960050_INSPECTIONS_20171231

NORTH CAROLINA AM
Department of Environmental Qual

INSPECTIONS
INSPECTIONS
INSPECTIONS

0
Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Other Agency
Facility Number: 960050
Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS960050
Denied Access
Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection
Inactive Or Closed Date.
Reason for Visit: Routine
County: Wayne Region:
Washington
Date of Visit: 09/13/2017 Entry Time: 12:20 pm Exit Time: 1:40 pm Incident #
Farm Name: P & D Nursery
Owner Email:
[e-mail]
Owner: Wayne Mills
Phone:
919-689-2854
Mailing Address: 442 Mills Rd
Goldsboro NC 27530
Physical Address:- 464 Mills Rd
Goldsboro NC 27530
Facility Status: Compliant
Not Compliant Integrator: Maxwell Foods Inc
Location of Farm:
Latitude: 350 16' 43" Longitude:
78* 07- 01"
Hwy 13 south to SR 1122 (Mills Road) turn go to 8th house on right - Driveway on the south side of house follow driveway to
Nursery.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts
Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents
Other Issues
Certified Operator: Roy W Mills
Operator Certification Number:
17695
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name
Title Phone
Phone:
Primary Inspector: Justin K Davis
Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Waste Report N
9-11-17 1.18
3-2-17 1.77
9-7-16 0.97
Soil Report Due 2018
Calibration 9-3-2017
due 2019
Lagoon Sludge Survey due 2017
page: 1

Permit: AWS960050 Owner -Facility: Wayne Mills Facility Number: 960050
Inspection Date: 09/13/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
Swine - Wean to Feeder 3,200
Total Design Capacity: 3,200
Total SSLW: 96,000
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon PRIMARY 02104/91 19.00 29.00
page: 2

Permit: AWS960050 Owner -Facility: Wayne Mills Facility Number: 960050
Inspection Date: 09/13/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No Na No
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
M ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
M ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0 ❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
M ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
M ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
M ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage $ Treatment
Yes
No Na Ne
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large
❑
0 ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
M ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
0 ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
0 ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na No
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ M ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

Permit: AWS960050 Owner -Facility: Wayne Mills Facility Number: 960050
Inspection Date: 09/13/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes
No Na Ne
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type.4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
0 ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
❑
❑
16, Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
M ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
M ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na No
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
M ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis'?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

Permit: AWS960050 Owner -Facility: Wayne Mills Facility Number: 960050
Inspection Date: 09/13/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na Ne
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22, Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
0 ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
0 ❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
0 ❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
E ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
E ❑
❑
Otherlssues
Yes
No Na Ne
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑0
❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
0 ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
0 ❑
❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
0 ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
0 ❑
❑
page: 5

0 Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 960050
Facility Status: Active permit: AWS960050
❑ Denied Access
Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection
Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine
County: Wayne Region:
Washington
Date of Visit: 09/14/2016 Entry Time: 02:00 pm Exit Time: 3:30 pm Incident #
Farm Name: P & D Nursery,
Owner Email:
[e-mail]
Owner: Wayne Mills
Phone:
919-689-2854
Mailing Address: 442 Mills Rd
Goldsboro NC 27530
Physical Address: 464 Mills Rd
Goldsboro NC 27530
Facility Status: Compliant ❑
Not Compliant Integrator: Maxwell Foods Inc
Location of Farm:
Latitude: 35° 16' 43" Longitude:
78° 07' 01"
Hwy 13 south to SR 1122 (Mills Road) turn go to 8th house on right - Driveway on the south side of house follow driveway to
Nursery.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts
Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents
Other Issues
Certified Operator: Roy W Mills
Operator Certification Number:
17695
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name
Title Phone
24 hour contact name Brent
Mitchell Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: Justin K Davis Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
page: 1

Permit: AWS960050 Owner - Facility : Wayne Mills Facility Number: 960050
Inspection Date: 09/14/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Report N
5-4-16 2.14
9-14-15 1.39
Soil Report 3-20-:2015
Zn<1480
Cu<700
Calibration 8-20-2015
Lagoon Sludge Survey 8-23-2016
LTZ 5.9
Thickness 4.3
Pump Intake 4.6
% 31
page: 2

Permit: AWS960050 Owner -Facility: Wayne Mills Facility Number: 960050
Inspection Date: 09/14/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Swine
Design Capacity Current promotions
❑ Swine - Wean to Feeder 3,200
Total Design Capacity: 3,200
Total SSLW: 96,000
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon PRIMARY 02/04/91 19.00 35.00
page: 3

Permit: AWS960050
Owner -Facility: Wayne Mills Facility Number: 960050
Inspection Date: 09/14/16 ' Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No No Ne
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
M ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
0 ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
M ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes No No No
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
M ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large
❑
M ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
M ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
M ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
0 ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
0 ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No No No
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ M ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 100/6/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 4

Permit: AWS960050
Owner -Facility: Wayne Mills
Facility Number: 960050
Inspection Date: 09/14/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes
No Na Ne
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
0 ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
M ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
0 ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No Na No
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ M ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 5

Permit: AWS960050 Owner- Facility: Wayne Mills Facility Number: 960050
Inspection Date: 09/14/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No Na No
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22..Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
0 ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
M ❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a PDA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
M ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No No No
28. Did the facility fail to property dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑M
❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
0 ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
M ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
❑
❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
0 ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
M ❑
❑
page: 6

NDivision of Water Resources
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number:
960050
Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS960050
❑ Denied Access
Inppection Type:
Compliance Inspection
Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit:
Routine
County: Wayne Region:
Washington
Date of Visit:
09/15/2015 Entry Time: 10:20 am Exit Time: 11:50 am Incident #
Farm Name:
P & D Nursery
Owner Email:
millsriecQaol.com
Owner:
Wayne Mills
Phone:
919-689-2854
Mailing Address:
442 Mills Rd
Goldsboro NC 27530
Physical Address:
464 Mills Rd
Goldsboro NC 27530
Facility Status:
0Compliant ❑
Not Compliant Integrator: Maxwell Foods Inc
Location of Farm:
Latitudo: 35' 16' 43" Longitude:
78° 07' 01"
Flwy 13 south to SR 1122 (Mills Road) turn go to
8th house on right - Driveway on the south side of house follow driveway to
Nursery.
Question Areas:
0 Dischrge & Stream Impacts
Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
ja Records and Documents
Other Issues
Certified Operator: Donna C Mills Operator Certification Number: 18626
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Ropresontative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Brent Mitchell Phone : [phone]
Primary Inspector: Justin K Davis Phone:
Inspector Signature: _ _ _ Date:
Secondary Inspector(s)
Inspection Summary:
page: 1

Permit: AWS960050 Owner - Facility : Wayne Mills Facility Number: 960050
Inspection Date: 09/15/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Report N
6-13-15 1.87
2-13-15 1.04
Soil Report 3-20-2015
Zn=NUR1B 1480
Cu=NUR18 661
Lagoon Sludge Survey 9-3-2015
LTZ--3.2
Thickness-4.5
Purnp Intake-4.5
Calibration 8-20-2015
Crop Yield 80 bails in 2015.
Rainfall, Freeboard, and Pumping Records coincide
page: 2

Permit: AWS960050 Owner - Facility : Wayne Mills . Facility Number: 960050
Inspection Date: 09/15/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
El Swine - Wean to Feeder 3,200
Total Design Capacity: 3,200
Total SSLW: 96,000
Wasto Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon PRIMARY 02/04/91 19.00 33.00
page: 3

