Current
Capacity Population PoultryCapacity* Population " Cattle Capacity. Population
®Wean to Feeder
0 Feeder to mis
0 Farrow to Wean
0 Farrow to Feeder
0 Farrow to Finish
10 Gilts
0 Boars
0 ayer JE3 Dany
0 Non -Layer 10 Non-Ijairy
0 Other
Total Design Capacity 31200
'Total SSLW 969000
I Number' of Lagoons �� ,jOSubsurfaceerrains�cesent 0 Lagoon Area JE3 Spray Field Area I
Holding Ponds / Soli diTraps 0 0 Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? 0 Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: 0 Lagoon 0 Spray Field 0 Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? 0 Yes 0 No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) 0 Yes 0 No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaVmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) 0 Yes 0 No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? 0 Yes ®No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? 0 Yes ®No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? 0 Spillway 0 Yes ®No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
...................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard(inches): ...............36...................................................................................................................................................................................................

I
Facility Number: 96-51 Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity, of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
❑ Yes
® No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
❑ Yes
N No
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
®No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
®No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN p Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes
®No
12. Crop type Corn, Soybeans, Wheat
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
®No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
®No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
® No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
®No
Reauired Records & Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
IN No
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
®No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
® No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
®No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
®No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
tie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
® No
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
®No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
®No
25. Were anv additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ® No
p No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comments (refer to question #0 : Egplain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments
Use drawings of facility to better, eii lam situations (use additional pages as necessary) Field Copy p Fuial Notes
taste analysis - 3/15/02 = 2.9 lbs.; 1/8/02 = 2.2 lbs.; 10/23/01 = 2.1 lbs.; 8/10/01 = 1.5 lbs.; 6/11/01 = 1.4 lbs.
oil analysis - up through 2001 available - time put out 11/2001
Tigation records are complete and balanced out.
reeboard levels are recorded weekly as required...... on calendar
.ecords are complete and balanced out.
.eminder: Suggest to pull waste sample every 2 months; soil samples are required annually. (SEE PAGE 3)
Reviewer/Inspector Name Lyn;B. Hardison . entered byAnn Tyndall
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: y Y �,,� Date: 4- 2-2 -e' Z.

05103101
Continued
aci sty um er: 96_51
Date of Inspection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ® No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ® No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? []Yes ❑ No
,tatton on aixe wan is wen estaottsnea.
yfields are in good shape.
Jnue to practice weed control.
farm is well managed.
iu have any questions, contact your Technical Specialist or us at 252-946-6481.

f .
t
p DWQ Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
1* Kounne 0 a,ompinmi 0 runuw-up ui "W%Z u.apoauou
Facility Number
Farm Status: 13 Registered p Applied for Permit
.. N Certified p Permitted
in Not OperationaM Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: Partners'N' Pigs
Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection
® 24 hr. (hh:mm)
County:...W..ayne................................................ .W..aRO........
OwnerName: CorddlE.............................. Sasser ......................................................... Phone No: 73.4.1934....................................................................
Facility Contact: Cordell.Sasser................................................Title: O.Witer ................................................ Phone No: .73.4.1934................................
Mailing Address: 3659...LV.C.111N.................................................................................... rilmVillt-Dic ......................................................... 27861 ..............
Onsite Representative: Cordell.Sasser........................................................................... Integrator: Goldsbnra.Hog.Farms.......................................
Certified Operator: CorAcILE ............................. Sasser ............................................... Operator Certification Number:16582 .............................
Location of Farm:
Latitude ©• ®' ©" Longitude ©• ®®"
pe of Operation .Design Current
Swine ' Capacity -Population
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
p Other
_,-,Number of Lagoons /'Holding Ponds
- Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population :Cattle Capacity Population
p Layer I
1[3 Dairy
p Non -Layer 1 10 on- any
Total Design Capacity 3,200
Total SSLW 96,
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? p Yes ® No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? 13 Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: p Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? O Yes p No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes p No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) 13 Yes p No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? p Yes ® No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? p Yes ®No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require 13 Yes ® No
maintenance/improvement?
4/30/97

Itacility Number: _51
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
p Yes
® No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
p Yes
®No
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
p Yes
N No
Structures (Lagoons and/or Holdin¢ Ponds)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
p Yes
®No
Freeboard (ft): Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 6
_.__.... 2 24........ ...... .................. .......... _....... ...................................... .............. ........................ .......... _..........................
...............................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
p Yes
N No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
p Yes
® No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
p Yes
® No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
p Yes
® No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
p Yes
® No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type .......1 ~am.(Silage.&.Brain)....... ISmalL.(irain�.(Wh��eat,.Barley,.....................................................................................................................
Do differ with those designated m the animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
p Yes
N No
16. the receiving crops
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
p Yes
®No
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
p Yes
®No
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
p Yes
® No
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
p Yes
®No
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
p Yes
®No
For Certified Facilities Only
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
p Yes
®No
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
p Yes
®No
24. Does record keeping need improvement?
® Yes
p No
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: >&pvNI "�a-p1..n�00 Date:

Site Requires Immediate Attention:
Facility No. 116—S-r
Ses-26
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERA ION TE VISITATION RECORD
Date: , , 1995
Time:
Farm Name/Owner: 71p�T NLpp,S �� t"l .4 s JQSSSej�,
Mailing Address: lIC 1 111 !Je G j $C
County: fV
Integrator: Phone:
On Site Representative:p:� Z ( A Fjm,//�(Phone: 3
Physipal Address/Location: Cf,:,I fc�_ 1 w.: p< 1iia-41, .-P<so i kro ._
Type of Operation: Swine _ X Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: MW Wt.4utsenx No. of Animals on Site: C�)
DEM Certification No.: ACE ' DEM Certification No.: ACNEW
Latitude: - fig 2�Longitude: -)Z ��Elevation: Ft
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Ft + 25 year 24 hour
storm event? (approximately 1 Ft + 7 in) es or No
Actual Freeboard: Ft n Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes o No
Was any erosion observed? Yes or(�
Is adequate land available for spray? es or No h „ j
Is the cover crop adequate? or No /b•�4 Ac003, �RAj /Uec�.
Crop(s) being utilized: a Oz>R AJ A UAit
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? � G�
200 Ft from Dwellings? �s or No 100 Ft from Wells? Cea�r No
i
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Ft of USGS Blue Line Stream?
Yes or®
Is animal wasted applied or spray irrigated within 25 Ft of a USGS Map Blue
Line? Yes or o
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state b man-made ditch, flushing
system, or other similar man-made devices? Yes or o
If Yes, please explain:
Does the facility maintain adequate waste mana ement records (volumes o manure,
land applied, spray irrigated on specific a r ge with ver crop)? Ye or No
LV P1'ty qlc=L4
Inspector (dame ignature
Jr
CC: Facility Assessment Unit
Comments & Sketch on Back of Sheet

DEM
SITE VISITATION RECORD
Page Two
Sketch:
i