Permit: AWS960050 Owner - Facility : Wayne Mills Facility Number: 960050
Inspection Date: 09/15/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes No Ne No
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
®❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
®❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
®❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
®❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
®❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
®❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection. Storage & Treatment
Yes
No Na No
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Led large
❑
! ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
M ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
M ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
®❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
M ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No No No
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ®❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 4

Permit: AWS960050 Owner - Facility : Wayne Mills Facility Number: 960050
Inspection Date: 09/15/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes
No No No
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
ff ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
E ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■ ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No No No
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
®❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21, Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 5

Permit: AWS960050 Owner - Facility : Wayne Mills Facility Number: 960050
Inspection Date: 09/15/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No No No
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
N ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
01111
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
0 ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
e ❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No No No
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
®❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
e ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32, Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
N ❑
❑
CA WM P?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
0 ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
N ❑
❑
page: 6

0 Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 960050 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS960050 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Wayne Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 04/30/2014 Entry Time: 07:15 AM Exit Time: 08:00 AM Incident #:
Farm Name: P & D Nursery Owner Email: millsrie(g)aol.com
Owner: Wayne Mills Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 442 Mills Rd Goldsboro NC 27530
Physical Address: 464 Mills Rd Goldsboro NC 27530
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Maxwell Foods Inc
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°16'43" Longitude: 78007'01"
Hwy 13 south to SR 1122 (Mills Road) turn go to 8th house on right - Driveway on the south side of house follow driveway to Nursery.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Cot, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Donna C Mills
Secondary OIC(s):
Operator Certification Number: 18626
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Brent Mitchell Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Brent Mitchell Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: Ronnie T Smith Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

Permit: AWS960050 Owner -Facility; Wayne Mills Facility Number: 960050
Inspection Date: 04/30/2014 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
WuP 4/1/11
CoC in records
OIC in records
Irrigation Calibration 8/10/13
"'due again 2015"'
Soil Test 11/5/13
Zn & Cu high & keep eye on
L=0.0T
"'due again 2016'
Waste Analysis N
9/16/13 = 1.35
6/13/13 = 1.35
1/4/13 = 1.42
8/2/12 = .74
***Waste Analysis in Raleigh"'
Crop yield records reviewed
irrigation records correspond to rainfall & lagoon records
[e-mail] send 2013 sludge survey to me!!!
Page: 2

Permit: AWS960050
Inspection Date: 04/30/2014
Regulated Operations
Owner -Facility: Wayne Mills
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 960050
Reason for Visit: Routine
Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
W Swine - Wean to Feeder 3,200 0 771
Waste Structures
Type
Identifier
Total Design Capacity: 3,200
Total SSLW: 96,000
Designed Observed
Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
[a goon PRIMARY 02/04/91 19.00 34.00
Page: 3

Permit: AWS960050 Owner - Facility: Wayne Mills Facility Number :
Inspection Date: 04/30/2014 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
960050
Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No
NA
NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ ■
❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑ ■
❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ ■
❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ ■
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ ■
❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than
❑ ■
❑
❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
1100
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (l.e./ large trees, severe
❑ ■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑ ■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ ■
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑ ■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑ ■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application Yes No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑ ■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AW5960050 Owner -Facility: Wayne Mills
Facility Number: 960050
Inspection Date: 04/30/2014 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit:
Routine
Waste Application
Yes No
NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
w/ Rye
Overseed
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Kenansville
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■
❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■
❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ In
❑ ❑
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 5

Permit: AWS960050 Owner - Facility: Wayne Mills
Inspection Date: 04130/2014 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Records and Documents
Facility Number: 960050
Reason for Visit: Routine
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Lease Agreements? ❑
Other? ❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑
■ ❑ ❑
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a PDA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
Page: 6

Permit: AWS960050 Owner -Facility: Wayne Mills
Inspection Date: 04/30/2014 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 960050
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes
No
NA
NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■
❑
❑
Other Issues Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report
ONO
❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional
❑
■
❑
❑
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge,
❑
■
❑
❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
Lagoon / Storage Pond
Other
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Page: 7

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number : 960050 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS960050 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Wayne Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 08/13/2013 Entry Time: 08A5 AM Exit Time: 09:15 AM Incident #:
Farm Name: P & D Nursery Owner Email: millsrie0aol.com
Owner: Wayne Mills Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 442 Mills Rd Goldsboro NC 27530
Physical Address: 464 Mills Rd Goldsboro NC 27530
Facility Status: E Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Maxwell Foods Inc
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35016'43" Longitude: 78007'01"
Hwy 13 south to SR 1122 (Mills Road) turn go to 8th house on right - Driveway on the south side of house follow driveway to Nursery.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Donna C Mills
Secondary OIC(s):
Operator Certification Number: 18626
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Brent Mitchell Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Brent Mitchell Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: Ronnie T Smith Phone:
Inspector Signature: _
Secondary Inspector(s):
Date:
Page: 1

Permit: AWS960050 Owner • Facility: Wayne Mills Facility Number: 960050
Inspection Date: 08/13/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
Irrigation Calibration 8110/13
**due again 2015**
Sludge Survey 9/1/12
LTZ = 5.9
thickness = 4.3
31%
CoC in records
WuP 5/27/99
OIC records
"Soil test 3/19112
**due again 2013**
L=OT
Cu & Zn levels w/in range
Waste Analysis N
6/13/13 = 1.35
1/4/13 = 1.42
Crop yield records reviewed
Page: 2

Permit: AWS960050 Owner -Facility: Wayne Mills Facility Number: 960050
Inspection Date: 08/13/2013
Regulated Operations
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Design Capacity
Reason for Visit: Routine
Current Population
Swine
O Swine - Wean to Feeder 3,200 0 71
Total Design Capacity: 3,200
Total SSLW: 96,000
Waste Structures
Designed Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
agoon PRIMARY 02/04/91 19.00 40.00
Page: 3

Permit: AWS960050 Owner -Facility: Wayne Mills
Inspection Date: 08/13/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at:
Structure
Application Field
Other
a. Was conveyance man-made?
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
Facility Number: 960050
Reason for Visit: Routine
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes No NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Led large trees, severe ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, 00011
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ ■ Cl ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS960050 Owner - Facility: Wayne Mills
Facility Number: 960050
Inspection Date: 08/13/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit:
Routine
Waste Application
Yes No
NA
NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Coastal
Bermuda Grass
w/ Rye
Overseed
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Kenansville
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■
❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■
❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■
❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■
❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
1100
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 5

Permit: AWS960050 Owner • Facility: Wayne Mills
Inspection Date: 08/13/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Records and Documents
Facility Number: 960050
Reason for Visit: Routine
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking!
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑
■ ❑ ❑
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
Page: 6

Permit: AWS960050 Owner • Facility: Wayne Mills
Facility Number: 960050
Inspection Date: 08/13/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑■❑❑
Otherlssues Yes No NA NE
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field ❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond ❑
Other ❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 7

0
Division of Water Quality
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number : 960050 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS960050 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Insoection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Wayne Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 05/30/2012 Entry Time: 10:20 AM Exit Time: 10:25 AM Incident #:
Farm Name: P & D Nursery Owner Email: millsrie(rDaol.com
Owner: Wayne Mills Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 442 Mills Rd Goldsboro NC 27530
Physical Address: 464 Mills Rd Goldsboro NC 27530
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Maxwell Foods Inc
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35016'43" Longitude: 78°07'01"
Hwy 13 south to SR 1122 (Mills Road) turn go to 8th house on right - Driveway on the south side of house follow driveway to Nursery.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Donna C Mills Operator Certification Number: 18626
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Brent Mitchell Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Brent Mitchell Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: Ronnie T Smith Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Date:
Page: 1

Permit: AWS960050 Owner • Facility: Wayne Mills Facility Number: 960050
Inspection Date: 05/30/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
CoC in records
WUP 5/27/99
OIC in records
Soil test 319/12
"due again in 2013"
Cu & Zn levels Min range
L=OT
Waste Analysis N
3/15/12 = 2.1
12/23/11 = 1.7
7119/11 = 1.0
..new waste analysis in Raleigh"
irrigation calibration 8/23/11
"due again n 2013'"
irrigation records correspond to rainfall and lagoon records reviewed
Lagoon banks look good
Page: 2

Permit: AWS960050 Owner - Facility: Wayne Mills
Inspection Date: 05/30/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 960050
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Wean to Feeder 3,200 3,765
Total Design Capacity: 3,200
Total SSLW: 96,000
Waste Structures
Designed Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
agoon PRIMARY 02/04/91 19.00 30.00
Page: 3

Permit:AWS960050 Owner -Facility: Wayne Mills Facility Number: 960050
Inspection Date: 05/30/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No
NA
NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ ■
❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑ ■
❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ MOO
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ ■
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ ■
❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than
❑ ■
❑
❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
0011
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Led large trees, severe
❑ ■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑ ■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ ■
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑ ■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑ ■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application Yes No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑ ■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS960050 Owner • Facility: Wayne Mills
Facility Number: 960050
Inspection Date: 05/30/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No
NA
NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
w/ Rye
Overseed
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Kenansville
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■
❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■
❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■
❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■
❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
0011
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 5

Permit: AWS960050 Owner • Facility: Wayne Mills Facility Number : 960050
Inspection Date: 05/30/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Lease Agreements? ❑
Other? ❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit, conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑
■ ❑ ❑
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
r Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
- ❑
■ ❑ ❑
Page: 6

Permit: AWS960050 Owner - Facility: Wayne Mills
Inspection Date: 05/30/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number : 960050
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes
No
NA
NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■
❑
❑
Otherissues Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report
❑
■
❑
❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional
❑
■
❑
❑
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge,
❑
■
❑
❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface the drains exist at the facility?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
Lagoon / Storage Pond
Other
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Page: 7

Division of Water Quality
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number : 960050
Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS960050 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine
County: Wayne Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 07128/2011
Entry TIme:09:05 AM Exit Time: 09A5 AM Incident #:
Farm Name: P & D Nursery
Owner Email: millsriefgDaol.com
Owner: Wayne Mills
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 442 Mills Rd
Goldsboro NC 27530
Physical Address: 464 Mills Rd
Goldsboro NC 27530
Facility Status: 0 Compliant
❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Maxwell Foods Inc
Location of Farm:
Latitude: 35016'43" Longitude: 78°07'01"
Hwy 13 south to SR 1122 (Mills Road) turn go to 8th house on right -Driveway on the south side of house follow driveway to Nursery.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents
Other Issues
Certified Operator: Donna C Mills
Operator Certification Number: 18626
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name
Brent Mitchell Phone: [phone]
On -site representative
Brent Mitchell Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: Ronnie T Smith
Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

Permit: AWS960050 Owner - Facility: Wayne Mills
Facility Number: 960050
Inspection Date: 07/28/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
WUP 5/6/11
Soil Test 12/13/10
New CoC in records
**due again 2011
Cu & Zn levels w/in range
Waste Analysis N
L = OT
7/19/11 = 1.0
"waiting for 2011 results in Raleigh"
2/28/11 = 2.5
10/01/10 = .67
Sludge Survey 9/18/10
"'due again 2011""
irrigation calibration 6/20/10 thickness = 4.29
""due again in 2012""
LTZ = 4.24
irrigation records correspond to rainfall and lagoon records
Crop yield records reviewed
Bermuda looks good
Page: 2

Permit: AWS960050 Owner - Facility: Wayne Mills Facility Number: 960050
Inspection Date: 07/28/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Wean to Feeder 3,200 2,666
Total Design Capacity: 3,200
Total SSLW: 96,000
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon PRIMARY T02104/91 19.00 26.00
Page: 3

Permit: AWS960050 Owner - Facility: Wayne Mills
Inspection Date: 07/28/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at:
Structure
Application Field
Other
a. Was conveyance man-made?
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
Facility Number; 960050
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes No NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard? ❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Led large trees, severe ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
Hydraulic Overload?
Frozen Ground?
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■
❑ ❑
❑ ■
❑ ❑
Yes No
NA NE
❑ ■
❑ ❑
❑ ■
❑ ❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS960050 Owner -Facility: Wayne Mills
Facility Number: 960050
Inspection Date: 07/28/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay, Pasture)
Crop Type 2
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Pasture)
Crop Type 3
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Kenansville
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Page: 5

Permit: AWS960050 Owner - Facility: Wayne Mills
Inspection Date: 07/28/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 960050
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ In ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
0011
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑
■ ❑ ❑
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
Page: 6

Permit: AWS960050 Owner - Facility: Wayne Mills
Facility Number: 960050
Inspection Date: 07/28/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
Lagoon / Storage Pond
Other
If Other, please specify
0
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Page: 7

n
Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 960050 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS960050 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Wayne Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 10/05/2010 Entry Time:09,45 AM Exit Time:
Farm Name: P & D Nursery
Owner: Wayne Mills
Incident #:
Owner Email: millsrie(g)aol.com
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 442 Mills Rd Goldsboro NC 27530
Physical Address: 464 Mills Rd Goldsboro NC 27530
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Maxwell Foods Inc
Location of Farm:
Latitude:35°16'43" Longitude:78°07'01"
Hwy 13 south to SR 1122 (Mills Road) turn go to 8th house on right -Driveway on the south side of house follow driveway to Nursery.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Donna C Mills
Secondary OIC(s):
Operator Certification Number: 18626
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Brent Mitchell Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Donna C Mills Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer
Inspector Signature: _
Secondary Inspector(s):
Phone:
Date:
Page: 1

Permit: AWS960050 Owner - Facility: Wayne Mills Facility Number : 960050
Inspection Date: 10/05/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
Waste Analysis: Soil tested:
6/3/10 = 1.6 N 2010
3/11/10 = 2.9 N
BH = 180/275/305
equipment calibration:2010
sludge survey: 9/2010
Freeboard Range: 2/19/10 = 24" - 8/30/10 = 41"
Coastal is green and growing and should be taking up N for several days.
Looks great!
Page: 2

Permit: AWS960050 Owner - Facility: Wayne Mills Facility Number : 960050
Inspection Date: 10/05/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
O Swine - Wean to Feeder 3,200 3,169
Total Design Capacity: 3,200
Total SSLW: 96,000
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon PRIMARY 02/04/91 19.00 38.00
Page: 3

Permit: AWS960050 Owner -Facility: Wayne Mills
Facility Number : 960050
Inspection Date: 10/05/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? 110011
Discharge originated at:
Structure
Application Field
Other
a. Was conveyance man-made?
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
if yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NE
❑■❑❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
Hydraulic Overload?
Frozen Ground?
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
Yes No NA NE
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS960050 Owner • Facility: Wayne Mills
Facility Number: 960050
Inspection Date: 10/0512010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No
NA
NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Coastal
Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain
Overseed
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■
❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■
❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■
❑
❑
18, Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■
❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■
❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■
Cl
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 5

Permit: AWS960050 Owner -Facility: Wayne Mills
Facility Number :
960050
Inspection Date: 10/05/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after> 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES
only)? ❑
❑
❑ ■
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑ ❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑ ❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■
❑ ❑
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■
❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 6

Permit: AWS960050 Owner - Facility: Wayne Mills
Inspection Date: 10/05/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Otherlssues
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Facility Number : 960050
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 7

0
c
E Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number : 960050 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS960050 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Wayne Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 10119/2009 Entry Time: 12:19 PM Exit Time:
Farm Name: P & D Nursery
Owner: Wayne Mills
Incident #:
Owner Email: millsrie(Qaol.com
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 442 Mills Rd Goldsboro NC 27530
Physical Address: 464 Mills Rd Goldsboro NC 27530
Facility Status: E Compliant ❑ Not Compliant ' Integrator: Maxwell Foods Inc
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°16'43" Longitude: 78007'01"
Hwy 13 south to SR 1122 (Mills Road) turn go to 8th.house on right - Driveway on the south side of house follow driveway to Nursery
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Donna C Mills Operator Certification Number: 18626
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Wayne Mills Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Waste Analysis:
07/17/09 1.7
05/19/09 4.5
12/12/08 1.6
Soil test - 07/2009
Looks great!
Page: 1

Permit: AWS960050 Owner - Facility: Wayne Mills
Facility Number: 960050
Inspection Date: 10/19/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity
Current Population
Swine
Swine - Wean to Feeder 3,200 3.200
Total Design Capacity: 3,200
Total SSLW: 96,000
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Deslaned Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon PRIMARY 702/04191 19.00 36.00
Page: 2

Permit: AWS960050 Owner - Facility: Wayne Mills
Facility Number: 960050
Inspection Date: 10/19/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
Application Field
Other
a. Was conveyance man-made?
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NE
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
Hydraulic Overload?
Frozen Ground?
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
■
❑
❑
❑
■
❑
❑
Yes
No
NA
NE

Permit: AWS960050 Owner -Facility; Wayne Mills
Facility Number: 960050
Inspection Date: 10/19/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑
■
❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑
■
❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■
❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■
❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yea
No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
■
❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page:4

Permit: AWS960050 Owner - Facility: Wayne Mills
Facility Number: 960050
Inspection Date: 10/19/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑
❑
23, If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES
only)? ❑
❑
■
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■
❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■
❑
❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AWS960050 Owner - Facility: Wayne Mills Facility Number: 960050
Inspection Date: 10/19/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
�.�--'_----- V.. Ud WA NC
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Page: 6

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency ___--- _______
Facility Number: 960050
Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS960050 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine
County: Wayne Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 06/19/2008
Entry Time:10700 AM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: P&D Farms 2
Owner Email: millsrie(a)aol.com
Owner: Wayne Mills
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 442 Mills Rd
Goldsboro NC 27530
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑Compliant
❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Goldsboro Hog Farms Inc
Location of Farm:
Latitude: 35016'43" Longitude: 78°07'01"
Hwy 13 south to SR 1122 (Mills Road) turn go to 8th house on right - Driveway on the south side of house follow driveway to Nursery.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents
Other Issues
Certified Operator: Donna C Mills
Operator Certification Number: 18626
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name
Brent Mitchell Phone: [phone]
On -site representative
Brent Mitchell Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: Eric Newsome Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

Permit: AWS960050 Owner -Facility: Wayne Mills Facility Number: 960050
Inspection Date: 06/19/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
Saw CoC and Permit.
WUP dated 5/27/1999.
WARS (lbsN/1000gall): 5/2/08-1.1, 1/7/08-1.2, 8/17/07-1.3, 5/24/07-3.1
Soil test results (5/6/08): 0 tons/acre lime required; Znl-533, Cut-296 (sample NUR1 B).
20081RR1/2 (Rye): Pulls 1A, 1B.
2007 IRR1/2 (BG): Pulls 1A (4.18ac), 1 B (2.48 ac).
PAN rates met and balanced. Typical pumping rate 254 gpm. Pumping volumes of irrigation events were consistent with changes in
freeboard levels. Rainfall records were adequate.
200 sludge survey results (9/17/07): LTZ= 4.94', Thick= 3.83'
2008 calibration results (9/22/07): 1.26' ring, 55 psi @gun. 265gpm expected, 254gpm measured.
Crop yields seen (3/08= 19 bu of SG cut; 25 bales of BH was cut from the pasture 5/08).
Page: 2

Permit: AWS960050 Owner - Facility: Wayne Mills Facility Number: 960050
Inspection Date: 06/19/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
O Swine - Wean to Feeder 3,200 3,110
Total Design Capacity: 3,200
Total SSLW: 96,000
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon PRIMARY 02/04/91 19.00 27.00
Page: 3

I
Permit: AWS960050 Owner - Facility: Wayne Mills Facility Number : 960050
Inspection Date: 06/19/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
■
❑
Cl
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWO)
❑
■
❑
❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
Cl
■
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■
❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Led large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7, Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 4

Permit:AWS960050 Owner -Facility: Wayne Mills Facility Number:960050
Inspection Date: 06/19/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
PAN? ❑
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.? ❑
Total P2O5? ❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? ❑
Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑
Evidence of wind drift? ❑
Application outside of application area? ❑
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Pasture)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain
Overseed
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Kenansville
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■ ❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? .
❑ ■ ❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ E ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ E ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ E ❑
❑
If yes. check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 5

Permit: AWS960050 Owner - Facility: Wayne Mills Facility Number: 960050
Inspection Date: 06/19/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Other? ❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
❑
■
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑
■
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■
❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those
❑
■
❑
❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air
❑
❑
❑
■
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 6

Permit: AWS960050 Owner • Facility: Wayne Mills
Inspection Date: 06/19/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Otherlssues
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlmspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Facility Number: 960050
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
O ■ O a
O ■ O O
D ■ ❑ 0
Page: 7

1502 ft Irri'age ;�F�j 20C18 Digita�Globc
3 5"1 T06 59" N -18006'43 51"W
c I Cv 121 7/ 1 t
Mar l9,2007 Eye Mt 5884 it

t
jr''
� s
P&D Farms#296-50
IT, 71,
V,
s
063 ft
3501645 17 �* 78106,55 L 1- W
talGlobe
Mar 19, 2007
cxr 1c
Eye a It 3894 ft

4'
E Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 960050 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS960050 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Insoection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Wayne Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 04119/2007 Entry Time:03:30 PM Exit Time:
Farm Name: P&D Farms 2
Owner: Wayne Mills
Incident #:
Owner Email: milisrie(cDaol.com
Mailing Address: 442 Mills Rd Goldsboro NC 27530
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:35°16'43" Longitude:78°07'01"
Hwy 13 south to SR 1122 (Mills Road) turn go to 8th house on right - Driveway on the south side of house follow driveway to Nursery.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Donna C Mills
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name
On -site representative Donna Mills
24 hour contact name Donna Mills
Primary Inspector: Megan Hartwell
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
COC and Permit 2009
Waste Analysis 2-8-07 2.6
10-3-06 1.0
9-13-06 .60
Soil test complete 8-3-06 with highest lime .8 tons
Cu and Zn values within range
Irrigation records complete
Freeboard and rainfall records complete
Crop yield 2006
Calibrations 9-25-06 with 256 GPM
Sludge Survey 9-15-06 Thick-3.6' LTZ-7.3'
Operator Certification Number: 18626
Title
Phone:
Phone:
Phone:
Date:
Phone
Page: 1

Permit: AWS960050 Owner • Facility: Wayne Mills
Facility Number: 960050
Inspection Date: 04/19/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity
Current Population
Swine
O Swine - Wean to Feeder 3,200 1,497
Total Design Capacity: 3,200
Total SSLW: 96,000
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon PRIMARY 02/04/91 19.00 33.00
Page: 2

1
Permit: AWS960050 Owner -Facility: Wayne Mills Facility Number: 960050
Inspection Date: 04/19/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No
NA
NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
Cl
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
■
❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑
❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■
❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS960050 Owner • Facility: Wayne Mills
Facility Number: 960050
Inspection Date: 04/19/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Records and Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Pasture)
Small Grain Overseed
Kenansville
Cl ■ ❑ ❑
❑■❑❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Cl ■ ❑ Cl
Yes No NA NE
❑ ■ ❑ Cl
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 4
c

Permit: AWS960050 Owner -Facility: Wayne Mills Facility Number: 960050
Inspection Date: 04/19/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Checklists?
Design?
Maps?
Other?
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Yes No NA NE
El
El
El
❑ ■ Cl ❑
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
IN
❑
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? -
❑
0
❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
0
❑
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑
■
❑
Otherlssues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
0
❑
❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those
❑
■
❑
❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air
❑
❑
❑
■
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

r-
Ll
Permit: AWS960050 Owner- Facility: Wayne Mills
Facility Number:960050
Inspection Date: 04/19/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
O
■
❑
0
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
0
■
❑
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
■
0
❑
Page: 6

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency --------------------------------
Facility Number: 960050 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS960050 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Wayne Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 08/03/2006 Entry Time:10:05 AM Exit Time:
Incident #:
Farm Name: P&D Farms 2 Owner Email:
Owner: Wayne Mills
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 442 Mills Rd Goldsboro INC 27530
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:35°16'43" Longitude:78"07'01"
Hwy 13 south to SR 1122 (Mills Road) turn go to 8th house on right - Driveway on the south side of house follow driveway to Nursery.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Donna C Mills
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name
On -site representative Donna Mills
24 hour contact name Donna Mills
Primary Inspector: Joseph Gyamfi
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Operator Certification Number: 18626
Title
Phone:
Phone:
Phone:
Date:
Phone
Page: 1

Permit: AWS960050 Owner - Facility: Wayne Mills
Facility Number: 960050
Inspection Date: 08/03/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
• Stocking and mortality records from GHF available up to June 2006
• Soil test taken, no results. Lime being applied this week at a rate of 1.25 ton/acre
• Irrigation calibration dated 9/27/05, 3 reels: 256GPM, 252GPM, and 254GPM.
• Lagoon sludge survey report dated 9/19/05, sludge thickness = 3.6', LTZ = 5.0'
• WUP dated 6/4/1999
• Waste Analysis:
6/27/06 = 1.2
3/27106 = 1.5
9/19/06 = 0.87
• Reviewed IRR2 records - complete and balanced with weather codes and inspection initials
• Lagoon levels and rainfall recorded with initials. Levels are consistent.
• Reviewed 2006 crop yield records for Rye & Coastal.
• Spray fields are being sprayed on to kill State grass and pigweeds.
• Producer plans to reseed inside of dike wall with common grass.
• Farm and records are well organized.
Page: 2

Permit: AWS960050 Owner • Facility: Wayne Mills Facility Number: 960050
Inspection Date: 08/03/2006
Regulated Operations
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Design Capacity
Reason for Visit: Routine
Current Population
Swine
O Swine - Wean to Feeder 3,200 3,200
Total Design Capacity: 3,200
Total SSLW: 96,000
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon PRIMARY 02/04/91 19.00 34.00
Page: 3

Permit: AWS960050 Owner -Facility: Wayne Mills Facility Number: 960050
Inspection Date: 08/03/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No
NA
NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
■
❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑
❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■
❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Stora e 8 Treatment
..--- ...._.............-- - ._..... 9..._...-.._.__-.-_...- ...-_..
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
Cl
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS960050 Owner • Facility: Wayne Mills Facility Number: 960050
Inspection Date: 08/03/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
PAN? ❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.? ❑
Total P205? ❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? ❑
Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑
Evidence of wind drift? ❑
Application outside of application area? ❑
Crop Type 1 Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Pasture)
Crop Type 2 Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Kenansville
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑
■
❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
■
❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■
❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■
❑
❑
Records and Documents
.._..--._....__. - - . . _ .
Yes
No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
■
❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 5

Permit: AWS960050 Owner - Facility: Wayne Mills Facility Number,: 960050
Inspection Date: 08/03/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after> 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑
❑
23.'If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
❑
■
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑
■
❑
Otherlssues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■
Cl
❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those
❑
■
❑
Cl
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air
❑
■
❑
❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 6

Permit: AWS960050 Owner - Facility: Wayne Mills
Inspection Date: 08/03/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Other Issues
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Facility Number: 960050
Reason for Visit: Routine
Page: 7

Facility Number 96 50 Date of Visit: 10-14.2004 Time: 906
O Not Operational O Below Threshold
®Permitted N Certified l3 Conditionally Certified []Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
FarmName: P.&DJ.,>.sr'.ms.................... :............ _....... ........ ......... ....................... I .......... I...... County: WPyl e............................................... WARQ........ .
OwnerName: W..Ryac.................................... Mills ........... .................................................. Phone No: 919482. 2854...........................................................
Mailing Address: 4.42 Mills.&O..................................................................................... GAdshor.a..N.0 ..................................................... Z.7.S Q..........:...
FacilityContact: ..............................................................................Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
Onsite Representative: D)aAU0.>t..M.Llis................................................................................ Integrator: G.aWshQxo.Df0.FXar1mS.......................................
Certified Operator:D2oxam-C................................ 114.lk................................... :.............. Operator Certification Nurnber%tS62A .............................
t.nentinn of Fnrmc
Hwy 13 south to SR 1122 (Mills Road) turn go to 8th house on right - Driveway on the south side of house follow driveway to f
4ursery.
N Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 • 16 43 « Longitude 1 78 • 07 11 1 01
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
N Wean to Feeder 3200
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Number of Lagoons
Design Current Design Current
Poultry, Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer I Dairy
❑ Non -Layer I Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 3,200
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
Total SSLW 1 96
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass,a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: ................................................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard (inches): 44"
12112103
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
N No
❑ Yes
N No
❑ Yes
N No
Structure 6
Continued

Facility Number: 96-50 Date of Inspection 10-14-2004
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or ❑ Yes ® No
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level ❑ Yes ® No
elevation markings?
Waste ADDlication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ® No
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc? 30(
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Graze) Small Grain Overseed
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ® No
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ Yes ® No
Air Quality representative immediately.
Comments,(refer to question #) Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better eaplam situations (use a , itional pages'as necessary) Field Copy El Final Notes
ecords available
✓aste Analysis: 9-8-04 = 1.7 Ibs
7-2-04 = 2.1 lbs
5-13-04 = 2.1 Ibs
12-16-03 = 1.71bs
10-2-03 = 1.3 Ibs
oil analysis - 4-7-04 - lime was put out in August 2004.
3-11-03 - lime was put out in July 2003.
Tigation records are complete and balanced out.
'here are 2 irrigation events outside the 60 days window of a waste analysis
reeboard levels are recorded weekly.
.ainfall records are kept
lake sure to have a waste samples to cover all irrigation events
Reviewer/Inspector Name :Lyn B. Bison
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: j Date:
12112103 Continued
t
J

.. Facility Number: 96-50 Date of Inspection 10-14-2004
'Required Records & Documents
21. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
22. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
23. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Waste Application ❑ Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Sampling
24. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
25. Did the facility fail to havea actively certified operator in charge?
26. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Generaf Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
27. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
28. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
29. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
®No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
®No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
®No
NPDES Permitted Facilities
30. Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit. no, skip questions
31. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No
32. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
33. Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey? ❑ Yes ❑ No
34. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No
35. Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No
❑,Stocking Form [:]Crop Yield Form []Rainfall ❑ Inspection After 1'Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form
12112103

l
" �'�ia��`�,C��� >I " r*'1' X ^113M i�'�' ""�' r r�Au�)y ✓t 'i�' i" • lliviS10nt0I Water elUenry I � , � I
i 1T.� �i AID i41} rlw� nll ¢p�Yy ���F I tl I 'i I
Q Divisionlof Soil and Water Conservation
O,:Ottier A enc II ,
(Type of Vlsit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation I
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 96 50 Date of Visit: 12-10-2003 Time: 1403
0 Not Operational C Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified 13 Conditionally Certified 13 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
FarmName: F.&D..farMa..............................................................................I..................... County:W..tiYnt<............................................... WARQ........
OwnerName: F\' iyat.................................... M1115 ............................................................. Phone No: 9.19.-09:1854 ..........................................................
Mailing Address: +4Z.Allfi.l j).gd..................................................................................... G.ddshpirm... N.C..................................................... 2.7.53.0 ..............
Facility Contact:
Title:
Phone No:
Onsite Representative: D.Ox1AA.-lY,lj$................................................................................ Integrator: i's.Olds]xtll0. tlg.FAxltAa......................................
Certified Operator:AoAAa..0 . .............................. wits...........................................
,,,,,,,, Operator Certification Number:186z ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
Location of Farm:
Hwy 13 south to SR 1122 (Mills Road) turn go to 8th house on right - Driveway on the south side of house follow driveway to
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 16 43 Longitude F 78 • 07 01
Design Current
Swine Canneity Ponulation
® Wean to Feeder
3200
3200
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Po ulation Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 3,200
Total SSLW 96,000
I Number of Lagoons I� I❑ Subsurface Drains Present JI❑ Lagoon Area J❑ Spray Field Are" I
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps � ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min'?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
2, Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ....................
Freeboard (inches): 35
nCIA a/AI

VJ/VJ/Vl
Facility Number: 96-50 Date of Inspection 12-10-2003
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Auulication
l.V/NNfffGlf
❑ Yes
1
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
®No
❑ Yes
® No
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload [
❑ Yes
IN No
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Graze) Small Grain Overseed
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
Cl Yes ® No
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
3�:1y'v'"Tlw-JYIJ.., ;y+tsrM.,, 'h%19�'q�y. i f.,"A1+'V , �. :. ,6'.t w V}.,wf?ghldYeE wtw VYa71 I�9rl, a V �,._;�1'7 "ri. ,:$W'.ml✓J 011 �..:'-e;3yf .:..�w Qml ,r e*Mkflaaw'
oentsa refe toy uestion#�L Es lam ark tS
( 'k., , q [?. 3 Y-,XE }an vQersiand(orzany,rec4Punepd,attpns'or,"nAy other cortiments�l
W. y a, fMiLM rn ^¢ r.;aa� axm. I..i, miw it .,.
r<c
iJse,d amngs ofrfacihtyato betterxexplalniSituahons +(use additwual4pagepas,necessary) ❑ ®Final Notes
l�wry , w , , *
l+ _ , % , Field Copy qp
i; : a w Nl
k r + ,1 , +tlM4 t , 1 ryry, ,
t�. z I,INv+ ! ;`tl Ii
ldU".r1%'� •° �C.,.,y ,lr, v.�Y Cne.alY.l.r �C,i'���a V, 4..` �V1"I'>.. a'I�il uli`��.�Veh+ �ll«Gha Ig, ,,.f nn o- *-,:.. 1JpMW; vrn,'�;nvamo'9 +d^,1 ��..�!l:�," yl,, 6 [ h , xrrcu
Records were available for review.
Waste analysis:
10-2-03 - 1.3 lbs
7-9-03 - 2.1 lbs
4-22-03 - 2.91bs
9-18-02 - 1.6 lbs
Reviewer/Ins ector Name L B ]Ha ison �,
P
�,&
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: % _ t p . e;� '3

O5103101 Continued
Facility Number: 96-50 Date of Inspection 12-10-2003
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge attor below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ®No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ® No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Y ` v... It70liaOmC tS$aIi. Or¢ raF�91n 6'`"n"�'�='��"'+. n.w�,��ua �r inrklp'tgwfu �P��IP�id�lryii�,'�iy� M1iuY ikN� M� ,r No�yq@yd�iG�}y 5M1y�nla�,V,�O
m wxi.rm rnS'. 7h„,�'w g � .,i dirin �.a .!c .�u 1•,u�Y �Iv�'fi.4k"�i�Rm�llt� �-p,,:, I. *wJ'� I�W���* � I����i :�ja, i�u "��Yl'lCivNN)11 "!� .u� .!IAY Fn��. ih�
Soil analysis for 2003 available - lime applied July 03 •
Irrigation records are complete and balanced out.
Practice weed control in the spray field, suggest to contact Kevin Johnson 736-1799, area agronomist for assistance.
Small grain has been drilled & emerging
If you have any questions contact your Technical Specialist or me at 252-946-6481.

f
Type of Visit Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluabon
Reason for Visit OO Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number96 50 Date. of Visit: 4/9/2002 Time. 1040
0 Not Operational 0 Ilelo, Threshold
m' Permitted T Certified C'j Conditionally Certified Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name: P&D-Farim ..................................................................... ................................ Counti,W..4y.11C ............................................... W..ARA........
OwnerName: W..Aynte.................................... M& ............................................................. Phone No: ..........................................................
MailingAddress: 4,.42.MiILs..Road..................................................................................... Goldsbo a..NC...................................................... 2.7.530 .............
l+acilito' Contact:
Title. -
I ... I.... Phone No:
Onsite Representative: Dpppa 1 A119�.�akOrge.FCX1J19................................................. Integrator: faoWnhoxQ.Hog.lFaxma................
Certified Operator: Doajai.0................................ 11Q. R$.................................................. Operator Cetiitication Number::1$.6Z6
Location of Farm:
t__....._...-..-___...,..___------._.-__.__.__._.__.._.___...__..----......__._,.._...__.._...,._.._..-..................:_..._......_..---- ._..--- --.....___.._..__..........._.-_.-._.___..._._.�__..__..�_..._._-...____._.__�
Hwy 13 south to SR 1122 (Mills Road) turn go to 8th house on right - Driveway on the south side of house follow driveway to I A,
;Nursery. .
®Swine [-]Poultry ❑ Cattle []Horse Latitude 35. -'®16._m'_.;3.._.Longitude r -78_0 .__,.....t -..0..,.1._i .
Design Current
Swine Canneity Panulntinn
® Wean to Feeder
3200
3200
❑ Fceder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer - _ _ ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer 1 10 Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 3,200
Total SSLW 96,000
Number of Lagoons 0 ❑ Subsurface Drains Present 11EILagoonArea jE1SprayFieidArea
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Uquid Waste Management System
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? f. j Yes Ek'j No
t iSCIVI1'gC originmuf at: ❑ Lagoon 0 Spray Field ❑ Other
a. if discharge is observed. tNas the conveyance man-upade'? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. II'dischar�e is obsetivd. did it reach Water of the Stale" (lf )os. notilt' D\� c)) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is ob ervail. w1latl is the estimated doff ill gal/spill?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon ststoll? (If vQs. aotik 1)\\rO)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
irt'.d!bt4: �_�dlll€.'€a'^UBt as:.''I•rA"atfpient
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure i Slruclurc 2 Struciurc 3 Struetmv •l Structure
ldeaptiti;:r:
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes 53 No
03 Yes [Z No
❑ Yes L No
Structure 6
freeboard (iuchcs):...............3.2..............................
............................---- ........_...-------- ............................................................................

u✓/ u✓/ ul
Facility Number: 9ti-5o
Date of Inspection 4/9/2002
54 Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any strictures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
'4 nste A[iplication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type Bermuda Pasture Small Grain Overseed
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination'?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
it_L ircd ReVords c4 € ocuoleitts
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
t,'onturued
❑ Yes 9 No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes 9 No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
FI Yes ❑h No
Cl Yes 9 No
❑ Yes r No
Yes ® No
El Yes 21 No
El Yes 9 No
Yes d No
0 Yes 1[yj' No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? 0 Yes 9 No
—___7
10 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary): Field Copy ❑Final Notes
ecords available for review.
Taste analysis - awaiting most recent results: 2/7/02 = 1.9 lbs.; 9/13/01 = 1.6 lbs.; 6/11/01 = 2.9 lbs.
A analysis up through 2002 available. Lime was put out 5/2001.
rigation records are complete and balanced out.
.-eeboard levels are recorded weekly as required.
egetation on the dike wall is well established.
)rayfields are in good shape. (SEE PAGE 3)
Reviewer/Inspector Name Lyn B. Hardison entered by Ann
Reviewer/Inspector Sienature:
�-rd.✓- ,
Date:

05103101 Continued
Facility Number: 96-50 Ditte of inspection 4/9/2002
Odor 1."ues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead annuals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
verall, the farm is well managed.
you have any questions, contact your Technical Specialist or us at 252-946-6481.
[7, Yes I)cj No
0 Yes ® No
Yes No
Yes No
[] Yes ® No
[—J Yes 0 No
EI Yes ❑ No
'VS

of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O• Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other 0 Denied Access
Facility Number 96 50 Date of Visit: 4/18/2001 Time: 1402 Printed on: 6/19/2001
0 Not O erational 0 Below Threshold
0 Permitted M Certified 0 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
FarmName: P.&D.Farttts.................................................................................................... County:!!'BYfI�............................................... \18 f?........
Owner Name: W..ayne.................................... Mills ............................................................. Phone No: 9].9-6.89.-28S.4................................. ..........................
Mailing Address: 442.1WUs.RAUd..................................................................................... fa.Qldstarm... 1NC..................................................... 2.7.53.0 ..............
FacilityContact: .............................................................................. Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
Onsite Representative: pO11ma.MiI1S..jiOcey..CAktAn..aArgx.keXtas............... Integrator:.QldSktOrQ.Faagl aXtns......................................
Certified Operator:j).OJn10.a..0 ................_.............. MIS .................................................. Operator Certification Number:j.$62.6 .............................
Location of Farm:
Hwy 13 south to SR 1122 (Mills Road) turn go to 8th house on right - Driveway on the south side of house follow driveway to
Imo'
® Swine ❑ Poultry [I Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 • 16 43 Longitude 78 •F 077, F 01
Discharees & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 0 No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ® No
b. if discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ® No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min? n/a
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes 0No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes 0 No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes 0 No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes 0 No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard (inches): 30
nsin.;in�
('nnlinund

' OS/03/Ol
Facility Number: 96-50
Date of Inspection 4/18/2001
Continued'
Printed on: 6/19/2001
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ®No
12. Crop type Bermuda Pasture Small Grain Overseed
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ® No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes ®No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ®No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ® No
D No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
Records available for review.
Nste analysis: 3/28/01 = 4.7 Ibs; 1/18/01 = 3.8 Ibs; 9/26/00 = 1.7 lbs.
Soil analysis up through 2001 available.
rrigation records are complete and balanced out.
=reeboard levels are recorded as required.
/egetation on dike wall is improving (less bare spots).
iprayfields are in good shape. SEE PAGE 3
Reviewer/Inspector Name L'yn B. rdison ' " A'4. entered by Ann Tyndall
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: y, ia �k')ICU^. J Date:

i , • ,105/03/0I
Continued
Facility Number: 96-50 Date of Inspection 4/18/2001 Printed on: 6/19/2001
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ® No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ® No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ® No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ® No
arm is well managed.
you have any questions, contact me (252-946-6481, ext. 318) or your Technical Specialist.

11".
Y, s Diviswn of Rater
M., E
Q Divisto, gof Soil and Water Conservation •
r.. „..<Q OtherAgenry ,1�,:.
Type of Visit OO Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O• Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
— Date of visit: 7-25-2(NNI Time: 131N1 Printed on: 2/232001
Facility Number 96 50
Q Not O erational Q Below Threshold
Q Permitted M Certified ❑ ConditionallN. Certified ❑ Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .......................
Farm Name: P.&D.F.arms..................................................................................................... County: WaJ:Ite
...............................................
W..aBaD........
Owner Name: W..aY.tlg.................................... Mius ............................................................. Phone No: 9.19 b82:2B59...........................................................
FacilityContact: .............................................................................. Title:................................................................ Phone No:
MaitintiAddress: 9421VM.JW..........................................................................................Goldshoxa..IVIC..................................................... 2753Q ............
Onsite Representative: ]loon.M01s..Tincey.C.attttu.&.Gceot=..P:ettus............ Integrator: G..91dsho.a.H9g.F.arms.......................................
Certified Operator: DoAna.0................................ Mills................................................... Operator Certification Number: .18G26.............................
Location of Farm:
Hwy 13 south to SR 1122 (Mills Road) turn go to 8th house on right - Driveway on the south side of house follow driveway to
I�
® Swine ❑ Poultry
❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 16
43 Lonhitudc F 78 F 07 F 01
Shine
Design*:..r:Currenf ° Design
. Current
Design Current
Ga achy Po ulatiod Puultrti Ca achy;
Po ulation .:Cattle. .
Ga acrtv.. Po ulation
® Wean to Feeder
3200
3200
❑ Laver
❑ Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑Non -Laver
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑Other
❑ Farrow to Finish
Total Design. Capacity
3,200
❑ Gilts
'[E]Boars
Total SSLW, .
96,000
Number of Lagoons L� ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area JE3 Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds /Solid Traps. ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Dischar_,es & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from anv part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed. was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ® No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ® No
c. ll'discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min'? n/a
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (Ifyes. notifi, DWQ) ❑ Yes ZI No
2. is there evidence of past discharge from any pail of the operation? ❑ Yes 9 No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?. ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes 9 No
Structure I Stnucture 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure i Strucuure 6
Identifier:
...................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard("inches).................44................................................................................................................................................................ ..............

5100
Continued on hac6
Facility Number: 96-50 Date of Inspection 7-25-2000 Printed on: 2/23/2001
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees. severe erosion.
❑yes
Nf No
seepage. etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
7 Yes
®No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
N No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
® No
Waste AnMication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes
® No
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Graze) Small Grain Overseed
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
N No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
N No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
® No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
N No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
N No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
N No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
® No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
N No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
N No
23. Did Reviewer/hispector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
® No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
N No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
N No
�:.No violations;or deficiencies were, noted during thiswisit:: Yoti will:receive no furt6e'r: ;
comes pondence about this visit. .:.: : ... : .... : ::
Records available for review.
Waste analysis - 6-15-00 = 2.9 lbs; 2-9-00 = 2.8 lbs; 11-5-99 = 1.8 lbs; 6-4-99 = 3.5 lbs. Meets the requirements.
Soil analysis up through 2000 available. Lime has been applied.
Irrigation records are complete and balanced out.
Records are well organized.
Freeboard levels are recorded weekly as well as rainfall. Cont. Page 3
Reviewer/Inspector Name

Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 5/00 f
Facility Number. 96-50 Date. of Inspection 7-25-2000
p �� Primed on; 2/23l2001
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ® No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any, dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes E No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes gl No
roads, building structure, and/or public properly)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes iR No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ® No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanenthemporary cover? ❑ Yes ® No
During the hurricane season (1999), the farm was well managed. the levels remained within the permit
:quirements even though this farm is not permitted yet (# 17 - n/a).
Overall the farm is well managed and operated. Keep up the good work.
If you have any questions contact me @ 252-946-6481 ext. 318
T

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and
Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
July 12, 1999
Mr. Wayne Mills
P & D Farms
442 Mills Rd.
Goldsboro, NC 27530
NCDENR
NORTH C.AROLIIVA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AN0 NATURAL RESOURCES
SUBJECT: Animal Feedlot Operation Compliance Inspection
P & D Fars
Facility No. 96 -50
Wayne County
Dear Mr. Mills:
On June 10, 1999, I conducted an Animal Feedlot Operation Compliance Inspection at the referenced
facility. Overall, the operation was found to be in satisfactory condition. A copy of the inspection report is
attached for your review.
In general, this inspection includes verifying that: (1) the farm has a Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan (CAWMP); (2) the farm is complying with requirements of the State Rules 15 NCAC 2H.0217, Senate
Bill 1217, and the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan; (3) the farm operation`s waste management —
system is being operated properly under the direction of a Certified Operator, (4) the required records are
being kept; (5) there are no signs of seepage, erosion, and/or runoff
The recommendations and/or comments regarding your inspection can be found in the comment section of the
attached inspection for. It is very important as the owner and Operator in Charge that you address any noted
concerns, as soon as possible.
Thank you for your cooperation and assistance during the inspection. Should you have further questions or
comments regarding this inspection, do not hesitate to call me at [phone], east. 321.
Sincerely,
Daphne B. Cullom.
Environmental Specialist II
cc: George Pettus, Goldsboro Hog Fars
'Fayne County SWCD Office
I/WaRO
943 Washington Square Mall, Washington, North Carolina27889
Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

N
I* outine p t ompiamt p Pouow-up of uwd inspection p Poilow-up of ubwc: review p Other
Facility Number Dale of Inspection
Time of Inspecti6n 24 hr. (hh:mm)
p Permitted N Certified p Conditionally Certified p Registered in Not 0perationa Date Last Operated:
FarmName: P.&D.Facms..................................................................................................... County: Wayne WaRO
OwnerName: Wayne .................................... Mills............................................................ Phone No: fi89x285.4 ...................................................................
Facility Contact: Donna.A ilk....................................................Title: manages............................................. Phone No:....................................................
MailingAddress: 442.Mills.Rd.......................................................................................... Goldsbora.BC...................................................... 27530 ..............
Onsite Representative: Datma.Mills.dean..Catton,.George.P.ettus................... Integrator:Goldsbura.Hog.F.arms.......................................
Certified Operator:Donna.0............................... .1!'iillS................................................... Operator Certification Number: 18626.............................
Location of Farm:
Latitude ©• ®< ®« Longitude ®• ®L ®"
PV
nni
® can to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Fmish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finis
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
' Ptitiltry+ ,;'
0 U aver ..
ri Non -La
�❑ Otner
a
Tot
ign-Capactty 39200
` „Total SSLW'.`:
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ®No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ®No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ®No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
...................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard(inches): ............... 24................ .................................... ................................... .................................... .................................... ....................................
5. Are there any immediate, threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
3/23/99 seepage, etc.)
Continued on back

aci tv um er: 96-50 Date of Inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
❑ Yes
® No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
p Yes
N No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
U No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
p Yes
N No
11. Is there evidence of over application? 17 Excessive Ponding p PAN
p Yes
®No
12. Crop type Small Grain Coastal Bermuda (pasture)
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
p Yes
® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
p Yes
®No
{ b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
®No
' c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
®No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
p Yes
® No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
p Yes
®No
Required
Records & Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
p Yes
p No
t
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
p Yes
N No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
p Yes
® No
20,
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
®No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator -in charge?
- -p Yes
®No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
p No
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
p Yes
®No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
p Yes
®No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? 17 Yes ® No

4
3/23/99
Lacility Number: 96_50
I Date of Inspection 6/r ►0/99
Odor Issues
26.
Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
p Yes
® No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27.
Are there any dead animals hot disposed of properly within 24 hours?
p Yes
® No
28.
Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
p Yes
® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29.
Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
p Yes
® No
30.
Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
p Yes
® No
31.
Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
p Yes
®No
32.
Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
p Yes
® No
I Mr

Site Requires Immediate Attention: L
Facility No.
SCS- 33
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
-Date: , 1995
Time:
Farm Name/Owner: �d--1 NQ6 AS- L)Litgsj_ 2� l.JRyW-e- MA
Mailing Address: i .5Jr% " , #jry—�d
County:
Integrator: Ph ne: �2/,
On Site Representative: ah ee� Phone.
• �!9 - 68'�t -
Ph sical Address/Location: FRO&-% I#J -/;eu a ... /2 Sn� /L n. _/ sn
Type or uperazion: Swine �_ 'Poultry Cattle f
^__! ^^ Caaacity: Epp No. of Animals on Site: -�
:BEM Certification No.: ACE DEM Certification No.: AC -
Latitude: Longitude: I-
2S__QZ (0/ Elevation: Ft.
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient �yreeboard of 1 Ft + 25 year 24 hour
storm event? (approximatel 1 Ft + 7 in) <geQ or No
Actual Freeboard: Ft r7 Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes or
NJ"r _
Was any erosion observed? <:X!T%r NoP+
Is adequate land available for spray? Yes or No
'7 ae-fflLo-s C exz�-r Is the cover crop adequate? es or No s.`i Acoto3 N eedl �oAa ( 13Q'n`u c� ed
Crop(s) being utilized: ,%cF ACUZeS eF OnA.b,4t AUAi IA(�iQ
Does the facility meet SCS miZlmum setback criteria?
200. Ftfrom, Dwellings? es No 100 Ft --from Wells?
,or No
y..—
Is the a mal waste stockpiled within 100 Ft of USGS; Blue i Line Stream?
Yes or 1
Is animal wastnd applied or spray irrigated within 25 Ft of a USGS Map Blue
Line? . Yes or
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by #an -made ditch, flushing
system, or other similar man-made devices? Yes o N J
If Yes, please explain: _
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management re rds (volumes o nure,
land applied, spray irrigated on specific eage wit over crop)? es r No
Inspector Game ignature
cc: Facility Assessment Unit
Comments & Sketch on Back of Sheet

DEM
SITE VISITATION RECORD
Sketch: